Arguments for Yes for No

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/16/2019 Arguments for Yes for No

    1/1

    ARGUMENTS FOR YES FOR NO -FAULT

     YES Reduces the Complex process

    it aoids lo!"# cutthroat court $attles oer %ho is to $lame %he!marria"es &ai'l This %ould $e resulti!" i! lo%er le"al &ees a!d more time-e(cie!t proceedi!"s) A&ter all# ma!* people diorce &or reaso!s hai!"little to do %ith the traditio!al# codi+ed "rou!ds)

    Reduces the bitterness and antagonism

    It helps to allow people to determine their marriage is over without (officially) placing a blame game . The bitterness can have repercussions on the welfare of any children as well as parties willingness to co- operate in financial matters . This was supported in

    Booth Committee on atrimonial Causes !rocedures "#$% and also argues that fault based doesn&t help to reduce the divorce rate or saves marriage'

    Conclusion

    ,t is to $e !oted that &amil* la%*ers# ud"es a!d academic seem to &aour!o-&ault diorce# a!d &uture re&orms are li.el* to a$a!do! the &ault"rou!ds ) This %as also supported $* Thorpe L/ has ar"ued that !o &aultdiorce is 0the hi"hest le"islatie priorit* &or the &amil* ustice s*stem01 

    2ased o! the ar"ume!ts made ,t appears that the stateme!t that had$ee! made is !ot completel* true ) A moe to%ards !o &ault diorce is!ecessar* i! order to aoid a!imosit* o! &ailed marria"es %hich %ouldalso a3ect %el&are o& childre! a!d +!a!cial matters)

    ' Accessed at http455diorcedmoms)com5articles5the-pros-a!d-co!s-o&-!o&ault-diorce-la%s6 Ni"el Lo%e a!d Gillia! 7ou"hlas # 8 ''th ed # 69': # Bromley’s Familylaw ; p6191 ,!troductio! i! Thorpe L/ a!d E Clar.e 8ed; No Fault or Flaw: The Futureof the Family Law Act  '