Upload
dinhquynh
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Supplementary Information:
Appendix:
Aromatic hydrocarbons in air, water and soil. Sampling, and pre-treatment techniques
Nadeem Razaa1, Beshare Hashemib,c1, Ki-Hyun Kimc*, Sang-Hun Leed, Akash Deepe*
aGovt. Emerson College affiliated with Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, 60800 Pakistan; bDepartment of Chemistry, Razi University, 67149-67346 Kermanshah, Iran;cDepartment of Civil and
Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-Ro, Seoul, 04763 Republic of
Korea;dDepartment of Environmental Science, Keimyung University, 1095 Dalgubeol-Daero, Daegu,
42601, S. Korea; eCentral Scientific Instruments Organization (CSIR-CSIO), Sector 30 C Chandigarh,
160030, India.
1
Table S1. A list of aromatic compounds present in environmental media and their physiochemical
characteristics
Sr. No.
Name Molecular formula
CAS No.
Molar mass (g/mole)
Color/Flash or boiling point
Structure Concerns Estimated daily intake µg/d
A: Volatile organic compounds1 Benzene C6H6 71-
43-278.11 Colorless/
277.59 KMutagenic Air: 90-1300,
Smoking: 1800, Food: 250, Water:
10b
2 Toluene C7H8 108-88-3
92.14 Colorless/277.59 K
Reproductive organ damage
Air: 2-12000, Smoking: 2000,
Food: 64, Water: 433 Ethyl benzene C8H10 100-
41-4106.07 Colorless/
288.15 KCarcinogenici
tyAir: 2-3600,
Smoking: 40a, Food: NA, Water: 20b
4 O-Xylene C8H10 1330-20-7
106.17 Colorless /305.37 K
Respiratory issues
Air: 70-2000, Smoking: 190a,
Food: NA, Water: 24b
B: Semi-volatile aromatic compounds5 Anthracene C14H10 120-
12-7178.22 White-
yellow solid/ 613.15 K
Carcinogenic
6 Pyrene C16H10 129-00-0
202.25 Colorless solid/ 677 K
Respiratory and skin irritation
0.001*
7 Naphthalene C10H8 91-20-3
128.17 White crystalline
solid/ 490.92 K
Carcinogenic 0.001*
8 Chrysene C12H12 218-01-9
228.3 Colorless crystalline
solid/ 720.93 K
Carcinogenic 0.01*
9 Fluorene C13H10 86-73-7
166.21 White leaflets/
568.15 K
Respiratory irritation
0.001*
10 Acenaphthene C12H10 83-32-9
154.2 White needles/ 552 K
Eye damage 0.001*
11 Phenanthrene C14H10 85-01-8
178.22 Colorless monoclinic
crystals/ 612
Toxic when orally ingested
0.001*
2
K12 Benzo[a]pyren
eC20H12 50-
32-8252.3 Yellow
crystals/ 768.15 K
Carcinogenic 1*
C: Polychlorinated biphenyls 13 PCB 8 C12H8Cl2 34883
-43-7223.1 Carcinogenic 20 ng kg-1**
14 PCB 26 C12H7Cl3 38444-81-4
257.5 Organ toxicity
15 PCB 47 C12H4Cl4 2437-79-8
291.98 Organ toxicity
16 PCB 52 C12H6Cl4 35693-99-3
291.98 Organ toxicity
17 PCB 77 C12H6Cl4 32598-13-3
291.98 Organ toxicity
18 PCB 95 C12H5Cl5 38379-99-6
326.4
19 PCB 118 C12H5Cl5 31508-00-6
326.4 Organ toxicity
20 PCB 126 C12H5Cl5 57465-28-8
326.4 Organ toxicity
21 PCB 136 C12H4Cl6 38411-22-2
360.86 Organ toxicity
D: Phenols22 Phenol C6H6O 108-
95-294.1 colorless
crystals/ 352.6 K
Skin and eye irritation
100
23 Octylphenol C14H22O 2719-28-8
206.33 448 K Skin and eye irritation
24 Nonylphenol C15H24O 25154-52-3
220.35 Pale yellow liquid/ 422 K
Eye irritant 31.4
25 O-cresol C7H8O 95-48-7
108.14 Yellow liquid/
365.92 K
Burn to skin
26 2,6-Dimethyl phenol
C8H10O 1300-71-6
122.17 White crystals/ 347 K
Acute toxicity
Notes: Unless otherwise indicated, all data in this table are from [1-12]. a Assuming 5 cigarettes/d; b Assuming 2 L/d. NA: Not applicable * Toxic equivalent factor, ** Tolerable daily intake for all PCBs
3
Table S2. Comparative assessment of different methods employed for the sampling and
subsequent analysis of aromatic hydrocarbon compounds in air.
Method ID
Analytes LODs Sampling and analysis
approach
Advantages Disadvantages Ref.
TO-1 VOCs (80-200 oC)
0.01-100 ppbv
Tenax, GC/MS or GC/FID
Moisture is not an issueLarge volumes of air can be sampledLow LODsStandard procedures are available
Highly volatile compounds are not collected Contamination from adsorbent No possibility of multiple analysisLow breakthrough volumes of some compounds
[13]
TO-2 Highly volatile VOCs (-15 to +120 oC)
0.1-200 ppbv
CMS, GC/MS or GC/FID
Efficient collection of polar compoundsWide range of applicationsEasy to use in the field
Trace levels of some species are difficult to recoverWater is collected and can deactivate sorbentinterferences Structural isomers are common
[14]
TO-3 VOCs non-polar (-10 to +200 oC)
0.1-200 ppbv
Cryogenic trap, GC/FID/ECD
Consistent recoveriesLarge databaseSOPs are availableCollects a wide variety of VOCs
Moisture can cause freezing problems in cryogenic trapExpensive and difficult to use in the fieldIntegrated sampling is difficult
[15]
TO-13A PAHs 0.5-500 ngm-3
PUF or XAD-2 cartridge, GC/MS
Low cost Repeated analyses are possibleLarge sampling volumes are possible
Contamination from solvents can occurHeat, oxides of nitrogen, and ozone can decompose samples
[16]
TO-14A VOCs non polar
0.2-25 ppbv
Special canisters, GC/FID/ECD or GC/MS
Best method for broad spectrum analysisLarge database Proven field and analytical technology
Only non-polar compounds can be analyzed due to use of a permeation type drierExpensive detection techniquesHigh levels of moisture cause problem
[17]
TO-15 VOCs polar and non-polar
0.2-25 ppbv
Special canisters, GC/MS
Water management through multiple adsorbentsEstablished methodsEnhanced provision for QC
Significant expertise requiredExpensive detection techniques
[18]
TO-16 VOCs polar and non-polar
25-500 ppbv
Open path FTIR spectrometer
Maintains sample integrity, multi-gas analysis is possible, monitoring in remote areas is possible, possibility of real-time analysis of VOCs
Significant expertise requiredSpectral interpretation is required, Relatively high LODs, Significant interference from moisture and CO2
[19]
TO-17 VOCs polar and non-polar
0.2-25 ppbv
Multi-bed adsorbent tubes, GC/MS
Low cost, Good water management compared to TO-14A, Possibility of selection of sorbent according to analyte nature
Rigorous cleanup is requiredMultiple analysis is not possibleContamination from adsorbents can occur
[20]
325A VOCs polar and non-polar
0.5-500 µgm-3
Sorbent tubes, Passive sampling GC/FID, GC/MS
Integrated analysis is possibleLow cost Active and passive sampling can be used
Requires metrological dataComplex topography can interfere
[21]
325B VOCs 0.05-0.1 Passive Multi-detector GC techniques CO2, O3, and S can interfere [22]
4
polar and non-polar
ppbv sampling GC/MS, GC/FID
can be applicableWater management system is good
Highly volatile compounds cannot be analyzed
5
Table S3. Comparative assessment of different methods employed for the sampling and
subsequent analysis of aromatic hydrocarbon compounds in water
Method ID
Analytes LODs Sampling and analysis
approach
Advantages Limitations
502.2 VOCs MDL: 0.01-3 µg/LCalibration range: 0.02-200 µg/L
Purge and trap, TD, Capillary GC/PID/ELCD
Good applicability to a number of VOCsStandard procedures are available
Low concentrations are not measured accurately Moisture management is frequently problematic Interference from structural isomers is common
[23]
505 Organohalide pesticides and PCBs
MDL: 0.002-15 µg/LConcentration calibration range: 0.03-180 µg/L
Grab sampling, Micro-extraction, GC/ECD
Multiple analysis is possibleHigh sensitivity for some compounds (hexachlorobenzene)
Experienced analysts are requiredExpensive solvents are requiredCleanup of sample extracts is requiredSpecial precaution is needed for Endrin analysis
[24]
525.2 Highly volatile VOCs (-15 to +120 oC)
MDL: 0.03-3 µg/LCalibration range: 0.2-10 µg/L
C18 in a disk or cartridge, LSE, Capillary GC/MS
Multiple analysis is possibleWide range of applications (especially for non-polar analytes)
Contamination from reagents and LSE devices.
[25]
550 PAHs MDL: 0.002-3.3 µg/L
Grab sampling, LLE, HPLC/UV/FLD
Multiple analysis is possible Contamination from solvents Matrix interference is common for benzo(a) anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, and benzo(g,h,i)perylene
[26]
610 PAHs MDL: 0.013-2.3 µg/L
Grab sampling, LLE, GC/FID, optional HPLC/UV or FLD
Silica gel column removes many interferences
Four pairs of classes: Anthracene and phenanthrene; chrysene and benzo(a)anthracene; benzo(b) fluoranthene and benzo(k)fluoranthene; and dibenzo(a,h) anthracene and indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene are difficult to analyze with GC/MSContamination from solvents and reagents
[27]
8100-2 PAHs Grab sampling, SPE or LLE, packed or capillary GC/FID
Both neat and dilute samples can be analyzedMultiple analysis possible
Four pairs of classes: anthracene and phenanthrene; chrysene and benzo(a)anthracene; benzo(b) fluoranthene and benzo(k) fluoranthene; and dibenzo(a,h)anthracene and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene are difficult to analyze with packed column GC
[28]
8272 PAHs MDL: 0.06-9 µg/L
Grab sampling, centrifugation,
Multiple analysis is possibleOnly 1.5 mL per
Non-target hydrocarbons can interfere
[29]
6
Calibration range: 0.03-180 µg/L
SPME, GC/MS determination is requiredNo solvent extraction waste is generated
Experienced analysts are requiredPAHs with high Mol. Wt. require extra extraction
8310 PAHs MDL: 0.013-2.3 µg/L
Grab sampling, LLE, HPLC/UV-FLD
Sensitivity is usually not dependent on instrumental limitations
Experienced analysts are requiredMatrix artifacts can interfere
[30]
Fig. S1. Potential sources of aromatic hydrocarbon compounds in air, water, and soil.
References
7
[1] ASTDR, Toxicological profile for toluene. US department of health and human services,
Agency for toxic substances and disease registry, USA., DOI (2000).
[2] ASTDR, Draft toxicological profile for ethylbenzene. US department of health and human
services, agency for toxic substances and disease registry, USA, DOI (2007b).
[3] ASTDR, Toxicological profile for xylene. US department of health and human services,
agency for toxic substances and disease registry, USA., DOI (2007c).
[4] ATSDR, Toxicological profile for benzene. US department of health and human services,
agency for toxic substances and disease registry, USA., DOI (2007a).
[5] NTP, Report on carcinogens. Eleventh Ed. US department of health and human services,
public health service, national toxicology program, USA., DOI (2005).
[6] NHMRC, Australian drinking water guidelines. National health and medical research council
and natural resource
management ministerial council, Canberra, Australia., DOI (2004).
[7] WHO, Guidelines for drinking water quality. Third Edition incorporating the first and second
addenda. World Health
Organization, Geneva, Switzerland., DOI (2008).
[8] IPCS, Environmental health criteria 52: toluene. International programme on chemical safety,
World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. , DOI (1985).
[9] IPCS, Environmental health criteria 150: benzene. International programme on chemical
safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. , DOI (1993).
[10] IPCS, Environmental health criteria 186: ethylbenzene. International programme on
chemical safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland., DOI (1996).
[11] IPCS, Environmental health criteria 190: xylenes. International programme on chemical
safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland., DOI (1997).
[12] N. Raza, K.-H. Kim, Quantification techniques for important environmental contaminants in
milk and dairy products, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, DOI (2017).
[13] USEPA-TO-1, Method for the determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in
ambient air using Tenax® adsorption and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS).
DOI (1999).
8
[14] USEPA-TO-2, Method for the determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in
ambient air by carbon molecular sieve adsorption and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
(GC/MS), DOI (1999).
[15] USEPA-TO-3, Method for the determination of volatile organic compounds in ambient air
using cryogenic preconcentration techniques and gas chromatography with flame ionization and
electron capture detection, DOI (1999).
[16] USEPA-TO-13A, Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in ambient
air using gas chromatography/mass
spectrometry (GC/MD), Compendium method TO-13A, 2nd edn (Cincinnati, OH 45268). DOI
(1999).
[17] USEPA-TO-14A, Compendium method TO-14A: Determination of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) in ambient air using specially prepared canisters with subsequent analysis by
gas chromatography. In: Compendium of methods for the determination of toxic organic
compounds in ambient air, 2nd edn. US Environmental Protection Agency, DOI (1999).
[18] USEPA-TO-15, Compendium method TO-15: Determination of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) in ambient air using specially prepared canisters with subsequent analysis by gas
chromatography. In: Compendium of methods for the determination of toxic organic compounds
in ambient air, 2nd edn. US Environmental Protection Agency DOI (1999).
[19] USEPA-TO-16, Long path open path fourier transform infrared monitoring of atmospheric
gases, DOI (1999).
[20] USEPA-TO-17, Compendium method TO-17: Determination of volatile organic compounds
in ambient air using active sampling onto sorbent tubes. In: Compendium of methods for the
determination of toxic organic compounds in ambient air, 2nd edn. US Environmental Protection
Agency, DOI (1999).
[21] USEPA-Method-325A, Volatile organic compounds from fugitive and area sources:
sampler deployment and VOC sample collection.
40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUU [EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0682; FRL-9720-4], RIN 2060-AQ75,
Petroleum Refinery Sector
Risk and Technology Review and New Source Performance Standards. Available at
http://www3.epa.gov/9
ttn/emc/promgate/m-325a.pdf, DOI (2015).
[22] USEPA-Method-325B, Volatile organic compounds from fugitive and area sources: sampler
preparation and analysis. 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUU [EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0682; FRL-9720-
4], RIN 2060- AQ75, Petroleum Refinery Sector Risk and Technology Review and New Source
Performance Standards., DOI (2015).
[23] USEPA-Method-502.2, Volatile organic compounds in water by purge and trap capillary
column gas chromatography with photionization and electrolytic conductivity detectors in series.
National exposure research laboratory office of research and development, Cincinnati, Ohio.,
DOI (1995).
[24] USEPA-Method-505, Analysis of organochloride pesticides and commercial
polychlorinated biphenyl products in water by microextraction and gas chromatography, DOI
(1995).
[25] USEPA-Method-525.2, Determination of organic compounds in drinking water by liquid
solid extraction and capillary column gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. National exposure
research laboratory office of research and development, Cincinnati, Ohio., DOI (1991).
[26] USEPA-Method-550, Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in drinking water
by liquid liquid extraction and HPLC with coupled ultraviolet and flouorescence detection, DOI
(1990).
[27] USEPA-Method-610, Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. National technical information
service, PB82-258799, Springfield, Virginia. , DOI (1984).
[28] USEPA-Method-8100, Determination of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in solid waste
by gas chromatography, (US Government printing office, Washington DC, USA). DOI (1986).
[29] USEPA-Method-8272, Parent and alkyl polycyclic aromatics in sediment pore water by
solid-phase microextraction and gas chromathography/mass spectrometry in selected ion
monitoring mode, ss-846. , DOI (2007).
[30] USEPA-Method-8310, Determination of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in ground
water and wastes by liquid chromatography, (US Government Printing Office, Washington DC,
USA). DOI (1986).
10
References used in Tables of the main text (T-numbered references)
[T1] F. Soxhlet, Die gewichtsaiialytische Bestimmung des Milchfettes; von, DOI (1879).
[T2] G. Eiceman, A. Viau, F. Karasek, Ultrasonic extraction of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-
dioxins and other organic compounds from fly ash from municipal incinerators, Anal. Chem. 52
(1980) 1492-1496.
[T3] K. Ganzler, A. Salgó, K. Valkó, Microwave extraction: A novel sample preparation method
for chromatography, J Chromatogr. A 371 (1986) 299-306.
[T4] G. Audunsson, Aqueous/aqueous extraction by means of a liquid membrane for sample
cleanup and preconcentration of amines in a flow system, Anal. Chem. 58 (1986) 2714-2723.
[T5] F.A. DiGiano, D. Elliot, D. Leith, Application of passive dosimetry to the detection of trace
organic contaminants in water, Environ. Sci. Technol. 22 (1988) 1365-1367.
[T6] J. Huckins, M. Tubergen, J. Lebo, R. Gale, T. Schwartz, Polymeric film dialysis in organic
solvent media for cleanup of organic contaminants, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 73 (1990) 290-
293.
[T7] J.K. Kingston, R. Greenwood, G.A. Mills, G.M. Morrison, L.B. Persson, Development of a
novel passive sampling system for the time-averaged measurement of a range of organic
pollutants in aquatic environments, J. Environ. Monit. 2 (2000) 487-495.
[T8] J.A. Koziel, M. Odziemkowski, J. Pawliszyn, Sampling and analysis of airborne particulate
matter and aerosols using in-needle trap and SPME fiber devices, Anal. Chem. 73 (2001) 47-54.
[T9] S.J. Lehotay, A.d. Kok, M. Hiemstra, P.v. Bodegraven, Validation of a fast and easy
method for the determination of residues from 229 pesticides in fruits and vegetables using gas
and liquid chromatography and mass spectrometric detection, J. AOAC. Int. 88 (2005) 595-614.
[T10] M. Rezaee, Y. Assadi, M.-R.M. Hosseini, E. Aghaee, F. Ahmadi, S. Berijani,
Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction, J.
Chromatogr. A 1116 (2006) 1-9.
[T11] S.G. Attari, A. Bahrami, F.G. Shahna, M. Heidari, Solid-phase microextraction fiber
development for sampling and analysis of volatile organohalogen compounds in air, J. Environ.
Health Sci. Eng. 12 (2014) 123-130.
11
[T12] F. Bianchi, A. Bedini, N. Riboni, R. Pinalli, A. Gregori, L. Sidisky, E. Dalcanale, M.
Careri, Cavitand-based solid-phase microextraction coating for the selective detection of
nitroaromatic explosives in air and soil, Anal. Chem. 86 (2014) 10646-10652.
[T13] X. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Qin, L. Ding, Y. Chen, F. Xie, Sensitive and selective
determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mainstream cigarette smoke using a
graphene-coated solid-phase microextraction fiber prior to GC/MS, Talanta 140 (2015) 102-108.
[T14] H.C. Menezes, B.P. Paulo, N.T. Costa, Z.L. Cardeal, New method to determination of
naphthalene in ambient air using cold fiber-solid phase microextraction and gas
chromatography–mass spectrometry, Microchem. J. 109 (2013) 93-97.
[T15] H. Mokbel, E.J. Al Dine, A. Elmoll, C. Liaud, M. Millet, Simultaneous analysis of
organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in air samples by using accelerated
solvent extraction (ASE) and solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) coupled to gas
chromatography dual electron capture detection, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23 (2016) 8053-8063.
[T16] X.Y. Cui, Z.Y. Gu, D.Q. Jiang, Y. Li, H.F. Wang, X.P. Yan, In situ hydrothermal growth
of metal− organic framework 199 films on stainless steel fibers for solid-phase microextraction
of gaseous benzene homologues, Anal. Chem. 81 (2009) 9771-9777.
[T17] Z. G. Shi, H.K. Lee, Dispersive liquid− liquid microextraction coupled with dispersive μ-
solid-phase extraction for the fast determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in
environmental water samples, Anal. Chem. 82 (2010) 1540-1545.
[T18] D. Ge, H.K. Lee, Water stability of zeolite imidazolate framework 8 and application to
porous membrane-protected micro-solid-phase extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
from environmental water samples, J. Chromatogr. A 1218 (2011) 8490-8495.
[T19] J. Ma, R. Xiao, J. Li, J. Yu, Y. Zhang, L. Chen, Determination of 16 polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons in environmental water samples by solid-phase extraction using multi-walled
carbon nanotubes as adsorbent coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, J.
Chromatogr. A 1217 (2010) 5462-5469.
[T20] J. López Darias, V. Pino, Y. Meng, J.L. Anderson, A.M. Afonso, Utilization of a benzyl
functionalized polymeric ionic liquid for the sensitive determination of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons; parabens and alkylphenols in waters using solid-phase microextraction coupled to
gas chromatography–flame ionization detection, J. Chromatogr. A 1217 (2010) 7189-7197.
12
[T21] M. C. Wei, J. F. Jen, Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous
samples by microwave assisted headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas
chromatography/flame ionization detection, Talanta 72 (2007) 1269-1274.
[T22] C. Basheer, A.A. Alnedhary, B.M. Rao, R. Balasubramanian, H.K. Lee, Ionic liquid
supported three-phase liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction as a sample preparation technique for
aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons prior to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, J.
Chromatogr. A 1210 (2008) 19-24.
[T23] W.C. Tseng, P.S. Chen, S.D. Huang, Optimization of two different dispersive liquid–
liquid microextraction methods followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
determination for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) analysis in water, Talanta 120
(2014) 425-432.
[T24] A. Mehdinia, E. Khojasteh, T.B. Kayyal, A. Jabbari, Magnetic solid phase extraction using
gold immobilized magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles coupled with dispersive liquid–
liquid microextraction for determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, J. Chromatogr. A
1364 (2014) 20-27.
[T25] N.P. Petridis, V.A. Sakkas, T.A. Albanis, Chemometric optimization of dispersive
suspended microextraction followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for the
determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in natural waters, J. Chromatogr. A 1355
(2014) 46-52.
[T26] E. Rianawati, R. Balasubramanian, Optimization and validation of solid phase micro-
extraction (SPME) method for analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in rainwater and
stormwater, Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C, 34 (2009) 857-865.
[T27] P. Popp, C. Bauer, B. Hauser, P. Keil, L. Wennrich, Extraction of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons and organochlorine compounds from water: A comparison between solid‐phase
microextraction and stir bar sorptive extraction, J. Sep. Sci. 26 (2003) 961-967.
[T28] L. Guo, S. Tan, X. Li, H.K. Lee, Fast automated dual-syringe based dispersive liquid–
liquid microextraction coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for the
determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental water samples, J.
Chromatogr. A 1438 (2016) 1-9.
13
[T29] L.O. Santos, J.P. dos Anjos, S.L. Ferreira, J.B. de Andrade, Simultaneous determination of
PAHS, nitro-PAHS and quinones in surface and groundwater samples using SDME/GC-MS,
Microchem. J. 133 (2017) 431-440.
[T30] A. Amiri, M. Baghayeri, M. Kashmari, Magnetic nanoparticles modified with polyfuran
for the extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons prior to their determination by gas
chromatography, Microchim. Acta 183 (2016) 149-156.
[T31] Z. Wang, Q. Han, J. Xia, L. Xia, M. Ding, J. Tang, Graphene‐based solid‐phase extraction
disk for fast separation and preconcentration of trace polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from
environmental water samples, J. Sep. Sci. 36 (2013) 1834-1842.
[T32] X.F. Chen, H. Zang, X. Wang, J.G. Cheng, R.S. Zhao, C.G. Cheng, X.Q. Lu, Metal–
organic framework MIL-53 (Al) as a solid-phase microextraction adsorbent for the determination
of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water samples by gas chromatography–tandem mass
spectrometry, Analyst 137 (2012) 5411-5419.
[T33] S. Zhang, W. Yao, J. Ying, H. Zhao, Polydopamine-reinforced magnetization of zeolitic
imidazolate framework ZIF-7 for magnetic solid-phase extraction of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons from the air-water environment, J.Chromatogr. A 1452 (2016) 18-26.
[T34] M.S. Shahriman, M.R. Ramachandran, N.N.M. Zain, S. Mohamad, N.S.A. Manan, S.M.
Yaman, Polyaniline-dicationic ionic liquid coated with magnetic nanoparticles composite for
magnetic solid phase extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental samples,
Talanta 178 (2018) 211-221.
[T35] J.L. Benedé, J.L. Anderson, A. Chisvert, Trace determination of volatile polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons in natural waters by magnetic ionic liquid-based stir bar dispersive liquid
microextraction, Talanta 176 (2018) 253-261.
[T36] N. Fattahi, S. Samadi, Y. Assadi, M.R.M. Hosseini, Solid-phase extraction combined with
dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction-ultra preconcentration of chlorophenols in aqueous
samples, J. Chromatogr. A 1169 (2007) 63-69.
[T37] W. Chen, J. Zeng, J. Chen, X. Huang, Y. Jiang, Y. Wang, X. Chen, High extraction
efficiency for polar aromatic compounds in natural water samples using multiwalled carbon
nanotubes/Nafion solid-phase microextraction coating, J. Chromatogr. A 1216 (2009) 9143-
9148.
14
[T38] G. Zhang, Z. Li, X. Zang, C. Wang, Z. Wang, Solid‐phase microextraction with a
graphene‐composite‐coated fiber coupled with GC for the determination of some halogenated
aromatic hydrocarbons in water samples, J. Sep. Sci. 37 (2014) 440-446.
[T39] J. Ji, C. Deng, W. Shen, X. Zhang, Field analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and
xylene in water by portable gas chromatography–microflame ionization detector combined with
headspace solid-phase microextraction, Talanta 69 (2006) 894-899.
[T40] M. R. Lee, C. M. Chang, J. Dou, Determination of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene,
xylenes in water at sub-ngl−1 levels by solid-phase microextraction coupled to cryo-trap gas
chromatography–mass spectrometry, Chemosphere 69 (2007) 1381-1387.
[T41] A. Sarafraz Yazdi, G. Rounaghi, I. Razavipanah, H. Vatani, A. Amiri, New polypyrrole–
carbon nanotubes–silicon dioxide solid‐phase microextraction fiber for the preconcentration and
determination of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and o‐xylene using gas liquid chromatography,
J. Sep. Sci. 37 (2014) 2605-2612.
[T42] H. Faraji, A. Feizbakhsh, M. Helalizadeh, Modified dispersive liquid-liquid
microextraction for pre-concentration of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes prior to
their determination by GC, Microchim. Acta 180 (2013) 1141-1148.
[T43] K. Farhadi, R. Tahmasebi, R. Maleki, Preparation and application of the titania sol–gel
coated anodized aluminum fibers for headspace solid phase microextraction of aromatic
hydrocarbons from water samples, Talanta 77 (2009) 1285-1289.
[T44] H. Tabani, K. Khodaei, S.K. Movahed, A.Z. Moghaddam, F.D. Zare, S. Mirzaei,
Evaluation of three dimensional high nitrogen doped graphene as an efficient sorbent for the
preconcentration of BTEX compounds in environmental samples, RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 7198-
7211.
[T45] F. Zhou, X. Li, Z. Zeng, Determination of phenolic compounds in wastewater samples
using a novel fiber by solid-phase microextraction coupled to gas chromatography, Anal. Chim.
Acta 538 (2005) 63-70.
[T46] G.H. Wang, Y.Q. Lei, H.C. Song, Evaluation of Fe3O4@SiO2–MOF-177 as an
advantageous adsorbent for magnetic solid-phase extraction of phenols in environmental water
samples, Anal. Methods 6 (2014) 7842-7847.
15
[T47] H.B. Shang, C.X. Yang, X.P. Yan, Metal–organic framework UiO-66 coated stainless
steel fiber for solid-phase microextraction of phenols in water samples, J. Chromatogr. A 1357
(2014) 165-171.
[T48] L. Guo, H.K. Lee, Electro membrane extraction followed by low-density solvent based
ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction combined with derivatization for determining
chlorophenols and analysis by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A 1243
(2012) 14-22.
[T49] S. Piramoon, P. Aberoomand Azar, M. Saber Tehrani, S. Mohammadiazar, A. Tavassoli,
Solid‐phase nanoextraction of polychlorinated biphenyls in water and their determination by gas
chromatography with electron capture detector, J. Sep. Sci. 40 (2017) 449-457.
[T50] S. Zhou, J. Qiu, Y. Liang, Y. Ma, W. Wang, Q. Zhou, X. Chen, P. Shi, A. Li,
Development of a magnetic solid‐phase extraction coupled with gas chromatography and mass
spectrometry method for the analysis of semivolatile organic compounds, J. Sep. Sci. 38 (2015)
3295-3303.
[T51] H. Zang, J. P. Yuan, X. F. Chen, C. A. Liu, C. G. Cheng, R. S. Zhao, Hollow fiber-
protected metal–organic framework materials as micro-solid-phase extraction adsorbents for the
determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in water samples by gas chromatography-tandem
mass spectrometry, Anal. Methods 5 (2013) 4875-4882.
[T52] S. Ozcan, Analyses of polychlorinated biphenyls in waters and wastewaters using vortex‐
assisted liquid–liquid microextraction and gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry, J. Sep. Sci.
34 (2011) 574-584.
[T53] S. Luo, L. Fang, X. Wang, H. Liu, G. Ouyang, C. Lan, T. Luan, Determination of
octylphenol and nonylphenol in aqueous sample using simultaneous derivatization and dispersive
liquid–liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, J.
Chromatogr. A 1217 (2010) 6762-6768.
[T54] B. Hashemi, M. Shamsipur, A. Barati, Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Based on
Solidification of Floating Organic Drop with Central Composite Design for the Determination of
Nitrophenols Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography, J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 26 (2015)
2046-2053.
16
[T55] M.T. Pena, M.C. Casais, M.C. Mejuto, R. Cela, Development of an ionic liquid based
dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons in water samples, J. Chromatogr. A1216 (2009) 6356-6364.
[T56] Y. Huang, Q. Zhou, G. Xie, Development of micro-solid phase extraction with titanate
nanotube array modified by cetyltrimethylammonium bromide for sensitive determination of
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from environmental water samples, J. Hazard. Mater. 193
(2011) 82-89.
[T57] P. Popp, C. Bauer, L. Wennrich, Application of stir bar sorptive extraction in combination
with column liquid chromatography for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
in water samples, Anal. Chim. Acta 436 (2001) 1-9.
[T58] S.H. Huo, X.P. Yan, Facile magnetization of metal–organic framework MIL-101 for
magnetic solid-phase extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental water
samples, Analyst 137 (2012) 3445-3451.
[T59] Y. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. Ding, J. Zhou, L. Ni, C. Sun, Quantitative determination of 16
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil samples using solid‐phase microextraction, J. Sep. Sci.
32 (2009) 3951-3957.
[T60] L. Guo, H.K. Lee, Microwave assisted extraction combined with solvent bar
microextraction for one-step solvent-minimized extraction, cleanup and preconcentration of
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil samples, J. Chromatogr. A 1286 (2013) 9-15.
[T61] Y. Han, L. Ren, K. Xu, F. Yang, Y. Li, T. Cheng, X. Kang, C. Xu, Q. Shi, Supercritical
fluid extraction with carbon nanotubes as a solid collection trap for the analysis of polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons and their derivatives, J. Chromatogr. A 1395 (2015) 1-6.
[T62] M. Khajeh, A.A. Moosavi‐Movahedi, M. Shakeri, F. Musavi Zadeh, A. Khajeh, M.
Bohlooli, Dispersive solid phase extraction combined with dispersive liquid–liquid extraction for
the determination of BTEX in soil samples: ant colony optimization–artificial neural network, J.
Chemom. 29 (2015) 245-252.
[T63] D. Tan, J. Jin, F. Li, X. Sun, Y. Ni, J. Chen, Phenyltrichlorosilane-functionalized
magnesium oxide microspheres: preparation, characterization and application for the selective
extraction of dioxin-like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils with matrix solid-phase
dispersion, Anal. Chim. Acta DOI (2017).
17
[T64] R.J. Krupadam, B. Bhagat, S.R. Wate, G.L. Bodhe, B. Sellergren, Y. Anjaneyulu,
Fluorescence spectrophotometer analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental
samples based on solid phase extraction using molecularly imprinted polymer, Environ. Sci.
Technol. 43 (2009) 2871-2877.
18