Thursday, November 03, 2016 City of Ottawa 110 Laurier Ave West Ottawa, ON K1P 1J1 Attn: Kimberly Baldwin Re: Site Plan Application – 412 Lisgar Street –Application #D07-12-16-01111 ________________________________________________________________________ Please find enclosed the following in response to City of Ottawa review comments dated September 23rd, 2016: Civil: Enclosed please find (3) copies of the Servicing, Grading and Erosion

Control Plan as prepared by Novatech Engineering – dated October 27th 2016.

Landscape: Enclosed please find (3) copies of the Landscape Plan as prepared by

James B. Lennox and Associates – dated October 31st 2016. Architectural: Enclosed please find (3) copies of the Architectural Plans, Elevations and

Renderings as prepared by Roderick Lahey Architect Inc– dated October 21st 2016.

Should you require additional information please advise. Sincerely, Nina Davidson Project Coordinator

D07-12-16-0111

September 23, 2016 VIA EMAIL to Neil Malhotra, neil.malhotra@claridgehomes.com; Nina Davidson, nina.davidson@claridgehomes.com Dear Mr. Malhotra, Re: 412 Lisgar Street Site Plan Application I have summarized the technical comments that have been provided on the site plan control application. Please review and provide responses to all the comments provided below. When you provide your resubmission, please include a cover letter (3 copies) indicating how the comments have been addressed, accompanied by 3 sets of all revised plans. All addenda or revisions to any studies, or plans, must be accompanied by a *.pdf copy (either by CD or e-mail).

A. GENERAL COMMENTS

1. This development will be subject to parkland dedication as per By-law 2009-95. Click here for more information: http://ottawa.ca/en/residents/laws-licenses-and-permits/laws/parkland-dedication-law-law-no-2009-95

2. Status of Minor Variance Application.

• It is our understanding that the minor variance application (D08-02-15/A-00194) was filed on May 29, 2015 and adjourned sine die.

• As the minor variance application was received and submission deemed complete prior to July 8, 2015, this application falls under the transition clause in Section 9 of the Zoning Bylaw. Please be advised that this transition period will expire on July 8, 2017 (Variances would have to be approved and a building permit for the proposed development must be issued prior to this date).

1

• After July 8, 2017, the new zoning provisions as amended in Bylaw 2015-228 (a.k.a. Infill II regulations) will apply. For simplicity and greater flexibility on the timing of development, consider applying all the new regulations when the variance application is re-activated. For example: the new rear yard setback requirement is 30% of lot depth which must comprise of at least 25% of the area of the lot.

3. Please be advised that the Amenity Area requirements in Section 137 of

the Zoning Bylaw were revised in 2014. For ease of reference, I have copy/pasted an excerpt from the Bylaw below: Amenity area provided as communal in the rear yard is 52.4 m2

Amenity Area (Section 137) 137. (1) Amenity area must be provided for a residential use that is a permitted use in

the zone in which it is located, in accordance with Table 137. (2) Amenity area must be located on the same lot as the use for which it is

provided. (3) Amenity area provided outdoors must not be located in a required front or

corner side yard. (4) Where amenity area is located outside at grade, it may be included in the

calculation of landscaped area requirements. (5) Minimum required communal amenity area may only be included as part of a

required landscaped buffer where it is aggregated into areas of 54m2 or more.

Table 137- Amenity Area (By-law 2014-189) (OMB Order File #PL150797 issued July 25, 2016 – By-law 2015-228)

I

Land Use

II

Total Amenity Area

III

Communal Amenity Area

IV

Layout of Communal Amenity Area

(3) Low-rise Apartment Dwelling in any Residential Zone within the area shown as Area A on Schedule 321

15m2 per dwelling unit up to 8 units, plus 6m2 per unit in excess of 8.

100% of the amenity area required for the first 8 units.

Communal amenity area required for the first 8 units must: -be located at grade and in the

2

rear yard;

-be landscaped; -consist of at least 80% soft landscaping; and -abut the rear lot line, unless the lot has access to a rear lane

(6) Despite rows (1) through (3) of Table 137: (b) the total amenity area required at grade for all Three-unit Dwellings, Low-

rise Apartment Dwellings, Rooming Houses and Converted Rooming Houses in the Planned Unit Development does not need to exceed 120 m2. (By-law 2014-189)

4. Based on our assessment, minor variances are required for lot width, lot

area, rear yard setback, interior side yard setback, amenity area, and possibly front yard setback.

Lot area is 308.5 m2 Rear yard setback is 6.0 metres Interior side yard setback is 1.5 metres for the full length of the lot Amenity area is 52.4 m2 communal, 16.0 m2 private (Total 68.4 m2, 8.55 m2 per unit) Front yard is 3.0 metres

5. Please show on the site plan the 21 metre depth dimension for review of the interior side yard setback. The 21.0 metre dimension has been added to the site plan

6. Please show the front yard setback dimension on abutting properties to confirm compliance or whether a variance is required.

Item 6 We have added a 3.0 m dimension to the vacant lot to the west. 7. As there will be no vehicular parking, the proposed development should

provide good bicycle parking opportunities for the residents of this building. Consider providing a ratio of one bicycle space per unit.

4 bicycle parking spaces shown on the attached landscape plan.

8. Consider providing a bicycle enclosure that is secure and sheltered from weather. Acknowledged

9. Create a waste management area inside the building to allow more room and better enjoyment of the amenity space in the rear yard. The required

3

dimensions for waste management are provided in Waste Services comments below. Acknowledged

10. Is the easement adjacent to 414 Lisgar a right-of-way for vehicular

passage? Refer to the attached Civil Plan.

B. URBAN DESIGN COMMENTS

11. Façade articulation: a. It is appreciated that the street façade employs a masonry facing,

however to avoid this looking like a simple appliqué, it is recommended that the masonry be taken around both corners of the façade to the side elevations for at least a part of those building faces.

See revised coloured elevations and added building perspective sheet 12. Material treatment and their relationships on the building:

b. There doesn’t appear to be sufficient information on what is meant by ‘metal siding’ on the facades. Please provide additional detail.

See revised coloured elevations and added building perspective sheet. 13. Architectural elements:

c. The ramp/access to the rear yard is not illustrated on the elevations. The ramp has been added to the east elevation

d. The east and west elevations are both of equal distance from the property lines. Not clear why the west elevation has so few window openings (which would break up the mass of the three+ storey very long wall and provide further articulation). Please explain. We have the maximum windows the building code allows, the majority of the windows are along the west side to maximise the sun and the existing view. The east side looks into the rear yards of the houses along Kent Street and which has a very undesirable view.

14. Building massing: e. The Metal panel box on the front and rear façade is an appreciated

architectural detail to provide visual interest for the building. Acknowledged

4

C. ENGINEERING COMMENTS

15. There is one big issue. The back yard drainage from the Catch Basin is within 1.0 metre of the foundation wall which is no permitted. Please revise.

Refer to the attached Civil Plan.

D. TRANSPORTATION COMMENTS

16. The section of ramp south of the main entrance does not meet the ramping requirements for accessibility: The Ontario Building Code (OBC, 2006 – Section 3.8.3.4 - Ramps): maximum gradient of 1 in 12 (or 8.3%)

Ramps at front are both 6 % with landing approx.. mid way

17. If longitudinal grades are greater than 8% alternative solutions such as the use of handrails should be considered. Refer to comment #16.

18. The closure of an existing private approach shall reinstate the sidewalk, shoulder, curb and boulevard to City standards. Remove the depressed curb and bring it to sidewalk height. Show on all plans. Refer to the attached Civil & Architectural Drawings.

19. For the interlock pavers, landscaped areas and public art on City’s road right-of-way the developer has to sign a “Maintenance Agreement” with the City to cover any claims. Acknowledged

E. WASTE SERVICES COMMENTS

20. Additional details are required about the garbage enclosure. Provide the dimension of the enclosure and door opening. Also, the pathway leading to the street should be a minimum of 2.2 metres.

This is what is required for containers: Garbage: 1 x 2 yard Fibre: 2 x 360L cart Glass metal plastic: 1 x 360L cart Organics: 1 x 240L cart. Refer to the attached Landscape Drawings.

F. FORESTRY COMMENTS 21. Norway Maple is considered an invasive species and Forestry Services

does not plant them nor would approve the planting of this species on the City’s ROW. Please revise and use an alternate species. Refer to the attached Landscape Drawings.

5

22. The location of the 3 Elm Trees on the TCR and the site plan, servicing/grading plans seem to be different. Please revise Refer to the attached Landscape Drawings.

23. Show the critical root zone for the trees on the TCR. Refer to the attached Landscape Drawings.

24. Show the limits of excavation for the catch basin on the TCR. I am concerned that the excavation within the Critical Root Zone will compromise the health/stability of the retained trees. Refer to the attached Landscape Drawings.

FORESTRY COMMENTS

25. Norway Maple is considered an invasive species and Forestry Services does not plant them nor would approve the planting of this species on the City’s ROW. Please revise and use an alternate species. Refer to the attached Landscape Drawings.

26. The location of the 3 Elm Trees on the TCR and the site plan, servicing/grading plans seem to be different. Please revise. Refer to the attached Landscape Drawings.

27. Show the critical root zone for the trees on the TCR. Refer to the attached Landscape Drawings.

28. Show the limits of excavation for the catch basin on the TCR. I am concerned that the excavation within the Critical Root Zone will compromise the health/stability of the retained trees. Refer to the attached Landscape Drawings.

G. BUILDING CODE SERVICES COMMENTS

29. A building permit is required for the construction of the building. Acknowledged

30. Request for a Conditional permit may be considered only after approval is obtained from Development Review Services Urban Inner Core Branch Acknowledged

6

H. EXTERNAL AGENCIES COMMENTS

Hydro Ottawa Please find attached comments.

Enbridge Please find attached comments. Bell Canada

We have reviewed the circulation regarding the above noted application. We have no conditions and/or objections to the application at this time. We hereby advise the Developer, however, to contact Bell Canada during detailed design to confirm the provision of communication/telecommunication infrastructure needed to service the development.

As you may be aware, Bell Canada is Ontario’s principal telecommunications infrastructure provider, developing and maintaining an essential public service. It is incumbent upon the Municipality and the Developer to ensure that the development is serviced with communication/telecommunication infrastructure. In fact, the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) requires the development of coordinated, efficient and cost-effective infrastructure, including telecommunications systems (Section 1.6.1).

The Developer is hereby advised that prior to commencing any work, the Developer must confirm that sufficient wire-line communication/telecommunication infrastructure is available. In the event that such infrastructure is unavailable, the Developer shall be required to pay for the connection to and/or extension of the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure.

If the Developer elects not to pay for the above noted connection, then the Developer will be required to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Municipality that sufficient alternative communication/telecommunication will be provided to enable, at a minimum, the effective delivery of communication/telecommunication services for emergency management services (i.e., 911 Emergency Services).

MMM (a WSP company) operates Bell Canada’s development tracking system, which includes the intake and processing of municipal circulations. Please note, however, that all responses to circulations and other requests, such as requests for clearance, come directly from Bell Canada, and not from MMM. MMM is not responsible for the provision of comments or other responses.

7

Should you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Meaghan Palynchuk Manager, Municipal Relations Access Network Provisioning, Ontario Phone: 905-540-7254 Mobile: 289-527-3953 Email: Meaghan.Palynchuk@bell.ca

Rideau Valley Conservation Authority

This application indicates that the stormwater run off from this development will directed to an existing municipal sewer on Lisgar Street which ultimately outlets into the Ottawa River. No municipal treatment for quality is provided. However, based on the plans provided, this redevelopment will be primarily rooftop area receiving rainwater. Roofs and landscaped areas, for our purposes, are deemed as clean. The RVCA therefore accepts that the stormwater runoff from the site does not require any additional quality control measures for protection of the Ottawa River water quality. We will rely on the City of Ottawa to ensure that the storm water site management plan is consistent with the quantity design assumptions for the receiving storm sewer.

Rogers Communications Partnership

Rogers Communications Partnership has no concerns or objection in regards to the attached circulation. Please contact Martin Proulx at 613-688-2191 or e-mail at martin.proulx@rci.rogers.com for Rogers Site Servicing if approved.

Other Agencies

The following agencies provided comments but have no objections to the application:

i. Group Telecom ii. Telus iii. Conseil des écoles publiques de l”Est de l’Ontario iv. Conseil des écoles catholiques du centre-est v. Zayo

I. COUNCILLOR’S COMMENTS

Councillor McKenney’s office has not provided any comments at this time.

8

J. PUBLIC COMMENTS

We received one comment from a representative of the Centretown Citizens Community Association (CCCA). Their comments are stated as follows: It is impossible to make a recommendation to our Board of Directors on a site plan application that does not conform to the zoning by-law on the assumption that the minor variance will be approved. The CCCA Board voted to oppose the minor variance application in July 2015. It can be presumed from our previous opposition to the minor variance that we also would oppose a site plan based on variances that we previously opposed.

If you have any comments or questions about the summary of comments, please contact the undersigned at Kimberley.Baldwin@ottawa.ca or 613-580-2424 x 23032. Sincerely, l Signed by Kimberley Baldwin”

Kimberley Baldwin Planner, Inner Core, Urban Services Branch Urbaniste - Noyau Interne, Services Urbain City of Ottawa | Ville d'Ottawa cc: John Wu, Infrastructure Approvals Manager

9

EX

IT

MA

IN E

NTR

AN

CE

SLO

PE

6.0%S

LOP

E 6.0%

EX

ISTIN

G 2 S

TOR

EY

RE

SID

EN

CE

EX

ISTIN

G 2 12 S

TOR

EY

RE

SID

EN

CE

EX

ISTIN

G 2 12 S

TOR

EY

RE

SID

EN

CE

EX

ISTIN

G 2

STO

RE

YR

ES

IDE

NC

E

EXISTING 3 STOREY TOWNHOUSEDEVELOPMENT

1:12 SLO

PE

CONC. SIDE WALK

Frame

Porch

No. 2562 Storey

Dwelling

No. 2581 Storey Vinyl Sided

Addition

No. 2621 Storey Stucco Sided

AdditionFram

eShed

N 58° 58' 40" E9.02

N 59°01'40" E9.02

N 31°08'50" W34.24

N 31°08'50" W34.24

1 Storey

DC

Brick

Brick

412 LISGAR STREETPROPOSED 3 STOREYAPARTMENT BUILDING

(8 UNITS)

PROPOSED PANEL FENCE

PROPOSED PANEL FENCE

PROPOSED PANEL FENCE

STM SA

NW

ATE

R

SAN INV=69.12±

200mm STM INV=70.66±

CONNECTION TO SANITARY AND STORMTO BE MADE AT 2 O'CLOCK USING COREAND SADDLE METHOD.

13.10m-150mm SAN SERVICE @1.0%. INV @ BLDG=70.0014.30m-200mm STM SERVICE @ 1.0%. INV @ BLDG=70.80

REFER TO GRADING NOTES 8

INV.=71.80

CONNECTION TO EXISTING WATERMAINBY CITY FORCES. CONTRACTOR TOPROVIDE EXCAVATION, BACKFILLAND REINSTATEMENT.T/WM=± 70.66

T/G=73.00CB

FF=74.08TF=73.64

USF=71.00

SP

HYDROMETER

GASMETER

0+00.00

0+03.25

0+08.10

0+11.15

PROTECT EXISTING POLEDURING CONSTRUCTION

SW

ALE

SERVICES @ BLDG FACE:11.50m-100mm WATER SERVICE

NOTE:MAKE SEWER CONNECTIONS@ STREET AND RUN PIPE TOFACE OF FOUNDATION BEFOREESTABLISHING FOOTING ELEVATION.INSTALL BACKWATER VALVES AS PERCITY OF OTTAWA S14

PROPOSED ROAD CUT AND ASPHALTREINSTATEMENT AS PER R10. CONTRACTORTO EXPOSE EXISTING SERVICES AND ADVISE

ENGINEER OF ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONPRIOR TO PROCEEDING FURTHER.

WIN

DO

W W

ELL

WINDOW WELL

WINDOW WELL

RAMP WALL AND RAILSEE ARCHITECTURALAND STRUCTURAL

43.8m - 200mmØ SDR35CB LEAD @ 1.0%

42.8m - 200mmØ SDR35CB LEAD @ 1.0%

4R @ 180mm

3R @ 180mmWATER METERUNDER BASEMENTSTAIRS

100m

m D

R18

WA

TER

MA

IN U

ND

ER

SLA

B

1.1m

EX

IT

MA

IN E

NTR

AN

CE

SLO

PE

6.0%S

LOP

E 6.0%

EX

ISTIN

G 2 S

TOR

EY

RE

SID

EN

CE

EX

ISTIN

G 2 12 S

TOR

EY

RE

SID

EN

CE

EX

ISTIN

G 2 12 S

TOR

EY

RE

SID

EN

CE

EX

ISTIN

G 2

STO

RE

YR

ES

IDE

NC

E

EXISTING 3 STOREY TOWNHOUSEDEVELOPMENT

1:12 SLO

PE

CONC. SIDE WALK

Frame

Porch

No. 2562 Storey

Dwelling

No. 2581 Storey Vinyl Sided

Addition

No. 2621 Storey Stucco Sided

AdditionFram

eShed

N 58° 58' 40" E9.02

N 59°01'40" E9.02

N 31°08'50" W34.24

N 31°08'50" W34.24

1 Storey

DC

Brick

Brick

412 LISGAR STREETPROPOSED 3 STOREYAPARTMENT BUILDING

(8 UNITS)

PROPOSED PANEL FENCE

PROPOSED PANEL FENCE

PROPOSED PANEL FENCE

73.28

73.01

4.0%

2.0%

REFER TO GRADING NOTES 8

T/G=73.00CB

FF=74.08TF=73.64

USF=71.00

73.17

73.20

73.08

73.24

73.30

(PL)

73.4

1(PL

)

73.30(PL)

73.34

SP

PROTECT EXISTING POLEDURING CONSTRUCTION

73.3

0(PL

) 73.32

(PL)

73.24

73.33

3.0%

74.05

74.05

SW

ALE

74.0

5

73.34

73.4573.40(PL)

1.25%1.25%

2.0%

73.35(S)

73.45

73.6

4

74.05

73.5

1

73.15

73.30(PL)

73.15 PROPOSED (TYP)

73.20

73.25

EROSION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL FENCE TO BEINSTALLED ON ADJACENT ANDREAR PROPERTY LINES ANDIS TO BE MAINTAINED UNTILCONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED

EROSION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL FENCE TO BE

INSTALLED ON ADJACENT ANDREAR PROPERTY LINES ANDIS TO BE MAINTAINED UNTIL

CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED

PROPOSED ROAD CUT AND ASPHALTREINSTATEMENT AS PER R10. CONTRACTORTO EXPOSE EXISTING SERVICES AND ADVISE

ENGINEER OF ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONPRIOR TO PROCEEDING FURTHER.

73.20(S)

73.2

5(PL

)

73.6

6

RAMP WALL AND RAILSEE ARCHITECTURALAND STRUCTURAL

73.24

73.14

4R @ 180mm

T/WW=73.50

T/WW=73.50

T/WW=73.50

3R @ 180mm

74.05

74.0

5

73.05

73.1

4

73.30

M:\2

010\

1100

50\C

AD

\Des

ign\

1100

50-G

S.d

wg,

GS

, Oct

27,

201

6 - 1

0:13

am, m

linto

n

PLANA1.DWG - 841mmx594mm

NOTE:THE POSITION OF ALL POLE LINES, CONDUITS,WATERMAINS, SEWERS AND OTHERUNDERGROUND AND OVERGROUND UTILITIES ANDSTRUCTURES IS NOT NECESSARILY SHOWN ONTHE CONTRACT DRAWINGS, AND WHERE SHOWN,THE ACCURACY OF THE POSITION OF SUCHUTILITIES AND STRUCTURES IS NOT GUARANTEED.BEFORE STARTING WORK, DETERMINE THE EXACTLOCATION OF ALL SUCH UTILITIES ANDSTRUCTURES AND ASSUME ALL LIABILITY FORDAMAGE TO THEM.

PROJECT No.

REV

DRAWING No.

DRAWING NAME

LOCATION

No. REVISION DATE BY

FOR REVIEW ONLYSCALE

APPROVED

CHECKED

DRAWN

CHECKED

DESIGN

N.T.S.NORTH KEY PLAN

1 ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW MAR 01/10 BHB

110050-00

REV # 03

110050-GS

GJM

GJM

MWC

GJM

GJM

SERVICING, GRADING ANDEROSION CONTROL PLAN

CITY OF OTTAWA412 LISGAR STREET

CLARIDGE HOMESCLARIDGE HOMESSUITE 2001,210 GLADSTONE AVENUE,OTTAWA , ONTARIOK2P 0Y6.

CO

NS

TRU

CTI

ON

NO

RTH

N SITE

GEODETIC BENCHMARKNCC MON 310 3° TRANSVERSN: 5,030,878.00E: 367,376.00ELEV. 73.873

COOPER ST

GLOUCESTER ST

JAMES ST

KENT STLAURIER AV

LISGAR ST

LYON ST N

NEPEAN ST

SLATER ST

SOMERSET ST

BRO

NSO

N AV

CAMBRIDG

E ST N

QUEEN ST

BAY ST

PERCY ST

GILMOUR ST

MACLAREN ST

LISGAR STREET

SERVICING DRAWING GRADING DRAWING

LISGAR STREET

UNDERSIDE OFFOOTING ELEVATION

TOP OF FOOTING ELEVATION

PROPOSED ELEVATION

DRAINAGE EASEMENT LIMIT

C SWALE AND DIRECTION OF FLOW

PROPOSED SWALE ELEVATION

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ELEVATION

USF=

T/F=

L

73.25

73.10(S)

73.30(PL)

PROPOSED DOORWAY ELEVATION74.45

REARYARD GRADE AND DIRECTION

MAXIMUM 3: 1 SIDESLOPE

DRIVEWAY GRADE AND DIRECTION3.2%

PROPOSED TOP OF BOTTOM FLANGE

PROPOSED HYDRANT LOCATIONHYD

T/F=127.55

PROPOSED SILT FENCE

PROPOSED STORM SEWER

PROPOSED BARRIER CURB

PROPOSED DEPRESSED CURB

DIRECTION OF FLOW

PROPOSED VALVE & VALVE BOX

PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE

PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE

PROPOSED CATCHBASIN

PROPOSED CATCHBASIN/MANHOLE

PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK

PROPOSED CABLE PEDESTAL

PROPOSED BELL PEDESTAL

PROPOSED GAS METER

FH

WV

VC

H

T

TRAFF LT

LS

GM

IRON BAR & PROPERTY LINE

LEGAL ADJACENT

TMH

UP

PROPOSED SANITAY SEWER

X

REMOVALXX

ADJUSTED

PROPOSED REMOTE RECEPTACLE

PROPOSED WATER METER

PROPOSED STAND POST

2) INSULATE ALL PIPES (SAN/STM) THAT HAVE LESS THAN 1.5m COVER WITH50mmX1200mm HI-40 INSULATION. PROVIDE 150mm CLEARANCE BETWEEN PIPE ANDINSULATION.

3) SERVICES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO 1.0m FROM FACE OF BUILDING AT A MINIMUMSLOPE OF 1.0%.

4) PIPE BEDDING, COVER AND BACKFILL ARE TO BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% OFTHE STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY. THE USE OF CLEAR CRUSHEDSTONE AS A BEDDING LAYER SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED.

5) FLEXIBLE CONNECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR CONNECTING PIPES TO MANHOLES(FOR EXAMPLE KOR-N-SEAL, PSX: POSITIVE SEAL AND DURASEAL). THE CONCRETECRADLE FOR THE PIPE CAN BE ELIMINATED.

6) THE OWNER SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE SITE SERVICING CONTRACTOR PERFORMFIELD TESTS FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF ALL SANITARY SEWERS. LEAKAGE TESTINGSHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OPSS 410.07.16, 410.07.16.04 AND407.07.24. DYE TESTING IS TO BE COMPLETED ON ALL SANITARY SERVICES TOCONFIRM PROPER CONNECTION TO THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN. THE FIELD TESTSSHALL BE PERFORMED IN THE PRESENCE OF A CERTIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERWHO SHALL SUBMIT A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS.

SEWER NOTES:

WITH MAXIMUM PARTICLE SIZE=25mm)

CATCHBASIN (600x600mm)

COVER (GRANULAR A OR GRANULAR B TYPE I,BEDDING (GRANULAR A)

SANITARY SERVICE

SEWER TRENCH -CB FRAME & COVER

1) SPECIFICATIONS:ITEM

PVC DR 28

OPSDOPSD

705.010400.020

SPEC. No.OPSDOPSD

REFERENCE

GENERAL NOTES:1) COORDINATE AND SCHEDULE ALL WORK WITH OTHER TRADES AND CONTRACTORS.

2) DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE, MATERIAL AND ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTINGUTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. PROTECT AND ASSUMERESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN ON THISDRAWING.

3) OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS FROM THE CITY OF OTTAWABEFORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.

4) BEFORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION OBTAIN AND PROVIDE PROOF OFCOMPREHENSIVE, ALL RISK AND OPERATIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR$2,000,000.00. INSURANCE POLICY TO NAME OWNERS, ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTSAS CO-INSURED.

5) RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE, INCLUDING TRENCHES ANDSURFACES ON PUBLIC ROAD ALLOWANCES TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER TOTHE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY OF OTTAWA AND ENGINEER.

6) REMOVE FROM SITE ALL EXCESS EXCAVATED MATERIAL, ORGANIC MATERIAL ANDDEBRIS UNLESS OTHERWISE INSTRUCTED BY ENGINEER. EXCAVATE AND REMOVEFROM SITE ANY CONTAMINATED MATERIAL. ALL CONTAMINATED MATERIAL SHALL BEDISPOSED OF AT A LICENSED LANDFILL FACILITY.

7) ALL ELEVATIONS ARE GEODETIC.

8) REFER TO ARCHITECT'S AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING ANDHARDSURFACE AREAS AND DIMENSIONS.

9) SAW CUT AND KEY GRIND ASPHALT AT ALL ROAD CUTS AND ASPHALT TIE IN POINTS ASPER CITY OF OTTAWA STANDARDS (R10).

10) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THE CONSULTANT WITH A GENERAL PLAN OF SERVICESINDICATING ALL SERVICING AS-BUILT INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. AS-BUILTINFORMATION MUST INCLUDE: PIPE MATERIAL, SIZES, LENGTHS, SLOPES, INVERT ANDT/G ELEVATIONS, STRUCTURE LOCATIONS, VALVE AND HYDRANT LOCATIONS, T/WMELEVATIONS AND ANY ALIGNMENT CHANGES, ETC.

PVC CLASS 150 DR18

W17SPEC. No.

WATERMAIN SERVICE

WATERMAIN TRENCHING ITEM

1) SPECIFICATIONS:

WATERMAIN NOTES:

CITY OF OTTAWAREFERENCE

W50 WATERMAIN SERVICE CITY OF OTTAWAW22 THERMAL INSULATION IN SHALLOW TRENCHES CITY OF OTTAWA

2) SUPPLY AND CONSTRUCT ALL WATERMAINS AND APPURTENANCES IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE CITY OF OTTAWA STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS. EXCAVATION,INSTALLATION, BACKFILL AND RESTORATION OF ALL WATERMAINS BY THECONTRACTOR. CONNECTIONS AND SHUT-OFFS AT THE MAIN AND CHLORINATION OFTHE WATER SYSTEM SHALL BE PERFORMED BY CITY OFFICIALS.

3) WATERMAIN SERVCE SHALL BE MINIMUM 2.4m DEPTH BELOW GRADE UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED.

4) PROVIDE MINIMUM 0.25m CLEARANCE BETWEEN OUTSIDE OF PIPES AT ALLCROSSINGS.

5) WATER SERVICE IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO WITHIN 1.0m OF FOUNDATION WALL ANDCAPPED, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.

6) AVERAGE WATER DEMAND = 4,900 L/day

STORM SERVICE PVC DR 28CB LEAD PVC SDR 35

PAVEMENT STRUCTURE:

WALKWAY:

BRICK150mm GRAN "A"

WATERMAIN TABLE: LISGAR CONNECTION(MIN COVER = 2.4m)

STATION GRADE T/WM DESCRIPTION0+00.00

0+03.250+08.10

73.06 70.66 * CONNECTION TO MAINCURB FACESTANDPOST (P)

0+11.15 BLDG FACE

73.03 70.6373.25 70.8373.34 70.94

GRADING NOTES:

1) ALL TOPSOIL, ORGANIC OR DELETERIOUS MATERIAL MUST BE ENTIRELY REMOVED FROM BENEATH THEPROPOSED PAVED AREAS.

2) EXPOSED SUBGRADES IN PROPOSED PAVED AREAS SHOULD BE PROOF ROLLED WITH A LARGE STEELDRUM ROLLER AND INSPECTED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT.

3) ANY SOFT AREAS EVIDENT FROM THE PROOF ROLLING SHOULD BE SUBEXCAVATED AND REPLACED WITHSUITABLE MATERIAL THAT IS FROST COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING SOILS.

4) THE GRANULAR BASE SHOULD BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100% OF THE STANDARD PROCTORMAXIMUM DRY DENSITY VALUE. ANY ADDITIONAL GRANULAR FILL USED BELOW THE PROPOSEDPAVEMENT SHOULD BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRYDENSITY VALUE.

5) GRADE AND/OR FILL BEHIND PROPOSED CURB AND BETWEEN BUILDINGS AND CURBS, WHERE REQUIREDTO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.

6) MINIMUM OF 2% GRADE FOR ALL GRASS AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

7) ALL GRADES BY CURBS ARE EDGE OF PAVEMENT GRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.

8) REINSTATE 1.5m WIDE MONOLITHIC SIDEWALK AND CURB ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF THE PROPERTY ASPER CITY OF OTTAWA SC2

9) REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND OTHER LANDSCAPE FEATURE DETAILS.

EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES:

1) THE OWNER AGREES TO PREPARE AND IMPLEMENT AN EROSION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL PLAN TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY OF OTTAWA, APPROPRIATE TOTHE SITE CONDITIONS, PRIOR TO UNDERTAKING ANY SITE ALTERATIONS (FILLING,GRADING, REMOVAL OF VEGETATION, ETC.) AND DURING ALL PHASES OF SITEPREPARATION AND CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT BESTMANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SUCH AS BUT NOTLIMITED TO INSTALLING FILTER CLOTHS ACROSS MANHOLE/CATCHBASIN LIDS TOPREVENT SEDIMENTS FROM ENTERING STRUCTURES AND INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALIGHT DUTY SILT FENCE BARRIER AS REQUIRED.

2) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE FILTER CLOTH UNDER THE CATCHBASIN ANDMANHOLE GRATES FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND WILL REMAIN INPLACE DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION.

3) SILT FENCING FOR ENTIRE PERIMETER OF SITE, SHALL BE UTILIZED TO CONTROLEROSION FROM THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION.

4) THE CONTRACTOR ACKNOWLEDGES THAT FAILURE TO IMPLEMENT EROSION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE SUBJECT TO PENALTIES IMPOSED BY ANYAPPLICABLE REGULATORY AGENCY.

GEOTECHNICAL REFERENCE:

REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY PATTERSON GROUP. REPORT No. PG 3838-LET-01. JUNE 21, 2016.

PROPOSED WATERMAIN SERVICE

1:150

601:150

42

CB ID

CB 1

T/GRATE INVERT

73.00 71.80

CATCHBASIN TABLE

PROPOSED DOOR LOCATION L

SIZE

600 x 600

2 ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION MAR 12/10 GJM

W32 WATER METER CITY OF OTTAWA

MINIMUM UNDERSIDE OFFOOTING ELEVATION

MUSF=

3 REISSUED FOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION JUN 07/16 GJM

Engineers, Planners & Landscape Architects

Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K2M 1P6

Telephone (613) 254-9643

Facsimile (613) 254-5867

Website www.novatech-eng.com

NOTE:

CONTRACTOR TO EXTEND SERVICES TO 1.0m FROMFOUNDATION WALL AND CONFIRM ELEVATIONS WITHENGINEER BEFORE POURING FOOTINGS.

PROPOSED TOP OF WINDOW WELLT/WW=73.50

PROPOSED GAS

PROPOSED HYDRO/BELL CABLE

4 REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS OCT 27/16 GJM

EXIT

MAIN ENTRANCE

SLOPE 6.0%

SLOPE 6.0%1:12 SLOPE

CO

NC

. S

ID

E W

AL

K

DC

412 LISGAR STREET

PROPOSED 3 STOREY

APARTMENT BUILDING

(8 UNITS)

SID

EW

AL

K

1

UL

510mm DIA.

GOOD

BIKE PARKING

BA

LC

ON

Y

AB

OV

E

BA

LC

ON

Y

AB

OV

E

OUTDOOR

AMENITY AREA

2.4M HT. OPAQUE SCREENED IN

SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AREA

LIS

GA

R S

TR

EE

T

4

CS

1

AN

390mm DIA.

POOR

15

0

45

0

TOPSOIL MIXTURE AS PER

SPECIFICATIONS.

PLANTING BED AROUND

SHRUBS. COVER ENTIRE BED

WITH 75mm DEPTH

WOODCHIP MULCH. PULL

BACK MULCH FROM BASE OF

SHRUBS. ENSURE THAT

MULCH COVERS ALL

EXPOSED SOIL.

TAPER TO BLEND NATURALLY

WITH FINISHED GRADE.

REMOVE DAMAGED OR

OBJECTIONABLE BRANCHES.

FOLLOW PROPER

HORTICULTURAL PRACTICE.

REMOVE POTS COMPLETELY

FROM POTTED STOCK OR CUT

AND REMOVE BURLAP AND

WIRE FROM TOP 1/3 OF

ROOTBALL.

1500

NOTE

ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN

MILLIMETRES. USE TREE

SPECIES TOLERANT TO

POORLY DRAINED SOIL

CONDITIONS

3

1

PLACE 1/3 OF ROOT BALL ABOVE GRADE. CUT AND

REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET FROM TOP 1/3 OF

ROOTBALL WITHOUT DISTURBING ROOTS.

CONSTRUCT 100mm SAUCER AROUND TREE BASE. FILL WITH

75mm WOODCHIP MULCH. PULL BACK MULCH FROM BASE OF

TREE. ENSURE THAT MULCH COVERS ALL EXPOSED SOIL.

TREE WRAP APPLIED SPIRALLY FROM GROUND UP TO

HEIGHT OF SECOND BRANCHES.

REMOVE DAMAGED OR OBJECTIONABLE BRANCHES.

FOLLOW PROPER HORTICULTURAL PRACTICE. DO NOT

PRUNE LEADER

2 STAKES MIN 2400mm LONG WITH NO. 12 GALVANIZED WIRE

ENCASED IN 12mm DIAMETER RUBBER HOSE ALLOWING SLACK

IN GALVANIZED WIRE. REMOVE STAKES AFTER ONE YEAR.

STAKE BEYOND EDGE OF ROOTBALL.

ROOT COLLAR TO BE

SET 100mm ABOVE

FINISHED GRADE.

TAPER TO BLEND NATURALLY WITH FINISHED GRADE

TOPSOIL MIXTURE AS PER SPECIFICATIONS

COMPACTED

ROOTBALL

SUPPORT PAD

2300

ROOTBALL

3m0 21

SCALE

START DATE

PROJECT NO.

DRAWING NO.

PROJECT NORTH

STAMP

AS SHOWN

PROJECT

MAY 2010

PLOT SIZE ARCH-D

412 LISGAR STREET APARTMENTS

TREE CONSERVATION REPORT

AND

LANDSCAPE PLAN

L.1

ARCHITECTS:

CIVIL ENGINEERS:

CLIENT:

CONSULTANTS

LOCATION PLAN

JAMES B. LENNOX & ASSOCIATES INC.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS3332 CARLING AVE. OTTAWA, ONTARIO K2H 5A8Tel. (613) 722-5168 Fax. 1(866) 343-3942

LEGEND

10-CLG-1044

DRAWING

No. Issue

Date

ISSUED FOR COMMENT AND REVIEW1

DD/MM/YYYY

JL

DR CK

1. It is the responsibility of the appropriate contractor or official to report any

errors, omissions or discrepancies on this plan with actual site conditions to

the Landscape Architect before proceeding with construction.

2. The contractor is to notify all utility companies and authorities prior to any

excavation and ascertain locations of underground services.

3. The contractor is to reinstate all areas and items damaged as a result of

construction activity.

4. The contractor is to comply with all pertinent codes and by-laws.

5. The contractor is to maintain a positive surface run-off throughout the entire

construction period.

6. The Landscape Architect is not responsible for subsurface conditions.

7. The contractor is to identify all existing trees to remain on site with the

Landscape Architect prior to construction.

8. The contractor is to stake the proposed location of all plant material in

conjunction with the Landscape Architect prior to excavation.

9. Minimum distances for selected deciduous trees are as follows:

- Sidewalks 1.5m

- Public Streets 2.5m

- Underground Infrastructure 2.0m

10. All trees within 1m of underground utility trenches are to be excavated by

hand.

11. Remove all protective wrapping from tree trunks after installation.

12. Staking of trees shall only be performed if necessary.

13. Ensure that mulch is pulled back a min. distance of 75mm from base of

tree trunk.

GENERAL NOTES:

PROPOSED PLANT LIST

KEY QTY. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION REMARKS

TREES

AP 1 Acer platanoides 'Columnare' Columnare Norway Maple 60mm ø B&B

SHRUBS

RA 23 Ribes alpinum Alpine Currant 600mm ht. Potted 800 mm o.c.

TL 8 Thuja Occidentalis 'Little Teddy' Little Teddy Dwarf Cedar 400 mm spr. Potted 500 mm o.c.

RT 5 Rhus typhina Staghorn Sumac 800 mm ht. Potted 1200 mm o.c.

SP 5 Spiraea x vanhouttei Bridal Wreath Spirea 600 mm ht. Potted 1500 mm o.c.

AH 4 Hydrangea arborescens 'Annabelle' Annabelle Hydrangea 3 gal. pot Potted 800 mm o.c.

JA 39 Juniperus horizontalis 'Andorra Compacta'Compact Andorra Juniper 600mm spr. Potted 800 mm o.c.

VINES

CS 12 Celastrus scandens American Bittersweet 1200mm ht. Potted train up fence

PERENNIALS.

CG 4 Calamagrostis 'Karl Forester' Karl Forester Grass 250mm pot Potted 800 mm o.c.

GROUNDCOVERS

VM 80 Vinca minor Periwinkle 60mm plug Cell Pack 300 mm o.c.

1L.1

TREE CONSERVATION REPORT & LANDSCAPE PLANSCALE 1:75

EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN

(Approximate Location)

EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED

(Approximate Location)

PROPOSED TREE

EXISTING WOOD SCREEN FENCE

PROPOSED BLACK VINYL CHAIN LINK

FENCE

4' height with black post and rails.

PROPOSED SHRUBS, VINES,

PERENNIALS

PROPOSED PAVERS

PROPOSED GROUNDCOVERS

PROPOSED PEASTONE

240 Michael Cowpland Dr., Suite 200

Ottawa, ON

Tel : (613) 234.9643

Novatech Engineering Consultants Ltd.

56 Beech St.

Ottawa, ON

Tel : (613) 721.9932

Roderick Lahey Architect Inc.

2L.1

DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTINGN.T.S.

3L.1

SHRUB AND PERENNIAL PLANTINGN.T.S.

SITE

L

I

S

G

A

R

S

T

.

K

E

N

T

S

T

.

VP03/06/2016

2001 Gladstone Ave., Suite 210

Ottawa, ON

Tel : (613) 233.6030

Claridge Homes

ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL2 JLVP20/06/2016

KEY

QTY.

SIZE diameter of trunk at breast height (DBH)

Extent of critical root zone (CRZ)

REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS3 JLLC31/10/2016

SIZE diameter of trunk at breast height (DBH)

Extent of critical root zone (CRZ)

EXISTING TREE LIST

KEY QTY. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION REMARKS

TREES

AN 1 Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 390mm DIA. POOR To be removed

AS 2 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 380-420mm DIA. GOOD To Remain

JN 1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 550mm DIA. GOOD To Remain

UL 2 Ulmus sp. Elm 510-640mm DIA. GOOD To Remain

QTY.

KEY

SIZE

11

01

40

1

EXIT

MAIN

ENTRANCE

SITE AREA 3318 SQ.FT

3.0 FRONT

YARD SETBACK

7.5 REAR

YARD SETBACK

FIBER

BIN

FIBER

BIN

GLASS

METAL

PLASTIC

SLOPE 1:12 (MAX.)

SLOPE 1:12 (MAX.)

3.0m

24270

6.0m

412 LISGAR STREET

PROPOSED 3 STOREY APARTMENT BUILDING

(8 UNITS)

60

06

1.5

m1

.5

m

15

5

6

5

7

8

9

3

SCALE = 1:75

7.5

0m

2.5 5

10

STM

SAN

WATER

EXISTING 2 STOREY

RESIDENCE

EXISTING 2

1

2

STOREY

RESIDENCE

EXISTING 2

1

2

STOREY

RESIDENCE

EXISTING 2 STOREY

RESIDENCE

EXISTING 3 STOREY

TOWNHOUSE

DEVELOPMENT

SLOPE DOWN 1:12 (MAX.)

11

00

3

No. 414

Frame

Porch

No. 256

2 Storey Brick

Dwelling

No. 258

1 Storey Vinyl Sided

Addition

No. 262

1 Storey Stucco Sided

Addition

Frame

Shed

N 58° 58' 40" E

9.0

2

N 59°01'40" E

9.0

2

N 31°08'50" W 34.24

N 31°08'50" W 34.24

SUBJECT TO EASEMENT INST. CR530616

1.0

71

.3

7

18.90

1 Storey Brick

323

3

10

10

3

61

7

8

11

11

11

12

12 13

13

14

3

15

18

17

16

19

1.5M INTERIOR SIDE YARD

SETBACK LESS THAN 11.0 M

17

17

6000 1670 6543 1666 9000

20

±15 METRES TO FIRE HYDRANT

JOB BENCHMARK

Top of Spindle on

Fire Hydrant

Elev=73.93

(AT CORNER)

3000

6.0M SIDE

YARD SETBACK

AFTER 21.0m

1.5M INTERIOR SIDE YARD

SETBACK LESS THAN 11.0 M

21

1800

TYP.

5606

1163

ORG.

19

21.0m

ZONING

308.5 sq. m.

(3,321 sq. ft.)

SITE AREA

PROJECT INFORMATION

SITE PLAN DRAWING NOTE:

Zoning By-Law 2008-250 R4T(479)

BUILDING STATISTICS

SETBACKS

FRONT YARD 3.0 m.

INTERIOR SIDE YARD

1.5 m.

REAR YARD 7.5 m.

BUILDING HEIGHT 14.5 m.

LOT WIDTH (MINIMUM) 15.0 m.

LOT AREA (MINIMUM) 450.0 sq. m.

145.4 sq. m.BUILDING FOOTPRINT

9.02 m.

LOT WIDTH

52.9%LANDSCAPE AREA 163.1 sq. m.

Apartment dwelling

(within 21 metres of a front lot line,

building wall is 11m or less),

6.0 m.

all other circumstances

3.0 m.

and that yard

abuts a residential subzone

that does not permit that dwelling type

must be landscaped.

GROSS BUILDING - AREAS

(CITY OF OTTAWA'S DEFINITION)

34.24 m.

LOT DEPTH

10.5 m.

UNITS

2 BEDROOM UNITS

BACHELOR UNIT

4

1 BEDROOM UNITS

(INCLUDING ACCESSIBLE UNIT)

(1)

(INCLUDING ACCESSIBLE UNIT)

3

1

TOTAL8

(1)

PARKING SPACE 0

BICYCLE SPACE 4

(INCLUDING ACCESSIBLE UNIT)

(2)

EXISTING BUILDING

CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE EXIT STEPS

600mm DEEP TIMBER FRAMED WINDOW WELL

ACCESS EASEMENT

BALCONY ABOVE

MAIN ENTRANCE ACCESSIBLE RAMP

2.4M HT. OPAQUE SCREENED IN SOLID WAIST

COLLECT AREA

ENTRY CANOPY

ENTRY STEPS

EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK W/ CURB

UNIT PAVER SURFACE

SOFT LANDSCAPING (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN)

2100mm HT. SOLID WOOD PRIVACY FENCE ON

PROPERTY LINE

14

EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE ON ADJACENT

PROPERTY, PROTECT AS REQUIRED

BUILDING PROJECTION ABOVE

EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED

EXISTING SOLID WOOD FENCE ON ADJACENT

PROPERTY

PROPOSED SERVICES, SEE CIVIL

EXISTING GRAVEL AND ASPHALT PARKING LOT

SLOPED WALK TO REAR YARD

EXISTING DEPRESSED CURB AND SIDEWALK TO BE

REPLACED WITH NEW AS PER CIVIL DWG.

19

18

17

16

15

20

BUILDING HEIGHT

47.1%

101.0 sq. m.

1,087 sq. ft.

LOWER FLOOR

219.0 sq. m.

2,358 sq. ft.

2 UPPER FLOORS

2 X 109.5 sq. m.

2 X 1,179 sq. ft.

425.1 sq. m.

4,576 sq. ft.

TOTAL

105.1 sq. m.

1,131 sq. ft.

GROUND FLOOR

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

SURVEYOR

SITE PLAN SYMBOLS:

UNIT ENTRANCE

UNIT PAVER WALK

ASPHALT DRIVING SURFACE

ZONING YARD SETBACK

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

CIVIL ENGINEER

PROPERTY LINE

600 X 1800mm

BIKE PARKING SPACE

PEA STONE SURFACE

CONCRETE PATH &

ENTRANCE LANDING

SOFT LANDSCAPING

SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN

Novatech Eng. Consultants Limited

200 - 240 Michael Cowpland Drive

Ottawa, Ontario, K2M 1P6

Tel: (613) 254-9643

Fax: (613) 254.5867

Annis O'Sullivan Vollebekk Ltd.

Ontario Land Surveyors

14 Concourse Gate, Suite 500,

Nepean, Ontario K2E 7S6

Tel: (613) 727-0850

Fax: (613) 727-1079

James B. Lennox & Associates Inc.3332 Carling Ave.

Ottawa, Ontario K2H 5A8

Tel: (613) 722.5168

Fax: 1-866-343-3942

SURVEYOR'S REAL PROPERTY REPORT

PART 1 Plan of

PART OF LOT 26

( South Side Lisgar Street )

REGISTERED PLAN 15061

CITY OF OTTAWA

Surveyed by Annis, O'Sullivan, Vollebekk Ltd.

1.5 m.building wall is over 11m)

21

AMENITY AREA (COMMUNAL) 120.0 sq. m.

15m² PER UNIT UP TO 8 UNITS

AMENITY AREA (COMMUNAL) 52.0 sq. m.

PAPER SIZE: ARCH Full Bleed D (36.00 X 24.00 Inches)PLOT DATE: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 PLOT SCALE: 1:1 PEN STYLE: 0-RLA-MASTER-100%.ctb F:\2016\1616-412 Lisgar Street Apartment\dwgs\1616 SP-1 Site Plan Oct 24.dwg

SHEET No.

CHECKED:

PROJECT TITLE:

NORTH ARROW:ARCHITECT SEAL:

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPROPRIATE

CONTRACTOR TO CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS

ON SITE AND TO REPORT ALL ERRORS AND/OR

OMISSIONS TO THE ARCHITECT.

ALL CONTRACTORS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL

PERTINENT CODES AND BY-LAWS.

THIS DRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

UNTIL SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT.

DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.

COPYRIGHT RESERVED.

No. Revision Date

1

SITE PLAN

2016-06-14ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL

SP-1

R.L.

OTTAWA ONTARIO

SITE

DRAWN:

T.Z.

SCALE:

1:75

PROJECT NO.

1616

CLARIDGE HOMES

CLARIDGE HOMES

SUITE 2001,

210 GLADSTONE AVENUE,

OTTAWA , ONTARIO

K2P 0Y6.

SHEET TITLE:

CLIENT:

ARCHITECT:

KEY MAP

2 2016-10-21REVISED AS PER SPC COMMENTS

BED71 SQ.FT

BED95 SQ.FT BED95 SQ.FT

2400 3020

BEDROOM

9'-0" x 7'-10"

2751

BEDROOM

9'-0" x 9'-11"

2751

K+L+D

261 SQ.FT

P

5606

LIVING/DINING/KITCHEN

18'-5" x 10'-0"

3050

2777

2720

BEDROOM

8'-11" x 9'-1"

5606

LIVING/DINING/KITCHEN

18'-5" x 9'-8"

2950

K+L+D+B

203 SQ.FT

P

UNIT4

1 BEDS

533 SQ.FT

UNIT 3

2 BED

708 SQ.FT

FLOOR AREA

1565 SQ.FT

SLOPE 1:12

SLOPE 1:12+

0

.

4

4+

0

.

9

2

0

325 6000 6543 16701670

WINDOW WELL

24270

EXIT

WIN

DO

W W

EL

L

WINDOW WELL

WIN

DO

W

WE

LL

WIN

DO

W W

EL

L

60

06

SLOPE 1:12

K+L+D+B

222 SQ.FT

BED65 SQ.FT

BED95 SQ.FT

3364

2571

BEDROOM

8'-5" x 11'-0"

MECH.

P

K+L+D

289 SQ.FT

5276

LIVING/DINING

17'-4" x 9'-0"

2750 2350

2571

BEDROOM

8'-5" x 7'-9"

4482

2590

KITCHEN

8'-6" x 14'-8"

5276

LIVING/DINING/BED

17'-4" x 10'-3"

3112

STOR.

UNIT 2

1 BEDS

405 SQ.FT

UNIT 3

2 BED

746 SQ.FT

FLOOR AREA

1566 SQ.FT

24285

60

06

WIN

DO

W

WE

LL

WIN

DO

W W

EL

L

WINDOW WELL

WIN

DO

W W

EL

L

WINDOW WELL

PAPER SIZE: ARCH Full Bleed D (36.00 X 24.00 Inches)PLOT DATE: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 PLOT SCALE: 1:1 PEN STYLE: 0-RLA-MASTER-100%.ctb F:\2016\1616-412 Lisgar Street Apartment\dwgs\20160602-site.dwg

NORTH ARROW:ARCHITECT SEAL:

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPROPRIATE

CONTRACTOR TO CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS

ON SITE AND TO REPORT ALL ERRORS AND/OR

OMISSIONS TO THE ARCHITECT.

ALL CONTRACTORS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL

PERTINENT CODES AND BY-LAWS.

THIS DRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

UNTIL SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT.

DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.

COPYRIGHT RESERVED.

No. Revision Date

1

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

SCALE = 1 : 50

A-1

2

BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN

SCALE = 1 : 50

A-1

1

2016-06-03ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL

SHEET No.

CHECKED:

PROJECT TITLE:

FLOOR PLANS

DRAWN:

SCALE:

PROJECT NO.

CLARIDGE HOMES

CLARIDGE HOMES

SUITE 2001,

210 GLADSTONE AVENUE,

OTTAWA , ONTARIO

K2P 0Y6.

SHEET TITLE:

CLIENT:

ARCHITECT:

A-1

R.L.

OTTAWA ONTARIO

T.Z.

1:50

1616

2 2016-10-21REVISED AS PER SPC COMMENTS

BED96 SQ.FT

BED95 SQ.FT

BED74 SQ.FT

2375

2851

BEDROOM

9'-4" x 7'-10"

2860

BEDROOM

9'-4" x 9'-5"

2851

2677

3445

BEDROOM

11'-4" x 8'-9"

5606

LIVING/DINING/KITCHEN

18'-5" x 10'-0"

3050

5606

LIVING/DINING

18'-5" x 10'-0"

3050

4514

2640

KITCHEN

8'-8" x 14'-10"

UNIT 8

1 BEDS

559 SQ.FT

UNIT 7

2 BED

743 SQ.FT

FLOOR AREA

1565 SQ.FT

P

P

24270

60

06

K+L+D+B

208 SQ.FT

1525

2900

BALCONY

9'-6" x 5'-0"

1525

2900

BALCONY

9'-6" x 5'-0"

BED96 SQ.FTBED74 SQ.FT

BED95 SQ.FT

2375

2851

BEDROOM

9'-4" x 7'-10"

P

2860

BEDROOM

9'-4" x 9'-5"

2851

5606

LIVING/DINING

18'-5" x 10'-0"

3050

4514

2640

KITCHEN

8'-8" x 14'-10"

2677

3445

BEDROOM

11'-4" x 8'-9"

5606

LIVING/DINING/KITCHEN

18'-5" x 10'-0"

3050

UNIT 6

1 BEDS

559 SQ.FT

UNIT 5

2 BED

743 SQ.FT

FLOOR AREA

1565 SQ.FT

P

K+L+D

317 SQ.FT

24270

60

06

K+L+D+B

208 SQ.FT

1525

2687

BALCONY

8'-10" x 5'-0"

1525

2687

BALCONY

8'-10" x 5'-0"

PAPER SIZE: ARCH Full Bleed D (36.00 X 24.00 Inches)PLOT DATE: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 PLOT SCALE: 1:1 PEN STYLE: 0-RLA-MASTER-100%.ctb F:\2016\1616-412 Lisgar Street Apartment\dwgs\20160602-site.dwg

NORTH ARROW:ARCHITECT SEAL:

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPROPRIATE

CONTRACTOR TO CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS

ON SITE AND TO REPORT ALL ERRORS AND/OR

OMISSIONS TO THE ARCHITECT.

ALL CONTRACTORS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL

PERTINENT CODES AND BY-LAWS.

THIS DRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

UNTIL SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT.

DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.

COPYRIGHT RESERVED.

No. Revision Date

1

THIRD FLOOR PLAN

SCALE = 1 : 50

A-2

2

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

SCALE = 1 : 50

A-2

1

2016-06-03ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL

SHEET No.

CHECKED:

PROJECT TITLE:

FLOOR PLANS

DRAWN:

SCALE:

PROJECT NO.

CLARIDGE HOMES

CLARIDGE HOMES

SUITE 2001,

210 GLADSTONE AVENUE,

OTTAWA , ONTARIO

K2P 0Y6.

SHEET TITLE:

CLIENT:

ARCHITECT:

A-2

R.L.

OTTAWA ONTARIO

T.Z.

1:50

1616

2 2016-10-21REVISED AS PER SPC COMMENTS

44

0

28

80

24

40

440

28

80

24

40

44

0

33

40

24

40

60

0

30

0

1500

288

0

244

0

10

50

0

1500

METAL PANEL

BRICK

METAL SIDING - "INDUSTRIAL STEEL

CLADDING", CORRUGATED 7/8” WITH

THE MILLED FINISH, NATURAL FINISH

NOTE:

FIRE SHUTTER

METAL CANOPY

CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL

STUCCO

PAPER SIZE: ARCH Full Bleed D (36.00 X 24.00 Inches)PLOT DATE: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 PLOT SCALE: 1:1 PEN STYLE: 0-RLA-MASTER-100%.ctb F:\2016\1616-412 Lisgar Street Apartment\dwgs\20160602-site.dwg

NORTH ARROW:ARCHITECT SEAL:

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPROPRIATE

CONTRACTOR TO CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS

ON SITE AND TO REPORT ALL ERRORS AND/OR

OMISSIONS TO THE ARCHITECT.

ALL CONTRACTORS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL

PERTINENT CODES AND BY-LAWS.

THIS DRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

UNTIL SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT.

DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.

COPYRIGHT RESERVED.

No. Revision Date

1

WEST ELEVATION

SCALE = 1 : 50

A-3

2

NORTH ELEVATION

SCALE = 1 : 50

A-3

1

2016-06-03ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL

SHEET No.

CHECKED:

PROJECT TITLE:

ELEVATIONS

DRAWN:

SCALE:

PROJECT NO.

CLARIDGE HOMES

CLARIDGE HOMES

SUITE 2001,

210 GLADSTONE AVENUE,

OTTAWA , ONTARIO

K2P 0Y6.

SHEET TITLE:

CLIENT:

ARCHITECT:

A-3

R.L.

OTTAWA ONTARIO

T.Z.

1:50

1616

2 2016-10-21REVISED AS PER SPC COMMENTS

440

2440

440

2440

440

2440

600

300

2880

2880

3340

3000

2440

2880

6900

10500

28

80

24

40

44

02

440

44

02

44

06

00

28

80

288

03

34

0

300

10

500

1500 1500

244

04

40

28

80

METAL PANEL

BRICK

METAL SIDING - "INDUSTRIAL STEEL

CLADDING", CORRUGATED 7/8” WITH

THE MILLED FINISH, NATURAL FINISH

NOTE:

FIRE SHUTTER

METAL CANOPY

CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL

STUCCO

PAPER SIZE: ARCH Full Bleed D (36.00 X 24.00 Inches)PLOT DATE: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 PLOT SCALE: 1:1 PEN STYLE: 0-RLA-MASTER-100%.ctb F:\2016\1616-412 Lisgar Street Apartment\dwgs\20160602-site.dwg

NORTH ARROW:ARCHITECT SEAL:

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPROPRIATE

CONTRACTOR TO CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS

ON SITE AND TO REPORT ALL ERRORS AND/OR

OMISSIONS TO THE ARCHITECT.

ALL CONTRACTORS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL

PERTINENT CODES AND BY-LAWS.

THIS DRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

UNTIL SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT.

DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.

COPYRIGHT RESERVED.

No. Revision Date

1 2016-06-03ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL

SHEET No.

CHECKED:

PROJECT TITLE:

ELEVATIONS

DRAWN:

SCALE:

PROJECT NO.

CLARIDGE HOMES

CLARIDGE HOMES

SUITE 2001,

210 GLADSTONE AVENUE,

OTTAWA , ONTARIO

K2P 0Y6.

SHEET TITLE:

CLIENT:

ARCHITECT:

A-4

R.L.

OTTAWA ONTARIO

T.Z.

1:50

1616

2 2016-10-21REVISED AS PER SPC COMMENTS

WEST ELEVATION

SCALE = 1 : 50

A-4

2

SOUTH ELEVATION

SCALE = 1 : 50

A-4

1

PAPER SIZE: ARCH Full Bleed D (36.00 X 24.00 Inches)PLOT DATE: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 PLOT SCALE: 1:1 PEN STYLE: 0-RLA-MASTER-100%.ctb F:\2016\1616-412 Lisgar Street Apartment\dwgs\20160602-site.dwg

NORTH ARROW:ARCHITECT SEAL:

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPROPRIATE

CONTRACTOR TO CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS

ON SITE AND TO REPORT ALL ERRORS AND/OR

OMISSIONS TO THE ARCHITECT.

ALL CONTRACTORS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL

PERTINENT CODES AND BY-LAWS.

THIS DRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

UNTIL SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT.

DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.

COPYRIGHT RESERVED.

No. Revision Date

1 2016-06-03ISSUED FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL

SHEET No.

CHECKED:

PROJECT TITLE:

PERSPECTIVE

VIEWS

DRAWN:

SCALE:

PROJECT NO.

CLARIDGE HOMES

CLARIDGE HOMES

SUITE 2001,

210 GLADSTONE AVENUE,

OTTAWA , ONTARIO

K2P 0Y6.

SHEET TITLE:

CLIENT:

ARCHITECT:

A-5

R.L.

OTTAWA ONTARIO

T.Z.

NTS

1616

2 2016-10-21REVISED AS PER SPC COMMENTS