10

. 'Dr.K. Ramalingam,~halrman,

":T\Airports Authority of India,Safdarjung Airport,NEWDELHI.

Subject: R AND PRI

Sir,

I Wehave been requesting for review of new Rand P Guidelines in the wake of suchI review already undertaken in the case of non-executives vide letter\ i No.PERS/MPP/1126/1/2006/325 dated 10th March, 2008, but in spite of our persistentI I requests no such review has been ordered in the case of Executives. . Normally, the

Management had been taking decisions on such ,policy issues collectively for bothExecutives and Non-Executives but surprisingly Executives have been ommitted from this

.,mcercisethis time for reasOns not known,to us. .

Whereas, we welcome the conscious decisions taken in the case of Non-Executives,1\\1. we further understand that a Personnel Audit Team has been appointed to study the

implications of implementation of new Rand P Guidelines and recommend further reviewof the above Regulations in the wake of difficulties/ disparities experienced while.implementing the same. It is unfortunate that the constitution of the said PersonnelAudit Team has not been notified to us and the said Team has not interacted with us. Wefurther understand that the Team is at the verge of finalising amendments to the Rand P

I guidelines in the case of non-executives only. .

..,~H In the interest of equality, it shall be highlyappreciated if the said Team is asked to

I interact with the Associations as well and take note of our proposals before giving final'>.shape to its recommendations. The areas which require attention in the. case of

Executives are enumerated below for your kind ~nsideration and passing on to theCommittee .for examination/ consideration, as considered appropriate:-

'1. The Executives may be placed in Clusters with Asstt. Manager/Manager(E-2 and E-3) forming one Cluster and Asstt. Manager with 3 years servicebe allowed to move to Manager's grade within the Cluster.lIlt

\I,I

I

\"1'

1

I....

I

2. Promotion from (E-2/3) Cluster to Sr. Manager's grade and from (E-4/E-5) Cluster to. Dy. Genl. Manager's grade in next dusters shall be.vacancybased but in case of non-availability of vacancy, the Executive be placedin the lower scale of next duster as SG on completion of total 6 yearsservice in the lower duster.

3. DGM/Jt. DGM(E-6 and E-7) be made next Cluster and DGMwith 3 yearsservice be moved to the grade of Jt. DGM,which may be redesignated asAddl. GM,as was in vogue earlier and the post of Jt. General Manager(proposed to be redesignated as Addl.General Manager) be not treated asfunctional post..

4. For promotion as General Manager, the present eligibility provision is Jt.General Manager with 2 years service and total 5 years service as Jt.General Manager/ Dy.General Managercombined. This provisionappearsto be superfidal since an Executive is promoted as Jt. General Manageronly. after three years service as DGM. In the new dispensa.tion, wepropose that DGM/Addl.GM with together 5 years regular service beconsidered for promotion as General Manager.

\II""I\I

\"1',n

D\m 2/-

II\"1'

( RAJEJt. General Sec:y-II,

AAOA(I)30-10-2008

. ~(t} -ttr'J ~ ,

(5.1<.citA~ ~ (C.P. SING ), General Secretary General Secretary

\I~ ACOA (I) IAAlOA' , \~

I' 30-10-2008 . 30-10-2008 ~~.., /

fiyi Seaetary, Minisby of CivilAviation, RG Bhawan, Safdarjung Airort, New Delhi.I\Jt. Secretary (1<),Mlnisby of Civil Aviation, RG Bhawan, Safdaljung Airort, New Delhi.

\

Member (O~)/Member (Flnance)/Member (Planning)=--- 0.. .I \ .~ D~ '~I '

\I! ~"o ," 3i;;

I '10\ \.P ~.?i , 0 Iv'.. ~',:

..

.

5. In the case of Jt. Genl. Manager only 30O/qposts have bepn made functional'and rest of the DGMswith five years !it!rvice are 'granted 5G scale ()f 3GM.Since promotional' avenues to the grade of General' MCtQilgerare' tOOmeager, it shall be highly appropriate that a,1the DGMswith 3 years serviceare granted promotion as Jt. General Manager' and cap of 30CMa'isdone 'away with. '

,~

6. The General Manager with one year service Is eligible for being consid.-edfor appointment as AAI Board' Membe.-by PESBwhereas the sameGMrequires to complete about 6 years se~ce to be eligible for col1$iclerationfor being appointed as ED. 1111sdause Is discrinlinatory ~nd therefore, it Isappropriate to con~ider GMswith one years servic:ebe also co~idered forappointment as ED~Since, the Officersat the level ,ofGM"ve resigned toleave AM because of limited promotional opportunities, a more rationalapproach in this regard, as suggested above, shall stop this phenomena.

, .' .

I Since the Management has already amended the Rand P guidelines in case of\Non-Executivesand a precedent exists wherei.ndeclsions'have been taken with an intention1

\

' to provide relief from stagnation, we request you,

to kindlyorder a .-eviewof the guidelinesIin case of Executives as' well and take suitable, decision in the matter at your earliestlconvenience. Further, the Chainnan, AAIis empowered to amend the Rand P Regulations,iwe hope that, our democratic, polite 'and principled submissions shall receive your and yourR>lleague's valued attention and necessary positive decision shall be taken in case of

recutlves as well. '

Thanking you.

, .: ~~J~~

D.I<.~RA )ieneral Secretary

'w ~ - Guild (I)P-l0-2008

Yours Sincerely,~

~".\e. 'lD"~( D.I<.KAMRA)President

AAI Engs. Guild30-10-2008

)

- - -

'''".~\~~~,

,~ ,::;',j~

.t'.':1'1'4

:.~..~~, .

,-