ANSI - H2S Training Programs

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Safety

Citation preview

  • ANSVASSE 2390.1-I995 (R2001)

    AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD I I I

    Accepted Practices for Hydrogen Sulj2de (H2S) Safety Training Programs

    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF SAFETY ENGINEERS

    I

  • ANSI@ 2390.1 -1 995 (R-2001)

    ..

    American National Standard Accepted Practices for Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)

    Safety Training Programs

    Secretariat

    American Society of Safety Engineers 1800 East Oakton Street Des Plaines, Illinois 6001 8-21 87

    Approved May 8,2001 American National Standards Institute, Inc.

  • American National Standard

    An American National Standard implies a consensus of those substantially concerned with its scope and provisions. An American National Standard is intended as a guide to aid the manufac- turer, the consumer, and the general public. The existence of an Amencan National Standard does not in any respect preclude anyone, whether they have approved the standard or not, from manu- facturing, marketing, purchasing, or using products, processes, or procedures not conforming to the standard. American National Standards are subject to periodic review and users are cautioned to obtain the latest editions.

    The American National Standards Institute does not develop standards and will in no circum- stances give an interpretation of any American National Standard. Moreover, no persons shall have the right or authority to issue an interpretation of an American National Standard in the name of the American National Standards Institute.

    CAUTION NOTICE This American National Standard may be revised or withdrawn at any time. The procedures of the American National Standards Institute require that action be taken to reaffirm, revise, or withdraw this standard no later than five years from the date of publication. Purchasers of American National Standards may receive current information on aii standards by calling or writing the American National Standards Institute.

    Published by

    American Society of Safety Engineers 1800 East Oakton Street, Des Plaines, Iliinois 60018-2187

    Copyright 2001 by American Society of Safety Engineers Ail rights reserved.

    No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

    Printed in the United States of America

  • Foreword (This Foreword is not a part of American National Standard 2390.1-1995 R-2001.)

    This is a reaffirmation of the 1995 edition of the American National Standard 2390.1, Accepted Practices for Hydrogen Suljde (H2S) Safety Training Programs with no change in technical con- tent. Corrections to typographical errors noted since 1995 have been included in this edition.

    . The Committee list at the time of reaffirmation will replace the current list. Add a footnote to the committee list and superscripts, as appropriate, to indicate those committee members who were also represented on the Committee at the time of the approval of the 1995 edition. The added footnote will read:

    'Also represented on the 2390 Committee that approved the 1995 edition.

    The charter of the Amencan National Standards Committee 2390 on Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Training was accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) on October 5, 1992. This standard grew out of the recognition of a need for specialized training dealing with this toxic chemical, above and beyond conventional hazard communications training, due to numerous fatal accidents involving victims and their would-be rescuers succumbing to the effects of hydrogen sulfide.

    Historically, hydrogen sulfide training issues have been addressed by only a few industries, and the consistency of the training criteria varied greatly from one organization to another. In some cases, the emphasis placed on student competency may have given way or been sacrificed to meet the immediate financial needs of the organization. For these reasons, the standard address- es the individual training criteria which should be incorporated into a comprehensive training course. These criteria were developed by combining accepted practices in numerous affected industries. Most significantly, emphasis has been given to the qualifications and proficiency of individual Hydrogen Sulfide Safety Instructors, as well as student performance-based compe- tency and qualifications.

    Governmental regulations (see 29 CFR 1910.1200) specify mandatory requirements for the train- ing of personnel working with or around hazardous chemicals. As a voluntary consensus stan- dard, this document complements those regulations. However, compliance with this standard does not assure compliance with govemmental regulations, and vice versa.

    The 2390 Committee solicits public input that may suggest revisions to the standard. Such input should be sent to the Secretariat, American Society of Safety Engineers, 1800 E. Oakton Street, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018-2187.

    This standard was developed and approved for submittal to ANSI by the American National Standards Committee on Hydrogen Sulfide Training, 2390. Committee approval of the standard does not necessarily imply that all members voted for its approval. At the time of its approval, the 2390 Standards Committee had the following members:

    Frank Perry, Chairman Charles A. Simpson, Vice Chairman Thomas F. Bresnahan, Secretary

    Organization Represented

    Amencan Industrial Hygiene Association American Petroleum Institute

    American Society of Safety Engineers

    Association of Energy Services Companies

    Compressed Gas Association

    Eastman Chemical

    Name of Representative

    Janet E. Wiikil Vacant Kendall C. Crawford (Alt) F& Pew1 Pamela R. Huck (Alt) Steve M. Olson1 Ken Houston Alt)

    Roger Smith (Alt) Gary Shrum

    D. Larry Zink i

  • Edison Electric Institute

    International Association of Drilling Contractors

    International Pipe Inspectors Association National Environmental Training Association National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Petroleum Educational Council

    Railroad Commission of Texas Oil and Gas Division Sulphur Institute U.S. Coast Guard U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Interior U.S. Department of Labor-OSHA U.S. EF'A Individual Voting Members

    Janet Fox Charles Kelly (Alt) Steve Kroplal Alan Spackman (Alt) Joseph Hurt (Alt) Joe Mach ' Jack Barnidgel Jeff (Charles) Bryant' Charles A. Simpson1 Bill Walker (Alt) Charles S . (Charley) Ross Harold H. Weber' LCDR Clint Chamberlain m e Curole1 Richard (Rick) Ensele Ira Wainless* Jewel Moms' James A. Kratt1 Reggie Lirette, Jr. George C. Rodgers, Jr.' mornas L. ~obertsl

    *Non-voting advisory member

  • Contents SECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PAGE

    1 . Scope. Purpose. and Application of Standard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1.1 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1:2 Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1.3Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

    2 . Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

    3 . Training Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.1 Physical and Chemical Properties of H2S ............................ 8 3.2 Sources of H2S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.3 Human Physiology and Medical Evaluation ........................... 9 3.4 Work Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-0 3.5 Personal Protective Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.6 Use of Contingency Plan and Emergency Response .................... 10 3.7 Burning, Flaring and Venting of H2S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.8 State and Federal Regulatory Requirements .......................... 11 3.9 H2S Release Dispersion Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.1 O Rescue Techniques, First Aid and Post Exposure Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

    3.1 3 Transportation of H2S Cargoes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.1 4 Emerging Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

    4 . Instructor Qualification & Proficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

    3.11 Methods of Detection and Monitoring ............................... 11 3.1 2 Engineering Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

    5 . Documentation and Recordkeeping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 5.1 Program Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 5.2 Class Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 5.3 Certification Card . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 5.4 Recordkeeping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

    6 . Student Competency and Qualification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

    7 . Training Techniques. Language and Literacy Factors ...................... 13

    8 . Protection Requirements for Visitors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

    9 . Related Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

    Appendixes Appendix A: Occupations with Potential H2S Exposure ..................... 14

    Appendix C: Sample Course Outline ................................... 19 Appendix B: Training Techniques. Language and Literacy Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

  • AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD 2390.1-1995 (R-2001)

    American National Standard Accepted Practices for Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Safety Training Programs

    I . Scope, Purpose, and Application

    1.1 Scope. This standard sets forth accepted practices for hydrogen sulfide (H2S) safety training and instruction of affected personnel to include, but not be limited to, the following: - minimum informational content of the course; - recommended exercises and drills; - refresher training requirements; - H,S Safety Instructor qualifications; - properties and characteristics of H2S; - sources of H2S and areas of potential exposure; - typical site-specific safe work practices associated

    - detection methods for HzS; - selection, use and care of personal protective

    with H2S operations;

    equipment appropriate for atmospheres containing H2S concentrations above the Threshold Limit Value-Time Weighted Average (TLV-TWA);

    victims of H2S exposure. - rescue techniques and first-aid procedures for

    1.2 Purpose. The purpose of this standard is to establish minimum requirements for site-specific H2S safety training programs that will enhance safety in occupational settings where hydrogen sulfide is present, or is recognized as being potentially present, above the V-TWA.

    1.3 Application. This standard is recommended for voluntary application in occupational settings where personnel have the potential to be exposed to concentrations of H2S in excess of the TLV-TWA, as established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH).

    1.3.1 These requirements/recommendations apply when the instructor/administrator of the course meets the provisions of the standard, even when one or more assistant instructors presenting the course may not meet those standards.

    1.3.2 If any of the provisions of this standard are deemed to be not applicable, the other requirements/recommendations of the standard shall still apply.

    2. Definitions

    2.1 acute exposure: Generally, exposure to a substance for less than 24 hours.

    2.2 acute toxicity: The acute adverse effects resulting from a single dose of, or exposure to, a substance. Acute toxi- city tests (1) give a quantitative estimate of acute toxicity (LD50) for comparisons to other substances; (2) identify target organs and other clinical manifestations of acute toxicity; (3) establish the reversibility of the toxic response; and (4) give dose-ranging guidance for other studies.

    2.3 chronic exposure: Generally, exposure to a substance for a period of more than 3 months. Chronic toxicity tests are performed to assess the cumulative toxicity effects and car- cinogenicity of chemicals.

    2.4 contingency plan: A site-specific written document that provides an organized plan for alerting and protecting the public within an area of exposure following the accidental release of a potentially hazardous atmospheric concentration of hydrogen sulfide.

    2.5 emergency procedures plan: A part of a broader and more comprehensive Contingency Plan. The emergency procedures plan includes, but is not limited to, such items as the responsibilities of personnel, the immediate action plan, telephone numbers and communication methods, the location of nearby residences, businesses, schools, churches, medical facilities and emergency response personnel, safety equipment and supplies available, and evacuation routes. It outlines the immediate steps and actions that would be taken in the event of a major release of toxic material.

    7

  • AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD 2390.1-1995 (R-2001)

    2.6 equivalent: In this standard, denotes where instructors,

    formance. Chemical formula *2s

    Chemical family .............. Inorganic sulfide facilities, equipment, course design, etc. provide equal per-

    ............

    2.7 firing: The controlled combustion of the flammable vapors discharged from vent piping or pipe lines.

    2.8 instructorladministrator: An individual who has successfully completed a course in hydrogen sulfide training from an institution or organization offering such cours- es, or has received equivalent instruction from a company-designated hydrogen sulfide safety instructor/trainer. or has equivalent instnictor/trainer experience.

    2.9 may: Denotes a permissive statement.

    Normal physical state ............................ Highly toxic, colorless gas,

    slightly heavier than air. Vapor density = 1.19 at 32F (WC) at 760 mm Hg (air = 1.00). Density = 1.5392 g/L H2S may collect in low-lying areas or confined spaces.

    Autoignition temperature ............. 5ooOF(26o"C)

    2.10 non-essential personnel: Those individuals who are not required to engage in activities to control the hazardous conditions associated with hydrogen sulfide during an emer-

    Boiling point ................... -76.4T (-60.2")

    Melting Point ..................-117.2"F (- 82.9W gency.

    Flammable limits ............. 4.3% . 46% vapor by volume 2.ll parts per million (ppm): Parts of a substance per in air. million parts of air. It is a measure of a substance's concentration in a volume or air.

    2.12 shall: Denotes a mandatory requirement.

    Solubility .......................... Soluble in water and oil; solubility decreases as the temperature of the liquid increases.

    2.13 should: Denotes an advisory recommendation.

    2.14 venting: The process of discharging a material to the atmosphere through a series of piping and/or venting devices, to facilitate the proper and safe dispersion of toxic materials and to minimize personnel exposure.

    2.15 visitor: An individual who is visiting a job site for a short period of time, and who is not required to provide any of the operational or control activities at the site.

    3. Training Criteria

    3.1 Physical and Chemical Properties of H2S.

    3.1.1 The physical and chemical properties of H2S, including but not limited to the following, should be discussed as part of H2S training, as appropriate for the facility.

    Synonyms .................. Sulfureted hydrogen, hydrosulfuric acid, dihydro- gen sulfide, rotten egg gas, swamp gas, meadow gas, stink damp, and others.

    Combustibility ................. Burns in air with a blue flame to produce sulfur dioxide (Sod, a very irritating gas with a pungent odor. Sulfur dioxide is a colorless gas appreciably heavier than air, with a specific gravity = 2.26 at 32F (W) and 760 mm Hg (air = 1. 00).

    Odor and warning properties ...................... Hydrogen sulfide has an un-

    pleasant odor, characteristic of rotten eggs, and may be easily detected at low concen- trations. Due to the rapid onset of olfactory fatigue and paralysis (loss of the sense of smell), odor shall not be used as the only warning for the presence of H2S.

    8

  • AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD 2390.1-1995 (R-2001)

    3.1.2 Incompatibilities and Reactivities. When H2S contacts strong oxidizers and oxidizing materials it may cause fire or explosions, it may also cause sulfide stress cracking andlor hydrogen embrittlement.

    When H2S dissolves in water, it forms a weak acid that can cor- rode and pit metal.

    Many metals will react with H2S to form metal sulfides. H2S may react with iron or steel to form iron sulfide, which can be pyrophoric (able to ignite spontaneously on contact with air).

    3.2 Sources of H2S.

    3.2.1 Students shall be informed of the following sources of H2S:

    -Natural sources: H2S is produced in nature primarily through the decomposition of organic material by bacteria. It may develop in low oxygen environments such as bogs, swamps and polluted water. The gas also occurs as a con- stituent of natural gas, petroleum, suifur deposits, volcanic gases and sulfur springs.

    - Industrial sources: In industrial operations, H2S is either a product, byproduct or waste material. As a byproduct, it is often recovered and converted to elemental sulfur or sulfuric acid. (See Appendix A for a listing of occupations with poten- tial H2S exposures.)

    3.3 Human Physiology and Medical Evaluation.

    3.3.1 Human Physiology Information. An overview of the respiratory system and the eyes shall be presented. The tar- get organs and body structures subject to the effects of H2S shall be identified. These include, at a minimum, the following: - olfactory nerves; - lungs; - brain; - respiratory control center; - eyes.

    3.3.2 Signs and Symptoms of H2S Exposure Associated with Acute Toxiciy. The signs and symptoms of H2S exposure associated with acute toxicity shall be presented. These include: - olfactory paralysis; - excitement; - eye irritation;

    - headaches; - sneezing; - nausea; - irritation of the respiratory tract; - diarrhea; - pulmonary edema; - dizziness; - respiratory arrest; - confusion; - brain damage; - staggering gait; - photophobia; - cardiac arrest.

    - coughing;

    3.3.3 Signs and Symptoms of H2S Exposure Associated with Chronic Toxicity. The signs and symptoms of H2S exposure associated with chronic toxicity shall be presented. These include: - eye irritatioq - corneal blistering, pitting and opacity; - headaches; - nausea; - kitation of the respiratory tract; - pulmonary edema; - anorexia; - sleep disturbances.

    3.3.4 Variables Afsecting the Symptomatology of H2S Exposure. Information concerning variables that determine the symptoms associated with H2S exposure and the speed of their onset shall be presented. The primary variables are exposure concentration, exposure frequency, exposure duration, and individual variables. Individual variables include: - body mass; - overall physical condition; - age; - smokerlnon-smoker; - personal biochemistry. 3.3.5 Interaction of Drugs and Alcohol with H2S.

    Information concerning alcohol, prescription medications and/or illicit drugs in the body, which may result in hypersen- sitivity to the effects of H2S, shall be presented.

    9

  • AMERICAN NATJONAL STANDARD 2390.1-1995 (3-2001)

    3.3.6 Medical Evaluation. The need for a medical evaluation to determine whether or not respiratory protection can be used effectively shall be discussed. (Refer to ANSI Standards 288.2-1992, "Practices for Respiratory Protection", and 288.6- 1984, "Physical Qualifications for Respirator Use".)

    3.4 Work Procedures

    3.4.1 Workers involved in operations where H2S may be present should understand that proper work procedures and prac- tices can greatly reduce the potential for accidents. These work- ers shall be trained in proper safe work procedures.

    3.4.2 Safe work procedures and practices should include, but

    -maintaining compliance with permit requirements; -providing at least one standby person qualified to

    -venfymg that proper safety equipment is available,

    -checking and remaining aware of wind conditions and

    not be limited to:

    perform first aid and CPR,

    functioning properly, and is used;

    direction (start on the upwind side whenever possible when working on equipment);

    -perorming a thorough check for personnel and ignition sources in the downwind area before stamng any potentially hazardous work;

    -notifying supervisory personnel, when necessary, before initiating operations that could involve the release of H2S;

    -using the "buddy system" and never working alone in H2S areas;

    -monitoring conditions through implementation of an H2S detection andor monitoring strategy; ventilating work areas, vents or purge lines on vessels before beginning work;

    -keeping non-essential personnel away from work areas; -never taking shortcuts.

    3.5 Personal Protective Equipment

    3.5.1 Students should be provided with appropriate training for industry-specific items of personal protection equipment.

    3.5.2 Emphasis should be placed on respiratory protection training, as recommended by ANSI Standard 288.21992, "Practices for Respiratory Protection".

    3.5.3 Special information should be given on the

    -location of Supplied Air Respirators (SAR); -location of spare air cylinders, if applicable; -site-specific issues; -situations that would require respirators; -limitations and capabilities of positive

    pressure/full facepiece respirators; -limitations and capabilities of air supplied and

    air purifying respirators; -brand/model/size of respirators available.

    following:

    3.6 Use of Contingency Plan and Emergency Response

    3.6.1 Students should be taught the purpose of the contingency ~ plan is to serve as a logical step-by-step approach to dealing with an emergency.

    3.6.2 Students should be familiarized with the contents of the contingency plan, which may include (but is not limited to) the following, as applicable:

    -instructions for alerting employees and the public in case of an emergency;

    -procedure for requesting assistance and followup action to remove the public from the area of exposure;

    -a call list of people to notify in the event of an emergency;

    -plat of area showing location of public areas, evacuation routes and assembly places, safety equipment, telephones, and, if required, the radius of exposure;

    within the area of exposure and the person responsible for any public area;

    -provision for advance briefing of the public within an area of exposure;

    -detailed operating procedures to be followed in any emergency:

    -emergency medical services available, including current names and phone numbers (prior contact should be made with designated medical facilities);

    -list of names and telephone numbers of residents

    -location of the contingency plan.

    3.7 Burning, Flaring and Venting of H2S

    3.7.1 Students should be made aware that in some industries, flaring or venting lines are provided in workplaces where there is a probability that large volumes of H2S might be present in concentrations of more than 15 ppm. This is an engi- neering control to minimize worker exposure.

    10

  • -CAN NATIONAL STANDARD 2390.1-1995 (R-2001)

    3.7.2 Students should also be made aware that burning H2S results in sulfur dioxide (SO2). Therefore, appropriate training for SO2 may be necessary.

    3.8 State and Federal Regulatory Requirements

    3.8.1 Students should be aware of the existence of regulatory requirements concerning H2S. There may be differencesbetween- _. regulatory requirements that are adopted and enforced by differ- ent agencies.

    3.8.2 Numerous agencies reference or provide standardslguide- lines concerning H2S. They include, but-are not limited to, the following agencies:

    -U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety

    -State OSHA plans; -American Conference of Governmental

    -US. Department of the Interior, Minerals

    -U.S. Department of Transportation, Coast Guar4 -U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); -Bureau of Land Management; -U.S. Department of Health and Human

    & Health Administration (OSHA):

    Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH);

    Management Service;

    , , Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH);

    -Various state and county regulatory agencies; -Environment Canada; -Workplace Hazardous Materials Information

    System (WHMIS).

    3.9 H2S Release Dispersion Models

    3.9.1 Students may be apprised that dispersion

    3.10 Rescue Techniques, First Aid and Post Exposure Evaluation.

    3.10.1 Rescue Techniques. Students shall be trained in proper rescue techniques applicable to their specific work envi- ronment. Emphasis shall be placed on the importance of protect- ing oneself prior to attempting a rescue.

    3.10.2 FirstAid. Students shail be instructed in the importance of activating the emergency medical services system. In addition, students shall receive appropriate training in rescue breathing and CF'R.

    should be considered when H2S concentrations and volumes have the potential to impact personnel or the public to the extent that an emergency condition may result from accidental release.

    3.9.2 Dispersion models are available for predicting conditions that may result from a release of H2S Computer. H2S dispersion models have gained acceptance for use in emergency planning. Vapor cloud travel and exposure concentrations over specific time periods may be calculated. The validity of dispersion modeling increases with the

    3.10.3 Post Exposure Evaluation. Students shall be informed that individuals overcome by H2S shall receive medical approval before returning to the workplace.

    3.ll Methods of Detection and Monitoring

    3.11.1 Each type of detector and monitor has its own set of capabilities and limitations with which users shall be familiar. When training students on methods of detection and monitoring, the instructor shall place emphasis on the site-specific types of detection and monitoring devices and sampling strategies available to, or for, the benefit of workers. Training shall include an explanation of the warning alarms (if applicable) and emergency response procedures associated with the specific types of detection and monitoring devices.

    3.11.2 Training shall include the following as applicable: -types of detectors and/or monitors available; - manufacturer's recommendations; -purposes, suitability, capabilities, limitations, calibration,

    function testing, placement, use, and maintenance of detec- models tors and/or monitors available.

    3.12 Engineenng Controls. Training should discussion regarding site-specific engineering Students should be familiarized with the following:

    -design or remodeling of worksites; -enclosed worksites; -ventilation equipment; -monitoring equipment; -metallurgical properties of equipment; -burning, flaring and venting of H2S; -containment:

    include controls.

    accuracy of the H2S data input into the model. -dispersion.

    11

  • -CAN NATIONAL STANDARD 2390.1-1995 (R-2001)

    3.13 Transportation of H2S Cargoes

    3.13.1 If applicable, students should be made aware of the modes of transportation by which cargoes involving known or potential H2S hazards may travel, such as:

    -maritime; -highway; -rail; - air; -pipelines.

    3.14 Emerging Technology

    4.3.1 The requirements/recommendations in 4.3 permit the instructor to receive the most recent technical information, regulatory changes, and updated data on technology advance- ments, including, but not limited to, personal protective equip- ment, monitoring or detection devices, medical advancements and instructional techniques.

    5. Documentation and Recordkeeping

    5.1 Program Documentation. Documentation detailing the content of the training program shall be developed and main- tained. This documentation shall include:

    -names of instructors/administrators qualified to teach the

    3.14.1 Where applicable, special emphasis should be placed on emerging technologies in the areas of respiratory protection equipment, portable and fixed detection and monitoring devices, as well as the development of chemical treatment technologies that could potentially reduce the presence of H2S.

    program;

    sented; -an outline containing the information which must be pre-

    -a copy of printed materials supplied to students; -titles of audiovisual materials presented to students. -a description of gas detectors and respiratory prokction

    equipment used in the program;

    3.14.2 H2S training instructors should remain aware of advances in technology.

    4. Instructor Qualification and Proficiency

    4.1 H2S training instructors/administrators shall have successfully completed an appropriate H2S train-the-trainer development course; they shall also be deemed qualified if they possess significant past experience in instructing in this field.

    4.1.1 The instructor/administrator shall be able to demonstrate hisher knowledge of the technical aspects of H2S training, and proficiency in training techniques relating to H2S. Training credentials or certification from a recognized or accredited training authority constitutes qualification under this section.

    4.2 Qualified H2S instructors should ensure that the comprehensive outline for their individual course of instruction includes all of the topics covered in this standard. No class should ever be abbreviated in the interest of time or any other factors.

    4.3 H2S instructors/administrators shall conduct a minimum of two H2S training classes each year. Documentation should

    ~' be maintained to substantiate evidence of these sessions. Every three years, instructors should attend an H2S instructor refresher course.

    -a description of hands-on exercises; -a description of the type of proficiency examination.

    5.2 Class Documentation. A record of training shall be created. This documentation shall include the:

    -name of the instructor; -name and address of the training provider with which the

    instructor is affiliated; -names of the students and their employers; -date of training; -duration of training; -model of respiratory and gas detection devices the students

    are trained to use.

    5.3 Ce?@caion Card. A cemfication card should be provided to include the:

    -name of the student; -signature of the instructor; -date of training; -name of the training provider with which the instructor is

    -address of the facility where the training record is main-

    -model of respiratory and gas detection devices the student

    affiliated;

    tained;

    is trained to use.

    5.4 Recordkeeping. A copy of the program and class documentation and the certification card s h d be kept for at least three years by the training provider with which the instructor is affiliated. The student's employer, if different than the instructor's, should also maintain copies of class docu- mentation for at least three years.

    12

  • AMENCAN NATIONAL STANDARD 2390-1-1995 (R-2001)

    6. Student Competency and Qualification

    6.1 Student competency shall be required at the end of the training in order to receive qualification. This performance-based competency shall be demonstrated through a performance-based evaluation including written, verbal or practical tests. Documentation of the student's ability to demonstrate such competency shall be retained as substantive proof.

    6.2 Due to the extreme hazard involved in H2S operations, each individual covered by this standard should be retrained annually.

    7. Training Techniques, Language and Literacy Factors

    7.1 H2S training should be student-oriented and focused on the skills and knowledge required to work safely in an H2S environment. Each H2S environment may have differing requirements for safety. The information in Appendix B shall provide a guide to developing H2S training.

    7.2 A sample course outline is presented in Appendix C.

    8. Protection Requirements for Visitors

    8.1 Attention shall be given to site-specific policy concerning evacuation of visitors in the event of an emergency.

    8.2 At a minimum, visitors shall be briefed on the following: - site specific sources of H2S; - health hazards of H2S; - routes of egress; - emergency assembly areas; - applicable alarm signals; - how to respond in the event of an emergency.

    9. Related Standards

    9.1 This standard is intended for use in conjunction with the following American National Standards or latest revision: - Safety in Welding and Cutting,

    - Practices for Respiratory Protection,

    - Physical Qualifications for Respirator Use,

    - Safety Requirements for Confined Spaces,

    ANSI 249.1-1994;

    ANSI 288.2-1992;

    ANSI 288.6-1984;

    ANSI Z117.1- 1995.

    13

  • Appendix A

    Appendix A (Informative)

    Occupations with Potential H2S Exposure

    Animal fat and oil processors Animal manure removers Artificial flavor makers Asphalt storage workers Barium carbonate makers Barium salt makers Blast furnace workers Brewery workers Bromide-brine workers Cable splicers Caisson workers Carbon disulfide makers Cellophane makers Chemical laboratory workers, teachers and students Cistern cleaners Citrus root fumigators Coal gasification workers Coke oven workers Copper ore sulfidizers Depilatory makers Dyemakers Excavators Felt makers Fermentation process workers Fertilizer makers Fishing and fish-processing workers Fur dressers Geothermal power drilling and production workers Glue makers Gold ore workers Heavy metal precipitators Heavy water manufacturers Hydrochloric acid purifiers Hydrogen sulfide production and sales workers Landfill workers Lead ore sulfidizers Lead removers

    Lithographers Lithophone makers Livestock farmers Manhole and trench workers Metallurgists Miners Natural gas production and processing workers Painters using polysulfide caulking compounds Papermakers Petroleum production and refinery workers Phosphate purifiers P hotoengravers Pipeline maintenance workers Pyrite burners Rayon makers Refrigerant makers Rubber and plastics processors Septic tank cleaners Sewage (waste water) treatment plant workers Sewer (waste water treatment) workers S heepdippers Silk makers Slaughterhouse workers Smelting workers Soapmakers Sugar beet and cane processors Sulfur spa workers Sulfur products processors Synthetic fiber makers Tank gagers Tannery workers Textile printers Thiophene makers Tunnel workers Well diggers and cleaners Wool pullers

    14

  • APPENDiXB

    Appendix B (Informative)

    Training Techniques, Language and Literacy Factors

    Every trainer should ask the question, "What is it that the student must be able to do as a result of this training?" This approach is better than creating instructor-oriented training by asking, "What am I going to present?" The information in this section may be used to assist a trainer in preparing an H2S training course or to aid in evaluating the quality of contractor training programs.

    Writing Performance-based Objectives The trainer should begin the design of his training materials by writing perform ance-based objectives that clearly indicate how the student will demonstrate the knowledge or skiil. PerFormanced-based objectives generally contain four basic components. These are:

    1) Audience: A clear identification of the personnel for whom the objective is written. Some objectives may be for super- visors, some for first-line workers, some for contractors, and so on.

    2) Behavior: This component identifies how the student will actually demonstrate the task or knowledge.

    3) Condition: This component identifies the conditions under which the student wili perform the task or demonstration.

    4) Depree: Quantdy how often, or to what extent, the student must be correct. For example, if your evaluation tool is a mul- tiple choice test, identify the passing grade allowed.

    The following is a comparkon of two training objectives: - Objective 1 : The student will know the hazards of H2S.

    - Objective 2: Given a list of health hazards, confined space entrants will be able to identify the health hazards that occur with exposure to various concentrations of H2S. The student will demonstrate this knowledge by matching the health effects to a given concentration range. The responses must match the instructor answer key.

    in the second objective, the four conditions of a performance-based objective are met. It can be seen that when objectives are clearly written, the evaluation tool is also easily determined. Sound objectives are the basis for any type of training program, regardless of the method.

    "raining Methods Training may be delivered in a variety of methods. Making an appropriate choice will be a function of i d e n m g the:

    - Audience: Characteristics that you will want to identify regarding your audience include: - entry level knowledge; - interest in the topic; - preferred learning style; - age; - gender; - education level.

    - Locatiort: Where is the training to take place? Training limitations on an offshore platform may be very different than those encountered in a land-based operation.

    - TvDe qf Learning: there are different levels of learning. Knowledge level information, for example, reciting health nsks,may be conveyed effectively with a book, whereas motor skills, such as donning an SCBA, may require hands-on tutoring.

    - Resource Constraints: Other limitations such as budget, available development h e , or available trainers may drive you toward a particular instruction platform.

    15

  • I Method 1: Booklets, Brochures and Programmed Learning Texts - Advantages

    - self-paced, - inexpensive to produce; - easy to update; - able to use in a variety of settings

    (very portable); - a large volume of information can be presented.

    - Limitations - limited interactivity; - no graphics or motion-based concepts can be

    - not good for complex topics.

    Method 2: Instructor-led "kaining '

    covered;

    - Advantages - good for complex issues; instructor is available

    - inexpensive; - instructor can present a large volume of

    information; - instructor is present to assess students as they progress in the class;

    - good for demonstration and evaluation of hands-on, motor type skills.

    to answer questions;

    - Limitations - dependent of skills of the instructor; - poor retention of information by students; - not self-paced; - not good for visual concepts.

    Method 3: Video Training - Advantages

    - good for illustrating visual and motion-based

    - good at illustrating behavior; - useful for affective or "attitude" type

    - repeat consistency.

    concepts;

    objectives;

    Method 4: Computer-based "kaining (CBT)

    - good for knowledge level objectives; - self-paced, - interactive; - available on deman& - consistent delivery of information; - visually interesting.

    - Advantages

    - Limitations - hardware requirements may be a logistical

    - not good for very complex information; - can be costly to develop; - student must be comfortable with computers.

    problem;

    Method 5: Interactive Multimedia - Advantages

    - self-paced; - full motion video can be incorporated, lending

    - very interactive; - good for learners accustomed to advanced

    video advantages;

    technology.

    - Limitations - very expensive to produce; - limited off-the-shelf offerings available; - hardware requirements may be extensive.

    - Limitations - expensive and time-consuming to produce; - delivery is usually h e r , - not very interactive; - often used stand alone by trainers to satisfy

    training requirements.

    16

  • Tips for Delivering Good Instructor-led kaining While technology-based training media such as computer based training (CBT) and laser disk programs are very useful, the real- ity is that most training is still delivered with instructors. The following infomation is provided to assist in the development and delivery of effective instructor-led training.

    Use a Variety of Media

    - slides; - transparencies;

    - demonstration; - videos.

    Instructors should use as many different types of presentation aides as possible. These include:

    - flip Charts;

    These graphic aids should be colorful and present consistent visual cues. Slides and transparencies should have colorful, rele- vant graphics that support the text. If possible, text-only slides should be avoided. Slides with lists should be limited to 5 items or less.

    Use Interactive Techniques Training must involve the student. Use open-ended questions to draw responses from your students. Use fiip charts to list stu- dent responses. Seeing their responses in writing in front of the class validates the students answer and creates interest. Develop the student materials so that they involve the class throughout the lecture segments. For example, rather than just telling a class that the permissible exposure limit for H2S is 20 ppm, have a blank in the student manual where they write the number in. Writing information down increases retention.

    Humor can be effectively used in training classes to break the tedium and increase attentiveness. Humor used in training class- es should follow some simple rules:

    Use Humor and Creativity

    - Humor should be appropriate. Avoid ethnic, religious or political humor. - Seif-effacing humor can be very effective. Studies have shown that instructors maintain credibility even when using

    - Avoid insulting or directed humor. - Be sensitive to the audience. A joke that might appeal to a very narrow segment of society may not go over very well

    Apply creative thought to the construction of your delivery materials and your exercises. Exercises can take on the form of games, allowing drill and practice on information in a fun manner. For example, a trivia-type format for refreshing students on previously delivered information can be very effective and draw students into participating.

    A training course should be evaluated every time it is delivered to assess its quality. Evaluation is divided into four levels:

    jokes about themselves.

    with a general audience.

    Evaluate Raining

    - Level I . This is a subjective evaluation by the students in the course. Questions regarding instructor presentation skills, accommodations, pace, and usefulness of content may be asked.

    - Level 2 . An in-class assessment of how well the students learned the material. Frequently this is a paperbased test. For motor skills such as donning an SCBA, an insructor critique with the use of a checklist may be a more appropriate Level 2 evaluation.

    - Level 3. At this level, an assessment is done on whether or not students have integrated their skiils and knowledge on the job. This type of evaluation is usually done by supervisor observation at some point after the training course.

    - Level 4 . At this level, trainers attempt to determine a return on the training investment. With safety training, this is usu- ally not a straightforward process. It is difficult to estimate the money saved from an accident that does not occur. Some estimation may be possible if a drop in accident frequency occurs after the training and that drop can be attributed to the training.

    17

  • APPENDIX B

    Language and Literacy Factors

    Language Training should always be delivered in the native language of the student when possible. If not possible, the following condi- tions should be followed:

    - Ensure that the student is fluent enough to understand the course material. - For instruction and exercises, pair a less fluent student with a fluent bilingual. - Avoid use of colloquialisms or local expressions. For example, an expression like "up a creek without a paddle" may

    - Evaluation instruments, such as tests, may need to be orally administered. - Training material should be as visually oriented as possible. For example, use a picture of a respirator next to the word.

    not be meaningful to someone not fluent in American English.

    Literacy Factors As with employees who may speak English as a second language, written English literacy may be a problem for some students. If this is determined to be the case, the following conditions must be followed: ?< zJ--

    - Students should be able to demonstrate recognition of waming signs and state the intended message. - Evaluation instruments, such as tests, may need to be orally administered. - Responsible persons must determine that the individual does not represent a safety hazard on the job to himself or

    - As with second language students, the training should be visually oriented. others.

    18

  • Appendix C (Informative)

    Sample Course Outline

    Course Title: Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Certification

    Time: 4 hours

    Course Description: Hydrogen Sulfide Certification is designed as a safety awareness program to familiarize students with the dangers associated with working in an H2S environment. The class is appropriate for entry level through supervisory level employees. The course is required for all employees who have the potential to be exposed to H2S in excess of the Threshold Limit Value-Time Weighted Average (TLV-TWA) as established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Annual refresher training is required.

    Course materials include student handouts and a final examination. Delivery is accomplished through lecture, hands-on demonstration of monitors and detectors, student participation and practice, videotapes, overheads, and student exercises for don- ning/doffing the self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA).

    Course Outline

    I. What is H2S? A. Toxicity B. Commonnarnes C . How is H2S formed?

    II. Common industrial sites A. Petro-chemical B. Petroleum exploration and production C . Manufacturing D. Agricultural

    iII. Properties and characteristics of H2S A. Physical properties B. Chemical properties

    IV. Concentrations/toxic levels A, ACGII-I/TLVAWA B. OSHAPEUWA C . Exposure levels D. Toxic gas comparisons

    V. Video: "Hydrogen Sulfide - A Matter of Life or Death"

    Vi. H2S effects on individuals A. Entry routes B. Susceptibility and hypersusceptibility

    VII. Detection and monitoring Personal, portable and fixed monitors and detectors

    A.

    B. Chemical vs. electronic instnunentation

    Vm. Contingency and emergency response plans A. B. Emergency call list C. D. E. Emergency equipment list

    G. H. Trainingsummiuy I.

    J. Leak prevention and surveiilance K. Remedial action

    Characteristics of H2S and SO2

    Inventory of public in area of exposure Map or plot of area of exposure

    E Detail of the system Description of the emergency system

    Program for maintaining the current applicability of the plan

    IX. Personal protective equipment

    X. Rescue, first aid techniques and post exposure evaluation A. Emergency rescue B. Rescue breathing and CPR C. Medical follow-up

    XI. Final examination

    19

  • APPENDKC

    Complementing the course outlines are the following aids and references:

    Student handouts - Class roster - Ten commandments of hydrogen suide (H2S) - Case histories of H2S accidents - Hazards and characteristics of H2S - Finalexamination - Safety passports

    Overheads Ten commandments of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) Hazards and characteristics of H2S (2) Toxicity of hydrogen sulfide to men Toxicity of various gases Common sources of H2S Industries and activities with occupational exposure to

    Methods of detection H2S detection and monitoring Hydrogen sulfide monitors Chemical detectors (2) Tutweiler apparatus Electronic detectors (2) Outline for developing a contingency plan (3)

    H2S

    AudioNisual Equipment Requirements - Chalkboard, chalk, eraser or dry-erase marker board

    - Overhead projector and screen - 1/2" VHS player and color monitor - Pointer - 33 mm slide projector and screen

    markers and eraser Flip chart with paper and markers

    Videos - Hydrogen Sulfide - A Matter of Life or Death. 18 minutes.

    Coastal Video Communications Corp., 3083 Brickhouse Court, Virginia Beach, VA 23452. (800) 767-7703.

    - Hydrogen Sulfide: Don't Let it Get You Down. Industrial Training System Corp., 9 East Stow Road, Marlton, NJ 08053. (800) 727-2487.

    - One Breath Away. 7 minutes. Safety Short Productions, Inc., 2960 N. 23rd St., LaPorte, TX 77571. (800) 458- 2236.

    - The Silent Sniper. 7.5 minutes. Industrial Training Systems Corp., 9 East Stow Road, Marlton, NJ 08053. (800) 727- 2487.

    - Hydrogen Suifide - HazChem 8. Distributed by Emergency Film Group, 1380 Soldiers Field Road, Boston, MA 02135. (800) 842-0999

    Other related publications ACGIH lOO, 2000 TLVsB and BEIsB. American Conferemce of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc., 1330 Kemper Meadow Dr., Suite 600, Cincinnati, OH 45240. (5 13) 742-2020

    API RP-55, Recommended Practices for Oil and Gas Producing and Gas Processing Plant Operations Involving Hydrogen Sulfide. American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20005. (202) 682-8375

    ISA RP 12.15, Parts I and II. Instrument Society of America, 67 Alexander Drive, P.O. Box 12277 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. (919) 549-8411

    Texas Statewide Rule 36, Hydrogen Suijde Safety. Texas Railroad Commission, P.O. Box 12967,1701 N. Congress, Austin, TX 78711. (512) 463-7255

    29 CFR 1910.134, Respiratory Protection. 29 CFR 1910.146, Confined Space Entry. 29 CFR 1910.252, Welding Standard. 29 CFR 1910.2000, Hazard Communication. 29 CFR 1910.120, Hazardous Waste Operations (HAZWOPER). 29 CFR 1910.20, Employee Access to Medical Records and Industrial Hygiene Records.

    H2S release dispersion modeling references - Gas Dispersion Models, R. Goyal and N. Al-Jurashi,

    Professional Safety, May, 1990, (pages 23-32). Contains a discussion and listing of dispersion models.

    - EPA-453IR-93-05. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, 411 West Chapel Hill Street, Durham, NC 27701. The report may also be obtained from the American Petroleum Industry, Washington, D.C., (202)

    - Casarett and Doull's Toxicology; The Basic Science Of 682-827 1

    Poisons. 4th ed. Pergamon Press.

    - Hydrogen Sulfide Principles. 32 minutes. IHRDC Video Library Sales, 535 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02116. (617) 536-0202

    20