Upload
yidel4313
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Arnaud Rouzee et al- Laser spatial profile effects in measurements of impulsive molecular alignment
1/7
INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING JOURNAL OF PHYSICS B: ATOMIC, MOLECULAR AND OPTICAL PHYSICS
J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38 (2005) 23292335 doi:10.1088/0953-4075/38/14/001
Laser spatial profile effects in measurements ofimpulsive molecular alignment
Arnaud Rouzee, Vincent Renard, Bruno Lavorel and Olivier Faucher
Laboratoire de Physique de lUniversite de Bourgogne, UMR CNRS 5027, BP 47870,21078 Dijon Cedex, France
Received 1 February 2005, in final form 24 May 2005
Published 20 June 2005
Online at stacks.iop.org/JPhysB/38/2329
Abstract
We use a non-intrusive technique based on a polarization scheme to probe the
periodic alignment of the CO2 and N2 molecules induced by a strong laser
pulse linearly polarized. A weak probe field experiences the birefringence
resulting from the alignment of the molecules. By comparing the probe
depolarization signal with the numerical simulation of the time-dependent
Schrodinger equation, it is possible to quantify the alignment of the molecular
sample. The modelling takes into account the spatial profile of the pump
intensity. It allows from the alignment signal to determine the onset of
saturation due to ionization, despite the intrinsic saturation of the alignment
arising for about the same laser intensity.
1. Introduction
In thelast few years, laser-induced molecularalignment hasbecome of great interest in different
domains of application such as chemistry or molecular optics. Oneof the established alignment
techniques is to use a strong non-resonant laser pulse that applies in principle to any molecular
system with an anisotropic polarizability [1]. Within this technique, two cases have to be
considered: the adiabatic [2] and the quasi-sudden regime [3, 4]. In the first case, a relatively
long pulse with respect to the rotational period of the molecule is needed and alignment along
the polarization direction of the field is achieved only during the laser pulse. After extinction
of the latter, molecules return to their initial states. In the second case, the pulse is shorter than
the rotational period and alignment occurs periodically in time at revivals of the rotationalwave packet [5] launched by the laser pulse. This case is of particular interest because the
alignment occurs in field-free conditions that are suitable for most applications. The truly
sudden regime is valid for a pulse duration much shorter compared with the rotational period
of the molecule in its higher rotational state populated during the pulse interaction. Field-
free alignment can be observed by imaging the photo-fragmentation of molecules produced
by an additional strong laser pulse [4, 6, 7]. From the non-isotropic angular distribution,
the degree of alignment is quantified by determining the average value cos2 , where is
0953-4075/05/142329+07$30.00 2005 IOP Publishing Ltd Printed in the UK 2329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/38/14/001http://stacks.iop.org/jb/38/2329http://stacks.iop.org/jb/38/2329http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/38/14/0018/3/2019 Arnaud Rouzee et al- Laser spatial profile effects in measurements of impulsive molecular alignment
2/7
2330 A Rouzee et al
the angle between the molecular axis and the polarization direction of the laser field. As
inherent in the imaging technique, molecules are destroyed while the probing process occurs.
The technique employed in the present work makes use of a weak probe that preserves the
molecules [8]. A linearly polarized probe beam experiences the birefringence induced by the
molecular alignment. In the case of linear molecules, the subsequent probe depolarizationprovides an information on molecular alignment. In [8, 9], the spatial dependence of the
electric field for the pump and probe pulse was ignored in the model and an effective value of
(cos2 1/3)2 was extracted by comparing experiments with simulations. In the present
work, we improve the analysis by considering the volume effects in the model and by using
an iterative least-squares fitting of the experimental data for the determination of cos2 .
We present results obtained in CO2 and N2. The numerical simulations are performed for an
adjusted intensity that can directly be compared to the measured intensity. The cos2 value
deduced from the numerical adjustment corresponds to the alignment at the centre of the laser
beam, rather than to a value averaged over the interaction volume. Furthermore, because the
spatial distribution of the laser beams is included in the model, the saturation of the alignment
signal of CO2 observed for large intensities can unambiguously be related to the depletion of
the neutrals through the ionization process.
2. Experimental setup
The experiment is based on a Ti:Sapphire laser chirped pulse amplified system operating at
20 Hz and 1 KHz. The pulse duration is about 100 fs and the wavelength is centred at 800 nm.
The scheme of the experiment is presented in [9]. The incoming beam is split in two parts. The
strong part, vertically polarized, is used as the pump. In order to change the intensity of the
pump, we use a half-wave plate combined with a polarizer. The weak part, used as the probe, is
polarized at 45 with respect to the polarization direction of the pump. A delay line composed
of a corner cube mounted on a motorized linear stage is placed on the probe path in order to
adjust the temporal delay between the pump and probe pulse. Both beams are focused with a
175 mm (300 mm) focal length lens and cross each other in a cell of CO 2 (N2) at a small angle
(2). The measured waist is 30 m (40 m) and 50 m (60 m) for the pump and probe,
respectively. After the cell, the pump is blocked and the depolarization of the probe is analysed
with a polarizer set at 90 with respect to its initial polarization direction. The outgoing signal
field is then collected with a photomultiplier, sampled by a boxcar integrator and displayed
on a computer that is also used to control the delay line. The interaction of the two pulses
takes place in a 0.2 m long static cell at room temperature and under pressure of 0.11 bar of
CO2 or 0.86 bar of N2, which is a compromise to ensure a good signal-to-noise ratio and to
minimize the decay of the signal due to collisions. The spatial overlapping of the laser beams
into the interaction region is adjusted prior to each experimental run by maximizing the signal
amplitude and by checking that the signal shape is not affected by a small displacement around
the position that optimizes the signal. It assumes that an offset
8/3/2019 Arnaud Rouzee et al- Laser spatial profile effects in measurements of impulsive molecular alignment
3/7
Laser spatial profile effects in measurements of impulsive molecular alignment 2331
Ep(r,z,t) = E
w0
w(z)exp
2 l n 2
t
p
2exp
r
w(z)
2cos(t)
e p, (1)
where w(z) is the beam radius, w0 is the beam waist (defined at z = 0), E is the peak amplitude
of the pulse, r =
(x2 + y2) is the transverse coordinate, is the angular frequency of thelaser, p is the pulse duration and
e p is an unit vector along the polarization direction. In the
non-adiabatic regime, i.e. p < rot with rot the classical rotational period of the molecule,
the interaction leads to a periodic alignment of the molecules along the vectore p that remains
after the extinction of the pump pulse. Considering the spatial distribution of the electric field,
the magnitude of alignment is different with respect to the position of the molecule within the
laser focus. At the space coordinate (r, z), the state vectorr,z(t) of the molecule is evaluated
by solving the time-dependent Schrodinger equation ihd/dt = H with
H = Hrot p
Ep(r,z,t) (2)
the effective Hamiltonian that describes the non-resonant excitation of the molecular
polarizability, Hrot the rotational Hamiltonian,
p = 1/2
Ep the effective dipole momentand
the polarizability [9]. Higher-order polarizabilities (i.e., hyperpolarizabilities) can be
neglected under the intensity regime investigated in this work. From equation (2), we can
calculate the thermal average value cos2 r,z(t) in each point of space within the interaction
volume and in particular at the focus (r = z = 0), where the alignment is maximum. In the
experiment, the alignment is probed with a second weak pulse, time delayed with respect to
the pump pulse. The birefringence induced by the alignment of the molecular sample changes
the polarization of the probe field and results in a signal field
Es(r,z,t ) Epr(r,z,t )n(r,z,t), (3)
where Epr is the incident probe field envelope, is the time delay, and n = n n is
the birefringence of the medium with n and n the refractive index respectively parallel and
perpendicular to the pump polarization direction. Finally, we can show that the birefringenceis related to the molecular alignment by [10]
n(r, z,t ) N
cos2 r,z(t) 13
. (4)
In this expression, Nis the number density and = is the polarizability anisotropy,
with and the components of the polarizability respectively parallel and perpendicular
to the molecular axis. Because the molecular sample is excited by coherent fields, the total
electric field collected by the detector is obtained by a summation of signal fields (defined in
equation (3)) over the space coordinates
Es(t )
r
z
2 rEs(r,z,t ) dr dz (5)
and, finally, the signal delivered by the detector is
Is( )
+
E2s (t ) dt. (6)
As seen from equations (3)(6), the signal is proportional to the temporal convolution of
(cos2 1/3)2 with the probe intensity, spaced-averaged. By fitting the experimental
data with the numerical simulation, we can deduce the thermal average cos2 at any space
coordinate within the interaction volume.
8/3/2019 Arnaud Rouzee et al- Laser spatial profile effects in measurements of impulsive molecular alignment
4/7
2332 A Rouzee et al
-0.1
0.0
0.1
Obs-calc
35302520151050
Pump-probe delay (ps)
-0.6
-0.3
0.0
0.3
0.6
Signal
(arb.units)
Experiment
Theory
Figure 1. Upper graph: signal (experiment) versus pumpprobe delay recorded in CO2 at0.11 bar for a peak intensity of 127 TW cm 2. Numerical simulation (theory) performed for alaser peak intensity of 120 TW cm2. Lower graph: observation calculation.
4. Results and discussion
Experiments have been conducted in CO2 and N2. Figure 1 displays the polarization signal
versus thepumpprobe delay performedat room temperature in CO2. The traceis characterized
by transients equally spaced by Tr/4, where Tr = 1/2B0c 42.7 ps is the classical rotational
period and B0 is the rotational constant in the ground vibronic state. Each peak can be
associated with the alignment of the molecular axis along the direction of polarizatione p of
the pump field (cos2 > 1/3) or to the planar delocalization of the molecular axis in the
plane perpendicular to this direction (cos2 < 1/3). For an isotropic angular distribution
cos2 = 1/3. The nonzero background signal observed between transients is produced by
the permanent alignment of the molecules [4, 8]. In the same figure, we show the numerical
fit of equation (6) based on the solution of the time-dependent Schrodinger equation. The
beam sizes used in the simulation correspond to the measured values (cf section 2). Because
the shape of the transients and the permanent alignment depend both on the laser intensity,
the numerical adjustment is quite accurate. The difference between the calculation and the
observation is shown in the lower graph. The adjusted peak intensity is 120 TW cm2.
Because the calculation accounts for the spatial dependence of the pump and probe fields, this
value is very close to 127 TW cm2, the measured peak intensity. The measurements in N2were performedat higherpressure0.86 bar, in order to compensate for thesmaller polarizability
of N2 as compared to CO2. The results obtained in N2 are shown in figure 2. The transients are
spaced by Tr/4, with Tr = 1/2B0c 8.38 ps. The alternation of small and large transients
results from the difference of spin degeneracy factor between rotational states of odd and
even J-values, respectively equal to 3 and 6. In the same figure, the signal is compared to
the numerical simulation. The latter accounts for a small static birefringence (2% of the
maximum signal) produced by the windows of the gas cell. The agreement between theory andexperiment is found for an adjusted peak intensity of 92 TW cm2, that is about the measured
intensity (90 TW cm2). The residual obscalc is nevertheless not as good as in CO2 for the
following reason. The numerical simulations assume that the laser beams are co-propagating
within the sample. It is known for pumpprobe experiments that crossed beams introduce
degradation of the temporal resolution ensuing broadening of the temporal signal. This effect
is unimportant in CO2 because the transients contain substructures relatively large compared
to N2 and to the pulse duration. In N2, the statistical weight being different for the population
8/3/2019 Arnaud Rouzee et al- Laser spatial profile effects in measurements of impulsive molecular alignment
5/7
Laser spatial profile effects in measurements of impulsive molecular alignment 2333
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4Signal(arb.units)
-0.1
0.0
0.1
Obs-calc
1614121086420
Pump-probe delay (ps)
Experiment
Theory
Figure 2. Upper graph: signal (experiment) versus pumpprobe delay recorded in N2 at0.86 bar for a peak intensity of 90 TW cm 2. Numerical simulation (theory) performed for a laser
peak intensity of 92 TW cm
2
. Lower graph: observation calculation.
150
125
100
75
50
Ith(TW/cm
2)
1601401201008060
Iexp (TW/cm2)
80
60
40
20
10080604020
slope = 0.93
slope = 0.88
(a) N
(b)2
2
CO
Figure 3. Adjusted peak intensity (Ith) versus measured peak intensity (Iexp). Adjustments aremade over the eight first transients of N2 (a) and three first transients of CO2 (b).
of odd and even J states, the structural shape of the signal is different and the separation
between peaks belonging to a same transient is closer to the pulse duration. This is roughly
accounted for by increasing the pulse duration of the probe pulse from 100 fs to 120 fs in the
simulation of the N2 signal.
We have studied the intensity dependence of the alignment in CO2 and N2. For each
intensity of the pump beam, an iterative least-squares fittings of the temporal traces includingthe three first transients of CO2 (see figure 1), and the eight first of N2 (see figure 2), have been
performed. Figure 3 displays the adjusted intensity Ith versus the measured peak intensity
Iexp between 10 and 165 TW cm2. In this intensity range, the ratio Ith/Iexp is close to 1 for
both molecules. We can compare this value to that obtained with CO2 in a previous work
[9] where volume effects were not included in the calculation. In that work, the effective
intensity introduced in the calculation was compared with the averaged intensity Iav measured
in the experiment. The ratio Ith/Iav was estimated close to 0.7. Assuming that for a Gaussian
8/3/2019 Arnaud Rouzee et al- Laser spatial profile effects in measurements of impulsive molecular alignment
6/7
2334 A Rouzee et al
180
160
140
120100
80
60
40
Ith
(TW
/cm2)
0.7 0.6 0.5
< cos2>
35030025020015010050
Iexp (TW/cm2)
(a) (b)
Figure 4. (a) Thermal average of cos2 estimated for CO2 at the beam centre as a functionof the adjusted peak intensity Ith. (b) Same as figure 3(b) but with larger intensities Iexp andmeasurements performed only on the third transient. Discontinuous lines between points includedto guide the eye.
pulse the average intensity is about two times smaller than the peak intensity, it translates to
Ith/Iexp 0.35. Thus, including the volume effect in the calculation leads to a better accuracy
in the determination of cos2 . The agreement between calculation and observation is also
improved.
Further measurements have been performed in CO2 at larger intensities. In this case,
only the third transient ( 32.7 ps) was recorded. The numerical adjustment is therefore
less accurate than using a trace with several transients. Nevertheless, recording only one
transient offers the possibility of acquiring more data sets at different intensities with a better
reproducibility. The results of the numerical simulations are reported in figure 4(b). As it is
shown, a reduction of the ratio Ith/Iexp is observed above 200 TW cm2. At first sight, this
feature could be incriminated to the combined effect of ionization and intrinsic saturation of
the alignment at room temperature. Both arise at about the same laser intensity. Saturation
of the ionization of CO2 occurs around 200 TW cm2 at 800 nm [11], whereas the numerics
predicts the intrinsic saturation of the alignment around 100 TW cm2. Nevertheless, because
the intensity profile of the laser beams is included in the simulation, the discrepancy between
the adjusted and measured intensity can be unambiguously attributed to the result of ionization.
In this context, two scenarios can be considered. (1) Once the neutral molecules have been
ionized, only the resulting ions can eventually produce a probe signal. This would assume that
the ions sample created right after the pump pulse is left in a non-isotropic angular distribution
and therefore can lead to a polarization signal. The latter would be most likely different than
that resulting from the neutrals. So far, we have no evidence that the ions contribute to the
signal observed in this work. The issue of whether or not ions produced from the ionization
of aligned molecules are themselves aligned and measurable should be investigated. (2) The
pump beam could be affected along its propagation through the medium that it ionizes. For
instance, self-defocusing would result in a peak intensity smaller than the one estimated andhence could explain the results of figure 4(b). In CO2, the pump beam geometry measured after
the gas sample above 150 TW cm2 shows a slight alteration of the wave front with noticeable
transverse inhomogeneities that could support this scenario. In both cases, the results of
figure 4(b) confirm that the saturation intensity for ionization occurs effectively around
200 TW cm2. Finally, we show in figure 4(a) the thermal average ofcos2 achieved at the
laser focus. In our experimental conditions (i.e. 100 fs pulse duration, room temperature), the
maximum alignment cos2 0.7 is achieved at a peak intensity of 150 TW cm 2.
8/3/2019 Arnaud Rouzee et al- Laser spatial profile effects in measurements of impulsive molecular alignment
7/7
Laser spatial profile effects in measurements of impulsive molecular alignment 2335
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, we have shown that it is possible to improve the accuracy for the characterization
of field-free alignment by the polarization technique. This is achieved by including in the
theoretical model the spatial profile of the laser beams, which is critical at large laser intensitywhen saturation occurs. It also allows us to observe the limitation of the alignment resulting
from ionization of the neutral molecules by the pump pulse. In addition, we have used an
iterative least-squares fitting procedure to analyse the data. With these improvements, it is
possible to directly compare the calculated intensity to the measured intensity and to extract
the spatial distribution of cos2 . This is of particular importance for experiments that aim
at using samples of aligned molecules.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Conseil Regional de Bourgogne, the Action Concertee
Incitative Photonique from the French Ministry of Research and a Marie Curie European
Reintegration Grant within the 6th European Community RTD Framework Programme. Theauthors would like to acknowledge E Hertz and M Renard for fruitful discussions.
References
[1] Stapelfeldt H and Seideman T 2003 Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 543
[2] Sakai H, Safvan C P, Larsen J J, Hilligse K M, Hald K and Stapelfeldt H 1999 J. Chem. Phys. 110 10235
[3] Ortigoso J, Rodrguez M, Gupta M and Friedrich B 1999 J. Chem. Phys. 110 3870
[4] Rosca-Pruna F and Vrakking M J J 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 153902
[5] Seideman T 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 4971
[6] Dooley P W, Litvinyuk I V, Lee K F, Rayner D M, Spanner M, Villeneuve D M and Corkum P B 2003 Phys.
Rev. A 68 023406
[7] Peronne E, Poulsen M D, Bisgaard C Z, Stapelfeldt H and Seideman T 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 043003
[8] Renard V, Renard M, Guerin S, Pashayan Y T, Lavorel B, Faucher O and Jauslin H R 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90
3601[9] Renard V, Renard M, Rouzee A, Guerin S, Jauslin H R, Lavorel B and Faucher O 2003 Phys. Rev. A 70 033420
[10] Lalanne J R, Ducasse A and Kielich S 1996 Laser-Molecules Interaction: Laser Physics and Molecular Non
Linear Optics (New York: Wiley)
[11] Cornaggia C and Hering Ph 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62 23403