18
Contractor 3

AsteroidGazer (AG) Design Review

  • Upload
    von

  • View
    41

  • Download
    5

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Contractor 3. AsteroidGazer (AG) Design Review. Mission Overview. III. Formation Alignment with Star Pictures Data downlink Stationkeeping. II. Deployment. IV. Deorbit. I. Launch. Design Overview. Twelve 3U cubesats External, deployable telescope feature - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

Contractor 3

Page 2: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

I. Launch

III.•Formation•Alignment with Star•Pictures•Data downlink•Stationkeeping

II. Deployment

IV. Deorbit

Page 3: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

Twelve 3U cubesats External, deployable telescope

featureThruster and Attitude control systemSolar and battery powerAbility to individually transmit data

to groundCircular formation for maximum

resolution

Page 4: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

Pegasus XL – Orbital Sciences

Cape Canaveral, FL : Latitude 28°N

Launch due East i=28°

Page 5: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

Line Circle Concentric Circles

Y Shape Plus Sin Wave

Page 6: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

Formation Most Likely # of Pixels

Maximum # of Pixels

Line 1 12

Circle 6 10

Concentric Circles 6 7

Y Shape 6 5

Plus 7 6

Sin Wave 5 8

Decided to focus formation on detecting NEAs with 140 m diameter.

The equally spaced circle formation provided an acceptable maximum number of pixels

Page 7: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

Resolution = 250 meters

12 Cube Sat Solution

Page 8: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

3U Cubesat

Camera System

Attitude ControlSystem

Battery System

Propulsion System

Solar Panels

Optical System

Components

Page 9: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review
Page 10: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

Power System Solar panels Batteries

Communication System Transmitter Antenna

Propulsion System Thrusters

Attitude System Attitude

Determination & Control System

Optical System Telescope parts Camera

Page 11: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

Primary Power Source: Solar Panels High quality PCB substrate & Kapton

overlay. Generate up to 1 Watt of power each Number of panels is dependent power

required and space available

Backup Power Source: Lithium-Polymer Batteries High energy density Previous success on satellites Battery size is dependent on power

required (150 Watt-hour per kilogram)

Page 12: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

Regulator: EPS board Will regulate and monitor power

generated. Under-voltage and over-current

protection.

Distributor: Power Distribution Module Will distribute power to all components in

the Cubesat. Under-voltage and over-current

protection.

Page 13: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

Calculated data rate of 80 kb/s.Estimated fly over GS time of 7 min. Individual communication of each

satellite with ground station. S – Band Transmitter▪ 2 mb/s data rate

S – Band patch antenna

Page 14: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

Large maneuvers: Pulse Plasma Thruster

Delta V = 250 m/s for mission duration Typical shot energy 1.8J Mass <200g including 10g of propellant Copper Tungsten electrode provides

durability Power draw of less than 0.5W Specific impulse measured at 590s

Page 15: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

Blue Canyon Technologies XACT

Fully integrated solution:3 axis stellar attitude determination3 Reaction Wheels3 torque rods IMUMagnetometerSun sensorsComputer

Page 16: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review
Page 17: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

Cassegrain Reflector primary concave mirror secondary convex mirror

CCD (Charge-Coupled Device) Detector CCD 595 from Fairchild Imaging Designed for space applications 9216 x 9216 full frame CCD array

Page 18: AsteroidGazer  (AG) Design Review

COMPONENT COSTSolar Panels 25,000Battery 5,000Antenna 4,500Transmitter 8,900Thrusters 18,000Attitude Control System 18,000Telescope 20,000Photodetector/Camera 3,000EPS 4,500Power Distribution Module 7,750

Total 114,650Total Cube Sat Cost 1,210,800