1
Automatic Detection of ADHD subjects using Deep Convolutional Neural Network Arjun Watane, Soumyabrata Dey ([email protected], [email protected]) University of Central Florida I. Problem & Motivation: Automatic detection of ADHD Structural MRI Strict 3-D anatomical structure Lack of biological measures for diagnosis Subjective to Verbal Test Inconsistent and over-diagnosis problem Data set: NYU data center of ADHD-200 203 training, 41 test subjects Network Configurations Input Blob – 203 Subjects, 21 slices per subject, 256x256 pixels slice image Layer – convolution and max-pooling to generate feature map 5 convolution layers, 4 max pooling layers, 2 fully connected layers (FC) Extraction of features using pretrained Imagenet model III. Formulation: Slice 1 Slice 2 Slice n Combine FC6 and FC7 for each slice Vector Length = 4096x2 = 8192 SVM Classifie r Slice 1 Decision Convolutional Neural Network Extraction of Feature Layer FC6 and FC7 Slice 2 Decision Slice n Decision Slic es Type Slice Accuracy FC6 % Accuracy FC7 % Accuracy FC6 and FC7 % 1 GM 75 65.85 63.42 78.05 2 Normal 55 70.73 51.22 78.05 3 WM 55 46.34 60.98 78.05 4 NGW 195 63.41 65.85 70.73 5 GM (Late Fusion) 75, 85, 115 75.61 78.05 80.49 Late Fusion of FC6 and FC7 features showed the highest accuracy of ADHD classification, at 80.49%. V. Visualization of Features : Gray Matter White Matter Normalized Slic es 1 2 3 4 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 IV. Image Pre- Processing : VI. Results : Accuracy Comparison of Independent Feature vs. Feature Combination Brain Segmentation Convolution 1 Convolution 2 Convolution 3 Convolution 4 Convolution 5 FC6+FC7 FC7 FC6 Weighted Late Fusion D W . T final D : final D Final decision : W Weight vector : D Decision vector , 2 , 2 1 ) 2 ( 2 n i n i i e e S 0 2 n i 0 2 n i ' ' 2 ' 1 ' ,..., , n w w w W : Calculated from training data , ' i i i w S w 2 n i 0 1 II. Convolutional Neural Network : FC6 FC7 2048 2048 n w w w ,..., , 2 1 W } ,... 2 , 1 { n i Slices are ranked based on the score. Slice1 has highest weight ' i w

Automatic Detection of ADHD subjects using Deep Convolutional Neural Network

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Automatic Detection of ADHD subjects using Deep Convolutional Neural Network Arjun Watane , Soumyabrata Dey ([email protected], [email protected]) University of Central Florida. III. Formulation:. Slices. Problem & Motivation: Automatic detection of ADHD Structural MRI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Automatic Detection of ADHD subjects using Deep Convolutional Neural Network

Automatic Detection of ADHD subjects using Deep Convolutional Neural Network

Arjun Watane, Soumyabrata Dey([email protected], [email protected])

University of Central Florida

I. Problem & Motivation:

Automatic detection of ADHDStructural MRI

Strict 3-D anatomical structure

Lack of biological measures for diagnosis Subjective to Verbal Test Inconsistent and over-diagnosis problem

Data set: NYU data center of ADHD-200 203 training, 41 test subjects

Network Configurations

Input Blob – 203 Subjects, 21 slices per subject, 256x256 pixels slice image

Layer – convolution and max-pooling to generate feature map

5 convolution layers, 4 max pooling layers, 2 fully connected layers (FC)

Extraction of features using pretrained Imagenet model

III. Formulation: Slice 1

Slice 2

Slice n

Combine FC6 and FC7 for each slice

Vector Length = 4096x2 = 8192

SVM Classifier

Slice 1 Decision

Convolutional Neural Network

Extraction of Feature Layer FC6 and FC7

Slice 2 Decision

Slice n Decision

Slices

Type SliceAccuracyFC6 %

Accuracy FC7 %

Accuracy FC6 and FC7 %

1 GM 75 65.85 63.42 78.05

2 Normal 55 70.73 51.22 78.05

3 WM 55 46.34 60.98 78.05

4 NGW 195 63.41 65.85 70.73

5GM (Late

Fusion) 75, 85, 115 75.61 78.05 80.49

Late Fusion of FC6 and FC7 features showed the highest accuracy of ADHD classification, at 80.49%.

V. Visualization of Features :

Gray Matter

White Matter

Normalized

Slices

1 2 3 4 50

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

IV. Image Pre-Processing :

VI. Results :

Accuracy Comparison of Independent Feature vs. Feature Combination

Brain Segmentation

Convolution 1 Convolution 2 Convolution 3 Convolution 4 Convolution 5

FC6+FC7

FC7

FC6

Weighted Late Fusion

DW .TfinalD

:finalD Final decision

:W Weight vector

:D Decision vector

,2

,2

1

)2(

2

ni

ni

ie

e

S

02 ni

02 ni

''2

'1

' ,...,, nwwwW : Calculated from training data

,'iii wSw

2ni 0

1

II. Convolutional Neural Network :

FC6 FC72048 2048

nwww ,...,, 21W

},...,2,1{ ni

Slices are ranked based on the score. Slice1 has highest weight'iw