1
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012 www.PosterPresentations.com Introduc4on 1 Ins.tue of Transporta.on Studies, University of California, Irvine , CA, USA. 2 Dept. of Civil Eng., University of California, Irvine , CA, USA Thuy T.B. Luong 1 , Will Recker 2 ANALYSING HOW SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATE PUBLIC TRANSIT USAGE A COMPARISON BETWEEN SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 94 th Annual Mee.ng of Transporta.on Research Board, January 2015, Washington, D.C., USA. The National Household Travel Survey, 2009 Select by Metropolitan Statistical Areas (CBSA) Codes South: 2446 individuals from Los Angeles-Long Beach- Santa Ana, San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, Riverside- San Bernardino-Ontario North: 1605 individuals from San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Sacramento--Arden-Arcade—Roseville, San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont Data California needs transit systems that are smart and diverse to make them more viable and effective for commutes. Knowledge about California transit riders’ characteristics and how they affect transit usage still is lacking. Investigates the differences in transit usage between people in Southern and Northern California. Transit riders’ socio-demographic and travel attitudes are accounted for in the comparison between the regions. Source: Google Map 2014, US Census Bureau Most of the determining socio-demographic variables - race, education, employment status, age, household income – are significantly different between the Northern and the Southern transit riders, while gender showed no significant difference (chi square test). Results A series of multivariate regressions were performed to identify the characteristics of those in each region who prefer to take transit. The results show that the socio-demographic factors associated with frequency of taking transit that vary between the regions. Predictors South North Model 2 y = PTUSED Model 1 y = log(PTUSED) Model 3 y = PTUSED Model 4 y = log(PTUSED) (Intercept) 16.473 *** 1.837 *** 14.761 *** 1.568 *** African American, Black 0.400 0.114 0.095 Asian Only 0.999 0.248 * 0.058 Other race 1.247 0.037 3.313 Hispanic/Mexican 3.200 ** 0.237 ** 3.828 Number of drivers 1.602 * 0.169 ** 1.287 $25,000 $44,999 2.476 * 0.248 ** 1.249 $45,000 $64,999 3.215 ** 0.436 *** 0.255 $65,000 $79,999 3.609 ** 0.436 *** 0.962 $80,000 $99,999 3.712 ** 0.403 *** 1.865 more than $100,000 4.218 *** 0.343 *** 1.034 HH size 0.616 * 0.065 ** 1.347 ** 0.127 *** Number of vehicles 2.597 *** 0.236 *** 2.399 *** 0.209 *** Number of adults 1.345 0.084 1.313 0.261 *** Number of workers 0.085 0.245 Foreign born 0.759 2.048 * 0.152 * Has driver status 0.805 0.234 * 2.578 0.264 Some college or Voca4onal 0.456 0.044 1.399 0.264 ** Bachelor 1.440 0.127 1.227 0.170 Graduate or Professional 1.949 0.112 1.099 0.197 * Access to/availability of public transit 6.203 *** 0.508 *** 6.405 *** 0.684 *** Lack of walkways or sidewalks 2.715 0.041 0.538 0.157 Price of travel 0.205 0.041 0.946 0.219 ** Aggressive / distracted drivers 0.178 0.087 0.701 0.082 Safety concerns 0.075 0.006 0.132 0.026 AGE 0.040 0.006 *** 0.105 *** 0.007 *** Male 0.659 0.112 * 1.192 0.174 ** Not a worker 3.193 *** 0.203 *** 4.113 *** 0.327 *** DF 2418 2410 1577 1578 pvalue <2.2e16 <2.2e16 <2.2e16 <2.2e16 Adjusted Rsquared 0.104 0.147 0.101 0.142 signif.codes: '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 A significant association between region and views on public transit. The models were able to distinguish between respondents who did and did not take transit and between regions. Major differences between regions in trends in propensity to use public transit related primarily to race, ethnicity, and income. Conclusion Income Race Educa.on Rela.onship with other factors AXtudes Clustering family characteris.cs North South

ANALYSING0HOW0SOCIO ...Model010 y0=log(PTUSED)0 Model0300 y0=PTUSED0 Model040 y0=log(PTUSED)0 (Intercept) 16.473*** 1.837*** 14.761*** 1.568*** African0American,0Black 0.400 0.114

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    27

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ANALYSING0HOW0SOCIO ...Model010 y0=log(PTUSED)0 Model0300 y0=PTUSED0 Model040 y0=log(PTUSED)0 (Intercept) 16.473*** 1.837*** 14.761*** 1.568*** African0American,0Black 0.400 0.114

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012

www.PosterPresentations.com

QUICK TIPS (--THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRINT--)

This PowerPoint template requires basic PowerPoint (version 2007 or newer) skills. Below is a list of commonly asked questions specific to this template. If you are using an older version of PowerPoint some template features may not work properly.

Using the template

Verifying the quality of your graphics Go to the VIEW menu and click on ZOOM to set your preferred magnification. This template is at 100% the size of the final poster. All text and graphics will be printed at 100% their size. To see what your poster will look like when printed, set the zoom to 100% and evaluate the quality of all your graphics before you submit your poster for printing. Using the placeholders To add text to this template click inside a placeholder and type in or paste your text. To move a placeholder, click on it once (to select it), place your cursor on its frame and your cursor will change to this symbol: Then, click once and drag it to its new location where you can resize it as needed. Additional placeholders can be found on the left side of this template. Modifying the layout This template has four different column layouts. Right-click your mouse on the background and click on “Layout” to see the layout options. The columns in the provided layouts are fixed and cannot be moved but advanced users can modify any layout by going to VIEW and then SLIDE MASTER. Importing text and graphics from external sources TEXT: Paste or type your text into a pre-existing placeholder or drag in a new placeholder from the left side of the template. Move it anywhere as needed. PHOTOS: Drag in a picture placeholder, size it first, click in it and insert a photo from the menu. TABLES: You can copy and paste a table from an external document onto this poster template. To adjust the way the text fits within the cells of a table that has been pasted, right-click on the table, click FORMAT SHAPE then click on TEXT BOX and change the INTERNAL MARGIN values to 0.25 Modifying the color scheme To change the color scheme of this template go to the “Design” menu and click on “Colors”. You can choose from the provide color combinations or you can create your own.

QUICK DESIGN GUIDE (--THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRINT--)

This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 36”x48” professional poster. It will save you valuable time placing titles, subtitles, text, and graphics. Use it to create your presentation. Then send it to PosterPresentations.com for premium quality, same day affordable printing. We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide you through the poster design process and answer your poster production questions. View our online tutorials at: http://bit.ly/Poster_creation_help (copy and paste the link into your web browser). For assistance and to order your printed poster call PosterPresentations.com at 1.866.649.3004

Object Placeholders

Use the placeholders provided below to add new elements to your poster: Drag a placeholder onto the poster area, size it, and click it to edit. Section Header placeholder Move this preformatted section header placeholder to the poster area to add another section header. Use section headers to separate topics or concepts within your presentation. Text placeholder Move this preformatted text placeholder to the poster to add a new body of text. Picture placeholder Move this graphic placeholder onto your poster, size it first, and then click it to add a picture to the poster.

©  2012  PosterPresenta.ons.com  

       2117  Fourth  Street  ,  Unit  C          Berkeley  CA  94710          [email protected]  

Student discounts are available on our Facebook page. Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.

Introduc4on  

1Ins.tue  of  Transporta.on  Studies,  University  of  California,  Irvine  ,  CA,  USA.  2Dept.  of  Civil    Eng.,  University  of  California,  Irvine  ,  CA,  USA  

Thuy  T.B.  Luong  1  ,  Will  Recker  2  

 

ANALYSING  HOW  SOCIO-­‐DEMOGRAPHIC  CHARACTERISTICS  ASSOCIATE  PUBLIC  TRANSIT  USAGE      A  COMPARISON  BETWEEN  SOUTHERN  AND  NORTHERN  CALIFORNIA      

94th  Annual  Mee.ng  of  Transporta.on  Research  Board,  January  2015,  Washington,  D.C.,  USA.    

•  The National Household Travel Survey, 2009

•  Select by Metropolitan Statistical Areas (CBSA) Codes •  South: 2446 individuals from Los Angeles-Long Beach-

Santa Ana, San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario

• North: 1605 individuals from San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Sacramento--Arden-Arcade—Roseville, San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont

Data  

• California needs transit systems that are smart and diverse to make them more viable and effective for commutes.

• Knowledge about California transit riders’ characteristics and how they affect transit usage still is lacking.

•  Investigates the differences in transit usage between people in Southern and Northern California.

•  Transit riders’ socio-demographic and travel attitudes are accounted for in the comparison between the regions.

Source:  Google  Map  2014,  US  Census  Bureau  

Most of the determining socio-demographic variables - race, education, employment status, age, household income – are significantly different between the Northern and the Southern transit riders, while gender showed no significant difference (chi square test).

Results   A series of multivariate regressions were performed to identify the characteristics of those in each region who prefer to take transit. The results show that the socio-demographic factors associated with frequency of taking transit that vary between the regions.

Predictors   South   North  Model  2  

y  =  PTUSED  Model  1  

y  =  log(PTUSED)  Model  3    

y  =  PTUSED  Model  4  

y  =  log(PTUSED)  

(Intercept)   16.473  ***   1.837  ***   14.761  ***   1.568  ***  African  American,  Black   -­‐0.400   0.114   0.095  Asian  Only   0.999   0.248  *   -­‐0.058  Other  race   -­‐1.247   -­‐0.037   3.313  Hispanic/Mexican   3.200  **   0.237  **   -­‐3.828  Number  of  drivers   1.602  *   0.169  **   1.287  $25,000  -­‐  $44,999   -­‐2.476  *   -­‐0.248  **   -­‐1.249  $45,000  -­‐  $64,999   -­‐3.215  **   -­‐0.436  ***   0.255  $65,000  -­‐  $79,999   -­‐3.609  **   -­‐0.436  ***   -­‐0.962  $80,000  -­‐  $99,999   -­‐3.712  **   -­‐0.403  ***   -­‐1.865  more  than  $100,000   -­‐4.218  ***   -­‐0.343  ***   -­‐1.034  HH  size   -­‐0.616  *   -­‐0.065  **   -­‐1.347  **   -­‐0.127  ***  Number  of  vehicles   -­‐2.597  ***   -­‐0.236  ***   -­‐2.399  ***   -­‐0.209  ***  Number  of  adults   1.345   0.084   1.313   0.261  ***  Number  of  workers   -­‐0.085   0.245  Foreign  born   -­‐0.759   2.048  *   0.152  *  Has  driver  status   -­‐0.805   0.234  *   2.578   0.264  Some  college  or  Voca4onal   0.456   0.044   1.399   0.264  **  Bachelor   -­‐1.440   -­‐0.127   1.227   0.170  Graduate  or  Professional   -­‐1.949   -­‐0.112   1.099   0.197  *  Access  to/availability  of  public  transit   6.203  ***   0.508  ***   6.405  ***   0.684  ***  Lack  of  walkways  or  sidewalks   2.715   0.041   0.538   -­‐0.157  Price  of  travel   0.205   0.041   0.946   0.219  **  Aggressive  /  distracted  drivers   0.178   -­‐0.087   0.701   0.082  Safety  concerns   0.075   0.006   -­‐0.132   0.026  AGE   -­‐0.040   -­‐0.006  ***   -­‐0.105  ***   -­‐0.007  ***  Male   -­‐0.659   -­‐0.112  *   -­‐1.192   -­‐0.174  **  Not  a  worker   -­‐3.193  ***   -­‐0.203  ***   -­‐4.113  ***   -­‐0.327  ***  

DF   2418   2410   1577   1578  p-­‐value   <2.2e-­‐16   <2.2e-­‐16   <2.2e-­‐16   <2.2e-­‐16  Adjusted  R-­‐squared   0.104   0.147   0.101   0.142  

signif.codes:  '***'  0.001  '**'  0.01  '*'  0.05    

•  A significant association between region and views on public transit.

•  The models were able to distinguish between respondents

who did and did not take transit and between regions.

•  Major differences between regions in trends in propensity to use public transit related primarily to race, ethnicity, and income.

Conclusion  

Income  

Race   Educa.on  

Rela.onship  with  other  factors  

AXtudes    

Clustering  family  characteris.cs  

North  

South