19
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Accounting for Public-Private-Partnerships ABA PCLS Privatization, Outsourcing and Financing Transactions Committee McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP Washington, DC April 10, 2014 1

April 10, 2014

  • Upload
    cayla

  • View
    46

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Accounting for Public-Private-Partnerships ABA PCLS Privatization, Outsourcing and Financing Transactions Committee McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP Washington, DC. April 10, 2014. Disclaimer. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: April 10, 2014

1

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory BoardAccounting for Public-Private-Partnerships

ABA PCLS Privatization, Outsourcing and Financing Transactions Committee

McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP Washington, DC

April 10, 2014

Page 2: April 10, 2014

2

Disclaimer

• Views expressed are those of the speakers. The Board expresses its views in official publications.

Page 3: April 10, 2014

3

FASAB’s Mission

The FASAB serves the public interest by improving federal financial reporting through

issuing federal financial accounting standards and providing guidance after considering the

needs of external and internal users of federal financial information.

Page 4: April 10, 2014

4

What is FASAB? One of three U.S. Accounting Standards-

Setting Organizations

United States

Page 5: April 10, 2014

5

Who is FASAB? We currently have 9 board members supported by 8 staff.

Bios available at www.fasab.govCurrent as of December 2013

Mark RegerTreasury

Norman DongOMB

Sam McCall Robert DaceyGAO

Harold Steinberg Graylin Smith

Michael Granof D. Scott Showalter

Tom AllenChairman

(Former GASB Chair)

Wendy PayneExecutive Director

Non-voting Member

Page 6: April 10, 2014

Public-Private PartnershipsOverall goal - Making the full costs of P3s transparent

• Governments increasingly use innovative approaches to partnering with non-governmental entities. – Benefits include:

• Risk sharing• Enhanced performance incentives• Financing arrangements to avoid large up front investments of

taxpayer funds– Arrangements may obscure costs and results.

• The project will consider how the lease and entity standards may be applied to such arrangements and fill any voids in the standards.

6

Page 7: April 10, 2014

7

Task Force CompositionPublic & Private Participants

Page 8: April 10, 2014

8

Task Force CompositionProfessional Disciplines

Page 9: April 10, 2014

9

Agencies Consulted

Page 10: April 10, 2014

10

Public-Private PartnershipsDisclosure Phase Overview

Page 11: April 10, 2014

11

Work-in-ProgressDraft Definition

• Federal public-private partnerships (P3s) are contractual arrangements or transactions between public and private sector entities to deliver a service or an asset for either government or general public use where in addition to the sharing of resources, each party shares in the risks and rewards potential of said arrangements or transactions.

• As a result, federal P3s can (1) exclude contractual protections afforded the government by the Federal Acquisition Regulations, (2) require the government to provide resources or absorb losses greater than other alternative or competing arrangements or transactions, and (3) include the formation of special purpose vehicles or SPV’s.

• Sharing of risks and rewards is evidenced by conditions such as (1) agreements covering a significant portion of the economic life of a project or asset, and/or lasting more than five years, (2) financing arranged by the private partner, (3) conveyance or transfer of real and personal property, multi-sector skills and expertise, and (4) formation of special purpose vehicles or SPV’s.

Page 12: April 10, 2014

12

Proposed Characteristics

Conclusive – “You’re in if you meet any one”1. Creation of a long-lived asset or financing liability2. The federal entity participates in or helps sponsor

an SPV, partnership, trust, etc. 3. The term of the procurement or contract

arrangement is longer than 5 years.4. The principal arrangement is exempt from the

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Page 13: April 10, 2014

13

Proposed CharacteristicsSuggestive – “Maybe, maybe not” - requires

judgment. View each SC in light of the others.

1. A Value for Money analysis is performed.2. The principal arrangement is NOT managed by an

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) and/or Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO).

3. The consideration or items given up in an arrangement or their value are not readily apparent.

4. Significant work force duties, activities, or knowledge are cross-shared between public and private sector P3 parties.

Page 14: April 10, 2014

14

Proposed Characteristics5. The focus is more on collaboration and informal,

real-time, resolution processes as opposed to formal, contractual, administrative processes.

6. The government relies on either the private sector partner’s or a third party’s determination of a P3’s performance or return on investment/equity, without performing its own verification of performance/return on investment/equity.

Page 15: April 10, 2014

15

Suggested Disclosures1. The purpose or objective for the P3 arrangement or

transaction to include the relative benefits/revenues being received in exchange for all of the government’s consideration, monetary and non-monetary.

2. The decision criteria for selecting a P3 arrangement or transaction to include the entity’s statutory authority for entering into the P3.

3. Type of funding, federal or otherwise used to meet mission requirements and service delivery needs to support the P3; e.g., appropriated, non-appropriated, private capital or investment.

Page 16: April 10, 2014

16

Suggested Disclosures4. The operational and financial structure of the P3

including the entity’s rights and responsibilities and amounts the government can be reasonably expected to incur/pay over the life of the P3 arrangement or transaction.

5. Contractual provisions for termination/exit payments and related amounts.

6. Whether the private partner(s), to include any SPV, have borrowed or invested capital contingent upon the entity’s promise to pay whether implied or explicit.

Page 17: April 10, 2014

17

Suggested Disclosures7. Identification of the significant risks the P3 partners are

undertaking. 8. Violations of legal and contractual provisions governing

the P3 arrangement or transaction.

What do you think about the disclosures?• Too Burdensome?• Are they sufficient?• How might they impact you or your

organization?

Page 18: April 10, 2014

18

Uncle Sam Wants YOU!!!!

.

We invite your comments and suggestions so

ask for a copy of the draft ED and get a head start!!

If you’d like to join the P3 Task

Force or follow its work, let me

know.

Page 19: April 10, 2014

19

Contact and Website Information

• General inquiries can be directed to [email protected]

• Phone: 202 512-7350• www.FASAB.gov

– Listserv– Exposure Drafts– Active Projects

• I can be reached at: [email protected], 202 512-6841