22
Bandura’s Self- Efficacy Presented by Caley Foster

Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

  • Upload
    mercia

  • View
    208

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy. Presented by Caley Foster. Outline. Background Definition of Self-efficacy Reciprocal Determinism Formation of Self-efficacy Effects of Self-efficacy Beliefs Self-efficacy & Job Performance Implications for Trainers Work Self-efficacy Inventory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Bandura’s Self-EfficacyPresented by Caley Foster

Page 2: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Outline Background Definition of Self-efficacy Reciprocal Determinism Formation of Self-efficacy Effects of Self-efficacy Beliefs Self-efficacy & Job Performance Implications for Trainers Work Self-efficacy Inventory Self-efficacy & Academics Summary

Page 3: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Background on Self-efficacy Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory

Expanded on Social Learning Theory (Miller & Dollard, 1941)

Actions and reactions of an individual are influenced by observed actions of others

Role of observational learning and social experience in personality development

Self-efficacy lies at the heart of this theory

Page 4: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Self-efficacy Defined “Perceived self-efficacy is defined as people’s

beliefs about their capabilities to produce designated levels of performance that exercise influence over events that effect their lives” (Bandura, 1994).

High self-efficacy Belief that one can perform well

Low self-efficacy Belief that one lacks the ability to perform well

Page 5: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Reciprocal Determinism Theory set forth by Bandura in 1986 View that (1) personal factors in the form of

cognition, affect, & biological events, (2) behavior, and (c) environmental influences create interactions that result in a triadic reciprocality

Page 6: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Formation of Self-efficacy Self-efficacy is formed in part through four

major psychological processes Cognitive Motivational Affective Selection

Page 7: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Formation of Self-efficacy:Cognitive Beliefs in efficacy shape the types of anticipatory

scenarios they form and rehearse High self-efficacy -- successful scenarios Low self-efficacy -- dwell on possibility of failure, what can

go wrong Those with resilient sense of efficacy in face of

difficult tasks set more challenging goals Success gives confidence and competence, thus

reaffirming high efficacy

Page 8: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Formation of Self-efficacy:Motivational Attribution Theory

High-efficacy people attribute failures to insufficient effort.

Low-efficacy people attribute failure to low ability. Expectancy-value theory expectations

High-Expect success; Low-expect failure Goal-setting

Goals lower for low-efficacy High-efficacy, higher goals, greater sense of

achievement

Page 9: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Formation of Self-efficacy:Affective High-efficacy people generally feel less

threatened by challenges and more likely to consider them exciting

Low-efficacy can produce depression and anxiety

Page 10: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Formation of Self-efficacy:Selection Processes People avoid activities and situations

they believe exceed their coping capabilities.

People undertake challenging activities and select situations they consider themselves capable of handling.

Page 11: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Self-efficacy vs Self-efficacy Beliefs ”People's level of motivation, affective states,

and actions are based more on what they believe than on what is objectively true.”

Effects of self-efficacy beliefs Choice behavior Effort expenditure and persistence Thought patterns and emotional reactions Humans as producers vs foretellers of behavior

Page 12: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Effects of Beliefs Explored:Choice Behavior Tendency to avoid involvement in tasks

where efficacy is low Generally engage in tasks where efficacy is

high High-efficacy/low skill can result in

irreparable harm Low-efficacy/high skill doesn’t allow for

growth

Page 13: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Effects of Beliefs Explored:Effort Expenditure & Persistence Stronger perceived self-efficacy results in

more vigorous/persistent efforts Individuals with high self-efficacy may feel

less of a need to invest much effort in preparation

When applying skills, high-efficacy intensifies and maintains the effort required to realize a difficult performance Difficult for someone with low-efficacy

Page 14: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Effects of Beliefs Explored:Thought Patterns & Emotional Reactions

Low-efficacy individuals believe things are more difficult than they actually are Creates stress and narrow vision

High-efficacy people devote attention and energy to demands of the situation and perceive obstacles as challenges

High-efficacy people attribute failure to insufficient effort

Low-efficacy people relate failure to deficient ability

Page 15: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Effects of Beliefs Explored:Behavior Producers vs Foretellers People with high self-efficacy act, think, and

feel differently from those with low self-efficacy. They create their own futures, rather than foretell it.

Page 16: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Self-efficacy & Job Performance r =.38 for self-efficacy and work-related performance Skills unaccompanied by positive self-efficacy will

lead to deficient or absent performance. Low-efficacy individuals are more stressed and

unhappier than high-efficacy people High-efficacy/High-skill people may lack the

incentive to perform well. Task uncertainty can mislead efficacy judgments

Page 17: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Implications for Trainers Self-efficacy is strengthened through a combination of

practice and the conditions and consequences that accompany the practice of such skills. Disparities in self-efficacy will occur if efficacy is measured for a

simulated situation and performance is measured in a real situation, or vice versa.

5 ways to strengthen efficacy Performance mastery Task-diagnostic feedback Modeling Social persuasion Inference from physiological information

Page 18: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

The Work Self-Efficacy Inventory (WS-Ei) Dr. Joe Raelin developed the Work Self-efficacy

Inventory (WS-Ei) to measure a range of behaviors/practices related to self-efficacy in the workplace.

Seven 5-point Likert-type scales Not at all Confident to Completely Confident 30 items in 7 dimensions and composite score

M = 3.8, SD =.6 Cronbach’s Alpha ~.80 for subscores & composite Strong convergent & divergent validity Two forms - self or other

Page 19: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

WS-Ei sample

Page 20: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Self-efficacy & Academics Beliefs students create, develop, and hold to be true about

themselves greatly contribute to success or failure in school

Most influential is a student’s mastery experience Interpretation of performance-success or failure

Vicarious experience emphasizes teacher’s role Self-efficacy beliefs influence college students’ choices of

majors and career decisions Efficacy beliefs of teachers are related to their instructional

practices, which in turn relate to student outcomes Students’ academic self-efficacy beliefs strongly influence

academic performance and achievement

Page 21: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Summary Self-efficacy is one’s belief about his/her

capabilities to perform Self-efficacy beliefs can influence behaviors

in the workplace, academics, etc Efforts should be taken to increase self-

efficacy in individuals

Page 22: Bandura ’ s Self-Efficacy

Questions? Comments?