Upload
addison-hyde
View
52
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Astrophysics with 2 sr and 24/7 VHE Detectors. Brenda Dingus for the Milagro and HAWC collaborations. Milagro Gamma Ray Observatory @ 8600’ altitude near Los Alamos, NM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
Astrophysics with 2 sr and 24/7 VHE Detectors
Brenda Dingus for the Milagro and HAWC
collaborations
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
Milagro Gamma Ray Observatory @ 8600’ altitude near Los Alamos, NMAbdo9, R.Atkins,1,2 W. Benbow,3,4 D. Berley,5 E. Blaufuss5, D.G. Coyne,3 T. DeYoung,3,5
B.L. Dingus,6 D.E. Dorfan,3 R.W. Ellsworth,7 L. Fleysher,8 R.Fleysher8, M.M. Gonzalez,1,14 J.A. Goodman5, E. Hays5, C.M. Hoffman,6
C.P. Lansdell,5 J.T. Linnemann,9 J.E. McEnery,1,10 A.I. Mincer,8 M.F. Morales,3,11
P. Nemethy,8 D. Noyes,5 J.M. Ryan,12 F.W. Samuelson,6 P.M. Saz Parkinson,3 Shoup,13 G. Sinnis,6 A.J. Smith,5 G.W. Sullivan,5 D.A. Williams,3 X.W. Xu6
and G.B. Yodh13
1. Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin2. Current Address: Department of Physics, University of Utah3. Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz4. Current address: Max-Plank-Institute fur Kernphysik5. Deoartment of Physics, University of Maryland6. Los Alamos National Laboratory7. Department of Physics and Astronomy, George Mason University8. Department of Physics, New York University9. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University10. Current address: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center11. Current address: Massachusetts Institute of Technology12. Department of Physics, University of New Hampshire13. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine14. UNAM, Mexico City
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
Water Cherenkov Detectors
8 meters
e
80 meters
50 meters
• Detect Particles in Extensive Air Showers from Cherenkov light created in a covered pond containing filtered water.
• Reconstruct shower direction from the time different photodetectors are hit.
• Multi-kHz trigger rate mostly due to Extensive Air Showers created by cosmic rays
• Field of view is ~2 sr and the average duty factor is nearly 100%Milagro Cross Section Schematic
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
Milagro, miniHAWC, HAWC
Median Energy
Angular
Res.Time for 5
on CrabmCrab/day
@ 5mCrab/
month@ 5mCrab/year
@ 5
Milagro w/o outriggers
3 TeV 0.75o 1.1 years 21,000 3,800 1,200
Milagro 3 TeV 0.5o ½ year 13,000 2,500 700
miniHAWC 700 GeV 0.4o 2 days 1,700 300 70
HAWC 250 GeV 0.3o ½ hour 300 50 15
Design details about miniHAWC and HAWC are in other presentations. #s below depends on source spectrum and declination plus trigger cuts.
– Crab spectrum of dN/dE E-2.59 was assumed.– Background was normalized from Milagro observations.– Detector latitude is arbitrarily same as Milagro, so Crab transits at 15o
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
Pre-Outrigger – data since 2000• Optimized with MC simulations• Published detection of the Crab (ApJ 595, 803 (2003))• Sensitivity: ~4.7/yr on the Crab• 10.0 from 4.5yr
Sensitivity of Milagro to the Crab Nebula
Post-Outrigger – data since 2003• Good angular reconstruction on off-pond cores• Sensitivity: ~8/yr on the Crab
• 9.7 from 1.5yr
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
Predicted TeV AGNs
HAWC can monitor multiple AGN on daily to monthly timescales
1-year HAWC observation
Costamante & Ghisellini AGN (31 sources)
Kneiske, Hartmann, Mannheim 2005 IR model absorption model
+ known TeV sources
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1day 1month 0.5 yr 1yr 2yr 4yr
HAWC Observation Time
# o
f C
&G
AG
N >
5 s
igm
a
StandardDeviations
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
GLAST AGNs
Dermer & Davis, 1999
• BL Lacs will be largest fraction of GLAST AGN.• Many will not be known at other wavelengths.• GLAST localization at flux threshold ~20’.• HAWC sensitivity extrapolated as E-2 down to
100 MeV is ~ GLAST flux threshold.• HAWC detection of GLAST sources would
constrain redshift, location, and variability as well as point to targets for air Cherenkov telescopes.
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
Energy Measurement
Average Energy vs Compactness
Milagro is sensitive to energy above the median detected energy of 3 TeV.
HAWC should have similar capabilities above it’s median energy of 250 GeV.
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
GRBs Rate of Satellite Triggers
is Low– SWIFT 2/week – GLAST GBM 4/week
but ~4o position error– GLAST LAT detection
(10 MeV) ~1/week with rapid positions ~1/month
HAWC fov ~1/6 of sky and duty factor ~100% so ~1 GRB/week is searched for VHE emission
HAWC will detect even high z GRBs IF VHE fluence is ~ keV fluence Lines are 5sensitivity to a known
location within 20o of zenith
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
High Energy Component in GRBsCombined EGRET-BATSE observation shows a new high energy component with hard spectrum and more fluence. (Gonzalez, 2003 Nature 424, 749)
The highest energy gamma-ray detected by EGRET from a GRB was ~20 GeV and was over an hour late. (Hurley, 1994 Nature 372, 652)
Milagrito’s > 650 GeV observation implies a new mechanism with greater fluence than synchrotron. (Atkins, 2003, Ap J 583 824)
GRB940217
GRB970417
GRB941017
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
VHE & GRBs
VHE Prompt emission constrains bulk Lorentz factors due to opacity in source
VHE early afterglow probes B field and electron energy densities
VHE lightcurve constrains quantum gravity
Razzaque, Meszaros & Zhang 2004
Zhang & Meszaros 2001
1min
1 hr
1 day
1month
HAWC Median Energy
HAWC Median Energy
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
Searching for VHE transients HAWC data can be searched for VHE transient within a few seconds Milagro search yields model dependent limit on VHE fluence from GRBs Model assumptions will be better constrained by SWIFT and GLAST
redshift T90 Eiso
(1) Assumptions:
(2) Predictions:
(3) Upper Limit on VHE Emission:
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
Other Transients
X-ray binaries– PSR1259-63 has low
duty cycle as observed by HESS for few months out of 3.4 year elliptical orbit
Microquasars– Variable at other
wavelengths
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
HESS Galactic Sources PWN, SNR, & UnID Most HESS detections
in the Galactic Plane are extended sources
Flux of HESS Sources is 2-20% of Crab Flux >300 GeV
Largest Source is Vela Jr with diameter of 2 degrees (F. Aharonian et al., Astron. Astrophys. 437 (2005) L7-L10)
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
EGRET Diffuse Model
Milagro excess in overlapping 5.9o bins in left fig. Milagro excess convolved with 0.75o psf in right fig.
Milagro Galactic Source
HEGRA detected TeV Source: TEV J2032_4130.
PSF
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
EGRET Unidentified Sources & Milagro Morphology
> 100 MeV/cm2s 1 3EG J2016+3657 (34.7 ± 5.7) x 10-8 2.092 3EG J2020+4017 (123. ± 6.7) x 10-8 2.08 3 3EG J2021+3716 (59.1 ± 6.2) x 10-8 1.864 3EG J2022+4317 (24.7 ± 5.2) x 10-8 2.315 3EG J2027+3429 (25.9 ± 4.7) x 10-8 2.286 3EG J2033+4118 (73.0 ± 6.7) x 10-8 1.967 3EG J2035+4441 (29.2 ± 5.5) x 10-8 2.08
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3rd EGRET Catalog sources shown with 95% position error circle.
Flux of maximum point: 500mCrab(May be extended)
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
Molecular Clouds– GLAST predicted to
detect >100 molecular clouds (Torres, et al 2005)
– Measures ratio of CO to Molecular Hydrogen and samples cosmic ray spectrum outside solar neighborhood
LMC and SMC Starburst Galaxies Galaxy Clusters
VHE Emission from Cosmic Rays
Maddalena, 1986
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
Milagro’s Observation of the Galactic Plane (-2O<b<2O)
Consider Region l = 20O-100O
Weighted Map: 7.5
Exclude the Cygnus Region: l=20O-75O
Weighted Map: 5.8
Galactic longitude 20-75 excludes Cygnus region Galactic longitude 20-100 includes Cygnus region
=1.42 +/- .26
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
Integral Flux: Milagro & EGRET
E-2.51±0.05
R1 (Gal. Long. 40 to 100 deg) Based on 3ys of data, 4.5 Flux(>3.5 TeV)
= (6.8±1.5±2.2)x10-11 cm-2 sec-1 sr-1
Spectral Index to connect with EGRET = -2.61± 0.03±0.05
With outriggers we can measure the spectrum at TeV energies
2 more years of data needed for ±0.1 on spectral index at TeV energies
R2 (Gal. Long. 140 to 200 deg) Flux(>3.5 TeV)
< 4 x 10-11cm-2 sec-1 sr-1 (99% c.l.) Spectral index to connect with EGRET
< -2.66 (99% c.l.) Not yet a crisis but spectrum may be
softer in outer Galaxy Additional data will tellSubmitted to PRL
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
Brenda Dingus20 Oct 2005
Summary
Water Cherenkov Technique has been proven to work and is discovering new VHE phenomena
Future Water Cherenkov Detectors can have the sensitivity to – Detect multiple sources daily – Survey the sky for pt sources >1% of the Crab flux
above 250 GeV in 2 years (5 )– Search 2 sr of the sky for short duration transients
with nearly 100% duty factor– Explore the morphology of extended sources such as
the Galactic plane and molecular clouds