Upload
deeptej-kolambkar
View
104
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Analysis and Optimization of Mechanical Utility SystemPresented by: Kolambkar Deeptej Govind
Nandu Pooja KishorSinkar Kiran KashinathSohal Simran Avtarsingh
Project Objectives• To Carry out a detailed analysis of the mechanical utility
system.• Identification of a system which might require improvement and
optimization.• Increasing system efficiency by finding a feasible alternative to
the currently employed compression system.• Prediction and documentation of the monetary, power and
maintenance savings after replacement.
Compression System• Chemical plant operation requires pure nitrogen, obtained by adsorption
process.• Ambient air is compressed to a pressure of 7.7 Kg/cm2 in a 2 stage reciprocating
air compressor.
• The compressed air passes through a Carbon Molecular Sieve (CMS)
• Oxygen and other gases are adsorbed on the CMS surface & only nitrogen is passed to the storage cylinder.
• The required mass flow rate of nitrogen for chemical processes is 100 m3/ hr.
Utility System Floor Layout
Component Overview
• First bullet point here• Second bullet point here• Third bullet point here
Sr. No.
Component Name
Operating Parameters
Power Rating
Application
1. Reciprocating air compressor
Pressure Ratio= 7.454Flow rate = 257.407cfm
45 kW/ 60 hp
To supply compressed air to nitrogen filter.
2. Reciprocating air compressor
Pressure Ratio = 6.5 23 kW/30 hp
Used for operation of various pneumatic valves in MUS.
3. Reciprocating air compressor (20 TR)
Flow rate = 163.8 cfm 55 kW/75 hp
To supply compressed ammonia to brine chiller for cooling purpose.
4. Reciprocating air compressor (30 TR)
Flow rate = 245.74 cfm
70 kW/95 hp
To supply compressed ammonia to brine chiller for cooling purpose.
5. Nitrogen separator
Pressure = 5 kg/cm2
Flow rate = 61.72 cfm- Required for chemical processes.
Selecting an Alternative
Maintenance
• First bullet point here• Second bullet point here• Third bullet point here
Component Life Cost per unit
(Rs.)Maintenance time per unit Total cost per year (Rs.)
V-belt 3 months 1600 30 minutes 25,600
Piston Rings 6 months 2800 3 to 4 hrs. 11,200
Piston 2 to 3 years 12000 4 hrs 8,000*
Discharge Valves 4 months 3925 4 hrs 23,550
Suction valves 4 months 4250 4 hrs 25,500
Page 37 -39
Component Breakdown Frequency
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 40
1
2
3
4
5
6
Series 1Series 2Series 3
V-Belt Piston Ring Piston Discharge Valves
Suction Valves
Lubricant Oil Air Filters0
5
10
15
20
25
30
3
6
24
4 4 3
6
Frequency
Tim
e (i
n m
onth
s)
Page 40
Maintenance Down Time
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 40
1
2
3
4
5
6
Series 1Series 2Series 3
V-Belts Piston Ring Piston Discharge Valves
Suction Valves Lubricant Oil Air Filter0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
30
240 240 240 240
5 15
120
480
160
720 720
20 30
Down Time per Unit Down time per year per unit
Tim
e (i
n m
inut
es)
Page 40
Total Maintenance Cost
27%
12%
8%24%
27%
0.2%
2%
V-Belt : Rs.25600Piston Rings : Rs.11200Piston : Rs. 8000Discharge Valves : Rs. 23550Suction Valves : Rs. 25500Lubricant Oil : Rs. 400Air Filters : Rs. 1900
Total cost : Rs. 96150
Page 42
Maintenance Time & Cost Saving
• First bullet point here• Second bullet point here• Third bullet point here
Component Time saved per Annum
V-belts 120 minutes.Piston rings 480 minutes.
Piston 160 minutes.
Total time saved 760 minutes = 12 hours 40 minutes.
Component Cost saved / AnnumV-belts Rs. 25,600.
Piston rings Rs. 11,200.
Piston Rs. 8,000.
Total maintenance cost minimized Rs. 44,800.Page 43; 44
Power Consumption & Savings
No load Full load05
1015202530354045
20
41
14
27
Operating Power Comparison
Reciprocating Compressor Screw Compressor
Load Condition
Powe
r (kW
)
Page 50
Load Cost Per Day
Reciprocating Compressor Screw Compressor0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
1131.9
700.7
4419.8
2910.6
No Load Full LoadCo
st p
er d
ay (i
n Rs
.)
Page 50;51;52
Savings Related to PumpingMotor Power (kW) 1.74
Electricity Cost
Saving (Rs.)
For a Day 321.55
For a Month 9,646.56
For a Year 1,15,758.72
The table shows saving in pumping cost if reciprocating compressor is replaced by screw compressor since latter does not require intercooler as it is single stage compression process.
Page 53
Saving in Compression Cost Full Load No Load
Motor Power (kW) 14 8Electricity Cost Saving (Rs.)
For a Day 1,509.2 431.2For a Month 45,276 12,936For a Year 5,43,312 1,55,232
The table shows saving in motor power and electricity cost in compression process for full load and no load conditions if screw compression is used.
Page 52
Need for Efficiency Optimisation
Productive Demands
LeaksInnappropriate Uses
Artificial Demands
System Losses
Typically, only 50% of compressed air is used
for productive demands
Over 10 years, the energy cost will be 10 to 30 times the initial capital cost
Capital
Installation
Maintenance
Energy
Efficiency ImprovementRECIPROCATING COMPRESSOR
SCREW COMPRESSOR
Ideal work 27.829 kW 27.829kW
Motor Power 45 30
Efficiency=ideal/motor
61.84 % 92.76 %
Page 62 - 64
Floor Space Saving213
130
Dimensions are in cm.
Total Financial Savings
Contents Annual Savings
Pumping Cost 115758
Compression Cost543312 (full load)
155232 (no load)
Maintenance Cost 96150
Total Cost 9,10,452
THANK YOU