BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF ... · Pursuant to Rule 1.8(d) of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the California Public Utilities Commission (“Commission”)

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Order Instituting Investigation into the Creation of a Shared Database or Statewide Census of Utility Poles and Conduit in California.

Investigation 17-06-027

And Related Matter.

Rulemaking 17-06-028

WORKSHOP REPORT FILED BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) FOR WORKSHOPS HELD NOVEMBER 15, 2018 AND JANUARY 22-23, 2019

FADIA RAFEEDIE KHOURY GLORIA M. ING

Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Telephone: (626) 302-1999 Facsimile: (626) 302-6693 E-mail: [email protected]

Dated: February 28, 2019


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Title Page

-i-

I. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1

II. REGULATORY AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ............................................................2

A. Background of the Proceeding .............................................................................................2

B. Summary of November 15, 2018 Workshop .......................................................................4

C. Summary of January 22-23 Workshop ................................................................................5

1. Workshop Day 1 ......................................................................................................6

2. Workshop Day 2 ......................................................................................................7

III. PROPOSED TRACKS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACCESS TO UTILITY POLE AND CONDUIT INVENTORY ...........................................................................................8

A. Track 1 .................................................................................................................................8

B. Track 2 ...............................................................................................................................10

C. Track 3 ...............................................................................................................................12

IV. RECOMMENDATIONS/NEXT STEPS .......................................................................................12

V. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...........................................................................................................13

APPENDIX A I.17-06-027 POLE OII PHASE I WORKSHOP - NOVEMBER 15, 2018 – AGENDA

APPENDIX B I.17-06-027 POLE OII PHASE I WORKSHOP - NOVEMBER 15, 2018 (CPUC STAFF PRESENTATION)

APPENDIX C POLE OWNER/ATTACHER GROUP PRESENTATION EXAMINING DATABASE-RELATED ISSUES (ORIGINAL)

APPENDIX D JANUARY 22-23, 2019 WORKSHOP – AGENDA

APPENDIX E POLE OWNER/ATTACHER GROUP PRESENTATION EXAMINING DATABASE-RELATED ISSUES (REVISED W/ HIGHLIGHTED WORKSHOP NOTES)

APPENDIX F EXTENET SYSTEMS (CALIFORNIA) LLC PRESENTATION

APPENDIX G CALTEL TRACK 3 PRESENTATION

APPENDIX H LIST OF WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS

1


STATE OF CALIFORNIA



And Related Matter.



I.

INTRODUCTION

Pursuant to Rule 1.8(d) of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the California Public

Utilities Commission (“Commission”) and the August 8, 2018 Assigned Commissioner’s

Scoping Memo and Ruling, as modified by Administrative Law Judge Robert Mason’s ruling on

January 28, 2019, Southern California Edison Company (“SCE”) respectfully files this

Workshop Report for the workshops held on November 15, 2018 and January 22-23, 2019.

The joint parties that participated in the workshops and created the report are: AT&T;1 Bear

Valley Electric Service (“BVES”), a division of Golden State Water Company; the California

Association of Competitive Telecommunications Companies (“CALTEL”),2 California Cable

and Telecommunications Association (“CCTA”); Charter Fiberlink-CA-CCO, LLC and Time

Warner Cable Information Services (California) LLC (collectively referred to herein as

1 Pacific Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T California, AT&T Mobility (AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings, Inc., New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, and Santa Barbara Cellular Systems, Ltd) and AT&T Corp. are collectively referred to herein as “AT&T.”

2 CALTEL members are certificated competitive local exchange carriers (“CLECs”) that primarily provide voice and broadband services to residential and business end user customers in California.

2

“Charter”), California Municipal Utilities Association (“CMUA”); Comcast Phone of California,

LLC (“Comcast”); Cox Communications California, LLC; the Commission’s Electric Safety and

Reliability Branch of the Safety and Enforcement Division (“SED Advocacy”);3 Crown Castle

Fiber, LLC;4 ExteNet Systems (California) LLC; Frontier;5 PacifiCorp d/b/a Pacific Power;

Pacific Gas and Electric Company (“PG&E”); the Public Advocates Office; San Diego Gas and

Electric Company (“SDG&E”); Southern California Gas Company (“SoCalGas”); Southern

California Edison Company (“SCE”); the Small LECs;6 Sprint7 and Verizon. In addition, several

non-party entities also participated in the informal workshops held January 22-23, 2019 in San

Francisco.

II.

REGULATORY AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Background of the Proceeding

On July 10, 2017, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Investigation I.17-06-027

(“OII”) into the possible creation of a shared database or statewide census of utility poles and

conduit in California. The OII was opened in conjunction with Rulemaking R.17-06-028

(collectively “OII/OIR”) in order to consider: strategies for increased and non-discriminatory

3 Commission staff from SED’s Utility Risk Assessment Branch, Energy Division, and Communications Division participated on an advisory basis in the workshops and in preparation of this workshop report.

4 Crown Castle Fiber, LLC and Sunesys, LLC are collectively referred to herein as “Crown Castle.” 5 Citizens Telecommunications Company of California d/b/a/ Frontier Communications of California,

Frontier Communications of the Southwest Inc., and Frontier California Inc. are collectively referred to herein as “Frontier.”

6 The Small LECs are the following carriers: Calaveras Telephone Company, Cal-Ore Telephone Co., Ducor Telephone Company, Foresthill Telephone Co., Happy Valley Telephone Company, Hornitos Telephone Company, Kerman Telephone Co., Pinnacles Telephone Co., The Ponderosa Telephone Co., Sierra Telephone Company, Inc., The Siskiyou Telephone Company, Volcano Telephone Company, and Winterhaven Telephone Company

7 Sprint Communications Company, L.P., Sprint Spectrum L.P., and Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. (collectively, “Sprint”).

3

access to poles and conduit by competitive communications providers; the impact of such

increased access on safety; and how best to ensure the integrity of the affected communications

and electric supply infrastructure going forward.8 Regarding the OII, the Commission said it

would investigate the feasibility of a data management platform that would allow stakeholders to

share key pole attachment and conduit information.9 The OII/OIR was followed by the issuance

of an Assigned Commissioner’s Scoping Memo and Ruling dated August 8, 2018 (“ACR”),

which, among other things, set forth the category, issues, schedules and other matters related to

the scope of Phase I of the OII. The ACR also ruled on a joint motion to set collaborative

workshops.10 While the ACR denied the Joint Motion, without prejudice, the ACR stated: “I do

not mean to suggest that interested parties may not meet among themselves in order to discuss

the issues identified in this Ruling and, where they determine to be appropriate, prepare joint

filings with the Commission.11

The ACR went on to emphasize the scope of Phase I as an information gathering phase of

the OII/OIR proceeding and presented a Use Case proposal.12 Additionally, the ACR established

that the Commission would hold a workshop with the purpose of presenting the potential Use

Cases, initiating dialogue, and collecting input and feedback to refine the Use Cases and match

the data fields critical for the defined uses. In two subsequent ALJ Rulings,13 the Commission

scheduled the OII Phase I Workshop for November 15-16, 2018.

In light of the ACR’s previously highlighted statement, an informal group of pole and

conduit owners and attachers engaged in a series of informal meetings from September to

November 2018 to discuss the issues raised in the OII and the ACR, share information and

8 OII/OIR at 1. 9 Id. 10 ACR at 5-6. 11 ACR at 6. 12 Parties provided comments on September 8, 2018 and reply comments on October 31, 2018. 13 See September 12, 2018 E-mail Ruling Revising the Schedule in the ACR and October 15, 2018

Ruling inviting Reply Comments and Adjusting the Schedule regarding Upcoming Workshop.

4

perspectives, and consider possible paths forward regarding pole and conduit information

sharing. Those meetings culminated in a draft Joint Parties’ Proposal for the OII, which was

outlined in a PowerPoint presentation14 that was presented jointly by some participants in the

informal group at the Commission’s November 15, 2018 workshop.15 The second day of the

planned November 15-16 workshop was cancelled due to a U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency’s declaration of hazardous air quality levels.16 As a follow-up to the shortened

workshop, the informal industry group of pole/conduit owners and attachers held a two-day

public workshop on January 22-23, 2019. An invitation to participate was extended to the entire

OII/OIR service list and Commission staff.

B. Summary of November 15, 2018 Workshop

Commission Staff scheduled two days of workshops for November 15 and November 16,

2018. The November 15, 2018 workshop proceeded as planned. As mentioned above, due to

very unhealthy air quality levels in the San Francisco Bay Area, the second day of the workshop

was cancelled by Commission Staff. During the November 15 workshop, a PowerPoint

presentation17 was utilized to facilitate topical discussions.

During the course of the workshop, the participants considered OII Proceeding goals and

objectives, problems the proceeding aimed to solve, and issues that might arise in pursuing a

statewide database or other software solution. Commission President Michael Picker provided

opening remarks describing California State Legislature expectations related to infrastructure

data.

14 See Appendix C. 15 The PowerPoint presentation did not represent a consensus view on all issues. 16 See Assigned Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Revising Schedule for Order Instituting

Investigation dated January 28, 2019 at 1. 17 See Appendix B.

5

As the planned agenda progressed, meeting organizers modified the agenda to allow

earlier presentation of an industry coalition proposal and demonstration. Consequently,

Commission Staff did not present on cost/benefit, cost effectiveness, and cost recovery.

Commission Staff presented the software development life cycle model as a potential

problem-solving process that parties could utilize. By examining use cases, defining high-level

requirements, and performing a technical gap analysis, Commission Staff and parties could have

the necessary information for determining the tools and technology needed to meet functional

requirements of pole/conduit owners, and attachers, and Commission Staff. Participants shared

feedback regarding pursuit of short term or longer-term solutions.

A pole/conduit owner and attacher group comprised of a subset of participants presented

a preliminary draft presentation based on a series of meetings held in the Fall of 2018, consistent

with the ACR which encouraged pole/conduit owners and attachers to meet among themselves

(see Appendix C). Entities who did not have the opportunity to participate in these meetings

requested that the Commission allow opening and reply comments related to the pole/conduit

owner and attachers’ group proposal.

PG&E presented its Joint Use Map and Portal (“JUMP”). JUMP is an application that

provides users with access to PG&E’s maps and other relevant pole data.

The November 15 workshop was adjourned early to provide entities additional time to

develop additional use cases for presentation and discussion the following day. The November

15, 2018 Workshop session was recorded and is available in the Commission’s video archive at:

http://www.adminmonitor.com/ca/cpuc/workshop/20181115/.

C. Summary of January 22-23 Workshop

As described above, during the workshop held on November 15, 2018, an informal

industry group of pole/ conduit owners and attachers delivered a presentation that proposed a

phased approach and path forward regarding access to pole and conduit information. During

subsequent discussions, a recommendation to expand the small group discussions to

6

other interested parties emerged. On December 21, 2018, the informal industry group notified

parties via email that supplemental workshops would be held at PG&E’s Energy Center in San

Francisco on January 22-23, 2019, with the intent to discuss the industry group’s phased

approach regarding pole and conduit information and address related data-access matters

stemming from the November 15 workshop. An initial draft workshop agenda was transmitted

to parties on January 8, 2019, and a revised agenda was transmitted on January 15, 2019, along

with a copy of the industry group’s original presentation and a link to the video record of the

November 15 workshop.

1. Workshop Day 1

Following a safety briefing by PG&E and self-introductions by parties and other

participants attending in person and via the web-ex, the facilitator reviewed the agenda and led a

group discussion on the purpose and intended outcome of the workshop. ExteNet made a

presentation (Appendix F) describing its business and the necessity of making pole attachment

data and conduit data available electronically. Following ExteNet’s presentation, attendees

reviewed the industry group’s Track 1 proposal to seek feedback from the smaller IOUs and the

POUs, and to seek to resolve non-consensus items. After the Track 1 discussions, attendees

discussed and sought feedback on the matter of the Commission’s access and monitoring of pole

and conduit information. Certain Commission staff members in attendance offered comments

and potential scenarios for the use of pole and conduit information, as well as comments on

information describing how and by whom the pole and conduit portal is being utilized and could

be useful to staff. There was also discussion regarding the desire for expeditious access to

whatever pole attachment and conduit data is currently available electronically (in whatever

format) with access to a more formalized database or other platform for attachment and conduit

data to follow. Commission Staff discussed the meaning of the term “spatial” used in Use

Case#1. Various parties also expressed a wide range of concerns including data integrity,

confidentiality, necessity, presentation, and completion of Tracks 1, 2, and 3 (described further

7

below in Section III). The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (“CAL FIRE”)

liaison to the Commission discussed poles, conductors, and locations of poles with non-exempt

equipment as related to emergency response, de-energization, and the Public Resources Code.

Attendees closed the day with a brief discussion of Use Case #1 (Maintain Accurate and

Comprehensive Pole & Conduit Asset Inventory in Spatial Database).

2. Workshop Day 2

After the safety briefing and recap of Day 1, parties briefly discussed

underground/conduit data and the challenges of relying on historic records and maps, and other

challenges related to field verification of surplus conduit in electric utility systems. Comcast

made an oral presentation describing its processes for obtaining information about poles that may

be available for new attachments, and in particular, its frequent use of PG&E’s JUMP

application. The ensuing discussion touched on several points of concern by CLECs and cable

companies, some of which are already being addressed by the larger IOUs and ILECs and

intended to be addressed formally in Track 1, with other matters possibly being addressed in

Tracks 2 and 3.

Commission Staff inquired about using opportunities like the PG&E Field Asset

Inventory project to collect and record information about all the communication attachments in

the communication space.

After the lunch break, parties discussed the pole attachment and conduit data that

could be addressed in Track 2 and Track 3, and concluded with a discussion of possible “next

steps.”18 Parties agreed that it was important to continue the dialog among the pole and conduit

owners and attachers, and that additional guidance and authorization from the Commission was

needed to move forward with the development of a formal work plan and the formation of

working groups.

18 CALTEL presented its list of desired data on conduit structures, although the list was not discussed in detail during the workshop. (See Appendix G.)

8

Twenty-six entities participated in the workshop process, including SED, electric

and gas IOUs and POUs, communications companies, cable providers, and industry associations.

The list of participants represented in the workshops is provided as Appendix H.

The workshops included the following presentations, which are provided as

appendices to this Workshop Report:

APPENDIX DESCRIPTION A I.17-06-027 Pole OII Phase I Workshop - November 15, 2018 –

Agenda B I.17-06-027 Pole OII Phase I Workshop - November 15, 2018

(CPUC Staff Presentation) C Pole Owner/Attacher Group Presentation Examining Database-

Related Issues (original) D January 22-23, 2019 Workshop – Agenda E Pole Owner/Attacher Group Presentation Examining Database-

Related Issues (revised w/ highlighted workshop notes) F ExteNet Systems (California) LLC Presentation G CALTEL Track 3 Presentation H List of Workshop Participants

A draft of this Workshop Report was circulated to all workshop participants who

are parties to the proceeding for review and comment prior to its submission.

III.

PROPOSED TRACKS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACCESS TO UTILITY POLE

AND CONDUIT INVENTORY

A. Track 1

Track 1 of the Workshop Proposal generally consists of electronic access to pole data,

either by attachers or by Commission staff. Track 1 generally is the same as what was described

as “Phase 1” of the Joint Parties’ Proposal presented at the November 15, 2018 Workshop, but

with the addition of functionality that will allow monitoring of pole data by Commission staff.

9

These data points were discussed in consideration with Use Case #8 (Facilitating Non-

Discriminatory Access and Enhancing Competition). As discussed at the workshop, Track 1

consists of the following:

Within one year of a Commission order, the major pole owners (AT&T, Frontier, PG&E,

SCE, and SDG&E) must make the following pole data available in electronic format, either in

real time or within one business day:

• Unique identifier of pole

• Pole location information (e.g., GIS coordinates and/or address)

• High fire threat district and tier category

• Pole length, class, and material

• Pole installation date

• Name of any other joint owner(s); percentage ownership of each joint owner(s)

• Intrusive test data: date of last test and test result

• Number of pending attachment application(s) (if any) and/or make-ready work (if

available)

• Notice of any pending pole replacement/reinforcement and date (if available)

• Buddy pole info: identification of incomplete pole transfer situation, date of second

pole install, identification of parties with attachments on old pole (if available).

There was limited discussion among the parties regarding the ‘one-year’ and ‘one

business day’ timeframes. However, during the discussion, it became apparent that the major

pole owners likely would satisfy the electronic access obligation by providing an electronic

portal to their pole data. A portal would allow real-time access, thereby rendering the timeframe

issue moot. The Track 1 Technical Working Group will clarify these issues.

The parties also discussed several data items that were identified as non-consensus items

in the Joint Parties’ Proposal at the November 15, 2018 Workshop. After additional discussion,

no party in attendance on January 22 expressed objection to the data set listed above as a starting

point. The Track 1 Technical Working Group will further refine this data set.

10

There was discussion among the parties regarding what form of Commission pole data

monitoring functionality should be included within Track 1. For example, should monitoring

consist of providing Commission access to the pole owners’ databases via a portal, regularly-

generated reports of pertinent pole data responding to specific inquiries from the Commission, or

some combination of these? The parties discussed various uses the Commission could make of

the pole data, but the issue was not resolved during the workshop. The Track 1 Technical

Working Group will work with Commission Staff to address this issue.

The parties discussed which pole owners are prepared to participate in Track 1. The

larger IOU pole owners in attendance did not express objections to meeting the Track 1

obligations within one year of a Commission order. However, some of the other pole owners in

attendance indicated that a one-year timeframe could be technically problematic and/or

burdensome for their companies. The parties discussed the concept of allowing smaller investor-

owned pole owners additional time to permit electronic access to their pole data. The Track 1

Technical Working Group will explore this issue.

B. Track 2

The primary objective of Track 2 is to add the critical pole attachment information that

provides clearer insight into a pole’s safety, available capacity, and available physical space for

access. At a high level, the Track 2 fields as proposed include Electric Attachments,

Communications Attachments, and Supporting Info (such as guys and anchors). Parties

discussed that the industry would benefit from a clear understanding and ranking of criticality

and purpose as was done for Track 1 data sets for specific types of attachments (such as primary

vs. secondary vs. service drops).

11

The Track 2 proposal also seeks to include Special Load Cases and notice of any pending

attachment application. Parties discussed adding an indicator for “exempt” vs. “non-exempt”

equipment as related to Public Resource Code vegetation clearing requirement.19

Finally, the Track 2 work plan is intended to include clarified definitions, expectations,

and alternatives for Data Integrity, Providing Secure Access, and Cost Considerations. The

parties discussed the possibility of the work on Track 2 proceeding in parallel with work on

Track 1. The workshop parties discussed a rough outline of Workgroups that would form to

finalize the work plan and industry position on the above topics:

• Further Subgroup Definition – a workgroup that effectively forms quickly and early

in the process to brainstorm/confirm all of the right workgroups have been identified,

and add more if necessary;

• “Who and When?” – Who does Track 2 apply to and when will it be required to be

complete?;

• “How, What, and Why?” – How will the work be accomplished, including the

housing of the data, presumably more extensive than Track 1 data? What does each

company’s product look like? Why is it required or what specific purpose will such

gathered and maintained data serve?;

• Identify Additional Use Cases and Prioritize Use Cases;

• Data Integrity – define “accuracy” expectations, how often is data kept up-to-date,

define how various data points would be flagged with high or low “confidence

levels”;

• Legacy Data Collection Options;

• Confidentiality / Cyber Security; and

• Cost Sharing / Cost-Benefit Analysis

19 See: http://cdfdata.fire.ca.gov/pub/fireplan/fpupload/fppguidepdf126.pdf.

12

C. Track 3

Track 3 of the Workshop Proposal addresses conduit data and related access issues.

Participants expressed varying views regarding what priority conduit access should receive.

Suggestions ranged from a recommendation that all tracks could proceed on a parallel timeline

providing equal priority to each, while others contended that conduit data is a separate and

complex undertaking that should be addressed after pole-related data issues are considered.

Workshop participants also discussed the availability of conduit data, and the accessibility of that

data to third parties seeking access. Some contended that conduit access was primarily an issue

for communications provider-owned conduit and not generally an issue for electric utility

conduit. Finally, unlike Tracks 1 and 2, about which parties developed detailed discussion points

and identified some points of agreement, no similar discussion was held, or discussion points

developed for conduit. However, one industry participant, CALTEL, developed its own list of

desired access data points related to conduit access that was briefly displayed on-screen. Though

not discussed in detail by participants at the January 22-23 workshops, the conduit data points

submitted by CALTEL are attached as Appendix G.

IV.

RECOMMENDATIONS/NEXT STEPS

Workshop participants discussed creating working groups to develop detailed

requirements for Track 1, Track 2 and Track 3. Key features of a work plan would include, but

may not be limited to, the following:

1) Goals and objectives;

2) How work will be accomplished;

3) Milestones and oversight/steering of planned work;

4) Data requirements (and justifications);

5) Accessibility and security of pole/conduit data;

6) Data collection, accuracy, and management/monitoring; and

13

7) Implementation process, procedures, and timeline

Matters related to the foregoing list and discussed at the January workshop included:

flexibility for implementation for smaller IOUs and ILECs; the need for working groups and

smaller task groups to address data integrity; legacy data collection; confidentiality/cyber

security; cost sharing; and creation of separate working groups for Tracks, 1, 2, and 3 that could

work in tandem.

To oversee the progress of track development and ensure consistency in the working

groups’ endeavors, a Steering Committee could also be established. Parties are encouraged to

comment on a work plan, related elements, and a calendar to develop a Track 1 work plan.

V.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The parties wish to thank PG&E for hosting the second workshop meeting in January

2019. The parties also thank the Workshop Report team, with members from the CPUC, AT&T,

CCTA, Comcast, PG&E, SCE, for producing this report and special thanks to all workshop

participants for their willingness to address the various issues identified in this proceeding in a

good faith manner and engage in open, direct dialogue.

Respectfully submitted, FADIA RAFEEDIE KHOURY GLORIA M. ING

/s/ Gloria M. Ing By: Gloria M. Ing

Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Telephone: (626) 302-1999 Facsimile: (626) 302-6693 E-mail: [email protected]

February 28, 2019

Appendix A

I.17-06-027 Pole OII Phase I Workshop - November 15, 2018 – Agenda

Appendix B

I.17-06-027 Pole OII Phase I Workshop - November 15, 2018

(CPUC Staff Presentation)

Appendix C

Pole Owner/Attacher Group Presentation Examining Database-Related Issues (original)

Appendix D

January 22-23, 2019 Workshop – Agenda

Appendix E

Pole Owner/Attacher Group Presentation Examining Database-Related Issues (revised w/

highlighted workshop notes)

Appendix F

ExteNet Systems (California) LLC Presentation

Appendix G

CALTEL Track 3 Presentation

Cond

uit D

atab

ase

Desig

n Th

e pr

opos

ed c

ondu

it da

taba

se d

esig

n in

corp

orat

es tw

o ob

ject

type

s: B

ox a

nd D

uct.

A Du

ct is

a p

athw

ay th

roug

h w

hich

cab

les c

an b

e ru

n. A

Box

is

a lo

catio

n w

here

the

Duct

is a

cces

sible

. Bot

h ob

ject

s can

be

thou

ght o

f spa

tially

, tha

t is,

both

a D

uct a

nd B

ox a

re p

hysic

ally

pre

sent

in th

e w

orld

at a

geo

grap

hic

loca

tion.

The

spat

ial l

ocat

ion

of th

ese

item

s def

ines

the

conn

ectiv

ity o

f the

con

duit

netw

ork.

Add

ition

ally

, det

ails

such

as

cond

uit t

ype,

yea

r of i

nsta

llatio

n, e

tc. a

re a

ssoc

iate

d to

eac

h ob

ject

.

Duct

obj

ects

are

requ

ired

to re

pres

enta

tiona

lly st

art a

nd e

nd o

n a

Box

obje

ct. T

his c

orre

spon

ds to

the

phys

ical

pre

senc

e of

that

duc

t in

a Bo

x. T

o m

odel

a D

uct w

hich

pas

ses u

nder

a B

ox, w

e ne

ed o

nly

ensu

re th

at th

e Du

ct o

bjec

t doe

s not

hav

e an

end

poin

t at t

hat B

ox lo

catio

n.

Som

e Bo

x ob

ject

s are

not

stric

tly b

oxes

, but

rath

er a

spec

ial a

cces

sible

loca

tion

for a

con

duit.

Exa

mpl

es in

clud

e “s

tub”

box

es (e

.g. a

con

duit

ends

at

that

poi

nts)

and

“Y-

Cast

” bo

xes (

e.g.

a Y

-cas

t of t

he c

ondu

it).

In so

me

case

s, th

e ge

ospa

tially

-sto

red

loca

tion

of a

n ob

ject

may

diff

er sl

ight

ly fr

om th

e ph

ysic

al lo

catio

n of

the

unde

rlyin

g ob

ject

. Thi

s is d

one

to

allo

w fo

r the

exp

ress

ion

of th

e co

rrec

t obj

ect-

netw

ork

rela

tions

hip.

For

mod

elin

g pu

rpos

es, D

uct e

ndpo

ints

and

Box

obj

ects

are

con

sider

ed to

fo

rm a

con

nect

ed n

etw

ork

if th

ey a

re p

lace

d w

ithin

0.0

01 m

eter

s (1

mill

imet

er) o

f eac

h ot

her.

For t

he p

urpo

ses o

f fin

ding

a p

hysic

al lo

catio

n,

this

devi

ance

doe

s not

resu

lt in

any

subs

tant

ial d

etrim

ent.

To a

ccom

mod

ate

the

case

whe

re d

ucts

are

pla

ced

insid

e ot

her d

ucts

(e.g

. inn

erdu

ct, m

icro

duct

, etc

.), D

uct o

bjec

ts c

an b

e lin

ked

to o

ther

duc

t ob

ject

s thr

ough

a “p

lace

d-in

side-

of”

rela

tions

hip.

The

se re

late

d du

ct o

bjec

ts d

o N

OT

need

to h

ave

thei

r ow

n ge

ospa

tial r

epre

sent

atio

n.

Plac

eabl

e m

ulti-

cell

duct

ban

ks (e

.g. M

axCe

ll, m

icro

duct

duc

t pac

ks, e

tc.)

shal

l be

mod

eled

as a

n in

divi

dual

Duc

t obj

ect f

or e

ach

avai

labl

e ce

ll.

Obj

ect M

odel

s

Duct

Fiel

d N

ame

Fiel

d De

scrip

tion

Type

N

otes

du

ctU

UID

Gl

obal

ly u

niqu

e id

entif

ier f

or th

is du

ct se

gmen

t Va

rcha

r(25

5)

Met

hodo

logy

to p

reve

nt in

terc

ompa

ny o

verla

p TB

D

duct

Ow

nerID

O

wne

r ID

for t

his D

uct,

if av

aila

ble

Varc

har(

255)

U

sed

to re

late

Com

pany

dat

abas

es to

the

cond

uit o

bjec

t mod

el

diam

eter

Di

amet

er -

insid

e, sm

alle

st

dim

ensio

n, in

ches

Fl

oat

For t

extil

e in

nerd

uct (

e.g.

Max

Cell)

, thi

s is t

he m

axim

um c

able

siz

e al

low

ed

type

Ty

pe o

f Duc

t - P

VC, C

lay,

Red

woo

d,

Max

Cell,

etc

. Va

rcha

r(25

5)

Pre-

defin

ed li

st (a

ka d

omai

n) to

be

defin

ed b

efor

e im

plem

enta

tion

last

Proo

fDat

e Da

te o

f las

t pro

of te

stin

g Da

tetim

e

last

Proo

fRes

ult

Resu

lts o

f las

t pro

of te

stin

g –

Good

, col

laps

ed, e

tc.

Varc

har(

255)

Pr

e-de

fined

list

(aka

dom

ain)

to b

e de

fined

bef

ore

impl

emen

tatio

n pl

aced

Insid

eOf

duct

UU

ID o

f par

ent d

uct o

bjec

t (e

.g. t

he D

uct t

hat t

his D

uct i

s pl

aced

insid

e of

)

Varc

har(

255)

owne

r O

wne

r of t

his D

uct

Varc

har(

255)

Pr

e-de

fined

list

(aka

dom

ain)

to b

e de

fined

bef

ore

impl

emen

tatio

n in

Use

By

Occ

upan

t of t

his D

uct.

If se

t, th

is Du

ct is

in u

se.

Varc

har(

255)

Pr

e-de

fined

list

(aka

dom

ain)

to b

e de

fined

bef

ore

impl

emen

tatio

n –

sam

e as

abo

ve

inU

seDi

amet

er

Diam

eter

– o

utsid

e, la

rges

t di

men

sion,

inch

es –

of t

he

occu

pant

of t

his D

uct

Floa

t Fo

r nes

ted

Duct

obj

ects

, thi

s MU

ST b

e se

t to

the

OD

of th

e pr

oduc

t tha

t occ

upie

s the

Duc

t

inU

seFi

llTyp

e Ty

pe o

f occ

upan

t in

this

Duct

–

fiber

, cop

per,

duct

Va

rcha

r(25

5)

Pre-

defin

ed li

st (a

ka d

omai

n) to

be

defin

ed b

efor

e im

plem

enta

tion

field

Not

es

Fiel

d no

tes f

or th

is Du

ct –

e.g

“c

olla

psed

at 2

40’ f

rom

MH1

23”

Text

geom

Ge

omet

ry o

f thi

s Duc

t obj

ect

Geom

etry

Po

lygo

nal c

hain

repr

esen

ting

the

loca

tion

of th

is Du

ct in

spac

e.

For t

ext-

base

d ex

chan

ge, t

his o

bjec

t sha

ll be

repr

esen

ted

as a

W

KT c

onta

inin

g on

e LI

NES

TRIN

G ob

ject

, pro

ject

ed in

the

WGS

84

geod

etic

dat

um

Box

Futu

re w

ork

Mod

el D

uct s

idew

all a

ppea

ranc

es (e

.g. w

hich

MH/

HH si

dew

all a

Duc

t app

ears

on)

o

This

wou

ld b

e do

ne w

ith a

rela

tions

hip

betw

een

Duct

and

Box

obj

ects

that

add

s add

ition

al in

form

atio

n M

odel

end

-to-e

nd D

uct c

oupl

ing

(e.g

. inn

erdu

ct w

ith c

oupl

ers)

o

This

wou

ld b

e do

ne w

ith a

rela

tions

hip

betw

een

Duct

and

Duc

t, sh

owin

g a

coup

ling

oLi

kely

com

pany

pro

prie

tary

Fiel

d N

ame

Fiel

d De

scrip

tion

Type

N

otes

bo

xUU

ID

Glob

ally

uni

que

iden

tifie

r for

th

is bo

x Va

rcha

r(25

5)

Met

hodo

logy

to p

reve

nt in

terc

ompa

ny o

verla

p TB

D

type

Ty

pe o

f Box

– H

andh

ole,

M

anho

le, S

tub,

Y-C

ast,

etc.

Va

rcha

r(25

5)

Pre-

defin

ed li

st (a

ka d

omai

n) to

be

defin

ed b

efor

e im

plem

enta

tion

owne

r O

wne

r of t

his B

ox

Varc

har(

255)

Pr

e-de

fined

list

(aka

dom

ain)

to b

e de

fined

bef

ore

impl

emen

tatio

n in

stal

lDat

e Da

te o

f ins

talla

tion

of th

is Bo

x Da

tetim

e

last

Insp

ectio

nDat

e Da

te o

f las

t ins

pect

ion

Date

time

la

stIn

spec

tionR

esul

t Re

sult

of la

st in

spec

tion

– e.

g.

good

, nee

ds re

hab

Varc

har(

255)

Pr

e-de

fined

list

(aka

dom

ain)

to b

e de

fined

bef

ore

impl

emen

tatio

n di

mLe

ngth

Le

ngth

of B

ox –

insid

e, in

ches

Fl

oat

di

mW

idth

W

idth

of B

ox –

insid

e, in

ches

Fl

oat

di

mHe

ight

He

ight

of B

ox –

insid

e, in

ches

Fl

oat

ra

ting

Traf

fic ra

ting

of th

is Bo

x –

A8,

H10,

H20

, etc

. Va

rcha

r(25

5)

Pre-

defin

ed li

st (a

ka d

omai

n) to

be

defin

ed b

efor

e im

plem

enta

tion

burie

d Is

this

Box

burie

d?

Bool

ean

Use

d to

det

erm

ine

Box

acce

ssib

ility

fie

ldN

otes

Fi

eld

note

s for

this

Box

– e.

g.

“thi

s man

hole

is a

lway

s flo

oded

”

Text

Appendix H

List of Workshop Participants

APPENDIX H

WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS

AT&TBVESCALFIRE CALTELCCTACA-PAOCHARTER/TWCCMUACOMCASTCOXCPUC-SED, CD, EDCROWN CASTLE/SUNESYSEXTENET SYSTEMSFRONTIERLADWPLIBERTY ENERGYPACIFICORPPG&ESCESCGSDG&ESMALL LECSSMUDSPRINTVERIZONCHRIS WITTEMAN BLACK & VEATCHCOPPER LEAF TECHNOLOGIES


STATE OF CALIFORNIA



And Related Matter.


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, I have this day served a true copy of the WORKSHOP REPORT FILED BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) FOR WORKSHOPS HELD NOVEMBER 15, 2018 AND JANUARY 22-23, 2019 on all parties identified on the attached service list for I.17-06-027, et al. Service was effected by transmitting copies via e-mail to all parties who have provided an e-mail address, and by placing copies in sealed envelopes and causing such envelopes to be delivered via United States mail with first-class postage prepaid to the office of the Assigned ALJ or other addressee.

ALJ Robert M. Mason California Public Utilities Commission Division of Administrative Law Judges 505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 5016 San Francisco, CA 94102-3214

Executed on February 28, 2019, at Rosemead, California.

/s/ Olivia Gutierrez Olivia Gutierrez

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770

CPUC Home

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSIONService Lists

PROCEEDING: I1706027 - CPUC - OII INTO THE FILER: CPUC LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: FEBRUARY 27, 2019

Download the Comma-delimited File About Comma-delimited Files

Back to Service Lists Index

Parties

ANGELA DAVID MILLER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA JOINT POLE COMMITTEE PACIFIC BELL, DBA AT&T CALIFORNIA EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA JOINT POLE FOR: PACIFIC BELL, DBA AT&T CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE

KRISTINE L. DEVINE STEPHEN P. BOWEN ATTORNEY AT LAW ATTORNEY HARRIS, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS, LLP BOWEN LAW GROUP 1919 M STREET NW, EIGHTH FLOOR 19660 NORTH RIM DRIVE, SUITE 201 WASHINGTON, DC 20036 SURPRISE, AZ 85374 FOR: GOOGLE FIBER INC. FOR: CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF COMPETITIVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES (CALTEL)

ELLIOTT HENRY DANIEL MARSH SR. COUNSEL MGR, RATES AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY LIBERTY UTILITIES (CALIFORNIA) 555 WEST 5TH ST., GT-14E7 9750 WASHBURN ROAD LOS ANGELES, CA 90013 DOWNEY, CA 90241-7002 FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY FOR: LIBERTY UTILITIES (CALPECO ELECTRIC) LLC

FADIA KHOURY GLORIA M. ING DIR. & MANAGING ATTORNEY SR ATTORNEY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE. / PO BOX 800 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE

Page 1 of 11CPUC - Service Lists - I1706027

2/28/2019https://ia.cpuc.ca.gov/servicelists/I1706027_84558.htm

ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (SCE)

NGUYEN QUAN ESTHER NORTHRUP REGULATORY AFFAIRS COX CALIFORNIA TELCOM, LLC GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY 5651 COPLEY DRIVE 630 EAST FOOTHILL BLVD. SAN DIEGO, CA 92111-7903 SAN DIMAS, CA 91773 FOR: COX CALIFORNIA TELECOM, LLC FOR: BEAR VALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICE

JOHN A. PACHECO JESUS G. ROMAN SR. COUNSEL VERIZON SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 15505 SAND CANYON AVE. D201 8330 CENTURY PARK CT., CP32 IRVINE, CA 92618 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 FOR: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP AND WIRELESS FOR: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AFFILIATES, DBA VERIZON; MCI METRO (SDG&E) ACCESS TRANSMISSION SERVICES AND WIRELESS AFFILIATES, SOME OR ALL DBA VERIZON

CANDACE CHOE PAUL ANGELOPULO CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION LEGAL DIVISION LEGAL DIVISION ROOM 4107 ROOM 4107 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 FOR: ORA FOR: SAFETY AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION (SED)

WILLIAM K. SANDERS CHRISTINE MAILLOUX DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY STAFF ATTORNEY CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK CITY HALL RM 234 785 MARKET STR., STE. 1400 1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-4682 FOR: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK (TURN) FOR: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

ALYSSA KOO CHRISTOPHER J. WARNER ATTORNEY ATTORNEY PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY 77 BEALE STREET, B30A 77 BEALE STREET, MC B30A, RM 3145 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 FOR: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (PG&E)

JAMES MCTARNAGHAN MARGARET TOBIAS ATTORNEY ATTORNEY AT LAW PERKINS COIE LLP TOBIAS LAW OFFICE 505 HOWARD STREET, STE. 1000 460 PENNSYLVANIA AVE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107 FOR: CHARTER FIBERLINK CA-CCO, LLC & FOR: COX CALIFORNIA TELECOM, LLC TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES

DAVID J. MILLER JEANNE B. ARMSTRONG



AVP - SR. LEGAL COUNSEL ATTORNEY AT&T SERVICES, INC. GOODIN MACBRIDE SQUERI & DAY LLP 430 BUSH STREET, ROOM 310 505 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 900 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 FOR: AT&T CALIFORNIA AND AT&T MOBILITY FOR: CTIA (AT&T)

SARAH DEYOUNG DAVID L. HUARD EXECUTIVE DIR. ATTORNEY CALTEL MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 50 CALIFORNIA ST., STE. 1500 ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 30TH FL. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3736 FOR: CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF FOR: CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMPETITIVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES (CALTEL)

SUZANNE TOLLER SUZANNE TOLLER ATTORNEY DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 505 MONTGOMERY STREET, STE. 800 505 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 800 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-6533 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-6533 FOR: COMCAST PHONE OF CALIFORNIA, LLC FOR: WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION (WIA) FORMERLY PCIA

MARK D. PATRIZIO TINA L. SIMMS PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY OPERATIONS MANAGER PO BOX 7442 NORTHERN CA JOINT POLE ASSOC. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 1800 SUTTER ST, SUITE 830 FOR: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY CONCORD, CA 94520 FOR: NORTHERN CALIFORNIA JOINT POLE ASSOCIATION

JOHN GUTIERREZ ANITA TAFF-RICE DIRECTOR, GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS ATTORNEY COMCAST PHONE OF CALIFORNIA, LLC (5698) ICOMMLAW 3055 COMCAST PLACE 1547 PALOS VERDES, NO. 298 LIVERMORE, CA 94551 WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597 FOR: COMCAST PHONE OF CALIFORNIA, LLC FOR: EXTENET SYSTEMS (CALIFORNIA), LLC

CHARLES E. BORN FLOYD JASINSKI MANAGER - GOV'T. & EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MGR - GOV'T AFFAIRS FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS INC. 9260 E. STOCKTON BLVD. PO BOX 619969 ELK GROVE, CA 95624 ROSEVILLE, CA 95661-0969 FOR: FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC. FOR: CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

JUSTIN WYNNE JEROME F. CANDELARIA ATTORNEY VP & COUNSEL - REGULATORY AFFAIRS BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE, P.C. CALIFORNIA CABLE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS 915 L STREET, STE. 1480 1001 K STREET, 2ND FL. SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-3832 FOR: CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES FOR: CALIFORNIA CABLE & ASSOCIATION (CMUA) TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION (CCTA)

CYNTHIA MIFSUD



SENIOR ATTORNEY PACIFICORP 825 NE MULTNOMAH ST., STE. 1800 PORTLAND, OR 97232 FOR: PACIFICORP

Information Only

A AYRES AMY WARSHAUER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY GOV'T AFFAIRS ANALYST EMAIL ONLY FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

BRUCE SMITH CHRISTINE FANOUS GRC & REGULATORY SUPPORT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

DARREN LEE DAVID X. HUANG REGULATORY LEGAL SECRETARY ATTORNEY COOPER, WHITE & COOPER LLP COOPER, WHITE & COOPER, LLP EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

IGOR GRINBERG INNA VINOGRADOV REGULATORY AFFAIRS ICOMMLAW PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

MARIA BROWNE MARK P. SCHREIBER ATTORNEY (D.C. OFFICE) PARTNER DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP COOPER, WHITE & COOPER LLP EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, DC 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: COX CALIFORNIA TELECOM, LLC

RYAN APPEL SHARON YANG DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP DIRECTOR OF LEGAL SERVICES EMAIL ONLY LIBERTY UTILITIES (WEST REGION) EMAIL ONLY, DC 00000 EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, AA 00000

N.CAL JOINT POLE ASSOC (NCJPA) PERKINS COIE, LLP EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: NORTHERN CALIFORNIA JOINT POLE ASSOCIATION (NCJPA)

DARAH FRANKLIN D. ZACHARY CHAMP GOOGLE INC. WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION



25 MASSACHUSETTS AVE., STE. 900 500 MONTGOMERY STREET, STE. 500 WASHINGTON, DC 20001 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 FOR: WIA (FORMERLY PCIA)

JEAN HAWLEY KELLY FENNELL FRIEND, HUDAK& HARRIS, LLP DIRECTOR - REGULATORY 3 RAVINIA DRIVE, SUITE. 1700 AT&T ATLANTA, GA 30346-2131 444 MICHIGAN AVENUE, SUITE 1750 DETROIT, MI 48226

STEVEN L. BERENBAUM HARAN RASHES AREA MANAGER - REGULATORY RELATIONS EXTENET SYSTEMS (CALIFORNIA) LLC AT&T 3030 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 340 444 MICHIGAN AVENUE, SUITE 1750 LISLE, IL 60532 DETROIT, MI 48226

RICHARD T. CHIP HOWELL ANDREW H. STEWART AREA MGR - REGULATORY RELATIONS EDM INTERNATIONAL, INC. AT&T 4001 AUTOMATION WAY 208 S. AKARD ST., RM 2510.02 FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 DALLAS, TX 75202

MARK DINUNZIO LINDA C. STINAR COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC. DIR - REGULATORY AFFAIRS EMAIL ONLY CENTURYLINK EMAIL ONLY, AZ 85027 6700 VIA AUSTI PARKWAY LAS VEGAS, NV 89119

JEFFERY A. WILLIAMS BRYAN PENA SUPERINTENDENT - CODES & ORDINANCES CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION L.A. DEPT OF WATER & POWER ELECTRIC SAFETY AND RELIABILITY BRANCH 111 NORTH HOPE STREET, RM. 856 320 West 4th Street Suite 500 LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 Los Angeles, CA 90013

JEFFREY B. FOHRER GREGORY HEALY SR. COUNSEL - REGULATORY REGULATORY CASE MGR. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 555 W. FIFTH STREET, GT-14E7 555 WEST FIFTH STREET, GT14D6 LOS ANGELES, CA 90013 LOS ANGELES, CA 90013-1011 FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

BETH A. FOX EDWARD N. JACKSON MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP DIR - RATES / REGULATORY AFFAIRS 11355 W. OLYMPIC BLVD. LIBERTY UTILITIES (CALIFORNIA) LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 9750 WASHBURN ROAD / PO BOX 7002 DOWNEY, CA 90241-7002

CHARLES H. CARRATHERS III ASIA POWELL FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 2535 W. HILLCREST DRIVE, MC CAM21LB 510 PARK AVE. NEWBURY PARK, CA 91320 SAN FERNANDO, CA 91340

FELICIA HUDSON CASE ADMINISTRATION



FRONTIER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2560 TELLER ROAD 8631 RUSH STREET NEWBURY PARK, CA 91360 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770

CINDY JACOBS JULIA A. MOSEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE./PO BOX 800 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

KAREN CHUNG CENTRAL FILES MGR - PROJECT SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 8330 CENTURY PARK COURT, CP31-E 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770

CHARLES MANZUK PAMELA J. MILLS SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 8330 CENTURY PARK COURT, CP 32D 8330 CENTURY PARK COURT, CP32H SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 FOR: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO. FOR: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO.

REBECCA W. GILES CENTRAL FILES REGULATORY CASE MANAGER SEMPRA ENERGY UTILITIES SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 8330 CENTURY PARK COURT, CP31-E 8330 CENTURY PARK COURT, CP32-F SAN DIEGO, CA 92123-1548 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123

ERIC CARDELLA PAUL MARCONI SUPERVISOR, ENGINEERING & PLANNING DIRECTOR BEAR VALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICE BEAR VALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICE 42020 GARSTIN DRIVE / PO BOX 1547 42020 GRASTIN DRIVE / PO BOX 1547 BIG BEAR LAKE, CA 92315 BIG BEAR LAKE, CA 92315 FOR: A DIVISION OF GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY

REBECCA L. HUSSEY ALASDAIR MCLAY UTILITY RELATIONS COUNSEL MANAGING PARTNER CROWN CASTLE FIBER LLC EXYION, INC. 200 SPECTRUM CENTER DRIVE 4790 IRVINE BLVD., STE. 327-105 IRVINE, CA 92618 IRVINE, CA 92620 FOR: CROWN CASTLE FIBER LLC

FLEUR KNOWSLEY MARC D. JOSEPH ACTING GENERAL COUNSEL ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO GOOGLE FIBER INC. 601 GATEWAY BLVD., SUITE 1000 1600 AMPHITHEATRE PARKWAY SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94043

MILA A. BUCKNER DAWN ANAISCOURT ATTORNEY ATTORNEY ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 601 GATEWAY BLVD., STE. 1000 601 VAN NESS AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102



JOYCE STEINGASS RUSSELL MCAVEY CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING AND PERMITTING B BROADBAND, POLICY & ANALYSIS BRANCH AREA AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

SHELLY LYSER ASHLEY SALAS CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ATTORNEY COMMUNICATIONS AND WATER POLICY BRANCH THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK AREA 785 MAREKT ST., NO. 1400 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

REGINA COSTA ROBERT FINKELSTEIN TELECOM RESEARCH DIR. GENERAL COUNSEL THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK 785 MARKET ST., STE. 1400 785 MARKET ST., STE. 1400 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103

CHARLES R. LEWIS IV JANE WHANG ATTORNEY STAFF COUNSEL PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY VERIZON 77 BEALE ST., B30A 201 SPEAR STREET, 7TH FL. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 FOR: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

RUDY M. REYES RX UY VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. ATTORNEY 201 SPEAR STREET, 7TH FLOOR PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 77 BEALE STREET, B30A FOR: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP AND WIRELESS SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 AFFILIATES, DBA VERIZON; MCI METRO ACCESS TRANSMISSION SERVICES AND WIRELESS AFFILIATES, SOME OR ALL DBA VERIZON

FASSIL T. FENIKILE MICHELLE CHOO DIR. - REGULATORY ASSISTANT AT&T SERVICES, INC AT&T SERVICES, INC. 430 BUSH STREET, RM. 1925 430 BUSH STREET, 3ND FL. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108

PETER HAYES ROSS JOHNSON AVP - REGULATORY DIR - REGULATORY AT&T SERVICES, INC. AT&T CALIFORNIA 430 BUSH STREET, 5TH FLOOR 430 BUSH STREET, 5TH FL, STE 29 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 FOR: AT&T CALIFORNIA (U 1001 C) AND NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC (U 3060 C)

ROSS JOHNSON THOMAS SELHORST AT&T SERVICES SENIOR PARALEGAL



430 BUSH STREET, 5TH FL, STE 29 AT&T CALIFORNIA, INC. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 430 BUSH STREET, 3RD FL, RM. 326 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108

DEMETRIO MARQUEZ JAMES W. TOMLINSON REGULATORY SPECIALIST DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 505 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 800 ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 30TH FL. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 FOR: CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

JOHN L. CLARK LILLY B. MCKENNA ATTORNEY MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP GOODIN MACBRIDE SQUERI & DAY LLP ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 30TH FLR. 505 SANSOME STREET, STE. 900 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 FOR: CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH

ZEB ZANKEL DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP ATTORNEY 505 MONTGOMERY STREET, STE. 800 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 505 MONTGOMERY STREET, STE. 800 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 FOR: COX CALIFORNIA TELECOM, LLC

CHARLES R. MIDDLEKAUFF CASE COORDINATION ATTORNEY PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EMAIL ONLY PO BOX 7442, MC-B30A-2475 EMAIL ONLY, CA 94177 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120

MATTHEW S. YERGOVICH LEON M. BLOOMFIELD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY VINCULUMS SERVICES, LLC LAW OFFICES OF LEON M. BLOOMFIELD 575 LENNON LANE, SUITE 125 1901 HARRISON ST., SUITE 1400 WALNUT CREEK, CA 94598 OAKLAND, CA 94612

VINHCENT LE TRISH STEEL COUNSEL - TELECOM & TECH BROADBAND ALLIANCE OF MENDOCINO COUNTY THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE PO BOX 286 360 14TH STREET 2ND FLOOR LAYTONVILLE, CA 95454 OAKLAND, CA 94612

CHARLES BORN LAURA TAYLOR SR. MGR. GOV'T. AND EXTERNAL AFFAIRS ATTORNEY FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE, P.C. 1201 K STREET. SUITE 1980 915 L STREET, STE. 1480 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

JEDEDIAH J. GIBSON 0/ MASTACHE ATTORNEY SR. ATTY - OFF. OF GEN. COUNSEL ELLISON SCHNEIDER HARRIS & DONLAN LLP SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT 2600 CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE 400 6301 S STREET, MS A311 SACRAMENTO, CA 95816-5931 SACRAMENTO, CA 95817 FOR: PACIFICORP.



CATHIE ALLEN DIR - REGULATORY AFFAIRS PACIFICORP 825 NE MULTNOMAH ST., STE 300 PORTLAND, OR 97232 FOR: PACIFICORP

State Service

CHLOE LUKINS MICHAEL J. MINKUS MGR - PUBLIC ADVOCATES OFFICE CPUC - EXEC. DIV. CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

FADI DAYE RAFFY STEPANIAN CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ELECTRIC SAFETY AND RELIABILITY BRANCH ELECTRIC SAFETY AND RELIABILITY BRANCH 320 West 4th Street Suite 500 320 West 4th Street Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Los Angeles, CA 90013

ADAM CLARK ALEXANDER J. ABRAMSON CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CONSUMER PROGRAMS BRANCH BROADBAND, POLICY & ANALYSIS BRANCH AREA 2-D AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 FOR: ORA

ANA MARIA JOHNSON APRIL MULQUEEN CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS AND WATER POLICY BRANCH EXECUTIVE DIVISION AREA 2-D AREA 5-A 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

AROCLES AGUILAR CAMERON REED CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION LEGAL DIVISION COMMUNICATIONS AND WATER POLICY BRANCH ROOM 5138 AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 FOR: ORA

CAROLINA CONTRERAS CHARLES CHRISTIANSEN CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OFFICE OF THE SAFETY ADVOCATE BROADBAND, POLICY & ANALYSIS BRANCH AREA AREA 3-E 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 FOR: OSA



CHARLOTTE TERKEURST CHRIS WITTEMAN CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ELECTRIC SAFETY AND RELIABILITY BRANCH LEGAL DIVISION ROOM 2201 ROOM 5028 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

CYNTHIA WALKER DAVID K. LEE CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING AND PERMITTING B ROOM 3209 AREA 4-A 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

DOROTHY DUDA ELIZABETH PODOLINSKY CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION MARKET STRUCTURE, COSTS AND NATURAL GAS PRESIDENT PICKER ROOM 4003 ROOM 5306 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

GLENN SEMOW JAMES RALPH CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION BROADBAND, POLICY & ANALYSIS BRANCH PRESIDENT PICKER AREA 3-F ROOM 5037 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

JONATHAN FROST KELLY C. LEE CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING AND PERMITTING B ENERGY SAFETY & INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH AREA ROOM 4108 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

KIMBERLY LIPPI LESLIE L. PALMER CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION LEGAL DIVISION SAFETY AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION ROOM 5001 ROOM 2203 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

MARTIN KURTOVICH MICHAEL MORRIS CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION RISK ASSESSMENT AND ENFORCEMENT BROADBAND, POLICY & ANALYSIS BRANCH AREA ROOM 3-F 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

QUANG PHAM RAYMOND CHO CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ELECTRIC SAFETY AND RELIABILITY BRANCH ELECTRIC SAFETY AND RELIABILITY BRANCH AREA 2-D AREA 2-D 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214



FOR: ORA

ROBERT MASON SIMI ROSE GEORGE CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES COMMISSIONER RECHTSCHAFFEN ROOM 5016 ROOM 5119 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

TOVAH TRIMMING TRAVIS FOSS CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION LEGAL DIVISION LEGAL DIVISION ROOM 4107 ROOM 5026 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

WENDY AL-MUKDAD LAURA MCWILLIAMS CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION STATE SENATOR JERRY HILL RISK ASSESSMENT AND ENFORCEMENT STATE CAPITOL, ROOM 5035 AREA 4-A SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

ROBERT B. OSBORN CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION BROADBAND, POLICY & ANALYSIS BRANCH 770 L Street, Suite 1250 Sacramento, CA 95814

TOP OF PAGE BACK TO INDEX OF SERVICE LISTS



Documents

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF ... · Pursuant to Rule 1.8(d) of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the California Public Utilities Commission (“Commission”)