Analysis for Military Decisions by Edward S. QuadeReview by: Eliot A. CohenForeign Affairs, Vol. 76, No. 5 (Sep. - Oct., 1997), p. 220Published by: Council on Foreign RelationsStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20048224 .

Accessed: 14/06/2014 20:51

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

.

Council on Foreign Relations is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to ForeignAffairs.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 62.122.73.17 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:51:03 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Significant Books

Tzu. The book is particularly worth ex

amining, however, because of the author's

shrewdness, and his influence on those of

his own and succeeding generations who

have engaged in guerrilla warfare.

Makers of Modern Strategy: Military

Thought from Machiavelli to Hitler. EDITED BY EDWARD MEAD EARLE.

Princeton: Princeton University Press,

1943>547PP This book, which marks the birth of modern strategic studies, was, appropri

ately enough, published during World War II. Although it draws on the work

of many talented historians (and many of

its chapters remain unsurpassed), when

taken together the essays lead the reader

to conceive of a discipline of strategy, distinct from history and political science,

although deeply indebted to them. This was one of the first books in this century

to treat the study of means and ends of

military power as a scholarly, and not

only a practical, subject. Of course, some

of the essays here are dated (for example, one on

Japanese naval strategy), and a

subsequent version edited by Peter Paret

in 1986 has since taken and held the field.

Furthermore, the editor seems to have

wavered in deciding whether his topic was military thought

or military action.

Nonetheless, a landmark work.

Analysis for Military Decisions, edited

by edward s. QUADE. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966,382 pp.

The development of nuclear weapons, the rise of advanced military technology, and the prevalence of struggles only

rarely punctuated by warfare has given birth to communities of civilian defense

experts in all advanced countries. In most

cases they rely, directly

or indirectly,

on

the analytical techniques described

herein, set down at rand and rooted in

the Anglo-American mobilization of

scientific and analytical talent for two

world wars. At the heart of this enter

prise lay the attempt to measure with

rigor and, wherever possible, numbers

the effects of military operations and the

effectiveness of military organizations. The authors of these essays?including Albert Wohlstetter, Thomas Schelling, C. J. Hitch, and Quade?were some of

the pioneers in this work. Time has

revealed the weaknesses and inadequacies of some of these approaches but has not

diminished their hold on the minds of civilians and, now, many soldiers as well.

The Soldier and the State: The Theory and

Politics of Civil-Military Relations, by

SAMUEL P. HUNTINGTON.

Cambridge: Harvard University Press,

1957.534PP. The Professional Soldier: A Social and

Political Portrait, by morris

janowitz. Glencoe: Free Press, i960,

468 pp. These books lay out two divergent under

standings of the military profession and its

relation to civil society. For Huntington, the tension between soldier and statesman

is rooted in the essence of professionalism.

Offering a now-classic description of the

military mind?conservative, realistic, and pessimistic about human nature?he

prescribes "objective control" as the opti mum form of civil-military relations. This

form of civilian control achieves its objec tives by maximizing the professionalism of the officer corps to include its autonomy

within a clearly defined military sphere.

Janowitz, the founder of American mili

[22o] FOREIGN AF F AIRS - Volume 76 No. s

This content downloaded from 62.122.73.17 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:51:03 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions