Upload
dotu
View
223
Download
7
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AUSTRALIA GRAINS INDUSTRY CONFERENCE – SINGAPORE
MICHAEL WHITEHEAD ANZ CLIENT INSIGHTS
MARCH 2014
> 2
AGENDA
SECTION TOPIC
1. GRAIN & OIL SEED INDUSTRY OUTLOOK
2. GRAIN & OIL SEED FORECAST
3. GRAIN & OILSEED SUPPLY CHAIN INVESTMENT REQUIREMENT
US & CANADA BLACK SEA AUSTRALIA
INCREASING COMPETITION TO GAIN ASIA FOOD BOWL SHARE
INCREASING SHARE OF GLOBAL MIDDLE CLASS
2013:28%
2030:66%
TO DRIVE GRAIN CONSUMPTION IN LONG TERM
KEY GLOBAL GRAIN EXPORTERS TO COMPETE FOR THE ASIAN MARKET SHARE
-
140
280
420
560
700
-
700
1,400
2,100
2,800
3,500
1961
/196
2
1965
/196
6
1969
/197
0
1973
/197
4
1977
/197
8
1981
/198
2
1985
/198
6
1989
/199
0
1993
/199
4
1997
/199
8
2001
/200
2
2005
/200
6
2009
/201
0
2013
/201
4
Stock (RHS) Production (LHS) Consumption
> 4
GLOBAL GRAIN & OIL SEED PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION (In MT)
GLOBAL GRAINS & OILSEEDS – RECORD PRODUCTION FORECAST
Source: USDA & ANZ Analysis Note 1: Production forecast is based on 25 year Long term growth rate
-
7%
14%
21%
28%
35%
-
700
1,400
2,100
2,800
3,500
1961
/1962
1965
/1966
1969
/1970
1973
/1974
1977
/1978
1981
/1982
1985
/1986
1989
/1990
1993
/1994
1997
/1998
2001
/2002
2005
/2006
2009
/2010
2013
/2014
Production (LHS) Stock-To-Use (RHS)
> 5
GLOBAL GRAINS & OILSEEDS – S/U REMAINS STEADY
GLOBAL GRAIN & OIL SEED PRODUCTION vs. STOCK-TO-USE (In MT)
Source: USDA & ANZ Analysis Note 1: Production forecast is based on 25 year Long term growth rate
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
2013/2014 2017/2018 2021/2022 2025/2026 2029/2030
China United States European UnionIndia Former Soviet Union - 12 BrazilArgentina Canada AustraliaROTW Rapid convergence consumption ABARES consumptionFAO consumption
> 6
GLOBAL GRAINS & OILSEEDS – CONSUMPTION GAP LOOMING
GLOBAL GRAIN & OIL SEED PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION FORECAST (In MT)
Source: USDA & ANZ Analysis Note 1: Production forecast is based on 25 year Long term growth rate
4.2 4.8 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.4
26.6 26.3 26.8 27.3 27.8 28.4 28.9 29.5 30.1 30.7 31.3 31.9 32.5 33.1 33.8 34.5 35.1
6.6 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9
19.5 19.0 20.0 20.4 20.9 21.3 21.8 22.3 22.8 23.3 23.8 24.4 24.9 25.5 26.0 26.6 27.2
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
1
2
3
4
2014 2018 2022 2026 2030
Kazakhstan Russia Ukraine Australia 90
110
130
150
2014 2018 2022 2026 2030
Kazakhstan Russia Ukraine Australia
> 7
AUSTRALIA WHEAT FORECAST (In mt)
AUSTRALIAN WHEAT FORECAST HIGHLIGHTS THE NEED FOR 40% INCREASE IN HARVEST AREA
WHEAT YIELD FORECAST (T/Ha) HARVEST AREA REQUIRED TO SUPPORT FORECASTED PRODUCTION (Indexed to 2013)
Opening Stock Production Export Domestic Consumption
Source: USDA Foreign Agricultural Services , ABARES and ANZ Analysis Note 1: Production forecast is based on 25 year average growth, ending stock is based on stock to consumption median for 25 years Note 2: OECD forecast till 2022 is extrapolated for 2030 based on 2013 to 2022 data Note 3: Harvest area calculation is based on production forecast divided by yield per hectare
-
9%
18%
27%
36%
45%
APH AH APW ASW AGP Milling Noodle Durum Feed
2009 2010 2011 2012
Perc
enta
ge o
f ex
port
s
300
350
400
450
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Blacksea 14.5 DNS 14 CWRS 13.5 APH13 AH12
> 8
AUSTRALIA SUPERIOR WHEAT QUALITY & EXPORT
AUSTRALIAN WHEAT EXPORT
Acceptable Preferred
Wheat Variety Competition Region
(Quality) Noodles Bread Biscuits Steamed
Bread
AU (APH/AH)
AU (APW)
AU (ASW)
USA (HRW)
USA (DNS)
CAN (CWHWS)
CAN (CPSW)
CAN (CWRS)
IND WHEAT
PAK WHEAT
RUS WHEAT
UKR WHEAT
HIG
H P
RO
TEIN
WH
EAT
PR
ICE
(USD
/T )
BULK EXPORT CONTAINER EXPORT
Source: Trade sources, ABARES and ANZ Analysis Note 1: Based on CNF Malaysia for 2013
300
350
400
450
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Blacksea 14.5 DNS 14 CWRS 13.5 APH13 AH12
-
1
2
3
4
5
2007 2009 2011 2013
China Japan Korea Thailand Vietnam Other
1.0 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
13.0 12.6 12.8 13.1 13.3 13.6 13.8 14.1 14.4 14.7 15.0 15.3 15.5 15.9 16.2 16.5 16.8
6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.8 6.9 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.5 7.6
6.7 5.8 6.3 6.5 6.7 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8.0 8.2 8.5 8.7 8.9 9.2
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Opening Stock Production Export Domestic Consumption
> 9
AUSTRALIA COARSE GRAIN FORECAST (In mt)
AUSTRALIAN COARSE GRAIN FORECAST – BARLEY FALL LOOMING
BARLEY & SORGHUM EXPORT TARGET MARKET (In mt) HARVEST AREA REQUIRED TO SUPPORT FORECASTED PRODUCTION (Indexed to 2013)
80%
110%
140%
170%
200%
2014 2018 2022 2026 2030Harvest Area (Max Yield:2.4 T/ha)Harvest Area (Average Yield:1.61 T/ha)Harvest Area (Median Yield: 1.58 T/ha)
Source: USDA Foreign Agricultural Services , ABARES and ANZ Analysis Note 1: Production forecast is based on 25 year average growth, ending stock is based on stock to consumption median for 25 years Note 2: Harvest area calculation is based on production forecast divided by yield per hectare
-
4
8
12
16
` 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013Domestic Consumption Export
-
4
8
12
16
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013Barley Oat Sorghum Corn (maize) Triticale
-
2
4
6
8
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Barley Oat Sorghum Corn (maize)
-
1
2
3
4
5
2007 2009 2011 2013
China Japan Koprea Thailand Vietnam Other
> 10
AUSTRALIA COARSE GRAIN PRODUCTION (In mt)
COARSE GRAIN EXPORT (In mt)
AUSTRALIAN COARSE GRAIN - BEER CONSUMPTION HOPES
BARLEY & SORGHUM EXPORT MARKET (In mt)
AUSTRALIA COARSE GRAIN USAGE (In mt)
Source: USDA Foreign Agricultural Services , ABARES and ANZ Analysis
-
1
2
3
4
2007 2009 2011 2013
Belgium Netherlands Pakistan China Japan Other
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
2014 2018 2022 2026 2030
Harvest Area (Max Yield: 1.78 T/ha)Harvest Area (Average Yield: 1.25 T/ha)Harvest Area (Median Yield: 1.28 T/ha)
> 11
AUSTRALIA OILSEED FORECAST (In mt)
AUSTRALIAN OILSEED FORECAST – SHORT TERM FALLS
HARVEST AREA REQUIRED TO SUPPORT FORECASTED PRODUCTION (Indexed to 2013)
CANOLA EXPORT TARGET MARKET (In mt)
0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3
4.9 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 6.1
1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
3.1 3.1 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.9 4.0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Opening Stock Production Export Domestic Consumption
Source: USDA Foreign Agricultural Services , ABARES and ANZ Analysis Note 1: Production forecast is based on 25 year average growth, ending stock is based on stock to consumption median for 25 years Note 2: Harvest area calculation is based on production forecast divided by yield per hectare
-
1
2
3
4
5
2007 2009 2011 2013Oilseeds Canola Cottonseed Other
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
2007 2009 2011 2013Canola Cotton Seed Other
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013Domestic Consumption Export
> 12
AUSTRALIA OILSEED PRODUCTION (In mt)
AUSTRALIA OILSEED EXPORT (In mt)
AUSTRALIAN OILSEED OVERVIEW – STRONG CHINA POTENTIAL
AUSTRALIA OILSEED USAGE (In mt)
Source: USDA Foreign Agricultural Services , ABARES and ANZ Analysis
CANOLA EXPORT TARGET MARKET (In mt)
-
1
2
3
4
2007 2009 2011 2013
Belgium Netherlands Pakistan China Japan Other
22%
24% 54%
JAPA
N
AUSTRALIAN EXPORTS BY REGION (In mt)
CONSUMPTION
(In mt) ASIA IMPORT MIX
6.4
6.4
2013
2030
121.7
136.6
2013
2030
2.7
3.7
2013
2030
4.3
4.6
2013
2030
5.5
7.8
2013
2030
69% 9%
16% 6%
95%
4% 1%
41%
6% 42%
11%
71%
15%
11% 3%
4
8
12
16
20
2007 2009 2011 2013
Africa Asia Middle East Oceania
AUSTRALIA EXPORT (In mt)
PRODUCTION
(In mt)
2030:
2013:
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
133.12
120.66
1.16
0.83
IND
ON
ESIA
KO
REA
VIE
TNAM
CH
INA
INCREASING FOCUS ON ASIA TO PROVIDE NEW EXPORT OPPORTUNITIES FOR AUSTRALIA
Source: USDA Foreign Agricultural Services , ABARES and ANZ Analysis Note 1: As of 2012 Note 2: OECD forecast till 2022 is extrapolated for 2030 based on 2013 to 2022 data
5
10
15
20
25
2007 2009 2011 2013Indonesia Korea VietnamChina Japan Others AsiaOther Global
2030:
2013:
2030:
2013:
2030:
2013:
2030:
2013:
41% 6% 42%
11%
Australia Canada US Other
-
6%
12%
18%
24%
30%
-
9
18
27
36
45
1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014Ukraine RussiaKazakhstan Australia % (Global Export) (RHS)Black Sea % ( Global Export) (RHS)
22 23
3335
37
Ukraine North Russia WesternAustralia
South Australia EasternAustralia
-
24
48
72
96
120
1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014
Kazakhstan Russia Ukraine
> 14
INCREASING COMPETITION FROM BLACK SEA TO POSE CHALLENGE IN LONG TERM
INCREASING BLACK SEA WHEAT PRODUCTION … …COUPLED WITH SEA FREIGHT ADVANTAGE TO MIDDLE EAST1,2…
INCREASING SHARE OF BLACK SEA WHEAT EXPORT IS DRIVEN BY YIELD GROWTH
(In mt) (In USD/T)
Source: USDA Foreign Agricultural Services , ABARES and ANZ Analysis Note 1: As of 2012 Note 3: Freight charges for Iran from respective countries Note 3:OECD forecast till 2022 is extrapolated for 2030 based on 2013 to 2022 data
-
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Indonesia Korea Vietnam China Japan
Australia Canada US Other
…RESULTING IN THE REGION BECOMING A KEY EXPORT MARKET FOR BLACK SEA (In mt)
-
10%
20%
30%
40%
<$50 $50-$99 $100-$199 $200-$499 $500-$999 $1,000+
(USD '000)
461 341 270
520
1,200
89 133
-
10
20
30
40
NSW Vic Qld SA WA Tas NTNo. of farms ('000) Avg. Farm Size (ha)
-
6%
12%
18%
24%
15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 +
Farmers and Farm Managers Employed Total
> 15
KEY CHALLENGES TO AUSTRALIAN FARMING
AGEING AUSTRALIAN FARMERS…
Source: Agricultural Commodities, Australia and ANZ Analysis Note 1: Data include all farming activities and sourced from Agricultural Census for 2011-2012
SMALL FARM SIZES…
…LOW TURNOVERS…
-
6%
12%
18%
24%
AU BRZ UKR US CAN CHN EU OECD RUSProducer Support (% of sector revenue)
80
100
120
140
160
1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
Index of Prices received Index of Prices paid
> 16
KEY CHALLENGES TO AUSTRALIAN FARMING
…ALONG WITH LESS GOVT. SUPPORT …
Source: Agricultural Commodities, Australia and ANZ Analysis Note 1: Data include all farming activities and sourced from Agricultural Census for 2011-2012
…LEADING TO LOW RETURNS…
Impacting competitiveness of Australian Farming
Industry
(20)
(10)
-
10
20
30
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
17
Farm Production
Receival & Storage1
16% - 29%
Note 1: Receival and Storage costs based on 3-months storage
INFRASTRUCTURE CHALLENGES ACROSS THE SUPPLY CHAIN…
Australian Grain Supply Chain
Throughput 0.6x
Receival Sites: 623
Avg. Dist2 20km
Throughput: 6-7x
Receival Sites : 271
Avg. Dist2 80km
* Median cost of wheat supply chain for all states
Note 2: Average Farm to Bin distance
USA & Canada Grain Supply Chain
Southern Oscillation Index Cost of Grain Production USD/T
Sources: USDA, ABARES, AGEIC
NOTE: The above table represents the best practices across USA and Canada
136138
140142 143
145
Ukraine Argentina USA Canada France Australia
> Australia currently has scattered receival sites with total bulk handling capacity of over 55mt, in addition it has ~15mt on-farm storage capacity
> Majority of the storage capacities in US & Canada are on-farm storage units providing farmers the option to store grains in un-favourable marketing conditions
% of supply chain cost
Canada Canada
30% - 34%
8%-9%
18
Port Facilities
Others4
Sea Freight
…LEADING TO HIGH SUPPLY CHAIN COST ~70 USD/TON…
Transit Time: 6 days
Shipping USD 9/ton
Transit Time 26 days
Shipping USD 31/ton
International Shipment3: 3.4
International Shipments3: 3.6
Note 5: Charge for a 40-foot dry container or a semi-trailer (total freight including agent fees, port, airport, and other charges).
Costs5: USD
1,020
Costs5: USD 680
Note 1: Logistics Performance Index Note 2: Ease of tracking cargo score Note 3: Ease of arranging competitively priced shipments score
Transportation6
27% - 39%
Axle Load: 16-19 ton
LPI Index1: 3.7
Axle Load: 23 ton
LPI Index1: 3.9
Tracking2: 3.8
Tracking2: 4.1
> Grain transport facility in Australia is deteriorating, with large maintenance investments required, specially into rail infrastructure
> In USA, train lines can move grain 1,000 km at a cost of USD 10/ton compared to USD 25/ton in Australia for less than 500 km
> Australia’s proximity to Asia, provides it with significant cost advantage in terms of sea freight specially for South-East Asia
> Western exports into Asian countries are challenged to a greater extent due the freight disadvantages it has to Australia
NOTE: The above table represents the best practices across USA and Canada
Australian Grain Supply Chain USA & Canada Grain Supply Chain
Note 4: Other charges include GRDC Levy and other levy Note 6: Transportation costs based on Rail charges for 200km distance between receival site and port
Western Australia To Indonesia
USA To Indonesia
19
…REQUIRES INVESTMENT INTO UPGRADING THE FACILITIES…
STORAGE RAIL TRACK UPGRADE PORT
20mt
$2.0bn
2013 Total Grain Exports – 30mt Exports by OAE’s – 15mt
2030 Total Grain Exports – 40mt Exports by OAE’s – 20mt
Assuming OAE’s account for ~50% of total grain exports from Australia, capex requirements have been derived till 2030 considering a new supply chain is setup to support the OAE’s
$1.6bn
Capacity - 2030
Total Capex - 2030
Initial Capex – 2014 - 18
1,325 km
$2.0bn
$1.6bn
Capacity - 2030
Total Capex - 2030
Initial Capex – 2014 - 18
30mt
$7.6bn
$6.0bn
Capacity - 2030
Total Capex - 2030
Initial Capex – 2014 - 18
Note 1: Assuming OAE’s export 50% of total grain exports from Australia Note 2: OAE’s – Other Accredited Exporters
28% 33% 31% 8% 27% 37% 25% 11%
19.7 23.0 21.8 5.6
20
… WHICH COULD LEAD TO POTENTIAL COST REDUCTION ACROSS SUPPLY CHAIN
Note 1: Assuming storage time of 3 months and rail network being used to transport to port at a distance of 200km Note 2: Other charges include GRDC Levy, End Point Royalties, and other levy
BENEFITS OF PARALLEL SUPPLY CHAIN – COST ANALYSIS
CAPEX TIMELINE (In USD bn)
Total Capex Required till 2030: USD 11.6 bn
AUSTRALIA WHEAT SUPPLY CHAIN - USD/TON OAE’s Wheat Supply Chain - USD/ton
Current Scenario Parallel Supply Chain
2014 $1.7
2015 $1.9
2016 $1.9
2017 $1.9
2018 $1.9
2019 $0.2
2020 $0.2
2021 $0.2
2022 $0.2
2023 $0.2
2024 $0.2
2025 $0.2
2026 $0.2
2027 $0.2
2028 $0.2
2029 $0.2
2030 $0.2
Total Cost: USD 70/ton COST BREAK-UP
13.7 18.4 12.4 5.6 20.0
COST BREAK-UP
13.7 18.4 12.4 5.6 20.0
Receival & Storage Transportation Port Facilities Others Benefit
> USD 20/ton benefit arising from the OAE’s moving to a parallel supply chain > OAE’s can save ~29% of their current supply chain costs driven by operational efficiencies and reduced charges
21
UPGRADING CURRENT INFRASTRUCTURE
> Australia’s current supply chain infrastructure requires substantial upgrading and maintenance in order to compete with other grain exporters supplying into Asia (USA, Canada, etc.)
> Investments are required into developing efficient storage capacities, upgrading existing grain rail lines and capacities at port level (storage and loading) in order to make the system more efficient
IMPROVING THE EXISTING GRAIN SUPPLY CHAIN
> Grain storage facilities/receival bins are currently scattered across Australia (~623 receival bins) with average distance between a grain farm and bin in Australia is ~20km compared to ~80km in Canada. In WA ~40% of the sites handle ~80% of grain, thereby leading to inefficiency for other sites due to under utilisation
GRAIN STORAGE
GRAIN RAIL NETWORK
> Axle loads (currently ~17 ton) and low siding, limits the rail length and load carrying capacity. Up-gradation of axle loads to 20-23 ton and increasing siding could further increase load capacity per train from ~2,000 to 10,000 ton
GRAIN ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE
> Truck capacities also require investments, as ageing of current fleet along with limited capacities compared to new models restrict the movement of grains and increase costs
GRAIN PORT FACILITY
> Loading capacities for port terminals can vary from ~600 ton/hr to 5,000 ton/hr in Australia, leading to congestion in ports with low capacities as trucks/trains have to wait for longer time
AUSTRALIA WELL REPRESENTED BY SCALE COMPARISON > 22
North America
35%
South America
12% Australia 12%
Eastern EU/Black
Sea 10%
Africa 9%
Asia 3%
Global 19%
Total AUM by Target Geography (Percent)
North America, $9,450
South America, $3,360 Australia,
$3,245
Eastern EU/Black
Sea, $2,815
Africa, $2,295
Asia, $900
Global, $5,200
Total AUM by Target Geography (USD)
ROW CROPS REMAIN THE MAJOR FOCUS > 23
Permanent 10%
Row 59%
Pastoral 20%
Infrastructure
11%
Total AUM by Crop Type
Permanent $2,790
Row $15,960
Pastoral $5,455
Infrastructure $3,060
Total AUM by Crop Type
ACCESSIBILITY OF MEDIUM SIZED FUNDS > 24
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Up to $50m
$51 - $199m
$200 - $499m
$500 - 999 $1000m+
Size of Major Agri Funds
Up to $50m 2% $51 -
$199m 9%
$200 - $499m 29% $500 - 999
18%
$1000m+ 42%
% of Total Assets by Fund Size
THANK YOU