Upload
lindsay-walton
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Birthweight & Childhood Leukaemia:
Results from pooled analyses
Tracy Lightfoot Epidemiology & Cancer Statistics Unit
Department of Health Sciences University of York
In utero origins of leukaemia
• Evidence childhood leukaemia originates in utero.
• Chromosomal translocations such as t(12;21), t(4;11), or t(8;21) are found at birth in children who later develop leukaemia.
• Indicative that prenatal exposures may be important in leukaemogenesis
Aetiology of childhood leukaemia
• Known risk factors– Age– Sex– Trisomy 21
Aetiology of childhood leukaemia
• Known risk factors– Age– Sex– Trisomy 21
• Consistent observations– Genetic variants IKZF1(7p12.2),
CDKN2A/CDKN2B(9p21), ARID5B(10q21.2), CEBPE(14q11.2)
– Heavy birthweight (> 3500, 4000 or 4500g)
Previous meta-analysis
• 18 studies conducted between 1962-2002• 10282 children - 5281 ALL cases• OR 1.26 (95% CI 1.17-1.37) (≥4,000 g vs. <4,000
g)• 14% increase in risk of ALL per 1000g increase in
birthweight
Additional observations
• Findings similar for B-cell ALL and T-cell ALL and individuals subtypes (Hjalgrim et al., 2004; O’Neil et al., 2012)
– Suggest determinants are not risk factors for a specific type of ALL
• Children with ALL have the same birthweight as their siblings (Hjalgrim et al.,
2004 and Smith et al., 2010)
Questions still to answer?
• What’s the relationship between ALL and fetal growth across the gestational age spectrum?
• What’s the relative importance of a baby’s absolute weight/size at birth versus the rate of fetal growth?
Potential issues…..Rare events: • ALL accounts for less than 0.5% of all incident cancers• Less than 1% of live births weighing < 1500g, and only
1-3% weight above 4500g.
• Most investigations concentrate on high birthweight, either dichotomizing their data (e.g. <4000g versus ≥ 4000g) or using relatively conservative cut-points (e.g. <2500g, 2500-3999g, ≥ 4000g).
Self-reported data:• Many of the case-control studies on this topic have
relied on birth characteristics reported by mothers at interview, (potential for maternal recall bias)
Recent studies
• Pooled analyses from Germany, UK and USA– started 2001 – published 2013 – 4075 cases and 12065 controls
• Pooled analyses from CLIC– Started 2009 – published 2013– 7348 cases and 12489 controls (12 studies)
• 1680 cases and 3139 controls POBW
USA UK Germany Controls Cases Controls Cases Controls Cases
N (%) N (%) N (%) N(%) N (%) N (%) Total 1948 100 1775 100 7463 100 1405 100 2412 100 742 100
Gender Boys 1056 54.2 987 55.6 4199 56.3 784 55.8 1365 56.6 439 59.2 Girls 892 45.8 788 44.4 3264 43.7 621 44.2 1047 43.4 303 40.8
Age at diagnosis (years) 0 80 4.1 59 3.3 614 8.2 49 3.5 224 9.3 28 3.8 1-4 1029 52.8 942 53.1 3102 41.6 757 53.9 1012 42.0 403 54.3 5-9 569 29.2 518 29.2 2033 27.2 378 26.9 736 30.5 213 28.7 10-14 270 13.9 256 14.4 1714 23.0 221 15.7 440 18.2 98 13.2
Maternal age birth (years) <20 114 5.9 158 8.9 463 6.2 113 8.0 66 2.7 30 4.0 20-29 1240 63.7 1086 61.2 4529 60.7 852 60.6 1558 64.6 494 66.6 30-39 581 29.8 516 29.1 2345 31.4 416 29.6 764 31.7 208 28.0 ≥ 40 13 0.7 15 0.9 91 1.2 15 1.1 23 1.0 8 1.1 Birth order 1 855 43.9 751 42.3 3306 44.3 644 45.8 1173 48.6 395 53.2 2 670 34.4 648 36.5 2585 34.6 470 33.5 867 36.0 240 32.4 3 291 14.9 235 13.2 1074 14.4 207 14.7 286 11.9 80 10.8 ≥4 132 6.8 141 7.9 498 6.7 84 6.0 85 3.5 26 3.5
USA UK Germany Controls Cases Controls Cases Controls Cases
N (%) N (%) N (%) N(%) N (%) N (%)
Total 1948 100 17755 100 7463 100 1405 100 2412 100 742 100
Type of delivery Vaginal 1515 77.8 1392 78.4 6594 88.4 1238 88.1 2097 86.9 642 86.5 Caesarian 433 22.2 383 21.6 867 11.6 164 11.7 313 13.0 98 13.2
Gestational age (weeks) <37 107 5.5 84 4.7 440 5.9 92 6.6 92 3.8 42 5.7 37-40 1345 69.1 1246 70.2 4849 65.0 894 63.6 1686 69.9 502 67.7 >40 496 25.5 445 25.1 2123 28.5 405 28.8 605 25.1 187 25.2
Birth weight (kg) <2.5 94 4.8 69 4.0 428 5.7 65 4.7 68 2.8 23 3.1 2.5-3.4 932 47.8 827 46.6 3986 53.4 706 50.3 1248 51.7 360 48.5 3.5-4.4 869 44.7 826 46.6 2853 38.3 587 41.8 1041 43.2 331 44.6 > 4.5 52 2.7 50 2.8 129 1.7 32 2.3 48 2.0 22 3.0
Individual countries and pooled birthweight distributions
02,
000
4,00
06,
000
birt
h w
eig
ht (
g)
Downs, multiple pregnancies excluded
ALL cases and controlsUS birth weight
control ALL
02
,00
04
,00
06
,00
0
birt
h w
eigh
t (g)
Downs, multiple pregnancies excluded
ALL cases and controlsUK interview birth weight
control ALL
02,
000
4,00
06,
000
birt
h w
eig
ht (
g)
Downs, multiple pregnancies excluded
ALL cases and controlsGerman birth weight
control ALL
02
,00
04
,00
06
,00
0
birt
h w
eigh
t (g)
Downs, multiple pregnancies excluded
ALL cases and controlsPooled birth weight
control ALL
US, UK and Germany pooled birth weight distribution by gestational age
02
,00
04
,00
06
,00
0
under36 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 over42
birth
weig
ht
(g)
Downs, multiple pregnancies excluded
ALL cases and controlsPooled birth weight by gestation
control ALL
Birthweight
Number (%) Adjusted OR†
(95% CI)Adjusted OR‡
(95% CI) Controls Cases
Grams ≤1500 57 (0.5) 5 (0.1) 0.3 (0.1-0.7) 0.2 (0.1-0.7) 1500-1999 109 (0.9) 38 (1.0) 1.2 (0.8-1.6) 0.8 (0.4-1.4) 2000-2499 421 (3.6) 111 (2.9) 0.8 (0.7-1.0) 0.7 (0.6-1.0) 2500-2999 1732 (14.8) 494 (12.7) 0.9(0.8-1.0) 0.9 (0.8-1.0) 3000-3499 4410 (37.7) 1393 (35.9) } 1.0 } 1.0 3500-3999 3664 (31.3) 1279 (32.9) 4500-4499 1086 (9.3) 460 (11.9) 1.2 (1.1-1.4) 1.2 (1.1-1.4) ≥4500 227 (1.9) 103 (2.6) 1.2 (0.9-1.6) 1.2 (0.9-1.6)
P<0.0001 P<0.0001
Birthweight and ALL
Birthweight
Number (%) Adjusted OR†
(95% CI)Adjusted OR‡ (95% CI) Controls Cases
Gestational age <37 weeks < 10 62 (9.8) 10 (4.6) 0.5 (0.2-1.0) 0.5 (0.2-1.0) 10-19 65 (10.2) 24 (11.1) 1.0 (0.6-1.7) 1.0 (0.6-1.8) 20-79 382 (60.1) 131 (60.4) 1.0 1.0 80-89 58 (9.1) 22 (10.1) 1.2 (0.7-2.1) 1.2 (0.7-2.1) ≥ 90 69 (10.9) 30 (13.8) 1.6 (0.9-2.6) 1.6 (0.9-2.7) Per kg increase 1.4 (1.1-1.8) 1.4 (1.1-1.8) 37-40 weeks < 10 778 (9.9) 184 (7.0) 0.8 (0.7-0.9) 0.8 (0.7-0.9) 10-19 781 (10.0) 234 (8.9) 0.9 (0.8-1.1) 0.9 (0.9-1.2) 20-79 4691 (59.8) 1573 (59.8) 1.0 1.0 80-89 778 (9.9) 281 (10.7) 1.0 (0.9-1.2) 1.0 (0.9-1.2) ≥ 90 820 (10.5) 358 (13.6) 1.2 (1.0-1.4) 1.2 (1.0-1.3) Per kg increase 1.2 (1.1-1.3) 1.2 (1.0-1.3) >40 weeks < 10 308 (9.6) 88 (8.5) 1.0 (0.8-1.3) 1.0 (0.8-1.3) 10-19 279 (8.7) 90 (8.7) 1.2 (0.9-1.6) 1.2 (0.9-1.6) 20-79 1966 (61.0) 580 (56.0) 1.0 1.0 80-89 320 (9.9) 120 (11.6) 1.2 (1.0-1.6) 1.2 (1.0-1.6) ≥ 90 349 (10.8) 158 (15.3) 1.5 (1.2-1.9) 1.5 (1.2-1.8) Per kg increase 1.3 (1.1-1.5) 1.3 (1.1-1.5)
Variable
Birthweight Number (%) Adjusted OR‡ (95% CI)
OR ‡ (95% CI) Per kg increase Centile Cases Controls
Gender Boys < 10 167 (7.6) 643 (9.8) 0.8 (0.6-1.0) 10-19 204 9.3 660 10.1 1.0 (0.8-1.2) 20-79 1281 58.6 3875 59.1 1.0 1.2(1.1-1.3) 80-89 245 11.2 713 10.9 1.0 (0.8-1.2) P<0.001 ≥ 90 290 13.3 662 10.1 1.2 (1.1-1.5) Girls < 10 123 7.3 496 9.6 0.7 (0.5-0.9) 10-19 145 8.6 522 10.1 0.9 (0.7-1.1) 20-79 1012 59.7 3104 60.2 1.0 1.2 (1.1-1.4) 80-89 169 10.0 514 10.0 1.0 (0.8-1.2) P<0.001 ≥ 90 247 14.6 517 10.0 1.3 (1.1-1.6) Age at diagnosis < 1 year < 10 8 5.9 91 10.0 0.7 (0.3-1.6) 10-19 11 8.2 85 9.3 0.8 (0.4-1.6) 20-79 89 65.9 554 60.7 1.0 1.4 (1.0-2.1) 80-89 12 8.9 87 9.5 0.8 (0.4-1.7) P>0.05 ≥ 90 15 11.1 96 10.5 1.2 (0.6-1.3) 1-4 years < 10 160 7.7 506 9.9 0.7 (0.6-0.9) 10-19 197 9.4 512 10.0 1.0 (0.8-1.2) 20-79 1235 59.1 3035 59.4 1.0 1.2 (1.1-1.3) 80-89 227 10.9 542 10.6 1.0 (0.8-1.2) P<0.001 ≥ 90 271 13.0 512 10.0 1.2 (1.0-1.4) 5-9 years < 10 80 7.3 328 10.0 0.8 (0.6-1.1) 10-19 96 8.8 307 9.3 1.1 (0.8-1.4) 20-79 630 57.7 1984 60.2 1.0 1.2 (1.0-1.4) 80-89 142 13.0 346 10.5 1.2 (0.9-1.5) P<0.05 ≥ 90 144 13.2 333 10.1 1.3 (1.1-1.7) 10-14 years < 10 49 8.7 232 9.7 0.8 (0.5-1.2) 10-19 49 8.7 202 8.5 1.0 (0.7-1.4) 20-79 316 55.8 1453 60.9 1.0 1.2 (1.0-1.5) 80-89 73 12.9 263 11.0 1.2 (0.8-1.6) P<0.05 ≥ 90 79 14.0 238 10.0 1.4 (1.0-1.9)
Variable
Birthweight Number (%) Adjusted OR‡ (95% CI)
OR ‡ (95% CI) Per kg increase Centile Cases Controls
Birth order 1 < 10 142 8.0 525 10.0 0.7 (0.6-0.9) 10-19 157 8.9 486 9.2 1.0 (0.8-1.2) 20-79 1066 60.2 3199 60.7 1.0 1.2 (1.0-1.3) 80-89 152 8.6 522 9.9 0.8 (0.7-1.1) P<0.01 ≥ 90 253 14.3 541 10.3 1.2 (1.0-1.5) > 1 < 10 155 7.3 636 9.9 0.8 (0.6-0.9) 10-19 167 7.9 606 9.4 0.9 (0.8-1.1) 20-79 1277 60.5 3903 60.7 1.0 1.2 (1.1-1.4) 80-89 245 11.6 645 10.0 1.1 (1.0-1.4) P<0.001 ≥ 90 268 12.7 643 10.0 1.3 (1.1-1.5) Caesarean Section No < 10 248 7.7 1002 9.9 0.8 (0.7-1.0) 10-19 299 9.2 940 9.3 1.0 (0.9-1.2) 20-79 1904 58.8 6102 60.4 1.0 1.2 (1.1-1.3) 80-89 352 10.9 1045 10.3 1.1 (0.9-1.2) P<0.001 ≥ 90 437 13.5 1016 10.1 1.3 (1.2-1.5) Yes < 10 34 5.3 154 9.6 0.4 (0.2-0.8) 10-19 51 8.0 158 9.9 0.7 (0.5-1.0) 20-79 398 62.2 965 60.4 1.0 1.3 (1.0-1.6) 80-89 61 9.5 146 9.1 0.9 (0.6-1.2) P<0.05 ≥ 90 96 15.0 176 11.0 1.2 (0.8-1.6)
Study population Children (≤ 15 years)
registered for primary care with a General Practitioner (GP)
Cases - ascertained from multiple sources
Treating/referring hospitals Cross-checks with cancer
registries
Controls – 2 per case from primary
care population registers, individually
matched on:-
date of birth sex UKCCS region of residence Linked to primary care and maternity records, registration and census data, birth and death certificates for all cases and controls irrespective of participation in the study
UK BWT interview versus birth certificates
02
,00
04
,00
06
,00
0
birth
weig
ht (g
)
Downs, multiple pregnancies included
total ALL cases and first choice controlsUK birth weight from birth certificates
control ALL
02
,00
04
,00
06
,00
0
bir
th w
eig
ht
(g)
Downs, multiple pregnancies excluded
ALL cases and controlsUK interview birth weight
control ALL
Gestational Age0
1020
3040
20 25 30 35 40 45gestation
obstetric data interview data
rela
tive
frequ
ency
(%)
Downs excluded
total controls
UKCCS gestational age relative frequencyobstetric & interview data
010
2030
4025 30 35 40 45
gestation
obstetric data interview data
rela
tive
frequ
ency
(%)
Downs excluded
total cases
UKCCS gestational age relative frequencyobstetric & interview data
Gestational age0
1020
3040
21 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
rela
tive
frequ
ency
(%)
Downs excluded
total cases & controls
UKCCS gestational age relative frequencyobstetric & interview data
Obstetric Interview
0.5
1
21 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
rela
tive
freq
uenc
y(%
)
Downs excluded
total cases & controls
UKCCS gestational age relative frequencyobstetric & interview data
Obstetric Interview
UK control dataBirth
weight(grams)
E & W,1988 UKCCS Unadjusted ORs (95% CI)
Live births
Controls Cases UKCCS cases versus UKCCS
Controls
UKCCS cases Versus
E & W Controls N= 693,577 (%)
N=6337 (%) N=1366 (%)
<1500 6511 (0.9) 29 (0.5) 0 } 0.6 (0.3-1.1) } 0.5 (0.3-0.9)
1500-1999 8989 (1.3) 88 (1.4) 16 (1.2)
2000-2499 30181 (4.4) 285 (4.5) 59 (4.3) 1.0 (0.7-1.3) 1.0 (0.8-1.4)
2500-2999 118808 (17.2) 1049 (16.6) 210 (15.4) 1.0 (0.8-1.1) 0.9 (0.8-1.1)
3000-3499 260932 (37.7) 2380 (37.6) 497 (36.4) 1.0 1.0
3500-3999 198593 (28.7) 1838 (29.0) 415 (30.4) 1.1 (0.9-1.2) 1.1 (1.0-1.2)
4000-4499 59299 (8.6) 583 (9.2) 135 (9.9) 1.1(0.9-1.4) 1.2 (1.0-1.4)
≥4500 9433 (1.4) 85 (1.3) 34 (2.5) 1.9(1.3-2.9) 1.9 (1.3-2.7)
Summary
• Children with ALL were, on average, heavier than controls at all gestations
• Overall, a 1.2 (95% CI 1.1-1.3) increase in ALL risk per kg increase in birthweight was observed– driven by a deficit of low-birthweight at all gestations
and an excess of high-birthweight at ≥ 40 weeks.
• Stable relationship within age strata (< 1, 1-4, 5-9 and 10-14 years) is noteworthy and is in accord with other studies that have presented age-specific data.– Confirms association with size at birth is not
restricted to infants, as had originally been suggested
Conclusions
• Importance of looking across full birthweight spectrum when examining associations with disease risk.
• For the first time identified marked paucity of very low-birthweight babies (< 1500g) among ALL cases at all gestational ages; – given in-utero origins of ALL presence of
disease at birth could act to increase perinatal mortality in this immature and vulnerable group?
Map of Childhood Leukemia Studies participating in CLIC
26
4
1312
14 15
9,10,11
16
17
18
6,7
8
5
12
3
Pooled analysis : California State, USA, COG, USA, Canada; Brazil; UK, France (x3), Germany; Greece, Australia, New Zealand.
Fetal growth and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: LGA v AGA
OR 1.24 95% CI (1.13-1.36)
Total N1
Cases/Controls
Cases N LGA/AGA
Controls N LGA/AGA
OR 95% CI
Overall 7,292/12,406 988/5,670 1,398/9,779
1.21 1.11, 1.32
Birth weight <4,000g
6,394/11,077 297/5,463 408/9,440 1.26 1.07, 1.48
Sex Males 4,106/6,905 552/3,192 782/5,435 1.18 1.05, 1.33Females 3,186/5,501 436/2,478 616/4,344 1.25 1.09, 1.43
Age at diagnosis 0-1 636/1,447 76/521 154/1,149 1.04 0.75, 1.44>1-5 4,075/6,087 559/3,178 712/4,808 1.20 1.06, 1.35>5 2,581/4,872 353/1,971 532/3,822 1.26 1.08, 1.46
Ethnicity White/European/Caucasian
6,042/10,858 812/4,747 1,232/8,618
1.18 1.07, 1.30
Other 1,250/1548 176/923 1,66/1,161 1.44 1.14, 1.83
Immunophenotype B-lineage cases 5,735/12,406 771/4,456 1,398/9,77
91.20 1.09, 1.33
T-lineage cases 705/12,406 105/546 1,398/9,779
1.32 1.05, 1.64
Proportion of Optimal Birthweight
• Takes into account mothers height (cm), birthorder, sex, birthweight (g) and gestational age
Fetal growth and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: POBW
OR 1.16 95% CI (1.09-1.24)
Subgroup N Cases/controls
Pooled OR2
95% CI
Overall 1,689/3,154 1.16 1.09, 1.24Birth weight <4,000g 1,467/2,771 1.21 1.12, 1.31Sex of child3 Males 954/1,746 1.11 1.02, 1.21Females 735/1,408 1.22 1.12, 1.34Age at diagnosis (years) 4
0-1 179/268 1.09 0.87, 1.37>1-5 971/1,769 1.17 1.08, 1.27>5 539/1,117 1.18 1.06, 1.31Ethnic Group5 White/European/Caucasian
1,281/2,583 1.14 1.06, 1.23
Other 408/571 1.22 1.08, 1.39Immunophenotype B-lineage cases 1,400/3,154 1.17 1.09, 1.24T-lineage cases 161/3,154 1.22 1.04, 1.43
Summary
• Accelerated fetal growth associated with increased risk of ALL irrespective of high birth weight.
• Effect consistent whether using categorical or continuous measure of growth.
Mechanisms???????
• Links with other childhood/adults cancers • ↑ IGF1 levels
– Drives pre-leukaemic cells towards leukemogenesis
– Pre-leukaemic cells have higher IGF-1 levels leading to higher birthweight
• Not supported by sibling birthweight observations
• Factors governing IGF levels e.g. PAPP-A• In utero levels of estrogens• Increased numbers of stem cells• ???????????????????
Acknowledgements • Eve Roman• Alex Smith• Michele R Forman• Martha S Linet• Les Robison• Jill Simpson• Peter Kaatsch• Kathrine Grell• Kirsten Frederiksen• Joachim Schüz
• Clinicians/Health Professionals• Funders
• Families…
• Elizabeth Milne• Kathryn R. Greenop• Catherine Metayer• Eleni Petridou• Maria S. Pombo-de-Oliveira• Claire Infante-Rivard• John D. Dockerty• Logan Spector• Sérgio Koifman• Laurent Orsi• Jérémie Rudant• Nick Dessypris• Margarita Baka• Alessandra Faro• Bruce K. Armstrong• Jacqueline Clavel• Patricia A. Buffler