458
Annotated Table of Contents Annotated Table of Contents Page of 4 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Overview Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results (pp. -8) The overview provides a general understanding of the findings from the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. The information includes an examination of member colleges and consortia composition, comparisons between CCSSE institutions and all students at public community colleges, a review of selected findings, and information on understanding your results. 2007 CCSSE Cohort Frequencies This report provides item-by-item percentage responses for the 2007 CCSSE Cohort (students who participated in CCSSE from 2005 through 2007). It is designed to provide a summary of the results contained in the Frequency Distributions Report and is presented in the same layout as The Community College Student Report. College Results: A Synopsis Table : Respondents to Underlying Populations This table details respondent characteristics from your college compared to population data for (1) your college, (2) similarly-sized 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges, and 3) all 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges. The specific characteristics examined include gender, race/ethnicity, age, and enrollment status. First Look: All Students This report for all students at your institution highlights those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. It is designed to provide a summary of results displayed following the Means Summary tab. First Look: Enrollment Status Breakout This report by enrollment status (part- and full-time) highlights those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. It too is designed to provide a summary of results displayed following the Means Summary tab. Frequency Report: All Students This report provides item-by-item percentage responses for all students at your institution. In addition, the far right column contains asterisks indicating those items that are significantly different, when applicable, from your comparison group at p < .001 and with an effect size greater than or equal to .2. Means Summary Means Summary Report: All Students (pp. M-M9) This report provides item-by-item means for all students at your institution contrasted with a

Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    11

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Annotated Table of Contents

Annotated Table of Contents Page � of 4

Community College Surveyof Student Engagement

CCSSE Overview

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results (pp. �-�8)The overview provides a general understanding of the findings from the 2007 CCSSE

Cohort. The information includes an examination of member colleges and consortia composition, comparisons between CCSSE institutions and all students at public community

colleges, a review of selected findings, and information on understanding your results.

2007 CCSSE Cohort FrequenciesThis report provides item-by-item percentage responses for the 2007 CCSSE Cohort (students who

participated in CCSSE from 2005 through 2007). It is designed to provide a summary of the results contained in the Frequency Distributions Report and is presented in the same layout as The Community College Student Report.

College Results: A Synopsis

Table �: Respondents to Underlying Populations This table details respondent characteristics from your college compared to population data for

(1) your college, (2) similarly-sized 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges, and 3) all 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges. The specific characteristics examined include gender, race/ethnicity, age, and enrollment status.

First Look: All Students This report for all students at your institution highlights those items where your college falls notably

above or below the mean of your comparison group. It is designed to provide a summary of results displayed following the Means Summary tab.

First Look: Enrollment Status Breakout This report by enrollment status (part- and full-time) highlights those items where your college falls

notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. It too is designed to provide a summary of results displayed following the Means Summary tab.

Frequency Report: All Students This report provides item-by-item percentage responses for all students at your institution. In addition,

the far right column contains asterisks indicating those items that are significantly different, when applicable, from your comparison group at p < .001 and with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.

Means Summary

Means Summary Report: All Students (pp. M�-M9) This report provides item-by-item means for all students at your institution contrasted with a

Page 2: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4

comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort.

Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M�0-M�3) This report presents statistics on all students at your institution contrasted with a comparison group

and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort.

Means Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout (pp. M�4-M22) This report provides item-by-item means for all students at your institution by enrollment status

(part- and full-time) contrasted with a comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort.

Summary Statistics: Part-Time Students (pp. M23-M26) This report presents statistics on part-time students at your institution contrasted with a comparison

group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort.

Summary Statistics: Full-Time Students (pp. M27-M30) This report presents statistics on full-time students at your institution contrasted with a comparison

group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort.

Frequency Distributions

Frequency Distributions by Enrollment Status and All Students (pp. F�-F�4) This report summarizes the observed frequencies of occurrence (counts and percentages) of the values

for each item on The Community College Student Report. Data are presented for all, part-time, and full-time students at your college, a comparison group, and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Please note: certain demographic items (gender, race/ethnicity, age, and enrollment status) do not appear on this report but can be found in Table 1.

2007 CCSSE Special Focus Questions Frequencies This report summarizes the observed frequencies of occurrence (counts and percentages) of the values

for the five CCSSE Special Focus Questions included with the Community College Student Report. Data are presented for all, part-time, and full-time students at your college, a comparison group, and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort.

2007 Consortium Supplemental Questions Frequencies�

This report summarizes the observed frequencies of occurrence (counts and percentages) of the values for your consortium’s supplemental questions only. Data are presented for all, part-time, and full-time students at your college compared to your consortium.

2007 Institution-Level Supplemental Questions Frequencies2

This report summarizes the observed frequencies of occurrence (counts and percentages) of the values for your institution’s supplemental questions only. Data are presented for all, part-time, and full-time students at your college.

� You will only receive the 2007 Consortium Supplemental Questions Frequencies Report if your college participated in a CCSSE consortium that chose to add specific questions to the survey.

2 You will only receive the 2007 Institution-Level Supplemental Questions Frequencies if your college participated in the 2007 Institution-Level Supplemental Questions Pilot.

Page 3: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Annotated Table of Contents Page 3 of 4

Benchmark Reports

2007 Benchmark Overview (pp. �-5) The overview provides detailed information about CCSSE’s Five Benchmarks of Effective Educational

Practice (Active and Collaborative Learning, Student Effort, Academic Challenge, Student-Faculty Interaction, and Support for Learners), information to aid in understanding and using the benchmarks, and CCSSE’s policy statement on the “Responsible Uses of CCSSE Data.”

2007 Benchmark Summary Table, Deciles, and Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition: All Students (pp. B�-B7)3

This is a series of reports, beginning with a Summary Table, which provides scores on each of the five benchmarks for your institution, a comparison group, and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges. Meanwhile, the Benchmark Deciles Report, on page B2, highlights the five benchmark deciles for all students at your institution. Finally, the third report – Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition ─ uses bar charts to represent the data provided in the summary table, for all students for each benchmark (pp. B3 - B7).

2007 Benchmark Summary Table, Deciles, and Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition: Enrollment Status Breakout (pp. B8-B�9)

This series of reports contains the same reports described above broken down by enrollment status (part- and full-time) for your institution, a comparison group, and 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges.

2007 Benchmark Summary Table, Deciles, and Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition: Credit Hour Status Breakout (pp. B20-B3�)

This series of reports contains the same reports described above broken down by credit hour status (0 to 29 and 30+ credits) for your institution, a comparison group, and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges.

Codebook

2007 Codebook (pp. �-�3) The codebook provides information on the structure, contents, and layout of the CCSSE dataset.

2007 Consortium Supplemental Questions Codebook4 The codebook includes the exact items used as additional questions for your consortium, variable names associated with additional survey items, and response values for each variable.

2007 Institution-Level Supplemental Questions Codebook5 The codebook includes the exact items used as additional questions for your institution, variable names associated with additional survey items, and response values for each variable.

Using CCSSE Results (pp. 1-7)

This section provides a series of recommendations on interpreting and communicating your CCSSE results as well as ideas on ways to use data to drive decision making at your institution.

3 Please note that for consortium comparison reports, there are no decile reports; therefore, page numbers will not correspond exactly to those listed below. 4 You will only receive the 2007 Consortium Supplemental Questions Codebook if your college participated in a CCSSE consortium that chose to add specific questions to the survey.

5 You will only receive the 2007 Institution-Level Supplemental Questions Codebook if your college participated in the 2007 Institution-Level Supplemental Questions Pilot.

Page 4: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Annotated Table of Contents Page 4 of 4

CCFSSE

Overview of National 2007 CCFSSE Cohort Survey Results (pp. �-9) The overview provides a general understanding of the project and highlights selected findings from the

2007 cohort of colleges participating in the faculty survey.

2007 CCFSSE Cohort Colleges An alphabetical list of all institutions participating in the CCFSSE from 2005 through 2007.

Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions (pp. SFC�-FF�0) The first report provides side-by-side frequency data from faculty (part-time, full-time, and all faculty), and

all-student data from the 2007 CCSSE administration for your institution. The second report summarizes the observed frequencies of occurrence (counts and percentages) of the values for all faculty survey items that do not correspond to similar items on the student survey. Example reports are provided if your institution did not participate.

2007 CCFSSE Cohort Participating Faculty Report (pp. SFC�-FF�0) This report provides aggregated side-by-side frequency data as well as frequency distributions for the

2007 CCFSSE Cohort colleges.

2007 CCFSSE Codebook (pp. �-�3) The codebook provides information on the structure, contents, and layout of the CCFSSE dataset.

Page 5: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

2007 Institutional Report Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Survey Results

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page � of �8

1 For returning participants, the college’s most recent year of participation is included in data analyses. For example, if a college participated in 2005 and 2007, only the 2007 data would be used in the three-year cohort.2 Size classifications are based on the college’s enrollment size during their most recent year of CCSSE participation; this may or may not match the college’s current size classification.3 These designations are based on the Carnegie Foundation Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.

Introduction The Community College Survey

of Student Engagement (CCSSE) provides information about effective

educational practice in community colleges and assists institutions in using

that information to promote improvements in student learning and persistence. CCSSE’s

goal is to provide member colleges with results that can be used to inform decision making

and target institutional improvements. Student engagement, or the amount of time and energy that

students invest in meaningful educational practices, is the underlying foundation for CCSSE’s work. CCSSE’s survey instrument, the Community College Student Report (CCSR), is designed to capture student engagement as a measure of institutional quality.

CCSSE again this year has used a three-year cohort of participating colleges (2005 through 2007) in all of its data analyses, including the computation of benchmark scores. This cohort is referred to as the 2007 CCSSE Cohort throughout all reports and documentation.�

This approach increases the total number of institutions and students contributing to the national dataset, which in turn increases the reliability of the overall results. In addition, the three-year cohort approach minimizes the impact, in any given year, of participation by statewide consortia.

This overview encompasses four key sections and is organized to provide a general understanding of findings from the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. First, 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges and student respondents are highlighted as well as data concerning the 2007 CCSSE Consortia. Second, CCSSE institutions and their students are compared to all U.S. public community colleges. In the third section, selected findings are showcased. In the fourth section, information is provided to help college leaders understand and use their CCSSE results.

CCSSE Member Colleges

The 2007 CCSSE Cohort is comprised of a total of 525 institutions across 48 states, plus British Columbia and the Marshall Islands. Two hundred sixty of these member colleges are classified as small (< 4,500), 136 as medium (4,500-7,999), 83 as large (8,000-14,999), and 46 as extra-large institutions (�5,000 + credit students).2 One hundred two of the Cohort member colleges are classified as urban-serving, ��3 as suburban-serving, and 3�0 as rural-serving.3

CCSSE ConsortiaA CCSSE consortium may comprise three or more colleges in a multi-college district, system, or state ─ or alternatively, a group of five or more colleges with common interests or challenges. Consortium members share reports and can add customized questions to the survey.

2007 CCSSE membership includes statewide participation in Alaska, Florida, Louisiana, Massachusetts, North Dakota, and Wyoming; other state-based consortia include Illinois, Kentucky, Minnesota, Northeast Minnesota, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. The Alaska, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Northwest, South Carolina, and Wyoming consortia added questions to the Community College Student Report for purposes of statewide assessment, to respond to accrediting agencies, and/or for internal review.

All colleges from Alamo Community College District and North Harris Montgomery Coummunity College District in Texas are participating as CCSSE consortia. Also, the Northwest Consortium is comprised of six Washington community colleges and one community college located in British Columbia.

Launched in 2006, the Student Support Partnership Integrating Resources and Education (SSPIRE) Initiative is supported by the James Irvine Foundation and includes nine California community colleges. SSPIRE colleges aspire to raise academic achievement, rates of persistence, and degree completion among primarily young, low-income, under-prepared, and traditionally underserved students. The CCSSE-SSPIRE Consortium provides opportunities

Page 6: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 2 of �8

4 See exclusionary rules on pg. 3

for SSPIRE colleges to review CCSSE and CCFSSE results, discuss those results and needs for improvement during specialized CCSSE workshops, and implement improvement initiatives that focus on SSPIRE goals.

This is the third year for the Achieving the Dream Consortium. The Achieving the Dream Consortium comprises 22 colleges from 7 states that are part of a national initiative focused on improving success rates for community college students, particularly those that traditionally have been underserved in American higher education.

The Hispanic Student Success (HSS) Consortium is a group of colleges that are designated by the federal government as Hispanic-Serving Institutions (those with at least 25% Hispanic full-time equivalent enrollment and of the Hispanic student enrollment at least 50% are low income) and/or hold current membership in the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities (HACU). Also in its fourth year, the HSS Consortium brings together �5 institutions across six states to build collaborative and networking relationships and to highlight promising practices through publications and at national and regional community college conferences. This consortium also adds questions to the Community College Student Report and will use CCSSE data and comparative reports to make informed decisions about how to improve these unique institutions.

This is the fourth year for the Texas Small Colleges Consortium. These �0 Texas small community colleges have joined CCSSE to gain valuable information about the engagement, learning, and retention of the students they serve -- and to build institutional capacity for collecting, understanding, and using data about educational practices and student success. With support from the Houston Endowment, Inc., six of the institutions gathered and reviewed baseline data in 2005, sought to implement necessary changes for improvement in 2006, and have administered a follow-up survey this year.

Student Respondents

Credit classes are randomly selected – stratified by time of day (morning, afternoon, and evening) – from institutional class data files to participate in the survey. Of those sampled, 3�0,0�3 students submitted usable surveys. The number of completed surveys produced an overall “percent of target” rate of 79%. Percent of target rate is the ratio of the adjusted number of completed surveys to target sample sizes. The adjusted survey count is the number of usable surveys that were filled out properly and did not fall into any of the exclusionary categories.4

Student Respondent Profile To compare the characteristics of student respondents to the characteristics of the underlying student population for each participating college, CCSSE uses the data reported by the institution in its most recent IPEDS Enrollment Report for the following variables: gender, race and ethnicity, student age, and enrollment status (part- or full-time). The data are aggregated to compare the 2007 CCSSE Cohort survey respondent population to the total student population of the 2007 CCSSE Cohort member colleges.

GenderOf the 301,506 student respondents who answered this item, 40% are male and 60% are female. This mirrors the full population of 2007 CCSSE Cohort community college students, comprised of 4�% males and 59% females.

Age2007 CCSSE Cohort student respondents range in age from 18 to 65+. Approximately 90% are between 18 and 39; 66% are 18 to 24, while 24% are 25 to 39.

Racial IdentificationSixty-five percent of student respondents identify themselves as White/non-Hispanic, 11% as Hispanic/Latino/Spanish, �2% as Black or African American, and 5% as Asian. Two percent of the student respondents are Native American. Four percent marked “other” when responding to the question, “What is your racial identification?”

International StudentsResponses to the question, “Are you an international student or foreign national?” reflect variations related to college size. Four percent of small college respondents indicate that they are international students, while 5% of medium-size college respondents indicate the same. In large institutions, 9% of the students who completed the survey indicate international/foreign student status. Extra-large institutions have the highest representation of international students at �0%.

Enrollment StatusSixty-nine percent of the student respondents report attending college full-time, while 37% of the 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges’ total student population attended full-time. Only 3�% of the surveyed students report being part-time college students, compared to 63% as reported to IPEDS. This inverse representation is a result of the sampling technique and the in-class administration process. For this reason, survey results are either weighted or disaggregated on the full-time/part-time variable so that reports will accurately reflect the underlying student population.

Page 7: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 3 of �8

5 If a student does not answer any of the 21 sub-items on item 4, answers “Very Often” to all 21 items, or answers “Never” to all, the survey is excluded.

The results for the following student respondent categories are weighted according to the most recent IPEDS population data.

Limited English Speaking StudentsStudents with limited English speaking skills, or those whose native language is not English, comprise a significant proportion of students in community colleges. Among CCSSE participants, small institutions include 6% non-native English speakers, while �0% of medium institutions’ students are non-native English speakers. Comparatively, large numbers of non-native English speaking students attend large (�7% of enrollees) and extra-large institutions (24%).

First-Generation StatusThirty-four percent of students indicate that neither parent has earned a degree higher than a high school diploma nor has college experience; accordingly, these students are considered “first-generation” status. Of these first-generation students who provided responses for mother’s and father’s education level, 66% percent indicate that their mothers’ highest level of education is a high school diploma, and 61% indicate that level for their fathers.

Educational AttainmentSixty-eight percent of the respondents report starting their college careers at the community college where they completed the survey. Meanwhile, 73% of students indicate that their highest level of educational attainment is a high school diploma or GED; 18% report either a certificate or an associate degree; 5% have earned a bachelor’s degree; and 2% have earned an advanced degree.

Credit Hours Earned Forty-six percent of students report having completed fewer than �5 credit hours; 2�% have completed �5-29 credit hours; and 33% have completed more than 30 credit hours.

GradesForty-four percent of students report that they earned grades of B+ or higher, while 2% of students report that they earned grades of C- or lower.

External CommitmentsFifty-seven percent of students work 2� or more hours per week; 23% of students care for dependents between � and 10 hours per week; and 69% of students spend between 1 and 5 hours per week commuting to and from class.

Excluded RespondentsThe total counts of respondents in an institution’s raw data file will differ from the numbers reported in the institutional reports due to intentional exclusion of certain surveys. Exclusions serve the purpose of ensuring that all institutional reports are based on the same sampling methods and that results are therefore comparable across institutions. Respondents may be excluded from institutional reports for the following reasons:

The respondent did not indicate whether he or she was enrolled part- or full-time at the institution. Because all results are either weighted or broken down by enrollment status, this is essential information for reporting.

The survey is invalid.5

The student reported his or her age as under �8. The student indicated that he or she had taken the

survey in a previous class or did not respond to the item.

Oversampled respondents are not included. These are surveys that individual institutions paid an additional fee to acquire. Because there are no requirements stipulating how these students are sampled, these data are not included in the standard institutional report.

Respondents Included in the College’s Raw Data FileRaw data files contain responses from all students who completed the CCSR, including oversample and/or on-line respondents, with the exception of invalid surveys and those completed by students under the age of �8.

Page 8: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 4 of �8

Table 1: Colleges by Size and Urbanicity

2007 CCSSE Cohort Member

Colleges

National Population7

2007 CCSSE Cohort Proportion

of National Population

By Size

# of Institutions 5�8 �,047 49%

Small (up to 4,499) 254 561 45%

Medium (4,500-7,999) 136 238 57%

Large (8,000-14,999) 82 �5� 54%

Extra-Large (15,000+) 46 97 47%

By Urbanicity

# of Institutions 5�8 �,059 49%

Urban-serving �0� �87 54%

Suburban-serving ��0 22� 50%

Rural-serving 307 651 47%

6 Hospital-based institutions, private institutions, and institutions located outside the fifty states are not included in representation charts.7 Includes all colleges in the target population that have valid IPEDS data.

RepresentationCCSSE Institutions Compared to All U.S. Public Community Colleges

Table � provides information about the representation of the 2007 CCSSE Cohort member colleges as compared to community and technical colleges across the nation.6 CCSSE uses the most recent IPEDS enrollment data for comparisons in this table.

Page 9: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 5 of �8

Table 2: Enrollments by Size and Urbanicity

Students Enrolled in 2007 CCSSE Cohort Member

Colleges

National Student Population in

Community Colleges

Proportion of Students Enrolled

in 2007 CCSSE Cohort Member

CollegesCredit

EnrollmentCredit

Enrollment

3,391,101 CCSSE students

6,365,137 national population 53%

By Size

Small (up to 4,499) 611,747 �,249,83� 49%

Medium (4,500-7,999) 784,322 �,395,08� 56%

Large (8,000-14,999) 896,192 1,634,076 55%

Extra-Large (15,000+) �,098,840 2,086,149 53%

By Urbanicity

Urban-serving �,2�9,7�� 2,�42,387 57%

Suburban-serving 997,4�5 �,938,3�3 5�%

Rural-serving �,�73,975 2,284,437 5�%

CCSSE Member College Enrollments Compared to All U.S. Public Community Colleges

Table 2 shows the number of credit-enrolled students from CCSSE member colleges as compared to the number across the nation by size and urbanicity.8 Overall, CCSSE’s 2007 Cohort survey respondents represent a total credit enrollment of 3,39�,�0� students across 5�8 CCSSE member colleges. CCSSE’s entire college membership represents approximately 49% of the nation’s community colleges (�,059 accredited, public associate degree-granting institutions) and 53% of the national student population (6,365,137 credit students).

8 Hospital-based institutions, private institutions, and institutions located outside the fifty states are not included in representation charts.

Page 10: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 6 of 18

Table 3: Adjusted Respondents by Size and Urbanicity

2007 CCSSE Cohort Member Colleges’

Adjusted Respondents9

2007 CCSSE Cohort Member Colleges’

EnrollmentsRespondents Credit Enrollments

310,013 students (�00%) 3,404,271 students (�00%)

By Size

Small (up to 4,499) �05,787 (34%) 616,121 (�8%)

Medium (4,500-7,999) 86,636 (28%) 784,322 (23%)

Large (8,000-14,999) 68,500 (22%) 904,988 (27%)

Extra-Large (15,000+) 49,090 (16%) �,098,840 (32%)

By Urbanicity

Urban-serving 75,776 (24%) �,220,473 (36%)

Suburban-serving 78,641 (26%) �,007,42� (30%)

Rural-serving 155,596 (50%) 1,176,377 (34%)

9 Minus exclusions (see exclusionary rules on pg. 3).

CCSSE Student Respondents across Member Institutions

Table 3 shows a comparison of the adjusted number of CCSSE cohort survey respondents displayed alongside the total student enrollment at participating colleges. The column labeled “2007 CCSSE Cohort Member Colleges Adjusted Respondents” shows the number of usable surveys (those not affected by CCSSE’s exclusionary rules). The column labeled, “2007 CCSSE Cohort Member Colleges Enrollments” reflects institutions’ populations as reported to IPEDS for the most recent enrollment reports.

These data are displayed by institutional size (small, medium, large, and extra-large) as well as urbanicity (rural, suburban, and urban). The data from Table 3 highlight an over-representation of student respondents from small institutions, which in turn results in an under-representation of respondents from extra-large colleges.

Page 11: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 7 of �8

Selected FindingsMany crucial questions that community colleges need answered — What are our students’ goals? What issues keep our students from persisting? How effectively are we engaging students in the classroom? How satisfied are our students with the support services we offer? — can be answered by investigating the percentage of student responses to specific CCSSE survey items.

This section on Selected Findings from the 2007 CCSSE Cohort data is organized in terms of seven key topics: Educational Goals, Time on Task, Relationships, Academic Experience, Barriers to Persistence, Student Satisfaction, and Student and Academic Support Services.

Educational GoalsCommunity colleges have multiple missions and goals, as do their students. Students responding to the survey are given the opportunity to mark Primary Goal, Secondary Goal, or Not a Goal in response to a list of possible goals for attending their particular college. As a result, many students mark more than one primary goal; therefore, the percentages in the table below do not sum to �00%.

As seen in Table 4, students identify various educational goals. Fifty-eight percent of the student respondents identify obtaining an associate degree as a primary goal. Fifty-one percent are interested in transferring to a 4-year college or university, while 4�% are primarily interested in obtaining or updating job-related skills. Twenty-nine percent of respondents seek to change careers, and 29% aspire to complete a certification program.

Time on TaskStudents’ behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will attain their educational goals. “Time on task” is a key variable, and there are a variety of settings and means through which students may apply themselves to the learning process.

Table 4: Educational Goals

Primary goal

Secondary goal Not a goal

Complete a certification program 29% �9% 52%

Obtain an associate degree 58% 2�% 2�%

Transfer to a 4-year college or university 5�% 2�% 27%

Obtain or update job-related skills 4�% 27% 32%

Self-improvement/personal enjoyment 39% 35% 26%

Change careers 29% 16% 55%

Table 5: Time on Task

Part-time Full-time

5 hours or fewer

6-20 hours

More than 21 hours

5 hours or fewer

6-20 hours

More than 21 hours

Preparing for class 5�% 43% 6% 38% 50% �2%

Working for pay �9% �4% 66% 3�% 24% 46%

Participating in college-sponsored activities 97% 3% 0% 93% 6% 2%

Table 5 highlights that only �2% of full-time students spend more than 2� hours per week preparing for class while 38% spend 5 hours or fewer preparing for class.

Page 12: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 8 of �8

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

Less favorable(1 through 3)

(4) More favorable(5 through 7)

Figure 1: Relationships

Relationships with other studentsRelationships with instructorsRelationships with administrative personnel and offices

Not surprisingly, part-time students spend more time working for pay, more than 2� hours per week, than their full-time counterparts (66% vs. 46%); however, these findings highlight the competing priorities facing all students attending community colleges. Finally, there is minimal participation in college-sponsored activities among all students.

RelationshipsMany educators believe in the power of their individual connections to students – a belief that is supported by higher education research as well. In point of fact, the level of student-faculty interaction is one of the most powerful predictors of student persistence in college. And, in numerous focus groups conducted with community college students, it was found that when asked to cite the factor that was most important in helping them stay in school and succeed there, students inevitably talk about relationships.

Various items on the survey can address the level and extent of students’ relational experience while attending the college. Item 4q on the survey asks students to indicate how often they worked with instructors on activities other than coursework. Nearly three-fourths (72%) indicated they “Never” engaged in such activities. When asked how much their college encouraged contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds, 47% stated that this occurred “Quite a bit/

Very much.” Over two-thirds (70%) indicated that their college provided “Some/Very little” of the support needed to thrive socially while only 9% indicated this occurred “Very much.” Finally, 78% of their friends are “Quite a bit/Extremely” supportive of their attending the college while 86% of their families were supportive of this decision.

Figure � highlights results from item �� on the survey, which ask specifically about students’ relationships with other students, instructors, and administrative personnel and offices at the college. Overall, students gave high ratings to their relationships. Regarding relationships with other students, respondents judged the quality of their relationships quite favorably with a rating of 5 or higher given by 77%. An even higher percentage (83%) gave favorable ratings to the quality of their relationships with instructors, while relationships with administrative personnel and offices were given a slightly lower favorable rating (62%).

Page 13: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 9 of �8

Academic ExperienceA positive academic experience is a product of many ingredients, one of which is the amount of time and energy that students invest in their academic work. The CCSR asks students to respond to seven survey items in order to gauge how actively they are involved in their education. Students are given the opportunity to mark Very Often, Often, Sometimes, or Never in response to items such as the following:

Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions

Made a class presentation Worked with other students on

projects during class Worked with classmates outside of

class to prepare assignments

While some students are highly involved in their academic experience (those who marked Often or Very Often), others are less engaged, as illustrated by their responses of Never, as displayed in Figure 2.

Developmental Education and ESLCommunity colleges have quite diverse student populations, and in order to adequately serve student needs, the institutions offer a variety of courses and special programs. Item 8 on the CCSR asks students to identify which course paths they are following. As shown in Figure 3, large percentages of students either have taken or plan to enroll in developmental reading, writing, and/or math

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Asked questions inclass or

contributed to classdiscussions

Made a classpresentation

Worked w ith otherstudents on

projects duringclass

Worked w ithclassmates outsideof class to prepareclass assignments

Figure 2: Academic Experience

Often or Very Often Never

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%

Developmental readingcourse

Developmental writingcourse

Developmental mathcourse

English as a secondlanguage course

Figure 3: Developmental Education and ESL(Have Done or Plan to Do)

courses, while a smaller percentage plan on taking an ESL course.

Page 14: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page �0 of �8

Study Skills and Orientation CoursesA third of students have taken or will enroll in a study skills course, and 39% have taken or will enroll in an orientation course, as highlighted in Figure 4.

Student LearningStudent respondents indicate how much their coursework emphasizes intellectual processes such as memorization, the application of theories and concepts to practical problems, analysis, synthesis and organization, making value judgments, and using learned information to perform new skills. Figure 5 illustrates students’ perceptions of the extent to which their respective colleges promote these cognitive activities.

Table 6: Curricular Experiences

Have done or

Plan to do

Internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment 57%

Honors course 26%

Organized learning communities (linked courses/study groups led by faculty or counselors)

26%

Curricular ExperienceTable 6 shows the percentage of students who have taken or plan to enroll in internships, honors courses, or organized learning communities.

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Study skills course College orientation program orcourse

Figure 4: Study Skills and Orientation Courses(Have Done or Plan to Do)

Figure 5: Student Learning(Quite a bit or Very Much)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Memorizing facts, ideas, ormethods from your courses andreadings so you can repeat them

in pretty much the same form

Analyzing the basic elements ofan idea, experience, or theory

Synthesizing and organizingideas, information, or experiences

in new w ays

Applying theories or concepts topractical problems or in new

situations

Page 15: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page �� of �8

Barriers to PersistenceCCSSE also asks students to indicate the issues that would require them to withdraw from college. That is, what keeps students from achieving their educational goals? The percentage of students who report that the various factors would result in their withdrawing from class or from college is highlighted in Figure 6. Again, students could mark more than one factor; therefore, percentages will

not sum to �00%. Other barriers to persistence include lack of peer or familial support. Twenty-two percent of students report that their friends are Somewhat or Not Very supportive of “your attending this college” while only �4% respond similarly about support from their immediate families.

Student SatisfactionA useful measure of satisfaction is whether a student recommends a service or institution to others. The CCSR asks students if they would recommend their college to a friend or family member. Ninety-four percent report they would make such a recommendation. Another item asks students to evaluate their entire educational experience. Eighty-six percent describe their experience as Good or Excellent, and only �% rate their experience as Poor.

Another measure of student satisfaction is the percent of returning or successful students. Sixty-five percent of the students indicate that they plan to enroll in their college within the next �2 months, while �2% report that they have accomplished their goals and will not be returning. On the other hand, twenty-two percent report they are uncertain or have no plans to return.

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

Lack of finances

Academicallyunprepared

Caring for dependents

Working full-time

Figure 6: Barriers to Persistence(Likely or Very Likely)

Student and Academic Support ServicesOften surveys ask a combination of questions relating to satisfaction, use, or importance levels of services, but rarely are surveys designed in a way that asks students to link all three, as does CCSSE. Table 7 displays use, satisfaction, and importance of a number of key academic and student support services. The first column reports the percentage of students who say that they used the service either Sometimes or Often; the second column shows the percentage of students who report they are Somewhat or Very Satisfied with the service; and the third column reports the percentage of students who rate the service as Somewhat or Very Important.

Page 16: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page �2 of �8

Across the board, part-time students are less likely than are their full-time peers to indicate substantial levels of engagement.

Participation in Selected ActivitiesThe first 21 engagement items on the CCSR ask students to indicate how often they have engaged in particular activities during the current academic year. For purposes of analysis, CCSSE collapsed the response categories Often and Very Often to report substantial levels of engagement; the criterion for inclusion was that half of all students had to report participating in the activity. This information is highlighted in Table 8.

Table 7: Student Services by Use, Satisfaction, and Importance

Use Satisfaction Importance

Academic Advising /planning 54% 71% 89%Career Counseling 28% 45% 79%Job placement assistance 12% 23% 64%Peer or other tutoring 25% 40% 70%Skills labs (writing, math, etc.) 38% 50% 74%Child care 5% 12% 45%Financial aid advising 43% 50% 78%Computer lab 62% 71% 84%Student Organizations 16% 28% 58%Transfer credit assistance 28% 38% 72%Services to students with disabilities 9% 18% 59%

Note: The services highlighted in bright blue in each column are the three highest ratings in that area while the services highlighted in orange are among the lowest rated in each area.

Accordingly, students are most likely to use, express satisfaction with, and rate as important the following services: academic advising and planning and computer labs. While almost half of the students report child care as important, only 5% use child care services and only 12% are satisfied with this service. Similarly, 64% of respondents rate job placement assistance as important, but only �2% use this service and only 23% are satisfied with it.

Page 17: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page �3 of �8

In comparison, it is also important to note what students are not doing in college as frequently as one might expect. To report the least frequent activities, CCSSE uses the never response category. Table 9 consists of items where 30% or more of all students report never engaging in that particular activity.

Table 9: Percentage of Students Who Reported Never Participating in Selected Activities by Enrollment Status

Least Frequent Student Activity Items All Part-Time Full-time

Participated in a community-based project as a part of a regular course 79% 83% 73%

Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) 73% 78% 67%

Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework 72% 76% 65%

Skipped class 50% 56% 4�%

Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with instructors outside of class 47% 53% 40%

Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments 42% 49% 32%

Made a class presentation 32% 40% 2�%

Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor 32% 37% 24%

Came to class without completing readings or assignments 30% 34% 24%

Part-time students are more likely than are their full-time peers to report never when responding to student activity items.

Table 8: Percentage of Students Who Reported Participating Often or Very Often in Selected Activities by Enrollment Status

Most Frequent Student Activity Items All Part-Time Full-time

Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions 64% 63% 66%

Used the Internet or instant messaging to work on an assignment 61% 56% 70%

Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources 59% 53% 69%

Received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on your performance 56% 55% 57%

Page 18: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page �4 of �8

Table 10: 2007 CCSSE Special Focus Questions

Question Response Options

1. By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, I had met with an advisor to discuss my educational goals.

A=YesB=No, I met with an advisor by the end of my first four weeks at this college, but we did not discuss my educational goalsC=No, I did not meet with an advisor by the end of my first four weeks at this collegeD=No, I have discussed educational goals with an advisor, but it did not happen by the end of my first four weeks at this collegeE=I do not recall

2. By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, I had completed an initial assessment test to determine which reading, writing, and math courses I should enroll in.

A=YesB=NoC=I do not recall

3. By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, my instructors had used teaching techniques that encouraged me to become actively involved in the classroom.

A=Very oftenB=OftenC=SometimesD=Never E=I do not recall

4. How satisfied were you with the quality of your college’s orientation course or program for new students?

A=Very Satisfied

B=Somewhat Satisfied

C=Not at all Satisfied

D=Have not attended an orientation course or program

5. Rate your overall satisfaction with this college’s processes for working with new students – including the admissions process, the financial aid office, new student assessment, your first class registration experience, etc.

A=Very SatisfiedB=Somewhat Satisfied

C=Somewhat Dissatisfied

D=Very Dissatisfied

Results from these responses are provided in the Frequency Distributions section of your Institutional Report and will be highlighted in CCSSE’s 2007 National Report. In future years, the special focus will be determined by college interests and national trends.

2007 Special Focus Questions: The Entering Student ExperienceCCSSE has established a regular feature that will allow participating colleges and national researchers to delve more deeply into areas of student experience and institutional performance that are key to student success. The five 2007 “special focus questions” elicited new information about students’ educational experiences during their earliest weeks of college.

Page 19: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page �5 of �8

Entering Student Experience ResultsEvidence suggests that college students’ earliest experiences play an important role in whether they persist and achieve their educational goals. Orientation courses, initial assessment tests, and advising are key pieces of the entering student experience. Forty-three percent of all students report having met with an advisor in the first four weeks at their particular college to discuss their educational goals, and over half of all students report completing an initial assessment test. However, only 39% of part-time students, as compared

with almost half of full-time students, report having met with an advisor. Part-time students also report being less likely than their full-time counterparts to have completed an initial assessment (51% vs. 62%). One quarter of full-time students responded that they had not attended an orientation course at their college, while 38% of part-time students reported never having done so. Further, part-time students who did attend an orientation course or program report being less satisfied with it than full-time students.

Table 11: Selected Special Focus Questions Frequencies

Part-time Full-time All Students

By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, I had met with an advisor to discuss my educational goals.

Yes 39% 49% 43%

No, I met with an advisor by the end of my first four weeks at this college, but we did not discuss my educational goals

7% 8% 7%

No, I did not meet with an advisor by the end of my first four weeks at this college 32% 23% 28%

No, I have discussed educational goals with an advisor, but it did not happen by the end of my first four weeks at this college

�3% �2% �3%

I do not recall �0% 8% 9%

By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, I had completed an initial assessment test to determine which reading, writing, and math courses I should enroll in.

Yes 5�% 62% 56%

No 40% 29% 36%

I do not recall 8% 9% 9% How satisfied were you with the quality of your college’s orientation course or program for new students?

Very Satisfied 22% 26% 24%

Somewhat Satisfied 33% 4�% 36%

Not at all Satisfied 6% 8% 7%

Have not attended an orientation course or program 38% 25% 32%

Page 20: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 16 of 18

�0Please see the Benchmark Overview for specific information regarding calculations of benchmark scores.

CCSSE in Action: Understanding Survey ResultsCCSSE recommends that college leaders familiarize themselves with CCSSE findings before communicating about the results. The following are some things to consider:

CCSSE Benchmarks10

Benchmarks are groups of conceptually related items that address key areas of student engagement, learning, and persistence. CCSSE’s five benchmarks denote areas that educational research has shown to be important in high-quality educational practice. The five benchmarks of effective educational practice in community colleges are active and collaborative learning, student effort, academic challenge, student-faculty interaction, and support for learners. These benchmarks are tools that can be used to compare college performance across benchmarks, to similarly sized institutions, and to the full CCSSE population of community colleges.

As a reminder, the benchmark results highlight data from the 2007 CCSSE Cohort, which includes 525 institutions and 3�0,0�3 student respondents. The larger number of institutions and students contributing to the national dataset increases the reliability of the overall results. In addition, the three-year cohort approach minimizes the impact, in any given year, of statewide consortia participation.

Enrollment StatusEnrollment status (part-time versus full-time) receives special attention in CCSSE reports; all results are either presented separately for part-time and full-time students or are weighted by enrollment status. In the CCSSE sampling procedure, classes are selected, not students. Accordingly, full-time students, who by definition are enrolled in more classes than part-time students, are more likely to be sampled. As a result, though approximately two-thirds of the students enrolled at the participating institutions are part-time students, the proportion in the CCSSE sample is nearly opposite. In the data analysis process, therefore, CCSSE assigns weights to responses based on respondents’ enrollment status, thereby producing more accurate measures of student engagement.

Weighting is a technique that proportionally adjusts an individual respondent’s contribution to a statistic, such as a mean or frequency; thus, some responses are weighted more heavily than others. If subgroups (e.g., part- versus full-time students) differ in their responses, then aggregate results will be biased in favor of the larger subgroup. Bias occurs, for example, when a disproportionate number of

full-time students complete the survey as compared to the population.

With the assignment of weights, subgroups (part-time) that are disproportionately small in the sample relative to the population have larger weights that increase their impact on summary statistics; the converse is true for subgroups (full-time) that are disproportionately large in the sample relative to the population.

There are several other individual characteristics, such as race, sex, or credit hours completed, where there could potentially be differences in subgroups. This observation begs the question: Why does CCSSE weight data on enrollment status and not on other individual characteristics? The answer is simple: there is no reason to do it. The only systematic bias that occurs is with enrollment status.

Effect Size as a Measure of Notable DifferencesEffect size is a measure of group differences. In the CCSSE results, it refers to mean differences between your institution and the group of colleges to which your institution is being compared divided by their standard deviation. This procedure rescales all effect sizes to the same scale (differences in standard deviations) and thus allows for comparisons.

CCSSE uses both statistical significance and standardized effect sizes to identify items on which a college’s perform-ance differs from comparison groups. An asterisk (*) highlights items for which students’ responses differ at a statistically significant level (p < .001) and have standardized effect sizes equal to or greater than (.2). Statistical significance is based on the effect size, the number of respondents, and the variability in their responses; as a single number, it also is the probability that the observed difference between outcomes would occur where there is truly no difference. While this is a useful guideline for identifying differences between groups, very small differences can be statistically significant in very large sample sizes such as the CCSSE national data set. Thus, items where notable differences occurred were identified as standardized effect sizes of (.2) or greater.

Statistical Significance Meets Practical SignificanceIn addition to focusing on items meeting the criteria highlighted above, look for patterns in students’ responses. For example, are students consistently above or below the mean of the comparison group in certain areas of engagement? Are the differences explainable in terms of a college’s mission, the nature of the undergraduate program, or certain students’ characteristics? Also, do not rely exclusively on statistical significance tests to identify

Page 21: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page �7 of �8

��See pp. �-2 for information about CCSSE consortia.

areas that warrant attention. A consistent pattern of scoring above the mean, even though all the items may not reach statistical significance, may indicate the institution is doing the right things in terms of good educational practice. At the same time, some institutions have very high expectations for student engagement and may fall short of their own aspirations even though comparisons with other institutions are favorable. And in some cases, of course, it may be that the national mean is itself unacceptably low.

CCSSE Consortia ResultsCCSSE consortium colleges that added questions to the survey instrument will find their corresponding frequency results behind the Frequency Distributions tab.�� In addition to a college’s comparison to its consortium group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort, a consortium college also will receive a comparison to other colleges in its size category.

OversamplingCCSSE’s sample sizes are determined by institutional size, as reported in IPEDS. Colleges may elect to oversample in order to examine results for specific groups (such as students enrolled in developmental courses or students attending particular campus sites) or in order to increase overall sample size. The oversample dataset is included on CCSSE’s Web site for download.

Student Identifier Data In accordance with Texas state law and The University of Texas policies, CCSSE will no longer provide student-identifier data in the Institutional Report raw data file available for download via the CCSSE Web site. For those colleges that depend upon the student identifier field in the CCSSE raw data file for institutional analyses, we will be happy to release that information in a separate and secure transmission. If you would like these data, please contact your liaison, and CCSSE will provide you the raw data file with student identifiers included on an encrypted CD-ROM. The decryption password will be supplied in an email.

Page 22: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCSSE Cohort Survey Results Page �8 of �8

Fast FactsSurvey Instrument: The Community College Student Report (CCSR)

Paper administration, in-class completion time ranges from 35 to 50 minutes to complete Web-based administration; approximately �5 minutes to complete (available only in oversample situations).

CCSSE Participants 3�0,0�3 students from 525 institutions in 48 states have completed the CCSR between 2005 and 2007.

2007 CCSSE Cohort RespondentsGender: Male student respondents – 40% Female student respondents – 60%

Race/Ethnicity

Asian – 5% Black – �2% Latino/Hispanic – 11% International – 6% Native American – 2% White – 65% Other – 4%

Enrollment Status: Part-time – 31% Full-time – 69%

2007 CCSSE Consortia Statewide and state-based consortia include Alaska, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts,

Minnesota, North Dakota, Northeast Minnesota, Northwest, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wyoming. Regional and district-wide consortia include the Northwest Consortium, the Alamo Community College District

Consortium, and the North Harris Montgomery Community College District Consortium. Texas Small Colleges Consortium: �0 small colleges across Texas Hispanic Student Success Consortium: 15 colleges Achieving the Dream Consortium: 22 colleges SSPIRE Consortium: 9 colleges

CCSSE Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Active and Collaborative Learning (items: 4a, 4b, 4f, 4g, 4h, 4i, and 4r) Student Effort (items: 4c, 4d, 4e, 6b, 10a, 13d1, 13e1, and 13h1) Academic Challenge (items: 4p, 5b, 5c, 5d, 5e, 5f, 6a, 6c, 7, 9a) Student-Faculty Interaction (items: 4k,4l,4m,4n,4o,and 4q) Support for Learners (items: 9b, 9c, 9d, 9e, 9f, �3a�, and �3b�)

Validity and ReliabilityCCSSE’s validation research study, “Exploring Relationships Between Student Engagement and Student Outcomes in Community Colleges: Report on Validation Research,” is available on the CCSSE Web site.

Future Plans Pilot of Survey of Entering Student Engagement (SENSE) -- fall 2007 (invitation only) Focus group research on entering student experiences in community colleges -- fall 2007 - fall 2008 National Field Test of Survey of Entering Student Engagement (SENSE) -- fall 2008 (open to limited

registration) National Administration of Survey of Entering Student Engagement (SENSE) -- fall 2009 Development of a survey of online student engagement (TBA)

Page 23: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCSSE Cohort Frequencies This report provides item-by-item percentage responses for the 2007 CCSSE Cohort (students who participated in CCSSE from 2005 through 2007). For returning participants, the college’s most recent year of participation is included. For example, if a college participated in 2006 and 2007, only the 2007 data are used in the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. The report is designed to provide a summary of the results contained in the Frequency Distributions Report and is presented in the same layout as The Community College Student Report. This is NOT institution-level data but rather frequencies for all students contained in the 2007 CCSSE Cohort.

Page 24: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

1 Did you begin college at this college or elsewhere?68 Started here 32 Started elsewhere

4 In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following? Very Some-

Often Often times Nevera. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions 29 35 33 3b. Made a class presentation 8 20 40 32c. Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before 19 30 30 21

turning it ind. Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas 22 37 29 12

or information from various sourcese. Come to class without completing readings or assignments 4 11 56 30f. Worked with other students on projects during class 13 32 41 14g. Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments 6 15 37 42h. Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) 2 5 19 73i. Participated in a community-based project as a part of a regular course 2 4 15 79j. Used the Internet or instant messaging to work on an assignment 31 30 26 13

k. Used e-mail to communicate with an instructor 18 25 35 21l. Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor 14 31 45 10

m. Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor 7 17 44 32n. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with instructors outside of class 4 11 37 47o. Received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on your performance 17 39 36 8p. Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or 15 34 40 11

expectationsq. Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework 2 6 20 72r. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class 18 31 38 13

(students, family members, co-workers, etc.)s. Had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity other than 18 24 34 24

your ownt. Had serious conversations with students who differ from you in terms of their 16 23 36 24

religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal valuesu. Skipped class 2 4 44 50

5 During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized the following mental activities? Very Quite Very

much a bit Some littlea. Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your courses and readings so you 25 39 29 7

can repeat them in pretty much the same formb. Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory 23 43 29 5c. Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways 19 38 34 8d. Making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, 16 34 37 13

or methodse. Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations 19 35 35 11f. Using information you have read or heard to perform a new skill 23 35 32 10

2007 CCSSE Cohort Frequencies

Notes:

Items 2, 29, 30, 33, and 34 are not included in this report. See Table 1.

Page 25: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

6 During the current school year, about how much reading and writing have you done at this college? More

None 1 to 4 5 to 10 11 to 20 than 20a. Number of assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or book-length 3 43 31 14 10

packs of course readings b. Number of books read on your own (not assigned) for personal 29 49 14 5 4

enjoyment or academic enrichmentc. Number of written papers or reports of any length 11 32 31 17 9

7 Mark the box that best represents the extent to which your examinations during the current school year have challenged you to do your best work at this college.

Extremely 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Extremelychallenging 11 23 34 24 6 2 1 easy

8 Which of the following have you done, are you doing, or do you plan to do while attending this college?

I have I plan I have not donedone to do nor plan to do

a. Internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment 16 40 43b. English as a second language course 9 5 86c. Developmental/remedial reading course 18 9 74d. Developmental/remedial writing course 21 11 68e. Developmental/remedial math course 32 14 54f. Study skills course 15 18 67

g. Honors course 5 22 73h. College orientation program or course 26 13 61i. Organized learning communities (linked courses/study groups led by 8 18 74

faculty or counselors)

9 How much does this college emphasize each of the following?

Very Quite Verymuch a bit Some little

a. Encouraging you to spend significant amounts of time studying 28 43 24 5b. Providing the support you need to help you succeed at this college 28 42 24 5c. Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial 18 29 34 20

or ethnic backgroundsd. Helping you cope with your non-academic 8 16 33 42

responsibilities (work, family, etc.)e. Providing the support you need to thrive socially 9 21 40 30f. Providing the financial support you need to afford your education 21 24 27 28

g. Using computers in academic work 41 33 19 7

Page 26: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M
Page 27: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

10 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following?

None 1 – 5 6 - 10 11 - 20 21 - 30 Morethan 30

a. Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, 2 44 29 16 5 3doing homework, or other activities related to your program)

b. Working for pay 20 5 6 12 17 40c. Participating in college-sponsored activities (organizations, 83 12 3 1 1 1

campus publications, student government, intercollegiate orintramural sports,etc.)

d. Providing care for dependents living with you (parents, 44 15 8 6 4 23children, spouse, etc.)

e. Commuting to and from classes 7 69 16 5 1 2

11 Mark the number that best represents the quality of your relationships with peopleat this college.

Your relationship with:

a. Other Students

Friendly, supportive, 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unfriendly, unsupportive,sense of belonging 27 28 22 16 5 2 1 sense of alienation

b. Instructors

Available, helpful, 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unavailable, unhelpful,sympathetic 30 32 21 12 4 2 1 unsympathetic

c. Administrative Personnel & Offices

Helpful, considerate, 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unhelpful, inconsiderate,flexible 18 22 22 20 9 5 3 rigid

12 How much has YOUR EXPERIENCE AT THIS COLLEGE contributed to your knowledge,skills, and personal development in the following areas?

Very Quite Verymuch a bit Some little

a. Acquiring a broad general education 28 42 24 6b. Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills 21 30 30 18c. Writing clearly and effectively 21 38 29 12d. Speaking clearly and effectively 19 35 31 15e. Thinking critically and analytically 25 42 26 7f. Solving numerical problems 20 34 30 17g. Using computing and information technology 25 32 28 14h. Working effectively with others 21 36 32 10i. Learning effectively on your own 27 41 26 7j. Understanding yourself 21 31 30 17k. Understanding people of other racial and ethnic 16 26 34 24l. Developing a personal code of values and ethics 15 26 34 25

m. Contributing to the welfare of your community 9 18 35 38n. Developing clearer career goals 23 32 29 16o. Gaining information about career opportunities 21 29 30 20

Page 28: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M
Page 29: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

13 This section has three parts. Please answer all three sections, indicating(1) HOW OFTEN you use the following services, (2) HOW SATISFIED you are with the services, and (3) HOW IMPORTANT the services are to you AT THIS COLLEGE.

(1) Frequency of (2) Satisfaction (3) Importance Use

Don't

Some- Rarely/ know Some- Not Some- NotOften times Never N.A. Very what at all N.A. Very what at all

a. Academic advising/planning 12 42 36 10 27 44 10 19 61 28 11b. Career counseling 5 23 50 21 16 29 13 41 50 29 22c. Job placement assistance 3 9 46 42 7 16 13 64 36 28 36d. Peer or other tutoring 7 18 46 29 17 23 10 51 39 31 30e. Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) 14 24 37 24 22 28 7 42 43 31 25f. Child care 2 3 37 58 5 7 10 78 27 18 55g. Financial aid advising 17 26 32 24 25 25 13 36 60 18 23h. Computer lab 32 30 24 14 43 28 5 23 59 25 16i. Student organizations 5 11 44 40 9 19 10 61 23 35 42j. Transfer credit assistance 7 21 36 36 15 23 12 51 51 21 28k. Services to students with 4 5 32 60 8 10 8 75 44 15 41

disabilities

14 How likely is it that the following issues would cause you to withdraw from class orfrom this college? (Please respond to each item) Some-

Very what Notlikely Likely likely likely

a. Working full-time 20 18 21 41b. Caring for dependents 13 16 22 49c. Academically unprepared 7 12 23 58d. Lack of finances 26 18 23 33e. Transfer to a 4-year college or university 31 18 17 34

15 How supportive are your friends of your attending this college? 49 Extremely 18 Somewhat 29 Quite a bit 4 Not Very

16 How supportive is your immediate family of your attending 66 Extremely 11 Somewhat this college? 20 Quite a bit 3 Not Very

17 Indicate which of the following are your reasons/goals for attending this college.(Please respond to each item)

Primary Secondary Notgoal goal a goal

a. Complete a certificate program 29 19 52b. Obtain an associate degree 58 21 21c. Transfer to a 4-year college or university 51 21 27d. Obtain or update job-related skills 41 27 32e. Self-improvement/personal enjoyment 39 35 26f. Change careers 29 16 55

Page 30: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

18 Indicate which of the following are sources you use to pay your tuition at this college. (Please respond to each item)

Major Minor Notsource source a source

a. My own income/savings 40 28 32b. Parent or spouse/significant other's income/savings 29 18 53c. Employer contributions 8 8 84d. Grants & scholarships 33 11 56e. Student loans (bank, etc.) 19 8 73f. Public assistance 7 5 89

19 Since high school, which of the following types of schools have you attended other than the one you are now attending? (Please mark all that apply)

8 Proprietary (private) school or training program9 Public vocational-technical school

20 Another community or technical college23 4-year college or university50 None

20 When do you plan to take classes at this college again?

12 I will accomplish my goal(s) during this term and will not be returning5 I have no current plan to return

65 Within the next 12 months17 Uncertain

21 At this college, in what range is your overall college grade average?

16 A 28 A- to B+ 24 B19 B- to C+ 8 C 2 C- or lower3 Do not have a GPA at this school1 Pass/fail classes only

22 When do you most frequently take classes at this college? (Mark one only)

68 Day classes (morning or afternoon)31 Evening classes1 Weekend classes

23 How many TOTAL credit hours have you earned at this college, not counting thecourses you are currently taking this term?

13 none 33 1-14 credits21 15-29 credits 13 30-44 credits11 45-60 credits 9 over 60 credits

Page 31: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

24 At what other types of institutions are you taking classes this term?(Please mark all that apply)

86 None2 High school1 Vocational/technical school2 Another community or technical college4 4-year college/university3 Other

25 How many classes are you presently taking at OTHER institutions?24

83 None 4 1 class 4 2 classes3 3 classes 5 4 classes or more

26 Would you recommend this college to a friend or family member?16

94 Yes 6 No

27 How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this college?

30 Excellent 56 Good 13 Fair 1 Poor

28 Do you have children who live with you?

31 Yes 69 No

31 Are you married?

25 Yes 75 No

32 Is English your native (first) language?

88 Yes 12 No

35 What is the highest academic credential you have earned?

3 None73 High school diploma or GED10 Vocational/technical certificate8 Associate degree5 Bachelor's degree2 Master's/doctoral/professional degree

36 What is the highest level of education obtained by your:

Father Mothera. Not a high school graduate 16 14b. High school diploma or GED 32 33c. Some college, did not complete degree 14 17d. Associate degree 7 11e. Bachelor's degree 13 13f. Master's degree/1st professional 7 6g. Doctorate degree 2 1h. Unknown 8 5

Page 32: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Respondents to Underlying Populations

Table 1, on the following page, details respondent characteristics from your college as well as population data for: 1) your college, 2) similarly-sized 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges (colleges that participated in CCSSE from 2005 through 2007), and 3) all 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges. The specific characteristics examined include gender, race/ethnicity, age, and enrollment status. Please note: Enrollment status (part-time versus full-time) receives special attention in CCSSE reports; all results are either presented separately for part-time and full-time students or are weighted by enrollment status. In the CCSSE sampling procedure, classes are selected, not students. Accordingly, full-time students, who by definition are enrolled in more classes than part-time students, are more likely to be sampled. As a result, though approximately two-thirds of the students enrolled at the participating institutions are part-time students, the proportion in the CCSSE sample is nearly opposite. In the data analysis process, therefore, CCSSE assigns weights to responses based on respondents’ enrollment status, thereby producing more accurate measures of student engagement.

Page 33: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College

2007 Cohort 2007 CCSSESize Group Cohort

Your Your Comparison CollegesRespondents Population Population Population

GenderMale 51% 45% 40% 41%Female 49% 55% 60% 59%

Race/EthnicityAmerican Indian or other Native American 1% 0% 2% 1%Asian, Asian American, or Pacific Islander 1% 1% 3% 6%Black or African American, Non-Hispanic 3% 8% 11% 14%White, Non-Hispanic 63% 67% 72% 59%Hispanic, Latino, Spanish 24% 24% 7% 14%Other 2% 0% 4% 5%International Student or Foreign National 4% 0% 1% 2%

Student Age18 to 19 26% 27% 25% 23%20 to 21 21% 17% 17% 18%22 to 24 13% 15% 13% 15%25 to 29 13% 14% 13% 14%30 to 39 13% 16% 16% 15%40 to 49 9% 7% 10% 9%50 to 64 3% 2% 5% 4%65 and over 0% 0% 1% 1%

Enrollment StatusFull - Time 55% 24% 43% 37%Part - Time 45% 76% 57% 63%

Table 1Respondents to Underlying Populations Comparisons:

Comparison Group and All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges

Notes:

Population data are those reported by colleges for the most recent IPEDS enrollment report.

Respondents include only data used in the national CCSSE analysis as in accordance with the CCSSE data exclusion rules.

Page 34: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

1 Did you begin college at this college or elsewhere?83 Started here 17 Started elsewhere

4 In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following? Very Some-

Often Often times Nevera. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions 27 36 34 3b. Made a class presentation 6 15 39 40 *c. Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before 12 22 37 29 *

turning it ind. Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas 16 35 35 15

or information from various sourcese. Come to class without completing readings or assignments 4 9 52 34f. Worked with other students on projects during class 14 29 43 14g. Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments 5 16 35 44h. Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) 2 7 23 67i. Participated in a community-based project as a part of a regular course 2 3 10 85j. Used the Internet or instant messaging to work on an assignment 25 23 32 20 *

k. Used e-mail to communicate with an instructor 12 20 34 35 *l. Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor 13 32 44 11

m. Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor 6 17 42 35n. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with instructors outside of class 5 11 40 45o. Received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on your performance 21 32 35 12p. Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or 10 26 48 15 *

expectationsq. Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework 4 5 15 75r. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class 18 29 40 13

(students, family members, co-workers, etc.)s. Had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity other than 20 26 33 22

your ownt. Had serious conversations with students who differ from you in terms of their 20 18 38 24

religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal valuesu. Skipped class 2 4 40 55

5 During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized the following mental activities? Very Quite Very

much a bit Some littlea. Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your courses and readings so you 22 36 35 8

can repeat them in pretty much the same formb. Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory 14 45 34 7 *c. Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways 16 31 42 11 *d. Making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, 14 29 39 17

or methodse. Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations 16 33 36 15f. Using information you have read or heard to perform a new skill 17 39 33 11

The Community College Student Report 2007Brazosport College

Compared with other Achieving the Dream Colleges

Notes:

* indicates a significant difference and effect size =>.2 between your college and your comparison group.

Items 2, 29, 30, 33, and 34 are not included in this report. See Table 1.

Page 35: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

6 During the current school year, about how much reading and writing have you done at this college? More

None 1 to 4 5 to 10 11 to 20 than 20a. Number of assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or book-length 5 48 27 10 10

packs of course readings b. Number of books read on your own (not assigned) for personal 35 41 15 5 4

enjoyment or academic enrichmentc. Number of written papers or reports of any length 19 37 27 12 5 *

7 Mark the box that best represents the extent to which your examinations during the current school year have challenged you to do your best work at this college.

Extremely 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Extremelychallenging 9 19 35 25 6 4 1 easy

8 Which of the following have you done, are you doing, or do you plan to do while attending this college?

I have I plan I have not donedone to do nor plan to do

a. Internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment 29 27 44b. English as a second language course 7 9 85c. Developmental/remedial reading course 16 9 75d. Developmental/remedial writing course 14 11 75e. Developmental/remedial math course 35 18 48f. Study skills course 10 22 68

g. Honors course 6 22 72h. College orientation program or course 32 11 57i. Organized learning communities (linked courses/study groups led by 7 16 77

faculty or counselors)

9 How much does this college emphasize each of the following?

Very Quite Verymuch a bit Some little

a. Encouraging you to spend significant amounts of time studying 22 45 28 5b. Providing the support you need to help you succeed at this college 21 56 20 4c. Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial 13 31 36 20

or ethnic backgroundsd. Helping you cope with your non-academic 9 23 27 41

responsibilities (work, family, etc.)e. Providing the support you need to thrive socially 8 23 37 32f. Providing the financial support you need to afford your education 20 20 28 33

g. Using computers in academic work 38 38 16 9

Page 36: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M
Page 37: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

10 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following?

None 1 – 5 6 - 10 11 - 20 21 - 30 Morethan 30

a. Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, 4 57 23 11 3 2 *doing homework, or other activities related to your program)

b. Working for pay 14 2 4 9 12 58 *c. Participating in college-sponsored activities (organizations, 89 7 2 2 0 0

campus publications, student government, intercollegiate orintramural sports,etc.)

d. Providing care for dependents living with you (parents, 35 14 8 5 4 35 *children, spouse, etc.)

e. Commuting to and from classes 10 72 11 4 2 1

11 Mark the number that best represents the quality of your relationships with peopleat this college.

Your relationship with:

a. Other Students

Friendly, supportive, 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unfriendly, unsupportive,sense of belonging 29 31 20 13 5 1 1 sense of alienation

b. Instructors

Available, helpful, 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unavailable, unhelpful,sympathetic 36 32 19 9 2 2 0 unsympathetic

c. Administrative Personnel & Offices

Helpful, considerate, 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unhelpful, inconsiderate,flexible 21 23 24 19 5 3 4 rigid

12 How much has YOUR EXPERIENCE AT THIS COLLEGE contributed to your knowledge,skills, and personal development in the following areas?

Very Quite Verymuch a bit Some little

a. Acquiring a broad general education 23 43 27 7b. Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills 19 36 28 18c. Writing clearly and effectively 18 33 32 17 *d. Speaking clearly and effectively 15 37 31 18e. Thinking critically and analytically 23 38 31 8f. Solving numerical problems 19 35 29 16g. Using computing and information technology 22 33 26 19h. Working effectively with others 21 34 34 11i. Learning effectively on your own 22 41 30 8j. Understanding yourself 17 30 35 19k. Understanding people of other racial and ethnic 11 27 32 30 *l. Developing a personal code of values and ethics 13 24 36 27

m. Contributing to the welfare of your community 6 18 36 40n. Developing clearer career goals 19 38 27 16o. Gaining information about career opportunities 20 33 29 18

Page 38: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M
Page 39: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

13 This section has three parts. Please answer all three sections, indicating(1) HOW OFTEN you use the following services, (2) HOW SATISFIED you are with the services, and (3) HOW IMPORTANT the services are to you AT THIS COLLEGE.

(1) Frequency of (2) Satisfaction (3) Importance Use

Don't

Some- Rarely/ know Some- Not Some- NotOften times Never N.A. Very what at all N.A. Very what at all

a. Academic advising/planning 8 40 39 13 25 43 9 23 52 31 17 *b. Career counseling 7 26 49 19 22 32 13 32 50 29 21c. Job placement assistance 2 14 44 40 9 19 14 57 33 27 40d. Peer or other tutoring 9 18 41 33 23 21 8 48 42 28 30e. Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) 14 25 33 29 19 30 10 41 41 33 26f. Child care 2 6 30 62 7 8 10 75 28 18 53g. Financial aid advising 15 19 30 36 24 19 12 45 55 14 31h. Computer lab 35 30 17 17 45 27 5 22 57 25 18i. Student organizations 3 13 31 53 7 17 11 65 23 27 50j. Transfer credit assistance 3 17 32 48 15 17 12 57 45 20 35k. Services to students with 3 4 28 65 7 10 7 77 39 15 47

disabilities

14 How likely is it that the following issues would cause you to withdraw from class orfrom this college? (Please respond to each item) Some-

Very what Notlikely Likely likely likely

a. Working full-time 24 19 20 36b. Caring for dependents 16 16 20 48c. Academically unprepared 6 13 21 60d. Lack of finances 26 18 17 38e. Transfer to a 4-year college or university 26 16 18 40

15 How supportive are your friends of your attending this college? 51 Extremely 18 Somewhat 25 Quite a bit 6 Not Very

16 How supportive is your immediate family of your attending 68 Extremely 13 Somewhat this college? 17 Quite a bit 2 Not Very

17 Indicate which of the following are your reasons/goals for attending this college.(Please respond to each item)

Primary Secondary Notgoal goal a goal

a. Complete a certificate program 40 19 42b. Obtain an associate degree 50 25 25c. Transfer to a 4-year college or university 43 20 38d. Obtain or update job-related skills 48 21 30e. Self-improvement/personal enjoyment 41 33 27f. Change careers 27 16 57

Page 40: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

18 Indicate which of the following are sources you use to pay your tuition at this college. (Please respond to each item)

Major Minor Notsource source a source

a. My own income/savings 50 21 30b. Parent or spouse/significant other's income/savings 30 15 55c. Employer contributions 17 8 75d. Grants & scholarships 23 10 67e. Student loans (bank, etc.) 8 8 84f. Public assistance 4 5 90

19 Since high school, which of the following types of schools have you attended other than the one you are now attending? (Please mark all that apply)

5 Proprietary (private) school or training program7 Public vocational-technical school

20 Another community or technical college13 4-year college or university63 None

20 When do you plan to take classes at this college again?

7 I will accomplish my goal(s) during this term and will not be returning3 I have no current plan to return

71 Within the next 12 months19 Uncertain

21 At this college, in what range is your overall college grade average?

17 A 31 A- to B+ 24 B17 B- to C+ 5 C 3 C- or lower3 Do not have a GPA at this school1 Pass/fail classes only

22 When do you most frequently take classes at this college? (Mark one only)

43 Day classes (morning or afternoon)57 Evening classes0 Weekend classes

23 How many TOTAL credit hours have you earned at this college, not counting thecourses you are currently taking this term?

12 none 38 1-14 credits20 15-29 credits 15 30-44 credits6 45-60 credits 9 over 60 credits

Page 41: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

24 At what other types of institutions are you taking classes this term?(Please mark all that apply)

91 None4 High school2 Vocational/technical school2 Another community or technical college1 4-year college/university1 Other

25 How many classes are you presently taking at OTHER institutions?24

83 None 2 1 class 4 2 classes6 3 classes 5 4 classes or more

26 Would you recommend this college to a friend or family member?16

93 Yes 7 No

27 How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this college?

32 Excellent 54 Good 13 Fair 1 Poor

28 Do you have children who live with you?

46 Yes 54 No

31 Are you married?

35 Yes 65 No

32 Is English your native (first) language?

87 Yes 13 No

35 What is the highest academic credential you have earned?

4 None77 High school diploma or GED9 Vocational/technical certificate6 Associate degree2 Bachelor's degree2 Master's/doctoral/professional degree

36 What is the highest level of education obtained by your:

Father Mothera. Not a high school graduate 26 21b. High school diploma or GED 21 29c. Some college, did not complete degree 21 19d. Associate degree 6 10e. Bachelor's degree 8 10f. Master's degree/1st professional 6 4g. Doctorate degree 3 1h. Unknown 8 5

Page 42: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

First Look The following two reports highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The first report provides this data for all students at your college while the second provides the data by enrollment status (part- and full-time). It is designed to provide a summary of the results that are displayed following the Means Summary tab. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2. The effect size represents the magnitude of the discrepancy between your college and the comparison group in the student or institutional behavior represented by the item. Using both probability and effect size measures increases the likelihood that the quality of the student experience represented by the item(s) is appreciably different from other colleges of similar size; and the results, therefore, may be of practical as well as statistical significance.

Page 43: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College: First Look

Compared with other Small colleges

Above the Mean

WEEKLY ACTIVITIES

10b. Working for pay

Below the Mean

COLLEGE ACTIVITIES

4b. Made a class presentation

4c. Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in

4j. Used the Internet or instant messaging to work on an assignment

4k. Used email to communicate with an instructor

4p. Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations

6c. Number of written papers or reports of any length

WEEKLY ACTIVITIES

10a. Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, doing homework, or other activities related to your program)

STUDENT SERVICES

13a1. Frequency: Academic advising/planning

13a3. Importance: Academic advising/planning

13g3. Importance: Financial aid advising

Page 44: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College: First Look

Compared with other Achieving the Dream colleges

Above the Mean

WEEKLY ACTIVITIES Part- Time

Full- Time

10d. Providing care for dependents living with you (parents, children, spouse, etc.) *

Below the Mean

COLLEGE ACTIVITIES Part- Time

Full- Time

4b. Made a class presentation * 4c. Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in * * 4d. Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources

*

4j. Used the Internet or instant messaging to work on an assignment * 4k. Used email to communicate with an instructor * * 4p. Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations

* *

6c. Number of written papers or reports of any length *

EDUCATIONAL AND PERSONAL GROWTH Part- Time

Full- Time

12c. Writing clearly and effectively * 12k. Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds *

STUDENT SERVICES Part- Time

Full- Time

13a3. Importance: Academic advising/planning * 13g3. Importance: Financial aid advising *

Page 45: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College: First Look

Compared with other Achieving the Dream colleges

Above the Mean

WEEKLY ACTIVITIES

10b. Working for pay

10d. Providing care for dependents living with you (parents, children, spouse, etc.)

Below the Mean

COLLEGE ACTIVITIES

4b. Made a class presentation

4c. Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in

4j. Used the Internet or instant messaging to work on an assignment

4k. Used email to communicate with an instructor

4p. Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations

5b. Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory

5c. Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways

6c. Number of written papers or reports of any length

WEEKLY ACTIVITIES

10a. Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, doing homework, or other activities related to your program)

EDUCATIONAL AND PERSONAL GROWTH

12c. Writing clearly and effectively

12k. Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds

STUDENT SERVICES

13a3. Importance: Academic advising/planning

Page 46: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Frequency Report: All Students This report provides item-by-item percentage responses for all students at your institution. In addition, the far right column contains asterisks for those items that are significantly different, when applicable, from your comparison group at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.

Page 47: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

1 Did you begin college at this college or elsewhere?83 Started here 17 Started elsewhere

4 In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following? Very Some-

Often Often times Nevera. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions 27 36 34 3b. Made a class presentation 6 15 39 40 *c. Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before 12 22 37 29 *

turning it ind. Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas 16 35 35 15

or information from various sourcese. Come to class without completing readings or assignments 4 9 52 34f. Worked with other students on projects during class 14 29 43 14g. Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments 5 16 35 44h. Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) 2 7 23 67i. Participated in a community-based project as a part of a regular course 2 3 10 85j. Used the Internet or instant messaging to work on an assignment 25 23 32 20 *

k. Used e-mail to communicate with an instructor 12 20 34 35 *l. Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor 13 32 44 11

m. Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor 6 17 42 35n. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with instructors outside of class 5 11 40 45o. Received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on your performance 21 32 35 12p. Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or 10 26 48 15 *

expectationsq. Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework 4 5 15 75r. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class 18 29 40 13

(students, family members, co-workers, etc.)s. Had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity other than 20 26 33 22

your ownt. Had serious conversations with students who differ from you in terms of their 20 18 38 24

religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal valuesu. Skipped class 2 4 40 55

5 During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized the following mental activities? Very Quite Very

much a bit Some littlea. Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your courses and readings so you 22 36 35 8

can repeat them in pretty much the same formb. Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory 14 45 34 7c. Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways 16 31 42 11d. Making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, 14 29 39 17

or methodse. Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations 16 33 36 15f. Using information you have read or heard to perform a new skill 17 39 33 11

The Community College Student Report 2007Brazosport College

Compared with other Small Colleges

Notes:

* indicates a significant difference and effect size =>.2 between your college and your comparison group.

Items 2, 29, 30, 33, and 34 are not included in this report. See Table 1.

Page 48: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

6 During the current school year, about how much reading and writing have you done at this college? More

None 1 to 4 5 to 10 11 to 20 than 20a. Number of assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or book-length 5 48 27 10 10

packs of course readings b. Number of books read on your own (not assigned) for personal 35 41 15 5 4

enjoyment or academic enrichmentc. Number of written papers or reports of any length 19 37 27 12 5 *

7 Mark the box that best represents the extent to which your examinations during the current school year have challenged you to do your best work at this college.

Extremely 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Extremelychallenging 9 19 35 25 6 4 1 easy

8 Which of the following have you done, are you doing, or do you plan to do while attending this college?

I have I plan I have not donedone to do nor plan to do

a. Internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment 29 27 44b. English as a second language course 7 9 85c. Developmental/remedial reading course 16 9 75d. Developmental/remedial writing course 14 11 75e. Developmental/remedial math course 35 18 48f. Study skills course 10 22 68

g. Honors course 6 22 72h. College orientation program or course 32 11 57i. Organized learning communities (linked courses/study groups led by 7 16 77

faculty or counselors)

9 How much does this college emphasize each of the following?

Very Quite Verymuch a bit Some little

a. Encouraging you to spend significant amounts of time studying 22 45 28 5b. Providing the support you need to help you succeed at this college 21 56 20 4c. Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial 13 31 36 20

or ethnic backgroundsd. Helping you cope with your non-academic 9 23 27 41

responsibilities (work, family, etc.)e. Providing the support you need to thrive socially 8 23 37 32f. Providing the financial support you need to afford your education 20 20 28 33

g. Using computers in academic work 38 38 16 9

Page 49: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M
Page 50: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

10 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following?

None 1 – 5 6 - 10 11 - 20 21 - 30 Morethan 30

a. Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, 4 57 23 11 3 2 *doing homework, or other activities related to your program)

b. Working for pay 14 2 4 9 12 58 *c. Participating in college-sponsored activities (organizations, 89 7 2 2 0 0

campus publications, student government, intercollegiate orintramural sports,etc.)

d. Providing care for dependents living with you (parents, 35 14 8 5 4 35children, spouse, etc.)

e. Commuting to and from classes 10 72 11 4 2 1

11 Mark the number that best represents the quality of your relationships with peopleat this college.

Your relationship with:

a. Other Students

Friendly, supportive, 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unfriendly, unsupportive,sense of belonging 29 31 20 13 5 1 1 sense of alienation

b. Instructors

Available, helpful, 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unavailable, unhelpful,sympathetic 36 32 19 9 2 2 0 unsympathetic

c. Administrative Personnel & Offices

Helpful, considerate, 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unhelpful, inconsiderate,flexible 21 23 24 19 5 3 4 rigid

12 How much has YOUR EXPERIENCE AT THIS COLLEGE contributed to your knowledge,skills, and personal development in the following areas?

Very Quite Verymuch a bit Some little

a. Acquiring a broad general education 23 43 27 7b. Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills 19 36 28 18c. Writing clearly and effectively 18 33 32 17d. Speaking clearly and effectively 15 37 31 18e. Thinking critically and analytically 23 38 31 8f. Solving numerical problems 19 35 29 16g. Using computing and information technology 22 33 26 19h. Working effectively with others 21 34 34 11i. Learning effectively on your own 22 41 30 8j. Understanding yourself 17 30 35 19k. Understanding people of other racial and ethnic 11 27 32 30l. Developing a personal code of values and ethics 13 24 36 27

m. Contributing to the welfare of your community 6 18 36 40n. Developing clearer career goals 19 38 27 16o. Gaining information about career opportunities 20 33 29 18

Page 51: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M
Page 52: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

13 This section has three parts. Please answer all three sections, indicating(1) HOW OFTEN you use the following services, (2) HOW SATISFIED you are with the services, and (3) HOW IMPORTANT the services are to you AT THIS COLLEGE.

(1) Frequency of (2) Satisfaction (3) Importance Use

Don't

Some- Rarely/ know Some- Not Some- NotOften times Never N.A. Very what at all N.A. Very what at all

a. Academic advising/planning 8 40 39 13 * 25 43 9 23 52 31 17 *b. Career counseling 7 26 49 19 22 32 13 32 50 29 21c. Job placement assistance 2 14 44 40 9 19 14 57 33 27 40d. Peer or other tutoring 9 18 41 33 23 21 8 48 42 28 30e. Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) 14 25 33 29 19 30 10 41 41 33 26f. Child care 2 6 30 62 7 8 10 75 28 18 53g. Financial aid advising 15 19 30 36 24 19 12 45 55 14 31 *h. Computer lab 35 30 17 17 45 27 5 22 57 25 18i. Student organizations 3 13 31 53 7 17 11 65 23 27 50j. Transfer credit assistance 3 17 32 48 15 17 12 57 45 20 35k. Services to students with 3 4 28 65 7 10 7 77 39 15 47

disabilities

14 How likely is it that the following issues would cause you to withdraw from class orfrom this college? (Please respond to each item) Some-

Very what Notlikely Likely likely likely

a. Working full-time 24 19 20 36b. Caring for dependents 16 16 20 48c. Academically unprepared 6 13 21 60d. Lack of finances 26 18 17 38e. Transfer to a 4-year college or university 26 16 18 40

15 How supportive are your friends of your attending this college? 51 Extremely 18 Somewhat 25 Quite a bit 6 Not Very

16 How supportive is your immediate family of your attending 68 Extremely 13 Somewhat this college? 17 Quite a bit 2 Not Very

17 Indicate which of the following are your reasons/goals for attending this college.(Please respond to each item)

Primary Secondary Notgoal goal a goal

a. Complete a certificate program 40 19 42b. Obtain an associate degree 50 25 25c. Transfer to a 4-year college or university 43 20 38d. Obtain or update job-related skills 48 21 30e. Self-improvement/personal enjoyment 41 33 27f. Change careers 27 16 57

Page 53: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

18 Indicate which of the following are sources you use to pay your tuition at this college. (Please respond to each item)

Major Minor Notsource source a source

a. My own income/savings 50 21 30b. Parent or spouse/significant other's income/savings 30 15 55c. Employer contributions 17 8 75d. Grants & scholarships 23 10 67e. Student loans (bank, etc.) 8 8 84f. Public assistance 4 5 90

19 Since high school, which of the following types of schools have you attended other than the one you are now attending? (Please mark all that apply)

5 Proprietary (private) school or training program7 Public vocational-technical school

20 Another community or technical college13 4-year college or university63 None

20 When do you plan to take classes at this college again?

7 I will accomplish my goal(s) during this term and will not be returning3 I have no current plan to return

71 Within the next 12 months19 Uncertain

21 At this college, in what range is your overall college grade average?

17 A 31 A- to B+ 24 B17 B- to C+ 5 C 3 C- or lower3 Do not have a GPA at this school1 Pass/fail classes only

22 When do you most frequently take classes at this college? (Mark one only)

43 Day classes (morning or afternoon)57 Evening classes0 Weekend classes

23 How many TOTAL credit hours have you earned at this college, not counting thecourses you are currently taking this term?

12 none 38 1-14 credits20 15-29 credits 15 30-44 credits6 45-60 credits 9 over 60 credits

Page 54: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

24 At what other types of institutions are you taking classes this term?(Please mark all that apply)

91 None4 High school2 Vocational/technical school2 Another community or technical college1 4-year college/university1 Other

25 How many classes are you presently taking at OTHER institutions?24

83 None 2 1 class 4 2 classes6 3 classes 5 4 classes or more

26 Would you recommend this college to a friend or family member?16

93 Yes 7 No

27 How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this college?

32 Excellent 54 Good 13 Fair 1 Poor

28 Do you have children who live with you?

46 Yes 54 No

31 Are you married?

35 Yes 65 No

32 Is English your native (first) language?

87 Yes 13 No

35 What is the highest academic credential you have earned?

4 None77 High school diploma or GED9 Vocational/technical certificate6 Associate degree2 Bachelor's degree2 Master's/doctoral/professional degree

36 What is the highest level of education obtained by your:

Father Mothera. Not a high school graduate 26 21b. High school diploma or GED 21 29c. Some college, did not complete degree 21 19d. Associate degree 6 10e. Bachelor's degree 8 10f. Master's degree/1st professional 6 4g. Doctorate degree 3 1h. Unknown 8 5

Page 55: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Means Summary There are five reports contained in this section. The first two reports present data for all students and the final three present data for students by enrollment status (part-and full-time). The Means Summary Report (pp. M1 - M9) provides item-by-item means for all students at your institution contrasted with a comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort (students who participated in CCSSE from 2005 through 2007). Below is a description of the layout of this report: Item The items from The Community College Student Report appear in the left column in the same order they appear on the instrument. Because the report lists means and mean comparison information, only those items that have numerically scaled responses appear. The items measuring other educational experiences (practicum experiences, study abroad, etc.) do not appear because their response sets are categorical (yes, no, undecided). Please refer to the Frequencies Distributions for details on these items. Variable The name of each variable appears in the second column for easy reference to your data file and the summary statistics reports. Class The class appears in the third column and corresponds to the sample for which the data are reported (e.g., all students, part-time students, or full-time students). Mean A mean is the arithmetic average of all responses on a particular item. Means are provided for your institution, a comparison group, and for the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Sig (Statistical Significance) A t test, a statistical procedure used to compare two means, is conducted between your college and comparison group as well as your college and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. The statistical significance – the probability of the observed difference occurring were there truly no differences between the means – is reported. For the comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort mean differences that are significant at the p < .001 level and have an effect size greater than or equal to .2 (see below) are indicated by a single asterisk (*). Effect Size The actual magnitude of some item score differences may seem trivial, even though they are highly reliable and statistically significant. For this reason, CCSSE also reports the effect size (only when the value is greater than or equal to .2) associated with those item comparisons that are statistically significant. The effect size represents the magnitude of the discrepancy in the student or institutional behavior represented by the item.

Page 56: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

The Summary Statistics Report (pp. M10 - M13) presents statistics on all students at your institution contrasted with a comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. A description of the layout of this report is provided below: Variable Names The name of each variable; this is the same name contained in the second column of the Means Summary Report: All Students. # of respondents The total number of respondents for your college, a comparison group, and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort are listed. As a reminder, respondents may be excluded from institutional reports for the following reasons: 1) the respondent did not indicate whether he or she was enrolled part- or full-time at the institution, 2) the survey is invalid, 3) the student reported his or her age as under 18, or; 4) the student indicated that he or she had taken the survey in a previous class. Mean Arithmetic average of all responses on a particular item. Standard deviation A statistic used as a measure of the dispersion or variation in a distribution, equal to the square root of the arithmetic mean of the squares of the deviations from the arithmetic mean; more generally, a measure of the extent to which numbers are spread around their average. Std error of the mean A measurement of error when a sample mean is used to estimate the mean of the population from which the sample was drawn. The standard error of the mean is computed as the standard deviation of the original population divided by the square root of the sample size. Significance The probability of the observed difference occurring were there truly no differences between the means. For the comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort, mean differences that are significant at the p < .001 level and have an effect size greater than or equal to .2 are indicated by a single asterisk (*). Effect size The effect size represents the magnitude of the discrepancy in the student or institutional behavior represented by the item. For a more detailed description, see above. The next series of reports, found on pages M14 through M30, contain the same reports described above broken down by enrollment status for your institution, a comparison group, and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort.

Page 57: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect SizeAll Students N = 416

COLLEGE ACTIVITIES

Academic, Intellectual and Social Experiences

4. In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following?

1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often, 4=Very often

a. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions CLQUEST All Students 2.86 2.96 2.91

b. Made a class presentation CLPRESEN All Students 1.86 2.05 * -0.21 2.04

c. Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before REWROPAP All Students 2.16 2.48 * -0.30 2.47 * -0.30turning it in

d. Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or INTEGRAT All Students 2.51 2.69 2.70 information from various sources

e. Came to class without completing readings or assignments CLUNPREP All Students 1.84 1.85 1.88

f. Worked with other students on projects during class CLASSGRP All Students 2.44 2.48 2.46

g. Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare OCCGRP All Students 1.82 1.89 1.84 class assignments

h. Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) TUTOR All Students 1.45 1.38 1.36

i. Participated in a community-based project as a part of a COMMPROJ All Students 1.22 1.31 1.29 regular course

j. Used the Internet or instant messaging to work on an INTERNET All Students 2.53 2.80 * -0.27 2.79 * -0.26assignment

k. Used email to communicate with an instructor EMAIL All Students 2.09 2.39 * -0.29 2.41 * -0.32

l. Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor FACGRADE All Students 2.46 2.53 2.49

m. Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor FACPLANS All Students 1.94 2.06 1.99

All Other Small N = 105371 All Other Colleges N = 309597

Brazosport CollegeOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

* T-tests: 2-tailed M1

Page 58: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

COLLEGE ACTIVITIES

Academic, Intellectual, and Social Experiences continuedn. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with FACIDEAS All Students 1.75 1.76 1.72

instructors outside of class o. Received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on FACFEED All Students 2.62 2.67 2.65

your performance p. Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an WORKHARD All Students 2.32 2.54 * -0.26 2.52 * -0.23

instructor's standards or expectations q. Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework FACOTH All Students 1.37 1.43 1.39

r. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others OOCIDEAS All Students 2.51 2.56 2.55

outside of class (students, family members, coworkers, etc.) s. Had serious conversations with students of a different race DIVRSTUD All Students 2.44 2.28 2.36

or ethnicity than your own t. Had serious conversations with students who differ from you DIFFSTUD All Students 2.34 2.30 2.32

in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values u. Skipped class SKIPCLAS All Students 1.53 1.55 1.58

Character of Mental Activities

5. During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized the following mental activities?

a. Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your courses and MEMORIZE All Students 2.72 2.81 2.82 readings so you can repeat them in pretty much the same form

b. Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory ANALYZE All Students 2.67 2.80 2.82

c. Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences SYNTHESZ All Students 2.52 2.69 2.69 in new ways

d. Making judgments about the value or soundness of EVALUATE All Students 2.41 2.53 2.53 information, arguments, or methods

e. Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new APPLYING All Students 2.51 2.63 2.62 situations

f. Using information you have read or heard to perform a PERFORM All Students 2.63 2.75 2.72 new skill.

1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much

1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often, 4=Very often

* T-tests: 2-tailed M2

Page 59: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

COLLEGE ACTIVITIES

Reading and Writing

6. During the current school year, about how much reading and writing have you done at this college?

a. Number of assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or READASGN All Students 2.73 2.87 2.85 book-length packs of course readings

b. Number of books read on your own (not assigned) for READOWN All Students 2.02 2.06 2.07 personal enjoyment or academic enrichment

c. Number of written papers or reports of any length WRITEANY All Students 2.47 2.82 * -0.31 2.81 * -0.31

Nature of Exams

7. Mark the box that best represents the extent to which your examinations during the current school year have challenged you to do your best work at this college

EXAMS All Students 4.83 5.05 5.00

OPINIONS ABOUT YOUR SCHOOL

Institutional Emphasis9. How much does this college emphasize each of the following?

a. Encouraging you to spend significant amounts of time ENVSCHOL All Students 2.84 2.96 2.94 studying

b. Providing the support you need to help you succeed at this ENVSUPRT All Students 2.94 2.96 2.93 college

c. Encouraging contact among students from different economic, ENVDIVRS All Students 2.37 2.42 2.45 social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds

d. Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities ENVNACAD All Students 1.99 1.95 1.90 (work, family, etc.)

e. Providing the support you need to thrive socially ENVSOCAL All Students 2.06 2.12 2.08

f. Providing the financial support you need to afford your FINSUPP All Students 2.27 2.47 2.37 education

g. Using computers in academic work ENVCOMP All Students 3.04 3.11 3.07

1=None, 2=Between 1 and 4, 3=Between 5 and 10, 4=Between 11 and 20, 5=More than 20

1=Extremely easy to 7=Extremely challenging

1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much

* T-tests: 2-tailed M3

Page 60: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

WEEKLY ACTIVITIES

10. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7 - day week doing each of the following?

a. Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, ACADPR01 All Students 1.58 1.91 * -0.30 1.88 * -0.29doing homework, or other activities related to your program)

b. Working for pay PAYWORK All Students 3.77 3.08 * 0.35 3.23 * 0.28

c. Participating in college-sponsored activities (organizations, campus COCURR01 All Students 0.19 0.31 0.27 publications, student government, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.)

d. Providing care for dependents living with you (parents, children, CAREDE01 All Students 2.33 2.00 1.81 * 0.25spouse, etc.)

e. Commuting to and from classes COMMUTE All Students 1.20 1.33 1.31

Quality of Relationships

11. Mark the box that best represents the quality of your relationships with people at this college.

a. Relationships with other students ENVSTU All Students 5.59 5.60 5.47

b. Relationships with instuctors ENVFAC All Students 5.82 5.72 5.65

c. Relationships with administrative personnel and offices ENVADM All Students 5.10 5.11 4.93

1=Unhelpful, inconsiderate, rigid to 7=Helpful, considerate, flexible

0=None, 1=1-5 hours/week, 2=6-10 hours/week, 3=11-20 hours/week, 4=21-30 hours/week, 5=More than 30 hours/week

1=Unfriendly, unsupportive, sense of alienation to 7=Friendly, supportive, sense of belonging

1=Unavailable, unhelpful, unsympathetic to 7=Available, helpful, sympathetic

* T-tests: 2-tailed M4

Page 61: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

EDUCATIONAL AND PERSONAL GROWTH

Knowledge, Skills & Personal Development

12. How much has YOUR EXPERIENCE AT THIS COLLEGE contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas?

a. Acquiring a broad general education GNGENLED All Students 2.82 2.93 2.93

b. Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills GNWORK All Students 2.56 2.66 2.54

c. Writing clearly and effectively GNWRITE All Students 2.51 2.69 2.68

d. Speaking clearly and effectively GNSPEAK All Students 2.49 2.60 2.58

e. Thinking critically and analytically GNANALY All Students 2.76 2.87 2.85

f. Solving numerical problems GNSOLVE All Students 2.56 2.59 2.57

g. Using computing and information technology GNCMPTS All Students 2.59 2.76 2.69

h. Working effectively with others GNOTHERS All Students 2.66 2.75 2.69

i. Learning effectively on your own GNINQ All Students 2.76 2.91 2.88

j. Understanding yourself GNSELF All Students 2.45 2.60 2.56

k. Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds GNDIVERS All Students 2.19 2.32 2.34

l. Developing a personal code of values and ethics GNETHICS All Students 2.22 2.36 2.32

m. Contributing to the welfare of your community GNCOMMUN All Students 1.90 2.03 1.97

n. Developing clearer career goals CARGOAL All Students 2.60 2.68 2.62

o. Gaining information about career opportunities GAINCAR All Students 2.56 2.58 2.51

1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much

* T-tests: 2-tailed M5

Page 62: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

STUDENT SERVICES

13.1 How often do you use the following services?a. Frequency: Academic advising/planning USEACAD All Students 1.64 1.79 * -0.22 1.74

b. Frequency: Career counseling USECACOU All Students 1.48 1.44 1.43

c. Frequency: Job placement assistance USEJOBPL All Students 1.30 1.28 1.24

d. Frequency: Peer or other tutoring USETUTOR All Students 1.52 1.45 1.45

e. Frequency: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) USELAB All Students 1.73 1.74 1.70

f. Frequency: Child care USECHLD All Students 1.27 1.22 1.18

g. Frequency: Financial aid advising USEFAADV All Students 1.77 1.87 1.80

h. Frequency: Computer lab USECOMLB All Students 2.21 2.14 2.09

i. Frequency: Student organizations USESTORG All Students 1.41 1.38 1.34

j. Frequency: Transfer credit assistance USETRCRD All Students 1.46 1.56 1.55

k. Frequency: Services to students with disabilities USEDISAB All Students 1.28 1.32 1.30

0=Don’t know/N.A, 1=Rarely/never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often

* T-tests: 2-tailed M6

Page 63: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

STUDENT SERVICES

13.2 How satisfied are you with the services?a. Satisfaction: Academic advising/planning SATACAD All Students 2.20 2.27 2.21

b. Satisfaction: Career counseling SATCACOU All Students 2.13 2.06 2.04

c. Satisfaction: Job placement assistance SATJOBPL All Students 1.89 1.87 1.82

d. Satisfaction: Peer or other tutoring SATTUTOR All Students 2.29 2.15 2.14

e. Satisfaction: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) SATLAB All Students 2.16 2.26 2.25

f. Satisfaction: Child care SATCHLD All Students 1.89 1.79 1.76

g. Satisfaction: Financial aid advising SATFAADV All Students 2.22 2.24 2.18

h. Satisfaction: Computer lab SATCOMLB All Students 2.51 2.51 2.49

i. Satisfaction: Student organizations SATSTORG All Students 1.88 1.99 1.96

j. Satisfaction: Transfer credit assistance SATTRCRD All Students 2.06 2.09 2.06

k. Satisfaction: Services to students with disabilities SATDISAB All Students 1.99 2.03 2.00

0=N.A.,1=Not at all, 2=Somewhat, 3=Very

* T-tests: 2-tailed M7

Page 64: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

STUDENT SERVICES

13.3 How important are the services to you?a. Importance: Academic advising/planning IMPACAD All Students 2.34 2.51 * -0.25 2.50 * -0.23

b. Importance: Career counseling IMPCACOU All Students 2.29 2.27 2.28

c. Importance: Job placement assistance IMPJOBPL All Students 1.92 2.04 2.01

d. Importance: Peer or other tutoring IMPTUTOR All Students 2.13 2.08 2.08

e. Importance: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) IMPLAB All Students 2.14 2.18 2.18

f. Importance: Child care IMPCHLD All Students 1.75 1.74 1.73

g. Importance: Financial aid advising IMPFAADV All Students 2.24 2.43 * -0.23 2.37

h. Importance: Computer lab IMPCOMLB All Students 2.39 2.46 2.43

i. Importance: Student organizations IMPSTORG All Students 1.74 1.83 1.81

j. Importance: Transfer credit assistance IMPTRCRD All Students 2.10 2.19 2.23

k. Importance: Services to students with disabilities IMPDISAB All Students 1.92 2.03 2.02

1=Not at all, 2=Somewhat, 3=Very

* T-tests: 2-tailed M8

Page 65: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

COLLEGE EXPERIENCES

14. How likely is it that the following issues would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college?

a. Working full-time WRKFULL All Students 2.32 2.13 2.17

b. Caring for dependents CAREDEP All Students 2.01 1.94 1.92

c. Academically unprepared ACADUNP All Students 1.66 1.62 1.67

d. Lack of finances LACKFIN All Students 2.32 2.42 2.38

e. Transfer to a 4-year college or university TRANSFER All Students 2.29 2.29 2.47

15. How supportive are your friends of your attending this FRNDSUPP All Students 3.20 3.27 3.23 college?

16. How supportive is your immediate family of your attending FAMSUPP All Students 3.52 3.53 3.50 this college?

23. How many TOTAL credit hours have you earned at this college, TOTCHRS All Students 1.91 2.04 2.02 not counting the courses you are currently taking this term?

25. How many classes are you presently taking at OTHER OTHINST All Students 1.49 1.42 1.42 institutions?

27. How would you evaluate your entire educational experience ENTIREXP All Students 3.17 3.18 3.15 at this college?

0=None, 1=1-14 credits, 2=15-29 credits, 3=30-44 credits, 4=45-60 credits, 5= over 60 credits

1=None, 2=1 class, 3=2 classes, 4=3 classes, 5=4 classes or more

1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Excellent

1=Not likely, 2=Somewhat likely, 3=Likely, 4=Very likely

1=Not very, 2=Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Extremely

1=Not very, 2=Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Extremely

* T-tests: 2-tailed M9

Page 66: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

* T-tests: 2-tailed M10

Page 67: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

CohortOther Small Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Small Colleges

2007 CCSSE Cohort

CLQUEST 415 105,252 309,179 2.86 2.96 2.91 0.85 0.84 0.85 0.042 0.003 0.002 0.021 0.296 -0.11 -0.05CLPRESEN 415 104,859 307,933 1.86 2.05 2.04 0.88 0.91 0.91 0.043 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.21 -0.19REWROPAP 412 104,513 306,896 2.16 2.48 2.47 0.97 1.03 1.03 0.048 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.30 -0.30INTEGRAT 411 104,649 307,254 2.51 2.69 2.70 0.93 0.94 0.95 0.046 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.19 -0.19CLUNPREP 413 104,331 306,396 1.84 1.85 1.88 0.76 0.74 0.74 0.038 0.002 0.001 0.799 0.269 -0.01 -0.05CLASSGRP 409 104,120 305,888 2.44 2.48 2.46 0.90 0.88 0.89 0.045 0.003 0.002 0.367 0.707 -0.04 -0.02OCCGRP 413 104,478 306,888 1.82 1.89 1.84 0.88 0.90 0.88 0.044 0.003 0.002 0.154 0.621 -0.07 -0.02TUTOR 413 104,763 307,735 1.45 1.38 1.36 0.73 0.70 0.69 0.036 0.002 0.001 0.050 0.015 0.10 0.12

COMMPROJ 412 104,325 306,434 1.22 1.31 1.29 0.58 0.65 0.64 0.029 0.002 0.001 0.004 0.017 -0.14 -0.12INTERNET 414 104,320 306,386 2.53 2.80 2.79 1.07 1.03 1.03 0.053 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.27 -0.26

EMAIL 415 104,373 306,671 2.09 2.39 2.41 1.01 1.03 1.01 0.049 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.29 -0.32FACGRADE 411 104,530 306,840 2.46 2.53 2.49 0.85 0.85 0.86 0.042 0.003 0.002 0.106 0.479 -0.08 -0.03FACPLANS 413 104,292 306,486 1.94 2.06 1.99 0.87 0.89 0.87 0.043 0.003 0.002 0.006 0.264 -0.14 -0.06FACIDEAS 415 104,258 306,091 1.75 1.76 1.72 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.040 0.003 0.001 0.839 0.393 -0.01 0.04FACFEED 410 104,372 306,369 2.62 2.67 2.65 0.94 0.85 0.86 0.046 0.003 0.002 0.220 0.501 -0.06 -0.03

WORKHARD 415 104,506 306,789 2.32 2.54 2.52 0.86 0.87 0.87 0.042 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.26 -0.23FACOTH 405 103,779 304,349 1.37 1.43 1.39 0.75 0.73 0.71 0.037 0.002 0.001 0.112 0.602 -0.08 -0.03

OOCIDEAS 415 104,809 307,673 2.51 2.56 2.55 0.93 0.92 0.93 0.046 0.003 0.002 0.311 0.450 -0.05 -0.04DIVRSTUD 413 104,725 307,499 2.44 2.28 2.36 1.04 1.03 1.04 0.051 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.108 0.15 0.08DIFFSTUD 410 104,609 307,212 2.34 2.30 2.32 1.06 1.00 1.01 0.052 0.003 0.002 0.461 0.745 0.04 0.02SKIPCLAS 415 104,842 307,892 1.53 1.55 1.58 0.66 0.65 0.67 0.032 0.002 0.001 0.522 0.094 -0.03 -0.08MEMORIZE 415 105,080 308,589 2.72 2.81 2.82 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.044 0.003 0.002 0.029 0.027 -0.11 -0.11ANALYZE 414 104,793 307,709 2.67 2.80 2.82 0.81 0.84 0.84 0.040 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.000 -0.16 -0.19

SYNTHESZ 411 104,381 306,379 2.52 2.69 2.69 0.89 0.87 0.87 0.044 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.19 -0.19EVALUATE 414 104,578 306,901 2.41 2.53 2.53 0.94 0.91 0.91 0.046 0.003 0.002 0.009 0.007 -0.13 -0.13APPLYING 413 104,724 307,403 2.51 2.63 2.62 0.93 0.91 0.91 0.046 0.003 0.002 0.005 0.009 -0.14 -0.13PERFORM 413 105,011 308,357 2.63 2.75 2.72 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.044 0.003 0.002 0.004 0.034 -0.14 -0.10

READASGN 409 103,968 305,238 2.73 2.87 2.85 1.06 1.05 1.03 0.052 0.003 0.002 0.005 0.013 -0.14 -0.12READOWN 410 104,065 305,539 2.02 2.06 2.07 1.02 1.01 1.00 0.051 0.003 0.002 0.444 0.284 -0.04 -0.05WRITEANY 409 103,941 305,135 2.47 2.82 2.81 1.08 1.13 1.12 0.053 0.004 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.31 -0.31

Brazosport CollegeSummary Statistics: All Students

* T-tests: 2-tailed M10

Page 68: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

CohortOther Small Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Small Colleges

2007 CCSSE Cohort

Brazosport CollegeSummary Statistics: All Students

EXAMS 392 100,096 292,924 4.83 5.05 5.00 1.26 1.21 1.20 0.064 0.004 0.002 0.000 0.006 -0.18 -0.14ENVSCHOL 409 104,074 305,512 2.84 2.96 2.94 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.041 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.009 -0.15 -0.13ENVSUPRT 408 103,944 305,089 2.94 2.96 2.93 0.74 0.85 0.85 0.037 0.003 0.002 0.674 0.760 -0.02 0.02ENVDIVRS 406 103,719 304,387 2.37 2.42 2.45 0.94 0.99 1.00 0.047 0.003 0.002 0.320 0.133 -0.05 -0.07ENVNACAD 410 103,765 304,422 1.99 1.95 1.90 1.00 0.96 0.95 0.049 0.003 0.002 0.407 0.068 0.04 0.09ENVSOCAL 407 103,291 303,028 2.06 2.12 2.08 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.046 0.003 0.002 0.208 0.673 -0.06 -0.02FINSUPP 408 103,483 303,486 2.27 2.47 2.37 1.12 1.10 1.10 0.056 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.070 -0.18 -0.09

ENVCOMP 410 103,915 304,984 3.04 3.11 3.07 0.94 0.93 0.94 0.046 0.003 0.002 0.144 0.520 -0.07 -0.03ACADPR01 406 103,813 304,684 1.58 1.91 1.88 0.97 1.09 1.07 0.048 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.30 -0.29PAYWORK 405 103,576 303,721 3.77 3.08 3.23 1.81 1.99 1.94 0.090 0.006 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.35 0.28COCURR01 407 103,662 304,156 0.19 0.31 0.27 0.63 0.77 0.72 0.031 0.002 0.001 0.003 0.037 -0.15 -0.10CAREDE01 407 103,482 303,509 2.33 2.00 1.81 2.18 2.12 2.05 0.108 0.007 0.004 0.002 0.000 0.15 0.25COMMUTE 405 103,645 303,855 1.20 1.33 1.31 0.84 0.91 0.88 0.042 0.003 0.002 0.006 0.011 -0.14 -0.13

ENVSTU 407 103,933 304,843 5.59 5.60 5.47 1.32 1.30 1.34 0.065 0.004 0.002 0.920 0.060 0.00 0.09ENVFAC 407 103,994 305,035 5.82 5.72 5.65 1.23 1.25 1.26 0.061 0.004 0.002 0.101 0.005 0.08 0.14ENVADM 408 103,900 304,583 5.10 5.11 4.93 1.56 1.55 1.57 0.077 0.005 0.003 0.954 0.030 0.00 0.11

GNGENLED 407 103,821 304,511 2.82 2.93 2.93 0.86 0.85 0.86 0.043 0.003 0.002 0.005 0.009 -0.14 -0.13GNWORK 405 103,688 303,993 2.56 2.66 2.54 0.99 1.01 1.02 0.049 0.003 0.002 0.045 0.785 -0.10 0.01GNWRITE 406 103,689 304,096 2.51 2.69 2.68 0.98 0.93 0.93 0.048 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.19 -0.18GNSPEAK 404 103,677 303,994 2.49 2.60 2.58 0.95 0.95 0.96 0.047 0.003 0.002 0.022 0.053 -0.11 -0.10GNANALY 407 103,593 303,826 2.76 2.87 2.85 0.90 0.87 0.88 0.044 0.003 0.002 0.010 0.052 -0.13 -0.10GNSOLVE 406 103,538 303,652 2.56 2.59 2.57 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.048 0.003 0.002 0.596 0.977 -0.03 0.00GNCMPTS 405 103,559 303,721 2.59 2.76 2.69 1.03 0.99 1.00 0.051 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.042 -0.17 -0.10

GNOTHERS 406 103,617 303,857 2.66 2.75 2.69 0.93 0.91 0.92 0.046 0.003 0.002 0.030 0.391 -0.11 -0.04GNINQ 405 103,662 303,891 2.76 2.91 2.88 0.88 0.87 0.89 0.044 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.007 -0.18 -0.13

GNSELF 406 103,512 303,586 2.45 2.60 2.56 0.98 1.00 1.01 0.049 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.022 -0.15 -0.11GNDIVERS 405 103,479 303,419 2.19 2.32 2.34 0.99 1.01 1.01 0.049 0.003 0.002 0.014 0.004 -0.12 -0.14GNETHICS 404 103,499 303,433 2.22 2.36 2.32 0.98 1.00 1.01 0.049 0.003 0.002 0.005 0.044 -0.14 -0.10

GNCOMMUN 404 103,331 302,825 1.90 2.03 1.97 0.90 0.96 0.96 0.045 0.003 0.002 0.012 0.161 -0.13 -0.07CARGOAL 404 103,603 303,761 2.60 2.68 2.62 0.98 0.99 1.01 0.049 0.003 0.002 0.104 0.693 -0.08 -0.02

* T-tests: 2-tailed M11

Page 69: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

CohortOther Small Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Small Colleges

2007 CCSSE Cohort

Brazosport CollegeSummary Statistics: All Students

GAINCAR 406 103,742 304,216 2.56 2.58 2.51 1.01 1.02 1.03 0.050 0.003 0.002 0.661 0.349 -0.02 0.05USEACAD 355 94,866 276,566 1.64 1.79 1.74 0.64 0.68 0.68 0.034 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.005 -0.22 -0.15

USECACOU 335 82,154 239,973 1.48 1.44 1.43 0.64 0.62 0.61 0.035 0.002 0.001 0.183 0.130 0.07 0.08USEJOBPL 253 61,043 175,770 1.30 1.28 1.24 0.52 0.55 0.52 0.034 0.002 0.001 0.603 0.091 0.03 0.11USETUTOR 283 74,090 216,072 1.52 1.45 1.45 0.70 0.66 0.66 0.042 0.002 0.001 0.099 0.112 0.10 0.10

USELAB 293 79,187 230,175 1.73 1.74 1.70 0.75 0.76 0.76 0.045 0.003 0.002 0.847 0.537 -0.01 0.04USECHLD 161 42,719 124,218 1.27 1.22 1.18 0.55 0.56 0.51 0.044 0.003 0.001 0.284 0.033 0.09 0.17

USEFAADV 267 82,683 231,030 1.77 1.87 1.80 0.79 0.76 0.77 0.049 0.003 0.002 0.030 0.465 -0.14 -0.05USECOMLB 344 90,592 262,227 2.21 2.14 2.09 0.76 0.78 0.79 0.041 0.003 0.002 0.093 0.005 0.09 0.15USESTORG 214 64,959 183,985 1.41 1.38 1.34 0.58 0.62 0.60 0.042 0.003 0.001 0.471 0.089 0.05 0.12USETRCRD 233 64,396 194,911 1.46 1.56 1.55 0.59 0.69 0.68 0.040 0.003 0.002 0.044 0.064 -0.14 -0.13USEDISAB 155 41,293 121,721 1.28 1.32 1.30 0.58 0.63 0.62 0.049 0.003 0.002 0.426 0.690 -0.07 -0.03SATACAD 306 85,928 246,166 2.20 2.27 2.21 0.63 0.63 0.64 0.036 0.002 0.001 0.051 0.741 -0.11 -0.02

SATCACOU 265 62,060 176,311 2.13 2.06 2.04 0.71 0.70 0.69 0.044 0.003 0.002 0.144 0.045 0.09 0.12SATJOBPL 168 41,080 110,269 1.89 1.87 1.82 0.73 0.71 0.71 0.057 0.004 0.002 0.689 0.193 0.03 0.10SATTUTOR 208 51,979 148,513 2.29 2.15 2.14 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.050 0.003 0.002 0.005 0.002 0.20 0.22

SATLAB 229 61,609 173,628 2.16 2.26 2.25 0.67 0.64 0.65 0.045 0.003 0.002 0.022 0.045 -0.15 -0.13SATCHLD 99 23,944 64,041 1.89 1.79 1.76 0.80 0.78 0.77 0.083 0.005 0.003 0.189 0.082 0.14 0.18

SATFAADV 219 71,834 192,223 2.22 2.24 2.18 0.77 0.73 0.73 0.053 0.003 0.002 0.570 0.497 -0.04 0.05SATCOMLB 313 82,062 232,876 2.51 2.51 2.49 0.61 0.60 0.61 0.035 0.002 0.001 0.855 0.548 0.01 0.03SATSTORG 152 44,983 119,965 1.88 1.99 1.96 0.66 0.67 0.67 0.057 0.003 0.002 0.048 0.165 -0.17 -0.12SATTRCRD 184 49,924 147,584 2.06 2.09 2.06 0.75 0.72 0.71 0.058 0.003 0.002 0.606 0.925 -0.04 -0.01SATDISAB 104 27,460 75,540 1.99 2.03 2.00 0.71 0.76 0.77 0.075 0.005 0.003 0.635 0.845 -0.05 -0.02IMPACAD 392 99,947 291,761 2.34 2.51 2.50 0.76 0.67 0.68 0.038 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 -0.25 -0.23

IMPCACOU 387 98,880 288,399 2.29 2.27 2.28 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.040 0.003 0.001 0.598 0.839 0.03 0.01IMPJOBPL 386 97,653 284,617 1.92 2.04 2.01 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.043 0.003 0.002 0.010 0.052 -0.13 -0.10IMPTUTOR 388 97,666 284,651 2.13 2.08 2.08 0.84 0.83 0.82 0.043 0.003 0.002 0.240 0.296 0.06 0.05

IMPLAB 385 97,272 283,599 2.14 2.18 2.18 0.81 0.80 0.81 0.041 0.003 0.002 0.372 0.359 -0.05 -0.05IMPCHLD 382 96,783 281,769 1.75 1.74 1.73 0.87 0.87 0.86 0.045 0.003 0.002 0.887 0.628 0.01 0.02

IMPFAADV 386 97,739 284,534 2.24 2.43 2.37 0.90 0.80 0.83 0.045 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.002 -0.23 -0.15

* T-tests: 2-tailed M12

Page 70: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

CohortOther Small Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Small Colleges

2007 CCSSE Cohort

Brazosport CollegeSummary Statistics: All Students

IMPCOMLB 387 98,137 285,946 2.39 2.46 2.43 0.77 0.74 0.75 0.039 0.002 0.001 0.090 0.316 -0.09 -0.05IMPSTORG 380 96,510 280,991 1.74 1.83 1.81 0.81 0.78 0.78 0.042 0.003 0.001 0.020 0.052 -0.12 -0.10IMPTRCRD 387 97,534 284,386 2.10 2.19 2.23 0.89 0.86 0.85 0.045 0.003 0.002 0.047 0.004 -0.10 -0.15IMPDISAB 384 97,182 283,175 1.92 2.03 2.02 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.047 0.003 0.002 0.018 0.033 -0.12 -0.11WRKFULL 401 103,569 303,476 2.32 2.13 2.17 1.21 1.16 1.17 0.060 0.004 0.002 0.001 0.011 0.16 0.13CAREDEP 402 103,394 302,847 2.01 1.94 1.92 1.15 1.07 1.07 0.057 0.003 0.002 0.143 0.072 0.07 0.09ACADUNP 399 103,030 301,765 1.66 1.62 1.67 0.93 0.90 0.93 0.046 0.003 0.002 0.469 0.804 0.04 -0.01LACKFIN 399 103,301 302,492 2.32 2.42 2.38 1.24 1.19 1.19 0.062 0.004 0.002 0.112 0.330 -0.08 -0.05

TRANSFER 400 103,389 302,857 2.29 2.29 2.47 1.25 1.23 1.25 0.062 0.004 0.002 0.898 0.004 -0.01 -0.14FRNDSUPP 403 103,611 303,607 3.20 3.27 3.23 0.95 0.86 0.89 0.047 0.003 0.002 0.115 0.576 -0.08 -0.03FAMSUPP 401 103,357 302,746 3.52 3.53 3.50 0.79 0.77 0.80 0.039 0.002 0.001 0.713 0.608 -0.02 0.03TOTCHRS 402 102,807 301,146 1.91 2.04 2.02 1.43 1.50 1.48 0.071 0.005 0.003 0.079 0.147 -0.09 -0.07OTHINST 402 103,029 301,259 1.49 1.42 1.42 1.15 1.06 1.05 0.057 0.003 0.002 0.168 0.197 0.07 0.06

ENTIREXP 404 103,046 301,275 3.17 3.18 3.15 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.034 0.002 0.001 0.826 0.592 -0.01 0.03

* T-tests: 2-tailed M13

Page 71: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

COLLEGE ACTIVITIES

Academic, Intellectual and Social Experiences

4. In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following?

1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often, 4=Very often

a. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions CLQUEST Part - Time 2.81 2.93 2.88 Full - Time 3.02 2.99 2.94

b. Made a class presentation CLPRESEN Part - Time 1.79 1.90 1.90 Full - Time 2.08 2.23 2.24

c. Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before REWROPAP Part - Time 2.11 2.35 2.36 turning it in Full - Time 2.32 2.63 * -0.31 2.64 * -0.32

d. Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or INTEGRAT Part - Time 2.45 2.54 2.54 information from various sources Full - Time 2.72 2.90 2.92 * -0.23

e. Came to class without completing readings or assignments CLUNPREP Part - Time 1.82 1.77 1.82 Full - Time 1.93 1.95 1.98

f. Worked with other students on projects during class CLASSGRP Part - Time 2.40 2.38 2.38 Full - Time 2.57 2.59 2.56

g. Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare OCCGRP Part - Time 1.76 1.73 1.72 class assignments Full - Time 2.03 2.06 2.01

h. Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) TUTOR Part - Time 1.41 1.29 1.30 Full - Time 1.55 1.48 1.46

i. Participated in a community-based project as a part of a COMMPROJ Part - Time 1.17 1.23 1.23 regular course Full - Time 1.34 1.40 1.38

j. Used the Internet or instant messaging to work on an INTERNET Part - Time 2.45 2.65 2.65 assignment Full - Time 2.78 2.99 * -0.22 3.00 * -0.23

k. Used email to communicate with an instructor EMAIL Part - Time 2.00 2.24 2.28 * -0.28Full - Time 2.37 2.58 2.62 * -0.25

l. Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor FACGRADE Part - Time 2.42 2.43 2.40 Full - Time 2.59 2.65 2.61

m. Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor FACPLANS Part - Time 1.89 1.92 1.87 Full - Time 2.11 2.23 2.15

All Part-Time Students N = 186

All Full-Time Students N = 230

All Other Small N = 105371

All Other Small (Part-Time) N = 29305

All Other Small (Full-Time) N = 76066

Brazosport CollegeOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

All Students N = 416 All Other Colleges N = 309597

All Other Colleges (Part-Time) N = 96164

All Other Colleges (Full-Time) N = 213433

* T-tests: 2-tailed M14

Page 72: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

COLLEGE ACTIVITIES

Academic, Intellectual, and Social Experiences continuedn. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with FACIDEAS Part - Time 1.72 1.66 1.64

instructors outside of class Full - Time 1.87 1.88 1.83 o. Received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on FACFEED Part - Time 2.62 2.66 2.64

your performance Full - Time 2.64 2.70 2.67 p. Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an WORKHARD Part - Time 2.27 2.48 2.46

instructor's standards or expectations Full - Time 2.45 2.63 2.60 q. Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework FACOTH Part - Time 1.33 1.33 1.32

Full - Time 1.51 1.55 1.49 r. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others OOCIDEAS Part - Time 2.48 2.51 2.51

outside of class (students, family members, coworkers, etc.) Full - Time 2.61 2.62 2.61 s. Had serious conversations with students of a different race DIVRSTUD Part - Time 2.41 2.18 2.29

or ethnicity than your own Full - Time 2.53 2.40 2.48 t. Had serious conversations with students who differ from you DIFFSTUD Part - Time 2.29 2.18 2.22

in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values Full - Time 2.51 2.46 2.48 u. Skipped class SKIPCLAS Part - Time 1.48 1.46 1.50

Full - Time 1.69 1.65 1.69

Character of Mental Activities

5. During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized the following mental activities?

a. Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your courses and MEMORIZE Part - Time 2.66 2.76 2.77 readings so you can repeat them in pretty much the same form Full - Time 2.90 2.89 2.89

b. Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory ANALYZE Part - Time 2.62 2.76 2.78 Full - Time 2.81 2.87 2.90

c. Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences SYNTHESZ Part - Time 2.46 2.64 2.64 in new ways Full - Time 2.71 2.76 2.77

d. Making judgments about the value or soundness of EVALUATE Part - Time 2.36 2.44 2.45 information, arguments, or methods Full - Time 2.55 2.63 2.65

e. Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new APPLYING Part - Time 2.47 2.55 2.55 situations Full - Time 2.61 2.73 2.72

f. Using information you have read or heard to perform a PERFORM Part - Time 2.59 2.67 2.66 new skill. Full - Time 2.73 2.86 2.81

1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often, 4=Very often

1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much

* T-tests: 2-tailed M15

Page 73: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

COLLEGE ACTIVITIES

Reading and Writing

6. During the current school year, about how much reading and writing have you done at this college?

a. Number of assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or READASGN Part - Time 2.68 2.66 2.67 book-length packs of course readings Full - Time 2.88 3.13 * -0.24 3.12 * -0.24

b. Number of books read on your own (not assigned) for READOWN Part - Time 2.01 2.08 2.09 personal enjoyment or academic enrichment Full - Time 2.05 2.04 2.06

c. Number of written papers or reports of any length WRITEANY Part - Time 2.36 2.57 2.57 Full - Time 2.80 3.13 * -0.30 3.16 * -0.33

Nature of Exams

7. Mark the box that best represents the extent to which your examinations during the current school year have challenged you

EXAMS Part - Time 4.76 5.03 4.97

to do your best work at this college Full - Time 5.05 5.09 5.03

OPINIONS ABOUT YOUR SCHOOL

Institutional Emphasis9. How much does this college emphasize each of the following?

a. Encouraging you to spend significant amounts of time ENVSCHOL Part - Time 2.80 2.90 2.89 studying Full - Time 2.94 3.03 3.02

b. Providing the support you need to help you succeed at this ENVSUPRT Part - Time 2.93 2.92 2.89 college Full - Time 2.96 3.01 2.98

c. Encouraging contact among students from different economic, ENVDIVRS Part - Time 2.34 2.36 2.40 social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds Full - Time 2.48 2.50 2.52

d. Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities ENVNACAD Part - Time 2.01 1.89 1.86 (work, family, etc.) Full - Time 1.93 2.01 1.96

e. Providing the support you need to thrive socially ENVSOCAL Part - Time 2.03 2.04 2.02 Full - Time 2.17 2.21 2.17

f. Providing the financial support you need to afford your FINSUPP Part - Time 2.20 2.34 2.24 education Full - Time 2.50 2.63 2.54

g. Using computers in academic work ENVCOMP Part - Time 3.01 2.98 2.95 Full - Time 3.16 3.27 3.25

1=None, 2=Between 1 and 4, 3=Between 5 and 10, 4=Between 11 and 20, 5=More than 20

1=Extremely easy to 7=Extremely challenging

1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much

* T-tests: 2-tailed M16

Page 74: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

WEEKLY ACTIVITIES

10. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7 - day week doing each of the following?

a. Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, ACADPR01 Part - Time 1.48 1.75 * -0.28 1.74 * -0.27doing homework, or other activities related to your program) Full - Time 1.89 2.11 2.09

b. Working for pay PAYWORK Part - Time 3.95 3.53 3.59 Full - Time 3.20 2.59 * 0.32 2.76 * 0.23

c. Participating in college-sponsored activities (organizations, campus COCURR01 Part - Time 0.11 0.18 0.18 publications, student government, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.) Full - Time 0.44 0.44 0.39

d. Providing care for dependents living with you (parents, children, CAREDE01 Part - Time 2.54 2.29 2.03 spouse, etc.) Full - Time 1.66 1.68 1.50

e. Commuting to and from classes COMMUTE Part - Time 1.14 1.23 1.23 Full - Time 1.38 1.44 1.43

Quality of Relationships

11. Mark the box that best represents the quality of your relationships with

people at this college.

a. Relationships with other students ENVSTU Part - Time 5.58 5.57 5.43 Full - Time 5.62 5.66 5.51

b. Relationships with instuctors ENVFAC Part - Time 5.87 5.78 5.70 Full - Time 5.66 5.66 5.57

c. Relationships with administrative personnel and offices ENVADM Part - Time 5.12 5.13 4.94 Full - Time 5.07 5.09 4.91

4=21-30 hours/week, 5=More than 30 hours/week

1=Unfriendly, unsupportive, sense of alienation to 7=Friendly, supportive, sense of belonging

1=Unavailable, unhelpful, unsympathetic to 7=Available, helpful, sympathetic

1=Unhelpful, inconsiderate, rigid to 7=Helpful, considerate, flexible

0=None, 1=1-5 hours/week, 2=6-10 hours/week, 3=11-20 hours/week,

* T-tests: 2-tailed M17

Page 75: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

EDUCATIONAL AND PERSONAL GROWTH

Knowledge, Skills & Personal Development

12. How much has YOUR EXPERIENCE AT THIS COLLEGE contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas?

a. Acquiring a broad general education GNGENLED Part - Time 2.75 2.85 2.85 Full - Time 3.01 3.03 3.04

b. Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills GNWORK Part - Time 2.53 2.57 2.48 Full - Time 2.65 2.76 2.62

c. Writing clearly and effectively GNWRITE Part - Time 2.46 2.59 2.59 Full - Time 2.66 2.80 2.80

d. Speaking clearly and effectively GNSPEAK Part - Time 2.46 2.50 2.50 Full - Time 2.60 2.72 2.70

e. Thinking critically and analytically GNANALY Part - Time 2.71 2.80 2.78 Full - Time 2.91 2.97 2.95

f. Solving numerical problems GNSOLVE Part - Time 2.50 2.48 2.47 Full - Time 2.76 2.72 2.70

g. Using computing and information technology GNCMPTS Part - Time 2.54 2.64 2.58 Full - Time 2.75 2.89 2.83

h. Working effectively with others GNOTHERS Part - Time 2.63 2.66 2.62 Full - Time 2.73 2.86 2.79

i. Learning effectively on your own GNINQ Part - Time 2.71 2.86 2.83 Full - Time 2.91 2.97 2.94

j. Understanding yourself GNSELF Part - Time 2.42 2.52 2.50 Full - Time 2.54 2.68 2.65

k. Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds GNDIVERS Part - Time 2.16 2.22 2.27 Full - Time 2.31 2.42 2.44

l. Developing a personal code of values and ethics GNETHICS Part - Time 2.18 2.26 2.24 Full - Time 2.34 2.47 2.42

m. Contributing to the welfare of your community GNCOMMUN Part - Time 1.83 1.95 1.91 Full - Time 2.12 2.10 2.05

n. Developing clearer career goals CARGOAL Part - Time 2.57 2.57 2.53 Full - Time 2.69 2.80 2.74

o. Gaining information about career opportunities GAINCAR Part - Time 2.55 2.45 2.41 Full - Time 2.59 2.72 2.64

1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much

* T-tests: 2-tailed M18

Page 76: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

STUDENT SERVICES

13.1 How often do you use the following services?a. Frequency: Academic advising/planning USEACAD Part - Time 1.62 1.73 1.69

Full - Time 1.70 1.85 1.81 b. Frequency: Career counseling USECACOU Part - Time 1.46 1.41 1.41

Full - Time 1.54 1.47 1.46 c. Frequency: Job placement assistance USEJOBPL Part - Time 1.30 1.22 1.21

Full - Time 1.32 1.33 1.29 d. Frequency: Peer or other tutoring USETUTOR Part - Time 1.48 1.41 1.42

Full - Time 1.61 1.49 1.50 e. Frequency: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) USELAB Part - Time 1.74 1.67 1.66

Full - Time 1.72 1.81 1.77 f. Frequency: Child care USECHLD Part - Time 1.27 1.19 1.16

Full - Time 1.27 1.25 1.20 g. Frequency: Financial aid advising USEFAADV Part - Time 1.75 1.80 1.73

Full - Time 1.82 1.95 1.89 h. Frequency: Computer lab USECOMLB Part - Time 2.16 2.00 1.97

Full - Time 2.37 2.28 2.24 i. Frequency: Student organizations USESTORG Part - Time 1.41 1.29 1.26

Full - Time 1.43 1.47 1.43 j. Frequency: Transfer credit assistance USETRCRD Part - Time 1.47 1.52 1.51

Full - Time 1.44 1.59 1.60 k. Frequency: Services to students with disabilities USEDISAB Part - Time 1.24 1.28 1.27

Full - Time 1.36 1.35 1.33

0=Don’t know/N.A, 1=Rarely/never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often

* T-tests: 2-tailed M19

Page 77: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

STUDENT SERVICES

13.2 How satisfied are you with the services?a. Satisfaction: Academic advising/planning SATACAD Part - Time 2.19 2.26 2.20

Full - Time 2.23 2.28 2.22 b. Satisfaction: Career counseling SATCACOU Part - Time 2.12 2.04 2.03

Full - Time 2.15 2.09 2.06 c. Satisfaction: Job placement assistance SATJOBPL Part - Time 1.86 1.82 1.78

Full - Time 1.98 1.91 1.86 d. Satisfaction: Peer or other tutoring SATTUTOR Part - Time 2.28 2.11 2.11

Full - Time 2.33 2.19 2.17 e. Satisfaction: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) SATLAB Part - Time 2.15 2.24 2.23

Full - Time 2.19 2.29 2.28 f. Satisfaction: Child care SATCHLD Part - Time 1.93 1.73 1.71

Full - Time 1.81 1.84 1.80 g. Satisfaction: Financial aid advising SATFAADV Part - Time 2.20 2.21 2.14

Full - Time 2.25 2.28 2.22 h. Satisfaction: Computer lab SATCOMLB Part - Time 2.47 2.47 2.46

Full - Time 2.63 2.55 2.53 i. Satisfaction: Student organizations SATSTORG Part - Time 1.83 1.91 1.89

Full - Time 1.98 2.06 2.02 j. Satisfaction: Transfer credit assistance SATTRCRD Part - Time 2.00 2.08 2.05

Full - Time 2.19 2.09 2.08 k. Satisfaction: Services to students with disabilities SATDISAB Part - Time 1.91 1.97 1.96

Full - Time 2.13 2.07 2.05

0=N.A.,1=Not at all, 2=Somewhat, 3=Very

* T-tests: 2-tailed M20

Page 78: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

STUDENT SERVICES

13.3 How important are the services to you?a. Importance: Academic advising/planning IMPACAD Part - Time 2.33 2.46 2.45

Full - Time 2.37 2.57 * -0.33 2.57 * -0.32b. Importance: Career counseling IMPCACOU Part - Time 2.28 2.21 2.24

Full - Time 2.30 2.33 2.34 c. Importance: Job placement assistance IMPJOBPL Part - Time 1.90 1.95 1.96

Full - Time 2.01 2.12 2.08 d. Importance: Peer or other tutoring IMPTUTOR Part - Time 2.10 2.01 2.03

Full - Time 2.20 2.16 2.15 e. Importance: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) IMPLAB Part - Time 2.13 2.11 2.13

Full - Time 2.17 2.25 2.25 f. Importance: Child care IMPCHLD Part - Time 1.73 1.71 1.70

Full - Time 1.82 1.79 1.76 g. Importance: Financial aid advising IMPFAADV Part - Time 2.24 2.33 2.29

Full - Time 2.25 2.54 * -0.39 2.48 * -0.30h. Importance: Computer lab IMPCOMLB Part - Time 2.33 2.35 2.34

Full - Time 2.59 2.58 2.56 i. Importance: Student organizations IMPSTORG Part - Time 1.68 1.73 1.74

Full - Time 1.92 1.94 1.91 j. Importance: Transfer credit assistance IMPTRCRD Part - Time 2.07 2.13 2.17

Full - Time 2.20 2.26 2.31 k. Importance: Services to students with disabilities IMPDISAB Part - Time 1.90 1.97 1.98

Full - Time 2.01 2.10 2.09

1=Not at all, 2=Somewhat, 3=Very

* T-tests: 2-tailed M21

Page 79: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

COLLEGE EXPERIENCES

14. How likely is it that the following issues would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college?

a. Working full-time WRKFULL Part - Time 2.34 2.16 2.21 Full - Time 2.23 2.10 2.11

b. Caring for dependents CAREDEP Part - Time 2.04 1.94 1.93 Full - Time 1.94 1.92 1.90

c. Academically unprepared ACADUNP Part - Time 1.65 1.59 1.65 Full - Time 1.67 1.65 1.70

d. Lack of finances LACKFIN Part - Time 2.30 2.40 2.37 Full - Time 2.40 2.43 2.39

e. Transfer to a 4-year college or university TRANSFER Part - Time 2.16 2.19 2.36 Full - Time 2.70 2.43 2.64

15. How supportive are your friends of your attending this FRNDSUPP Part - Time 3.18 3.27 3.23 college? Full - Time 3.27 3.29 3.23

16. How supportive is your immediate family of your attending FAMSUPP Part - Time 3.51 3.50 3.48 this college? Full - Time 3.56 3.57 3.53

23. How many TOTAL credit hours have you earned at this college, TOTCHRS Part - Time 1.84 1.85 1.87 not counting the courses you are currently taking this term? Full - Time 2.16 2.23 2.20

25. How many classes are you presently taking at OTHER OTHINST Part - Time 1.49 1.42 1.42 institutions? Full - Time 1.49 1.40 1.42

27. How would you evaluate your entire educational experience ENTIREXP Part - Time 3.19 3.19 3.16 at this college? Full - Time 3.10 3.17 3.14

1=None, 2=1 class, 3=2 classes, 4=3 classes, 5=4 classes or more

1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Excellent

1=Not likely, 2=Somewhat likely, 3=Likely, 4=Very likely

1=Not very, 2=Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Extremely

1=Not very, 2=Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Extremely

0=None, 1=1-14 credits, 2=15-29 credits, 3=30-44 credits, 4=45-60 credits, 5= over 60 credits

* T-tests: 2-tailed M22

Page 80: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

CohortOther Small Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Small Colleges

2007 CCSSE Cohort

CLQUEST 185 29,266 96,006 2.81 2.93 2.88 0.84 0.84 0.85 0.062 0.005 0.003 0.046 0.260 -0.15 -0.08CLPRESEN 185 29,145 95,535 1.79 1.90 1.90 0.86 0.91 0.90 0.063 0.005 0.003 0.087 0.097 -0.13 -0.12REWROPAP 183 29,042 95,207 2.11 2.35 2.36 0.97 1.04 1.04 0.071 0.006 0.003 0.001 0.001 -0.24 -0.24INTEGRAT 184 29,063 95,272 2.45 2.54 2.54 0.93 0.98 0.98 0.068 0.006 0.003 0.191 0.170 -0.10 -0.10CLUNPREP 186 29,006 95,082 1.82 1.77 1.82 0.77 0.72 0.73 0.056 0.004 0.002 0.374 0.995 0.07 0.00CLASSGRP 182 28,931 94,927 2.40 2.38 2.38 0.90 0.91 0.91 0.067 0.005 0.003 0.814 0.797 0.02 0.02OCCGRP 184 29,046 95,291 1.76 1.73 1.72 0.87 0.86 0.85 0.064 0.005 0.003 0.683 0.617 0.03 0.04TUTOR 184 29,126 95,544 1.41 1.29 1.30 0.70 0.63 0.63 0.052 0.004 0.002 0.011 0.015 0.19 0.18

COMMPROJ 183 28,971 95,079 1.17 1.23 1.23 0.52 0.57 0.57 0.038 0.003 0.002 0.196 0.208 -0.10 -0.09INTERNET 186 28,987 95,082 2.45 2.65 2.65 1.09 1.06 1.05 0.080 0.006 0.003 0.009 0.009 -0.19 -0.19

EMAIL 186 28,988 95,114 2.00 2.24 2.28 0.99 1.02 1.00 0.073 0.006 0.003 0.001 0.000 -0.24 -0.28FACGRADE 183 29,027 95,165 2.42 2.43 2.40 0.84 0.85 0.85 0.062 0.005 0.003 0.897 0.799 -0.01 0.02FACPLANS 183 28,971 95,051 1.89 1.92 1.87 0.86 0.85 0.84 0.063 0.005 0.003 0.627 0.783 -0.04 0.02FACIDEAS 186 28,919 94,863 1.72 1.66 1.64 0.81 0.79 0.79 0.060 0.005 0.003 0.337 0.176 0.07 0.10FACFEED 182 28,976 94,984 2.62 2.66 2.64 0.97 0.87 0.87 0.072 0.005 0.003 0.492 0.760 -0.05 -0.02

WORKHARD 186 29,015 95,128 2.27 2.48 2.46 0.85 0.88 0.88 0.063 0.005 0.003 0.001 0.004 -0.23 -0.21FACOTH 179 28,803 94,320 1.33 1.33 1.32 0.73 0.65 0.65 0.055 0.004 0.002 0.999 0.859 0.00 0.01

OOCIDEAS 186 29,101 95,435 2.48 2.51 2.51 0.95 0.93 0.94 0.070 0.005 0.003 0.664 0.706 -0.03 -0.03DIVRSTUD 186 29,076 95,327 2.41 2.18 2.29 1.03 1.02 1.03 0.075 0.006 0.003 0.003 0.104 0.22 0.12DIFFSTUD 185 29,047 95,230 2.29 2.18 2.22 1.06 0.98 1.00 0.078 0.006 0.003 0.143 0.357 0.11 0.07SKIPCLAS 185 29,127 95,496 1.48 1.46 1.50 0.64 0.61 0.64 0.047 0.004 0.002 0.654 0.556 0.03 -0.04MEMORIZE 186 29,190 95,739 2.66 2.76 2.77 0.89 0.91 0.91 0.065 0.005 0.003 0.157 0.111 -0.10 -0.12ANALYZE 186 29,102 95,414 2.62 2.76 2.78 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.058 0.005 0.003 0.033 0.011 -0.16 -0.19

SYNTHESZ 184 28,981 94,964 2.46 2.64 2.64 0.89 0.88 0.88 0.065 0.005 0.003 0.006 0.005 -0.20 -0.21EVALUATE 185 29,041 95,147 2.36 2.44 2.45 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.070 0.005 0.003 0.243 0.180 -0.09 -0.10APPLYING 185 29,068 95,313 2.47 2.55 2.55 0.94 0.91 0.92 0.069 0.005 0.003 0.240 0.212 -0.09 -0.09PERFORM 186 29,155 95,634 2.59 2.67 2.66 0.89 0.93 0.93 0.065 0.005 0.003 0.253 0.321 -0.08 -0.07

READASGN 182 28,818 94,501 2.68 2.66 2.67 1.08 1.02 1.00 0.080 0.006 0.003 0.839 0.905 0.02 0.01READOWN 182 28,849 94,590 2.01 2.08 2.09 1.01 1.02 1.00 0.075 0.006 0.003 0.351 0.298 -0.07 -0.08WRITEANY 182 28,800 94,436 2.36 2.57 2.57 1.05 1.11 1.10 0.078 0.007 0.004 0.010 0.008 -0.19 -0.20

Brazosport CollegeSummary Statistics: Part - Time Students

* T-tests: 2-tailed M23

Page 81: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

CohortOther Small Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Small Colleges

2007 CCSSE Cohort

Brazosport CollegeSummary Statistics: Part - Time Students

EXAMS 175 27,534 90,001 4.76 5.03 4.97 1.29 1.25 1.24 0.097 0.008 0.004 0.005 0.023 -0.22 -0.17ENVSCHOL 182 28,808 94,477 2.80 2.90 2.89 0.81 0.84 0.85 0.060 0.005 0.003 0.123 0.145 -0.11 -0.11ENVSUPRT 182 28,759 94,286 2.93 2.92 2.89 0.69 0.85 0.86 0.051 0.005 0.003 0.771 0.513 0.02 0.05ENVDIVRS 181 28,643 93,943 2.34 2.36 2.40 0.91 0.99 1.00 0.067 0.006 0.003 0.771 0.393 -0.02 -0.06ENVNACAD 182 28,649 93,907 2.01 1.89 1.86 1.00 0.95 0.94 0.074 0.006 0.003 0.093 0.030 0.12 0.16ENVSOCAL 181 28,500 93,403 2.03 2.04 2.02 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.068 0.005 0.003 0.908 0.856 -0.01 0.01FINSUPP 182 28,526 93,473 2.20 2.34 2.24 1.11 1.11 1.10 0.083 0.007 0.004 0.089 0.563 -0.13 -0.04

ENVCOMP 182 28,704 94,179 3.01 2.98 2.95 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.071 0.006 0.003 0.692 0.458 0.03 0.06ACADPR01 181 28,771 94,369 1.48 1.75 1.74 0.88 1.00 0.98 0.065 0.006 0.003 0.000 0.000 -0.28 -0.27PAYWORK 180 28,683 93,942 3.95 3.53 3.59 1.76 1.91 1.87 0.131 0.011 0.006 0.003 0.009 0.22 0.19COCURR01 181 28,698 94,092 0.11 0.18 0.18 0.45 0.57 0.57 0.033 0.003 0.002 0.108 0.129 -0.12 -0.11CAREDE01 181 28,667 93,899 2.54 2.29 2.03 2.20 2.17 2.11 0.164 0.013 0.007 0.126 0.001 0.11 0.24COMMUTE 179 28,713 94,034 1.14 1.23 1.23 0.79 0.81 0.80 0.059 0.005 0.003 0.116 0.138 -0.12 -0.11

ENVSTU 182 28,762 94,313 5.58 5.57 5.43 1.33 1.31 1.36 0.099 0.008 0.004 0.868 0.140 0.01 0.11ENVFAC 182 28,806 94,421 5.87 5.78 5.70 1.17 1.25 1.26 0.087 0.007 0.004 0.293 0.063 0.08 0.14ENVADM 182 28,736 94,123 5.12 5.13 4.94 1.49 1.55 1.57 0.111 0.009 0.005 0.927 0.140 -0.01 0.11

GNGENLED 182 28,703 94,090 2.75 2.85 2.85 0.87 0.88 0.89 0.064 0.005 0.003 0.128 0.147 -0.11 -0.11GNWORK 180 28,668 93,917 2.53 2.57 2.48 0.97 1.02 1.03 0.072 0.006 0.003 0.579 0.544 -0.04 0.05GNWRITE 182 28,660 93,897 2.46 2.59 2.59 0.99 0.96 0.96 0.073 0.006 0.003 0.064 0.075 -0.14 -0.13GNSPEAK 180 28,630 93,843 2.46 2.50 2.50 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.071 0.006 0.003 0.536 0.557 -0.05 -0.04GNANALY 182 28,622 93,829 2.71 2.80 2.78 0.90 0.89 0.90 0.067 0.005 0.003 0.208 0.339 -0.09 -0.07GNSOLVE 181 28,574 93,667 2.50 2.48 2.47 0.98 1.01 1.01 0.072 0.006 0.003 0.807 0.698 0.02 0.03GNCMPTS 181 28,617 93,757 2.54 2.64 2.58 1.05 1.02 1.03 0.078 0.006 0.003 0.189 0.522 -0.10 -0.05

GNOTHERS 181 28,636 93,798 2.63 2.66 2.62 0.93 0.92 0.93 0.069 0.005 0.003 0.632 0.895 -0.04 0.01GNINQ 181 28,647 93,847 2.71 2.86 2.83 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.066 0.005 0.003 0.019 0.063 -0.17 -0.14

GNSELF 181 28,608 93,727 2.42 2.52 2.50 0.97 1.00 1.01 0.072 0.006 0.003 0.183 0.262 -0.10 -0.08GNDIVERS 180 28,588 93,660 2.16 2.22 2.27 0.97 1.00 1.01 0.072 0.006 0.003 0.362 0.129 -0.07 -0.11GNETHICS 179 28,593 93,663 2.18 2.26 2.24 0.97 1.01 1.01 0.073 0.006 0.003 0.279 0.396 -0.08 -0.06

GNCOMMUN 179 28,542 93,436 1.83 1.95 1.91 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.064 0.006 0.003 0.090 0.258 -0.13 -0.08CARGOAL 180 28,632 93,764 2.57 2.57 2.53 0.98 1.01 1.02 0.073 0.006 0.003 0.984 0.609 0.00 0.04

* T-tests: 2-tailed M24

Page 82: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

CohortOther Small Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Small Colleges

2007 CCSSE Cohort

Brazosport CollegeSummary Statistics: Part - Time Students

GAINCAR 181 28,665 93,924 2.55 2.45 2.41 1.01 1.03 1.03 0.075 0.006 0.003 0.223 0.074 0.09 0.13USEACAD 156 25,088 81,893 1.62 1.73 1.69 0.63 0.68 0.67 0.050 0.004 0.002 0.045 0.221 -0.16 -0.10

USECACOU 145 21,504 70,828 1.46 1.41 1.41 0.63 0.60 0.60 0.053 0.004 0.002 0.274 0.300 0.09 0.09USEJOBPL 105 15,326 50,518 1.30 1.22 1.21 0.52 0.51 0.49 0.050 0.004 0.002 0.151 0.065 0.14 0.18USETUTOR 116 18,828 62,304 1.48 1.41 1.42 0.70 0.65 0.65 0.065 0.005 0.003 0.235 0.327 0.11 0.09

USELAB 122 20,166 66,463 1.74 1.67 1.66 0.77 0.76 0.76 0.070 0.005 0.003 0.358 0.229 0.08 0.11USECHLD 64 11,394 37,487 1.27 1.19 1.16 0.54 0.53 0.48 0.068 0.005 0.002 0.231 0.065 0.15 0.23

USEFAADV 112 20,844 65,391 1.75 1.80 1.73 0.80 0.78 0.78 0.076 0.005 0.003 0.468 0.815 -0.07 0.02USECOMLB 145 22,877 74,611 2.16 2.00 1.97 0.78 0.81 0.81 0.065 0.005 0.003 0.018 0.004 0.20 0.24USESTORG 76 15,424 50,135 1.41 1.29 1.26 0.57 0.57 0.55 0.065 0.005 0.002 0.061 0.024 0.22 0.26USETRCRD 85 16,850 56,690 1.47 1.52 1.51 0.61 0.68 0.67 0.066 0.005 0.003 0.485 0.617 -0.08 -0.05USEDISAB 59 10,757 35,968 1.24 1.28 1.27 0.57 0.60 0.60 0.074 0.006 0.003 0.619 0.709 -0.06 -0.05SATACAD 134 21,862 69,757 2.19 2.26 2.20 0.63 0.64 0.65 0.054 0.004 0.002 0.203 0.852 -0.11 -0.02

SATCACOU 117 15,327 49,451 2.12 2.04 2.03 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.066 0.006 0.003 0.259 0.168 0.10 0.13SATJOBPL 73 9,203 28,672 1.86 1.82 1.78 0.71 0.74 0.73 0.083 0.008 0.004 0.609 0.337 0.06 0.11SATTUTOR 86 12,272 40,031 2.28 2.11 2.11 0.71 0.74 0.73 0.077 0.007 0.004 0.039 0.034 0.22 0.23

SATLAB 98 14,574 47,008 2.15 2.24 2.23 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.069 0.006 0.003 0.220 0.264 -0.12 -0.11SATCHLD 40 5,821 17,758 1.93 1.73 1.71 0.80 0.79 0.78 0.126 0.010 0.006 0.127 0.087 0.24 0.27

SATFAADV 93 16,957 50,653 2.20 2.21 2.14 0.77 0.76 0.77 0.080 0.006 0.003 0.937 0.433 -0.01 0.08SATCOMLB 129 19,371 61,788 2.47 2.47 2.46 0.63 0.64 0.64 0.055 0.005 0.003 0.963 0.774 0.00 0.03SATSTORG 53 9,219 28,498 1.83 1.91 1.89 0.67 0.71 0.71 0.092 0.007 0.004 0.406 0.527 -0.11 -0.09SATTRCRD 69 12,407 40,416 2.00 2.08 2.05 0.80 0.74 0.73 0.097 0.007 0.004 0.377 0.567 -0.11 -0.07SATDISAB 35 6,546 20,543 1.91 1.97 1.96 0.74 0.79 0.79 0.126 0.010 0.006 0.657 0.732 -0.08 -0.06IMPACAD 177 27,472 89,508 2.33 2.46 2.45 0.77 0.71 0.72 0.058 0.004 0.002 0.021 0.024 -0.17 -0.17

IMPCACOU 173 27,132 88,360 2.28 2.21 2.24 0.79 0.82 0.82 0.060 0.005 0.003 0.212 0.471 0.10 0.05IMPJOBPL 173 26,737 87,088 1.90 1.95 1.96 0.85 0.86 0.86 0.065 0.005 0.003 0.379 0.358 -0.07 -0.07IMPTUTOR 173 26,743 87,028 2.10 2.01 2.03 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.064 0.005 0.003 0.140 0.272 0.11 0.08

IMPLAB 173 26,619 86,713 2.13 2.11 2.13 0.81 0.83 0.83 0.061 0.005 0.003 0.770 0.992 0.02 0.00IMPCHLD 173 26,597 86,342 1.73 1.71 1.70 0.85 0.87 0.86 0.065 0.005 0.003 0.746 0.692 0.02 0.03

IMPFAADV 174 26,807 87,086 2.24 2.33 2.29 0.90 0.85 0.86 0.068 0.005 0.003 0.155 0.480 -0.11 -0.05

* T-tests: 2-tailed M25

Page 83: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

CohortOther Small Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Small Colleges

2007 CCSSE Cohort

Brazosport CollegeSummary Statistics: Part - Time Students

IMPCOMLB 173 26,871 87,473 2.33 2.35 2.34 0.79 0.79 0.80 0.060 0.005 0.003 0.719 0.843 -0.03 -0.02IMPSTORG 170 26,408 85,959 1.68 1.73 1.74 0.80 0.78 0.78 0.061 0.005 0.003 0.351 0.273 -0.07 -0.08IMPTRCRD 174 26,774 87,095 2.07 2.13 2.17 0.90 0.88 0.87 0.068 0.005 0.003 0.358 0.114 -0.07 -0.12IMPDISAB 173 26,644 86,705 1.90 1.97 1.98 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.070 0.006 0.003 0.277 0.252 -0.08 -0.09WRKFULL 183 28,679 93,883 2.34 2.16 2.21 1.20 1.17 1.18 0.089 0.007 0.004 0.032 0.130 0.16 0.11CAREDEP 184 28,603 93,625 2.04 1.94 1.93 1.14 1.08 1.08 0.084 0.006 0.004 0.235 0.183 0.09 0.10ACADUNP 183 28,488 93,243 1.65 1.59 1.65 0.93 0.89 0.92 0.069 0.005 0.003 0.394 0.941 0.06 0.01LACKFIN 181 28,604 93,564 2.30 2.40 2.37 1.22 1.19 1.19 0.090 0.007 0.004 0.259 0.422 -0.08 -0.06

TRANSFER 183 28,597 93,557 2.16 2.19 2.36 1.22 1.22 1.24 0.090 0.007 0.004 0.723 0.028 -0.03 -0.16FRNDSUPP 184 28,687 93,922 3.18 3.27 3.23 0.96 0.87 0.89 0.070 0.005 0.003 0.181 0.483 -0.10 -0.05FAMSUPP 182 28,642 93,688 3.51 3.50 3.48 0.80 0.79 0.81 0.059 0.005 0.003 0.951 0.612 0.00 0.04TOTCHRS 184 28,470 93,172 1.84 1.85 1.87 1.40 1.50 1.49 0.103 0.009 0.005 0.886 0.729 -0.01 -0.03OTHINST 182 28,581 93,263 1.49 1.42 1.42 1.11 0.99 0.99 0.082 0.006 0.003 0.376 0.361 0.07 0.07

ENTIREXP 184 28,578 93,282 3.19 3.19 3.16 0.65 0.67 0.67 0.048 0.004 0.002 0.981 0.548 0.00 0.04

* T-tests: 2-tailed M26

Page 84: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

CohortOther Small Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Small Colleges

2007 CCSSE Cohort

CLQUEST 230 75,986 213,173 3.02 2.99 2.94 0.87 0.83 0.84 0.057 0.003 0.002 0.615 0.156 0.03 0.09CLPRESEN 230 75,714 212,398 2.08 2.23 2.24 0.91 0.89 0.89 0.060 0.003 0.002 0.010 0.008 -0.17 -0.18REWROPAP 229 75,471 211,689 2.32 2.63 2.64 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.066 0.004 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.31 -0.32INTEGRAT 227 75,586 211,982 2.72 2.90 2.92 0.90 0.86 0.86 0.060 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.000 -0.21 -0.23CLUNPREP 227 75,325 211,314 1.93 1.95 1.98 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.049 0.003 0.002 0.655 0.287 -0.03 -0.07CLASSGRP 227 75,189 210,961 2.57 2.59 2.56 0.90 0.84 0.84 0.059 0.003 0.002 0.727 0.890 -0.02 0.01OCCGRP 229 75,432 211,597 2.03 2.06 2.01 0.89 0.91 0.90 0.059 0.003 0.002 0.569 0.763 -0.04 0.02TUTOR 229 75,637 212,191 1.55 1.48 1.46 0.81 0.77 0.76 0.053 0.003 0.002 0.122 0.049 0.10 0.13

COMMPROJ 229 75,354 211,355 1.34 1.40 1.38 0.73 0.72 0.71 0.048 0.003 0.002 0.247 0.410 -0.08 -0.05INTERNET 228 75,333 211,304 2.78 2.99 3.00 1.00 0.96 0.95 0.066 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 -0.22 -0.23

EMAIL 229 75,385 211,557 2.37 2.58 2.62 1.01 1.02 0.99 0.067 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.000 -0.21 -0.25FACGRADE 228 75,503 211,675 2.59 2.65 2.61 0.87 0.84 0.85 0.058 0.003 0.002 0.269 0.646 -0.07 -0.03FACPLANS 230 75,321 211,435 2.11 2.23 2.15 0.91 0.90 0.89 0.060 0.003 0.002 0.046 0.448 -0.13 -0.05FACIDEAS 229 75,339 211,228 1.87 1.88 1.83 0.85 0.85 0.84 0.056 0.003 0.002 0.865 0.496 -0.01 0.05FACFEED 228 75,396 211,385 2.64 2.70 2.67 0.85 0.83 0.83 0.056 0.003 0.002 0.293 0.546 -0.07 -0.04

WORKHARD 229 75,491 211,661 2.45 2.63 2.60 0.85 0.86 0.86 0.056 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.008 -0.20 -0.18FACOTH 226 74,976 210,029 1.51 1.55 1.49 0.80 0.79 0.76 0.053 0.003 0.002 0.488 0.683 -0.05 0.03

OOCIDEAS 229 75,708 212,238 2.61 2.62 2.61 0.86 0.91 0.92 0.057 0.003 0.002 0.828 0.982 -0.01 0.00DIVRSTUD 227 75,649 212,172 2.53 2.40 2.48 1.08 1.04 1.04 0.072 0.004 0.002 0.073 0.457 0.12 0.05DIFFSTUD 225 75,562 211,982 2.51 2.46 2.48 1.05 1.00 1.01 0.070 0.004 0.002 0.446 0.688 0.05 0.03SKIPCLAS 230 75,715 212,396 1.69 1.65 1.69 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.045 0.002 0.001 0.357 0.999 0.06 0.00MEMORIZE 229 75,890 212,850 2.90 2.89 2.89 0.89 0.86 0.86 0.059 0.003 0.002 0.810 0.799 0.02 0.02ANALYZE 228 75,691 212,295 2.81 2.87 2.90 0.82 0.82 0.81 0.054 0.003 0.002 0.276 0.119 -0.07 -0.10

SYNTHESZ 227 75,400 211,415 2.71 2.76 2.77 0.87 0.85 0.85 0.058 0.003 0.002 0.421 0.343 -0.05 -0.06EVALUATE 229 75,537 211,754 2.55 2.63 2.65 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.059 0.003 0.002 0.185 0.110 -0.09 -0.11APPLYING 228 75,656 212,090 2.61 2.73 2.72 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.059 0.003 0.002 0.041 0.064 -0.14 -0.12PERFORM 227 75,856 212,723 2.73 2.86 2.81 0.91 0.89 0.90 0.061 0.003 0.002 0.036 0.175 -0.14 -0.09

READASGN 227 75,150 210,737 2.88 3.13 3.12 0.98 1.03 1.02 0.065 0.004 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.24 -0.24READOWN 228 75,216 210,949 2.05 2.04 2.06 1.06 1.00 1.00 0.070 0.004 0.002 0.822 0.887 0.01 -0.01WRITEANY 227 75,141 210,699 2.80 3.13 3.16 1.09 1.09 1.07 0.073 0.004 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.30 -0.33

Brazosport CollegeSummary Statistics: Full - Time Students

* T-tests: 2-tailed M27

Page 85: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

CohortOther Small Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Small Colleges

2007 CCSSE Cohort

Brazosport CollegeSummary Statistics: Full - Time Students

EXAMS 217 72,562 202,923 5.05 5.09 5.03 1.18 1.15 1.15 0.080 0.004 0.003 0.601 0.808 -0.04 0.02ENVSCHOL 227 75,266 211,035 2.94 3.03 3.02 0.88 0.82 0.83 0.058 0.003 0.002 0.081 0.140 -0.12 -0.10ENVSUPRT 226 75,185 210,803 2.96 3.01 2.98 0.88 0.84 0.85 0.059 0.003 0.002 0.392 0.792 -0.06 -0.02ENVDIVRS 225 75,076 210,444 2.48 2.50 2.52 1.05 1.00 1.00 0.070 0.004 0.002 0.818 0.570 -0.02 -0.04ENVNACAD 228 75,116 210,515 1.93 2.01 1.96 0.99 0.97 0.96 0.065 0.004 0.002 0.189 0.562 -0.09 -0.04ENVSOCAL 226 74,791 209,625 2.17 2.21 2.17 0.96 0.94 0.93 0.064 0.003 0.002 0.468 0.977 -0.05 0.00FINSUPP 226 74,957 210,013 2.50 2.63 2.54 1.12 1.08 1.10 0.075 0.004 0.002 0.083 0.596 -0.12 -0.04

ENVCOMP 228 75,211 210,805 3.16 3.27 3.25 0.89 0.84 0.85 0.059 0.003 0.002 0.052 0.140 -0.13 -0.10ACADPR01 225 75,042 210,315 1.89 2.11 2.09 1.15 1.17 1.15 0.077 0.004 0.002 0.005 0.008 -0.19 -0.18PAYWORK 225 74,893 209,779 3.20 2.59 2.76 1.87 1.95 1.92 0.125 0.007 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.32 0.23COCURR01 226 74,964 210,064 0.44 0.44 0.39 0.97 0.92 0.87 0.065 0.003 0.002 0.973 0.336 0.00 0.06CAREDE01 226 74,815 209,610 1.66 1.68 1.50 1.99 2.02 1.91 0.133 0.007 0.004 0.902 0.209 -0.01 0.08COMMUTE 226 74,932 209,821 1.38 1.44 1.43 0.98 1.00 0.96 0.065 0.004 0.002 0.375 0.455 -0.06 -0.05

ENVSTU 225 75,171 210,530 5.62 5.66 5.51 1.30 1.28 1.33 0.086 0.005 0.003 0.697 0.211 -0.03 0.08ENVFAC 225 75,188 210,614 5.66 5.66 5.57 1.37 1.25 1.25 0.092 0.005 0.003 0.980 0.297 0.00 0.07ENVADM 226 75,164 210,460 5.07 5.09 4.91 1.77 1.55 1.58 0.118 0.006 0.003 0.806 0.130 -0.02 0.10

GNGENLED 225 75,118 210,421 3.01 3.03 3.04 0.83 0.81 0.81 0.055 0.003 0.002 0.635 0.567 -0.03 -0.04GNWORK 225 75,020 210,076 2.65 2.76 2.62 1.05 0.99 1.01 0.070 0.004 0.002 0.123 0.637 -0.10 0.03GNWRITE 224 75,029 210,199 2.66 2.80 2.80 0.92 0.89 0.89 0.062 0.003 0.002 0.016 0.015 -0.16 -0.16GNSPEAK 224 75,047 210,151 2.60 2.72 2.70 0.96 0.92 0.93 0.064 0.003 0.002 0.054 0.092 -0.13 -0.11GNANALY 225 74,971 209,997 2.91 2.97 2.95 0.87 0.84 0.84 0.058 0.003 0.002 0.319 0.545 -0.07 -0.04GNSOLVE 225 74,964 209,985 2.76 2.72 2.70 0.96 0.93 0.94 0.064 0.003 0.002 0.549 0.352 0.04 0.06GNCMPTS 224 74,942 209,964 2.75 2.89 2.83 0.96 0.94 0.96 0.064 0.003 0.002 0.026 0.222 -0.15 -0.08

GNOTHERS 225 74,981 210,059 2.73 2.86 2.79 0.94 0.88 0.89 0.063 0.003 0.002 0.037 0.316 -0.14 -0.07GNINQ 224 75,015 210,044 2.91 2.97 2.94 0.86 0.86 0.87 0.057 0.003 0.002 0.269 0.598 -0.07 -0.04

GNSELF 225 74,904 209,859 2.54 2.68 2.65 1.03 0.99 1.00 0.069 0.004 0.002 0.034 0.113 -0.14 -0.11GNDIVERS 225 74,891 209,759 2.31 2.42 2.44 1.04 1.00 1.00 0.070 0.004 0.002 0.078 0.048 -0.12 -0.13GNETHICS 225 74,906 209,770 2.34 2.47 2.42 1.02 1.00 1.00 0.068 0.004 0.002 0.049 0.194 -0.13 -0.09

GNCOMMUN 225 74,789 209,389 2.12 2.10 2.05 1.01 0.97 0.97 0.068 0.004 0.002 0.753 0.239 0.02 0.08CARGOAL 224 74,971 209,997 2.69 2.80 2.74 0.98 0.97 0.98 0.066 0.004 0.002 0.082 0.472 -0.12 -0.05

* T-tests: 2-tailed M28

Page 86: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

CohortOther Small Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Small Colleges

2007 CCSSE Cohort

Brazosport CollegeSummary Statistics: Full - Time Students

GAINCAR 225 75,077 210,292 2.59 2.72 2.64 1.01 1.00 1.01 0.067 0.004 0.002 0.047 0.429 -0.13 -0.05USEACAD 199 69,778 194,673 1.70 1.85 1.81 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.050 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.025 -0.22 -0.16

USECACOU 190 60,650 169,145 1.54 1.47 1.46 0.68 0.64 0.64 0.049 0.003 0.002 0.102 0.080 0.12 0.13USEJOBPL 148 45,717 125,252 1.32 1.33 1.29 0.58 0.60 0.56 0.048 0.003 0.002 0.746 0.518 -0.03 0.05USETUTOR 167 55,262 153,768 1.61 1.49 1.50 0.74 0.69 0.69 0.057 0.003 0.002 0.026 0.031 0.17 0.17

USELAB 171 59,021 163,712 1.72 1.81 1.77 0.75 0.78 0.78 0.058 0.003 0.002 0.138 0.433 -0.11 -0.06USECHLD 97 31,325 86,731 1.27 1.25 1.20 0.62 0.59 0.54 0.063 0.003 0.002 0.709 0.241 0.04 0.12

USEFAADV 155 61,839 165,639 1.82 1.95 1.89 0.83 0.77 0.78 0.066 0.003 0.002 0.041 0.285 -0.16 -0.09USECOMLB 199 67,715 187,616 2.37 2.28 2.24 0.73 0.76 0.77 0.051 0.003 0.002 0.108 0.023 0.11 0.16USESTORG 138 49,535 133,850 1.43 1.47 1.43 0.71 0.68 0.67 0.061 0.003 0.002 0.493 0.965 -0.06 0.00USETRCRD 148 47,546 138,221 1.44 1.59 1.60 0.64 0.71 0.71 0.053 0.003 0.002 0.009 0.005 -0.22 -0.23USEDISAB 96 30,536 85,753 1.36 1.35 1.33 0.68 0.66 0.65 0.070 0.004 0.002 0.884 0.598 0.01 0.05SATACAD 172 64,066 176,409 2.23 2.28 2.22 0.65 0.63 0.64 0.050 0.002 0.002 0.291 0.851 -0.08 0.01

SATCACOU 148 46,733 126,860 2.15 2.09 2.06 0.73 0.70 0.70 0.060 0.003 0.002 0.275 0.110 0.09 0.13SATJOBPL 95 31,877 81,597 1.98 1.91 1.86 0.80 0.73 0.73 0.082 0.004 0.003 0.375 0.110 0.09 0.16SATTUTOR 122 39,707 108,482 2.33 2.19 2.17 0.72 0.71 0.71 0.065 0.004 0.002 0.030 0.016 0.20 0.22

SATLAB 131 47,035 126,620 2.19 2.29 2.28 0.69 0.65 0.66 0.060 0.003 0.002 0.095 0.140 -0.15 -0.13SATCHLD 59 18,123 46,283 1.81 1.84 1.80 0.90 0.79 0.78 0.117 0.006 0.004 0.824 0.887 -0.03 0.02

SATFAADV 126 54,877 141,570 2.25 2.28 2.22 0.81 0.73 0.74 0.072 0.003 0.002 0.595 0.732 -0.05 0.03SATCOMLB 184 62,691 171,088 2.63 2.55 2.53 0.61 0.60 0.60 0.045 0.002 0.001 0.071 0.041 0.13 0.15SATSTORG 99 35,764 91,467 1.98 2.06 2.02 0.77 0.69 0.70 0.077 0.004 0.002 0.278 0.557 -0.11 -0.06SATTRCRD 115 37,517 107,168 2.19 2.09 2.08 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.068 0.004 0.002 0.151 0.086 0.13 0.16SATDISAB 69 20,914 54,997 2.13 2.07 2.05 0.80 0.77 0.78 0.097 0.005 0.003 0.547 0.385 0.07 0.10IMPACAD 215 72,475 202,253 2.37 2.57 2.57 0.74 0.62 0.63 0.050 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 -0.33 -0.32

IMPCACOU 214 71,748 200,039 2.30 2.33 2.34 0.80 0.76 0.76 0.055 0.003 0.002 0.507 0.457 -0.05 -0.05IMPJOBPL 213 70,916 197,529 2.01 2.12 2.08 0.85 0.83 0.83 0.058 0.003 0.002 0.052 0.271 -0.13 -0.08IMPTUTOR 215 70,923 197,623 2.20 2.16 2.15 0.84 0.80 0.80 0.057 0.003 0.002 0.485 0.458 0.05 0.05

IMPLAB 212 70,653 196,886 2.17 2.25 2.25 0.81 0.77 0.78 0.056 0.003 0.002 0.120 0.151 -0.11 -0.10IMPCHLD 209 70,186 195,427 1.82 1.79 1.76 0.93 0.87 0.87 0.065 0.003 0.002 0.592 0.355 0.04 0.06

IMPFAADV 212 70,932 197,448 2.25 2.54 2.48 0.88 0.73 0.77 0.061 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.39 -0.30

* T-tests: 2-tailed M29

Page 87: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your CollegeOther Small

Colleges2007 CCSSE

CohortOther Small Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Small Colleges

2007 CCSSE Cohort

Brazosport CollegeSummary Statistics: Full - Time Students

IMPCOMLB 214 71,266 198,473 2.59 2.58 2.56 0.68 0.65 0.67 0.046 0.002 0.001 0.713 0.408 0.03 0.06IMPSTORG 210 70,102 195,032 1.92 1.94 1.91 0.84 0.78 0.78 0.058 0.003 0.002 0.750 0.884 -0.02 0.01IMPTRCRD 213 70,760 197,291 2.20 2.26 2.31 0.87 0.84 0.83 0.059 0.003 0.002 0.292 0.047 -0.07 -0.14IMPDISAB 211 70,538 196,470 2.01 2.10 2.09 0.93 0.91 0.91 0.064 0.003 0.002 0.132 0.220 -0.10 -0.08WRKFULL 218 74,890 209,593 2.23 2.10 2.11 1.20 1.15 1.15 0.082 0.004 0.003 0.080 0.116 0.12 0.11CAREDEP 218 74,791 209,222 1.94 1.92 1.90 1.13 1.07 1.06 0.076 0.004 0.002 0.865 0.587 0.01 0.04ACADUNP 216 74,542 208,522 1.67 1.65 1.70 0.91 0.91 0.94 0.062 0.003 0.002 0.740 0.670 0.02 -0.03LACKFIN 218 74,697 208,928 2.40 2.43 2.39 1.28 1.19 1.19 0.087 0.004 0.003 0.667 0.904 -0.03 0.01

TRANSFER 217 74,792 209,300 2.70 2.43 2.64 1.22 1.24 1.24 0.083 0.005 0.003 0.001 0.446 0.22 0.05FRNDSUPP 219 74,924 209,685 3.27 3.29 3.23 0.91 0.86 0.88 0.062 0.003 0.002 0.844 0.454 -0.01 0.05FAMSUPP 219 74,715 209,058 3.56 3.57 3.53 0.74 0.75 0.78 0.050 0.003 0.002 0.814 0.556 -0.02 0.04TOTCHRS 218 74,337 207,974 2.16 2.23 2.20 1.47 1.45 1.44 0.100 0.005 0.003 0.449 0.666 -0.05 -0.03OTHINST 220 74,448 207,996 1.49 1.40 1.42 1.26 1.12 1.14 0.085 0.004 0.002 0.236 0.361 0.08 0.06

ENTIREXP 220 74,468 207,993 3.10 3.17 3.14 0.74 0.69 0.68 0.050 0.003 0.001 0.127 0.366 -0.10 -0.06

* T-tests: 2-tailed M30

Page 88: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect SizeAll Students N = 416

COLLEGE ACTIVITIES

Academic, Intellectual and Social Experiences

4. In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following?

1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often, 4=Very often

a. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions CLQUEST All Students 2.86 2.89 2.91

b. Made a class presentation CLPRESEN All Students 1.86 2.08 * -0.23 2.04

c. Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before REWROPAP All Students 2.16 2.48 * -0.31 2.47 * -0.30turning it in

d. Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or INTEGRAT All Students 2.51 2.69 2.70 information from various sources

e. Came to class without completing readings or assignments CLUNPREP All Students 1.84 1.88 1.88

f. Worked with other students on projects during class CLASSGRP All Students 2.44 2.44 2.46

g. Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare OCCGRP All Students 1.82 1.87 1.84 class assignments

h. Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) TUTOR All Students 1.45 1.38 1.36

i. Participated in a community-based project as a part of a COMMPROJ All Students 1.22 1.31 1.29 regular course

j. Used the Internet or instant messaging to work on an INTERNET All Students 2.53 2.82 * -0.29 2.79 * -0.26assignment

k. Used email to communicate with an instructor EMAIL All Students 2.09 2.47 * -0.39 2.41 * -0.32

l. Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor FACGRADE All Students 2.46 2.52 2.49

m. Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor FACPLANS All Students 1.94 1.97 1.99

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumOther Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

All Other Consortium N = 15924 All Other Colleges N = 309597

* T-tests: 2-tailed M1

Page 89: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

COLLEGE ACTIVITIES

Academic, Intellectual, and Social Experiences continuedn. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with FACIDEAS All Students 1.75 1.73 1.72

instructors outside of class o. Received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on FACFEED All Students 2.62 2.63 2.65

your performance p. Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an WORKHARD All Students 2.32 2.57 * -0.29 2.52 * -0.23

instructor's standards or expectations q. Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework FACOTH All Students 1.37 1.40 1.39

r. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others OOCIDEAS All Students 2.51 2.54 2.55

outside of class (students, family members, coworkers, etc.) s. Had serious conversations with students of a different race DIVRSTUD All Students 2.44 2.41 2.36

or ethnicity than your own t. Had serious conversations with students who differ from you DIFFSTUD All Students 2.34 2.32 2.32

in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values u. Skipped class SKIPCLAS All Students 1.53 1.59 1.58

Character of Mental Activities

5. During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized the following mental activities?

a. Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your courses and MEMORIZE All Students 2.72 2.83 2.82 readings so you can repeat them in pretty much the same form

b. Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory ANALYZE All Students 2.67 2.84 * -0.21 2.82

c. Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences SYNTHESZ All Students 2.52 2.72 * -0.22 2.69 in new ways

d. Making judgments about the value or soundness of EVALUATE All Students 2.41 2.56 2.53 information, arguments, or methods

e. Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new APPLYING All Students 2.51 2.65 2.62 situations

f. Using information you have read or heard to perform a PERFORM All Students 2.63 2.77 2.72 new skill.

1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often, 4=Very often

1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much

* T-tests: 2-tailed M2

Page 90: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

COLLEGE ACTIVITIES

Reading and Writing

6. During the current school year, about how much reading and writing have you done at this college?

a. Number of assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or READASGN All Students 2.73 2.84 2.85 book-length packs of course readings

b. Number of books read on your own (not assigned) for READOWN All Students 2.02 2.04 2.07 personal enjoyment or academic enrichment

c. Number of written papers or reports of any length WRITEANY All Students 2.47 2.78 * -0.28 2.81 * -0.31

Nature of Exams

7. Mark the box that best represents the extent to which your examinations during the current school year have challenged you to do your best work at this college

EXAMS All Students 4.83 5.00 5.00

OPINIONS ABOUT YOUR SCHOOL

Institutional Emphasis9. How much does this college emphasize each of the following?

a. Encouraging you to spend significant amounts of time ENVSCHOL All Students 2.84 2.95 2.94 studying

b. Providing the support you need to help you succeed at this ENVSUPRT All Students 2.94 2.94 2.93 college

c. Encouraging contact among students from different economic, ENVDIVRS All Students 2.37 2.50 2.45 social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds

d. Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities ENVNACAD All Students 1.99 1.95 1.90 (work, family, etc.)

e. Providing the support you need to thrive socially ENVSOCAL All Students 2.06 2.16 2.08

f. Providing the financial support you need to afford your FINSUPP All Students 2.27 2.41 2.37 education

g. Using computers in academic work ENVCOMP All Students 3.04 3.11 3.07

1=None, 2=Between 1 and 4, 3=Between 5 and 10, 4=Between 11 and 20, 5=More than 20

1=Extremely easy to 7=Extremely challenging

1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much

* T-tests: 2-tailed M3

Page 91: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

WEEKLY ACTIVITIES

10. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7 - day week doing each of the following?

a. Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, ACADPR01 All Students 1.58 1.83 * -0.24 1.88 * -0.29doing homework, or other activities related to your program)

b. Working for pay PAYWORK All Students 3.77 3.25 * 0.27 3.23 * 0.28

c. Participating in college-sponsored activities (organizations, campus COCURR01 All Students 0.19 0.23 0.27 publications, student government, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.)

d. Providing care for dependents living with you (parents, children, CAREDE01 All Students 2.33 1.86 * 0.23 1.81 * 0.25spouse, etc.)

e. Commuting to and from classes COMMUTE All Students 1.20 1.34 1.31

Quality of Relationships

11. Mark the box that best represents the quality of your relationships with people at this college.

a. Relationships with other students ENVSTU All Students 5.59 5.53 5.47

b. Relationships with instuctors ENVFAC All Students 5.82 5.65 5.65

c. Relationships with administrative personnel and offices ENVADM All Students 5.10 4.88 4.93

0=None, 1=1-5 hours/week, 2=6-10 hours/week, 3=11-20 hours/week, 4=21-30 hours/week, 5=More than 30 hours/week

1=Unfriendly, unsupportive, sense of alienation to 7=Friendly, supportive, sense of belonging

1=Unavailable, unhelpful, unsympathetic to 7=Available, helpful, sympathetic

1=Unhelpful, inconsiderate, rigid to 7=Helpful, considerate, flexible

* T-tests: 2-tailed M4

Page 92: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

EDUCATIONAL AND PERSONAL GROWTH

Knowledge, Skills & Personal Development

12. How much has YOUR EXPERIENCE AT THIS COLLEGE contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas?

a. Acquiring a broad general education GNGENLED All Students 2.82 2.97 2.93

b. Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills GNWORK All Students 2.56 2.56 2.54

c. Writing clearly and effectively GNWRITE All Students 2.51 2.72 * -0.23 2.68

d. Speaking clearly and effectively GNSPEAK All Students 2.49 2.66 2.58

e. Thinking critically and analytically GNANALY All Students 2.76 2.89 2.85

f. Solving numerical problems GNSOLVE All Students 2.56 2.64 2.57

g. Using computing and information technology GNCMPTS All Students 2.59 2.76 2.69

h. Working effectively with others GNOTHERS All Students 2.66 2.76 2.69

i. Learning effectively on your own GNINQ All Students 2.76 2.92 2.88

j. Understanding yourself GNSELF All Students 2.45 2.65 2.56

k. Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds GNDIVERS All Students 2.19 2.44 * -0.24 2.34

l. Developing a personal code of values and ethics GNETHICS All Students 2.22 2.41 2.32

m. Contributing to the welfare of your community GNCOMMUN All Students 1.90 2.03 1.97

n. Developing clearer career goals CARGOAL All Students 2.60 2.67 2.62

o. Gaining information about career opportunities GAINCAR All Students 2.56 2.55 2.51

1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much

* T-tests: 2-tailed M5

Page 93: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

STUDENT SERVICES

13.1 How often do you use the following services?a. Frequency: Academic advising/planning USEACAD All Students 1.64 1.73 1.74

b. Frequency: Career counseling USECACOU All Students 1.48 1.44 1.43

c. Frequency: Job placement assistance USEJOBPL All Students 1.30 1.24 1.24

d. Frequency: Peer or other tutoring USETUTOR All Students 1.52 1.49 1.45

e. Frequency: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) USELAB All Students 1.73 1.72 1.70

f. Frequency: Child care USECHLD All Students 1.27 1.18 1.18

g. Frequency: Financial aid advising USEFAADV All Students 1.77 1.82 1.80

h. Frequency: Computer lab USECOMLB All Students 2.21 2.12 2.09

i. Frequency: Student organizations USESTORG All Students 1.41 1.34 1.34

j. Frequency: Transfer credit assistance USETRCRD All Students 1.46 1.54 1.55

k. Frequency: Services to students with disabilities USEDISAB All Students 1.28 1.29 1.30

0=Don’t know/N.A, 1=Rarely/never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often

* T-tests: 2-tailed M6

Page 94: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

STUDENT SERVICES

13.2 How satisfied are you with the services?a. Satisfaction: Academic advising/planning SATACAD All Students 2.20 2.18 2.21

b. Satisfaction: Career counseling SATCACOU All Students 2.13 2.06 2.04

c. Satisfaction: Job placement assistance SATJOBPL All Students 1.89 1.84 1.82

d. Satisfaction: Peer or other tutoring SATTUTOR All Students 2.29 2.15 2.14

e. Satisfaction: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) SATLAB All Students 2.16 2.27 2.25

f. Satisfaction: Child care SATCHLD All Students 1.89 1.80 1.76

g. Satisfaction: Financial aid advising SATFAADV All Students 2.22 2.17 2.18

h. Satisfaction: Computer lab SATCOMLB All Students 2.51 2.52 2.49

i. Satisfaction: Student organizations SATSTORG All Students 1.88 1.96 1.96

j. Satisfaction: Transfer credit assistance SATTRCRD All Students 2.06 2.07 2.06

k. Satisfaction: Services to students with disabilities SATDISAB All Students 1.99 2.02 2.00

0=N.A.,1=Not at all, 2=Somewhat, 3=Very

* T-tests: 2-tailed M7

Page 95: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

STUDENT SERVICES

13.3 How important are the services to you?a. Importance: Academic advising/planning IMPACAD All Students 2.34 2.53 * -0.28 2.50 * -0.23

b. Importance: Career counseling IMPCACOU All Students 2.29 2.33 2.28

c. Importance: Job placement assistance IMPJOBPL All Students 1.92 2.03 2.01

d. Importance: Peer or other tutoring IMPTUTOR All Students 2.13 2.15 2.08

e. Importance: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) IMPLAB All Students 2.14 2.24 2.18

f. Importance: Child care IMPCHLD All Students 1.75 1.78 1.73

g. Importance: Financial aid advising IMPFAADV All Students 2.24 2.39 2.37

h. Importance: Computer lab IMPCOMLB All Students 2.39 2.48 2.43

i. Importance: Student organizations IMPSTORG All Students 1.74 1.86 1.81

j. Importance: Transfer credit assistance IMPTRCRD All Students 2.10 2.26 2.23

k. Importance: Services to students with disabilities IMPDISAB All Students 1.92 2.06 2.02

1=Not at all, 2=Somewhat, 3=Very

* T-tests: 2-tailed M8

Page 96: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: All Students

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

COLLEGE EXPERIENCES

14. How likely is it that the following issues would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college?

a. Working full-time WRKFULL All Students 2.32 2.21 2.17

b. Caring for dependents CAREDEP All Students 2.01 1.96 1.92

c. Academically unprepared ACADUNP All Students 1.66 1.71 1.67

d. Lack of finances LACKFIN All Students 2.32 2.41 2.38

e. Transfer to a 4-year college or university TRANSFER All Students 2.29 2.53 2.47

15. How supportive are your friends of your attending this FRNDSUPP All Students 3.20 3.24 3.23 college?

16. How supportive is your immediate family of your attending FAMSUPP All Students 3.52 3.52 3.50 this college?

23. How many TOTAL credit hours have you earned at this college, TOTCHRS All Students 1.91 2.04 2.02 not counting the courses you are currently taking this term?

25. How many classes are you presently taking at OTHER OTHINST All Students 1.49 1.45 1.42 institutions?

27. How would you evaluate your entire educational experience ENTIREXP All Students 3.17 3.17 3.15 at this college?

0=None, 1=1-14 credits, 2=15-29 credits, 3=30-44 credits, 4=45-60 credits, 5= over 60 credits

1=None, 2=1 class, 3=2 classes, 4=3 classes, 5=4 classes or more

1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Excellent

1=Not likely, 2=Somewhat likely, 3=Likely, 4=Very likely

1=Not very, 2=Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Extremely

1=Not very, 2=Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Extremely

* T-tests: 2-tailed M9

Page 97: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

CLQUEST 415 15,908 309,179 2.86 2.89 2.91 0.85 0.84 0.85 0.042 0.007 0.002 0.517 0.296 -0.03 -0.05CLPRESEN 415 15,836 307,933 1.86 2.08 2.04 0.88 0.94 0.91 0.043 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.23 -0.19REWROPAP 412 15,777 306,896 2.16 2.48 2.47 0.97 1.03 1.03 0.048 0.008 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.31 -0.30INTEGRAT 411 15,774 307,254 2.51 2.69 2.70 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.046 0.008 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.19 -0.19CLUNPREP 413 15,739 306,396 1.84 1.88 1.88 0.76 0.74 0.74 0.038 0.006 0.001 0.369 0.269 -0.04 -0.05CLASSGRP 409 15,733 305,888 2.44 2.44 2.46 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.045 0.007 0.002 0.910 0.707 -0.01 -0.02OCCGRP 413 15,775 306,888 1.82 1.87 1.84 0.88 0.90 0.88 0.044 0.007 0.002 0.244 0.621 -0.06 -0.02TUTOR 413 15,819 307,735 1.45 1.38 1.36 0.73 0.71 0.69 0.036 0.006 0.001 0.064 0.015 0.09 0.12

COMMPROJ 412 15,748 306,434 1.22 1.31 1.29 0.58 0.67 0.64 0.029 0.005 0.001 0.007 0.017 -0.14 -0.12INTERNET 414 15,733 306,386 2.53 2.82 2.79 1.07 1.02 1.03 0.053 0.008 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.29 -0.26

EMAIL 415 15,749 306,671 2.09 2.47 2.41 1.01 0.99 1.01 0.049 0.008 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.39 -0.32FACGRADE 411 15,763 306,840 2.46 2.52 2.49 0.85 0.86 0.86 0.042 0.007 0.002 0.156 0.479 -0.07 -0.03FACPLANS 413 15,738 306,486 1.94 1.97 1.99 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.043 0.007 0.002 0.543 0.264 -0.03 -0.06FACIDEAS 415 15,715 306,091 1.75 1.73 1.72 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.040 0.007 0.001 0.512 0.393 0.03 0.04FACFEED 410 15,733 306,369 2.62 2.63 2.65 0.94 0.86 0.86 0.046 0.007 0.002 0.899 0.501 -0.01 -0.03

WORKHARD 415 15,766 306,789 2.32 2.57 2.52 0.86 0.89 0.87 0.042 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.29 -0.23FACOTH 405 15,606 304,349 1.37 1.40 1.39 0.75 0.71 0.71 0.037 0.006 0.001 0.546 0.602 -0.03 -0.03

OOCIDEAS 415 15,795 307,673 2.51 2.54 2.55 0.93 0.94 0.93 0.046 0.007 0.002 0.583 0.450 -0.03 -0.04DIVRSTUD 413 15,795 307,499 2.44 2.41 2.36 1.04 1.04 1.04 0.051 0.008 0.002 0.597 0.108 0.03 0.08DIFFSTUD 410 15,794 307,212 2.34 2.32 2.32 1.06 1.02 1.01 0.052 0.008 0.002 0.712 0.745 0.02 0.02SKIPCLAS 415 15,827 307,892 1.53 1.59 1.58 0.66 0.68 0.67 0.032 0.005 0.001 0.067 0.094 -0.09 -0.08MEMORIZE 415 15,850 308,589 2.72 2.83 2.82 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.044 0.007 0.002 0.009 0.027 -0.13 -0.11ANALYZE 414 15,805 307,709 2.67 2.84 2.82 0.81 0.84 0.84 0.040 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.21 -0.19

SYNTHESZ 411 15,736 306,379 2.52 2.72 2.69 0.89 0.88 0.87 0.044 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.22 -0.19EVALUATE 414 15,768 306,901 2.41 2.56 2.53 0.94 0.92 0.91 0.046 0.007 0.002 0.001 0.007 -0.16 -0.13APPLYING 413 15,787 307,403 2.51 2.65 2.62 0.93 0.91 0.91 0.046 0.007 0.002 0.002 0.009 -0.16 -0.13PERFORM 413 15,842 308,357 2.63 2.77 2.72 0.90 0.91 0.92 0.044 0.007 0.002 0.002 0.034 -0.15 -0.10

READASGN 409 15,654 305,238 2.73 2.84 2.85 1.06 1.03 1.03 0.052 0.008 0.002 0.025 0.013 -0.11 -0.12READOWN 410 15,673 305,539 2.02 2.04 2.07 1.02 0.98 1.00 0.051 0.008 0.002 0.655 0.284 -0.02 -0.05WRITEANY 409 15,640 305,135 2.47 2.78 2.81 1.08 1.09 1.12 0.053 0.009 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.28 -0.31

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: All Students

* T-tests: 2-tailed M10

Page 98: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: All Students

EXAMS 392 14,960 292,924 4.83 5.00 5.00 1.26 1.21 1.20 0.064 0.010 0.002 0.006 0.006 -0.14 -0.14ENVSCHOL 409 15,662 305,512 2.84 2.95 2.94 0.83 0.85 0.84 0.041 0.007 0.002 0.006 0.009 -0.14 -0.13ENVSUPRT 408 15,631 305,089 2.94 2.94 2.93 0.74 0.86 0.85 0.037 0.007 0.002 0.971 0.760 0.00 0.02ENVDIVRS 406 15,598 304,387 2.37 2.50 2.45 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.047 0.008 0.002 0.015 0.133 -0.12 -0.07ENVNACAD 410 15,600 304,422 1.99 1.95 1.90 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.049 0.008 0.002 0.455 0.068 0.04 0.09ENVSOCAL 407 15,523 303,028 2.06 2.16 2.08 0.92 0.95 0.93 0.046 0.008 0.002 0.051 0.673 -0.10 -0.02FINSUPP 408 15,562 303,486 2.27 2.41 2.37 1.12 1.12 1.10 0.056 0.009 0.002 0.012 0.070 -0.13 -0.09

ENVCOMP 410 15,625 304,984 3.04 3.11 3.07 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.046 0.007 0.002 0.162 0.520 -0.07 -0.03ACADPR01 406 15,630 304,684 1.58 1.83 1.88 0.97 1.05 1.07 0.048 0.008 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.24 -0.29PAYWORK 405 15,575 303,721 3.77 3.25 3.23 1.81 1.95 1.94 0.090 0.016 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.27 0.28COCURR01 407 15,597 304,156 0.19 0.23 0.27 0.63 0.65 0.72 0.031 0.005 0.001 0.191 0.037 -0.07 -0.10CAREDE01 407 15,562 303,509 2.33 1.86 1.81 2.18 2.03 2.05 0.108 0.016 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.23 0.25COMMUTE 405 15,568 303,855 1.20 1.34 1.31 0.84 0.92 0.88 0.042 0.007 0.002 0.003 0.011 -0.15 -0.13

ENVSTU 407 15,651 304,843 5.59 5.53 5.47 1.32 1.34 1.34 0.065 0.011 0.002 0.320 0.060 0.05 0.09ENVFAC 407 15,640 305,035 5.82 5.65 5.65 1.23 1.28 1.26 0.061 0.010 0.002 0.008 0.005 0.13 0.14ENVADM 408 15,623 304,583 5.10 4.88 4.93 1.56 1.60 1.57 0.077 0.013 0.003 0.005 0.030 0.14 0.11

GNGENLED 407 15,605 304,511 2.82 2.97 2.93 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.043 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.009 -0.18 -0.13GNWORK 405 15,571 303,993 2.56 2.56 2.54 0.99 1.03 1.02 0.049 0.008 0.002 0.965 0.785 0.00 0.01GNWRITE 406 15,581 304,096 2.51 2.72 2.68 0.98 0.93 0.93 0.048 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.23 -0.18GNSPEAK 404 15,572 303,994 2.49 2.66 2.58 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.047 0.008 0.002 0.001 0.053 -0.17 -0.10GNANALY 407 15,579 303,826 2.76 2.89 2.85 0.90 0.87 0.88 0.044 0.007 0.002 0.003 0.052 -0.15 -0.10GNSOLVE 406 15,565 303,652 2.56 2.64 2.57 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.048 0.008 0.002 0.115 0.977 -0.08 0.00GNCMPTS 405 15,572 303,721 2.59 2.76 2.69 1.03 0.99 1.00 0.051 0.008 0.002 0.000 0.042 -0.18 -0.10

GNOTHERS 406 15,577 303,857 2.66 2.76 2.69 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.046 0.007 0.002 0.024 0.391 -0.11 -0.04GNINQ 405 15,587 303,891 2.76 2.92 2.88 0.88 0.89 0.89 0.044 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.007 -0.19 -0.13

GNSELF 406 15,571 303,586 2.45 2.65 2.56 0.98 1.00 1.01 0.049 0.008 0.002 0.000 0.022 -0.20 -0.11GNDIVERS 405 15,549 303,419 2.19 2.44 2.34 0.99 1.02 1.01 0.049 0.008 0.002 0.000 0.004 -0.24 -0.14GNETHICS 404 15,555 303,433 2.22 2.41 2.32 0.98 1.02 1.01 0.049 0.008 0.002 0.000 0.044 -0.19 -0.10

GNCOMMUN 404 15,524 302,825 1.90 2.03 1.97 0.90 0.98 0.96 0.045 0.008 0.002 0.009 0.161 -0.13 -0.07CARGOAL 404 15,573 303,761 2.60 2.67 2.62 0.98 1.01 1.01 0.049 0.008 0.002 0.132 0.693 -0.08 -0.02

* T-tests: 2-tailed M11

Page 99: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: All Students

GAINCAR 406 15,602 304,216 2.56 2.55 2.51 1.01 1.03 1.03 0.050 0.008 0.002 0.884 0.349 0.01 0.05USEACAD 355 14,175 276,566 1.64 1.73 1.74 0.64 0.67 0.68 0.034 0.006 0.001 0.017 0.005 -0.13 -0.15

USECACOU 335 12,528 239,973 1.48 1.44 1.43 0.64 0.62 0.61 0.035 0.006 0.001 0.253 0.130 0.06 0.08USEJOBPL 253 9,089 175,770 1.30 1.24 1.24 0.52 0.51 0.52 0.034 0.005 0.001 0.056 0.091 0.12 0.11USETUTOR 283 11,262 216,072 1.52 1.49 1.45 0.70 0.68 0.66 0.042 0.006 0.001 0.535 0.112 0.04 0.10

USELAB 293 11,932 230,175 1.73 1.72 1.70 0.75 0.77 0.76 0.045 0.007 0.002 0.866 0.537 0.01 0.04USECHLD 161 6,606 124,218 1.27 1.18 1.18 0.55 0.50 0.51 0.044 0.006 0.001 0.034 0.033 0.17 0.17

USEFAADV 267 11,897 231,030 1.77 1.82 1.80 0.79 0.78 0.77 0.049 0.007 0.002 0.340 0.465 -0.06 -0.05USECOMLB 344 13,598 262,227 2.21 2.12 2.09 0.76 0.79 0.79 0.041 0.007 0.002 0.037 0.005 0.12 0.15USESTORG 214 9,495 183,985 1.41 1.34 1.34 0.58 0.60 0.60 0.042 0.006 0.001 0.081 0.089 0.13 0.12USETRCRD 233 10,060 194,911 1.46 1.54 1.55 0.59 0.68 0.68 0.040 0.007 0.002 0.111 0.064 -0.11 -0.13USEDISAB 155 6,415 121,721 1.28 1.29 1.30 0.58 0.61 0.62 0.049 0.008 0.002 0.731 0.690 -0.03 -0.03SATACAD 306 12,602 246,166 2.20 2.18 2.21 0.63 0.63 0.64 0.036 0.006 0.001 0.563 0.741 0.03 -0.02

SATCACOU 265 9,288 176,311 2.13 2.06 2.04 0.71 0.69 0.69 0.044 0.007 0.002 0.099 0.045 0.10 0.12SATJOBPL 168 5,688 110,269 1.89 1.84 1.82 0.73 0.71 0.71 0.057 0.010 0.002 0.344 0.193 0.07 0.10SATTUTOR 208 8,001 148,513 2.29 2.15 2.14 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.050 0.008 0.002 0.005 0.002 0.20 0.22

SATLAB 229 9,130 173,628 2.16 2.27 2.25 0.67 0.66 0.65 0.045 0.007 0.002 0.016 0.045 -0.16 -0.13SATCHLD 99 3,515 64,041 1.89 1.80 1.76 0.80 0.78 0.77 0.083 0.013 0.003 0.235 0.082 0.12 0.18

SATFAADV 219 9,916 192,223 2.22 2.17 2.18 0.77 0.74 0.73 0.053 0.008 0.002 0.415 0.497 0.06 0.05SATCOMLB 313 12,145 232,876 2.51 2.52 2.49 0.61 0.60 0.61 0.035 0.006 0.001 0.825 0.548 -0.01 0.03SATSTORG 152 6,203 119,965 1.88 1.96 1.96 0.66 0.68 0.67 0.057 0.009 0.002 0.162 0.165 -0.12 -0.12SATTRCRD 184 7,537 147,584 2.06 2.07 2.06 0.75 0.72 0.71 0.058 0.008 0.002 0.787 0.925 -0.02 -0.01SATDISAB 104 4,016 75,540 1.99 2.02 2.00 0.71 0.78 0.77 0.075 0.012 0.003 0.724 0.845 -0.04 -0.02IMPACAD 392 14,897 291,761 2.34 2.53 2.50 0.76 0.67 0.68 0.038 0.005 0.001 0.000 0.000 -0.28 -0.23

IMPCACOU 387 14,732 288,399 2.29 2.33 2.28 0.79 0.78 0.79 0.040 0.006 0.001 0.261 0.839 -0.06 0.01IMPJOBPL 386 14,561 284,617 1.92 2.03 2.01 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.043 0.007 0.002 0.018 0.052 -0.12 -0.10IMPTUTOR 388 14,509 284,651 2.13 2.15 2.08 0.84 0.82 0.82 0.043 0.007 0.002 0.515 0.296 -0.03 0.05

IMPLAB 385 14,477 283,599 2.14 2.24 2.18 0.81 0.80 0.81 0.041 0.007 0.002 0.017 0.359 -0.12 -0.05IMPCHLD 382 14,359 281,769 1.75 1.78 1.73 0.87 0.88 0.86 0.045 0.007 0.002 0.494 0.628 -0.04 0.02

IMPFAADV 386 14,512 284,534 2.24 2.39 2.37 0.90 0.82 0.83 0.045 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.002 -0.18 -0.15

* T-tests: 2-tailed M12

Page 100: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: All Students

IMPCOMLB 387 14,574 285,946 2.39 2.48 2.43 0.77 0.73 0.75 0.039 0.006 0.001 0.030 0.316 -0.11 -0.05IMPSTORG 380 14,371 280,991 1.74 1.86 1.81 0.81 0.79 0.78 0.042 0.007 0.001 0.004 0.052 -0.15 -0.10IMPTRCRD 387 14,544 284,386 2.10 2.26 2.23 0.89 0.85 0.85 0.045 0.007 0.002 0.000 0.004 -0.19 -0.15IMPDISAB 384 14,477 283,175 1.92 2.06 2.02 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.047 0.008 0.002 0.005 0.033 -0.15 -0.11WRKFULL 401 15,573 303,476 2.32 2.21 2.17 1.21 1.18 1.17 0.060 0.009 0.002 0.074 0.011 0.09 0.13CAREDEP 402 15,551 302,847 2.01 1.96 1.92 1.15 1.09 1.07 0.057 0.009 0.002 0.298 0.072 0.05 0.09ACADUNP 399 15,481 301,765 1.66 1.71 1.67 0.93 0.95 0.93 0.046 0.008 0.002 0.239 0.804 -0.06 -0.01LACKFIN 399 15,524 302,492 2.32 2.41 2.38 1.24 1.19 1.19 0.062 0.010 0.002 0.126 0.330 -0.08 -0.05

TRANSFER 400 15,536 302,857 2.29 2.53 2.47 1.25 1.24 1.25 0.062 0.010 0.002 0.000 0.004 -0.19 -0.14FRNDSUPP 403 15,590 303,607 3.20 3.24 3.23 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.047 0.007 0.002 0.446 0.576 -0.04 -0.03FAMSUPP 401 15,555 302,746 3.52 3.52 3.50 0.79 0.80 0.80 0.039 0.006 0.001 0.995 0.608 0.00 0.03TOTCHRS 402 15,498 301,146 1.91 2.04 2.02 1.43 1.48 1.48 0.071 0.012 0.003 0.094 0.147 -0.08 -0.07OTHINST 402 15,494 301,259 1.49 1.45 1.42 1.15 1.09 1.05 0.057 0.009 0.002 0.489 0.197 0.03 0.06

ENTIREXP 404 15,497 301,275 3.17 3.17 3.15 0.68 0.67 0.68 0.034 0.005 0.001 0.960 0.592 0.00 0.03

* T-tests: 2-tailed M13

Page 101: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: All Students

* T-tests: 2-tailed M14

Page 102: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: All Students

* T-tests: 2-tailed M15

Page 103: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: All Students

* T-tests: 2-tailed M16

Page 104: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: All Students

* T-tests: 2-tailed M17

Page 105: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: All Students

* T-tests: 2-tailed M18

Page 106: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

COLLEGE ACTIVITIES

Academic, Intellectual and Social Experiences

4. In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following?

1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often, 4=Very often

a. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions CLQUEST Part - Time 2.81 2.86 2.88 Full - Time 3.02 2.95 2.94

b. Made a class presentation CLPRESEN Part - Time 1.79 1.93 1.90 Full - Time 2.08 2.30 * -0.24 2.24

c. Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before REWROPAP Part - Time 2.11 2.38 * -0.26 2.36 turning it in Full - Time 2.32 2.64 * -0.32 2.64 * -0.32

d. Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or INTEGRAT Part - Time 2.45 2.55 2.54 information from various sources Full - Time 2.72 2.93 * -0.24 2.92 * -0.23

e. Came to class without completing readings or assignments CLUNPREP Part - Time 1.82 1.83 1.82 Full - Time 1.93 1.95 1.98

f. Worked with other students on projects during class CLASSGRP Part - Time 2.40 2.37 2.38 Full - Time 2.57 2.56 2.56

g. Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare OCCGRP Part - Time 1.76 1.78 1.72 class assignments Full - Time 2.03 2.03 2.01

h. Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) TUTOR Part - Time 1.41 1.33 1.30 Full - Time 1.55 1.47 1.46

i. Participated in a community-based project as a part of a COMMPROJ Part - Time 1.17 1.25 1.23 regular course Full - Time 1.34 1.40 1.38

j. Used the Internet or instant messaging to work on an INTERNET Part - Time 2.45 2.70 2.65 assignment Full - Time 2.78 3.01 * -0.25 3.00 * -0.23

k. Used email to communicate with an instructor EMAIL Part - Time 2.00 2.35 * -0.35 2.28 * -0.28Full - Time 2.37 2.67 * -0.31 2.62 * -0.25

l. Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor FACGRADE Part - Time 2.42 2.44 2.40 Full - Time 2.59 2.65 2.61

m. Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor FACPLANS Part - Time 1.89 1.86 1.87 Full - Time 2.11 2.15 2.15

All Other Consortium N = 15924

All Other Consortium (Part-Time) N = 5232

All Other Consortium (Full-Time) N = 10692

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumOther Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

All Students N = 416 All Other Colleges N = 309597

All Other Colleges (Part-Time) N = 96164

All Other Colleges (Full-Time) N = 213433

All Part-Time Students N = 186

All Full-Time Students N = 230

* T-tests: 2-tailed M14

Page 107: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

COLLEGE ACTIVITIES

Academic, Intellectual, and Social Experiences continuedn. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with FACIDEAS Part - Time 1.72 1.66 1.64

instructors outside of class Full - Time 1.87 1.84 1.83 o. Received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on FACFEED Part - Time 2.62 2.61 2.64

your performance Full - Time 2.64 2.66 2.67 p. Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an WORKHARD Part - Time 2.27 2.52 * -0.27 2.46

instructor's standards or expectations Full - Time 2.45 2.66 * -0.24 2.60 q. Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework FACOTH Part - Time 1.33 1.34 1.32

Full - Time 1.51 1.49 1.49 r. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others OOCIDEAS Part - Time 2.48 2.49 2.51

outside of class (students, family members, coworkers, etc.) Full - Time 2.61 2.62 2.61 s. Had serious conversations with students of a different race DIVRSTUD Part - Time 2.41 2.34 2.29

or ethnicity than your own Full - Time 2.53 2.53 2.48 t. Had serious conversations with students who differ from you DIFFSTUD Part - Time 2.29 2.23 2.22

in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values Full - Time 2.51 2.46 2.48 u. Skipped class SKIPCLAS Part - Time 1.48 1.53 1.50

Full - Time 1.69 1.68 1.69

Character of Mental Activities

5. During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized the following mental activities?

a. Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your courses and MEMORIZE Part - Time 2.66 2.79 2.77 readings so you can repeat them in pretty much the same form Full - Time 2.90 2.91 2.89

b. Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory ANALYZE Part - Time 2.62 2.80 2.78 Full - Time 2.81 2.92 2.90

c. Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences SYNTHESZ Part - Time 2.46 2.67 2.64 in new ways Full - Time 2.71 2.81 2.77

d. Making judgments about the value or soundness of EVALUATE Part - Time 2.36 2.48 2.45 information, arguments, or methods Full - Time 2.55 2.69 2.65

e. Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new APPLYING Part - Time 2.47 2.59 2.55 situations Full - Time 2.61 2.75 2.72

f. Using information you have read or heard to perform a PERFORM Part - Time 2.59 2.70 2.66 new skill. Full - Time 2.73 2.87 2.81

1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often, 4=Very often

1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much

* T-tests: 2-tailed M15

Page 108: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

COLLEGE ACTIVITIES

Reading and Writing

6. During the current school year, about how much reading and writing have you done at this college?

a. Number of assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or READASGN Part - Time 2.68 2.69 2.67 book-length packs of course readings Full - Time 2.88 3.08 3.12 * -0.24

b. Number of books read on your own (not assigned) for READOWN Part - Time 2.01 2.05 2.09 personal enjoyment or academic enrichment Full - Time 2.05 2.03 2.06

c. Number of written papers or reports of any length WRITEANY Part - Time 2.36 2.57 2.57 Full - Time 2.80 3.09 * -0.27 3.16 * -0.33

Nature of Exams

7. Mark the box that best represents the extent to which your examinations during the current school year have challenged you

EXAMS Part - Time 4.76 5.00 4.97

to do your best work at this college Full - Time 5.05 5.02 5.03

OPINIONS ABOUT YOUR SCHOOL

Institutional Emphasis9. How much does this college emphasize each of the following?

a. Encouraging you to spend significant amounts of time ENVSCHOL Part - Time 2.80 2.90 2.89 studying Full - Time 2.94 3.02 3.02

b. Providing the support you need to help you succeed at this ENVSUPRT Part - Time 2.93 2.90 2.89 college Full - Time 2.96 2.99 2.98

c. Encouraging contact among students from different economic, ENVDIVRS Part - Time 2.34 2.43 2.40 social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds Full - Time 2.48 2.59 2.52

d. Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities ENVNACAD Part - Time 2.01 1.90 1.86 (work, family, etc.) Full - Time 1.93 2.03 1.96

e. Providing the support you need to thrive socially ENVSOCAL Part - Time 2.03 2.09 2.02 Full - Time 2.17 2.25 2.17

f. Providing the financial support you need to afford your FINSUPP Part - Time 2.20 2.30 2.24 education Full - Time 2.50 2.58 2.54

g. Using computers in academic work ENVCOMP Part - Time 3.01 3.00 2.95 Full - Time 3.16 3.27 3.25

1=None, 2=Between 1 and 4, 3=Between 5 and 10, 4=Between 11 and 20, 5=More than 20

1=Extremely easy to 7=Extremely challenging

1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much

* T-tests: 2-tailed M16

Page 109: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

WEEKLY ACTIVITIES

10. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7 - day week doing each of the following?

a. Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, ACADPR01 Part - Time 1.48 1.72 1.74 * -0.27doing homework, or other activities related to your program) Full - Time 1.89 2.02 2.09

b. Working for pay PAYWORK Part - Time 3.95 3.53 3.59 Full - Time 3.20 2.79 2.76 * 0.23

c. Participating in college-sponsored activities (organizations, campus COCURR01 Part - Time 0.11 0.17 0.18 publications, student government, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.) Full - Time 0.44 0.32 0.39

d. Providing care for dependents living with you (parents, children, CAREDE01 Part - Time 2.54 2.01 * 0.25 2.03 spouse, etc.) Full - Time 1.66 1.61 1.50

e. Commuting to and from classes COMMUTE Part - Time 1.14 1.26 1.23 Full - Time 1.38 1.47 1.43

Quality of Relationships

11. Mark the box that best represents the quality of your relationships with

people at this college.

a. Relationships with other students ENVSTU Part - Time 5.58 5.50 5.43 Full - Time 5.62 5.57 5.51

b. Relationships with instuctors ENVFAC Part - Time 5.87 5.70 5.70 Full - Time 5.66 5.58 5.57

c. Relationships with administrative personnel and offices ENVADM Part - Time 5.12 4.89 4.94 Full - Time 5.07 4.84 4.91

0=None, 1=1-5 hours/week, 2=6-10 hours/week, 3=11-20 hours/week, 4=21-30 hours/week, 5=More than 30 hours/week

1=Unfriendly, unsupportive, sense of alienation to 7=Friendly, supportive, sense of belonging

1=Unavailable, unhelpful, unsympathetic to 7=Available, helpful, sympathetic

1=Unhelpful, inconsiderate, rigid to 7=Helpful, considerate, flexible

* T-tests: 2-tailed M17

Page 110: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

EDUCATIONAL AND PERSONAL GROWTH

Knowledge, Skills & Personal Development

12. How much has YOUR EXPERIENCE AT THIS COLLEGE contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas?

a. Acquiring a broad general education GNGENLED Part - Time 2.75 2.90 2.85 Full - Time 3.01 3.07 3.04

b. Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills GNWORK Part - Time 2.53 2.49 2.48 Full - Time 2.65 2.65 2.62

c. Writing clearly and effectively GNWRITE Part - Time 2.46 2.62 2.59 Full - Time 2.66 2.86 * -0.22 2.80

d. Speaking clearly and effectively GNSPEAK Part - Time 2.46 2.56 2.50 Full - Time 2.60 2.79 2.70

e. Thinking critically and analytically GNANALY Part - Time 2.71 2.82 2.78 Full - Time 2.91 2.99 2.95

f. Solving numerical problems GNSOLVE Part - Time 2.50 2.57 2.47 Full - Time 2.76 2.75 2.70

g. Using computing and information technology GNCMPTS Part - Time 2.54 2.67 2.58 Full - Time 2.75 2.90 2.83

h. Working effectively with others GNOTHERS Part - Time 2.63 2.68 2.62 Full - Time 2.73 2.87 2.79

i. Learning effectively on your own GNINQ Part - Time 2.71 2.87 2.83 Full - Time 2.91 3.00 2.94

j. Understanding yourself GNSELF Part - Time 2.42 2.58 2.50 Full - Time 2.54 2.75 2.65

k. Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds GNDIVERS Part - Time 2.16 2.36 2.27 Full - Time 2.31 2.55 * -0.24 2.44

l. Developing a personal code of values and ethics GNETHICS Part - Time 2.18 2.33 2.24 Full - Time 2.34 2.53 2.42

m. Contributing to the welfare of your community GNCOMMUN Part - Time 1.83 1.97 1.91 Full - Time 2.12 2.12 2.05

n. Developing clearer career goals CARGOAL Part - Time 2.57 2.57 2.53 Full - Time 2.69 2.82 2.74

o. Gaining information about career opportunities GAINCAR Part - Time 2.55 2.44 2.41 Full - Time 2.59 2.71 2.64

1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much

* T-tests: 2-tailed M18

Page 111: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

STUDENT SERVICES

13.1 How often do you use the following services?a. Frequency: Academic advising/planning USEACAD Part - Time 1.62 1.68 1.69

Full - Time 1.70 1.80 1.81 b. Frequency: Career counseling USECACOU Part - Time 1.46 1.41 1.41

Full - Time 1.54 1.50 1.46 c. Frequency: Job placement assistance USEJOBPL Part - Time 1.30 1.21 1.21

Full - Time 1.32 1.28 1.29 d. Frequency: Peer or other tutoring USETUTOR Part - Time 1.48 1.46 1.42

Full - Time 1.61 1.54 1.50 e. Frequency: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) USELAB Part - Time 1.74 1.69 1.66

Full - Time 1.72 1.78 1.77 f. Frequency: Child care USECHLD Part - Time 1.27 1.15 1.16

Full - Time 1.27 1.22 1.20 g. Frequency: Financial aid advising USEFAADV Part - Time 1.75 1.74 1.73

Full - Time 1.82 1.92 1.89 h. Frequency: Computer lab USECOMLB Part - Time 2.16 2.01 1.97

Full - Time 2.37 2.28 2.24 i. Frequency: Student organizations USESTORG Part - Time 1.41 1.28 1.26

Full - Time 1.43 1.41 1.43 j. Frequency: Transfer credit assistance USETRCRD Part - Time 1.47 1.49 1.51

Full - Time 1.44 1.59 1.60 k. Frequency: Services to students with disabilities USEDISAB Part - Time 1.24 1.27 1.27

Full - Time 1.36 1.32 1.33

0=Don’t know/N.A, 1=Rarely/never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often

* T-tests: 2-tailed M19

Page 112: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

STUDENT SERVICES

13.2 How satisfied are you with the services?a. Satisfaction: Academic advising/planning SATACAD Part - Time 2.19 2.17 2.20

Full - Time 2.23 2.19 2.22 b. Satisfaction: Career counseling SATCACOU Part - Time 2.12 2.03 2.03

Full - Time 2.15 2.09 2.06 c. Satisfaction: Job placement assistance SATJOBPL Part - Time 1.86 1.82 1.78

Full - Time 1.98 1.87 1.86 d. Satisfaction: Peer or other tutoring SATTUTOR Part - Time 2.28 2.13 2.11

Full - Time 2.33 2.19 2.17 e. Satisfaction: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) SATLAB Part - Time 2.15 2.25 2.23

Full - Time 2.19 2.29 2.28 f. Satisfaction: Child care SATCHLD Part - Time 1.93 1.78 1.71

Full - Time 1.81 1.82 1.80 g. Satisfaction: Financial aid advising SATFAADV Part - Time 2.20 2.14 2.14

Full - Time 2.25 2.22 2.22 h. Satisfaction: Computer lab SATCOMLB Part - Time 2.47 2.49 2.46

Full - Time 2.63 2.56 2.53 i. Satisfaction: Student organizations SATSTORG Part - Time 1.83 1.91 1.89

Full - Time 1.98 2.02 2.02 j. Satisfaction: Transfer credit assistance SATTRCRD Part - Time 2.00 2.07 2.05

Full - Time 2.19 2.07 2.08 k. Satisfaction: Services to students with disabilities SATDISAB Part - Time 1.91 1.99 1.96

Full - Time 2.13 2.06 2.05

0=N.A.,1=Not at all, 2=Somewhat, 3=Very

* T-tests: 2-tailed M20

Page 113: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

STUDENT SERVICES

13.3 How important are the services to you?a. Importance: Academic advising/planning IMPACAD Part - Time 2.33 2.49 2.45

Full - Time 2.37 2.59 * -0.35 2.57 * -0.32b. Importance: Career counseling IMPCACOU Part - Time 2.28 2.30 2.24

Full - Time 2.30 2.38 2.34 c. Importance: Job placement assistance IMPJOBPL Part - Time 1.90 1.99 1.96

Full - Time 2.01 2.08 2.08 d. Importance: Peer or other tutoring IMPTUTOR Part - Time 2.10 2.12 2.03

Full - Time 2.20 2.21 2.15 e. Importance: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) IMPLAB Part - Time 2.13 2.20 2.13

Full - Time 2.17 2.29 2.25 f. Importance: Child care IMPCHLD Part - Time 1.73 1.76 1.70

Full - Time 1.82 1.81 1.76 g. Importance: Financial aid advising IMPFAADV Part - Time 2.24 2.33 2.29

Full - Time 2.25 2.49 * -0.31 2.48 * -0.30h. Importance: Computer lab IMPCOMLB Part - Time 2.33 2.40 2.34

Full - Time 2.59 2.59 2.56 i. Importance: Student organizations IMPSTORG Part - Time 1.68 1.80 1.74

Full - Time 1.92 1.93 1.91 j. Importance: Transfer credit assistance IMPTRCRD Part - Time 2.07 2.22 2.17

Full - Time 2.20 2.32 2.31 k. Importance: Services to students with disabilities IMPDISAB Part - Time 1.90 2.02 1.98

Full - Time 2.01 2.11 2.09

1=Not at all, 2=Somewhat, 3=Very

* T-tests: 2-tailed M21

Page 114: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student EngagementMeans Summary Report: Enrollment Status Breakout

Your College

Item Variable Class Mean Mean Sig* Effect Size Mean Sig* Effect Size

Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

COLLEGE EXPERIENCES

14. How likely is it that the following issues would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college?

a. Working full-time WRKFULL Part - Time 2.34 2.25 2.21 Full - Time 2.23 2.16 2.11

b. Caring for dependents CAREDEP Part - Time 2.04 1.97 1.93 Full - Time 1.94 1.93 1.90

c. Academically unprepared ACADUNP Part - Time 1.65 1.68 1.65 Full - Time 1.67 1.75 1.70

d. Lack of finances LACKFIN Part - Time 2.30 2.41 2.37 Full - Time 2.40 2.42 2.39

e. Transfer to a 4-year college or university TRANSFER Part - Time 2.16 2.43 2.36 Full - Time 2.70 2.68 2.64

15. How supportive are your friends of your attending this FRNDSUPP Part - Time 3.18 3.23 3.23 college? Full - Time 3.27 3.25 3.23

16. How supportive is your immediate family of your attending FAMSUPP Part - Time 3.51 3.48 3.48 this college? Full - Time 3.56 3.58 3.53

23. How many TOTAL credit hours have you earned at this college, TOTCHRS Part - Time 1.84 1.94 1.87 not counting the courses you are currently taking this term? Full - Time 2.16 2.18 2.20

25. How many classes are you presently taking at OTHER OTHINST Part - Time 1.49 1.44 1.42 institutions? Full - Time 1.49 1.46 1.42

27. How would you evaluate your entire educational experience ENTIREXP Part - Time 3.19 3.17 3.16 at this college? Full - Time 3.10 3.17 3.14

1=None, 2=1 class, 3=2 classes, 4=3 classes, 5=4 classes or more

1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Excellent

1=Not likely, 2=Somewhat likely, 3=Likely, 4=Very likely

1=Not very, 2=Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Extremely

1=Not very, 2=Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Extremely

0=None, 1=1-14 credits, 2=15-29 credits, 3=30-44 credits, 4=45-60 credits, 5= over 60 credits

* T-tests: 2-tailed M22

Page 115: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

CLQUEST 185 5,226 96,006 2.81 2.86 2.88 0.84 0.84 0.85 0.062 0.012 0.003 0.449 0.260 -0.06 -0.08CLPRESEN 185 5,192 95,535 1.79 1.93 1.90 0.86 0.92 0.90 0.063 0.013 0.003 0.037 0.097 -0.16 -0.12REWROPAP 183 5,178 95,207 2.11 2.38 2.36 0.97 1.04 1.04 0.071 0.014 0.003 0.001 0.001 -0.26 -0.24INTEGRAT 184 5,163 95,272 2.45 2.55 2.54 0.93 0.97 0.98 0.068 0.014 0.003 0.167 0.170 -0.10 -0.10CLUNPREP 186 5,165 95,082 1.82 1.83 1.82 0.77 0.73 0.73 0.056 0.010 0.002 0.834 0.995 -0.02 0.00CLASSGRP 182 5,165 94,927 2.40 2.37 2.38 0.90 0.93 0.91 0.067 0.013 0.003 0.673 0.797 0.03 0.02OCCGRP 184 5,182 95,291 1.76 1.78 1.72 0.87 0.88 0.85 0.064 0.012 0.003 0.739 0.617 -0.02 0.04TUTOR 184 5,194 95,544 1.41 1.33 1.30 0.70 0.67 0.63 0.052 0.009 0.002 0.112 0.015 0.12 0.18

COMMPROJ 183 5,181 95,079 1.17 1.25 1.23 0.52 0.61 0.57 0.038 0.008 0.002 0.098 0.208 -0.12 -0.09INTERNET 186 5,160 95,082 2.45 2.70 2.65 1.09 1.05 1.05 0.080 0.015 0.003 0.001 0.009 -0.24 -0.19

EMAIL 186 5,177 95,114 2.00 2.35 2.28 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.073 0.014 0.003 0.000 0.000 -0.35 -0.28FACGRADE 183 5,170 95,165 2.42 2.44 2.40 0.84 0.86 0.85 0.062 0.012 0.003 0.761 0.799 -0.02 0.02FACPLANS 183 5,173 95,051 1.89 1.86 1.87 0.86 0.84 0.84 0.063 0.012 0.003 0.616 0.783 0.04 0.02FACIDEAS 186 5,156 94,863 1.72 1.66 1.64 0.81 0.80 0.79 0.060 0.011 0.003 0.352 0.176 0.07 0.10FACFEED 182 5,161 94,984 2.62 2.61 2.64 0.97 0.88 0.87 0.072 0.012 0.003 0.974 0.760 0.00 -0.02

WORKHARD 186 5,171 95,128 2.27 2.52 2.46 0.85 0.89 0.88 0.063 0.012 0.003 0.000 0.004 -0.27 -0.21FACOTH 179 5,117 94,320 1.33 1.34 1.32 0.73 0.67 0.65 0.055 0.009 0.002 0.847 0.859 -0.01 0.01

OOCIDEAS 186 5,178 95,435 2.48 2.49 2.51 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.070 0.013 0.003 0.899 0.706 -0.01 -0.03DIVRSTUD 186 5,181 95,327 2.41 2.34 2.29 1.03 1.03 1.03 0.075 0.014 0.003 0.370 0.104 0.07 0.12DIFFSTUD 185 5,182 95,230 2.29 2.23 2.22 1.06 1.01 1.00 0.078 0.014 0.003 0.459 0.357 0.06 0.07SKIPCLAS 185 5,191 95,496 1.48 1.53 1.50 0.64 0.67 0.64 0.047 0.009 0.002 0.250 0.556 -0.09 -0.04MEMORIZE 186 5,205 95,739 2.66 2.79 2.77 0.89 0.90 0.91 0.065 0.013 0.003 0.065 0.111 -0.14 -0.12ANALYZE 186 5,186 95,414 2.62 2.80 2.78 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.058 0.012 0.003 0.005 0.011 -0.21 -0.19

SYNTHESZ 184 5,167 94,964 2.46 2.67 2.64 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.065 0.012 0.003 0.002 0.005 -0.23 -0.21EVALUATE 185 5,171 95,147 2.36 2.48 2.45 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.070 0.013 0.003 0.098 0.180 -0.12 -0.10APPLYING 185 5,181 95,313 2.47 2.59 2.55 0.94 0.92 0.92 0.069 0.013 0.003 0.083 0.212 -0.13 -0.09PERFORM 186 5,194 95,634 2.59 2.70 2.66 0.89 0.92 0.93 0.065 0.013 0.003 0.100 0.321 -0.12 -0.07

READASGN 182 5,124 94,501 2.68 2.69 2.67 1.08 1.00 1.00 0.080 0.014 0.003 0.869 0.905 -0.01 0.01READOWN 182 5,135 94,590 2.01 2.05 2.09 1.01 0.98 1.00 0.075 0.014 0.003 0.562 0.298 -0.04 -0.08WRITEANY 182 5,117 94,436 2.36 2.57 2.57 1.05 1.06 1.10 0.078 0.015 0.004 0.009 0.008 -0.20 -0.20

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: Part - Time Students

* T-tests: 2-tailed M23

Page 116: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: Part - Time Students

EXAMS 175 4,840 90,001 4.76 5.00 4.97 1.29 1.25 1.24 0.097 0.018 0.004 0.013 0.023 -0.19 -0.17ENVSCHOL 182 5,131 94,477 2.80 2.90 2.89 0.81 0.85 0.85 0.060 0.012 0.003 0.109 0.145 -0.12 -0.11ENVSUPRT 182 5,112 94,286 2.93 2.90 2.89 0.69 0.86 0.86 0.051 0.012 0.003 0.615 0.513 0.04 0.05ENVDIVRS 181 5,101 93,943 2.34 2.43 2.40 0.91 0.99 1.00 0.067 0.014 0.003 0.220 0.393 -0.09 -0.06ENVNACAD 182 5,101 93,907 2.01 1.90 1.86 1.00 0.96 0.94 0.074 0.013 0.003 0.121 0.030 0.12 0.16ENVSOCAL 181 5,073 93,403 2.03 2.09 2.02 0.92 0.94 0.92 0.068 0.013 0.003 0.417 0.856 -0.06 0.01FINSUPP 182 5,076 93,473 2.20 2.30 2.24 1.11 1.11 1.10 0.083 0.016 0.004 0.240 0.563 -0.09 -0.04

ENVCOMP 182 5,115 94,179 3.01 3.00 2.95 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.071 0.014 0.003 0.928 0.458 0.01 0.06ACADPR01 181 5,128 94,369 1.48 1.72 1.74 0.88 0.98 0.98 0.065 0.014 0.003 0.001 0.000 -0.25 -0.27PAYWORK 180 5,100 93,942 3.95 3.53 3.59 1.76 1.91 1.87 0.131 0.027 0.006 0.004 0.009 0.22 0.19COCURR01 181 5,114 94,092 0.11 0.17 0.18 0.45 0.55 0.57 0.033 0.008 0.002 0.125 0.129 -0.12 -0.11CAREDE01 181 5,106 93,899 2.54 2.01 2.03 2.20 2.08 2.11 0.164 0.029 0.007 0.001 0.001 0.25 0.24COMMUTE 179 5,100 94,034 1.14 1.26 1.23 0.79 0.86 0.80 0.059 0.012 0.003 0.070 0.138 -0.14 -0.11

ENVSTU 182 5,130 94,313 5.58 5.50 5.43 1.33 1.36 1.36 0.099 0.019 0.004 0.400 0.140 0.06 0.11ENVFAC 182 5,125 94,421 5.87 5.70 5.70 1.17 1.27 1.26 0.087 0.018 0.004 0.072 0.063 0.14 0.14ENVADM 182 5,116 94,123 5.12 4.89 4.94 1.49 1.60 1.57 0.111 0.022 0.005 0.056 0.140 0.14 0.11

GNGENLED 182 5,106 94,090 2.75 2.90 2.85 0.87 0.88 0.89 0.064 0.012 0.003 0.029 0.147 -0.16 -0.11GNWORK 180 5,096 93,917 2.53 2.49 2.48 0.97 1.04 1.03 0.072 0.015 0.003 0.628 0.544 0.04 0.05GNWRITE 182 5,096 93,897 2.46 2.62 2.59 0.99 0.95 0.96 0.073 0.013 0.003 0.024 0.075 -0.17 -0.13GNSPEAK 180 5,095 93,843 2.46 2.56 2.50 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.071 0.014 0.003 0.143 0.557 -0.11 -0.04GNANALY 182 5,097 93,829 2.71 2.82 2.78 0.90 0.89 0.90 0.067 0.012 0.003 0.102 0.339 -0.12 -0.07GNSOLVE 181 5,087 93,667 2.50 2.57 2.47 0.98 1.00 1.01 0.072 0.014 0.003 0.389 0.698 -0.07 0.03GNCMPTS 181 5,088 93,757 2.54 2.67 2.58 1.05 1.01 1.03 0.078 0.014 0.003 0.088 0.522 -0.13 -0.05

GNOTHERS 181 5,092 93,798 2.63 2.68 2.62 0.93 0.94 0.93 0.069 0.013 0.003 0.465 0.895 -0.06 0.01GNINQ 181 5,103 93,847 2.71 2.87 2.83 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.066 0.013 0.003 0.014 0.063 -0.19 -0.14

GNSELF 181 5,091 93,727 2.42 2.58 2.50 0.97 1.01 1.01 0.072 0.014 0.003 0.038 0.262 -0.16 -0.08GNDIVERS 180 5,083 93,660 2.16 2.36 2.27 0.97 1.02 1.01 0.072 0.014 0.003 0.008 0.129 -0.20 -0.11GNETHICS 179 5,082 93,663 2.18 2.33 2.24 0.97 1.02 1.01 0.073 0.014 0.003 0.044 0.396 -0.15 -0.06

GNCOMMUN 179 5,076 93,436 1.83 1.97 1.91 0.85 0.96 0.95 0.064 0.014 0.003 0.058 0.258 -0.14 -0.08CARGOAL 180 5,093 93,764 2.57 2.57 2.53 0.98 1.03 1.02 0.073 0.014 0.003 0.982 0.609 0.00 0.04

* T-tests: 2-tailed M24

Page 117: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: Part - Time Students

GAINCAR 181 5,101 93,924 2.55 2.44 2.41 1.01 1.03 1.03 0.075 0.014 0.003 0.172 0.074 0.10 0.13USEACAD 156 4,496 81,893 1.62 1.68 1.69 0.63 0.67 0.67 0.050 0.010 0.002 0.308 0.221 -0.08 -0.10

USECACOU 145 3,951 70,828 1.46 1.41 1.41 0.63 0.60 0.60 0.053 0.010 0.002 0.282 0.300 0.09 0.09USEJOBPL 105 2,809 50,518 1.30 1.21 1.21 0.52 0.49 0.49 0.050 0.009 0.002 0.073 0.065 0.18 0.18USETUTOR 116 3,517 62,304 1.48 1.46 1.42 0.70 0.67 0.65 0.065 0.011 0.003 0.765 0.327 0.03 0.09

USELAB 122 3,754 66,463 1.74 1.69 1.66 0.77 0.77 0.76 0.070 0.013 0.003 0.477 0.229 0.07 0.11USECHLD 64 2,099 37,487 1.27 1.15 1.16 0.54 0.46 0.48 0.068 0.010 0.002 0.044 0.065 0.26 0.23

USEFAADV 112 3,643 65,391 1.75 1.74 1.73 0.80 0.78 0.78 0.076 0.013 0.003 0.877 0.815 0.01 0.02USECOMLB 145 4,166 74,611 2.16 2.01 1.97 0.78 0.80 0.81 0.065 0.012 0.003 0.033 0.004 0.18 0.24USESTORG 76 2,820 50,135 1.41 1.28 1.26 0.57 0.57 0.55 0.065 0.011 0.002 0.047 0.024 0.23 0.26USETRCRD 85 3,148 56,690 1.47 1.49 1.51 0.61 0.67 0.67 0.066 0.012 0.003 0.743 0.617 -0.04 -0.05USEDISAB 59 1,995 35,968 1.24 1.27 1.27 0.57 0.60 0.60 0.074 0.013 0.003 0.699 0.709 -0.05 -0.05SATACAD 134 3,858 69,757 2.19 2.17 2.20 0.63 0.64 0.65 0.054 0.010 0.002 0.716 0.852 0.03 -0.02

SATCACOU 117 2,781 49,451 2.12 2.03 2.03 0.71 0.70 0.71 0.066 0.013 0.003 0.196 0.168 0.12 0.13SATJOBPL 73 1,620 28,672 1.86 1.82 1.78 0.71 0.73 0.73 0.083 0.018 0.004 0.617 0.337 0.06 0.11SATTUTOR 86 2,372 40,031 2.28 2.13 2.11 0.71 0.72 0.73 0.077 0.015 0.004 0.053 0.034 0.21 0.23

SATLAB 98 2,711 47,008 2.15 2.25 2.23 0.68 0.67 0.68 0.069 0.013 0.003 0.155 0.264 -0.15 -0.11SATCHLD 40 1,053 17,758 1.93 1.78 1.71 0.80 0.80 0.78 0.126 0.025 0.006 0.255 0.087 0.18 0.27

SATFAADV 93 2,866 50,653 2.20 2.14 2.14 0.77 0.76 0.77 0.080 0.014 0.003 0.423 0.433 0.08 0.08SATCOMLB 129 3,516 61,788 2.47 2.49 2.46 0.63 0.63 0.64 0.055 0.011 0.003 0.725 0.774 -0.03 0.03SATSTORG 53 1,677 28,498 1.83 1.91 1.89 0.67 0.71 0.71 0.092 0.017 0.004 0.403 0.527 -0.12 -0.09SATTRCRD 69 2,250 40,416 2.00 2.07 2.05 0.80 0.74 0.73 0.097 0.016 0.004 0.434 0.567 -0.10 -0.07SATDISAB 35 1,208 20,543 1.91 1.99 1.96 0.74 0.79 0.79 0.126 0.023 0.006 0.577 0.732 -0.10 -0.06IMPACAD 177 4,860 89,508 2.33 2.49 2.45 0.77 0.70 0.72 0.058 0.010 0.002 0.004 0.024 -0.22 -0.17

IMPCACOU 173 4,781 88,360 2.28 2.30 2.24 0.79 0.80 0.82 0.060 0.012 0.003 0.818 0.471 -0.02 0.05IMPJOBPL 173 4,717 87,088 1.90 1.99 1.96 0.85 0.86 0.86 0.065 0.012 0.003 0.147 0.358 -0.11 -0.07IMPTUTOR 173 4,729 87,028 2.10 2.12 2.03 0.84 0.83 0.84 0.064 0.012 0.003 0.775 0.272 -0.02 0.08

IMPLAB 173 4,706 86,713 2.13 2.20 2.13 0.81 0.82 0.83 0.061 0.012 0.003 0.254 0.992 -0.09 0.00IMPCHLD 173 4,670 86,342 1.73 1.76 1.70 0.85 0.88 0.86 0.065 0.013 0.003 0.681 0.692 -0.03 0.03

IMPFAADV 174 4,709 87,086 2.24 2.33 2.29 0.90 0.85 0.86 0.068 0.012 0.003 0.185 0.480 -0.10 -0.05

* T-tests: 2-tailed M25

Page 118: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: Part - Time Students

IMPCOMLB 173 4,730 87,473 2.33 2.40 2.34 0.79 0.77 0.80 0.060 0.011 0.003 0.249 0.843 -0.09 -0.02IMPSTORG 170 4,672 85,959 1.68 1.80 1.74 0.80 0.80 0.78 0.061 0.012 0.003 0.050 0.273 -0.15 -0.08IMPTRCRD 174 4,755 87,095 2.07 2.22 2.17 0.90 0.86 0.87 0.068 0.012 0.003 0.027 0.114 -0.17 -0.12IMPDISAB 173 4,711 86,705 1.90 2.02 1.98 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.070 0.013 0.003 0.079 0.252 -0.14 -0.09WRKFULL 183 5,099 93,883 2.34 2.25 2.21 1.20 1.18 1.18 0.089 0.017 0.004 0.269 0.130 0.08 0.11CAREDEP 184 5,091 93,625 2.04 1.97 1.93 1.14 1.10 1.08 0.084 0.015 0.004 0.405 0.183 0.06 0.10ACADUNP 183 5,075 93,243 1.65 1.68 1.65 0.93 0.94 0.92 0.069 0.013 0.003 0.630 0.941 -0.04 0.01LACKFIN 181 5,083 93,564 2.30 2.41 2.37 1.22 1.20 1.19 0.090 0.017 0.004 0.238 0.422 -0.09 -0.06

TRANSFER 183 5,091 93,557 2.16 2.43 2.36 1.22 1.24 1.24 0.090 0.017 0.004 0.003 0.028 -0.22 -0.16FRNDSUPP 184 5,109 93,922 3.18 3.23 3.23 0.96 0.89 0.89 0.070 0.012 0.003 0.425 0.483 -0.06 -0.05FAMSUPP 182 5,098 93,688 3.51 3.48 3.48 0.80 0.82 0.81 0.059 0.012 0.003 0.717 0.612 0.03 0.04TOTCHRS 184 5,090 93,172 1.84 1.94 1.87 1.40 1.49 1.49 0.103 0.021 0.005 0.360 0.729 -0.07 -0.03OTHINST 182 5,088 93,263 1.49 1.44 1.42 1.11 1.01 0.99 0.082 0.014 0.003 0.525 0.361 0.05 0.07

ENTIREXP 184 5,095 93,282 3.19 3.17 3.16 0.65 0.67 0.67 0.048 0.009 0.002 0.627 0.548 0.04 0.04

* T-tests: 2-tailed M26

Page 119: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

CLQUEST 230 10,682 213,173 3.02 2.95 2.94 0.87 0.83 0.84 0.057 0.008 0.002 0.186 0.156 0.09 0.09CLPRESEN 230 10,644 212,398 2.08 2.30 2.24 0.91 0.92 0.89 0.060 0.009 0.002 0.000 0.008 -0.24 -0.18REWROPAP 229 10,599 211,689 2.32 2.64 2.64 1.00 0.98 0.99 0.066 0.010 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.32 -0.32INTEGRAT 227 10,611 211,982 2.72 2.93 2.92 0.90 0.86 0.86 0.060 0.008 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.24 -0.23CLUNPREP 227 10,574 211,314 1.93 1.95 1.98 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.049 0.007 0.002 0.650 0.287 -0.03 -0.07CLASSGRP 227 10,568 210,961 2.57 2.56 2.56 0.90 0.86 0.84 0.059 0.008 0.002 0.823 0.890 0.02 0.01OCCGRP 229 10,593 211,597 2.03 2.03 2.01 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.059 0.009 0.002 0.943 0.763 0.00 0.02TUTOR 229 10,625 212,191 1.55 1.47 1.46 0.81 0.76 0.76 0.053 0.007 0.002 0.081 0.049 0.12 0.13

COMMPROJ 229 10,567 211,355 1.34 1.40 1.38 0.73 0.74 0.71 0.048 0.007 0.002 0.267 0.410 -0.07 -0.05INTERNET 228 10,573 211,304 2.78 3.01 3.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.066 0.009 0.002 0.000 0.001 -0.25 -0.23

EMAIL 229 10,572 211,557 2.37 2.67 2.62 1.01 0.97 0.99 0.067 0.009 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.31 -0.25FACGRADE 228 10,593 211,675 2.59 2.65 2.61 0.87 0.85 0.85 0.058 0.008 0.002 0.309 0.646 -0.07 -0.03FACPLANS 230 10,565 211,435 2.11 2.15 2.15 0.91 0.89 0.89 0.060 0.009 0.002 0.539 0.448 -0.04 -0.05FACIDEAS 229 10,559 211,228 1.87 1.84 1.83 0.85 0.85 0.84 0.056 0.008 0.002 0.585 0.496 0.04 0.05FACFEED 228 10,572 211,385 2.64 2.66 2.67 0.85 0.84 0.83 0.056 0.008 0.002 0.746 0.546 -0.02 -0.04

WORKHARD 229 10,595 211,661 2.45 2.66 2.60 0.85 0.88 0.86 0.056 0.009 0.002 0.000 0.008 -0.24 -0.18FACOTH 226 10,489 210,029 1.51 1.49 1.49 0.80 0.77 0.76 0.053 0.008 0.002 0.735 0.683 0.02 0.03

OOCIDEAS 229 10,617 212,238 2.61 2.62 2.61 0.86 0.93 0.92 0.057 0.009 0.002 0.830 0.982 -0.01 0.00DIVRSTUD 227 10,614 212,172 2.53 2.53 2.48 1.08 1.04 1.04 0.072 0.010 0.002 0.973 0.457 0.00 0.05DIFFSTUD 225 10,612 211,982 2.51 2.46 2.48 1.05 1.03 1.01 0.070 0.010 0.002 0.536 0.688 0.04 0.03SKIPCLAS 230 10,636 212,396 1.69 1.68 1.69 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.045 0.007 0.001 0.762 0.999 0.02 0.00MEMORIZE 229 10,645 212,850 2.90 2.91 2.89 0.89 0.87 0.86 0.059 0.008 0.002 0.862 0.799 -0.01 0.02ANALYZE 228 10,619 212,295 2.81 2.92 2.90 0.82 0.82 0.81 0.054 0.008 0.002 0.050 0.119 -0.13 -0.10

SYNTHESZ 227 10,569 211,415 2.71 2.81 2.77 0.87 0.85 0.85 0.058 0.008 0.002 0.093 0.343 -0.11 -0.06EVALUATE 229 10,597 211,754 2.55 2.69 2.65 0.89 0.90 0.89 0.059 0.009 0.002 0.023 0.110 -0.15 -0.11APPLYING 228 10,606 212,090 2.61 2.75 2.72 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.059 0.009 0.002 0.023 0.064 -0.15 -0.12PERFORM 227 10,648 212,723 2.73 2.87 2.81 0.91 0.90 0.90 0.061 0.009 0.002 0.026 0.175 -0.15 -0.09

READASGN 227 10,530 210,737 2.88 3.08 3.12 0.98 1.03 1.02 0.065 0.010 0.002 0.004 0.000 -0.19 -0.24READOWN 228 10,538 210,949 2.05 2.03 2.06 1.06 0.97 1.00 0.070 0.009 0.002 0.765 0.887 0.02 -0.01WRITEANY 227 10,523 210,699 2.80 3.09 3.16 1.09 1.06 1.07 0.073 0.010 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.27 -0.33

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: Full - Time Students

* T-tests: 2-tailed M27

Page 120: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: Full - Time Students

EXAMS 217 10,120 202,923 5.05 5.02 5.03 1.18 1.16 1.15 0.080 0.012 0.003 0.678 0.808 0.03 0.02ENVSCHOL 227 10,531 211,035 2.94 3.02 3.02 0.88 0.84 0.83 0.058 0.008 0.002 0.124 0.140 -0.10 -0.10ENVSUPRT 226 10,519 210,803 2.96 2.99 2.98 0.88 0.86 0.85 0.059 0.008 0.002 0.600 0.792 -0.04 -0.02ENVDIVRS 225 10,497 210,444 2.48 2.59 2.52 1.05 1.01 1.00 0.070 0.010 0.002 0.125 0.570 -0.10 -0.04ENVNACAD 228 10,499 210,515 1.93 2.03 1.96 0.99 0.98 0.96 0.065 0.010 0.002 0.104 0.562 -0.11 -0.04ENVSOCAL 226 10,450 209,625 2.17 2.25 2.17 0.96 0.95 0.93 0.064 0.009 0.002 0.190 0.977 -0.09 0.00FINSUPP 226 10,486 210,013 2.50 2.58 2.54 1.12 1.11 1.10 0.075 0.011 0.002 0.299 0.596 -0.07 -0.04

ENVCOMP 228 10,510 210,805 3.16 3.27 3.25 0.89 0.85 0.85 0.059 0.008 0.002 0.051 0.140 -0.13 -0.10ACADPR01 225 10,502 210,315 1.89 2.02 2.09 1.15 1.13 1.15 0.077 0.011 0.002 0.084 0.008 -0.12 -0.18PAYWORK 225 10,475 209,779 3.20 2.79 2.76 1.87 1.95 1.92 0.125 0.019 0.004 0.002 0.000 0.21 0.23COCURR01 226 10,483 210,064 0.44 0.32 0.39 0.97 0.76 0.87 0.065 0.007 0.002 0.021 0.336 0.15 0.06CAREDE01 226 10,456 209,610 1.66 1.61 1.50 1.99 1.91 1.91 0.133 0.019 0.004 0.656 0.209 0.03 0.08COMMUTE 226 10,468 209,821 1.38 1.47 1.43 0.98 1.00 0.96 0.065 0.010 0.002 0.191 0.455 -0.09 -0.05

ENVSTU 225 10,521 210,530 5.62 5.57 5.51 1.30 1.32 1.33 0.086 0.013 0.003 0.541 0.211 0.04 0.08ENVFAC 225 10,515 210,614 5.66 5.58 5.57 1.37 1.28 1.25 0.092 0.013 0.003 0.340 0.297 0.06 0.07ENVADM 226 10,507 210,460 5.07 4.84 4.91 1.77 1.62 1.58 0.118 0.016 0.003 0.042 0.130 0.14 0.10

GNGENLED 225 10,499 210,421 3.01 3.07 3.04 0.83 0.81 0.81 0.055 0.008 0.002 0.238 0.567 -0.08 -0.04GNWORK 225 10,475 210,076 2.65 2.65 2.62 1.05 1.01 1.01 0.070 0.010 0.002 0.961 0.637 0.00 0.03GNWRITE 224 10,485 210,199 2.66 2.86 2.80 0.92 0.88 0.89 0.062 0.009 0.002 0.001 0.015 -0.22 -0.16GNSPEAK 224 10,477 210,151 2.60 2.79 2.70 0.96 0.92 0.93 0.064 0.009 0.002 0.002 0.092 -0.21 -0.11GNANALY 225 10,482 209,997 2.91 2.99 2.95 0.87 0.85 0.84 0.058 0.008 0.002 0.157 0.545 -0.10 -0.04GNSOLVE 225 10,478 209,985 2.76 2.75 2.70 0.96 0.95 0.94 0.064 0.009 0.002 0.921 0.352 0.01 0.06GNCMPTS 224 10,484 209,964 2.75 2.90 2.83 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.064 0.009 0.002 0.023 0.222 -0.15 -0.08

GNOTHERS 225 10,485 210,059 2.73 2.87 2.79 0.94 0.91 0.89 0.063 0.009 0.002 0.025 0.316 -0.15 -0.07GNINQ 224 10,484 210,044 2.91 3.00 2.94 0.86 0.87 0.87 0.057 0.009 0.002 0.128 0.598 -0.10 -0.04

GNSELF 225 10,480 209,859 2.54 2.75 2.65 1.03 1.00 1.00 0.069 0.010 0.002 0.002 0.113 -0.21 -0.11GNDIVERS 225 10,466 209,759 2.31 2.55 2.44 1.04 1.01 1.00 0.070 0.010 0.002 0.000 0.048 -0.24 -0.13GNETHICS 225 10,473 209,770 2.34 2.53 2.42 1.02 1.01 1.00 0.068 0.010 0.002 0.005 0.194 -0.19 -0.09

GNCOMMUN 225 10,448 209,389 2.12 2.12 2.05 1.01 0.99 0.97 0.068 0.010 0.002 0.964 0.239 0.00 0.08CARGOAL 224 10,480 209,997 2.69 2.82 2.74 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.066 0.010 0.002 0.047 0.472 -0.13 -0.05

* T-tests: 2-tailed M28

Page 121: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: Full - Time Students

GAINCAR 225 10,501 210,292 2.59 2.71 2.64 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.067 0.010 0.002 0.077 0.429 -0.12 -0.05USEACAD 199 9,679 194,673 1.70 1.80 1.81 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.050 0.007 0.002 0.046 0.025 -0.14 -0.16

USECACOU 190 8,577 169,145 1.54 1.50 1.46 0.68 0.66 0.64 0.049 0.007 0.002 0.335 0.080 0.07 0.13USEJOBPL 148 6,280 125,252 1.32 1.28 1.29 0.58 0.55 0.56 0.048 0.007 0.002 0.421 0.518 0.07 0.05USETUTOR 167 7,745 153,768 1.61 1.54 1.50 0.74 0.70 0.69 0.057 0.008 0.002 0.175 0.031 0.11 0.17

USELAB 171 8,178 163,712 1.72 1.78 1.77 0.75 0.78 0.78 0.058 0.009 0.002 0.351 0.433 -0.07 -0.06USECHLD 97 4,507 86,731 1.27 1.22 1.20 0.62 0.55 0.54 0.063 0.008 0.002 0.392 0.241 0.09 0.12

USEFAADV 155 8,254 165,639 1.82 1.92 1.89 0.83 0.79 0.78 0.066 0.009 0.002 0.126 0.285 -0.12 -0.09USECOMLB 199 9,432 187,616 2.37 2.28 2.24 0.73 0.76 0.77 0.051 0.008 0.002 0.115 0.023 0.11 0.16USESTORG 138 6,675 133,850 1.43 1.41 1.43 0.71 0.65 0.67 0.061 0.008 0.002 0.792 0.965 0.02 0.00USETRCRD 148 6,912 138,221 1.44 1.59 1.60 0.64 0.71 0.71 0.053 0.009 0.002 0.010 0.005 -0.21 -0.23USEDISAB 96 4,420 85,753 1.36 1.32 1.33 0.68 0.63 0.65 0.070 0.010 0.002 0.498 0.598 0.07 0.05SATACAD 172 8,744 176,409 2.23 2.19 2.22 0.65 0.64 0.64 0.050 0.007 0.002 0.391 0.851 0.07 0.01

SATCACOU 148 6,507 126,860 2.15 2.09 2.06 0.73 0.69 0.70 0.060 0.009 0.002 0.278 0.110 0.09 0.13SATJOBPL 95 4,068 81,597 1.98 1.87 1.86 0.80 0.73 0.73 0.082 0.011 0.003 0.149 0.110 0.15 0.16SATTUTOR 122 5,629 108,482 2.33 2.19 2.17 0.72 0.70 0.71 0.065 0.009 0.002 0.031 0.016 0.20 0.22

SATLAB 131 6,419 126,620 2.19 2.29 2.28 0.69 0.66 0.66 0.060 0.008 0.002 0.084 0.140 -0.15 -0.13SATCHLD 59 2,462 46,283 1.81 1.82 1.80 0.90 0.78 0.78 0.117 0.016 0.004 0.950 0.887 -0.01 0.02

SATFAADV 126 7,050 141,570 2.25 2.22 2.22 0.81 0.75 0.74 0.072 0.009 0.002 0.658 0.732 0.04 0.03SATCOMLB 184 8,629 171,088 2.63 2.56 2.53 0.61 0.59 0.60 0.045 0.006 0.001 0.160 0.041 0.10 0.15SATSTORG 99 4,526 91,467 1.98 2.02 2.02 0.77 0.70 0.70 0.077 0.010 0.002 0.584 0.557 -0.06 -0.06SATTRCRD 115 5,287 107,168 2.19 2.07 2.08 0.72 0.73 0.72 0.068 0.010 0.002 0.088 0.086 0.16 0.16SATDISAB 69 2,808 54,997 2.13 2.06 2.05 0.80 0.78 0.78 0.097 0.015 0.003 0.437 0.385 0.09 0.10IMPACAD 215 10,037 202,253 2.37 2.59 2.57 0.74 0.62 0.63 0.050 0.006 0.001 0.000 0.000 -0.35 -0.32

IMPCACOU 214 9,951 200,039 2.30 2.38 2.34 0.80 0.75 0.76 0.055 0.008 0.002 0.122 0.457 -0.11 -0.05IMPJOBPL 213 9,844 197,529 2.01 2.08 2.08 0.85 0.83 0.83 0.058 0.008 0.002 0.232 0.271 -0.08 -0.08IMPTUTOR 215 9,780 197,623 2.20 2.21 2.15 0.84 0.80 0.80 0.057 0.008 0.002 0.835 0.458 -0.01 0.05

IMPLAB 212 9,771 196,886 2.17 2.29 2.25 0.81 0.78 0.78 0.056 0.008 0.002 0.028 0.151 -0.15 -0.10IMPCHLD 209 9,689 195,427 1.82 1.81 1.76 0.93 0.88 0.87 0.065 0.009 0.002 0.948 0.355 0.00 0.06

IMPFAADV 212 9,803 197,448 2.25 2.49 2.48 0.88 0.77 0.77 0.061 0.008 0.002 0.000 0.000 -0.31 -0.30

* T-tests: 2-tailed M29

Page 122: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

# of respondents mean standard deviation std error of the mean significance effect size

Variable Names Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort Your College

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Other Consortium Colleges*

2007 CCSSE Cohort*

Other Consortium

Colleges2007 CCSSE

Cohort

Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream ConsortiumSummary Statistics: Full - Time Students

IMPCOMLB 214 9,844 198,473 2.59 2.59 2.56 0.68 0.65 0.67 0.046 0.007 0.001 0.955 0.408 0.00 0.06IMPSTORG 210 9,699 195,032 1.92 1.93 1.91 0.84 0.79 0.78 0.058 0.008 0.002 0.784 0.884 -0.02 0.01IMPTRCRD 213 9,789 197,291 2.20 2.32 2.31 0.87 0.82 0.83 0.059 0.008 0.002 0.029 0.047 -0.15 -0.14IMPDISAB 211 9,766 196,470 2.01 2.11 2.09 0.93 0.91 0.91 0.064 0.009 0.002 0.119 0.220 -0.11 -0.08WRKFULL 218 10,474 209,593 2.23 2.16 2.11 1.20 1.18 1.15 0.082 0.011 0.003 0.350 0.116 0.06 0.11CAREDEP 218 10,460 209,222 1.94 1.93 1.90 1.13 1.08 1.06 0.076 0.011 0.002 0.977 0.587 0.00 0.04ACADUNP 216 10,406 208,522 1.67 1.75 1.70 0.91 0.98 0.94 0.062 0.010 0.002 0.218 0.670 -0.08 -0.03LACKFIN 218 10,441 208,928 2.40 2.42 2.39 1.28 1.19 1.19 0.087 0.012 0.003 0.789 0.904 -0.02 0.01

TRANSFER 217 10,445 209,300 2.70 2.68 2.64 1.22 1.24 1.24 0.083 0.012 0.003 0.779 0.446 0.02 0.05FRNDSUPP 219 10,481 209,685 3.27 3.25 3.23 0.91 0.89 0.88 0.062 0.009 0.002 0.688 0.454 0.03 0.05FAMSUPP 219 10,457 209,058 3.56 3.58 3.53 0.74 0.76 0.78 0.050 0.007 0.002 0.780 0.556 -0.02 0.04TOTCHRS 218 10,408 207,974 2.16 2.18 2.20 1.47 1.44 1.44 0.100 0.014 0.003 0.828 0.666 -0.01 -0.03OTHINST 220 10,406 207,996 1.49 1.46 1.42 1.26 1.20 1.14 0.085 0.012 0.002 0.737 0.361 0.02 0.06

ENTIREXP 220 10,402 207,993 3.10 3.17 3.14 0.74 0.67 0.68 0.050 0.007 0.001 0.108 0.366 -0.11 -0.06

* T-tests: 2-tailed M30

Page 123: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Frequency Distributions This report summarizes the observed frequencies of occurrence (counts and percentages) of the values for each item on The Community College Student Report. Data are presented for all, part-time, and full-time students at your college, a comparison group, and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort (i.e. all students who participated in CCSSE from 2005 through 2007). Please note, certain demographic items (gender, race/ethnicity, age, and enrollment status) do not appear on this report but can be found in Table 1.

Page 124: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %1. Did you begin college at this Started here 154 82.8 18811 64.4 60181 62.8 195 84.8 57782 76.1 159946 75.0 346 83.3 73731 70.1 210638 68.2

college or elsewhere? Started elsewhere 32 17.2 10405 35.6 35714 37.2 35 15.2 18165 23.9 53177 25.0 70 16.7 31407 29.9 98273 31.8Total 186 100.0 29216 100.0 95895 100.0 230 100.0 75947 100.0 213123 100.0 416 100.0 105138 100.0 308911 100.0

4a. Asked questions in class or Never 7 3.8 684 2.3 2791 2.9 4 1.7 1328 1.7 4646 2.2 14 3.3 2216 2.1 8056 2.6contributed to class Sometimes 65 35.1 9311 31.8 32859 34.2 72 31.3 22430 29.5 67478 31.7 142 34.2 32510 30.9 102619 33.2discussions Often 69 37.3 10505 35.9 33296 34.7 69 30.0 27587 36.3 76391 35.8 147 35.5 38065 36.2 108830 35.2

Very often 44 23.8 8766 30.0 27060 28.2 85 37.0 24641 32.4 64658 30.3 112 27.0 32455 30.8 89642 29.0Total 185 100.0 29266 100.0 96006 100.0 230 100.0 75986 100.0 213173 100.0 414 100.0 105246 100.0 309146 100.0

4b. Made a class presentation Never 82 44.3 11582 39.7 37962 39.7 65 28.3 15705 20.7 44037 20.7 167 40.4 32693 31.2 98452 32.0Sometimes 69 37.3 10777 37.0 35516 37.2 102 44.3 33981 44.9 94585 44.5 162 39.0 42534 40.6 123815 40.2

Often 25 13.5 4795 16.5 15762 16.5 42 18.3 18701 24.7 52809 24.9 61 14.7 21186 20.2 61302 19.9Very often 9 4.9 1991 6.8 6295 6.6 21 9.1 7327 9.7 20967 9.9 24 5.9 8429 8.0 24234 7.9

Total 185 100.0 29145 100.0 95535 100.0 230 100.0 75714 100.0 212398 100.0 414 100.0 104842 100.0 307803 100.04c. Prepared two or more drafts of Never 56 30.6 7549 26.0 24783 26.0 57 24.9 10982 14.6 30891 14.6 120 29.2 21906 21.0 65702 21.4

a paper or assignment before Sometimes 71 38.8 8560 29.5 27844 29.2 72 31.4 22971 30.4 63131 29.8 152 37.0 31336 30.0 90668 29.6turning it in Often 36 19.7 8011 27.6 26357 27.7 69 30.1 24272 32.2 68430 32.3 91 22.2 30951 29.6 90612 29.5

Very often 20 10.9 4922 16.9 16223 17.0 31 13.5 17246 22.9 49237 23.3 47 11.6 20309 19.4 59801 19.5Total 183 100.0 29042 100.0 95207 100.0 229 100.0 75471 100.0 211689 100.0 410 100.0 104503 100.0 306783 100.0

4d. Worked on a paper or project Never 31 16.8 4834 16.6 15776 16.6 19 8.4 4105 5.4 10892 5.1 61 14.8 12192 11.7 36513 11.9that required integrating ideas Sometimes 65 35.3 9080 31.2 29567 31.0 76 33.5 20281 26.8 54985 25.9 143 34.9 30830 29.5 89238 29.1or information from various Often 63 34.2 9771 33.6 32227 33.8 82 36.1 30594 40.5 86496 40.8 143 34.7 38411 36.7 112702 36.7sources Very often 25 13.6 5378 18.5 17702 18.6 50 22.0 20606 27.3 59609 28.1 64 15.6 23175 22.2 68628 22.3

Total 184 100.0 29063 100.0 95272 100.0 227 100.0 75586 100.0 211982 100.0 411 100.0 104608 100.0 307081 100.04e. Came to class without Never 67 36.0 10847 37.4 32667 34.4 60 26.4 19096 25.4 49899 23.6 140 33.7 33216 31.8 91774 30.0

completing readings or Sometimes 94 50.5 14858 51.2 50341 52.9 133 58.6 44225 58.7 125353 59.3 218 52.5 57030 54.7 170112 55.5assignments Often 17 9.1 2431 8.4 8892 9.4 24 10.6 8564 11.4 26059 12.3 39 9.5 10215 9.8 32457 10.6

Very often 8 4.3 870 3.0 3182 3.3 10 4.4 3440 4.6 10003 4.7 18 4.3 3860 3.7 11964 3.9Total 186 100.0 29006 100.0 95082 100.0 227 100.0 75325 100.0 211314 100.0 415 100.0 104321 100.0 306306 100.0

4f. Worked with other students on Never 28 15.4 4952 17.1 16411 17.3 21 9.3 5847 7.8 17882 8.5 57 13.9 13323 12.8 41607 13.6projects during class Sometimes 78 42.9 11703 40.5 38208 40.2 97 42.7 30519 40.6 86487 41.0 175 42.8 42085 40.4 124111 40.6

Often 52 28.6 8617 29.8 28305 29.8 67 29.5 27273 36.3 76111 36.1 117 28.8 34215 32.9 99241 32.5Very often 24 13.2 3659 12.6 12003 12.6 42 18.5 11550 15.4 30481 14.4 59 14.5 14462 13.9 40826 13.4

Total 182 100.0 28931 100.0 94927 100.0 227 100.0 75189 100.0 210961 100.0 408 100.0 104084 100.0 305785 100.04g. Worked with classmates Never 89 48.4 14252 49.1 46884 49.2 71 31.0 22643 30.0 68193 32.2 182 44.1 41992 40.2 129289 42.1

outside of class to prepare Sometimes 60 32.6 9760 33.6 32260 33.9 96 41.9 31330 41.5 87991 41.6 144 34.9 38943 37.3 113747 37.1class assignments Often 26 14.1 3670 12.6 11711 12.3 46 20.1 15389 20.4 39946 18.9 64 15.6 17009 16.3 46158 15.0

Very often 9 4.9 1364 4.7 4436 4.7 16 7.0 6070 8.0 15467 7.3 22 5.4 6523 6.2 17667 5.8Total 184 100.0 29046 100.0 95291 100.0 229 100.0 75432 100.0 211597 100.0 412 100.0 104468 100.0 306861 100.0

4h. Tutored or taught other Never 128 69.6 22696 77.9 74180 77.6 138 60.3 50050 66.2 143018 67.4 277 67.3 75802 72.4 225811 73.4students (paid or voluntary) Sometimes 39 21.2 4802 16.5 15869 16.6 65 28.4 17898 23.7 48561 22.9 95 23.0 20886 19.9 59210 19.2

Often 14 7.6 1102 3.8 3697 3.9 16 7.0 4992 6.6 13610 6.4 31 7.5 5350 5.1 15124 4.9Very often 3 1.6 526 1.8 1798 1.9 10 4.4 2697 3.6 7002 3.3 9 2.3 2726 2.6 7568 2.5

Total 184 100.0 29126 100.0 95544 100.0 229 100.0 75637 100.0 212191 100.0 412 100.0 104764 100.0 307713 100.04i. Participated in a community- Never 160 87.4 24076 83.1 79203 83.3 178 77.7 53990 71.6 154345 73.0 349 85.0 80963 77.6 242038 79.0

based project as a part of a Sometimes 16 8.7 3538 12.2 11374 12.0 32 14.0 14922 19.8 39368 18.6 41 10.0 16551 15.9 45285 14.8regular course Often 5 2.7 961 3.3 3198 3.4 11 4.8 4432 5.9 12111 5.7 13 3.2 4728 4.5 13268 4.3

Very often 2 1.1 396 1.4 1304 1.4 8 3.5 2010 2.7 5531 2.6 7 1.7 2045 2.0 5762 1.9Total 183 100.0 28971 100.0 95079 100.0 229 100.0 75354 100.0 211355 100.0 410 100.0 104287 100.0 306353 100.0

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)Brazosport College

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College Other Small Colleges

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F1

Page 125: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College Other Small Colleges

4j. Used the Internet or instant Never 42 22.6 5032 17.4 16308 17.2 29 12.7 5920 7.9 16069 7.6 84 20.2 13615 13.1 40449 13.2messaging to work on an Sometimes 63 33.9 7926 27.3 26225 27.6 56 24.6 17122 22.7 47987 22.7 131 31.6 26380 25.3 78436 25.6assignment Often 37 19.9 8201 28.3 27147 28.6 79 34.6 23979 31.8 67629 32.0 97 23.5 31231 29.9 91917 30.0

Very often 44 23.7 7828 27.0 25402 26.7 64 28.1 28312 37.6 79619 37.7 103 24.7 33080 31.7 95516 31.2Total 186 100.0 28987 100.0 95082 100.0 228 100.0 75333 100.0 211304 100.0 415 100.0 104306 100.0 306318 100.0

4k. Used email to communicate Never 72 38.7 8046 27.8 24055 25.3 50 21.8 12296 16.3 29448 13.9 144 34.6 23680 22.7 63644 20.8with an instructor Sometimes 61 32.8 10242 35.3 35008 36.8 85 37.1 24667 32.7 71065 33.6 141 33.8 35553 34.1 108568 35.4

Often 34 18.3 6322 21.8 21754 22.9 54 23.6 21051 27.9 61899 29.3 81 19.6 25646 24.6 78088 25.5Very often 19 10.2 4378 15.1 14297 15.0 40 17.5 17371 23.0 49145 23.2 50 12.0 19446 18.6 56217 18.3

Total 186 100.0 28988 100.0 95114 100.0 229 100.0 75385 100.0 211557 100.0 416 100.0 104325 100.0 306516 100.04l. Discussed grades or Never 22 12.0 3300 11.4 11682 12.3 19 8.3 4488 5.9 14482 6.8 46 11.1 9249 8.9 30602 10.0

assignments with an instructor Sometimes 82 44.8 13578 46.8 44714 47.0 96 42.1 31156 41.3 89276 42.2 181 44.1 46277 44.3 138096 45.0Often 59 32.2 8547 29.4 27343 28.7 73 32.0 26192 34.7 71484 33.8 132 32.2 33304 31.9 94585 30.8

Very often 20 10.9 3602 12.4 11426 12.0 40 17.5 13667 18.1 36433 17.2 51 12.5 15642 15.0 43384 14.1Total 183 100.0 29027 100.0 95165 100.0 228 100.0 75503 100.0 211675 100.0 410 100.0 104471 100.0 306666 100.0

4m. Talked about career plans with Never 68 37.2 10070 34.8 35434 37.3 64 27.8 15808 21.0 51228 24.2 143 34.9 29463 28.3 97039 31.7an instructor or advisor Sometimes 77 42.1 12792 44.2 41067 43.2 96 41.7 34461 45.8 96104 45.5 173 42.0 46875 45.0 135503 44.2

Often 28 15.3 4423 15.3 13680 14.4 51 22.2 17222 22.9 44533 21.1 70 17.0 19679 18.9 52807 17.2Very often 10 5.5 1686 5.8 4870 5.1 19 8.3 7830 10.4 19570 9.3 25 6.2 8257 7.9 20979 6.8

Total 183 100.0 28971 100.0 95051 100.0 230 100.0 75321 100.0 211435 100.0 411 100.0 104273 100.0 306328 100.04n. Discussed ideas from your Never 87 46.8 14683 50.8 49841 52.5 86 37.6 28188 37.4 85377 40.4 185 44.5 46383 44.5 145046 47.4

readings or classes with Sometimes 73 39.2 10373 35.9 32774 34.5 100 43.7 32191 42.7 86645 41.0 168 40.3 40756 39.1 114142 37.3instructors outside of class Often 18 9.7 2899 10.0 9108 9.6 30 13.1 10883 14.4 28725 13.6 44 10.5 12616 12.1 34514 11.3

Very often 8 4.3 964 3.3 3140 3.3 13 5.7 4077 5.4 10481 5.0 19 4.6 4416 4.2 12164 4.0Total 186 100.0 28919 100.0 94863 100.0 229 100.0 75339 100.0 211228 100.0 416 100.0 104171 100.0 305866 100.0

4o. Received prompt feedback Never 24 13.2 2483 8.6 8803 9.3 16 7.0 4489 6.0 13839 6.5 48 11.7 7758 7.4 24923 8.1(written or oral) from Sometimes 62 34.1 10070 34.8 33520 35.3 89 39.0 27205 36.1 77440 36.6 144 35.3 37033 35.5 109909 35.9instructors on your Often 56 30.8 11247 38.8 36189 38.1 84 36.8 30277 40.2 83968 39.7 132 32.3 41067 39.4 118736 38.8performance Very often 40 22.0 5176 17.9 16472 17.3 39 17.1 13425 17.8 36138 17.1 85 20.8 18463 17.7 52617 17.2

Total 182 100.0 28976 100.0 94984 100.0 228 100.0 75396 100.0 211385 100.0 408 100.0 104321 100.0 306185 100.04p. Worked harder than you Never 31 16.7 3626 12.5 12420 13.1 26 11.4 6097 8.1 18389 8.7 64 15.4 10976 10.5 34470 11.2

thought you could to meet an Sometimes 91 48.9 11780 40.6 39072 41.1 103 45.0 29048 38.5 82537 39.0 199 48.0 41565 39.8 123582 40.3instructors standards or Often 46 24.7 9662 33.3 30913 32.5 71 31.0 27412 36.3 75966 35.9 109 26.3 36147 34.6 103851 33.9expectations Very often 18 9.7 3947 13.6 12723 13.4 29 12.7 12934 17.1 34769 16.4 43 10.4 15746 15.1 44686 14.6

Total 186 100.0 29015 100.0 95128 100.0 229 100.0 75491 100.0 211661 100.0 416 100.0 104435 100.0 306590 100.04q. Worked with instructors on Never 142 79.3 21753 75.5 72105 76.4 144 63.7 45796 61.1 136494 65.0 304 75.5 71167 68.6 217560 71.5

activities other than Sometimes 21 11.7 5134 17.8 15847 16.8 60 26.5 19993 26.7 50644 24.1 62 15.4 22937 22.1 60693 20.0coursework Often 10 5.6 1387 4.8 4680 5.0 11 4.9 6655 8.9 16809 8.0 22 5.4 6997 6.7 19020 6.3

Very often 6 3.4 529 1.8 1688 1.8 11 4.9 2532 3.4 6082 2.9 15 3.7 2619 2.5 6858 2.3Total 179 100.0 28803 100.0 94320 100.0 226 100.0 74976 100.0 210029 100.0 402 100.0 103720 100.0 304131 100.0

4r. Discussed ideas from your Never 28 15.1 3954 13.6 13364 14.0 17 7.4 7411 9.8 22174 10.4 55 13.2 12423 11.9 38516 12.5readings or classes with others Sometimes 73 39.2 11262 38.7 36710 38.5 96 41.9 28537 37.7 80211 37.8 166 39.9 40266 38.4 117779 38.3outside of class (students, Often 52 28.0 8870 30.5 28705 30.1 75 32.8 24836 32.8 68074 32.1 121 29.1 32968 31.5 95041 30.9family members, coworkers, etc.) Very often 33 17.7 5015 17.2 16656 17.5 41 17.9 14924 19.7 41779 19.7 74 17.8 19089 18.2 56189 18.3

Total 186 100.0 29101 100.0 95435 100.0 229 100.0 75708 100.0 212238 100.0 416 100.0 104747 100.0 307525 100.04s. Had serious conversations Never 41 22.0 8815 30.3 25361 26.6 47 20.7 16802 22.2 42484 20.0 90 21.7 28060 26.8 74305 24.2

with students of a different race Sometimes 62 33.3 10198 35.1 32817 34.4 70 30.8 26068 34.5 70983 33.5 136 32.7 36512 34.9 104892 34.1or ethnicity other than your own Often 49 26.3 5939 20.4 21700 22.8 53 23.3 18119 24.0 53623 25.3 106 25.6 22998 22.0 72599 23.6

Very often 34 18.3 4124 14.2 15449 16.2 57 25.1 14660 19.4 45082 21.2 83 19.9 17113 16.3 55498 18.1Total 186 100.0 29076 100.0 95327 100.0 227 100.0 75649 100.0 212172 100.0 415 100.0 104684 100.0 307294 100.0

4t. Had serious conversations Never 48 25.9 8188 28.2 26316 27.6 43 19.1 13849 18.3 38649 18.2 100 24.3 24792 23.7 72942 23.8with students who differ from you Sometimes 72 38.9 11154 38.4 35070 36.8 77 34.2 27704 36.7 75261 35.5 156 37.8 39435 37.7 111888 36.4in terms of their religious beliefs, Often 29 15.7 5987 20.6 20552 21.6 53 23.6 19717 26.1 55812 26.3 72 17.6 24193 23.1 72156 23.5political opinions, or personal values Very often 36 19.5 3718 12.8 13292 14.0 52 23.1 14292 18.9 42260 19.9 84 20.3 16147 15.4 50015 16.3

Total 185 100.0 29047 100.0 95230 100.0 225 100.0 75562 100.0 211982 100.0 412 100.0 104568 100.0 307002 100.04u. Skipped class Never 109 58.9 17358 59.6 53502 56.0 95 41.3 33517 44.3 87661 41.3 226 54.6 54777 52.3 153192 49.8

Sometimes 67 36.2 10619 36.5 37352 39.1 115 50.0 36779 48.6 107667 50.7 164 39.6 44255 42.2 135408 44.0Often 6 3.2 804 2.8 3215 3.4 16 7.0 3804 5.0 12029 5.7 17 4.2 4028 3.8 13350 4.3

Very often 3 1.6 346 1.2 1427 1.5 4 1.7 1615 2.1 5039 2.4 7 1.7 1738 1.7 5779 1.9Total 185 100.0 29127 100.0 95496 100.0 230 100.0 75715 100.0 212396 100.0 414 100.0 104797 100.0 307730 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F2

Page 126: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College Other Small Colleges

5a. Memorizing facts, ideas, or Very little 15 8.1 2548 8.7 8249 8.6 14 6.1 4022 5.3 11418 5.4 32 7.6 7438 7.1 22315 7.2methods from your courses Some 70 37.6 8854 30.3 28626 29.9 60 26.2 21094 27.8 58494 27.5 145 34.9 30757 29.3 89315 29.0and readings so you can repeat Quite a bit 64 34.4 10965 37.6 35980 37.6 90 39.3 30301 39.9 86077 40.4 148 35.6 40727 38.8 119738 38.8them in pretty much the same form Very much 37 19.9 6823 23.4 22884 23.9 65 28.4 20473 27.0 56861 26.7 91 22.0 26125 24.9 77114 25.0

Total 186 100.0 29190 100.0 95739 100.0 229 100.0 75890 100.0 212850 100.0 416 100.0 105047 100.0 308483 100.05b. Analyzing the basic elements of an Very little 14 7.5 1951 6.7 6117 6.4 11 4.8 3017 4.0 8143 3.8 29 6.9 5783 5.5 16602 5.4

idea, experience, or theory Some 65 34.9 9085 31.2 28894 30.3 69 30.3 21832 28.8 58272 27.4 140 33.8 31795 30.4 90116 29.3Quite a bit 84 45.2 12141 41.7 39958 41.9 100 43.9 32773 43.3 93474 44.0 186 44.8 44339 42.3 131327 42.7Very much 23 12.4 5925 20.4 20445 21.4 48 21.1 18069 23.9 52406 24.7 60 14.5 22838 21.8 69492 22.6

Total 186 100.0 29102 100.0 95414 100.0 228 100.0 75691 100.0 212295 100.0 415 100.0 104755 100.0 307536 100.05c. Synthesizing and organizing ideas, Very little 23 12.5 2599 9.0 8842 9.3 14 6.2 4501 6.0 12690 6.0 45 11.0 7980 7.6 24442 8.0

information, or experiences in new Some 79 42.9 10412 35.9 33435 35.2 86 37.9 25174 33.4 69289 32.8 172 41.7 36479 35.0 105168 34.4ways Quite a bit 56 30.4 10796 37.3 35340 37.2 78 34.4 29700 39.4 83928 39.7 129 31.4 39806 38.2 116985 38.2

Very much 26 14.1 5174 17.9 17347 18.3 49 21.6 16025 21.3 45508 21.5 66 15.9 20066 19.2 59570 19.5Total 184 100.0 28981 100.0 94964 100.0 227 100.0 75400 100.0 211415 100.0 411 100.0 104332 100.0 306164 100.0

5d. Making judgments about the value Very little 35 18.9 4522 15.6 14797 15.6 27 11.8 7144 9.5 19562 9.2 71 17.2 13452 12.9 39815 13.0or soundness of information, Some 74 40.0 11253 38.7 36241 38.1 84 36.7 27451 36.3 75259 35.5 162 39.2 39398 37.7 113883 37.1arguments, or methods Quite a bit 50 27.0 9203 31.7 30313 31.9 82 35.8 26956 35.7 76978 36.4 121 29.2 35030 33.5 103398 33.7

Very much 26 14.1 4063 14.0 13796 14.5 36 15.7 13986 18.5 39955 18.9 60 14.5 16660 15.9 49631 16.2Total 185 100.0 29041 100.0 95147 100.0 229 100.0 75537 100.0 211754 100.0 414 100.0 104540 100.0 306727 100.0

5e. Applying theories or concepts to Very little 30 16.2 3608 12.4 12035 12.6 22 9.6 5779 7.6 16956 8.0 60 14.6 10766 10.3 32965 10.7practical problems or in new Some 66 35.7 10776 37.1 34720 36.4 86 37.7 25232 33.4 70522 33.3 150 36.2 37113 35.5 108177 35.2situations Quite a bit 61 33.0 9790 33.7 32231 33.8 78 34.2 27970 37.0 78844 37.2 138 33.3 36846 35.2 108188 35.2

Very much 28 15.1 4894 16.8 16327 17.1 42 18.4 16675 22.0 45768 21.6 66 15.9 19944 19.1 57902 18.8Total 185 100.0 29068 100.0 95313 100.0 228 100.0 75656 100.0 212090 100.0 413 100.0 104669 100.0 307232 100.0

5f. Using information you have read Very little 22 11.8 3114 10.7 10650 11.1 20 8.8 4860 6.4 15642 7.4 46 11.1 9115 8.7 29433 9.5or heard to perform a new skill Some 61 32.8 9628 33.0 31653 33.1 73 32.2 21973 29.0 63527 29.9 135 32.6 32822 31.3 98171 31.9

Quite a bit 74 39.8 10193 35.0 32950 34.5 82 36.1 28245 37.2 78598 36.9 161 38.9 37820 36.0 109400 35.5Very much 29 15.6 6220 21.3 20381 21.3 52 22.9 20778 27.4 54956 25.8 72 17.4 25206 24.0 71209 23.1

Total 186 100.0 29155 100.0 95634 100.0 227 100.0 75856 100.0 212723 100.0 415 100.0 104963 100.0 308213 100.06a. Number of assigned textbooks, None 11 6.0 1248 4.3 3743 4.0 4 1.8 1231 1.6 3352 1.6 20 5.0 3262 3.1 9196 3.0

manuals, books, or book-length Between 1 and 4 92 50.5 15205 52.8 49551 52.4 92 40.5 21614 28.8 60593 28.8 196 48.1 43501 41.9 130149 42.7packs of course readings Between 5 and 10 44 24.2 6928 24.0 23454 24.8 79 34.8 28769 38.3 81777 38.8 109 26.8 31638 30.5 93192 30.6

Between 11 and 20 15 8.2 2959 10.3 9942 10.5 32 14.1 13401 17.8 37875 18.0 39 9.7 14280 13.7 41456 13.6More than 20 20 11.0 2478 8.6 7811 8.3 20 8.8 10135 13.5 27140 12.9 43 10.5 11173 10.8 30893 10.1

Total 182 100.0 28818 100.0 94501 100.0 227 100.0 75150 100.0 210737 100.0 408 100.0 103855 100.0 304885 100.06b. Number of books read on your own None 64 35.2 8443 29.3 26362 27.9 77 33.8 23198 30.8 61563 29.2 142 34.8 31348 30.2 87390 28.6

(not assigned) for personal Between 1 and 4 74 40.7 13682 47.4 46235 48.9 96 42.1 35743 47.5 102696 48.7 167 41.0 49215 47.3 148467 48.6enjoyment or academic enrichment Between 5 and 10 28 15.4 3966 13.7 13339 14.1 32 14.0 9635 12.8 27712 13.1 61 15.1 13779 13.3 41615 13.6

Between 11 and 20 10 5.5 1444 5.0 4630 4.9 12 5.3 3520 4.7 10007 4.7 22 5.4 5078 4.9 14736 4.8More than 20 6 3.3 1314 4.6 4024 4.3 11 4.8 3120 4.1 8971 4.3 15 3.7 4535 4.4 12966 4.2

Total 182 100.0 28849 100.0 94590 100.0 228 100.0 75216 100.0 210949 100.0 408 100.0 103955 100.0 305174 100.06c. Number of written papers or reports None 40 22.0 4736 16.4 15046 15.9 22 9.7 3375 4.5 8192 3.9 77 19.0 11581 11.2 33544 11.0

of any length Between 1 and 4 69 37.9 10493 36.4 34666 36.7 79 34.8 20045 26.7 53945 25.6 152 37.1 33167 32.0 97903 32.1Between 5 and 10 48 26.4 7912 27.5 26382 27.9 65 28.6 25317 33.7 72759 34.5 110 26.9 31332 30.2 93326 30.6

Between 11 and 20 18 9.9 3753 13.0 12351 13.1 44 19.4 16494 22.0 47931 22.7 50 12.2 17720 17.1 51947 17.0More than 20 7 3.8 1906 6.6 5991 6.3 17 7.5 9910 13.2 27872 13.2 19 4.7 10003 9.6 28000 9.2

Total 182 100.0 28800 100.0 94436 100.0 227 100.0 75141 100.0 210699 100.0 408 100.0 103804 100.0 304719 100.07. Mark the box that best represents Extremely easy 2 1.1 322 1.2 1069 1.2 1 0.5 420 0.6 1250 0.6 4 1.0 888 0.9 2773 1.0

the extent to which your 2 9 5.1 558 2.0 1998 2.2 5 2.3 1077 1.5 3270 1.6 17 4.5 1795 1.8 5748 2.0examinations during the current 3 12 6.9 1574 5.7 5485 6.1 10 4.6 3344 4.6 10251 5.1 25 6.3 5266 5.3 16539 5.7school year have challenged you to 4 44 25.1 6427 23.3 21720 24.1 53 24.4 16255 22.4 47137 23.2 98 25.0 23038 23.1 69377 23.8do your best work at this college 5 63 36.0 8780 31.9 29271 32.5 66 30.4 25275 34.8 72299 35.6 136 34.6 33121 33.2 98645 33.8

6 29 16.6 6399 23.2 20349 22.6 61 28.1 17876 24.6 48527 23.9 76 19.4 23712 23.8 67546 23.2Extremely challenging 16 9.1 3474 12.6 10109 11.2 21 9.7 8315 11.5 20189 9.9 36 9.3 11908 11.9 31128 10.7

Total 175 100.0 27534 100.0 90001 100.0 217 100.0 72562 100.0 202923 100.0 392 100.0 99728 100.0 291755 100.08a. Internship, field experience, coop

experience, or clinical assignmentI have not done, nor plan

to do 77 42.8 12730 44.5 43551 46.5 112 49.6 26620 35.6 80810 38.6 180 44.4 41694 40.4 130615 43.2

I plan to do 50 27.8 11077 38.8 36287 38.7 53 23.5 31990 42.8 89490 42.7 108 26.7 41905 40.6 122142 40.4I have done 53 29.4 4775 16.7 13864 14.8 61 27.0 16129 21.6 39204 18.7 117 28.8 19520 18.9 49855 16.5

Total 180 100.0 28582 100.0 93702 100.0 226 100.0 74739 100.0 209504 100.0 404 100.0 103120 100.0 302612 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F3

Page 127: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College Other Small Colleges

8b. English as a second language course I have not done, nor plan to do 148 83.6 25139 88.0 80974 86.4 196 87.5 64434 86.3 178292 85.1 337 84.6 89763 87.1 260077 85.9

I plan to do 17 9.6 1521 5.3 4949 5.3 14 6.3 4230 5.7 10972 5.2 35 8.8 5731 5.6 16079 5.3I have done 12 6.8 1911 6.7 7837 8.4 14 6.3 6013 8.1 20189 9.6 26 6.6 7601 7.4 26585 8.8

Total 177 100.0 28571 100.0 93760 100.0 224 100.0 74677 100.0 209453 100.0 398 100.0 103095 100.0 302741 100.08c. Developmental/remedial reading

courseI have not done, nor plan

to do 130 72.2 21922 76.6 70023 74.7 183 81.7 54647 73.1 150401 71.8 301 74.5 77348 75.0 222720 73.6

I plan to do 19 10.6 2384 8.3 8696 9.3 12 5.4 5498 7.4 16224 7.7 37 9.3 8209 8.0 26084 8.6I have done 31 17.2 4298 15.0 15045 16.0 29 12.9 14600 19.5 42868 20.5 65 16.2 17627 17.1 53954 17.8

Total 180 100.0 28604 100.0 93764 100.0 224 100.0 74745 100.0 209493 100.0 403 100.0 103185 100.0 302757 100.08d. Developmental/remedial writing course I have not done, nor plan

to do 132 73.3 20180 70.5 64668 69.0 180 80.0 49894 66.7 137726 65.7 303 75.0 70994 68.8 204949 67.7

I plan to do 22 12.2 3086 10.8 11140 11.9 14 6.2 6873 9.2 20038 9.6 43 10.7 10419 10.1 32924 10.9I have done 26 14.4 5353 18.7 17972 19.2 31 13.8 18022 24.1 51894 24.8 58 14.3 21837 21.2 65027 21.5

Total 180 100.0 28619 100.0 93780 100.0 225 100.0 74789 100.0 209658 100.0 404 100.0 103250 100.0 302900 100.08e. Developmental/remedial math course I have not done, nor plan

to do 83 46.6 15978 55.9 51642 55.1 114 50.2 39281 52.6 108702 51.9 191 47.5 56102 54.4 162973 53.9

I plan to do 37 20.8 4217 14.7 15078 16.1 21 9.3 8394 11.2 25212 12.0 72 17.9 13607 13.2 43491 14.4I have done 58 32.6 8399 29.4 26946 28.8 92 40.5 27024 36.2 75438 36.0 139 34.6 33464 32.4 96068 31.8

Total 178 100.0 28594 100.0 93666 100.0 227 100.0 74699 100.0 209352 100.0 401 100.0 103173 100.0 302532 100.08f. Study skills course I have not done, nor plan

to do 120 66.3 19837 69.5 64548 68.9 164 72.9 47948 64.2 136007 65.0 275 67.9 68983 66.9 203662 67.3

I plan to do 43 23.8 4781 16.7 17031 18.2 39 17.3 11919 16.0 35293 16.9 90 22.2 16940 16.4 53105 17.6I have done 18 9.9 3933 13.8 12113 12.9 22 9.8 14791 19.8 38000 18.2 40 9.9 17129 16.6 45780 15.1

Total 181 100.0 28551 100.0 93692 100.0 225 100.0 74658 100.0 209300 100.0 405 100.0 103053 100.0 302547 100.08g. Honors course I have not done, nor plan

to do 129 73.7 22134 77.9 71098 76.2 146 64.9 52280 70.3 142858 68.5 283 71.5 76543 74.6 220843 73.3

I plan to do 39 22.3 5274 18.6 18740 20.1 49 21.8 17590 23.7 52491 25.2 88 22.2 21284 20.7 66245 22.0I have done 7 4.0 1017 3.6 3457 3.7 30 13.3 4484 6.0 13185 6.3 25 6.3 4778 4.7 14253 4.7

Total 175 100.0 28425 100.0 93295 100.0 225 100.0 74354 100.0 208534 100.0 395 100.0 102605 100.0 301342 100.08h. College orientation program or course I have not done, nor plan

to do 104 58.4 17957 62.9 60754 64.9 114 51.4 39140 52.4 117039 55.9 226 56.7 59727 58.0 184855 61.1

I plan to do 21 11.8 3694 12.9 12639 13.5 21 9.5 9223 12.4 27409 13.1 45 11.2 13125 12.7 40168 13.3I have done 53 29.8 6900 24.2 20216 21.6 87 39.2 26273 35.2 64758 31.0 128 32.1 30163 29.3 77282 25.6

Total 178 100.0 28551 100.0 93609 100.0 222 100.0 74636 100.0 209206 100.0 399 100.0 103016 100.0 302305 100.08i. Organized learning communities (linked

courses/study groups led byI have not done, nor plan

to do 141 77.9 21894 76.5 71207 75.8 168 74.3 53157 71.0 148257 70.6 313 77.0 76348 73.9 223671 73.7

faculty or counselors) I plan to do 29 16.0 4753 16.6 16445 17.5 37 16.4 13324 17.8 39295 18.7 65 16.1 17741 17.2 54398 17.9I have done 11 6.1 1975 6.9 6257 6.7 21 9.3 8391 11.2 22334 10.6 28 6.9 9227 8.9 25222 8.3

Total 181 100.0 28622 100.0 93909 100.0 226 100.0 74872 100.0 209886 100.0 406 100.0 103317 100.0 303290 100.09a. Encouraging you to spend Very little 9 4.9 1436 5.0 4905 5.2 15 6.6 2612 3.5 7855 3.7 22 5.4 4486 4.3 14018 4.6

significant amounts of time Some 54 29.7 7503 26.0 24676 26.1 49 21.6 16413 21.8 46473 22.0 113 27.7 25141 24.2 74607 24.5studying Quite a bit 83 45.6 12409 43.1 40443 42.8 98 43.2 32052 42.6 90439 42.9 184 45.0 44564 42.9 130783 42.9

Very much 36 19.8 7460 25.9 24453 25.9 65 28.6 24189 32.1 66268 31.4 90 22.0 29736 28.6 85619 28.1Total 182 100.0 28808 100.0 94477 100.0 227 100.0 75266 100.0 211035 100.0 408 100.0 103927 100.0 305028 100.0

9b. Providing the support you need to Very little 5 2.7 1525 5.3 5454 5.8 15 6.6 3285 4.4 9936 4.7 15 3.7 5076 4.9 16284 5.3help you succeed at this college Some 35 19.2 7153 24.9 23990 25.4 47 20.8 16435 21.9 48381 23.0 80 19.6 24394 23.5 74218 24.4

Quite a bit 109 59.9 12304 42.8 40090 42.5 95 42.0 31502 41.9 88546 42.0 226 55.5 44000 42.4 129007 42.4Very much 33 18.1 7777 27.0 24752 26.3 69 30.5 23963 31.9 63940 30.3 86 21.2 30315 29.2 85032 27.9

Total 182 100.0 28759 100.0 94286 100.0 226 100.0 75185 100.0 210803 100.0 407 100.0 103786 100.0 304541 100.09c. Encouraging contact among Very little 35 19.3 6292 22.0 19737 21.0 48 21.3 13538 18.0 36866 17.5 80 19.8 20827 20.1 59520 19.6

students from different economic, Some 69 38.1 10194 35.6 32451 34.5 67 29.8 25069 33.4 68988 32.8 146 36.1 35889 34.7 103045 33.9social, and racial or ethnic Quite a bit 58 32.0 7755 27.1 26169 27.9 63 28.0 21877 29.1 62390 29.6 126 31.1 29030 28.1 86775 28.6backgrounds Very much 19 10.5 4402 15.4 15586 16.6 47 20.9 14592 19.4 42200 20.1 53 13.0 17747 17.1 54332 17.9

Total 181 100.0 28643 100.0 93943 100.0 225 100.0 75076 100.0 210444 100.0 405 100.0 103493 100.0 303671 100.09d. Helping you cope with your non- Very little 74 40.7 12269 42.8 41855 44.6 99 43.4 27525 36.6 82053 39.0 169 41.3 41109 39.7 127810 42.1

academic responsibilities (work, Some 48 26.4 9473 33.1 30432 32.4 68 29.8 26561 35.4 72954 34.7 111 27.2 35470 34.3 101557 33.4family, etc.) Quite a bit 44 24.2 4620 16.1 14561 15.5 40 17.5 13803 18.4 36915 17.5 92 22.5 17885 17.3 49814 16.4

Very much 16 8.8 2287 8.0 7059 7.5 21 9.2 7227 9.6 18593 8.8 36 8.9 9055 8.7 24465 8.1Total 182 100.0 28649 100.0 93907 100.0 228 100.0 75116 100.0 210515 100.0 408 100.0 103519 100.0 303646 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F4

Page 128: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College Other Small Colleges

9e. Providing the support you need to Very little 61 33.7 9287 32.6 31390 33.6 62 27.4 18273 24.4 54940 26.2 131 32.2 29454 28.6 91749 30.4thrive socially Some 66 36.5 11274 39.6 36626 39.2 89 39.4 30466 40.7 85148 40.6 151 37.2 41500 40.3 120678 39.9

Quite a bit 42 23.2 5578 19.6 17964 19.2 50 22.1 17875 23.9 48507 23.1 93 22.9 22309 21.7 63161 20.9Very much 12 6.6 2361 8.3 7423 7.9 25 11.1 8177 10.9 21030 10.0 31 7.7 9775 9.5 26608 8.8

Total 181 100.0 28500 100.0 93403 100.0 226 100.0 74791 100.0 209625 100.0 406 100.0 103038 100.0 302196 100.09f. Providing the financial support you Very little 65 35.7 8509 29.8 30906 33.1 53 23.5 14599 19.5 47118 22.4 133 32.7 25694 24.9 85947 28.4

need to afford your education Some 49 26.9 7662 26.9 25585 27.4 67 29.6 19462 26.0 55538 26.4 112 27.6 27496 26.6 81927 27.1Quite a bit 35 19.2 6563 23.0 20161 21.6 46 20.4 20327 27.1 54462 25.9 79 19.5 25874 25.1 71259 23.6Very much 33 18.1 5792 20.3 16821 18.0 60 26.5 20569 27.4 52895 25.2 82 20.2 24122 23.4 63412 21.0

Total 182 100.0 28526 100.0 93473 100.0 226 100.0 74957 100.0 210013 100.0 407 100.0 103186 100.0 302546 100.09g. Using Computers in academic work Very little 18 9.9 2749 9.6 9229 9.8 12 5.3 2617 3.5 7993 3.8 36 8.8 7016 6.8 22153 7.3

Some 28 15.4 5867 20.4 20176 21.4 39 17.1 11221 14.9 32617 15.5 65 15.8 18546 17.9 57583 18.9Quite a bit 71 39.0 9393 32.7 30719 32.6 77 33.8 24592 32.7 69872 33.1 154 37.7 33994 32.8 100191 32.9Very much 65 35.7 10695 37.3 34055 36.2 100 43.9 36781 48.9 100323 47.6 154 37.7 44120 42.6 124391 40.9

Total 182 100.0 28704 100.0 94179 100.0 228 100.0 75211 100.0 210805 100.0 408 100.0 103676 100.0 304318 100.010a. Preparing for class (studying, None 8 4.4 643 2.2 1968 2.1 4 1.8 1096 1.5 2783 1.3 15 3.8 2019 1.9 5525 1.8

reading, writing, rehearsing, doing 1-5 hours 110 60.8 13910 48.3 46374 49.1 105 46.7 27684 36.9 77474 36.8 232 57.3 44957 43.4 134495 44.2homework, or other activities 6-10 hours 39 21.5 8398 29.2 27414 29.0 62 27.6 21681 28.9 62469 29.7 93 23.0 30049 29.0 89107 29.3related to your program) 11-20 hours 18 9.9 4149 14.4 13258 14.0 32 14.2 14792 19.7 42047 20.0 45 11.0 17368 16.7 50060 16.4

21-30 hours 5 2.8 1083 3.8 3583 3.8 10 4.4 6213 8.3 16501 7.8 13 3.2 5941 5.7 16512 5.4More than 30 hours 1 0.6 588 2.0 1772 1.9 12 5.3 3576 4.8 9041 4.3 7 1.7 3363 3.2 8684 2.9

Total 181 100.0 28771 100.0 94369 100.0 225 100.0 75042 100.0 210315 100.0 405 100.0 103698 100.0 304382 100.010b. Working for pay None 23 12.8 4809 16.8 14554 15.5 44 19.6 21075 28.1 52226 24.9 58 14.4 23091 22.3 59453 19.6

1-5 hours 3 1.7 1244 4.3 3932 4.2 9 4.0 5029 6.7 12878 6.1 9 2.2 5686 5.5 15288 5.06-10 hours 8 4.4 1474 5.1 4816 5.1 8 3.6 5461 7.3 14244 6.8 17 4.2 6400 6.2 17741 5.8

11-20 hours 11 6.1 2417 8.4 8157 8.7 36 16.0 12065 16.1 35092 16.7 34 8.5 12407 12.0 36505 12.021-30 hours 16 8.9 3939 13.7 13603 14.5 52 23.1 14455 19.3 45099 21.5 50 12.4 16773 16.2 52651 17.4

More than 30 hours 119 66.1 14800 51.6 48880 52.0 76 33.8 16808 22.4 50240 23.9 235 58.2 39087 37.8 121652 40.1Total 180 100.0 28683 100.0 93942 100.0 225 100.0 74893 100.0 209779 100.0 404 100.0 103445 100.0 303290 100.0

10c. Participating in college-sponsored None 168 92.8 25092 87.4 82747 87.9 172 76.1 54269 72.4 159265 75.8 360 88.7 82958 80.1 251195 82.7activities (organizations, campus 1-5 hours 8 4.4 2743 9.6 8424 9.0 30 13.3 14297 19.1 34991 16.7 27 6.6 14659 14.2 37300 12.3publications, student government, 6-10 hours 3 1.7 484 1.7 1634 1.7 10 4.4 2907 3.9 7404 3.5 9 2.3 2868 2.8 7635 2.5intercollegiate or intramural sports, 11-20 hours 2 1.1 193 0.7 692 0.7 9 4.0 1725 2.3 4315 2.1 7 1.8 1514 1.5 3964 1.3etc.) 21-30 hours 0 0.0 73 0.3 242 0.3 2 0.9 789 1.1 1887 0.9 1 0.2 669 0.6 1618 0.5

More than 30 hours 0 0.0 113 0.4 353 0.4 3 1.3 977 1.3 2202 1.0 1 0.3 836 0.8 1990 0.7Total 181 100.0 28698 100.0 94092 100.0 226 100.0 74964 100.0 210064 100.0 406 100.0 103505 100.0 303702 100.0

10d. Providing care for dependents None 57 31.5 10421 36.4 37644 40.1 103 45.6 35348 47.2 102680 49.0 142 34.9 43106 41.7 132948 43.9living with you (parents, children, 1-5 hours 23 12.7 3647 12.7 13338 14.2 39 17.3 11241 15.0 34940 16.7 56 13.8 14212 13.8 46013 15.2spouse, etc.) 6-10 hours 15 8.3 2009 7.0 7164 7.6 17 7.5 5335 7.1 16435 7.8 33 8.1 7242 7.0 23198 7.7

11-20 hours 8 4.4 1762 6.1 5777 6.2 13 5.8 3972 5.3 11564 5.5 19 4.7 5940 5.7 17765 5.921-30 hours 7 3.9 1341 4.7 4129 4.4 6 2.7 2707 3.6 7191 3.4 14 3.6 4303 4.2 12080 4.0

More than 30 hours 71 39.2 9487 33.1 25847 27.5 48 21.2 16212 21.7 36800 17.6 141 34.8 28549 27.6 71084 23.5Total 181 100.0 28667 100.0 93899 100.0 226 100.0 74815 100.0 209610 100.0 406 100.0 103352 100.0 303088 100.0

10e. Commuting to and from classes None 19 10.6 1918 6.7 6170 6.6 18 8.0 6304 8.4 14505 6.9 40 10.0 8125 7.8 20873 6.91-5 hours 133 74.3 21183 73.8 70111 74.6 146 64.6 43983 58.7 128876 61.4 289 71.9 68791 66.4 208959 68.9

6-10 hours 17 9.5 3845 13.4 11982 12.7 35 15.5 15596 20.8 42543 20.3 44 11.0 17410 16.8 48369 15.911-20 hours 5 2.8 998 3.5 3250 3.5 18 8.0 5544 7.4 14927 7.1 16 4.1 5488 5.3 15144 5.021-30 hours 3 1.7 262 0.9 923 1.0 3 1.3 1443 1.9 3872 1.8 6 1.6 1423 1.4 4052 1.3

More than 30 hours 2 1.1 507 1.8 1598 1.7 6 2.7 2062 2.8 5098 2.4 6 1.5 2291 2.2 6094 2.0Total 179 100.0 28713 100.0 94034 100.0 226 100.0 74932 100.0 209821 100.0 402 100.0 103527 100.0 303493 100.0

11a. Other students Unfriendly,unsupportive, sense of alienation 3 1.6 212 0.7 911 1.0 2 0.9 521 0.7 1896 0.9 6 1.5 745 0.7 2850 0.9

2 1 0.5 477 1.7 2026 2.1 1 0.4 1134 1.5 4023 1.9 2 0.5 1689 1.6 6280 2.13 9 4.9 1117 3.9 4490 4.8 12 5.3 2583 3.4 9162 4.4 21 5.0 3857 3.7 13883 4.64 23 12.6 4240 14.7 15622 16.6 31 13.8 9506 12.6 30635 14.6 53 12.9 14442 13.9 47785 15.75 36 19.8 6250 21.7 21043 22.3 42 18.7 15562 20.7 46101 21.9 79 19.5 22138 21.3 67466 22.26 58 31.9 7894 27.4 25218 26.7 68 30.2 22299 29.7 61123 29.0 128 31.5 29479 28.4 84422 27.7

Friendly,supportive, sense of belonging 52 28.6 8572 29.8 25003 26.5 69 30.7 23566 31.3 57590 27.4 118 29.1 31417 30.3 81736 26.8

Total 182 100.0 28762 100.0 94313 100.0 225 100.0 75171 100.0 210530 100.0 407 100.0 103767 100.0 304422 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F5

Page 129: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College Other Small Colleges

11b. Instructors Unavailable,unhelpful, unsympathetic 0 0.0 189 0.7 603 0.6 4 1.8 484 0.6 1416 0.7 2 0.4 663 0.6 1975 0.6

2 4 2.2 386 1.3 1394 1.5 3 1.3 1110 1.5 3222 1.5 8 2.0 1455 1.4 4570 1.53 3 1.6 888 3.1 3231 3.4 9 4.0 2680 3.6 8254 3.9 9 2.2 3457 3.3 11048 3.64 15 8.2 3052 10.6 10842 11.5 25 11.1 8434 11.2 26264 12.5 36 8.9 11314 10.9 36143 11.95 34 18.7 5303 18.4 18746 19.9 44 19.6 16085 21.4 48052 22.8 77 18.9 20576 19.8 64160 21.16 60 33.0 8883 30.8 29278 31.0 64 28.4 24430 32.5 68539 32.5 130 31.9 32837 31.6 96510 31.7

Available,helpful, sympathetic 66 36.3 10105 35.1 30327 32.1 76 33.8 21965 29.2 54867 26.1 145 35.7 33553 32.3 90265 29.6

Total 182 100.0 28806 100.0 94421 100.0 225 100.0 75188 100.0 210614 100.0 407 100.0 103854 100.0 304670 100.011c. Administrative personnel and offices Unhelpful,inconsiderate,

rigid 7 3.8 741 2.6 3100 3.3 13 5.8 2138 2.8 7302 3.5 18 4.3 2830 2.7 10190 3.4

2 4 2.2 1214 4.2 4550 4.8 13 5.8 3255 4.3 10982 5.2 12 3.1 4427 4.3 15092 5.03 9 4.9 2144 7.5 8027 8.5 14 6.2 5694 7.6 18433 8.8 21 5.3 7782 7.5 26087 8.64 35 19.2 5193 18.1 19258 20.5 37 16.4 13333 17.7 41717 19.8 76 18.5 18572 17.9 61082 20.15 49 26.9 6206 21.6 20899 22.2 37 16.4 16695 22.2 47672 22.7 99 24.3 22754 21.9 68113 22.46 42 23.1 6772 23.6 20575 21.9 53 23.5 18163 24.2 47460 22.6 94 23.2 24761 23.9 67614 22.2

Helpful,considerate, flexible 36 19.8 6466 22.5 17714 18.8 59 26.1 15886 21.1 36894 17.5 87 21.3 22581 21.8 55860 18.4

Total 182 100.0 28736 100.0 94123 100.0 226 100.0 75164 100.0 210460 100.0 407 100.0 103706 100.0 304037 100.012a. Acquiring a broad general education Very little 14 7.7 1985 6.9 7003 7.4 10 4.4 2559 3.4 7390 3.5 28 6.9 5513 5.3 17598 5.8

Some 54 29.7 7587 26.4 24564 26.1 46 20.4 15866 21.1 43230 20.5 112 27.4 24924 24.1 72479 23.8Quite a bit 77 42.3 11810 41.1 38194 40.6 101 44.9 33109 44.1 93392 44.4 175 42.9 44154 42.6 128424 42.3Very much 37 20.3 7321 25.5 24329 25.9 68 30.2 23584 31.4 66409 31.6 93 22.7 29025 28.0 85441 28.1

Total 182 100.0 28703 100.0 94090 100.0 225 100.0 75118 100.0 210421 100.0 407 100.0 103616 100.0 303942 100.012b. Acquiring job or work-related Very little 32 17.8 5153 18.0 19505 20.8 39 17.3 9261 12.3 33024 15.7 71 17.7 15715 15.2 56034 18.5

knowledge and skills Some 51 28.3 8356 29.1 28337 30.2 58 25.8 20328 27.1 62202 29.6 112 27.7 29195 28.2 90774 29.9Quite a bit 67 37.2 8818 30.8 27456 29.2 70 31.1 24947 33.3 66081 31.5 144 35.7 33200 32.1 91920 30.3Very much 30 16.7 6341 22.1 18619 19.8 58 25.8 20484 27.3 48769 23.2 76 18.9 25380 24.5 64695 21.3

Total 180 100.0 28668 100.0 93917 100.0 225 100.0 75020 100.0 210076 100.0 404 100.0 103491 100.0 303423 100.012c. Writing clearly and effectively Very little 36 19.8 4199 14.7 14033 14.9 22 9.8 5728 7.6 16012 7.6 71 17.4 11797 11.4 36006 11.9

Some 56 30.8 8758 30.6 28520 30.4 80 35.7 21109 28.1 58961 28.1 130 32.0 30589 29.6 89460 29.5Quite a bit 60 33.0 10188 35.5 33397 35.6 74 33.0 30335 40.4 85399 40.6 134 33.0 39107 37.8 114416 37.7Very much 30 16.5 5515 19.2 17947 19.1 48 21.4 17857 23.8 49827 23.7 72 17.7 21966 21.2 63547 20.9

Total 182 100.0 28660 100.0 93897 100.0 224 100.0 75029 100.0 210199 100.0 407 100.0 103459 100.0 303430 100.012d. Speaking clearly and effectively Very little 34 18.9 4996 17.5 16646 17.7 31 13.8 7621 10.2 22651 10.8 71 17.7 14537 14.1 44889 14.8

Some 54 30.0 9188 32.1 29992 32.0 72 32.1 22489 30.0 62996 30.0 123 30.5 32249 31.2 94562 31.2Quite a bit 68 37.8 9568 33.4 31005 33.0 77 34.4 28443 37.9 78693 37.4 149 36.9 36743 35.5 106037 35.0Very much 24 13.3 4878 17.0 16200 17.3 44 19.6 16494 22.0 45811 21.8 60 14.9 19886 19.2 57819 19.1

Total 180 100.0 28630 100.0 93843 100.0 224 100.0 75047 100.0 210151 100.0 403 100.0 103415 100.0 303306 100.012e. Thinking critically and Very little 16 8.8 2331 8.1 8029 8.6 12 5.3 3275 4.4 9978 4.8 32 7.9 6631 6.4 21127 7.0

analytically Some 59 32.4 7810 27.3 26287 28.0 60 26.7 17764 23.7 50776 24.2 126 31.0 26569 25.7 80192 26.4Quite a bit 68 37.4 11802 41.2 38009 40.5 89 39.6 32106 42.8 90038 42.9 154 37.9 43370 42.0 125963 41.5Very much 39 21.4 6679 23.3 21504 22.9 64 28.4 21826 29.1 59205 28.2 94 23.1 26804 25.9 75923 25.0

Total 182 100.0 28622 100.0 93829 100.0 225 100.0 74971 100.0 209997 100.0 407 100.0 103373 100.0 303204 100.012f. Solving numerical problems Very little 33 18.2 5752 20.1 19333 20.6 25 11.1 7989 10.7 24054 11.5 67 16.5 16273 15.8 50801 16.8

Some 54 29.8 8499 29.7 27786 29.7 63 28.0 22173 29.6 62388 29.7 119 29.4 30756 29.8 90125 29.8Quite a bit 64 35.4 9053 31.7 29415 31.4 79 35.1 27772 37.0 76646 36.5 143 35.3 35237 34.1 101710 33.6Very much 30 16.6 5270 18.4 17133 18.3 58 25.8 17030 22.7 46897 22.3 76 18.8 21005 20.3 60263 19.9

Total 181 100.0 28574 100.0 93667 100.0 225 100.0 74964 100.0 209985 100.0 405 100.0 103272 100.0 302899 100.012g. Using computing and Very little 38 21.0 4633 16.2 16596 17.7 27 12.1 6320 8.4 21072 10.0 76 18.8 12857 12.4 43533 14.4

information technology Some 47 26.0 8060 28.2 27032 28.8 56 25.0 18886 25.2 55182 26.3 104 25.7 27743 26.8 84205 27.8Quite a bit 57 31.5 9025 31.5 28834 30.8 87 38.8 26433 35.3 72380 34.5 135 33.3 34433 33.3 98121 32.4Very much 39 21.5 6899 24.1 21295 22.7 54 24.1 23303 31.1 61330 29.2 90 22.2 28301 27.4 77190 25.5

Total 181 100.0 28617 100.0 93757 100.0 224 100.0 74942 100.0 209964 100.0 405 100.0 103333 100.0 303049 100.012h. Working effectively with others Very little 21 11.6 3112 10.9 11034 11.8 18 8.0 4866 6.5 15817 7.5 43 10.7 9107 8.8 30140 9.9

Some 60 33.1 9358 32.7 31742 33.8 83 36.9 20904 27.9 62777 29.9 138 34.1 31453 30.4 97460 32.1Quite a bit 65 35.9 10239 35.8 32788 35.0 65 28.9 29355 39.1 80510 38.3 139 34.2 38706 37.4 110561 36.5Very much 35 19.3 5927 20.7 18234 19.4 59 26.2 19856 26.5 50955 24.3 85 21.0 24136 23.3 65022 21.4

Total 181 100.0 28636 100.0 93798 100.0 225 100.0 74981 100.0 210059 100.0 405 100.0 103402 100.0 303183 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F6

Page 130: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College Other Small Colleges

12i. Learning effectively on your Very little 16 8.8 2041 7.1 7402 7.9 13 5.8 3838 5.1 12129 5.8 33 8.1 6343 6.1 21148 7.0own Some 57 31.5 7385 25.8 24878 26.5 55 24.6 17424 23.2 50585 24.1 121 29.8 25526 24.7 77329 25.5

Quite a bit 72 39.8 11709 40.9 37724 40.2 96 42.9 30906 41.2 85711 40.8 164 40.5 42500 41.1 122984 40.6Very much 36 19.9 7512 26.2 23843 25.4 60 26.8 22847 30.5 61619 29.3 87 21.6 29052 28.1 81771 27.0

Total 181 100.0 28647 100.0 93847 100.0 224 100.0 75015 100.0 210044 100.0 405 100.0 103420 100.0 303232 100.012j. Understanding yourself Very little 34 18.8 5192 18.1 17998 19.2 42 18.7 10105 13.5 30978 14.8 76 18.8 16374 15.9 52244 17.2

Some 65 35.9 8964 31.3 28810 30.7 68 30.2 21777 29.1 61558 29.3 140 34.5 31449 30.4 91650 30.3Quite a bit 54 29.8 8851 30.9 28564 30.5 66 29.3 24854 33.2 67745 32.3 120 29.7 33011 32.0 94799 31.3Very much 28 15.5 5601 19.6 18355 19.6 49 21.8 18168 24.3 49578 23.6 69 17.0 22471 21.8 64243 21.2

Total 181 100.0 28608 100.0 93727 100.0 225 100.0 74904 100.0 209859 100.0 405 100.0 103305 100.0 302937 100.012k. Understanding people of other Very little 55 30.6 8070 28.2 24984 26.7 63 28.0 15396 20.6 42143 20.1 121 29.9 25432 24.6 72602 24.0

racial and ethnic backgrounds Some 59 32.8 9899 34.6 32032 34.2 65 28.9 25443 34.0 71109 33.9 128 31.8 35521 34.4 103397 34.2Quite a bit 49 27.2 6764 23.7 23016 24.6 62 27.6 20885 27.9 58822 28.0 110 27.3 26455 25.6 78737 26.0Very much 17 9.4 3855 13.5 13628 14.6 35 15.6 13167 17.6 37685 18.0 44 10.9 15829 15.3 47985 15.9

Total 180 100.0 28588 100.0 93660 100.0 225 100.0 74891 100.0 209759 100.0 404 100.0 103237 100.0 302721 100.012l. Developing a personal code of Very little 51 28.5 7672 26.8 26276 28.1 54 24.0 14191 18.9 43449 20.7 110 27.4 23766 23.0 75330 24.9

values and ethics Some 65 36.3 9856 34.5 31530 33.7 79 35.1 25141 33.6 70375 33.5 145 36.0 35286 34.2 102047 33.7Quite a bit 43 24.0 7009 24.5 22669 24.2 54 24.0 21834 29.1 59336 28.3 97 24.0 27603 26.7 78647 26.0Very much 20 11.2 4056 14.2 13188 14.1 38 16.9 13740 18.3 36610 17.5 51 12.6 16615 16.1 46719 15.4

Total 179 100.0 28593 100.0 93663 100.0 225 100.0 74906 100.0 209770 100.0 402 100.0 103271 100.0 302743 100.012m. Contributing to the welfare of Very little 75 41.9 11146 39.1 38818 41.5 75 33.3 23629 31.6 72026 34.4 160 39.8 36523 35.4 115966 38.4

your community Some 66 36.9 10074 35.3 31651 33.9 75 33.3 27855 37.2 76115 36.4 145 36.0 37459 36.3 105880 35.0Quite a bit 31 17.3 4824 16.9 15281 16.4 47 20.9 15198 20.3 40301 19.2 73 18.2 19104 18.5 53239 17.6Very much 7 3.9 2498 8.8 7686 8.2 28 12.4 8107 10.8 20947 10.0 24 6.0 10008 9.7 27020 8.9

Total 179 100.0 28542 100.0 93436 100.0 225 100.0 74789 100.0 209389 100.0 402 100.0 103094 100.0 302105 100.012n. Developing clearer career Very little 31 17.2 4989 17.4 17733 18.9 31 13.8 8017 10.7 26324 12.5 66 16.4 14709 14.2 48972 16.2

goals Some 48 26.7 8512 29.7 28127 30.0 60 26.8 19669 26.2 57244 27.3 108 26.7 29118 28.2 87512 28.9Quite a bit 69 38.3 9004 31.4 28590 30.5 80 35.7 26260 35.0 71295 34.0 152 37.7 34323 33.2 97176 32.1Very much 32 17.8 6127 21.4 19314 20.6 53 23.7 21025 28.0 55134 26.3 77 19.2 25241 24.4 69425 22.9

Total 180 100.0 28632 100.0 93764 100.0 224 100.0 74971 100.0 209997 100.0 403 100.0 103391 100.0 303086 100.012o. Gaining information about Very little 33 18.2 6063 21.2 21591 23.0 37 16.4 9925 13.2 32659 15.5 72 17.8 17913 17.3 59849 19.7

career opportunities Some 52 28.7 8995 31.4 29564 31.5 69 30.7 20972 27.9 61106 29.1 118 29.2 30919 29.9 92571 30.5Quite a bit 60 33.1 8145 28.4 25474 27.1 69 30.7 24486 32.6 65795 31.3 132 32.5 31530 30.5 87985 29.0Very much 36 19.9 5462 19.1 17295 18.4 50 22.2 19694 26.2 50732 24.1 83 20.5 23153 22.4 63151 20.8

Total 181 100.0 28665 100.0 93924 100.0 225 100.0 75077 100.0 210292 100.0 405 100.0 103514 100.0 303556 100.013a1. Frequency: Academic Do not know/N.A. 27 14.8 3323 11.7 10992 11.8 19 8.7 4567 6.1 13286 6.4 54 13.3 9355 9.1 28686 9.6

advising/planning Rarely/never 71 38.8 10069 35.4 35300 38.0 87 39.9 22377 30.1 67603 32.5 158 39.1 33734 32.9 106875 35.6Sometimes 73 39.9 11699 41.2 36859 39.7 84 38.5 35278 47.5 95968 46.1 161 39.6 45234 44.1 127467 42.5

Often 12 6.6 3320 11.7 9734 10.5 28 12.8 12123 16.3 31102 15.0 33 8.0 14231 13.9 37195 12.4Total 183 100.0 28411 100.0 92885 100.0 218 100.0 74345 100.0 207959 100.0 406 100.0 102555 100.0 300223 100.0

13b1. Frequency: Career counseling Do not know/N.A. 37 20.3 6789 24.0 21689 23.4 29 13.2 13417 18.1 37982 18.3 75 18.6 21584 21.1 63608 21.3Rarely/never 89 48.9 14089 49.8 46188 49.9 107 48.9 37162 50.2 104463 50.4 198 48.9 51052 50.0 150133 50.2

Sometimes 45 24.7 6080 21.5 20246 21.9 63 28.8 18693 25.2 51365 24.8 104 25.7 23828 23.3 69111 23.1Often 11 6.0 1335 4.7 4394 4.7 20 9.1 4795 6.5 13317 6.4 27 6.8 5695 5.6 16203 5.4

Total 182 100.0 28293 100.0 92517 100.0 219 100.0 74067 100.0 207127 100.0 404 100.0 102158 100.0 299055 100.013c1. Frequency: Job placement Do not know/N.A. 76 42.0 12776 45.5 41321 45.0 69 31.8 27876 37.9 80530 39.1 159 39.6 42355 41.7 126048 42.4

assistance Rarely/never 77 42.5 12524 44.6 41952 45.7 110 50.7 33516 45.5 96160 46.7 179 44.5 45628 45.0 136862 46.1Sometimes 25 13.8 2170 7.7 6676 7.3 29 13.4 9157 12.4 22151 10.8 55 13.7 10278 10.1 26271 8.8

Often 3 1.7 632 2.2 1890 2.1 9 4.1 3044 4.1 6941 3.4 9 2.2 3223 3.2 7803 2.6Total 181 100.0 28102 100.0 91839 100.0 217 100.0 73593 100.0 205782 100.0 402 100.0 101485 100.0 296983 100.0

13d1. Frequency: Peer or other Do not know/N.A. 64 35.6 9234 32.9 29367 32.0 51 23.4 18236 24.8 51689 25.2 131 32.6 29556 29.2 86561 29.2tutoring Rarely/never 74 41.1 12796 45.6 41609 45.4 90 41.3 34229 46.6 94552 46.0 165 41.2 46635 46.0 135486 45.7

Sometimes 28 15.6 4329 15.4 15019 16.4 52 23.9 14874 20.2 42162 20.5 70 17.5 17927 17.7 53593 18.1Often 14 7.8 1703 6.1 5676 6.2 25 11.5 6159 8.4 17054 8.3 35 8.7 7239 7.1 20843 7.0

Total 180 100.0 28062 100.0 91671 100.0 218 100.0 73498 100.0 205457 100.0 401 100.0 101357 100.0 296483 100.013e1. Frequency: Skill labs (writing, Do not know/N.A. 55 31.1 7858 28.0 25059 27.4 44 20.5 14231 19.4 41195 20.1 112 28.5 24315 24.0 71996 24.3

math, etc.) Rarely/never 56 31.6 10218 36.5 34447 37.6 79 36.7 24890 34.0 73305 35.8 130 32.9 35588 35.2 108850 36.8Sometimes 42 23.7 6304 22.5 20487 22.4 61 28.4 20545 28.0 55400 27.0 98 24.8 25477 25.2 72218 24.4

Often 24 13.6 3644 13.0 11529 12.6 31 14.4 13586 18.5 35007 17.1 54 13.8 15741 15.6 42793 14.5Total 177 100.0 28024 100.0 91522 100.0 215 100.0 73252 100.0 204907 100.0 394 100.0 101121 100.0 295857 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F7

Page 131: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College Other Small Colleges

13f1. Frequency: Child care Do not know/N.A. 116 64.4 16639 59.4 54064 59.1 118 54.9 41949 57.2 118177 57.7 248 62.2 58877 58.2 172775 58.4Rarely/never 50 27.8 9972 35.6 33477 36.6 80 37.2 26196 35.8 74637 36.4 120 30.0 36136 35.7 108074 36.5

Sometimes 11 6.1 716 2.6 2198 2.4 8 3.7 2565 3.5 6512 3.2 22 5.5 3077 3.0 8161 2.8Often 3 1.7 706 2.5 1812 2.0 9 4.2 2564 3.5 5582 2.7 9 2.3 3060 3.0 6890 2.3

Total 180 100.0 28033 100.0 91551 100.0 215 100.0 73274 100.0 204908 100.0 399 100.0 101150 100.0 295899 100.013g1. Frequency: Financial aid Do not know/N.A. 70 38.5 7155 25.6 26147 28.6 59 27.6 11464 15.6 39430 19.2 144 35.9 20995 20.8 72312 24.4

advising Rarely/never 53 29.1 8791 31.4 30896 33.8 69 32.2 20142 27.5 61118 29.8 120 29.9 29962 29.6 94795 32.0Sometimes 34 18.7 7355 26.3 21073 23.0 45 21.0 24877 33.9 62197 30.3 77 19.2 30411 30.1 78034 26.4

Often 25 13.7 4698 16.8 13422 14.7 41 19.2 16820 22.9 42324 20.6 60 15.0 19723 19.5 50826 17.2Total 182 100.0 27999 100.0 91538 100.0 214 100.0 73303 100.0 205069 100.0 402 100.0 101091 100.0 295968 100.0

13h1. Frequency: Computer lab Do not know/N.A. 36 19.9 5160 18.4 17072 18.6 18 8.3 5699 7.8 17651 8.6 69 17.1 13588 13.4 42639 14.4Rarely/never 34 18.8 7451 26.6 25522 27.8 29 13.4 12874 17.5 39001 19.0 70 17.5 22538 22.3 71251 24.0

Sometimes 54 29.8 7983 28.5 26162 28.5 68 31.3 23016 31.4 64200 31.3 121 30.2 30176 29.8 88042 29.7Often 57 31.5 7443 26.5 22927 25.0 102 47.0 31825 43.4 84415 41.1 141 35.2 34898 34.5 94383 31.9

Total 181 100.0 28037 100.0 91683 100.0 217 100.0 73414 100.0 205267 100.0 402 100.0 101199 100.0 296316 100.013i1. Frequency: Student Do not know/N.A. 106 58.2 12422 44.6 40882 44.9 79 36.4 23391 32.1 69925 34.3 214 53.1 38849 38.6 118793 40.4

organizations Rarely/never 48 26.4 11932 42.8 39619 43.5 97 44.7 31820 43.6 90241 44.3 124 30.7 43441 43.2 128987 43.8Sometimes 25 13.7 2581 9.3 7763 8.5 23 10.6 12268 16.8 30327 14.9 52 13.0 12970 12.9 33153 11.3

Often 3 1.6 911 3.3 2753 3.0 18 8.3 5447 7.5 13282 6.5 13 3.2 5285 5.3 13256 4.5Total 182 100.0 27846 100.0 91017 100.0 217 100.0 72926 100.0 203775 100.0 404 100.0 100545 100.0 294190 100.0

13j1. Frequency: Transfer credit Do not know/N.A. 94 52.5 11241 40.0 35129 38.3 70 32.1 25994 35.3 67465 32.8 190 47.6 38436 37.9 107220 36.1assistance Rarely/never 50 27.9 9817 34.9 33582 36.6 95 43.6 25575 34.8 73183 35.6 126 31.7 35279 34.8 107179 36.1

Sometimes 30 16.8 5270 18.8 17475 19.0 41 18.8 15790 21.5 46905 22.8 69 17.3 20343 20.1 61045 20.6Often 5 2.8 1763 6.3 5633 6.1 12 5.5 6181 8.4 18133 8.8 14 3.4 7354 7.3 21419 7.2

Total 179 100.0 28091 100.0 91819 100.0 218 100.0 73540 100.0 205686 100.0 399 100.0 101413 100.0 296862 100.013k1. Frequency: Services to Do not know/N.A. 123 67.6 17381 61.8 56006 60.9 120 55.6 43160 58.6 120257 58.4 261 64.7 61043 60.1 177689 59.8

students with disabilities Rarely/never 49 26.9 8660 30.8 29295 31.9 72 33.3 22952 31.1 66013 32.0 115 28.4 31492 31.0 94929 31.9Sometimes 6 3.3 1221 4.3 3768 4.1 13 6.0 4338 5.9 11209 5.4 16 3.9 5255 5.2 14061 4.7

Often 4 2.2 876 3.1 2905 3.2 11 5.1 3246 4.4 8531 4.1 12 2.9 3805 3.7 10667 3.6Total 182 100.0 28138 100.0 91974 100.0 216 100.0 73696 100.0 206010 100.0 403 100.0 101595 100.0 297347 100.0

13a2. Satisfaction: Academic N.A. 41 23.4 5747 20.8 20359 22.6 45 20.7 8874 12.2 27228 13.4 89 22.8 16795 16.8 54553 18.6advising/planning Not at all 16 9.1 2450 8.9 9218 10.2 21 9.7 6254 8.6 21161 10.4 36 9.3 8761 8.7 30000 10.3

Somewhat 77 44.0 11328 41.0 37574 41.7 90 41.5 33399 45.8 94686 46.5 170 43.4 43444 43.4 127950 43.7Very 41 23.4 8084 29.3 22965 25.5 61 28.1 24413 33.5 60562 29.7 96 24.6 31157 31.1 80021 27.4

Total 175 100.0 27609 100.0 90116 100.0 217 100.0 72940 100.0 203637 100.0 392 100.0 100157 100.0 292524 100.013b2. Satisfaction: Career N.A. 56 32.4 11997 43.9 39732 44.6 69 31.8 25567 35.4 74970 37.1 125 32.2 39424 39.7 119682 41.3

Counseling Not at all 23 13.3 3573 13.1 11681 13.1 30 13.8 9769 13.5 27979 13.9 52 13.4 13220 13.3 39002 13.5Somewhat 57 32.9 7493 27.4 24636 27.6 66 30.4 23205 32.1 63761 31.6 126 32.3 29536 29.8 85049 29.4

Very 37 21.4 4261 15.6 13134 14.7 52 24.0 13759 19.0 35120 17.4 86 22.0 17049 17.2 45965 15.9Total 173 100.0 27324 100.0 89183 100.0 217 100.0 72300 100.0 201830 100.0 388 100.0 99228 100.0 289698 100.0

13c2. Satisfaction: Job placement N.A. 98 57.3 17785 65.9 59294 67.4 120 55.8 39664 55.4 117886 59.1 219 56.9 59498 60.7 182068 63.7assistance Not at all 24 14.0 3487 12.9 11372 12.9 31 14.4 10093 14.1 28127 14.1 54 14.1 13290 13.5 38513 13.5

Somewhat 35 20.5 3897 14.4 12195 13.9 35 16.3 14493 20.3 36800 18.4 75 19.4 17022 17.4 45555 15.9Very 14 8.2 1819 6.7 5105 5.8 29 13.5 7291 10.2 16670 8.4 36 9.5 8277 8.4 19881 7.0

Total 171 100.0 26988 100.0 87966 100.0 215 100.0 71541 100.0 199483 100.0 384 100.0 98087 100.0 286017 100.013d2. Satisfaction: Peer or other N.A. 84 49.4 14726 54.5 47973 54.5 93 43.3 31830 44.5 90998 45.6 183 47.9 48900 49.8 145292 50.8

tutoring Not at all 13 7.6 2699 10.0 8574 9.7 18 8.4 6872 9.6 19204 9.6 30 7.8 9625 9.8 27760 9.7Somewhat 36 21.2 5469 20.3 18381 20.9 46 21.4 18459 25.8 51236 25.7 81 21.2 22451 22.9 65559 22.9

Very 37 21.8 4104 15.2 13076 14.9 58 27.0 14376 20.1 38042 19.1 88 23.1 17138 17.5 47503 16.6Total 170 100.0 26998 100.0 88004 100.0 215 100.0 71537 100.0 199480 100.0 382 100.0 98114 100.0 286113 100.0

13e2. Satisfaction: Skill labs (writing, N.A. 72 42.4 12337 45.8 40775 46.4 81 38.2 24317 34.1 72262 36.3 157 41.3 39403 40.3 120127 42.1math, etc.) Not at all 16 9.4 2010 7.5 6657 7.6 21 9.9 5077 7.1 14605 7.3 36 9.5 7134 7.3 21361 7.5

Somewhat 51 30.0 7100 26.4 22897 26.1 64 30.2 23455 32.9 62524 31.4 114 30.0 28897 29.5 81121 28.4Very 31 18.2 5464 20.3 17454 19.9 46 21.7 18503 25.9 49491 24.9 73 19.1 22406 22.9 62738 22.0

Total 170 100.0 26911 100.0 87783 100.0 212 100.0 71352 100.0 198882 100.0 381 100.0 97842 100.0 285346 100.013f2. Satisfaction: Child care N.A. 130 76.5 21052 78.3 69687 79.7 152 72.0 52880 74.5 151621 76.6 287 75.4 74499 76.4 222294 78.2

Not at all 14 8.2 2794 10.4 8601 9.8 30 14.2 7401 10.4 19670 9.9 37 9.7 10191 10.4 28178 9.9Somewhat 15 8.8 1782 6.6 5619 6.4 10 4.7 6284 8.9 16242 8.2 30 7.8 7521 7.7 20537 7.2

Very 11 6.5 1245 4.6 3538 4.0 19 9.0 4438 6.3 10371 5.2 27 7.1 5316 5.5 13103 4.6Total 170 100.0 26873 100.0 87445 100.0 211 100.0 71003 100.0 197904 100.0 381 100.0 97528 100.0 284111 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F8

Page 132: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College Other Small Colleges

13g2. Satisfaction: Financial aid N.A. 79 45.9 10069 37.3 37291 42.4 84 40.0 16594 23.2 57578 28.9 171 44.5 29906 30.5 103950 36.4advising Not at all 20 11.6 3502 13.0 11814 13.4 29 13.8 8984 12.6 26585 13.3 47 12.2 12604 12.8 38343 13.4

Somewhat 34 19.8 6383 23.6 19841 22.6 37 17.6 21516 30.1 56768 28.5 74 19.2 26386 26.9 72246 25.3Very 39 22.7 7072 26.2 18998 21.6 60 28.6 24377 34.1 58217 29.2 92 24.1 29208 29.8 71252 24.9

Total 172 100.0 27026 100.0 87944 100.0 210 100.0 71471 100.0 199148 100.0 384 100.0 98104 100.0 285792 100.013h2. Satisfaction: Computer lab N.A. 44 25.4 7682 28.4 26312 29.9 28 13.2 8960 12.5 28616 14.3 87 22.5 20578 20.9 66533 23.2

Not at all 9 5.2 1559 5.8 5064 5.7 12 5.7 3380 4.7 9614 4.8 21 5.3 5234 5.3 15384 5.4Somewhat 50 28.9 7144 26.4 23444 26.6 45 21.2 21741 30.3 60461 30.3 104 27.0 27779 28.3 80691 28.2

Very 70 40.5 10668 39.4 33280 37.8 127 59.9 37570 52.4 101013 50.6 174 45.2 44675 45.5 123764 43.2Total 173 100.0 27053 100.0 88100 100.0 212 100.0 71651 100.0 199704 100.0 386 100.0 98266 100.0 286373 100.0

13i2. Satisfaction: Student N.A. 119 69.2 17497 65.5 58482 67.2 114 53.5 35094 49.5 105709 53.6 252 65.4 56219 57.9 173448 61.3organizations Not at all 17 9.9 2767 10.4 8933 10.3 30 14.1 7644 10.8 21189 10.7 42 10.9 10227 10.5 29529 10.4

Somewhat 28 16.3 4502 16.9 13705 15.8 41 19.2 18493 26.1 47184 23.9 65 17.0 20686 21.3 54614 19.3Very 8 4.7 1950 7.3 5860 6.7 28 13.1 9627 13.6 23094 11.7 26 6.7 9996 10.3 25182 8.9

Total 172 100.0 26716 100.0 86980 100.0 213 100.0 70858 100.0 197176 100.0 385 100.0 97128 100.0 282772 100.013j2. Satisfaction: Transfer credit N.A. 104 60.1 14646 54.1 47592 54.1 99 46.3 33978 47.5 92198 46.2 220 56.7 50126 51.0 145453 50.8

assistance Not at all 22 12.7 2941 10.9 9920 11.3 21 9.8 8172 11.4 23903 12.0 46 12.0 10894 11.1 32965 11.5Somewhat 25 14.5 5545 20.5 18527 21.1 51 23.8 17625 24.7 51204 25.7 65 16.7 22120 22.5 65795 23.0

Very 22 12.7 3921 14.5 11969 13.6 43 20.1 11720 16.4 32061 16.1 56 14.5 15052 15.3 41831 14.6Total 173 100.0 27053 100.0 88008 100.0 214 100.0 71495 100.0 199366 100.0 387 100.0 98191 100.0 286044 100.0

13k2. Satisfaction: Services to N.A. 136 79.5 20393 75.7 67153 76.6 141 67.1 50456 70.7 143794 72.3 292 76.5 71639 73.2 212822 74.6students with disabilities Not at all 11 6.4 2126 7.9 6874 7.8 18 8.6 5430 7.6 15237 7.7 27 7.0 7626 7.8 22123 7.8

Somewhat 16 9.4 2467 9.2 7614 8.7 24 11.4 8491 11.9 21810 11.0 38 9.9 10321 10.5 27780 9.7Very 8 4.7 1953 7.2 6055 6.9 27 12.9 6993 9.8 17950 9.0 25 6.7 8303 8.5 22371 7.8

Total 171 100.0 26939 100.0 87696 100.0 210 100.0 71370 100.0 198791 100.0 382 100.0 97888 100.0 285095 100.013a3. Importance: Academic Not at all 32 18.1 3509 12.8 11811 13.2 33 15.3 5028 6.9 14922 7.4 69 17.4 10009 10.0 31207 10.7

advising/planning Somewhat 54 30.5 7897 28.7 25195 28.1 70 32.6 20757 28.6 57413 28.4 122 31.0 28778 28.9 82491 28.4Very 91 51.4 16066 58.5 52502 58.7 112 52.1 46690 64.4 129918 64.2 203 51.6 60834 61.1 176886 60.9

Total 177 100.0 27472 100.0 89508 100.0 215 100.0 72475 100.0 202253 100.0 394 100.0 99622 100.0 290583 100.013b3. Importance: Career counseling Not at all 36 20.8 6932 25.5 21528 24.4 46 21.5 12610 17.6 35739 17.9 81 21.0 21407 21.7 62077 21.6

Somewhat 52 30.1 7702 28.4 24245 27.4 58 27.1 22601 31.5 60979 30.5 114 29.3 29506 30.0 82877 28.9Very 85 49.1 12498 46.1 42587 48.2 110 51.4 36537 50.9 103321 51.7 192 49.7 47588 48.3 142141 49.5

Total 173 100.0 27132 100.0 88360 100.0 214 100.0 71748 100.0 200039 100.0 387 100.0 98501 100.0 287095 100.013c3. Importance: Job placement Not at all 72 41.6 10605 39.7 34118 39.2 75 35.2 20445 28.8 60854 30.8 155 40.1 33416 34.4 100677 35.5

assistance Somewhat 47 27.2 6760 25.3 22682 26.0 60 28.2 21179 29.9 60679 30.7 106 27.4 26820 27.6 79491 28.1Very 54 31.2 9372 35.1 30288 34.8 78 36.6 29292 41.3 75996 38.5 126 32.5 36958 38.0 103044 36.4

Total 173 100.0 26737 100.0 87088 100.0 213 100.0 70916 100.0 197529 100.0 387 100.0 97195 100.0 283211 100.013d3. Importance: Peer or other Not at all 53 30.6 9385 35.1 29279 33.6 59 27.4 18113 25.5 50979 25.8 116 29.9 29821 30.7 86108 30.4

tutoring Somewhat 49 28.3 7727 28.9 25531 29.3 55 25.6 23556 33.2 65104 32.9 107 27.7 30097 31.0 87587 30.9Very 71 41.0 9631 36.0 32218 37.0 101 47.0 29254 41.2 81540 41.3 165 42.5 37300 38.4 109467 38.7

Total 173 100.0 26743 100.0 87028 100.0 215 100.0 70923 100.0 197623 100.0 387 100.0 97218 100.0 283163 100.013e3. Importance: Skill labs (writing, Not at all 46 26.6 7765 29.2 24752 28.5 54 25.5 14328 20.3 41275 21.0 102 26.3 24189 25.0 71475 25.3

math, etc.) Somewhat 58 33.5 8041 30.2 25735 29.7 68 32.1 24171 34.2 65777 33.4 128 33.2 31156 32.2 88526 31.4Very 69 39.9 10813 40.6 36226 41.8 90 42.5 32154 45.5 89834 45.6 156 40.5 41451 42.8 122126 43.3

Total 173 100.0 26619 100.0 86713 100.0 212 100.0 70653 100.0 196886 100.0 386 100.0 96796 100.0 282127 100.013f3. Importance: Child care Not at all 92 53.2 15019 56.5 48690 56.4 113 54.1 35848 51.1 101843 52.1 205 53.4 51974 53.9 152957 54.5

Somewhat 36 20.8 4353 16.4 14657 17.0 21 10.0 13525 19.3 38106 19.5 70 18.2 17231 17.9 50789 18.1Very 45 26.0 7225 27.2 22995 26.6 75 35.9 20813 29.7 55478 28.4 109 28.4 27239 28.2 76792 27.4

Total 173 100.0 26597 100.0 86342 100.0 209 100.0 70186 100.0 195427 100.0 385 100.0 96445 100.0 280538 100.013g3. Importance: Financial aid Not at all 54 31.0 6736 25.1 23654 27.2 62 29.2 10161 14.3 33343 16.9 119 30.6 19414 19.9 64171 22.7

advising Somewhat 24 13.8 4397 16.4 14719 16.9 35 16.5 12608 17.8 35943 18.2 56 14.4 16871 17.3 49804 17.6Very 96 55.2 15674 58.5 48713 55.9 115 54.2 48163 67.9 128162 64.9 213 54.9 61048 62.7 169197 59.8

Total 174 100.0 26807 100.0 87086 100.0 212 100.0 70932 100.0 197448 100.0 388 100.0 97332 100.0 283172 100.013h3. Importance: Computer lab Not at all 35 20.2 5398 20.1 17943 20.5 23 10.7 6445 9.0 19738 9.9 69 17.9 14526 14.9 45582 16.0

Somewhat 46 26.6 6637 24.7 21713 24.8 41 19.2 17254 24.2 48717 24.5 96 24.8 23940 24.5 70400 24.7Very 92 53.2 14836 55.2 47817 54.7 150 70.1 47567 66.7 130018 65.5 222 57.3 59185 60.6 168484 59.2

Total 173 100.0 26871 100.0 87473 100.0 214 100.0 71266 100.0 198473 100.0 387 100.0 97651 100.0 284466 100.013i3. Importance: Student Not at all 90 52.9 12468 47.2 40133 46.7 83 39.5 23674 33.8 68825 35.3 189 49.7 39231 40.9 117017 41.9

organizations Somewhat 45 26.5 8543 32.4 27855 32.4 61 29.0 27223 38.8 74704 38.3 103 27.1 34009 35.4 97638 34.9Very 35 20.6 5397 20.4 17971 20.9 66 31.4 19205 27.4 51503 26.4 88 23.2 22797 23.7 64920 23.2

Total 170 100.0 26408 100.0 85959 100.0 210 100.0 70102 100.0 195032 100.0 380 100.0 96037 100.0 279575 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F9

Page 133: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College Other Small Colleges

13j3. Importance: Transfer credit Not at all 64 36.8 8893 33.2 26967 31.0 63 29.6 18179 25.7 46158 23.4 136 35.0 28914 29.8 79051 27.9assistance Somewhat 34 19.5 5492 20.5 18042 20.7 45 21.1 16151 22.8 43927 22.3 77 19.9 21163 21.8 60842 21.5

Very 76 43.7 12389 46.3 42086 48.3 105 49.3 36430 51.5 107206 54.3 175 45.0 47082 48.5 143165 50.6Total 174 100.0 26774 100.0 87095 100.0 213 100.0 70760 100.0 197291 100.0 388 100.0 97159 100.0 283059 100.0

13k3. Importance: Services to Not at all 83 48.0 11810 44.3 38177 44.0 89 42.2 25897 36.7 73824 37.6 180 46.6 39412 40.7 116256 41.2students with disabilities Somewhat 25 14.5 3751 14.1 12372 14.3 31 14.7 11403 16.2 31840 16.2 56 14.5 14689 15.2 42787 15.2

Very 65 37.6 11083 41.6 36156 41.7 91 43.1 33238 47.1 90806 46.2 150 38.9 42677 44.1 122807 43.6Total 173 100.0 26644 100.0 86705 100.0 211 100.0 70538 100.0 196470 100.0 386 100.0 96778 100.0 281850 100.0

14a. Working full-time Not likely 64 35.0 11882 41.4 37208 39.6 90 41.3 32736 43.7 90496 43.2 148 36.5 43860 42.4 124576 41.1Somewhat likely 38 20.8 6149 21.4 19784 21.1 35 16.1 15873 21.2 44163 21.1 80 19.7 22065 21.3 63950 21.1

Likely 35 19.1 4871 17.0 16659 17.7 45 20.6 12543 16.7 36135 17.2 79 19.5 17503 16.9 53171 17.5Very likely 46 25.1 5777 20.1 20232 21.6 48 22.0 13738 18.3 38799 18.5 99 24.4 20030 19.4 61413 20.3

Total 183 100.0 28679 100.0 93883 100.0 218 100.0 74890 100.0 209593 100.0 406 100.0 103457 100.0 303111 100.014b. Caring for dependents Not likely 85 46.2 13729 48.0 45764 48.9 113 51.8 36306 48.5 104282 49.8 194 47.5 49710 48.1 148783 49.2

Somewhat likely 38 20.7 6630 23.2 20920 22.3 38 17.4 17214 23.0 46869 22.4 81 19.9 23878 23.1 67766 22.4Likely 30 16.3 4390 15.3 14518 15.5 35 16.1 11956 16.0 33448 16.0 66 16.2 16222 15.7 47576 15.7

Very likely 31 16.8 3854 13.5 12423 13.3 32 14.7 9315 12.5 24623 11.8 67 16.3 13434 13.0 38283 12.7Total 184 100.0 28603 100.0 93625 100.0 218 100.0 74791 100.0 209222 100.0 407 100.0 103244 100.0 302409 100.0

14c. Academically unprepared Not likely 111 60.7 17765 62.4 55727 59.8 123 56.9 44052 59.1 117943 56.6 242 59.8 62444 60.7 176089 58.4Somewhat likely 36 19.7 6161 21.6 20898 22.4 55 25.5 17196 23.1 49951 24.0 85 21.0 23015 22.4 69538 23.1

Likely 25 13.7 2924 10.3 10584 11.4 24 11.1 8581 11.5 26190 12.6 53 13.1 11221 10.9 35696 11.8Very likely 11 6.0 1638 5.7 6034 6.5 14 6.5 4713 6.3 14438 6.9 25 6.1 6202 6.0 19977 6.6

Total 183 100.0 28488 100.0 93243 100.0 216 100.0 74542 100.0 208522 100.0 405 100.0 102882 100.0 301301 100.014d. Lack of finances Not likely 70 38.7 9119 31.9 30910 33.0 82 37.6 23057 30.9 67878 32.5 155 38.4 32279 31.3 98778 32.7

Somewhat likely 31 17.1 6675 23.3 21497 23.0 37 17.0 16855 22.6 46827 22.4 69 17.1 23770 23.0 68787 22.8Likely 36 19.9 5101 17.8 16848 18.0 29 13.3 14109 18.9 39225 18.8 74 18.3 19023 18.4 55508 18.4

Very likely 44 24.3 7709 27.0 24309 26.0 70 32.1 20676 27.7 54998 26.3 105 26.2 28127 27.3 79058 26.2Total 181 100.0 28604 100.0 93564 100.0 218 100.0 74697 100.0 208928 100.0 402 100.0 103198 100.0 302132 100.0

14e. Transfer to a 4-year college or Not likely 81 44.3 12331 43.1 34748 37.1 56 25.8 26032 34.8 59737 28.5 162 39.9 40900 39.6 102476 33.9university Somewhat likely 34 18.6 5125 17.9 16575 17.7 34 15.7 13137 17.6 33783 16.1 73 17.9 18246 17.7 51645 17.1

Likely 26 14.2 4505 15.8 16131 17.2 46 21.2 13003 17.4 38662 18.5 64 15.9 16916 16.4 53360 17.6Very likely 42 23.0 6636 23.2 26103 27.9 81 37.3 22620 30.2 77118 36.8 107 26.3 27179 26.3 94851 31.4

Total 183 100.0 28597 100.0 93557 100.0 217 100.0 74792 100.0 209300 100.0 405 100.0 103241 100.0 302331 100.015. How supportive are your Not very 12 6.5 1018 3.5 3903 4.2 10 4.6 2555 3.4 8515 4.1 25 6.1 3627 3.5 12472 4.1

friends of your attending this Somewhat 34 18.5 4943 17.2 17091 18.2 39 17.8 12362 16.5 37977 18.1 75 18.3 17680 17.1 55113 18.2college? Quite a bit 47 25.5 8136 28.4 26869 28.6 51 23.3 21153 28.2 60122 28.7 102 25.0 29374 28.4 86974 28.7

Extremely 91 49.5 14590 50.9 46059 49.0 119 54.3 38854 51.9 103071 49.2 206 50.6 52804 51.0 148677 49.0Total 184 100.0 28687 100.0 93922 100.0 219 100.0 74924 100.0 209685 100.0 408 100.0 103485 100.0 303236 100.0

16. How supportive is your Not very 3 1.6 758 2.6 2814 3.0 5 2.3 1695 2.3 5808 2.8 7 1.8 2589 2.5 8813 2.9immediate family of your Somewhat 26 14.3 3033 10.6 10547 11.3 17 7.8 6583 8.8 20317 9.7 51 12.7 10097 9.8 31984 10.6attending this college? Quite a bit 29 15.9 5927 20.7 19646 21.0 47 21.5 13612 18.2 40087 19.2 70 17.3 20258 19.6 61240 20.3

Extremely 124 68.1 18924 66.1 60681 64.8 150 68.5 52825 70.7 142846 68.3 276 68.2 70318 68.1 200373 66.3Total 182 100.0 28642 100.0 93688 100.0 219 100.0 74715 100.0 209058 100.0 404 100.0 103262 100.0 302410 100.0

17a. Complete a certificate program Not a goal 69 37.9 14617 52.0 49232 53.6 115 53.5 34574 46.8 105167 50.9 167 41.6 50219 49.4 155421 52.2Secondary goal 34 18.7 5053 18.0 16925 18.4 42 19.5 14718 19.9 41612 20.1 76 18.9 19214 18.9 56874 19.1

Primary goal 79 43.4 8426 30.0 25700 28.0 58 27.0 24658 33.3 59802 28.9 159 39.5 32301 31.8 85231 28.6Total 182 100.0 28096 100.0 91857 100.0 215 100.0 73950 100.0 206581 100.0 403 100.0 101734 100.0 297526 100.0

17b. Obtain an Associate degree Not a goal 41 22.4 6838 24.2 22498 24.3 72 33.6 10983 14.8 33421 16.1 101 25.0 20518 20.0 62707 20.9Secondary goal 48 26.2 5192 18.3 18137 19.6 44 20.6 15101 20.3 45837 22.1 101 24.9 19701 19.3 61621 20.6

Primary goal 94 51.4 16272 57.5 51965 56.1 98 45.8 48234 64.9 128550 61.9 202 50.1 62121 60.7 175280 58.5Total 183 100.0 28302 100.0 92600 100.0 214 100.0 74318 100.0 207808 100.0 404 100.0 102341 100.0 299607 100.0

17c. Transfer to a 4-year college or Not a goal 76 41.8 11031 39.2 29090 31.5 52 24.2 21360 28.8 42128 20.3 151 37.6 35446 34.7 81586 27.3university Secondary goal 36 19.8 6659 23.6 20727 22.5 43 20.0 16703 22.5 41199 19.8 80 19.8 23428 23.0 63908 21.4

Primary goal 70 38.5 10477 37.2 42503 46.0 120 55.8 36106 48.7 124420 59.9 171 42.5 43150 42.3 153593 51.4Total 182 100.0 28167 100.0 92320 100.0 215 100.0 74169 100.0 207747 100.0 403 100.0 102025 100.0 299086 100.0

17d. Obtain or update job-related Not a goal 47 26.1 8679 30.9 30126 32.8 95 44.6 20890 28.3 66039 32.0 121 30.5 30019 29.5 96028 32.3skills Secondary goal 38 21.1 7091 25.2 23976 26.1 48 22.5 20080 27.2 57843 28.1 85 21.4 26618 26.2 80014 26.9

Primary goal 95 52.8 12326 43.9 37667 41.0 70 32.9 32861 44.5 82296 39.9 192 48.1 45032 44.3 121096 40.8Total 180 100.0 28096 100.0 91769 100.0 213 100.0 73831 100.0 206178 100.0 398 100.0 101669 100.0 297138 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F10

Page 134: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College Other Small Colleges

17e. Self-improvement/personal Not a goal 45 24.7 6929 24.6 23744 25.7 74 34.1 18635 25.2 56468 27.3 109 26.9 25247 24.7 78418 26.3enjoyment Secondary goal 58 31.9 9413 33.4 30871 33.5 75 34.6 26233 35.4 74634 36.1 131 32.5 35086 34.4 103198 34.6

Primary goal 79 43.4 11882 42.1 37619 40.8 68 31.3 29167 39.4 75824 36.6 164 40.5 41700 40.9 116836 39.1Total 182 100.0 28224 100.0 92234 100.0 217 100.0 74035 100.0 206926 100.0 404 100.0 102032 100.0 298452 100.0

17f. Change careers Not a goal 96 52.7 13534 48.0 45959 49.9 154 71.3 42955 58.0 126891 61.3 230 57.1 53754 52.7 162995 54.6Secondary goal 33 18.1 4687 16.6 15611 16.9 17 7.9 11144 15.0 30955 15.0 63 15.7 16325 16.0 48144 16.1

Primary goal 53 29.1 9967 35.4 30604 33.2 45 20.8 19959 27.0 49020 23.7 109 27.2 31910 31.3 87163 29.2Total 182 100.0 28188 100.0 92174 100.0 216 100.0 74058 100.0 206866 100.0 403 100.0 101990 100.0 298302 100.0

18a. My own income/savings Not a source 51 27.7 8542 30.2 25129 27.1 79 36.2 29940 40.4 79614 38.4 121 29.7 35741 35.0 95873 32.0Minor source 32 17.4 7359 26.0 22811 24.6 67 30.7 24440 33.0 67586 32.6 84 20.5 29963 29.3 83947 28.0Major source 101 54.9 12410 43.8 44816 48.3 72 33.0 19710 26.6 59930 28.9 203 49.7 36509 35.7 119692 40.0

Total 184 100.0 28311 100.0 92756 100.0 218 100.0 74090 100.0 207130 100.0 407 100.0 102212 100.0 299512 100.018b. Parent or spouse/significant Not a source 110 60.1 17200 61.3 53969 58.7 89 40.6 36784 49.7 93119 45.0 225 55.5 56691 55.7 158010 53.0

other's income/savings Minor source 23 12.6 4298 15.3 14478 15.7 46 21.0 15647 21.2 42154 20.4 59 14.6 18391 18.1 52773 17.7Major source 50 27.3 6580 23.4 23534 25.6 84 38.4 21529 29.1 71551 34.6 122 29.9 26607 26.2 87105 29.2

Total 183 100.0 28078 100.0 91981 100.0 219 100.0 73960 100.0 206824 100.0 406 100.0 101689 100.0 297887 100.018c. Employer contributions Not a source 131 72.8 22510 80.4 73932 80.7 182 83.9 64818 88.3 181270 88.3 302 75.4 85024 84.1 248595 83.9

Minor source 15 8.3 2317 8.3 7799 8.5 13 6.0 5248 7.1 14730 7.2 31 7.8 7855 7.8 23523 7.9Major source 34 18.9 3155 11.3 9873 10.8 22 10.1 3336 4.5 9197 4.5 67 16.8 8258 8.2 24070 8.1

Total 180 100.0 27982 100.0 91604 100.0 217 100.0 73402 100.0 205197 100.0 400 100.0 101137 100.0 296187 100.018d. Grants & scholarships Not a source 130 71.4 16267 57.8 59888 65.1 113 52.1 25740 34.8 90455 43.7 270 66.8 47698 46.8 165998 55.7

Minor source 18 9.9 2961 10.5 8383 9.1 21 9.7 10722 14.5 27391 13.2 40 9.8 12843 12.6 32811 11.0Major source 34 18.7 8915 31.7 23782 25.8 83 38.2 37594 50.8 89102 43.1 94 23.3 41372 40.6 99325 33.3

Total 182 100.0 28143 100.0 92053 100.0 217 100.0 74056 100.0 206948 100.0 404 100.0 101913 100.0 298134 100.018e. Student loans (bank, etc.) Not a source 152 84.4 21030 75.0 71920 78.3 180 83.3 46630 63.1 141036 68.3 336 84.2 69890 68.8 218466 73.5

Minor source 14 7.8 2060 7.3 6339 6.9 17 7.9 7096 9.6 18449 8.9 31 7.8 8626 8.5 23344 7.8Major source 14 7.8 4964 17.7 13569 14.8 19 8.8 20162 27.3 46976 22.8 32 8.0 23082 22.7 55576 18.7

Total 180 100.0 28054 100.0 91828 100.0 216 100.0 73888 100.0 206461 100.0 400 100.0 101598 100.0 297385 100.018f. Public assistance Not a source 164 90.6 25114 89.6 83103 90.6 194 89.8 62380 84.5 177818 86.2 363 90.4 88485 87.2 263407 88.7

Minor source 11 6.1 1167 4.2 3539 3.9 6 2.8 4875 6.6 11908 5.8 21 5.3 5497 5.4 14059 4.7Major source 6 3.3 1739 6.2 5083 5.5 16 7.4 6556 8.9 16469 8.0 17 4.3 7508 7.4 19590 6.6

Total 181 100.0 28020 100.0 91725 100.0 216 100.0 73811 100.0 206195 100.0 401 100.0 101490 100.0 297056 100.019. Proprietary (private) school or No response 177 95.2 26887 91.7 87320 90.8 221 96.1 71739 94.3 200190 93.8 397 95.4 98009 93.0 285228 92.1

training program Response 9 4.8 2418 8.3 8844 9.2 9 3.9 4327 5.7 13243 6.2 19 4.6 7362 7.0 24369 7.9Total 186 100.0 29305 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 76066 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 105371 100.0 309597 100.0

Public vocational-technical No response 172 92.5 25971 88.6 86013 89.4 216 93.9 69740 91.7 197130 92.4 386 92.8 94821 90.0 280596 90.6school Response 14 7.5 3334 11.4 10151 10.6 14 6.1 6326 8.3 16303 7.6 30 7.2 10550 10.0 29001 9.4

Total 186 100.0 29305 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 76066 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 105371 100.0 309597 100.0Another community or technical college No response 147 79.0 22546 76.9 73647 76.6 192 83.5 63792 83.9 180073 84.4 333 80.1 84486 80.2 247348 79.9

Response 39 21.0 6759 23.1 22517 23.4 38 16.5 12274 16.1 33360 15.6 83 19.9 20885 19.8 62249 20.1Total 186 100.0 29305 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 76066 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 105371 100.0 309597 100.0

Four year college or university No response 161 86.6 21778 74.3 70034 72.8 207 90.0 63344 83.3 175949 82.4 364 87.4 82899 78.7 238487 77.0Response 25 13.4 7527 25.7 26130 27.2 23 10.0 12722 16.7 37484 17.6 52 12.6 22472 21.3 71110 23.0

Total 186 100.0 29305 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 76066 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 105371 100.0 309597 100.0None No response 71 38.2 16390 55.9 55476 57.7 80 34.8 30629 40.3 87456 41.0 155 37.3 51039 48.4 156160 50.4

Response 115 61.8 12915 44.1 40688 42.3 150 65.2 45437 59.7 125977 59.0 261 62.7 54332 51.6 153437 49.6Total 186 100.0 29305 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 76066 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 105371 100.0 309597 100.0

20. When do you plan to take classes at this college again?

I will accomplish my goals this term and will not be

returning9 4.9 2661 9.3 9213 9.9 32 14.6 10720 14.4 30579 14.7 29 7.2 12133 11.8 35977 11.9

I have no current plan to return 4 2.2 1577 5.5 4769 5.1 14 6.4 4735 6.4 11821 5.7 13 3.2 6217 6.0 16360 5.4

Within the next 12 months 135 73.4 18972 66.5 62416 66.9 139 63.5 46414 62.3 131715 63.3 290 71.0 66023 64.1 196215 65.1

Uncertain 36 19.6 5329 18.7 16931 18.1 34 15.5 12618 16.9 34064 16.4 76 18.6 18574 18.0 52696 17.5

Total 184 100.0 28539 100.0 93329 100.0 219 100.0 74487 100.0 208179 100.0 408 100.0 102947 100.0 301249 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F11

Page 135: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College Other Small Colleges

21. At this college, in what range is your Pass/fail classes only 2 1.1 250 0.9 737 0.8 0 0.0 277 0.4 740 0.4 3 0.8 676 0.7 1864 0.6overall college grade average? Do not have a GPA at this

school 5 2.8 1042 3.7 3441 3.7 6 2.8 966 1.3 3200 1.5 11 2.8 2605 2.5 8351 2.8

C- or lower 5 2.8 647 2.3 2325 2.5 5 2.3 1485 2.0 4245 2.0 11 2.7 2272 2.2 7012 2.3C 9 5.0 1918 6.7 6981 7.5 12 5.5 5903 7.9 16876 8.1 21 5.1 7637 7.4 23565 7.8

B- to C+ 32 17.7 4585 16.1 16063 17.2 29 13.3 15030 20.2 42826 20.6 67 16.6 18632 18.1 56227 18.7B 43 23.8 6172 21.7 20866 22.4 57 26.1 18419 24.7 52790 25.4 98 24.3 23652 23.0 71011 23.6

A- to B+ 56 30.9 8095 28.4 25350 27.2 69 31.7 21855 29.4 59329 28.5 125 31.1 29466 28.7 83223 27.7A 29 16.0 5782 20.3 17379 18.7 40 18.3 10523 14.1 27948 13.4 67 16.6 17855 17.4 49477 16.5

Total 181 100.0 28491 100.0 93142 100.0 218 100.0 74458 100.0 207954 100.0 402 100.0 102796 100.0 300731 100.022. When do you most frequently take

classes at this college?Day classes (morning or

afternoon) 61 33.7 15366 54.3 49618 53.7 159 74.0 65120 88.2 180145 87.3 173 43.2 72221 70.8 203585 68.3

Evening classes 120 66.3 12711 44.9 41709 45.2 56 26.0 8641 11.7 25746 12.5 228 56.8 29414 28.8 92694 31.1Weekend classes 0 0.0 220 0.8 986 1.1 0 0.0 93 0.1 348 0.2 0 0.0 429 0.4 1947 0.7

Total 181 100.0 28297 100.0 92313 100.0 215 100.0 73854 100.0 206239 100.0 401 100.0 102064 100.0 298226 100.023. How many TOTAL credit hours None 24 13.0 4692 16.5 14720 15.8 20 9.2 6800 9.1 19065 9.2 49 12.1 13409 13.1 39068 13.0

have you earned at this college, 1-14 credits 72 39.1 10425 36.6 33706 36.2 71 32.6 20681 27.8 60934 29.3 153 37.6 33095 32.2 99736 33.2not counting the courses you 15-29 credits 36 19.6 5225 18.4 17442 18.7 50 22.9 18870 25.4 50024 24.1 83 20.4 22160 21.6 62983 20.9are currently taking this term? 30-44 credits 29 15.8 3142 11.0 11028 11.8 30 13.8 11334 15.2 32963 15.8 62 15.3 13268 12.9 40464 13.5

45-60 credits 8 4.3 2478 8.7 8359 9.0 26 11.9 9886 13.3 27706 13.3 25 6.1 11171 10.9 32531 10.8Over 60 credits 15 8.2 2508 8.8 7917 8.5 21 9.6 6766 9.1 17282 8.3 35 8.5 9568 9.3 25983 8.6Total 184 100.0 28470 100.0 93172 100.0 218 100.0 74337 100.0 207974 100.0 407 100.0 102671 100.0 300766 100.0

24. None No response 17 9.1 4623 15.8 15617 16.2 23 10.0 7546 9.9 22566 10.6 39 9.3 13877 13.2 42932 13.9Response 169 90.9 24682 84.2 80547 83.8 207 90.0 68520 90.1 190867 89.4 377 90.7 91494 86.8 266665 86.1

Total 186 100.0 29305 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 76066 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 105371 100.0 309597 100.0High school No response 177 95.2 28165 96.1 93335 97.1 227 98.7 75161 98.8 210789 98.8 399 96.0 102441 97.2 302388 97.7

Response 9 4.8 1140 3.9 2829 2.9 3 1.3 905 1.2 2644 1.2 17 4.0 2930 2.8 7209 2.3Total 186 100.0 29305 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 76066 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 105371 100.0 309597 100.0

Vocational/technical school No response 182 97.8 28958 98.8 95121 98.9 227 98.7 75139 98.8 211490 99.1 408 98.1 104077 98.8 306422 99.0Response 4 2.2 347 1.2 1043 1.1 3 1.3 927 1.2 1943 0.9 8 1.9 1294 1.2 3175 1.0

Total 186 100.0 29305 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 76066 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 105371 100.0 309597 100.0Another community or No response 182 97.8 28539 97.4 93553 97.3 225 97.8 74800 98.3 209741 98.3 407 97.8 103113 97.9 302608 97.7technical college Response 4 2.2 766 2.6 2611 2.7 5 2.2 1266 1.7 3692 1.7 9 2.2 2258 2.1 6989 2.3

Total 186 100.0 29305 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 76066 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 105371 100.0 309597 100.04- year college/ university No response 184 98.9 28111 95.9 91568 95.2 230 100.0 74411 97.8 208285 97.6 413 99.2 101927 96.7 297823 96.2

Response 2 1.1 1194 4.1 4596 4.8 0 0.0 1655 2.2 5148 2.4 3 0.8 3444 3.3 11774 3.8Total 186 100.0 29305 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 76066 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 105371 100.0 309597 100.0

Other No response 184 98.9 28356 96.8 92924 96.6 228 99.1 73646 96.8 206380 96.7 412 99.0 102025 96.8 299308 96.7Response 2 1.1 949 3.2 3240 3.4 2 0.9 2420 3.2 7053 3.3 4 1.0 3346 3.2 10289 3.3

Total 186 100.0 29305 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 76066 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 105371 100.0 309597 100.025. How many classes are you None 148 81.3 23216 81.2 75591 81.1 190 86.4 64913 87.2 180249 86.7 334 82.5 86395 83.9 251052 83.4

presently taking at OTHER 1 class 5 2.7 1592 5.6 5309 5.7 1 0.5 1645 2.2 4538 2.2 9 2.2 4081 4.0 12599 4.2institutions? 2 classes 10 5.5 1758 6.2 5885 6.3 1 0.5 1058 1.4 3056 1.5 17 4.3 4090 4.0 12851 4.3

3 classes 12 6.6 1064 3.7 3613 3.9 8 3.6 1533 2.1 4715 2.3 24 5.9 3112 3.0 9693 3.24 classes or more 7 3.8 951 3.3 2865 3.1 20 9.1 5299 7.1 15438 7.4 21 5.1 5301 5.1 14819 4.9

Total 182 100.0 28581 100.0 93263 100.0 220 100.0 74448 100.0 207996 100.0 405 100.0 102980 100.0 301013 100.026 Would you recommend this Yes 172 93.5 27039 94.7 88437 95.0 203 92.3 68955 92.8 193697 93.3 380 93.2 96302 93.7 283058 94.2

college to a friend or family member? No 12 6.5 1506 5.3 4694 5.0 17 7.7 5370 7.2 13947 6.7 28 6.8 6525 6.3 17492 5.8Total 184 100.0 28545 100.0 93131 100.0 220 100.0 74325 100.0 207644 100.0 408 100.0 102827 100.0 300550 100.0

27. How would you evaluate your Poor 0 0.0 343 1.2 1169 1.3 8 3.6 1095 1.5 2998 1.4 4 0.9 1389 1.3 4037 1.3entire educational experience at Fair 25 13.6 3273 11.5 11447 12.3 26 11.8 9091 12.2 26521 12.8 54 13.2 12284 11.9 37641 12.5this college? Good 99 53.8 15601 54.6 51925 55.7 123 55.9 40630 54.6 117511 56.5 222 54.3 56213 54.6 168565 56.0

Excellent 60 32.6 9361 32.8 28741 30.8 63 28.6 23652 31.8 60963 29.3 129 31.7 33099 32.1 90794 30.2Total 184 100.0 28578 100.0 93282 100.0 220 100.0 74468 100.0 207993 100.0 408 100.0 102984 100.0 301036 100.0

28. Do you have children who live Yes 94 51.1 12005 42.1 33850 36.3 64 29.2 20793 28.0 49188 23.7 187 45.9 36312 35.3 93522 31.1with you? No 90 48.9 16527 57.9 59282 63.7 155 70.8 53533 72.0 158456 76.3 221 54.1 66493 64.7 207035 68.9

Total 184 100.0 28532 100.0 93132 100.0 219 100.0 74326 100.0 207644 100.0 408 100.0 102805 100.0 300557 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F12

Page 136: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College Other Small Colleges

29. Mark your age group. 18 to 19 32 17.6 4316 15.2 14247 15.4 74 33.8 24329 32.8 70232 33.920 to 21 29 15.9 4146 14.6 15221 16.4 54 24.7 18733 25.3 56419 27.222 to 24 23 12.6 4012 14.2 14684 15.9 29 13.2 9164 12.4 27429 13.225 to 29 33 18.1 4486 15.8 14880 16.1 21 9.6 7953 10.7 21103 10.230 to 39 28 15.4 5465 19.3 16759 18.1 25 11.4 7991 10.8 18737 9.040 to 49 26 14.3 3811 13.4 10906 11.8 12 5.5 4190 5.7 9311 4.550 to 64 10 5.5 1847 6.5 5117 5.5 3 1.4 1660 2.2 3520 1.7

65+ 1 0.5 265 0.9 784 0.8 1 0.5 89 0.1 295 0.1Total 182 100.0 28348 100.0 92598 100.0 219 100.0 74109 100.0 207046 100.0

30. Sex: Male 98 53.6 9467 33.1 34214 36.7 109 49.8 29995 40.3 86486 41.6Female 85 46.4 19095 66.9 59002 63.3 110 50.2 44443 59.7 121402 58.4

Total 183 100.0 28562 100.0 93216 100.0 219 100.0 74438 100.0 207888 100.031. Marital status Yes 72 39.1 10475 36.7 29654 31.8 49 22.4 13805 18.6 31813 15.3 143 35.2 28926 28.1 75168 25.0

No 112 60.9 18062 63.3 63511 68.2 170 77.6 60613 81.4 176052 84.7 264 64.8 73940 71.9 225575 75.0Total 184 100.0 28537 100.0 93165 100.0 219 100.0 74418 100.0 207865 100.0 408 100.0 102866 100.0 300743 100.0

32. Is English your native (first) Yes 158 85.9 26603 93.1 80889 86.8 201 92.2 69965 94.0 182689 87.9 356 87.4 96484 93.7 263926 87.7language? No 26 14.1 1966 6.9 12345 13.2 17 7.8 4460 6.0 25208 12.1 51 12.6 6451 6.3 36969 12.3

Total 184 100.0 28569 100.0 93234 100.0 218 100.0 74425 100.0 207897 100.0 407 100.0 102936 100.0 300895 100.033. Are you an international Yes 7 3.9 1105 3.9 5525 6.0 9 4.1 2995 4.0 13527 6.5

student or foreign national? No 173 96.1 27267 96.1 87083 94.0 209 95.9 71077 96.0 193306 93.5Total 180 100.0 28372 100.0 92608 100.0 218 100.0 74072 100.0 206833 100.0

34. What is your racial identification? (Mark only one)

American Indian or other Native American 3 1.6 751 2.7 1592 1.7 3 1.4 2149 2.9 4017 2.0

Asian, Asian American, or Pacific Islander 3 1.6 768 2.7 4635 5.0 3 1.4 2026 2.7 11563 5.6

Native Hawaiian 0 0.0 159 0.6 287 0.3 2 0.9 377 0.5 695 0.3

Black or African American 6 3.3 2990 10.6 11712 12.7 12 5.5 8087 11.0 23986 11.7

White, Non-Hispanic 111 60.3 20589 72.9 58603 63.6 145 66.5 53835 73.0 135173 65.7

Hispanic, Latino, Spanish 54 29.3 2167 7.7 11605 12.6 50 22.9 5016 6.8 21776 10.6

Other 7 3.8 828 2.9 3644 4.0 3 1.4 2304 3.1 8530 4.1

Total 184 100.0 28252 100.0 92078 100.0 218 100.0 73794 100.0 205740 100.035. What is the highest academic

credential you have earned? None 8 4.4 1131 4.0 3029 3.3 2 0.9 1179 1.6 3492 1.7 14 3.6 3091 3.1 8102 2.7

High school diploma or GED 135 75.0 18204 65.1 60461 66.2 185 84.9 60332 82.4 170828 83.5 310 77.4 73624 72.9 216543 73.3

Vocational / technical certificate 17 9.4 3682 13.2 10356 11.3 16 7.3 6104 8.3 14406 7.0 36 8.9 11058 10.9 28334 9.6

Associate degree 11 6.1 2647 9.5 8364 9.2 11 5.0 4052 5.5 10780 5.3 23 5.9 7897 7.8 22507 7.6

Bachelor's degree 5 2.8 1708 6.1 6939 7.6 2 0.9 1292 1.8 4233 2.1 9 2.3 4113 4.1 15363 5.2

Master's / doctoral / professional degree 4 2.2 583 2.1 2146 2.4 2 0.9 224 0.3 890 0.4 8 1.9 1213 1.2 4487 1.5

Total 180 100.0 27955 100.0 91295 100.0 218 100.0 73183 100.0 204629 100.0 401 100.0 100996 100.0 295336 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F13

Page 137: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College Other Small Colleges

36m. Highest level of education: mother Not a high school graduate 40 23.5 4095 15.6 13074 15.2 29 14.5 7998 11.8 21632 11.4 80 21.4 13006 13.8 37460 13.6

High school diploma or GED 50 29.4 9663 36.7 28865 33.5 52 26.0 23678 35.0 60235 31.8 107 28.6 33637 35.7 90871 32.9

Some college, did not complete degree 31 18.2 4150 15.8 13897 16.1 47 23.5 11295 16.7 32637 17.2 73 19.5 15293 16.2 45821 16.6

Associate degree 17 10.0 2849 10.8 8931 10.4 21 10.5 8973 13.3 23736 12.5 38 10.1 11394 12.1 31478 11.4

Bachelor's degree 16 9.4 2747 10.4 10540 12.2 28 14.0 8035 11.9 26332 13.9 39 10.5 10532 11.2 35554 12.9

Master's degree / First professional 6 3.5 1411 5.4 5453 6.3 9 4.5 4005 5.9 12945 6.8 14 3.8 5211 5.5 17903 6.5

Doctorate degree 2 1.2 191 0.7 806 0.9 5 2.5 499 0.7 1860 1.0 6 1.5 693 0.7 2618 0.9

Unknown 8 4.7 1213 4.6 4524 5.3 9 4.5 3233 4.8 9875 5.2 17 4.7 4508 4.8 14454 5.2

Total 170 100.0 26319 100.0 86090 100.0 200 100.0 67716 100.0 189252 100.0 376 100.0 94274 100.0 276159 100.036f. Highest level of education: father Not a high school

graduate 50 29.4 5219 19.5 15663 18.0 33 16.3 10746 15.6 27486 14.3 99 26.3 16926 17.7 45994 16.5

High school diploma or GED 36 21.2 9565 35.8 27053 31.1 44 21.7 24797 36.0 60533 31.6 80 21.3 34382 35.9 88152 31.6

Some college, did not complete degree 36 21.2 3540 13.3 12043 13.9 43 21.2 9922 14.4 28629 14.9 80 21.2 13147 13.7 39882 14.3

Associate degree 8 4.7 1748 6.5 5728 6.6 22 10.8 5740 8.3 15328 8.0 23 6.2 7233 7.6 20284 7.3

Bachelor's degree 12 7.1 2766 10.4 11083 12.8 22 10.8 7570 11.0 26171 13.7 30 8.0 10155 10.6 36281 13.0

Master's degree / Ist professional 9 5.3 1423 5.3 6120 7.0 19 9.4 3667 5.3 13836 7.2 24 6.3 5015 5.2 19549 7.0

Doctorate degree 6 3.5 509 1.9 2218 2.6 5 2.5 1137 1.7 4216 2.2 12 3.3 1695 1.8 6635 2.4

Unknown 13 7.6 1926 7.2 7002 8.1 15 7.4 5259 7.6 15389 8.0 29 7.6 7150 7.5 22392 8.0

Total 170 100.0 26696 100.0 86910 100.0 203 100.0 68838 100.0 191588 100.0 377 100.0 95704 100.0 279170 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F14

Page 138: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F15

Page 139: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F16

Page 140: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F17

Page 141: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F18

Page 142: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F19

Page 143: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F20

Page 144: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F21

Page 145: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F22

Page 146: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F23

Page 147: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F24

Page 148: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F25

Page 149: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F26

Page 150: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F27

Page 151: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %1. Did you begin college at this Started here 154 82.8 3394 65.0 60181 62.8 195 84.8 8073 75.6 159946 75.0 346 83.3 11044 69.5 210638 68.2

college or elsewhere? Started elsewhere 32 17.2 1830 35.0 35714 37.2 35 15.2 2604 24.4 53177 25.0 70 16.7 4856 30.5 98273 31.8Total 186 100.0 5224 100.0 95895 100.0 230 100.0 10677 100.0 213123 100.0 416 100.0 15900 100.0 308911 100.0

4a. Asked questions in class or Never 7 3.8 150 2.9 2791 2.9 4 1.7 250 2.3 4646 2.2 14 3.3 422 2.7 8056 2.6contributed to class Sometimes 65 35.1 1832 35.1 32859 34.2 72 31.3 3230 30.2 67478 31.7 142 34.2 5314 33.4 102619 33.2discussions Often 69 37.3 1851 35.4 33296 34.7 69 30.0 4023 37.7 76391 35.8 147 35.5 5772 36.3 108830 35.2

Very often 44 23.8 1393 26.7 27060 28.2 85 37.0 3179 29.8 64658 30.3 112 27.0 4399 27.7 89642 29.0Total 185 100.0 5226 100.0 96006 100.0 230 100.0 10682 100.0 213173 100.0 414 100.0 15907 100.0 309146 100.0

4b. Made a class presentation Never 82 44.3 2006 38.6 37962 39.7 65 28.3 2127 20.0 44037 20.7 167 40.4 4943 31.2 98452 32.0Sometimes 69 37.3 1913 36.8 35516 37.2 102 44.3 4427 41.6 94585 44.5 162 39.0 6129 38.7 123815 40.2

Often 25 13.5 889 17.1 15762 16.5 42 18.3 2836 26.6 52809 24.9 61 14.7 3310 20.9 61302 19.9Very often 9 4.9 384 7.4 6295 6.6 21 9.1 1254 11.8 20967 9.9 24 5.9 1440 9.1 24234 7.9

Total 185 100.0 5192 100.0 95535 100.0 230 100.0 10644 100.0 212398 100.0 414 100.0 15822 100.0 307803 100.04c. Prepared two or more drafts of Never 56 30.6 1302 25.1 24783 26.0 57 24.9 1509 14.2 30891 14.6 120 29.2 3276 20.8 65702 21.4

a paper or assignment before Sometimes 71 38.8 1536 29.7 27844 29.2 72 31.4 3224 30.4 63131 29.8 152 37.0 4747 30.1 90668 29.6turning it in Often 36 19.7 1432 27.7 26357 27.7 69 30.1 3491 32.9 68430 32.3 91 22.2 4689 29.7 90612 29.5

Very often 20 10.9 908 17.5 16223 17.0 31 13.5 2375 22.4 49237 23.3 47 11.6 3061 19.4 59801 19.5Total 183 100.0 5178 100.0 95207 100.0 229 100.0 10599 100.0 211689 100.0 410 100.0 15773 100.0 306783 100.0

4d. Worked on a paper or project Never 31 16.8 834 16.2 15776 16.6 19 8.4 550 5.2 10892 5.1 61 14.8 1851 11.8 36513 11.9that required integrating ideas Sometimes 65 35.3 1641 31.8 29567 31.0 76 33.5 2714 25.6 54985 25.9 143 34.9 4657 29.6 89238 29.1or information from various Often 63 34.2 1722 33.4 32227 33.8 82 36.1 4284 40.4 86496 40.8 143 34.7 5695 36.2 112702 36.7sources Very often 25 13.6 966 18.7 17702 18.6 50 22.0 3063 28.9 59609 28.1 64 15.6 3545 22.5 68628 22.3

Total 184 100.0 5163 100.0 95272 100.0 227 100.0 10611 100.0 211982 100.0 411 100.0 15747 100.0 307081 100.04e. Came to class without Never 67 36.0 1726 33.4 32667 34.4 60 26.4 2683 25.4 49899 23.6 140 33.7 4759 30.2 91774 30.0

completing readings or Sometimes 94 50.5 2774 53.7 50341 52.9 133 58.6 6170 58.4 125353 59.3 218 52.5 8741 55.6 170112 55.5assignments Often 17 9.1 489 9.5 8892 9.4 24 10.6 1267 12.0 26059 12.3 39 9.5 1642 10.4 32457 10.6

Very often 8 4.3 176 3.4 3182 3.3 10 4.4 454 4.3 10003 4.7 18 4.3 592 3.8 11964 3.9Total 186 100.0 5165 100.0 95082 100.0 227 100.0 10574 100.0 211314 100.0 415 100.0 15734 100.0 306306 100.0

4f. Worked with other students on Never 28 15.4 958 18.5 16411 17.3 21 9.3 1012 9.6 17882 8.5 57 13.9 2347 14.9 41607 13.6projects during class Sometimes 78 42.9 2018 39.1 38208 40.2 97 42.7 4185 39.6 86487 41.0 175 42.8 6184 39.3 124111 40.6

Often 52 28.6 1529 29.6 28305 29.8 67 29.5 3814 36.1 76111 36.1 117 28.8 5063 32.2 99241 32.5Very often 24 13.2 660 12.8 12003 12.6 42 18.5 1557 14.7 30481 14.4 59 14.5 2135 13.6 40826 13.4

Total 182 100.0 5165 100.0 94927 100.0 227 100.0 10568 100.0 210961 100.0 408 100.0 15730 100.0 305785 100.04g. Worked with classmates Never 89 48.4 2409 46.5 46884 49.2 71 31.0 3370 31.8 68193 32.2 182 44.1 6428 40.7 129289 42.1

outside of class to prepare Sometimes 60 32.6 1805 34.8 32260 33.9 96 41.9 4382 41.4 87991 41.6 144 34.9 5899 37.4 113747 37.1class assignments Often 26 14.1 681 13.1 11711 12.3 46 20.1 2034 19.2 39946 18.9 64 15.6 2443 15.5 46158 15.0

Very often 9 4.9 287 5.5 4436 4.7 16 7.0 807 7.6 15467 7.3 22 5.4 1005 6.4 17667 5.8Total 184 100.0 5182 100.0 95291 100.0 229 100.0 10593 100.0 211597 100.0 412 100.0 15774 100.0 306861 100.0

4h. Tutored or taught other Never 128 69.6 3942 75.9 74180 77.6 138 60.3 7106 66.9 143018 67.4 277 67.3 11478 72.6 225811 73.4students (paid or voluntary) Sometimes 39 21.2 893 17.2 15869 16.6 65 28.4 2438 22.9 48561 22.9 95 23.0 3056 19.3 59210 19.2

Often 14 7.6 241 4.6 3697 3.9 16 7.0 734 6.9 13610 6.4 31 7.5 867 5.5 15124 4.9Very often 3 1.6 118 2.3 1798 1.9 10 4.4 347 3.3 7002 3.3 9 2.3 418 2.6 7568 2.5

Total 184 100.0 5194 100.0 95544 100.0 229 100.0 10625 100.0 212191 100.0 412 100.0 15818 100.0 307713 100.04i. Participated in a community- Never 160 87.4 4263 82.3 79203 83.3 178 77.7 7703 72.9 154345 73.0 349 85.0 12395 78.7 242038 79.0

based project as a part of a Sometimes 16 8.7 634 12.2 11374 12.0 32 14.0 1880 17.8 39368 18.6 41 10.0 2274 14.4 45285 14.8regular course Often 5 2.7 189 3.6 3198 3.4 11 4.8 651 6.2 12111 5.7 13 3.2 724 4.6 13268 4.3

Very often 2 1.1 95 1.8 1304 1.4 8 3.5 333 3.2 5531 2.6 7 1.7 366 2.3 5762 1.9Total 183 100.0 5181 100.0 95079 100.0 229 100.0 10567 100.0 211355 100.0 410 100.0 15758 100.0 306353 100.0

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)Brazosport College, Achieving the Dream Consortium

Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F1

Page 152: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges

4j. Used the Internet or instant Never 42 22.6 821 15.9 16308 17.2 29 12.7 793 7.5 16069 7.6 84 20.2 1957 12.4 40449 13.2messaging to work on an Sometimes 63 33.9 1393 27.0 26225 27.6 56 24.6 2326 22.0 47987 22.7 131 31.6 3962 25.2 78436 25.6assignment Often 37 19.9 1480 28.7 27147 28.6 79 34.6 3393 32.1 67629 32.0 97 23.5 4726 30.1 91917 30.0

Very often 44 23.7 1466 28.4 25402 26.7 64 28.1 4061 38.4 79619 37.7 103 24.7 5079 32.3 95516 31.2Total 186 100.0 5160 100.0 95082 100.0 228 100.0 10573 100.0 211304 100.0 415 100.0 15725 100.0 306318 100.0

4k. Used email to communicate Never 72 38.7 1112 21.5 24055 25.3 50 21.8 1243 11.8 29448 13.9 144 34.6 2787 17.7 63644 20.8with an instructor Sometimes 61 32.8 1962 37.9 35008 36.8 85 37.1 3545 33.5 71065 33.6 141 33.8 5719 36.3 108568 35.4

Often 34 18.3 1299 25.1 21754 22.9 54 23.6 3233 30.6 61899 29.3 81 19.6 4286 27.2 78088 25.5Very often 19 10.2 804 15.5 14297 15.0 40 17.5 2551 24.1 49145 23.2 50 12.0 2963 18.8 56217 18.3

Total 186 100.0 5177 100.0 95114 100.0 229 100.0 10572 100.0 211557 100.0 416 100.0 15755 100.0 306516 100.04l. Discussed grades or Never 22 12.0 606 11.7 11682 12.3 19 8.3 678 6.4 14482 6.8 46 11.1 1497 9.5 30602 10.0

assignments with an instructor Sometimes 82 44.8 2342 45.3 44714 47.0 96 42.1 4332 40.9 89276 42.2 181 44.1 6883 43.7 138096 45.0Often 59 32.2 1561 30.2 27343 28.7 73 32.0 3649 34.4 71484 33.8 132 32.2 5020 31.9 94585 30.8

Very often 20 10.9 661 12.8 11426 12.0 40 17.5 1934 18.3 36433 17.2 51 12.5 2356 15.0 43384 14.1Total 183 100.0 5170 100.0 95165 100.0 228 100.0 10593 100.0 211675 100.0 410 100.0 15756 100.0 306666 100.0

4m. Talked about career plans with Never 68 37.2 1980 38.3 35434 37.3 64 27.8 2576 24.4 51228 24.2 143 34.9 5166 32.8 97039 31.7an instructor or advisor Sometimes 77 42.1 2198 42.5 41067 43.2 96 41.7 4827 45.7 96104 45.5 173 42.0 6890 43.8 135503 44.2

Often 28 15.3 739 14.3 13680 14.4 51 22.2 2215 21.0 44533 21.1 70 17.0 2662 16.9 52807 17.2Very often 10 5.5 256 4.9 4870 5.1 19 8.3 947 9.0 19570 9.3 25 6.2 1023 6.5 20979 6.8

Total 183 100.0 5173 100.0 95051 100.0 230 100.0 10565 100.0 211435 100.0 411 100.0 15741 100.0 306328 100.04n. Discussed ideas from your Never 87 46.8 2639 51.2 49841 52.5 86 37.6 4253 40.3 85377 40.4 185 44.5 7392 47.1 145046 47.4

readings or classes with Sometimes 73 39.2 1824 35.4 32774 34.5 100 43.7 4285 40.6 86645 41.0 168 40.3 5879 37.4 114142 37.3instructors outside of class Often 18 9.7 503 9.8 9108 9.6 30 13.1 1498 14.2 28725 13.6 44 10.5 1791 11.4 34514 11.3

Very often 8 4.3 190 3.7 3140 3.3 13 5.7 523 5.0 10481 5.0 19 4.6 646 4.1 12164 4.0Total 186 100.0 5156 100.0 94863 100.0 229 100.0 10559 100.0 211228 100.0 416 100.0 15708 100.0 305866 100.0

4o. Received prompt feedback Never 24 13.2 503 9.7 8803 9.3 16 7.0 765 7.2 13839 6.5 48 11.7 1384 8.8 24923 8.1(written or oral) from Sometimes 62 34.1 1866 36.2 33520 35.3 89 39.0 3893 36.8 77440 36.6 144 35.3 5756 36.6 109909 35.9instructors on your Often 56 30.8 1916 37.1 36189 38.1 84 36.8 4100 38.8 83968 39.7 132 32.3 5926 37.7 118736 38.8performance Very often 40 22.0 876 17.0 16472 17.3 39 17.1 1814 17.2 36138 17.1 85 20.8 2659 16.9 52617 17.2

Total 182 100.0 5161 100.0 94984 100.0 228 100.0 10572 100.0 211385 100.0 408 100.0 15725 100.0 306185 100.04p. Worked harder than you Never 31 16.7 617 11.9 12420 13.1 26 11.4 893 8.4 18389 8.7 64 15.4 1670 10.6 34470 11.2

thought you could to meet an Sometimes 91 48.9 2052 39.7 39072 41.1 103 45.0 3825 36.1 82537 39.0 199 48.0 6049 38.4 123582 40.3instructors standards or Often 46 24.7 1703 32.9 30913 32.5 71 31.0 3907 36.9 75966 35.9 109 26.3 5428 34.5 103851 33.9expectations Very often 18 9.7 799 15.5 12723 13.4 29 12.7 1970 18.6 34769 16.4 43 10.4 2608 16.6 44686 14.6

Total 186 100.0 5171 100.0 95128 100.0 229 100.0 10595 100.0 211661 100.0 416 100.0 15755 100.0 306590 100.04q. Worked with instructors on Never 142 79.3 3854 75.3 72105 76.4 144 63.7 6821 65.0 136494 65.0 304 75.5 11141 71.4 217560 71.5

activities other than Sometimes 21 11.7 888 17.4 15847 16.8 60 26.5 2499 23.8 50644 24.1 62 15.4 3100 19.9 60693 20.0coursework Often 10 5.6 276 5.4 4680 5.0 11 4.9 853 8.1 16809 8.0 22 5.4 994 6.4 19020 6.3

Very often 6 3.4 99 1.9 1688 1.8 11 4.9 316 3.0 6082 2.9 15 3.7 361 2.3 6858 2.3Total 179 100.0 5117 100.0 94320 100.0 226 100.0 10489 100.0 210029 100.0 402 100.0 15595 100.0 304131 100.0

4r. Discussed ideas from your Never 28 15.1 761 14.7 13364 14.0 17 7.4 1146 10.8 22174 10.4 55 13.2 2089 13.2 38516 12.5readings or classes with others Sometimes 73 39.2 2009 38.8 36710 38.5 96 41.9 3886 36.6 80211 37.8 166 39.9 6005 38.1 117779 38.3outside of class (students, Often 52 28.0 1503 29.0 28705 30.1 75 32.8 3392 31.9 68074 32.1 121 29.1 4757 30.1 95041 30.9family members, coworkers, etc.) Very often 33 17.7 905 17.5 16656 17.5 41 17.9 2193 20.7 41779 19.7 74 17.8 2930 18.6 56189 18.3

Total 186 100.0 5178 100.0 95435 100.0 229 100.0 10617 100.0 212238 100.0 416 100.0 15781 100.0 307525 100.04s. Had serious conversations Never 41 22.0 1285 24.8 25361 26.6 47 20.7 2034 19.2 42484 20.0 90 21.7 3583 22.7 74305 24.2

with students of a different race Sometimes 62 33.3 1755 33.9 32817 34.4 70 30.8 3334 31.4 70983 33.5 136 32.7 5214 33.0 104892 34.1or ethnicity other than your own Often 49 26.3 1238 23.9 21700 22.8 53 23.3 2822 26.6 53623 25.3 106 25.6 3924 24.9 72599 23.6

Very often 34 18.3 903 17.4 15449 16.2 57 25.1 2424 22.8 45082 21.2 83 19.9 3067 19.4 55498 18.1Total 186 100.0 5181 100.0 95327 100.0 227 100.0 10614 100.0 212172 100.0 415 100.0 15788 100.0 307294 100.0

4t. Had serious conversations Never 48 25.9 1447 27.9 26316 27.6 43 19.1 2126 20.0 38649 18.2 100 24.3 3913 24.8 72942 23.8with students who differ from you Sometimes 72 38.9 1830 35.3 35070 36.8 77 34.2 3595 33.9 75261 35.5 156 37.8 5514 34.9 111888 36.4in terms of their religious beliefs, Often 29 15.7 1169 22.6 20552 21.6 53 23.6 2734 25.8 55812 26.3 72 17.6 3749 23.7 72156 23.5political opinions, or personal values Very often 36 19.5 736 14.2 13292 14.0 52 23.1 2157 20.3 42260 19.9 84 20.3 2613 16.6 50015 16.3

Total 185 100.0 5182 100.0 95230 100.0 225 100.0 10612 100.0 211982 100.0 412 100.0 15789 100.0 307002 100.04u. Skipped class Never 109 58.9 2834 54.6 53502 56.0 95 41.3 4475 42.1 87661 41.3 226 54.6 7859 49.7 153192 49.8

Sometimes 67 36.2 2053 39.5 37352 39.1 115 50.0 5363 50.4 107667 50.7 164 39.6 6926 43.8 135408 44.0Often 6 3.2 197 3.8 3215 3.4 16 7.0 550 5.2 12029 5.7 17 4.2 687 4.3 13350 4.3

Very often 3 1.6 107 2.1 1427 1.5 4 1.7 248 2.3 5039 2.4 7 1.7 344 2.2 5779 1.9Total 185 100.0 5191 100.0 95496 100.0 230 100.0 10636 100.0 212396 100.0 414 100.0 15816 100.0 307730 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F2

Page 153: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges

5a. Memorizing facts, ideas, or Very little 15 8.1 420 8.1 8249 8.6 14 6.1 573 5.4 11418 5.4 32 7.6 1086 6.8 22315 7.2methods from your courses Some 70 37.6 1539 29.6 28626 29.9 60 26.2 2817 26.5 58494 27.5 145 34.9 4518 28.5 89315 29.0and readings so you can repeat Quite a bit 64 34.4 1982 38.1 35980 37.6 90 39.3 4254 40.0 86077 40.4 148 35.6 6175 39.0 119738 38.8them in pretty much the same form Very much 37 19.9 1264 24.3 22884 23.9 65 28.4 3001 28.2 56861 26.7 91 22.0 4071 25.7 77114 25.0

Total 186 100.0 5205 100.0 95739 100.0 229 100.0 10645 100.0 212850 100.0 416 100.0 15849 100.0 308483 100.05b. Analyzing the basic elements of an Very little 14 7.5 303 5.8 6117 6.4 11 4.8 398 3.7 8143 3.8 29 6.9 791 5.0 16602 5.4

idea, experience, or theory Some 65 34.9 1564 30.2 28894 30.3 69 30.3 2820 26.6 58272 27.4 140 33.8 4573 28.9 90116 29.3Quite a bit 84 45.2 2178 42.0 39958 41.9 100 43.9 4651 43.8 93474 44.0 186 44.8 6743 42.7 131327 42.7Very much 23 12.4 1141 22.0 20445 21.4 48 21.1 2750 25.9 52406 24.7 60 14.5 3692 23.4 69492 22.6

Total 186 100.0 5186 100.0 95414 100.0 228 100.0 10619 100.0 212295 100.0 415 100.0 15798 100.0 307536 100.05c. Synthesizing and organizing ideas, Very little 23 12.5 470 9.1 8842 9.3 14 6.2 566 5.4 12690 6.0 45 11.0 1211 7.7 24442 8.0

information, or experiences in new Some 79 42.9 1757 34.0 33435 35.2 86 37.9 3331 31.5 69289 32.8 172 41.7 5220 33.2 105168 34.4ways Quite a bit 56 30.4 1950 37.7 35340 37.2 78 34.4 4221 39.9 83928 39.7 129 31.4 6073 38.6 116985 38.2

Very much 26 14.1 990 19.2 17347 18.3 49 21.6 2451 23.2 45508 21.5 66 15.9 3232 20.5 59570 19.5Total 184 100.0 5167 100.0 94964 100.0 227 100.0 10569 100.0 211415 100.0 411 100.0 15735 100.0 306164 100.0

5d. Making judgments about the value Very little 35 18.9 769 14.9 14797 15.6 27 11.8 936 8.8 19562 9.2 71 17.2 1959 12.4 39815 13.0or soundness of information, Some 74 40.0 1942 37.6 36241 38.1 84 36.7 3601 34.0 75259 35.5 162 39.2 5729 36.3 113883 37.1arguments, or methods Quite a bit 50 27.0 1689 32.7 30313 31.9 82 35.8 3862 36.4 76978 36.4 121 29.2 5373 34.1 103398 33.7

Very much 26 14.1 771 14.9 13796 14.5 36 15.7 2198 20.7 39955 18.9 60 14.5 2699 17.1 49631 16.2Total 185 100.0 5171 100.0 95147 100.0 229 100.0 10597 100.0 211754 100.0 414 100.0 15760 100.0 306727 100.0

5e. Applying theories or concepts to Very little 30 16.2 630 12.2 12035 12.6 22 9.6 799 7.5 16956 8.0 60 14.6 1636 10.4 32965 10.7practical problems or in new Some 66 35.7 1797 34.7 34720 36.4 86 37.7 3464 32.7 70522 33.3 150 36.2 5372 34.0 108177 35.2situations Quite a bit 61 33.0 1823 35.2 32231 33.8 78 34.2 3943 37.2 78844 37.2 138 33.3 5670 35.9 108188 35.2

Very much 28 15.1 931 18.0 16327 17.1 42 18.4 2400 22.6 45768 21.6 66 15.9 3104 19.7 57902 18.8Total 185 100.0 5181 100.0 95313 100.0 228 100.0 10606 100.0 212090 100.0 413 100.0 15782 100.0 307232 100.0

5f. Using information you have read Very little 22 11.8 504 9.7 10650 11.1 20 8.8 711 6.7 15642 7.4 46 11.1 1338 8.5 29433 9.5or heard to perform a new skill Some 61 32.8 1694 32.6 31653 33.1 73 32.2 2992 28.1 63527 29.9 135 32.6 4906 31.0 98171 31.9

Quite a bit 74 39.8 1829 35.2 32950 34.5 82 36.1 3955 37.1 78598 36.9 161 38.9 5712 36.1 109400 35.5Very much 29 15.6 1167 22.5 20381 21.3 52 22.9 2990 28.1 54956 25.8 72 17.4 3873 24.5 71209 23.1

Total 186 100.0 5194 100.0 95634 100.0 227 100.0 10648 100.0 212723 100.0 415 100.0 15829 100.0 308213 100.06a. Number of assigned textbooks, None 11 6.0 185 3.6 3743 4.0 4 1.8 182 1.7 3352 1.6 20 5.0 436 2.8 9196 3.0

manuals, books, or book-length Between 1 and 4 92 50.5 2654 51.8 49551 52.4 92 40.5 3346 31.8 60593 28.8 196 48.1 6880 44.0 130149 42.7packs of course readings Between 5 and 10 44 24.2 1283 25.0 23454 24.8 79 34.8 3840 36.5 81777 38.8 109 26.8 4615 29.5 93192 30.6

Between 11 and 20 15 8.2 577 11.3 9942 10.5 32 14.1 1813 17.2 37875 18.0 39 9.7 2132 13.6 41456 13.6More than 20 20 11.0 425 8.3 7811 8.3 20 8.8 1349 12.8 27140 12.9 43 10.5 1568 10.0 30893 10.1

Total 182 100.0 5124 100.0 94501 100.0 227 100.0 10530 100.0 210737 100.0 408 100.0 15630 100.0 304885 100.06b. Number of books read on your own None 64 35.2 1489 29.0 26362 27.9 77 33.8 3142 29.8 61563 29.2 142 34.8 4606 29.4 87390 28.6

(not assigned) for personal Between 1 and 4 74 40.7 2522 49.1 46235 48.9 96 42.1 5171 49.1 102696 48.7 167 41.0 7690 49.1 148467 48.6enjoyment or academic enrichment Between 5 and 10 28 15.4 689 13.4 13339 14.1 32 14.0 1360 12.9 27712 13.1 61 15.1 2054 13.1 41615 13.6

Between 11 and 20 10 5.5 228 4.4 4630 4.9 12 5.3 464 4.4 10007 4.7 22 5.4 683 4.4 14736 4.8More than 20 6 3.3 207 4.0 4024 4.3 11 4.8 401 3.8 8971 4.3 15 3.7 621 4.0 12966 4.2

Total 182 100.0 5135 100.0 94590 100.0 228 100.0 10538 100.0 210949 100.0 408 100.0 15654 100.0 305174 100.06c. Number of written papers or reports None 40 22.0 740 14.5 15046 15.9 22 9.7 424 4.0 8192 3.9 77 19.0 1601 10.3 33544 11.0

of any length Between 1 and 4 69 37.9 1963 38.4 34666 36.7 79 34.8 2948 28.0 53945 25.6 152 37.1 5354 34.3 97903 32.1Between 5 and 10 48 26.4 1475 28.8 26382 27.9 65 28.6 3641 34.6 72759 34.5 110 26.9 4863 31.1 93326 30.6

Between 11 and 20 18 9.9 648 12.7 12351 13.1 44 19.4 2257 21.4 47931 22.7 50 12.2 2523 16.2 51947 17.0More than 20 7 3.8 291 5.7 5991 6.3 17 7.5 1253 11.9 27872 13.2 19 4.7 1271 8.1 28000 9.2

Total 182 100.0 5117 100.0 94436 100.0 227 100.0 10523 100.0 210699 100.0 408 100.0 15612 100.0 304719 100.07. Mark the box that best represents Extremely easy 2 1.1 56 1.2 1069 1.2 1 0.5 68 0.7 1250 0.6 4 1.0 139 0.9 2773 1.0

the extent to which your 2 9 5.1 88 1.8 1998 2.2 5 2.3 173 1.7 3270 1.6 17 4.5 267 1.8 5748 2.0examinations during the current 3 12 6.9 301 6.2 5485 6.1 10 4.6 516 5.1 10251 5.1 25 6.3 866 5.8 16539 5.7school year have challenged you to 4 44 25.1 1168 24.1 21720 24.1 53 24.4 2413 23.8 47137 23.2 98 25.0 3579 24.1 69377 23.8do your best work at this college 5 63 36.0 1580 32.6 29271 32.5 66 30.4 3580 35.4 72299 35.6 136 34.6 5037 33.9 98645 33.8

6 29 16.6 1044 21.6 20349 22.6 61 28.1 2326 23.0 48527 23.9 76 19.4 3272 22.0 67546 23.2Extremely challenging 16 9.1 603 12.5 10109 11.2 21 9.7 1044 10.3 20189 9.9 36 9.3 1713 11.5 31128 10.7

Total 175 100.0 4840 100.0 90001 100.0 217 100.0 10120 100.0 202923 100.0 392 100.0 14873 100.0 291755 100.08a. Internship, field experience, coop

experience, or clinical assignmentI have not done, nor plan

to do 77 42.8 2302 45.2 43551 46.5 112 49.6 3915 37.3 80810 38.6 180 44.4 6537 42.1 130615 43.2

I plan to do 50 27.8 2066 40.6 36287 38.7 53 23.5 4657 44.4 89490 42.7 108 26.7 6537 42.1 122142 40.4I have done 53 29.4 721 14.2 13864 14.8 61 27.0 1914 18.3 39204 18.7 117 28.8 2463 15.9 49855 16.5

Total 180 100.0 5089 100.0 93702 100.0 226 100.0 10486 100.0 209504 100.0 404 100.0 15536 100.0 302612 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F3

Page 154: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges

8b. English as a second language course I have not done, nor plan to do 148 83.6 4360 85.6 80974 86.4 196 87.5 8776 83.9 178292 85.1 337 84.6 13189 84.9 260077 85.9

I plan to do 17 9.6 268 5.3 4949 5.3 14 6.3 602 5.8 10972 5.2 35 8.8 851 5.5 16079 5.3I have done 12 6.8 464 9.1 7837 8.4 14 6.3 1085 10.4 20189 9.6 26 6.6 1489 9.6 26585 8.8

Total 177 100.0 5092 100.0 93760 100.0 224 100.0 10463 100.0 209453 100.0 398 100.0 15529 100.0 302741 100.08c. Developmental/remedial reading

courseI have not done, nor plan

to do 130 72.2 3681 72.4 70023 74.7 183 81.7 7148 68.2 150401 71.8 301 74.5 10950 70.5 222720 73.6

I plan to do 19 10.6 399 7.8 8696 9.3 12 5.4 718 6.9 16224 7.7 37 9.3 1162 7.5 26084 8.6I have done 31 17.2 1004 19.7 15045 16.0 29 12.9 2610 24.9 42868 20.5 65 16.2 3411 22.0 53954 17.8

Total 180 100.0 5084 100.0 93764 100.0 224 100.0 10476 100.0 209493 100.0 403 100.0 15523 100.0 302757 100.08d. Developmental/remedial writing course I have not done, nor plan

to do 132 73.3 3561 70.0 64668 69.0 180 80.0 6879 65.7 137726 65.7 303 75.0 10571 68.1 204949 67.7

I plan to do 22 12.2 517 10.2 11140 11.9 14 6.2 915 8.7 20038 9.6 43 10.7 1499 9.7 32924 10.9I have done 26 14.4 1010 19.9 17972 19.2 31 13.8 2679 25.6 51894 24.8 58 14.3 3457 22.3 65027 21.5

Total 180 100.0 5088 100.0 93780 100.0 225 100.0 10473 100.0 209658 100.0 404 100.0 15527 100.0 302900 100.08e. Developmental/remedial math course I have not done, nor plan

to do 83 46.6 2588 51.0 51642 55.1 114 50.2 4912 46.9 108702 51.9 191 47.5 7616 49.1 162973 53.9

I plan to do 37 20.8 729 14.4 15078 16.1 21 9.3 1195 11.4 25212 12.0 72 17.9 2060 13.3 43491 14.4I have done 58 32.6 1761 34.7 26946 28.8 92 40.5 4359 41.6 75438 36.0 139 34.6 5828 37.6 96068 31.8

Total 178 100.0 5078 100.0 93666 100.0 227 100.0 10466 100.0 209352 100.0 401 100.0 15504 100.0 302532 100.08f. Study skills course I have not done, nor plan

to do 120 66.3 3402 66.9 64548 68.9 164 72.9 6506 62.2 136007 65.0 275 67.9 10066 64.8 203662 67.3

I plan to do 43 23.8 1019 20.0 17031 18.2 39 17.3 2096 20.0 35293 16.9 90 22.2 3128 20.1 53105 17.6I have done 18 9.9 668 13.1 12113 12.9 22 9.8 1858 17.8 38000 18.2 40 9.9 2329 15.0 45780 15.1

Total 181 100.0 5089 100.0 93692 100.0 225 100.0 10460 100.0 209300 100.0 405 100.0 15523 100.0 302547 100.08g. Honors course I have not done, nor plan

to do 129 73.7 3727 73.6 71098 76.2 146 64.9 6798 65.3 142858 68.5 283 71.5 10884 70.4 220843 73.3

I plan to do 39 22.3 1130 22.3 18740 20.1 49 21.8 3029 29.1 52491 25.2 88 22.2 3843 24.9 66245 22.0I have done 7 4.0 209 4.1 3457 3.7 30 13.3 587 5.6 13185 6.3 25 6.3 728 4.7 14253 4.7

Total 175 100.0 5066 100.0 93295 100.0 225 100.0 10414 100.0 208534 100.0 395 100.0 15455 100.0 301342 100.08h. College orientation program or course I have not done, nor plan

to do 104 58.4 3233 63.6 60754 64.9 114 51.4 5740 54.9 117039 55.9 226 56.7 9265 59.7 184855 61.1

I plan to do 21 11.8 748 14.7 12639 13.5 21 9.5 1599 15.3 27409 13.1 45 11.2 2346 15.1 40168 13.3I have done 53 29.8 1102 21.7 20216 21.6 87 39.2 3113 29.8 64758 31.0 128 32.1 3897 25.1 77282 25.6

Total 178 100.0 5083 100.0 93609 100.0 222 100.0 10452 100.0 209206 100.0 399 100.0 15508 100.0 302305 100.08i. Organized learning communities (linked

courses/study groups led byI have not done, nor plan

to do 141 77.9 3757 73.6 71207 75.8 168 74.3 7133 68.1 148257 70.6 313 77.0 11127 71.5 223671 73.7

faculty or counselors) I plan to do 29 16.0 999 19.6 16445 17.5 37 16.4 2264 21.6 39295 18.7 65 16.1 3169 20.4 54398 17.9I have done 11 6.1 347 6.8 6257 6.7 21 9.3 1075 10.3 22334 10.6 28 6.9 1261 8.1 25222 8.3

Total 181 100.0 5103 100.0 93909 100.0 226 100.0 10472 100.0 209886 100.0 406 100.0 15557 100.0 303290 100.09a. Encouraging you to spend Very little 9 4.9 258 5.0 4905 5.2 15 6.6 421 4.0 7855 3.7 22 5.4 718 4.6 14018 4.6

significant amounts of time Some 54 29.7 1349 26.3 24676 26.1 49 21.6 2291 21.8 46473 22.0 113 27.7 3836 24.5 74607 24.5studying Quite a bit 83 45.6 2147 41.8 40443 42.8 98 43.2 4425 42.0 90439 42.9 184 45.0 6574 42.0 130783 42.9

Very much 36 19.8 1377 26.8 24453 25.9 65 28.6 3394 32.2 66268 31.4 90 22.0 4515 28.9 85619 28.1Total 182 100.0 5131 100.0 94477 100.0 227 100.0 10531 100.0 211035 100.0 408 100.0 15644 100.0 305028 100.0

9b. Providing the support you need to Very little 5 2.7 289 5.7 5454 5.8 15 6.6 521 5.0 9936 4.7 15 3.7 832 5.3 16284 5.3help you succeed at this college Some 35 19.2 1277 25.0 23990 25.4 47 20.8 2353 22.4 48381 23.0 80 19.6 3727 23.9 74218 24.4

Quite a bit 109 59.9 2193 42.9 40090 42.5 95 42.0 4303 40.9 88546 42.0 226 55.5 6593 42.2 129007 42.4Very much 33 18.1 1353 26.5 24752 26.3 69 30.5 3342 31.8 63940 30.3 86 21.2 4453 28.5 85032 27.9

Total 182 100.0 5112 100.0 94286 100.0 226 100.0 10519 100.0 210803 100.0 407 100.0 15605 100.0 304541 100.09c. Encouraging contact among Very little 35 19.3 1034 20.3 19737 21.0 48 21.3 1723 16.4 36866 17.5 80 19.8 2895 18.6 59520 19.6

students from different economic, Some 69 38.1 1706 33.4 32451 34.5 67 29.8 3221 30.7 68988 32.8 146 36.1 5042 32.4 103045 33.9social, and racial or ethnic Quite a bit 58 32.0 1500 29.4 26169 27.9 63 28.0 3202 30.5 62390 29.6 126 31.1 4663 29.9 86775 28.6backgrounds Very much 19 10.5 861 16.9 15586 16.6 47 20.9 2351 22.4 42200 20.1 53 13.0 2972 19.1 54332 17.9

Total 181 100.0 5101 100.0 93943 100.0 225 100.0 10497 100.0 210444 100.0 405 100.0 15572 100.0 303671 100.09d. Helping you cope with your non- Very little 74 40.7 2189 42.9 41855 44.6 99 43.4 3820 36.4 82053 39.0 169 41.3 6252 40.2 127810 42.1

academic responsibilities (work, Some 48 26.4 1675 32.8 30432 32.4 68 29.8 3583 34.1 72954 34.7 111 27.2 5218 33.5 101557 33.4family, etc.) Quite a bit 44 24.2 801 15.7 14561 15.5 40 17.5 2034 19.4 36915 17.5 92 22.5 2668 17.1 49814 16.4

Very much 16 8.8 436 8.5 7059 7.5 21 9.2 1062 10.1 18593 8.8 36 8.9 1432 9.2 24465 8.1Total 182 100.0 5101 100.0 93907 100.0 228 100.0 10499 100.0 210515 100.0 408 100.0 15570 100.0 303646 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F4

Page 155: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges

9e. Providing the support you need to Very little 61 33.7 1587 31.3 31390 33.6 62 27.4 2507 24.0 54940 26.2 131 32.2 4375 28.2 91749 30.4thrive socially Some 66 36.5 1927 38.0 36626 39.2 89 39.4 4015 38.4 85148 40.6 151 37.2 5908 38.1 120678 39.9

Quite a bit 42 23.2 1098 21.6 17964 19.2 50 22.1 2718 26.0 48507 23.1 93 22.9 3642 23.5 63161 20.9Very much 12 6.6 461 9.1 7423 7.9 25 11.1 1210 11.6 21030 10.0 31 7.7 1568 10.1 26608 8.8

Total 181 100.0 5073 100.0 93403 100.0 226 100.0 10450 100.0 209625 100.0 406 100.0 15493 100.0 302196 100.09f. Providing the financial support you Very little 65 35.7 1590 31.3 30906 33.1 53 23.5 2343 22.3 47118 22.4 133 32.7 4286 27.6 85947 28.4

need to afford your education Some 49 26.9 1374 27.1 25585 27.4 67 29.6 2631 25.1 55538 26.4 112 27.6 4073 26.2 81927 27.1Quite a bit 35 19.2 1132 22.3 20161 21.6 46 20.4 2622 25.0 54462 25.9 79 19.5 3647 23.5 71259 23.6Very much 33 18.1 980 19.3 16821 18.0 60 26.5 2890 27.6 52895 25.2 82 20.2 3516 22.7 63412 21.0

Total 182 100.0 5076 100.0 93473 100.0 226 100.0 10486 100.0 210013 100.0 407 100.0 15523 100.0 302546 100.09g. Using Computers in academic work Very little 18 9.9 459 9.0 9229 9.8 12 5.3 399 3.8 7993 3.8 36 8.8 1073 6.9 22153 7.3

Some 28 15.4 1060 20.7 20176 21.4 39 17.1 1588 15.1 32617 15.5 65 15.8 2870 18.4 57583 18.9Quite a bit 71 39.0 1624 31.7 30719 32.6 77 33.8 3260 31.0 69872 33.1 154 37.7 4933 31.6 100191 32.9Very much 65 35.7 1972 38.6 34055 36.2 100 43.9 5263 50.1 100323 47.6 154 37.7 6728 43.1 124391 40.9

Total 182 100.0 5115 100.0 94179 100.0 228 100.0 10510 100.0 210805 100.0 408 100.0 15604 100.0 304318 100.010a. Preparing for class (studying, None 8 4.4 127 2.5 1968 2.1 4 1.8 159 1.5 2783 1.3 15 3.8 317 2.0 5525 1.8

reading, writing, rehearsing, doing 1-5 hours 110 60.8 2550 49.7 46374 49.1 105 46.7 4116 39.2 77474 36.8 232 57.3 7178 46.0 134495 44.2homework, or other activities 6-10 hours 39 21.5 1468 28.6 27414 29.0 62 27.6 3125 29.8 62469 29.7 93 23.0 4524 29.0 89107 29.3related to your program) 11-20 hours 18 9.9 695 13.6 13258 14.0 32 14.2 1968 18.7 42047 20.0 45 11.0 2430 15.6 50060 16.4

21-30 hours 5 2.8 195 3.8 3583 3.8 10 4.4 725 6.9 16501 7.8 13 3.2 768 4.9 16512 5.4More than 30 hours 1 0.6 93 1.8 1772 1.9 12 5.3 409 3.9 9041 4.3 7 1.7 402 2.6 8684 2.9

Total 181 100.0 5128 100.0 94369 100.0 225 100.0 10502 100.0 210315 100.0 405 100.0 15619 100.0 304382 100.010b. Working for pay None 23 12.8 861 16.9 14554 15.5 44 19.6 2637 25.2 52226 24.9 58 14.4 3115 20.0 59453 19.6

1-5 hours 3 1.7 199 3.9 3932 4.2 9 4.0 660 6.3 12878 6.1 9 2.2 750 4.8 15288 5.06-10 hours 8 4.4 269 5.3 4816 5.1 8 3.6 651 6.2 14244 6.8 17 4.2 876 5.6 17741 5.8

11-20 hours 11 6.1 417 8.2 8157 8.7 36 16.0 1603 15.3 35092 16.7 34 8.5 1697 10.9 36505 12.021-30 hours 16 8.9 743 14.6 13603 14.5 52 23.1 2184 20.8 45099 21.5 50 12.4 2659 17.1 52651 17.4

More than 30 hours 119 66.1 2611 51.2 48880 52.0 76 33.8 2740 26.2 50240 23.9 235 58.2 6457 41.5 121652 40.1Total 180 100.0 5100 100.0 93942 100.0 225 100.0 10475 100.0 209779 100.0 404 100.0 15554 100.0 303290 100.0

10c. Participating in college-sponsored None 168 92.8 4477 87.5 82747 87.9 172 76.1 8187 78.1 159265 75.8 360 88.7 13054 83.8 251195 82.7activities (organizations, campus 1-5 hours 8 4.4 486 9.5 8424 9.0 30 13.3 1674 16.0 34991 16.7 27 6.6 1886 12.1 37300 12.3publications, student government, 6-10 hours 3 1.7 89 1.7 1634 1.7 10 4.4 324 3.1 7404 3.5 9 2.3 351 2.2 7635 2.5intercollegiate or intramural sports, 11-20 hours 2 1.1 37 0.7 692 0.7 9 4.0 177 1.7 4315 2.1 7 1.8 170 1.1 3964 1.3etc.) 21-30 hours 0 0.0 9 0.2 242 0.3 2 0.9 55 0.5 1887 0.9 1 0.2 52 0.3 1618 0.5

More than 30 hours 0 0.0 16 0.3 353 0.4 3 1.3 66 0.6 2202 1.0 1 0.3 70 0.4 1990 0.7Total 181 100.0 5114 100.0 94092 100.0 226 100.0 10483 100.0 210064 100.0 406 100.0 15582 100.0 303702 100.0

10d. Providing care for dependents None 57 31.5 1992 39.0 37644 40.1 103 45.6 4675 44.7 102680 49.0 142 34.9 6400 41.1 132948 43.9living with you (parents, children, 1-5 hours 23 12.7 784 15.4 13338 14.2 39 17.3 1880 18.0 34940 16.7 56 13.8 2556 16.4 46013 15.2spouse, etc.) 6-10 hours 15 8.3 431 8.4 7164 7.6 17 7.5 958 9.2 16435 7.8 33 8.1 1360 8.7 23198 7.7

11-20 hours 8 4.4 325 6.4 5777 6.2 13 5.8 657 6.3 11564 5.5 19 4.7 979 6.3 17765 5.921-30 hours 7 3.9 226 4.4 4129 4.4 6 2.7 401 3.8 7191 3.4 14 3.6 646 4.2 12080 4.0

More than 30 hours 71 39.2 1348 26.4 25847 27.5 48 21.2 1885 18.0 36800 17.6 141 34.8 3613 23.2 71084 23.5Total 181 100.0 5106 100.0 93899 100.0 226 100.0 10456 100.0 209610 100.0 406 100.0 15554 100.0 303088 100.0

10e. Commuting to and from classes None 19 10.6 370 7.3 6170 6.6 18 8.0 641 6.1 14505 6.9 40 10.0 1072 6.9 20873 6.91-5 hours 133 74.3 3684 72.2 70111 74.6 146 64.6 6439 61.5 128876 61.4 289 71.9 10567 68.0 208959 68.9

6-10 hours 17 9.5 686 13.5 11982 12.7 35 15.5 2071 19.8 42543 20.3 44 11.0 2477 15.9 48369 15.911-20 hours 5 2.8 190 3.7 3250 3.5 18 8.0 776 7.4 14927 7.1 16 4.1 803 5.2 15144 5.021-30 hours 3 1.7 63 1.2 923 1.0 3 1.3 243 2.3 3872 1.8 6 1.6 255 1.6 4052 1.3

More than 30 hours 2 1.1 107 2.1 1598 1.7 6 2.7 298 2.8 5098 2.4 6 1.5 376 2.4 6094 2.0Total 179 100.0 5100 100.0 94034 100.0 226 100.0 10468 100.0 209821 100.0 402 100.0 15550 100.0 303493 100.0

11a. Other students Unfriendly,unsupportive, sense of alienation 3 1.6 42 0.8 911 1.0 2 0.9 89 0.8 1896 0.9 6 1.5 127 0.8 2850 0.9

2 1 0.5 100 1.9 2026 2.1 1 0.4 162 1.5 4023 1.9 2 0.5 282 1.8 6280 2.13 9 4.9 235 4.6 4490 4.8 12 5.3 449 4.3 9162 4.4 21 5.0 699 4.5 13883 4.64 23 12.6 842 16.4 15622 16.6 31 13.8 1520 14.4 30635 14.6 53 12.9 2446 15.6 47785 15.75 36 19.8 1104 21.5 21043 22.3 42 18.7 2186 20.8 46101 21.9 79 19.5 3311 21.2 67466 22.26 58 31.9 1288 25.1 25218 26.7 68 30.2 2994 28.5 61123 29.0 128 31.5 4126 26.4 84422 27.7

Friendly,supportive, sense of belonging 52 28.6 1519 29.6 25003 26.5 69 30.7 3121 29.7 57590 27.4 118 29.1 4641 29.7 81736 26.8

Total 182 100.0 5130 100.0 94313 100.0 225 100.0 10521 100.0 210530 100.0 407 100.0 15632 100.0 304422 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F5

Page 156: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges

11b. Instructors Unavailable,unhelpful, unsympathetic 0 0.0 35 0.7 603 0.6 4 1.8 90 0.9 1416 0.7 2 0.4 118 0.8 1975 0.6

2 4 2.2 81 1.6 1394 1.5 3 1.3 171 1.6 3222 1.5 8 2.0 250 1.6 4570 1.53 3 1.6 172 3.4 3231 3.4 9 4.0 414 3.9 8254 3.9 9 2.2 561 3.6 11048 3.64 15 8.2 587 11.5 10842 11.5 25 11.1 1329 12.6 26264 12.5 36 8.9 1865 11.9 36143 11.95 34 18.7 1017 19.8 18746 19.9 44 19.6 2318 22.0 48052 22.8 77 18.9 3253 20.8 64160 21.16 60 33.0 1559 30.4 29278 31.0 64 28.4 3308 31.5 68539 32.5 130 31.9 4790 30.7 96510 31.7

Available,helpful, sympathetic 66 36.3 1674 32.7 30327 32.1 76 33.8 2885 27.4 54867 26.1 145 35.7 4784 30.6 90265 29.6

Total 182 100.0 5125 100.0 94421 100.0 225 100.0 10515 100.0 210614 100.0 407 100.0 15620 100.0 304670 100.011c. Administrative personnel and offices Unhelpful,inconsiderate,

rigid 7 3.8 210 4.1 3100 3.3 13 5.8 442 4.2 7302 3.5 18 4.3 640 4.1 10190 3.4

2 4 2.2 225 4.4 4550 4.8 13 5.8 588 5.6 10982 5.2 12 3.1 755 4.8 15092 5.03 9 4.9 475 9.3 8027 8.5 14 6.2 965 9.2 18433 8.8 21 5.3 1443 9.2 26087 8.64 35 19.2 1051 20.5 19258 20.5 37 16.4 2105 20.0 41717 19.8 76 18.5 3158 20.2 61082 20.15 49 26.9 1147 22.4 20899 22.2 37 16.4 2302 21.9 47672 22.7 99 24.3 3469 22.2 68113 22.46 42 23.1 1084 21.2 20575 21.9 53 23.5 2284 21.7 47460 22.6 94 23.2 3350 21.5 67614 22.2

Helpful,considerate, flexible 36 19.8 924 18.1 17714 18.8 59 26.1 1821 17.3 36894 17.5 87 21.3 2788 17.9 55860 18.4

Total 182 100.0 5116 100.0 94123 100.0 226 100.0 10507 100.0 210460 100.0 407 100.0 15603 100.0 304037 100.012a. Acquiring a broad general education Very little 14 7.7 343 6.7 7003 7.4 10 4.4 381 3.6 7390 3.5 28 6.9 836 5.4 17598 5.8

Some 54 29.7 1254 24.6 24564 26.1 46 20.4 1962 18.7 43230 20.5 112 27.4 3468 22.3 72479 23.8Quite a bit 77 42.3 2088 40.9 38194 40.6 101 44.9 4660 44.4 93392 44.4 175 42.9 6585 42.3 128424 42.3Very much 37 20.3 1421 27.8 24329 25.9 68 30.2 3496 33.3 66409 31.6 93 22.7 4688 30.1 85441 28.1

Total 182 100.0 5106 100.0 94090 100.0 225 100.0 10499 100.0 210421 100.0 407 100.0 15577 100.0 303942 100.012b. Acquiring job or work-related Very little 32 17.8 1061 20.8 19505 20.8 39 17.3 1630 15.6 33024 15.7 71 17.7 2891 18.6 56034 18.5

knowledge and skills Some 51 28.3 1518 29.8 28337 30.2 58 25.8 2970 28.4 62202 29.6 112 27.7 4543 29.2 90774 29.9Quite a bit 67 37.2 1477 29.0 27456 29.2 70 31.1 3311 31.6 66081 31.5 144 35.7 4685 30.1 91920 30.3Very much 30 16.7 1040 20.4 18619 19.8 58 25.8 2564 24.5 48769 23.2 76 18.9 3428 22.0 64695 21.3

Total 180 100.0 5096 100.0 93917 100.0 225 100.0 10475 100.0 210076 100.0 404 100.0 15548 100.0 303423 100.012c. Writing clearly and effectively Very little 36 19.8 708 13.9 14033 14.9 22 9.8 732 7.0 16012 7.6 71 17.4 1696 10.9 36006 11.9

Some 56 30.8 1509 29.6 28520 30.4 80 35.7 2740 26.1 58961 28.1 130 32.0 4407 28.3 89460 29.5Quite a bit 60 33.0 1867 36.6 33397 35.6 74 33.0 4303 41.0 85399 40.6 134 33.0 5989 38.5 114416 37.7Very much 30 16.5 1012 19.9 17947 19.1 48 21.4 2710 25.8 49827 23.7 72 17.7 3458 22.2 63547 20.9

Total 182 100.0 5096 100.0 93897 100.0 224 100.0 10485 100.0 210199 100.0 407 100.0 15551 100.0 303430 100.012d. Speaking clearly and effectively Very little 34 18.9 810 15.9 16646 17.7 31 13.8 1003 9.6 22651 10.8 71 17.7 2053 13.2 44889 14.8

Some 54 30.0 1568 30.8 29992 32.0 72 32.1 2809 26.8 62996 30.0 123 30.5 4540 29.2 94562 31.2Quite a bit 68 37.8 1754 34.4 31005 33.0 77 34.4 4063 38.8 78693 37.4 149 36.9 5650 36.3 106037 35.0Very much 24 13.3 963 18.9 16200 17.3 44 19.6 2602 24.8 45811 21.8 60 14.9 3305 21.3 57819 19.1

Total 180 100.0 5095 100.0 93843 100.0 224 100.0 10477 100.0 210151 100.0 403 100.0 15548 100.0 303306 100.012e. Thinking critically and Very little 16 8.8 380 7.5 8029 8.6 12 5.3 465 4.4 9978 4.8 32 7.9 954 6.1 21127 7.0

analytically Some 59 32.4 1406 27.6 26287 28.0 60 26.7 2400 22.9 50776 24.2 126 31.0 4012 25.8 80192 26.4Quite a bit 68 37.4 2042 40.1 38009 40.5 89 39.6 4373 41.7 90038 42.9 154 37.9 6342 40.8 125963 41.5Very much 39 21.4 1269 24.9 21504 22.9 64 28.4 3244 30.9 59205 28.2 94 23.1 4245 27.3 75923 25.0

Total 182 100.0 5097 100.0 93829 100.0 225 100.0 10482 100.0 209997 100.0 407 100.0 15554 100.0 303204 100.012f. Solving numerical problems Very little 33 18.2 873 17.2 19333 20.6 25 11.1 1129 10.8 24054 11.5 67 16.5 2251 14.5 50801 16.8

Some 54 29.8 1484 29.2 27786 29.7 63 28.0 2957 28.2 62388 29.7 119 29.4 4477 28.8 90125 29.8Quite a bit 64 35.4 1699 33.4 29415 31.4 79 35.1 3805 36.3 76646 36.5 143 35.3 5379 34.6 101710 33.6Very much 30 16.6 1031 20.3 17133 18.3 58 25.8 2587 24.7 46897 22.3 76 18.8 3424 22.0 60263 19.9

Total 181 100.0 5087 100.0 93667 100.0 225 100.0 10478 100.0 209985 100.0 405 100.0 15531 100.0 302899 100.012g. Using computing and Very little 38 21.0 763 15.0 16596 17.7 27 12.1 955 9.1 21072 10.0 76 18.8 1919 12.4 43533 14.4

information technology Some 47 26.0 1426 28.0 27032 28.8 56 25.0 2536 24.2 55182 26.3 104 25.7 4129 26.6 84205 27.8Quite a bit 57 31.5 1646 32.4 28834 30.8 87 38.8 3622 34.5 72380 34.5 135 33.3 5178 33.3 98121 32.4Very much 39 21.5 1253 24.6 21295 22.7 54 24.1 3371 32.2 61330 29.2 90 22.2 4310 27.7 77190 25.5

Total 181 100.0 5088 100.0 93757 100.0 224 100.0 10484 100.0 209964 100.0 405 100.0 15536 100.0 303049 100.012h. Working effectively with others Very little 21 11.6 578 11.4 11034 11.8 18 8.0 742 7.1 15817 7.5 43 10.7 1471 9.5 30140 9.9

Some 60 33.1 1590 31.2 31742 33.8 83 36.9 2835 27.0 62777 29.9 138 34.1 4611 29.7 97460 32.1Quite a bit 65 35.9 1798 35.3 32788 35.0 65 28.9 3947 37.6 80510 38.3 139 34.2 5640 36.3 110561 36.5Very much 35 19.3 1126 22.1 18234 19.4 59 26.2 2961 28.2 50955 24.3 85 21.0 3827 24.6 65022 21.4

Total 181 100.0 5092 100.0 93798 100.0 225 100.0 10485 100.0 210059 100.0 405 100.0 15548 100.0 303183 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F6

Page 157: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges

12i. Learning effectively on your Very little 16 8.8 374 7.3 7402 7.9 13 5.8 555 5.3 12129 5.8 33 8.1 1000 6.4 21148 7.0own Some 57 31.5 1294 25.4 24878 26.5 55 24.6 2332 22.2 50585 24.1 121 29.8 3758 24.1 77329 25.5

Quite a bit 72 39.8 2037 39.9 37724 40.2 96 42.9 4199 40.1 85711 40.8 164 40.5 6239 40.1 122984 40.6Very much 36 19.9 1398 27.4 23843 25.4 60 26.8 3398 32.4 61619 29.3 87 21.6 4569 29.4 81771 27.0

Total 181 100.0 5103 100.0 93847 100.0 224 100.0 10484 100.0 210044 100.0 405 100.0 15566 100.0 303232 100.012j. Understanding yourself Very little 34 18.8 853 16.8 17998 19.2 42 18.7 1347 12.9 30978 14.8 76 18.8 2339 15.1 52244 17.2

Some 65 35.9 1559 30.6 28810 30.7 68 30.2 2786 26.6 61558 29.3 140 34.5 4517 29.1 91650 30.3Quite a bit 54 29.8 1564 30.7 28564 30.5 66 29.3 3484 33.2 67745 32.3 120 29.7 4947 31.8 94799 31.3Very much 28 15.5 1115 21.9 18355 19.6 49 21.8 2863 27.3 49578 23.6 69 17.0 3737 24.0 64243 21.2

Total 181 100.0 5091 100.0 93727 100.0 225 100.0 10480 100.0 209859 100.0 405 100.0 15540 100.0 302937 100.012k. Understanding people of other Very little 55 30.6 1200 23.6 24984 26.7 63 28.0 1815 17.3 42143 20.1 121 29.9 3235 20.8 72602 24.0

racial and ethnic backgrounds Some 59 32.8 1714 33.7 32032 34.2 65 28.9 3318 31.7 71109 33.9 128 31.8 5132 33.1 103397 34.2Quite a bit 49 27.2 1312 25.8 23016 24.6 62 27.6 3135 30.0 58822 28.0 110 27.3 4277 27.6 78737 26.0Very much 17 9.4 857 16.9 13628 14.6 35 15.6 2198 21.0 37685 18.0 44 10.9 2874 18.5 47985 15.9

Total 180 100.0 5083 100.0 93660 100.0 225 100.0 10466 100.0 209759 100.0 404 100.0 15519 100.0 302721 100.012l. Developing a personal code of Very little 51 28.5 1238 24.4 26276 28.1 54 24.0 1906 18.2 43449 20.7 110 27.4 3362 21.7 75330 24.9

values and ethics Some 65 36.3 1723 33.9 31530 33.7 79 35.1 3291 31.4 70375 33.5 145 36.0 5125 33.0 102047 33.7Quite a bit 43 24.0 1306 25.7 22669 24.2 54 24.0 3110 29.7 59336 28.3 97 24.0 4262 27.5 78647 26.0Very much 20 11.2 815 16.0 13188 14.1 38 16.9 2166 20.7 36610 17.5 51 12.6 2769 17.8 46719 15.4

Total 179 100.0 5082 100.0 93663 100.0 225 100.0 10473 100.0 209770 100.0 402 100.0 15518 100.0 302743 100.012m. Contributing to the welfare of Very little 75 41.9 1975 38.9 38818 41.5 75 33.3 3374 32.3 72026 34.4 160 39.8 5581 36.0 115966 38.4

your community Some 66 36.9 1738 34.2 31651 33.9 75 33.3 3668 35.1 76115 36.4 145 36.0 5388 34.8 105880 35.0Quite a bit 31 17.3 899 17.7 15281 16.4 47 20.9 2169 20.8 40301 19.2 73 18.2 2949 19.0 53239 17.6Very much 7 3.9 464 9.1 7686 8.2 28 12.4 1237 11.8 20947 10.0 24 6.0 1576 10.2 27020 8.9

Total 179 100.0 5076 100.0 93436 100.0 225 100.0 10448 100.0 209389 100.0 402 100.0 15494 100.0 302105 100.012n. Developing clearer career Very little 31 17.2 924 18.1 17733 18.9 31 13.8 1166 11.1 26324 12.5 66 16.4 2361 15.2 48972 16.2

goals Some 48 26.7 1478 29.0 28127 30.0 60 26.8 2588 24.7 57244 27.3 108 26.7 4230 27.2 87512 28.9Quite a bit 69 38.3 1563 30.7 28590 30.5 80 35.7 3664 35.0 71295 34.0 152 37.7 5067 32.6 97176 32.1Very much 32 17.8 1128 22.1 19314 20.6 53 23.7 3062 29.2 55134 26.3 77 19.2 3886 25.0 69425 22.9

Total 180 100.0 5093 100.0 93764 100.0 224 100.0 10480 100.0 209997 100.0 403 100.0 15543 100.0 303086 100.012o. Gaining information about Very little 33 18.2 1093 21.4 21591 23.0 37 16.4 1495 14.2 32659 15.5 72 17.8 2869 18.4 59849 19.7

career opportunities Some 52 28.7 1642 32.2 29564 31.5 69 30.7 2854 27.2 61106 29.1 118 29.2 4706 30.2 92571 30.5Quite a bit 60 33.1 1391 27.3 25474 27.1 69 30.7 3385 32.2 65795 31.3 132 32.5 4575 29.4 87985 29.0Very much 36 19.9 975 19.1 17295 18.4 50 22.2 2767 26.3 50732 24.1 83 20.5 3422 22.0 63151 20.8

Total 181 100.0 5101 100.0 93924 100.0 225 100.0 10501 100.0 210292 100.0 405 100.0 15572 100.0 303556 100.013a1. Frequency: Academic Do not know/N.A. 27 14.8 538 10.7 10992 11.8 19 8.7 691 6.7 13286 6.4 54 13.3 1392 9.1 28686 9.6

advising/planning Rarely/never 71 38.8 1958 38.9 35300 38.0 87 39.9 3433 33.1 67603 32.5 158 39.1 5609 36.5 106875 35.6Sometimes 73 39.9 2032 40.4 36859 39.7 84 38.5 4733 45.6 95968 46.1 161 39.6 6560 42.7 127467 42.5

Often 12 6.6 506 10.1 9734 10.5 28 12.8 1513 14.6 31102 15.0 33 8.0 1810 11.8 37195 12.4Total 183 100.0 5034 100.0 92885 100.0 218 100.0 10370 100.0 207959 100.0 406 100.0 15372 100.0 300223 100.0

13b1. Frequency: Career counseling Do not know/N.A. 37 20.3 1067 21.3 21689 23.4 29 13.2 1739 16.9 37982 18.3 75 18.6 2982 19.5 63608 21.3Rarely/never 89 48.9 2580 51.4 46188 49.9 107 48.9 5103 49.5 104463 50.4 198 48.9 7767 50.7 150133 50.2

Sometimes 45 24.7 1133 22.6 20246 21.9 63 28.8 2697 26.1 51365 24.8 104 25.7 3669 24.0 69111 23.1Often 11 6.0 238 4.7 4394 4.7 20 9.1 777 7.5 13317 6.4 27 6.8 895 5.8 16203 5.4

Total 182 100.0 5018 100.0 92517 100.0 219 100.0 10316 100.0 207127 100.0 404 100.0 15313 100.0 299055 100.013c1. Frequency: Job placement Do not know/N.A. 76 42.0 2176 43.7 41321 45.0 69 31.8 3997 38.9 80530 39.1 159 39.6 6363 41.8 126048 42.4

assistance Rarely/never 77 42.5 2338 46.9 41952 45.7 110 50.7 4850 47.2 96160 46.7 179 44.5 7152 47.0 136862 46.1Sometimes 25 13.8 360 7.2 6676 7.3 29 13.4 1099 10.7 22151 10.8 55 13.7 1322 8.7 26271 8.8

Often 3 1.7 111 2.2 1890 2.1 9 4.1 331 3.2 6941 3.4 9 2.2 392 2.6 7803 2.6Total 181 100.0 4985 100.0 91839 100.0 217 100.0 10277 100.0 205782 100.0 402 100.0 15227 100.0 296983 100.0

13d1. Frequency: Peer or other Do not know/N.A. 64 35.6 1454 29.2 29367 32.0 51 23.4 2467 24.2 51689 25.2 131 32.6 4152 27.4 86561 29.2tutoring Rarely/never 74 41.1 2248 45.2 41609 45.4 90 41.3 4526 44.3 94552 46.0 165 41.2 6807 44.9 135486 45.7

Sometimes 28 15.6 907 18.2 15019 16.4 52 23.9 2283 22.4 42162 20.5 70 17.5 3002 19.8 53593 18.1Often 14 7.8 362 7.3 5676 6.2 25 11.5 936 9.2 17054 8.3 35 8.7 1208 8.0 20843 7.0

Total 180 100.0 4971 100.0 91671 100.0 218 100.0 10212 100.0 205457 100.0 401 100.0 15168 100.0 296483 100.013e1. Frequency: Skill labs (writing, Do not know/N.A. 55 31.1 1214 24.4 25059 27.4 44 20.5 2016 19.8 41195 20.1 112 28.5 3400 22.4 71996 24.3

math, etc.) Rarely/never 56 31.6 1875 37.7 34447 37.6 79 36.7 3627 35.6 73305 35.8 130 32.9 5590 36.9 108850 36.8Sometimes 42 23.7 1177 23.7 20487 22.4 61 28.4 2759 27.1 55400 27.0 98 24.8 3801 25.1 72218 24.4

Often 24 13.6 702 14.1 11529 12.6 31 14.4 1792 17.6 35007 17.1 54 13.8 2358 15.6 42793 14.5Total 177 100.0 4968 100.0 91522 100.0 215 100.0 10194 100.0 204907 100.0 394 100.0 15149 100.0 295857 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F7

Page 158: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges

13f1. Frequency: Child care Do not know/N.A. 116 64.4 2858 57.7 54064 59.1 118 54.9 5706 55.9 118177 57.7 248 62.2 8616 56.9 172775 58.4Rarely/never 50 27.8 1884 38.0 33477 36.6 80 37.2 3826 37.5 74637 36.4 120 30.0 5716 37.8 108074 36.5

Sometimes 11 6.1 122 2.5 2198 2.4 8 3.7 374 3.7 6512 3.2 22 5.5 450 3.0 8161 2.8Often 3 1.7 93 1.9 1812 2.0 9 4.2 307 3.0 5582 2.7 9 2.3 357 2.4 6890 2.3

Total 180 100.0 4957 100.0 91551 100.0 215 100.0 10213 100.0 204908 100.0 399 100.0 15139 100.0 295899 100.013g1. Frequency: Financial aid Do not know/N.A. 70 38.5 1325 26.7 26147 28.6 59 27.6 1967 19.2 39430 19.2 144 35.9 3571 23.5 72312 24.4

advising Rarely/never 53 29.1 1707 34.4 30896 33.8 69 32.2 2952 28.9 61118 29.8 120 29.9 4882 32.2 94795 32.0Sometimes 34 18.7 1182 23.8 21073 23.0 45 21.0 3030 29.6 62197 30.3 77 19.2 3973 26.2 78034 26.4

Often 25 13.7 754 15.2 13422 14.7 41 19.2 2272 22.2 42324 20.6 60 15.0 2740 18.1 50826 17.2Total 182 100.0 4968 100.0 91538 100.0 214 100.0 10221 100.0 205069 100.0 402 100.0 15167 100.0 295968 100.0

13h1. Frequency: Computer lab Do not know/N.A. 36 19.9 789 15.9 17072 18.6 18 8.3 785 7.7 17651 8.6 69 17.1 1900 12.6 42639 14.4Rarely/never 34 18.8 1310 26.4 25522 27.8 29 13.4 1805 17.7 39001 19.0 70 17.5 3487 23.0 71251 24.0

Sometimes 54 29.8 1486 30.0 26162 28.5 68 31.3 3176 31.1 64200 31.3 121 30.2 4643 30.7 88042 29.7Often 57 31.5 1370 27.6 22927 25.0 102 47.0 4451 43.6 84415 41.1 141 35.2 5111 33.8 94383 31.9

Total 181 100.0 4955 100.0 91683 100.0 217 100.0 10217 100.0 205267 100.0 402 100.0 15141 100.0 296316 100.013i1. Frequency: Student Do not know/N.A. 106 58.2 2122 42.9 40882 44.9 79 36.4 3472 34.2 69925 34.3 214 53.1 5935 39.4 118793 40.4

organizations Rarely/never 48 26.4 2210 44.7 39619 43.5 97 44.7 4532 44.7 90241 44.3 124 30.7 6743 44.7 128987 43.8Sometimes 25 13.7 439 8.9 7763 8.5 23 10.6 1531 15.1 30327 14.9 52 13.0 1719 11.4 33153 11.3

Often 3 1.6 171 3.5 2753 3.0 18 8.3 612 6.0 13282 6.5 13 3.2 683 4.5 13256 4.5Total 182 100.0 4942 100.0 91017 100.0 217 100.0 10147 100.0 203775 100.0 404 100.0 15079 100.0 294190 100.0

13j1. Frequency: Transfer credit Do not know/N.A. 94 52.5 1844 36.9 35129 38.3 70 32.1 3341 32.6 67465 32.8 190 47.6 5356 35.2 107220 36.1assistance Rarely/never 50 27.9 1900 38.1 33582 36.6 95 43.6 3755 36.6 73183 35.6 126 31.7 5694 37.4 107179 36.1

Sometimes 30 16.8 939 18.8 17475 19.0 41 18.8 2231 21.8 46905 22.8 69 17.3 3065 20.1 61045 20.6Often 5 2.8 309 6.2 5633 6.1 12 5.5 926 9.0 18133 8.8 14 3.4 1117 7.3 21419 7.2

Total 179 100.0 4992 100.0 91819 100.0 218 100.0 10253 100.0 205686 100.0 399 100.0 15232 100.0 296862 100.013k1. Frequency: Services to Do not know/N.A. 123 67.6 2999 60.1 56006 60.9 120 55.6 5842 56.9 120257 58.4 261 64.7 8962 58.8 177689 59.8

students with disabilities Rarely/never 49 26.9 1620 32.4 29295 31.9 72 33.3 3414 33.3 66013 32.0 115 28.4 4983 32.7 94929 31.9Sometimes 6 3.3 216 4.3 3768 4.1 13 6.0 597 5.8 11209 5.4 16 3.9 751 4.9 14061 4.7

Often 4 2.2 159 3.2 2905 3.2 11 5.1 409 4.0 8531 4.1 12 2.9 544 3.6 10667 3.6Total 182 100.0 4994 100.0 91974 100.0 216 100.0 10262 100.0 206010 100.0 403 100.0 15240 100.0 297347 100.0

13a2. Satisfaction: Academic N.A. 41 23.4 1043 21.3 20359 22.6 45 20.7 1377 13.6 27228 13.4 89 22.8 2705 18.0 54553 18.6advising/planning Not at all 16 9.1 521 10.6 9218 10.2 21 9.7 1132 11.2 21161 10.4 36 9.3 1623 10.8 30000 10.3

Somewhat 77 44.0 2175 44.4 37574 41.7 90 41.5 4818 47.6 94686 46.5 170 43.4 6868 45.8 127950 43.7Very 41 23.4 1162 23.7 22965 25.5 61 28.1 2794 27.6 60562 29.7 96 24.6 3796 25.3 80021 27.4

Total 175 100.0 4901 100.0 90116 100.0 217 100.0 10121 100.0 203637 100.0 392 100.0 14992 100.0 292524 100.013b2. Satisfaction: Career N.A. 56 32.4 2063 42.6 39732 44.6 69 31.8 3535 35.2 74970 37.1 125 32.2 5839 39.3 119682 41.3

Counseling Not at all 23 13.3 629 13.0 11681 13.1 30 13.8 1312 13.1 27979 13.9 52 13.4 1955 13.2 39002 13.5Somewhat 57 32.9 1427 29.5 24636 27.6 66 30.4 3324 33.1 63761 31.6 126 32.3 4591 30.9 85049 29.4

Very 37 21.4 725 15.0 13134 14.7 52 24.0 1871 18.6 35120 17.4 86 22.0 2458 16.6 45965 15.9Total 173 100.0 4844 100.0 89183 100.0 217 100.0 10042 100.0 201830 100.0 388 100.0 14844 100.0 289698 100.0

13c2. Satisfaction: Job placement N.A. 98 57.3 3167 66.2 59294 67.4 120 55.8 5882 59.1 117886 59.1 219 56.9 9281 63.2 182068 63.7assistance Not at all 24 14.0 610 12.7 11372 12.9 31 14.4 1371 13.8 28127 14.1 54 14.1 1950 13.3 38513 13.5

Somewhat 35 20.5 693 14.5 12195 13.9 35 16.3 1855 18.6 36800 18.4 75 19.4 2372 16.2 45555 15.9Very 14 8.2 317 6.6 5105 5.8 29 13.5 842 8.5 16670 8.4 36 9.5 1080 7.4 19881 7.0

Total 171 100.0 4787 100.0 87966 100.0 215 100.0 9950 100.0 199483 100.0 384 100.0 14683 100.0 286017 100.013d2. Satisfaction: Peer or other N.A. 84 49.4 2415 50.4 47973 54.5 93 43.3 4268 43.1 90998 45.6 183 47.9 6972 47.6 145292 50.8

tutoring Not at all 13 7.6 491 10.3 8574 9.7 18 8.4 966 9.8 19204 9.6 30 7.8 1491 10.2 27760 9.7Somewhat 36 21.2 1092 22.8 18381 20.9 46 21.4 2633 26.6 51236 25.7 81 21.2 3553 24.2 65559 22.9

Very 37 21.8 789 16.5 13076 14.9 58 27.0 2030 20.5 38042 19.1 88 23.1 2641 18.0 47503 16.6Total 170 100.0 4787 100.0 88004 100.0 215 100.0 9897 100.0 199480 100.0 382 100.0 14657 100.0 286113 100.0

13e2. Satisfaction: Skill labs (writing, N.A. 72 42.4 2065 43.2 40775 46.4 81 38.2 3481 35.2 72262 36.3 157 41.3 5825 39.8 120127 42.1math, etc.) Not at all 16 9.4 359 7.5 6657 7.6 21 9.9 744 7.5 14605 7.3 36 9.5 1099 7.5 21361 7.5

Somewhat 51 30.0 1311 27.4 22897 26.1 64 30.2 3056 30.9 62524 31.4 114 30.0 4237 28.9 81121 28.4Very 31 18.2 1041 21.8 17454 19.9 46 21.7 2619 26.5 49491 24.9 73 19.1 3477 23.8 62738 22.0

Total 170 100.0 4776 100.0 87783 100.0 212 100.0 9900 100.0 198882 100.0 381 100.0 14637 100.0 285346 100.013f2. Satisfaction: Child care N.A. 130 76.5 3699 77.8 69687 79.7 152 72.0 7356 74.9 151621 76.6 287 75.4 11124 76.5 222294 78.2

Not at all 14 8.2 476 10.0 8601 9.8 30 14.2 1008 10.3 19670 9.9 37 9.7 1489 10.2 28178 9.9Somewhat 15 8.8 334 7.0 5619 6.4 10 4.7 889 9.1 16242 8.2 30 7.8 1142 7.9 20537 7.2

Very 11 6.5 243 5.1 3538 4.0 19 9.0 565 5.8 10371 5.2 27 7.1 793 5.5 13103 4.6Total 170 100.0 4752 100.0 87445 100.0 211 100.0 9818 100.0 197904 100.0 381 100.0 14549 100.0 284111 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F8

Page 159: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges

13g2. Satisfaction: Financial aid N.A. 79 45.9 1902 39.9 37291 42.4 84 40.0 2851 28.8 57578 28.9 171 44.5 5144 35.2 103950 36.4advising Not at all 20 11.6 661 13.9 11814 13.4 29 13.8 1369 13.8 26585 13.3 47 12.2 2037 13.9 38343 13.4

Somewhat 34 19.8 1143 24.0 19841 22.6 37 17.6 2787 28.1 56768 28.5 74 19.2 3757 25.7 72246 25.3Very 39 22.7 1062 22.3 18998 21.6 60 28.6 2894 29.2 58217 29.2 92 24.1 3679 25.2 71252 24.9

Total 172 100.0 4768 100.0 87944 100.0 210 100.0 9901 100.0 199148 100.0 384 100.0 14617 100.0 285792 100.013h2. Satisfaction: Computer lab N.A. 44 25.4 1268 26.5 26312 29.9 28 13.2 1303 13.1 28616 14.3 87 22.5 3090 21.1 66533 23.2

Not at all 9 5.2 251 5.2 5064 5.7 12 5.7 443 4.5 9614 4.8 21 5.3 737 5.0 15384 5.4Somewhat 50 28.9 1282 26.8 23444 26.6 45 21.2 2884 29.0 60461 30.3 104 27.0 4065 27.7 80691 28.2

Very 70 40.5 1983 41.5 33280 37.8 127 59.9 5302 53.4 101013 50.6 174 45.2 6781 46.2 123764 43.2Total 173 100.0 4784 100.0 88100 100.0 212 100.0 9932 100.0 199704 100.0 386 100.0 14673 100.0 286373 100.0

13i2. Satisfaction: Student N.A. 119 69.2 3061 64.6 58482 67.2 114 53.5 5285 53.9 105709 53.6 252 65.4 8730 60.1 173448 61.3organizations Not at all 17 9.9 502 10.6 8933 10.3 30 14.1 1064 10.8 21189 10.7 42 10.9 1556 10.7 29529 10.4

Somewhat 28 16.3 819 17.3 13705 15.8 41 19.2 2313 23.6 47184 23.9 65 17.0 2893 19.9 54614 19.3Very 8 4.7 356 7.5 5860 6.7 28 13.1 1149 11.7 23094 11.7 26 6.7 1340 9.2 25182 8.9

Total 172 100.0 4738 100.0 86980 100.0 213 100.0 9811 100.0 197176 100.0 385 100.0 14519 100.0 282772 100.013j2. Satisfaction: Transfer credit N.A. 104 60.1 2549 53.1 47592 54.1 99 46.3 4638 46.7 92198 46.2 220 56.7 7419 50.5 145453 50.8

assistance Not at all 22 12.7 538 11.2 9920 11.3 21 9.8 1211 12.2 23903 12.0 46 12.0 1699 11.6 32965 11.5Somewhat 25 14.5 1015 21.2 18527 21.1 51 23.8 2471 24.9 51204 25.7 65 16.7 3345 22.8 65795 23.0

Very 22 12.7 697 14.5 11969 13.6 43 20.1 1605 16.2 32061 16.1 56 14.5 2230 15.2 41831 14.6Total 173 100.0 4799 100.0 88008 100.0 214 100.0 9925 100.0 199366 100.0 387 100.0 14694 100.0 286044 100.0

13k2. Satisfaction: Services to N.A. 136 79.5 3571 74.7 67153 76.6 141 67.1 7069 71.6 143794 72.3 292 76.5 10715 73.2 212822 74.6students with disabilities Not at all 11 6.4 379 7.9 6874 7.8 18 8.6 786 8.0 15237 7.7 27 7.0 1176 8.0 22123 7.8

Somewhat 16 9.4 463 9.7 7614 8.7 24 11.4 1078 10.9 21810 11.0 38 9.9 1500 10.3 27780 9.7Very 8 4.7 366 7.7 6055 6.9 27 12.9 944 9.6 17950 9.0 25 6.7 1242 8.5 22371 7.8

Total 171 100.0 4779 100.0 87696 100.0 210 100.0 9877 100.0 198791 100.0 382 100.0 14632 100.0 285095 100.013a3. Importance: Academic Not at all 32 18.1 586 12.1 11811 13.2 33 15.3 735 7.3 14922 7.4 69 17.4 1490 10.0 31207 10.7

advising/planning Somewhat 54 30.5 1310 27.0 25195 28.1 70 32.6 2695 26.9 57413 28.4 122 31.0 4019 27.0 82491 28.4Very 91 51.4 2964 61.0 52502 58.7 112 52.1 6607 65.8 129918 64.2 203 51.6 9363 63.0 176886 60.9

Total 177 100.0 4860 100.0 89508 100.0 215 100.0 10037 100.0 202253 100.0 394 100.0 14872 100.0 290583 100.013b3. Importance: Career counseling Not at all 36 20.8 1012 21.2 21528 24.4 46 21.5 1640 16.5 35739 17.9 81 21.0 2814 19.2 62077 21.6

Somewhat 52 30.1 1335 27.9 24245 27.4 58 27.1 2895 29.1 60979 30.5 114 29.3 4175 28.4 82877 28.9Very 85 49.1 2434 50.9 42587 48.2 110 51.4 5416 54.4 103321 51.7 192 49.7 7688 52.4 142141 49.5

Total 173 100.0 4781 100.0 88360 100.0 214 100.0 9951 100.0 200039 100.0 387 100.0 14677 100.0 287095 100.013c3. Importance: Job placement Not at all 72 41.6 1752 37.1 34118 39.2 75 35.2 3041 30.9 60854 30.8 155 40.1 5016 34.6 100677 35.5

assistance Somewhat 47 27.2 1250 26.5 22682 26.0 60 28.2 2944 29.9 60679 30.7 106 27.4 4060 28.0 79491 28.1Very 54 31.2 1715 36.4 30288 34.8 78 36.6 3859 39.2 75996 38.5 126 32.5 5425 37.4 103044 36.4

Total 173 100.0 4717 100.0 87088 100.0 213 100.0 9844 100.0 197529 100.0 387 100.0 14501 100.0 283211 100.013d3. Importance: Peer or other Not at all 53 30.6 1376 29.1 29279 33.6 59 27.4 2339 23.9 50979 25.8 116 29.9 3924 27.1 86108 30.4

tutoring Somewhat 49 28.3 1398 29.6 25531 29.3 55 25.6 3079 31.5 65104 32.9 107 27.7 4411 30.4 87587 30.9Very 71 41.0 1955 41.3 32218 37.0 101 47.0 4362 44.6 81540 41.3 165 42.5 6152 42.5 109467 38.7

Total 173 100.0 4729 100.0 87028 100.0 215 100.0 9780 100.0 197623 100.0 387 100.0 14486 100.0 283163 100.013e3. Importance: Skill labs (writing, Not at all 46 26.6 1180 25.1 24752 28.5 54 25.5 1952 20.0 41275 21.0 102 26.3 3299 22.9 71475 25.3

math, etc.) Somewhat 58 33.5 1382 29.4 25735 29.7 68 32.1 3048 31.2 65777 33.4 128 33.2 4374 30.3 88526 31.4Very 69 39.9 2144 45.6 36226 41.8 90 42.5 4771 48.8 89834 45.6 156 40.5 6761 46.8 122126 43.3

Total 173 100.0 4706 100.0 86713 100.0 212 100.0 9771 100.0 196886 100.0 386 100.0 14434 100.0 282127 100.013f3. Importance: Child care Not at all 92 53.2 2512 53.8 48690 56.4 113 54.1 4845 50.0 101843 52.1 205 53.4 7474 52.2 152957 54.5

Somewhat 36 20.8 784 16.8 14657 17.0 21 10.0 1800 18.6 38106 19.5 70 18.2 2509 17.5 50789 18.1Very 45 26.0 1374 29.4 22995 26.6 75 35.9 3044 31.4 55478 28.4 109 28.4 4336 30.3 76792 27.4

Total 173 100.0 4670 100.0 86342 100.0 209 100.0 9689 100.0 195427 100.0 385 100.0 14319 100.0 280538 100.013g3. Importance: Financial aid Not at all 54 31.0 1184 25.1 23654 27.2 62 29.2 1665 17.0 33343 16.9 119 30.6 3149 21.8 64171 22.7

advising Somewhat 24 13.8 794 16.9 14719 16.9 35 16.5 1686 17.2 35943 18.2 56 14.4 2476 17.1 49804 17.6Very 96 55.2 2731 58.0 48713 55.9 115 54.2 6452 65.8 128162 64.9 213 54.9 8828 61.1 169197 59.8

Total 174 100.0 4709 100.0 87086 100.0 212 100.0 9803 100.0 197448 100.0 388 100.0 14454 100.0 283172 100.013h3. Importance: Computer lab Not at all 35 20.2 845 17.9 17943 20.5 23 10.7 897 9.1 19738 9.9 69 17.9 2067 14.2 45582 16.0

Somewhat 46 26.6 1155 24.4 21713 24.8 41 19.2 2233 22.7 48717 24.5 96 24.8 3484 24.0 70400 24.7Very 92 53.2 2730 57.7 47817 54.7 150 70.1 6714 68.2 130018 65.5 222 57.3 8969 61.8 168484 59.2

Total 173 100.0 4730 100.0 87473 100.0 214 100.0 9844 100.0 198473 100.0 387 100.0 14520 100.0 284466 100.013i3. Importance: Student Not at all 90 52.9 2044 43.8 40133 46.7 83 39.5 3354 34.6 68825 35.3 189 49.7 5724 39.9 117017 41.9

organizations Somewhat 45 26.5 1528 32.7 27855 32.4 61 29.0 3630 37.4 74704 38.3 103 27.1 4959 34.6 97638 34.9Very 35 20.6 1100 23.5 17971 20.9 66 31.4 2715 28.0 51503 26.4 88 23.2 3651 25.5 64920 23.2

Total 170 100.0 4672 100.0 85959 100.0 210 100.0 9699 100.0 195032 100.0 380 100.0 14335 100.0 279575 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F9

Page 160: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges

13j3. Importance: Transfer credit Not at all 64 36.8 1362 28.6 26967 31.0 63 29.6 2262 23.1 46158 23.4 136 35.0 3826 26.3 79051 27.9assistance Somewhat 34 19.5 1000 21.0 18042 20.7 45 21.1 2113 21.6 43927 22.3 77 19.9 3119 21.5 60842 21.5

Very 76 43.7 2393 50.3 42086 48.3 105 49.3 5414 55.3 107206 54.3 175 45.0 7594 52.2 143165 50.6Total 174 100.0 4755 100.0 87095 100.0 213 100.0 9789 100.0 197291 100.0 388 100.0 14538 100.0 283059 100.0

13k3. Importance: Services to Not at all 83 48.0 1959 41.6 38177 44.0 89 42.2 3572 36.6 73824 37.6 180 46.6 5705 39.5 116256 41.2students with disabilities Somewhat 25 14.5 692 14.7 12372 14.3 31 14.7 1564 16.0 31840 16.2 56 14.5 2199 15.2 42787 15.2

Very 65 37.6 2060 43.7 36156 41.7 91 43.1 4630 47.4 90806 46.2 150 38.9 6540 45.3 122807 43.6Total 173 100.0 4711 100.0 86705 100.0 211 100.0 9766 100.0 196470 100.0 386 100.0 14444 100.0 281850 100.0

14a. Working full-time Not likely 64 35.0 1958 38.4 37208 39.6 90 41.3 4414 42.1 90496 43.2 148 36.5 6195 39.8 124576 41.1Somewhat likely 38 20.8 1074 21.1 19784 21.1 35 16.1 2102 20.1 44163 21.1 80 19.7 3224 20.7 63950 21.1

Likely 35 19.1 923 18.1 16659 17.7 45 20.6 1839 17.6 36135 17.2 79 19.5 2781 17.9 53171 17.5Very likely 46 25.1 1144 22.4 20232 21.6 48 22.0 2119 20.2 38799 18.5 99 24.4 3357 21.6 61413 20.3

Total 183 100.0 5099 100.0 93883 100.0 218 100.0 10474 100.0 209593 100.0 406 100.0 15556 100.0 303111 100.014b. Caring for dependents Not likely 85 46.2 2407 47.3 45764 48.9 113 51.8 5122 49.0 104282 49.8 194 47.5 7426 47.8 148783 49.2

Somewhat likely 38 20.7 1158 22.7 20920 22.3 38 17.4 2289 21.9 46869 22.4 81 19.9 3502 22.5 67766 22.4Likely 30 16.3 800 15.7 14518 15.5 35 16.1 1670 16.0 33448 16.0 66 16.2 2452 15.8 47576 15.7

Very likely 31 16.8 726 14.3 12423 13.3 32 14.7 1379 13.2 24623 11.8 67 16.3 2153 13.9 38283 12.7Total 184 100.0 5091 100.0 93625 100.0 218 100.0 10460 100.0 209222 100.0 407 100.0 15533 100.0 302409 100.0

14c. Academically unprepared Not likely 111 60.7 2934 57.8 55727 59.8 123 56.9 5680 54.6 117943 56.6 242 59.8 8734 56.5 176089 58.4Somewhat likely 36 19.7 1173 23.1 20898 22.4 55 25.5 2480 23.8 49951 24.0 85 21.0 3643 23.5 69538 23.1

Likely 25 13.7 604 11.9 10584 11.4 24 11.1 1373 13.2 26190 12.6 53 13.1 1915 12.4 35696 11.8Very likely 11 6.0 364 7.2 6034 6.5 14 6.5 873 8.4 14438 6.9 25 6.1 1179 7.6 19977 6.6

Total 183 100.0 5075 100.0 93243 100.0 216 100.0 10406 100.0 208522 100.0 405 100.0 15472 100.0 301301 100.014d. Lack of finances Not likely 70 38.7 1631 32.1 30910 33.0 82 37.6 3292 31.5 67878 32.5 155 38.4 4918 31.7 98778 32.7

Somewhat likely 31 17.1 1149 22.6 21497 23.0 37 17.0 2342 22.4 46827 22.4 69 17.1 3499 22.6 68787 22.8Likely 36 19.9 916 18.0 16848 18.0 29 13.3 1926 18.4 39225 18.8 74 18.3 2834 18.3 55508 18.4

Very likely 44 24.3 1387 27.3 24309 26.0 70 32.1 2881 27.6 54998 26.3 105 26.2 4257 27.5 79058 26.2Total 181 100.0 5083 100.0 93564 100.0 218 100.0 10441 100.0 208928 100.0 402 100.0 15508 100.0 302132 100.0

14e. Transfer to a 4-year college or Not likely 81 44.3 1752 34.4 34748 37.1 56 25.8 2839 27.2 59737 28.5 162 39.9 4910 31.6 102476 33.9university Somewhat likely 34 18.6 907 17.8 16575 17.7 34 15.7 1694 16.2 33783 16.1 73 17.9 2662 17.1 51645 17.1

Likely 26 14.2 902 17.7 16131 17.2 46 21.2 1917 18.4 38662 18.5 64 15.9 2785 17.9 53360 17.6Very likely 42 23.0 1530 30.1 26103 27.9 81 37.3 3995 38.2 77118 36.8 107 26.3 5167 33.3 94851 31.4

Total 183 100.0 5091 100.0 93557 100.0 217 100.0 10445 100.0 209300 100.0 405 100.0 15524 100.0 302331 100.015. How supportive are your Not very 12 6.5 222 4.3 3903 4.2 10 4.6 433 4.1 8515 4.1 25 6.1 669 4.3 12472 4.1

friends of your attending this Somewhat 34 18.5 916 17.9 17091 18.2 39 17.8 1852 17.7 37977 18.1 75 18.3 2795 17.9 55113 18.2college? Quite a bit 47 25.5 1421 27.8 26869 28.6 51 23.3 2862 27.3 60122 28.7 102 25.0 4306 27.6 86974 28.7

Extremely 91 49.5 2550 49.9 46059 49.0 119 54.3 5334 50.9 103071 49.2 206 50.6 7809 50.1 148677 49.0Total 184 100.0 5109 100.0 93922 100.0 219 100.0 10481 100.0 209685 100.0 408 100.0 15579 100.0 303236 100.0

16. How supportive is your Not very 3 1.6 183 3.6 2814 3.0 5 2.3 264 2.5 5808 2.8 7 1.8 500 3.2 8813 2.9immediate family of your Somewhat 26 14.3 547 10.7 10547 11.3 17 7.8 936 9.0 20317 9.7 51 12.7 1555 10.0 31984 10.6attending this college? Quite a bit 29 15.9 993 19.5 19646 21.0 47 21.5 1769 16.9 40087 19.2 70 17.3 2872 18.5 61240 20.3

Extremely 124 68.1 3375 66.2 60681 64.8 150 68.5 7488 71.6 142846 68.3 276 68.2 10614 68.3 200373 66.3Total 182 100.0 5098 100.0 93688 100.0 219 100.0 10457 100.0 209058 100.0 404 100.0 15540 100.0 302410 100.0

17a. Complete a certificate program Not a goal 69 37.9 2724 54.3 49232 53.6 115 53.5 5331 51.8 105167 50.9 167 41.6 8145 53.2 155421 52.2Secondary goal 34 18.7 954 19.0 16925 18.4 42 19.5 2085 20.2 41612 20.1 76 18.9 2992 19.6 56874 19.1

Primary goal 79 43.4 1336 26.6 25700 28.0 58 27.0 2884 28.0 59802 28.9 159 39.5 4167 27.2 85231 28.6Total 182 100.0 5014 100.0 91857 100.0 215 100.0 10300 100.0 206581 100.0 403 100.0 15304 100.0 297526 100.0

17b. Obtain an Associate degree Not a goal 41 22.4 1159 23.0 22498 24.3 72 33.6 1783 17.2 33421 16.1 101 25.0 3166 20.5 62707 20.9Secondary goal 48 26.2 1044 20.7 18137 19.6 44 20.6 2319 22.3 45837 22.1 101 24.9 3273 21.2 61621 20.6

Primary goal 94 51.4 2847 56.4 51965 56.1 98 45.8 6277 60.5 128550 61.9 202 50.1 8977 58.2 175280 58.5Total 183 100.0 5050 100.0 92600 100.0 214 100.0 10379 100.0 207808 100.0 404 100.0 15416 100.0 299607 100.0

17c. Transfer to a 4-year college or Not a goal 76 41.8 1318 26.1 29090 31.5 52 24.2 1684 16.3 42128 20.3 151 37.6 3423 22.2 81586 27.3university Secondary goal 36 19.8 1122 22.2 20727 22.5 43 20.0 2143 20.7 41199 19.8 80 19.8 3340 21.7 63908 21.4

Primary goal 70 38.5 2603 51.6 42503 46.0 120 55.8 6536 63.1 124420 59.9 171 42.5 8630 56.1 153593 51.4Total 182 100.0 5043 100.0 92320 100.0 215 100.0 10363 100.0 207747 100.0 403 100.0 15393 100.0 299086 100.0

17d. Obtain or update job-related Not a goal 47 26.1 1619 32.3 30126 32.8 95 44.6 3159 30.8 66039 32.0 121 30.5 4815 31.5 96028 32.3skills Secondary goal 38 21.1 1326 26.5 23976 26.1 48 22.5 2825 27.5 57843 28.1 85 21.4 4136 27.1 80014 26.9

Primary goal 95 52.8 2065 41.2 37667 41.0 70 32.9 4279 41.7 82296 39.9 192 48.1 6325 41.4 121096 40.8Total 180 100.0 5010 100.0 91769 100.0 213 100.0 10263 100.0 206178 100.0 398 100.0 15276 100.0 297138 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F10

Page 161: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges

17e. Self-improvement/personal Not a goal 45 24.7 1270 25.2 23744 25.7 74 34.1 2651 25.7 56468 27.3 109 26.9 3911 25.5 78418 26.3enjoyment Secondary goal 58 31.9 1597 31.7 30871 33.5 75 34.6 3461 33.5 74634 36.1 131 32.5 4993 32.5 103198 34.6

Primary goal 79 43.4 2170 43.1 37619 40.8 68 31.3 4216 40.8 75824 36.6 164 40.5 6454 42.0 116836 39.1Total 182 100.0 5037 100.0 92234 100.0 217 100.0 10328 100.0 206926 100.0 404 100.0 15358 100.0 298452 100.0

17f. Change careers Not a goal 96 52.7 2550 50.7 45959 49.9 154 71.3 6283 61.0 126891 61.3 230 57.1 8409 54.8 162995 54.6Secondary goal 33 18.1 834 16.6 15611 16.9 17 7.9 1626 15.8 30955 15.0 63 15.7 2513 16.4 48144 16.1

Primary goal 53 29.1 1648 32.8 30604 33.2 45 20.8 2392 23.2 49020 23.7 109 27.2 4416 28.8 87163 29.2Total 182 100.0 5032 100.0 92174 100.0 216 100.0 10301 100.0 206866 100.0 403 100.0 15338 100.0 298302 100.0

18a. My own income/savings Not a source 51 27.7 1343 26.4 25129 27.1 79 36.2 3978 38.3 79614 38.4 121 29.7 4846 31.3 95873 32.0Minor source 32 17.4 1269 25.0 22811 24.6 67 30.7 3318 32.0 67586 32.6 84 20.5 4301 27.8 83947 28.0Major source 101 54.9 2470 48.6 44816 48.3 72 33.0 3079 29.7 59930 28.9 203 49.7 6320 40.9 119692 40.0

Total 184 100.0 5082 100.0 92756 100.0 218 100.0 10375 100.0 207130 100.0 407 100.0 15467 100.0 299512 100.018b. Parent or spouse/significant Not a source 110 60.1 2889 57.2 53969 58.7 89 40.6 4586 44.4 93119 45.0 225 55.5 7980 51.8 158010 53.0

other's income/savings Minor source 23 12.6 825 16.3 14478 15.7 46 21.0 2096 20.3 42154 20.4 59 14.6 2759 17.9 52773 17.7Major source 50 27.3 1341 26.5 23534 25.6 84 38.4 3655 35.4 71551 34.6 122 29.9 4661 30.3 87105 29.2

Total 183 100.0 5055 100.0 91981 100.0 219 100.0 10337 100.0 206824 100.0 406 100.0 15400 100.0 297887 100.018c. Employer contributions Not a source 131 72.8 4088 81.4 73932 80.7 182 83.9 8905 86.8 181270 88.3 302 75.4 12767 83.4 248595 83.9

Minor source 15 8.3 430 8.6 7799 8.5 13 6.0 799 7.8 14730 7.2 31 7.8 1270 8.3 23523 7.9Major source 34 18.9 507 10.1 9873 10.8 22 10.1 559 5.4 9197 4.5 67 16.8 1263 8.3 24070 8.1

Total 180 100.0 5025 100.0 91604 100.0 217 100.0 10263 100.0 205197 100.0 400 100.0 15300 100.0 296187 100.018d. Grants & scholarships Not a source 130 71.4 3235 64.1 59888 65.1 113 52.1 4836 46.8 90455 43.7 270 66.8 8803 57.2 165998 55.7

Minor source 18 9.9 464 9.2 8383 9.1 21 9.7 1298 12.6 27391 13.2 40 9.8 1620 10.5 32811 11.0Major source 34 18.7 1346 26.7 23782 25.8 83 38.2 4205 40.7 89102 43.1 94 23.3 4958 32.2 99325 33.3

Total 182 100.0 5045 100.0 92053 100.0 217 100.0 10339 100.0 206948 100.0 404 100.0 15382 100.0 298134 100.018e. Student loans (bank, etc.) Not a source 152 84.4 3853 76.6 71920 78.3 180 83.3 7194 69.6 141036 68.3 336 84.2 11341 73.8 218466 73.5

Minor source 14 7.8 402 8.0 6339 6.9 17 7.9 1016 9.8 18449 8.9 31 7.8 1343 8.7 23344 7.8Major source 14 7.8 776 15.4 13569 14.8 19 8.8 2130 20.6 46976 22.8 32 8.0 2673 17.4 55576 18.7

Total 180 100.0 5031 100.0 91828 100.0 216 100.0 10340 100.0 206461 100.0 400 100.0 15358 100.0 297385 100.018f. Public assistance Not a source 164 90.6 4512 89.7 83103 90.6 194 89.8 8762 84.8 177818 86.2 363 90.4 13469 87.7 263407 88.7

Minor source 11 6.1 241 4.8 3539 3.9 6 2.8 643 6.2 11908 5.8 21 5.3 826 5.4 14059 4.7Major source 6 3.3 277 5.5 5083 5.5 16 7.4 929 9.0 16469 8.0 17 4.3 1058 6.9 19590 6.6

Total 181 100.0 5030 100.0 91725 100.0 216 100.0 10334 100.0 206195 100.0 401 100.0 15353 100.0 297056 100.019. Proprietary (private) school or No response 177 95.2 4796 91.7 87320 90.8 221 96.1 10055 94.0 200190 93.8 397 95.4 14758 92.7 285228 92.1

training program Response 9 4.8 436 8.3 8844 9.2 9 3.9 637 6.0 13243 6.2 19 4.6 1166 7.3 24369 7.9Total 186 100.0 5232 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 10692 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 15924 100.0 309597 100.0

Public vocational-technical No response 172 92.5 4634 88.6 86013 89.4 216 93.9 9847 92.1 197130 92.4 386 92.8 14331 90.0 280596 90.6school Response 14 7.5 598 11.4 10151 10.6 14 6.1 845 7.9 16303 7.6 30 7.2 1593 10.0 29001 9.4

Total 186 100.0 5232 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 10692 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 15924 100.0 309597 100.0Another community or technical college No response 147 79.0 4151 79.3 73647 76.6 192 83.5 9141 85.5 180073 84.4 333 80.1 12999 81.6 247348 79.9

Response 39 21.0 1081 20.7 22517 23.4 38 16.5 1551 14.5 33360 15.6 83 19.9 2925 18.4 62249 20.1Total 186 100.0 5232 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 10692 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 15924 100.0 309597 100.0

Four year college or university No response 161 86.6 3819 73.0 70034 72.8 207 90.0 8727 81.6 175949 82.4 364 87.4 12218 76.7 238487 77.0Response 25 13.4 1413 27.0 26130 27.2 23 10.0 1965 18.4 37484 17.6 52 12.6 3706 23.3 71110 23.0

Total 186 100.0 5232 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 10692 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 15924 100.0 309597 100.0None No response 71 38.2 2962 56.6 55476 57.7 80 34.8 4397 41.1 87456 41.0 155 37.3 7995 50.2 156160 50.4

Response 115 61.8 2270 43.4 40688 42.3 150 65.2 6295 58.9 125977 59.0 261 62.7 7929 49.8 153437 49.6Total 186 100.0 5232 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 10692 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 15924 100.0 309597 100.0

20. When do you plan to take classes at this college again?

I will accomplish my goals this term and will not be

returning9 4.9 545 10.7 9213 9.9 32 14.6 1526 14.7 30579 14.7 29 7.2 1901 12.2 35977 11.9

I have no current plan to return 4 2.2 222 4.4 4769 5.1 14 6.4 503 4.8 11821 5.7 13 3.2 711 4.6 16360 5.4

Within the next 12 months 135 73.4 3410 66.9 62416 66.9 139 63.5 6518 62.6 131715 63.3 290 71.0 10085 65.0 196215 65.1

Uncertain 36 19.6 921 18.1 16931 18.1 34 15.5 1866 17.9 34064 16.4 76 18.6 2824 18.2 52696 17.5

Total 184 100.0 5098 100.0 93329 100.0 219 100.0 10413 100.0 208179 100.0 408 100.0 15521 100.0 301249 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F11

Page 162: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges

21. At this college, in what range is your Pass/fail classes only 2 1.1 47 0.9 737 0.8 0 0.0 58 0.6 740 0.4 3 0.8 114 0.7 1864 0.6overall college grade average? Do not have a GPA at this

school 5 2.8 182 3.6 3441 3.7 6 2.8 138 1.3 3200 1.5 11 2.8 402 2.6 8351 2.8

C- or lower 5 2.8 103 2.0 2325 2.5 5 2.3 209 2.0 4245 2.0 11 2.7 313 2.0 7012 2.3C 9 5.0 363 7.2 6981 7.5 12 5.5 710 6.8 16876 8.1 21 5.1 1090 7.0 23565 7.8

B- to C+ 32 17.7 966 19.0 16063 17.2 29 13.3 2253 21.7 42826 20.6 67 16.6 3126 20.2 56227 18.7B 43 23.8 1170 23.1 20866 22.4 57 26.1 2607 25.1 52790 25.4 98 24.3 3698 23.9 71011 23.6

A- to B+ 56 30.9 1426 28.1 25350 27.2 69 31.7 3139 30.2 59329 28.5 125 31.1 4480 29.0 83223 27.7A 29 16.0 817 16.1 17379 18.7 40 18.3 1280 12.3 27948 13.4 67 16.6 2243 14.5 49477 16.5

Total 181 100.0 5074 100.0 93142 100.0 218 100.0 10394 100.0 207954 100.0 402 100.0 15466 100.0 300731 100.022. When do you most frequently take

classes at this college?Day classes (morning or

afternoon) 61 33.7 2835 56.3 49618 53.7 159 74.0 9022 87.6 180145 87.3 173 43.2 10524 68.6 203585 68.3

Evening classes 120 66.3 2138 42.5 41709 45.2 56 26.0 1258 12.2 25746 12.5 228 56.8 4698 30.6 92694 31.1Weekend classes 0 0.0 60 1.2 986 1.1 0 0.0 22 0.2 348 0.2 0 0.0 119 0.8 1947 0.7

Total 181 100.0 5033 100.0 92313 100.0 215 100.0 10302 100.0 206239 100.0 401 100.0 15341 100.0 298226 100.023. How many TOTAL credit hours None 24 13.0 727 14.3 14720 15.8 20 9.2 946 9.1 19065 9.2 49 12.1 1885 12.2 39068 13.0

have you earned at this college, 1-14 credits 72 39.1 1794 35.2 33706 36.2 71 32.6 3248 31.2 60934 29.3 153 37.6 5231 33.7 99736 33.2not counting the courses you 15-29 credits 36 19.6 992 19.5 17442 18.7 50 22.9 2301 22.1 50024 24.1 83 20.4 3172 20.5 62983 20.9are currently taking this term? 30-44 credits 29 15.8 662 13.0 11028 11.8 30 13.8 1716 16.5 32963 15.8 62 15.3 2223 14.3 40464 13.5

45-60 credits 8 4.3 471 9.3 8359 9.0 26 11.9 1321 12.7 27706 13.3 25 6.1 1633 10.5 32531 10.8Over 60 credits 15 8.2 444 8.7 7917 8.5 21 9.6 876 8.4 17282 8.3 35 8.5 1358 8.8 25983 8.6Total 184 100.0 5090 100.0 93172 100.0 218 100.0 10408 100.0 207974 100.0 407 100.0 15502 100.0 300766 100.0

24. None No response 17 9.1 784 15.0 15617 16.2 23 10.0 1206 11.3 22566 10.6 39 9.3 2169 13.6 42932 13.9Response 169 90.9 4448 85.0 80547 83.8 207 90.0 9486 88.7 190867 89.4 377 90.7 13755 86.4 266665 86.1

Total 186 100.0 5232 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 10692 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 15924 100.0 309597 100.0High school No response 177 95.2 5093 97.3 93335 97.1 227 98.7 10556 98.7 210789 98.8 399 96.0 15588 97.9 302388 97.7

Response 9 4.8 139 2.7 2829 2.9 3 1.3 136 1.3 2644 1.2 17 4.0 336 2.1 7209 2.3Total 186 100.0 5232 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 10692 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 15924 100.0 309597 100.0

Vocational/technical school No response 182 97.8 5190 99.2 95121 98.9 227 98.7 10611 99.2 211490 99.1 408 98.1 15792 99.2 306422 99.0Response 4 2.2 42 0.8 1043 1.1 3 1.3 81 0.8 1943 0.9 8 1.9 132 0.8 3175 1.0

Total 186 100.0 5232 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 10692 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 15924 100.0 309597 100.0Another community or No response 182 97.8 5136 98.2 93553 97.3 225 97.8 10520 98.4 209741 98.3 407 97.8 15642 98.2 302608 97.7technical college Response 4 2.2 96 1.8 2611 2.7 5 2.2 172 1.6 3692 1.7 9 2.2 282 1.8 6989 2.3

Total 186 100.0 5232 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 10692 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 15924 100.0 309597 100.04- year college/ university No response 184 98.9 4948 94.6 91568 95.2 230 100.0 10370 97.0 208285 97.6 413 99.2 15200 95.5 297823 96.2

Response 2 1.1 284 5.4 4596 4.8 0 0.0 322 3.0 5148 2.4 3 0.8 724 4.5 11774 3.8Total 186 100.0 5232 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 10692 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 15924 100.0 309597 100.0

Other No response 184 98.9 5073 97.0 92924 96.6 228 99.1 10339 96.7 206380 96.7 412 99.0 15424 96.9 299308 96.7Response 2 1.1 159 3.0 3240 3.4 2 0.9 353 3.3 7053 3.3 4 1.0 500 3.1 10289 3.3

Total 186 100.0 5232 100.0 96164 100.0 230 100.0 10692 100.0 213433 100.0 416 100.0 15924 100.0 309597 100.025. How many classes are you None 148 81.3 4130 81.2 75591 81.1 190 86.4 8921 85.7 180249 86.7 334 82.5 12833 82.8 251052 83.4

presently taking at OTHER 1 class 5 2.7 222 4.4 5309 5.7 1 0.5 183 1.8 4538 2.2 9 2.2 520 3.4 12599 4.2institutions? 2 classes 10 5.5 344 6.8 5885 6.3 1 0.5 172 1.7 3056 1.5 17 4.3 745 4.8 12851 4.3

3 classes 12 6.6 238 4.7 3613 3.9 8 3.6 271 2.6 4715 2.3 24 5.9 613 4.0 9693 3.24 classes or more 7 3.8 154 3.0 2865 3.1 20 9.1 859 8.3 15438 7.4 21 5.1 782 5.0 14819 4.9

Total 182 100.0 5088 100.0 93263 100.0 220 100.0 10406 100.0 207996 100.0 405 100.0 15493 100.0 301013 100.026 Would you recommend this Yes 172 93.5 4862 95.6 88437 95.0 203 92.3 9863 94.9 193697 93.3 380 93.2 14754 95.3 283058 94.2

college to a friend or family member? No 12 6.5 224 4.4 4694 5.0 17 7.7 526 5.1 13947 6.7 28 6.8 724 4.7 17492 5.8Total 184 100.0 5086 100.0 93131 100.0 220 100.0 10389 100.0 207644 100.0 408 100.0 15479 100.0 300550 100.0

27. How would you evaluate your Poor 0 0.0 47 0.9 1169 1.3 8 3.6 141 1.4 2998 1.4 4 0.9 167 1.1 4037 1.3entire educational experience at Fair 25 13.6 648 12.7 11447 12.3 26 11.8 1181 11.4 26521 12.8 54 13.2 1900 12.3 37641 12.5this college? Good 99 53.8 2813 55.2 51925 55.7 123 55.9 5860 56.3 117511 56.5 222 54.3 8630 55.7 168565 56.0

Excellent 60 32.6 1587 31.1 28741 30.8 63 28.6 3220 31.0 60963 29.3 129 31.7 4809 31.0 90794 30.2Total 184 100.0 5095 100.0 93282 100.0 220 100.0 10402 100.0 207993 100.0 408 100.0 15506 100.0 301036 100.0

28. Do you have children who live Yes 94 51.1 1838 36.1 33850 36.3 64 29.2 2689 25.9 49188 23.7 187 45.9 4990 32.2 93522 31.1with you? No 90 48.9 3248 63.9 59282 63.7 155 70.8 7702 74.1 158456 76.3 221 54.1 10495 67.8 207035 68.9

Total 184 100.0 5086 100.0 93132 100.0 219 100.0 10391 100.0 207644 100.0 408 100.0 15485 100.0 300557 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F12

Page 163: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges

29. Mark your age group. 18 to 19 32 17.6 804 15.9 14247 15.4 74 33.8 3207 31.0 70232 33.920 to 21 29 15.9 910 18.0 15221 16.4 54 24.7 2912 28.1 56419 27.222 to 24 23 12.6 819 16.2 14684 15.9 29 13.2 1549 15.0 27429 13.225 to 29 33 18.1 787 15.6 14880 16.1 21 9.6 1146 11.1 21103 10.230 to 39 28 15.4 898 17.8 16759 18.1 25 11.4 902 8.7 18737 9.040 to 49 26 14.3 522 10.3 10906 11.8 12 5.5 436 4.2 9311 4.550 to 64 10 5.5 261 5.2 5117 5.5 3 1.4 178 1.7 3520 1.7

65+ 1 0.5 58 1.1 784 0.8 1 0.5 16 0.2 295 0.1Total 182 100.0 5059 100.0 92598 100.0 219 100.0 10346 100.0 207046 100.0

30. Sex: Male 98 53.6 1985 38.9 34214 36.7 109 49.8 4205 40.4 86486 41.6Female 85 46.4 3113 61.1 59002 63.3 110 50.2 6193 59.6 121402 58.4

Total 183 100.0 5098 100.0 93216 100.0 219 100.0 10398 100.0 207888 100.031. Marital status Yes 72 39.1 1501 29.5 29654 31.8 49 22.4 1618 15.6 31813 15.3 143 35.2 3715 24.0 75168 25.0

No 112 60.9 3593 70.5 63511 68.2 170 77.6 8778 84.4 176052 84.7 264 64.8 11782 76.0 225575 75.0Total 184 100.0 5094 100.0 93165 100.0 219 100.0 10396 100.0 207865 100.0 408 100.0 15497 100.0 300743 100.0

32. Is English your native (first) Yes 158 85.9 4178 82.1 80889 86.8 201 92.2 8420 80.9 182689 87.9 356 87.4 12661 81.7 263926 87.7language? No 26 14.1 910 17.9 12345 13.2 17 7.8 1983 19.1 25208 12.1 51 12.6 2828 18.3 36969 12.3

Total 184 100.0 5088 100.0 93234 100.0 218 100.0 10403 100.0 207897 100.0 407 100.0 15489 100.0 300895 100.033. Are you an international Yes 7 3.9 297 5.9 5525 6.0 9 4.1 724 7.0 13527 6.5

student or foreign national? No 173 96.1 4765 94.1 87083 94.0 209 95.9 9611 93.0 193306 93.5Total 180 100.0 5062 100.0 92608 100.0 218 100.0 10335 100.0 206833 100.0

34. What is your racial identification? (Mark only one)

American Indian or other Native American 3 1.6 52 1.0 1592 1.7 3 1.4 123 1.2 4017 2.0

Asian, Asian American, or Pacific Islander 3 1.6 175 3.5 4635 5.0 3 1.4 440 4.3 11563 5.6

Native Hawaiian 0 0.0 9 0.2 287 0.3 2 0.9 20 0.2 695 0.3

Black or African American 6 3.3 647 12.9 11712 12.7 12 5.5 1270 12.3 23986 11.7

White, Non-Hispanic 111 60.3 2343 46.6 58603 63.6 145 66.5 4777 46.4 135173 65.7

Hispanic, Latino, Spanish 54 29.3 1588 31.6 11605 12.6 50 22.9 3206 31.2 21776 10.6

Other 7 3.8 214 4.3 3644 4.0 3 1.4 450 4.4 8530 4.1

Total 184 100.0 5028 100.0 92078 100.0 218 100.0 10286 100.0 205740 100.035. What is the highest academic

credential you have earned? None 8 4.4 158 3.2 3029 3.3 2 0.9 156 1.5 3492 1.7 14 3.6 384 2.5 8102 2.7

High school diploma or GED 135 75.0 3338 67.2 60461 66.2 185 84.9 8578 83.9 170828 83.5 310 77.4 11233 74.1 216543 73.3

Vocational / technical certificate 17 9.4 578 11.6 10356 11.3 16 7.3 739 7.2 14406 7.0 36 8.9 1519 10.0 28334 9.6

Associate degree 11 6.1 422 8.5 8364 9.2 11 5.0 525 5.1 10780 5.3 23 5.9 1092 7.2 22507 7.6

Bachelor's degree 5 2.8 336 6.8 6939 7.6 2 0.9 185 1.8 4233 2.1 9 2.3 686 4.5 15363 5.2

Master's / doctoral / professional degree 4 2.2 132 2.7 2146 2.4 2 0.9 42 0.4 890 0.4 8 1.9 243 1.6 4487 1.5

Total 180 100.0 4964 100.0 91295 100.0 218 100.0 10225 100.0 204629 100.0 401 100.0 15157 100.0 295336 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F13

Page 164: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted data *)

Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your College 2007 CCSSE CohortOther Consortium

Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort Your CollegeOther Consortium

Colleges

36m. Highest level of education: mother Not a high school graduate 40 23.5 880 18.9 13074 15.2 29 14.5 1552 16.6 21632 11.4 80 21.4 2536 18.0 37460 13.6

High school diploma or GED 50 29.4 1528 32.8 28865 33.5 52 26.0 2936 31.4 60235 31.8 107 28.6 4520 32.1 90871 32.9

Some college, did not complete degree 31 18.2 672 14.4 13897 16.1 47 23.5 1468 15.7 32637 17.2 73 19.5 2101 14.9 45821 16.6

Associate degree 17 10.0 459 9.9 8931 10.4 21 10.5 1082 11.6 23736 12.5 38 10.1 1508 10.7 31478 11.4

Bachelor's degree 16 9.4 500 10.7 10540 12.2 28 14.0 1153 12.3 26332 13.9 39 10.5 1585 11.3 35554 12.9

Master's degree / First professional 6 3.5 269 5.8 5453 6.3 9 4.5 535 5.7 12945 6.8 14 3.8 804 5.7 17903 6.5

Doctorate degree 2 1.2 45 1.0 806 0.9 5 2.5 93 1.0 1860 1.0 6 1.5 136 1.0 2618 0.9

Unknown 8 4.7 303 6.5 4524 5.3 9 4.5 522 5.6 9875 5.2 17 4.7 872 6.2 14454 5.2

Total 170 100.0 4656 100.0 86090 100.0 200 100.0 9341 100.0 189252 100.0 376 100.0 14061 100.0 276159 100.036f. Highest level of education: father Not a high school

graduate 50 29.4 1006 21.3 15663 18.0 33 16.3 1707 18.0 27486 14.3 99 26.3 2875 20.2 45994 16.5

High school diploma or GED 36 21.2 1348 28.6 27053 31.1 44 21.7 2894 30.5 60533 31.6 80 21.3 4179 29.3 88152 31.6

Some college, did not complete degree 36 21.2 641 13.6 12043 13.9 43 21.2 1328 14.0 28629 14.9 80 21.2 1961 13.8 39882 14.3

Associate degree 8 4.7 297 6.3 5728 6.6 22 10.8 657 6.9 15328 8.0 23 6.2 944 6.6 20284 7.3

Bachelor's degree 12 7.1 579 12.3 11083 12.8 22 10.8 1255 13.2 26171 13.7 30 8.0 1792 12.6 36281 13.0

Master's degree / Ist professional 9 5.3 305 6.5 6120 7.0 19 9.4 645 6.8 13836 7.2 24 6.3 931 6.5 19549 7.0

Doctorate degree 6 3.5 92 2.0 2218 2.6 5 2.5 173 1.8 4216 2.2 12 3.3 262 1.8 6635 2.4

Unknown 13 7.6 444 9.4 7002 8.1 15 7.4 827 8.7 15389 8.0 29 7.6 1309 9.2 22392 8.0

Total 170 100.0 4712 100.0 86910 100.0 203 100.0 9486 100.0 191588 100.0 377 100.0 14254 100.0 279170 100.0

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F14

Page 165: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F15

Page 166: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F16

Page 167: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F17

Page 168: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F18

Page 169: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F19

Page 170: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F20

Page 171: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F21

Page 172: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F22

Page 173: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F23

Page 174: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F24

Page 175: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F25

Page 176: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F26

Page 177: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Frequency Distributions

* Data was weighted according to the full-time/part-time population data from IPEDS.

*Regarding Blank Cells: Please see Table 1 for unweighted sample and population values. F27

Page 178: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCSSE Special Focus Questions Frequencies

This report summarizes the observed frequencies of occurrence (counts and percentages) of the values for the five 2007 CCSSE special focus questions included with The Community College Student Report. Data are presented for all, part-time, and full-time students at your college, a comparison group, and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort.

Page 179: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

CCSSE Special Focus Questions

By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, I had met with an advisor to discuss my educational goals.

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Participants

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted)

Response

Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %

Yes 71 43% 83 43% 157 43% 4600 42% 17952 54% 21251 48% 16493 39% 48978 49% 61396 43%

No, I met with an advisor by the end of my first four weeks at this college, but we did not discuss my educational goals 10 6% 16 8% 24 7% 799 7% 2608 8% 3349 8% 3026 7% 7507 8% 10393 7%

No, I did not meet with an advisor by the end of my first four weeks at this college 41 25% 47 24% 90 24% 3291 30% 6599 20% 10867 25% 13567 32% 22677 23% 39503 28%

No, I have discussed educational goals with an advisor, but it did not happen by the end of my first four weeks at this college 20 12% 20 10% 43 12% 1278 12% 3497 10% 4867 11% 5523 13% 12147 12% 17836 13%

I do not recall 25 15% 29 15% 55 15% 1074 10% 2737 8% 3960 9% 4119 10% 8418 8% 13011 9%

Total 167 100% 195 100% 368 100% 11042 100% 33393 100% 44293 100% 42728 100% 99727 100% 142140 100%

By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, I had completed an initial assessment test to determine which reading, writing, and math courses I should enroll in.

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Participants

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted)

Response

Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %

Yes 61 37% 100 53% 147 41% 5484 50% 20586 62% 24618 56% 21699 51% 61491 62% 78567 56%

No 84 52% 70 37% 173 48% 4442 41% 9486 29% 15151 35% 16933 40% 28749 29% 49832 35%

I do not recall 18 11% 19 10% 39 11% 964 9% 3026 9% 4011 9% 3518 8% 8492 9% 12024 9%

Total 163 100% 189 100% 359 100% 10890 100% 33098 100% 43779 100% 42150 100% 98732 100% 140423 100%

Page 180: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

CCSSE Special Focus Questions

By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, my instructors had used teaching techniques that encouraged me to become actively involved in the classroom.

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Participants

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted)

Response

Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %

Very often 54 32% 59 31% 117 32% 3901 35% 11380 34% 15402 35% 13710 32% 30481 31% 44930 32%

Often 41 25% 49 25% 91 25% 3284 30% 10585 32% 13572 31% 12721 30% 31719 32% 43460 31%

Sometimes 49 29% 60 31% 109 30% 2613 24% 8510 26% 10864 25% 10985 26% 27529 28% 37612 27%

Never 10 6% 11 6% 22 6% 632 6% 1489 4% 2272 5% 2676 6% 5083 5% 8151 6%

I do not recall 13 8% 14 7% 28 8% 576 5% 1319 4% 2033 5% 2463 6% 4503 5% 7418 5%

Total 167 100% 193 100% 368 100% 11006 100% 33283 100% 44143 100% 42555 100% 99315 100% 141571 100%

How satisfied were you with the quality of your college's orientation course or program for new students?

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Participants

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted)

Response

Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %

Very Satisfied 36 22% 42 22% 79 22% 2792 26% 10239 31% 12464 28% 9414 22% 25720 26% 33936 24%

Somewhat Satisfied 56 34% 84 44% 132 36% 3446 32% 13493 41% 15908 36% 13779 33% 40284 41% 50767 36%

Not at all Satisfied 18 11% 20 11% 39 11% 600 6% 2491 8% 2829 6% 2702 6% 8341 8% 10152 7%

Have not attended an orientation course or program 55 33% 43 23% 112 31% 4047 37% 6859 21% 12578 29% 16223 39% 24211 25% 45454 32%

Total 165 100% 189 100% 362 100% 10885 100% 33082 100% 43778 100% 42118 100% 98556 100% 140309 100%

Page 181: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

CCSSE Special Focus Questions

Rate your overall satisfaction with this college's processes for working with new students - including the admissions process, the financial aid office, new student assessment, your first class registration experience, etc.

Your College Other Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Participants

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted)

Response

Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %

Very Satisfied 57 35% 66 35% 126 35% 4158 38% 13497 41% 17310 40% 14082 34% 34870 35% 48432 35%

Somewhat Satisfied 79 48% 93 49% 175 48% 5155 48% 15365 47% 20583 47% 21066 50% 48404 49% 69545 50%

Somewhat Dissatisfied 18 11% 22 12% 40 11% 1169 11% 3138 10% 4360 10% 5191 12% 11521 12% 16722 12%

Very Dissatisfied 11 7% 9 5% 23 6% 350 3% 1007 3% 1366 3% 1614 4% 3657 4% 5218 4%

Total 165 100% 190 100% 363 100% 10832 100% 33007 100% 43619 100% 41953 100% 98452 100% 139918 100%

Page 182: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

CCSSE Special Focus Questions

By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, I had met with an advisor to discuss my educational goals.

Your College Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Participants

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted)

Response

Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %

Yes 71 43% 83 43% 157 43% 1691 38% 4270 47% 5656 41% 16493 39% 48978 49% 61396 43%

No, I met with an advisor by the end of my first four weeks at this college, but we did not discuss my educational goals 10 6% 16 8% 24 7% 324 7% 726 8% 1025 7% 3026 7% 7507 8% 10393 7%

No, I did not meet with an advisor by the end of my first four weeks at this college 41 25% 47 24% 90 24% 1411 31% 2213 24% 3902 28% 13567 32% 22677 23% 39503 28%

No, I have discussed educational goals with an advisor, but it did not happen by the end of my first four weeks at this college 20 12% 20 10% 43 12% 615 14% 1091 12% 1764 13% 5523 13% 12147 12% 17836 13%

I do not recall 25 15% 29 15% 55 15% 461 10% 880 10% 1380 10% 4119 10% 8418 8% 13011 9%

Total 167 100% 195 100% 368 100% 4502 100% 9180 100% 13726 100% 42728 100% 99727 100% 142140 100%

By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, I had completed an initial assessment test to determine which reading, writing, and math courses I should enroll in.

Your College Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Participants

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted)

Response

Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %

Yes 61 37% 100 53% 147 41% 2285 51% 5547 61% 7528 56% 21699 51% 61491 62% 78567 56%

No 84 52% 70 37% 173 48% 1754 40% 2680 30% 4777 35% 16933 40% 28749 29% 49832 35%

I do not recall 18 11% 19 10% 39 11% 401 9% 841 9% 1247 9% 3518 8% 8492 9% 12024 9%

Total 163 100% 189 100% 359 100% 4440 100% 9068 100% 13552 100% 42150 100% 98732 100% 140423 100%

Page 183: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

CCSSE Special Focus Questions

By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, my instructors had used teaching techniques that encouraged me to become actively involved in the classroom.

Your College Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Participants

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted)

Response

Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %

Very often 54 32% 59 31% 117 32% 1395 31% 2849 31% 4258 31% 13710 32% 30481 31% 44930 32%

Often 41 25% 49 25% 91 25% 1370 31% 2881 32% 4242 31% 12721 30% 31719 32% 43460 31%

Sometimes 49 29% 60 31% 109 30% 1144 25% 2502 27% 3585 26% 10985 26% 27529 28% 37612 27%

Never 10 6% 11 6% 22 6% 305 7% 478 5% 839 6% 2676 6% 5083 5% 8151 6%

I do not recall 13 8% 14 7% 28 8% 274 6% 425 5% 750 5% 2463 6% 4503 5% 7418 5%

Total 167 100% 193 100% 368 100% 4488 100% 9135 100% 13675 100% 42555 100% 99315 100% 141571 100%

How satisfied were you with the quality of your college's orientation course or program for new students?

Your College Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Participants

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted)

Response

Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %

Very Satisfied 36 22% 42 22% 79 22% 1008 23% 2333 26% 3250 24% 9414 22% 25720 26% 33936 24%

Somewhat Satisfied 56 34% 84 44% 132 36% 1369 31% 3528 39% 4627 34% 13779 33% 40284 41% 50767 36%

Not at all Satisfied 18 11% 20 11% 39 11% 270 6% 703 8% 915 7% 2702 6% 8341 8% 10152 7%

Have not attended an orientation course or program 55 33% 43 23% 112 31% 1790 40% 2500 28% 4752 35% 16223 39% 24211 25% 45454 32%

Total 165 100% 189 100% 362 100% 4437 100% 9064 100% 13545 100% 42118 100% 98556 100% 140309 100%

Page 184: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

CCSSE Special Focus Questions

Rate your overall satisfaction with this college's processes for working with new students - including the admissions process, the financial aid office, new student assessment, your first class registration experience, etc.

Your College Other Consortium Colleges 2007 CCSSE Participants

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted) Part-Time Full-Time

All Students (weighted)

Response

Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %

Very Satisfied 57 35% 66 35% 126 35% 1451 33% 3196 35% 4583 34% 14082 34% 34870 35% 48432 35%

Somewhat Satisfied 79 48% 93 49% 175 48% 2220 50% 4453 49% 6735 50% 21066 50% 48404 49% 69545 50%

Somewhat Dissatisfied 18 11% 22 12% 40 11% 551 13% 1047 12% 1624 12% 5191 12% 11521 12% 16722 12%

Very Dissatisfied 11 7% 9 5% 23 6% 179 4% 360 4% 536 4% 1614 4% 3657 4% 5218 4%

Total 165 100% 190 100% 363 100% 4401 100% 9056 100% 13478 100% 41953 100% 98452 100% 139918 100%

Page 185: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Institution-Level Supplemental Questions Frequencies

This report summarizes the observed frequencies of occurrence (counts and percentages) of the values for your institution’s supplemental questions only. Data are presented for all, part-time, and full-time students at your college. These data are available only if your college participated in the 2007 Institution-Level Supplemental Questions Pilot.

Page 186: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College Supplemental Questions

While attending this college, what has been your best source of

academic advising (academic planning, course recommendations, graduation requirements, etc.)? (Choose only one.)

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Response

Count % Count % Count %

Academic advisor (not faculty) 14 8% 16 8% 31 8%

Academic advisor (faculty) 58 35% 77 40% 132 36%

Friends, family, or other students 55 33% 61 32% 120 33%

Online college registration and/or computerized degree advising system 12 7% 17 9% 28 8%

I have not received any academic advising 28 17% 21 11% 57 15%

Total 167 100% 192 100% 367 100%

Most staff members have been friendly in their interactions with me.

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Response

Count % Count % Count %

Strongly disagree 23 14% 35 19% 54 15%

Disagree 10 6% 14 7% 23 6%

Agree 90 54% 81 43% 188 52%

Strongly agree 43 26% 58 31% 98 27%

Total 166 100% 188 100% 364 100%

When appropriate, faculty effectively incorporate the use of computers and other technology into their teaching.

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Response

Count % Count % Count %

Strongly disagree 17 10% 28 15% 41 11%

Disagree 10 6% 9 5% 21 6%

Agree 92 56% 98 52% 199 55%

Strongly agree 44 27% 54 29% 98 27%

Total 163 100% 189 100% 359 100%

At this college, assistance is available when I experience problems using computers and other technology.

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Response

Count % Count % Count %

Strongly agree 50 31% 61 32% 111 31%

Agree 78 48% 90 48% 172 48%

Disagree 27 17% 24 13% 56 16%

Strongly disagree 7 4% 13 7% 18 5%

Total 162 100% 188 100% 357 100%

Page 187: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College Supplemental Questions

Where are you most likely to access a computer with an Internet connection to do your school work?

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Response

Count % Count % Count %

Home 106 65% 114 60% 230 64%

Campus computer lab 34 21% 56 30% 82 23%

Campus Library 11 7% 8 4% 22 6%

Other facilities on campus 6 4% 8 4% 14 4%

Work/Office 6 4% 3 2% 11 3%

Total 163 100% 189 100% 359 100%

On average, how often do you use the library during a term?

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Response

Count % Count % Count %

Never 69 42% 52 27% 140 39%

Once a month or less 66 40% 81 43% 147 41%

Once a week 21 13% 39 21% 53 15%

Several times a week 6 4% 13 7% 16 4%

Daily 2 1% 5 3% 6 2%

Total 164 100% 190 100% 361 100%

During the current academic year, about how often have you used library resources (including on-line databases and materials) to

complete a course assignment?

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Response

Count % Count % Count %

Very often 16 10% 22 12% 37 10%

Often 32 20% 45 24% 74 21%

Sometimes 48 30% 67 35% 111 31%

Never 65 40% 55 29% 134 38%

Total 161 100% 189 100% 356 100%

Do you use the library's electronic resources more than the print collections?

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Response

Count % Count % Count %

No 98 64% 110 60% 214 63%

Yes 54 36% 73 40% 124 37%

Total 152 100% 183 100% 338 100%

Page 188: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College Supplemental Questions

To what extent has your experience with the library staff and resources helped you to acquire the knowledge and skills necessary

to search for information?

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Response

Count % Count % Count %

Very much 31 19% 60 32% 79 22%

Some 67 41% 66 35% 142 40%

Very Little 26 16% 29 16% 57 16%

Not at all 38 23% 31 17% 78 22%

Total 162 100% 186 100% 356 100%

Members of the library staff are always courteous and helpful.

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Response

Count % Count % Count %

Strongly agree 66 42% 85 45% 149 43%

Agree 84 53% 84 45% 179 51%

Disagree 6 4% 11 6% 15 4%

Strongly disagree 2 1% 7 4% 6 2%

Total 158 100% 187 100% 350 100%

The college provides comfortable space or facilities where I can meet and interact with my fellow students.

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Response

Count % Count % Count %

Very much so 68 42% 80 42% 150 42%

For the most part 60 37% 74 39% 134 38%

Somewhat 21 13% 27 14% 47 13%

Only slightly 8 5% 5 3% 16 4%

Not at all 4 2% 4 2% 9 2%

Total 161 100% 190 100% 356 100%

The college provides many opportunities for interdisciplinary learning.

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Response

Count % Count % Count %

Strongly disagree 22 14% 20 11% 46 13%

Disagree 21 13% 26 14% 47 13%

Agree 102 64% 121 65% 226 64%

Strongly agree 15 9% 18 10% 33 9%

Total 160 100% 185 100% 352 100%

Page 189: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College Supplemental Questions

The environment here is one in which students are encouraged to develop an active, healthy lifestyle.

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Response

Count % Count % Count %

Strongly disagree 15 9% 22 12% 35 10%

Disagree 27 17% 20 11% 54 15%

Agree 99 62% 113 59% 217 61%

Strongly agree 19 12% 35 18% 48 13%

Total 160 100% 190 100% 354 100%

To what extent are you meeting your educational objectives as a result of your enrollment at this college?

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Response

Count % Count % Count %

Definitely meeting my objectives 77 47% 97 51% 173 48%

Partially meeting my objectives 51 31% 64 34% 114 32%

Not meeting my objectives 16 10% 12 6% 32 9%

Too early to tell 19 12% 17 9% 40 11%

Total 163 100% 190 100% 359 100%

Which of the following factors, if any, poses the biggest obstacle to your academic progress?

Part-Time Full-Time All Students (weighted) Response

Count % Count % Count %

Money, work obligations, finances 80 51% 92 49% 176 51%

Family obligations 29 19% 25 13% 60 17%

Difficulties getting the courses you need 20 13% 15 8% 40 12%

Lack of good academic advising 10 6% 18 10% 25 7%

Lack of personal motivation 17 11% 38 20% 45 13%

Total 156 100% 188 100% 347 100%

Page 190: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Institutional Report Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice

1For returning participants, the college’s most recent year of participation is included in data analyses. For example, if a college participated in 2006 and 2007, only the 2007 data would be used in the 3-year cohort.

2007 Institutional Report: Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Page 1 of 5

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

of benchmark scores.1 This cohort is referred to as the 2007 CCSSE Cohort throughout all reports and documentation.

This new approach increases the total number of institutions and students contributing to the national dataset, which in turn increases the reliability of the overall results. In addition, the 3-year cohort approach minimizes the impact, in any given year, of statewide consortia participation.

The benchmarks are briefly described below.

Active and Collaborative LearningStudents learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaboration with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with the kinds of situations and problems they will encounter in the workplace, community, and their personal lives. The seven survey items that contribute to this benchmark are these:

During the current school year, how often have you Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions Made a class presentation Worked with other students on projects during class Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) Participated in a community-based project as a part of a regular course Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

The Community College Survey of Student Engagement

(CCSSE) utilizes a set of five benchmarks of effective

educational practice in community colleges. These benchmarks allow

member institutions, with missions focused on teaching, learning, and

student success, to gauge and monitor their performance in areas that are truly central to

their work. In addition, participating colleges have the opportunity to make appropriate and

useful comparisons between their performance and that of other groups of similar colleges.

Community colleges differ significantly — even dramatically — from one another on variables including size, location, resources, enrollment patterns, and student characteristics. It is important to take these differences into account when interpreting benchmark scores — especially when making institutional comparisons. Furthermore, the Community College Survey of Student Engagement has adopted an official policy on “Responsible Uses of CCSSE Data.” Please review the policy, which is provided as an appendix to this report.

CCSSE’s Benchmarks

The five benchmarks encompass 38 engagement items from the CCSSE survey that reflect many of the most important aspects of the student experience. These institutional practices and student behaviors are some of the most powerful contributors to effective teaching, learning, student retention, and student success.

CCSSE has again used this year a 3-year cohort of participating colleges (2005 through 2007) in all of its data analyses, including the computation

Page 191: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Institutional Report: Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Page 2 of 5

Student EffortStudents’ own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals. “Time on task” is a key variable, and there are a variety of settings and means through which students may apply themselves to the learning process. Associated with this benchmark are eight survey items indicating student behavior in these terms:

During the current school year, how often have you Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources Come to class without completing readings or assignments (reverse coded) Used peer or other tutoring Used skill labs Used a computer lab

During the current school year How many books did you read on your own (not assigned) for personal enjoyment or academic enrichment How many hours did you spend in a typical week preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing or other activities related to your program)

Academic ChallengeChallenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Ten items from The Community College Student Report correspond to components of academic challenge including the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the standards faculty members use to evaluate student performance. Specifically, Academic Challenge includes the following items:

During the current school year, how often have you Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor’s standards or expectations

How much does your coursework at this college emphasize

Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways

Making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Using information you have read or heard to perform a new skill

During the current school year How many assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or book-length packs of course readings did you read How many papers or reports of any length did you write To what extent have your examinations challenged you to do your best work

How much does this college emphasize Encouraging you to spend significant amounts of time studying

Student-Faculty InteractionThe more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and to persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Personal interaction with faculty members strengthens students’ connections to the college and helps them focus on their academic progress. Working with an instructor on a project or serving with faculty members on a college committee lets students see first-hand how experts identify and solve practical problems. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning. The six items used in this benchmark are about students’ experience in these areas:

During the current school year, how often have you Used email to communicate with an instructor Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with instructors outside of class Received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on your performance Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework

Support for LearnersStudents perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and

Page 192: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Institutional Report: Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Page 3 of 5

cultivate positive working and social relationships among different groups on campus. Community college students also benefit from services targeted to assist them with academic and career planning, academic skill development, and other issues that may affect both learning and retention. The seven survey items contributing to this benchmark include the following:

How much does this college emphasize Providing the support you need to help you succeed at this college Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) Providing the support you need to thrive socially Providing the financial support you need to afford your education

During the current school year, how often have you Used academic advising/ planning services Used career counseling services

Understanding and Using Benchmarks

What are benchmark scores?Benchmark scores provide a useful way to look at an institution’s data by creating groups of conceptually related items that address key areas of student engagement. As described above, these areas are active and collaborative learning, student effort, academic challenge, student-faculty interaction, and support for learners. These are five areas that have been shown through research to be important in high-quality educational practice. Through examining empirical results of factor analytic models and with input from its Technical Advisory Panel, CCSSE grouped together survey items related to each of these areas.

In order to create the benchmark scores, the survey items associated with each benchmark are first rescaled so that all items are on the same scale (0 to 1). Next, the benchmark scores are computed by averaging the scores of the related survey items. Finally, the scores are standardized around the mean of the 3-year cohort so that respondents’ scores have a mean of 50, weighted by full- and part-time attendance status, and a standard deviation of 25.

Benchmark scores are then computed by averaging the scores on the associated items.

Rescaling scores increases the value of the scores in the following two ways: 1) all of the benchmarks are on the same scale, enabling comparisons across benchmarks; and 2) the scores provide information about how an individual institution is doing relative to other institutions.

Having scores on the same scale makes comparisons across benchmarks more meaningful than comparisons using raw scores. The limitation of using raw scores is illustrated by the fact that there are some aspects of student engagement that will nearly always take place with greater frequency than others. For example, students may typically engage in activities such as homework more frequently than they engage in talking with instructors about career plans, so raw scores will always be higher for homework than for talking with instructors. Without knowing what a typical score is for each of these engagement areas, college faculty and staff have little basis for determining where their institutional strengths and weaknesses may lie.

Knowing that all benchmarks are on the same scale makes it immediately obvious that a particular college’s scores are either above or below those for other participating schools. Knowing that the mean is at 50 across all students in the sample enhances the score’s usefulness for benchmarking, as the score contains information about whether an institution’s performance is better or worse than average − and how much better or worse. For example, benchmark scores of 55 on Student Effort and 42 on Student-Faculty Interaction would indicate to a college that the institution is performing relatively better in regard to Student Effort than in regard to Student-Faculty Interaction. Further, the benchmark scores allow the college to understand that the results are above the average for participating institutions on one benchmark and below average on the other. Thus the data may be used both to identify relative strengths and to zero in on areas in which the college may need to improve.

What can a college do with the benchmarks?There are a number of ways that college leaders might choose to use the benchmarks and the comparison information provided in this report. Examples are

Page 193: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Institutional Report: Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Page 4 of 5

provided below:

A starting point for understanding your campus findings — Multiple pages of survey data presented at the individual item level may be daunting. Where does one start when there are over 150 items addressing a variety of topics? The benchmark scores provide a manageable starting point for reviewing and understanding your CCSSE data.

For example, suppose that you have a college mission statement that expresses a commitment to faculty involvement with students. But you note that the college’s student-faculty interaction benchmark score is lower than those for the comparison group and for the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Therefore, you decide that this is the area you want to target for improvement. To help you understand more precisely what the differences are, CCSSE suggests that you drill down to the item level, look at the percentage of students responding in each category, and compare the responses to those in your comparison groups. This will allow you to identify the specific items that are problem areas, and then target these areas, creating appropriate initiatives to build student-faculty interaction.

Understanding the big picture — CCSSE reports data for important breakout groups for each benchmark, enabling college leaders to review how their colleges are performing overall, by part- and full-time attendance status, and by credit hours earned. This view provides the big picture of student engagement and involvement.

Talking points — Benchmark scores are designed to help colleges investigate student engagement in key areas that — according to research — contribute to effective educational practice (Chickering and Gamson, 1987). Colleges can use these scores to prompt dialogue about effective teaching and learning. Scores likewise can be used to focus attention on programs and policies that may be in need of improvement – and on those worthy of celebration.

Institutional comparisons — Until recently, community and technical colleges have had little opportunity to make valid and appropriate cross-institutional comparisons, particularly with regard to important dimensions of teaching and learning.

Many national surveys do not employ strict sampling protocols, thus making comparisons less meaningful and potentially inappropriate. CCSSE employs a strict sampling protocol which allows for appropriate cross-institutional comparisons. CCSSE controls the sample selection, thereby ensuring that all class sections have equal chances of being selected. What this means is that no college has the opportunity to skew the results by sampling only highly engaging classes, and therefore, every college is on the same playing field.

Colleges can target areas that need improvement both by considering their own institutional aspirations and priorities and by comparing their benchmark scores with groups of similar colleges. After identifying other colleges that are high performers on a particular benchmark, a college can initiate communication to explore the educational practices that may be contributing to enhanced effectiveness at benchmark institutions.

Subsequent analyses — Any or all of the benchmark scores can be used as variables in subsequent analyses using the CCSSE student record data for your college, which was provided with your Institutional Report. The benchmark scores can also be used in conjunction with traditional institutional data, such as grades and demographic data, to understand the factors that really matter in student success.

POLICY STATEMENT ON RESPONSIBLE USES OF CCSSE DATA

In accessing the CCSSE database and using the CCSSE data search tools, the user agrees to the following CCSSE policy positions regarding responsible and appropriate uses of the survey data.

CCSSE supports uses of survey data for benchmarking effective educational practices, for targeting and monitoring progress in quality improvement, and for public reporting in ways that serve to increase understanding of collegiate quality and to support institutional efforts to improve undergraduate student learning and retention. CCSSE especially supports public reporting of student engagement results in ways that enable thoughtful, responsible institutional comparisons while encouraging and celebrating institutional diversity.

Page 194: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Institutional Report: Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Page 5 of 5

CCSSE does not support the use of student engagement survey results for the purpose of ranking community and technical colleges. Such uses would obscure complex dimensions of institutional performance and student behavior.

Because of differences in institutional focus, student characteristics, and resources, comparisons of survey results from two single institutions serve little constructive purpose and may in fact be wholly inappropriate. CCSSE’s data search tools therefore provide group comparisons, using aggregated data from at least three institutions.

Appropriate interpretation of survey data will take into account the institutional context (mission, size, urbanicity, program mix, and so on) as well as the characteristics of a particular institution’s student population – for example, the proportions of full- vs. part-time students, traditional college-age vs. non-traditional-age students, students who are academically under-prepared as they enter the institution, and students with various educational goals.

Page 195: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Benchmark Reports This section contains nine reports presenting data for all students, for students by enrollment status (e.g., part- and full-time), and for students by credit hour status (0 to 29 and 30+ credits). The first report, on page B1, is a Summary Table of scores for all students on each of the five benchmarks: 1) Active and Collaborative Learning, 2) Student Effort, 3) Academic Challenge, 4) Student-Faculty Interactions, and 5) Support for Learners for your institution, a comparison group, and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. The CCSSE Benchmark Deciles Report, on page B2, highlights the five benchmark deciles for all students at your institution. Deciles are percentile scores that divide the frequency of benchmark scores into ten equal groups. A percentile represents the point at or below which a specified percentage of the college benchmark scores fall. For example, the 60th percentile represents the point at or below which 60 percent of the college benchmark scores fall for the respective comparison group. Deciles are listed for the 2007 CCSSE Cohort and for each appropriate breakdown according to college size and urbanicity. To help you gauge your college’s performance relative to the comparison groups, the shaded area on the tables indicate the deciles that are less than or equal to your benchmark scores. The third report – Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - uses bar charts to represent the data provided in the summary table, for all students for each benchmark (pp. B3 - B7). In addition, it provides a listing of items from The Community College Student Report making up that particular benchmark (e.g., Active and Collaborative Learning), the means associated with each item and whether your college’s mean is above or below the mean for the comparison group as well as the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. The next series of reports, found on pages B8 through B19, contain the same reports described above broken down by enrollment status for your institution, a comparison group, and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. The final set of reports, pages B20 through B31, highlight data for all students by credit hour status for your institution, a comparison group, and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Please note that for consortium reports, there are no deciles reports; hence, the page numbers will not correspond to those listed above.

Page 196: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

B1

Page 197: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

B2

Page 198: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Active and Collaborative Learning Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - All Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B3

description

Description - Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with the kinds of situations and problems they will encounter in the workplace, the community, and their personal lives.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

All Students 48.0 51.7 50.0

Page 199: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student Effort Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - All Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B4

description

Description - Students' own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

All Students 46.3 51.1 50.0

Page 200: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Academic Challenge Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - All Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B5

description

Description - Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Ten survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the standards faculty members use to evaluate student performance.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

All Students 43.2 50.4 50.0

Page 201: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student-Faculty Interaction Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - All Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B6

description

Description - In general, the more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

All Students 46.9 51.9 50.0

Page 202: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Support for Learners Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - All Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B7

description

Description - Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relationships among different groups on campus.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

All Students 48.5 51.9 50.0

Page 203: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

B8

Page 204: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

B9

Page 205: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Active and Collaborative Learning Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Part-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B10

description

Description - Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with the kinds of situations and problems they will encounter in the workplace, the community, and their personal lives.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Part-Time 45.6 47.3 46.6

Page 206: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student Effort Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Part-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B11

description

Description - Students' own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Part-Time 44.5 47.1 46.8

Page 207: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Academic Challenge Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Part-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B12

description

Description - Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Ten survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the standards faculty members use to evaluate student performance.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Part-Time 41.1 46.5 46.4

Page 208: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student-Faculty Interaction Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Part-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B13

description

Description - In general, the more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Part-Time 44.9 47.6 46.8

Page 209: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Support for Learners Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Part-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B14

description

Description - Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relationships among different groups on campus.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Part-Time 47.4 49.6 48.4

Page 210: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Active and Collaborative Learning Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Full-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B15

description

Description - Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with the kinds of situations and problems they will encounter in the workplace, the community, and their personal lives.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Full-Time 55.7 57.3 56.2

Page 211: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student Effort Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Full-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B16

description

Description - Students' own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Full-Time 51.8 56.1 55.5

Page 212: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Academic Challenge Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Full-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B17

description

Description - Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Ten survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the standards faculty members use to evaluate student performance.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Full-Time 49.8 55.8 55.6

Page 213: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student-Faculty Interaction Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Full-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B18

description

Description - In general, the more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Full-Time 53.2 57.3 56.0

Page 214: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Support for Learners Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Full-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B19

description

Description - Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relationships among different groups on campus.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Full-Time 51.9 55.1 53.8

Page 215: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

B20

Page 216: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

B21

Page 217: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Active and Collaborative Learning Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 0 to 29 Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B22

description

Description - Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with the kinds of situations and problems they will encounter in the workplace, the community, and their personal lives.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

0 to 29 Credits 45.2 48.7 47.7

Page 218: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student Effort Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 0 to 29 Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B23

description

Description - Students' own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

0 to 29 Credits 46.1 49.9 49.1

Page 219: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Academic Challenge Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 0 to 29 Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B24

description

Description - Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Ten survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the standards faculty members use to evaluate student performance.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

0 to 29 Credits 42.0 48.3 48.1

Page 220: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student-Faculty Interaction Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 0 to 29 Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B25

description

Description - In general, the more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

0 to 29 Credits 43.3 49.1 48.1

Page 221: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Support for Learners Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 0 to 29 Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B26

description

Description - Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relationships among different groups on campus.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

0 to 29 Credits 49.0 51.1 49.9

Page 222: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Active and Collaborative Learning Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 30+ Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B27

description

Description - Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with the kinds of situations and problems they will encounter in the workplace, the community, and their personal lives.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

30+ Credits 54.8 58.0 56.5

Page 223: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student Effort Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 30+ Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B28

description

Description - Students' own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

30+ Credits 46.8 53.6 52.9

Page 224: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Academic Challenge Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 30+ Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B29

description

Description - Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Ten survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the standards faculty members use to evaluate student performance.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

30+ Credits 46.5 55.3 54.7

Page 225: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student-Faculty Interaction Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 30+ Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B30

description

Description - In general, the more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

30+ Credits 55.5 58.0 56.1

Page 226: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Support for Learners Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 30+ Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B31

description

Description - Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relationships among different groups on campus.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Small Colleges 2007 CCSSE Cohort

30+ Credits 46.8 53.6 52.1

Page 227: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

B1

Page 228: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Active and Collaborative Learning Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - All Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B2

description

Description - Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with the kinds of situations and problems they will encounter in the workplace, the community, and their personal lives.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

All Students 48.0 50.0 50.0

Page 229: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student Effort Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - All Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B3

description

Description - Students' own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

All Students 46.3 49.9 50.0

Page 230: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Academic Challenge Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - All Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B4

description

Description - Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Ten survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the standards faculty members use to evaluate student performance.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

All Students 43.2 50.4 50.0

Page 231: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student-Faculty Interaction Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - All Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B5

description

Description - In general, the more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

All Students 46.9 50.1 50.0

Page 232: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Support for Learners Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - All Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B6

description

Description - Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relationships among different groups on campus.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

All Students 48.5 50.9 50.0

Page 233: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

B7

Page 234: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Active and Collaborative Learning Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Part-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B8

description

Description - Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with the kinds of situations and problems they will encounter in the workplace, the community, and their personal lives.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Part-Time 45.6 46.3 46.6

Page 235: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student Effort Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Part-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B9

description

Description - Students' own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Part-Time 44.5 46.8 46.8

Page 236: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Academic Challenge Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Part-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B10

description

Description - Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Ten survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the standards faculty members use to evaluate student performance.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Part-Time 41.1 47.1 46.4

Page 237: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student-Faculty Interaction Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Part-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B11

description

Description - In general, the more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Part-Time 44.9 46.7 46.8

Page 238: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Support for Learners Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Part-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B12

description

Description - Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relationships among different groups on campus.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Part-Time 47.4 48.7 48.4

Page 239: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Active and Collaborative Learning Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Full-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B13

description

Description - Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with the kinds of situations and problems they will encounter in the workplace, the community, and their personal lives.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Full-Time 55.7 56.4 56.2

Page 240: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student Effort Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Full-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B14

description

Description - Students' own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Full-Time 51.8 55.2 55.5

Page 241: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Academic Challenge Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Full-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B15

description

Description - Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Ten survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the standards faculty members use to evaluate student performance.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Full-Time 49.8 56.0 55.6

Page 242: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student-Faculty Interaction Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Full-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B16

description

Description - In general, the more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Full-Time 53.2 56.1 56.0

Page 243: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Support for Learners Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - Full-Time Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B17

description

Description - Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relationships among different groups on campus.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

Full-Time 51.9 54.5 53.8

Page 244: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

B18

Page 245: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Active and Collaborative Learning Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 0 to 29 Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B19

description

Description - Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with the kinds of situations and problems they will encounter in the workplace, the community, and their personal lives.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

0 to 29 Credits 45.2 46.8 47.7

Page 246: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student Effort Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 0 to 29 Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B20

description

Description - Students' own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

0 to 29 Credits 46.1 48.4 49.1

Page 247: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Academic Challenge Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 0 to 29 Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B21

description

Description - Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Ten survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the standards faculty members use to evaluate student performance.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

0 to 29 Credits 42.0 47.8 48.1

Page 248: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student-Faculty Interaction Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 0 to 29 Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B22

description

Description - In general, the more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

0 to 29 Credits 43.3 47.8 48.1

Page 249: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Support for Learners Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 0 to 29 Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B23

description

Description - Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relationships among different groups on campus.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

0 to 29 Credits 49.0 50.4 49.9

Page 250: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Active and Collaborative Learning Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 30+ Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B24

description

Description - Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with the kinds of situations and problems they will encounter in the workplace, the community, and their personal lives.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

30+ Credits 54.8 56.2 56.5

Page 251: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student Effort Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 30+ Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B25

description

Description - Students' own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

30+ Credits 46.8 52.4 52.9

Page 252: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Academic Challenge Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 30+ Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B26

description

Description - Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Ten survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the standards faculty members use to evaluate student performance.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

30+ Credits 46.5 55.3 54.7

Page 253: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Student-Faculty Interaction Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 30+ Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B27

description

Description - In general, the more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

30+ Credits 55.5 54.9 56.1

Page 254: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Support for Learners Bar Charts and Benchmark Item Composition - 30+ Credits Students

[NOTE: Directional arrows in charts highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group. The items listed are significant at p < .001 with an effect size greater than or equal to .2.]

B28

description

Description - Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relationships among different groups on campus.

Benchmark Scores

Brazosport College Consortium 2007 CCSSE Cohort

30+ Credits 46.8 51.9 52.1

Page 255: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Codebook CCSSE’s data dictionary begins on the next page. It provides information on the structure, contents, and layout of the CCSSE dataset. Specifically, the codebook includes variable names associated with items, information about response values for those variables, and codes used to indicate missing data or invalid responses. In addition, the codebook lists exact items from The Community College Student Report (CCSR), Course Master Data File elements, course-level data from the Class Information Sheet, the part- v. full-time status weight variable, raw benchmark scores, exclusionary criteria, CCSSE Special Focus Questions, and derived variables used in various Web site analyses.

Page 256: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

1

CCSSE 2007 Codebook Please note the following for the CCSSE dataset:

•Invalid responses are coded as missing “.”

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value SURVEYNO Survey Number 1

ENTER Did you begin college at this college or elsewhere?

1=Started here 2=Started elsewhere

2 ENRLMENT Thinking about this current academic term, how would you characterize your enrollment at this college?

1= Less than full-time 2=Full-time

3 SRVAGAIN Have you taken this survey in another class this term?

1=Yes 2=No

4) In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following? NOTE: All items below have the following response values:

1=Never 2=Sometimes 3=Often 4=Very often

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 4a CLQUEST Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions 4b CLPRESEN Made a class presentation 4c REWROPAP Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before

turning it in 4d INTEGRAT Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas

or information from various sources 4e CLUNPREP Come to class without completing readings or assignments 4f CLASSGRP Worked with other students on projects during class 4g OCCGRP Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class

assignments 4h TUTOR Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) 4i COMMPROJ Participated in a community-based project as a part of a

regular course 4j INTERNET Used the Internet or instant messaging to work on an

assignment 4k EMAIL Used email to communicate with an instructor 4l FACGRADE Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor 4m FACPLANS Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor 4n FACIDEAS Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with

instructors outside of class 4o FACFEED Received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors

on your performance

Page 257: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label

4p WORKHARD Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations

4q FACOTH Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework

4r OOCIDEAS Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

4s DIVRSTUD Had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity other than your own

4t DIFFSTUD Had serious conversations with students who differ from you in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values

4u SKIPCLAS Skipped class

5) During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized the following mental activities? NOTE: All items below have the following response values:

1=Very little 2=Some 3=Quite a bit 4=Very much

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 5a MEMORIZE Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your courses and

readings so you can repeat them in pretty much the same form

5b ANALYZE Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory

5c SYNTHESZ Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways

5d EVALUATE Making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods

5e APPLYING Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations

5f PERFORM Using information you have read or heard to perform a new skill.

Page 258: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

3

6) During the current school year, about how much reading and writing have you done at this college? NOTE: All items below have the following response values:

1=None 2=Between 1 and 4 3=Between 5 and 10 4=Between 11 and 20 5=More than 20

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 6a READASGN Number of assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or book-

length packs of course readings 6b READOWN Number of books read on your own (not assigned) for

personal enjoyment or academic enrichment 6c WRITEANY Number of written papers or reports of any length

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value 7

EXAMS Mark the box that best represents the extent to which your examinations during the current school year have challenged you to do your best work at this college

Responses range from 1 to 7, with scale anchors described: (1) Extremely easy (7) Extremely challenging

8) Which of the following have you done, are you doing, or do you plan to do while attending this college? NOTE: All items below have the following response values:

1=I Have Not Done, Nor Plan To Do 2=I Plan To Do 3=I Have Done

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 8a INTERN Internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical

assignment 8b ESL English as a second language course 8c DEVREAD Developmental/remedial reading course 8d DEVWRITE Developmental/remedial writing course 8e DEVMATH Developmental/remedial math course 8f STUDSKIL Study skills course 8g HONORS Honors course 8h ORIEN College orientation program or course 8i LRNCOMM Organized learning communities (linked courses/study

groups led by faculty or counselors)

Page 259: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

4

9) How much does this college emphasize each of the following? NOTE: All items below have the following response values:

1=Very little 2=Some 3=Quite a bit 4=Very much

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 9a ENVSCHOL Encouraging you to spend significant amounts of time

studying 9b ENVSUPRT Providing the support you need to help you succeed at this

college 9c ENVDIVRS Encouraging contact among students from different

economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds 9d ENVNACAD Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities

(work, family, etc.) 9e ENVSOCAL Providing the support you need to thrive socially 9f FINSUPP Providing the financial support you need to afford your

education 9g ENVCOMP Using computers in academic work

10) About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? NOTE: All items below have the following response values:

0=None 1=1-5 hours 2=6-10 hours 3=11-20 hours 4=21-30 hours 5=More than 30 hours

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 10a

ACADPR01 Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, doing homework, or other activities related to your program)

10b PAYWORK Working for pay 10c

COCURR01 Participating in college-sponsored activities (organizations, campus publications, student government, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.)

10d

CAREDE01 Providing care for dependents living with you (parents, children, spouse, etc.)

10e COMMUTE Commuting to and from classes

Page 260: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

5

11) Mark the box that best represents the quality of your relationships with people at this college. Your relationship with:

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value 11a ENVSTU Other students Responses range from 1 to 7, with

scale anchors described as: (1) Unfriendly, unsupportive, sense of alienation (7) Friendly, supportive, sense of belonging

11b ENVFAC Instructors Responses range from 1 to 7, with scale anchors described as: (1) Unavailable, unhelpful, unsympathetic (7) Available, helpful, sympathetic

11c ENVADM Administrative personnel and offices Responses range from 1 to 7, with scale anchors described as: (1) Unhelpful, inconsiderate, rigid (7) Helpful, considerate, flexible

12) How much has YOUR EXPERIENCE AT THIS COLLEGE contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas? NOTE: All items below have the following response values:

1=Very little 2=Some 3=Quite a bit 4=Very much

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 12a GNGENLED Acquiring a broad general education 12b GNWORK Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills 12c GNWRITE Writing clearly and effectively 12d GNSPEAK Speaking clearly and effectively 12e GNANALY Thinking critically and analytically 12f GNSOLVE Solving numerical problems 12g GNCMPTS Using computing and information technology 12h GNOTHERS Working effectively with others 12i GNINQ Learning effectively on your own 12j GNSELF Understanding yourself 12k GNDIVERS Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds12l GNETHICS Developing a personal code of values and ethics 12m GNCOMMUN Contributing to the welfare of your community 12n CARGOAL Developing clearer career goals 12o GAINCAR Gaining information about career opportunities

Page 261: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

6

13a) Indicate how often you use the following services. NOTE: All items below have the following response values:

0=Don’t Know/N.A 1=Rarely/never 2=Sometimes 3=Often

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 13a1 USEACAD Frequency: Academic advising/planning 13b1 USECACOU Frequency: Career counseling 13c1 USEJOBPL Frequency: Job placement assistance 13d1 USETUTOR Frequency: Peer or other tutoring 13e1 USELAB Frequency: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) 13f1 USECHLD Frequency: Child care 13g1 USEFAADV Frequency: Financial aid advising 13h1 USECOMLB Frequency: Computer lab 13i1 USESTORG Frequency: Student organizations 13j1 USETRCRD Frequency: Transfer credit assistance 13k1 USEDISAB Frequency: Services to students with disabilities

13b) Indicate how satisfied you are with the services at this college. NOTE: All items below have the following response values:

0=N.A. 1=Not at all 2=Somewhat 3=Very

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 13a2 SATACAD Satisfaction: Academic advising/planning 13b2 SATCACOU Satisfaction: Career Counseling 13c2 SATJOBPL Satisfaction: Job placement assistance 13d2 SATTUTOR Satisfaction: Peer or other tutoring 13e2 SATLAB Satisfaction: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) 13f2 SATCHLD Satisfaction: Child care 13g2 SATFAADV Satisfaction: Financial aid advising 13h2 SATCOMLB Satisfaction: Computer lab 13i2 SATSTORG Satisfaction: Student organizations 13j2 SATTRCRD Satisfaction: Transfer credit assistance 13k2 SATDISAB Satisfaction: Services to students with disabilities

Page 262: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

7

13c) Indicate how important the services are to you. NOTE: All items below have the following response values:

1=Not at all 2=Somewhat 3=Very

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 13a3 IMPACAD Importance: Academic advising/planning 13b3 IMPCACOU Importance: Career counseling 13c3 IMPJOBPL Importance: Job placement assistance 13d3 IMPTUTOR Importance: Peer or other tutoring 13e3 IMPLAB Importance: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) 13f3 IMPCHLD Importance: Child care 13g3 IMPFAADV Importance: Financial aid advising 13h3 IMPCOMLB Importance: Computer lab 13i3 IMPSTORG Importance: Student organizations 13j3 IMPTRCRD Importance: Transfer credit assistance 13k3 IMPDISAB Importance: Services to students with disabilities

14) How likely is it that the following issues would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college? NOTE: All items below have the following response values:

1=Not Likely 2=Somewhat Likely 3=Likely 4=Very Likely

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 14a WRKFULL Working full-time 14b CAREDEP Caring for dependents 14c ACADUNP Academically unprepared 14d LACKFIN Lack of finances 14e TRANSFER Transfer to a 4-year college or university

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value 15

FRNDSUPP How supportive are your friends of your attending this college?

1=Not very 2=Somewhat 3=Quite a bit 4=Extremely

16

FAMSUPP How supportive is your immediate family of your attending this college?

1=Not very 2=Somewhat 3=Quite a bit 4=Extremely

Page 263: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

8

17) Indicate which of the following are your reasons/goals for attending this college. NOTE: All items below have the following response values:

1=Not a goal 2=Secondary goal 3=Primary goal

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 17a CERTPRGM Complete a certificate program

17b ASSOCDEG Obtain an associate degree 17c TR4YR Transfer to a 4-year college or university 17d OBUPSKIL Obtain or update job-related skills 17e SLFIMP Self-improvement/personal enjoyment 17f CARCHNG Change careers

18) Indicate which of the following are sources you use to pay your tuition at this college. (Please respond to each item) NOTE: All items below have the following response values:

1=Not a source 2=Minor source 3=Major source

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label

18a OWNINC My own income/savings 18b PARSPINC Parent or spouse/significant other’s

income/savings 18c EMPLOYER Employer contributions 18d GRANTS Grants and scholarships 18e STULOANS Student loans (bank, etc.) 18f PUBASSIT Public assistance

19) Since high school, which of the following types of schools have you attended other than the one you are now attending? This question asks students to select all options that apply. To permit multiple responses, the question is represented in the codebook by five separate items the student either checks or does not check. NOTE: All items below have the following response values:

0=No response 1=Response

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 19a PROPSCH Proprietary (private) school or training program 19b VOCTECH Public vocational-technical school 19c COMMCOLL Another community or technical college 19d FOURYEAR 4-year college or university 19e NONESC None

Page 264: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

9

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value 20 TAKAGAIN When do you plan to take classes at

this college again? 1=I will accomplish my goal(s) this term and will not be returning 2=I have no current plans to return 3=Within the next 12 months

4= Uncertain 21 GPA At this college, in what range is your

overall college grade average? 1=Pass/fail classes only 2=Do not have a GPA at this school 3=C- or lower 4=C 5=B- to C+ 6=B 7=A- to B+ 8=A

22 TIMCLASS When do you most frequently take classes at this college?

1=Day classes (morning or afternoon)2=Evening classes 3=Weekend classes

23 TOTCHRS How many TOTAL credit hours have you earned at this college, not counting the courses you are currently taking this term?

0=None 1=1 – 14 credits 2=15 – 29 credits 3=30 – 44 credits 4=45 – 60 credits 5= over 60 credits

24) At what other types of institutions are you taking classes this term? This question asks students to select all options that apply. To permit multiple responses, the question is represented in the codebook by six separate items the student either checks or does not check. NOTE: All items below have the following response values:

0=No response 1=Response

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 24a OTCLSNON None 24b OTCLSHS High school 24c OTCLSVT Vocational/technical school 24d OTCLSCC Another community or technical college 24e OTCLS4Y 4-year college/ university 24f OTCLASS Other

Page 265: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

10

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value 25

OTHINST How many classes are you presently taking at OTHER institutions?

1=None 2=1 class 3=2 classes 4=3 classes 5=4 classes or more

26 RECOMMEN Would you recommend this college

to a friend or family member? 1=Yes 2=No

27 ENTIREXP How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this college?

1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4=Excellent

28 HAVKID Do you have children who live with you?

1=Yes 2=No

29 AGENEW Mark your age group 1=Under 18 2=18 to 19 3=20 to 21 4=22 to 24 5=25 to 29 6=30 to 39 7=40 to 49 8=50 to 64 9=65+

30 SEX Your sex 1=Male 2=Female

31 MARRY Are you married? 1=Yes 2=No

32 ENGFIRST Is English your native (first) language?

1=Yes 2=No

33 INTERNAT Are you an international student or foreign national?

1=Yes 2=No

34 RERACE What is your racial identification? (Mark only one)

1=American Indian or other Native American 2=Asian, Asian American or Pacific Islander 3=Native Hawaiian 4=Black or African American, Non-Hispanic 5=White, Non-Hispanic 6=Hispanic, Latino, Spanish 7=Other

35

HIACCRED What is the highest academic credential you have earned?

1=None 2=High school diploma or GED 3=Vocational/technical certificate 4= Associate degree 5= Bachelor’s degree 6= Master's/doctoral/professional degree

Page 266: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

11

Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value 36m

MOTHED Highest level of education: mother

1=Not a high school graduate 2=High school diploma or GED 3=Some college, did not complete degree 4=Associate degree 5=Bachelor’s degree 6=Master's/1st professional degree 7=Doctorate degree 8=Unknown

36f

FATHED Highest level of education: father

1=Not a high school graduate 2=High school diploma or GED 3=Some college, did not complete degree 4=Associate degree 5=Bachelor’s degree 6=Master's/1st professional degree 7=Doctorate degree 8=Unknown

37

MAJOR Using the list provided, please write the code indicating your major

38 STID Student Identification Number The items below contain course level data from the Course Master Data File:

Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value psample Record in primary sample 0=False

1=True in Survey number in range for packet 0=False

1=True sdate Course start date edate Course end date timegrp Administration Time Group 1=Morning (Before Noon)

2=Afternoon (Noon to 4:59) 3=Evening (5:00 or later)

camploc Campus location

secno Section number

courseno Course number

courname Course full name

bldg Building

room Room

meetdays Class meeting days

instrnam Instructor name

depart Department

actenrol Actual enrollment

stime Class start time

etime Class end time

Page 267: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

12

The items below refer to derived CCSSE variables:

Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

credit Credit hours completed 1=Students with 0-29 Credits 2=Students with 30 or More Credits

stud_age_class Traditional/Nontraditional age students 1=Traditional Age Student (24 and younger)

2=Nontraditional Age Student (25 and older)

developmental Developmental/Nondevelopmental coursework

1=Nondevelopmental 2=Developmental

generation First-Generation/Not First-Generation Students

1=First-Generation (neither parent attended college)

2=Not First-Generation (at least one parent attended college)

credential Credential/Noncredential seeking 1=Noncredential Seeking 2=Credential Seeking

The items below contain course level data from the class information sheet:

Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value SRVADMN Survey administered by 1=Faculty 2=Survey Administrator FACFTPT Faculty member’s status 1=Full-time 2=Part-time NUMSTU Number of students in attendance ADMNTIME Total administration time: in minutes ADMNDATE Administration date SPNEEDS How many students in this class have special needs? SEMHRS Number of credit hours taught this semester by faculty member teaching this class:

Semester system hours QRTHRS Number of credit hours taught this semester by faculty member teaching this class:

Quarter system hours The items below are calculated weights and benchmarks:

Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label iweight Institutional weight based on part-time/full-time enrollment actcoll Active and collaborative learning benchmark score (rescaled from 0 to 1) stueff Student effort benchmark score (rescaled from 0 to 1) acchall Academic challenge benchmark score (rescaled from 0 to 1) stufac Student-faculty interaction benchmark score (rescaled from 0 to 1) support Support for learners benchmark score (rescaled from 0 to 1)

Page 268: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

13

The items below are standardized benchmarks:

Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label actcoll_std Standardized active and collaborative learning benchmark score (mean of 50) stueff_std Standardized student effort benchmark score (mean of 50) acchall_std Standardized academic challenge benchmark score (mean of 50) stufac_std Standardized student-faculty interaction benchmark score (mean of 50) support_std Standardized support for learners benchmark score (mean of 50)

The items below refer to the CCSSE Supplemental Questions:

Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

COLLQ149 By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, I had met with an advisor to discuss my educational goals.

1= Yes 2= No, I met with an advisor by the end of my first four weeks at this college, but we did not discuss my educational goals 3= No, I did not meet with an advisor by the end of my first four weeks at this college 4= No, I have discussed educational goals with an advisor, but it did not happen by the end of my first four weeks at this college 5= I do not recall

COLLQ150 By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, I had completed an initial assessment test to determine which reading, writing, and math courses I should enroll in.

1= Yes 2= No 3= I do not recall

COLLQ151 By the end of my FIRST FOUR WEEKS at this college, my instructors had used teaching techniques that encouraged me to become actively involved in the classroom.

1= Very often 2= Often 3= Sometimes 4= Never 5= I do not recall

COLLQ152 How satisfied were you with the quality of your college's orientation course or program for new students?

1= Very Satisfied 2= Somewhat Satisfied 3= Not at all Satisfied 4= Have not attended an orientation course or program

COLLQ153 Rate your overall satisfaction with this college's processes for working with new students - including the admissions process, the financial aid office, new student assessment, your first class registration experience, etc.

1= Very Satisfied 2= Somewhat Satisfied 3= Somewhat Dissatisfied 4= Very Dissatisfied

Page 269: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Institution-Level Supplemental Questions Codebook

The data dictionary for your institution-level supplemental questions follows. The codebook includes exact items used as supplemental questions for your institution, variable names associated with supplemental survey items, and response values for each variable.

Page 270: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Texas Gulf Coast Supplemental Questions Codebook

Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

COLLQ189 While attending this college, what has been your best source of academic advising (academic planning, course recommendations, graduation requirements, etc.)? (Choose only one.)

1= Academic advisor (not faculty) 2= Academic advisor (faculty) 3= Friends, family, or other students 4= Online college registration and/or computerized degree advising system 5= I have not received any academic advising

COLLQ190 Most staff members have been friendly in their interactions with me.

1= Strongly disagree 2= Disagree 3= Agree 4= Strongly agree

COLLQ191 When appropriate, faculty effectively incorporate the use of computers and other technology into their teaching.

1= Strongly disagree 2= Disagree 3= Agree 4= Strongly agree

COLLQ192 At this college, assistance is available when I experience problems using computers and other technology.

1= Strongly agree 2= Agree 3= Disagree 4= Strongly disagree

COLLQ193 Where are you most likely to access a computer with an Internet connection to do your school work?

1= Home 2= Campus computer lab 3= Campus Library 4= Other facilities on campus 5= Work/Office

COLLQ194 On average, how often do you use the library during a term?

1= Never 2= Once a month or less 3= Once a week 4= Several times a week 5= Daily

COLLQ195 During the current academic year, about how often have you used library resources (including on-line databases and materials) to complete a course assignment?

1= Very often 2= Often 3= Sometimes 4= Never

COLLQ196 Do you use the library's electronic resources more than the print collections?

1= No 2= Yes

COLLQ197 To what extent has your experience with the library staff and resources helped you to acquire the knowledge and skills necessary to search for information?

1= Very much 2= Some 3= Very Little 4= Not at all

COLLQ198 Members of the library staff are always courteous and helpful.

1= Strongly agree 2= Agree 3= Disagree 4= Strongly disagree

Page 271: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Texas Gulf Coast Supplemental Questions Codebook

Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

COLLQ199 The college provides comfortable space or facilities where I can meet and interact with my fellow students.

1= Very much so 2= For the most part 3= Somewhat 4= Only slightly 5= Not at all

COLLQ200 The college provides many opportunities for interdisciplinary learning.

1= Strongly disagree 2= Disagree 3= Agree 4= Strongly agree

COLLQ201 The environment here is one in which students are encouraged to develop an active, healthy lifestyle.

1= Strongly disagree 2= Disagree 3= Agree 4= Strongly agree

COLLQ202 To what extent are you meeting your educational objectives as a result of your enrollment at this college?

1= Definitely meeting my objectives 2= Partially meeting my objectives 3= Not meeting my objectives 4= Too early to tell

COLLQ203 Which of the following factors, if any, poses the biggest obstacle to your academic progress?

1= Money, work obligations, finances 2= Family obligations 3= Difficulties getting the courses you need 4= Lack of good academic advising 5= Lack of personal motivation

Page 272: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

1See Benchmark Overview for a detailed description of the five CCSSE benchmarks.

2007 Institutional Report: Using CCSSE Results Page 1 of 7

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

2007 Institutional Report Using CCSSE Results

Approaching Your CCSSE Results

Introduction

Each member college’s results should be considered in terms of its own

mission, institutional focus, and student characteristics. However, CCSSE has

developed a set of recommendations regarding the analysis and interpretation of your results

based on feedback from member institutions, conference and workshop presentations, and experts in the field.

The “Big Picture”

CCSSE recommends asking general questions first and using Institutional Report tables to help answer such questions. General questions might include

What data confirm facts you already knew? What results had you not expected? Is your sample representative of your entire population of students?

Tables from the report that assist with this general review include

Table 1: Respondents to Underlying Populations Comparisons — This one-page table details respondent characteristics from your college compared to population data for 1) your college, 2) similarly-sized 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges, and 3) the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. The specific characteristics examined include gender, race/ethnicity, age, and enrollment status.

First Look — These reports highlight those items where your college falls notably above or below the mean of your comparison group broken out by all students and enrollment status (part- and full-time).

Frequency Report: All Students — This report provides item-by-item percentage responses for all students at your institution. In addition, it displays asterisks for those items that are significantly different, when applicable, from your comparison group.

Benchmark Reports — Benchmarks are groups of conceptually related survey items that address key areas of student engagement. CCSSE’s five benchmarks denote areas that educational research has shown to be important in quality educational practice.1 The benchmarks are used to compare your institution’s performance to that of similar institutions and with the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Data are presented in both tabular and graph form.

Digging Deeper

CCSSE also recommends taking the time to examine your results in greater detail, especially the items that comprise the five CCSSE benchmarks. Review of individual survey items can shed light on specific aspects of your institution’s efforts that are not detailed in the “big picture” reports mentioned previously. Both the Means Summary and Frequency Distribution tables assist with such efforts.

Means Summary — These reports provide item-by-item means for students at your institution contrasted with a comparison group and the CCSSE Cohort. Other useful statistics found in these reports include 1) significance, 2) effect size, 3) standard deviation, and 4) standard error of the mean. The actual magnitude of some item score differences may seem trivial, even though they are highly reliable and statistically significant; hence, the presentation of the effect size indicator and other statistics which aid in the interpretation of the magnitude of the differences on any given item.

Page 273: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Institutional Report: Using CCSSE Results Page 2 of 7

Frequency Distributions — This report summarizes the observed frequencies of occurrence (counts and percentages) of the values for each item on the survey. Such statistics are useful for easily locating the highest and lowest scores as well as understanding how the data are distributed across response categories.

Reaching for Excellence

Standardized reports are an easy way to assess whether an individual college is performing above or below the mean as well as allowing for comparisons across similar colleges. While such reports are quite useful, they should only serve as a starting point. Better educational outcomes are the result of using data wisely and being relentless about putting it in front of faculty and staff – and using the data to focus effort and promote positive change. Given such requirements, CCSSE also provides the following tips for examining and interpreting your data.

Tip #1: Compare your college to high-performing collegesCCSSE provides a Benchmark Deciles Report for each institution, which provides an indication of your college’s performance relative to the highest-performing colleges. Your college may aspire, for example, to attain performance on one or more benchmarks that is equivalent to the performances of the top ten percent of community colleges nationally. The decile report lets you know where you stand in relation to that aspiration. Deciles are percentiles that divide the frequency of benchmark scores into 10 equal groups.

Deciles are listed for the 2007 CCSSE Cohort of colleges and for each appropriate breakdown according to size and urbanicity. To help gauge a college’s performance relative to the comparison groups, the shaded area on the tables indicates the deciles that are less than or equal to your benchmark scores.

The definition of “high-performing” certainly may vary, but CCSSE typically classifies high performers as those institutions scoring at or above the 80th percentile on at least three benchmarks.

In addition, CCSSE encourages colleges to review the work of MetLife Foundation Best-Practice Colleges. Selection of these award-winning colleges is based on the institutions’ performances on a retention index

reflecting results on three CCSSE benchmarks that are related to student retention.

Brief descriptions of the award winners are located on CCSSE’s Web site: http://www.ccsse.org/retention/bestpractices.cfm.

Tip #2: Measure your college’s performance in terms of your least-engaged student groupIn certain cases, colleges may know which group on campus is least engaged, while in others, further analysis of the data helps yield that information. In each scenario, filtering and calculations using your raw data file will be necessary.

CCSSE has developed classifications for the following groups of students that are typically of interest in community college efforts to improve student outcomes:

1) First generation students: those who are the first in their immediate families to attend college

2) Developmental students: those who have taken or plan to take developmental courses while attending college

3) High-risk students: those with multiple risk factors such as being single parents, having to care for dependents, attending college part-time, etc.

You may also wish to explore levels of engagement of minority student groups, returning female students, or other groups.

Please contact CCSSE for information regarding the survey items used in creating these groups.

Once you have identified your least-engaged group, CCSSE recommends that you run comparisons between this group and the remainder of your college population, as well as comparing the results for the least-engaged group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort.

Tip #3: Gauge work in areas most strongly valuedCCSSE always recommends examining your results in light of your institution’s vision, mission, and/or strategic objectives. Before reviewing your data, you may want to identify key issues by answering questions like these:

What are the high-priority objectives in your college’s strategic plan? What benchmarks, trends, or services are most important to your college? Examples might include particular benchmarks (academic challenge, student-faculty interaction, etc.); critical issues,

Page 274: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Institutional Report: Using CCSSE Results Page 3 of 7

such as retention; and services that are key to student success, such as academic advising or college orientation. What educational practices most concern your college? How do your mission and specific programs at your college relate to the CCSSE benchmarks and survey items? What new programs are being developed at your college?

For example, if your college scored low on student-faculty interaction, a high priority on your campus, then ascertain the specific survey items of that benchmark that require attention; or, if your college scored high on all benchmarks, focus on ways to continue strengthening these areas.

Tip #4: Compare where you are now with where you want to beAnother useful way to examine your institution’s results is to perform a gap analysis looking at where you are now versus where you want to be. Questions to consider include

What issues have been identified for your college through self-study for reaffirmation of accreditation — or recommendations from the visiting team? What strengths or opportunities for improvement in your college have been identified through other data-gathering or institutional research efforts? Are there emerging trends that fit with your college’s strengths? Are there emerging trends that amplify areas where your college needs improvement?

Once questions such as these have been addressed, utilizing your CCSSE results in conjunction with other institutionally-relevant data, a set of strategic goals can be established and then pursued at your college. CCSSE in Action: Communicating about and Using your Results

High levels of student engagement are the product of an institution-wide commitment, not discrete initiatives. In other words, quality education is not an event — it’s a culture. CCSSE is committed to helping you build that culture at your college, and we provide a Communications Toolkit as a key resource for those efforts.

The 7-step plan below can be tailored and implemented to help you share your college’s results and launch a dialogue with key internal and external constituencies. CCSSE’s Web site (www.ccsse.org) also offers various resources, including an online search engine, references, and other tools to help you communicate about your results.

Step 1:Identify your internal and external audiences. Internal constituencies may include governing board members, administrators, faculty, staff, and students. External audiences might include the media, policymakers, business leaders, K-12 educators, and community-based organizations. What do you want them to know about the survey and your results? What questions will they have? What do you want them to do with the information?

Step 2:Set parameters — for yourself and your various audiences — that establish what data will and won’t be used for. For example, you may choose to use results to design faculty development opportunities, noting that they are inappropriate for use in evaluation of individual faculty members. You may want to use data immediately with external audiences, or you may choose to focus internally at first and then, at a later date, demonstrate data-driven changes to external constituents.

Step 3:Develop storylines that relate to issues relevant to your college and geographic area. Ask yourself, “What are the stories our students are telling us through this survey? What do these stories say about the educational experience we are providing?” Examples of potential storylines are included in the “Communication Tools” located at http://www.ccsse.org/members/communications.cfm.

Step 4:Engage your audiences, particularly your internal audiences, in ways that encourage them to move forward. Create forums that help people understand what the data mean so they can use the information to develop improvement strategies.

Step 5:Work within your college’s culture. For example, some colleges may want to organize conversations by department; others will benefit more from interdisciplinary and cross-functional discussions.

Page 275: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Institutional Report: Using CCSSE Results Page 4 of 7

Some will find it natural to incorporate improvement initiatives into their annual planning process, and some will want to convene an annual convocation or launch a special initiative on student engagement.

Step 6:Listen to your various audiences. The best ideas often come from unexpected places. By all means, report back to the college community on action taken in response to survey results — and the ideas generated in discussions about the survey. And don’t forget students. The survey emphasizes that they have a role to play in their own learning, and these are their observations on their educational experiences. Meet with student government and encourage student-faculty discussions. Consider using selected CCSSE items in new venues, such as incorporating them into students’ evaluations of courses and faculty. The CCSSE Course Feedback Form is an instrument that could be used in this manner: http://www.ccsse.org/publications/toolkit.cfm.

Step 7:Don’t shy away from the data. Information, whether positive or negative, can help improve educational practice and performance. Use it to dispel myths, showcase your college’s best practices, and set the bar higher for the future.

CCSSE’s Web site, www.ccsse.org, is aimed at promoting public understanding of the work of community colleges, supporting institutional improvement, and advancing public discussion about new ways of defining and examining quality in higher education.

The Web site is a primary vehicle for putting survey results in context. Special features for CCSSE member colleges include a CCSSE Toolkit (http://www.ccsse.org/members/communications.cfm) that contains resources to help colleges understand their survey results, communicate them to various audiences, and use them to target institutional improvement initiatives. The “Communications” section of the Toolkit contains the following documents:

Drop-In Overview TemplateCCSSE suggests that you complete the Drop-in Overview template and then circulate a copy of it to key constituency groups. Once it is completed, it can be used to conduct guided conversations or

focus groups to promote a better understanding of your institution’s survey findings and their potential implications for improvement initiatives.

Developing Storylines to Communicate ResultsThese sample storylines use hypothetical situations with hypothetical data to provide ideas for stories that can be told using CCSSE results. This isn’t about spin. CCSSE’s purpose is to be straightforward about data, both when the results make us shine and when they cause us to question — and improve — our current practices. These storylines are intended to inform, engage, and highlight important issues. Similar stories, geared to your college, your community, and your survey results, might be used with internal college groups, governing board members, community groups, and other audiences.

PowerPoint Presentation TemplateUse this PowerPoint template as a starting point for custom presentations to both internal and external audiences.

Sample News ReleaseCustomize this sample press release to highlight your college’s CCSSE results.

Sample News Release for College NewspaperUse this sample news release for your college newspaper to introduce the CCSR to your students - what it is, what it measures, and what it can do.

Sample Fact SheetCustomize this sample fact sheet to highlight your college’s CCSSE results.

Sample Letters to the EditorThese sample letters to the editor provide background on key issues. Customize them with your specific CCSSE results and tie them to events in your area.

Tips for Working with the MediaUse these tips so you can be better prepared to talk with the media about your CCSSE results and other aspects of college quality and performance.

Page 276: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Institutional Report: Using CCSSE Results Page � of 7

The “Using CCSSE” section of the Toolkit contains the following documents:

Tips on Gaining Support for Using CCSSECCSSE will be most valuable to the colleges if there are college-wide communication efforts both prior to survey administration and after results are returned. Dialogue with faculty, staff, and administrators about the purpose of the survey and its connection to college issues and priorities, and sharing information about how results can advance college goals, will engage college faculty and staff who can make positive change.

Tips for Engaging Faculty to Strengthen Student Success

This guide offers tips to help faculty understand CCSSE as a valuable tool for strengthening student success, tips on ways faculty can engage in using CCSSE results, and examples of how other colleges have elicited faculty participation with their CCSSE results.

Faculty PredictionsUse this document to jump-start discussions with faculty and staff. Start the session by asking participants to provide the answers they predict (or hope) students provided. Then have the full group go through the items and provide the actual student responses from your Institutional Report. Discuss whether and why faculty predictions differ from actual student responses.

Student Services Staff PredictionsUse this document to jump-start discussions with student services staff. Start the session by asking participants to provide the answers they predict (or hope) students provided. Then have the full group go through the items and provide the actual student responses from your Institutional Report. Discuss whether and why student services staff predictions differ from actual student responses.

Use these toolkit items to help you communicate and use your college’s results and launch a dialogue with key internal and external constituencies. All the tools can be customized for your college.

Additional CCSSE Web Site Resources

The CCSSE Accreditation Toolkits Because all regional accreditation associations require evidence of student learning and of efforts to improve student outcomes, CCSSE results could be

appropriately used in institutional self-studies. This information is particularly powerful if CCSSE results are corroborated by other institutional data such as results from other national or local surveys, review of institutional records, or student focus groups. The CCSSE Accreditation Toolkits are individually tailored for each of the six regional higher education accrediting bodies. Each toolkit includes

a model regional accreditation timeline and advice about including CCSSE administrations in that timeline a section that aligns the CCSSE items to your accrediting body’s standards and criteria examples of how colleges in your accrediting region have used CCSSE results for their review purposes

The CCSSE Course Feedback Form The CCSSE Course Feedback Form — an end-of-course evaluation instrument for course-level and program-level assessment — was developed with the assistance of an advisory panel of administrators, counselors, and faculty members from six CCSSE member colleges. The instrument is based on student engagement items from the CCSSE survey and additional course feedback items submitted and reviewed by our advisory panel members. The CCSSE Course Feedback Form is provided free of charge and is intended for local administration and data analysis.

The CCSSE Classroom Observation Form The CCSSE Classroom Observation Form was designed as a professional development tool to be used by deans, department heads, mentor faculty, and peer faculty. The instrument includes standard classroom review items, but keeps student engagement as its primary area of focus. The CCSSE Classroom Observation Form is provided free of charge and is intended for local data collection and analysis, in accord with the college’s policies.

The Student Focus Group Toolkit Your CCSSE data provide a great deal of information to help you identify strengths and areas in need of improvement at your college. Generally, the data will point you to specific areas where you’ll want to focus your attention. Before you begin to consider improvement strategies, you may want to learn more about student experiences in those areas pinpointed through the CCSSE survey. CCSSE encourages you to hold focus groups to gather this information. These structured discussions will help you better understand

Page 277: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Institutional Report: Using CCSSE Results Page � of 7

students’ experiences, as well as uncover possible strategies to consider for improvement. They will provide qualitative information to enhance your CCSSE data. The Student Focus Group Toolkit contains instructions for planning focus groups and recruiting focus group participants, discussion tools to use during the focus groups, and a focus group summary report sample.

The Web site also features a comprehensive search-the-data section — for example, the user can generate a report showing CCSSE results for all large, urban colleges; for all small, rural colleges; or for the participating colleges in a particular state or accrediting region. Results are presented in drill-down charts that display information in easy-to-manage steps. Users first see a graph that shows general results; then, they can click on various parts of the graph to get the details behind the numbers at http://www.ccsse.org/members/search/.

We intend to regularly update the CCSSE Web site with other examples about how community colleges are using their CCSSE data as we learn about them. In that regard, please keep us informed about how you are using, or plan to use, your CCSSE results by contacting CCSSE at [email protected] or at �12-471-�807.

CCSSE in Action: CCSSE Member Colleges Communicate about their Results

Paradise Valley Community College (Arizona)Paradise Valley Community College (PVCC) held a series of workshops to provide an overview of CCSSE survey data and lay out an action plan and timeline. The action plan called on each division or department to share CCSSE findings with faculty and staff, identify data-driven strategies for improving teaching and learning, and document ways in which faculty and staff implemented the pilot strategies. A series of e-briefings related to CCSSE shared promising practices from other colleges and relevant research. For example, “A Dozen Easy-to-Implement CCSSE Plans for Faculty” included suggestions such as scheduling appointments with students and requiring internship experiences. PVCC also created the Student Engagement-CCSSE Awards, through which faculty members who submitted CCSSE action plans could win stipends to purchase resources for teaching and learning.

Illinois Central College (IL) When Illinois Central College (ICC) received its CCSSE results, the college gathered faculty members and staff to review them. Participants broke into small groups and discussed four questions regarding the college’s results: Do the data reflect your experience at ICC? Do the data mean something for you in your role? Is average where we want to be as a college? If not, how can we attempt to improve the results in the future? Each group focused on one benchmark. Participants then shared responses and suggestions for improvement.

North Hennepin Community College (MN)To engage faculty members in reviewing CCSSE results, North Hennepin Community College gathered faculty members and asked them to predict students’ responses to the survey items. Instead of doing this exercise on paper, the college used personal response system “clickers” and got immediate feedback after posing each question. The actual student data then were displayed for discussion. After getting this feedback, the faculty members were randomly divided into groups and assigned one CCSSE benchmark. Each group identified two priorities for change related to their benchmark. These priorities now are part of the college’s assessment plan initiatives.

CCSSE in Action: CCSSE Member Colleges Use their Results

Cedar Valley College (TX)After its first CCSSE administration, Cedar Valley College (CVC) set a goal of making tutoring available to more students. The first objective was to provide tutoring to every CVC student who needed it, a change from the earlier practice of providing tutoring only to students who met particular guidelines. CVC created a tutoring center located in the middle of its campus to provide tutoring in all disciplines, for all students. The president committed funds to the center, and the college hired a director, employed additional tutors, and trained tutors extensively. The new tutoring center established relationships with faculty members, who broadly advertised its services. When CVC completed its second CCSSE administration, the college scored significantly higher than other colleges in the frequency of use of tutoring services. CVC also learned that students ranked tutoring as one of the three services with which they were most satisfied.

Page 278: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Institutional Report: Using CCSSE Results Page 7 of 7

Greenfield Community College (MA)Greenfield Community College has implemented significant changes in student services as a result of using CCSSE. Despite receiving high scores on all benchmarks, the college fell below the national average in contributing to students’ knowledge, skills, and personal development in the areas of identifying clearer career goals and gaining information about career opportunities. Furthermore, despite average scores in satisfaction with career counseling services, the center was clearly underutilized. As a result, the Career Center implemented an outreach initiative to educate faculty, staff and students about career counseling services and their impact on student persistence. The Career Center was also moved to a more visible location on campus, in close proximity to the Academic Advising Center, where several collaborative initiatives are taking place. In addition, a pilot study is underway to examine the impact of career counseling in the advising process to improve retention among liberal arts students.

Miami Dade College (FL)Miami Dade College (MDC) created several new initiatives based on its CCSSE findings. The college developed long-term academic planners that map out students’ courses, term by term, so students can chart their progress toward their goals. In an effort to improve transfer assistance, the college held general and discipline-specific transfer workshops on each campus and launched a campaign to emphasize the advantages of completing an associate degree prior to transferring. MDC also developed a dual degree opportunity with Florida International University (FIU) so students can be dually admitted to the two institutions. Students can complete their associate degrees while making connections with FIU faculty and staff and preparing to transfer to upper division programs.

J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College (VA)At J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College, CCSSE results revealed low levels of engagement with various services, particularly academic and career advising. As a result of those findings, the college developed a new student orientation program. Results from surveys and other data indicate that high percentages of participants either clarified or changed their curriculum as a result of the early advising. In addition, new data suggest that participants were retained at a higher rate than nonparticipants.

Page 279: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

2007 Institutional Report Overview of National 2007 CCFSSE

Cohort Survey Results

Overview of National 2007 CCFSSE Cohort Survey Results Page � of 9

Introduction The Community College Faculty

Survey of Student Engagement (CCFSSE) was piloted in the fall of

2004 and administered for the first time nationally in the spring of 2005 by

the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE). The CCFSSE,

designed as a companion to the Community College Student Report, elicits information from

faculty about their teaching practices, the ways they spend their professional time, both in and out of class,

and their perceptions regarding students’ educational experiences.

The CCFSSE results will not only help member colleges identify areas of strength, but will also enable them to recognize challenges or gaps that may require further consideration. CCSSE member colleges are already using student survey results for internal review, benchmarking, and responding to accrediting agencies. The CCFSSE can be used to strengthen those endeavors and to promote faculty involvement. Furthermore, results from the CCFSSE can be used to target areas of focus for faculty development programs.

The CCFSSE report enables participating institutions to view faculty expectations and perceptions of student engagement alongside student responses. However, it is important to remember that the side-by-side tables, while illustrative, are not entirely equivalent – that is, the CCSSE asks students to report perceptions and experiences across the period of the current academic year. Faculty, in contrast, are asked to describe their practices in a specific selected course, as well as to indicate their perceptions of student experiences in the college more generally.

Nonetheless, the comparisons of student and faculty responses provide a useful prompt for campus discussions, particularly in those areas where students and faculty seem to be reporting divergent perceptions of the same experience.

Beginning this year, CCFSSE will utilize a three-year cohort of 223 participating colleges (2005, 2006, and 2007) in all of its data analyses.� This cohort is referred to as the 2007 CCFSSE Cohort throughout all reports and documentation. This new approach increases the total number of institutions and faculty contributing to the national dataset, which in turn increases the reliability of the overall results.

This overview is divided into two sections and is organized to provide a general understanding of survey administration and of selected findings from the 2007 CCFSSE Cohort. In the first section, we describe how the survey was administered and compare the 2007 CCFSSE Cohort with the national population of two-year colleges.

In the second section, we highlight selected findings from the 2007 CCFSSE Cohort and make some comparisons to 2007 CCSSE Cohort results.

2007 CCFSSE Cohort Institutions and Respondents

All institutions that participated in the 2007 CCSSE survey administration were invited to participate in the CCFSSE. The survey was administered via the Web: faculty members at participating institutions were sent an invitation email and asked to respond to an online survey. All faculty members who taught spring credit courses were invited to participate. The CCFSSE survey was completed by 20,586 faculty members across the 2005, 2006, and 2007 administrations.

Response RatesThe average institutional response rate for the 2007 CCFSSE administration was 35%.2

�For returning participants, the college’s most recent year of CCFSSE participation is included in data analyses. For example, if a college participated in 2006 and 2007, only the 2007 data would be used in the three-year cohort.2The CCFSSE institutional response rate is the number of surveys returned divided by the attempted number of survey invitations sent.

Page 280: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCFSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 2 of 9

Representation of InstitutionsTable � provides information about the representation ofthe 2007 CCFSSE Cohort member colleges as comparedto community and technical colleges across the nation.

Representation of Faculty Respondents

The 2007 CCFSSE Cohort faculty respondents generally mirror the national two-year college faculty population, with the exception of employment status, as illustrated in Table 2.

Gender55% of all respondents to the CCFSSE were female, and 45% of respondents were male. Nationally, women comprise 49% of faculty at two-year institutions.

Race and EthnicityThe 2007 CCFSSE Cohort respondents’ race and ethnicity closely parallel the NCES faculty data for two-year institutions.4

Employment StatusSixty percent of 2007 CCFSSE Cohort respondents identified themselves as full-time faculty members, while 40% indicated that they were employed on a part-time basis. These percentages are quite different from NCES national data, which indicate that only 33% of community college faculty members are employed full-time. Faculty members at participating CCFSSE institutions are sent an email invitation and asked to respond to the survey online. The inverse employment status representation is likely a product of colleges being unable to provide as many valid email addresses for part-time faculty as full-time.

3National population data do not include hospital-based or private institutions.4U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2004 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF:04)

Table 1. Colleges by Size and Urbanicity

2007 CCFSSE Cohort Member Colleges

National Population3

2007 CCFSSECohort Proportionof NationalPopulation

By Size

# of Institutions 223 �,047 2�%

Small (up to 4,499) 99 56� �8%

Medium (4,500-7,999) 52 238 22%

Large (8,000-14,999) 50 �5� 33%Extra-Large (15,000+) 22 97 23%

By Urbanicity

# of Institutions 223 �,059 2�%

Urban-serving 48 �87 26%

Suburban-serving 48 22� 22%

Rural-serving �27 65� 20%

Page 281: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCFSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 3 of 9

52004 NCES data do not include the category “Native Hawaiian.”

Academic Rank

Table 3 illustrates the percentage of all faculty respondents by academic rank as compared to national data. As shown, CCFSSE respondents report much higher percentages—42% altogether—of professor, associate professor, and assistant professor ranks than those reported in national findings (19%), while the national data show 3�% of all two-year faculty hold some “other” rank than those listed, much higher than the 6% reported by CCFSSE respondents.

There are also significant differences in the responses of part-time and full-time faculty. Seventy-seven percent of part-time respondents hold the rank of instructor or lecturer, as opposed to 38% of full-time faculty, and only �4% of part-time participants hold any rank of professor—assistant, associate, or full—while 60% of full-time faculty have these titles.

Table 2. Respondents versus National Population

2007 CCFSSE Cohort

National Population

Gender

Male 45% 5�%

Female 55% 49%

Race/EthnicityAmerican Indian or other Native American �% <�%

Asian, Asian American or Pacific Islander 3% 3%

Native Hawaiian <�% -5

Black or African American, Non-Hispanic 6% 7%

White, Non-Hispanic 82% 83%Hispanic, Latino, Spanish 6% 5%

Other 3% 2%

Employment StatusFull-time 60% 33%

Part-time 40% 67%

Table 3. Academic Rank

2007 CCFSSE Cohort

National Population

Professor 2�% �0%

Associate Professor ��% 5%

Assistant Professor �0% 4%

Instructor or Lecturer 53% 50%

Other 6% 3�%

Page 282: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCFSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 4 of 9

Selected Findings This section of the overview features selected findings from the 2007 CCFSSE Cohort.

Class Size as Compared to College Size The largest percentage of faculty at large and extra-large colleges reported that between 20 and 29 students were enrolled in their classes; at small colleges, 29% of faculty report teaching classes this size, and 35% of medium sized college faculty reported teaching classes this size.

How Faculty Spend Their Time: Professional Activities

Table 5 highlights the teaching-related and other professional activities on which full- and part-time faculty reported spending their time in a typical 7-day week.6 As expected, full-time faculty reported spending more hours teaching students than their part-time counterparts. Interestingly, though, roughly equal percentages of both groups spent � and �2 hours a week on the remaining teaching-related activities.

6Percentages will not total to �00 in all cases because data from the “None” category has been excluded.

Forty-one percent of small college faculty teach classes that are �0-�9 students in size, but a substantial percentage of faculty from the other sized colleges reported these class enrollments as well. Interestingly, all faculty who responded to the survey reported teaching quite low percentages of large classes, which include those over 39 students.

Table 4. Class Sizes across Colleges by Size

Class Size<10 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-69 70>

College Size

Extra-Large (15,000+) 5% 34% 4�% �4% 4% �%

Large (8,000-14,999) 9% 37% 38% ��% 3% �%

Medium (4,500-7,999)�2% 38% 35% ��% 3% �%

Small (up to 4,499) �8% 4�% 29% 7% 3% �%

However, a significantly larger percentage of full-time faculty spent between � and �2 hours on other professional activities such as advising students, working with students on activities other than coursework, and conducting service activities.

Page 283: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCFSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 5 of 9

Table 5. Hours Spent on Selected Activities during 7-day Week

Part-time Full-time

Teaching-related activities 1 to 12 13-20 21+ 1 to 12 13-20 21+

Teaching students in class86% �0% 4% 32% 52% �6%

Grading papers92% 4% �% 84% �2% 4%

Giving other forms of written and oral feedback to students

94% 2% �% 9�% 6% 2%

Preparing for class93% 6% �% 85% �3% 3%

Reflecting and working on ways to improve my teaching

94% 3% �% 92% 5% 2%

Other professional activities

Research and scholarly activities

70% 5% 2% 77% 4% �%

Working with honors projects9% <�% <�% �6% �% <�%

Advising students59% �% �% 84% 3% 2%

Supervising internships or other field experiences

�0% �% �% 25% 3% �%

Working with students on activities other than course work (committees, organizations, student life activities, orientation, intramurals, etc.)

�7% �% <�% 50% 2% �%

Other interactions with students outside the classroom

48% �% �% 76% 2% �%

Conducting service activities

�6% �% �% 43% �% �%

Page 284: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCFSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 6 of 9

How Faculty Spend Their Time: Class Time

Question #�6 asks faculty to report the percentage of class time spent on activities such as lecture, student computer use, and in-class writing. Almost a third of faculty respondents revealed spending 50-�00% of their class time lecturing.

On the other hand, over 90% of respondents reported spending less than 20% of their class time on in-class writing. Similarly, 50% of faculty conveyed spending no class time on student computer use, and over half of respondents reported devoting less than �0% of their class time to small group activities.

Table 6. Percent of Class Time Spent on Various Activities (All Faculty)

0% 1-9%10-19%

20-29%

30-39%

40-49% 50-74%

75-100%

Lecture 2% �3% �5% �3% �2% �4% 22% 9%

Teacher-led discussion 4% 23% 25% �9% ��% 8% 8% 3%

Teacher-student shared responsibility 25% 27% �9% �2% 6% 5% 5% 2%

Student computer use

50% 23% 9% 5% 3% 3% 4% 4%

Small group activities 2�% 32% 2�% �2% 6% 4% 4% �%

Student presentations

40% 36% �3% 5% 3% 2% 2% �%

In-class writing 50% 30% �0% 4% 2% �% �% �%

Testing and evaluation

5% 46% 3�% �0% 4% 2% 2% �%

Performances in applied and fine arts

9�% 4% �% �% �% <�% �% �%

Experiential 65% �2% 6% 5% 3% 3% 4% 2%

Hands-on practice 27% �9% �5% �0% 6% 6% 9% 8%

Page 285: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCFSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 7 of 9

The percentage of class time spent on various activities fluctuates quite a bit depending upon the number of years faculty members have taught, as shown in Table 7. Instructors in their first year of teaching most closely parallel instructors who have been in the profession 30-39 years in terms of how much time is devoted to varying classroom activities. However, those who have been teaching �-4 years more closely parallel those who have been teaching 5-9 years in many instructional categories.

Teachers who have taught �0-�9 years were more likely to spend their class time on teacher-led discussion and small group activities than were teachers in any other category. In fact, over a third of the teachers in this category reported that they devote a minimum of 75% of their class time to small group activities; similarly, over a quarter of the instructors in this category report devoting at least half of their class time to in-class writing.

Table 7. Percentage of Class Time Spent on Various Activities Based on Number of Years Teaching (All Faculty)

Number of years teaching

First year 1-4 5-9 10-19 20-29 30-39Lecture

30-39% 5% �9% 23% 30% �5% 6%40-49% 5% 20% 25% 28% �5% 7%50-74% 6% 20% 24% 27% �5% 7%75-�00% 6% 20% 22% 25% �5% 9%Teacher-led discussion

30-39% 5% 2�% 24% 28% �6% 6%40-49% 5% 20% 24% 28% �5% 7%50-74% 6% 22% 24% 28% �3% 7%75-�00% 6% 25% 24% 23% �2% 7%Student computer use

30-39% 5% �8% 28% 25% �7% 6%40-49% 4% �6% 29% 27% �6% 7%50-74% 5% �7% 27% 3�% �3% 6%75-�00% 6% �8% 29% 26% �5% 6%Small group activities

30-39% 5% 2�% 24% 30% �3% 5%40-49% 6% 22% 26% 26% �4% 6%50-74% 7% 23% 27% 28% �0% 5%75-�00% 8% �6% 22% 35% �2% 7%In-class writing

30-39% 5% �9% 24% 27% �6% 6%40-49% 5% �9% 26% 3�% �0% 8%50-74% 4% 20% 28% 26% �5% 5%75-�00% 2% 29% 24% 27% ��% 6%

Page 286: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCFSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 8 of 9

Faculty Perceptions about Student Engagement

On the CCFSSE survey, faculty members are asked how often students interact with them, in and out of class. Table 8 presents the percentage of faculty who report that students interact with them often or very often; the table also indicates how the 2007 CCSSE Cohort responded to the same items.7

Table 8. Student-Faculty Interactions (Response of “Often” or “Very Often”)

Faculty Responses

StudentResponses

Use e-mail to communicate with you 59% 44%

Discuss grades or assignments with you 7�% 45%

Talk about career plans with you

40% 24%

Discuss ideas from your readings or classes with you outside of class 30% �5%

Receive prompt feedback (written or oral) from you about their performance

93% 56%

As the table highlights, on every item listed, faculty reported higher rates of interaction than students, most notably with respect to receiving prompt feedback (written and oral) and discussing grades or assignments.

Student and Faculty Responses by Benchmark

Figure �, Student and Faculty Responses by Benchmark, highlights side-by-side responses to CCSSE’s five benchmark areas of effective educational practice.8 When student and faculty views are presented side-by-side in this Overview, as they are in Table 8 and Figure �, the student responses include data only from colleges that are members of the 2007 CCFSSE Cohort.

Figure 1. Student and Faculty Responses by Benchmark

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.7

Active andCollaborative

Learning

StudentEffort

AcademicChallenge

Student-Faculty

Interaction

Support forLearners

Faculty Students

7These student responses only include data from colleges that are members of the 2007 CCFSSE Cohort.8For Figure �, data are presented in groupings of CCFSSE items that correspond to comparable CCSSE benchmark composition items (excluding items 6a, 6b, and 6c). Student data is not weighted in this graph as there is not a comparable weighting scheme for faculty. Data are means of items where items were rescaled between 0 and �.

Page 287: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Overview of National 2007 CCFSSE Cohort Survey Results Page 9 of 9

Suggested Steps for Reviewing, Understanding, and Using CCFSSE Results

Examine the gaps between faculty and student responses on items of interest to your institution.

Examine how faculty spend their time as well as what activities they incorporate into class time.

Review and present the findings to faculty with all the caveats noted above.

Engage faculty in discussions about the results and solicit suggestions on how to address any gaps or other issues of concern to faculty.

Provide faculty with information on ways the administration will support faculty recommendations for change.

Page 288: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Cohort

2007CCFSSECohort Page1of5

Community College Surveyof Student Engagement

AikenTechnicalCollege Graniteville SC 2006AlvinCommunityCollege Alvin TX 2007

AmericanRiverCollege Sacramento CA 2007AngelinaCollege Lufkin TX 2007

Anoka-RamseyCommunityCollege CoonRapids MN 2006Asheville-BuncombeTechnicalCommunity

College Asheville NC 2007Asnuntuck Community College Enfield CT 2006

AustinCommunityCollege Austin TX 2007BigSandyCommunityandTechnicalCollege Prestonsburg KY 2007BismarckStateCollege Bismarck ND 2007BossierParishCommunityCollege BossierCity LA 2007BrazosportCollege LakeJackson TX 2007BrevardCommunityCollege Cocoa FL 2007BrookhavenCollege FarmersBranch TX 2006BunkerHillCommunityCollege Boston MA 2007BurlingtonCountyCollege Pemberton NJ 2007ButlerCountyCommunityCollege(KS) ElDorado KS 2006ButlerCountyCommunityCollege(PA) Butler PA 2006CaldwellCommunityCollegeandTechnicalInstitute Hudson NC 2007CapeCodCommunityCollege WestBarnstable MA 2007CapitalCommunityCollege Hartford CT 2006CarrollCommunityCollege Westminster MD 2006CarteretCommunityCollege MoreheadCity NC 2006CasperCollege Casper WY 2007CentralArizonaCollege Coolidge AZ 2006CentralCommunityCollege GrandIsland NE 2007CentralFloridaCommunityCollege Ocala FL 2007CentralLakesCollege Brainerd MN 2006CentralMaineCommunityCollege Auburn ME 2007CentralWyomingCollege Riverton WY 2007CenturyCollege WhiteBearLake MN 2007Chandler-GilbertCommunityCollege Chandler AZ 2007ChattanoogaStateTechnicalCommunityCollege Chattanooga TN 2007ChipolaCollege Marianna FL 2007CityCollegeofSanFrancisco SanFrancisco CA 2007ClevelandStateCommunityCollege Cleveland TN 2007CoastalCarolinaCommunityCollege Jacksonville NC 2007CoastalGeorgiaCommunityCollege Brunswick GA 2005CollegeofAlameda Alameda CA 2007CollegeofLakeCounty Grayslake IL 2007CollegeoftheMainland TexasCity TX 2006CollegeoftheMarshallIslands Majuro MH 2007CollegeoftheSiskiyous Weed CA 2006

Year of most recent CCFSSE

Institution City State participation

Page 289: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCFSSECohort Page2of5

Year of most recent CCFSSE Institution City State participation

ColoradoMountainCollege GlenwoodSpringsCO 2007ColumbiaStateCommunityCollege Columbia TN 2006CommunityCollegeofAlleghenyCounty Pittsburgh PA 2007CommunityCollegeofDenver Denver CO 2005CommunityCollegeofSouthernNevada LasVegas NV 2006CumberlandCountyCollege Vineland NJ 2007CyFairCollege Cypress TX 2007DanvilleCommunityCollege Danville VA 2007DaytonaBeachCommunityCollege DaytonaBeach FL 2007DeAnzaCollege Cupertino CA 2007DelMarCollege CorpusChristi TX 2007DelgadoCommunityCollege NewOrleans LA 2007DeltaCollege UniversityCenter MI 2007DurhamTechnicalCommunityCollege Durham NC 2005EasternWyomingCollege Torrington WY 2007Eastfield College Mesquite TX 2007EdisonCollege FortMyers FL 2007ElCentroCollege Dallas TX 2007ElPasoCommunityCollege ElPaso TX 2007ElizabethtownCommunity&TechnicalCollege Elizabethtown KY 2007EstrellaMountainCommunityCollege Avondale AZ 2006FairmontStateCommunityandTechnicalCollege Fairmont WV 2005FloridaCommunityCollegeatJacksonville Jacksonville FL 2007GalvestonCollege Galveston TX 2006GatewayCommunityandTechnicalCollege Ft.Mitchell KY 2007GatewayCommunityCollege NewHaven CT 2006GeneseeCommunityCollege Batavia NY 2007GloucesterCountyCollege Sewell NJ 2007GrandRapidsCommunityCollege GrandRapids MI 2005GraysonCountyCollege Denison TX 2006GreenvilleTechnicalCollege Greenville SC 2007GuilfordTechnicalCommunityCollege Jamestown NC 2007GulfCoastCommunityCollege PanamaCity FL 2007HaroldWashingtonCollege Chicago IL 2005HawaiiCommunityCollege Hilo HI 2006HazardCommunityandTechnicalCollege Hazard KY 2006HesstonCollege Hesston KS 2007HousatonicCommunityCollege Bridgeport CT 2006HowardCollege BigSpring TX 2006IllinoisValleyCommunityCollege Oglesby IL 2006IndianRiverCommunityCollege FortPierce FL 2007IsothermalCommunityCollege Spindale NC 2007ItawambaCommunityCollege Fulton MS 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-CentralIndiana Indianapolis IN 2007J.SargeantReynoldsCommunityCollege Richmond VA 2005JacksonCommunityCollege Jackson MI 2006JacksonStateCommunityCollege Jackson TN 2006JamesA.RhodesStateCollege Lima OH 2007JolietJrCollege Joliet IL 2007KankakeeCommunityCollege Kankakee IL 2005KenaiPeninsulaCollege-UAA Soldotna AK 2007KingsboroughCommunityCollege Brooklyn NY 2005KingwoodCollege Houston TX 2007

Page 290: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCFSSECohort Page�of5

Year of most recent CCFSSE Institution City State participation

KirkwoodCommunityCollege CedarRapids IA 2007KirtlandCommunityCollege Roscommon MI 2007KodiakCollege,UniversityofAlaskaAnchorage Kodiak AK 2007LaGuardiaCommunityCollege LongIslandCity NY 2005LakeCityCommunityCollege LakeCity FL 2007LakeRegionStateCollege DevilsLake ND 2007LakeSuperiorCollege Duluth MN 2007LamarInstituteofTechnology Beaumont TX 2006LamarStateCollege-Orange Orange TX 2007LaneyCollege Oakland CA 2007LaramieCountyCommunityCollege Cheyenne WY 2007LeeCollege Baytown TX 2007LorainCountyCommunityCollege Elyria OH 2006LouisburgCollege Louisburg NC 2006ManateeCommunityCollege Bradenton FL 2007ManchesterCommunityCollege Manchester CT 2006MassachusettsBayCommunityCollege WellesleyHills MA 2007MassasoitCommunityCollege Brockton MA 2007McHenryCountyCollege CrystalLake IL 2007MercedCollege Merced CA 2007MiamiDadeCollege Miami FL 2007MidMichiganCommunityCollege Harrison MI 2007MiddleGeorgiaCollege Cochran GA 2007MiddlesexCommunityCollege Lowell MA 2007MidlandsTechnicalCollege Columbia SC 2007MinotStateUniversity-Bottineau Bottineau ND 2007MontanaStateUniversityBillings Billings MT 2007MontgomeryCollege Conroe TX 2007MontgomeryCountyCommunityCollege BlueBell PA 2007Mt.SanAntonioCollege Walnut CA 2007NaugatuckValleyCommunityCollege Waterbury CT 2006NewMexicoJuniorCollege Hobbs NM 2007NewMexicoMilitaryInstitute Roswell NM 2006NewRiverCommunityandTechnicalCollege Beckley WV 2005NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Manchester Manchester NH 2006NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Stratham Stratham NH 2006North Central State College Mansfield OH 2006NorthDakotaStateCollegeofScience Wahpeton ND 2007NorthHarrisCollege Houston TX 2007NorthLakeCollege Irving TX 2006NortheastIowaCommunityCollege Calmar IA 2006NortheastLakeviewCollege SanAntonio TX 2007NortheastMississippiCommunityCollege Booneville MS 2007NortheastStateTechnicalCommunityCollege Blountville TN 2006NortheastTexasCommunityCollege MtPleasant TX 2007Northern Maine Community College Presque Isle ME 2007NorthernOklahomaCollege Tonkawa OK 2006NorthwestCollege Powell WY 2007NorthwestIndianCollege Bellingham WA 2005NorthwestVistaCollege SanAntonio TX 2007OuachitaTechnicalCollege Malvern AR 2007OwensboroCommunityandTechnicalCollege Owensboro KY 2007PaloAltoCollege SanAntonio TX 2007

Page 291: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCFSSECohort Page�of5

Year of most recent CCFSSE Institution City State participation

PasadenaCityCollege Pasadena CA 2007Pasco-HernandoCommunityCollege NewPortRichey FL 2007PaulD.CampCommunityCollege Franklin VA 2005PellissippiStateTechnicalCommunityCollege Knoxville TN 2006PensacolaJuniorCollege Pensacola FL 2007PhoenixCollege Phoenix AZ 2006PiedmontVirginiaCommunityCollege Charlottesville VA 2005PittCommunityCollege Winterville NC 2006PolkCommunityCollege WinterHaven FL 2007PrinceWilliamSoundCommunityCollege Valdez AK 2007PuebloCommunityCollege Pueblo CO 2007ReadingAreaCommunityCollege Reading PA 2007RedlandsCommunityCollege ElReno OK 2007RichlandCollege Dallas TX 2006Rowan-CabarrusCommunityCollege Salisbury NC 2006SalemCommunityCollege CarneysPoint NJ 2007SalishKootenaiCollege Pablo MT 2007SanAntonioCollege SanAntonio TX 2005SanDiegoMesaCollege SanDiego CA 2007SanJacintoCollege-CentralCampus Pasadena TX 2007SanJacintoCollege-NorthCampus Pasadena TX 2007SanJacintoCollege-SouthCampus Pasadena TX 2007SantaAnaCollege SantaAna CA 2007SantaFeCommunityCollege(FL) Gainesville FL 2007SantaFeCommunityCollege(NM) SantaFe NM 2007SchoolcraftCollege Livonia MI 2007SeminoleCommunityCollege Sanford FL 2007SheltonStateCommunityCollege Tuscaloosa AL 2007SheridanCollege Sheridan WY 2007SinclairCommunityCollege Dayton OH 2007SouthFloridaCommunityCollege AvonPark FL 2007SouthMountainCommunityCollege Phoenix AZ 2007SouthTexasCollege McAllen TX 2007SoutheastKentuckyCommunity&TechnicalCollege Cumberland KY 2006SoutheasternCommunityCollege(IA) WestBurlington IA 2007SouthernMaineCommunityCollege SouthPortland ME 2006SouthwestTennesseeCommunityCollege Memphis TN 2007SouthwestTexasJuniorCollege Uvalde TX 2006SouthwesternIllinoisCollege Belleville IL 2005SouthwesternOregonCommunityCollege CoosBay OR 2007SpoonRiverCollege Canton Il 2007St.PetersburgCollege St.Petersburg FL 2007St.Philip’sCollege SanAntonio TX 2007TaftCollege Taft CA 2007TallahasseeCommunityCollege Tallahassee FL 2007TananaValleyCampus,UniversityofAlaskaFairbanks Fairbanks AK 2007TechnicalCollegeoftheLowcountry Beaufort SC 2007TheCommunityCollegeofBaltimoreCounty Baltimore MD 2006TheVictoriaCollege Victoria TX 2006ThreeRiversCommunityCollege Norwich CT 2006TomballCollege Tomball TX 2007TrinityValleyCommunityCollege Athens TX 2007TruckeeMeadowsCommunityCollege Reno NV 2005

Page 292: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCFSSECohort Page5of5

Year of most recent CCFSSE Institution City State participation

UniversityofAlaskaMatanuskaSusitnaCollege Palmer AK 2007UniversityofAlaskaSoutheastKetchikancampus Juneau AK 2007UniversityofArkansasCommunityCollegeatBatesville Batesville AR 2007UniversityofCincinnatiClermontCollege Batavia OH 2006UniversityofNewMexico-Gallup Gallup NM 2006UniversityofNewMexico-TaosBranch Taos NM 2006ValenciaCommunityCollege Orlando FL 2007VictorValleyCollege Victorville CA 2007VincennesUniversity Vincennes IN 2007WaltersStateCommunityCollege Morristown TN 2006WarrenCountyCommunityCollege Washington NJ 2005WashingtonStateCommunityCollege Marietta OH 2007WayneCommunityCollege Goldsboro NC 2007WestKentuckyCommunityandTechnicalCollege Paducah KY 2007WestVirginiaStateCommunityandTechnicalCollege Institute WV 2007WesternNebraskaCommunityCollege Scottsbluff NE 2007WesternWyomingCommunityCollege RockSprings WY 2007WhartonCountyJuniorCollege Wharton TX 2007WilburWrightCollege Chicago IL 2007WillistonStateCollege Williston ND 2007YorkTechnicalCollege RockHill SC 2007

Page 293: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions

There are two reports in this section. The first report summarizes the observed frequencies of occurrence (counts and percentages) of the values for generally equivalent items from your institution’s faculty (part-time, full-time, and all faculty) on the Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (CCFSSE), and all student data from your institution’s in-class administration of the Community College Student Report (CCSR). With regard to this report, please note that for the faculty survey, faculty are asked to respond to certain items with regard to one selected course; for other items, faculty are asked to indicate their perceptions of overall student experiences and institutional practices. On the student survey, students are asked about their overall experience at the college, not their experience in a particular class. The second report summarizes the observed frequencies of occurrence (counts and percentages) from your institution’s faculty for all faculty survey items that do not appear on the student survey. Data are presented for part-time, full-time, and all faculty respondents from your institution. For colleges that did not participate in the faculty survey, an example report is provided.

Page 294: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency DistributionsBrazosport College

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentDon't Know 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Never 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Never 14 3%Sometimes 2 25% 0 0% 2 12% Sometimes 142 34%

Often 2 25% 6 67% 8 47% Often 147 36%Very Often 4 50% 3 33% 7 41% Very Often 112 27%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 414 100%Don't Know 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Never 6 75% 4 44% 10 59% Never 167 40%Sometimes 1 13% 3 33% 4 24% Sometimes 162 39%

Often 0 0% 2 22% 2 12% Often 61 15%Very Often 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Very Often 24 6%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 414 100%Don't Know 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%

Never 4 50% 3 33% 7 41% Never 120 29%Sometimes 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Sometimes 152 37%

Often 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Often 91 22%Very Often 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Very Often 47 12%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 410 100%Don't Know 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Never 4 50% 2 22% 6 35% Never 61 15%Sometimes 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Sometimes 143 35%

Often 0 0% 2 22% 2 12% Often 143 35%Very Often 2 25% 3 33% 5 29% Very Often 64 16%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 411 100%Don't Know 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%

Never 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Never 140 34%Sometimes 7 88% 2 22% 9 53% Sometimes 218 52%

Often 0 0% 3 33% 3 18% Often 39 9%Very Often 0 0% 3 33% 3 18% Very Often 18 4%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 415 100%Don't Know 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Never 3 38% 1 11% 4 24% Never 57 14%Sometimes 3 38% 4 44% 7 41% Sometimes 175 43%

Often 0 0% 3 33% 3 18% Often 117 29%Very Often 2 25% 1 11% 3 18% Very Often 59 14%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 408 100%Don't Know 2 25% 4 44% 6 35%

Never 2 25% 0 0% 2 12% Never 182 44%Sometimes 3 38% 3 33% 6 35% Sometimes 144 35%

Often 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Often 64 16%Very Often 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Very Often 22 5%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 412 100%Don't Know 5 63% 2 22% 7 41%

Never 0 0% 3 33% 3 18% Never 277 67%Sometimes 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Sometimes 95 23%

Often 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Often 31 7%Very Often 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Very Often 9 2%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 412 100%Don't Know 6 75% 1 11% 7 41%

Never 1 13% 8 89% 9 53% Never 349 85%Sometimes 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Sometimes 41 10%

Often 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Often 13 3%Very Often 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Very Often 7 2%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 410 100%

How often do students in your selected course section prepare two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in

How often do students in your selected course section work on a paper that requires integrating ideas or information from various sources

In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions

Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you made a class presentation

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in

How often do students in your selected course section come to class without completing readings or assignments

In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you come to class without completing readings or assignments

All Students

How often do students in your selected course section ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions

How often do students in your selected course section make a class presentation

Part-Time Faculty

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources

How often do students in your selected course section work with other students on projects during class

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you worked with other students on projects during class

How often do students in your selected course section work with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments

How often do students in your selected course section tutor or teach other students (paid or voluntary)

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary)

How often do students in your selected course section participate in a community-based project as a part of a regular course

In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you participated in a community-based project as a part of a regular course

SFC1

Page 295: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency DistributionsBrazosport College

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentFull-Time Faculty All Faculty All StudentsPart-Time Faculty

Don't Know 4 50% 0 0% 4 24% Never 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Never 84 20%

Sometimes 1 13% 3 33% 4 24% Sometimes 131 32%Often 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Often 97 23%

Very Often 0 0% 2 22% 2 12% Very Often 103 25%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 415 100%

Don't Know 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Never 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Never 144 35%

Sometimes 5 63% 3 33% 8 47% Sometimes 141 34%Often 1 13% 3 33% 4 24% Often 81 20%

Very Often 1 13% 3 33% 4 24% Very Often 50 12%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 416 100%

Don't Know 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Never 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Never 46 11%

Sometimes 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Sometimes 181 44%Often 6 75% 5 56% 11 65% Often 132 32%

Very Often 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Very Often 51 13%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 410 100%

Don't Know 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Never 2 25% 1 11% 3 18% Never 143 35%

Sometimes 3 38% 5 56% 8 47% Sometimes 173 42%Often 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Often 70 17%

Very Often 2 25% 1 11% 3 18% Very Often 25 6%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 411 100%

Don't Know 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Never 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Never 185 45%

Sometimes 5 63% 4 44% 9 53% Sometimes 168 40%Often 3 38% 3 33% 6 35% Often 44 11%

Very Often 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Very Often 19 5%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 416 100%

Don't Know 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Never 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Never 48 12%

Sometimes 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Sometimes 144 35%Often 1 13% 5 56% 6 35% Often 132 32%

Very Often 6 75% 4 44% 10 59% Very Often 85 21%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 408 100%

Don't Know 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Never 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Never 64 15%

Sometimes 3 38% 4 44% 7 41% Sometimes 199 48%Often 5 63% 2 22% 7 41% Often 109 26%

Very Often 0 0% 2 22% 2 12% Very Often 43 10%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 416 100%

Don't Know 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Never 6 75% 3 33% 9 53% Never 304 75%

Sometimes 2 25% 5 56% 7 41% Sometimes 62 15%Often 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Often 22 5%

Very Often 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Very Often 15 4%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 402 100%

Don't Know 5 63% 6 67% 11 65% Never 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Never 55 13%

Sometimes 2 25% 1 11% 3 18% Sometimes 166 40%Often 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Often 121 29%

Very Often 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Very Often 74 18%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 416 100%

Don't Know 5 63% 5 56% 10 59% Never 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Never 90 22%

Sometimes 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Sometimes 136 33%Often 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Often 106 26%

Very Often 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Very Often 83 20%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 415 100%

How often do students in your selected course section use the internet or instant messaging to work on an assignment

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you used the internet or instant messaging to work on an assignment

How often do students in your selected course section use e-mail to communicate with you

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you used e-mail to communicate with an instructor

How often do students in your selected course section discuss grades or assignments with you

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you discussed grades or assignments with an instructor

How often do students in your selected course section talk about career plans with you

In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor

How often do students in your selected course section discuss ideas from their readings or classes with you outside of class

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you discussed ideas from your readings or classes with instructors outside of class

How often do students in your selected course section receive prompt feedback (written or oral) from you about their performance

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on your performance

How often do students in your selected course section work harder than they thought they could to meet your standards or expectations

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations

How often do students in your selected course section work with you on activities other than coursework

In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you worked with instructors on activities other than coursework

How often do students in your selected course section discuss ideas from their readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

How often do students in your selected course section have serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity other than their own

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity other than your own

SFC2

Page 296: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency DistributionsBrazosport College

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentFull-Time Faculty All Faculty All StudentsPart-Time Faculty

Don't Know 5 63% 5 56% 10 59% Never 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Never 100 24%

Sometimes 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Sometimes 156 38%Often 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Often 72 18%

Very Often 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Very Often 84 20%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 412 100%

Don't Know 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Never 0 0% 2 22% 2 12% Never 226 55%

Sometimes 6 75% 5 56% 11 65% Sometimes 164 40%Often 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Often 17 4%

Very Often 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Very Often 7 2%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 414 100%

Very Little 1 13% 3 33% 4 24% Very Little 32 8%Some 3 38% 4 44% 7 41% Some 145 35%

Quite a bit 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Quite a bit 148 36%Very Much 3 38% 0 0% 3 18% Very Much 91 22%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 416 100%Very Little 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Very Little 29 7%

Some 3 38% 1 11% 4 24% Some 140 34%Quite a bit 3 38% 7 78% 10 59% Quite a bit 186 45%Very Much 2 25% 1 11% 3 18% Very Much 60 14%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 415 100%Very Little 2 25% 0 0% 2 12% Very Little 45 11%

Some 3 38% 1 11% 4 24% Some 172 42%Quite a bit 3 38% 7 78% 10 59% Quite a bit 129 31%Very Much 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Very Much 66 16%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 411 100%Very Little 3 38% 0 0% 3 18% Very Little 71 17%

Some 3 38% 3 33% 6 35% Some 162 39%Quite a bit 1 13% 5 56% 6 35% Quite a bit 121 29%Very Much 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Very Much 60 14%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 414 100%Very Little 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Very Little 60 15%

Some 3 38% 0 0% 3 18% Some 150 36%Quite a bit 1 13% 7 78% 8 47% Quite a bit 138 33%Very Much 3 38% 2 22% 5 29% Very Much 66 16%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 413 100%Very Little 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Very Little 46 11%

Some 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Some 135 33%Quite a bit 5 63% 6 67% 11 65% Quite a bit 161 39%Very Much 2 25% 0 0% 2 12% Very Much 72 17%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 415 100%None 2 25% 0 0% 2 12% None 20 5%

1 2 25% 5 56% 7 41% 1 to 4 196 48%2-3 3 38% 4 44% 7 41% 5 to 10 109 27%4-6 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% 11 to 20 39 10%

More than 6 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% More than 20 43 10%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 408 100%

None 5 63% 2 22% 7 41% None 77 19%1 0 0% 3 33% 3 18% 1 to 4 152 37%

2 to 3 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 5 to 10 110 27%4 to 6 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% 11 to 20 50 12%

More than 6 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% More than 20 19 5%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 408 100%

In your selected course section, what is the number of written papers or reports of any length that your students write

During the current school year, about what number of written papers or reports of any length do you write

In your selected course section, what is the number of assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or book-length packs of course readings that your students read

During the current school year, about what number of assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or book-length packs of course readings do you read

How often do students in your selected course section have serious conversations with students who differ from them in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you had serious conversations with students who differ from you in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values

How often do students in your selected course section skip class

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you skipped class

During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize memorizing facts, ideas, or methods so the students can repeat them in pretty much the same form

During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your courses and readings so you can repeat them in pretty much the same form

During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory

During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory

During the current school year, how much doe the coursework in your selected course section emphasize synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways

During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways

During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods

During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods

During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations

During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations

During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize having students use information they have read or heard to perform a new skill

During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized using information you have read or heard to perform a new skill

SFC3

Page 297: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency DistributionsBrazosport College

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentFull-Time Faculty All Faculty All StudentsPart-Time Faculty

Extremely Easy (1) 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Extremely Easy (1) 4 1%(2) 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% (2) 17 4%(3) 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% (3) 25 6%(4) 2 25% 0 0% 2 12% (4) 98 25%(5) 3 38% 5 56% 8 47% (5) 136 35%(6) 2 25% 4 44% 6 35% (6) 76 19%

Extremely Challenging (7) 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Extremely Challenging (7) 36 9%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 392 100%

Not important 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% I have not done, nor plan to do 180 44%Somewhat important 3 38% 5 56% 8 47% I plan to do 108 27%

Very important 4 50% 3 33% 7 41% I have done 117 29%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 404 100%

Not important 3 38% 2 22% 5 29% I have not done, nor plan to do 337 85%Somewhat important 1 13% 4 44% 5 29% I plan to do 35 9%

Very important 4 50% 3 33% 7 41% I have done 26 7%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 398 100%

Not important 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% I have not done, nor plan to do 301 75%Somewhat important 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% I plan to do 37 9%

Very important 5 63% 7 78% 12 71% I have done 65 16%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 403 100%

Not important 2 25% 0 0% 2 12% I have not done, nor plan to do 303 75%Somewhat important 1 13% 3 33% 4 24% I plan to do 43 11%

Very important 5 63% 6 67% 11 65% I have done 58 14%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 404 100%

Not important 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% I have not done, nor plan to do 191 48%Somewhat important 2 25% 3 33% 5 29% I plan to do 72 18%

Very important 5 63% 6 67% 11 65% I have done 139 35%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 401 100%

Not important 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% I have not done, nor plan to do 275 68%Somewhat important 3 38% 3 33% 6 35% I plan to do 90 22%

Very important 5 63% 6 67% 11 65% I have done 40 10%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 405 100%

Not important 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% I have not done, nor plan to do 283 72%Somewhat important 3 38% 5 56% 8 47% I plan to do 88 22%

Very important 3 38% 2 22% 5 29% I have done 25 6%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 395 100%

Not important 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% I have not done, nor plan to do 226 57%Somewhat important 7 88% 5 56% 12 71% I plan to do 45 11%

Very important 1 13% 3 33% 4 24% I have done 128 32%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 399 100%

Not important 2 25% 3 33% 5 29% I have not done, nor plan to do 313 77%Somewhat important 6 75% 5 56% 11 65% I plan to do 65 16%

Very important 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% I have done 28 7%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 406 100%

Very Little 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Very Little 22 5%Some 2 25% 3 33% 5 29% Some 113 28%

Quite a bit 3 38% 5 56% 8 47% Quite a bit 184 45%Very Much 3 38% 0 0% 3 18% Very Much 90 22%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 408 100%Very Little 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Very Little 15 4%

Some 0 0% 2 22% 2 12% Some 80 20%Quite a bit 4 50% 5 56% 9 53% Quite a bit 226 56%Very Much 4 50% 2 22% 6 35% Very Much 86 21%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 407 100%Very Little 0 0% 3 33% 3 18% Very Little 80 20%

Some 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Some 146 36%Quite a bit 6 75% 3 33% 9 53% Quite a bit 126 31%Very Much 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Very Much 53 13%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 405 100%

How much does this college emphasize encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds

How much does this college emphasize encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds

How much does this college emphasize providing students the support they need to help them to succeed at this college

How much does this college emphasize providing the support you need to help you succeed at this college

How much does this college emphasize encouraging students to spend significant amounts of time studying

How much does this college emphasize encouraging you to spend significant amounts of time studying

How important is it to you that students participate in study skills courses

Student activities: Study skills course

How important is it to you that students participate in developmental/remedial math courses

Student activities: Developmental/remedial math course

How important is it to you that students participate in developmental/remedial writing courses

Student activities: Developmental/remedial writing course

How important is it to you that students participate in developmental/remedial reading courses

Student activities: Developmental/remedial reading course

How important is it to you that students participate in English as a second language courses

Student activities: English as a second language course

How important is it to you that students participate in internships, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment

Student activities: Internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment

Select the circle that best represents the extent to which your examinations of student performance (e.g. Exams, portfolio) challenge students to do their best work

Mark the response that best represents the extent to which your examinations during the current school year have challenged you to do your best work at this college

How important is it to you that students participate in honors courses

Student activities: Honors course

How important is it to you that students participate in a college orientation program or course

Student activities: College orientation program or course

How important is it to you that students participate in organized learning communities

Student activities: Organized learning communities

SFC4

Page 298: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency DistributionsBrazosport College

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentFull-Time Faculty All Faculty All StudentsPart-Time Faculty

Very Little 2 25% 3 33% 5 29% Very Little 169 41%Some 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Some 111 27%

Quite a bit 3 38% 3 33% 6 35% Quite a bit 92 23%Very Much 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Very Much 36 9%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 408 100%Very Little 2 25% 3 33% 5 29% Very Little 131 32%

Some 2 25% 3 33% 5 29% Some 151 37%Quite a bit 4 50% 2 22% 6 35% Quite a bit 93 23%Very Much 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Very Much 31 8%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 406 100%Very Little 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Very Little 133 33%

Some 1 13% 3 33% 4 24% Some 112 28%Quite a bit 3 38% 4 44% 7 41% Quite a bit 79 20%Very Much 4 50% 2 22% 6 35% Very Much 82 20%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 407 100%Very Little 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Very Little 36 9%

Some 1 14% 0 0% 1 6% Some 65 16%Quite a bit 2 29% 3 33% 5 31% Quite a bit 154 38%Very Much 4 57% 6 67% 10 63% Very Much 154 38%

Total 7 100% 9 100% 16 100% Total 408 100%None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% None 15 4%1 to 5 4 50% 5 56% 9 53% 1 to 5 232 57%

6 to 10 4 50% 4 44% 8 47% 6 to 10 93 23%11 to 20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 11 to 20 45 11%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 21 to 30 13 3%

More than 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% More than 30 7 2%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 405 100%

None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% None 58 14%1 to 5 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 to 5 9 2%

6 to 10 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 to 10 17 4%11 to 20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 11 to 20 34 9%21 to 30 4 57% 6 67% 10 63% 21 to 30 50 12%

More than 30 3 43% 3 33% 6 38% More than 30 235 58%Total 7 100% 9 100% 16 100% Total 404 100%

None 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% None 360 89%1 to 5 6 75% 8 89% 14 82% 1 to 5 27 7%

6 to 10 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% 6 to 10 9 2%11 to 20 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% 11 to 20 7 2%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 21 to 30 1 0%

More than 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% More than 30 1 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 406 100%

None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% None 142 35%1 to 5 2 29% 0 0% 2 13% 1 to 5 56 14%

6 to 10 1 14% 2 25% 3 20% 6 to 10 33 8%11 to 20 1 14% 4 50% 5 33% 11 to 20 19 5%21 to 30 2 29% 1 13% 3 20% 21 to 30 14 4%

More than 30 1 14% 1 13% 2 13% More than 30 141 35%Total 7 100% 8 100% 15 100% Total 406 100%

None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% None 40 10%1 to 5 7 88% 7 78% 14 82% 1 to 5 289 72%

6 to 10 0 0% 2 22% 2 12% 6 to 10 44 11%11 to 20 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% 11 to 20 16 4%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 21 to 30 6 2%

More than 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% More than 30 6 1%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 402 100%

About how many hours do you think full and part-time students at this college spend in a typical 7 - day week commuting to and from class.

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7 - day week commuting to and from class

About how many hours do you think full and part-time students at this college spend in a typical 7 - day week providing care for dependents living with them (parents, children, spouse, etc.)

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7 - day week providing care for dependents living with you (parents, children, spouse, etc.)

About how many hours do you think full and part-time students at this college spend in a typical 7 - day week participating in college-sponsored activities (organizations, campus publications, student government, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.)

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7 - day week participating in college-sponsored activities (organizations, campus publications, student government, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.)

About how many hours do you think full and part-time students at this college spend in a typical 7 - day week preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, doing homework, or other activities related to their programs)

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7 - day week preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, doing homework, or other activities related to your programs)

How much does this college emphasize using computers in academic work

How much does this college emphasize using computers in academic work

How much does this college emphasize providing the financial support students need to afford their education

How much does this college emphasize providing the financial support you need to afford your education

How much does this college emphasize providing students the support they need to thrive socially

How much does this college emphasize providing the support you need to thrive socially

How much does this college emphasize helping students cope with their non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.)

How much does this college emphasize helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.)

About how many hours do you think full and part-time students at this college spend in a typical 7 - day week working for pay

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7 - day week working for pay

SFC5

Page 299: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency DistributionsBrazosport College

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentFull-Time Faculty All Faculty All StudentsPart-Time Faculty

Unfriendly, unsupportive, sense of alienation (1) 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Unfriendly, unsupportive, sense of alienation (1) 6 1%

(2) 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% (2) 2 1%(3) 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% (3) 21 5%(4) 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% (4) 53 13%(5) 2 25% 5 56% 7 41% (5) 79 20%(6) 5 63% 3 33% 8 47% (6) 128 31%

Friendly, supportive, sense of belonging (7) 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%

Friendly, supportive, sense of belonging (7) 118 29%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 407 100%Unavailable, unhelpful,

unsympathetic (1) 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Unavailable, unhelpful,

unsympathetic (1) 2 0%(2) 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% (2) 8 2%(3) 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% (3) 9 2%(4) 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% (4) 36 9%(5) 4 50% 3 33% 7 41% (5) 77 19%(6) 2 25% 4 44% 6 35% (6) 130 32%

Available, helpful, sympathetic (7) 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%

Available, helpful, sympathetic (7) 145 36%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 407 100%

Unhelpful, inconsiderate, rigid (1) 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Unhelpful, inconsiderate, rigid (1) 18 4%(2) 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% (2) 12 3%(3) 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% (3) 21 5%(4) 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% (4) 76 19%(5) 3 38% 2 22% 5 29% (5) 99 24%(6) 3 38% 3 33% 6 35% (6) 94 23%

Helpful, considerate, flexible (7) 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Helpful, considerate, flexible (7) 87 21%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 407 100%

None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Very little 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Very little 28 7%

Some 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Some 112 27%Quite a bit 7 88% 6 67% 13 76% Quite a bit 175 43%Very much 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Very much 93 23%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 407 100%None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Very little 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Very little 71 18%Some 3 38% 1 11% 4 24% Some 112 28%

Quite a bit 2 25% 3 33% 5 29% Quite a bit 144 36%Very much 3 38% 5 56% 8 47% Very much 76 19%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 404 100%None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Very little 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Very little 71 17%Some 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Some 130 32%

Quite a bit 4 50% 3 33% 7 41% Quite a bit 134 33%Very much 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Very much 72 18%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 407 100%None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Very little 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Very little 71 18%Some 1 13% 4 44% 5 29% Some 123 31%

Quite a bit 4 50% 3 33% 7 41% Quite a bit 149 37%Very much 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Very much 60 15%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 403 100%None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Very little 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Very little 32 8%Some 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Some 126 31%

Quite a bit 4 50% 3 33% 7 41% Quite a bit 154 38%Very much 3 38% 4 44% 7 41% Very much 94 23%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 407 100%

Select the circle that best represents the quality of student relationships with other students

Mark the number that best represents the quality of your relationships with other students at this college

Select the circle that best represents the quality of student relationships with instructors

Mark the number that best represents the quality of your relationships with instructors at this college

Select the circle that best represents the quality of student relationships with administrative personnel and offices

Mark the number that best represents the quality of your relationships with administrative personnel and offices at this college

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in acquiring a broad general education

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in acquiring a broad general education

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in writing clearly and effectively

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in writing clearly and effectively

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in speaking clearly and effectively

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in speaking clearly and effectively

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in thinking critically and analytically

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in thinking critically and analytically

SFC6

Page 300: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency DistributionsBrazosport College

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentFull-Time Faculty All Faculty All StudentsPart-Time Faculty

None 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Very little 1 13% 3 33% 4 24% Very little 67 16%

Some 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Some 119 29%Quite a bit 2 25% 1 11% 3 18% Quite a bit 143 35%Very much 2 25% 1 11% 3 18% Very much 76 19%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 405 100%None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Very little 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Very little 76 19%Some 4 50% 3 33% 7 41% Some 104 26%

Quite a bit 3 38% 2 22% 5 29% Quite a bit 135 33%Very much 1 13% 3 33% 4 24% Very much 90 22%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 405 100%None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Very little 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Very little 43 11%Some 3 38% 3 33% 6 35% Some 138 34%

Quite a bit 3 38% 3 33% 6 35% Quite a bit 139 34%Very much 1 13% 3 33% 4 24% Very much 85 21%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 405 100%None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Very little 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Very little 33 8%Some 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Some 121 30%

Quite a bit 4 50% 4 44% 8 47% Quite a bit 164 41%Very much 3 38% 3 33% 6 35% Very much 87 22%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 405 100%None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Very little 2 25% 0 0% 2 12% Very little 76 19%Some 1 13% 5 56% 6 35% Some 140 35%

Quite a bit 5 63% 2 22% 7 41% Quite a bit 120 30%Very much 0 0% 2 22% 2 12% Very much 69 17%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 405 100%None 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%

Very little 0 0% 2 22% 2 12% Very little 121 30%Some 3 38% 5 56% 8 47% Some 128 32%

Quite a bit 3 38% 1 11% 4 24% Quite a bit 110 27%Very much 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Very much 44 11%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 404 100%None 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%

Very little 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Very little 110 27%Some 3 38% 3 33% 6 35% Some 145 36%

Quite a bit 2 25% 5 56% 7 41% Quite a bit 97 24%Very much 2 25% 0 0% 2 12% Very much 51 13%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 402 100%None 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%

Very little 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Very little 160 40%Some 2 25% 7 78% 9 53% Some 145 36%

Quite a bit 4 50% 2 22% 6 35% Quite a bit 73 18%Very much 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Very much 24 6%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 402 100%None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Very little 2 25% 1 11% 3 18% Very little 66 16%Some 2 25% 6 67% 8 47% Some 108 27%

Quite a bit 3 38% 2 22% 5 29% Quite a bit 152 38%Very much 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Very much 77 19%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 403 100%None 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%

Very little 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Very little 72 18%Some 1 13% 4 44% 5 29% Some 118 29%

Quite a bit 2 25% 3 33% 5 29% Quite a bit 132 33%Very much 2 25% 0 0% 2 12% Very much 83 20%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 405 100%

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in solving numerical problems

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in solving numerical problems

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in using computing and information technology

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in using computing and information technology

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in working effectively with others

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in working effectively with others

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in learning effectively on their own

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in learning effectively on your own

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in understanding themselves

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in understanding yourself

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in developing a personal code of values and ethics

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in developing a personal code of values and ethics

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in contributing to the welfare of their community

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in contributing to the welfare of your community

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in developing clearer career goals

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in developing clearer career goals

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in gaining information about career opportunities

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in gaining information about career opportunities

SFC7

Page 301: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency DistributionsBrazosport College

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentFull-Time Faculty All Faculty All StudentsPart-Time Faculty

Don't know/N.A. 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Don't know/N.A. 54 13%Rarely or never 1 13% 2 22% 3 18% Rarely or never 158 39%

Sometimes 3 38% 6 67% 9 53% Sometimes 161 40%Often 3 38% 1 11% 4 24% Often 33 8%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 406 100%Don't know/N.A. 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Don't know/N.A. 75 19%Rarely or never 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Rarely or never 198 49%

Sometimes 3 38% 7 78% 10 59% Sometimes 104 26%Often 2 25% 0 0% 2 12% Often 27 7%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 404 100%Don't know/N.A. 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Don't know/N.A. 159 40%Rarely or never 2 25% 5 56% 7 41% Rarely or never 179 44%

Sometimes 4 50% 4 44% 8 47% Sometimes 55 14%Often 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Often 9 2%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 402 100%Don't know/N.A. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Don't know/N.A. 131 33%Rarely or never 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Rarely or never 165 41%

Sometimes 4 50% 3 33% 7 41% Sometimes 70 18%Often 2 25% 4 44% 6 35% Often 35 9%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 401 100%Don't know/N.A. 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Don't know/N.A. 112 29%Rarely or never 3 38% 3 33% 6 35% Rarely or never 130 33%

Sometimes 2 25% 4 44% 6 35% Sometimes 98 25%Often 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Often 54 14%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 394 100%Don't know/N.A. 2 25% 0 0% 2 12% Don't know/N.A. 248 62%Rarely or never 3 38% 3 33% 6 35% Rarely or never 120 30%

Sometimes 3 38% 6 67% 9 53% Sometimes 22 6%Often 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Often 9 2%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 399 100%Don't know/N.A. 2 25% 0 0% 2 12% Don't know/N.A. 144 36%Rarely or never 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Rarely or never 120 30%

Sometimes 3 38% 6 67% 9 53% Sometimes 77 19%Often 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Often 60 15%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 402 100%Don't know/N.A. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Don't know/N.A. 69 17%Rarely or never 2 25% 1 11% 3 18% Rarely or never 70 17%

Sometimes 3 38% 6 67% 9 53% Sometimes 121 30%Often 3 38% 2 22% 5 29% Often 141 35%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 402 100%Don't know/N.A. 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Don't know/N.A. 214 53%Rarely or never 4 50% 4 44% 8 47% Rarely or never 124 31%

Sometimes 3 38% 5 56% 8 47% Sometimes 52 13%Often 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Often 13 3%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 404 100%Don't know/N.A. 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Don't know/N.A. 190 48%Rarely or never 3 38% 2 22% 5 29% Rarely or never 126 32%

Sometimes 4 50% 6 67% 10 59% Sometimes 69 17%Often 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Often 14 3%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 399 100%Don't know/N.A. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Don't know/N.A. 261 65%Rarely or never 4 50% 3 33% 7 41% Rarely or never 115 28%

Sometimes 4 50% 5 56% 9 53% Sometimes 16 4%Often 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Often 12 3%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 403 100%Not at all 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Not at all 69 17%

Somewhat 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Somewhat 122 31%Very 7 88% 8 89% 15 88% Very 203 52%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 394 100%

How often do you refer students to academic advising/planning

How often do you use academic advising/planning

How often do you refer students to career counseling How often do you use career counseling

How often do you refer students to job placement assistance How often do you use job placement assistance

How often do you refer students to peer or other tutoring How often do you use peer or other tutoring

How often do you refer students to skill labs (writing, math, etc.)

How often do you use skills labs (writing, math, etc.)

How often do you refer students to child care How often do you use child care

How often do you refer students to financial aid advising How often do you use financial aid advising

How often do you refer students to computer labs How often do you use computer labs

How often do you refer students to student organizations How often do you use student organizations

How often do you refer students to transfer credit assistance How often do you use transfer credit assistance

How often do you refer students to services to students with disabilities

How often do you use services to students with disabilities

How important do you believe academic advising/planning is to students at this college

How important is academic advising/planning to you at this college

SFC8

Page 302: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency DistributionsBrazosport College

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentFull-Time Faculty All Faculty All StudentsPart-Time Faculty

Not at all 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Not at all 81 21%Somewhat 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Somewhat 114 29%

Very 6 75% 7 78% 13 76% Very 192 50%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 387 100%

Not at all 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Not at all 155 40%Somewhat 3 38% 4 44% 7 41% Somewhat 106 27%

Very 4 50% 5 56% 9 53% Very 126 33%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 387 100%

Not at all 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Not at all 116 30%Somewhat 5 63% 4 44% 9 53% Somewhat 107 28%

Very 3 38% 5 56% 8 47% Very 165 42%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 387 100%

Not at all 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Not at all 102 26%Somewhat 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Somewhat 128 33%

Very 6 75% 7 78% 13 76% Very 156 41%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 386 100%

Not at all 2 25% 0 0% 2 12% Not at all 205 53%Somewhat 3 38% 4 44% 7 41% Somewhat 70 18%

Very 3 38% 5 56% 8 47% Very 109 28%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 385 100%

Not at all 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Not at all 119 31%Somewhat 3 38% 2 22% 5 29% Somewhat 56 14%

Very 5 63% 7 78% 12 71% Very 213 55%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 388 100%

Not at all 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Not at all 69 18%Somewhat 2 25% 3 33% 5 29% Somewhat 96 25%

Very 5 63% 6 67% 11 65% Very 222 57%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 387 100%

Not at all 2 25% 3 33% 5 29% Not at all 189 50%Somewhat 4 50% 4 44% 8 47% Somewhat 103 27%

Very 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Very 88 23%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 380 100%

Not at all 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Not at all 136 35%Somewhat 3 38% 3 33% 6 35% Somewhat 77 20%

Very 4 50% 5 56% 9 53% Very 175 45%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 388 100%

Not at all 0 0% 1 11% 1 6% Not at all 180 47%Somewhat 3 38% 3 33% 6 35% Somewhat 56 15%

Very 5 63% 5 56% 10 59% Very 150 39%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 386 100%

Not likely 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Not likely 148 36%Somewhat likely 0 0% 2 22% 2 12% Somewhat likely 80 20%

Likely 3 38% 2 22% 5 29% Likely 79 19%Very likely 4 50% 5 56% 9 53% Very likely 99 24%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 406 100%Not likely 1 13% 0 0% 1 6% Not likely 194 48%

Somewhat likely 0 0% 3 33% 3 18% Somewhat likely 81 20%Likely 3 38% 4 44% 7 41% Likely 66 16%

Very likely 4 50% 2 22% 6 35% Very likely 67 16%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 407 100%

Not likely 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Not likely 242 60%Somewhat likely 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Somewhat likely 85 21%

Likely 4 50% 4 44% 8 47% Likely 53 13%Very likely 3 38% 4 44% 7 41% Very likely 25 6%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 405 100%

How important do you believe career counseling is to students at this college

How important is career counseling to you at this college

How important do you believe job placement assistance is to students at this college

How important is job placement assistance to you at this college

How important do you believe peer and other tutoring is to students at this college

How important is peer and other tutoring to you at this college

How important do you believe skills labs (writing, math, etc.) are to students at this college

How important are skills labs (writing, math, etc.) to you at this college

How important do you believe child care is to students at this college

How important is child care to you at this college

How important do you believe financial aid advising is to students at this college

How important is financial aid advising to you at this college

How important do you believe computer labs are to students at this college

How important are computer labs to you at this college

How important do you believe student organizations are to students at this college

How important are student organizations to you at this college

How important do you believe transfer credit assistance is to students at this college

How important is transfer credit assistance to you at this college

How important do you believe services to students with disabilities are to students at this college

How important are services to students with disabilities to you at this college

How likely is it that working full-time would cause students to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that working full-time would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that caring for dependents would cause students to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that caring for dependents would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that being academically unprepared would cause students to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that being academically unprepared would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college

SFC9

Page 303: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency DistributionsBrazosport College

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentFull-Time Faculty All Faculty All StudentsPart-Time Faculty

Not likely 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Not likely 155 38%Somewhat likely 0 0% 3 33% 3 18% Somewhat likely 69 17%

Likely 2 25% 2 22% 4 24% Likely 74 18%Very likely 5 63% 3 33% 8 47% Very likely 105 26%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 402 100%Not likely 1 13% 1 11% 2 12% Not likely 162 40%

Somewhat likely 3 38% 2 22% 5 29% Somewhat likely 73 18%Likely 2 25% 5 56% 7 41% Likely 64 16%

Very likely 2 25% 1 11% 3 18% Very likely 107 26%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100% Total 405 100%

How likely is it that lacking finances would cause students to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that lack of finances would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that transferring to a 4-year college or university would cause students to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that transferring to a 4-year college or university would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college

SFC10

Page 304: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College

Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentFewer than 10 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%

10 to 19 2 25% 5 56% 7 41%20 to 29 5 63% 3 33% 8 47%30 to 39 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%40 to 69 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

70 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

None 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%1 to 3 3 38% 1 11% 4 24%4 to 6 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%7 to 9 1 13% 2 22% 3 18%

10 to 15 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%16 to 20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

21 or more 2 25% 3 33% 5 29%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

N.A. 2 25% 0 0% 2 12%Rarely or never 1 13% 3 33% 4 24%

Sometimes 4 50% 5 56% 9 53%Often 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%N.A. 2 25% 0 0% 2 12%

Rarely or never 2 25% 4 44% 6 35%Sometimes 2 25% 4 44% 6 35%

Often 2 25% 1 11% 3 18%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

N.A. 3 38% 0 0% 3 18%Rarely or never 3 38% 5 56% 8 47%

Sometimes 1 13% 3 33% 4 24%Often 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%N.A. 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%

Rarely or never 2 25% 5 56% 7 41%Sometimes 3 38% 1 11% 4 24%

Often 2 25% 3 33% 5 29%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

N.A. 2 25% 0 0% 2 12%Rarely or never 2 25% 5 56% 7 41%

Sometimes 1 13% 2 22% 3 18%Often 3 38% 2 22% 5 29%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

How many students are enrolled in your selected course section

Prior to the Spring semester, how many times have you taught your selected course?

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

How much do you incorporate the use of skills labs (writing, math, etc.) into your selected course section

How much do you incorporate the use of academic advising/planning into your selected course section

How much do you incorporate the use of career counseling into your course section

How much do you incorporate the use of job placement assistance into your selected course section

How much do you incorporate the use of peer or other tutoring into your course section

FF1

Page 305: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

N.A. 4 50% 1 11% 5 29%Rarely or never 3 38% 6 67% 9 53%

Sometimes 1 13% 2 22% 3 18%Often 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%N.A. 3 38% 0 0% 3 18%

Rarely or never 2 25% 6 67% 8 47%Sometimes 3 38% 3 33% 6 35%

Often 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

N.A. 2 25% 0 0% 2 12%Rarely or never 2 25% 3 33% 5 29%

Sometimes 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%Often 3 38% 5 56% 8 47%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%N.A. 2 25% 1 11% 3 18%

Rarely or never 3 38% 5 56% 8 47%Sometimes 3 38% 3 33% 6 35%

Often 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

N.A. 3 38% 0 0% 3 18%Rarely or never 3 38% 4 44% 7 41%

Sometimes 2 25% 5 56% 7 41%Often 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%N.A. 3 38% 1 11% 4 24%

Rarely or never 2 25% 4 44% 6 35%Sometimes 3 38% 3 33% 6 35%

Often 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

Not likely 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Somewhat likely 1 13% 2 22% 3 18%

Likely 6 75% 4 44% 10 59%Very likely 1 13% 3 33% 4 24%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%1 to 4 3 38% 0 0% 3 18%5 to 8 4 50% 1 11% 5 29%

9 to 12 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%13 to 16 0 0% 4 44% 4 24%17 to 20 0 0% 3 33% 3 18%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

31 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

How much do you incorporate the use of child care into your course section

How much do you incorporate the use of financial aid advising into your selected course section

How much do you incorporate the use of computer labs into your course section

How much do you incorporate the use of student organizations into your selected course section

How much do you incorporate the use of transfer credit assistance into your course section

How much do you incorporate the use of services to students with disabilities into your selected course section

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week teaching students in class

How likely is it that personal issues would cause students to withdraw from class or from this college?

FF2

Page 306: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%1 to 4 8 100% 2 22% 10 59%5 to 8 0 0% 2 22% 2 12%

9 to 12 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%13 to 16 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%17 to 20 0 0% 2 22% 2 12%21 to 30 0 0% 2 22% 2 12%

31 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%1 to 4 8 100% 7 78% 15 88%5 to 8 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%

9 to 12 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%13 to 16 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%17 to 20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

31 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%1 to 4 6 75% 1 11% 7 41%5 to 8 0 0% 3 33% 3 18%

9 to 12 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%13 to 16 1 13% 3 33% 4 24%17 to 20 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

31 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%1 to 4 6 75% 6 67% 12 71%5 to 8 2 25% 2 22% 4 24%

9 to 12 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%13 to 16 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%17 to 20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

31 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

None 2 25% 2 22% 4 24%1 to 4 4 50% 5 56% 9 53%5 to 8 2 25% 2 22% 4 24%

9 to 12 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%13 to 16 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%17 to 20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

31 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week grading papers

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week giving other forms of written and oral feedback to students

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week preparing for class

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week reflecting and working on ways to improve my teaching

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week research and scholarly activities

FF3

Page 307: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

None 7 88% 4 44% 11 65%1 to 4 1 13% 4 44% 5 29%5 to 8 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

9 to 12 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%13 to 16 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%17 to 20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

31 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

None 5 63% 2 22% 7 41%1 to 4 3 38% 5 56% 8 47%5 to 8 0 0% 2 22% 2 12%

9 to 12 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%13 to 16 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%17 to 20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

31 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

None 8 100% 8 89% 16 94%1 to 4 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%5 to 8 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

9 to 12 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%13 to 16 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%17 to 20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

31 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

None 7 88% 5 63% 12 75%1 to 4 1 13% 1 13% 2 13%5 to 8 0 0% 2 25% 2 13%

9 to 12 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%13 to 16 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%17 to 20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

31 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 8 100% 16 100%

None 5 63% 4 44% 9 53%1 to 4 3 38% 3 33% 6 35%5 to 8 0 0% 2 22% 2 12%

9 to 12 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%13 to 16 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%17 to 20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

31 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week working with honors' projects

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week advising students

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week working with students on activities other than course work

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week involved in other interactions with students outside the classroom

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week supervising internships or other field experiences

FF4

Page 308: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

None 8 100% 5 63% 13 81%1 to 4 0 0% 3 38% 3 19%5 to 8 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

9 to 12 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%13 to 16 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%17 to 20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

31 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 8 100% 16 100%

None 7 88% 2 25% 9 56%1 to 4 1 13% 4 50% 5 31%5 to 8 0 0% 1 13% 1 6%

9 to 12 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%13 to 16 0 0% 1 13% 1 6%17 to 20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

31 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 8 100% 16 100%

None 6 75% 2 22% 8 47%1 to 4 2 25% 5 56% 7 41%5 to 8 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%

9 to 12 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%13 to 16 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%17 to 20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

31 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

None 7 88% 7 78% 14 82%1 to 4 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%5 to 8 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%

9 to 12 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%13 to 16 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%17 to 20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%21 to 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

31 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

0% 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%1 to 9% 2 25% 0 0% 2 12%

10 to 19% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%20 to 29% 0 0% 2 22% 2 12%30 to 39% 4 50% 1 11% 5 29%40 to 49% 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%50 to 74% 0 0% 4 44% 4 24%

75 to 100% 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week conducting service activities

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on lecture

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week coordination and/or administrative activities

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week participating on college committees or task forces

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week mentoring other faculty

FF5

Page 309: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

0 1 14% 0 0% 1 6%1 to 9% 2 29% 2 22% 4 25%

10 to 19% 2 29% 0 0% 2 13%20 to 29% 0 0% 5 56% 5 31%30 to 39% 2 29% 0 0% 2 13%40 to 49% 0 0% 2 22% 2 13%50 to 74% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

75 to 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 7 100% 9 100% 16 100%

0% 3 38% 2 25% 5 31%1 to 9% 1 13% 2 25% 3 19%

10 to 19% 1 13% 1 13% 2 13%20 to 29% 1 13% 2 25% 3 19%30 to 39% 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%40 to 49% 0 0% 1 13% 1 6%50 to 74% 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%

75 to 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 8 100% 16 100%

0 5 63% 4 44% 9 53%1 to 9% 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%

10 to 19% 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%20 to 29% 1 13% 2 22% 3 18%30 to 39% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%40 to 49% 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%50 to 74% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

75 to 100% 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

0% 5 63% 1 11% 6 35%1 to 9% 1 13% 2 22% 3 18%

10 to 19% 1 13% 2 22% 3 18%20 to 29% 0 0% 2 22% 2 12%30 to 39% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%40 to 49% 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%50 to 74% 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%

75 to 100% 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

0 4 50% 3 33% 7 41%1 to 9% 3 38% 5 56% 8 47%

10 to 19% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%20 to 29% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%30 to 39% 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%40 to 49% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%50 to 74% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

75 to 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on teacher-led discussion

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on teacher-student shared responsibility (seminar, discussion, etc.)

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on student computer use

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on small group activities

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on student presentations

FF6

Page 310: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

0% 5 63% 4 44% 9 53%1 to 9% 1 13% 2 22% 3 18%

10 to 19% 2 25% 1 11% 3 18%20 to 29% 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%30 to 39% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%40 to 49% 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%50 to 74% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

75 to 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%1 to 9% 4 50% 4 44% 8 47%

10 to 19% 3 38% 4 44% 7 41%20 to 29% 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%30 to 39% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%40 to 49% 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%50 to 74% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

75 to 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

0% 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%1 to 9% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

10 to 19% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%20 to 29% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%30 to 39% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%40 to 49% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%50 to 74% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

75 to 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

0 7 88% 5 56% 12 71%1 to 9% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

10 to 19% 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%20 to 29% 0 0% 2 22% 2 12%30 to 39% 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%40 to 49% 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%50 to 74% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

75 to 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

0% 2 25% 2 22% 4 24%1 to 9% 1 13% 2 22% 3 18%

10 to 19% 2 25% 2 22% 4 24%20 to 29% 1 13% 2 22% 3 18%30 to 39% 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%40 to 49% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%50 to 74% 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%

75 to 100% 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on in-class writing

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on testing and evaluation

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on performances in applied and fine arts (dance, drama, music)

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on experiential (labs, field work, art exhibits, clinical placements, internships)

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on hands-on practice

FF7

Page 311: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

Part-time faculty 8 100% 0 0% 8 47%Full-time faculty 0 0% 9 100% 9 53%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%1 to 3 hours 1 14% 0 0% 1 6%4 to 6 hours 4 57% 0 0% 4 25%7 to 9 hours 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

10 to 12 hours 0 0% 2 22% 2 13%13 to 15 hours 1 14% 0 0% 1 6%16 to 18 hours 1 14% 1 11% 2 13%19 to 21 hours 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%22 to 24 hours 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%25 to 27 hours 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%28 to 30 hours 0 0% 2 22% 2 13%

More than 30 hours 0 0% 3 33% 3 19%Total 7 100% 9 100% 16 100%

No 7 88% 9 100% 16 94%Yes 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%No 7 88% 8 89% 15 88%

Yes 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

No 8 100% 7 78% 15 88%Yes 0 0% 2 22% 2 12%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%No 8 100% 7 78% 15 88%

Yes 0 0% 2 22% 2 12%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

No 7 88% 4 44% 11 65%Yes 1 13% 5 56% 6 35%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%No 7 88% 8 89% 15 88%

Yes 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

No 8 100% 4 44% 12 71%Yes 0 0% 5 56% 5 29%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%No 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

Yes 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

No 7 88% 9 100% 16 94%Yes 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

During this term, does your institution consider you to be employed part-time or full-time

What is the total number of credit hours you are scheduled to teach during the current academic year (including summer sessions) at this college

During the current academic year, is team teaching part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, are linked courses part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, are learning communities part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, are capstone courses part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, is academic advising part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, is clinical and other field supervision of student work part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, are distance learning courses part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, is service learning (community service) incorporated into your course part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, are independent studies part of your teaching role at this college

FF8

Page 312: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

Other 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%Lecturer 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%

Instructor 7 88% 3 33% 10 59%Assistant Professor 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%Associate Professor 0 0% 2 22% 2 12%

Professor 0 0% 2 22% 2 12%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

No tenure system at this institution 2 29% 0 0% 2 13%Not on tenure track, although this

institution has a tenure system 5 71% 1 13% 6 40%On tenure track but not tenured 0 0% 3 38% 3 20%

Tenured 0 0% 4 50% 4 27%Total 7 100% 8 100% 15 100%

40 years or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%30 to 39 years 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%20 to 29 years 2 25% 2 22% 4 24%10 to 19 years 2 25% 0 0% 2 12%

5 to 9 years 1 13% 4 44% 5 29%1 to 4 years 2 25% 2 22% 4 24%

First-year teacher 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

Other 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%Associate degree 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%

Bachelor's degree 4 50% 0 0% 4 24%Master's degree 2 25% 6 67% 8 47%

Doctoral degree (e.g., Ph.D., Ed.D.) 0 0% 2 22% 2 12%First professional degree (e.g., M.D.,

D.D.S., J.D., D.V.M.) 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

22 to 24 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%25 to 29 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%30 to 39 0 0% 1 11% 1 6%40 to 49 1 13% 2 22% 3 18%50 to 64 4 50% 5 56% 9 53%

65 or more 2 25% 1 11% 3 18%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

Male 4 50% 7 78% 11 65%Female 4 50% 2 22% 6 35%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

How many years of teaching experience do you have in any college/university, not including graduate teaching assistant positions

Which of the following best describes your academic rank, title, or current position (Mark only one)

What is your current tenure status (Mark only one)

What is the highest degree you have earned

What is your age group

What is your gender

FF9

Page 313: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Brazosport College

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

United States citizen, native 7 88% 9 100% 16 94%United States citizen, naturalized 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%Permanent resident of the United

States (immigrant visa) 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Temporary resident of the United

States (non-immigrant visa) 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

American Indian or Native American 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%Asian, Asian American, or Pacific

Islander 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Native Hawaiian 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Black or African American, Non-Hispanic 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

White, Non-Hispanic 5 63% 8 100% 13 81%Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%

Other 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%Total 8 100% 8 100% 16 100%

No 7 88% 8 89% 15 88%Yes 1 13% 1 11% 2 12%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%No 6 75% 8 89% 14 82%

Yes 2 25% 1 11% 3 18%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

No 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%Yes 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%No 6 75% 9 100% 15 88%

Yes 2 25% 0 0% 2 12%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

No 7 88% 7 78% 14 82%Yes 1 13% 2 22% 3 18%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%No 7 88% 9 100% 16 94%

Yes 1 13% 0 0% 1 6%Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

No 5 63% 3 33% 8 47%Yes 3 38% 6 67% 9 53%

Total 8 100% 9 100% 17 100%

What is your citizenship status

What is your racial or ethnic identification (Mark only one)

Where are you employed outside of this college: Self-employed

Where are you employed outside of this college: Other college(s) in teaching position

Where are you employed outside of this college: Other college(s) in non-teaching position

Where are you employed outside of this college: Full-time non-academic position

Where are you employed outside of this college: Part-time non-academic position

Where are you employed outside of this college: Work related to my teaching field at this college

Where are you employed outside of this college: Not employed elsewhere

FF10

Page 314: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Cohort

Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions

There are two reports in this section. The first report summarizes the observed frequencies of occurrence (counts and percentages) of the values for generally equivalent items from all faculty (part-time, full-time, and all faculty) in the 2007 CCFSSE Cohort, and all student data from 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges that are also members of the 2007 CCFSSE Cohort. The second report summarizes the observed frequencies of occurrence (counts and percentages) from the 2007 CCFSSE Cohort for all faculty survey items that do not appear on the student survey. Data are presented for part-time, full-time, and all faculty respondents.

Page 315: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentDon't Know 2 0% 7 0% 9 0%

Never 20 0% 28 0% 48 0% Never 3828 3%Sometimes 1502 18% 1898 15% 3400 17% Sometimes 47281 34%

Often 2935 35% 4124 34% 7059 34% Often 49083 35%Very Often 3847 46% 6196 51% 10043 49% Very Often 39818 28%

Total 8306 100% 12253 100% 20559 100% Total 140010 100%Don't Know 29 0% 28 0% 57 0%

Never 2889 35% 4072 33% 6961 34% Never 44150 32%Sometimes 3230 39% 4897 40% 8127 40% Sometimes 55874 40%

Often 1191 14% 1791 15% 2982 15% Often 28275 20%Very Often 932 11% 1424 12% 2356 12% Very Often 11109 8%

Total 8271 100% 12212 100% 20483 100% Total 139408 100%Don't Know 922 11% 1012 8% 1934 10%

Never 3323 41% 4914 40% 8237 41% Never 29787 21%Sometimes 2237 27% 3524 29% 5761 28% Sometimes 41242 30%

Often 948 12% 1465 12% 2413 12% Often 40889 29%Very Often 761 9% 1220 10% 1981 10% Very Often 26995 19%

Total 8191 100% 12135 100% 20326 100% Total 138913 100%Don't Know 121 1% 96 1% 217 1%

Never 1580 19% 2031 17% 3611 18% Never 16242 12%Sometimes 2432 30% 3509 29% 5941 29% Sometimes 40783 29%

Often 2170 26% 3281 27% 5451 27% Often 50872 37%Very Often 1921 23% 3256 27% 5177 25% Very Often 31206 22%

Total 8224 100% 12173 100% 20397 100% Total 139103 100%Don't Know 300 4% 346 3% 646 3%

Never 408 5% 394 3% 802 4% Never 40308 29%Sometimes 4910 59% 6686 55% 11596 57% Sometimes 77808 56%

Often 1889 23% 3293 27% 5182 25% Often 15053 11%Very Often 772 9% 1488 12% 2260 11% Very Often 5562 4%

Total 8279 100% 12207 100% 20486 100% Total 138731 100%Don't Know 112 1% 75 1% 187 1%

Never 1212 15% 1486 12% 2698 13% Never 18494 13%Sometimes 2964 36% 4012 33% 6976 34% Sometimes 55768 40%

Often 2138 26% 3321 27% 5459 27% Often 45296 33%Very Often 1847 22% 3317 27% 5164 25% Very Often 18897 14%

Total 8273 100% 12211 100% 20484 100% Total 138455 100%Don't Know 1497 18% 1458 12% 2955 14%

Never 1262 15% 1418 12% 2680 13% Never 58219 42%Sometimes 3505 42% 5292 43% 8797 43% Sometimes 51946 37%

Often 1460 18% 2730 22% 4190 20% Often 20845 15%Very Often 535 6% 1307 11% 1842 9% Very Often 7982 6%

Total 8259 100% 12205 100% 20464 100% Total 138992 100%Don't Know 3447 42% 3407 28% 6854 34%

Never 1315 16% 1676 14% 2991 15% Never 102107 73%Sometimes 2571 31% 4770 39% 7341 36% Sometimes 26902 19%

Often 700 8% 1727 14% 2427 12% Often 6955 5%Very Often 219 3% 622 5% 841 4% Very Often 3409 2%

Total 8252 100% 12202 100% 20454 100% Total 139373 100%Don't Know 2803 34% 2441 20% 5244 26%

Never 4011 49% 6375 52% 10386 51% Never 108820 78%Sometimes 985 12% 2213 18% 3198 16% Sometimes 21092 15%

Often 245 3% 633 5% 878 4% Often 6191 4%Very Often 169 2% 483 4% 652 3% Very Often 2669 2%

Total 8213 100% 12145 100% 20358 100% Total 138773 100%

How often do students in your selected course section participate in a community-based project as a part of a regular course

In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you participated in a community-based project as a part of a regular course

How often do students in your selected course section tutor or teach other students (paid or voluntary)

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary)

How often do students in your selected course section work with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments

How often do students in your selected course section work with other students on projects during class

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you worked with other students on projects during class

How often do students in your selected course section come to class without completing readings or assignments

In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you come to class without completing readings or assignments

All Students

How often do students in your selected course section ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions

How often do students in your selected course section make a class presentation

Part-Time Faculty

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you made a class presentation

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in

In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions

Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

How often do students in your selected course section prepare two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in

How often do students in your selected course section work on a paper that requires integrating ideas or information from various sources

SFC1

Page 316: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentAll StudentsPart-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

Don't Know 1341 16% 1324 11% 2665 13% Never 782 9% 1130 9% 1912 9% Never 17771 13%

Sometimes 2454 30% 3556 29% 6010 29% Sometimes 35252 25%Often 1845 22% 2902 24% 4747 23% Often 41856 30%

Very Often 1824 22% 3273 27% 5097 25% Very Often 43918 32%Total 8246 100% 12185 100% 20431 100% Total 138798 100%

Don't Know 9 0% 16 0% 25 0% Never 275 3% 377 3% 652 3% Never 27110 20%

Sometimes 3049 37% 4676 38% 7725 38% Sometimes 49570 36%Often 2732 33% 3859 32% 6591 32% Often 36105 26%

Very Often 2224 27% 3288 27% 5512 27% Very Often 26012 19%Total 8289 100% 12216 100% 20505 100% Total 138797 100%

Don't Know 7 0% 8 0% 15 0% Never 46 1% 55 0% 101 0% Never 13884 10%

Sometimes 2554 31% 3191 26% 5745 28% Sometimes 62365 45%Often 3711 45% 5722 47% 9433 46% Often 42793 31%

Very Often 1966 24% 3230 26% 5196 25% Very Often 19837 14%Total 8284 100% 12206 100% 20490 100% Total 138879 100%

Don't Know 28 0% 13 0% 41 0% Never 695 8% 591 5% 1286 6% Never 44233 32%

Sometimes 4756 58% 6266 51% 11022 54% Sometimes 61409 44%Often 1939 23% 3403 28% 5342 26% Often 23795 17%

Very Often 849 10% 1906 16% 2755 13% Very Often 9383 7%Total 8267 100% 12179 100% 20446 100% Total 138820 100%

Don't Know 56 1% 44 0% 100 0% Never 1145 14% 934 8% 2079 10% Never 66101 48%

Sometimes 4835 59% 7204 59% 12039 59% Sometimes 51203 37%Often 1589 19% 2908 24% 4497 22% Often 15710 11%

Very Often 609 7% 1088 9% 1697 8% Very Often 5540 4%Total 8234 100% 12178 100% 20412 100% Total 138553 100%

Don't Know 7 0% 9 0% 16 0% Never 23 0% 25 0% 48 0% Never 11292 8%

Sometimes 619 7% 794 7% 1413 7% Sometimes 49883 36%Often 3365 41% 4812 39% 8177 40% Often 53546 39%

Very Often 4268 52% 6562 54% 10830 53% Very Often 23936 17%Total 8282 100% 12202 100% 20484 100% Total 138657 100%

Don't Know 674 8% 739 6% 1413 7% Never 106 1% 132 1% 238 1% Never 15842 11%

Sometimes 2857 34% 3984 33% 6841 33% Sometimes 56162 40%Often 3491 42% 5236 43% 8727 43% Often 46916 34%

Very Often 1162 14% 2133 17% 3295 16% Very Often 19973 14%Total 8290 100% 12224 100% 20514 100% Total 138894 100%

Don't Know 158 2% 137 1% 295 1% Never 4562 55% 4221 35% 8783 43% Never 98454 71%

Sometimes 2905 35% 6116 50% 9021 44% Sometimes 27541 20%Often 499 6% 1327 11% 1826 9% Often 8599 6%

Very Often 130 2% 394 3% 524 3% Very Often 3112 2%Total 8254 100% 12195 100% 20449 100% Total 137706 100%

Don't Know 2944 36% 3667 30% 6611 32% Never 230 3% 262 2% 492 2% Never 17631 13%

Sometimes 2960 36% 4466 37% 7426 36% Sometimes 53242 38%Often 1654 20% 2922 24% 4576 22% Often 42872 31%

Very Often 480 6% 880 7% 1360 7% Very Often 25541 18%Total 8268 100% 12197 100% 20465 100% Total 139286 100%

Don't Know 3124 38% 4091 34% 7215 35% Never 317 4% 377 3% 694 3% Never 32978 24%

Sometimes 1984 24% 3215 26% 5199 25% Sometimes 47182 34%Often 1850 22% 2840 23% 4690 23% Often 33052 24%

Very Often 987 12% 1660 14% 2647 13% Very Often 25964 19%Total 8262 100% 12183 100% 20445 100% Total 139175 100%

How often do students in your selected course section have serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity other than their own

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity other than your own

How often do students in your selected course section discuss ideas from their readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

How often do students in your selected course section work with you on activities other than coursework

In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you worked with instructors on activities other than coursework

How often do students in your selected course section work harder than they thought they could to meet your standards or expectations

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations

How often do students in your selected course section receive prompt feedback (written or oral) from you about their performance

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on your performance

How often do students in your selected course section discuss ideas from their readings or classes with you outside of class

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you discussed ideas from your readings or classes with instructors outside of class

How often do students in your selected course section talk about career plans with you

In your experiences at this college during the current school year, about how often have you talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor

How often do students in your selected course section discuss grades or assignments with you

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you discussed grades or assignments with an instructor

How often do students in your selected course section use e-mail to communicate with you

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you used e-mail to communicate with an instructor

How often do students in your selected course section use the internet or instant messaging to work on an assignment

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you used the internet or instant messaging to work on an assignment

SFC2

Page 317: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentAll StudentsPart-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

Don't Know 3661 44% 4865 40% 8526 42% Never 354 4% 397 3% 751 4% Never 32836 24%

Sometimes 1889 23% 3116 26% 5005 25% Sometimes 50373 36%Often 1536 19% 2455 20% 3991 20% Often 32725 24%

Very Often 806 10% 1341 11% 2147 11% Very Often 23074 17%Total 8246 100% 12174 100% 20420 100% Total 139007 100%

Don't Know 331 4% 374 3% 705 3% Never 498 6% 960 8% 1458 7% Never 67655 49%

Sometimes 6164 75% 9053 74% 15217 74% Sometimes 62673 45%Often 988 12% 1414 12% 2402 12% Often 6311 5%

Very Often 292 4% 392 3% 684 3% Very Often 2735 2%Total 8273 100% 12193 100% 20466 100% Total 139374 100%

Very Little 1767 21% 2712 22% 4479 22% Very Little 10210 7%Some 2905 35% 4218 35% 7123 35% Some 40287 29%

Quite a bit 2316 28% 3421 28% 5737 28% Quite a bit 54503 39%Very Much 1302 16% 1868 15% 3170 15% Very Much 34702 25%

Total 8290 100% 12219 100% 20509 100% Total 139702 100%Very Little 277 3% 299 2% 576 3% Very Little 7395 5%

Some 1424 17% 1856 15% 3280 16% Some 40574 29%Quite a bit 3887 47% 5727 47% 9614 47% Quite a bit 59832 43%Very Much 2684 32% 4321 35% 7005 34% Very Much 31493 23%

Total 8272 100% 12203 100% 20475 100% Total 139295 100%Very Little 300 4% 358 3% 658 3% Very Little 11070 8%

Some 1681 20% 2143 18% 3824 19% Some 47174 34%Quite a bit 3430 41% 5023 41% 8453 41% Quite a bit 53297 38%Very Much 2856 35% 4681 38% 7537 37% Very Much 27100 20%

Total 8267 100% 12205 100% 20472 100% Total 138642 100%Very Little 793 10% 961 8% 1754 9% Very Little 17923 13%

Some 2318 28% 3167 26% 5485 27% Some 50781 37%Quite a bit 2907 35% 4473 37% 7380 36% Quite a bit 47503 34%Very Much 2234 27% 3582 29% 5816 28% Very Much 22651 16%

Total 8252 100% 12183 100% 20435 100% Total 138858 100%Very Little 458 6% 471 4% 929 5% Very Little 14871 11%

Some 1931 23% 2327 19% 4258 21% Some 48495 35%Quite a bit 3033 37% 4385 36% 7418 36% Quite a bit 49293 35%Very Much 2831 34% 5007 41% 7838 38% Very Much 26472 19%

Total 8253 100% 12190 100% 20443 100% Total 139130 100%Very Little 740 9% 855 7% 1595 8% Very Little 13233 9%

Some 2184 27% 2854 23% 5038 25% Some 44201 32%Quite a bit 2864 35% 4174 34% 7038 34% Quite a bit 50053 36%Very Much 2450 30% 4297 35% 6747 33% Very Much 32104 23%

Total 8238 100% 12180 100% 20418 100% Total 139592 100%None 382 5% 513 4% 895 4% None 4161 3%

1 4343 53% 5663 47% 10006 49% 1 to 4 59572 43%2-3 2717 33% 4504 37% 7221 35% 5 to 10 42354 31%4-6 339 4% 725 6% 1064 5% 11 to 20 18494 13%

More than 6 435 5% 749 6% 1184 6% More than 20 13433 10%Total 8216 100% 12154 100% 20370 100% Total 138015 100%

None 2009 25% 2808 23% 4817 24% None 15051 11%1 1268 16% 1887 16% 3155 16% 1 to 4 44447 32%

2 to 3 1813 22% 2869 24% 4682 23% 5 to 10 42678 31%4 to 6 1527 19% 2167 18% 3694 18% 11 to 20 23294 17%

More than 6 1557 19% 2377 20% 3934 19% More than 20 12471 9%Total 8174 100% 12108 100% 20282 100% Total 137941 100%

During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations

During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations

During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize having students use information they have read or heard to perform a new skill

During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized using information you have read or heard to perform a new skill

During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods

During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods

During the current school year, how much doe the coursework in your selected course section emphasize synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways

During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways

During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory

During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory

During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize memorizing facts, ideas, or methods so the students can repeat them in pretty much the same form

During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your courses and readings so you can repeat them in pretty much the same form

How often do students in your selected course section skip class

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you skipped class

How often do students in your selected course section have serious conversations with students who differ from them in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values

In your experience at this college during the current school year, about how often have you had serious conversations with students who differ from you in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values

In your selected course section, what is the number of assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or book-length packs of course readings that your students read

During the current school year, about what number of assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or book-length packs of course readings do you read

In your selected course section, what is the number of written papers or reports of any length that your students write

During the current school year, about what number of written papers or reports of any length do you write

SFC3

Page 318: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentAll StudentsPart-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

Extremely Easy (1) 25 0% 31 0% 56 0% Extremely Easy (1) 1302 1%(2) 45 1% 59 0% 104 1% (2) 2654 2%(3) 184 2% 203 2% 387 2% (3) 7683 6%(4) 960 12% 1245 10% 2205 11% (4) 31682 24%(5) 3163 39% 4179 34% 7342 36% (5) 45039 34%(6) 3172 39% 5160 43% 8332 41% (6) 30187 23%

Extremely Challenging (7) 655 8% 1246 10% 1901 9% Extremely Challenging (7) 13610 10%Total 8204 100% 12123 100% 20327 100% Total 132157 100%

Not important 1213 15% 1413 12% 2626 13% I have not done, nor plan to do 59205 43%Somewhat important 2662 33% 3683 30% 6345 31% I plan to do 55452 40%

Very important 4248 52% 7024 58% 11272 56% I have done 22396 16%Total 8123 100% 12120 100% 20243 100% Total 137053 100%

Not important 1593 20% 2229 18% 3822 19% I have not done, nor plan to do 117310 86%Somewhat important 2633 33% 3773 31% 6406 32% I plan to do 7498 5%

Very important 3857 48% 6069 50% 9926 49% I have done 12274 9%Total 8083 100% 12071 100% 20154 100% Total 137082 100%

Not important 745 9% 580 5% 1325 7% I have not done, nor plan to do 100371 73%Somewhat important 2293 28% 2651 22% 4944 24% I plan to do 11565 8%

Very important 5056 62% 8867 73% 13923 69% I have done 25209 18%Total 8094 100% 12098 100% 20192 100% Total 137145 100%

Not important 701 9% 585 5% 1286 6% I have not done, nor plan to do 93258 68%Somewhat important 2138 26% 2683 22% 4821 24% I plan to do 14421 11%

Very important 5258 65% 8822 73% 14080 70% I have done 29483 21%Total 8097 100% 12090 100% 20187 100% Total 137161 100%

Not important 1129 14% 870 7% 1999 10% I have not done, nor plan to do 73051 53%Somewhat important 2251 28% 2704 22% 4955 25% I plan to do 19240 14%

Very important 4697 58% 8525 70% 13222 66% I have done 44694 33%Total 8077 100% 12099 100% 20176 100% Total 136985 100%

Not important 424 5% 444 4% 868 4% I have not done, nor plan to do 92054 67%Somewhat important 2535 31% 3668 30% 6203 31% I plan to do 24586 18%

Very important 5179 64% 8008 66% 13187 65% I have done 20384 15%Total 8138 100% 12120 100% 20258 100% Total 137024 100%

Not important 1715 21% 2823 23% 4538 23% I have not done, nor plan to do 99527 73%Somewhat important 3675 46% 5740 48% 9415 47% I plan to do 30425 22%

Very important 2663 33% 3452 29% 6115 30% I have done 6605 5%Total 8053 100% 12015 100% 20068 100% Total 136557 100%

Not important 933 12% 1097 9% 2030 10% I have not done, nor plan to do 83796 61%Somewhat important 3331 41% 4677 39% 8008 40% I plan to do 18368 13%

Very important 3811 47% 6308 52% 10119 50% I have done 34769 25%Total 8075 100% 12082 100% 20157 100% Total 136933 100%

Not important 1464 18% 2298 19% 3762 19% I have not done, nor plan to do 101066 74%Somewhat important 4123 51% 6295 52% 10418 52% I plan to do 24879 18%

Very important 2435 30% 3411 28% 5846 29% I have done 11405 8%Total 8022 100% 12004 100% 20026 100% Total 137350 100%

Very Little 432 5% 880 7% 1312 7% Very Little 6404 5%Some 2521 31% 3704 31% 6225 31% Some 33706 24%

Quite a bit 3397 42% 4823 40% 8220 41% Quite a bit 59413 43%Very Much 1708 21% 2715 22% 4423 22% Very Much 38539 28%

Total 8058 100% 12122 100% 20180 100% Total 138062 100%Very Little 132 2% 242 2% 374 2% Very Little 7204 5%

Some 1103 14% 1879 15% 2982 15% Some 33510 24%Quite a bit 3237 40% 4609 38% 7846 39% Quite a bit 58604 43%Very Much 3657 45% 5420 45% 9077 45% Very Much 38524 28%

Total 8129 100% 12150 100% 20279 100% Total 137842 100%Very Little 506 6% 1062 9% 1568 8% Very Little 26463 19%

Some 2219 28% 3794 31% 6013 30% Some 46239 34%Quite a bit 2844 36% 4024 33% 6868 34% Quite a bit 39898 29%Very Much 2396 30% 3193 26% 5589 28% Very Much 24893 18%

Total 7965 100% 12073 100% 20038 100% Total 137492 100%

How important is it to you that students participate in organized learning communities

Student activities: Organized learning communities

How important is it to you that students participate in a college orientation program or course

Student activities: College orientation program or course

How important is it to you that students participate in honors courses

Student activities: Honors course

Select the circle that best represents the extent to which your examinations of student performance (e.g. Exams, portfolio) challenge students to do their best work

Mark the response that best represents the extent to which your examinations during the current school year have challenged you to do your best work at this college

How important is it to you that students participate in internships, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment

Student activities: Internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment

How important is it to you that students participate in English as a second language courses

Student activities: English as a second language course

How important is it to you that students participate in developmental/remedial reading courses

Student activities: Developmental/remedial reading course

How important is it to you that students participate in developmental/remedial writing courses

Student activities: Developmental/remedial writing course

How important is it to you that students participate in developmental/remedial math courses

Student activities: Developmental/remedial math course

How important is it to you that students participate in study skills courses

Student activities: Study skills course

How much does this college emphasize encouraging students to spend significant amounts of time studying

How much does this college emphasize encouraging you to spend significant amounts of time studying

How much does this college emphasize providing students the support they need to help them to succeed at this college

How much does this college emphasize providing the support you need to help you succeed at this college

How much does this college emphasize encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds

How much does this college emphasize encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds

SFC4

Page 319: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentAll StudentsPart-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

Very Little 846 11% 1520 13% 2366 12% Very Little 57750 42%Some 3099 39% 4703 39% 7802 39% Some 45644 33%

Quite a bit 2594 33% 3799 31% 6393 32% Quite a bit 22851 17%Very Much 1386 17% 2044 17% 3430 17% Very Much 11173 8%

Total 7925 100% 12066 100% 19991 100% Total 137417 100%Very Little 910 12% 1839 15% 2749 14% Very Little 40956 30%

Some 3346 43% 5303 44% 8649 43% Some 54513 40%Quite a bit 2450 31% 3401 28% 5851 29% Quite a bit 29125 21%Very Much 1153 15% 1484 12% 2637 13% Very Much 12133 9%

Total 7859 100% 12027 100% 19886 100% Total 136726 100%Very Little 239 3% 344 3% 583 3% Very Little 38897 28%

Some 1896 24% 2695 22% 4591 23% Some 37107 27%Quite a bit 3524 45% 5497 46% 9021 45% Quite a bit 32299 24%Very Much 2240 28% 3506 29% 5746 29% Very Much 28608 21%

Total 7899 100% 12042 100% 19941 100% Total 136910 100%Very Little 142 2% 153 1% 295 1% Very Little 9887 7%

Some 927 12% 1201 10% 2128 11% Some 25830 19%Quite a bit 2877 36% 4275 35% 7152 35% Quite a bit 45514 33%Very Much 4097 51% 6479 54% 10576 52% Very Much 56497 41%

Total 8043 100% 12108 100% 20151 100% Total 137728 100%None 44 1% 64 1% 108 1% None 2547 2%1 to 5 3909 49% 5392 45% 9301 47% 1 to 5 62175 45%

6 to 10 2834 36% 4403 37% 7237 36% 6 to 10 40139 29%11 to 20 987 12% 1778 15% 2765 14% 11 to 20 22165 16%21 to 30 151 2% 291 2% 442 2% 21 to 30 7160 5%

More than 30 25 0% 66 1% 91 0% More than 30 3657 3%Total 7950 100% 11994 100% 19944 100% Total 137843 100%

None 39 0% 77 1% 116 1% None 26828 20%1 to 5 100 1% 159 1% 259 1% 1 to 5 6736 5%

6 to 10 337 4% 497 4% 834 4% 6 to 10 7999 6%11 to 20 1705 22% 2769 23% 4474 22% 11 to 20 16051 12%21 to 30 3128 40% 5428 45% 8556 43% 21 to 30 23802 17%

More than 30 2596 33% 3064 26% 5660 28% More than 30 55905 41%Total 7905 100% 11994 100% 19899 100% Total 137321 100%

None 1454 19% 2206 19% 3660 19% None 113445 82%1 to 5 5419 70% 8564 72% 13983 71% 1 to 5 17252 13%

6 to 10 655 8% 853 7% 1508 8% 6 to 10 3415 2%11 to 20 155 2% 232 2% 387 2% 11 to 20 1834 1%21 to 30 35 0% 38 0% 73 0% 21 to 30 683 0%

More than 30 7 0% 26 0% 33 0% More than 30 910 1%Total 7725 100% 11919 100% 19644 100% Total 137540 100%

None 234 3% 292 2% 526 3% None 60877 44%1 to 5 1134 15% 1607 14% 2741 14% 1 to 5 21068 15%

6 to 10 1442 19% 2157 18% 3599 18% 6 to 10 10602 8%11 to 20 1898 25% 2895 25% 4793 25% 11 to 20 8018 6%21 to 30 1344 17% 2299 20% 3643 19% 21 to 30 5482 4%

More than 30 1654 21% 2539 22% 4193 22% More than 30 31253 23%Total 7706 100% 11789 100% 19495 100% Total 137301 100%

None 101 1% 171 1% 272 1% None 10233 7%1 to 5 5106 65% 7135 60% 12241 62% 1 to 5 94502 69%

6 to 10 2008 26% 3596 30% 5604 28% 6 to 10 21486 16%11 to 20 477 6% 750 6% 1227 6% 11 to 20 6659 5%21 to 30 77 1% 170 1% 247 1% 21 to 30 1814 1%

More than 30 95 1% 120 1% 215 1% More than 30 2684 2%Total 7864 100% 11942 100% 19806 100% Total 137379 100%

About how many hours do you think full and part-time students at this college spend in a typical 7 - day week working for pay

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7 - day week working for pay

How much does this college emphasize providing students the support they need to thrive socially

How much does this college emphasize providing the support you need to thrive socially

How much does this college emphasize helping students cope with their non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.)

How much does this college emphasize helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.)

How much does this college emphasize providing the financial support students need to afford their education

How much does this college emphasize providing the financial support you need to afford your education

How much does this college emphasize using computers in academic work

How much does this college emphasize using computers in academic work

About how many hours do you think full and part-time students at this college spend in a typical 7 - day week preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, doing homework, or other activities related to their programs)

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7 - day week preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, doing homework, or other activities related to your programs)

About how many hours do you think full and part-time students at this college spend in a typical 7 - day week participating in college-sponsored activities (organizations, campus publications, student government, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.)

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7 - day week participating in college-sponsored activities (organizations, campus publications, student government, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.)

About how many hours do you think full and part-time students at this college spend in a typical 7 - day week providing care for dependents living with them (parents, children, spouse, etc.)

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7 - day week providing care for dependents living with you (parents, children, spouse, etc.)

About how many hours do you think full and part-time students at this college spend in a typical 7 - day week commuting to and from class.

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7 - day week commuting to and from class

SFC5

Page 320: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentAll StudentsPart-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

Unfriendly, unsupportive, sense of alienation (1) 8 0% 5 0% 13 0%

Unfriendly, unsupportive, sense of alienation (1) 1312 1%

(2) 35 0% 65 1% 100 0% (2) 2865 2%(3) 179 2% 305 3% 484 2% (3) 6409 5%(4) 957 12% 1556 13% 2513 13% (4) 21826 16%(5) 2565 32% 3927 33% 6492 32% (5) 30880 22%(6) 2787 35% 4308 36% 7095 35% (6) 38215 28%

Friendly, supportive, sense of belonging (7) 1513 19% 1871 16% 3384 17%

Friendly, supportive, sense of belonging (7) 36407 26%

Total 8044 100% 12037 100% 20081 100% Total 137914 100%Unavailable, unhelpful,

unsympathetic (1) 6 0% 10 0% 16 0%Unavailable, unhelpful,

unsympathetic (1) 875 1%(2) 24 0% 30 0% 54 0% (2) 1974 1%(3) 93 1% 145 1% 238 1% (3) 5117 4%(4) 537 7% 735 6% 1272 6% (4) 16450 12%(5) 1876 23% 2815 23% 4691 23% (5) 29219 21%(6) 3504 43% 5607 47% 9111 45% (6) 43570 32%

Available, helpful, sympathetic (7) 2032 25% 2710 22% 4742 24%

Available, helpful, sympathetic (7) 40791 30%

Total 8072 100% 12052 100% 20124 100% Total 137996 100%

Unhelpful, inconsiderate, rigid (1) 70 1% 196 2% 266 1% Unhelpful, inconsiderate, rigid (1) 4643 3%(2) 197 2% 584 5% 781 4% (2) 6897 5%(3) 462 6% 1169 10% 1631 8% (3) 11964 9%(4) 1232 15% 2207 18% 3439 17% (4) 28081 20%(5) 2022 25% 3240 27% 5262 26% (5) 30960 22%(6) 2461 31% 3148 26% 5609 28% (6) 30304 22%

Helpful, considerate, flexible (7) 1509 19% 1456 12% 2965 15% Helpful, considerate, flexible (7) 24786 18%Total 7953 100% 12000 100% 19953 100% Total 137635 100%

None 29 0% 45 0% 74 0% Very little 228 3% 514 4% 742 4% Very little 7879 6%

Some 1643 20% 2766 23% 4409 22% Some 32459 24%Quite a bit 3421 42% 4859 40% 8280 41% Quite a bit 58186 42%Very much 2783 34% 3873 32% 6656 33% Very much 39088 28%

Total 8104 100% 12057 100% 20161 100% Total 137612 100%None 66 1% 76 1% 142 1%

Very little 428 5% 518 4% 946 5% Very little 25854 19%Some 1928 24% 2554 21% 4482 22% Some 41190 30%

Quite a bit 2799 35% 3789 31% 6588 33% Quite a bit 41356 30%Very much 2875 36% 5132 43% 8007 40% Very much 29001 21%

Total 8096 100% 12069 100% 20165 100% Total 137401 100%None 334 4% 328 3% 662 3%

Very little 1122 14% 1583 13% 2705 13% Very little 16047 12%Some 2484 31% 3920 33% 6404 32% Some 40101 29%

Quite a bit 2266 28% 3482 29% 5748 29% Quite a bit 52169 38%Very much 1882 23% 2745 23% 4627 23% Very much 29038 21%

Total 8088 100% 12058 100% 20146 100% Total 137354 100%None 224 3% 255 2% 479 2%

Very little 990 12% 1502 12% 2492 12% Very little 19997 15%Some 2682 33% 4113 34% 6795 34% Some 42250 31%

Quite a bit 2607 32% 3748 31% 6355 32% Quite a bit 48668 35%Very much 1585 20% 2425 20% 4010 20% Very much 26426 19%

Total 8088 100% 12043 100% 20131 100% Total 137341 100%None 33 0% 27 0% 60 0%

Very little 185 2% 247 2% 432 2% Very little 9435 7%Some 1199 15% 1368 11% 2567 13% Some 36130 26%

Quite a bit 2891 36% 4064 34% 6955 35% Quite a bit 57155 42%Very much 3794 47% 6350 53% 10144 50% Very much 34607 25%

Total 8102 100% 12056 100% 20158 100% Total 137328 100%

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in thinking critically and analytically

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in thinking critically and analytically

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in speaking clearly and effectively

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in speaking clearly and effectively

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in writing clearly and effectively

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in writing clearly and effectively

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in acquiring a broad general education

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in acquiring a broad general education

Select the circle that best represents the quality of student relationships with administrative personnel and offices

Mark the number that best represents the quality of your relationships with administrative personnel and offices at this college

Select the circle that best represents the quality of student relationships with instructors

Mark the number that best represents the quality of your relationships with instructors at this college

Select the circle that best represents the quality of student relationships with other students

Mark the number that best represents the quality of your relationships with other students at this college

SFC6

Page 321: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentAll StudentsPart-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

None 2308 29% 2754 23% 5062 25% Very little 1928 24% 2682 22% 4610 23% Very little 22710 17%

Some 1521 19% 2413 20% 3934 20% Some 40656 30%Quite a bit 838 10% 1626 13% 2464 12% Quite a bit 46308 34%Very much 1484 18% 2593 21% 4077 20% Very much 27512 20%

Total 8079 100% 12068 100% 20147 100% Total 137186 100%None 519 6% 511 4% 1030 5%

Very little 963 12% 1172 10% 2135 11% Very little 19709 14%Some 2538 31% 3460 29% 5998 30% Some 37938 28%

Quite a bit 2076 26% 3377 28% 5453 27% Quite a bit 44528 32%Very much 2002 25% 3550 29% 5552 28% Very much 35067 26%

Total 8098 100% 12070 100% 20168 100% Total 137242 100%None 129 2% 103 1% 232 1%

Very little 580 7% 737 6% 1317 7% Very little 13367 10%Some 2465 30% 3210 27% 5675 28% Some 44225 32%

Quite a bit 2739 34% 4008 33% 6747 33% Quite a bit 49976 36%Very much 2193 27% 4015 33% 6208 31% Very much 29686 22%

Total 8106 100% 12073 100% 20179 100% Total 137254 100%None 12 0% 23 0% 35 0%

Very little 124 2% 186 2% 310 2% Very little 9637 7%Some 1404 17% 1997 17% 3401 17% Some 34913 25%

Quite a bit 3845 47% 5787 48% 9632 48% Quite a bit 55521 40%Very much 2723 34% 4086 34% 6809 34% Very much 37246 27%

Total 8108 100% 12079 100% 20187 100% Total 137318 100%None 182 2% 278 2% 460 2%

Very little 682 8% 1218 10% 1900 9% Very little 23321 17%Some 2432 30% 3759 31% 6191 31% Some 41098 30%

Quite a bit 2661 33% 3894 32% 6555 33% Quite a bit 43267 32%Very much 2078 26% 2842 24% 4920 25% Very much 29475 21%

Total 8035 100% 11991 100% 20026 100% Total 137161 100%None 579 7% 831 7% 1410 7%

Very little 1241 15% 1991 17% 3232 16% Very little 31932 23%Some 2485 31% 3853 32% 6338 32% Some 46760 34%

Quite a bit 2134 27% 3155 26% 5289 26% Quite a bit 36235 26%Very much 1612 20% 2214 18% 3826 19% Very much 22144 16%

Total 8051 100% 12044 100% 20095 100% Total 137071 100%None 291 4% 390 3% 681 3%

Very little 827 10% 1245 10% 2072 10% Very little 33609 25%Some 2811 35% 4099 34% 6910 34% Some 45854 33%

Quite a bit 2461 31% 3788 31% 6249 31% Quite a bit 35980 26%Very much 1658 21% 2522 21% 4180 21% Very much 21612 16%

Total 8048 100% 12044 100% 20092 100% Total 137054 100%None 674 8% 935 8% 1609 8%

Very little 1759 22% 2678 22% 4437 22% Very little 51913 38%Some 2926 37% 4279 36% 7205 36% Some 48016 35%

Quite a bit 1661 21% 2521 21% 4182 21% Quite a bit 24542 18%Very much 967 12% 1577 13% 2544 13% Very much 12336 9%

Total 7987 100% 11990 100% 19977 100% Total 136807 100%None 273 3% 372 3% 645 3%

Very little 1026 13% 1492 12% 2518 13% Very little 22154 16%Some 2945 37% 3941 33% 6886 34% Some 39566 29%

Quite a bit 2395 30% 3633 30% 6028 30% Quite a bit 43995 32%Very much 1419 18% 2606 22% 4025 20% Very much 31523 23%

Total 8058 100% 12044 100% 20102 100% Total 137238 100%None 537 7% 753 6% 1290 6%

Very little 1535 19% 2251 19% 3786 19% Very little 27183 20%Some 2785 35% 3764 31% 6549 33% Some 41571 30%

Quite a bit 1940 24% 2917 24% 4857 24% Quite a bit 39937 29%Very much 1228 15% 2327 19% 3555 18% Very much 28755 21%

Total 8025 100% 12012 100% 20037 100% Total 137446 100%

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in gaining information about career opportunities

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in gaining information about career opportunities

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in developing clearer career goals

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in developing clearer career goals

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in contributing to the welfare of their community

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in contributing to the welfare of your community

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in developing a personal code of values and ethics

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in developing a personal code of values and ethics

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in understanding themselves

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in understanding yourself

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in learning effectively on their own

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in learning effectively on your own

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in working effectively with others

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in working effectively with others

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in using computing and information technology

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in using computing and information technology

To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in solving numerical problems

How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in solving numerical problems

SFC7

Page 322: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentAll StudentsPart-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

Don't know/N.A. 391 5% 158 1% 549 3% Don't know/N.A. 13011 10%Rarely or never 2201 27% 1796 15% 3997 20% Rarely or never 49040 36%

Sometimes 3991 49% 5860 49% 9851 49% Sometimes 57472 42%Often 1535 19% 4263 35% 5798 29% Often 16568 12%

Total 8118 100% 12077 100% 20195 100% Total 136092 100%Don't know/N.A. 582 7% 343 3% 925 5% Don't know/N.A. 28312 21%Rarely or never 3577 44% 4081 34% 7658 38% Rarely or never 68130 50%

Sometimes 3054 38% 5743 48% 8797 44% Sometimes 31725 23%Often 892 11% 1896 16% 2788 14% Often 7407 5%

Total 8105 100% 12063 100% 20168 100% Total 135575 100%Don't know/N.A. 902 11% 683 6% 1585 8% Don't know/N.A. 56867 42%Rarely or never 4506 56% 5755 48% 10261 51% Rarely or never 62636 47%

Sometimes 2101 26% 4188 35% 6289 31% Sometimes 11806 9%Often 565 7% 1426 12% 1991 10% Often 3346 2%

Total 8074 100% 12052 100% 20126 100% Total 134656 100%Don't know/N.A. 366 5% 160 1% 526 3% Don't know/N.A. 38488 29%Rarely or never 1867 23% 1636 14% 3503 17% Rarely or never 61382 46%

Sometimes 3294 41% 5381 45% 8675 43% Sometimes 24955 19%Often 2583 32% 4883 40% 7466 37% Often 9611 7%

Total 8110 100% 12060 100% 20170 100% Total 134437 100%Don't know/N.A. 561 7% 435 4% 996 5% Don't know/N.A. 32177 24%Rarely or never 2408 30% 2604 22% 5012 25% Rarely or never 49358 37%

Sometimes 2669 33% 4690 39% 7359 37% Sometimes 32751 24%Often 2459 30% 4335 36% 6794 34% Often 19803 15%

Total 8097 100% 12064 100% 20161 100% Total 134089 100%Don't know/N.A. 1759 22% 2103 17% 3862 19% Don't know/N.A. 77971 58%Rarely or never 5304 66% 7481 62% 12785 64% Rarely or never 49490 37%

Sometimes 882 11% 2162 18% 3044 15% Sometimes 3676 3%Often 120 1% 289 2% 409 2% Often 2953 2%

Total 8065 100% 12035 100% 20100 100% Total 134089 100%Don't know/N.A. 982 12% 517 4% 1499 7% Don't know/N.A. 32646 24%Rarely or never 3724 46% 3327 28% 7051 35% Rarely or never 43749 33%

Sometimes 2643 33% 5710 47% 8353 41% Sometimes 35147 26%Often 731 9% 2500 21% 3231 16% Often 22669 17%

Total 8080 100% 12054 100% 20134 100% Total 134211 100%Don't know/N.A. 551 7% 314 3% 865 4% Don't know/N.A. 19232 14%Rarely or never 2044 25% 1959 16% 4003 20% Rarely or never 32538 24%

Sometimes 2890 36% 4750 39% 7640 38% Sometimes 40526 30%Often 2604 32% 5032 42% 7636 38% Often 42019 31%

Total 8089 100% 12055 100% 20144 100% Total 134316 100%Don't know/N.A. 1132 14% 644 5% 1776 9% Don't know/N.A. 53454 40%Rarely or never 4559 57% 4985 41% 9544 48% Rarely or never 58784 44%

Sometimes 1955 24% 4841 40% 6796 34% Sometimes 15217 11%Often 410 5% 1560 13% 1970 10% Often 6016 5%

Total 8056 100% 12030 100% 20086 100% Total 133472 100%Don't know/N.A. 1175 15% 755 6% 1930 10% Don't know/N.A. 48668 36%Rarely or never 4062 50% 4093 34% 8155 41% Rarely or never 48948 36%

Sometimes 2232 28% 5342 44% 7574 38% Sometimes 27529 20%Often 587 7% 1837 15% 2424 12% Often 9469 7%

Total 8056 100% 12027 100% 20083 100% Total 134614 100%Don't know/N.A. 764 9% 464 4% 1228 6% Don't know/N.A. 80196 60%Rarely or never 2749 34% 2830 24% 5579 28% Rarely or never 43580 32%

Sometimes 3411 42% 6496 54% 9907 49% Sometimes 6347 5%Often 1147 14% 2242 19% 3389 17% Often 4651 3%

Total 8071 100% 12032 100% 20103 100% Total 134774 100%Not at all 51 1% 72 1% 123 1% Not at all 13980 11%

Somewhat 1226 15% 1636 14% 2862 14% Somewhat 37065 28%Very 6778 84% 10339 86% 17117 85% Very 80766 61%

Total 8055 100% 12047 100% 20102 100% Total 131811 100%

How important do you believe academic advising/planning is to students at this college

How important is academic advising/planning to you at this college

How often do you refer students to services to students with disabilities

How often do you use services to students with disabilities

How often do you refer students to transfer credit assistance How often do you use transfer credit assistance

How often do you refer students to student organizations How often do you use student organizations

How often do you refer students to computer labs How often do you use computer labs

How often do you refer students to financial aid advising How often do you use financial aid advising

How often do you refer students to child care How often do you use child care

How often do you refer students to skill labs (writing, math, etc.)

How often do you use skills labs (writing, math, etc.)

How often do you refer students to peer or other tutoring How often do you use peer or other tutoring

How often do you refer students to job placement assistance How often do you use job placement assistance

How often do you refer students to career counseling How often do you use career counseling

How often do you refer students to academic advising/planning

How often do you use academic advising/planning

SFC8

Page 323: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentAll StudentsPart-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

Not at all 83 1% 148 1% 231 1% Not at all 27451 21%Somewhat 1861 23% 3275 27% 5136 26% Somewhat 37455 29%

Very 6099 76% 8608 72% 14707 73% Very 65335 50%Total 8043 100% 12031 100% 20074 100% Total 130241 100%

Not at all 146 2% 355 3% 501 2% Not at all 45593 35%Somewhat 2361 29% 4151 35% 6512 32% Somewhat 36762 29%

Very 5523 69% 7505 62% 13028 65% Very 46184 36%Total 8030 100% 12011 100% 20041 100% Total 128539 100%

Not at all 114 1% 150 1% 264 1% Not at all 38128 30%Somewhat 2372 30% 3085 26% 5457 27% Somewhat 40055 31%

Very 5549 69% 8779 73% 14328 71% Very 50302 39%Total 8035 100% 12014 100% 20049 100% Total 128484 100%

Not at all 89 1% 146 1% 235 1% Not at all 32084 25%Somewhat 1703 21% 2469 21% 4172 21% Somewhat 40096 31%

Very 6239 78% 9409 78% 15648 78% Very 55845 44%Total 8031 100% 12024 100% 20055 100% Total 128024 100%

Not at all 547 7% 767 6% 1314 7% Not at all 68961 54%Somewhat 3745 47% 4985 42% 8730 44% Somewhat 23189 18%

Very 3709 46% 6230 52% 9939 50% Very 35104 28%Total 8001 100% 11982 100% 19983 100% Total 127254 100%

Not at all 78 1% 69 1% 147 1% Not at all 28879 22%Somewhat 1571 20% 1890 16% 3461 17% Somewhat 22475 17%

Very 6376 79% 10062 84% 16438 82% Very 77094 60%Total 8025 100% 12021 100% 20046 100% Total 128449 100%

Not at all 66 1% 77 1% 143 1% Not at all 20623 16%Somewhat 1811 23% 2506 21% 4317 22% Somewhat 32440 25%

Very 6153 77% 9428 78% 15581 78% Very 75805 59%Total 8030 100% 12011 100% 20041 100% Total 128868 100%

Not at all 744 9% 1042 9% 1786 9% Not at all 52486 41%Somewhat 4781 60% 6818 57% 11599 58% Somewhat 44279 35%

Very 2480 31% 4134 34% 6614 33% Very 30077 24%Total 8005 100% 11994 100% 19999 100% Total 126842 100%

Not at all 181 2% 259 2% 440 2% Not at all 35700 28%Somewhat 2666 33% 3824 32% 6490 32% Somewhat 27759 22%

Very 5150 64% 7894 66% 13044 65% Very 64910 51%Total 7997 100% 11977 100% 19974 100% Total 128368 100%

Not at all 130 2% 208 2% 338 2% Not at all 52352 41%Somewhat 2305 29% 3380 28% 5685 29% Somewhat 19544 15%

Very 5543 69% 8360 70% 13903 70% Very 55836 44%Total 7978 100% 11948 100% 19926 100% Total 127732 100%

Not likely 183 2% 237 2% 420 2% Not likely 55827 41%Somewhat likely 1372 17% 1633 14% 3005 15% Somewhat likely 28898 21%

Likely 2726 34% 3836 32% 6562 33% Likely 24345 18%Very likely 3819 47% 6371 53% 10190 51% Very likely 28285 21%

Total 8100 100% 12077 100% 20177 100% Total 137355 100%Not likely 267 3% 350 3% 617 3% Not likely 67474 49%

Somewhat likely 2088 26% 2649 22% 4737 24% Somewhat likely 30595 22%Likely 3107 38% 4690 39% 7797 39% Likely 21586 16%

Very likely 2621 32% 4374 36% 6995 35% Very likely 17429 13%Total 8083 100% 12063 100% 20146 100% Total 137084 100%

Not likely 251 3% 251 2% 502 2% Not likely 78788 58%Somewhat likely 1745 22% 2018 17% 3763 19% Somewhat likely 32026 23%

Likely 2875 35% 4120 34% 6995 35% Likely 16555 12%Very likely 3228 40% 5681 47% 8909 44% Very likely 9169 7%

Total 8099 100% 12070 100% 20169 100% Total 136538 100%

How likely is it that being academically unprepared would cause students to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that being academically unprepared would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that caring for dependents would cause students to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that caring for dependents would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that working full-time would cause students to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that working full-time would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college

How important do you believe services to students with disabilities are to students at this college

How important are services to students with disabilities to you at this college

How important do you believe transfer credit assistance is to students at this college

How important is transfer credit assistance to you at this college

How important do you believe student organizations are to students at this college

How important are student organizations to you at this college

How important do you believe computer labs are to students at this college

How important are computer labs to you at this college

How important do you believe financial aid advising is to students at this college

How important is financial aid advising to you at this college

How important do you believe child care is to students at this college

How important is child care to you at this college

How important do you believe skills labs (writing, math, etc.) are to students at this college

How important are skills labs (writing, math, etc.) to you at this college

How important do you believe peer and other tutoring is to students at this college

How important is peer and other tutoring to you at this college

How important do you believe job placement assistance is to students at this college

How important is job placement assistance to you at this college

How important do you believe career counseling is to students at this college

How important is career counseling to you at this college

SFC9

Page 324: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Responses 2007 CCSSE Student Responses

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentAll StudentsPart-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

Not likely 532 7% 444 4% 976 5% Not likely 44973 33%Somewhat likely 2226 28% 2627 22% 4853 24% Somewhat likely 31208 23%

Likely 2805 35% 4217 35% 7022 35% Likely 25356 19%Very likely 2495 31% 4771 40% 7266 36% Very likely 35355 26%

Total 8058 100% 12059 100% 20117 100% Total 136893 100%Not likely 1365 17% 2356 20% 3721 19% Not likely 45456 33%

Somewhat likely 2811 35% 4301 36% 7112 35% Somewhat likely 23575 17%Likely 2570 32% 3496 29% 6066 30% Likely 24444 18%

Very likely 1304 16% 1879 16% 3183 16% Very likely 43570 32%Total 8050 100% 12032 100% 20082 100% Total 137045 100%

How likely is it that transferring to a 4-year college or university would cause students to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that transferring to a 4-year college or university would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that lacking finances would cause students to withdraw from class or from this college

How likely is it that lack of finances would cause you to withdraw from class or from this college

SFC10

Page 325: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Count Percent Count Percent Count PercentFewer than 10 968 12% 1346 11% 2314 11%

10 to 19 3314 40% 4414 36% 7728 38%20 to 29 2975 36% 4347 36% 7322 36%30 to 39 773 9% 1398 11% 2171 11%40 to 69 200 2% 505 4% 705 3%

70 or more 24 0% 176 1% 200 1%Total 8254 100% 12186 100% 20440 100%

None 1254 15% 719 6% 1973 10%1 to 3 2184 26% 1801 15% 3985 19%4 to 6 1320 16% 1553 13% 2873 14%7 to 9 780 9% 1202 10% 1982 10%

10 to 15 966 12% 1784 15% 2750 13%16 to 20 576 7% 1395 11% 1971 10%

21 or more 1225 15% 3792 31% 5017 24%Total 8305 100% 12246 100% 20551 100%

N.A. 862 11% 835 7% 1697 8%Rarely or never 3378 42% 3853 32% 7231 36%

Sometimes 2736 34% 4447 37% 7183 36%Often 1090 14% 2909 24% 3999 20%

Total 8066 100% 12044 100% 20110 100%N.A. 1016 13% 1040 9% 2056 10%

Rarely or never 3678 46% 4699 39% 8377 42%Sometimes 2445 30% 4112 34% 6557 33%

Often 916 11% 2172 18% 3088 15%Total 8055 100% 12023 100% 20078 100%

N.A. 1347 17% 1484 12% 2831 14%Rarely or never 4604 57% 6235 52% 10839 54%

Sometimes 1568 20% 2898 24% 4466 22%Often 516 6% 1390 12% 1906 10%

Total 8035 100% 12007 100% 20042 100%N.A. 600 7% 507 4% 1107 6%

Rarely or never 2433 30% 2866 24% 5299 26%Sometimes 3019 38% 5088 42% 8107 40%

Often 1995 25% 3553 30% 5548 28%Total 8047 100% 12014 100% 20061 100%

N.A. 805 10% 819 7% 1624 8%Rarely or never 2861 36% 3795 32% 6656 33%

Sometimes 2414 30% 4163 35% 6577 33%Often 1948 24% 3229 27% 5177 26%

Total 8028 100% 12006 100% 20034 100%

How much do you incorporate the use of skills labs (writing, math, etc.) into your selected course section

How much do you incorporate the use of academic advising/planning into your selected course section

How much do you incorporate the use of career counseling into your course section

How much do you incorporate the use of job placement assistance into your selected course section

How much do you incorporate the use of peer or other tutoring into your course section

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

How many students are enrolled in your selected course section

Prior to the Spring semester, how many times have you taught your selected course?

FF1

Page 326: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

N.A. 2255 28% 3031 25% 5286 26%Rarely or never 5152 64% 7624 64% 12776 64%

Sometimes 529 7% 1169 10% 1698 8%Often 79 1% 166 1% 245 1%

Total 8015 100% 11990 100% 20005 100%N.A. 1679 21% 1788 15% 3467 17%

Rarely or never 4579 57% 6039 50% 10618 53%Sometimes 1402 18% 3163 26% 4565 23%

Often 350 4% 1002 8% 1352 7%Total 8010 100% 11992 100% 20002 100%

N.A. 771 10% 650 5% 1421 7%Rarely or never 2353 29% 2616 22% 4969 25%

Sometimes 2491 31% 4274 36% 6765 34%Often 2431 30% 4468 37% 6899 34%

Total 8046 100% 12008 100% 20054 100%N.A. 1542 19% 1432 12% 2974 15%

Rarely or never 4706 59% 5956 50% 10662 53%Sometimes 1422 18% 3510 29% 4932 25%

Often 318 4% 1070 9% 1388 7%Total 7988 100% 11968 100% 19956 100%

N.A. 1622 20% 1639 14% 3261 16%Rarely or never 4596 58% 5823 49% 10419 52%

Sometimes 1435 18% 3399 28% 4834 24%Often 335 4% 1104 9% 1439 7%

Total 7988 100% 11965 100% 19953 100%N.A. 972 12% 953 8% 1925 10%

Rarely or never 3121 39% 3896 33% 7017 35%Sometimes 2867 36% 5232 44% 8099 41%

Often 1030 13% 1874 16% 2904 15%Total 7990 100% 11955 100% 19945 100%

Not likely 95 1% 72 1% 167 1%Somewhat likely 1874 23% 2032 17% 3906 19%

Likely 3155 39% 4401 37% 7556 38%Very likely 2940 36% 5517 46% 8457 42%

Total 8064 100% 12022 100% 20086 100%None 9 0% 7 0% 16 0%1 to 4 2800 35% 841 7% 3641 18%5 to 8 2722 34% 1258 10% 3980 20%

9 to 12 1440 18% 1745 15% 3185 16%13 to 16 554 7% 3679 31% 4233 21%17 to 20 276 3% 2580 21% 2856 14%21 to 30 197 2% 1601 13% 1798 9%

31 or more 111 1% 303 3% 414 2%Total 8109 100% 12014 100% 20123 100%

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week teaching students in class

How likely is it that personal issues would cause students to withdraw from class or from this college?

How much do you incorporate the use of transfer credit assistance into your course section

How much do you incorporate the use of services to students with disabilities into your selected course section

How much do you incorporate the use of computer labs into your course section

How much do you incorporate the use of student organizations into your selected course section

How much do you incorporate the use of child care into your course section

How much do you incorporate the use of financial aid advising into your selected course section

FF2

Page 327: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

None 211 3% 117 1% 328 2%1 to 4 5007 62% 3948 33% 8955 45%5 to 8 1853 23% 4088 34% 5941 30%

9 to 12 576 7% 1997 17% 2573 13%13 to 16 220 3% 861 7% 1081 5%17 to 20 131 2% 545 5% 676 3%21 to 30 61 1% 280 2% 341 2%

31 or more 29 0% 162 1% 191 1%Total 8088 100% 11998 100% 20086 100%

None 286 4% 205 2% 491 2%1 to 4 6241 77% 6536 55% 12777 64%5 to 8 1080 13% 3272 27% 4352 22%

9 to 12 266 3% 1088 9% 1354 7%13 to 16 93 1% 445 4% 538 3%17 to 20 43 1% 216 2% 259 1%21 to 30 32 0% 120 1% 152 1%

31 or more 17 0% 75 1% 92 0%Total 8058 100% 11957 100% 20015 100%

None 20 0% 10 0% 30 0%1 to 4 3550 44% 2651 22% 6201 31%5 to 8 2908 36% 4991 42% 7899 39%

9 to 12 1031 13% 2543 21% 3574 18%13 to 16 315 4% 989 8% 1304 6%17 to 20 169 2% 501 4% 670 3%21 to 30 63 1% 179 1% 242 1%

31 or more 37 0% 119 1% 156 1%Total 8093 100% 11983 100% 20076 100%

None 130 2% 116 1% 246 1%1 to 4 5671 70% 7052 59% 12723 63%5 to 8 1462 18% 3033 25% 4495 22%

9 to 12 455 6% 981 8% 1436 7%13 to 16 159 2% 354 3% 513 3%17 to 20 97 1% 194 2% 291 1%21 to 30 33 0% 86 1% 119 1%

31 or more 69 1% 154 1% 223 1%Total 8076 100% 11970 100% 20046 100%

None 1796 22% 2059 17% 3855 19%1 to 4 3854 48% 6417 54% 10271 51%5 to 8 1290 16% 2022 17% 3312 17%

9 to 12 523 6% 772 6% 1295 6%13 to 16 230 3% 342 3% 572 3%17 to 20 163 2% 180 2% 343 2%21 to 30 91 1% 73 1% 164 1%

31 or more 104 1% 79 1% 183 1%Total 8051 100% 11944 100% 19995 100%

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week reflecting and working on ways to improve my teaching

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week research and scholarly activities

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week giving other forms of written and oral feedback to students

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week preparing for class

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week grading papers

FF3

Page 328: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

None 7295 91% 9933 83% 17228 86%1 to 4 582 7% 1576 13% 2158 11%5 to 8 83 1% 244 2% 327 2%

9 to 12 26 0% 78 1% 104 1%13 to 16 18 0% 43 0% 61 0%17 to 20 5 0% 22 0% 27 0%21 to 30 5 0% 5 0% 10 0%

31 or more 9 0% 15 0% 24 0%Total 8023 100% 11916 100% 19939 100%

None 3175 39% 1440 12% 4615 23%1 to 4 4194 52% 7330 61% 11524 58%5 to 8 423 5% 2091 17% 2514 13%

9 to 12 109 1% 575 5% 684 3%13 to 16 60 1% 214 2% 274 1%17 to 20 39 0% 125 1% 164 1%21 to 30 20 0% 88 1% 108 1%

31 or more 40 0% 92 1% 132 1%Total 8060 100% 11955 100% 20015 100%

None 7139 89% 8443 71% 15582 78%1 to 4 552 7% 2003 17% 2555 13%5 to 8 162 2% 647 5% 809 4%

9 to 12 60 1% 368 3% 428 2%13 to 16 34 0% 221 2% 255 1%17 to 20 22 0% 107 1% 129 1%21 to 30 16 0% 64 1% 80 0%

31 or more 23 0% 35 0% 58 0%Total 8008 100% 11888 100% 19896 100%

None 6599 82% 5696 48% 12295 62%1 to 4 1153 14% 4823 40% 5976 30%5 to 8 157 2% 896 8% 1053 5%

9 to 12 50 1% 260 2% 310 2%13 to 16 24 0% 106 1% 130 1%17 to 20 23 0% 71 1% 94 0%21 to 30 16 0% 38 0% 54 0%

31 or more 15 0% 43 0% 58 0%Total 8037 100% 11933 100% 19970 100%

None 4063 50% 2571 22% 6634 33%1 to 4 3412 42% 7235 61% 10647 53%5 to 8 337 4% 1443 12% 1780 9%

9 to 12 74 1% 363 3% 437 2%13 to 16 46 1% 145 1% 191 1%17 to 20 44 1% 77 1% 121 1%21 to 30 32 0% 48 0% 80 0%

31 or more 48 1% 74 1% 122 1%Total 8056 100% 11956 100% 20012 100%

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week working with students on activities other than course work

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week involved in other interactions with students outside the classroom

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week supervising internships or other field experiences

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week working with honors' projects

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week advising students

FF4

Page 329: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

None 6638 83% 6612 56% 13250 67%1 to 4 1015 13% 4093 35% 5108 26%5 to 8 201 3% 747 6% 948 5%

9 to 12 62 1% 186 2% 248 1%13 to 16 28 0% 89 1% 117 1%17 to 20 20 0% 39 0% 59 0%21 to 30 13 0% 25 0% 38 0%

31 or more 21 0% 32 0% 53 0%Total 7998 100% 11823 100% 19821 100%

None 5601 70% 3320 28% 8921 45%1 to 4 1853 23% 4475 38% 6328 32%5 to 8 231 3% 1988 17% 2219 11%

9 to 12 95 1% 935 8% 1030 5%13 to 16 40 0% 432 4% 472 2%17 to 20 50 1% 294 2% 344 2%21 to 30 32 0% 216 2% 248 1%

31 or more 112 1% 214 2% 326 2%Total 8014 100% 11874 100% 19888 100%

None 6314 79% 1305 11% 7619 38%1 to 4 1365 17% 7697 64% 9062 45%5 to 8 218 3% 2035 17% 2253 11%

9 to 12 64 1% 529 4% 593 3%13 to 16 21 0% 193 2% 214 1%17 to 20 16 0% 121 1% 137 1%21 to 30 12 0% 43 0% 55 0%

31 or more 12 0% 37 0% 49 0%Total 8022 100% 11960 100% 19982 100%

None 6829 85% 5183 44% 12012 60%1 to 4 1027 13% 5658 48% 6685 34%5 to 8 89 1% 714 6% 803 4%

9 to 12 16 0% 190 2% 206 1%13 to 16 11 0% 70 1% 81 0%17 to 20 5 0% 39 0% 44 0%21 to 30 5 0% 22 0% 27 0%

31 or more 7 0% 31 0% 38 0%Total 7989 100% 11907 100% 19896 100%

0% 161 2% 297 2% 458 2%1 to 9% 985 12% 1592 13% 2577 13%

10 to 19% 1126 14% 1772 15% 2898 15%20 to 29% 1064 13% 1529 13% 2593 13%30 to 39% 968 12% 1450 12% 2418 12%40 to 49% 1163 14% 1640 14% 2803 14%50 to 74% 1791 22% 2596 22% 4387 22%

75 to 100% 777 10% 1039 9% 1816 9%Total 8035 100% 11915 100% 19950 100%

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week conducting service activities

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on lecture

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week coordination and/or administrative activities

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week participating on college committees or task forces

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week mentoring other faculty

FF5

Page 330: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

0 310 4% 466 4% 776 4%1 to 9% 1657 21% 2801 24% 4458 23%

10 to 19% 1930 24% 3006 26% 4936 25%20 to 29% 1485 19% 2169 18% 3654 19%30 to 39% 850 11% 1225 10% 2075 11%40 to 49% 675 9% 867 7% 1542 8%50 to 74% 714 9% 900 8% 1614 8%

75 to 100% 296 4% 343 3% 639 3%Total 7917 100% 11777 100% 19694 100%

0% 1881 24% 2885 25% 4766 25%1 to 9% 1924 25% 3175 28% 5099 27%

10 to 19% 1385 18% 2188 19% 3573 19%20 to 29% 1012 13% 1372 12% 2384 12%30 to 39% 513 7% 689 6% 1202 6%40 to 49% 417 5% 487 4% 904 5%50 to 74% 422 5% 461 4% 883 5%

75 to 100% 163 2% 191 2% 354 2%Total 7717 100% 11448 100% 19165 100%

0 4348 55% 5409 46% 9757 50%1 to 9% 1531 19% 3020 26% 4551 23%

10 to 19% 640 8% 1166 10% 1806 9%20 to 29% 354 4% 603 5% 957 5%30 to 39% 218 3% 403 3% 621 3%40 to 49% 213 3% 316 3% 529 3%50 to 74% 276 3% 434 4% 710 4%

75 to 100% 350 4% 412 4% 762 4%Total 7930 100% 11763 100% 19693 100%

0% 1885 24% 2266 19% 4151 21%1 to 9% 2365 30% 3933 33% 6298 32%

10 to 19% 1618 20% 2570 22% 4188 21%20 to 29% 921 12% 1343 11% 2264 11%30 to 39% 475 6% 682 6% 1157 6%40 to 49% 320 4% 418 4% 738 4%50 to 74% 270 3% 430 4% 700 4%

75 to 100% 94 1% 170 1% 264 1%Total 7948 100% 11812 100% 19760 100%

0 3126 39% 4669 40% 7795 40%1 to 9% 2675 34% 4312 37% 6987 35%

10 to 19% 1102 14% 1528 13% 2630 13%20 to 29% 436 6% 592 5% 1028 5%30 to 39% 233 3% 253 2% 486 2%40 to 49% 144 2% 172 1% 316 2%50 to 74% 136 2% 164 1% 300 2%

75 to 100% 63 1% 98 1% 161 1%Total 7915 100% 11788 100% 19703 100%

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on student presentations

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on student computer use

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on small group activities

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on teacher-led discussion

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on teacher-student shared responsibility (seminar, discussion, etc.)

FF6

Page 331: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

0% 4059 52% 5742 49% 9801 50%1 to 9% 2085 26% 3802 32% 5887 30%

10 to 19% 811 10% 1200 10% 2011 10%20 to 29% 385 5% 431 4% 816 4%30 to 39% 218 3% 225 2% 443 2%40 to 49% 129 2% 145 1% 274 1%50 to 74% 130 2% 123 1% 253 1%

75 to 100% 59 1% 65 1% 124 1%Total 7876 100% 11733 100% 19609 100%

0 447 6% 599 5% 1046 5%1 to 9% 3469 44% 5707 48% 9176 46%

10 to 19% 2501 31% 3655 31% 6156 31%20 to 29% 869 11% 1051 9% 1920 10%30 to 39% 300 4% 405 3% 705 4%40 to 49% 163 2% 168 1% 331 2%50 to 74% 143 2% 154 1% 297 1%

75 to 100% 81 1% 104 1% 185 1%Total 7973 100% 11843 100% 19816 100%

0% 7143 91% 10654 91% 17797 91%1 to 9% 294 4% 447 4% 741 4%

10 to 19% 98 1% 144 1% 242 1%20 to 29% 61 1% 91 1% 152 1%30 to 39% 50 1% 77 1% 127 1%40 to 49% 35 0% 50 0% 85 0%50 to 74% 57 1% 90 1% 147 1%

75 to 100% 91 1% 102 1% 193 1%Total 7829 100% 11655 100% 19484 100%

0 5641 72% 7028 60% 12669 65%1 to 9% 795 10% 1448 12% 2243 11%

10 to 19% 400 5% 778 7% 1178 6%20 to 29% 319 4% 688 6% 1007 5%30 to 39% 194 2% 478 4% 672 3%40 to 49% 183 2% 487 4% 670 3%50 to 74% 233 3% 561 5% 794 4%

75 to 100% 104 1% 246 2% 350 2%Total 7869 100% 11714 100% 19583 100%

0% 2406 30% 2930 25% 5336 27%1 to 9% 1465 19% 2261 19% 3726 19%

10 to 19% 1133 14% 1783 15% 2916 15%20 to 29% 793 10% 1223 10% 2016 10%30 to 39% 417 5% 797 7% 1214 6%40 to 49% 402 5% 770 7% 1172 6%50 to 74% 636 8% 1145 10% 1781 9%

75 to 100% 648 8% 854 7% 1502 8%Total 7900 100% 11763 100% 19663 100%

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on experiential (labs, field work, art exhibits, clinical placements, internships)

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on hands-on practice

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on testing and evaluation

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on performances in applied and fine arts (dance, drama, music)

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on in-class writing

FF7

Page 332: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

Part-time faculty 8323 100% 0 0% 8323 40%Full-time faculty 0 0% 12263 100% 12263 60%

Total 8323 100% 12263 100% 20586 100%1 to 3 hours 1066 13% 190 2% 1256 6%4 to 6 hours 1669 21% 278 2% 1947 10%7 to 9 hours 1212 15% 340 3% 1552 8%

10 to 12 hours 1133 14% 547 5% 1680 8%13 to 15 hours 687 9% 1217 10% 1904 10%16 to 18 hours 651 8% 1033 9% 1684 8%19 to 21 hours 444 6% 653 5% 1097 5%22 to 24 hours 394 5% 678 6% 1072 5%25 to 27 hours 228 3% 505 4% 733 4%28 to 30 hours 198 2% 1305 11% 1503 8%

More than 30 hours 382 5% 5224 44% 5606 28%Total 8064 100% 11970 100% 20034 100%

No 7442 91% 9934 82% 17376 86%Yes 722 9% 2149 18% 2871 14%

Total 8164 100% 12083 100% 20247 100%No 7480 92% 10550 87% 18030 89%

Yes 684 8% 1533 13% 2217 11%Total 8164 100% 12083 100% 20247 100%

No 7629 93% 10673 88% 18302 90%Yes 535 7% 1410 12% 1945 10%

Total 8164 100% 12083 100% 20247 100%No 7903 97% 10128 84% 18031 89%

Yes 261 3% 1955 16% 2216 11%Total 8164 100% 12083 100% 20247 100%

No 7452 91% 4758 39% 12210 60%Yes 712 9% 7325 61% 8037 40%

Total 8164 100% 12083 100% 20247 100%No 7750 95% 9436 78% 17186 85%

Yes 414 5% 2647 22% 3061 15%Total 8164 100% 12083 100% 20247 100%

No 7364 90% 8083 67% 15447 76%Yes 800 10% 4000 33% 4800 24%

Total 8164 100% 12083 100% 20247 100%No 7803 96% 10316 85% 18119 89%

Yes 361 4% 1767 15% 2128 11%Total 8164 100% 12083 100% 20247 100%

No 7484 92% 9560 79% 17044 84%Yes 680 8% 2523 21% 3203 16%

Total 8164 100% 12083 100% 20247 100%

During the current academic year, are independent studies part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, are distance learning courses part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, is service learning (community service) incorporated into your course part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, is academic advising part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, is clinical and other field supervision of student work part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, are learning communities part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, are capstone courses part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, is team teaching part of your teaching role at this college

During the current academic year, are linked courses part of your teaching role at this college

During this term, does your institution consider you to be employed part-time or full-time

What is the total number of credit hours you are scheduled to teach during the current academic year (including summer sessions) at this college

FF8

Page 333: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

Other 722 9% 401 3% 1123 6%Lecturer 458 6% 72 1% 530 3%

Instructor 5688 71% 4389 37% 10077 51%Assistant Professor 249 3% 1656 14% 1905 10%Associate Professor 333 4% 1845 15% 2178 11%

Professor 532 7% 3545 30% 4077 20%Total 7982 100% 11908 100% 19890 100%

No tenure system at this institution 2253 30% 3868 33% 6121 32%Not on tenure track, although this

institution has a tenure system 4949 66% 949 8% 5898 30%On tenure track but not tenured 119 2% 1918 16% 2037 11%

Tenured 201 3% 5085 43% 5286 27%Total 7522 100% 11820 100% 19342 100%

40 years or more 92 1% 124 1% 216 1%30 to 39 years 328 4% 1110 9% 1438 7%20 to 29 years 685 9% 2373 20% 3058 15%10 to 19 years 1682 21% 3916 33% 5598 28%

5 to 9 years 2103 26% 2633 22% 4736 24%1 to 4 years 2351 29% 1486 12% 3837 19%

First-year teacher 762 10% 278 2% 1040 5%Total 8003 100% 11920 100% 19923 100%

Other 158 2% 186 2% 344 2%Associate degree 242 3% 444 4% 686 3%

Bachelor's degree 1162 15% 1002 8% 2164 11%Master's degree 5238 65% 7886 66% 13124 66%

Doctoral degree (e.g., Ph.D., Ed.D.) 917 11% 2111 18% 3028 15%First professional degree (e.g., M.D.,

D.D.S., J.D., D.V.M.) 288 4% 283 2% 571 3%Total 8005 100% 11912 100% 19917 100%

22 to 24 49 1% 18 0% 67 0%25 to 29 489 6% 338 3% 827 4%30 to 39 1453 18% 2037 17% 3490 18%40 to 49 1772 22% 3263 28% 5035 25%50 to 64 3544 44% 5782 49% 9326 47%

65 or more 677 8% 426 4% 1103 6%Total 7984 100% 11864 100% 19848 100%

Male 3572 45% 5343 45% 8915 45%Female 4378 55% 6481 55% 10859 55%

Total 7950 100% 11824 100% 19774 100%

What is your gender

What is the highest degree you have earned

What is your age group

How many years of teaching experience do you have in any college/university, not including graduate teaching assistant positions

Which of the following best describes your academic rank, title, or current position (Mark only one)

What is your current tenure status (Mark only one)

FF9

Page 334: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

2007 CCFSSE Faculty Only Frequency Distributions

Part-Time Faculty Full-Time Faculty All Faculty

United States citizen, native 7215 90% 10887 92% 18102 91%United States citizen, naturalized 553 7% 714 6% 1267 6%Permanent resident of the United

States (immigrant visa) 187 2% 216 2% 403 2%Temporary resident of the United

States (non-immigrant visa) 24 0% 42 0% 66 0%Total 7979 100% 11859 100% 19838 100%

American Indian or Native American 71 1% 102 1% 173 1%Asian, Asian American, or Pacific

Islander 274 3% 355 3% 629 3%Native Hawaiian 7 0% 10 0% 17 0%

Black or African American, Non-Hispanic 459 6% 620 5% 1079 5%

White, Non-Hispanic 6441 82% 9620 82% 16061 82%Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish 420 5% 700 6% 1120 6%

Other 217 3% 329 3% 546 3%Total 7889 100% 11736 100% 19625 100%

No 6644 82% 10804 90% 17448 87%Yes 1466 18% 1225 10% 2691 13%

Total 8110 100% 12029 100% 20139 100%No 6534 81% 11249 94% 17783 88%

Yes 1576 19% 780 6% 2356 12%Total 8110 100% 12029 100% 20139 100%

No 7840 97% 11966 99% 19806 98%Yes 270 3% 63 1% 333 2%

Total 8110 100% 12029 100% 20139 100%No 6789 84% 11883 99% 18672 93%

Yes 1321 16% 146 1% 1467 7%Total 8110 100% 12029 100% 20139 100%

No 7499 92% 11576 96% 19075 95%Yes 611 8% 453 4% 1064 5%

Total 8110 100% 12029 100% 20139 100%No 6654 82% 11049 92% 17703 88%

Yes 1456 18% 980 8% 2436 12%Total 8110 100% 12029 100% 20139 100%

No 5850 72% 3388 28% 9238 46%Yes 2260 28% 8641 72% 10901 54%

Total 8110 100% 12029 100% 20139 100%

Where are you employed outside of this college: Work related to my teaching field at this college

Where are you employed outside of this college: Not employed elsewhere

Where are you employed outside of this college: Full-time non-academic position

Where are you employed outside of this college: Part-time non-academic position

Where are you employed outside of this college: Other college(s) in teaching position

Where are you employed outside of this college: Other college(s) in non-teaching position

What is your racial or ethnic identification (Mark only one)

Where are you employed outside of this college: Self-employed

What is your citizenship status

FF10

Page 335: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCFSSE Codebook The data dictionary for the Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (CCFSSE) begins on the next page. It provides information on the structure, contents, and layout of the CCFSSE dataset. Please note: Some items in the codebook are not included in the data file to protect the individual identities of the participating faculty members. These include items 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, and 27.

Page 336: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

1

CCFSSE 2007 Codebook

Note: Some items in this codebook are not included in your data file to protect the individual identities of the faculty members. (These include items 20, 21, 22,24,25,26, & 27)

Section 1: CCFSSE Items with related CCSSE items 4) How often do students in your selected course section do the following? 0=Don’t know 1=Never 2=Sometimes 3=Often 4=Very often Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 4a FCLQUEST Ask questions in class or contribute to class

discussions 4b FCLPRESEN Make a class presentation 4c FREWROPAP Prepare two or more drafts of a paper or assignment

before turning it in 4d FINTEGRAT Work on a paper that requires integrating ideas or

information from various sources 4e FCLUNPREP Come to class without completing readings or

assignments 4f FCLASSGRP Work with other students on projects during class 4g FOCCGRP Work with classmates outside of class to prepare class

assignments 4h FTUTOR Tutor or teach other students (paid or voluntary) 4i FCOMMPROJ Participate in a community-based project as a part of a

regular course 4j FINTERNET Use the internet or instant messaging to work on an

assignment 4k FEMAIL Use e-mail to communicate with you 4l FFACGRADE Discuss grades or assignments with you 4m FFACPLANS Talk about career plans with you 4n FFACIDEAS Discuss ideas from their readings or classes with you

outside of class 4o FFACFEED Receive prompt feedback (written or oral) from you

about their performance 4p FWORKHARD Work harder than they thought they could to meet your

standards or expectations 4q FFACOTH Work with you on activities other than coursework 4r FOOCIDEAS Discuss ideas from their readings or classes with

others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

4s FDIVRSTUD Have serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity other than their own

4t FDIFFSTUD Have serious conversations with students who differ from them in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values

4u FSKIPCLAS Skip class

Page 337: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2

5) During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize the following mental activities? 1=Very little 2=Some 3=Quite a bit 4=Very Much Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 5a FMEMORIZE Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods so the students

can repeat them in pretty much the same form 5b FANALYZE Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or

theory 5c FSYNTHESZ Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or

experiences in new ways 5d FEVALUATE Making judgments about the value or soundness of

information, arguments, or methods 5e FAPPLYING Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or

in new situations 5f FPERFORM Having students use information they have read or

heard to perform a new skill 6) In your selected course section, about how much reading and writing do your students do? 1=None 2=1 3=2 to 3 4=4 to 6 5=More than 6 Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 6a FREADASGN Number of assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or

book-length packs of course readings 6b FWRITEANY Number of written papers or reports of any length Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value 7 FEXAMS Select the circle that best represents

the extent to which your examinations of student performance (e.g. Exams, portfolio) challenge students to do their best work

Responses range from 1 to 7, with scale anchors described: (1) Extremely easy (7) Extremely challenging

Page 338: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

3

8) How important is it to you that students at this college participate in the following when appropriate? 1=Not important 2=Somewhat important 3=Very important Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 8a FINTERN Internships, field experience, co-op experience, or

clinical assignment 8b FESL English as a second language courses 8c FDEVREAD Developmental/remedial reading courses 8d FDEVWRITE Developmental/remedial writing courses 8e FDEVMATH Developmental/remedial math courses 8f FSTUDSKIL Study skills courses 8g FHONORS Honors courses 8h FORIEN College orientation program or course 8i FLRNCOMM Organized learning communities (linked courses/study

groups led by faculty or counselors) 9) How much does this college emphasize each of the following? 1=Very little 2=Some 3=Quite a bit 4=Very much Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 9a FENVSCHOL Encouraging students to spend significant amounts of

time studying 9b FENVSUPRT Providing students the support they need to help them

to succeed at this college 9c FENVDIVRS Encouraging contact among students from different

economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds 9d FENVNACAD Helping students cope with their non-academic

responsibilities (work, family, etc.) 9e FENVSOCAL Providing students the support they need to thrive

socially 9f FFINSUPP Providing the financial support students need to afford

their education 9g FENVCOMP Using computers in academic work

Page 339: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

4

10) About how many hours do you think full and part-time students at this college spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? 0=None 1=1 to 5 hours 2=6 to 10 hours 3=11 to 20 hours 4=21 to 30 hours 5=More than 30 hours Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 10a FACADPR01 Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing,

rehearsing, doing homework, or other activities related to their programs)

10b FPAYWORK Working for pay 10c FCOCURR01 Participating in college-sponsored activities

(organizations, campus publications, student government, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.)

10d FCAREDE01 Providing care for dependents living with them (parents, children, spouse, etc.)

10e FCOMMUTE Commuting to and from class. 11) Select the circle that best represents the quality of student relationships with: Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value 11a FENVSTU Other students Responses range from 1 to 7 with

scale anchors as described: (1) Unfriendly, unsupportive, sense of alienation (7) Friendly, supportive, sense of belonging

11b FENVFAC Instructors Responses range from 1 to 7 with scale anchors as described: (1) Unavailable, unhelpful, unsympathetic (7) Available, helpful, sympathetic

11c FENVADM Administrative personnel and offices

Responses range from 1 to 7 with scale anchors as described: (1) Unhelpful, inconsiderate, rigid (7) Helpful, considerate, flexible

Page 340: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

5

12) To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas? 0=None 1=Very little 2=Some 3=Quite a bit 4=Very much Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 12a FGNGENLED Acquiring a broad general education 12b FGNWORK Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills 12c FGNWRITE Writing clearly and effectively 12d FGNSPEAK Speaking clearly and effectively 12e FGNANALY Thinking critically and analytically 12f FGNSOLVE Solving numerical problems 12g FGNCMPTS Using computing and information technology 12h FGNOTHERS Working effectively with others 12i FGNINQ Learning effectively on their own 12j FGNSELF Understanding themselves

12k FGNDIVERS Understanding people of other racial and ethnic

backgrounds 12l FGNETHICS Developing a personal code of values and ethics 12m FGNCOMMUN Contributing to the welfare of their community 12n FCARGOAL Developing clearer career goals 12o FGAINCAR Gaining information about career opportunities 13.1) How often do you refer students to the following services? 0=Don’t know/N.A. 1=Rarely or never 2=Sometimes 3=Often Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 13a1 FUSEACAD Academic advising/planning 13b1 FUSECACOU Career counseling 13c1 FUSEJOBPL Job placement assistance 13d1 FUSETUTOR Peer or other tutoring 13e1 FUSELAB Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) 13f1 FUSECHLD Child care 13g1 FUSEFAADV Financial aid advising 13h1 FUSECOMLB Computer lab 13i1 FUSESTORG Student organizations 13j1 FUSETRCRD Transfer credit assistance 13k1 FUSEDISAB Services to students with disabilities

Page 341: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

6

13.3) How important do you believe the services are to students at this college. 1=Not at all 2=Somewhat 3=Very Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 13a3 FIMPACAD Academic advising/planning 13b3 FIMPCACOU Career counseling 13c3 FIMPJOBPL Job placement assistance 13d3 FIMPTUTOR Peer or other tutoring 13e3 FIMPLAB Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) 13f3 FIMPCHLD Child care 13g3 FIMPFAADV Financial aid advising 13h3 FIMPCOMLB Computer lab 13i3 FIMPSTORG Student organizations 13j3 FIMPTRCRD Transfer credit assistance 13k3 FIMPDISAB Services to students with disabilities 14) How likely is it that the following issues would cause students to withdraw from class or from this college? (Please respond to each item) 1=Not likely 2=Somewhat likely 3=Likely 4=Very likely Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 14a FWRKFULL Working full-time 14b FCAREDEP Caring for dependents 14c FACADUNP Being academically unprepared 14d FLACKFIN Lacking finances 14e FTRANSFER Transferring to a 4-year college or university Section 2: CCFSSE Items without related CCSSE items Item # Variable

Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

1 FNUMSTU How many students are enrolled in your selected course section?

1=Fewer than 10 2=10 to 19 3=20 to 29 4=30 to 39 5=40 to 69 6=70 or more

Page 342: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

7

2) Using the list provided, please enter the code that best corresponds to the general area of your selected course. Variable: FMAJOR Response Value

Description

01 Agriculture 02 Architecture & Related Programs (city/urban, community/regional planning, etc.) 03 Biological Sciences/Life Sciences (biology, biochemistry, botany, zoology, etc.) 04 Business Management & Administrative Services (accounting, business admin.,

marketing, management, real estate, etc.) 05 Communications (advertising, journalism, television/radio, etc.) 06 Computer & Information Sciences 07 Conservation & Renewable Natural Resources (fishing, forestry, wildlife, etc.) 08 Construction Trades (masonry, carpentry, plumbing & pipe fitters, etc.) 09 Education 10 Engineering 11 English Language & Literature/Letters (composition, creative writing, etc.) 12 Foreign Languages & Literatures (French, Spanish, etc.) 13 Health Professions & Related Sciences (nursing, physical therapy, dental, EMT,

veterinary, etc.) 14 Law & Legal Studies 15 Liberal Arts & Sciences, General Studies & Humanities 16 Library Science 17 Mathematics 18 Mechanics & Repairers (A/C, heating & refrigeration, electrical/electronic

equipment, etc.) 19 Military Technologies 20 Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies (international relations, ecology, environmental

studies, etc.) 21 Parks, Recreation, Leisure & Fitness Studies 22 Personal & Miscellaneous Services (gaming & sports, cosmetic, culinary, etc.) 23 Physical Sciences (astronomy, chemistry, geology, physics, etc.) 24 Precision Production Trades (drafting, graphic, precious metal worker, etc.) 25 Protective Services (criminal justice & corrections, fire protection, etc.) 26 Psychology 27 Public Administration & Services (public policy, social work, etc.) 28 Science Technologies (biological technology, nuclear & industrial radiological

technology, etc.) 29 Social Sciences & History (anthropology, archeology, economics, geography,

history, political science, sociology, etc.) 30 Theology Studies & Religious Vocations (philosophy, ministry, etc.) 31 Transportation & Materials Moving Workers (air, vehicle, & water workers, etc.) 32 Visual & Performing Arts (art, music, theater, dance, etc.) 33 Vocational Home Economics (child care/guidance worker & manager, clothing,

apparel, & textile worker, housekeeping, etc.) 34 Other 35 Developmental Math 36 Developmental Reading 37 Developmental Writing 38 Other Developmental

Page 343: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

8

Item # Variable Name

Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

3 FTIMES Prior to the Spring semester, how many times have you taught your selected course?

1=None 2=1 to 3 3=4 to 6 4=7 to 9 5=10 to 15 6=16 to 20 7=21 or more

13.2) How much do you incorporate the use of these services into your selected course section? 0=N.A. 1=Rarely or Never 2=Sometimes 3=Often Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 13a2 FSATACAD Academic advising/planning 13b2 FSATCACOU Career counseling 13c2 FSATJOBPL Job placement assistance 13d2 FSATTUTOR Peer or other tutoring 13e2 FSATLAB Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) 13f2 FSATCHLD Child care 13g2 FSATFAADV Financial aid advising 13h2 FSATCOMLB Computer lab 13i2 FSATSTORG Student organizations 13j2 FSATTRCRD Transfer credit assistance 13k2 FSATDISAB Services to students with disabilities 14) How likely is it that the following issues would cause students to withdraw from class or from this college? (Please respond to each item) 1=Not likely 2=Somewhat likely 3=Likely 4=Very likely Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 14f FPERSON Personal issues

Page 344: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

9

15) About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? 0=None 4=13 to 16 1=1 to 4 5=17 to 20 2=5 to 8 6=21 to 30 3=9 to 12 7=31+ Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 15a FTEACH Teaching students in class 15b FGRADE Grading papers 15c FFEEDBACK Giving other forms of written and oral feedback to

students 15d FPREP Preparing for class 15e FREFLECT Reflecting and working on ways to improve my

teaching 15f FRESEARCH Research and scholarly activities 15g FWORKHON Working with honors' projects 15h FADVISE Advising students 15i FSUPERV Supervising internships or other field experiences 15j FWORKSTA Working with students on activities other than course

work (committees, organizations, student life activities, orientation, intramurals, etc.)

15k FOUTCLAS Other interactions with students outside the classroom 15l FCONDUCT Conducting service activities 15m FCOORD Coordination and/or administrative activities 15n FTASK Participating on college committees or task forces 15o FMENT Mentoring other faculty 16) In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? 0=0% 1=1 to 9% 2=10 to 19% 3=20 to 29% 4=30 to 39% 5=40 to 49% 6=50 to 74% 7=75 to 100% Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 16a FLECTURE Lecture 16b FTEACHDIS Teacher-led discussion 16c FTEACHSTU Teacher-student shared responsibility (seminar,

discussion, etc.) 16d FSTUCOM Student computer use 16e FSMGROUP Small group activities 16f FSTUPRES Student presentations 16g FCLASWRIT In-class writing 16h FTESTEVAL Testing and evaluation 16i FPERART Performances in applied and fine arts (dance, drama,

music) 16j FEXPERI Experiential (labs, field work, art exhibits, clinical

placements, internships) 16k FHANDS Hands-on practice

Page 345: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

10

Item # Variable

Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

17 FENROLL During this term, does your institution consider you to be employed part-time or full-time?

1=Part-time faculty 2=Full-time faculty

Item # Variable

Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

18 FSECTIONS

What is the total number of credit hours you are scheduled to teach during the current academic year (including summer sessions) at this college?

1=1 to 3 hours 2=4 to 6 hours 3=7 to 9 hours 4=10 to 12 hours 5=13 to 15 hours 6=16 to 18 hours 7=19 to 21 hours 8=22 to 24 hours 9=25 to 27 hours 10=28 to 30 hours 11=More than 30 hours

19) During the current academic year, which of the following are part of your teaching role at this college? This question asks faculty to select all options that apply. To permit multiple responses, the question is represented in the codebook by nine separate items the faculty member either checks or does not check. NOTE: All items below have the following response values: 0=No response 1=Response Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 19a FTEAMTEC Team teaching 19b FLINKED Linked courses 19c FLEARNCMM Learning community 19d FCAPSTONE Capstone course (culminating a program or integrating

a series of courses) 19e FACAADV Academic advising 19f FCLINIC Clinical or other field supervision of student work 19g FDISTANC Distance learning course 19h FSERVIC Service learning (community service) incorporated into

course(s) 19i FINDSTUDY Independent study

Page 346: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

11

Item # Variable Name

Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

20 FACADRANK

Which of the following best describes your academic rank, title, or current position?

1=Other 2=Lecturer 3=Instructor 4=Assistant Professor 5=Associate Professor 6=Professor

Item # Variable

Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

21 FTENURE What is your current tenure status?

1=No tenure system at this institution 2=Not on tenure track, although this institution has a tenure system 3=On tenure track but not tenured 4=Tenured

Item # Variable

Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

22 FYEARS

How many years of teaching experience do you have in any college/university, not including graduate teaching assistant positions?

1=40 years or more 2=30 to 39 years 3=20 to 29 years 4=10 to 19 years 5=5 to 9 years 6=1 to 4 years 7=First-year teacher

Item # Variable

Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

23 FDEGREE What is the highest degree you have earned?

1=Other 2=Associate degree 3=Bachelor's degree 4=Master's degree 5=Doctoral degree (e.g., Ph.D., Ed.D.) 6=First professional degree (e.g., M.D., D.D.S., J.D., D.V.M.)

Item # Variable

Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

24 FACAGE

What is your age group? 1=22 to 24 2=25 to 29 3=30 to 39 4=40 to 49 5=50 to 64 6=65 or more

Item # Variable

Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

25 FSEX

What is your gender? 1=Male 2=Female

Page 347: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

12

Item # Variable Name

Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

26 FINTERNAT

What is your citizenship status? 1=United States citizen, native 2=United States citizen, naturalized 3=Permanent resident of the United States (immigrant visa) 4=Temporary resident of the United States (non-immigrant visa)

Item # Variable

Name Item Description/Variable Label Response Value

27 FRERACE

What is your racial or ethnic identification? (Mark only one)

1=American Indian or other Native American 2=Asian, Asian American or Pacific Islander 3=Native Hawaiian 4=Black or African American, Non-Hispanic 5=White, Non-Hispanic 6=Hispanic, Latino, Spanish 7=Other

28) Where are you employed outside of this college? This question asks faculty to select all options that apply. To permit multiple responses, the question is represented in the codebook by seven separate items the faculty member either checks or does not check. NOTE: All items below have the following response values: 0=No response 1=Response Item # Variable Name Item Description/Variable Label 28a FSELFEM Self-employed 28b FOTCOLTP Other college(s) in teaching position 28c FOTCOLNT Other college(s) in non-teaching position 28d FFTNAP Full-time non-academic position 28e FPTNAP Part-time non-academic position 28f FWORKTEA Work related to my teaching field at this college 28g FNOTEMP Not employed elsewhere

Page 348: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

13

29) Using the list provided, please enter the code that best corresponds to your teaching area. Variable: FTEACAREA Response Value

Description

01 Agriculture 02 Architecture & Related Programs (city/urban, community/regional planning, etc.) 03 Biological Sciences/Life Sciences (biology, biochemistry, botany, zoology, etc.) 04 Business Management & Administrative Services (accounting, business admin.,

marketing, management, real estate, etc.) 05 Communications (advertising, journalism, television/radio, etc.) 06 Computer & Information Sciences 07 Conservation & Renewable Natural Resources (fishing, forestry, wildlife, etc.) 08 Construction Trades (masonry, carpentry, plumbing & pipe fitters, etc.) 09 Education 10 Engineering 11 English Language & Literature/Letters (composition, creative writing, etc.) 12 Foreign Languages & Literatures (French, Spanish, etc.) 13 Health Professions & Related Sciences (nursing, physical therapy, dental, EMT,

veterinary, etc.) 14 Law & Legal Studies 15 Liberal Arts & Sciences, General Studies & Humanities 16 Library Science 17 Mathematics 18 Mechanics & Repairers (A/C, heating & refrigeration, electrical/electronic

equipment, etc.) 19 Military Technologies 20 Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies (international relations, ecology, environmental

studies, etc.) 21 Parks, Recreation, Leisure & Fitness Studies 22 Personal & Miscellaneous Services (gaming & sports, cosmetic, culinary, etc.) 23 Physical Sciences (astronomy, chemistry, geology, physics, etc.) 24 Precision Production Trades (drafting, graphic, precious metal worker, etc.) 25 Protective Services (criminal justice & corrections, fire protection, etc.) 26 Psychology 27 Public Administration & Services (public policy, social work, etc.) 28 Science Technologies (biological technology, nuclear & industrial radiological

technology, etc.) 29 Social Sciences & History (anthropology, archeology, economics, geography,

history, political science, sociology, etc.) 30 Theology Studies & Religious Vocations (philosophy, ministry, etc.) 31 Transportation & Materials Moving Workers (air, vehicle, & water workers, etc.) 32 Visual & Performing Arts (art, music, theater, dance, etc.) 33 Vocational Home Economics (child care/guidance worker & manager, clothing,

apparel, & textile worker, housekeeping, etc.) 34 Other 35 Developmental Math 36 Developmental Reading 37 Developmental Writing 38 Other Developmental

Page 349: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Annotated Table of Contents:Appendix

2007 CCSSE Cohort AnalphabeticallistofallinstitutionsthathaveparticipatedinCCSSEin2005,2006,

or 2007. Only a college’s most recent year of participation is reflected.

2007 CCSSE Cohort: Comparison GroupsAnalphabeticallistof2007CCSSE Cohort institutions grouped by size classification (small,

medium,large,orextra-large).

2007 Consortia AlistofallinstitutionsparticipatinginCCSSE2007consortia.Institutionsareableto

participateinmorethanoneconsortium;therefore,aninstitution’snamemayappearmorethanonce.

Table 2: Percent of Target Aseriesoftablesthatprovidedataonsurveycompletioncountsandratesfor2007CCSSECohort

institutions as well as breakouts for institutions in each size category ─ small, medium, large, and extra-large.

Table 3: Respondents to Underlying Population by College Size Atablethathighlightsdataaboutrespondentandpopulationcharacteristicsbyinstitutionsizeand

overall, similar to data presented in Table 1. The specific characteristics examined include gender, race/ethnicity,age,andenrollmentstatus.

Table 4: Underlying Populations Percentages (Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Enrollment Status)

A table displaying college-level population characteristics by institution size (i.e., small, medium, large, andextra-large).

Table 5: Underlying Populations Percentages (Age) A table displaying college-level population characteristics by institution size (i.e., small, medium, large,

andextra-large).

Table 6: Survey Completion Rates A table providing data on (1) overall survey completion rates; (2) average survey completion rates;

and (3) the percentage of sampled classes for the 2007 CCSSECohortcollegesaswellasbreakoutsfor colleges in each size category ─ small, medium, large, and extra-large.

National Advisory Board Alistofmembersof CCSSE’s National Advisory Board (NAB).

CCSSE Staff AlistofCCSSEstaffmembers.

CCSSE Brochure and sample copy of The Community College Student Report (CCSR)

Community College Surveyof Student Engagement

Page 350: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCSSE Cohort

2007CCSSECohort Page1of11

Community College Surveyof Student Engagement

AbrahamBaldwinAgriculturalCollege Tifton GA 2006AikenTechnicalCollege Graniteville SC 2007

AlabamaSouthernCommunityCollege Monroeville AL 2007AlexandriaTechnicalCollege Alexandria MN 2007

AlleganyCollegeofMaryland Cumberland MD 2006AlpenaCommunityCollege Alpena MI 2007

AlvinCommunityCollege Alvin TX 2007AmericanRiverCollege Sacramento CA 2007

AngelinaCollege Lufkin TX 2007AnneArundelCommunityCollege Arnold MD 2006Anoka-RamseyCommunityCollege CoonRapids MN 2006Asheville-BuncombeTechnicalCommunityCollege Asheville NC 2007AshlandCommunityandTechnicalCollege Ashland KY 2007Asnuntuck Community College Enfield CT 2006AtlantaMetropolitanCollege Atlanta GA 2006AtlantaTechnicalCollege Atlanta GA 2006AustinCommunityCollege Austin TX 2007BainbridgeCollege Bainbridge GA 2006BaltimoreCityCommunityCollege Baltimore MD 2006BartonCountyCommunityCollege GreatBend KS 2006BatonRougeCommunityCollege BatonRouge LA 2007BelmontTechnicalCollege St.Clairsville OH 2006Berkshire Community College Pittsfield MA 2007BigBendCommunityCollege MosesLake WA 2007BigSandyCommunityandTechnicalCollege Prestonsburg KY 2007BismarckStateCollege Bismarck ND 2007BlackHawkCollege Moline IL 2006BlinnCollege Brenham TX 2006BlueRidgeCommunityCollege WeyersCave VA 2006BluegrassCommunityandTechnicalCollege Lexington KY 2006BoroughofManhattanCommunityCollege NewYork NY 2007BossierParishCommunityCollege BossierCity LA 2007BowlingGreenTechnicalCollege BowlingGreen KY 2007BrazosportCollege LakeJackson TX 2007BrevardCommunityCollege Cocoa FL 2007BristolCommunityCollege FallRiver MA 2007BrookdaleCommunityCollege Lincroft NJ 2007BrookhavenCollege FarmersBranch TX 2006BrowardCommunityCollege FortLauderdale FL 2007BucksCountyCommunityCollege Newtown PA 2006BunkerHillCommunityCollege Boston MA 2007BurlingtonCountyCollege Pemberton NJ 2007ButlerCountyCommunityCollege(KS) ElDorado KS 2006

Year of most recent CCSSE

Institution City State participation

Page 351: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohort Page2of11

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

ButlerCountyCommunityCollege(PA) Butler PA 2006CaldwellCommunityCollegeandTechnicalInstitute Hudson NC 2007CapeCodCommunityCollege WestBarnstable MA 2007CapeFearCommunityCollege Wilmington NC 2006CapitalCommunityCollege Hartford CT 2006CaritasLaboureCollege Boston MA 2007CarolinasCollegeofHealthSciences Charlotte NC 2007CarrollCommunityCollege Westminster MD 2006CarteretCommunityCollege MoreheadCity NC 2006CascadiaCommunityCollege Bothell WA 2006CasperCollege Casper WY 2007CecilCommunityCollege NorthEast MD 2006CedarValleyCollege Lancaster TX 2006CentralArizonaCollege Coolidge AZ 2006CentralCommunityCollege GrandIsland NE 2007CentralFloridaCommunityCollege Ocala FL 2007CentralLakesCollege Brainerd MN 2006CentralMaineCommunityCollege Auburn ME 2007CentralVirginiaCommunityCollege Lynchburg VA 2006CentralWyomingCollege Riverton WY 2007CentraliaCollege Centralia WA 2006CenturyCollege WhiteBearLake MN 2007Chandler-GilbertCommunityCollege Chandler AZ 2007ChattahoocheeTechnicalCollege Marietta GA 2006ChattanoogaStateTechnicalCommunityCollege Chattanooga TN 2007ChesapeakeCollege WyeMills MD 2006ChipolaCollege Marianna FL 2007CitrusCollege Glendora CA 2006CityCollegeofSanFrancisco SanFrancisco CA 2007ClarendonCollege Clarendon TX 2006ClevelandCommunityCollege Shelby NC 2007ClevelandStateCommunityCollege Cleveland TN 2007ClovisCommunityCollege Clovis NM 2006CoastalBendCollege Beeville TX 2006CoastalCarolinaCommunityCollege Jacksonville NC 2007CoastalGeorgiaCommunityCollege Brunswick GA 2006CochiseCollege SierraVista AZ 2007CollegeofAlameda Alameda CA 2007CollegeofDuPage GlenEllyn IL 2006CollegeofLakeCounty Grayslake IL 2007CollegeofSouthernIdaho TwinFalls ID 2007CollegeofSouthernMaryland LaPlata MD 2006CollegeoftheMainland TexasCity TX 2006CollegeoftheMarshallIslands Majuro MH 2007CollegeoftheRedwoods Eureka CA 2006CollegeoftheSiskiyous Weed CA 2006ColoradoMountainCollege GlenwoodSpringsCO 2007ColumbiaStateCommunityCollege Columbia TN 2006CommunityCollegeofAlleghenyCounty Pittsburgh PA 2007CommunityCollegeofDenver Denver CO 2006CommunityCollegeofPhiladelphia Philadelphia PA 2007CommunityCollegeofRhodeIsland Warwick RI 2006CommunityCollegeofSouthernNevada LasVegas NV 2006

Page 352: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohort Page�of11

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

CorningCommunityCollege Corning NY 2007CumberlandCountyCollege Vineland NJ 2007CuyahogaCommunityCollege Cleveland OH 2006CyFairCollege Cypress TX 2007DabneyS.LancasterCommunityCollege CliftonForge VA 2006DanvilleAreaCommunityCollege Danville IL 2006DanvilleCommunityCollege Danville VA 2007DartonCollege Albany GA 2006DaytonaBeachCommunityCollege DaytonaBeach FL 2007DeAnzaCollege Cupertino CA 2007DelMarCollege CorpusChristi TX 2007DelawareTechnical&CommunityCollege-OwensCampus Dover DE 2007DelawareTechnical&CommunityCollege-Stanton-Wilmington Dover DE 2007DelawareTechnical&CommunityCollege-TerryCampus Dover DE 2007DelgadoCommunityCollege NewOrleans LA 2007DeltaCollege UniversityCenter MI 2007DoñaAnaCommunityCollege LasCruces NM 2007DouglasCollege Coquitlam BC 2007DurhamTechnicalCommunityCollege Durham NC 2006DyersburgStateCommunityCollege Dyersburg TN 2006EastGeorgiaCollege Swainsboro GA 2007EasternNewMexicoUniversity-Roswell Roswell NM 2006EasternShoreCommunityCollege Melfa VA 2006Eastern West Virginia Community & Technical College Moorefield WV 2006EasternWyomingCollege Torrington WY 2007Eastfield College Mesquite TX 2007EdisonCollege FortMyers FL 2007EdisonStateCommunityCollege Piqua OH 2007ElCentroCollege Dallas TX 2007ElPasoCommunityCollege ElPaso TX 2007ElizabethtownCommunityandTechnicalCollege Elizabethtown KY 2007EllsworthCommunityCollege Marshalltown IA 2007EssexCountyCollege Newark NJ 2006EstrellaMountainCommunityCollege Avondale AZ 2006EverettCommunityCollege Everett WA 2006FairmontStateCommunityandTechnicalCollege Fairmont WV 2006FloridaCommunityCollegeatJacksonville Jacksonville FL 2007FloridaKeysCommunityCollege KeyWest FL 2007FondduLacTribalandCommunityCollege Cloquet MN 2007FrankPhillipsCollege Borger TX 2007FrederickCommunityCollege Frederick MD 2006GainesvilleCollege Oakwood GA 2006GalvestonCollege Galveston TX 2006GarrettCollege McHenry MD 2006GatewayCommunityandTechnicalCollege Ft.Mitchell KY 2007GatewayCommunityCollege NewHaven CT 2006GeneseeCommunityCollege Batavia NY 2007GeorgeCWallaceStateCommunityCollege Hanceville AL 2006GeorgiaHighlandsCollege Rome GA 2006GeorgiaMilitaryCollege Milledgeville GA 2007

Page 353: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohort Page�of11

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

GeorgiaPerimeterCollege Decatur GA 2006GermannaCommunityCollege LocustGrove VA 2006GlendaleCommunityCollege Glendale CA 2007GloucesterCountyCollege Sewell NJ 2007GordonCollege Barnesville GA 2006GrandRapidsCommunityCollege GrandRapids MI 2007GraysHarborCollege Aberdeen WA 2006GraysonCountyCollege Denison TX 2006Greenfield Community College Greenfield MA 2007GreenvilleTechnicalCollege Greenville SC 2007GuilfordTechnicalCommunityCollege Jamestown NC 2007GulfCoastCommunityCollege PanamaCity FL 2007HagerstownCommunityCollege Hagerstown MD 2006HarfordCommunityCollege BelAir MD 2006HaroldWashingtonCollege Chicago IL 2006HarperCollege Palatine IL 2006HawaiiCommunityCollege Hilo HI 2006HawkeyeCommunityCollege Waterloo IA 2006HazardCommunityandTechnicalCollege Hazard KY 2006HeartlandCommunityCollege Normal IL 2007HendersonCommunityCollege Henderson KY 2006HesstonCollege Hesston KS 2007HibbingCommunityCollege Hibbing MN 2007HillsboroughCommunityCollege Tampa FL 2007HolyokeCommunityCollege Holyoke MA 2007HonoluluCommunityCollege Honolulu HI 2006HopkinsvilleCommunityCollege Hopkinsville KY 2007HousatonicCommunityCollege Bridgeport CT 2006HoustonCommunityCollegeSystem Houston TX 2007HowardCollege BigSpring TX 2006HowardCommunityCollege Columbia MD 2006HudsonValleyCommunityCollege Troy NY 2007HutchinsonCommunityCollege Hutchinson KS 2006IllinoisCentralCollege EastPeoria IL 2006IllinoisValleyCommunityCollege Oglesby IL 2006IndianRiverCommunityCollege FortPierce FL 2007IsothermalCommunityCollege Spindale NC 2007ItascaCommunityCollege GrandRapids MN 2007ItawambaCommunityCollege Fulton MS 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Anderson Muncie IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Bloomington Bloomington IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-CentralIndiana Indianapolis IN 2007IvyTechCommunityCollege-Columbus Columbus IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-EastChicago Gary IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Elkhart SouthBend IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Evansville Evansville IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-FortWayne FortWayne IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Gary Gary IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Kokomo Kokomo IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Lafayette Lafayette IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Lawrenceburg Lawrenceburg IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Logansport Kokomo IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Madison Lawrenceburg IN 2006

Page 354: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohort Page�of11

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

IvyTechCommunityCollege-Marion Muncie IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-MichiganCity Gary IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Muncie Muncie IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Sellersburg Sellersburg IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-SouthBend SouthBend IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-TerreHaute TerreHaute IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Valparaiso Gary IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Warsaw SouthBend IN 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Whitewater Richmond IN 2006J.SargeantReynoldsCommunityCollege Richmond VA 2006JacksonCommunityCollege Jackson MI 2006JacksonStateCommunityCollege Jackson TN 2006JamesA.RhodesStateCollege Lima OH 2007JeffersonCommunityandTechnicalCollege Louisville KY 2007JeffersonCommunityCollege Steubenville OH 2006JohnTylerCommunityCollege Chester VA 2006JohnsonCountyCommunityCollege OverlandPark KS 2007JolietJrCollege Joliet IL 2007KankakeeCommunityCollege Kankakee IL 2007KansasCityKansasCommunityCollege KansasCity KS 2007KapiolaniCommunityCollege Honolulu HI 2006KauaiCommunityCollege Lihue HI 2006KenaiPeninsulaCollege-UAA Soldotna AK 2007Kennebec Valley Community College Fairfield ME 2007KilgoreCollege Kilgore TX 2006KingsboroughCommunityCollege Brooklyn NY 2006KingwoodCollege Houston TX 2007KirkwoodCommunityCollege CedarRapids IA 2007KirtlandCommunityCollege Roscommon MI 2007KodiakCollege,UniversityofAlaskaAnchorage Kodiak AK 2007KuskokwimCampus,UniversityofAlaskaFairbanks Bethel AK 2007L.E.FletcherTechnicalCommunityCollege Houma LA 2007LaGuardiaCommunityCollege LongIslandCity NY 2007LakeCityCommunityCollege LakeCity FL 2007LakeRegionStateCollege DevilsLake ND 2007LakeSuperiorCollege Duluth MN 2007Lake-SumterCommunityCollege Leesburg FL 2007LamarInstituteofTechnology Beaumont TX 2006LamarStateCollege-Orange Orange TX 2007LaneCommunityCollege Eugene OR 200�LaneyCollege Oakland CA 2007LaramieCountyCommunityCollege Cheyenne WY 2007LeeCollege Baytown TX 2007LeechLakeTribalCollege CassLake MN 2007LeewardCommunityCollege PearlCity HI 2006LehighCarbonCommunityCollege Schnecksville PA 2006Lincoln Land Community College Springfield IL 2005Linn-BentonCommunityCollege Albany OR 2006LorainCountyCommunityCollege Elyria OH 2006LordFairfaxCommunityCollege Middletown VA 200�LouisburgCollege Louisburg NC 2007LouisianaDeltaCommunityCollege Monroe LA 2007LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region2 BatonRouge LA 2007

Page 355: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohort Page6of11

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region� MorganCity LA 2007LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region� Lafayette LA 2007LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region6 Alexandria LA 2007LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region7 Minden LA 2007LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region8 WestMonroe LA 2007LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region9 Bogalusa LA 2007LowerColumbiaCollege Longview WA 2007MacombCommunityCollege Warren MI 2007MadisonvilleCommunityCollege Madisonville KY 2007MalcolmXCollege Chicago IL 2006ManateeCommunityCollege Bradenton FL 2007ManchesterCommunityCollege Manchester CT 2006MarshallCommunityandTechnicalCollege Huntington WV 200�MarshalltownCommunityCollege Marshalltown IA 2007MartinCommunityCollege Williamston NC 2006MassachusettsBayCommunityCollege WellesleyHills MA 2007MassasoitCommunityCollege Brockton MA 2007MauiCommunityCollege Kahului HI 2006MaylandCommunityCollege SprucePine NC 2007MaysvilleCommunityandTechnicalCollege Maysville KY 2007McHenryCountyCollege CrystalLake IL 2007MercedCollege Merced CA 2007MercerCountyCommunityCollege WestWindsor NJ 200�MercyCollegeofHealthSciences DesMoines IA 2006MesabiRangeCommunityandTechnicalCollege Virginia MN 2007MetropolitanCommunityCollege Omaha NE 200�MetropolitanCommunityCollege-KansasCity KansasCity MO 2007MiamiDadeCollege Miami FL 2007MidMichiganCommunityCollege Harrison MI 2007MiddleGeorgiaCollege Cochran GA 2007MiddlesexCommunityCollege Lowell MA 2007MiddlesexCommunityCollege Middletown CT 2006MiddlesexCountyCollege Edison NJ 2006MidlandsTechnicalCollege Columbia SC 2007Mid-SouthCommunityCollege WestMemphis AR 200�MinneapolisCommunityandTechnicalCollege Minneapolis MN 2007MinotStateUniversity-Bottineau Bottineau ND 2007MiraCostaCollege Oceanside CA 2007ModestoJuniorCollege Modesto CA 2006MontanaStateUniversityBillings Billings MT 2007MontgomeryCollege Conroe TX 2007MontgomeryCollege Rockville MD 2006MontgomeryCountyCommunityCollege BlueBell PA 2007MoraineValleyCommunityCollege PalosHills IL 200�MotlowStateCommunityCollege Tullahoma TN 2007MountWachusettCommunityCollege Gardner MA 2007MountainEmpireCommunityCollege BigStoneGap VA 200�MountainViewCollege Dallas TX 200�Mt.HoodCommunityCollege Gresham OR 200�Mt.SanAntonioCollege Walnut CA 2007NashvilleStateTechnicalCommunityCollege Nashville TN 2006NaugatuckValleyCommunityCollege Waterbury CT 2006NavarroCollege Corsicana TX 2006

Page 356: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohort Page7of11

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

NewHampshireTechnicalInstitute Concord NH 2006NewMexicoJuniorCollege Hobbs NM 2007NewMexicoMilitaryInstitute Roswell NM 2006NewMexicoStateUniversity-Grants Grants NM 2006NewMexicoStateUniversityatAlamogordo Alamogordo NM 2006NewRiverCommunityandTechnicalCollege Beckley WV 200�NewRiverCommunityCollege Dublin VA 200�NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Berlin Berlin NH 2006NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Claremont Claremont NH 2006NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Laconia Laconia NH 2006NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Manchester Manchester NH 2006NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Nashua Nashua NH 2006NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Stratham Stratham NH 2006NorthArkansasCollege Harrison AR 2007NorthCentralMissouriCollege Trenton MO 2007North Central State College Mansfield OH 2006NorthDakotaStateCollegeofScience Wahpeton ND 2007NorthFloridaCommunityCollege Madison FL 2007NorthHarrisCollege Houston TX 2007NorthHennepinCommunityCollege BrooklynPark MN 2007NorthIowaAreaCommunityCollege MasonCity IA 2006NorthLakeCollege Irving TX 2006NorthShoreCommunityCollege Danvers MA 2007NorthamptonCommunityCollege Bethlehem PA 2007NortheastIowaCommunityCollege Calmar IA 2006NortheastLakeviewCollege SanAntonio TX 2007NortheastMississippiCommunityCollege Booneville MS 2007NortheastStateTechnicalCommunityCollege Blountville TN 2006NortheastTexasCommunityCollege MtPleasant TX 2007NorthernEssexCommunityCollege Haverhill MA 2007NorthernMaineCommunityCollege PresqueIsle ME 2007NorthernNewMexicoCommunityCollege Espanola NM 2006NorthernOklahomaCollege Tonkawa OK 2007NorthernVirginiaCommunityCollege Annandale VA 200�NorthWestArkansasCommunityCollege Bentonville AR 2007NorthwestCollege Powell WY 2007NorthwestIndianCollege Bellingham WA 200�NorthwestIowaCommunityCollege Sheldon IA 2007NorthwestVistaCollege SanAntonio TX 2007NorthwesternConnecticutCommunityCollege Winsted CT 2006NorwalkCommunityCollege Norwalk CT 2006NunezCommunityCollege Chalmette LA 2007Oakland Community College Bloomfield Hills MI 2005OaktonCommunityCollege DesPlaines IL 2006OceanCountyCollege TomsRiver NJ 2006Okaloosa-WaltonCollege Niceville FL 2007OklahomaCityCommunityCollege OklahomaCity OK 2007OlympicCollege Bremerton WA 2007OnondagaCommunityCollege Syracuse NY 2007OregonCoastCommunityCollege Newport OR 2006OuachitaTechnicalCollege Malvern AR 2007OwensboroCommunityandTechnicalCollege Owensboro KY 2007PalmBeachCommunityCollege LakeWorth FL 2007

Page 357: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohort Page8of11

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

PaloAltoCollege SanAntonio TX 2007PalomarCollege SanMarcos CA 2007PanolaCollege Carthage TX 2006ParadiseValleyCommunityCollege Phoenix AZ 2007ParisJuniorCollege Paris TX 2006ParklandCollege Champaign IL 2007PasadenaCityCollege Pasadena CA 2007Pasco-HernandoCommunityCollege NewPortRichey FL 2007PatrickHenryCommunityCollege Martinsville VA 200�PaulD.CampCommunityCollege Franklin VA 200�PellissippiStateTechnicalCommunityCollege Knoxville TN 2006PensacolaJuniorCollege Pensacola FL 2007PhoenixCollege Phoenix AZ 2006PiedmontVirginiaCommunityCollege Charlottesville VA 2007PittCommunityCollege Winterville NC 2006PolkCommunityCollege WinterHaven FL 2007PrairieStateCollege ChicagoHeights IL 2006PrinceGeorge’sCommunityCollege Largo MD 2006PrinceWilliamSoundCommunityCollege Valdez AK 2007PuebloCommunityCollege Pueblo CO 2007QueensboroughCommunityCollege Bayside NY 2007QuinebaugValleyCommunityCollege Danielson CT 2006QuinsigamondCommunityCollege Worcester MA 2007RainyRiverCommunityCollege InternationalFalls MN 2007RangerCollege Ranger TX 2006RappahannockCommunityCollege Glenns VA 200�RaritanValleyCommunityCollege Somerville NJ 200�ReadingAreaCommunityCollege Reading PA 2007RedRocksCommunityCollege Lakewood CO 200�RedlandsCommunityCollege ElReno OK 2007RendLakeCollege Ina IL 2007RichardJ.DaleyCollege Chicago IL 2007RichlandCollege Dallas TX 2006RiverParishesCommunityCollege Sorrento LA 2007RiverlandCommunityCollege Austin MN 2007RoaneStateCommunityCollege Harriman TN 2006RochesterCommunityandTechnicalCollege Rochester MN 2007Rowan-CabarrusCommunityCollege Salisbury NC 2006RoxburyCommunityCollege Roxbury MA 2007SalemCommunityCollege CarneysPoint NJ 2007SalishKootenaiCollege Pablo MT 2007SaltLakeCommunityCollege SaltLakeCity UT 2006SanAntonioCollege SanAntonio TX 2007SanDiegoMesaCollege SanDiego CA 2007SanJacintoCollege-CentralCampus Pasadena TX 2007SanJacintoCollege-NorthCampus Pasadena TX 2007SanJacintoCollege-SouthCampus Pasadena TX 2007SanJuanCollege Farmington NM 2006SantaAnaCollege SantaAna CA 2007SantaFeCommunityCollege(FL) Gainesville FL 2007SantaFeCommunityCollege(NM) SantaFe NM 2007SchoolcraftCollege Livonia MI 2007ScottsdaleCommunityCollege Scottsdale AZ 200�

Page 358: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohort Page9of11

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

SeminoleCommunityCollege Sanford FL 2007SheltonStateCommunityCollege Tuscaloosa AL 2007SheridanCollege Sheridan WY 2007SinclairCommunityCollege Dayton OH 2007SkagitValleyCollege MountVernon WA 2007SomersetCommunityCollege Somerset KY 2006SouthFloridaCommunityCollege AvonPark FL 2007SouthGeorgiaCollege Douglas GA 2007SouthLouisianaCommunityCollege Lafayette LA 2007SouthMountainCommunityCollege Phoenix AZ 2007SouthPiedmontCommunityCollege Polkton NC 200�SouthPugetSoundCommunityCollege Olympia WA 200�SouthSeattleCommunityCollege Seattle WA 2007SouthSuburbanCollege SouthHolland IL 2007SouthTexasCollege McAllen TX 2007SoutheastKentuckyCommunityandTechnicalCollege Cumberland KY 2006SoutheasternCommunityCollege(IA) WestBurlington IA 2007SoutheasternCommunityCollege(NC) Whiteville NC 2007SoutheasternTechnicalCollege Vidalia GA 2007SouthernMaineCommunityCollege SouthPortland ME 2006SouthernUniversityatShreveport Shreveport LA 200�SouthernWestVirginiaCommunityandTechnicalCollegeMountGay WV 200�SouthsideVirginiaCommunityCollege Alberta VA 200�SouthwestTennesseeCommunityCollege Memphis TN 2007SouthwestTexasJuniorCollege Uvalde TX 2006SouthwestVirginiaCommunityCollege Richlands VA 200�SouthwesternCommunityCollege Sylva NC 200�SouthwesternIllinoisCollege Belleville IL 200�SouthwesternIndianPolytechnicInstitute Albuquerque NM 2006SouthwesternOregonCommunityCollege CoosBay OR 2007SOWELATechnicalCommunityCollege LakeCharles LA 2007SpokaneCommunityCollege Spokane WA 200�SpoonRiverCollege Canton Il 2007Springfield Technical Community College Springfield MA 2007St.CharlesCommunityCollege St.Peters MO 2006St.JohnsRiverCommunityCollege Palatka FL 2007St.LouisCommunityCollege-Meramec St.Louis MO 2006St.LouisCommunityCollegeatForestPark St.Louis MO 2006St.LouisCommunityCollege-FlorissantValley St.Louis MO 2006St.PetersburgCollege St.Petersburg FL 2007St.Philip’sCollege SanAntonio TX 2007StarkStateCollegeofTechnology NorthCanton OH 200�SurryCommunityCollege Dobson NC 2007TacomaCommunityCollege Tacoma WA 200�TaftCollege Taft CA 2007TallahasseeCommunityCollege Tallahassee FL 2007TananaValleyCampus,UniversityofAlaskaFairbanks Fairbanks AK 2007TechnicalCollegeoftheLowcountry Beaufort SC 2007TempleCollege Temple TX 2007TexasStateTechnicalCollegeHarlingen Harlingen TX 200�TexasStateTechnicalCollegeMarshall Marshall TX 2007TexasStateTechnicalCollegeWaco Waco TX 2006TexasStateTechnicalCollegeWestTexas Sweetwater TX 2006

Page 359: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohort Page10of11

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

TheCommunityandTechnicalCollegeatWVUTech Montgomery WV 200�TheCommunityandTechnicalCollegeofShepherd Martinsburg WV 200�TheCommunityCollegeofBaltimoreCounty Baltimore MD 2006TheVictoriaCollege Victoria TX 2007ThomasNelsonCommunityCollege Hampton VA 2007ThreeRiversCommunityCollege Norwich CT 2006TidewaterCommunityCollege Norfolk VA 200�TomballCollege Tomball TX 2007TompkinsCortlandCommunityCollege Dryden NY 2007Tri-CountyCommunityCollege Murphy NC 200�Tri-CountyTechnicalCollege Pendleton SC 2007TrinityValleyCommunityCollege Athens TX 2007TritonCollege RiverGrove IL 2006TruckeeMeadowsCommunityCollege Reno NV 200�TrumanCollege Chicago IL 2007TunxisCommunityCollege Farmington CT 2006UniversityofAlaskaMatanuskaSusitnaCollege Palmer AK 2007UniversityofAlaskaSoutheastKetchikancampus Juneau AK 2007UniversityofArkansasCommunityCollegeatBatesville Batesville AR 2007UniversityofArkansasCommunityCollegeatHope Hope AR 200�UniversityofCincinnatiClermontCollege Batavia OH 2006UniversityofNewMexico-Gallup Gallup NM 2006UniversityofNewMexico-TaosBranch Taos NM 2006UniversityofNewMexico-ValenciaCampus LosLunas NM 2006UniversityofWisconsinColleges Madison WI 200�ValenciaCommunityCollege Orlando FL 2007VermilionCommunityCollege Ely MN 2007VernonCollege Vernon TX 2007VictorValleyCollege Victorville CA 2007VincennesUniversity Vincennes IN 2007VirginiaHighlandsCommunityCollege Abingdon VA 200�VirginiaWesternCommunityCollege Roanoke VA 200�VolunteerStateCommunityCollege Gallatin TN 2007WaltersStateCommunityCollege Morristown TN 2006WarrenCountyCommunityCollege Washington NJ 200�WashingtonStateCommunityCollege Marietta OH 2007WaycrossCollege Waycross GA 200�WayneCommunityCollege Goldsboro NC 2007WeatherfordCollege Weatherford TX 2007WenatcheeValleyCollege Wenatchee WA 2007WestHillsCommunityCollegeDistrict Coalinga CA 2007WestKentuckyCommunityandTechnicalCollege Paducah KY 2007WestVirginiaNorthernCommunityCollege Wheeling WV 200�WestVirginiaStateCommunityandTechnicalCollege Institute WV 2007WestVirginiaUniversityatParkersburg Parkersburg WV 200�WestchesterCommunityCollege Valhalla NY 200�WesternIowaTechCommunityCollege SiouxCity IA 200�WesternNebraskaCommunityCollege Scottsbluff NE 2007WesternPiedmontCommunityCollege Morganton NC 200�WesternTexasCollege Snyder TX 2006WesternWyomingCommunityCollege RockSprings WY 2007WestmorelandCountyCommunityCollege Youngwood PA 2007WhartonCountyJuniorCollege Wharton TX 2007

Page 360: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohort Page11of11

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

WilburWrightCollege Chicago IL 2007WillistonStateCollege Williston ND 2007WindwardCommunityCollege Kaneohe HI 2006WisconsinIndianheadTechnicalCollege ShellLake WI 200�Wor-WicCommunityCollege Salisbury MD 2006WythevilleCommunityCollege Wytheville VA 200�YorkTechnicalCollege RockHill SC 2007ZaneStateCollege Zanesville OH 200�

Page 361: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CCSSE CohortComparison Groups

2007CCSSECohortComparisonGroups Page1of12

Community College Surveyof Student Engagement

Comparison Groups—Small Colleges

AbrahamBaldwinAgriculturalCollege Tifton GA 2005AikenTechnicalCollege Graniteville SC 2007

AlabamaSouthernCommunityCollege Monroeville AL 2007AlexandriaTechnicalCollege Alexandria MN 2007

AlleganyCollegeofMaryland Cumberland MD 2006AlpenaCommunityCollege Alpena MI 2007

AlvinCommunityCollege Alvin TX 2007AshlandCommunityandTechnicalCollege Ashland KY 2007

Asnuntuck Community College Enfield CT 2006AtlantaMetropolitanCollege Atlanta GA 2005AtlantaTechnicalCollege Atlanta GA 2006BainbridgeCollege Bainbridge GA 2005BartonCountyCommunityCollege GreatBend KS 2006BelmontTechnicalCollege St.Clairsville OH 2006Berkshire Community College Pittsfield MA 2007BigBendCommunityCollege MosesLake WA 2007BismarckStateCollege Bismarck ND 2007BlueRidgeCommunityCollege WeyersCave VA 2005BowlingGreenTechnicalCollege BowlingGreen KY 2007BrazosportCollege LakeJackson TX 2007ButlerCountyCommunityCollege(PA) Butler PA 2006CaldwellCommunityCollegeandTechnicalInstitute Hudson NC 2007CapeCodCommunityCollege WestBarnstable MA 2007CapitalCommunityCollege Hartford CT 2006CaritasLaboureCollege Boston MA 2007CarolinasCollegeofHealthSciences Charlotte NC 2007CarrollCommunityCollege Westminster MD 2006CarteretCommunityCollege MoreheadCity NC 2006CascadiaCommunityCollege Bothell WA 2006CasperCollege Casper WY 2007CecilCommunityCollege NorthEast MD 2006CedarValleyCollege Lancaster TX 2006CentralLakesCollege Brainerd MN 2006CentralMaineCommunityCollege Auburn ME 2007CentralWyomingCollege Riverton WY 2007CentraliaCollege Centralia WA 2006ChattahoocheeTechnicalCollege Marietta GA 2005ChesapeakeCollege WyeMills MD 2006ChipolaCollege Marianna FL 2007ClarendonCollege Clarendon TX 2006ClevelandCommunityCollege Shelby NC 2007ClevelandStateCommunityCollege Cleveland TN 2007ClovisCommunityCollege Clovis NM 2006

Year of most recent CCSSE

Institution City State participation

Page 362: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohortComparisonGroups Page2of12

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

CoastalBendCollege Beeville TX 2006CoastalCarolinaCommunityCollege Jacksonville NC 2007CoastalGeorgiaCommunityCollege Brunswick GA 2005CollegeoftheMainland TexasCity TX 2006CollegeoftheMarshallIslands Majuro MH 2007CollegeoftheSiskiyous Weed CA 2006CumberlandCountyCollege Vineland NJ 2007DabneyS.LancasterCommunityCollege CliftonForge VA 2005DanvilleAreaCommunityCollege Danville IL 2006DanvilleCommunityCollege Danville VA 2007DartonCollege Albany GA 2005DelawareTechnical&CommunityCollege-OwensCampus Dover DE 2007DelawareTechnical&CommunityCollege-TerryCampus Dover DE 2007DyersburgStateCommunityCollege Dyersburg TN 2006EastGeorgiaCollege Swainsboro GA 2007EasternNewMexicoUniversity-Roswell Roswell NM 2006EasternShoreCommunityCollege Melfa VA 2005Eastern West Virginia Community & Technical College Moorefield WV 2005EasternWyomingCollege Torrington WY 2007EdisonStateCommunityCollege Piqua OH 2007EllsworthCommunityCollege Marshalltown IA 2007FairmontStateCommunityandTechnicalCollege Fairmont WV 2005FloridaKeysCommunityCollege KeyWest FL 2007FondduLacTribalandCommunityCollege Cloquet MN 2007FrankPhillipsCollege Borger TX 2007GalvestonCollege Galveston TX 2006GarrettCollege McHenry MD 2006GatewayCommunityandTechnicalCollege Ft.Mitchell KY 2007GeorgiaHighlandsCollege Rome GA 2005GordonCollege Barnesville GA 2005GraysHarborCollege Aberdeen WA 2005GraysonCountyCollege Denison TX 2006Greenfield Community College Greenfield MA 2007HagerstownCommunityCollege Hagerstown MD 2006HawaiiCommunityCollege Hilo HI 2006HazardCommunityandTechnicalCollege Hazard KY 2006HendersonCommunityCollege Henderson KY 2006HesstonCollege Hesston KS 2007HibbingCommunityCollege Hibbing MN 2007HonoluluCommunityCollege Honolulu HI 2006HopkinsvilleCommunityCollege Hopkinsville KY 2007HowardCollege BigSpring TX 2006IllinoisValleyCommunityCollege Oglesby IL 2006IsothermalCommunityCollege Spindale NC 2007ItascaCommunityCollege GrandRapids MN 2007IvyTechCommunityCollege-Bloomington Bloomington IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-Columbus Columbus IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-Elkhart SouthBend IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-Evansville Evansville IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-Kokomo Kokomo IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-Lawrenceburg Lawrenceburg IN 2005

Comparison Groups—Small Colleges (continued)

Page 363: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohortComparisonGroups Page�of12

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

IvyTechCommunityCollege-Logansport Kokomo IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-Madison Lawrenceburg IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-Sellersburg Sellersburg IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-SouthBend SouthBend IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-TerreHaute TerreHaute IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-Warsaw SouthBend IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-Whitewater Richmond IN 2005JacksonStateCommunityCollege Jackson TN 2006JamesA.RhodesStateCollege Lima OH 2007JeffersonCommunityCollege Steubenville OH 2006KankakeeCommunityCollege Kankakee IL 2007KauaiCommunityCollege Lihue HI 2006KenaiPeninsulaCollege-UAA Soldotna AK 2007Kennebec Valley Community College Fairfield ME 2007KirtlandCommunityCollege Roscommon MI 2007KodiakCollege,UniversityofAlaskaAnchorage Kodiak AK 2007KuskokwimCampus,UniversityofAlaskaFairbanks Bethel AK 2007L.E.FletcherTechnicalCommunityCollege Houma LA 2007LakeCityCommunityCollege LakeCity FL 2007LakeRegionStateCollege DevilsLake ND 2007Lake-SumterCommunityCollege Leesburg FL 2007LamarInstituteofTechnology Beaumont TX 2006LamarStateCollege-Orange Orange TX 2007LaramieCountyCommunityCollege Cheyenne WY 2007LeechLakeTribalCollege CassLake MN 2007LouisburgCollege Louisburg NC 2007LouisianaDeltaCommunityCollege Monroe LA 2007LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region2 BatonRouge LA 2007LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region� MorganCity LA 2007LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region4 Lafayette LA 2007LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region6 Alexandria LA 2007LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region7 Minden LA 2007LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region8 WestMonroe LA 2007LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region9 Bogalusa LA 2007LowerColumbiaCollege Longview WA 2007MadisonvilleCommunityCollege Madisonville KY 2007MarshallCommunityandTechnicalCollege Huntington WV 2005MarshalltownCommunityCollege Marshalltown IA 2007MartinCommunityCollege Williamston NC 2006MauiCommunityCollege Kahului HI 2006MaylandCommunityCollege SprucePine NC 2007MaysvilleCommunity&TechnicalCollege Maysville KY 2007MercyCollegeofHealthSciences DesMoines IA 2006MesabiRangeCommunityandTechnicalCollege Virginia MN 2007MidMichiganCommunityCollege Harrison MI 2007Mid-SouthCommunityCollege WestMemphis AR 2005MiddleGeorgiaCollege Cochran GA 2007MiddlesexCommunityCollege Middletown CT 2006MinotStateUniversity-Bottineau Bottineau ND 2007MontanaStateUniversityBillings Billings MT 2007MotlowStateCommunityCollege Tullahoma TN 2007MountWachusettCommunityCollege Gardner MA 2007MountainEmpireCommunityCollege BigStoneGap VA 2005

Comparison Groups—Small Colleges (continued)

Page 364: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohortComparisonGroups Page4of12

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

NewHampshireTechnicalInstitute Concord NH 2006NewMexicoJuniorCollege Hobbs NM 2007NewMexicoMilitaryInstitute Roswell NM 2006NewMexicoStateUniversity-Grants Grants NM 2006NewMexicoStateUniversityatAlamogordo Alamogordo NM 2006NewRiverCommunityandTechnicalCollege Beckley WV 2005NewRiverCommunityCollege Dublin VA 2005NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Berlin Berlin NH 2006NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Claremont Claremont NH 2006NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Laconia Laconia NH 2006NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Manchester Manchester NH 2006NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Nashua Nashua NH 2006NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Stratham Stratham NH 2006NorthArkansasCollege Harrison AR 2007NorthCentralMissouriCollege Trenton MO 2007North Central State College Mansfield OH 2006NorthDakotaStateCollegeofScience Wahpeton ND 2007NorthFloridaCommunityCollege Madison FL 2007NorthIowaAreaCommunityCollege MasonCity IA 2006NortheastLakeviewCollege SanAntonio TX 2007NortheastMississippiCommunityCollege Booneville MS 2007NortheastTexasCommunityCollege MtPleasant TX 2007NorthernMaineCommunityCollege PresqueIsle ME 2007NorthernNewMexicoCommunityCollege Espanola NM 2006NorthwestCollege Powell WY 2007NorthwestIndianCollege Bellingham WA 2005NorthwestIowaCommunityCollege Sheldon IA 2007NorthwesternConnecticutCommunityCollege Winsted CT 2006NunezCommunityCollege Chalmette LA 2007OregonCoastCommunityCollege Newport OR 2006OuachitaTechnicalCollege Malvern AR 2007PanolaCollege Carthage TX 2006ParisJuniorCollege Paris TX 2006PatrickHenryCommunityCollege Martinsville VA 2005PaulD.CampCommunityCollege Franklin VA 2005PiedmontVirginiaCommunityCollege Charlottesville VA 2007PrinceWilliamSoundCommunityCollege Valdez AK 2007QuinebaugValleyCommunityCollege Danielson CT 2006RainyRiverCommunityCollege InternationalFalls MN 2007RangerCollege Ranger TX 2006RappahannockCommunityCollege Glenns VA 2005ReadingAreaCommunityCollege Reading PA 2007RedlandsCommunityCollege ElReno OK 2007RiverParishesCommunityCollege Sorrento LA 2007RiverlandCommunityCollege Austin MN 2007RoxburyCommunityCollege Roxbury MA 2007SalemCommunityCollege CarneysPoint NJ 2007SalishKootenaiCollege Pablo MT 2007SantaFeCommunityCollege(NM) SantaFe NM 2007SheridanCollege Sheridan WY 2007SouthFloridaCommunityCollege AvonPark FL 2007SouthGeorgiaCollege Douglas GA 2007SouthLouisianaCommunityCollege Lafayette LA 2007

Comparison Groups—Small Colleges (continued)

Page 365: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohortComparisonGroups Page5of12

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

SouthMountainCommunityCollege Phoenix AZ 2007SouthPiedmontCommunityCollege Polkton NC 2005SoutheasternCommunityCollege(IA) WestBurlington IA 2007SoutheasternCommunityCollege(NC) Whiteville NC 2007SoutheasternTechnicalCollege Vidalia GA 2007SouthernMaineCommunityCollege SouthPortland ME 2006SouthernUniversityatShreveport Shreveport LA 2005SouthernWestVirginiaCommunityandTechnicalCollege MountGay WV 2005SouthwestTexasJuniorCollege Uvalde TX 2006SouthwestVirginiaCommunityCollege Richlands VA 2005SouthwesternCommunityCollege Sylva NC 2005SouthwesternIndianPolytechnicInstitute Albuquerque NM 2006SouthwesternOregonCommunityCollege CoosBay OR 2007SOWELATechnicalCommunityCollege LakeCharles LA 2007SpoonRiverCollege Canton Il 2007SurryCommunityCollege Dobson NC 2007TananaValleyCampus,UniversityofAlaskaFairbanks Fairbanks AK 2007TechnicalCollegeoftheLowcountry Beaufort SC 2007TempleCollege Temple TX 2007TexasStateTechnicalCollegeHarlingen Harlingen TX 2005TexasStateTechnicalCollegeMarshall Marshall TX 2007TexasStateTechnicalCollegeWaco Waco TX 2006TexasStateTechnicalCollegeWestTexas Sweetwater TX 2006TheCommunityandTechnicalCollegeatWVUTech Montgomery WV 2005TheCommunityandTechnicalCollegeofShepherd Martinsburg WV 2005TheVictoriaCollege Victoria TX 2007ThreeRiversCommunityCollege Norwich CT 2006TompkinsCortlandCommunityCollege Dryden NY 2007Tri-CountyCommunityCollege Murphy NC 2005TunxisCommunityCollege Farmington CT 2006UniversityofAlaskaMatanuskaSusitnaCollege Palmer AK 2007UniversityofAlaskaSoutheastKetchikancampus Juneau AK 2007UniversityofArkansasCommunityCollegeatBatesville Batesville AR 2007UniversityofArkansasCommunityCollegeatHope Hope AR 2005UniversityofCincinnatiClermontCollege Batavia OH 2006UniversityofNewMexico-Gallup Gallup NM 2006UniversityofNewMexico-TaosBranch Taos NM 2006UniversityofNewMexico-ValenciaCampus LosLunas NM 2006VermilionCommunityCollege Ely MN 2007VernonCollege Vernon TX 2007VirginiaHighlandsCommunityCollege Abingdon VA 2005WarrenCountyCommunityCollege Washington NJ 2005WashingtonStateCommunityCollege Marietta OH 2007WaycrossCollege Waycross GA 2005WayneCommunityCollege Goldsboro NC 2007WenatcheeValleyCollege Wenatchee WA 2007WestVirginiaNorthernCommunityCollege Wheeling WV 2005WestVirginiaStateCommunityandTechnicalCollege Institute WV 2007WestVirginiaUniversityatParkersburg Parkersburg WV 2005WesternNebraskaCommunityCollege Scottsbluff NE 2007WesternPiedmontCommunityCollege Morganton NC 2005

Comparison Groups—Small Colleges (continued)

Page 366: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohortComparisonGroups Page6of12

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

WesternTexasCollege Snyder TX 2006WesternWyomingCommunityCollege RockSprings WY 2007WillistonStateCollege Williston ND 2007WindwardCommunityCollege Kaneohe HI 2006WisconsinIndianheadTechnicalCollege ShellLake WI 2005Wor-WicCommunityCollege Salisbury MD 2006WythevilleCommunityCollege Wytheville VA 2005YorkTechnicalCollege RockHill SC 2007ZaneStateCollege Zanesville OH 2005

Comparison Groups—Small Colleges (continued)

Page 367: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohortComparisonGroups Page7of12

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

AngelinaCollege Lufkin TX 2007Anoka-RamseyCommunityCollege CoonRapids MN 2006Asheville-BuncombeTechnicalCommunityCollege Asheville NC 2007BaltimoreCityCommunityCollege Baltimore MD 2006BatonRougeCommunityCollege BatonRouge LA 2007BigSandyCommunityandTechnicalCollege Prestonsburg KY 2007BlackHawkCollege Moline IL 2006BossierParishCommunityCollege BossierCity LA 2007BristolCommunityCollege FallRiver MA 2007BunkerHillCommunityCollege Boston MA 2007BurlingtonCountyCollege Pemberton NJ 2007CapeFearCommunityCollege Wilmington NC 2005CentralArizonaCollege Coolidge AZ 2006CentralCommunityCollege GrandIsland NE 2007CentralFloridaCommunityCollege Ocala FL 2007CentralVirginiaCommunityCollege Lynchburg VA 2005ChattanoogaStateTechnicalCommunityCollege Chattanooga TN 2007CochiseCollege SierraVista AZ 2007CollegeofAlameda Alameda CA 2007CollegeofSouthernIdaho TwinFalls ID 2007CollegeofSouthernMaryland LaPlata MD 2006CollegeoftheRedwoods Eureka CA 2006ColoradoMountainCollege GlenwoodSpringsCO 2007ColumbiaStateCommunityCollege Columbia TN 2006CorningCommunityCollege Corning NY 2007DelawareTechnical&CommunityCollege-Stanton-Wilmington Dover DE 2007DoñaAnaCommunityCollege LasCruces NM 2007DurhamTechnicalCommunityCollege Durham NC 2005ElCentroCollege Dallas TX 2007ElizabethtownCommunity&TechnicalCollege Elizabethtown KY 2007EstrellaMountainCommunityCollege Avondale AZ 2006EverettCommunityCollege Everett WA 2006FrederickCommunityCollege Frederick MD 2006GainesvilleCollege Oakwood GA 2005GatewayCommunityCollege NewHaven CT 2006GeneseeCommunityCollege Batavia NY 2007GeorgeCWallaceStateCommunityCollege Hanceville AL 2005GeorgiaMilitaryCollege Milledgeville GA 2007GermannaCommunityCollege LocustGrove VA 2005GloucesterCountyCollege Sewell NJ 2007GulfCoastCommunityCollege PanamaCity FL 2007HarfordCommunityCollege BelAir MD 2006HawkeyeCommunityCollege Waterloo IA 2005HeartlandCommunityCollege Normal IL 2007HolyokeCommunityCollege Holyoke MA 2007HousatonicCommunityCollege Bridgeport CT 2006HowardCommunityCollege Columbia MD 2006HutchinsonCommunityCollege Hutchinson KS 2006ItawambaCommunityCollege Fulton MS 2006IvyTechCommunityCollege-Anderson Muncie IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-EastChicago Gary IN 2005

Comparison Groups—Medium Colleges

Page 368: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohortComparisonGroups Page8of12

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

IvyTechCommunityCollege-FortWayne FortWayne IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-Gary Gary IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-Lafayette Lafayette IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-Marion Muncie IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-MichiganCity Gary IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-Muncie Muncie IN 2005IvyTechCommunityCollege-Valparaiso Gary IN 2005JacksonCommunityCollege Jackson MI 2006JohnTylerCommunityCollege Chester VA 2005KansasCityKansasCommunityCollege KansasCity KS 2007KapiolaniCommunityCollege Honolulu HI 2006KilgoreCollege Kilgore TX 2006KingwoodCollege Houston TX 2007LakeSuperiorCollege Duluth MN 2007LeeCollege Baytown TX 2007LeewardCommunityCollege PearlCity HI 2006LehighCarbonCommunityCollege Schnecksville PA 2006Lincoln Land Community College Springfield IL 2005Linn-BentonCommunityCollege Albany OR 2006LordFairfaxCommunityCollege Middletown VA 2005MalcolmXCollege Chicago IL 2006ManchesterCommunityCollege Manchester CT 2006MassachusettsBayCommunityCollege WellesleyHills MA 2007MassasoitCommunityCollege Brockton MA 2007McHenryCountyCollege CrystalLake IL 2007MinneapolisCommunityandTechnicalCollege Minneapolis MN 2007MountainViewCollege Dallas TX 2005NashvilleStateTechnicalCommunityCollege Nashville TN 2006NaugatuckValleyCommunityCollege Waterbury CT 2006NavarroCollege Corsicana TX 2006NorthHennepinCommunityCollege BrooklynPark MN 2007NorthShoreCommunityCollege Danvers MA 2007NorthamptonCommunityCollege Bethlehem PA 2007NortheastIowaCommunityCollege Calmar IA 2006NortheastStateTechnicalCommunityCollege Blountville TN 2006NorthernEssexCommunityCollege Haverhill MA 2007NorthernOklahomaCollege Tonkawa OK 2007NorthWestArkansasCommunityCollege Bentonville AR 2007NorwalkCommunityCollege Norwalk CT 2006Okaloosa-WaltonCollege Niceville FL 2007OlympicCollege Bremerton WA 2007OwensboroCommunityandTechnicalCollege Owensboro KY 2007PaloAltoCollege SanAntonio TX 2007Pasco-HernandoCommunityCollege NewPortRichey FL 2007PellissippiStateTechnicalCommunityCollege Knoxville TN 2006PittCommunityCollege Winterville NC 2006PolkCommunityCollege WinterHaven FL 2007PrairieStateCollege ChicagoHeights IL 2006PuebloCommunityCollege Pueblo CO 2007QuinsigamondCommunityCollege Worcester MA 2007RaritanValleyCommunityCollege Somerville NJ 2005RedRocksCommunityCollege Lakewood CO 2005RendLakeCollege Ina IL 2007

Comparison Groups—Medium College (continued)

Page 369: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohortComparisonGroups Page9of12

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

RoaneStateCommunityCollege Harriman TN 2006RochesterCommunityandTechnicalCollege Rochester MN 2007Rowan-CabarrusCommunityCollege Salisbury NC 2006SanJacintoCollege-NorthCampus Pasadena TX 2007SanJuanCollege Farmington NM 2006SheltonStateCommunityCollege Tuscaloosa AL 2007SkagitValleyCollege MountVernon WA 2007SomersetCommunityCollege Somerset KY 2006SouthPugetSoundCommunityCollege Olympia WA 2005SouthSeattleCommunityCollege Seattle WA 2007SouthSuburbanCollege SouthHolland IL 2007SoutheastKentuckyCommunity&TechnicalCollege Cumberland KY 2006SouthsideVirginiaCommunityCollege Alberta VA 2005SpokaneCommunityCollege Spokane WA 2005Springfield Technical Community College Springfield MA 2007St.CharlesCommunityCollege St.Peters MO 2006St.JohnsRiverCommunityCollege Palatka FL 2007St.LouisCommunityCollegeatForestPark St.Louis MO 2006St.LouisCommunityCollege-FlorissantValley St.Louis MO 2006StarkStateCollegeofTechnology NorthCanton OH 2005TacomaCommunityCollege Tacoma WA 2005TomballCollege Tomball TX 2007Tri-CountyTechnicalCollege Pendleton SC 2007TrinityValleyCommunityCollege Athens TX 2007VolunteerStateCommunityCollege Gallatin TN 2007WaltersStateCommunityCollege Morristown TN 2006WeatherfordCollege Weatherford TX 2007WestHillsCommunityCollegeDistrict Coalinga CA 2007WestKentuckyCommunityandTechnicalCollege Paducah KY 2007WesternIowaTechCommunityCollege SiouxCity IA 2005WestmorelandCountyCommunityCollege Youngwood PA 2007WhartonCountyJuniorCollege Wharton TX 2007

Comparison Groups—Medium Colleges (continued)

Page 370: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohortComparisonGroups Page10of12

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

Comparison Groups—Large Colleges

AnneArundelCommunityCollege Arnold MD 2006BlinnCollege Brenham TX 2006BluegrassCommunityandTechnicalCollege Lexington KY 2006BrevardCommunityCollege Cocoa FL 2007BrookdaleCommunityCollege Lincroft NJ 2007BrookhavenCollege FarmersBranch TX 2006BucksCountyCommunityCollege Newtown PA 2006ButlerCountyCommunityCollege(KS) ElDorado KS 2006CenturyCollege WhiteBearLake MN 2007Chandler-GilbertCommunityCollege Chandler AZ 2007CitrusCollege Glendora CA 2006CollegeofLakeCounty Grayslake IL 2007CommunityCollegeofDenver Denver CO 2005CyFairCollege Cypress TX 2007DaytonaBeachCommunityCollege DaytonaBeach FL 2007DelMarCollege CorpusChristi TX 2007DelgadoCommunityCollege NewOrleans LA 2007DeltaCollege UniversityCenter MI 2007DouglasCollege Coquitlam BC 2007Eastfield College Mesquite TX 2007EdisonCollege FortMyers FL 2007EssexCountyCollege Newark NJ 2006GrandRapidsCommunityCollege GrandRapids MI 2007GreenvilleTechnicalCollege Greenville SC 2007GuilfordTechnicalCommunityCollege Jamestown NC 2007HaroldWashingtonCollege Chicago IL 2005HudsonValleyCommunityCollege Troy NY 2007IllinoisCentralCollege EastPeoria IL 2006IndianRiverCommunityCollege FortPierce FL 2007IvyTechCommunityCollege-CentralIndiana Indianapolis IN 2007J.SargeantReynoldsCommunityCollege Richmond VA 2005JeffersonCommunityandTechnicalCollege Louisville KY 2007JolietJrCollege Joliet IL 2007KingsboroughCommunityCollege Brooklyn NY 2005LaGuardiaCommunityCollege LongIslandCity NY 2007LaneCommunityCollege Eugene OR 2005LaneyCollege Oakland CA 2007LorainCountyCommunityCollege Elyria OH 2006ManateeCommunityCollege Bradenton FL 2007MercedCollege Merced CA 2007MercerCountyCommunityCollege WestWindsor NJ 2005MetropolitanCommunityCollege Omaha NE 2005MiddlesexCommunityCollege Lowell MA 2007MiddlesexCountyCollege Edison NJ 2006MidlandsTechnicalCollege Columbia SC 2007MiraCostaCollege Oceanside CA 2007MontgomeryCollege Conroe TX 2007MontgomeryCountyCommunityCollege BlueBell PA 2007Mt.HoodCommunityCollege Gresham OR 2005NorthHarrisCollege Houston TX 2007NorthLakeCollege Irving TX 2006NorthwestVistaCollege SanAntonio TX 2007

Page 371: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohortComparisonGroups Page11of12

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

Comparison Groups—Large Colleges

OaktonCommunityCollege DesPlaines IL 2006OceanCountyCollege TomsRiver NJ 2006OklahomaCityCommunityCollege OklahomaCity OK 2007OnondagaCommunityCollege Syracuse NY 2007ParadiseValleyCommunityCollege Phoenix AZ 2007ParklandCollege Champaign IL 2007PensacolaJuniorCollege Pensacola FL 2007PhoenixCollege Phoenix AZ 2006PrinceGeorge’sCommunityCollege Largo MD 2006QueensboroughCommunityCollege Bayside NY 2007RichardJ.DaleyCollege Chicago IL 2007RichlandCollege Dallas TX 2006SanJacintoCollege-CentralCampus Pasadena TX 2007SanJacintoCollege-SouthCampus Pasadena TX 2007SchoolcraftCollege Livonia MI 2007ScottsdaleCommunityCollege Scottsdale AZ 2005SeminoleCommunityCollege Sanford FL 2007SouthwestTennesseeCommunityCollege Memphis TN 2007St.LouisCommunityCollege-Meramec St.Louis MO 2006St.Philip’sCollege SanAntonio TX 2007TaftCollege Taft CA 2007TallahasseeCommunityCollege Tallahassee FL 2007ThomasNelsonCommunityCollege Hampton VA 2007TruckeeMeadowsCommunityCollege Reno NV 2005TrumanCollege Chicago IL 2007UniversityofWisconsinColleges Madison WI 2005VictorValleyCollege Victorville CA 2007VincennesUniversity Vincennes IN 2007VirginiaWesternCommunityCollege Roanoke VA 2005WestchesterCommunityCollege Valhalla NY 2005WilburWrightCollege Chicago IL 2007

Page 372: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007CCSSECohortComparisonGroups Page12of12

Year of most recent CCSSE Institution City State participation

Comparison Groups—Extra-Large Colleges

AmericanRiverCollege Sacramento CA 2007AustinCommunityCollege Austin TX 2007BoroughofManhattanCommunityCollege NewYork NY 2007BrowardCommunityCollege FortLauderdale FL 2007CityCollegeofSanFrancisco SanFrancisco CA 2007CollegeofDuPage GlenEllyn IL 2006CommunityCollegeofAlleghenyCounty Pittsburgh PA 2007CommunityCollegeofPhiladelphia Philadelphia PA 2007CommunityCollegeofRhodeIsland Warwick RI 2005CommunityCollegeofSouthernNevada LasVegas NV 2006CuyahogaCommunityCollege Cleveland OH 2006DeAnzaCollege Cupertino CA 2007ElPasoCommunityCollege ElPaso TX 2007FloridaCommunityCollegeatJacksonville Jacksonville FL 2007GeorgiaPerimeterCollege Decatur GA 2005GlendaleCommunityCollege Glendale CA 2007HarperCollege Palatine IL 2006HillsboroughCommunityCollege Tampa FL 2007HoustonCommunityCollegeSystem Houston TX 2007JohnsonCountyCommunityCollege OverlandPark KS 2007KirkwoodCommunityCollege CedarRapids IA 2007MacombCommunityCollege Warren MI 2007MetropolitanCommunityCollege-KansasCity KansasCity MO 2007MiamiDadeCollege Miami FL 2007ModestoJuniorCollege Modesto CA 2006MontgomeryCollege Rockville MD 2006MoraineValleyCommunityCollege PalosHills IL 2005Mt.SanAntonioCollege Walnut CA 2007NorthernVirginiaCommunityCollege Annandale VA 2005Oakland Community College Bloomfield Hills MI 2005PalmBeachCommunityCollege LakeWorth FL 2007PalomarCollege SanMarcos CA 2007PasadenaCityCollege Pasadena CA 2007SaltLakeCommunityCollege SaltLakeCity UT 2006SanAntonioCollege SanAntonio TX 2007SanDiegoMesaCollege SanDiego CA 2007SantaAnaCollege SantaAna CA 2007SantaFeCommunityCollege(FL) Gainesville FL 2007SinclairCommunityCollege Dayton OH 2007SouthTexasCollege McAllen TX 2007SouthwesternIllinoisCollege Belleville IL 2005St.PetersburgCollege St.Petersburg FL 2007TheCommunityCollegeofBaltimoreCounty Baltimore MD 2006TidewaterCommunityCollege Norfolk VA 2005TritonCollege RiverGrove IL 2006ValenciaCommunityCollege Orlando FL 2007

Page 373: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Consortia

2007 Consortia Page�of3

Alamo Community College District

NortheastLakeviewCollegeNorthwestVistaCollege

PaloAltoCollegeSanAntonioCollege

St.Philip’sCollege

Achieving the DreamAlvinCommunityCollege

BrazosportCollegeCommunityCollegeofAlleghenyCounty

CommunityCollegeofPhiladelphiaDanvilleCommunityCollegeDonaAnaCommunityCollegeElPasoCommunityCollegeGuilfordTechnicalCommunityCollegeHillsboroughCommunityCollegeMontgomeryCountyCommunityCollegeNorthamptonCommunityCollegeNorthwestVistaCollegeSanJacintoCollege-CentralCampusSanJacintoCollege-NorthCampusSanJacintoCollege-SouthCampusSantaFeCommunityCollege(NM)SinclairCommunityCollegeSouthTexasCollegeSt.Philip’sCollegeWayneCommunityCollegeWestmorelandCountyCommunityCollegeWhartonCountyJuniorCollege

AlaskaKenaiPeninsulaCollege-UAAKodiakCollege,UniversityofAlaskaAnchorageKuskokwimCampus,UniversityofAlaskaFairbanksPrinceWilliamSoundCommunityCollegeTananaValleyCampus,UniversityofAlaskaFairbanksUniversityofAlaskaMatanuskaSusitnaCollegeUniversityofAlaskaSoutheastKetchikanCampus

FloridaBrevardCommunityCollegeBrowardCommunityCollegeCentralFloridaCommunityCollegeChipolaCollegeDaytonaBeachCommunityCollegeEdisonCollegeFloridaCommunityCollegeatJacksonvilleFloridaKeysCommunityCollegeGulfCoastCommunityCollegeHillsboroughCommunityCollegeIndianRiverCommunityCollegeLakeCityCommunityCollegeLake-SumterCommunityCollegeManateeCommunityCollegeMiamiDadeCollegeNorthFloridaCommunityCollegeOkaloosa-WaltonCollegePalmBeachCommunityCollegePasco-HernandoCommunityCollegePensacolaJuniorCollegePolkCommunityCollegeSantaFeCommunityCollege(FL)SeminoleCommunityCollegeSouthFloridaCommunityCollegeSt.JohnsRiverCommunityCollegeSt.PetersburgCollegeTallahasseeCommunityCollegeValenciaCommunityCollege

Hispanic Student SuccessAustinCommunityCollegeBunkerHillCommunityCollegeDelMarCollegeDoñaAnaCommunityCollegeEastfield CollegeElCentroCollegeElPasoCommunityCollegeGlendaleCommunityCollegeMt.SanAntonioCollegeNorthwestVistaCollegeSouthMountainCommunityCollegeSouthTexasCollegeTheVictoriaCollegeWestHillsCommunityCollegeDistrictWilburWrightCollege

Page 374: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007Consortia Page2of3

IllinoisCollegeofLakeCountyHeartlandCommunityCollegeJolietJrCollegeMcHenryCountyCollegeParklandCollegeRendLakeCollegeSouthSuburbanCollegeSpoonRiverCollegeTrumanCollegeWilburWrightCollege

KentuckyAshlandCommunityandTechnicalCollegeBigSandyCommunityandTechnicalCollegeBowlingGreenTechnicalCollegeElizabethtownCommunityandTechnicalCollegeGatewayCommunityandTechnicalCollegeHopkinsvilleCommunityCollegeJeffersonCommunityandTechnicalCollegeMadisonvilleCommunityCollegeMaysvilleCommunityandTechnicalCollegeOwensboroCommunityandTechnicalCollegeWestKentuckyCommunityandTechnicalCollege

LouisianaBatonRougeCommunityCollegeBossierParishCommunityCollegeDelgadoCommunityCollegeL.E.FletcherTechnicalCommunityCollegeLouisianaDeltaCommunityCollegeLouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region2LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region3LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region4LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region6LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region7LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region8LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region9NunezCommunityCollegeRiverParishesCommunityCollegeSouthLouisianaCommunityCollegeSOWELATechnicalCommunityCollege

MassachusettsBerkshireCommunityCollegeBristolCommunityCollegeBunkerHillCommunityCollegeCapeCodCommunityCollegeGreenfield Community CollegeHolyokeCommunityCollegeMassachusettsBayCommunityCollegeMassasoitCommunityCollegeMiddlesexCommunityCollegeMountWachusettCommunityCollegeNorthShoreCommunityCollegeNorthernEssexCommunityCollegeQuinsigamondCommunityCollegeRoxburyCommunityCollegeSpringfield Technical Community College

MinnesotaAlexandriaTechnicalCollegeCenturyCollegeLakeSuperiorCollegeMinneapolisCommunityandTechnicalCollegeNorthHennepinCommunityCollegeRiverlandCommunityCollegeRochesterCommunityandTechnicalCollege

North Harris Montgomery Community College DistrictCyFairCollegeKingwoodCollegeMontgomeryCollegeNorthHarrisCollegeTomballCollege

North DakotaBismarckStateCollegeLakeRegionStateCollegeMinotStateUniversity-BottineauNorthDakotaStateCollegeofScienceWillistonStateCollege

Northeast MinnesotaFondduLacTribalandCommunityCollegeHibbingCommunityCollegeItascaCommunityCollegeMesabiRangeCommunityandTechnicalCollegeRainyRiverCommunityCollegeVermilionCommunityCollege

NorthwestBigBendCommunityCollegeDouglasCollegeLowerColumbiaCollegeOlympicCollegeSkagitValleyCollegeSouthSeattleCommunityCollegeWenatcheeValleyCollege

South CarolinaAikenTechnicalCollegeGreenvilleTechnicalCollegeMidlandsTechnicalCollegeTechnicalCollegeoftheLowcountryTri-CountyTechnicalCollegeYorkTechnicalCollege

SSPIREAmericanRiverCollegeCollegeofAlamedaDeAnzaCollegeMercedCollegeMt.SanAntonioCollegePasadenaCityCollegeSantaAnaCollegeTaftCollege

Page 375: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007Consortia Page3of3

VictorValleyCollege

TennesseeChattanoogaStateTechnicalCommunityCollegeClevelandStateCommunityCollegeMotlowStateCommunityCollegeSouthwestTennesseeCommunityCollegeVolunteerStateCommunityCollege

Texas Small CollegesAngelinaCollegeElCentroCollegeFrankPhillipsCollegeLamarStateCollege-OrangeNortheastTexasCommunityCollegeTempleCollegeTexasStateTechnicalCollegeMarshallTheVictoriaCollegeTrinityValleyCommunityCollegeVernonCollege

WyomingCasperCollegeCentralWyomingCollegeEasternWyomingCollegeLaramieCountyCommunityCollegeNorthwestCollegeSheridanCollegeWesternWyomingCommunityCollege

Page 376: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Percent of Target Table 2, beginning on the next page, provides data on survey completion counts and rates for 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges (colleges that participated in CCSSE from 2005 through 2007) as well as breakouts for colleges in each size category - small, medium, large, and extra-large. Each participating college has a target sample size, the third column in the table that is based on most current total enrollment as reported by IPEDS: samples normally range from approximately 600 to 1,200 students. The first column of data, Percent of Target Rate, is the ratio of adjusted surveys to target sample size. For example, if a college’s target sample size was 800 and the adjusted survey count was 665, then the Percent of Target Rate would be 83% (665/800). The second column lists the adjusted survey count, which is the total number of surveys completed by a college excluding students who were under the age of 18, students who had taken the survey more than once, students who did not indicate their enrollment status (part- or full-time), and surveys that were invalid. The final column details the most current year of CCSSE participation for the college.

Page 377: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Table 22007 CCSSE Cohort:

Percent of Target

Table2:PercentofTarget Page1of12

Community College Surveyof Student Engagement

2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 79% 310,013 392,241All Small CCSSE Colleges 76% 105,787 138,941

AbrahamBaldwinAgriculturalCollege 2005 95% 568 600AikenTechnicalCollege 2007 82% 492 600

AlabamaSouthernCommunityCollege 2007 68% 278 409AlexandriaTechnicalCollege 2007 96% 575 600

AlleganyCollegeofMaryland 2006 99% 594 600AlpenaCommunityCollege 2007 62% 373 600

AlvinCommunityCollege 2007 79% 471 600AshlandCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2007 79% 472 600AsnuntuckCommunityCollege 2006 79% 475 600AtlantaMetropolitanCollege 2005 72% 431 600AtlantaTechnicalCollege 2006 80% 480 600BainbridgeCollege 2005 54% 321 600BartonCountyCommunityCollege 2006 79% 472 600BelmontTechnicalCollege 2006 73% 438 600BerkshireCommunityCollege 2007 73% 440 600BigBendCommunityCollege 2007 78% 469 600BismarckStateCollege 2007 90% 540 600BlueRidgeCommunityCollege 2005 93% 556 600BowlingGreenTechnicalCollege 2007 66% 397 600BrazosportCollege 2007 69% 416 600ButlerCountyCommunityCollege(PA) 2006 97% 580 600CaldwellCommunityCollegeandTechnicalInstitute 2007 85% 508 600CapeCodCommunityCollege 2007 101% 606 600CapitalCommunityCollege 2006 86% 514 600CaritasLaboureCollege 2007 81% 273 336CarolinasCollegeofHealthSciences 2007 87% 229 263CarrollCommunityCollege 2006 86% 518 600CarteretCommunityCollege 2006 85% 507 600CascadiaCommunityCollege 2006 82% 491 600CasperCollege 2007 74% 444 600CecilCommunityCollege 2006 78% 470 600CedarValleyCollege 2006 75% 450 600CentralLakesCollege 2006 88% 525 600CentralMaineCommunityCollege 2007 87% 521 600CentralWyomingCollege 2007 51% 305 600CentraliaCollege 2006 73% 438 600ChattahoocheeTechnicalCollege 2005 90% 537 600ChesapeakeCollege 2006 69% 415 600ChipolaCollege 2007 88% 525 600

Institution

Year of most recent CCSSE Participation

Targeted Number of Surveys

Adjusted Survey Count

Percent of Target

Page 378: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Table2:PercentofTarget Page2of12

Institution

Year of most recent CCSSE Participation

Percent of Target

Adjusted Survey Count

Targeted Number of Surveys

ClarendonCollege 2006 58% 218 378ClevelandCommunityCollege 2007 77% 459 600ClevelandStateCommunityCollege 2007 86% 516 600ClovisCommunityCollege 2006 94% 564 600CoastalBendCollege 2006 81% 484 600CoastalCarolinaCommunityCollege 2007 105% 627 600CoastalGeorgiaCommunityCollege 2005 79% 472 600CollegeoftheMainland 2006 74% 441 600CollegeoftheMarshallIslands 2007 81% 244 301CollegeoftheSiskiyous 2006 66% 395 600CumberlandCountyCollege 2007 82% 494 600DabneyS.LancasterCommunityCollege 2005 53% 226 424DanvilleAreaCommunityCollege 2006 85% 510 600DanvilleCommunityCollege 2007 72% 429 600DartonCollege 2005 74% 446 600DelawareTechnical&CommunityCollege-OwensCampus 2007 83% 496 600DelawareTechnical&CommunityCollege-TerryCampus 2007 76% 456 600DyersburgStateCommunityCollege 2006 80% 480 600EastGeorgiaCollege 2007 83% 356 429EasternNewMexicoUniversity-Roswell 2006 70% 420 600EasternShoreCommunityCollege 2005 82% 281 344EasternWestVirginiaCommunity&TechnicalCollege 2005 26% 104 406EasternWyomingCollege 2007 64% 267 415EdisonStateCommunityCollege 2007 84% 503 600EllsworthCommunityCollege 2007 65% 232 355FairmontStateCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2005 92% 550 600FloridaKeysCommunityCollege 2007 69% 273 396FondduLacTribalandCommunityCollege 2007 63% 227 360FrankPhillipsCollege 2007 51% 209 408GalvestonCollege 2006 66% 396 600GarrettCollege 2006 72% 219 304GatewayCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2007 73% 437 600GeorgiaHighlandsCollege 2005 92% 551 600GordonCollege 2005 91% 548 600GraysHarborCollege 2005 75% 451 600GraysonCountyCollege 2006 101% 604 600Greenfield Community College 2007 78% 469 600HagerstownCommunityCollege 2006 97% 579 600HawaiiCommunityCollege 2006 88% 525 600HazardCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2006 42% 250 600HendersonCommunityCollege 2006 76% 455 600HesstonCollege 2007 92% 244 266HibbingCommunityCollege 2007 54% 227 417HonoluluCommunityCollege 2006 69% 413 600HopkinsvilleCommunityCollege 2007 76% 456 600HowardCollege 2006 84% 505 600IllinoisValleyCommunityCollege 2006 108% 646 600IsothermalCommunityCollege 2007 75% 447 600ItascaCommunityCollege 2007 65% 261 400IvyTechCommunityCollege-Bloomington 2005 63% 376 600IvyTechCommunityCollege-Columbus 2005 80% 480 600

Page 379: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Table2:PercentofTarget Page3of12

Institution

Year of most recent CCSSE Participation

Percent of Target

Adjusted Survey Count

Targeted Number of Surveys

IvyTechCommunityCollege-Elkhart 2005 48% 286 600IvyTechCommunityCollege-Evansville 2005 85% 511 600IvyTechCommunityCollege-Kokomo 2005 79% 474 600IvyTechCommunityCollege-Lawrenceburg 2005 72% 434 600IvyTechCommunityCollege-Logansport 2005 72% 432 600IvyTechCommunityCollege-Madison 2005 52% 309 600IvyTechCommunityCollege-Sellersburg 2005 88% 530 600IvyTechCommunityCollege-SouthBend 2005 69% 415 600IvyTechCommunityCollege-TerreHaute 2005 66% 397 600IvyTechCommunityCollege-Warsaw 2005 38% 228 600IvyTechCommunityCollege-Whitewater 2005 63% 377 600JacksonStateCommunityCollege 2006 95% 571 600JamesA.RhodesStateCollege 2007 79% 471 600JeffersonCommunityCollege 2006 73% 439 600KankakeeCommunityCollege 2007 81% 488 600KauaiCommunityCollege 2006 63% 246 391KenaiPeninsulaCollege-UAA 2007 52% 310 600KennebecValleyCommunityCollege 2007 87% 520 600KirtlandCommunityCollege 2007 77% 461 600KodiakCollege,UniversityofAlaskaAnchorage 2007 66% 165 249KuskokwimCampus,UniversityofAlaskaFairbanks 2007 17% 42 250L.E.FletcherTechnicalCommunityCollege 2007 71% 283 397LakeCityCommunityCollege 2007 73% 436 600LakeRegionStateCollege 2007 53% 228 427Lake-SumterCommunityCollege 2007 99% 594 600LamarInstituteofTechnology 2006 93% 557 600LamarStateCollege-Orange 2007 72% 430 600LaramieCountyCommunityCollege 2007 84% 503 600LeechLakeTribalCollege 2007 34% 65 189LouisburgCollege 2007 84% 276 330LouisianaDeltaCommunityCollege 2007 60% 232 388LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region2 2007 55% 194 352LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region3 2007 40% 242 600LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region4 2007 88% 526 600LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region6 2007 78% 305 392LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region7 2007 81% 339 420LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region8 2007 75% 281 377LouisianaTechnicalCollege-Region9 2007 38% 134 352LowerColumbiaCollege 2007 81% 486 600MadisonvilleCommunityCollege 2007 87% 520 600MarshallCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2005 87% 520 600MarshalltownCommunityCollege 2007 61% 364 600MartinCommunityCollege 2006 77% 281 365MauiCommunityCollege 2006 88% 526 600MaylandCommunityCollege 2007 77% 331 429MaysvilleCommunity&TechnicalCollege 2007 78% 466 600MercyCollegeofHealthSciences 2006 88% 276 314MesabiRangeCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2007 69% 295 428MidMichiganCommunityCollege 2007 89% 536 600Mid-SouthCommunityCollege 2005 81% 322 396MiddleGeorgiaCollege 2007 87% 523 600MiddlesexCommunityCollege 2006 72% 432 600MinotStateUniversity-Bottineau 2007 51% 142 280

Page 380: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Table2:PercentofTarget Page4of12

Institution

Year of most recent CCSSE Participation

Percent of Target

Adjusted Survey Count

Targeted Number of Surveys

MontanaStateUniversityBillings 2007 61% 231 381MotlowStateCommunityCollege 2007 89% 536 600MountWachusettCommunityCollege 2007 96% 578 600MountainEmpireCommunityCollege 2005 79% 473 600NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Berlin 2006 88% 317 362NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Claremont 2006 85% 306 359NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Laconia 2006 92% 360 393NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Manchester 2006 85% 508 600NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Nashua 2006 84% 504 600NHCommunityTechnicalCollege-Stratham 2006 85% 361 423NewHampshireTechnicalInstitute 2006 103% 620 600NewMexicoJuniorCollege 2007 73% 438 600NewMexicoMilitaryInstitute 2006 100% 250 251NewMexicoStateUniversity-Grants 2006 55% 176 321NewMexicoStateUniversityatAlamogordo 2006 75% 451 600NewRiverCommunityCollege 2005 103% 617 600NewRiverCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2005 57% 341 600NorthArkansasCollege 2007 73% 438 600NorthCentralMissouriCollege 2007 74% 308 415NorthCentralStateCollege 2006 89% 536 600NorthDakotaStateCollegeofScience 2007 100% 602 600NorthFloridaCommunityCollege 2007 71% 288 406NorthIowaAreaCommunityCollege 2006 97% 581 600NortheastLakeviewCollege 2007 94% 562 600NortheastMississippiCommunityCollege 2007 114% 686 600NortheastTexasCommunityCollege 2007 67% 399 600NorthernMaineCommunityCollege 2007 82% 299 364NorthernNewMexicoCommunityCollege 2006 73% 436 600NorthwestCollege 2007 78% 465 600NorthwestIndianCollege 2005 40% 124 311NorthwestIowaCommunityCollege 2007 76% 293 386NorthwesternConnecticutCommunityCollege 2006 75% 449 600NunezCommunityCollege 2007 76% 249 327OregonCoastCommunityCollege 2006 57% 174 307OuachitaTechnicalCollege 2007 64% 385 600PanolaCollege 2006 78% 469 600ParisJuniorCollege 2006 87% 520 600PatrickHenryCommunityCollege 2005 90% 539 600PaulD.CampCommunityCollege 2005 47% 282 600PiedmontVirginiaCommunityCollege 2007 83% 495 600PrinceWilliamSoundCommunityCollege 2007 15% 51 347QuinebaugValleyCommunityCollege 2006 77% 464 600RainyRiverCommunityCollege 2007 37% 91 244RangerCollege 2006 69% 250 362RappahannockCommunityCollege 2005 68% 407 600ReadingAreaCommunityCollege 2007 76% 456 600RedlandsCommunityCollege 2007 74% 441 600RiverParishesCommunityCollege 2007 70% 268 383RiverlandCommunityCollege 2007 55% 328 600RoxburyCommunityCollege 2007 72% 431 600SOWELATechnicalCommunityCollege 2007 46% 276 600SalemCommunityCollege 2007 85% 344 406SalishKootenaiCollege 2007 66% 259 394

Page 381: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Table2:PercentofTarget Page5of12

Institution

Year of most recent CCSSE Participation

Percent of Target

Adjusted Survey Count

Targeted Number of Surveys

SantaFeCommunityCollege(NM) 2007 70% 422 600SheridanCollege 2007 83% 495 600SouthFloridaCommunityCollege 2007 84% 504 600SouthGeorgiaCollege 2007 85% 510 600SouthLouisianaCommunityCollege 2007 70% 420 600SouthMountainCommunityCollege 2007 66% 397 600SouthPiedmontCommunityCollege 2005 63% 380 600SoutheasternCommunityCollege(IA) 2007 87% 521 600SoutheasternCommunityCollege(NC) 2007 68% 405 600SoutheasternTechnicalCollege 2007 91% 340 373SouthernMaineCommunityCollege 2006 112% 673 600SouthernUniversityatShreveport 2005 31% 186 600SouthernWestVirginiaCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2005 79% 472 600SouthwestTexasJuniorCollege 2006 82% 489 600SouthwestVirginiaCommunityCollege 2005 81% 483 600SouthwesternCommunityCollege 2005 71% 424 600SouthwesternIndianPolytechnicInstitute 2006 62% 210 338SouthwesternOregonCommunityCollege 2007 74% 445 600SpoonRiverCollege 2007 83% 495 600SurryCommunityCollege 2007 88% 530 600TananaValleyCampus,UniversityofAlaskaFairbanks 2007 56% 334 600TechnicalCollegeoftheLowcountry 2007 70% 418 600TempleCollege 2007 62% 372 600TexasStateTechnicalCollegeHarlingen 2005 78% 469 600TexasStateTechnicalCollegeMarshall 2007 69% 200 291TexasStateTechnicalCollegeWaco 2006 80% 477 600TexasStateTechnicalCollegeWestTexas 2006 66% 393 600TheCommunityandTechnicalCollegeatWVUTech 2005 80% 241 300TheCommunityandTechnicalCollegeofShepherd 2005 65% 277 427TheVictoriaCollege 2007 81% 487 600ThreeRiversCommunityCollege 2006 90% 539 600TompkinsCortlandCommunityCollege 2007 93% 559 600Tri-CountyCommunityCollege 2005 71% 281 396TunxisCommunityCollege 2006 87% 519 600UniversityofAlaskaMatanuskaSusitnaCollege 2007 72% 300 415UniversityofAlaskaSoutheastKetchikanCampus 2007 10% 61 600UniversityofArkansasCommunityCollegeatBatesville 2007 84% 352 420UniversityofArkansasCommunityCollegeatHope 2005 69% 274 396UniversityofCincinnatiClermontCollege 2006 72% 434 600UniversityofNewMexico-Gallup 2006 84% 506 600UniversityofNewMexico-TaosBranch 2006 70% 267 384UniversityofNewMexico-ValenciaCampus 2006 83% 365 441VermilionCommunityCollege 2007 63% 212 338VernonCollege 2007 79% 473 600VirginiaHighlandsCommunityCollege 2005 81% 485 600WarrenCountyCommunityCollege 2005 76% 301 396WashingtonStateCommunityCollege 2007 76% 457 600WaycrossCollege 2005 91% 346 379WayneCommunityCollege 2007 76% 455 600WenatcheeValleyCollege 2007 77% 464 600WestVirginiaNorthernCommunityCollege 2005 71% 424 600

Page 382: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Table2:PercentofTarget Page6of12

Institution

Year of most recent CCSSE Participation

Percent of Target

Adjusted Survey Count

Targeted Number of Surveys

WestVirginiaStateCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2007 73% 435 600WestVirginiaUniversityatParkersburg 2005 91% 548 600WesternNebraskaCommunityCollege 2007 76% 458 600WesternPiedmontCommunityCollege 2005 86% 518 600WesternTexasCollege 2006 46% 278 600WesternWyomingCommunityCollege 2007 80% 481 600WillistonStateCollege 2007 57% 208 368WindwardCommunityCollege 2006 67% 399 600WisconsinIndianheadTechnicalCollege 2005 68% 409 600Wor-WicCommunityCollege 2006 87% 521 600WythevilleCommunityCollege 2005 77% 459 600YorkTechnicalCollege 2007 85% 512 600ZaneStateCollege 2005 87% 523 600

Page 383: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Table2:PercentofTarget Page7of12

Institution

Year of most recent CCSSE Participation

Percent of Target

Adjusted Survey Count

Targeted Number of Surveys

2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 79% 310,013 392,241All Medium CCSSE Colleges 76% 86,636 108,800

AngelinaCollege 2007 84% 673 800Anoka-RamseyCommunityCollege 2006 85% 679 800Asheville-BuncombeTechnicalCommunityCollege 2007 89% 708 800BaltimoreCityCommunityCollege 2006 57% 452 800BatonRougeCommunityCollege 2007 74% 591 800BigSandyCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2007 54% 430 800BlackHawkCollege 2006 95% 756 800BossierParishCommunityCollege 2007 85% 676 800BristolCommunityCollege 2007 105% 842 800BunkerHillCommunityCollege 2007 26% 205 800BurlingtonCountyCollege 2007 93% 743 800CapeFearCommunityCollege 2005 93% 745 800CentralArizonaCollege 2006 61% 488 800CentralCommunityCollege 2007 56% 445 800CentralFloridaCommunityCollege 2007 78% 622 800CentralVirginiaCommunityCollege 2005 77% 617 800ChattanoogaStateTechnicalCommunityCollege 2007 70% 559 800CochiseCollege 2007 66% 525 800CollegeofAlameda 2007 57% 456 800CollegeofSouthernIdaho 2007 95% 757 800CollegeofSouthernMaryland 2006 93% 741 800CollegeoftheRedwoods 2006 67% 533 800ColoradoMountainCollege 2007 62% 492 800ColumbiaStateCommunityCollege 2006 99% 794 800CorningCommunityCollege 2007 78% 624 800DelawareTechnical&CommunityCollege-Stanton-Wilmington 2007 97% 773 800DonaAnaCommunityCollege 2007 88% 704 800DurhamTechnicalCommunityCollege 2005 85% 679 800ElCentroCollege 2007 81% 647 800ElizabethtownCommunity&TechnicalCollege 2007 84% 675 800EstrellaMountainCommunityCollege 2006 84% 672 800EverettCommunityCollege 2006 70% 558 800FrederickCommunityCollege 2006 103% 824 800GainesvilleCollege 2005 96% 766 800GatewayCommunityCollege 2006 88% 704 800GeneseeCommunityCollege 2007 91% 724 800GeorgeCWallaceStateCommunityCollege 2005 100% 797 800GeorgiaMilitaryCollege 2007 95% 758 800GermannaCommunityCollege 2005 85% 679 800GloucesterCountyCollege 2007 76% 604 800GulfCoastCommunityCollege 2007 81% 648 800HarfordCommunityCollege 2006 92% 736 800HawkeyeCommunityCollege 2005 89% 708 800HeartlandCommunityCollege 2007 62% 494 800HolyokeCommunityCollege 2007 80% 639 800HousatonicCommunityCollege 2006 86% 686 800HowardCommunityCollege 2006 84% 672 800HutchinsonCommunityCollege 2006 94% 751 800

Page 384: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Table2:PercentofTarget Page8of12

Institution

Year of most recent CCSSE Participation

Percent of Target

Adjusted Survey Count

Targeted Number of Surveys

ItawambaCommunityCollege 2006 99% 793 800IvyTechCommunityCollege-Anderson 2005 53% 421 800IvyTechCommunityCollege-EastChicago 2005 39% 315 800IvyTechCommunityCollege-FortWayne 2005 74% 594 800IvyTechCommunityCollege-Gary 2005 44% 351 800IvyTechCommunityCollege-Lafayette 2005 54% 433 800IvyTechCommunityCollege-Marion 2005 46% 365 800IvyTechCommunityCollege-MichiganCity 2005 38% 300 800IvyTechCommunityCollege-Muncie 2005 58% 462 800IvyTechCommunityCollege-Valparaiso 2005 57% 458 800JacksonCommunityCollege 2006 89% 712 800JohnTylerCommunityCollege 2005 88% 703 800KansasCityKansasCommunityCollege 2007 88% 706 800KapiolaniCommunityCollege 2006 80% 638 800KilgoreCollege 2006 88% 704 800KingwoodCollege 2007 88% 702 800LakeSuperiorCollege 2007 88% 702 800LeeCollege 2007 85% 679 800LeewardCommunityCollege 2006 72% 579 800LehighCarbonCommunityCollege 2006 87% 693 800LincolnLandCommunityCollege 2005 93% 740 800Linn-BentonCommunityCollege 2006 73% 585 800LordFairfaxCommunityCollege 2005 96% 770 800MalcolmXCollege 2006 82% 652 800ManchesterCommunityCollege 2006 73% 581 800MassachusettsBayCommunityCollege 2007 73% 587 800MassasoitCommunityCollege 2007 75% 602 800McHenryCountyCollege 2007 103% 827 800MinneapolisCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2007 76% 606 800MountainViewCollege 2005 62% 496 800NashvilleStateTechnicalCommunityCollege 2006 94% 753 800NaugatuckValleyCommunityCollege 2006 86% 689 800NavarroCollege 2006 95% 759 800NorthHennepinCommunityCollege 2007 90% 716 800NorthShoreCommunityCollege 2007 75% 596 800NorthWestArkansasCommunityCollege 2007 81% 645 800NorthamptonCommunityCollege 2007 93% 740 800NortheastIowaCommunityCollege 2006 85% 683 800NortheastStateTechnicalCommunityCollege 2006 88% 704 800NorthernEssexCommunityCollege 2007 68% 542 800NorthernOklahomaCollege 2007 48% 383 800NorwalkCommunityCollege 2006 87% 692 800Okaloosa-WaltonCollege 2007 81% 651 800OlympicCollege 2007 90% 720 800OwensboroCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2007 75% 602 800PaloAltoCollege 2007 80% 636 800Pasco-HernandoCommunityCollege 2007 44% 349 800PellissippiStateTechnicalCommunityCollege 2006 95% 757 800PittCommunityCollege 2006 99% 795 800PolkCommunityCollege 2007 83% 664 800PrairieStateCollege 2006 83% 661 800PuebloCommunityCollege 2007 77% 613 800QuinsigamondCommunityCollege 2007 75% 598 800

Page 385: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Table2:PercentofTarget Page9of12

Institution

Year of most recent CCSSE Participation

Percent of Target

Adjusted Survey Count

Targeted Number of Surveys

RaritanValleyCommunityCollege 2005 75% 602 800RedRocksCommunityCollege 2005 75% 596 800RendLakeCollege 2007 84% 668 800RoaneStateCommunityCollege 2006 81% 647 800RochesterCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2007 84% 675 800Rowan-CabarrusCommunityCollege 2006 95% 762 800SanJacintoCollege-NorthCampus 2007 66% 524 800SanJuanCollege 2006 73% 581 800SheltonStateCommunityCollege 2007 85% 676 800SkagitValleyCollege 2007 65% 520 800SomersetCommunityCollege 2006 95% 758 800SouthPugetSoundCommunityCollege 2005 88% 704 800SouthSeattleCommunityCollege 2007 63% 506 800SouthSuburbanCollege 2007 68% 546 800SoutheastKentuckyCommunity&TechnicalCollege 2006 86% 689 800SouthsideVirginiaCommunityCollege 2005 78% 620 800SpokaneCommunityCollege 2005 91% 730 800Springfield Technical Community College 2007 83% 666 800St.CharlesCommunityCollege 2006 92% 736 800St.JohnsRiverCommunityCollege 2007 90% 717 800St.LouisCommunityCollegeatForestPark 2006 65% 518 800St.LouisCommunityCollege-FlorissantValley 2006 81% 650 800StarkStateCollegeofTechnology 2005 98% 787 800TacomaCommunityCollege 2005 89% 708 800TomballCollege 2007 85% 682 800Tri-CountyTechnicalCollege 2007 79% 628 800TrinityValleyCommunityCollege 2007 76% 611 800VolunteerStateCommunityCollege 2007 90% 720 800WaltersStateCommunityCollege 2006 100% 802 800WeatherfordCollege 2007 72% 572 800WestHillsCommunityCollegeDistrict 2007 70% 562 800WestKentuckyCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2007 77% 612 800WesternIowaTechCommunityCollege 2005 79% 633 800WestmorelandCountyCommunityCollege 2007 93% 746 800WhartonCountyJuniorCollege 2007 91% 727 800

Page 386: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Table2:PercentofTarget Page10of12

Institution

Year of most recent CCSSE Participation

Percent of Target

Adjusted Survey Count

Targeted Number of Surveys

2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 79% 310,013 392,241All Large CCSSE Colleges 82% 68,500 83,000

AnneArundelCommunityCollege 2006 92% 918 1000BlinnCollege 2006 87% 866 1000BluegrassCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2006 76% 757 1000BrevardCommunityCollege 2007 102% 1024 1000BrookdaleCommunityCollege 2007 75% 751 1000BrookhavenCollege 2006 102% 1024 1000BucksCountyCommunityCollege 2006 63% 632 1000ButlerCountyCommunityCollege(KS) 2006 67% 665 1000CenturyCollege 2007 103% 1031 1000Chandler-GilbertCommunityCollege 2007 108% 1081 1000CitrusCollege 2006 83% 829 1000CollegeofLakeCounty 2007 58% 575 1000CommunityCollegeofDenver 2005 79% 785 1000CyFairCollege 2007 81% 812 1000DaytonaBeachCommunityCollege 2007 71% 707 1000DelMarCollege 2007 98% 976 1000DelgadoCommunityCollege 2007 84% 841 1000DeltaCollege 2007 101% 1005 1000DouglasCollege 2007 68% 675 1000Eastfield College 2007 78% 775 1000EdisonCollege 2007 82% 821 1000EssexCountyCollege 2006 82% 816 1000GrandRapidsCommunityCollege 2007 88% 875 1000GreenvilleTechnicalCollege 2007 91% 913 1000GuilfordTechnicalCommunityCollege 2007 87% 866 1000HaroldWashingtonCollege 2005 68% 679 1000HudsonValleyCommunityCollege 2007 72% 721 1000IllinoisCentralCollege 2006 89% 885 1000IndianRiverCommunityCollege 2007 80% 799 1000IvyTechCommunityCollege-CentralIndiana 2007 59% 592 1000J.SargeantReynoldsCommunityCollege 2005 88% 877 1000JeffersonCommunityandTechnicalCollege 2007 91% 906 1000JolietJrCollege 2007 65% 651 1000KingsboroughCommunityCollege 2005 72% 716 1000LaGuardiaCommunityCollege 2007 73% 732 1000LaneCommunityCollege 2005 85% 853 1000LaneyCollege 2007 44% 439 1000LorainCountyCommunityCollege 2006 91% 908 1000ManateeCommunityCollege 2007 98% 979 1000MercedCollege 2007 90% 897 1000MercerCountyCommunityCollege 2005 101% 1008 1000MetropolitanCommunityCollege 2005 102% 1015 1000MiddlesexCommunityCollege 2007 87% 873 1000MiddlesexCountyCollege 2006 83% 829 1000MidlandsTechnicalCollege 2007 98% 984 1000MiraCostaCollege 2007 95% 952 1000MontgomeryCollege 2007 53% 527 1000MontgomeryCountyCommunityCollege 2007 88% 880 1000Mt.HoodCommunityCollege 2005 80% 797 1000

Page 387: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Table2:PercentofTarget Page11of12

Institution

Year of most recent CCSSE Participation

Percent of Target

Adjusted Survey Count

Targeted Number of Surveys

NorthHarrisCollege 2007 78% 775 1000NorthLakeCollege 2006 74% 738 1000NorthwestVistaCollege 2007 85% 850 1000OaktonCommunityCollege 2006 78% 776 1000OceanCountyCollege 2006 76% 764 1000OklahomaCityCommunityCollege 2007 101% 1014 1000OnondagaCommunityCollege 2007 80% 802 1000ParadiseValleyCommunityCollege 2007 87% 868 1000ParklandCollege 2007 86% 862 1000PensacolaJuniorCollege 2007 91% 912 1000PhoenixCollege 2006 65% 653 1000PrinceGeorge’sCommunityCollege 2006 94% 939 1000QueensboroughCommunityCollege 2007 86% 857 1000RichardJ.DaleyCollege 2007 64% 644 1000RichlandCollege 2006 83% 828 1000SanJacintoCollege-CentralCampus 2007 83% 829 1000SanJacintoCollege-SouthCampus 2007 72% 723 1000SchoolcraftCollege 2007 86% 860 1000ScottsdaleCommunityCollege 2005 92% 917 1000SeminoleCommunityCollege 2007 80% 800 1000SouthwestTennesseeCommunityCollege 2007 70% 700 1000St.LouisCommunityCollege-Meramec 2006 82% 822 1000St.Philip’sCollege 2007 81% 807 1000TaftCollege 2007 42% 418 1000TallahasseeCommunityCollege 2007 89% 885 1000ThomasNelsonCommunityCollege 2007 78% 779 1000TruckeeMeadowsCommunityCollege 2005 100% 995 1000TrumanCollege 2007 91% 914 1000UniversityofWisconsinColleges 2005 95% 952 1000VictorValleyCollege 2007 53% 525 1000VincennesUniversity 2007 99% 989 1000VirginiaWesternCommunityCollege 2005 96% 955 1000WestchesterCommunityCollege 2005 97% 971 1000WilburWrightCollege 2007 86% 858 1000

Page 388: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Table2:PercentofTarget Page12of12

Institution

Year of most recent CCSSE Participation

Percent of Target

Adjusted Survey Count

Targeted Number of Surveys

2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 79% 310,013 392,241All Extra Large CCSSE Colleges 79% 49,090 61,500

AmericanRiverCollege 2007 67% 1006 1500AustinCommunityCollege 2007 62% 930 1500BoroughofManhattanCommunityCollege 2007 36% 429 1200BrowardCommunityCollege 2007 81% 1208 1500CityCollegeofSanFrancisco 2007 79% 1179 1500CollegeofDuPage 2006 84% 1265 1500CommunityCollegeofAlleghenyCounty 2007 78% 932 1200CommunityCollegeofPhiladelphia 2007 70% 845 1200CommunityCollegeofRhodeIsland 2005 74% 887 1200CommunityCollegeofSouthernNevada 2006 60% 903 1500CuyahogaCommunityCollege 2006 73% 1101 1500DeAnzaCollege 2007 91% 1097 1200ElPasoCommunityCollege 2007 77% 1152 1500FloridaCommunityCollegeatJacksonville 2007 84% 1259 1500GeorgiaPerimeterCollege 2005 94% 1124 1200GlendaleCommunityCollege 2007 93% 1119 1200HarperCollege 2006 83% 1001 1200HillsboroughCommunityCollege 2007 73% 875 1200HoustonCommunityCollegeSystem 2007 72% 1084 1500JohnsonCountyCommunityCollege 2007 71% 847 1200KirkwoodCommunityCollege 2007 80% 961 1200MacombCommunityCollege 2007 87% 1047 1200MetropolitanCommunityCollege-KansasCity 2007 73% 881 1200MiamiDadeCollege 2007 73% 1099 1500ModestoJuniorCollege 2006 75% 897 1200MontgomeryCollege 2006 63% 761 1200MoraineValleyCommunityCollege 2005 99% 1186 1200Mt.SanAntonioCollege 2007 73% 1099 1500NorthernVirginiaCommunityCollege 2005 90% 1351 1500OaklandCommunityCollege 2005 73% 1100 1500PalmBeachCommunityCollege 2007 101% 1206 1200PalomarCollege 2007 85% 1268 1500PasadenaCityCollege 2007 82% 1223 1500SaltLakeCommunityCollege 2006 75% 1124 1500SanAntonioCollege 2007 100% 1198 1200SanDiegoMesaCollege 2007 84% 1007 1200SantaAnaCollege 2007 74% 1109 1500SantaFeCommunityCollege(FL) 2007 79% 953 1200SinclairCommunityCollege 2007 77% 923 1200SouthTexasCollege 2007 85% 1024 1200SouthwesternIllinoisCollege 2005 97% 1159 1200St.PetersburgCollege 2007 98% 1470 1500TheCommunityCollegeofBaltimoreCounty 2006 75% 900 1200TidewaterCommunityCollege 2005 89% 1337 1500TritonCollege 2006 86% 1031 1200ValenciaCommunityCollege 2007 102% 1533 1500

Page 389: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Respondents to Underlying Population by College Size

Table 3, on the following page, highlights data about respondent and population characteristics-similar to data presented in Table 1-by institution size and overall. The specific characteristics examined include gender, race/ethnicity, age, and enrollment status. The first column details these characteristics for 2007 Small College Respondents while the second presents the population data for the same size group – 2007 CCSSE Cohort Small Colleges (small colleges that participated in CCSSE from 2005 through 2007). This pattern of data presentation, respondents in one column and population data in the next, continues for medium through extra-large colleges. The last two columns present data for 2007 CCSSE respondents and then population data for 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges.

Page 390: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2007 CohortSmall College Small College Medium College Medium College Large College Large College ExLarge College ExLarge College CollegeRespondents Population Respondents Population Respondents Population Respondents Population Respondents

Male 38% 40% 40% 39% 42% 42% 42% 43% 40%Female 62% 60% 60% 61% 58% 58% 58% 57% 60%

American Indian or other Native American 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2%Asian, Asian American or Pacific Islander 2% 3% 3% 4% 5% 5% 8% 9% 4%Black or African American, Non-Hispanic 10% 11% 11% 13% 12% 15% 11% 14% 11%White, Non-Hispanic 72% 72% 68% 67% 57% 57% 48% 47% 64%Hispanic, Latino, Spanish 6% 7% 8% 9% 12% 15% 18% 21% 10%Other 3% 4% 3% 5% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4%International Student or Foreign National 4% 1% 5% 1% 9% 2% 10% 3% 6%

18 to 19 28% 25% 29% 24% 29% 24% 27% 20% 28%20 to 21 22% 17% 24% 18% 26% 19% 25% 19% 24%22 to 24 13% 13% 13% 14% 15% 16% 16% 16% 14%25 to 29 12% 13% 12% 13% 12% 14% 13% 15% 12%30 to 39 13% 16% 12% 16% 11% 14% 11% 15% 12%40 to 49 8% 10% 7% 10% 5% 9% 6% 9% 7%50 to 64 3% 5% 3% 4% 2% 4% 2% 4% 3%65 and over <1% 1% <1% 1% <1% 1% <1% 1% <1%

Full-Time 72% 43% 70% 39% 67% 36% 63% 34% 69%Part-Time 28% 57% 30% 61% 33% 64% 37% 66% 31%

Student Age

Enrollment Status

Table 32007 CCSSE Cohort Respondents to the Underlying Population Comparisons by College Size

Gender

Race/Ethnicity

Notes:

All population data are those reported by institutions for the most recent IPEDS enrollment report.

Respondents include only data used in the national CCSSE analysis. Some data was excluded in accordance with CCSSE data exclusion rules.

Page 391: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

2007 CohortCollege

Population

41%59%

1%6%

14%59%14%5%2%

23%18%15%14%15%9%4%1%

37%63%

Notes:

All population data are those reported by institutions for the most recent IPEDS enrollment report.

Respondents include only data used in the national CCSSE analysis. Some data was excluded in accordance with CCSSE data exclusion rules.

Page 392: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Underlying Population Percentages Tables 4 and 5, beginning on the following page, examine college-level population characteristics by institution size (i.e., small, medium, large, and extra-large). The characteristics are the same as those examined in Tables 1 and 3: gender, race/ethnicity, age, and enrollment status. This table differs from Tables 1 and 3 in that the characteristics, which had previously been rows, are now columns, and the college-level data are rows. There are a series of tables, for each size category, with population data presented for each college falling into that grouping.

Page 393: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Small Colleges

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Small Colleges 40% 60% 2% 3% 11% 72% 7% 4% 1% 43%Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College 42% 58% <1% 1% 17% 79% 3% 0% 1% 65%Aiken Technical College 35% 65% 1% 1% 34% 60% 2% 2% <1% 46%Alabama Southern Community College 34% 66% <1% <1% 39% 60% <1% <1% 0% 67%Alexandria Technical College 57% 43% 1% 1% <1% 87% 1% 11% 0% 75%Allegany College of Maryland 31% 69% <1% 1% 6% 91% 1% 1% 0% 57%Alpena Community College 42% 58% <1% 1% 1% 97% <1% <1% <1% 51%Alvin Community College 45% 55% <1% 2% 8% 68% 21% 1% 0% 30%Ashland Community and Technical College 43% 57% <1% <1% 1% 80% <1% 18% <1% 48%Asnuntuck Community College 41% 59% <1% 2% 5% 88% 3% 1% <1% 35%Atlanta Metropolitan College 36% 64% <1% 1% 95% 1% 1% 0% 3% 50%Atlanta Technical College 40% 60% <1% 2% 88% 7% 1% 2% 0% 44%Bainbridge College 30% 70% <1% 3% 51% 46% 1% 0% 0% 39%Barton County Community College 48% 52% 1% 2% 11% 79% 6% 0% 1% 25%Belmont Technical College 39% 61% <1% <1% 3% 95% <1% <1% <1% 66%Berkshire Community College 37% 63% 1% 1% 3% 84% 4% 5% 2% 40%Big Bend Community College 43% 57% 1% 2% 1% 71% 21% 3% <1% 66%Bismarck State College 51% 49% 3% <1% 1% 94% 1% <1% 1% 64%Blue Ridge Community College 42% 58% <1% 2% 4% 92% 2% 0% <1% 40%Bowling Green Technical College 65% 35% <1% 1% 5% 79% 1% 14% <1% 25%Brazosport College 45% 55% <1% 1% 8% 67% 24% 0% <1% 24%Butler County Community College (PA) 40% 60% <1% 1% 2% 92% 1% 4% <1% 52%Caldwell Community College and Technical Institute 44% 56% <1% 1% 4% 91% 1% 2% 0% 34%Cape Cod Community College 36% 64% 1% 1% 6% 76% 2% 12% 1% 32%Capital Community College 28% 72% <1% 4% 38% 26% 25% 6% 1% 26%Caritas Laboure College 9% 91% <1% 3% 30% 52% 5% 9% 2% 10%Carolinas College of Health Sciences 13% 87% <1% 1% 17% 70% 3% 9% 0% 29%Carroll Community College 36% 64% <1% 2% 3% 91% 2% 2% 0% 43%Carteret Community College 32% 68% <1% 1% 9% 84% 2% 4% 0% 25%Cascadia Community College 51% 49% <1% 6% 1% 73% 5% 14% <1% 50%Casper College 40% 60% 1% <1% 1% 95% 3% 0% 1% 46%Cecil Community College 35% 65% <1% 1% 7% 87% 2% 2% <1% 36%Cedar Valley College 36% 64% <1% 1% 56% 28% 12% 2% <1% 36%Central Lakes College 43% 57% 1% 1% 1% 96% 1% <1% <1% 64%Central Maine Community College 47% 53% 1% 1% 2% 67% 1% 28% <1% 42%Central Wyoming College 35% 65% 15% 1% 0% 77% 4% 2% 1% 42%Centralia College 51% 49% 2% 2% 5% 81% 4% 5% <1% 34%Chattahoochee Technical College 46% 54% <1% 2% 33% 53% 4% 5% 2% 36%Chesapeake College 31% 69% <1% 1% 18% 79% 1% <1% <1% 34%Chipola College 40% 60% 1% 1% 19% 78% 2% <1% 0% 44%

Table 4

Gender Race/Ethnicity Enrollme

Underlying Population Percentages by Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Enrollment Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 394: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Small Colleges continued

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Small Colleges 40% 60% 2% 3% 11% 72% 7% 4% 1% 43%Clarendon College 54% 46% 1% 1% 12% 69% 17% <1% <1% 37%Cleveland Community College 33% 67% <1% 1% 22% 75% 1% 1% <1% 41%Cleveland State Community College 39% 61% 1% 1% 5% 90% 2% 1% 1% 52%Clovis Community College 35% 65% 1% 1% 5% 63% 29% 2% <1% 17%Coastal Bend College 39% 61% <1% 1% 3% 31% 64% <1% 1% 41%Coastal Carolina Community College 35% 65% 1% 3% 19% 67% 9% <1% 1% 50%Coastal Georgia Community College 31% 69% <1% 1% 30% 66% 2% 0% <1% 33%College of the Mainland 41% 59% 1% 2% 16% 59% 20% 2% <1% 35%College of the Marshall Islands 53% 47% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 78%College of the Siskiyous 44% 56% 4% 3% 3% 74% 8% 8% <1% 35%Cumberland County College 36% 64% 2% 1% 18% 61% 17% 1% <1% 53%Dabney S. Lancaster Community College 38% 62% <1% <1% 5% 93% 1% 0% 0% 28%Danville Area Community College 36% 64% <1% 1% 10% 86% 3% 0% <1% 44%Danville Community College 39% 61% <1% <1% 35% 63% <1% 0% <1% 35%Darton College 29% 71% <1% 1% 46% 51% 1% 0% 1% 46%Delaware Technical & Community College - Owens Campus 33% 67% <1% 1% 14% 75% 3% 2% 5% 41%Delaware Technical & Community College - Terry Campus 29% 71% <1% 2% 24% 67% 3% 2% 1% 34%Dyersburg State Community College 29% 71% <1% <1% 19% 78% 2% 0% 0% 58%East Georgia College 42% 58% <1% 1% 33% 65% 1% 0% <1% 74%Eastern New Mexico University - Roswell 46% 54% 4% 1% 2% 48% 41% 5% <1% 37%Eastern Shore Community College 30% 70% <1% 1% 37% 61% 2% 0% 0% 29%Eastern West Virginia Community & Technical College 33% 67% 1% <1% 2% 97% <1% 0% 0% 8%Eastern Wyoming College 33% 67% <1% <1% 1% 94% 5% 0% <1% 39%Edison State Community College 36% 64% <1% 1% 2% 92% 1% 4% 0% 36%Ellsworth Community College 46% 54% <1% 1% 7% 89% 2% <1% <1% 66%Fairmont State Community and Technical College 44% 56% <1% 1% 6% 91% 1% 1% 0% 56%Florida Keys Community College 41% 59% <1% 1% 9% 73% 13% 2% 1% 21%Fond du Lac Tribal and Community College 39% 61% 15% 1% 1% 79% 1% 3% <1% 40%Frank Phillips College 42% 58% <1% <1% 2% 79% 16% <1% 1% 47%Galveston College 35% 65% <1% 3% 19% 52% 24% <1% 1% 38%Garrett College 47% 53% <1% 0% 7% 87% 1% 1% 3% 65%Gateway Community and Technical College 52% 48% <1% 1% 5% 80% 1% 12% <1% 24%Georgia Highlands College 35% 65% <1% 2% 11% 84% 3% 0% 1% 54%Gordon College 36% 64% <1% 1% 32% 64% 2% 0% 1% 67%Grays Harbor College 45% 55% 3% 2% 3% 81% 4% 6% <1% 46%Grayson County College 39% 61% 2% 1% 6% 84% 5% 0% 2% 47%Greenfield Community College 37% 63% <1% 3% 2% 83% 3% 9% <1% 45%Hagerstown Community College 37% 63% <1% 1% 7% 87% 2% 2% 0% 34%Hawaii Community College 36% 64% 1% 67% 1% 24% 2% 3% 2% 46%

Gender Race/Ethnicity Enrollme

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 395: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Small Colleges continued

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Small Colleges 40% 60% 2% 3% 11% 72% 7% 4% 1% 43%Hazard Community and Technical College 40% 60% <1% <1% 1% 89% <1% 9% 0% 47%Henderson Community College 39% 61% <1% <1% 6% 77% 1% 15% <1% 33%Hesston College 50% 50% 1% 1% 6% 79% 3% 1% 9% 87%Hibbing Community College 47% 53% 2% 1% 5% 83% <1% 8% <1% 69%Honolulu Community College 53% 47% <1% 80% 2% 13% 2% 3% 1% 37%Hopkinsville Community College 30% 70% <1% 1% 21% 53% 3% 21% 0% 43%Howard College 38% 62% 1% 1% 5% 61% 31% 1% <1% 38%Illinois Valley Community College 44% 56% <1% 1% 3% 85% 6% 5% 0% 45%Isothermal Community College 35% 65% 1% <1% 16% 80% 2% 1% 1% 46%Itasca Community College 52% 48% 4% 1% 2% 86% 1% 6% 2% 73%Ivy Tech Community College - Bloomington 39% 61% <1% 1% 3% 91% 1% 4% <1% 48%Ivy Tech Community College - Columbus 29% 71% <1% 1% 2% 90% 1% 6% <1% 38%Ivy Tech Community College - Elkhart 44% 56% <1% 1% 12% 77% 5% 5% 1% 26%Ivy Tech Community College - Evansville 47% 53% <1% <1% 7% 89% 1% 2% <1% 34%Ivy Tech Community College - Kokomo 36% 64% 1% <1% 3% 90% 2% 3% <1% 35%Ivy Tech Community College - Lawrenceburg 28% 72% <1% 1% 1% 96% 1% 1% <1% 38%Ivy Tech Community College - Logansport 36% 64% 1% <1% 3% 90% 2% 3% <1% 35%Ivy Tech Community College - Madison 28% 72% <1% 1% 1% 96% 1% 1% <1% 38%Ivy Tech Community College - Sellersburg 49% 51% 1% <1% 4% 90% 1% 4% <1% 29%Ivy Tech Community College - South Bend 44% 56% <1% 1% 12% 77% 5% 5% 1% 26%Ivy Tech Community College - Terre Haute 43% 57% 1% <1% 3% 93% <1% 3% <1% 44%Ivy Tech Community College - Warsaw 44% 56% <1% 1% 12% 77% 5% 5% 1% 26%Ivy Tech Community College - Whitewater 26% 74% <1% <1% 5% 92% 1% 2% <1% 33%Jackson State Community College 35% 65% <1% <1% 18% 79% 1% 1% <1% 53%James A. Rhodes State College 29% 71% <1% <1% 8% 88% 1% 2% 0% 52%Jefferson Community College 38% 62% <1% 1% 5% 85% 1% 8% 0% 54%Kankakee Community College 36% 64% <1% 1% 13% 81% 4% 0% <1% 38%Kauai Community College 37% 63% 1% 67% 1% 28% 2% 1% 1% 38%Kenai Peninsula College-UAA 41% 59% 7% 1% 1% 76% 2% 10% 2% 29%Kennebec Valley Community College 31% 69% 1% <1% <1% 75% 1% 23% 0% 29%Kirtland Community College 37% 63% 2% <1% 1% 92% 1% 4% <1% 38%Kodiak College, University of Alaska Anchorage 29% 71% 11% 8% 1% 68% 4% 4% 2% 12%Kuskokwim Campus, University of Alaska Fairbanks 24% 76% 69% 1% <1% 21% 2% 5% 1% 22%L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College 47% 53% 5% 1% 23% 68% 2% 1% 0% 35%Lake City Community College 35% 65% <1% 2% 11% 85% 2% <1% 1% 44%Lake Region State College 42% 58% 4% 1% 2% 91% 1% <1% 1% 28%Lake-Sumter Community College 33% 67% <1% 2% 10% 77% 9% 1% 1% 36%Lamar Institute of Technology 54% 46% 1% 2% 33% 53% 8% 4% <1% 50%Lamar State College - Orange 28% 72% 1% 1% 19% 76% 3% <1% 0% 43%

EnrollmeGender Race/Ethnicity

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 396: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Small Colleges continued

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Small Colleges 40% 60% 2% 3% 11% 72% 7% 4% 1% 43%Laramie County Community College 39% 61% 1% 1% 2% 88% 7% 1% <1% 38%Leech Lake Tribal College 40% 60% 94% 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 71%Louisburg College 72% 28% 1% 1% 58% 31% 8% 0% 1% 98%Louisiana Delta Community College 40% 60% 1% 1% 24% 73% 1% 1% 0% 44%Louisiana Technical College - Region 2 54% 46% <1% 1% 53% 39% 2% 4% 1% 60%Louisiana Technical College - Region 3 73% 27% 1% 1% 25% 71% 2% <1% 0% 34%Louisiana Technical College - Region 4 48% 52% 1% 1% 36% 61% 1% <1% 0% 67%Louisiana Technical College - Region 6 49% 51% 1% 1% 35% 59% 1% 3% 0% 54%Louisiana Technical College - Region 7 50% 50% 2% 1% 40% 56% 1% <1% 0% 54%Louisiana Technical College - Region 8 38% 62% <1% <1% 42% 56% 1% <1% 0% 55%Louisiana Technical College - Region 9 63% 37% 1% 1% 24% 63% 1% 11% 0% 39%Lower Columbia College 36% 64% 1% 2% 1% 81% 3% 13% <1% 57%Madisonville Community College 42% 58% <1% <1% 5% 92% 1% 2% 0% 39%Marshall Community and Technical College 62% 38% <1% 1% 6% 78% 1% 14% <1% 50%Marshalltown Community College 37% 63% 3% 2% 3% 83% 6% 2% <1% 49%Martin Community College 23% 77% <1% <1% 56% 40% <1% 3% <1% 47%Maui Community College 33% 67% <1% 61% <1% 30% 2% 3% 3% 40%Mayland Community College 50% 50% 1% <1% 6% 91% 1% <1% <1% 37%Maysville Community & Technical College 49% 51% <1% <1% 2% 81% <1% 16% 0% 34%Mercy College of Health Sciences 9% 91% <1% 2% 1% 92% 1% 4% 0% 63%Mesabi Range Community and Technical College 50% 50% 1% 1% 4% 88% <1% 5% <1% 55%Mid Michigan Community College 38% 62% 2% 1% 2% 91% 2% 2% <1% 46%Middle Georgia College 41% 59% <1% 1% 34% 63% 1% 0% <1% 68%Middlesex Community College 35% 65% <1% 3% 7% 76% 8% 4% <1% 38%Mid-South Community College 35% 65% <1% 1% 46% 51% 1% 0% <1% 31%Minot State University-Bottineau 39% 61% 7% 1% 2% 86% 1% <1% 3% 60%Montana State University Billings 45% 55% 6% 1% 1% 83% 3% 5% <1% 63%Motlow State Community College 36% 64% <1% 1% 7% 88% 1% 2% <1% 59%Mount Wachusett Community College 33% 67% <1% 2% 4% 75% 8% 9% 1% 47%Mountain Empire Community College 35% 65% <1% <1% 2% 98% <1% 0% <1% 39%New Hampshire Technical Institute 41% 59% <1% 1% 2% 84% 1% 12% 0% 47%New Mexico Junior College 41% 59% 1% 1% 5% 49% 39% 6% 0% 45%New Mexico Military Institute 84% 16% 3% 9% 15% 48% 20% <1% 4% 100%New Mexico State University - Grants 30% 70% 41% <1% 1% 15% 32% 11% 0% 48%New Mexico State University at Alamogordo 34% 66% 4% 3% 5% 40% 26% 20% 2% 37%New River Community and Technical College 33% 67% 1% <1% 8% 91% 1% 0% <1% 57%New River Community College 46% 54% <1% 2% 5% 91% 1% 1% <1% 43%NH Community Technical College - Berlin 43% 57% <1% <1% <1% 79% <1% 20% 0% 36%NH Community Technical College - Claremont 39% 61% <1% 2% 1% 79% 3% 16% 0% 28%

Gender Race/Ethnicity Enrollme

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 397: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Small Colleges continued

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Small Colleges 40% 60% 2% 3% 11% 72% 7% 4% 1% 43%NH Community Technical College - Laconia 43% 57% <1% <1% <1% 79% <1% 20% 0% 36%NH Community Technical College - Manchester 44% 56% <1% 2% 1% 72% 2% 23% 0% 17%NH Community Technical College - Nashua 39% 61% <1% 2% 1% 79% 3% 16% 0% 28%NH Community Technical College - Stratham 44% 56% <1% 2% 1% 72% 2% 23% 0% 17%North Arkansas College 38% 62% 1% 1% 1% 94% 3% 1% 0% 52%North Central Missouri College 29% 71% 1% <1% 2% 96% 1% 0% <1% 52%North Central State College 34% 66% <1% 1% 5% 88% 1% 5% 0% 34%North Dakota State College of Science 61% 39% 2% 1% 2% 95% 1% 0% <1% 75%North Florida Community College 32% 68% <1% 1% 21% 75% 2% <1% <1% 46%North Iowa Area Community College 44% 56% <1% 1% 3% 92% 2% <1% 1% 54%Northeast Lakeview College 37% 63% 1% 3% 10% 54% 32% 0% 1% 43%Northeast Mississippi Community College 42% 58% <1% <1% 19% 79% 1% 1% <1% 85%Northeast Texas Community College 39% 61% 1% 1% 9% 74% 15% 0% 2% 36%Northern Maine Community College 47% 53% 4% <1% 1% 86% 1% 5% 4% 66%Northern New Mexico Community College 36% 64% 6% 1% 1% 20% 72% <1% <1% 34%Northwest College 37% 63% 1% 2% 1% 92% 5% <1% <1% 64%Northwest Indian College 33% 67% 78% 1% 1% 16% 1% 3% 0% 50%Northwest Iowa Community College 47% 53% <1% <1% <1% 92% 1% 6% <1% 48%Northwestern Connecticut Community College 32% 68% <1% 2% 2% 88% 3% 5% <1% 34%Nunez Community College 30% 70% 1% 2% 31% 61% 3% 2% <1% 56%Oregon Coast Community College 36% 64% 4% 3% 1% 90% 3% <1% 0% 12%Ouachita Technical College 49% 51% 1% 1% 12% 85% 1% 0% <1% 35%Panola College 34% 66% 1% 1% 17% 77% 4% 0% 1% 49%Paris Junior College 36% 64% 2% 1% 11% 81% 6% 0% <1% 45%Patrick Henry Community College 34% 66% 1% <1% 22% 76% 1% 0% 0% 35%Paul D. Camp Community College 34% 66% <1% 1% 37% 61% 1% 0% 0% 24%Piedmont Virginia Community College 41% 59% <1% 3% 13% 82% 2% 0% <1% 26%Prince William Sound Community College 43% 57% 14% 4% 1% 66% 2% 12% 1% 12%Quinebaug Valley Community College 32% 68% 1% 1% 2% 82% 9% 4% <1% 38%Rainy River Community College 48% 52% 2% 1% 25% 65% 1% 3% 3% 75%Ranger College 53% 47% 2% <1% 16% 65% 15% 1% 1% 73%Rappahannock Community College 37% 63% 1% 1% 18% 80% 1% 0% 0% 24%Reading Area Community College 35% 65% 1% 2% 10% 66% 14% 6% 1% 41%Redlands Community College 32% 68% 8% 2% 7% 80% 3% 0% 1% 45%River Parishes Community College 34% 66% <1% 1% 26% 68% 1% 5% 0% 41%Riverland Community College 48% 52% <1% 1% 2% 91% 3% <1% 2% 42%Roxbury Community College 32% 68% <1% 2% 49% 5% 13% 29% 3% 41%Salem Community College 36% 64% 1% <1% 19% 62% 3% 9% 5% 48%Salish Kootenai College 36% 64% 81% <1% <1% 17% 1% 0% 0% 60%

Race/Ethnicity EnrollmeGender

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 398: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Small Colleges continued

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Small Colleges 40% 60% 2% 3% 11% 72% 7% 4% 1% 43%Santa Fe Community College (NM) 38% 62% 3% 2% 1% 46% 38% 10% <1% 25%Sheridan College 44% 56% 1% 1% 1% 95% 3% 0% <1% 37%South Florida Community College 40% 60% <1% 2% 11% 67% 17% 1% 1% 33%South Georgia College 36% 64% <1% 1% 25% 71% 2% 0% 1% 69%South Louisiana Community College 45% 55% 1% 1% 27% 70% 1% <1% <1% 43%South Mountain Community College 35% 65% 4% 2% 14% 29% 38% 11% 1% 21%South Piedmont Community College 34% 66% 1% 1% 35% 59% 2% 2% 1% 34%Southeastern Community College (IA) 37% 63% <1% 1% 3% 89% 3% 3% 1% 60%Southeastern Community College (NC) 34% 66% 6% <1% 31% 60% 1% 1% <1% 56%Southeastern Technical College 27% 73% <1% <1% 29% 68% 2% <1% 0% 46%Southern Maine Community College 51% 49% 1% 1% 2% 81% 1% 12% <1% 51%Southern University at Shreveport 25% 75% <1% <1% 81% 17% 1% 1% <1% 63%Southern West Virginia Community and Technical College 31% 69% <1% <1% 1% 98% <1% 0% 0% 55%Southwest Texas Junior College 39% 61% <1% 1% 2% 15% 80% 1% <1% 44%Southwest Virginia Community College 41% 59% <1% <1% 2% 97% <1% 0% 0% 41%Southwestern Community College 36% 64% 9% <1% 1% 86% 1% 2% 1% 44%Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute 44% 56% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 76%Southwestern Oregon Community College 42% 58% 4% 2% 2% 71% 3% 18% 1% 49%SOWELA Technical Community College 61% 39% 1% 1% 21% 73% 1% 3% 0% 60%Spoon River College 45% 55% 1% 1% 5% 92% 1% 0% <1% 45%Surry Community College 39% 61% <1% <1% 4% 92% 2% 1% 1% 47%Tanana Valley Campus, University of Alaska Fairbanks 40% 60% 12% 3% 4% 66% 3% 8% 4% 50%Technical College of the Lowcountry 28% 72% <1% 1% 46% 46% 4% 2% <1% 33%Temple College 34% 66% 1% 2% 14% 69% 15% <1% <1% 35%Texas State Technical College Harlingen 49% 51% <1% <1% 1% 9% 89% 0% 1% 38%Texas State Technical College Marshall 70% 30% 1% 1% 26% 67% 6% 0% <1% 54%Texas State Technical College Waco 77% 23% <1% 1% 16% 64% 16% 0% 2% 67%Texas State Technical College West Texas 54% 46% <1% 1% 8% 67% 23% 0% <1% 50%The Community and Technical College at WVU Tech 52% 48% <1% 1% 6% 92% 1% 0% <1% 67%The Community and Technical College of Shepherd 40% 60% 1% 1% 8% 88% 2% 1% <1% 25%The Victoria College 34% 66% <1% 1% 5% 61% 32% <1% <1% 39%Three Rivers Community College 38% 62% 1% 3% 7% 74% 7% 6% 1% 32%Tompkins Cortland Community College 40% 60% <1% 2% 6% 87% 3% 0% 3% 68%Tri-County Community College 32% 68% 2% <1% 1% 94% 1% 2% 0% 40%Tunxis Community College 39% 61% <1% 3% 6% 78% 9% 3% 1% 38%University of Alaska Matanuska Susitna College 32% 68% 6% 2% 2% 82% 3% 5% 1% 40%University of Alaska Southeast Ketchikan campus 37% 63% 17% 4% <1% 62% 3% 11% 2% 31%University of Arkansas Community College at Batesville 33% 67% 1% 1% 3% 94% 2% 0% 0% 55%University of Arkansas Community College at Hope 31% 69% 1% 1% 31% 64% 2% 1% <1% 53%

Gender Race/Ethnicity Enrollme

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 399: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Small Colleges continued

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Small Colleges 40% 60% 2% 3% 11% 72% 7% 4% 1% 43%University of Cincinnati Clermont College 37% 63% <1% 1% 2% 82% 1% 13% <1% 61%University of New Mexico - Gallup 32% 68% 79% 1% 1% 9% 9% 1% <1% 40%University of New Mexico - Taos Branch 32% 68% 6% 1% 1% 32% 54% 7% 0% 23%University of New Mexico - Valencia Campus 30% 70% 4% 1% 1% 32% 58% 4% 1% 45%Vermilion Community College 66% 34% 1% 1% 9% 86% 3% 0% 0% 69%Vernon College 35% 65% 1% 1% 8% 76% 14% <1% <1% 36%Virginia Highlands Community College 44% 56% <1% <1% 2% 97% 1% 0% <1% 41%Warren County Community College 36% 64% <1% 1% 3% 68% 3% 21% 4% 38%Washington State Community College 36% 64% 1% <1% 1% 94% 1% 3% <1% 59%Waycross College 26% 74% <1% 1% 21% 77% 1% 0% 0% 42%Wayne Community College 35% 65% 1% 2% 31% 60% 3% 3% <1% 51%Wenatchee Valley College 37% 63% 3% 1% <1% 76% 15% 5% <1% 63%West Virginia Northern Community College 31% 69% <1% <1% 3% 96% <1% 0% <1% 50%West Virginia State Community and Technical College 36% 64% <1% 1% 17% 79% 1% 3% 0% 62%West Virginia University at Parkersburg 36% 64% <1% 1% 1% 97% 1% 1% 0% 58%Western Nebraska Community College 41% 59% 1% 1% 1% 72% 10% 13% 2% 38%Western Piedmont Community College 36% 64% <1% 6% 8% 83% 1% 2% <1% 32%Western Texas College 52% 48% <1% 1% 6% 71% 21% 0% 1% 26%Western Wyoming Community College 48% 52% 1% <1% 1% 89% 7% 0% 1% 33%Williston State College 27% 73% 5% <1% 1% 89% 2% 0% 3% 59%Windward Community College 37% 63% 1% 69% 1% 26% 2% 1% <1% 43%Wisconsin Indianhead Technical College 39% 61% 3% 1% <1% 92% 1% 4% 0% 44%Wor-Wic Community College 33% 67% <1% 2% 25% 68% 2% 3% 0% 32%Wytheville Community College 34% 66% <1% <1% 2% 96% 1% 0% 0% 31%York Technical College 36% 64% 2% 1% 24% 71% 1% 1% <1% 49%Zane State College 38% 62% 1% <1% 3% 91% <1% 5% 0% 64%

Gender Race/Ethnicity Enrollme

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 400: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Medium Colleges

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Medium Colleges 39% 61% 1% 4% 13% 67% 9% 5% 1% 39%Angelina College 37% 63% <1% 1% 14% 75% 10% <1% <1% 37%Anoka-Ramsey Community College 35% 65% 1% 3% 3% 83% 1% 8% <1% 42%Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College 43% 57% 1% 1% 5% 88% 2% 3% <1% 39%Baltimore City Community College 27% 73% <1% 2% 81% 9% 1% 7% 0% 37%Baton Rouge Community College 44% 56% 1% 2% 37% 57% 2% 1% <1% 55%Big Sandy Community and Technical College 45% 55% <1% <1% 2% 82% <1% 16% 0% 40%Black Hawk College 39% 61% <1% 1% 8% 81% 9% 0% 0% 46%Bossier Parish Community College 35% 65% <1% 1% 27% 65% 2% 5% <1% 54%Bristol Community College 37% 63% 1% 2% 5% 78% 3% 11% <1% 45%Bunker Hill Community College 40% 60% 1% 14% 27% 37% 14% 3% 5% 30%Burlington County College 39% 61% <1% 4% 21% 63% 6% 6% 1% 49%Cape Fear Community College 45% 55% 1% 1% 14% 79% 2% 3% 0% 42%Central Arizona College 40% 60% 6% 1% 5% 53% 32% 2% 1% 30%Central Community College 40% 60% <1% 1% 1% 87% 7% 4% <1% 33%Central Florida Community College 34% 66% 1% 2% 11% 78% 7% 1% 1% 41%Central Virginia Community College 45% 55% <1% 1% 15% 82% 1% 0% <1% 21%Chattanooga State Technical Community College 38% 62% <1% 2% 17% 79% 2% 1% 0% 45%Cochise College 40% 60% 1% 3% 5% 52% 33% 5% 1% 31%College of Alameda 46% 54% <1% 37% 25% 16% 12% 8% 2% 21%College of Southern Idaho 35% 65% 1% 1% <1% 83% 7% 4% 3% 42%College of Southern Maryland 34% 66% 1% 3% 19% 69% 3% 5% <1% 34%College of the Redwoods 42% 58% 6% 3% 2% 71% 7% 11% <1% 40%Colorado Mountain College 43% 57% 1% 1% 1% 76% 10% 11% <1% 26%Columbia State Community College 35% 65% <1% 1% 7% 88% 2% 1% <1% 50%Corning Community College 43% 57% 1% 1% 2% 60% 1% 35% <1% 50%Delaware Technical & Community College - Stanton-Wilmington 37% 63% <1% 3% 23% 62% 5% 5% 2% 37%Dona Ana Community College 42% 58% 2% 1% 3% 20% 64% 10% 1% 34%Durham Technical Community College 36% 64% <1% 2% 40% 42% 3% 2% 9% 26%El Centro College 30% 70% <1% 4% 35% 27% 28% 3% 2% 25%Elizabethtown Community & Technical College 41% 59% <1% 2% 8% 86% 2% 2% <1% 48%Estrella Mountain Community College 38% 62% 1% 3% 6% 40% 31% 18% 1% 21%Everett Community College 37% 63% 2% 5% 2% 60% 3% 27% 1% 46%Frederick Community College 38% 62% 1% 3% 9% 81% 4% 2% 0% 38%Gainesville College 46% 54% <1% 2% 4% 88% 4% 0% 2% 59%Gateway Community College 37% 63% <1% 3% 25% 52% 13% 6% 1% 32%Genesee Community College 35% 65% 1% <1% 3% 94% 1% <1% 2% 48%George C Wallace State Community College 36% 64% 1% <1% 5% 92% 1% 1% 0% 59%Georgia Military College 40% 60% <1% 1% 39% 52% 3% 3% <1% 63%Germanna Community College 35% 65% 1% 3% 12% 80% 4% 0% 0% 31%

Gender Race/Ethnicity Enrollme

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 401: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Medium Colleges continued

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Medium Colleges 39% 61% 1% 4% 13% 67% 9% 5% 1% 39%Gloucester County College 41% 59% <1% 2% 9% 74% 2% 11% <1% 53%Gulf Coast Community College 41% 59% 1% 2% 11% 80% 3% 2% 1% 35%Harford Community College 38% 62% <1% 3% 10% 81% 2% 3% <1% 40%Hawkeye Community College 44% 56% <1% 1% 8% 87% 2% 2% 0% 52%Heartland Community College 43% 57% <1% 2% 9% 85% 3% 0% <1% 41%Holyoke Community College 35% 65% 1% 2% 6% 74% 13% 3% <1% 49%Housatonic Community College 32% 68% <1% 2% 29% 41% 21% 6% 1% 33%Howard Community College 41% 59% 1% 9% 20% 56% 4% 6% 6% 39%Hutchinson Community College 43% 57% 1% 1% 5% 85% 5% 3% <1% 40%Itawamba Community College 36% 64% <1% <1% 29% 68% 1% 2% 0% 72%Ivy Tech Community College - Anderson 35% 65% <1% <1% 7% 88% 1% 3% <1% 45%Ivy Tech Community College - East Chicago 34% 66% <1% 1% 29% 59% 9% 3% <1% 32%Ivy Tech Community College - Fort Wayne 40% 60% <1% 1% 11% 80% 2% 4% <1% 37%Ivy Tech Community College - Gary 34% 66% <1% 1% 29% 59% 9% 3% <1% 32%Ivy Tech Community College - Lafayette 49% 51% <1% 1% 3% 85% 3% 8% <1% 41%Ivy Tech Community College - Marion 35% 65% <1% <1% 7% 88% 1% 3% <1% 45%Ivy Tech Community College - Michigan City 34% 66% <1% 1% 29% 59% 9% 3% <1% 32%Ivy Tech Community College - Muncie 35% 65% <1% <1% 7% 88% 1% 3% <1% 45%Ivy Tech Community College - Valparaiso 34% 66% <1% 1% 29% 59% 9% 3% <1% 32%Jackson Community College 36% 64% 1% 1% 5% 85% 4% 5% <1% 36%John Tyler Community College 37% 63% <1% 3% 25% 69% 3% 0% <1% 25%Kansas City Kansas Community College 35% 65% 1% 2% 23% 61% 6% 7% 1% 36%Kapiolani Community College 42% 58% <1% 74% 1% 15% 2% 2% 7% 36%Kilgore College 37% 63% <1% <1% 15% 77% 5% <1% 3% 54%Kingwood College 40% 60% <1% 6% 11% 55% 19% 4% 4% 18%Lake Superior College 44% 56% 2% 1% 2% 87% 1% 7% <1% 46%Lee College 41% 59% <1% 1% 17% 54% 25% 1% 2% 39%Leeward Community College 40% 60% 1% 77% 2% 14% 2% 4% 1% 42%Lehigh Carbon Community College 38% 62% <1% 2% 5% 81% 8% 4% 1% 39%Lincoln Land Community College 41% 59% <1% 1% 7% 89% 2% 0% <1% 39%Linn-Benton Community College 46% 54% 2% 3% 1% 84% 3% 6% <1% 53%Lord Fairfax Community College 38% 62% <1% 1% 5% 91% 2% 0% <1% 28%Malcolm X College 35% 65% <1% 5% 58% 7% 29% 0% 0% 39%Manchester Community College 44% 56% <1% 4% 12% 69% 10% 5% 1% 44%Massachusetts Bay Community College 42% 58% <1% 4% 11% 72% 7% 4% 2% 43%Massasoit Community College 43% 57% 1% 2% 16% 70% 3% 9% <1% 48%McHenry County College 42% 58% <1% 2% 1% 89% 7% 0% 2% 38%Minneapolis Community and Technical College 44% 56% 3% 6% 28% 51% 4% 5% 3% 42%Mountain View College 41% 59% 1% 3% 29% 20% 44% 2% 1% 28%

Gender Race/Ethnicity Enrollme

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 402: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Medium Colleges continued

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Medium Colleges 39% 61% 1% 4% 13% 67% 9% 5% 1% 39%Nashville State Technical Community College 42% 58% <1% 4% 27% 60% 2% 6% 0% 35%Naugatuck Valley Community College 40% 60% <1% 3% 8% 70% 11% 8% <1% 39%Navarro College 38% 62% 1% 1% 20% 65% 11% 0% 3% 52%North Hennepin Community College 39% 61% 1% 8% 15% 68% 1% 6% 1% 37%North Shore Community College 37% 63% <1% 3% 8% 70% 12% 6% <1% 42%Northampton Community College 39% 61% <1% 2% 5% 78% 9% 4% 1% 44%Northeast Iowa Community College 38% 62% <1% 1% 1% 90% 1% 8% <1% 38%Northeast State Technical Community College 47% 53% <1% 1% 3% 89% 1% 6% 0% 54%Northern Essex Community College 35% 65% <1% 2% 2% 66% 20% 9% 1% 36%Northern Oklahoma College 41% 59% 8% 1% 5% 82% 4% 0% 1% 57%NorthWest Arkansas Community College 40% 60% 2% 3% 1% 83% 8% 3% 0% 35%Norwalk Community College 37% 63% <1% 5% 18% 48% 18% 6% 4% 33%Okaloosa-Walton College 40% 60% 1% 4% 10% 77% 5% 2% <1% 36%Olympic College 45% 55% 2% 7% 2% 74% 4% 10% <1% 49%Owensboro Community and Technical College 47% 53% <1% <1% 3% 90% 1% 7% 0% 32%Palo Alto College 36% 64% <1% 1% 2% 35% 62% <1% <1% 41%Pasco-Hernando Community College 34% 66% 1% 2% 4% 84% 8% 1% 1% 36%Pellissippi State Technical Community College 46% 54% 1% 2% 7% 87% 2% 2% 1% 51%Pitt Community College 40% 60% <1% 1% 32% 61% 2% 3% <1% 56%Polk Community College 33% 67% <1% 2% 13% 72% 8% <1% 4% 29%Prairie State College 38% 62% 1% 1% 47% 39% 10% 3% <1% 34%Pueblo Community College 36% 64% 3% 1% 2% 58% 34% 2% <1% 38%Quinsigamond Community College 40% 60% <1% 3% 8% 72% 9% 7% <1% 46%Raritan Valley Community College 42% 58% <1% 7% 8% 63% 9% 7% 6% 41%Red Rocks Community College 49% 51% 1% 2% 2% 81% 10% 2% 1% 33%Rend Lake College 47% 53% <1% 1% 7% 90% 2% 0% <1% 33%Roane State Community College 32% 68% <1% 1% 2% 94% 1% 1% <1% 56%Rochester Community and Technical College 37% 63% <1% 4% 6% 82% 2% 5% 1% 56%Rowan-Cabarrus Community College 32% 68% 1% 2% 20% 74% 3% 1% 0% 48%San Jacinto College - North Campus 37% 63% <1% 3% 22% 29% 43% <1% 3% 37%San Juan College 40% 60% 32% 1% 1% 52% 12% 3% <1% 51%Shelton State Community College 47% 53% <1% 1% 29% 66% 1% 2% 0% 58%Skagit Valley College 35% 65% 1% 5% 2% 80% 6% 4% 2% 44%Somerset Community College 42% 58% <1% <1% 1% 94% <1% 4% <1% 46%South Puget Sound Community College 39% 61% 1% 5% 2% 64% 4% 22% 1% 48%South Seattle Community College 64% 36% 1% 12% 8% 57% 4% 14% 3% 26%South Suburban College 29% 71% <1% 1% 63% 28% 7% 0% <1% 33%Southeast Kentucky Community & Technical College 55% 45% <1% <1% 2% 86% <1% 12% <1% 36%Southside Virginia Community College 37% 63% <1% 1% 37% 61% 1% 0% <1% 31%

Race/Ethnicity EnrollmeGender

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 403: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Medium Colleges continued

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Medium Colleges 39% 61% 1% 4% 13% 67% 9% 5% 1% 39%Spokane Community College 46% 54% 2% 2% 2% 82% 3% 7% <1% 71%Springfield Technical Community College 42% 58% <1% 2% 14% 60% 15% 7% 1% 46%St. Charles Community College 39% 61% <1% 2% 4% 92% 2% 0% <1% 49%St. Johns River Community College 37% 63% 1% 2% 9% 77% 5% 6% <1% 32%St. Louis Community College at Forest Park 35% 65% <1% 3% 44% 38% 2% 10% 2% 33%St. Louis Community College- Florissant Valley 34% 66% <1% 1% 48% 41% 1% 7% 1% 39%Stark State College of Technology 42% 58% 1% 1% 10% 84% 1% 3% <1% 33%Tacoma Community College 34% 66% 2% 7% 10% 61% 5% 13% 3% 55%Tomball College 40% 60% <1% 6% 11% 55% 19% 4% 4% 18%Tri-County Technical College 40% 60% <1% 1% 15% 80% 1% 1% 1% 53%Trinity Valley Community College 42% 58% <1% <1% 13% 79% 7% 0% <1% 42%Volunteer State Community College 37% 63% <1% 1% 9% 86% 2% 1% <1% 49%Walters State Community College 37% 63% <1% 1% 4% 93% 1% 0% <1% 51%Weatherford College 42% 58% 1% 1% 2% 81% 8% 6% 1% 50%West Hills Community College District 39% 61% 1% 7% 7% 35% 43% 5% 1% 45%West Kentucky Community and Technical College 49% 51% <1% 1% 7% 82% 1% 10% 0% 38%Western Iowa Tech Community College 44% 56% 2% 2% 2% 77% 6% 11% <1% 39%Westmoreland County Community College 36% 64% <1% 1% 2% 89% 1% 7% 0% 43%Wharton County Junior College 42% 58% <1% 4% 9% 59% 24% 1% 4% 44%

EnrollmeGender Race/Ethnicity

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 404: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Large Colleges

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Large Colleges 42% 58% 1% 5% 15% 57% 15% 4% 2% 36%Anne Arundel Community College 38% 62% 1% 4% 14% 65% 3% 14% 1% 33%Blinn College 48% 52% <1% 1% 8% 78% 11% 0% 1% 52%Bluegrass Community and Technical College 43% 57% <1% 1% 10% 76% 2% 9% <1% 60%Brevard Community College 39% 61% 1% 3% 9% 80% 7% <1% 1% 37%Brookdale Community College 44% 56% <1% 4% 11% 73% 8% 3% 1% 54%Brookhaven College 42% 58% 1% 12% 14% 45% 24% 3% 2% 27%Bucks County Community College 42% 58% <1% 2% 3% 81% 2% 6% 6% 42%Butler County Community College (KS) 40% 60% 1% 3% 9% 73% 5% 5% 3% 41%Century College 42% 58% 1% 10% 8% 75% 2% 3% 1% 47%Chandler-Gilbert Community College 44% 56% 2% 4% 3% 66% 15% 9% 1% 27%Citrus College 44% 56% 1% 10% 6% 31% 42% 7% 4% 42%College of Lake County 43% 57% <1% 6% 8% 60% 23% 0% 2% 29%Community College of Denver 37% 63% 2% 6% 15% 44% 26% 2% 6% 23%CyFair College 40% 60% <1% 6% 11% 55% 19% 4% 4% 18%Daytona Beach Community College 37% 63% <1% 2% 12% 75% 7% 2% 1% 49%Del Mar College 39% 61% <1% 2% 3% 36% 56% 4% 0% 31%Delgado Community College 30% 70% 1% 2% 42% 37% 4% 11% 4% 44%Delta College 44% 56% 1% 1% 7% 83% 4% 4% 1% 38%Douglas College 37% 63% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 40%Eastfield College 39% 61% 1% 4% 22% 47% 23% 2% <1% 28%Edison College 38% 62% <1% 2% 10% 71% 13% 1% 3% 39%Essex County College 37% 63% <1% 3% 50% 11% 18% 10% 8% 54%Grand Rapids Community College 49% 51% 1% 2% 10% 79% 6% 2% 1% 44%Greenville Technical College 39% 61% <1% 2% 22% 70% 3% 3% <1% 40%Guilford Technical Community College 42% 58% <1% 2% 35% 56% 2% 2% 2% 37%Harold Washington College 43% 57% 1% 13% 42% 25% 20% 0% 0% 44%Hudson Valley Community College 51% 49% <1% 2% 8% 86% 3% 0% 1% 55%Illinois Central College 44% 56% <1% 2% 10% 85% 2% 0% 1% 40%Indian River Community College 38% 62% <1% 1% 13% 74% 9% 1% 1% 28%Ivy Tech Community College - Central Indiana 42% 58% <1% 1% 22% 70% 2% 4% 1% 34%J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College 39% 61% 1% 4% 31% 62% 2% 0% <1% 25%Jefferson Community and Technical College 47% 53% <1% 1% 16% 60% 2% 20% <1% 33%Joliet Jr College 41% 59% <1% 3% 11% 72% 14% 0% <1% 38%Kingsborough Community College 41% 59% <1% 11% 30% 39% 14% 0% 7% 52%LaGuardia Community College 36% 64% <1% 14% 20% 16% 35% 0% 15% 55%Lane Community College 44% 56% 3% 3% 1% 77% 4% 11% 1% 49%Laney College 42% 58% 1% 32% 29% 15% 12% 9% 3% 22%Lorain County Community College 34% 66% 1% 1% 8% 82% 6% 2% 1% 38%Manatee Community College 38% 62% <1% 2% 10% 77% 7% 2% 2% 39%

Gender Race/Ethnicity Enrollme

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 405: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Large Colleges

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Large Colleges 42% 58% 1% 5% 15% 57% 15% 4% 2% 36%Merced College 38% 62% 1% 12% 6% 35% 39% 6% 1% 34%Mercer County Community College 43% 57% <1% 5% 24% 48% 8% 10% 5% 38%Metropolitan Community College 44% 56% 1% 3% 11% 79% 5% <1% 1% 38%Middlesex Community College 40% 60% <1% 9% 5% 74% 9% 1% 1% 43%Middlesex County College 45% 55% <1% 14% 9% 39% 16% 19% 3% 50%Midlands Technical College 37% 63% 1% 2% 36% 55% 2% 4% <1% 44%MiraCosta College 42% 58% 1% 8% 4% 56% 21% 8% 2% 32%Montgomery College 40% 60% <1% 6% 11% 55% 19% 4% 4% 18%Montgomery County Community College 43% 57% <1% 7% 10% 69% 3% 10% 2% 44%Mt. Hood Community College 42% 58% 1% 6% 3% 79% 6% 5% <1% 38%North Harris College 40% 60% <1% 6% 11% 55% 19% 4% 4% 18%North Lake College 46% 54% <1% 11% 15% 42% 22% 2% 7% 32%Northwest Vista College 43% 57% <1% 3% 5% 48% 43% 0% <1% 38%Oakton Community College 44% 56% <1% 17% 5% 71% 7% 0% 0% 29%Ocean County College 41% 59% <1% 2% 4% 82% 6% 5% <1% 48%Oklahoma City Community College 43% 57% 6% 4% 9% 71% 6% 0% 4% 38%Onondaga Community College 47% 53% 1% 2% 8% 68% 2% 20% <1% 56%Paradise Valley Community College 40% 60% 1% 3% 2% 67% 10% 16% 1% 27%Parkland College 46% 54% 1% 4% 13% 75% 3% 0% 4% 47%Pensacola Junior College 39% 61% 1% 4% 13% 77% 3% <1% <1% 40%Phoenix College 38% 62% 4% 2% 8% 35% 32% 18% 1% 24%Prince George's Community College 35% 65% <1% 4% 78% 9% 4% 1% 4% 25%Queensborough Community College 41% 59% <1% 19% 25% 25% 21% 0% 10% 49%Richard J. Daley College 37% 63% <1% 1% 22% 11% 66% 0% 0% 35%Richland College 45% 55% <1% 13% 19% 42% 18% 4% 5% 31%San Jacinto College - Central Campus 43% 57% <1% 5% 6% 52% 34% <1% 3% 35%San Jacinto College - South Campus 43% 57% <1% 9% 10% 47% 26% 1% 6% 38%Schoolcraft College 43% 57% 1% 2% 8% 79% 2% 7% 1% 36%Scottsdale Community College 45% 55% 4% 3% 3% 70% 10% 9% 2% 30%Seminole Community College 39% 61% <1% 3% 12% 63% 13% 4% 5% 36%Southwest Tennessee Community College 35% 65% 1% 1% 59% 36% 2% 1% 1% 49%St. Louis Community College - Meramec 42% 58% <1% 3% 4% 81% 2% 9% 1% 46%St. Philip's College 42% 58% 1% 2% 16% 33% 48% <1% <1% 43%Taft College 78% 22% 1% 3% 7% 42% 43% 3% <1% 9%Tallahassee Community College 44% 56% <1% 2% 33% 56% 6% 3% 1% 51%Thomas Nelson Community College 41% 59% 1% 4% 31% 61% 4% 0% <1% 31%Truckee Meadows Community College 44% 56% 2% 6% 3% 70% 12% 6% 1% 25%Truman College 45% 55% <1% 11% 16% 21% 51% 0% 0% 18%University of Wisconsin Colleges 45% 55% 1% 3% 1% 93% 2% 0% <1% 66%

Gender Race/Ethnicity Enrollme

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 406: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Large Colleges continued

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Large Colleges 42% 58% 1% 5% 15% 57% 15% 4% 2% 36%Victor Valley College 39% 61% 1% 4% 13% 51% 27% 4% <1% 36%Vincennes University 57% 43% <1% 1% 7% 81% 2% 8% 1% 52%Virginia Western Community College 42% 58% <1% 2% 9% 88% 1% 0% <1% 24%Westchester Community College 44% 56% 1% 5% 19% 52% 18% 4% 2% 47%Wilbur Wright College 42% 58% 1% 7% 8% 35% 49% 0% 0% 26%

EnrollmeGender Race/Ethnicity

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 407: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Extra Large Colleges

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Extra Large Colleges 43% 57% 1% 9% 14% 47% 21% 5% 3% 34%American River College 49% 51% 1% 11% 9% 51% 13% 14% <1% 27%Austin Community College 43% 57% 1% 5% 7% 60% 23% 2% 2% 28%Borough of Manhattan Community College 37% 63% <1% 10% 36% 13% 29% 0% 11% 58%Broward Community College 38% 62% <1% 3% 27% 32% 23% 5% 9% 32%City College of San Francisco 42% 58% <1% 40% 9% 23% 16% 9% 2% 20%College of DuPage 45% 55% <1% 12% 6% 67% 14% 1% 0% 32%Community College of Allegheny County 43% 57% 1% 1% 14% 72% 1% 11% 1% 41%Community College of Philadelphia 33% 67% 1% 8% 51% 32% 6% <1% 2% 30%Community College of Rhode Island 37% 63% 1% 3% 8% 65% 10% 14% <1% 36%Community College of Southern Nevada 45% 55% 1% 12% 10% 48% 18% 11% <1% 24%Cuyahoga Community College 36% 64% <1% 2% 30% 59% 3% 4% 2% 42%De Anza College 48% 52% 1% 37% 5% 25% 14% 13% 5% 40%El Paso Community College 39% 61% <1% 1% 3% 8% 85% 0% 3% 40%Florida Community College at Jacksonville 37% 63% <1% 4% 23% 60% 5% 6% 2% 30%Georgia Perimeter College 38% 62% <1% 9% 36% 46% 4% 0% 4% 45%Glendale Community College 41% 59% <1% 15% 3% 52% 24% 3% 3% 31%Harper College 43% 57% <1% 12% 4% 60% 14% 8% 1% 41%Hillsborough Community College 39% 61% <1% 4% 19% 55% 20% 1% 2% 32%Houston Community College System 42% 58% <1% 12% 25% 23% 27% 3% 8% 31%Johnson County Community College 46% 54% 1% 4% 5% 72% 4% 13% 1% 36%Kirkwood Community College 46% 54% 1% 1% 4% 82% 2% 9% 1% 56%Macomb Community College 48% 52% <1% 4% 5% 79% 1% 9% 1% 37%Metropolitan Community College - Kansas City 39% 61% <1% 2% 11% 76% 3% 8% <1% 38%Miami Dade College 38% 62% <1% 1% 21% 9% 64% 1% 3% 35%Modesto Junior College 40% 60% 1% 9% 3% 47% 29% 11% <1% 37%Montgomery College 45% 55% <1% 13% 26% 39% 13% <1% 8% 38%Moraine Valley Community College 42% 58% <1% 2% 9% 76% 11% 0% 1% 42%Mt. San Antonio College 45% 55% <1% 25% 6% 22% 42% 4% 1% 32%Northern Virginia Community College 46% 54% 1% 14% 15% 56% 12% 0% 2% 34%Oakland Community College 42% 58% 1% 3% 13% 64% 2% 8% 9% 32%Palm Beach Community College 38% 62% <1% 3% 22% 54% 15% 3% 3% 31%Palomar College 51% 49% 1% 9% 3% 57% 22% 6% 1% 32%Pasadena City College 44% 56% 1% 30% 6% 17% 34% 10% 3% 29%Salt Lake Community College 51% 49% 1% 4% 1% 79% 7% 6% 1% 34%San Antonio College 40% 60% 1% 2% 4% 46% 45% 0% 1% 38%San Diego Mesa College 46% 54% 1% 21% 6% 41% 17% 12% 1% 27%Santa Ana College 58% 42% 1% 11% 3% 28% 43% 12% 1% 14%Santa Fe Community College (FL) 46% 54% <1% 3% 13% 71% 8% 2% 3% 54%Sinclair Community College 43% 57% <1% 2% 15% 73% 1% 8% 1% 39%

Gender Race/Ethnicity Enrollme

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 408: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Extra Large Colleges

Male Female

American Indian or

Other Native American

Asian, Asian American or

Pacific Islander

Black or African

American, Non-Hispanic

White, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish

Other

International Student or

Foreign National

Full-Time

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 41% 59% 1% 6% 14% 59% 14% 5% 2% 37%All Extra Large Colleges 43% 57% 1% 9% 14% 47% 21% 5% 3% 34%South Texas College 41% 59% <1% 1% <1% 3% 95% 0% <1% 38%Southwestern Illinois College 43% 57% 1% 2% 18% 77% 3% 0% <1% 37%St. Petersburg College 37% 63% 1% 3% 11% 76% 5% 3% 2% 32%The Community College of Baltimore County 37% 63% <1% 4% 30% 57% 2% 5% 2% 36%Tidewater Community College 39% 61% 1% 5% 30% 59% 4% 0% <1% 33%Triton College 44% 56% <1% 4% 16% 52% 26% 1% <1% 24%Valencia Community College 42% 58% <1% 5% 15% 48% 22% 7% 2% 40%

Gender Race/Ethnicity Enrollme

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 409: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%57%35%54%33%25%43%49%70%52%65%50%56%61%75%34%60%34%36%60%75%76%48%66%68%74%90%71%57%75%50%54%64%64%36%58%58%66%64%66%56%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 410: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%57%63%59%48%83%59%50%67%65%22%65%47%72%56%65%54%59%66%42%26%63%71%92%61%64%34%44%79%60%53%62%35%76%46%33%54%53%55%66%54%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 411: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%57%53%67%13%31%63%57%62%55%54%27%52%63%74%66%65%62%65%62%71%74%56%74%67%47%48%46%62%62%71%71%62%88%78%65%56%72%64%50%57%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 412: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%57%62%29%2%

56%40%66%33%46%46%45%61%43%61%50%51%53%60%63%66%37%45%54%32%62%69%40%37%41%53%61%53%55%0%

52%63%43%57%64%72%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 413: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%57%64%83%72%83%48%48%66%25%54%46%57%15%64%34%66%36%50%52%66%44%88%65%51%55%65%76%74%88%62%25%27%76%59%55%59%58%59%52%40%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 414: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%57%75%63%67%31%57%79%66%40%44%54%49%37%45%56%59%56%24%51%40%55%53%50%67%65%62%46%33%50%33%75%61%68%32%60%62%60%69%45%47%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 415: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%57%39%60%77%55%31%64%59%62%41%58%49%37%50%38%42%62%68%74%67%41%57%56%68%69%51%36%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 416: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%61%63%58%61%63%45%60%54%46%55%70%51%58%70%67%59%79%55%69%79%58%66%60%74%50%50%63%66%74%75%52%79%54%62%41%68%52%41%37%69%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 417: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%61%47%65%60%48%59%51%67%61%60%28%55%68%63%68%59%55%68%55%68%64%75%64%64%46%82%54%61%58%61%61%47%72%61%56%57%52%62%58%72%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 418: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%61%65%61%48%63%58%56%62%46%64%43%65%67%64%51%68%59%64%49%44%71%66%62%54%59%67%67%44%44%52%63%49%42%56%54%52%74%67%64%69%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 419: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%61%29%54%51%68%67%61%67%45%82%47%58%51%49%50%55%62%61%57%56%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 420: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%64%67%48%40%63%46%73%58%59%53%73%58%71%77%82%51%69%56%62%60%72%61%46%56%60%63%56%45%60%72%66%75%67%62%48%45%51%78%62%61%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 421: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%64%66%62%62%57%50%56%68%82%56%62%82%68%62%71%52%62%44%73%53%60%76%75%51%65%69%65%62%64%70%64%51%54%57%91%49%69%75%82%34%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 422: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%64%64%48%76%53%74%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 423: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%66%73%72%42%68%80%68%59%70%64%76%58%60%60%70%55%69%59%68%69%64%44%63%62%65%63%62%58%68%66%68%69%68%71%66%62%73%86%46%61%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 424: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Part-Time

63%66%62%63%68%64%67%76%60%

nt Status

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 425: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Small Colleges

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Small Colleges 25% 17% 13% 13% 16% 10% 5% 1%Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College 44% 21% 10% 8% 11% 5% 1% <1%Aiken Technical College 22% 22% 15% 14% 15% 8% 3% <1%Alabama Southern Community College 43% 21% 8% 8% 12% 5% 1% <1%Alexandria Technical College 45% 20% 11% 7% 8% 7% 3% <1%Allegany College of Maryland 33% 20% 12% 11% 12% 9% 2% <1%Alpena Community College 27% 23% 13% 11% 13% 8% 4% <1%Alvin Community College 26% 16% 15% 14% 16% 9% 3% <1%Ashland Community and Technical College 21% 18% 13% 15% 19% 10% 4% 1%Asnuntuck Community College 24% 15% 11% 10% 14% 16% 7% 1%Atlanta Metropolitan College 19% 21% 16% 18% 18% 6% 3% <1%Atlanta Technical College 10% 13% 15% 18% 22% 11% 7% 4%Bainbridge College 24% 13% 14% 14% 20% 11% 4% <1%Barton County Community College 24% 17% 15% 14% 16% 9% 4% 1%Belmont Technical College 22% 18% 14% 15% 17% 10% 4% 0%Berkshire Community College 26% 17% 13% 12% 15% 12% 5% <1%Big Bend Community College 29% 15% 12% 12% 18% 9% 5% <1%Bismarck State College 28% 22% 14% 12% 12% 9% 3% <1%Blue Ridge Community College 28% 23% 15% 11% 12% 8% 4% <1%Bowling Green Technical College 15% 11% 11% 14% 22% 16% 9% 3%Brazosport College 27% 17% 15% 14% 16% 7% 2% <1%Butler County Community College (PA) 30% 18% 13% 10% 14% 10% 4% <1%Caldwell Community College and Technical Institute 21% 17% 13% 12% 19% 11% 6% 1%Cape Cod Community College 20% 19% 15% 13% 13% 12% 5% 1%Capital Community College 14% 13% 13% 16% 24% 14% 4% 1%Caritas Laboure College 5% 9% 16% 23% 29% 14% 4% 0%Carolinas College of Health Sciences 12% 15% 20% 21% 25% 6% <1% 0%Carroll Community College 35% 21% 13% 8% 12% 9% 3% <1%Carteret Community College 21% 16% 16% 14% 15% 12% 6% <1%Cascadia Community College 35% 23% 15% 9% 7% 6% 4% 1%Casper College 22% 18% 14% 12% 14% 10% 8% 1%Cecil Community College 34% 18% 11% 11% 13% 10% 3% <1%Cedar Valley College 25% 16% 15% 13% 18% 9% 4% 1%Central Lakes College 37% 18% 11% 10% 11% 9% 4% 1%Central Maine Community College 28% 18% 11% 11% 16% 11% 5% <1%Central Wyoming College 25% 14% 10% 14% 15% 12% 8% 2%Centralia College 18% 11% 10% 14% 19% 13% 10% 5%Chattahoochee Technical College 21% 20% 15% 13% 17% 11% 3% <1%Chesapeake College 30% 17% 12% 11% 15% 11% 4% <1%Chipola College 36% 20% 10% 11% 12% 7% 3% <1%

Table 5Underlying Population Percentages by Age

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 426: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Small Colleges continued

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Small Colleges 25% 17% 13% 13% 16% 10% 5% 1%Clarendon College 40% 16% 13% 15% 12% 3% 1% 0%Cleveland Community College 19% 12% 10% 12% 24% 15% 7% <1%Cleveland State Community College 24% 19% 12% 12% 18% 11% 3% <1%Clovis Community College 12% 12% 13% 14% 16% 15% 11% 7%Coastal Bend College 33% 16% 12% 12% 15% 9% 3% <1%Coastal Carolina Community College 20% 18% 17% 17% 17% 8% 3% <1%Coastal Georgia Community College 24% 17% 12% 14% 19% 10% 3% <1%College of the Mainland 20% 18% 19% 17% 16% 7% 3% <1%College of the Marshall Islands 20% 29% 22% 12% 12% 5% 1% 0%College of the Siskiyous 20% 12% 9% 10% 14% 14% 16% 5%Cumberland County College 27% 19% 14% 12% 14% 9% 3% 1%Dabney S. Lancaster Community College 30% 15% 10% 8% 17% 13% 6% <1%Danville Area Community College 28% 14% 11% 13% 16% 11% 6% <1%Danville Community College 25% 12% 9% 10% 17% 15% 11% <1%Darton College 23% 17% 14% 15% 17% 8% 3% 3%Delaware Technical & Community College - Owens Campus 24% 16% 13% 13% 18% 11% 5% <1%Delaware Technical & Community College - Terry Campus 19% 13% 14% 14% 20% 14% 6% <1%Dyersburg State Community College 24% 18% 13% 14% 17% 10% 3% <1%East Georgia College 49% 24% 10% 7% 8% 3% 1% 0%Eastern New Mexico University - Roswell 15% 12% 12% 15% 20% 16% 9% 1%Eastern Shore Community College 30% 13% 10% 11% 16% 13% 7% <1%Eastern West Virginia Community & Technical College 23% 7% 7% 13% 23% 18% 9% <1%Eastern Wyoming College 31% 15% 9% 10% 13% 13% 8% 1%Edison State Community College 23% 15% 11% 13% 20% 12% 5% <1%Ellsworth Community College 45% 25% 9% 6% 6% 5% 3% <1%Fairmont State Community and Technical College 27% 17% 16% 12% 15% 9% 3% <1%Florida Keys Community College 17% 15% 12% 13% 17% 15% 10% 1%Fond du Lac Tribal and Community College 27% 16% 15% 14% 13% 11% 4% <1%Frank Phillips College 42% 18% 9% 11% 11% 6% 2% 0%Galveston College 21% 17% 15% 15% 17% 10% 4% 1%Garrett College 38% 20% 12% 9% 10% 8% 2% 1%Gateway Community and Technical College 18% 15% 13% 14% 18% 14% 8% 1%Georgia Highlands College 35% 22% 14% 10% 12% 6% 1% 0%Gordon College 47% 24% 9% 6% 8% 4% 1% <1%Grays Harbor College 18% 11% 8% 10% 17% 13% 13% 9%Grayson County College 29% 16% 13% 12% 15% 10% 4% <1%Greenfield Community College 21% 18% 15% 14% 14% 12% 5% <1%Hagerstown Community College 31% 16% 11% 11% 15% 10% 4% 1%Hawaii Community College 27% 18% 13% 13% 12% 10% 5% 1%

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 427: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Small Colleges continued

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Small Colleges 25% 17% 13% 13% 16% 10% 5% 1%Hazard Community and Technical College 24% 17% 13% 11% 18% 11% 5% 1%Henderson Community College 16% 12% 12% 12% 19% 16% 12% 1%Hesston College 61% 15% 8% 5% 6% 4% 1% 0%Hibbing Community College 31% 19% 14% 11% 12% 9% 3% 0%Honolulu Community College 25% 18% 17% 16% 14% 7% 3% <1%Hopkinsville Community College 18% 14% 13% 18% 22% 10% 3% 3%Howard College 27% 18% 14% 14% 15% 8% 2% <1%Illinois Valley Community College 29% 16% 12% 12% 14% 10% 5% 1%Isothermal Community College 21% 12% 8% 12% 22% 16% 9% <1%Itasca Community College 46% 19% 8% 7% 10% 7% 3% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - Bloomington 19% 18% 16% 15% 18% 11% 4% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - Columbus 15% 15% 13% 17% 22% 13% 5% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - Elkhart 11% 14% 15% 21% 21% 12% 6% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - Evansville 14% 17% 18% 17% 19% 10% 4% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - Kokomo 14% 14% 13% 18% 22% 13% 6% 1%Ivy Tech Community College - Lawrenceburg 19% 14% 13% 17% 19% 13% 4% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - Logansport 14% 14% 13% 18% 22% 13% 6% 1%Ivy Tech Community College - Madison 19% 14% 13% 17% 19% 13% 4% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - Sellersburg 12% 15% 17% 20% 22% 10% 3% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - South Bend 11% 14% 15% 21% 21% 12% 6% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - Terre Haute 19% 16% 15% 17% 20% 10% 3% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - Warsaw 11% 14% 15% 21% 21% 12% 6% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - Whitewater 15% 11% 14% 17% 27% 11% 5% <1%Jackson State Community College 25% 20% 15% 13% 16% 9% 3% <1%James A. Rhodes State College 20% 18% 15% 17% 19% 9% 2% <1%Jefferson Community College 23% 20% 14% 13% 16% 10% 5% <1%Kankakee Community College 25% 16% 12% 12% 16% 11% 7% 1%Kauai Community College 30% 18% 12% 11% 12% 8% 8% 1%Kenai Peninsula College-UAA 14% 11% 11% 12% 17% 16% 16% 3%Kennebec Valley Community College 12% 14% 12% 15% 21% 18% 9% <1%Kirtland Community College 23% 15% 12% 14% 17% 14% 4% <1%Kodiak College, University of Alaska Anchorage 10% 8% 7% 12% 19% 19% 21% 4%Kuskokwim Campus, University of Alaska Fairbanks 11% 13% 11% 17% 17% 19% 12% 1%L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College 20% 22% 16% 14% 14% 10% 4% 0%Lake City Community College 29% 20% 15% 12% 14% 7% 3% <1%Lake Region State College 30% 18% 15% 11% 13% 10% 4% <1%Lake-Sumter Community College 33% 20% 11% 10% 14% 9% 3% <1%Lamar Institute of Technology 23% 19% 18% 16% 15% 7% 2% <1%Lamar State College - Orange 26% 17% 16% 14% 17% 9% 3% <1%

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 428: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Small Colleges continued

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Small Colleges 25% 17% 13% 13% 16% 10% 5% 1%Laramie County Community College 26% 17% 15% 13% 14% 9% 5% 1%Leech Lake Tribal College 2% 8% 12% 17% 32% 22% 4% 2%Louisburg College 75% 22% 3% <1% <1% 0% 0% 0%Louisiana Delta Community College 14% 22% 24% 14% 13% 9% 3% <1%Louisiana Technical College - Region 2 14% 14% 11% 25% 20% 11% 5% <1%Louisiana Technical College - Region 3 18% 18% 11% 22% 18% 9% 4% <1%Louisiana Technical College - Region 4 26% 23% 13% 18% 12% 5% 2% <1%Louisiana Technical College - Region 6 18% 14% 12% 24% 18% 9% 4% <1%Louisiana Technical College - Region 7 18% 14% 11% 23% 20% 9% 4% <1%Louisiana Technical College - Region 8 17% 14% 12% 25% 19% 8% 4% <1%Louisiana Technical College - Region 9 24% 16% 14% 21% 13% 8% 3% <1%Lower Columbia College 26% 11% 10% 13% 17% 9% 8% 6%Madisonville Community College 21% 15% 12% 15% 19% 12% 6% <1%Marshall Community and Technical College 17% 14% 11% 12% 25% 16% 7% 0%Marshalltown Community College 35% 20% 11% 12% 12% 7% 3% <1%Martin Community College 17% 14% 9% 16% 20% 15% 8% <1%Maui Community College 25% 18% 14% 13% 15% 10% 6% <1%Mayland Community College 20% 14% 10% 14% 21% 13% 7% <1%Maysville Community & Technical College 21% 10% 10% 14% 22% 14% 8% 1%Mercy College of Health Sciences 12% 25% 19% 23% 12% 6% 3% 0%Mesabi Range Community and Technical College 37% 16% 12% 13% 12% 6% 3% <1%Mid Michigan Community College 26% 24% 17% 11% 11% 7% 2% <1%Middle Georgia College 45% 21% 9% 9% 11% 4% 1% <1%Middlesex Community College 25% 17% 13% 13% 15% 11% 5% 1%Mid-South Community College 22% 14% 13% 13% 19% 13% 5% 1%Minot State University-Bottineau 28% 21% 12% 12% 12% 9% 6% 0%Montana State University Billings 27% 19% 14% 15% 14% 9% 3% <1%Motlow State Community College 36% 20% 12% 11% 13% 7% 2% <1%Mount Wachusett Community College 23% 19% 14% 12% 16% 12% 5% <1%Mountain Empire Community College 28% 14% 10% 12% 16% 11% 8% 1%New Hampshire Technical Institute 32% 19% 11% 11% 13% 10% 3% 0%New Mexico Junior College 34% 17% 12% 12% 14% 7% 4% <1%New Mexico Military Institute 76% 22% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%New Mexico State University - Grants 17% 10% 13% 16% 21% 15% 8% 1%New Mexico State University at Alamogordo 18% 12% 15% 16% 19% 13% 6% 2%New River Community and Technical College 20% 16% 13% 17% 19% 11% 4% <1%New River Community College 22% 21% 17% 11% 16% 8% 4% <1%NH Community Technical College - Berlin 24% 16% 9% 10% 18% 14% 8% 1%NH Community Technical College - Claremont 23% 17% 11% 12% 18% 14% 5% 0%

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 429: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Small Colleges continued

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Small Colleges 25% 17% 13% 13% 16% 10% 5% 1%NH Community Technical College - Laconia 24% 16% 9% 10% 18% 14% 8% 1%NH Community Technical College - Manchester 26% 18% 13% 11% 15% 12% 4% <1%NH Community Technical College - Nashua 23% 17% 11% 12% 18% 14% 5% 0%NH Community Technical College - Stratham 26% 18% 13% 11% 15% 12% 4% <1%North Arkansas College 30% 14% 9% 12% 17% 12% 5% 1%North Central Missouri College 37% 14% 7% 13% 15% 11% 3% <1%North Central State College 17% 17% 15% 17% 18% 11% 4% <1%North Dakota State College of Science 40% 27% 11% 7% 6% 6% 3% <1%North Florida Community College 35% 17% 10% 9% 12% 10% 6% 1%North Iowa Area Community College 39% 22% 10% 8% 8% 7% 4% 2%Northeast Lakeview College 21% 20% 17% 17% 14% 8% 2% <1%Northeast Mississippi Community College 51% 18% 10% 7% 8% 5% 1% <1%Northeast Texas Community College 31% 22% 12% 10% 14% 7% 4% 1%Northern Maine Community College 17% 21% 15% 12% 19% 12% 3% <1%Northern New Mexico Community College 14% 9% 10% 12% 20% 17% 15% 3%Northwest College 28% 26% 13% 9% 10% 8% 6% 1%Northwest Indian College 8% 11% 9% 13% 25% 16% 14% 3%Northwest Iowa Community College 42% 22% 12% 8% 9% 5% 2% <1%Northwestern Connecticut Community College 24% 16% 12% 10% 12% 11% 7% 8%Nunez Community College 14% 15% 17% 17% 20% 10% 6% 1%Oregon Coast Community College 17% 13% 13% 12% 17% 15% 11% 2%Ouachita Technical College 26% 16% 11% 14% 20% 10% 2% <1%Panola College 21% 28% 16% 12% 14% 7% 2% <1%Paris Junior College 35% 17% 12% 10% 14% 9% 3% <1%Patrick Henry Community College 22% 10% 10% 12% 19% 16% 9% 1%Paul D. Camp Community College 23% 15% 12% 12% 17% 13% 6% 1%Piedmont Virginia Community College 25% 17% 14% 13% 14% 10% 6% 1%Prince William Sound Community College 10% 5% 7% 9% 23% 20% 25% 2%Quinebaug Valley Community College 25% 18% 13% 11% 14% 13% 6% 1%Rainy River Community College 42% 16% 7% 6% 8% 6% 4% 10%Ranger College 57% 21% 5% 7% 6% 3% 2% <1%Rappahannock Community College 32% 15% 10% 10% 15% 12% 5% 1%Reading Area Community College 22% 16% 14% 14% 18% 12% 3% <1%Redlands Community College 25% 18% 12% 13% 16% 12% 4% 1%River Parishes Community College 34% 20% 14% 11% 11% 7% 3% 0%Riverland Community College 25% 14% 11% 12% 16% 13% 8% 2%Roxbury Community College 10% 13% 15% 19% 24% 14% 3% 2%Salem Community College 23% 17% 12% 14% 17% 12% 5% <1%Salish Kootenai College 12% 16% 16% 17% 19% 11% 8% 1%

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 430: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Small Colleges continued

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Small Colleges 25% 17% 13% 13% 16% 10% 5% 1%Santa Fe Community College (NM) 12% 10% 10% 14% 19% 16% 15% 4%Sheridan College 28% 18% 11% 12% 12% 10% 7% 2%South Florida Community College 37% 20% 11% 9% 12% 8% 4% <1%South Georgia College 44% 22% 10% 8% 10% 5% 1% 0%South Louisiana Community College 29% 21% 17% 12% 11% 8% 3% <1%South Mountain Community College 19% 12% 11% 12% 18% 15% 11% 2%South Piedmont Community College 16% 10% 11% 14% 24% 17% 7% <1%Southeastern Community College (IA) 28% 21% 12% 12% 14% 9% 4% <1%Southeastern Community College (NC) 26% 16% 13% 14% 16% 9% 4% 1%Southeastern Technical College 15% 15% 16% 17% 20% 13% 4% <1%Southern Maine Community College 23% 23% 15% 14% 13% 9% 4% <1%Southern University at Shreveport 15% 16% 16% 18% 19% 11% 5% <1%Southern West Virginia Community and Technical College 28% 21% 13% 12% 15% 7% 3% <1%Southwest Texas Junior College 28% 19% 14% 15% 15% 6% 2% <1%Southwest Virginia Community College 22% 12% 11% 11% 19% 12% 9% 2%Southwestern Community College 22% 16% 13% 15% 18% 11% 5% <1%Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute 18% 18% 18% 16% 14% 10% 5% 0%Southwestern Oregon Community College 33% 13% 10% 13% 13% 11% 6% 1%SOWELA Technical Community College 20% 23% 19% 14% 14% 7% 3% <1%Spoon River College 29% 19% 13% 12% 14% 9% 4% <1%Surry Community College 32% 15% 10% 11% 16% 11% 4% 1%Tanana Valley Campus, University of Alaska Fairbanks 20% 16% 15% 15% 15% 11% 8% 1%Technical College of the Lowcountry 15% 15% 16% 18% 20% 11% 4% 1%Temple College 30% 17% 14% 13% 14% 9% 3% <1%Texas State Technical College Harlingen 28% 19% 16% 14% 14% 5% 3% <1%Texas State Technical College Marshall 24% 23% 16% 17% 12% 7% 2% 0%Texas State Technical College Waco 32% 23% 16% 13% 10% 4% 2% <1%Texas State Technical College West Texas 27% 15% 14% 15% 14% 10% 4% <1%The Community and Technical College at WVU Tech 19% 21% 17% 14% 17% 8% 3% 0%The Community and Technical College of Shepherd 10% 8% 8% 10% 22% 24% 18% 1%The Victoria College 29% 17% 16% 14% 14% 7% 2% <1%Three Rivers Community College 24% 15% 13% 15% 17% 12% 4% <1%Tompkins Cortland Community College 30% 22% 12% 12% 12% 8% 3% <1%Tri-County Community College 23% 14% 11% 15% 16% 13% 8% 1%Tunxis Community College 24% 18% 15% 14% 15% 10% 4% 1%University of Alaska Matanuska Susitna College 17% 15% 12% 12% 18% 14% 10% 1%University of Alaska Southeast Ketchikan campus 12% 10% 12% 15% 21% 17% 12% 1%University of Arkansas Community College at Batesville 21% 14% 13% 16% 21% 11% 4% 0%University of Arkansas Community College at Hope 27% 14% 14% 14% 16% 11% 4% 0%

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 431: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Small Colleges continued

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Small Colleges 25% 17% 13% 13% 16% 10% 5% 1%University of Cincinnati Clermont College 26% 20% 15% 14% 14% 8% 3% <1%University of New Mexico - Gallup 20% 14% 11% 14% 19% 14% 8% 1%University of New Mexico - Taos Branch 14% 9% 8% 13% 17% 18% 19% 2%University of New Mexico - Valencia Campus 22% 17% 13% 13% 14% 13% 7% 1%Vermilion Community College 53% 23% 10% 4% 5% 3% 2% 1%Vernon College 16% 22% 16% 16% 19% 8% 3% <1%Virginia Highlands Community College 28% 17% 12% 12% 16% 9% 5% <1%Warren County Community College 29% 17% 12% 11% 15% 12% 4% <1%Washington State Community College 25% 16% 13% 15% 16% 10% 4% 1%Waycross College 31% 17% 10% 13% 21% 7% 1% <1%Wayne Community College 24% 17% 13% 14% 17% 10% 4% <1%Wenatchee Valley College 27% 15% 13% 12% 15% 11% 6% 2%West Virginia Northern Community College 18% 14% 13% 16% 21% 12% 5% 1%West Virginia State Community and Technical College 17% 17% 16% 15% 19% 10% 5% <1%West Virginia University at Parkersburg 21% 17% 15% 16% 17% 10% 4% <1%Western Nebraska Community College 27% 13% 12% 13% 13% 13% 9% 1%Western Piedmont Community College 18% 13% 12% 15% 22% 14% 6% <1%Western Texas College 29% 14% 15% 13% 16% 9% 3% <1%Western Wyoming Community College 22% 14% 11% 13% 15% 14% 8% 2%Williston State College 28% 18% 13% 12% 15% 10% 3% 0%Windward Community College 30% 21% 15% 11% 11% 7% 5% 1%Wisconsin Indianhead Technical College 22% 14% 12% 13% 18% 15% 6% 1%Wor-Wic Community College 25% 16% 15% 14% 16% 10% 4% <1%Wytheville Community College 25% 14% 9% 11% 18% 13% 9% 1%York Technical College 27% 18% 13% 12% 17% 9% 3% <1%Zane State College 20% 21% 15% 15% 17% 9% 3% <1%

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 432: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Medium Colleges

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Medium Colleges 24% 18% 14% 13% 16% 10% 4% 1%Angelina College 22% 25% 17% 14% 14% 7% 3% <1%Anoka-Ramsey Community College 36% 19% 12% 11% 12% 7% 2% <1%Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College 20% 15% 13% 16% 18% 11% 6% <1%Baltimore City Community College 16% 12% 13% 17% 20% 14% 6% 2%Baton Rouge Community College 31% 23% 18% 12% 11% 4% 1% <1%Big Sandy Community and Technical College 26% 17% 12% 12% 17% 10% 5% 1%Black Hawk College 28% 16% 12% 14% 15% 10% 4% <1%Bossier Parish Community College 25% 20% 15% 15% 15% 7% 3% <1%Bristol Community College 29% 19% 13% 12% 15% 9% 3% <1%Bunker Hill Community College 14% 16% 19% 18% 20% 10% 3% <1%Burlington County College 29% 21% 13% 11% 12% 10% 4% <1%Cape Fear Community College 26% 22% 16% 13% 11% 7% 3% <1%Central Arizona College 18% 10% 10% 12% 20% 16% 10% 3%Central Community College 24% 16% 11% 12% 16% 13% 8% 1%Central Florida Community College 28% 20% 14% 12% 14% 10% 4% <1%Central Virginia Community College 24% 14% 12% 11% 17% 13% 7% 1%Chattanooga State Technical Community College 19% 17% 15% 15% 17% 10% 5% 1%Cochise College 22% 14% 12% 15% 16% 13% 8% 2%College of Alameda 18% 17% 16% 15% 16% 9% 7% 1%College of Southern Idaho 21% 16% 11% 12% 13% 10% 9% 9%College of Southern Maryland 32% 19% 12% 10% 14% 11% 3% <1%College of the Redwoods 21% 16% 14% 15% 13% 11% 8% 1%Colorado Mountain College 20% 13% 11% 13% 15% 13% 11% 2%Columbia State Community College 26% 20% 15% 13% 15% 8% 3% <1%Corning Community College 35% 18% 11% 10% 13% 9% 3% <1%Delaware Technical & Community College - Stanton-Wilmington 22% 18% 15% 14% 16% 11% 4% <1%Dona Ana Community College 29% 18% 14% 13% 13% 8% 4% <1%Durham Technical Community College 10% 11% 14% 18% 26% 15% 6% <1%El Centro College 18% 14% 15% 17% 21% 11% 4% <1%Elizabethtown Community & Technical College 22% 17% 12% 13% 18% 13% 5% <1%Estrella Mountain Community College 25% 13% 12% 13% 18% 11% 6% 1%Everett Community College 28% 16% 12% 12% 17% 10% 5% <1%Frederick Community College 24% 13% 11% 13% 19% 14% 5% 1%Gainesville College 42% 27% 13% 7% 6% 3% 1% <1%Gateway Community College 20% 15% 14% 15% 18% 12% 5% 1%Genesee Community College 36% 18% 11% 9% 13% 9% 3% <1%George C Wallace State Community College 28% 20% 11% 13% 15% 8% 3% 1%Georgia Military College 26% 21% 14% 13% 15% 8% 2% <1%Germanna Community College 32% 18% 13% 11% 14% 9% 2% <1%

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 433: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Medium Colleges continued

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Medium Colleges 24% 18% 14% 13% 16% 10% 4% 1%Gloucester County College 31% 22% 13% 11% 12% 8% 3% <1%Gulf Coast Community College 22% 19% 15% 14% 16% 9% 3% <1%Harford Community College 35% 17% 11% 11% 13% 9% 3% 2%Hawkeye Community College 33% 23% 15% 13% 10% 4% 2% <1%Heartland Community College 22% 22% 17% 14% 14% 8% 3% <1%Holyoke Community College 28% 21% 13% 12% 14% 9% 3% <1%Housatonic Community College 22% 17% 14% 14% 17% 10% 4% 2%Howard Community College 27% 17% 13% 12% 13% 9% 5% 4%Hutchinson Community College 31% 17% 10% 11% 14% 10% 6% 1%Itawamba Community College 35% 18% 12% 13% 14% 6% 2% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - Anderson 17% 17% 14% 15% 19% 12% 6% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - East Chicago 10% 13% 15% 18% 23% 13% 6% 1%Ivy Tech Community College - Fort Wayne 14% 16% 14% 17% 21% 12% 5% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - Gary 10% 13% 15% 18% 23% 13% 6% 1%Ivy Tech Community College - Lafayette 19% 20% 17% 16% 16% 9% 3% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - Marion 17% 17% 14% 15% 19% 12% 6% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - Michigan City 10% 13% 15% 18% 23% 13% 6% 1%Ivy Tech Community College - Muncie 17% 17% 14% 15% 19% 12% 6% <1%Ivy Tech Community College - Valparaiso 10% 13% 15% 18% 23% 13% 6% 1%Jackson Community College 24% 18% 13% 14% 18% 10% 4% <1%John Tyler Community College 23% 17% 13% 13% 18% 12% 4% <1%Kansas City Kansas Community College 19% 13% 15% 15% 18% 11% 6% 2%Kapiolani Community College 23% 23% 20% 15% 12% 5% 2% <1%Kilgore College 20% 24% 16% 15% 15% 8% 3% <1%Kingwood College 29% 20% 16% 13% 13% 7% 2% <1%Lake Superior College 23% 21% 18% 15% 12% 8% 3% <1%Lee College 12% 21% 16% 17% 19% 10% 4% <1%Leeward Community College 32% 21% 16% 11% 11% 6% 3% <1%Lehigh Carbon Community College 26% 19% 13% 12% 14% 12% 5% <1%Lincoln Land Community College 27% 17% 14% 13% 14% 9% 5% 1%Linn-Benton Community College 27% 21% 14% 12% 13% 8% 4% <1%Lord Fairfax Community College 33% 17% 12% 10% 13% 11% 5% <1%Malcolm X College 13% 12% 14% 17% 22% 13% 7% 1%Manchester Community College 31% 19% 13% 11% 12% 9% 4% <1%Massachusetts Bay Community College 22% 19% 16% 13% 15% 11% 3% <1%Massasoit Community College 27% 20% 14% 10% 14% 10% 4% 1%McHenry County College 32% 19% 11% 9% 12% 11% 5% 1%Minneapolis Community and Technical College 13% 15% 20% 22% 18% 8% 3% <1%Mountain View College 27% 18% 16% 14% 15% 7% 3% 1%

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 434: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Medium Colleges continued

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Medium Colleges 24% 18% 14% 13% 16% 10% 4% 1%Nashville State Technical Community College 7% 15% 18% 20% 22% 12% 6% <1%Naugatuck Valley Community College 26% 18% 14% 12% 15% 10% 4% 1%Navarro College 37% 17% 12% 11% 13% 7% 2% <1%North Hennepin Community College 23% 17% 16% 15% 18% 8% 3% <1%North Shore Community College 24% 18% 14% 13% 15% 11% 5% 1%Northampton Community College 28% 18% 12% 12% 15% 11% 4% <1%Northeast Iowa Community College 36% 18% 12% 11% 11% 9% 3% <1%Northeast State Technical Community College 23% 19% 13% 12% 20% 10% 3% <1%Northern Essex Community College 18% 19% 15% 13% 16% 13% 5% <1%Northern Oklahoma College 31% 22% 15% 11% 11% 6% 2% <1%NorthWest Arkansas Community College 25% 20% 17% 15% 14% 6% 2% <1%Norwalk Community College 20% 16% 14% 13% 15% 11% 6% 5%Okaloosa-Walton College 22% 20% 17% 15% 13% 10% 3% <1%Olympic College 22% 14% 14% 15% 17% 13% 5% <1%Owensboro Community and Technical College 24% 16% 12% 12% 17% 12% 6% 1%Palo Alto College 25% 20% 17% 14% 15% 7% 2% <1%Pasco-Hernando Community College 27% 18% 13% 12% 16% 9% 3% <1%Pellissippi State Technical Community College 23% 22% 19% 14% 13% 7% 2% <1%Pitt Community College 26% 19% 15% 13% 14% 9% 4% <1%Polk Community College 27% 20% 13% 13% 14% 9% 4% <1%Prairie State College 21% 16% 13% 14% 17% 12% 7% 1%Pueblo Community College 16% 13% 13% 18% 21% 13% 6% <1%Quinsigamond Community College 27% 20% 14% 12% 15% 10% 2% <1%Raritan Valley Community College 24% 21% 15% 11% 12% 10% 5% <1%Red Rocks Community College 20% 15% 14% 13% 18% 13% 7% 1%Rend Lake College 27% 11% 8% 12% 15% 11% 11% 4%Roane State Community College 25% 18% 13% 14% 17% 9% 3% <1%Rochester Community and Technical College 31% 19% 15% 13% 13% 8% 2% <1%Rowan-Cabarrus Community College 23% 15% 12% 12% 18% 13% 7% <1%San Jacinto College - North Campus 12% 27% 21% 16% 14% 7% 3% 0%San Juan College 17% 15% 15% 15% 18% 13% 6% 1%Shelton State Community College 29% 25% 15% 11% 12% 6% 2% <1%Skagit Valley College 21% 14% 11% 12% 15% 10% 9% 8%Somerset Community College 23% 15% 13% 14% 18% 12% 6% 1%South Puget Sound Community College 25% 17% 13% 13% 17% 10% 4% <1%South Seattle Community College 9% 9% 11% 16% 25% 18% 10% 1%South Suburban College 18% 14% 12% 14% 20% 14% 8% 1%Southeast Kentucky Community & Technical College 23% 15% 10% 11% 15% 14% 11% 2%Southside Virginia Community College 21% 13% 12% 11% 18% 15% 10% 1%

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 435: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Medium Colleges continued

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Medium Colleges 24% 18% 14% 13% 16% 10% 4% 1%Spokane Community College 18% 15% 16% 18% 18% 10% 5% <1%Springfield Technical Community College 20% 18% 15% 14% 18% 11% 4% 1%St. Charles Community College 35% 21% 13% 9% 11% 8% 2% <1%St. Johns River Community College 30% 20% 13% 11% 14% 9% 3% <1%St. Louis Community College at Forest Park 14% 16% 17% 18% 19% 10% 5% <1%St. Louis Community College- Florissant Valley 20% 20% 15% 14% 16% 10% 4% <1%Stark State College of Technology 13% 18% 16% 17% 19% 12% 5% <1%Tacoma Community College 22% 16% 14% 15% 17% 11% 4% <1%Tomball College 29% 20% 16% 13% 13% 7% 2% <1%Tri-County Technical College 30% 20% 13% 12% 14% 7% 3% <1%Trinity Valley Community College 25% 17% 11% 13% 19% 10% 3% <1%Volunteer State Community College 26% 19% 15% 13% 16% 8% 3% <1%Walters State Community College 30% 17% 11% 12% 19% 8% 3% 1%Weatherford College 40% 19% 10% 9% 12% 7% 2% <1%West Hills Community College District 27% 18% 15% 14% 15% 7% 3% 2%West Kentucky Community and Technical College 21% 13% 10% 12% 18% 14% 10% 2%Western Iowa Tech Community College 28% 16% 13% 14% 16% 9% 3% <1%Westmoreland County Community College 21% 20% 14% 12% 15% 12% 6% <1%Wharton County Junior College 35% 25% 15% 10% 8% 5% 2% <1%

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 436: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Large Colleges

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Large Colleges 24% 19% 16% 14% 14% 9% 4% 1%Anne Arundel Community College 29% 18% 13% 11% 13% 9% 5% 2%Blinn College 41% 29% 15% 7% 5% 2% 1% <1%Bluegrass Community and Technical College 22% 25% 18% 14% 12% 6% 2% <1%Brevard Community College 27% 20% 14% 11% 13% 10% 4% <1%Brookdale Community College 32% 22% 13% 9% 10% 8% 4% 2%Brookhaven College 18% 17% 18% 18% 15% 7% 3% 4%Bucks County Community College 29% 21% 14% 10% 11% 10% 4% <1%Butler County Community College (KS) 29% 18% 14% 13% 14% 9% 4% <1%Century College 29% 21% 16% 13% 12% 7% 2% <1%Chandler-Gilbert Community College 31% 18% 14% 11% 14% 8% 4% 1%Citrus College 32% 22% 16% 11% 10% 6% 3% 1%College of Lake County 21% 16% 13% 13% 17% 13% 6% 1%Community College of Denver 22% 16% 16% 18% 16% 9% 3% <1%CyFair College 29% 20% 16% 13% 13% 7% 2% <1%Daytona Beach Community College 23% 19% 14% 13% 15% 10% 5% <1%Del Mar College 20% 20% 17% 17% 16% 8% 3% <1%Delgado Community College 14% 18% 19% 18% 19% 9% 3% <1%Delta College 29% 21% 15% 12% 13% 8% 3% <1%Douglas College 22% 27% 22% 13% 10% 3% 2% <1%Eastfield College 23% 18% 16% 14% 16% 9% 3% <1%Edison College 27% 20% 14% 12% 14% 9% 3% <1%Essex County College 21% 18% 15% 15% 17% 10% 4% <1%Grand Rapids Community College 25% 25% 18% 12% 11% 6% 2% <1%Greenville Technical College 21% 14% 13% 16% 20% 11% 5% <1%Guilford Technical Community College 21% 18% 16% 15% 17% 9% 3% <1%Harold Washington College 16% 17% 18% 16% 16% 10% 6% 1%Hudson Valley Community College 34% 21% 14% 11% 10% 7% 3% <1%Illinois Central College 26% 18% 12% 14% 15% 10% 5% 1%Indian River Community College 23% 16% 12% 11% 15% 13% 9% 2%Ivy Tech Community College - Central Indiana 15% 15% 16% 19% 21% 10% 3% <1%J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College 20% 16% 15% 15% 17% 11% 5% <1%Jefferson Community and Technical College 21% 17% 16% 15% 18% 10% 4% 1%Joliet Jr College 28% 17% 11% 11% 16% 11% 5% 1%Kingsborough Community College 26% 23% 18% 11% 10% 5% 3% 4%LaGuardia Community College 20% 20% 20% 18% 14% 6% 2% <1%Lane Community College 20% 19% 16% 15% 14% 9% 6% <1%Laney College 12% 13% 15% 17% 20% 12% 8% 2%Lorain County Community College 20% 18% 15% 15% 18% 10% 3% <1%Manatee Community College 25% 20% 15% 13% 13% 9% 4% <1%

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 437: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Large Colleges continued

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Large Colleges 24% 19% 16% 14% 14% 9% 4% 1%Merced College 27% 22% 14% 11% 12% 9% 5% <1%Mercer County Community College 23% 19% 16% 13% 14% 10% 4% 1%Metropolitan Community College 18% 17% 17% 16% 16% 11% 5% <1%Middlesex Community College 28% 21% 14% 11% 13% 9% 3% <1%Middlesex County College 28% 24% 17% 12% 11% 7% 2% <1%Midlands Technical College 24% 18% 16% 15% 15% 8% 3% <1%MiraCosta College 24% 18% 16% 13% 12% 9% 6% 1%Montgomery College 29% 20% 16% 13% 13% 7% 2% <1%Montgomery County Community College 26% 20% 15% 12% 13% 9% 4% 1%Mt. Hood Community College 30% 15% 14% 14% 14% 8% 4% <1%North Harris College 29% 20% 16% 13% 13% 7% 2% <1%North Lake College 20% 18% 18% 17% 16% 7% 3% 1%Northwest Vista College 28% 25% 18% 13% 11% 5% 1% <1%Oakton Community College 21% 17% 15% 13% 12% 12% 8% 2%Ocean County College 33% 24% 13% 9% 10% 7% 2% <1%Oklahoma City Community College 18% 21% 20% 17% 14% 7% 2% <1%Onondaga Community College 28% 21% 15% 11% 12% 8% 3% <1%Paradise Valley Community College 24% 16% 14% 12% 14% 12% 8% 1%Parkland College 27% 22% 14% 13% 13% 7% 4% 1%Pensacola Junior College 27% 19% 14% 14% 14% 8% 3% <1%Phoenix College 17% 14% 14% 16% 18% 12% 8% 2%Prince George's Community College 20% 16% 14% 14% 18% 12% 5% 2%Queensborough Community College 29% 23% 17% 12% 11% 6% 2% 1%Richard J. Daley College 14% 15% 15% 19% 23% 10% 4% <1%Richland College 21% 18% 17% 15% 15% 7% 3% 4%San Jacinto College - Central Campus 11% 27% 22% 17% 14% 6% 2% <1%San Jacinto College - South Campus 11% 27% 22% 17% 14% 6% 2% <1%Schoolcraft College 28% 19% 15% 12% 13% 9% 4% <1%Scottsdale Community College 22% 19% 16% 13% 12% 9% 7% 2%Seminole Community College 21% 21% 17% 14% 15% 9% 4% <1%Southwest Tennessee Community College 18% 18% 16% 16% 19% 9% 4% <1%St. Louis Community College - Meramec 26% 25% 15% 11% 10% 8% 5% <1%St. Philip's College 16% 16% 16% 18% 20% 10% 4% <1%Taft College 10% 9% 12% 16% 24% 18% 10% 1%Tallahassee Community College 29% 28% 17% 11% 9% 4% 2% <1%Thomas Nelson Community College 20% 18% 16% 15% 16% 11% 4% <1%Truckee Meadows Community College 19% 20% 18% 14% 14% 9% 5% 2%Truman College 8% 11% 15% 21% 25% 12% 7% 3%University of Wisconsin Colleges 47% 21% 11% 8% 7% 4% 1% <1%

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 438: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Large Colleges

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Large Colleges 24% 19% 16% 14% 14% 9% 4% 1%Victor Valley College 25% 17% 14% 12% 15% 11% 5% 1%Vincennes University 35% 21% 12% 11% 12% 7% 2% <1%Virginia Western Community College 22% 14% 12% 12% 19% 12% 8% <1%Westchester Community College 24% 21% 15% 12% 12% 9% 6% 2%Wilbur Wright College 17% 17% 16% 16% 17% 10% 6% 1%

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 439: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Extra Large Colleges

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Extra Large Colleges 20% 19% 16% 15% 15% 9% 4% 1%American River College 16% 14% 15% 15% 19% 13% 7% 1%Austin Community College 21% 20% 18% 17% 15% 7% 3% <1%Borough of Manhattan Community College 19% 20% 21% 18% 14% 6% 2% <1%Broward Community College 22% 21% 18% 14% 15% 8% 2% <1%City College of San Francisco 10% 11% 12% 15% 20% 13% 11% 8%College of DuPage 24% 17% 12% 12% 14% 11% 7% 3%Community College of Allegheny County 19% 19% 15% 14% 16% 11% 5% 1%Community College of Philadelphia 9% 19% 18% 18% 19% 11% 5% 1%Community College of Rhode Island 24% 18% 14% 13% 16% 11% 4% <1%Community College of Southern Nevada 9% 17% 18% 18% 20% 11% 5% 1%Cuyahoga Community College 17% 15% 15% 15% 19% 12% 5% <1%De Anza College 25% 19% 16% 13% 13% 8% 4% 2%El Paso Community College 22% 21% 17% 14% 15% 8% 3% <1%Florida Community College at Jacksonville 19% 19% 16% 16% 17% 9% 4% <1%Georgia Perimeter College 23% 23% 18% 15% 14% 5% 1% <1%Glendale Community College 23% 18% 14% 12% 15% 11% 6% 2%Harper College 27% 19% 14% 12% 14% 10% 4% <1%Hillsborough Community College 24% 21% 18% 15% 14% 7% 2% <1%Houston Community College System 8% 19% 22% 20% 18% 9% 3% <1%Johnson County Community College 25% 18% 16% 14% 12% 8% 5% 1%Kirkwood Community College 33% 23% 14% 12% 10% 6% 2% <1%Macomb Community College 28% 21% 15% 11% 13% 8% 3% <1%Metropolitan Community College - Kansas City 24% 21% 14% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%Miami Dade College 20% 21% 17% 14% 16% 9% 3% <1%Modesto Junior College 29% 19% 15% 11% 12% 9% 4% 1%Montgomery College 24% 20% 16% 13% 13% 7% 4% 2%Moraine Valley Community College 29% 20% 14% 11% 12% 10% 4% <1%Mt. San Antonio College 25% 20% 16% 12% 11% 7% 5% 2%Northern Virginia Community College 20% 18% 16% 15% 16% 10% 5% <1%Oakland Community College 21% 20% 16% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%Palm Beach Community College 24% 24% 18% 12% 12% 7% 3% <1%Palomar College 25% 19% 16% 12% 11% 9% 6% 2%Pasadena City College 26% 20% 17% 12% 13% 7% 4% 1%Salt Lake Community College 18% 18% 24% 19% 12% 6% 2% <1%San Antonio College 19% 20% 18% 17% 15% 7% 3% <1%San Diego Mesa College 22% 21% 20% 16% 11% 6% 3% <1%Santa Ana College 13% 11% 12% 14% 22% 17% 9% 2%Santa Fe Community College (FL) 29% 26% 18% 12% 9% 5% 2% <1%Sinclair Community College 18% 17% 16% 15% 18% 11% 5% <1%

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 440: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Extra Large Colleges

18 to 19 20 to 21 22 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65+

All 2007 CCSSE Cohort Colleges 23% 18% 15% 14% 15% 9% 4% 1%All Extra Large Colleges 20% 19% 16% 15% 15% 9% 4% 1%South Texas College 25% 20% 18% 15% 15% 5% 1% <1%Southwestern Illinois College 22% 17% 14% 14% 15% 11% 5% 1%St. Petersburg College 17% 17% 16% 16% 18% 11% 4% 1%The Community College of Baltimore County 24% 16% 14% 14% 16% 9% 4% 3%Tidewater Community College 19% 16% 16% 16% 18% 11% 4% <1%Triton College 14% 16% 15% 18% 19% 11% 6% 1%Valencia Community College 27% 25% 18% 13% 10% 5% 2% <1%

Age

Note: All population percentages acquired from the 2005 IPEDS dataset, if available.

Page 441: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Survey Completion Rates Table 6, beginning on the next page, provides data on 1) overall survey completion rates, 2) within class completion rates, and 3) the percent of sampled classes for 2007 CCSSE Cohort colleges (colleges that participated in CCSSE from 2005 through 2007) as well as breakouts for colleges in each size category - small, medium, large, and extra-large. Overall survey completion rates consist of surveys completed divided by the number of total surveys mailed. Within class completion rates are surveys completed divided by the number of students enrolled in the class, and the percent of sampled classes includes participating classes divided by the total number of classes in the sample.

Page 442: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Within PercentOverall Class of Sampled

Completion Completion ClassesRate Rate Surveyed

All 2007 CCSSE Colleges 51% 59% 87%All Small CCSSE Colleges 50% 57% 87%Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College 63% 66% 98%Aiken Technical College 55% 61% 94%Alabama Southern Community College 46% 49% 91%Alexandria Technical College 64% 71% 91%Allegany College of Maryland 65% 71% 98%Alpena Community College 39% 58% 68%Alvin Community College 48% 51% 97%Ashland Community and Technical College 51% 53% 100%Asnuntuck Community College 49% 53% 96%Atlanta Metropolitan College 49% 53% 93%Atlanta Technical College 53% 57% 92%Bainbridge College 36% 53% 67%Barton County Community College 57% 65% 95%Belmont Technical College 53% 57% 89%Berkshire Community College 46% 64% 80%Big Bend Community College 49% 56% 89%Bismarck State College 55% 65% 81%Blue Ridge Community College 61% 62% 100%Bowling Green Technical College 46% 57% 82%Brazosport College 49% 55% 96%Butler County Community College (PA) 62% 65% 96%Caldwell Community College and Technical Institute 54% 57% 95%Cape Cod Community College 65% 66% 98%Capital Community College 56% 57% 100%Caritas Laboure College 48% 57% 82%Carolinas College of Health Sciences 48% 57% 84%Carroll Community College 60% 64% 96%Carteret Community College 57% 62% 92%Cascadia Community College 53% 55% 95%Casper College 53% 63% 89%Cecil Community College 51% 53% 97%Cedar Valley College 52% 58% 92%Central Lakes College 60% 74% 87%Central Maine Community College 59% 66% 95%Central Wyoming College 38% 50% 83%Centralia College 46% 55% 80%Chattahoochee Technical College 58% 62% 100%Chesapeake College 46% 54% 87%Chipola College 52% 66% 88%Clarendon College 42% 44% 92%Cleveland Community College 45% 49% 91%

Table 62007 CCSSE Colleges: Completion Rates

Page 443: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Within PercentOverall Class of Sampled

Completion Completion ClassesRate Rate Surveyed

All 2007 CCSSE Colleges 51% 59% 87%All Small CCSSE Colleges 50% 57% 87%Cleveland State Community College 53% 57% 98%Clovis Community College 56% 61% 92%Coastal Bend College 50% 55% 97%Coastal Carolina Community College 69% 70% 100%Coastal Georgia Community College 46% 53% 87%College of the Mainland 46% 52% 92%College of the Marshall Islands 64% 65% 100%College of the Siskiyous 43% 51% 80%Cumberland County College 53% 61% 87%Dabney S. Lancaster Community College 36% 66% 47%Danville Area Community College 51% 64% 79%Danville Community College 46% 61% 83%Darton College 51% 56% 91%Delaware Technical & Community College - Owens Campus 59% 65% 95%Delaware Technical & Community College - Terry Campus 50% 53% 90%Dyersburg State Community College 52% 56% 92%East Georgia College 51% 52% 100%Eastern New Mexico University - Roswell 50% 59% 90%Eastern Shore Community College 51% 54% 89%Eastern West Virginia Community & Technical College 26% 26% 100%Eastern Wyoming College 41% 52% 75%Edison State Community College 53% 57% 96%Ellsworth Community College 43% 53% 78%Fairmont State Community and Technical College 61% 63% 95%Florida Keys Community College 45% 54% 85%Fond du Lac Tribal and Community College 39% 53% 67%Frank Phillips College 36% 58% 62%Galveston College 39% 42% 94%Garrett College 45% 57% 86%Gateway Community and Technical College 51% 57% 95%Georgia Highlands College 58% 61% 95%Gordon College 57% 59% 97%Grays Harbor College 61% 64% 98%Grayson County College 58% 57% 100%Greenfield Community College 49% 54% 91%Hagerstown Community College 60% 61% 93%Hawaii Community College 54% 65% 86%Hazard Community and Technical College 28% 56% 54%Henderson Community College 50% 52% 97%Hesston College 50% 58% 83%Hibbing Community College 41% 70% 56%

Page 444: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Within PercentOverall Class of Sampled

Completion Completion ClassesRate Rate Surveyed

All 2007 CCSSE Colleges 51% 59% 87%All Small CCSSE Colleges 50% 57% 87%Honolulu Community College 46% 65% 78%Hopkinsville Community College 53% 56% 96%Howard College 45% 59% 92%Illinois Valley Community College 68% 71% 100%Isothermal Community College 49% 54% 97%Itasca Community College 41% 54% 75%Ivy Tech Community College - Bloomington 42% 54% 85%Ivy Tech Community College - Columbus 49% 59% 80%Ivy Tech Community College - Elkhart 32% 41% 78%Ivy Tech Community College - Evansville 53% 59% 91%Ivy Tech Community College - Kokomo 55% 60% 96%Ivy Tech Community College - Lawrenceburg 58% 60% 97%Ivy Tech Community College - Logansport 47% 51% 97%Ivy Tech Community College - Madison 34% 42% 81%Ivy Tech Community College - Sellersburg 59% 59% 98%Ivy Tech Community College - South Bend 43% 51% 87%Ivy Tech Community College - Terre Haute 42% 49% 89%Ivy Tech Community College - Warsaw 27% 45% 63%Ivy Tech Community College - Whitewater 44% 57% 82%Jackson State Community College 62% 64% 98%James A. Rhodes State College 53% 70% 79%Jefferson Community College 50% 54% 96%Kankakee Community College 54% 60% 91%Kauai Community College 43% 58% 76%Kenai Peninsula College-UAA 33% 48% 66%Kennebec Valley Community College 55% 62% 88%Kirtland Community College 48% 50% 93%Kodiak College, University of Alaska Anchorage 44% 53% 92%Kuskokwim Campus, University of Alaska Fairbanks 28% 60% 43%L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College 45% 47% 95%Lake City Community College 59% 59% 94%Lake Region State College 33% 52% 53%Lake-Sumter Community College 62% 65% 96%Lamar Institute of Technology 55% 59% 94%Lamar State College - Orange 48% 51% 94%Laramie County Community College 53% 55% 100%Leech Lake Tribal College 22% 47% 52%Louisburg College 58% 61% 100%Louisiana Delta Community College 40% 50% 85%Louisiana Technical College - Region 2 38% 58% 67%Louisiana Technical College - Region 3 39% 55% 76%

Page 445: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Within PercentOverall Class of Sampled

Completion Completion ClassesRate Rate Surveyed

All 2007 CCSSE Colleges 51% 59% 87%All Small CCSSE Colleges 50% 57% 87%Louisiana Technical College - Region 4 53% 69% 95%Louisiana Technical College - Region 6 50% 55% 92%Louisiana Technical College - Region 7 56% 65% 88%Louisiana Technical College - Region 8 47% 54% 94%Louisiana Technical College - Region 9 24% 65% 38%Lower Columbia College 50% 64% 81%Madisonville Community College 49% 57% 86%Marshall Community and Technical College 58% 58% 98%Marshalltown Community College 39% 48% 81%Martin Community College 48% 51% 98%Maui Community College 56% 59% 100%Mayland Community College 51% 63% 82%Maysville Community & Technical College 48% 48% 97%Mercy College of Health Sciences 53% 68% 76%Mesabi Range Community and Technical College 42% 52% 89%Mid Michigan Community College 51% 56% 98%Mid-South Community College 54% 56% 97%Middle Georgia College 55% 58% 98%Middlesex Community College 54% 62% 90%Minot State University-Bottineau 45% 69% 79%Montana State University Billings 40% 62% 66%Motlow State Community College 62% 64% 93%Mount Wachusett Community College 65% 73% 93%Mountain Empire Community College 48% 53% 95%NH Community Technical College - Berlin 46% 55% 74%NH Community Technical College - Claremont 55% 58% 92%NH Community Technical College - Laconia 55% 58% 96%NH Community Technical College - Manchester 50% 61% 82%NH Community Technical College - Nashua 51% 55% 95%NH Community Technical College - Stratham 59% 75% 84%New Hampshire Technical Institute 66% 70% 93%New Mexico Junior College 48% 49% 92%New Mexico Military Institute 56% 57% 100%New Mexico State University - Grants 36% 47% 74%New Mexico State University at Alamogordo 47% 53% 85%New River Community College 63% 64% 98%New River Community and Technical College 41% 62% 70%North Arkansas College 44% 60% 71%North Central Missouri College 46% 59% 72%North Central State College 58% 61% 93%North Dakota State College of Science 66% 85% 87%

Page 446: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Within PercentOverall Class of Sampled

Completion Completion ClassesRate Rate Surveyed

All 2007 CCSSE Colleges 51% 59% 87%All Small CCSSE Colleges 50% 57% 87%North Florida Community College 48% 54% 89%North Iowa Area Community College 63% 66% 93%Northeast Lakeview College 55% 55% 100%Northeast Mississippi Community College 76% 75% 100%Northeast Texas Community College 44% 51% 82%Northern Maine Community College 48% 54% 91%Northern New Mexico Community College 45% 51% 92%Northwest College 50% 58% 93%Northwest Indian College 25% 46% 63%Northwest Iowa Community College 43% 71% 69%Northwestern Connecticut Community College 47% 57% 81%Nunez Community College 49% 53% 92%Oregon Coast Community College 34% 46% 83%Ouachita Technical College 43% 49% 84%Panola College 45% 56% 89%Paris Junior College 53% 62% 75%Patrick Henry Community College 55% 60% 85%Paul D. Camp Community College 30% 46% 57%Piedmont Virginia Community College 55% 57% 98%Prince William Sound Community College 16% 45% 40%Quinebaug Valley Community College 50% 50% 100%Rainy River Community College 24% 36% 65%Ranger College 44% 51% 87%Rappahannock Community College 42% 58% 78%Reading Area Community College 48% 57% 85%Redlands Community College 43% 48% 93%River Parishes Community College 49% 49% 97%Riverland Community College 34% 57% 65%Roxbury Community College 47% 64% 83%SOWELA Technical Community College 31% 42% 78%Salem Community College 50% 51% 97%Salish Kootenai College 44% 67% 89%Santa Fe Community College (NM) 44% 54% 88%Sheridan College 49% 57% 83%South Florida Community College 56% 64% 92%South Georgia College 56% 60% 95%South Louisiana Community College 45% 49% 98%South Mountain Community College 49% 59% 77%South Piedmont Community College 42% 53% 82%Southeastern Community College (IA) 58% 69% 82%Southeastern Community College (NC) 50% 56% 85%

Page 447: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Within PercentOverall Class of Sampled

Completion Completion ClassesRate Rate Surveyed

All 2007 CCSSE Colleges 51% 59% 87%All Small CCSSE Colleges 50% 57% 87%Southeastern Technical College 58% 68% 86%Southern Maine Community College 68% 70% 100%Southern University at Shreveport 24% 44% 57%Southern West Virginia Community and Technical College 49% 54% 95%Southwest Texas Junior College 56% 58% 96%Southwest Virginia Community College 52% 61% 94%Southwestern Community College 46% 53% 86%Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute 35% 39% 97%Southwestern Oregon Community College 54% 57% 95%Spoon River College 56% 61% 90%Surry Community College 58% 63% 91%Tanana Valley Campus, University of Alaska Fairbanks 33% 55% 61%Technical College of the Lowcountry 44% 54% 85%Temple College 45% 54% 85%Texas State Technical College Harlingen 51% 52% 100%Texas State Technical College Marshall 47% 57% 86%Texas State Technical College Waco 52% 57% 96%Texas State Technical College West Texas 46% 54% 82%The Community and Technical College at WVU Tech 52% 66% 84%The Community and Technical College of Shepherd 41% 42% 95%The Victoria College 49% 52% 96%Three Rivers Community College 57% 68% 82%Tompkins Cortland Community College 57% 60% 96%Tri-County Community College 54% 63% 85%Tunxis Community College 58% 60% 98%University of Alaska Matanuska Susitna College 48% 55% 84%University of Alaska Southeast Ketchikan Campus 34% 50% 64%University of Arkansas Community College at Batesville 54% 57% 98%University of Arkansas Community College at Hope 47% 53% 88%University of Cincinnati Clermont College 45% 54% 78%University of New Mexico - Gallup 53% 62% 89%University of New Mexico - Taos Branch 45% 48% 93%University of New Mexico - Valencia Campus 48% 52% 92%Vermilion Community College 43% 63% 96%Vernon College 51% 63% 92%Virginia Highlands Community College 51% 54% 95%Warren County Community College 49% 53% 93%Washington State Community College 54% 57% 95%Waycross College 55% 55% 96%Wayne Community College 51% 55% 89%Wenatchee Valley College 45% 54% 84%

Page 448: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Within PercentOverall Class of Sampled

Completion Completion ClassesRate Rate Surveyed

All 2007 CCSSE Colleges 51% 59% 87%All Small CCSSE Colleges 50% 57% 87%West Virginia Northern Community College 49% 53% 94%West Virginia State Community and Technical College 51% 60% 94%West Virginia University at Parkersburg 59% 63% 96%Western Nebraska Community College 57% 64% 91%Western Piedmont Community College 57% 59% 95%Western Texas College 31% 46% 68%Western Wyoming Community College 51% 56% 97%Williston State College 40% 58% 67%Windward Community College 43% 59% 75%Wisconsin Indianhead Technical College 45% 61% 81%Wor-Wic Community College 57% 58% 100%Wytheville Community College 47% 56% 88%York Technical College 60% 61% 100%Zane State College 52% 53% 98%

Page 449: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Within PercentOverall Class of Sampled

Completion Completion ClassesRate Rate Surveyed

All 2007 CCSSE Colleges 51% 59% 87%All Medium CCSSE Colleges 51% 60% 87%Angelina College 55% 60% 96%Anoka-Ramsey Community College 55% 58% 93%Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College 56% 59% 95%Baltimore City Community College 38% 61% 63%Baton Rouge Community College 48% 52% 98%Big Sandy Community and Technical College 34% 50% 67%Black Hawk College 63% 67% 96%Bossier Parish Community College 56% 56% 100%Bristol Community College 68% 72% 95%Bunker Hill Community College 17% 60% 28%Burlington County College 61% 65% 94%Cape Fear Community College 60% 62% 97%Central Arizona College 42% 60% 77%Central Community College 34% 55% 65%Central Florida Community College 48% 52% 91%Central Virginia Community College 51% 64% 75%Chattanooga State Technical Community College 48% 55% 95%Cochise College 46% 62% 75%College of Alameda 39% 43% 91%College of Southern Idaho 59% 65% 98%College of Southern Maryland 60% 65% 92%College of the Redwoods 43% 61% 78%Colorado Mountain College 40% 54% 76%Columbia State Community College 63% 65% 100%Corning Community College 52% 60% 86%Delaware Technical & Community College - Stanton-Wilmington 62% 62% 98%Dona Ana Community College 59% 60% 100%Durham Technical Community College 54% 57% 97%El Centro College 50% 58% 85%Elizabethtown Community & Technical College 57% 61% 97%Estrella Mountain Community College 54% 65% 88%Everett Community College 43% 53% 85%Frederick Community College 62% 66% 92%Gainesville College 57% 58% 98%Gateway Community College 53% 56% 97%Genesee Community College 65% 66% 100%George C Wallace State Community College 60% 63% 89%Germanna Community College 53% 54% 100%Gloucester County College 50% 60% 81%Gulf Coast Community College 55% 61% 95%

Page 450: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Within PercentOverall Class of Sampled

Completion Completion ClassesRate Rate Surveyed

All 2007 CCSSE Colleges 51% 59% 87%All Medium CCSSE Colleges 51% 60% 87%Harford Community College 59% 62% 95%Hawkeye Community College 53% 59% 89%Heartland Community College 40% 55% 75%Holyoke Community College 50% 61% 81%Housatonic Community College 56% 56% 98%Howard Community College 53% 59% 89%Hutchinson Community College 60% 59% 96%Itawamba Community College 69% 72% 100%Ivy Tech Community College - Anderson 37% 47% 81%Ivy Tech Community College - East Chicago 32% 53% 68%Ivy Tech Community College - Fort Wayne 54% 62% 91%Ivy Tech Community College - Gary 32% 51% 70%Ivy Tech Community College - Lafayette 35% 59% 63%Ivy Tech Community College - Marion 30% 47% 66%Ivy Tech Community College - Michigan City 28% 38% 77%Ivy Tech Community College - Muncie 37% 54% 68%Ivy Tech Community College - Valparaiso 37% 50% 83%Jackson Community College 57% 69% 88%John Tyler Community College 52% 61% 95%Kansas City Kansas Community College 57% 60% 94%Kapiolani Community College 48% 58% 85%Kilgore College 56% 68% 89%Kingwood College 56% 59% 98%Lake Superior College 55% 61% 88%Lee College 58% 62% 95%Leeward Community College 47% 58% 80%Lehigh Carbon Community College 53% 64% 83%Lincoln Land Community College 56% 60% 86%Linn-Benton Community College 46% 57% 82%Lord Fairfax Community College 58% 58% 96%Malcolm X College 58% 60% 98%Manchester Community College 49% 56% 87%Massachusetts Bay Community College 47% 53% 85%Massasoit Community College 53% 59% 91%McHenry County College 66% 71% 97%Minneapolis Community and Technical College 54% 61% 84%Mountain View College 37% 57% 66%Nashville State Technical Community College 59% 63% 99%Naugatuck Valley Community College 56% 62% 92%Navarro College 58% 66% 99%North Hennepin Community College 57% 60% 98%

Page 451: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Within PercentOverall Class of Sampled

Completion Completion ClassesRate Rate Surveyed

All 2007 CCSSE Colleges 51% 59% 87%All Medium CCSSE Colleges 51% 60% 87%North Shore Community College 48% 57% 85%NorthWest Arkansas Community College 53% 67% 94%Northampton Community College 60% 67% 90%Northeast Iowa Community College 53% 58% 93%Northeast State Technical Community College 61% 63% 98%Northern Essex Community College 44% 60% 73%Northern Oklahoma College 30% 63% 53%Norwalk Community College 54% 62% 87%Okaloosa-Walton College 56% 62% 92%Olympic College 56% 64% 90%Owensboro Community and Technical College 54% 60% 90%Palo Alto College 48% 57% 82%Pasco-Hernando Community College 26% 51% 54%Pellissippi State Technical Community College 60% 63% 95%Pitt Community College 60% 64% 95%Polk Community College 53% 51% 100%Prairie State College 52% 59% 92%Pueblo Community College 45% 50% 85%Quinsigamond Community College 48% 59% 81%Raritan Valley Community College 53% 57% 91%Red Rocks Community College 45% 68% 68%Rend Lake College 58% 65% 91%Roane State Community College 58% 58% 100%Rochester Community and Technical College 48% 65% 76%Rowan-Cabarrus Community College 57% 60% 99%San Jacinto College - North Campus 43% 50% 87%San Juan College 45% 52% 86%Shelton State Community College 58% 62% 94%Skagit Valley College 42% 59% 70%Somerset Community College 59% 63% 97%South Puget Sound Community College 59% 63% 94%South Seattle Community College 39% 59% 59%South Suburban College 41% 58% 74%Southeast Kentucky Community & Technical College 58% 60% 93%Southside Virginia Community College 49% 56% 83%Spokane Community College 60% 75% 83%Springfield Technical Community College 58% 63% 96%St. Charles Community College 62% 63% 98%St. Johns River Community College 57% 64% 88%St. Louis Community College at Forest Park 44% 62% 71%St. Louis Community College- Florissant Valley 54% 66% 84%

Page 452: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Within PercentOverall Class of Sampled

Completion Completion ClassesRate Rate Surveyed

All 2007 CCSSE Colleges 51% 59% 87%All Medium CCSSE Colleges 51% 60% 87%Stark State College of Technology 62% 66% 96%Tacoma Community College 52% 57% 96%Tomball College 55% 55% 98%Tri-County Technical College 51% 59% 91%Trinity Valley Community College 52% 54% 100%Volunteer State Community College 60% 63% 98%Walters State Community College 62% 64% 97%Weatherford College 48% 48% 97%West Hills Community College District 43% 58% 87%West Kentucky Community and Technical College 49% 52% 93%Western Iowa Tech Community College 47% 50% 97%Westmoreland County Community College 59% 69% 100%Wharton County Junior College 58% 67% 86%

Page 453: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Within PercentOverall Class of Sampled

Completion Completion ClassesRate Rate Surveyed

All 2007 CCSSE Colleges 51% 59% 87%All Large CCSSE Colleges 53% 61% 88%Anne Arundel Community College 54% 58% 96%Blinn College 55% 56% 98%Bluegrass Community and Technical College 50% 56% 88%Brevard Community College 67% 69% 99%Brookdale Community College 48% 57% 82%Brookhaven College 66% 72% 94%Bucks County Community College 41% 63% 65%Butler County Community College (KS) 48% 65% 70%Century College 66% 67% 98%Chandler-Gilbert Community College 65% 66% 100%Citrus College 58% 63% 91%College of Lake County 37% 64% 62%Community College of Denver 51% 54% 94%CyFair College 55% 65% 85%Daytona Beach Community College 48% 55% 88%Del Mar College 57% 59% 93%Delgado Community College 57% 62% 96%Delta College 68% 76% 92%Douglas College 45% 76% 60%Eastfield College 49% 53% 96%Edison College 55% 60% 92%Essex County College 52% 54% 100%Grand Rapids Community College 57% 63% 91%Greenville Technical College 56% 57% 100%Guilford Technical Community College 58% 61% 96%Harold Washington College 46% 51% 93%Hudson Valley Community College 49% 61% 78%Illinois Central College 54% 66% 85%Indian River Community College 47% 55% 91%Ivy Tech Community College - Central Indiana 43% 47% 97%J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College 55% 57% 96%Jefferson Community and Technical College 55% 60% 97%Joliet Jr College 41% 62% 64%Kingsborough Community College 47% 72% 69%LaGuardia Community College 49% 59% 83%Lane Community College 49% 62% 81%Laney College 27% 56% 52%Lorain County Community College 59% 65% 94%Manatee Community College 65% 70% 94%Merced College 57% 60% 95%Mercer County Community College 60% 64% 99%

Page 454: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Within PercentOverall Class of Sampled

Completion Completion ClassesRate Rate Surveyed

All 2007 CCSSE Colleges 51% 59% 87%All Large CCSSE Colleges 53% 61% 88%Metropolitan Community College 71% 74% 96%Middlesex Community College 57% 66% 89%Middlesex County College 54% 60% 93%Midlands Technical College 65% 66% 100%MiraCosta College 61% 73% 88%Montgomery College 34% 52% 70%Montgomery County Community College 56% 62% 90%Mt. Hood Community College 52% 72% 73%North Harris College 46% 63% 80%North Lake College 51% 60% 91%Northwest Vista College 56% 61% 90%Oakton Community College 51% 63% 85%Ocean County College 51% 64% 79%Oklahoma City Community College 66% 69% 93%Onondaga Community College 49% 59% 85%Paradise Valley Community College 60% 64% 91%Parkland College 53% 68% 77%Pensacola Junior College 56% 65% 91%Phoenix College 43% 51% 88%Prince George's Community College 60% 62% 99%Queensborough Community College 53% 64% 87%Richard J. Daley College 42% 44% 99%Richland College 59% 59% 100%San Jacinto College - Central Campus 52% 55% 94%San Jacinto College - South Campus 48% 56% 88%Schoolcraft College 57% 61% 93%Scottsdale Community College 55% 61% 89%Seminole Community College 49% 57% 84%Southwest Tennessee Community College 43% 52% 84%St. Louis Community College - Meramec 52% 64% 80%St. Philip's College 54% 59% 94%Taft College 30% 45% 70%Tallahassee Community College 52% 53% 100%Thomas Nelson Community College 50% 59% 85%Truckee Meadows Community College 62% 66% 99%Truman College 58% 62% 94%University of Wisconsin Colleges 60% 67% 90%Victor Valley College 31% 41% 77%Vincennes University 67% 73% 95%Virginia Western Community College 60% 62% 97%Westchester Community College 64% 71% 91%Wilbur Wright College 55% 57% 98%

Page 455: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Within PercentOverall Class of Sampled

Completion Completion ClassesRate Rate Surveyed

All 2007 CCSSE Colleges 51% 59% 87%All Extra Large CCSSE Colleges 52% 61% 86%American River College 44% 52% 86%Austin Community College 42% 56% 72%Borough of Manhattan Community College 23% 63% 36%Broward Community College 54% 58% 95%City College of San Francisco 49% 58% 83%College of DuPage 55% 67% 83%Community College of Allegheny County 50% 65% 77%Community College of Philadelphia 49% 58% 88%Community College of Rhode Island 46% 54% 85%Community College of Southern Nevada 39% 54% 72%Cuyahoga Community College 49% 55% 88%De Anza College 55% 71% 79%El Paso Community College 51% 59% 89%Florida Community College at Jacksonville 54% 59% 91%Georgia Perimeter College 60% 62% 100%Glendale Community College 61% 67% 95%Harper College 52% 56% 94%Hillsborough Community College 50% 53% 92%Houston Community College System 52% 60% 85%Johnson County Community College 46% 60% 78%Kirkwood Community College 50% 59% 83%Macomb Community College 61% 66% 97%Metropolitan Community College - Kansas City 50% 62% 84%Miami Dade College 46% 53% 87%Modesto Junior College 42% 57% 86%Montgomery College 41% 70% 60%Moraine Valley Community College 63% 65% 98%Mt. San Antonio College 50% 58% 84%Northern Virginia Community College 60% 60% 100%Oakland Community College 48% 60% 83%Palm Beach Community College 63% 65% 99%Palomar College 54% 60% 91%Pasadena City College 51% 60% 84%Salt Lake Community College 52% 62% 86%San Antonio College 61% 62% 100%San Diego Mesa College 49% 60% 83%Santa Ana College 52% 73% 67%Santa Fe Community College (FL) 52% 59% 92%Sinclair Community College 50% 68% 75%South Texas College 53% 61% 89%Southwestern Illinois College 61% 63% 96%St. Petersburg College 61% 61% 98%The Community College of Baltimore County 49% 61% 81%Tidewater Community College 58% 60% 98%Triton College 54% 63% 82%Valencia Community College 64% 65% 98%

Page 456: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M
Page 457: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

Community College Surveyof Student Engagement

Peter Ewell, ChairVice President

National Center for Higher Education Management Systems

(NCHEMS)

David ArmstrongPresident

Broward Community College

George BoggsPresident and CEO

American Association of Community Colleges

Walter G. Bumphus Chairman, Department of Educational AdministrationThe University of Texas at Austin

Jacqueline ClaunchPresident Northwest Vista College

Susan ConnerExecutive Vice President and COOThe Lumina Foundation

Larry EbbersProfessor, Educational Leadership & Policy StudiesIowa State University

George GraingerGrant OfficerHouston Endowment Incorporated

Zelema HarrisPresident EmeritusParkland College

George KuhChancellor’s Professor and DirectorNational Survey of Student EngagementIndiana University

William LawPresidentTallahassee Community College

Homero Lopez Retired PresidentEstrella Mountain Community College

Byron N. McClenneyProgram DirectorAchieving the DreamThe University of Texas at Austin

Alexander McCormickSenior ScholarThe Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching

Christine Johnson McPhailProfessor and Graduate CoordinatorMorgan State University

Mark MillironDirector, NISODCommunity College Leadership ProgramThe University of Texas at Austin

Michael NettlesExecutive DirectorCenter for Policy Studies and ResearchEducational Testing Service

Michael PoindexterVice President of Student ServicesSacramento City College

John E. RouecheDirectorCommunity College Leadership ProgramThe University of Texas at Austin

Gerardo de los SantosPresidentLeague for Innovation in the Community College

Vincent TintoDistinguished ProfessorSyracuse University

Anne StantonProgram DirectorThe James Irvine Foundation

National Advisory Board

Page 458: Annotated Table of Contents - Brazosport College · Annotated Table of Contents Page 2 of 4 comparison group and the 2007 CCSSE Cohort. Summary Statistics: All Students (pp. M 0-M

CCSSE Staff Community College Survey of Student Engagement

Kay McClenney, Director (512) 471-6807 [email protected]

C. Nathan Marti, Senior Research (512) 232-6456 [email protected]

Jeff Crumpley, Senior Research Associate (512) 232-6455 [email protected]

Christine McLean, College Relations (512) 232-6452 [email protected]

Courtney Adkins, Survey Operations Coordinator (512) 475-6142 [email protected]

Arleen Arnsparger, Project Manager, MetLife (512) 471-6687 [email protected] Initiative on Student Success

Angela Oriano-Darnall, Project Coordinator, Survey (512) 475-6526 [email protected] Entering Student Engagement Chris Cosart, Research Associate (512) 232-9622 [email protected] Erika Glaser, Research Associate (512) 232-6453 [email protected]

Rowland Cadena, College Liaison (512) 232-6454 [email protected]

Tammy Reichelt, College Liaison (512) 471-6907 [email protected] Sarah Supulski, Senior Administrative Associate (512) 471-3130 [email protected] Judy Row, Senior Administrative Associate (512) 471-6687 [email protected]

Sara Gray, Administrative Assistant (512) 232-6458 [email protected] Adrienne Sneed, Senior Office Assistant (512) 471-6420 [email protected] Joe Calliham, Office Assistant (512) 471-6420 [email protected]

Lindsey Lucius, Office Assistant (512) 471-6420 [email protected]. edu