BioScience 2009 Saade 757 65

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 BioScience 2009 Saade 757 65

    1/9

    In the upper zone of the ocean and other water bodies, downto depths where light can penetrate, one can typically findan abundant group of eukaryotic algae known as diatoms.

    These microscopic, unicellular organisms are characterized

    by ornate, lacework-like, silicified shells and are distributedall around the world.Diatoms are photosynthetic organisms

    that can convert the energy from sunlight into chemical

    energy in the form of ATP (adenosine triphosphate). Thischemical reaction confers on diatoms the ability to producetheir own nutrients (sugars), thus they have an autonomous

    metabolism and are called photoautotrophs. Diatoms

    absorb and fix large amounts of atmospheric carbon dioxide

    (CO2) while capturing light and water to generate a major

    fraction of the oxygen generated on Earth by photosynthe-

    sis. They are in fact believed to contribute between 20% and

    25% of global primary production, equivalent to all terres-

    trial rainforests combined (Falkowski et al. 1998, Field et al.1998, Smetacek 1999), and consequently play an essential

    role in the well-being of our global ecosystem.

    The scientist and artist Ernst Haeckel was one of the first

    to observe and describe diatoms in the late 19th century(Breidbach 2005). German biologist Robert Lauterbornsubsequently made exquisite microscopic descriptions of

    subcellular events occurring during diatom cell division. A

    century later, Jeremy Pickett-Heaps translated Lauterborns

    observations from the original German and verified his dis-coveries using light and electron microscopy (Pickett-Heaps

    et al. 1984,De Martino et al. 2009). Others began describing

    diatoms habitats: Allen did research in the early 20th century(Allen WE 1926), and experimental culturing became more

    reliable with the finding that, in addition to light and macro-

    nutrients, certain micronutrients and vitamins were required

    to cultivate them (Harvey 1939). Ecological and descriptivestudies continue to this day, with researchers now incorpor-

    ating advanced techniques of molecular and cellular biology.

    Consequently, knowledge of diatoms basic biology and theirpotential for a range of commercial exploitations is now ad-vancing rapidly.

    Diatoms can be recognized in the microscope by their

    highly ornamented silicified cell walls, known as frustules

    (figure 1). How diatoms generate these beautiful structuresis largely unknown,although some insights are now being re-

    vealed (see below).The process is termedbiomineralization

    (defined as the formation of inorganic materials under bio-

    logical control), and the species-specific patterns indicatethat it is genetically determined. Because marine organisms

    use more than 6.7 gigatons of silicon per year (Trguer et al.

    1995), it is particularly important to understand silicon

    uptake and deposition processes in diatoms.Furthermore, diatoms are used as bioindicators of pollu-

    tion and water quality. Because many heavy metals and

    organic xenobiotics inhibit diatoms growth, other algae such

    as cyanobacteria come to dominate (Berland et al. 1976). It

    is therefore possible to determine water quality by analyzingplankton diversity. Diatoms are also used as hydrographic

    tracers because biogenic silica retains its primary oxygen

    BioScience59: 757765. ISSN 0006-3568, electronic ISSN 1525-3244. 2009 by American Institute of Biological Sciences. All rights reserved. Request

    permission to photocopy or reproduce article content at the University of California Presss Rights and Permissions Web site at www.ucpressjournals.

    com/reprintinfo.asp. doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.9.7

    Molecular Tools for Discovering

    the Secrets of Diatoms

    ANASTASIA SAADE AND CHRIS BOWLER

    Diatoms are photosynthetic unicellular eukaryotes found in most aquatic environments.They are major players in global biogeochemical cycles, andgenerate as much oxygen through photosynthesis as terrestrial rainforests do. Insights into their evolutionary origins have been revealed by thewhole-genome sequencing of Thalassiosira pseudonana and Phaeodactylum tricornutum. We now know that diatoms contain unusualassortments of genes derived from different sources, including those acquired by horizontal gene transfer from bacteria. These genes confer novelmetabolic and signaling capacities that may underlie the extraordinary ecological success of diatoms on Earth today. The availability of a suite oftechniques that can be used to monitor and manipulate diatom genes is enhancing our knowledge of their novel characteristics. We highlight these

    recent developments and illustrate how they are being used to understand different aspects of diatom biology. We also discuss the use of diatoms incommercial applications, such as for nanotechnology and biofuel production.

    Keywords: genomics, microarrays, nanotechnology, transgenic technology, biofuel

    www.biosciencemag.org October 2009 / Vol. 59 No. 9 BioScience 757

    21st Century Directions in Biology21st Century Directions in Biology

  • 8/12/2019 BioScience 2009 Saade 757 65

    2/9

    758 BioScience October 2009 / Vol. 59 No. 9 www.biosciencemag.org

    21st Century Directions in Biology21st Century Directions in Biology

    isotopic composition after burial (Sancetta 1981). This prop-erty can be used to monitor past surface temperatures and

    isotopic compositions of seawater (Shemesh et al. 1992).

    Additionally, because the frustule can retain its structural

    features over geological timescales, the diatom fossil recordis of high quality. These observations reveal that diatoms

    have been major players in marine environments for at least

    the past 90 million years (Kooistra et al. 2007).Diatoms belong to the heterokont branch of the eukary-

    otes. This group lies within the hypothesized Chromalveolata

    kingdom within which several major lineages, including

    algae, can be found (Harper et al. 2005). These lineages were

    originally defined using morphological and developmentalcharacters, and have subsequently been refined using molec-

    ular approachesfor example, sequence analysis of ribosomal

    RNA genes and highly conserved proteins such as RuBisCo

    (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase) and elon-gation factor Tu (Baldauf et al. 1996, 2000). More recent,

    larger-scale phylogenomics approaches based on multiple

    sequence alignments are providing further insights into the

    evolutionary relationships between diatoms (Baldauf 2003,Li et al. 2006). Algal chloroplasts are believed to be derivedfrom photosynthetic prokaryotes that invaded or were en-

    gulfed by a eukaryotic cell and then became endosymbionts

    more than 1.5 billion years ago (Gibbs 1981, Cavalier-Smith

    1982,1986).This event subsequently gave riseto the green andred algal lineages. The chromalveolates are thought to have

    derived from a second endosymbiotic event that occurred

    around 1 billion years ago (Yoon et al. 2004), in which a red,

    algal-like organism became associated a second time with aheterotrophic eukaryote(figure 2).The most striking evidence

    for this is the presence of four membranes surrounding the

    chloroplasts in many photosynthetic chromalveolates such asthe diatoms (Gibbs 1981). Diatoms are further divided intotwo groups, the centrics and pennates, on the basis of their

    radial and bilateral symmetry, respectively. Diatom fossils

    representing centric species datefrom the Cretaceous, whereas

    pennate diatoms appear to have arisen later, around 90 mil-lion years ago.

    Studies of diatom biology have gone through a paradigm

    shift following the recent incorporation of molecular and

    cellular methods to dissect their biology. Most of these stud-ies have been performed on two species, Thalassiosira pseudo-nanaandPhaeodactylumtricornutum, now considered modelspecies for the centrics and pennates,respectively, because of

    the availability of whole-genome sequences and moleculartools to assess gene function (Armbrust et al. 2004, Poulsenet al. 2007, Siaut et al. 2007, Bowler at al. 2008).

    Diatom genome sequencing confirms

    novel evolutionary histories

    Both diatom genomes have been sequenced by the Joint

    Genome Institute in California. The sequence from the cen-

    tric diatomT. pseudonanawas the first to be reported (Arm-brust et al. 2004),and it was the first of any eukaryoticmarinephytoplankton species to be sequenced. TheP. tricornutumgenome was subsequently completed (Bowler et al.2008). Both

    Figure 1. Electron micrograph of the elaborate silicified

    cell wall of a diatom (Thalassiosira oestrupiivar.ven-

    rickae). The cell has a diameter of 9.5 microns. Image:Courtesy of Diana Sarno (Service for Taxonomy and

    Identification of Marine Phytoplankton, Stazione Zoo-

    logica Anton Dohrn, Naples, Italy).

    Figure 2. Schematic representation of the secondary

    endosymbiotic process thought to have given rise to the

    diatoms. An autotrophic red algallike ancestor was en-docytosed by a heterotrophic host cell. In the resulting

    cell, gene transfer occurred between the endosymbiont

    nucleus and the host nucleus, and probably also from theplastid and mitochondrial genomes. The resulting diatom

    cell contains the endosymbiont chloroplast, surrounded

    by four membranes, the host nucleus, and the host mito-

    chondria. New genes have also been acquired by horizon-tal gene transfer from bacteria. Nuclei are shown in blue.

    Abbreviations: D, diatom; HGT, horizontal gene transfer;

    m, mitochondria; pp, primary plastid; SE, secondary

    endosymbiosis; sp, secondary plastid.

  • 8/12/2019 BioScience 2009 Saade 757 65

    3/9

    species contain around 11,000 predicted genes in approxi-mately 30 million base-pair (Mbp; 32 Mbp forT. pseudonanaand 27 Mbp for P. tricornutum) genomes.A careful functionaland phylogenetic annotation of these genes, facilitated by

    the use of powerful computational approaches for predictingfunctional domains and subcellular locations, has provided

    new information to help understand the biology and evo-lutionary origins of diatoms. Whole-genome sequences

    from a wider range of other algal species have also becomeavailable, including a red alga, Cyanidioschyzon merolae(Matsuzaki et al.2004),and three green algae species:Chlamy-domonas reinhardtii(Merchantet al.2007),Ostreococcus tauri(Derelle et al.2006), andOstreococcus lucimarinus(Palenik etal. 2007).

    In addition to whole-genome sequencing, expressed

    sequence tags (ESTs) provide a cheaper and simpler way to

    begin to acquire genomic data. The ESTs are generated frommRNAextracted from cellsof a species of interest, transformed

    into complementary DNA (cDNA),and cloned into plasmids.

    A small region of each cDNA can then be sequenced to gen-

    erate a tag that can serve to identify what the gene encodes.The ESTs from a range of unicellular algae have now been re-

    ported, including those from Fragilariopsis cylindrus, a diatomfound within the ice in polar regions, andPseudo-nitzschiamultiseries, a bloom-forming diatom capable of synthesizingthe toxin domoic acid. Both of these genome sequences are

    now being completed as well.

    As noted above, before genome sequencing technologies

    had been developed,a prevailing hypothesis was that diatomsoriginated from a secondary endosymbiotic event between a

    heterotrophic and an autotrophic eukaryote (figure 2). This

    hypothesis is supported by genome analysis, which revealedthe presence of genes typical of both animal and plant classesof eukaryotes, such as components encoding the urea cycle

    and fatty acid oxidation, typical of animals, andgenesencoding

    photosynthesis, found in plants. The proposed red algal ori-

    gin of the diatom chloroplast is also supported by genomeanalysis (Oudot-Le Secq et al. 2007, Bowler et al. 2008). In

    addition to providing strong support for these hypotheses,

    examination of the predicted gene sets has also revealed the

    presence of hundreds of genes that are likely to be derivedfrom horizontal gene transfer between bacteria and diatoms.

    Diatom genomes therefore appear to be melting pots of

    genes that have been derived from a variety of sources over

    evolutionary time, and it has been hypothesized that thisunique cocktail of genes has conferred new metabolic andregulatory capacities that have been key in establishing their

    ecological finesse (Bowler et al. 2008).

    Comparisons of gene repertoires betweenT. pseudonanaand P. tricornutum can also serveas a basis to explain the dif-ferences between centric and pennate diatoms. For example,

    in contrast to centric diatoms, raphid pennate diatoms

    possess a raphe, which permits them to move actively. They

    are major biofoulers, they include toxic species, and theygenerally respond most strongly to mesoscale iron fertiliza-

    tion (de Baar et al. 2005, Boyd et al. 2007, Kooistra et al.

    2007). They also have amoeboid isogametes in contrast tomotile sperm and oogamy in centric species. The availability

    of these two genome sequences, combined with the tools de-

    scribed below, allow the molecular bases of these differences

    to be explored and understood.

    Analysis of gene expression in diatomsAnalysis of gene expression over time and in different con-

    ditions is a useful proxy for identifying the conditions inwhich a gene product plays an important role. Gene-expres-

    sion studies are most often performed by quantifying levels

    of mRNAfor thegene of interest.This is most commonly done

    by first converting mRNA into cDNA, and then quantifyingthe amount of expression with quantitative real-time poly-

    merase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) using fluorescent dyes or

    fluorescent probes. This technique can be carried out with

    small amounts of mRNA, but it is crucial to have accurate ref-erence genes to normalize expression levels. Siaut and col-

    leagues (2007) identified several housekeeping genes in

    diatoms whose expression remains relatively constant in dif-

    ferent conditions,and in particular proposed the use ofRPS,a gene that encodes a 30S ribosomal protein subunit,andTBP,a gene encoding the TATA-box binding protein, as rather

    stable reference genes.

    A more general approach is to use ESTs to identify wholesuites of genes expressed under particular conditions. When

    performed on a large scale and without normalizing for

    differences in mRNA levels of each gene, a global picture of

    gene expression can be obtained. In P. tricornutum, ESTshave been generated from cells grown in 16 different con-

    ditions, such as on different nitrogen sources, under iron

    limitation, or in high CO2. Between 6000 and 12,000ESTs areavailable from each library, constituting a total of more than130,000 ESTs.These sequences have been organizedinto a dig-

    ital gene expression database that permits expressionpatterns

    of individual genes to be examined,and also allows the facile

    identification of genes displaying similar expression profiles(Maheswari et al.2009; www.biologie.ens.fr/diatomics/EST3).

    Another approach to examining gene expression at the

    whole-genome level is to use microarrays. Technologies are

    now available to generate high-densityarrays at a low cost,suchas those from Agilent (www.agilent.com) and Nimblegen(www.nimblegen.com). A microarray typically containsoligonucleotides representing each gene of interest, for ex-

    ample, for each annotated gene in a diatom genome. Com-pared with ESTs, an advantage of using microarrays is thatgenes that are both up- anddownregulated in a particular con-

    dition can be identified.On the other hand, ESTs can permit

    the identification of bona fide expressed genes that were not

    predicted by thein silicomethods used for genome annota-tion. This limitation of typical gene-specific microarrays was

    circumvented by Mock and colleagues (2008), who identified

    additional unpredicted genes inT. pseudonanausing tiledarrays.Tiled arrays are a kind of microarray in which a wholegenome is represented by oligonucleotides, often on both

    DNA strands. Using this method, they identified 3500 puta-

    www.biosciencemag.org October 2009 / Vol. 59 No. 9 BioScience 759

    21st Century Directions in Biology

  • 8/12/2019 BioScience 2009 Saade 757 65

    4/9

    tive new genes, some of which corresponded to noncodingandantisense RNAs. Among those genes, 75 were identified by

    gene-specific expression profiles as potentially involved in

    silicon metabolism, and half of them encode proteins of

    unknown function. Interestingly, these genes also providedevidence of a link between silicon and iron metabolism

    pathways.The above-described methods for studying gene expression

    can help infer a function of diatom-specific genes, andseveral examples have now been reported in which these

    methods have been used to explore specific aspects of diatom

    biology, such as nutrient assimilation (Allen AE et al. 2008,

    Mock et al. 2008), light responses (Siaut et al. 2007), andgene expression during cell division (Gillard et al. 2008).

    Such studies are especially important, given the unusual com-

    binations of genes that have been found in diatoms, such that

    empirical studies of gene expression in different conditionsare required to understand how they function together in a

    coordinated manner.

    Transgenic technology

    It is also important to be able to manipulate the expression

    of single genes and to assess the consequences of that mod-

    ulationfor the organism under study. Genetictransformation

    technologies offer powerful ways of doing this by reversegenetics. In diatoms, the most commonly used technique

    for generating transgenic cells is based on helium-accelerated

    bombardment of microparticles coated withthe DNA that is

    to be introduced.The methodology was initially reported forCyclotella cryptica(Roessler et al. 1994) and subsequentlyfor P. tricornutum (Apt et al. 1996),but has now been applied

    to a range of other diatoms,including most recentlyT. pseudo-nana(Poulsen et al.2007). Notwithstanding, thetools aremosthighly developed for P. tricornutumin particular, a series ofdifferent transformation vectors made from the Gateway

    cloning system from Invitrogen (www.invitrogen.com/gateway.html; Siaut et al. 2007), which greatly facilitates the genera-

    tion of chimeric gene constructs for a range of different ap-plications, such as for the inactivation and overexpression of

    genes,and for the localization of a gene product inside thecellby fusing it to fluorescent reporters.

    The green fluorescent protein (GFP) from the jellyfish

    Aequorea victoria, the most versatile fluorescent tag currentlyused in biology, was the subject of the project that won the2008 Nobel prize for chemistry. Besides the wild-type green

    version, a series of differently colored variants are nowavail-

    able, which can even be combined to label different proteins

    in thesame cell (figure 3). Such technologies complement themore traditional protein localization approaches by sub-

    cellular fractionation and immunolocalization, in that they

    permit localization to be visualized inside living cells. In

    addition to GFP, other reporter proteins have also been usedin diatoms, such as luciferase and beta-glucuronidase,which

    allow studies of gene expression in response to particular

    conditions (Falciatore et al. 1999).

    Using GFP as a reporter for protein localization, Kroth(2007a, 2007b) studied the mechanisms of protein translo-

    cation and import into diatom chloroplasts, a fundamental

    but little-understood process in diatoms. This is of further in-

    terest because diatom plastids are surrounded by four insteadof two membranes.These studies have shown that the outer

    two membranes of diatom plastids appear to be derived from

    760 BioScience October 2009 / Vol. 59 No. 9 www.biosciencemag.org

    21st Century Directions in Biology

    Figure 3. Fluorescent image of a pair of transgenicPhaeodactylum tricornutumcells cotransformed

    with a Sec4 protein-YFP fusion (green) and a Histone H4-CFP fusion (blue). The Sec4 proteinlocalizes to intracellular vesicles and to the plasma membrane, whereas H4 localizes to the

    nucleus. Chlorophyll autofluorescence from the plastid is shown in red. A brightfield view of

    twoP. tricornutumcells (left) is shown for comparison. Images: Courtesy of Anton Montsant.

  • 8/12/2019 BioScience 2009 Saade 757 65

    5/9

    plasma membrane and endoplasmic reticulum, whereas theinner twomembranes resemblethose found in green algae and

    higher plants, as would be predicted if diatom plastids were

    indeed acquired through secondary endosymbiosis (Gibbs

    1981). Other studies have shown proteins localized in diatommitochondria and other subcellular organelles (Siaut et al.

    2007). Furthermore, Vardi and colleagues (2008) recentlyfound that a protein associated with nitric oxide (NO) pro-

    duction localizes to diatomchloroplasts, in contrast to its plantortholog,which was found in mitochondria (Guo and Craw-

    ford 2005).Such fundamental differences were instrumental

    in defining therole of the protein in diatoms (see below), thus

    showing the utility of GFP-based reporters for protein local-ization studies.

    Transgenes introduced in diatoms are under the control of

    promoters, DNA sequences upstream of protein coding se-

    quences that spatiotemporally regulate gene expression.Whena transgene is placed under the control of a chosen promoter,

    it will usually display the expression pattern of the gene from

    which the promoter was derived. Transgenes are most often

    expressed from strong promoters such as FCP (fucoxanthinchlorophylprotein) promoters (derived from genes encoding

    light-harvesting fucoxanthin-chlorophylla/c-binding pro-teins). Althoughthese promoters are to some extent regulated

    by light, they are generally considered to be rather constitu-tive. Transgenic technology also enables the modulation of

    gene expression using inducible promoter systems, which

    can be particularly useful when expression of a gene is lethal

    for the cell. Poulsen and Krger (2005) reported the firstmethod for inducible gene expression to study gene function

    in diatoms, based on a nitrate reductase promoter that is

    responsive to exogenous nitrate concentrations. With thissystem, a transgene can in principle be switched on and offsimply by controlling the amount of nitrate in the growth

    medium.

    Overexpression of a gene of interest can help in under-

    standing its function, particularly when its inactivation islethal. An overexpressed gene can cause a change in pheno-

    type, thereby providing information that is useful for un-

    derstanding its function. Overexpression of specific genes

    has been reported several times in diatoms.A notable exam-ple is the overexpression of a gene encoding a glucose trans-

    porter to convertP. tricornutum cells from photoautotrophyto heterotrophy (Zaslavskaia et al. 2001).

    The inhibition of expression of a gene of interest has alsobecome a crucial method for elucidating gene function. Themethod is most typically called gene silencing,and it consists

    of generating small RNAs complementary to the target gene.

    These small RNAs will bind to the transcribed product and

    inhibit its translation into protein. The technique has re-cently been reported in diatoms, providing for the first time

    a method of inactivating gene expression in these organisms

    (De Riso et al. 2009).

    In addition to the methods of reverse genetics describedabove, forward genetics can discover genes responsible for a

    defined phenotype.In forward genetics,cells are usually first

    mutagenized and then screened for interesting and unusualphenotypes in the mutagenized population. This method

    has proved to be extremely powerful for dissecting the basic

    biology of a wide range of both unicellular and multicellu-

    lar organisms (Candela and Hake 2008, Carradice and Lieschke2008), although it has not yet been reported in diatoms

    because of the difficulty of controlling their sexual cycle(Chepurnov et al. 2008). This is importantbecause diatom cells

    are diploid, so any recessive mutation needs first to be fixedon both copies by going through a round of meiosis, that is,

    sex. To circumvent this shortcoming, a technique known as

    activation tagging has been used in other organisms (Candela

    and Hake 2008, Carradice and Lieschke 2008).The approachis based on the random introduction into the genome of en-

    hancers, DNA sequences that positively affect expression of

    a gene when inserted close by. The use of such techniques to

    generate dominant mutations in diatoms has notyet been re-ported, although it is likely to be a useful strategy for isolat-

    ing mutants in forward genetic screens.

    The benefits of using modern molecular

    technologies to study diatoms

    The use of molecular biology together with more classical

    studies of diatom biology has led to a range of advances for

    understanding their cell biology. The targeting of proteinsto the plastid (Gruber et al. 2007) and the dissection of

    diatom cell-division mechanisms (Gillard et al. 2008) were

    mentioned previously. The availability of diatom genome

    sequences has also provided valuable starting points forexploring their responses to key limiting nutrients such as

    nitrogen, silicate, and iron (Allen AE et al. 2006). Iron

    metabolism is of particular interest because diatoms tend todominate in mesoscale iron fertilization experiments (deBaar et al. 2005, Boyd et al. 2007), suggesting that they are iron

    limited under natural conditions. Iron responses have been

    studied at the transcriptional level in bothsequenced diatoms

    (AllenAE et al. 2008, Bidle and Bender 2008, Mock et al. 2008).While both diatoms possess classical ferric reductase en-

    zymes, these enzymes are more numerous in P. tricornutum.Furthermore,P. tricornutum possesses a number of geneclustersabsent in theT. pseudonanagenomethat arehighly expressed under iron limitation. Some of these genes,

    prokaryotic in character, point to newiron acquisition systems

    that have not yet been described in eukaryotic algae (Allen AE

    et al. 2008). Also notable is the presence of the iron-storageprotein ferritin inP. tricornutumbut not inT. pseudonana(Marchetti et al. 2008). These differences between the se-

    quenced centric and pennate diatoms may partly explain the

    higher tolerance ofP. tricornutum,and pennate diatoms ingeneral, to iron limitation (Kustka et al. 2002, de Baar et al.2005, Boyd et al. 2007).

    Carbon fixation in aquatic organisms can be enhanced by

    CO2-concentrating mechanisms (CCMs) that increase the

    availability of CO2for the carbon-fixing RuBisCo enzyme.

    These mechanisms are defined as biophysical, because of

    the action of inorganic carbon uptake systems and carbonic

    www.biosciencemag.org October 2009 / Vol. 59 No. 9 BioScience 761

    21st Century Directions in Biology

  • 8/12/2019 BioScience 2009 Saade 757 65

    6/9

    anhydrases, and biochemical, which is based on the cyclingof CO

    2through C4 intermediates. The mechanisms used by

    diatoms remain controversialdespite intensive research(Gior-

    dano et al. 2005). Phaeodactylum tricornutumhas been pro-posed to have a greater capacity for biophysical CCM thanother diatoms (Kroth et al. 2008), and this is also supported

    by the higher numbers, compared withT. pseudonana, ofbicarbonate transporters (seven and three,respectively) and

    carbonic anhydrases (four and one) encoded in its genome.Furthermore, one of the carbonic anhydrases is a beta-type,

    plastid-localized enzyme that is absent in T. pseudonana(Montsant et al. 2005). On the other hand, both diatoms

    may use a C4-based biochemical CCM involving the cyclingof C4 intermediates between the inside of the plastid, the

    periplastidic space,and the mitochondria (Kroth et al.2008).

    If confirmed, such a mechanism would be a highly novel

    means of capturing CO2, and may also help the cells to dis-

    sipate excess light energy.

    Illustrating the utility of molecular approaches to study

    diatom responses of ecological relevance, recent studies reveal

    the presence of complex inter- and intracellular signalingmechanisms that regulate population proliferation and even

    programmed celldeath in response to environmental signals.

    When zooplankton graze on diatom populations,the diatoms

    release aldehydes such as decadienal that can reduce the re-productive capacity of the grazer population,potentially pro-

    viding an antigrazing strategy. Increased aldehydeproduction

    by diatoms can also occur as a general response to wounding

    (Pohnert et al.2004).Vardiand colleagues (2006) showed thatbothP. tricornutumandT. weissflogiirespond to treatmentwith the aldehyde by producing NO, a phenomenon that is

    most likely regulated by changes in intracellular calcium con-centrations. At high concentrations, the aldehyde causes celldeath, whereas pretreatment with low concentrations can

    prime cells to become immune. In a subsequent study, Vardi

    and colleagues (2008) showed that expression of the PtNOAgene (NO associated),whichencodes a GTP-binding proteinbelonging to the highly conserved YqeH subfamily, is in-

    creased in response to the aldehyde, andP. tricornutumcellsoverexpressing PtNOA display increased NO production andthe appearance of several features symptomatic of stress. Ad-hesionof cells to surfaces was also compromised, implying the

    importance of NO-regulated events for biofilm formation

    (Thompson et al. 2008). These studies therefore identify a

    diatom gene that appears to be central for regulating stresssensitivity in diatoms.

    Diatom silicification is one of the most distinctive fea-

    tures of diatoms (figure 1). The frustule (the cell wall) is

    composed of two halves,a larger half and a smaller half called

    the epivalve and the hypovalve, respectively. The frustule ispartly organic (proteins and polysaccharides) and partly

    bioinorganic (hydrated silicon, SiO2[H

    2O]n). This incredi-

    bly robust and highly ornamented structure has several pro-

    posed roles, including protection from grazers and parasitesthrough its mechanical resistance (Hamm et al. 2003, Pon-

    daven et al. 2007), or as a proton-buffering agent (Milligan

    and Morel 2002). The frustule is synthesized during cell di-vision within a membrane-bound organelle, termed the

    silica deposition vesicle (SDV), which rapidly extends to

    form a flat, large vesicle in which the new valve is synthesized.

    When the new valve is complete, it is bulk exocytosed andbecomes the hypovalve of the new cell (Zurzolo and Bowler

    2001).Pioneering biochemical studies of frustule composition

    have been performed by Krger and colleagues in thepennatediatomCylindrotheca fusiformis,and have led to the identi-fication of several components found only in diatoms (Krger

    et al. 1999, Krger and Poulsen 2008). This work led to the

    discovery of silaffins, novel peptides that may participate inthe basic biomineralization process within the SDV (Krger

    et al. 1999). Remarkably, these silaffins can promote the

    formation of nanoscale silica spheres in vitro, and are the firstpeptides shown to be able to do this. They are encoded bymodular genes whose gene product requires extensive post-

    translational modifications such as the addition of phos-

    phate and sugar groupsduringmaturation from the precursor

    protein to the mature peptides.Other major organic constitu-ents of diatom biosilica are putrescine-derived, long-chain

    polyamines, which, like the silaffins, can also induce rapid

    silicic acid precipitationin vitro(Krger et al. 2000). Differ-ent diatoms are likely to have different complements ofsilaffinsand polyamines thatconfer species-specific differences

    to silica precipitation and thereby result in species-specific

    nanopatterning, although they have so far been poorly char-

    acterized because of the difficulties of identifying the genesinvolved on the basis of only homology. Furthermore, it

    appears that the posttranslational modifications to these

    peptides are in fact more important than their amino acidsequence per se. Notwithstanding, silaffin genes have beenfused to GFP, and the fusion proteins are incorporated into

    the silicified cell walls (Poulsen et al. 2007). Silaffin gene

    expression is also upregulated significantly during valve

    formation.Other proteinaceous components of diatom cell walls

    include frustulins and pleuralins (formerly called HEP

    proteins; Krger and Poulsen 2008), containing conserved

    calcium-binding domains separated by hydroxyproline,polyproline/hydroxyproline, or polyglycine-rich regions.Like

    the silaffins, pleuralins are also tightly bound to silica and can

    be removed from diatom cell walls only after the solubiliza-

    tion of silica with hydrogen fluoride. Pleuralins are encodedby a small multigene family in C. fusiformisbut have notbeen found inT. pseudonanaorP. tricornutum,and so theyare likely to represent a specific structural feature of this

    diatom. Pleuralin-1 is not targeted to the SDV but is directly

    secreted into the cleavage furrow that forms between the twodaughter cells (Krger and Wetherbee 2000). Association

    with the terminal girdle band of the hypotheca therefore

    occurs in the extracellular space. It will be interesting to de-

    termine how many other wall-associated proteins avoid theSDV during their secretion and incorporation into diatom

    frustules.

    762 BioScience October 2009 / Vol. 59 No. 9 www.biosciencemag.org

    21st Century Directions in Biology

  • 8/12/2019 BioScience 2009 Saade 757 65

    7/9

    Frustulins are much more loosely associated with diatomcell walls than are silaffins and pleuralins, and can be ex-

    tracted with EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, a com-

    mon chelating agent; Krger and Poulsen 2008). They are

    glycoproteins that can bind calcium because of the presenceof EF hands(helix-loop-helix structures in a family of calcium-

    binding proteins), and also contain characteristic acidic,cysteine-rich domains. Although frustulins are most likely

    conserved in all diatoms, including T. pseudonanaand P. tri-cornutum, their function is not yet known. They are notthought to be involved in silica deposition.

    Biotechnology. The precision of the nanoscale pattern andarchitecture of the frustule far exceeds the capabilities of

    current materials and science engineers, suggesting that

    understanding diatom cell-wall biosynthesis will one day be

    exploitable in nanotechnological applications (Parkinsonand Gordon 1999, Lopez et al.2005).Although the metabolic

    pathways that drive cell-wall biosynthesis remain largely un-

    explored, they constitute a clear target for the discovery of

    novelprotein functions that are unlikely to be found in otherorganisms and can be exploited in biotechnological applica-

    tions. For example, diatom frustules can be incorporated

    into membranes and used for the size-selective separation of

    nanoparticles (Losic et al. 2006).Biomimetic studies also seem promising: For example,

    Vrieling and colleagues (2005) reported using water glass

    based and polyethylene oxidebased polymers to control the

    synthesis of silica to generate ordered porous structures at thenanometer and micrometer levels. The use of frustulesto make

    other functional materials by chemical conversion has also

    been reported (Bao et al. 2007). These technologies open upnew opportunities to produce three-dimensional (3-D)siliceous materials that have never before been engineered

    (Krger 2007, Krger and Poulsen 2008). In addition, Gor-

    donand Parkinson (2005) proposed another role for silica in

    linear lithographic techniques that are used to engineermicroelectronics and thatconsist in replacementof siliconwith

    another atom while maintaining the 3-D structure of origin.

    The genomic-enabled techniques described in this review

    can be of great utility for understanding and ultimately ex-ploitingthe silicon nanaofabrication capacities of diatoms,and

    some progress has already been made, as evidenced in the

    previous section. Further progress will very likely require

    additionalhigh-quality biochemistry, as well as high-through-put, genetic-based screens, to identify diatom-specific genesof currently unknown function.

    The conversion of solar energy into chemical energy by

    photosynthesis has become of great interest for the genera-

    tion of renewable energy resources. Diatoms have a highlipid content (up to 70% dry weight; Chisti2007), and so they

    have been proposed as a source of biofuels (Kroth 2007a).

    Furthermore, the residual biomass is rich in protein and so

    could be used as animal feed. Moreover, because diatoms donot contain complex carbohydrate-based polymers such as

    cellulose, ruminants digestion of diatom-derived biomass

    generates less methane and other potent greenhouse gases thanwould be the case with other feed. Now that fossil fuels are

    being depleted and becoming more expensive, these diatom-

    based applications are particularly appealing.Compared with

    plant-based sources of biofuels, diatoms and other algae aremuch more efficient converters of solar energy and have a

    much higher energy potential (Chisti 2008). Furthermore,theydo not compete with food production, they can be grown in

    saltwater on marginal land, and they require less water inputs(Lebeau and Robert 2003, Dismukes et al. 2008).Phaeo-dactylumtricornutum is an attractive target for proof of prin-ciple because it has a high lipid content (up to 30%), it can

    be genetically manipulated, and it is already widely culti-vated for commercial aquaculture. Genetic manipulation

    can potentially be used to increase photosynthetic efficiency

    to enable increased biomass yield, to enhance biomass growth

    rate, to increase oil content in biomass, to improve temper-ature tolerance to reduce the expense of cooling, to eliminate

    light saturation of photosynthesis,and to reduce photoinhi-

    bitionand photooxidation.In addition,there is a need to iden-

    tify new diatom strains with high oil content or to breed orselect for improved strains.

    Conclusions

    The recently available genome sequences from two diatomsdemonstrated the novel multilineage history of their gene

    repertoires and revealed that their genomes encode an enor-

    mous metabolic and regulatory potential thatperhaps under-

    lies their ecological success.The noncanonical nature of theirgenomes indicates that the functional exploration of diatom-

    specific genes is required to dissect their roles in diatom biol-

    ogy. Revealing the functions of these thousands of diatomgenes that do not have proxies in conventional model or-ganisms is going to be a major challenge,and it is highly un-

    likely (because of the lack of financial resources and dedicated

    personnel) that each can be experimentally assigned a func-

    tionthroughreverse-geneticsapproaches such as gene knock-outs. Nonetheless, new molecular techniques combined with

    biochemical approaches provide an excellent starting point

    for exploring novel aspects of diatom biology and for devel-

    oping biotechnological applications. Additional computa-tional approaches are likely to be required to help us predict

    protein functions, and proteomics approaches can help to

    associate specific proteins with specific cellular structures or

    protein complexes.As knowledgeof diatombiologygrows through laboratory-

    based experiments,additional technologies willneed to be de-

    veloped for exploringdiatom biology in natural environments.

    Metabolomics technologies could be of some help,in that they

    can reveal the metabolic signatures of cells grown in specificconditions, as was recently illustrated (Allen AE et al. 2008).

    High-throughput genomics technologies that have yet to be

    developed for diatoms would also be a major boost for rapidly

    identifying mutations that result in major cellular perturba-tions (e.g., in the silicon nanofabrication process). In all such

    scenarios, the available genome sequences clearly provide a

    www.biosciencemag.org October 2009 / Vol. 59 No. 9 BioScience 763

    21st Century Directions in Biology

  • 8/12/2019 BioScience 2009 Saade 757 65

    8/9

    major advance in our knowledge and in our opportunities to

    explore diatom biology. We eagerly await the forthcoming

    sequences from the polar diatomFragilariopsis cylindrusandthe toxin-producingPseudo-nitzschia multiseries.

    Acknowledgments

    Funding for our work has been obtained from theEuropeanUnion (EU)funded FP6 Diatomics project (LSHG-CT-

    2004-512035), the EU-FP6 Marine Genomics Network of

    Excellence (GOCE-CT-2004-505403), an ATIP (Actions Th-

    matiques Initatives sur Programmes) Blanche grant from

    the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, and the

    Agence Nationale de la Recherche (France).

    References citedAllen AE, Vardi A, Bowler C. 2006. An ecological and evolutionary context

    for integrated nitrogen metabolism and related signaling pathways in

    marine diatoms. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 9: 264273.

    Allen AE,LaRoche J,Maheswari U, LommerM, Schauer N,LopezPJ,Finazzi

    G, Fernie AR,BowlerC. 2008. Whole-cell responseof thepennatediatomPhaeodactylum tricornutum to ironlimitation.Proceedingsof the NationalAcademy of Sciences 105: 1043810443.

    Allen WE.1926.Remarks on surfacedistributionof marine plankton diatoms

    in the East Pacific. Science 63: 9697.

    Apt KE,Kroth-Pancic PG, Grossman AR. 1996. Stable nuclear transforma-

    tion of the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Molecular Genetics andGenomics 252: 572579.

    Armbrust EV, et al. 2004. The genome of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudo-nana: Ecology, evolution, and metabolism. Science 306: 7986.

    Baldauf SL. 2003. The deep roots of eukaryotes. Science 300: 17031706.

    Baldauf SL,Palmer JD,Doolittle WF. 1996.The rootof the universaltree and

    the origin of eukaryotes based on elongation factor phylogeny. Pro-

    ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93: 77497754.

    Baldauf SL, Roger AJ, Wenk-Siefert I, Doolittle WF. 2000. A kingdom-level

    phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data. Science 290:972977.

    Bao Z, et al. 2007. Chemical reduction of three-dimensional silica micro-

    assemblies into microporous silicon replicas. Nature 446: 172175.

    Berland BR, Kapkov VI, Maestrini SY, Arlhac DP. 1976. Toxic effect of

    four heavy metals on the growth of unicellular marine algae. Comptes

    rendus hebdomadaires des sances de lAcadmie des Sciences D 282:

    633636.

    Bidle KD, Bender SJ. 2008. Iron starvation and culture age activate meta-

    caspasesand programmedcell death in themarinediatom Thalassiosirapseudonana.Eukaryotic Cell 7: 223236.

    Bowler C, et al.2008. ThePhaeodactylumgenome reveals the evolutionaryhistory of diatom genomes. Nature 456: 239244.

    Boyd PW, et al. 2007. Mesoscale iron enrichment experiments 19932005:

    Synthesis and future directions. Science 315: 612617.

    Breidbach O. 2005. Art Forms from the Ocean: The Radiolarian Prints ofErnst Haeckel. Prestel.

    Candela H, Hake S. 2008. The art and design of genetic screens: Maize.

    Nature Reviews Genetics 9: 192203.

    Carradice D, Lieschke GJ. 2008. Zebrafish in hematology: Sushi or science?

    Blood 111: 33313342.

    Cavalier-Smith T. 1982. The evolutionary origin and phylogeny of eukary-

    ote flagella. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 35:

    465493.

    . 1986. The kingdoms of organisms. Nature 324: 416417.

    Chepurnov VA, Mann DG, Von Dassow P,Vanormelingen P, Gillard J, Inz

    D, Sabbe K, Vyverman W. 2008. In search of new tractable diatoms for

    experimental biology. Bioessays 30: 692702.

    Chisti Y. 2007. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnology Advances 25:

    294306.

    . 2008. Biodiesel from microalgae beats bioethanol. Trends in

    Biotechnology 26: 126131.

    de Baar HJW, et al. 2005. Synthesis of iron fertilization experiments: From

    theironage in the ageof enlightenment.Journal of GeophysicalResearch

    Oceans 110: C09S16. doi: 10.1029/2004JC002601

    De MartinoA, AmatoA, Bowler C.2009.Mitosis in diatoms:Rediscovering

    an old model for cell division. Bioessays 31: 874884.

    De Riso V, Raniello R, Maumus F, Rogato A, Bowler C, Falciatore A. 2009.

    Gene silencing in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tr icornutum.Nucleic Acids Research 37: e96. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp448

    Derelle E, et al. 2006. Genome analysis of the smallest free-living eukaryote

    Ostreococcus tauriunveils many unique features. Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences 103: 1164711652.

    Dismukes GC, Carrieri D, Bennette N, Ananyev GM, Posewitz MC. 2008.

    Aquatic phototrophs: Efficient alternatives to land-based crops for

    biofuels. Current Opinions in Biotechnology 19: 235240.

    FalciatoreA, Casotti R,Leblanc C,AbresciaC, Bowler C.1999.Transformation

    of nonselectable reporter genes in marine diatoms.Marine Biotechnol-

    ogy 1: 239251.

    Falkowski PG, Barber RT, Smetacek V. 1998. Biogeochemical controls and

    feedbacks on ocean primary production. Science 281: 200207.

    FieldCB,BehrenfeldMJ, Randerson JT, FalkowskiP.1998.Primary production

    of the biosphere:Integratingterrestrial and oceanic components. Science

    281: 237240.

    Gibbs SP. 1981. The chloroplastsof somealgal groups mayhave evolved from

    endosymbiotic eukaryotic algae. Annals of the New York Academy of

    Sciences 361: 193208.

    Gillard J, et al. 2008. Physiological and transcriptomic evidence for a close

    coupling between chloroplast ontogeny and cell cycle progression in

    the pennate diatom Seminavis robusta. PlantPhysiology 148:13941411.Giordano M, BeardallJ, Raven JA.2005.CO

    2concentrating mechanisms in

    algae: Mechanisms, environmental modulation, and evolution.Annual

    Review of Plant Biology 56: 99131.

    GordonR, Parkinson J.2005.Potential roles fordiatomists in nanotechnol-

    ogy. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 5: 3540.

    Gruber A, Vugrinec S, Hempel F, Gould SB, Maier UG, Kroth PG. 2007.

    Protein targeting into complex diatom plastids: Functional characteri-

    sation of a specific targetingmotif. Plant Molecular Biology 64: 519530.GuoFQ, Crawford NM.2005.Arabidopsisnitric oxide synthase1 is targetedtomitochondria and protects against oxidativedamageand dark-induced

    senescence. Plant Cell 17: 34363450.

    Hamm CE, Merkel R, Springer O, Jurkojc P, Maier C,Prechtel K, Smetacek

    V. 2003. Architecture and material properties of diatom shells provide

    effective mechanical protection. Nature 421: 841843.

    Harper JT, Waanders E, Keeling PJ. 2005. On the monophyly of chromal-

    veolates using a six-protein phylogeny of eukaryotes. International

    Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 55: 487496.

    Harvey PH. 1939. Hereditary variation in plant nutrition. Genetics 24:

    437461.

    Kooistra WHCF, Gersonde R, Medlin LK, Mann DG. 2007. Pages 207249

    in Falkowski PG, Knoll AH, eds. Evolution of Primary Producers in the

    Sea. Academic Press.

    Krger N. 2007. Prescribing diatom morphology: Toward genetic engi-neering of biological nanomaterials. Current Opinion in Chemical

    Biology 11: 662669.

    Krger N, Poulsen N. 2008. Diatomsfrom cell wall biogenesis to nano-

    technology. Annual Review of Genetics 42: 83107.

    Krger N,WetherbeeR. 2000.Pleuralins are involved in thecadifferentiation

    in the diatomCylindrotheca fusiformis.Protist 151: 263273.Krger N,Deutzmann R,Sumper M.1999.Polycationic peptidesfrom dia-

    tom biosilica that direct silica nanosphere formation. Science 286:

    11291132.

    Krger N, Deutzmann R, Bergsdorf C, Sumper M. 2000. Species-specific

    polyamines from diatoms control silica morphology. Proceedings of

    the National Academy of Sciences 97: 1413314138.

    Kroth PG. 2007a. Molecular biology and the biotechnological potential of

    diatoms. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 616: 2333.

    764 BioScience October 2009 / Vol. 59 No. 9 www.biosciencemag.org

    21st Century Directions in Biology

  • 8/12/2019 BioScience 2009 Saade 757 65

    9/9

    . 2007b.Genetic transformation: A tool to study protein targeting in

    diatoms. Methods in Molecular Biology 390: 257268.

    Kroth PG, et al. 2008.A model for carbohydrate metabolism in the diatom

    Phaeodactylum tricornutumdeduced from comparative whole genomeanalysis.PLoS One 3: e1426.

    KustkaA, Carpenter EJ,Saudo-Wilhelmy SA.2002.Iron and marinenitrogen

    fixation: Progress and future directions. Research in Microbiology 153:

    255262.

    Lebeau T, Robert JM.2003.Diatom cultivation and biotechnologicallyrele-

    vant products, pt. 1: Cultivation at variousscales.Applied Microbiology

    and Biotechnology 60: 612623.

    Li S, Nosenko T, Hackett JD, Bhattacharya D. 2006. Phylogenomic analysis

    identifies red algalgenes of endosymbiotic originin the chromalveolates.

    Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 663674.

    Lopez PJ, Descls J,AllenAE, Bowler C.2005.Prospects in diatom research.

    Current Opinion in Biotechnology 16: 180186.

    Losic D, Rosengarten G, Mitchell JG, Voelcker NH.2006. Pore architecture

    of diatom frustules: Potential nanostructured membranes for molecu-

    lar and particle separations. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnol-

    ogy 6: 982989.

    Maheswari U,MockT,ArmbrustEV, Bowler C.2009.Update of theDiatom

    EST Database: A new tool for digital transcriptomics. Nucleic Acids

    Research 37: D1001D1005.

    MatsuzakiM, et al.2004.Genome sequence of theultrasmall unicellular red

    algaCyanidioschyzon merolae10D. Nature 428 : 653657.Marchetti A, Parker MS, Moccia LP, Lin EO,Arrieta AL, Ribalet F, Murphy

    ME, Maldonado MT, Armbrust EV. 2008. Ferritin is used for iron

    storagein bloom-forming marine pennatediatoms. Nature 457: 467470.

    Merchant SS,et al.2007.The Chlamydomonasgenome reveals the evolutionof key animal and plant functions. Science 318: 245250.

    Milligan AJ, Morel FM. 2002. A proton buffering role for silica in diatoms.

    Science 297: 18481850.

    Mock T, et al. 2008. Whole-genome expression profiling of the marine

    diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana identifies genes involved in siliconbioprocesses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105:

    15791584.

    Montsant A, Jabbari K, Maheswari U, Bowler C. 2005. Comparative ge-

    nomics of the pennate diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Plant

    Physiology 137: 500513.Oudot-Le Secq MP, Grimwood J,Shapiro H,ArmbrustEV, Bowler C,Green

    BR.2007. Chloroplast genomes of thediatomsPhaeodactylum tricornutumand Thalassiosira pseudonana: Comparison withother plastid genomesof the red lineage. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 277: 427439.

    Palenik B,et al.2007.The tiny eukaryote Ostreococcusprovides genomic in-sights intothe paraox of plankton speciation.Proceedings of theNational

    Academy of Sciences 104: 77057710.

    Parkinson J, Gordon R. 1999. Beyond micromachining: The potential of

    diatoms. Trends in Biotechnology 17: 190196.

    Pickett-Heaps J, SchmidA-MM, Tippit DH. 1984. Cell division in diatoms:

    A translation of part of Robert Lauterborns treatise of 1896 with some

    modern confirmatory observations. Protoplasma 120: 132154.

    Pohnert G, Adolph S, Wichard T. 2004. Short synthesis of labeled and un-

    labeled 6Z, 9Z, 12Z, 15-hexadecatetraenoic acid as metabolic probes

    for biosynthetic studies on diatoms.Chemistry and Physicsof Lipids 131:

    159166.

    PondavenP, Gallinari M,Chollet S,Bucciarelli E,Sarthou G, Schultes S,Jean

    F. 2007. Grazing-induced changes in cell wall silicification in a marine

    diatom. Protist 158: 2128.

    Poulsen N, Krger N. 2005. A new molecular tool for transgenic diatoms:

    Control of mRNA and protein biosynthesis by an inducible promoter-

    terminator cassette. FEBS Journal 272: 34133423.

    Poulsen N, Berne C, Spain J, Krger N. 2007. Silica immobilization of an

    enzyme through genetic engineeringof the diatom Thalassiosirapseudo-nana.Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English 46: 18431846.

    Roessler PG,BleibaumJL, ThompsonGA, Ohlrogge JB.1994. Characteristics

    of thegene that encodes acetyl-CoA carboxylasein thediatom Cyclotellacryptica.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 721: 250256.

    SancettaC. 1981. Diatoms as hydrographictracers: Example fromBering Sea

    sediments. Science 211: 279281.

    Shemesh A, Charles CD, Fairbanks RG. 1992. Oxygen isotopes in biogenic

    silica: Global changes in ocean temperature and isotopic composition.

    Science 256: 14341436.

    Siaut M,Heijde M,MangognaM,MontsantA, CoeselS,AllenA, Manfredonia

    A, FalciatoreA, Bowler C.2007. Molecular toolbox for studyingdiatom

    biology inPhaeodactylum tricornutum.Gene 406: 2335.Smetacek V. 1999. Diatoms and the ocean carbon cycle.Protist 150: 2532.

    Thompson SEM, Taylor AR, Brownlee C, Callow ME, Callow JA.2008. The

    role of nitric oxide in diatom adhesion in relation to substratum prop-

    erties. Journal of Phycology 44: 967976.

    Trguer P, Nelson DM, Van Bennekom AJ, Demaster DJ, Leynaert A,

    Quguiner B. 1995. The silica balance in the world ocean: A reestimate.

    Science 268: 375379.

    Vardi A,Formiggini F, Casotti R,De Martino A,Ribalet F, Miralto A,Bowler

    C. 2006. A stress surveillance system based on calcium and nitric oxide

    in marine diatoms.PLoS Biology 4: e60.

    VardiA, BidleKD, Kwityn C, HirshDJ, Thompson SM,Callow JA,Falkowski

    P, Bowler C. 2008. A diatom gene regulating nitric-oxide signaling and

    susceptibilityto diatom-derived aldehydes. CurrentBiology 18:895899.

    Vrieling EG,Sun Q, Beelen TP, HazelaarS, GieskesWW,van Santen RA,Som-

    merdijk NA. 2005.Controlled silica synthesis inspired by diatomsilicon

    biomineralization. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 5:6878.

    Yoon HS, Hackett JD, Ciniglia C, Pinto G, Bhattacharya D. 2004. A molec-

    ular timeline for the origin of photosynthetic eukaryotes. Molecular

    Biology and Evolution 21: 809818.

    Zaslavskaia LA, Lippmeier JC, Shih C, Ehrhardt D, Grossman AR, Apt KE.

    2001. Trophic conversion of an obligate photoautotrophic organism

    through metabolic engineering. Science 292: 20732075.

    Zurzolo C, Bowler C. 2001. Exploring bioinorganic pattern formation in

    diatoms.A story of polarized trafficking.Plant Physiology 127:13391345.

    Anastasia Saade ([email protected])andChrisBowler ([email protected]) are with the Department of Biology at the cole Normale Suprieurein Paris. Bowler is the director of research, and his laboratory studies signal-ing in higher plants and marine diatoms.

    www.biosciencemag.org October 2009 / Vol. 59 No. 9 BioScience 765

    21st Century Directions in Biology