Upload
trinhcong
View
304
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Benchmarking Energy Use in Buildings and Cleanrooms
Dr. Satish Kumar
Energy Efficiency Ambassador
Schneider Electric India Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly, Chief of Party, USAID ECO-III Project)
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore
February 21, 2011
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Outline
»Commercial Building Sector in India
»Benchmarking Energy Use in the Building Sector
»Implementation Barriers & Challenges
»ECBC Implementation Strategy
»Conclusions & Recommendations
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Commercial Buildings Sector in India
Commercial Buildings Growth Forecast
» Currently, ~ 659 million m2 (USAID ECO-III Internal Estimate Using MOSPI, CEA and Benchmarked Energy Use data)
» In 2030,~ 1,900 million m2 (estimated) *
• 66% building stock is yet to be constructed
Year: 2010
660 million
m2
* Assuming 5-6% Annual Growth
Current34%
Yet to be Built 66%
1,930 million m2
Source: USAID ECO- III Project, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Projected Growth Across Building Sector in India
Source: McKinsey Analysis
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Growth of Electricity Consumption in Commercial Sector in India
28201 31381
35965 40220
46685
11.3 14.6
11.8 16.1
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
GW
h
Growth in % over the previous year
SOURCE: Central Electricity Authority (2009).
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Indian Power Supply: Current Situation and Future Projections
»Installed Capacity in India – Approx. 160,000 MW
»Projected Capacity in 2030 – 800,000 MW
• 600 MW capacity addition each week
»Continued deficit supply in 2007-08 (MOP)
• Peak power deficit of 16.6%
• Energy Deficit of 9.9%
Source: Planning Commission of India and Central Electricity Authority
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Electricity Scenario in India
Domestic 24%
Commercial 9%
Industry 38%
Public Lighting 1%
Traction (Railways)
2%
Agricultutre 21%
Public Water Works & Sewage
Pumping 3%
Miscellaneous 2%
1614
1486 1433
1020
623
439
188 101
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Punjab Gujarat Delhi Maharashtra MadhyaPradesh
West Bengal Assam Bihar
Ele
ctri
city
in k
Wh
Source: Central Electricity Authority's 'Year End Review 2007-08'
State-wise Per Capita Electricity Consumption During the Year 2007-08
National Average
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
ECBC Compliance
ENVELOPE
HVAC
LIGHTING
ELECTRICAL POWER
SOLAR HOT WATER & PUMPING
Man
dat
ory
Req
uir
emen
ts
Prescriptive
Whole Building Performance
Trade-off option (for ENVELOPE only)
COMPLIANCE APPROACHES
Required for ALL Compliance Approaches
Applicable BUILDING SYSTEMS
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Energy Conservation Act 2001
» Government of India - creation of Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE)
» Powers and Functions of BEE vis-à-vis ECBC • Prescribe ECBC for efficient use of energy • Take suitable steps to prescribe guidelines for ECBC • Link Energy Performance Index (from the EC Act) to the ECBC Prescriptive Compliance
Approach in order to facilitate the implementation of the Code
[On Page 5, clause (j) of the EC Act, 2001 currently reads: "energy conservation building codes" means the norms and standards of energy consumption expressed in terms of per square meter of the area wherein energy is used and includes the location of the building]
» Power of State Government: The State Govt., in consultation with BEE, may
• amend ECBC to suit the regional and local climatic conditions with respect to use of energy in the buildings
• direct the owner or occupier of a building (if notified as a Designated Consumer) to comply with the provisions of ECBC
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Use of Benchmark Numbers
» Building Level Benchmarks – First Step, Less Costly
• Energy consumption per employee in an office
• Energy consumption per bed in a hospital
• Energy consumption per room in a hotel
» System Level Benchmarks – Requires Metering Infrastructure, More Costly and Data-Intensive
• Lighting System: 5 Watts/m2
• Equipment Power: 10 Watts/m2
• HVAC System: 50 m2/Ton of Refrigeration; 25 Watts/m2
• Chilled and Condenser water pumps: 10 Watts/GPM
• Air Handling Unit: 0.75 Watts/CFM
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Benchmarking: Macro Analysis – Building Population
N=760 N=861
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Baseline Energy Use in Commercial Buildings
Number of Buildings
Building Type Floor Area (m2)
Annual Energy Consumption
(kWh) Benchmarking Indices
OFFICE BUILDINGS kWh/m2/year kWh/m2/hour
145 One shift Buildings 16,716 20,92,364 149 0.068
55 Three shifts Buildings 31,226 88,82,824 349 0.042
88 Public Sector Buildings 15,799 18,38,331 115 0.045
224 Private Sector
Buildings 28,335 44,98,942 258 0.064
10 Green Buildings 8,382 15,89,508 141 -
HOSPITALS kWh/m2/year kWh/bed/year
128 Multi-specialty
Hospitals 8721 24,53,060 378 13,890
22 Government Hospitals 19,859 13,65,066 88 2,009
HOTELS kWh/m2/year kWh/room/yea
r
89 Luxury Hotels (4 and 5
Star) 19,136 48,65,711 279 24,110
SHOPPING MALLS kWh/m2/year kWh/m2/hour
101 Shopping Malls 10,516 23,40,939 252 0.05642
Source: Building Energy Benchmarking study undertaken by the USAID ECO-III Project
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Why Regression Based Rating and Why Not Simple EPI Based Rating?
»Simple EPI based rating does not take into account
• Physical characteristics
• Location characteristics
• Operating characteristics
Regression based methodology:
Energy consumption of a benchmarked building
= function (Building use, physical, operational and location characteristics).
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Performance Based Rating
1. Estimate energy consumed by benchmarked building log(kwh) = c0. + c1.climate + c2.log(%ac) + c3.log(bua) + c4.log(hrs) + c5.log(emp)
2. Calculate performance relative to the benchmarked building (BPI)
BPI=Actual Energy Consumed / Energy Consumed by the benchmarked building
3. Compare candidate buildings’ BPI to other buildings and assign score to the performance differential
0 1 2 3 4
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Building Performance Index (BPI)
BPI (Actual Annual KWH consumed/ Predicted KWH)
Cum
ulat
ive
Per
cent
DataFitted Curve
10 12 14 16 18
1012
1416
Actual Electricity Consumed(Log)
Est
imat
ed E
lect
ricity
Con
sum
ed(L
og)
lkwh
-3 -2 -1 0
0.17 0.87
8.0 8.5 9.0
0.093
1012
1416
18
0.83
-3-2
-10
lpac20.082 0.29 0.081
lbua0.11
46
8100.80
8.0
8.5
9.0
lhrs0.19
10 12 14 16 18 4 6 8 10 12 3 5 7 9
35
79lemp
Offices
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
10 12 14 16 18
1012
1416
Actual Electricity Consumed(Log)
Est
imat
ed E
lect
ricity
Con
sum
ed(L
og)
Performance Based Rating
Building Performance Index (BPI) =
Energy consumed by the benchmarked building
Actual Energy Consumed
BPI < 1 Efficient Bldgs.
BPI > 1 Inefficient Bldgs.
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Performance Based Rating
EPI Percentile ~ 82 25%
132 50%
200 ~ 75%
Building Type Office
Built up area (m2) 2,000
Annual Elec. Purchased (kWh) 100,000
Annual Elec. Generated (kWh) 40,000
Select Climate zone Hot and Dry
Hours per day 12
Days per Week 5
Percent conditioned space 0.75
Total number of employees 150
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Performance Based Rating
EPI Percentile ~ 72 25%
116 50%
175 ~ 75% Dynamic!
Building Type Office
Built up area (m2) 2,000
Annual Elec. Purchased (kWh) 100,000
Annual Elec. Generated (kWh) 40,000
Select Climate zone Hot and Dry
Hours per day 12
Days per Week 5
Percent conditioned space 0.75
Total number of employees 150
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Benchmarking of Cleanroom Facilities
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Cleanroom Energy Benchmarking
» Cleanroom energy benchmarking data shows that there is a variety of chiller plant designs and operating efficiency for cleanroom facilities.
» Chiller plants usually serve cleanroom facility and adjacent spaces simultaneously and use significant energy and water.
» The efficiency level of the overall chiller plant is influenced by the efficiency of individual components and subsystems in the plant.
» Major components include chillers, water pumps, and cooling tower or condenser fans.
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Benchmarked cleanroom energy usages in a semiconductor
cleanroom facility
Central Plant Chilled Water for Cleanroom
Cooling12%
Central Plant Chilled Water for Process
Cooling7%
Glycol Chilled Water40%
Heating10%
Cleanroom Fans14%
Process16%
Lighting1%
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Benchmarked HVAC energy usages in a semiconductor cleanroom facility
Chillers39%
Cooling Towers
7%
Pumps17%
MUAH + RCU Fans9%
Hot Water + Steam25%
Exhaust Fans3%
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
HVAC Air Systems
» Air Change Rates
• Recirculation air change rates (ACRs) are an important factor in contamination control in a cleanroom and are the single largest factor in determining fan and motor sizing for a recirculation air handling system.
• Many air change rate recommendations were developed decades ago with little scientific research to back them up. The recommended design ranges for ISO Class 5 (Class 100) cleanroom ACRs are from 250 to 700 air changes per hour. Higher ACRs equate to higher airflows and more energy use, and don’t always achieve the desired cleanliness.
• Benchmarking has shown that most facilities are operated at or below the low range of recommended ACRs. A Sematech study has also verified that lowered air change rates in cleanrooms are adequate in maintaining cleanliness. The actual operating ACRs documented for ten ISO Class 5 cleanrooms was between 94 and 276 air changes per hour.
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Global Trends
» Building Performance
» Labeling of Buildings and Facilities
• EN 16001
• ISO 50001
• IPMVP
» Automation and Controls Innovation
» Next Generation of Energy Management Systems
ISA Vision Summit, Bangalore, February 21st, 2011
Thank You
» Contact Information: Satish Kumar, Ph.D. Energy Efficiency Ambassador Schneider Electric India Pvt. Ltd. Phone: +91-124-3305-039 Email: [email protected]
» Useful Web Sites:http://www.bee-india.nic.in/ecbc.php http://www.eco3.org http://www.buildingenergytools.in/benchmarking http://www.buildingenergytools.in/econirman
Acknowledgements:
1. Bureau of Energy Efficiency, USAID, and ECO-III Project Team
2. Kumar, S. et. al. (2010): Developing an Energy Conservation Building Code Implementation Strategy in India, ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Asilomar, CA
3. Kumar, S. et. Al. (2010): Performance Based Rating and Energy Performance Benchmarking for Commercial Buildings in India, BauSIM 2010, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.