Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Andrea BALLARINVeneto Region
Integrating major Integrating major transport infrastructures transport infrastructures
in complex territories:in complex territories: a weighted programmatic a weighted programmatic
approachapproach
Ljubljana – 16 October 2013Ljubljana – 16 October 2013
Tool description 1/2Tool description 1/2
AIM Realizing a tool to support public decision makers in defining the best choice in terms of how to manage environmental and landscape criticism derived from the passage of a linear MTI.
STARTING QUESTION
Supposing that the decision of realizing a new track is already made, how public decision makers may be helped in determining the most suitable way to realize and shape the infrastructure in harmony with that territory maximizing its integration from the point of view of landscape and environment?
Tool description 2/2Tool description 2/2
ASSUMPTIONS
We are talking about linear transport infrastructures;
We are thinking about the utilization phase of the MTI;
We’ve used a multi-criterial and weighed analysis approach;
CONTEXTUALIZATION
We focused on the area of the Province of Venice which should be interested by the realization of a HS/HC train line from Venice to Trieste.
Main tool objective 1/2Main tool objective 1/2(Why tool is needed?)(Why tool is needed?)
MAIN ASSUMPTION
Working on a PROGRAMMATIC APPROACH before thinking to the realization of a MTI.
??Procedure already known and ruled by law
Needed because working on a field that has actually no specific rules or well determined procedures to follow and may help in determining priorities before starting up with a project, potentially reducing the risks of future problems.
Main tool objective 2/2Main tool objective 2/2(How’s going to work?)(How’s going to work?)
TERRITORIAL BASE KNOLEDGE
INPUTS OUTPUTS
SPECIFIC KNOLEDGE OF TERRITORY
REVEALED INTERVENTION PRIORITIES
Environmental and landscape
CRITICISM MAPin relation to the
characteristics of the territory
Environmental and landscape
CRITICISM MAPin relation to the
characteristics of the territory
Best options for MITIGATION/ATTENTION
MEASURES avoiding or reducing the impacts
Best options for MITIGATION/ATTENTION
MEASURES avoiding or reducing the impacts
332211
Target GroupsTarget Groups(Who is supposed to use the tool)(Who is supposed to use the tool)
TERRITORIAL STAKEHOLDERS
Local administrators (Representatives of Provinces, Municipalities, Associations of municipalities…)
Public associations and local development promoters (LAC, Committees …)
Association of citizens or similar
Giving reasoned advices/comments to the upper level of decision makers
Methodology 1/3Methodology 1/3(How was the tool built?)(How was the tool built?)
1st TERRITORIAL ANALISYS
NATURAL
AGRICULTURAL
SPRAWL
CONSOLIDATED
Starting from Corine Land Cover indicators, macro categories of territory
were identified and then 4 selected as more
representative
Starting from Corine Land Cover indicators, macro categories of territory
were identified and then 4 selected as more
representative
Methodology 2/3Methodology 2/3(How was the tool built?)(How was the tool built?)
2nd IMPACTS ANALISYS (Impacts matrix)Literature review of impacts derived from the passage of an MTI on the different macro categories of territory on environment and landscape and of impacts indicators (ALFA MATRIX).
Verifying with internal evaluation and with Focus Group 1 with experts the coherence, relevance and redundancy of impacts (BETA MATRIX).
Verifying with internal evaluation and with Focus Group 2 with experts the best available choices in terms of mitigation measures and technical solutions to avoid/reduce impacts (GAMMA MATRIX).
Verifying with internal evaluation and with Focus Group 3 with experts the economical/financial/social level of feasibility of the best solutions individuated (DELTA MATRIX).
Weighting with internal evaluation and with Panel Group with experts the coherence, relevance and redundancy of impacts (COUPLE MATRIX).
Methodology 3/3Methodology 3/3(Outputs)(Outputs)
Natural Agricult. Sprawl Consolid.
Methodology 3/3Methodology 3/3(Outputs)(Outputs)
ALFA
MAT
RIX
ALFA
MAT
RIX
LAYER 1 – Impact on FRAGMENTATION of the territoryLAYER 1 – Impact on FRAGMENTATION of the territory
Methodology 3/3Methodology 3/3(Outputs)(Outputs)
BETA
MAT
RIX
BETA
MAT
RIX
LAYER 2 – Impact on HISTORICAL & CULTURAL legibilityLAYER 2 – Impact on HISTORICAL & CULTURAL legibility
Methodology 3/3Methodology 3/3(Outputs)(Outputs)
BETA
MAT
RIX
BETA
MAT
RIX
LAYER 2LAYER 2LAYER 1LAYER 1
Methodology 3/3Methodology 3/3(Outputs)(Outputs)
COU
PLE
MAT
RIX
COU
PLE
MAT
RIX
Methodology 3/3Methodology 3/3(Outputs)(Outputs)
PRO
GRA
MM
ATIC
APP
ROAC
HPR
OG
RAM
MAT
IC A
PPRO
ACH
LAYER 2LAYER 2LAYER 1LAYER 1
Methodology 3/3Methodology 3/3(Outputs)(Outputs)
PRO
GRA
MM
ATIC
APP
ROAC
HPR
OG
RAM
MAT
IC A
PPRO
ACH
LAYER 2LAYER 2LAYER 1LAYER 1
Methodology 3/3Methodology 3/3(Outputs)(Outputs)
PROGRAMMATIC APPROACH - ResultPROGRAMMATIC APPROACH - Result
We did not start from a specific track option, but we individuated in a programmatic way:
-a sort of corridor to suggest to developers;-advices on specific attention/mitigation
measures to adoptin order to optimize integration and avoid
potential conflicts suggesting either
We did not start from a specific track option, but we individuated in a programmatic way:
-a sort of corridor to suggest to developers;-advices on specific attention/mitigation
measures to adoptin order to optimize integration and avoid
potential conflicts suggesting either
Area: AGRICULTURALBest attention measure:
GRADE LEVELBest mitigation measure:
POLYSPECIFIC HEDGE
Methodology 3/3Methodology 3/3(Outputs)(Outputs)
INFO on their technical and financial FEASIBILITY
GAMMA & DELTA MATRIX (Ex. 1)GAMMA & DELTA MATRIX (Ex. 1)
Area: SPRAWLBest attention measure:
VIADUCTBest mitigation measure:SOUNDPROOF BARRIERS
Methodology 3/3Methodology 3/3(Outputs)(Outputs)
INFO on their technical and financial FEASIBILITY
GAMMA & DELTA MATRIX (Ex. 2)GAMMA & DELTA MATRIX (Ex. 2)
Beneficiaries and StakeholdersBeneficiaries and Stakeholders(Who will benefit from the tool application?)(Who will benefit from the tool application?)
ENVIROMENT / LANDSCAPE will benefit from a low impact MTI
ENVIROMENT / LANDSCAPE will benefit from a low impact MTI
POLICY MAKERS will
benefit from avoiding potential
conflicts with stakeholders
POLICY MAKERS will
benefit from avoiding potential
conflicts with stakeholders
CITIZENS will benefit from a shared approach to the idealization of the MTI
CITIZENS will benefit from a shared approach to the idealization of the MTI
SUSTAINABLEMTI
SUSTAINABLEMTI
Next StepsNext Steps
WP6WP6Study verifying the feasibility of the best choices in terms of attention and mitigation measures individuated by the matrix’s tool tested on a specific area.
WP7WP7Guidelines on how to approach the problem of how to integrate MTI in different contexts and on how to propose solutions also for different kind of infrastructures.
Tender procedure for this service just completed.
Andrea BALLARIN
[email protected]+39 041 279 3258+39 327 1675323
Thanks for your attentionThanks for your attention
Ljubljana – 16 October 2013Ljubljana – 16 October 2013
