Upload
others
View
12
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Birla Corporation CMP
Rs. 640
Target
Rs. 765
Rating
BUY
Birla Corporation
Financial summary (Consolidated)
Year Revenues (Rs. mn) EBITDA (Rs. mn) PAT (Rs. mn) EPS (Rs.) EV/EBITDA(x) EV/t (Rs/t)
FY16 32,252 2,355 1,574 20.4 18.5 4,646
FY17E 44,825 6,445 2,669 34.7 14.1 6,788
FY18E 58,645 9,764 3,217 41.8 9.1 6,361
Play on favourable Central region at attractive valuations
Stock performance (%)
1m 3m 12m
BCORP 2% 45% 31%
Sensex 2% 8% 12%
Update date Sept, 2016
Market Data
SENSEX 28,599
Nifty 8779
Bloomberg BCORP IN
Shares o/s 77mn
Market Cap Rs. 49bn
52-wk High-Low Rs. 697-322
3m Avg. Daily Vol 30,996
Index member BSE 500
Latest shareholding (%)
Promoters 62.9
Institutions 19.9
Public 17.2
Birla Corporation has an installed capacity of 15.4mt, with presence in Central (56%), North (26%), East (15%), and West
(3%). We are positive on BCORP’s long term prospects, given (1) favorable regional exposure; (2) increased scale of
operations post Reliance Cement acquisition; (3) financial de-leverage; and (4) attractive valuations.
Investment thesis:
Increased scale of operations; Dominant player in the favorable Central markets: BCORP’s scale of operations has
increased to 15.4mt from 9.8mt, post the acquisition of 5.58mt capacity of Reliance Cement (will be consolidated in
2QFY17). The company is now the eight largest cement company in India with exposure in North, Central, and East
regions. BCORP will be a dominant player in the Central market, with 17% share of the installed Central region capacity,
behind UltraTech Cement 22% share post acquisition of Jaypee assets. Central region is one of the most favored region
given strong demand-supply dynamics. Utilisations of 85%, low new supply visibility, consolidated market (top 5 having 70%
market share of the region)
Reliance Cement acquisition, a step in the right direction: BCORP acquired Reliance Cement for an enterprise value of
Rs. 48bn, with a current capacity of 5.58mt implying an EV/t of $130/t. Further, Reliance Cement has land and leases to
expand in Rajasthan, Gujarat, Chhattisgarh, Karnataka, and Himachal Pradesh. The deal enhances BCORP’s position as it
(1) strengthens footprint in one of the most favored cement market (Central region); (2) aids optimization of logistics in the
Central markets; (3) Adds modern/ efficient plants to its portfolio; (4) Reliance Cement is eligible for VAT incentives over the
next 10-12 years; (5) De-risks the earnings from low profitable Chanderia operations (hampered due to limestone mining
ban). North capacity exposure will reduce to 26% from the current 41%.
Balance sheet quality to ease led by strong cash flow generation: BCORP’s FY16 net cash was ~Rs. 5bn. With the
acquisition of Reliance Cement, we expect BOCPR’s net debt to peak out Rs. 42bn in FY17E. With strong operating cash
flow generation to the tune of Rs. 24bn over FY17-FY19E and limited capex outlay, expect net debt to equity to trend down
from Rs. 1.5x to 1x by FY19E. Hence, the current balance sheet quality is not a cause of concern.
Valuation and view: We expect FY17-19E volume and realisation growth CAGR of 15% and 5% respectively due to
consolidation of Reliance Cement and demand revival in its key markets. EBITDA to grow by 34% CAGR over FY17-
FY19E.The stock trades at $95/t and 9x FY18E EBITDA vs. mid cap average of 10x FY18E EV/EBITDA. We believe this
discount is unwarranted given the increasing scale of operations, favorable regional exposure, and balance sheet de-
leveraging. We value BCORP at 10x FY18E EV/EBITDA. We have a Buy Rating with a TP of Rs. 765/share
GIRISH CHOUDHARY [email protected] +91 44 4344 0021
GAURAV NAGORI [email protected] +91 44 4344 0072 Find Spark Research on Bloomberg (SPAK <go>),
Thomson First Call, Reuters Knowledge and Factset
Page 1
Birla Corporation
Company overview – 15.4mt capacity with presence in four regions
Birla Corporation’s Capacity profile – Increased scale of operations post acquisition of Reliance Cement’s 5.58mt capacity
Source: Spark Capital Research
Existing Capacity Post acquisition
Chanderia
Rajasthan
Satna
Raibareli
Durgapur
U.P
M.P W.B
1.3 Mt
2.3 Mt
2.2 Mt 3.4 Mt
4.0 Mt 3.4 Mt
Chanderia
Rajasthan
Satna
Raibareli
Durgapur
Reliance Maihar
Kundanganj
Butibori
U.P
M.P W.B
Maharashtra
2.0 Mt
1.3 Mt
2.3 Mt
3.08 Mt 3.3 Mt
2.2 Mt 3.4 Mt
0.5 Mt
4.0 Mt 3.4 Mt
Cement Clinkers 15.4 Mt 10.0 Mt Total ►
Future expansion opportunities. Reliance Cement
has land and leases to expand in Rajasthan,
Gujarat, Maharashtra. Chhattisgarh, Karnataka,
and Himachal Pradesh
Page 2
Birla Corporation
Company Overview – 56% of capacity in Central region
BCORP’s plant-wise cement and clinker capacity
Source: Spark Capital Research.
Region wise capacity mix – Presence in four regions
Note: Capacity mix for Birla corp standalone. Source: Spark Capital Research
Region wise capacity share – Sizeable capacity share in Central region
Note: Capacity share for Birla corp standalone. Source: Spark Capital Research
Top cement manufacturers in India – BCORP among top 8
Source: Spark Capital Research
Plant Location Cement (mt) Clinker (mt)
Chanderia Rajasthan 4.0 3.4
Satna MP 2.2 3.3
Raibareli UP 1.3
Durgapur WB 2.3
Reliance Maihar MP 3.08 3.3
Kundanganj UP 2.0
Butibori Maharashtra 0.5
Total 15.4 10.0
Company FY16 Geographical spread
UltraTech 65.0 North, East, West, South, Central
Holcim (ACC + Ambuja) 67.6 North, East, West, South, Central
Shree Cement 27.0 North and East
Dalmia Bharat 25.0 East, West, South, North East
Ramco Cement 16.5 South and East
India Cement 15.7 South and North
Birla Corp 15.4 North, Central, and East
North 26%
Central 56%
East 15%
West 3%
Post deal
5%
17%
4%
1% 0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
North Central East West
Capacity share %
North, 41%
Central, 36%
East, 23%
Pre deal
Page 3
Birla Corporation
Analysis of Regions where BCORP is Present
Central Markets
North Markets
East Markets
Play on both demand and price
Play on both demand and price
Play on demand
Page 4
Birla Corporation
Increasing utilisations support prices in region
Source: Spark Capital
Around 70% of Central India’s capacity is held by five players
Source: Spark Capital
Demand break up of states in Central – ~50mt consumed in FY16
Source: Spark Capital
Central region demand growth
Source: Spark Capital
Uttar Pradesh 70%
Madhya Pradesh 30%
Central region – Consolidated market with nil capacity additions will aid better pricing power
UTCEM+JP, 22%
BCORP+Rel Cem, 17%
Holcim, 11% Prism cement, 11%
Heidelberg, 9%
Others 29% 8.1%
4.4%
10.1%
17.6%
10.4%
7.0%
3.0% 4.0%
6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 7.0%
8.0% 8.0%
FY
07
FY
08
FY
09
FY
10
FY
11
FY
12
FY
13
FY
14E
FY
15
FY
16
FY
17E
FY
18E
FY
19E
FY
20E
Demand growth
97% 93% 86% 82% 79% 82% 85% 89%
96% 99%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
Central region utilisations
Page 5
Birla Corporation
Rolling three year realisations CAGR below Costs since FY09 in North
region
Source: Company, Spark Capital
North region – Expect gradual recovery in price from the lows led by bottoming of utilisations
North India based cement manufacturers have been under pressure over the
last few years due to weak demand and new supplies (especially from newer
entrants in the region like Wonder Cement and Lafarge). The industry has
lacked pricing power as a result, margins more than halved from FY10 peak
levels. Interestingly, despite higher utilisations in North region versus South
region, the cement prices in North are currently 30% lower than prices in the
South.
Cement prices in North have touched its five year low in Jan15 and recovered
since then (30% from lows). We continue to expect gradual revival in prices
from a low base led by (1) Incremental supply vs. incremental demand gap in
North region turning favorable from FY17E onwards; (2) New capacities in the
region are coming from existing players, unlike in past which came from new
entrants; (3) Current profitability not sustainable on a longer basis.
We have modeled 6% price growth in the region over FY17E and FY18E and
8%-10% in FY19-20E.
North India - Demand, supply, Utilisations, and pricing trends
in million tons FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
Total capacity 28 30 33 42 48 59 62 64 67 74 79 84 85 88 91 94
Effective capacity 28 28 31 35 44 49 58 60 64 67 73 78 82 83 87 91
Production 26 30 32 37 41 46 48 52 56 58 61 63 67 72 77 85
Consumption 24 27 30 34 35 38 42 46 48 51 53 55 58 62 67 74
Demand growth 6% 12% 10% 12% 4% 9% 8% 10% 6% 5% 5% 3% 5% 7% 9% 10%
Utilisations% 94% 106% 105% 105% 94% 94% 82% 87% 88% 87% 84% 81% 81% 86% 89% 93%
Pricing growth 11% 13% 27% 10% 0% 2% 5% 3% 6% -4% 3% -6% 6% 6% 8% 10%
Incremental
supply 2 0 3 4 9 5 10 2 3 3 6 5 4 1 4 5
Incremental
demand 1 3 3 4 2 3 3 4 3 2 3 2 3 4 5 7
Surplus/(Deficit) 0 (3) (0) 1 8 1 6 (2) 0 1 3 3 1 (3) (1) (2)
7%
20%
30%
11%
4% 1%
3%
10%
2%
0% -1%
0%
5% 4%
15%
24%
16%
8% 5%
7% 8% 6%
4% 1%
-2% -1% -5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17E FY18E
Rolling 3yr CAGR % - Realisation Rolling 3yr CAGR % - Costs
Page 6
Birla Corporation
Prices in North are at a substantial discount to South
Source: Company, Spark Capital
-2%
-13%
-3%
5% 0%
4%
16% 12%
0%
-6%
9% 7%
-9% -10% -14%
-19%
-29% -35% -30% -25% -20% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5%
10% 15% 20%
FY
00
FY
01
FY
02
FY
03
FY
04
FY
05
FY
06
FY
07
FY
08
FY
09
FY
10
FY
11
FY
12
FY
13
FY
14
FY
15
FY
16
North Cement Prices (Rs/bag) discount/premium to South Cement prices
Average cement prices in North recovered after plunging to 5 years low
in Jan16
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Pricing discipline has not worked in North, given efficient operations…
Source: Company, Spark Capital
North Region prices at significant discount to South region despite better utilisations
… and healthy balance sheets versus South peers
Source: Company, Spark Capital
1.6
0.9 1.3
-0.3
1.6
0.9 0.7
1.2
0.0
-0.2 -0.5 -1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
JK
Cem
ent
Mangala
m
JK
Lakshm
i
Shre
e
Dalm
ia
India
Cem
ents
Madra
s
Orie
nt
Ultra
Te
ch
AC
C
Am
buja
North South Pan India
Net
de
bt
to E
qu
ity (
x)
4,078
3,273 3,211
2,702
3,880 3,892
3,432
2,904
3,955 3,956 3,638
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
JK
Cem
ent
Mangala
m
JK
Lakshm
i
Shre
e
Dalm
ia
India
Cem
ents
Madra
s
Orie
nt
Ultra
Te
ch
AC
C
Am
buja
North South Pan India
To
tal co
st
pe
r to
n
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
360
380
400
Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-16
Cem
en
t P
rice (
Rs/b
ag
)
North South
Page 7
Birla Corporation
Housing shortage high in East and Central states
Source: Company, Spark Capital
East Capacity and utilizations – Expect 11mt additions by FY18E
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Eastern region demand growth trends
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Pricing in the East have been under pressure over the last two years
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Eastern region – Demand potential remains high
2.78
4.59
2.99 4.15 4.17
18.68
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
North East West South Central India
Mn
Un
its
8%
19%
-4%
5%
18%
4%
-2%
2%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
OCL realisation growth %
13%
18%
6%
11%
5% 3% 6% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
East region demand growth %
31 39 42 44 46 48 52 58 66 69 73 73
90% 87%
81%
81% 81%
80%
82%
79%
75% 74% 76%
79%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
Total capacity (mt) East Capacity Utilization %
Page 8
Birla Corporation
Realisations were under pressure in North/Central markets in FY16
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Capacity increase from 6mt in FY08 to 10mt by FY16
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Volume CAGR of 5% over FY08-FY18
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Operating at healthy utilization rates
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Profile on BCORP’s existing operations – Steady track record of capacity expansion and volume growth
5.8 5.8 5.8
7.5 8.7
9.4 9.4 9.4 9.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
Capacity (mt)
5.3 5.3 5.7 5.9 6.0 6.5 7.4 7.6 8.0
1% 1% 6% 5%
0% 9%
14%
3%
6%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
Volumes (mt) % growth
91% 91%
98%
89%
73% 71%
78% 81%
85%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
Utilisations %
3,0
03
3,0
73
3,5
39
3,2
14
3,4
24
3,8
27
3,7
22
3,8
52
3,6
18
10%
2%
15%
-9%
7%
12% -3% 4% -6%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
Realisations (Rs/t) % growth
Page 9
Birla Corporation
Clinker Purchase has hurt margins in the past
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Costs/ profile
Source: Company, Spark Capital
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY12-FY16 CAGR
RM costs/t 391 533 633 764 888 831 934 890 1,025 6%
% y-o-y change 9% 36% 19% 21% 16% -6% 12% -5% 15%
Power & fuel costs/t 622 690 675 773 895 955 1,042 1,141 964 5%
% y-o-y change 6% 11% -2% 15% 16% 7% 9% 9% -15%
Freight costs/t 382 457 478 507 548 689 750 774 786 9%
% y-o-y change 6% 20% 5% 6% 8% 26% 9% 3% 2%
Total costs/t 1,910 2,276 2,294 2,510 2,895 3,280 3,435 3,531 3,325 6%
% y-o-y change 7% 19% 1% 9% 15% 13% 5% 3% -6%
Profile on BCORP’s existing operations – Costs hurt due to mining ban at its North plant and clinker shortage
Company’s operations were hit adversely at
its Chanderia unit post the limestone ban
ordered by Jodhpur High Court in August
2011. BCORP had to resort to external
limestone and clinker, which resulted in
~Rs.1.4bn increase in costs or ~Rs. 215/t in
FY13. Currently the matter is with Supreme
Court, which has appointed Central
Building Research Institute to do a study on
impact of full scale mining operations.
295
529
758
924
628
1,5
03
828
189
816
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
Clinker purchase (Rs. mn)
Page 10
Birla Corporation
Dividend payout
Source: Company, Spark Capital
OCF and FCF – Decent track record of FCF generation
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Leverage – Net cash balance sheet till Reliance Cement acquisition
Source: Company, Spark Capital
RoE and RoCE profile
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Profile on BCORP’s existing operations – Strong balance sheet
47%
28%
36%
17% 11% 11%
5% 7% 6%
37%
24%
28%
13%
9% 9% 6% 6% 6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
RoE % RoCE%
4 4
6 6 6 7
6
6 6
8% 11%
8% 14% 19%
20% 36%
26% 29%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
Dividend per share Dividend payout ratio%
-4
-6
-7
-6
-3 -3
-4
-5 -5
(0.37)
(0.44) (0.42)
(0.27)
(0.14) (0.14) (0.16) (0.17) (0.19)
-50%
-45%
-40%
-35%
-30%
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
Net debt (Rs bn) Net debt to equity %
3,9
41
4,0
48
4,4
93
2,4
65
2,4
41
1,9
59
3,6
22
2,7
84
2,4
46
598
3,4
32
(3,2
90)
(1,8
63) (
593)
205
(671)
1,9
25
1,5
57
-4,000
-3,000
-2,000
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
Operating cash flows (Rs. mn) Free cash flows (Rs mn)
Page 11
Birla Corporation
Reliance Cement Asset profile – Utilisations, Volumes, Costs/t,
EBITDA/t, Absolute EBITDA (Rs. Mn)
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Acquisition of Reliance Cement – Good strategic fit for BCORP; Increased exposure to Central region
Birla Corporation’s deal with Reliance Cement brings the following
synergies:
Strengthens BCORP’s footprint in one of the most favored cement
market (Central region)
Optimization of logistics in the Central and East markets will aid savings
to the tune of Rs. 200/t
Addition of modern and efficient plants to its portfolio of cement assets
Reliance Cement is eligible for incentives worth Rs. 10bn over the next
12 years
Future expansion opportunities. Reliance Cement has land and leases to
expand in Rajasthan, Gujarat, Chhattisgarh, Karnataka, and Himachal
Pradesh
De-risks the earnings from low profitable Chanderia operations
(hampered due to limestone mining ban). North capacity exposure will
reduce to 26% from the current 41%.
North 26%
Central 56%
East 15%
West 3%
4.0 3.5 2.3
9.8 5.1
0.5
5.6
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
North Central East West Total
Birla Corp Reliance Cement
FY14 FY15 FY16
Capacity 5.5 5.5 5.6
Volumes in mt 0.2 1.7 3.3
% growth 650% 100%
Utilisations % 4% 30% 59%
Realisations/t 3,261 2,904 4,434
% growth -11% 53%
EBITDA/t (137) 83 749
% growth NM 804%
EBITDA in mn (30) 137 2,473
EBITDA margins % (0) 3% 17%
BCORP + Reliance = Total Capacity (Region wise)
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Combined capacity mix
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Page 12
Birla Corporation
Key metrics of BCORP’s existing assets
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Key metrics of Reliance Cement assets
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Consolidated key metrics – Increased scale of operations + Pick up in prices in North = 4x jump in FY18 EBITDA over FY16
Birla corp FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
Capacity 9.8 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1
Volumes in mt 8.0 8.7 9.1 9.6 10.0
% growth 6% 8% 5% 5% 5%
Utilisations % 85% 87% 91% 95% 100%
Realisations/t 3,618 3,836 4,027 4,229 4,440
% growth -6% 6% 5% 5% 5%
EBITDA/t 293 575 678 763 853
% growth -9% 96% 18% 13% 12%
EBITDA in mn 2,355 4,991 6,174 7,303 8,574
Reliance cements FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
Capacity 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6
Volumes in mt 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2 4.6
% growth 100% 10% 8% 8% 8%
Utilisations % 59% 65% 70% 76% 82%
Realisations/t 4,434 4,523 4,749 4,986 5,236
% growth 53% 2% 5% 5% 5%
EBITDA/t 749 801 916 1,038 1,169
% growth 804% 7% 14% 13% 13%
EBITDA in mn 2,473 2,908 3,589 4,395 5,345
Consolidated FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
Capacity 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6
Volumes in mt 10.5 13.0 13.8 14.6
% growth 31% 24% 6% 6%
Utilisations % 67% 83% 88% 94%
Realisations/t 4,272 4,500 4,702 4,917
% growth 18% 5% 5% 5%
EBITDA/t 614 749 848 952
% growth 110% 22% 13% 12%
EBITDA in mn 6,445 9,764 11,698 13,919
Consolidated key metrics (BCORP existing + Reliance Cement)
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Page 13
Birla Corporation
FY16 – FY20E – RoE and RoCE profile
Source: Company, Spark Capital
FY16 -FY20E – Interest coverage ratio
Source: Company, Spark Capital
Near term leverage not a worry; Net debt to equity to trend down…
Source: Company, Spark Capital
… led by operating and free cash flow generation
Source: Company, Spark Capital
While balance sheet leverage will increase significantly in FY17, expect de-leveraging process to be quicker as well
Page 14
-5
43 40 38 35
(0.19)
1.46
1.27 1.06
0.84
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
Net debt (Rs bn) Net debt to equity %
3.7x
2.7x 2.2x
2.9x
3.8x
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
EBIT interest coverage ratio %
6%
9% 11%
14%
17% 6%
8% 8%
10%
11%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
RoE % RoCE%
2,4
46
4,5
93
9,4
17
10,2
45
11,8
56
1,5
57
2,9
48
2,9
95
3,8
45
-10,000
-5,000
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
Operating cash flows (Rs. mn) Free cash flows (Rs mn)
Birla Corporation
Valuation Summary for mid-cap cement companies
Company Revenues (Rs. mn) EBITDA (Rs. mn) PAT (Rs. mn) EPS (Rs.) FY17-FY19E CAGR
FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E Revenue EBITDA PAT
BCORP 32,252 44,825 58,645 64,902 2,355 6,445 9,764 11,698 1,574 2,669 3,217 4,621 20.4 34.7 41.8 60.0 20.3% 34.7% 32.0%
DBL 64,380 79,527 91,768 100,846 15,786 20,078 23,130 25,750 1,908 3,847 6,078 7,801 21.5 43.3 68.4 87.8 12.6% 13.2% 42.4%
ICEM 42,268 46,516 52,460 59,191 7,697 9,299 10,261 11,842 1,378 2,841 3,768 4,934 4.5 9.2 12.3 16.1 12.8% 12.8% 31.8%
TRCL 35,958 40,121 45,378 49,935 10,590 12,051 13,347 14,075 5,583 6,549 7,914 7,420 23.4 27.5 33.2 31.2 11.6% 8.1% 6.4%
ORCMNT 15,092 19,450 23,534 27,182 1,834 2,847 4,812 6,045 622 450 1,864 2,753 3.0 2.2 9.1 13.4 18.2% 45.7% 147.5%
JKLC 26,199 30,630 36,650 43,037 2,701 4,916 7,557 9,362 63 1,229 3,099 4,644 0.5 10.4 26.3 39.5 18.5% 38.0% 94.4%
Company
EBITDA margins % EBITDA/t (Rs/t) RoCE RoAE Net Debt to Equity (x)
FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E
BCORP 7.3% 14.4% 16.6% 18.0% 293 614 749 848 6.4% 7.5% 8.1% 9.5% 5.9% 9.5% 10.6% 13.7% -0.2 1.5 1.3 1.1
DBL 24.5% 25.2% 25.2% 25.5% 1,186 1,224 1,284 1,364 4.4% 6.9% 8.3% 9.3% 5.5% 9.5% 13.5% 15.0% 1.6 1.3 1.1 0.8
ICEM 18.2% 20.0% 19.6% 20.0% 854 918 925 976 6.2% 7.9% 8.9% 10.1% 3.8% 7.6% 9.4% 11.2% 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.4
TRCL 29.5% 30.0% 29.4% 28.2% 1,428 1,415 1,426 1,393 13.2% 14.1% 16.0% 14.0% 19.5% 19.4% 19.7% 15.9% 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1
ORCMNT 12.1% 14.6% 20.4% 22.2% 415 490 753 860 5.4% 6.5% 11.0% 13.6% 6.2% 4.4% 16.9% 21.4% 1.2 1.3 1.1 0.8
JKLC 10.3% 16.1% 20.6% 21.8% 369 601 821 899 -0.9% 8.1% 13.2% 16.3% 0.5% 8.9% 19.8% 24.1% 1.3 1.2 0.8 0.5
Company CMP Shares MCAP EV/EBITDA (x) EV/t (Rs/t) PE (x)
Rs. mn Rs. mn FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E
BCORP 640 77 49,286 18.5x 14.1x 9.1x 7.4x 4,646 6,788 6,361 6,057 31.3x 18.5x 15.3x 10.7x
DBL 1,734 89 153,979 14.7x 11.4x 9.6x 7.7x 10,023 9,400 9,110 9,301 80.7x 40.0x 25.3x 18.0x
ICEM 150 307 46,088 9.7x 7.7x 6.7x 5.5x 5,285 5,036 4,838 4,564 33.4x 16.2x 12.2x 9.3x
TRCL 595 238 141,656 14.9x 12.6x 10.9x 10.1x 11,689 11,262 10,780 8,644 25.4x 21.6x 17.9x 19.1x
ORCMNT 205 205 41,998 28.4x 19.4x 11.4x 8.9x 6,516 6,899 6,878 6,709 67.5x 93.4x 22.5x 15.3x
JKLC 470 118 55,319 24.5x 14.2x 9.0x 6.9x 7,816 7,104 6,002 6,015 880.9x 45.0x 17.9x 11.9x
Page 15
Birla Corporation
Complete chronology of events pertaining to Chanderia mining ban
Date Events
August 2011 Jodhpur High Court based on the PIL filed directed Birla Corp that no mining should take place in the mining leases within 10km radius
from the Chittorgarh Fort
October 2011 Mining operations got suspended from September 2011. First round of hearing happened on October 13, 2011 and the case got
adjourned to December 2011
December 2011 Court gave partial relief by allowing the company to remove 70000MT of already excavated limestone. Directed Indian Bureau of mines
to conduct inspection
April 2012 Based on the High Court order, permission was given to lift 1.85 lakh tonnes of limestone, blasted during a study conducted by the Indian
Bureau of Mines, as per the directions of the Court. However, in compliance with the Court’s order, mining operations continue to be
suspended
May 2012 Based on the judgment and order dated May 25, 2012 passed by the High Court at Jodhpur, the Court has inter alia directed that no
mining activities and blasting shall take place within 10 kms from Chittorgarh fort wall. It has further directed that the mining leases
granted within 10 kms from fort wall are cancelled. In terms of the aforesaid judgment and order, no mining and blasting operation could
be carried out within 10 kms from the fort wall. It may be noted that the mining and blasting operation at Chanderia unit remain
suspended since August, 2011 in terms of the directions of the High Court. Birla Corp decided to appeal the same with Supreme Court
January 2013 An interim order to allow mining operations without blasting was allowed by the Supreme Court and they nominated Central Building
Research Institute to conduct a study and evaluate the impact of mining without blasting operations i.e. mining with any kind of manual or
electric gadgets, on Chittorgarh fort. In the meanwhile, the petitioners have been permitted to carry out mining operations manually,
without use of any kind of heavy equipment
March 2013 Further to the submission of CBRI report, Supreme Court vide its Order dated 8th March 2013, was pleased to permit mining activities
with mechanical means without blasting for a period of 4 (four) weeks, i.e. from 18th March 2013 to 14th April 20L3, beyond 1 Km. of
Chittorgarh Fort Wall. Such mining activity would be carried out to enable Central Building Research Institute, Roorkie, to study the
cumulative impact of the entire mining activities on Chittorgarh fort and to submit a report to the Supreme Court. Further hearing in the
matter will take place after the above report is submitted
August 2013 After considering the report submitted by CBRI as well as the reply filed by Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), the Supreme Court
passed an interim order dated July 29, 2013 allowing mining operations beyond 2 kms from the Chittorgarh fort by using Heavy Earth
Moving Machinery (HEMM). The working mining area of the Company is located at a distance of 4.5 km from fort. Accordingly, pursuant
to the said Order, mechanical mining of limestone has been commenced by the Chanderia Unit. Further, as recommended by CBRI,
proposal would be submitted to Supreme Court for long term study of the impact of full scale mining operations on the fort to be taken up
independently
Page 16
Birla Corporation
Chronology of the Birla family vs. Lodha case
1982
M.P. Birla and his wife Priyamvada Birla executed a
‘mutual will’ wherein the entire property would go to
a charitable trust G.P. Birla (first cousin of M.P.
Birla), Kashinath Tapuria (brother of Priyamvada
Birla) and Pradip Khaitan were executors of this
said ‘will’ (which was not registered)
1999
Priyamvada Birla executed
another ‘will’ which was
registered, transferring all the
properties in the name of R.S.
Lodha after her death
1990
MP Birla dies. Priyamvada takes
control of the company with R.S.
Lodha assisting her
2004 – October
The Kolkata High Court has
quashed a petition filed by RS
Lodha and his associates
seeking dismissal of the criminal
case filed by the Birla family
against them
2011
In Feb, CLB dismissed petitions
filed by Birla family to remove
Harsh V. Lodha as the Chairman
and director with immediate
effect
2004 – July
Priyamvada dies. R.S. Lodha
claims the ownership as per the
1999 will Birlas file caveats in the
probate section of the District
Judges Court in Kolkata and
Calcutta High Court
2008
R.S Lodha died and his son, Mr.
Harsh V. Lodha took charge as
the Chairman of the Company
Note: We noticed Amarchand Mangaldas is representing Birla Trust and FML (Fox Mandal Little) is representing Lodhas
Key points as to how Birla Corp fared under Lodha management since FY08
Total Cement Capacity has increased from 5.8MT to 9.3MT
Company remains debt-free with net cash of Rs.5.5bn (19% of market cap)
Captive power plants and small Waste Heat Recovery plants have been added
Pet coke usage has gone up to 50% now from Nil
Page 17
Birla Corporation
Financial Summary
Page 18
Birla Corporation CMP
Rs. 640
Target
Rs. 765
Rating
BUY
Birla Corporation
Spark Disclaimer
Spark Capital Advisors (India) Private Limited (Spark Capital) and its affiliates are engaged in
investment banking, investment advisory and institutional equities and infrastructure advisory
services. Spark Capital is registered with SEBI as a Stock Broker and Category 1 Merchant Banker.
We hereby declare that our activities were neither suspended nor we have defaulted with any stock
exchange authority with whom we are registered in the last five years. We have not been debarred
from doing business by any Stock Exchange/SEBI or any other authorities, nor has our certificate of
registration been cancelled by SEBI at any point of time.
Absolute Rating Interpretation
BUY Stock expected to provide positive returns of >15% over a 1-year horizon
ADD Stock expected to provide positive returns of >5% – <15% over a 1-year horizon
REDUCE Stock expected to provide returns of <5% – -10% over a 1-year horizon
SELL Stock expected to fall >10% over a 1-year horizon
Spark Capital has a subsidiary Spark Investment Advisors (India) Private Limited which is engaged in the services of providing investment advisory services and is registered with SEBI as
Investment Advisor. Spark Capital has also an associate company Spark Infra Advisors (India) Private Limited which is engaged in providing infrastructure advisory services.
This document does not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. This document is
provided for assistance only and is not intended to be and must not alone be taken as the basis for an investment decision. Nothing in this document should be construed as investment or financial
advice, and nothing in this document should be construed as an advice to buy or sell or solicitation to buy or sell the securities of companies referred to in this document.
Each recipient of this document should make such investigations as it deems necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation of an investment in the securities of companies referred to in this
document (including the merits and risks involved), and should consult its own advisors to determine the merits and risks of such an investment. This document is being supplied to you solely for
your information and may not be reproduced, redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other person or published, copied, in whole or in part, for any purpose. This report is not
directed or intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction, where such distribution, publication,
availability or use would be contrary to law, regulation or which would subject Spark Capital and/or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. The securities
described herein may or may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to a certain category of investors. Persons in whose possession this document may come are required to inform themselves
of and to observe such applicable restrictions. This material should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or
solicitation would be illegal.
Spark Capital makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the information and opinions contained in this document. Spark Capital , its
affiliates, and the employees of Spark Capital and its affiliates may, from time to time, effect or have effected an own account transaction in, or deal as principal or agent in or for the securities
mentioned in this document. They may perform or seek to perform investment banking or other services for, or solicit investment banking or other business from, any company referred to in this
report.
0
200
400
600
800
Sep-13 Mar-14 Sep-14 Mar-15 Sep-15 Mar-16 Sep-16
Rs.
Price Target
Report Date Price Target Reco.
24/Nov/15 455 500 Buy
28/Aug/15 460 600 Buy
17/Jun/15 408 455 Buy
16/Mar/15 430 500 Buy
08/Aug/14 450 605 Buy
11/Jun/14 350 500 Buy
21/Mar/14 268 300 Buy
12/Dec/13 252 305 Buy
01/Nov/13 225 275 Buy
Page 19
Birla Corporation CMP
Rs. 640
Target
Rs. 765
Rating
BUY
Birla Corporation
Disclaimer (Cont’d)
This report has been prepared on the basis of information, which is already available in publicly accessible media or developed through an independent analysis by Spark Capital. While we would
endeavour to update the information herein on a reasonable basis, Spark Capital and its affiliates are under no obligation to update the information. Also, there may be regulatory, compliance or
other reasons that prevent Spark Capital and its affiliates from doing so. Neither Spark Capital nor its affiliates or their respective directors, employees, agents or representatives shall be
responsible or liable in any manner, directly or indirectly, for views or opinions expressed in this report or the contents or any errors or discrepancies herein or for any decisions or actions taken in
reliance on the report or the inability to use or access our service in this report or for any loss or damages whether direct or indirect, incidental, special or consequential including without limitation
loss of revenue or profits that may arise from or in connection with the use of or reliance on this report.
Spark Capital and/or its affiliates and/or employees may have interests/positions, financial or otherwise in the securities mentioned in this report. To enhance transparency, Spark Capital has
incorporated a disclosure of interest statement in this document. This should however not be treated as endorsement of views expressed in this report:
Disclosure of Interest Statement BCORP
Analyst financial interest in the company No
Group/directors ownership of the subject company covered No
Investment banking relationship with the company covered No
Spark Capital’s ownership/any other financial interest in the company covered No
Associates of Spark Capital’s ownership more than 1% in the company covered No
Any other material conflict of interest at the time of publishing the research report No
Receipt of compensation by Spark Capital or its Associate Companies from the subject company covered for in the last twelve months:
Managing/co-managing public offering of securities
Investment banking/merchant banking/brokerage services
Products or services other than those above
In connection with research report
No
Whether Research Analyst has served as an officer, director or employee of the subject company covered No
Whether the Research Analyst or Research Entity has been engaged in market making activity of the Subject Company; No
Analyst Certification of Independence
The views expressed in this research report accurately reflect the analyst’s personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers; and no part of the research analyst’s
compensations was, is or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendation or views expressed in the report.
Additional Disclaimer for US Institutional Investors
This research report prepared by Spark Capital Advisors (India) Private Limited is distributed in the United States to US Institutional Investors (as defined in Rule 15a-6 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) only by Auerbach Grayson, LLC, a broker-dealer registered in the US (registered under Section 15 of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended).
Auerbach Grayson accepts responsibility on the research reports and US Institutional Investors wishing to effect transaction in the securities discussed in the research material may do so through
Auerbach Grayson. All responsibility for the distribution of this report by Auerbach Grayson, LLC in the US shall be borne by Auerbach Grayson, LLC. All resulting transactions by a US person or
entity should be effected through a registered broker-dealer in the US. This report is not directed at you if Spark Capital Advisors (India) Private Limited or Auerbach Grayson, LLC is prohibited or
restricted by any legislation or regulation in any jurisdiction from making it available to you. You should satisfy yourself before reading it that Auerbach Grayson, LLC and Spark Capital Advisors
(India) Private Limited are permitted to provide research material concerning investment to you under relevant legislation and regulations.
Page 20