Click here to load reader
Upload
lenoremaier
View
136
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
-
Citation preview
Between Christianity and Costumbre:
Religious Syncretism and Resistance in Latin America
Lenore Maier
10336347
History 271
14Mar13
Instructor: Marie-Christine Dugal
Indigenous peoples all over Latin America have been exploited and victimized by
the unfettered weights of colonial endeavors since the arrival of the conquistadors in the
late fifteenth century. For over five hundred years these groups of people, although
unique in their beliefs and traditions, have shown interesting similarities in their abilities
to maintain centuries old practices through very innovative and unconventional ways.
Since the arrival of Europeans in Latin America, there has been a seemingly
merciless, colonial campaign to quell all things indigenous through the use of coercion.
Colonialism in Latin America utilized Christianity, more specifically roman
Catholicism, as a paramount tool in the conquest of the New World. Indigenous people
were required by Spanish law through the requerimiento to abandon their ancient
religious beliefs and practices, and embrace Christianity. In the years to follow,
Catholicism and costumbre, that is, the embodiment of ancient tradition and customs,
engaged in a centuries long confrontation that still continues today. The results were
quite remarkable. In the context of Latin America, fusions of religious syncretism
emerged, effectively blending elements of both Christianity and costumbre. In turn, these
religious syntheses enabled the continuity of indigenous religious practice, while
providing a sense of contentment within the catholic mission that the church had become
the new religious hegemon.
In reality, there are many case studies of religious syncretism in Latin America
that have fostered the identity and religious autonomy of indigenous people. By adopting
elements of Catholicism into indigenous practices, indigenous groups, to a significant
degree, effectively slowed the fervent nature of the Christian mission.
Indigenous groups were able to incorporate elements of Christianity into local religions,
instead of abandoning their beliefs altogether. On the surface, these groups may now
appear to be Christian, but upon further inquiry, it is evident that there is much more to
Catholicism in the Latin American context. In reality, syncretism in Latin America has
2
created a religious strata, in which elements of both Christianity and costumbre each
come to the fore at different times.
Firstly, this essay seeks to explain the misconceptions and contemporary
academic understandings surrounding religious syncretism. Secondly, those
understandings will be applied to three different case studies: The case of El Tío in the
highlands of Bolivia and Peru, the deity of Maximón in El Santiago de Atitlan in
Guatemala, and finally El Virgen de Guadalupe in Mexico. Lastly, but perhaps most
importantly, this essay will seek to demonstrate the stoic tenacity of the Latin American
spirit through the preservation of indigenous costumbre in religious syncretism. In
addition, it will support the idea that by replacing certain elements of pre-Colombian
religions with those of catholic origin, indigenous groups have in reality, managed to
save and maintain significant elements of their spiritual traditions by practicing them
under the guise of Christianity.
Religious syncretism has become a highly debated and quite controversial topic
in religious studies.1 Such a disputative nature may stem from our constructed
understandings of the term. Religious syncretism, according to Leopold and Jensen, is a
term that incorporates the blending of, or mixing of origins.2 They also note that
syncretism and our ways of understanding such, reveal much in the way of how we come
to identify relationships of kinship and foreign entities as well. To draw on these
aforementioned ideas, anthropologist Pascal Boyer “observes how people believe that
kinship refers to a special kind of ‘essence’ shared by people with a common
genealogy.”3 Similarly, anthropologist Larry Hirschfeld denotes the concept of “naive
sociology” in which we as humans tend to understand each social groups as naturally
different from one another.4 These ideas can help us to understand the often contested and 1 Anita Maria Leopold and Jeppe Sinding Jensen, “Syncretism in Religion: A Reader” (London: Equinox Publishing Ltd., 2004), 3.
2 Ibid, 2.3 Ibid, 3.4 Ibid.
3
debated nature of religious syncretism . The traditional understandings of syncretism are
more ‘cut and dry’ than reality may suggest. The very existence and embodiment of
religious syncretism in action contradicts traditional western understandings of religious
“purity”. Therefore, it is essential to view religious syncretism from outside of a
“pure/impure” context, to gain a better understanding of its depth. In other words,
syncretism embodies elements of struggle and negotiation, rather than contamination in
the transmission of religion.5
These arguments suggest that through an anthropological lens,
we must be critical of our own subliminal understanding of syncretism. Such a
consciousness is useful, and may perhaps foster a new understanding in the analysis of
religious syncretism in Latin America.
The mezcla, or mixing, of religions in Bolivia has had some very interesting
culminations with regards to the struggles of religious syncretism. The religious “strata”
in Bolivia exists in an amazing dichotomy of geography. On the ground, the catholic
church has roots that have been planted for over five hundred years. The country is
predominantly roman catholic, (although the number of people who attend mass is far
smaller).6 However, deep in the tin mines of the Andean spine, there exists another
spiritual icon, which is literally out of view from the watch of the catholic church.
For centuries, indigenous Bolivians have been forced to extract silver, and later
tin, out of the Andean cordillera, at the hand of European colonialism.
The Andes have housed some of the world’s most intriguing civilizations,
all of whom held a deep, spiritual relationship with the surrounding mountains, and
understood them to be the dwelling places of the gods.7 Descendants of the grand Inca
empire, the Quechua and Aymara people of the Andes have for centuries, held a very 5 Ibid, 2.6 U.S. Department of State: Diplomacy in Action. “Bolivia,” http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2006/71450.htm
7 Ibid, 338.
4
strong, spiritual relationship with Pachamama, or Earth Mother.8
With the coming of Catholicism from Europe, sacred mountain places such as El
Cerro Rico in Bolivia were pillaged of material wealth, and a catholic church erected at
its base. The colonial expansion of silver and tin mining in this region had a profound
and devastating effect on indigenous costumbre, and as such, new spiritual practices
developed in the mine itself.
In an unofficial response to the weighted impression of Catholicism, a somewhat
opposing deity has emerged in the mines. Known affectionately as El Tío, or The Uncle,
he is present in virtually every mine in Bolivia and Peru.
“Dawning a “chalky personage with moustache and large eyes, his mouth agape, nostrils blackened from cigarette smoke, and
his body is covered with various adornments. He is seated on a throne, his hands extended to receive offerings, his knees bent and feet enclosed in rubber mining boots. He displays a large erect penis, a reminder of his virility. The tunnels of the mines are his kingdom.”9
El Tío is a symbol of many things. He brings harm, but he also brings protection
to the workers in the mines. He is the devil, although he is never referred to as such.10 El
Tío is honoured through offerings and homage, similar to the ancient practices which
glorified Pachamama through indistinguishable means. Anthropologist and Historian,
Heraclio Bonilla explains the methodic variation of offerings to El Tío:
On Tuesday and Friday the miners offer coca leaves, hand-rolled cigarettes, and bottles of white rum to slake the Tio’s thirst.
Furthermore, each carnival Tuesday the miners perform cha’alla in the mine, soaking the earth around the
Tio with chicha (Andean corn-based beer), rum, or beer, lacing his neck with confetti garlands, and placing food and
8 Heraclio Bonilla, “Religious Practices in the Andes and Their Relevance to Political Struggle and Development: The Case of El Tío and Miners in Bolivia,” Mountain Research and Development, Vol. 26, No. 4, Religion and Sacredness in Mountains: A Historical Perspective (2006), 336.
9 Ibid, 336.10 Ibid.
5
drink all around his throne. Additionally, in August comes the toast of k’araku, a sacrificial offering of a llama or alpaca whose blood is splashed on the threshold and walls of the mine.11
El Tío emerges from the mines only once a year, during the famed festival of
Carnival, in which he is disguised as Lucifer so that he may dance with the other
demons.12 While El Tío is underground, he wears no disguise. For the mine is his mask,
inside which he becomes the tangible indigenous manifestation of ancient Inca
costumbre. It is when he emerges to the world above, where Catholicism thrives, when he
must be disguised as Lucifer, the Catholic epitome of evil. The symbolism in the scenario
is remarkable, and the seemingly obvious dismissal of traditional Christianity serves as a
blatant and rather “tongue in cheek” demonstration of the indigenous autonomy of
costumbre.
The deity of El Tío is found all throughout the major mines in Bolivia, in addition
to many more in Peru. However, in the Peruvian context, instead of El Tío, he is given
the Quechua name of muqui.13
The geographic strata of religion in the Andean region of South America is
ripe with elements of both Christianity and Costumbre. The apparent dominance of
Catholicism shifts to subservience upon entrance in the mines. In the netherworld of the
Andes, exists what great Peruvian thinker Jose Mariátegui called the “mythic core of
humankind”, which is paramount to a metaphysical conception of life.14
It is here in the sub-regions of the Andes where the Bolivian miners revitalized
another spiritual world for themselves. While above ground, El Tío garners minimal
power, and is replaced by the strong colonial influence of Catholicism. Upon entry into
the mines though, El Tío or muqui reigns supreme over the most powerful catholic
notion. It is here where the fantastic divide between two religions occurs. In a religiously
11 Ibid.12 Ibid.13 Ibid.14 Ibid, 341.
6
syncretic display, the mining regions of Bolivia and Peru appear at first to be plainly
catholic, but inside the mountain mines, where ancient gods live, there still exists a deity
named El Tío who rules in a world apart from Christianity.
Religion as a form of resistance in the Andean context is a testament to both a
political struggle, and a struggle to maintain autonomy with regards to identity and
customs. The perseverance of El Tío serves as a powerful example of resistance
through religion.
Further north in the highlands of Guatemala, another syncretic deity emerged
in response to an overtly coercive catholic mission. The figure of Maximon sits proudly
in the lake town of San Andres on the shores of El Lago de Atitlan.
“Maximon is basically a flat piece of wood about two and a half feet high and six to eight inches thick. A little jar or
enameled iron cup is strapped to the top end and contains the base of another piece of wood, or possibly a gourd, which
forms the core of the head. At the bottom end, two jars contain the wooden legs.”15
The immediate visualization seems less than impressive. However, Maximon is
most comfortable adorned and dressed in offerings. During fiestas, Maximon is covered
in numerous sets of clothing, and he emerges as “four and a half feet tall, clothed in shirt,
pants and belt of the local Atiteco style, plus a Texan 55-size hat, a blue serge jacket and
a bib made of some thirty silk scarves.16
Through such a veneration, Maximon becomes a deity that is half new/half old,
half Christian/half Costumbre. Maximon was born in the cofradia system, which was
originally a European creation, built as a means of organizing and supervising newly
converted indigenous catholics. Indeed, the cofradias eventually became a rather
unsuspecting place for the revitalization of ancient Mayan beliefs and practices. The
cofradia itself serves as a vehicle for both Christianity and Costumbre, as it has fostered
15Michael E. Mendelson, “Maximon: An Iconographical Introduction”. Royal Anthropological Institute of Britain and Ireland, Vol. 59 (1959), 57.
16 Ibid.
7
the development of two different religions, often at the same time. Maximon resides in
the cofradia Santa Cruz, “where all who enter cross themselves under the light of large
standing candles,”17 which are predominantly catholic elements of worship.
One particularly curious addition to the syncretic nature of Maximon is
surrounded in myth and uncertainty. Mendelson attests to the rumour that at his core,
Maximon “contains a small idol which cannot be checked: some speak of a gold or silver
figure, pagan or Christian, others of a silver cross, one man of an ear of corn.”18
Such uncertainty towards the essence of Maximon’s “core” demonstrates the
indigenous disavowal of the importance of Maximon’s origin, towards which Christianity
is so inclined. Instead, the uncertain mystery serves as more of an animistic power than
one of impurity or religious illegitimacy.
Maximon is very similar to the ancient Mayan deity Mam, who has through time,
become associated with Holy Week.19 With striking similarity, the ancient Mayans
“had a piece of wood, which they dressed like those figures of boys made of straw that are used in bullfights and placed
on a stool on a mat. They gave him food and gifts during the feast known as Vayeyab. When the feast was finished they
undressed the idol and threw the piece of wood on the ground without troubling to reverence it anymore.”20
In addition, Maximon also bears symbolic resemblance to Jesus Christ as well. He
is known as a traveler or walker, and also has a “whore wife” named Maria, or
Magdalena Castellana,21 which echoes an almost identical relationship between Mary
Magdalene and Jesus from the New Testament Bible.
Maximon’s moniker is naturally syncretic as well. Although it too, is subject to
regular confusion, any outcome is still religiously syncretic. Maximon is commonly
understood as a blend of Mam-Shimon: Mam referring to the aforementioned ancient
17 Ibid.18 Ibid.19 Ibid.20 Ibid.21 Ibid.
8
Mayan deity meaning “old man”, and Shimon referring to one of two Simons from the
catholic New Testament.22 The first possibility is the apostle and betrayer of Jesus, Simon
Judas. The second is Jesus’ apostle Simon Peter, more often referred to as Peter.23 Such
associations with Jesus’ apostles explain the common reference to Maximon as Primer
Apostol,24 or First Apostle of Jesus.
During the catholic Holy Week, Maximon is celebrated not in place of, but
alongside Jesus Christ during Lent.25 Such an occurrence serves as an example of
religious syncretism whereby two icons are openly celebrated in the same act of
glorification . This can be seen two different ways, albeit both religiously syncretic: On
one hand, one can view it as the emergence of polytheistic Catholicism, where Jesus and
Maximon share the devotion of their followers. On the other hand, this scenario can
alternatively be seen as the addition or incorporation of Jesus Christ into ancient, and
already polytheistic Mayan beliefs rituals.
The creation and embrace of Maximon in Guatemala was a culmination of
centuries of political and religious struggle for indigenous identity. As a response to the
coercive nature of religious conversion in colonial Latin America, indigenous peoples
found innovative ways to worship the ancient deity of Mam within the framework of
Catholicism. Through time, elements of Christianity and Mayan customs blended, and
Maximon emerged as result. The emergence of Maximon is neither proof of defeat nor
victory for either religion. Alternatively, he is an effective tool of resistance in a five
hundred year struggle to maintain religious autonomy and Mayan identity.
Another example of Religious syncretism emerged in Mexico, just north of the
capital on December 8, 1531, on the hill of Tepeyacac (now Tepeyac).26 According to
22 Ibid, 5923 Ibid.24 Ibid.25 Ibid, 58.26Jeanette Favrot Peterson. “The Virgin of Guadalupe: Symbol of Conquest or Liberation?” Art Journal, Vol. 51, No. 4, Latin American Art (1992), 39.
9
history,
“The Virgin Mary appeared to a newly Christianized native, whose baptismal name was Juan Diego. Using the Aztec
language of Nahuatl, the Virgin asked that a church be erected in her honour. Juan Diego tried three times to convince Archbishop Juan de Zumárraga of this apparition. He succeeded only on his last visit, when roses tumbled out of his tilmatli, or cloak, and a life-sized image of the Virgin was found miraculously imprinted on its cactus-fiber cloth. Juan Diego’s cloak is said to be the same painted icon that is central to the cult of the Virgin of Guadalupe, venerated today in the twentieth- century basilica that bears her name.27
This famous story of the Virgin Mary appearing before Juan Diego is
another account which garners an abundance of religious syncretism. The appearance of
Mary took place on the ancient and sacred site of Tepeyac. This site had for
centuries, served as the worshipping place for various pre-Colombian earth deities whom
often shared the same name of Tonantzin, or Earth Mother.28 It is here that Tonantzin
also became Jesus’ mother, Mary. In the wake of such fusion emerged El Virgen
de Guadalupe, who is effectively the embodiment of both forms.
Catholic churches were often erected on top of pre-Colombian spiritual spaces,
the geographic location is an example of an arguably violent negotiation between
religions.
After the erection of the catholic basilica on Tepeyac, church officials later noted,
“Now that the church of our Lady of Guadalupe has been built there, they (campesinos)
call her Tonantzin too. The term refers to that ancient Tonantzin and this state of affairs
should be remedied, because the proper name of the Mother of God is not Tonantzin.29
Through the subsequent emergence of The Virgin of Guadalupe, the catholic church
27 Ibid.28 Ibid.29 Eric R. Wolf, “The Virgin of Guadalupe: A Mexican National Symbol,” The Journal of
American Folklore. Vol. 71, No. 279 (1958), 35.
10
created a dilemma whereby indigenous Mexicans were able to continue worshipping the
Earth Mother, albeit under a catholic guise. By erecting a church on Tepeyac, the catholic
mission not only subdued Aztec religious practices, but they also unwittingly opened the
doors for religious syncretism in Mexico. It is important to note that this happened in
many places throughout the Americas, although Tepeyac is one grand example.
In addition to the maternal and geographical lendings to the syncretism of El
Virgen de Guadalupe, her physical attributes were also altered in the syncretic process.
The original Virgin of Guadalupe was “an eminently European image that had little
meaning for the Native worshiper.”30 As a result, the painted icon on Juan Diego’s cloak
contained essential modifications such as the inclusion of dark-olive skin, and straight
black hair. In addition, the mantle on which she stands is blue-green, a colour only kept
for the celestial Aztec couple Ometecuhtli and Omecihuatl. Moreover, she is also
adorned by the Sun, with the moon under her feet,31 qualities resembling that of the Aztec
Earth Mother, Tonantzil.
The collision of Aztec and Christian customs in colonial Mexico, formulated a
deity that, in time, came to reflect the beliefs and practices of both Christianity and
Costumbre. In a showdown of spiritual warfare, indigenous groups used religious
syncretism as a tool for political and social resistance. As a result, elements of
ancient Aztec customs survived, and live on, through the El Virgen de Guadalupe, when
they likely may not have otherwise.
The conquest of European colonialism changed Latin America forever. In a
centuries old confrontation that sought to subordinate and eradicate all things indigenous,
colonialism in the Americas has left its thieving fingerprints all over the land and people.
Religious syncretism as we have come to understand it, has a very unique history in Latin
America. The mission to convert all natives to Catholicism was fierce and merciless.
With virtually no defense from the disease and weapons of colonialism, indigenous
30 Peterson, 40.31 Ibid.
11
people all over the Americas found a way to covertly resist through the utilization of the
rather ironic tool of religion. These syncretic deities are just as fluid and changing as the
syncretism’s that made them.By blending into Catholicism just enough, ancient pre-
Colombian beliefs were salvaged and incorporated back into the changing religious
milieu.
The cases of El Tío in the Andes of Bolivia and Peru, Maximon in the highlands
of Guatemala, and El Virgen de Guadalupe in Mexico, are all unique examples of
indigenous resistance and struggle in the seemingly never ending campaign to maintain
cultural and religious identity and autonomy under the vacuum of European colonialism.
This resistance is neither victorious or defeated. Instead it is should be understood as
remarkably still alive and breathing. The ongoing process of religious syncretism in Latin
America is a testament to the consistent perseverance and solidarity of the spirit of
historically subjugated indigenous peoples, and their sincere refusal to abandon their
beliefs, even when it appeared impossible to do so.
Bibliography
Bonilla, Heraclio. Religious Practices in the Andes and Their Relevance to Political Struggle and Development: The Case of El Tío and Miners in Bolivia. Mountain Research and Development, Vol. 26, No. 4, Religion and Sacredness in Mountains: A Historical Perspective (Nov., 2006), pp. 336-342.
Chiappari, Christopher L. Culture, Power, and Identity: Negotiating between Catholic Orthodoxy and Popular Practice. Latin American Research Review, Vol. 42, No.3, October 2007.
12
Leopold, Anita Maria and Jeppe Sinding Jensen. Syncretism in Religion: A Reader. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd., 2004.
Mendelson, Michael E. Maximon: An Iconographical Introduction. Royal Anthropological Institute of Britain and Ireland. Vol. 59 (April, 1959), pp. 57-60.
O’Connor, Mary. The Virgin of Guadalupe and the Economics of Symbolic Behavior. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. Vol. 28, No. 2, (Jun., 1989), pp. 105-119.
Peterson, Jeanette Favrot. The Virgin of Guadalupe: Symbol of Conquest or Liberation? Art Journal, Vol. 51, No. 4, Latin American Art (Winter, 1992), pp. 39-47.
Stanzione, Vincent James. Rituals of Sacrifice. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2003.
Wolf, Eric R. The Virgin of Guadalupe: A Mexican National Symbol. The Journal of American Folklore. Vol. 71, No. 279 (Jan-Mar., 1958) pp. 34-39.
U.S. Department of State: Diplomacy in Action. http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2006/71450.htm
Vanderwood, Paul. Religion: Official, Popular, and Otherwise. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos, Vol. 16, No. 2, (Summer 2000), pp. 411-441.
13