Bibliography 

i

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aggarwal, J. C. (1993). Theory and Principles of Education. New Delhi:

Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.

Aijaz Ahmed, G. (2008). A comparative study to evaluate the

effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction versus classroom

lecture for Computer science at ICS level. Turkish online Journal

of Educational Technology, 7(4), 145-153.

Aikenhead, G. S. (1979). Using qualitative data in formative evaluation.

Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 25(2), 117-129.

Airasian, P. W. ( 1994). The impact of the taxonomy on testing and

evaluation, Bloom's Taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective: Ninety

third yearbook of the National Society for the study of education.

Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ajzen,I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude behaviour relations; A

thoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological

Bulletin, 84(3), 888-918.

Ajzen,I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting

social behaviour . Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall.

Akcay, H., & Yager, R. E.(2010). The impacts of a science/technology/

society teaching approach on student understanding in five

domains. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(4), 42-47.

Alexandria, M. (1973). The levels of questioning and their effects up on

student performance above the knowledge level of Bloom's

Taxonomy of educational objectives. A research paper.

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York:

Springer Publications.

Bibliography 

ii

Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cgnition. Cambridge, MA:

Harvard University Press.

Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications ( 3rd

ed.). New York: John Wiley.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning,

teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of

educational objectives. New York: Longman Publications.

Anderson, L. W., & Sosniak, L. A. (1994). Bloom's Taxonomy: A Forty

year retrospective. Ninety third yearbook of the national society

forthe study of education. Chicago: University of Chicago press.

Ann, B.P.(2002).The Revised Taxonomy and prospective teachers.

Theory into Practice, 41(4), 244-48.

Annie L. B. (1985). Current Research Limitations upon an Empirically

Based Taxonomy of Educational Objectives forThree-Through

Five-Year-Old Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service

No. ED059782).

Allen, J., & Wolmut, P. (1972). Development and evaluation of course

goals in science and language arts for grades K-12. East Lansing,

MI:National Centre for Research on Teacher Learning. (ERIC

Document Reproduction Service no: ED061043)

Anastasi, A. (1961). Psychological testing. New York: The Macmillan

Company.

Anderson, L. W. (2002). Curricular alignment: a re-examination. Theory

and Practice, 41(4), 255-60.

Anderson, R. D., & Mitchener, C.P. (1994). Research on science teacher

education. The handbook of Research on science teaching and

learning. New York: Macmillan Publications.

Bibliography 

iii

Angelina, G. (2003). The development of the music performance

assessment tool. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.

Ari, A. (2010). Finding acceptance of Bloom's Revised Cognitive

Taxonomy on the international stage and in Turkey. Educational

Sciences:Theory and Practice, 11(2), 767-772.

Athanassiou,N.,& Havey, C.(2003). Critical thinking in the management

classroom: Bloom's Taxonomy as a learning tool. Journal of

Management Education, 27(5), 533-55.

Audrey, C. R., & Linda, H. (2003). Activities for differentiated

instruction addressing all levels of Bloom's Taxonomy and eight

multiple intelligence.

Ayesha, S., & David J.E. (2011).Student-Content Interactions in Online

Courses: The Role of Question Prompts in Facilitating Higher-

Level Engagement with Course Content. Journal of Computing in

Higher Education. 23(2), 157-186.

Ball, D., & McDiarmid, G. (1990). The subject matter preparation of

teachers. Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. New York:

MacMillan Publications.

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self -regulation.

Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(6),

248-287.

Barr, A. S. (1960). Research method. Encyclopedia of educational

research. New York: Macmillan, pp. 1160-1166.

Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher development: A model from

science education. East Lansing, MI: National centre for Research

on Teacher Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No:

ED395763).

Bibliography 

iv

Best, J.W., & Khan, J.V. (2000). Research in education (7 Edn). New

Delhi: Practice Hall of India.

Best, J.W., & Khan, J.V. (2004). Research in education (9 Edn). New

Delhi: Practice Hall of India.

Bhattacharyya, T. (2012). Impact of SOLO Taxonomy in Computer aided

instruction to qualitative outcome of learning for secondary school

children. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling. 27(4),45-56.

Biggs, J. & Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: the

SOLO taxonomy. New York. Academy Press.

Bloom. B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New

York: McGraw-Hill.

Bloom. B. S.. Engelhart. M. D.. & Krathwohl. D. (1956). Taxonomy

of educational objectivities: The classification of educational

goals. Hand book I: Cognitive domain. New York: DavidMcKay.

Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I:

The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.

Bodrova. E., & Leong. D. J. (1996). Tools of mind: The Vygotskian

approach to early childhood education. Englewood Cliffs. NJ:

Prentice Hall

Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1989). Educational research. White Plains,

New York: Longman.

Brady, J. A. (1990). Lewis Structure Skills: Taxonomy and Difficulty

Levels. Journal of Chemical Education, 67, 491-493.

Brown. A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where and how to remember: A

problem of metacognition. Advances in Instructional Psychology.

Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Eribaum.

Bibliography 

v

Brown, C. L. (1989). The Secondary Schools Taxonomy (SST). East

Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.

(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED315544).

Bruner, J.S.(1961). The Process of Education. New York:Vintage Books.

Buch, M.B.(Ed)(1990). Fifth Survey of Research in Education. Baroda:

Center of Advanced study in Education.

Buch, M.B.(Ed)(1974). Fifth Survey of Research in Education. Baroda:

Center of Advanced study in Education.

Burnett, P.C.(2007). Assessing the structure of learning outcomes from

counselling using the SOLO Taxonomy: an exploratory study.

British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 27(4),567-580.

Carlton, H. S. (1973). An analysis of the assumptions underlying the

Taxonomy of Educational objectives: Cognitive domain. Journal

of research in Science Teaching, 10(3), 235-241.

Carolyn, R. F., & Frank, H. L. (2009). The evolution of educational

objectives:Bloom's Taxonomy and beyound. Journal on excellence

in college teaching, 20(1), 71-86.

Carol, S. W. (1999). The Montessori Teacher and Bloom's Taxonomy.

Montessori Life, 11(4), 43-45.

Carol Kehr, T. (1989). From Taxonomy to Constructing Meaning in

Context: Revisiting the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: II,

Affective Domain. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED

5503370.

Celene,J. (1998). A study of process outcomes in Physics in relation to

some select Cognitive, Affective, Social and Environmental

Variables. Ph. D.Thesis, Mahatma Gandhi University.

Bibliography 

vi

Charles, C.C., & Joe, H.H.(2002). Applying the SOLO Taxonomy on

student's learning outcomes: an empirical study. Assessment

&Evaluation in Higher Education,27(6), 38-49.

Chauhan, S. S.(1994). Innovations in teaching learning process. New

Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.

Cheung, K. C. ( 1990). To grow and to glow: Towards a model of teacher

education and professional development. East Lansing, MI:

National centre for Research on teacher learning. (ERIC

Document Reproduction Service No. ED338575).

Cherif,A.H.,& Verma, S.(2010).Effective understanding of human body

organs: A role playing activity for deep learning. The American

Biology Teacher, 72(7), 447-450

Chin, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of taxonomy of

responses to anomalous data in Science. Journal of Research in

Science Teaching, 35 (3), 623-654.

Chris, F. (2002). Using the Revised Taxonomy to plan and deliver team-

taught, integrated, thematic units. Theory into practice, 41(4), 238-

43.

Christopher, B.A.(2000). Teaching and Testing for Critical Thinking with

Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. (ERIC Document

Reproduction Service no: ED446023).

Claus, B., & Bettina, D.(2007). Constructive alignment and the SOLO

Taxonomy: a comparative study of university competencies in

Computer science vs Mathematics. Australian Computer Society,

69(9), 3-17.

Clermont, C. P., Borko, H., & Krajcik, J. S.(1990). Comparative study of

the Pedagogical Content Knowledge of experienced and novice

Bibliography 

vii

chemical demonstrators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of

the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta.

Cochran, K. F.(1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An interactive

model for Teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education,

44(4), 263-272.

Danett, I.J.,& Kaleigh,M. (2010). Generative learning quizzing and

cognitive learning: An experimental study in the communication

classroom. Communication Education, 59(2), 107-123.

Darcy Haag, G. (2000). Encouraging the cognitive development of

supervisees: Using Bloom's Taxonomy in supervision. Counselor

Education and Supervision, 40(1), 31-46.

Darcy Haag, G. (2000). Promoting cognitive complexity in a graduate

written work: Using Bloom's Taxonomy as a pedagogical tool to

improve literature reviews. Counselor Education and Supervision,

40(4), 292-307.

Darren, K. S. (2008). Electronic Delivery of Lectures in the University

Environment: An Empirical Comparison of Three Delivery Styles.

Computers & Education, 50(3), 640-651.

Dave, R. H. (1970). Psychomotor levels: In developing and writing

behavioural objectives. Tucson AZ: Educational Innovators Press.

Dave, R. H. (1975). Developing and writing behavioural objectives.

Educational Innovators Press.

David, S. (2010). Investigating the relationship between Faculty cognitive

expectations about learning Chemistry and the construction of

exam questions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice,

11(3), 212-217.

Bibliography 

viii

David,C.,& Jack, C. (2007). A new Bloom: Transforming Learning.

Learning and Leading with Technology, 34(5), 22-25.

Donald, S. (2003). Applying the Congruence Principle of Bloom's

Taxonomy to Designing Online Instruction. Quarterly Review of

Distance Education. 4(3), 17-30.

Doster, E. C., Jackson, D. F., & Smith, D. W. (1997). Modeling

pedagogical content knowledge in Physical Science for

prospective middle school teachers: Problems and possibilities.

Teacher Education Quarterly, 24(4), 51-65.

Dykstra, D. I. (1992). Studying conceptual change in learning Physics.

Science Education, 76(5), 615-652.

Eaves, R. C., & McLaughlin, P. J. ( 1981). Middle school curriculum for

visually impaired students. East Lansing, MI: National center for

research on teacher learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction

Service No. ED231118).

Ebel, R. L. ( 1996). Measuring educational achievement. New Delhi:

Practice Hall of India Private Limited.

Ebel, R. L. ( 1972). Essential educational achievement. New Delhi:

Practice Hall of Inc.

Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational

measurement. New Delhi: Practice Hall of India Private Limited.

Edwards, A. L. (1975). Techniques of attitude scale construction.

Bombay: Vakils Feffer and Simons Ltd.

Evelyn, B. (2002). Focusing upon Higher order Thinking skills: Web

Quests and the Learner centered Mathematical Learning

Environment. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service no:

ED474086)

Bibliography 

ix

Farzana, S. (2010). An Initial Study of a Method for Instructing

Educators about the Revised Taxonomy. ProQuest LLC, Ph.D.

Dissertation, University of South Carolina.

Felker, D .W. (1973) . Building positive self-concepts. Minneapolis, MI :

Burgess.

Fisher, K.M., & Lipson, J. I. (1982). Student misconceptions in

introductory Biology. East Lansing MI: National center for

research on Teacher learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction

Service No.ED216880).

Fleishman, E. A., & Quaintance, M. K. (1984). Taxonomies of human

performance: The description of human tasks. Orlando, FL:

Academic Press.

Fujita, S. (1990). Graphic characterization and taxonomy of organic

reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 67(4), 290-293.

Gay, L.R.(1996). Educational Research. New Jersy : Prentice Hall, Inc.

Gay, L.R.(1996). Educational Research competencies for Analysis and

Application. New Jersy:Prentice Hall, Inc.

Gardner, H. (1975). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligence.

New York: Basic Books.

Garret, H.E. (1981). Statistics in psychology and education.

Bombay:Vakils,Feffer and Simpsons.

Gilbert, S. W. (1992). Systematic Questioning: Taxonomies That

Develop Critical Thinking Skills. Science Teacher, 59(9), 41-46.

Good, C.V. (1973). Dictionary of education. New York: McGraw Hill

Book Company,Inc.

Bibliography 

x

Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and

teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

Gudmundsdottir, S. (1987). Pedagogical content knowledge: Teacher's

ways of knowing. East Lansing, MI: National center for research on

Teacher Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No:

ED2907010).

Gunilla, N. (2009). Interpretation of Standards with Blooms Revised

Taxonomy: A Comparison of Teachers and Assessment Experts.

International Journal of Research & Methods in Education, 32(1),

39-51.

Gupta, S.P.(1996). Elementary Statistical Methods. New Delhi:

SultanChand and Sons.

Gupta, S.M.(1980). Standardization of a test of creativity in Physical

Sciences. Ph. D Thesis, Kurushetra University.

Haneeshia, K.H. (2001). A comparative study of scientific creativity of

pupils in DPEP and non DPEP schools in the state of Kerala.

M.Ed. Thesis, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram.

Hannah, L.S., & Michaelis, J.U. (1977). A comprehensive framework for

instructional objectives: A guide to systematic planning and

evaluation. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.

Hang, K.K. (2009). A comparative study of Problem based and lecture

based learning in junior Secondary school science. Research in

Science Education, 39(5), 625-642.

Harrow, A. (1972). A taxonomy of psychomotor domain: A guide for

developing behavioural objectives. New York: David McKay.

Harold, E. M. (1982). Encyclopedia of educational research. New York:

The Free Press.

Bibliography 

xi

Hawks, K. W.(2010). The effects of implementing Bloom's Taxonomy and

utilizing the Virginia standards of learning curriculum framework

to develop Mathematics lessons for Elementary students.

Unpublished Ph.D thesis.

Hashweh, M. Z. (1987). Effects of subject matter knowledge in the

Teaching of Biology and Physics. Teaching& Teacher Education,

7(3), 109-20.

Hauenstein, A. (1998). A conceptual framework for educational

objectives: Aholistic approach to traditional taxonomies. Lanham,

MD: University Press of America.

Helena, M. (2002). The role of assessment in the revised Taxonomy.

Theory in to practice, 41(4), p249-54.

Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. (1988). An appropriate conception of

Teaching Science: A view from studies of Science Learning.

Science Education, 72(5), 597-614.

Hill, P. W. (1984). Testing hierarchy in Educational Taxonomies: A

Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Evaluation in Education:

an International Review Series, 8(2), 179-278.

Hillway, T. (1964). Introduction to Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

Publications.

Honey, J. N., & Paxman, H. M. (1986). The importance of Taxonomy in

Biological Education at advanced level. Journal of Biological

Education, 20(2), 103-111.

Hurd, P. H. (1997). Inventing Science Education for the New Millennium.

New York: Teachers College Press.

Bibliography 

xii

Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary

school students. International Journal of Science Education,

24(4), 389-402.

Jaimon, P.J. (2004). Effects of deficits in scientific skills on Achievement

in Science of the learning disabled at the primary school level. Ph.

D.Thesis, Mahatma Gandhi University.

James, P. T. (1999). The distribution of undergraduate examination

questions among the specified cognitive levels: A case of an

African university.

Job kuruvilla, V.& Mukhopadhyay, B.(2008). Epistemological study to

evolve creative learning process for engineering students.

Journalof Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, Special

issue,101-109.

Kanu E. O. N. (1999). Clinical Diagnosis as a Dynamic Cognitive

Process : Application of Bloom’s Taxonomy for Educational

Objectives in the Cognitive Domain. Medical Education

Online, 2 (1), 36-45.

Katherine, W. (2001). Using Bloom to bridge the WAC/WID Divide.

Kenneth, R. P. (1999). Pedagogical Content Knowledge and

Industrial Design Education. Journal of Technology studies, 9(3),

47-54.

Kiani,M.A.H.(2004). A Study to evaluate the examination system at

grade-V in Punjab, based on SOLO Taxonomy. Unpublished

Ph.DThesis.

Krathwohl, D. R., & Payne, D. A. (1971). Defining and assessing

educational objectives. In R. L Thorndike (Ed.), Educational

Bibliography 

xiii

measurement (pp. 17-45).Washington, DC: American Council on

Education.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An

overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), p 212-18.

Kristeal, W. H.(2010). The effects of implementing Bloom's Taxonomy

and utilizing the Virgina standards of learning curriculum

framework to develop Mathematics lessons for Elementary

students. Ph.D Thesis.

Kropp, R. P. (1982) The construction and validation of tests of the

cognitive processes as described in the taxonomy of educational

objectives. Institute of Human Learning and Dept. of Educational

Research and Testing, Florida State University.,

Koul, L. (1984). Methodology of educational research. New Delhi:Vikas

Publications Pvt . Ltd.

Koul, L. (1997). Methodology of educational research. New Delhi:Vikas

Publications Pvt . Ltd.

Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL:

University of Chicago Press.

Kumar, S. J.(1992). A study of the relationship between scientific

reasoning, scientific attitude, science interest and creativity of

higher secondary students of Kerala. M.Ed Thesis, University of

Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram.

Leila, A. H., & Sandra, P. (2009). An Evaluation of E-Learning on

the Basis of Blooms Taxonomy: An Exploratory Study. Journal of

Education for Business, 84(6), 374-380.

Lee, Y.S.(2007). An approach to identify effective learning outcomes for

a training programme. Ph.D. Thesis.

Bibliography 

xiv

Lekshmi, M.N.(2006). Relationship between Metacognitive Awareness

and Problem Solving Ability in Mathematics among Secondary

school students.M.Ed. Thesis, Mahatma Gandhi University.

Leslie, O.D. (2003). Approach to Learning , the Cognitive Demands of

Assessment, and Achievement in Physics . Canadian Journal of

Higher Education. 33(1), 87-111.

Lewis, T., & Zuga, K. F. (2005). A conceptual framework of ideas and

issues in technology education.Retrieved October 10, 2009, from

http://teched.vt.edu/ctte/HTML/Research1.html.

McCormack, A. J., & Yager, R. E. (1989). A New Taxonomy of Science

Education. Science Teacher, 56(2), 47-48.

McCormack, A. J., & Yager, R. E. (1989). Assessing Teaching/

Learning Successes in Multiple Domains of Science and

ScienceEducation. Science Education, 73(1) , 45-58

Magnusson, S., & Krajcik, J. S. (1993). Teacher Knowledge and

Representation of Content in Instruction about Heat Energy

andTemperature . East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research

onTeacher Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service

No.ED387313).

Mangal, S.K.(1995). Educational Psychology. Jalandhar: Prakash

Brothers Educational Publishers.

Marks, R. (1991). When Should Teachers Learn Pedagogical Content

Knowledge? East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on

Teacher Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.

ED 335338).

Bibliography 

xv

Matias, A. S. & Sebastian, E. (2011). A Framework for the Design and

Interaction of Collaborative Classroom Games. Computers &

Education , 57(1), 1127-1136.

Matthew, S. (2010). A Taxonomic Description of the Science

IntegratingLearning Objectives in Carreer and Technical Education

Programs of Study. Career and Technical Education Research,

35(3),157- 173.

Mary Pat, W. (2008). Biology in Bloom : Implementing Bloom's

Taxonomy to Enhance Student Learning in Biology. CBE- Life

Sciences Education , 7(4),368-381.

Marzano, R. J. (2001). Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational

Objectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theorv-based meta-analysis of research on

instruction. Aurora CO:Mid-continent Regional Educational

Laboratory.

Marzano, R. J. (2004). Building background knowledge for academic

achievement. Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision

andCurriculum Development.

Mayer, R. E. (1992). 'flunking, problem solving, and cognition (2nd ed.).

New York: Freeman.

McCombs, B. L. (1984). Processes and skills underlying intrinsic

motivation to learn: Toward a definition of motivational skills

training intervention. Edu-cational Psychologist, 19 (3), 197-218.

McCombs, B. L. (1986). The role of the self-system in self-regulated

learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology.

Bibliography 

xvi

McCombs, B. L.. & Marzano, R. J. (1990). Putting the self in self-

regulated learning: The self as agent in integrating will and skill.

Educational Psychologist, 25(1). 51-69.

Melear, T. C. (1995). Creativity& Inventiveness in science: A

reflective course for teachers and other majors. Journal of

Science Teacher Education, 4(4),137-143.

Merrill, M (1994). Instructional Design Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:

Educational Technology Publications.

Michaels, W.J. (1950). Measuring educational achievement. New York:

McGraw Hill Book Company.

Michael, P. (2000). Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn: Models and

Strategies to Develop a Classroom Culture of

thinking. Cheltenham, Vic.: Hawker Brownlow.

Millar, R., & Osborne, J.(1989). Beyound 2000: Science education for the

future. London, School of Education, King’s College London.

Minimol, A. S. (2000). Process outcomes in Basic Science of primary

school children: An investigation of certain personality correlates.

Ph. D.Thesis, Mahatma Gandhi University.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. ( 2006). Technological pedagogical content

knowledge: A Framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers

College Record 108(6), 1017-1054.

Moore, D. S. (1982). Reconsidering Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational

Objectives, Cognitive Domain. Educational Theory, 32(1), 29-34.

Mouly, G. J. (1978). Educational Research: The Arts and Science of

Investigation. Boston: Allyn and Bacon,Inc.

Bibliography 

xvii

Murali, D.V.E.(1997). Construction and Standardisation of musical

Interest Inventory and its application at secondary level.

M.Ed.Thesis, Mahatma Gandhi University.

Narjess, K. (2009). Cognitive levels of questions used by Iranian EFL

Teachers in advanced reading comprehension tests. Online

submission.

Neale, D., & Smith, D. (1989). Configurations Checklist for Evaluating

aTeaching Performance. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 1-

20.

Nersessian, N. (1989). Conceptual change in science and in science

education. Synthese, 80(6), 163-183.

Nida, M., & Parveen, M. ( 2012). Practice of teacher educators in using

taxonomy of educational objectives for making instructional

decisions. Educational Quest- An International Journal of

Education and Applied Social Sciences, 3(2),149-154.

Nussbaum, M. (2009). Multidimensional training system evaluation using

the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. Ph.D Thesis.

Pavelich, M. J. (1982). Using General Chemistry to Promote the Higher

Level Thinking Abilities. Journal of Chemical Education, 59, 721-

724.

Payne, D. (1992). Measuring and Evaluating Educational Outcomes.

New York: Merrill.

Popham, W. J., Cruse, K. L., & Williams, P. L. (1985). Measurement-

driven Instruction: It’s on the road. Phi Delta Kappan, 66 (May),

628-634.

Piaget, J. (1971). Genetic epistemology. New York: Norton.

Bibliography 

xviii

Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. C. (1992). An integrated model of

motivation and self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the

annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,

San Francisco, CA.

Poole, R. L. (1972). Characteristics of the taxonomy of educational

objectives, cognitive domain: A replication. Psychology in the

Schools, 9(1), 83-88.

Qaisar, S. (2001). Scholarly Teaching- Applications of Bloom's

Taxonomy in Kentuckys classroom. (ERIC Document

Reproduction Service no: ED471982)

Raffaella, N. (2009). Metacognitive awareness in developmental writing

students (Ph.D Thesis, University of Hawai at Manoa).

Dissertation

Abstracts International, 70(7).

Raven, P. H., Berlin, B., & Breedlove, D. E. (1971). The Origins of

Taxonomy a Review of Its Historical Development Shows Why

Taxonomy Is Unable to Do What We Expect of It. Science, 174,

1210-1213.

Raven, J. C. (1941). Standardisation of Progressive Matrices, 1938.

British Journal of Medical Psychology, XIX(1), 137-150.

Renumol, V.G., & Jayaprakash, S. (2009). Classification of cognitive

difficulties of students to learn computer programming. Technical

report.

Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington. DC:

National Academy Press.

Richardson, A. (1983). Imagery: Definitions and types.Imagery: Current

theory, research, and application. New York: John Wiley.

Bibliography 

xix

Robert J. S., & Gary, T. M. ( 1981). The Domain of Cognition: An

Alternative to Bloom's Cognitive Domain within the Framework of

an Information-Processing Model. ERIC Document Reproduction

Service No. ED 208511.

Rodney, A.B.(2003).Teaching introductory Organic Chemistry:

Blooming beyound a simple Taxonomy. Journal of Chemical

Education, 80(7),779-84.

Rohwer, W. D., & Sloane, K. (1994). Psychological perspectives. In L.

W. Anderson & L. A. Sosniak (Eds.), Bloom's taxonomy: A forty-

year retrospective: Ninety- third yearbook of the National Society

for the Studv of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Romberg, T. A., & Carpenter, T. P. (1986). Research on teaching and

learning mathe-matics: Two disciplines of scientific inquiry.

Handbookof research on teaching. New York: Macmillan.

Romiszowski, A. J. (1981). Designing instructional systems. New York:

Nichols.

Ross, J. A. (1988). Controlling variables: A meta-analysis of training

studies. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 405-437.

Ross, J., & Lawrence, K. A. (1968). Some observation on memory

artifice. Psychonomic Science, 13, 107-108.

Rowe, H. (1985). Problem solving and intelligence. Hillsdale. NJ:

Lawrence Eribaum.

Russell, P. K. (1982) .The construction and validation of tests of the

cognitive processes as described in the taxonomy of educational

objectives. Institute of Human Learning and Dept. of Educational

Research and Testing, Florida State University.

Bibliography 

xx

Rupani, C.M.& Bhutto, M.I.(2011). Evaluation of existing Teaching

learning process on Bloom's Taxonomy. International Journal of

Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1(3), 49-58.

Sakofs, M. (1995). Developing a Teacher Development Model: A Work

in Progress. Journal of Experiential Education, 18(3), 128-132.

Saunders, W. (1994). Elements of Improvement in Secondary Science

Teacher Preparation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 5(4),

146-151.

Sax, G. (1989). Principles of educational and psychological measurement

and evaluation. Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Scott, H. V. (1972). The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives as a

Curriculum Analysis Tool: A solution to some problems

encountered while coding activities. Science Education, 56(3),

411-415.

Schraw, G. & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive

awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(5), 460-

475.

Sharma, R. C. (1960). Modern Science Teaching. New Delhi: Danpat Rai

and Sons.

Shan, C.B.(1986). Cognition and Comprehension: a study of the need for

incorporation of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives in

English as a second language Remedial reading programme. M.Ed

Thesis, Chinese University of Hongkong.

Shashi kumar, N.R., & Pushpavathi, T.P. (2008). Dynamic cognitive

process: Application of Bloom's Taxonomy for complex software

design in the cognitive domain. Total Engineering Analysis and

Manufacturing Technologies.

Bibliography 

xxi

Shavelson, R.J., & Baxter, G.P.(1992). What we've learned about

assessing hands-on science. Educational Leadership, 49(8), 20-25.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the

New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in

Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Simpson, B. J. (1966). "The Classification of Educational Objectives:

Psychomotor Domain". Illinois Journal of Home Economics, 10

(4): 110–144.

Simpson E. J. (1972). The Classification of Educational Objectives in the

Psychomotor Domain. Washington, DC: Gryphon House.

Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The Construction of Subject

MatterKnowledge in Primary Science Teaching. Teaching &

Teacher Education, 5(1), 1-20.

Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1989). Implications of cognitive

psychology for edu-cational measurement. New York: American

Council on Education.

Snowman, J., & McCown, R. (1984). Cognitive processes in learning:

Amodel for investigating strategies and tactics. Paper presented at

the annual meeting of the American Educational Research

Association. New Orleans. LA.

Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and

measurement. New York: Macmillan.

Srivastava, V. P. (1998). Physics practical process skill of class XII

students in India. Indian Educational Review, 34(2), 49-56.

Bibliography 

xxii

Stanley, J. C., & Bolton, D. (1957). A review of Bloom's taxonomy of

educational objectives and J. R. Gerberich's specimen objective test

items: A guide to achievement test construction. Educational and

Psychological Measurement,17(4), 631-634.

Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing and

analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human

abilities. Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Eribaum.

Sternberg, R. J. (1984). Mechanisms of cognitive development: A

componential approach. Mechanisms of cognitive development.

New York: Freeman.

Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Inside intelligence. American Scientist, 74(4)

137-143.

Stigliano, T. (1984). Is a Scientific Classification of Educational

(Behavioral) Objectives Possible? . East Lansing, MI: National

Center for Research on Teacher Learning. (ERIC Document

Reproduction Service No. ED262099).

Sukhia, S.P., & Melhotra, P.V. (1981). Elements of educational research.

New Delhi, Allied Publishers.

Sukhia, S.P., Mehrotra, P.V., & Mehrotra, R.N. (1974). Elements of

educational research. New Delhi: Allied Publishers Pvt.Ltd.

Suma, M. K.(1996). Effect of Teacher Assisted Modular Approach in

Teaching Physics in Secondary schools in Kerala State.

M.Ed.Thesis, Mahatma Gandhi University.

Swamy, A.M.A. (1995). Effect of inquiry training model of teaching

science on science process skills, creativity and curiosity of

secondary school students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.

Bibliography 

xxiii

Swindoll, C. R. (1994). The finishing touch. Dallas, TX: Word

Publishing.

Sylvania Murphy, M. (1976). A comparison of achieving and

non achieving readers using the Taxonomy of Educational

objectives. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.

Tamir, P. (1987). Subject Matter and Related Pedagogical Knowledge in

Teacher Education . Washington, DC: Paper presented at the

annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Timothy,N.T; & Elizabeth, B.(2009). Examining Technology – Enhanced

Coursework in Rehabilitation Counselor Education Using Blooms

Taxonomy of Learning. Rehabilitation Education, 23(2), 107-118.

Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton University Press.

Tobias, S. (1999). Some Recent Developments in Teacher Education in

Mathematics and Science: A Review and Commentary. Journal of

Science Education and Technology, 8(2), 21-31.

Tobin, K. & Fraser, B. (1990). What does it mean to be an exemplary

science teacher? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5),

3-25.

Tobin, K. & Garrett, P. (1988). Exemplary practice in science

classrooms. Science Education, 72 (3), 187-208.

Tony, B. (2001). Gender Difference for 6-12 grade students over

Bloom'scognitive domain. Paper presented at the annual meeting

of the Western Psychological Association.

Torrance, E.P. (1969). What is honored: Comparative studies of creative

achievement and motivation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 3(3),

149-154.

Bibliography 

xxiv

Travers, R. M. W. (1950). How to make achievement tests. New York:

Odyssey.

Travers, R. M. W. (1980). Taxonomies of Educational Objectives and

Theories of Classification. Educational Evaluation & Policy

Analysis, 2(2), 5-23.

Tuan, H., Jeng, B., Whang, L., & Kaou, R. (1995). A Case Study of Pre-

service Chemistry Teachers Pedagogical Content Knowledge

Development . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the

National Association for Research in Science Teaching, April, San

Francisco, CA.

Turner, A., & Greene, E. (1977). The construction of a prepositional text

base. Boulder: The University of Colorado. Institute for the Study

of Intellectual Behavior.

Tyier, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction.

Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Tyier. R. W. (1949). Constructing achievement tests. Chicago: University

of Chicago Press.

Unnikrishnan, P.N.(2000). Construction and Standardisation of a

Scientific attitude scale and its application at Secondary level. M.

Ed. Thesis, Mahatma Gandhi University.

Wendell,H . (2007). The New Blooms Taxonomy: Implications for Music

Education. Arts Education Policy Review, 108(4),7-16.

Williams, R. G. (1972). The Relationship of Cognitive Flexibility to

Learning of Prose Material Differentially Classified According to

the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. American Educational

Research Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 3-7.

Bibliography 

xxv

Williams, R.V.(1999). Pedagogical Content Knowledge Taxonomies.

Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4), 38-49.

William, S.(2010). Understanding as an educational objective: From

seeking and playing with Taxonomies to discovering and reflecting

on revelations. Research in the Schools, 17(1), 64-76.

Woollacott, L. C.(2009). Validating the CDIO syllabus for Engineering

Education using the Taxonomy of Engineering Competencies.

European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(6), 545-559.

Yager, O. S., & Akcay,H. (2009). Comparing Science Learning Among

4th-, 5th-, and 6th-Grade Students: STS Versus Textbook-Based

Instruction. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 15-

24.

WEBLIOGRAPHY

http://www.google.com/

http://www.googlebooks.com/

http://www.education.com/

http://www.proquest.com/

http://www.indian journals.com/

http://www.hrmars.com/

http://www.tandfonline.com/

http://www.ssc.edu/

http://www.wikipedia.org/

http://www.sprigerlink.com/

http://www.eric ed.gov/

http://www.icaseonline.netd/