1
NATURE|Vol 437|27 October 2005 NEWS & VIEWS 1245 during DNA or RNA transactions. Therefore, when considering possible roles for a ‘helicase’ in the future, we should not immediately search for the helix that the enzyme unzips, but instead remember how Rep snaps back. Eckhard Jankowsky is in the Department of Biochemistry and at the Center for RNA Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA. e-mail: [email protected] 1. Lohman, T. M. & Bjornson, K. P. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 169–214 (1996). 2. Tanner, N. K. & Linder, P. Mol. Cell 8, 251–261 (2001). 3. Linder, P. Science 304, 694–695 (2004). 4. Lusser, A. & Kadonaga, J. T. BioEssays 25, 1192–1200 (2003). 5. von Hippel, P. H. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 494–496 (2004). 6. Myong, S., Rasnik, I., Joo, C., Lohman, T. M. & Ha, T. Nature 437, 1321–1325 (2005). 7. Marians, K. J. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359, 71–77 (2004). 8. Ha, T. et al. Nature 419, 638–641 (2002). 9. Veaute, X. et al. EMBO J. 24, 180–189 (2005). BIOPHYSICS Helicase snaps back Eckhard Jankowsky Helicase enzymes can move along DNA or RNA, unravelling the helices as they go. But simply travelling along a nucleic acid in one direction seems not to be enough for some of these molecular motors. Proteins of the helicase family are essential for almost all biological processes involving nucleic acids such as DNA, from the replication of the genome to the production of proteins 1,2 . Although these enzymes are mainly known for their ability to unwind DNA or RNA helices, it has become increasingly clear that they can have many other activities. For example, heli- cases can displace proteins from nucleic acids and remodel nucleosomes — the protein com- plexes around which DNA coils 3,4 . To account for some of the diverse activities of helicases, it has been proposed, and in a few cases shown, that these enzymes behave more like motor proteins, which move along a strand of DNA or RNA, fuelled by ATP (the cell’s energy cur- rency) 5 . On page 1321 of this issue, Myong et al. 6 add an unexpected twist to the repertoire of proteins that travel along nucleic acids — the astonishingly complex movement of the bac- terial helicase Rep along single-stranded DNA. Rep from Escherichia coli is involved in the replication of the bacterial genome, where it helps to restart stalled replication intermedi- ates 7 . Quite how it does this is not known. However, the DNA helicase activity of Rep is well understood, and it is clear that Rep must double up to form a dimer before it can unzip DNA 1,8 . A single Rep molecule — a Rep monomer — cannot unwind helices, but it can move along single-stranded DNA 8 . Whether Rep exists in the cell as a dimer, a monomer, or both, is not known. To investigate how Rep travels, Myong et al. 6 used a single-molecule fluorescence technique to follow the movement of individual Rep monomers along single-stranded DNA (Fig. 1). In the presence of ATP, Rep mono- mers slid along DNA in the expected 3to 5direction. But the authors wondered what would happen if a Rep monomer encountered an obstacle on the DNA. They therefore added a second piece of DNA to form a helix in front of the monomer. A helix creates an insur- mountable barrier for the Rep monomer 8 , and Rep would be expected either to fall off the DNA or to grind to a halt, remaining in front of the helix. Neither happens. Instead, Rep reaches behind itself, grabs the stretch of DNA it has just traversed, forms a loop with it, and then releases the DNA near the blockade — ending up close to the spot on the DNA where it began its journey (Fig. 1). The authors call this series of coordinated events ‘snap-back’, and Rep goes through many cycles of sliding forward and snapping back. Such ‘shuttling’ cycles also occurred when Rep encountered other obstacles on single-stranded DNA, such as bound molecules of the protein strepta- vidin. To find out how Rep snaps back, Myong et al. monitored changes in the shape of the pro- tein during the shuttling cycle. Throughout the sliding leg of the cycle, Rep seems to change conformation rapidly; but as it runs into the blockade, it favours one particular conformation. The authors hypothesize that this conformation exposes or creates an addi- tional binding site for single-stranded DNA that allows Rep also to bind the DNA over which it has just travelled. As a result, a DNA loop forms, causing Rep to release the DNA at the blockade and to snap back (Fig. 1). Myong and colleagues also show that Rep does not require a free DNA-end to snap back. The relocation of Rep to near the end of the single-stranded DNA fragments is presumably dictated by the stiffness of the DNA strand. Although further experiments are required to discover where Rep binds to the DNA strand, and how the various DNA-binding events are coordinated, the data clearly indicate that a complex movement of a single enzyme mol- ecule on DNA can occur in a few, relatively simple steps. Why would it be useful for a motor to shuttle on its track? Myong et al. suggest that Rep might repeatedly strip off other proteins from DNA as it restarts stalled DNA replication. The ubiquitous DNA-binding protein RecA, for example, has been proposed to bind to DNA replication intermediates and so interfere with the restart of replication 9 . If true, RecA binding might need to be actively prevented, but it is not known how this is accomplished. The authors show that shuttling Rep can efficiently clear RecA from single-stranded DNA. It remains to be seen whether this process occurs in the cell. However, Rep’s ability to continually displace RecA while shuttling on single- stranded DNA provides an attractive hypoth- esis for a physiological function for Rep. Because the removal of proteins from nucleic acids is assumed to be a core function of enzymes of the helicase families, it will be illuminating to test whether other family members also shuttle back and forth like Rep. It will also be useful to discover whether the snap-back mechanism allows Rep or other enzymes to switch from one nucleic-acid strand to another, which could simplify the coordination of complex structural changes Figure 1 | Watching a helicase shuttle. a, Myong et al. 6 followed the movement of single Rep monomers on a DNA strand by monitoring the distance between the Rep helicase and a fixed position on the DNA. They attached one fluorescent label to the DNA (red) and a second label to the helicase (green). If the fluorophores are close enough together, changes are observed in the fluorescence intensity of the two dyes, resulting from fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). The FRET efficiency is highly sensitive to the distance between the two labels; low FRET shows a greater distance, whereas high FRET indicates a lesser one. Rep moves gradually along the DNA until its passage is blocked. At this point a DNA loop forms transiently, then Rep snaps back and begins its journey again. Myong et al. directly show the formation of the DNA loop using an alternative scheme of dye-labelling the DNA. b, FRET time trajectories for single Rep–DNA complexes show a characteristic sawtooth pattern, with FRET gradually increasing during the translocation phase and then suddenly decreasing during the snap-back. Release of DNA DNA loop Low FRET High FRET Snap-back Snap-back Snap-back Snap-back Translocation Translocation High FRET Low Time b a Nature Publishing Group ©2005

Biophysics: Helicase snaps back

  • Upload
    eckhard

  • View
    213

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Biophysics: Helicase snaps back

© 2005 Nature Publishing Group

NATURE|Vol 437|27 October 2005 NEWS & VIEWS

1245

during DNA or RNA transactions. Therefore,when considering possible roles for a ‘helicase’in the future, we should not immediatelysearch for the helix that the enzyme unzips,but instead remember how Rep snaps back. ■

Eckhard Jankowsky is in the Department ofBiochemistry and at the Center for RNAMolecular Biology, School of Medicine, CaseWestern Reserve University, 10900 EuclidAvenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.e-mail: [email protected]

1. Lohman, T. M. & Bjornson, K. P. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65,169–214 (1996).

2. Tanner, N. K. & Linder, P. Mol. Cell 8, 251–261 (2001).3. Linder, P. Science 304, 694–695 (2004).4. Lusser, A. & Kadonaga, J. T. BioEssays 25, 1192–1200 (2003).5. von Hippel, P. H. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 494–496 (2004).6. Myong, S., Rasnik, I., Joo, C., Lohman, T. M. & Ha, T. Nature

437, 1321–1325 (2005).7. Marians, K. J. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359, 71–77 (2004).8. Ha, T. et al. Nature 419, 638–641 (2002).9. Veaute, X. et al. EMBO J. 24, 180–189 (2005).

BIOPHYSICS

Helicase snaps backEckhard Jankowsky

Helicase enzymes can move along DNA or RNA, unravelling the helices asthey go. But simply travelling along a nucleic acid in one direction seems notto be enough for some of these molecular motors.

Proteins of the helicase family are essential foralmost all biological processes involving nucleicacids such as DNA, from the replication of the genome to the production of proteins1,2.Although these enzymes are mainly known fortheir ability to unwind DNA or RNA helices, ithas become increasingly clear that they canhave many other activities. For example, heli-cases can displace proteins from nucleic acidsand remodel nucleosomes — the protein com-plexes around which DNA coils3,4. To accountfor some of the diverse activities of helicases, ithas been proposed, and in a few cases shown,that these enzymes behave more like motorproteins, which move along a strand of DNA orRNA, fuelled by ATP (the cell’s energy cur-rency)5. On page 1321 of this issue, Myong et al.6 add an unexpected twist to the repertoireof proteins that travel along nucleic acids — theastonishingly complex movement of the bac-terial helicase Rep along single-stranded DNA.

Rep from Escherichia coli is involved in thereplication of the bacterial genome, where ithelps to restart stalled replication intermedi-ates7. Quite how it does this is not known.However, the DNA helicase activity of Rep iswell understood, and it is clear that Rep mustdouble up to form a dimer before it can unzipDNA1,8. A single Rep molecule — a Repmonomer — cannot unwind helices, but it canmove along single-stranded DNA8. WhetherRep exists in the cell as a dimer, a monomer, orboth, is not known.

To investigate how Rep travels, Myong et al.6used a single-molecule fluorescence techniqueto follow the movement of individual Rep monomers along single-stranded DNA (Fig. 1). In the presence of ATP, Rep mono-mers slid along DNA in the expected 3� to 5�direction. But the authors wondered whatwould happen if a Rep monomer encounteredan obstacle on the DNA. They therefore addeda second piece of DNA to form a helix in frontof the monomer. A helix creates an insur-mountable barrier for the Rep monomer8, andRep would be expected either to fall off theDNA or to grind to a halt, remaining in frontof the helix. Neither happens. Instead, Repreaches behind itself, grabs the stretch of DNAit has just traversed, forms a loop with it, andthen releases the DNA near the blockade —ending up close to the spot on the DNA whereit began its journey (Fig. 1). The authors callthis series of coordinated events ‘snap-back’,and Rep goes through many cycles of sliding forward and snapping back. Such ‘shuttling’

cycles also occurred when Rep encounteredother obstacles on single-stranded DNA, suchas bound molecules of the protein strepta-vidin.

To find out how Rep snaps back, Myong etal. monitored changes in the shape of the pro-tein during the shuttling cycle. Throughoutthe sliding leg of the cycle, Rep seems tochange conformation rapidly; but as it runsinto the blockade, it favours one particularconformation. The authors hypothesize thatthis conformation exposes or creates an addi-tional binding site for single-stranded DNAthat allows Rep also to bind the DNA overwhich it has just travelled. As a result, a DNAloop forms, causing Rep to release the DNA atthe blockade and to snap back (Fig. 1).

Myong and colleagues also show that Repdoes not require a free DNA-end to snap back.The relocation of Rep to near the end of thesingle-stranded DNA fragments is presumablydictated by the stiffness of the DNA strand.Although further experiments are required todiscover where Rep binds to the DNA strand,and how the various DNA-binding events arecoordinated, the data clearly indicate that acomplex movement of a single enzyme mol-ecule on DNA can occur in a few, relativelysimple steps.

Why would it be useful for a motor to shuttleon its track? Myong et al. suggest that Repmight repeatedly strip off other proteins fromDNA as it restarts stalled DNA replication. Theubiquitous DNA-binding protein RecA, forexample, has been proposed to bind to DNAreplication intermediates and so interfere withthe restart of replication9. If true, RecA bindingmight need to be actively prevented, but it isnot known how this is accomplished. Theauthors show that shuttling Rep can efficientlyclear RecA from single-stranded DNA. Itremains to be seen whether this process occursin the cell. However, Rep’s ability to continuallydisplace RecA while shuttling on single-stranded DNA provides an attractive hypoth-esis for a physiological function for Rep.

Because the removal of proteins fromnucleic acids is assumed to be a core functionof enzymes of the helicase families, it will beilluminating to test whether other familymembers also shuttle back and forth like Rep.It will also be useful to discover whether thesnap-back mechanism allows Rep or otherenzymes to switch from one nucleic-acidstrand to another, which could simplify thecoordination of complex structural changes

Figure 1 | Watching a helicase shuttle. a, Myonget al.6 followed the movement of single Repmonomers on a DNA strand by monitoring thedistance between the Rep helicase and a fixedposition on the DNA. They attached onefluorescent label to the DNA (red) and a secondlabel to the helicase (green). If the fluorophoresare close enough together, changes are observedin the fluorescence intensity of the two dyes,resulting from fluorescence resonance energytransfer (FRET). The FRET efficiency is highlysensitive to the distance between the two labels;low FRET shows a greater distance, whereas highFRET indicates a lesser one. Rep moves graduallyalong the DNA until its passage is blocked. At thispoint a DNA loop forms transiently, then Repsnaps back and begins its journey again. Myong et al. directly show the formation of the DNAloop using an alternative scheme of dye-labellingthe DNA. b, FRET time trajectories for singleRep–DNA complexes show a characteristicsawtooth pattern, with FRET graduallyincreasing during the translocation phase andthen suddenly decreasing during the snap-back.

Release of DNA

DNA loop

Low FRET

High FRET

Snap-back

Snap-back

Snap-backSnap-back

Translocation

TranslocationHigh

FRET

LowTime

b

a

27.10 News & Views 1241 MH 24/10/05 10:12 AM Page 1245

Nature Publishing Group© 2005