Barnet Bread Case Study

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Barnet Bread Case Study

    1/14

    This report was carried out to evaluate the

    accident case study that is related to the

    relevant legislation and safety systems

    relevant to the Safety Technology elements

    where applicable and suggest the

    recommendation for better improvement

    AccidentCase Study

    Evaluation

  • 8/11/2019 Barnet Bread Case Study

    2/14

    Contents

    1.0 Introduction of the incident .............................................................................................................. 2

    2.0 Case review ....................................................................................................................................... 3

    3.0 Decision/recommendation ............................................................................................................... 8

    4.0 Summary/Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 9

    5.0 References ...................................................................................................................................... 10

    6.0 Legislation ....................................................................................................................................... 11

    7.0 Appendices......................................................................................................................................12

  • 8/11/2019 Barnet Bread Case Study

    3/14

    Barnet bread company fined after man dies from fall

    1.0 Introduction of the incident

    As reported in HSEs news (2011) a bread company based at Barnet in Greater

    London named Ovenpride Wholesale Ltds Finchley Road bakery has been

    prosecuted and fined by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) after cause a fatal

    accident where an employee fell from a ladder in 2009.

    The site manager of the bakery Amjad Mahmood, was gave an order to casual

    handyman Rocco Carofalo for build the shelving in the storeroom. The accident happenin the morning of 22 April 2009, Carofalo had stood on a stepladder while construct the

    shelves using the tools and material that provided by Ovenpride. However, the

    stepladder view to be in very poor condition, and cause an accident to Carofalo, he was

    found lying on the floor bleeding from a severe head wound, with the stepladder beside

    him at the noon. On 23 June, as a result of his injuries, he died.

    The tragic incident happen was easily preventable The Ovenpride and the manager

  • 8/11/2019 Barnet Bread Case Study

    4/14

    2.0 Case review

    Stones reported in Employers Liability Insurance News (2011), two Inspectors

    from HSE inspected the scene after the incident and issued a Prohibition Notice to stop

    any work at height because of the unsuitability of all access equipment. A stepladder

    was in poor condition, was taken from the bakery by HSE inspectors.

    The City of London Magistrates' Court heard that the Ovenpride Wholesale Ltd,

    of Empire Way, Brent pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) Health & Safety at Worketc Act 1974. It was fined total of 1. Ovenprides fine reflects the fact that the firm is

    now in liquidation.

    The site manager, Amjad Mahmood, age 57, from Donnington Road, Brent

    pleaded guilty to also breaching Section 2(1) of the Health & Safety at Work etc Act

    1974. He was fined a total of 300 and ordered to pay costs of 200.

    In Section 2(1) of Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 stated that:

    General duties of employers to their employees.

    (1) It shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably

    practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees

    Th i id h d b l k f i h k di h

  • 8/11/2019 Barnet Bread Case Study

    5/14

    2) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974

    General duties of employers to their employees. General duties of employers and self-employed to persons other than their

    employees.

    General duties of employees at work

    3) The Work at Height Regulations 2005

    According to The Work at Height Regulations 2005, it is require duty holders to

    ensure:

    all work at height is properly planned and organised

    all work at height takes account of weather conditions that could endanger

    health and safety

    those involved in work at height are trained and competent

    the place where work at height is done is safe

    equipment for work at height is appropriately inspected

    the risks from fragile surfaces are properly controlled

    the risks from falling objects are properly controlled

  • 8/11/2019 Barnet Bread Case Study

    6/14

    Safety Technology Elements

    1) Assessing suitable personal protective equipment (PPE) at work

    As stated in HSE website (2014) PPE is the equipment that will protect the user

    regarding health and safety risks at work. The Ovenpride Wholesale Ltd can

    apply the PPE approach to the workers. For example, it can include items such

    as safety helmets and hard hats, gloves, eye protection, high-visibility clothing,

    safety footwear and safety harnesses.

    For head hazards

    It can cause an impact from falling or flying objects, risk of head bumping, hair

    entanglement. The employee can wear an option such as range of helmets, hard

    hats and bump caps

    For hands and armsIt can cause hazards such as abrasion, temperature extremes, cuts and

    punctures, impact, chemicals, electric shock, skin infection, disease or

    contamination. The user should wear gloves, gauntlets, mitts, wrist-cuffs,

    armlets. It is recommended to avoid gloves when operating machines such as

    bench drills where the gloves could get caught.

    For feet and legs

  • 8/11/2019 Barnet Bread Case Study

    7/14

    When working on stepladders, avoid work that imposes a side loading,

    such as side-on drilling through solid materials for example bricks or

    concrete, by having the steps facing the work activity.

    Sources : www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg402.pdf.

  • 8/11/2019 Barnet Bread Case Study

    8/14

    Establish the ladder or stepladder is in a safe condition before using it. As a

    guide, only use ladders or stepladders that:

    Have no visible defects. They should have a pre-use check each working

    day

    Have a current detailed visual inspection.

    Have been maintained and stored in accordance with the manufacturers

    instructions.

    Do not use the top two steps of a stepladder, unless a suitable handrail isavailable on the stepladder (see Figure 11)

    Do not use the top three steps of swing-back or double-sided stepladders, where

    a step forms the very top of the stepladder (see Figure 12)

  • 8/11/2019 Barnet Bread Case Study

    9/14

    3) Maintenance of tools and equipment

    Ladders are easy tool to use but if they are not maintained properly, they can

    be unsafe. The employers should maintain the neglected ladders frequently.Before using a ladder, it should be inspected to make sure it is in good

    condition.

    A pre check ladder starts from the top to down. Users should looking for any

    loose steps and rungs. The rungs have to be sturdy, clean, and not slippery

    from grease or oil. The upright ladder legs should be strong and free of

    cracks, splits, and bent edges. The ladders braces should be solid. Nails,

    screws, bolts or other fasteners should be tight. Finally, the ladder feet should

    be examined and the non-slip base should be in good repair

    (www.statefundca.com/safety, 2013)

    3.0 Decision/recommendation

    Risk Assessment

  • 8/11/2019 Barnet Bread Case Study

    10/14

    iii. Evaluate the risks and decide on precaution

    Risks of using poor condition of materials and tools, proper risk

    assessment and maintenance from the employers should be taken toprevent any incident might happen.

    iv. Record findings and implement them

    v. Review assessment and update if necessary

    The sample of risk assessment and policy template to be attached in the

    appendices from Health and Safety Executive website.

    4.0 Summary/Conclusion

    From the case that had been review before, it was concluded that the

    breach of duty by employers and fatal accident cause to the workers because

    lack of proper inspection of tools and equipment. Aims to reduce work-related

    death, injury and ill health, according to the legislation, Health and Safety

  • 8/11/2019 Barnet Bread Case Study

    11/14

    5.0 References

    Available at: http://www.she.ltd.uk/how-can-we-help-you (Accessed: 24 January

    2014)

    Available at: http://www.thsp.co.uk/news/health-and-safety-in-the-

    workplace/death-fall-fine-for-barnet-bread-firm.html (Accessed: 22 January 2014)

    Available at:

    http://www.statefundca.com/safety/safetymeeting/SafetyMeetingArticle.aspx?Arti

    cleID=67 (Accessed: 22 January 2014)

    Falls from height, Available at: www.hse.gov.uk/falls/index.htm (Accessed: 22

    January 2014)

    Heath, Employers Liability Insurance, News (2011) Available at:

    http://www.johnheath.com/news/barnet-bread-firm-fined-over-employee-death/(Accessed: 22 January 2014)

    Health and Safety Executive (2011) Available at:

    http://www.hse.gov.uk/press/2011/coi-ldn-2017.htm (Accessed: 22 January

    2014)

    Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 Available at:

  • 8/11/2019 Barnet Bread Case Study

    12/14

  • 8/11/2019 Barnet Bread Case Study

    13/14

    pg. 12

  • 8/11/2019 Barnet Bread Case Study

    14/14

    pg. 13