Upload
trystan-broadley
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Analytical Evidence on Research & Innovation in the Danube Region
Progress of WP4
Vienna, 11.12.2014Béla Kardon, PhD; [email protected]
Overview
• D4.15 Analysis of research and innovation projects in the region and transferability of results (BIC)
• D4.16 Co-publication and co-patenting analysis among countries in the Danube Region (ZSI)
T4.1: Monitoring research and innovation cooperation
• D4.17 Study on cooperation barriers in the Danube Region (IMP)
T4.2: Barriers to cooperation in the Danube Region
• 4.18 Baseline study and concept for policy mix peer review (RCISD)• 4.32 Policy Mix Peer Review Reports (RCISD)
T4.3: Policy mix peer review
T4.1: Monitoring research and innovation cooperation• D4.15 Analysis of research and innovation
projects in the region and transferability of results – M14 (BIC)– Objectives:to identify and analyse EU
funded projects’ results that have a transferability potential for the Danube Region
– Content:• cluster development• technology transfer;• financing mechanisms and tools;• non-financing methods and tools
for supporting research and innovation.
– Actual status: • Very first draft of the report is
ready• 75 out of 274 projects running
(finished) under interregional & transnational programmes, FP7 & CIP were analysed
• Conclusions to be finalized
M6•Definition of selection criteria
M7•Automatic selection of projects > 10 000 projects
M9•Selection of projects for result analysis: ~500 projects
M10•Analysis of project results: ~200 projects
M10 M11•Drafting the report and project database: 50-100 projects
M11 M12•Consolidation of the report
M13-14•Quality assurance & final deliverable
M13•Uploading project entries to the website
•
T4.1: Monitoring research and innovation cooperation• D4.16 Co-publication and co-patenting analysis
among countries in the Danube Region – M14 (ZSI)– Objectives: basis for definition of strength
and weaknesses– Content:
• the amount of co-publications and co-patents per country,
• their development over time (2003-2013),
• major involved institutions and scientific fields , and
• the impact in terms of number of citations
– Status: drafting of the report and visualization is in progress
– The report shall be presented in a workshop (tbd)
M8-9
• Data acquisition
M9-10
• Data normalisation• Data processing
M10-11
• Bibliometric and co-patent analysis
M12-13
• Report • Visualization
T4.2: Barriers to cooperation in the Danube Region (1)
• D4.17 Study on cooperation barriers in the Danube Region – M14 (IMP)– Objective is to
• identify social, political and economic bottlenecks of S&T cooperation in the Danube region
– Content• Data analysis of desk research and the survey completed by DR
researchers• Policy recommendations
– Status:• MPI is in the process of finalization of the questionnaire by exchanging of
e-mails and word documents with comments with the involvement of partners from ZSI, MIZS, RCISD and external reviewer
• The latest version shall be agreed during the GA in Vienna
M7• Draft
questionnaire• Database of e-
mail addresses
M8-9• Peer review
(value survey mode)
M9-10 M11-12• Piloting and
finalization of questionnaire
M10-11 M13-14• Launch &
close of the survey
M12-13 M14-15• Statistical &
descriptive analyses
M13 M16-17• Report
delivery
T4.2: Barriers to cooperation in the Danube Region (2)
• D4.17 Study on cooperation barriers in the Danube Region – M14 (IMP)– Next steps:
• December 2014: Finalization of the questionnaire• January - February 2015: Launching the Survey
– Partners will be asked again to circulate the questionnaire within their national RI community
• February - March 2015: Following the closure of the survey, statistical and descriptive analyzes will take place
• April-May 2015: Report will be delivered to project board.
T4.3: Policy mix peer reviewThe task is consisted of the following activities• 4.19 Baseline study and concept for policy mix peer review –
M16• Policy mix peer review exercise• 4.32 Policy Mix Peer Review Reports – M27
M11
-12 Data
acquisition
M13
-15 Elaboration
of overview & methodology
M16 Final
baseline study M
16-1
7 Presentation of the baseline study M
17-2
5 Peer review exercise M
27 Final report on policy mix peer review
T4.3: Policy mix peer review• 4.19 Baseline study and concept for policy
mix peer review – M16 (RCISD)– Objective is to elaborate a baseline
study and concept for the policy mix peer review exercise
– Planned content• Baseline study: Overview to what extent
non-EU Danube countries’ RI policy mix is analysed, identifying needs, transferable good practice examples
Rationale for selecting the 2 countries subject to the exercise out of Serbia, BiH, Montenegro
• Methodology of the peer review exercise
– Status: concept sent for QA, data acquisition in progress
Data acquisition (M11-12)
Elaboration of overview & methodology (M13-15)
Final baseline study (M16)
Presentation of the baseline study (M16-17)
T4.3: Policy mix peer review• Policy mix peer review exercise
– Objective is the exchange of good practices on innovation support• programme and instruments portfolios, • incentive schemes and support structures, • funding bodies and institutional set-up, • framework conditions for R&I
– Why is it important?• Evaluations bring in external knowledge and opinions to policy-making and policy-delivery • Evaluations provide documentation on the implementation of policies
– What is in this exercise?• Defining specific needs of the countries concerned (shortcomings of previous evaluations,
current needs of RDTI policy mix, etc.)• Identification of good practises & country examples• Critical examination of the existing RTDI policy mix by using a “critical friends” approach• Dialogue with policy makers and RTDI experts from other countries to increase mutual
understanding and learning• Providing policy recommendations
T4.3: Policy mix peer review• Policy mix peer review exercise
– Planned steps of the implementation – in practise• Decision on the countries being peer-reviewed (expression of interest of the countries
concerned in line with the baseline study): beginning of 2015• Selection of reviewers: May-June 2015• Kick-off meeting: July 2015• Desk research: July-Aug 2015• Interviews: Sept-Nov 2015• Individual reports: Dec 2015• Draft synthesis report, presentation to national stakeholders: Jan 2016• Final report: Feb-March 2016
Decision on the countries: M13-15
Selection of reviewers: M16-18
Kick-off meeting: M19
Desk research: M19-20
Interviews: M21-23Individual reports: M24
Draft synthesis report, presentation
to national stakeholders: M25
Final report: M26
Thank you for your attention!
Contact: [email protected]