7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

1/16

Analisis spss IBM 18

NAUNGAN

faktor epidemik * intensitas penyakit Crosstabulation

intensitas penyakit

Totalfaktor epidemik

ringan sedang berat

Intensitas

cahaya

jelek Count 6 8 1 15

Expected Count 6.8 7.5 .7 15.0

% within faktor epidemik 40.0% 53.3% 6.7% 100.0%

% within intensitas

penyakit

60.0% 72.7% 100.0% 68.2%

optimal Count 4 3 0 7

Expected Count 3.2 3.5 .3 7.0

% within faktor epidemik 57.1% 42.9% .0% 100.0%

% within intensitas

penyakit

40.0% 27.3% .0% 31.8%

Total Count 10 11 1 22

Expected Count 10.0 11.0 1.0 22.0

% within faktor epidemik 45.5% 50.0% 4.5% 100.0%

% within intensitas

penyakit

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .880a

2 .644

Likelihood Ratio 1.170 2 .557

Linear-by-Linear Association .776 1 .378

N of Valid Cases 22

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .32.

7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

2/16

DRAINASE

drainase * intensitas serangan Crosstabulation

intensitas serangan

Totalringan sedang berat

drainase jelek Count 0 4 0 4

Expected Count 1.6 2.2 .2 4.0

% within drainase .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within intensitas serangan .0% 36.4% .0% 20.0%

% of Total .0% 20.0% .0% 20.0%

baik Count 8 7 1 16

Expected Count 6.4 8.8 .8 16.0

% within drainase 50.0% 43.8% 6.3% 100.0%

% within intensitas serangan 100.0% 63.6% 100.0% 80.0%

% of Total 40.0% 35.0% 5.0% 80.0%

Total Count 8 11 1 20

Expected Count 8.0 11.0 1.0 20.0

% within drainase 40.0% 55.0% 5.0% 100.0%

% within intensitas serangan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 40.0% 55.0% 5.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 4.091a

2 .129

Likelihood Ratio 5.595 2 .061

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.777 1 .183

N of Valid Cases 20

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .20.

7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

3/16

JENIS TANJAR

jenis tanjar * intensitas serangan Crosstabulation

Faktor epidemik intensitas serangan

Totalringan sedang berat

jenis tanjar mati Count 3 1 0 4

Expected Count 2.1 1.8 .2 4.0

hidup Count 8 6 1 15

Expected Count 7.8 6.6 .6 15.0

kombinasi Count 2 4 0 6

Expected Count 3.1 2.6 .2 6.0

Total Count 13 11 1 25

Expected Count 13.0 11.0 1.0 25.0

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.564a

4 .633

Likelihood Ratio 2.895 4 .576

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.137 1 .286

N of Valid Cases 25

a. 7 cells (77.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .16.

7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

4/16

Kelembaban 60-80%

faktor epidemi * IP Crosstabulation

IP

Totalringan sedang berat

faktor epidemi optimal Count 3 2 1 6

Expected Count 2,5 3,0 ,5 6,0

% within IP 30,0% 16,7% 50,0% 25,0%

jelek Count 7 10 1 18

Expected Count 7,5 9,0 1,5 18,0

% within IP 70,0% 83,3% 50,0% 75,0%

Total Count 10 12 2 24

Expected Count 10,0 12,0 2,0 24,0

% within IP 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1,244a

2 ,537

Likelihood Ratio 1,189 2 ,552

Linear-by-Linear

Association

,000 1 1,000

N of Valid Cases 24

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .50.

7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

5/16

UMUR TANAMAN

umur tanaman * intensitas serangan Crosstabulation

intensitas serangan

Totalringan sedang berat

umur tanaman TBM Count 5 0 0 5

Expected Count 2.6 2.2 .2 5.0

% within umur tanaman 100.0% .0% .0% 100.0%

% within intensitas serangan 38.5% .0% .0% 20.0%

% of Total 20.0% .0% .0% 20.0%

TM Count 8 11 1 20

Expected Count 10.4 8.8 .8 20.0

% within umur tanaman 40.0% 55.0% 5.0% 100.0%

% within intensitas serangan 61.5% 100.0% 100.0% 80.0%

% of Total 32.0% 44.0% 4.0% 80.0%

Total Count 13 11 1 25

Expected Count 13.0 11.0 1.0 25.0

% within umur tanaman 52.0% 44.0% 4.0% 100.0%

% within intensitas serangan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 52.0% 44.0% 4.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 5.769a 2 .056

Likelihood Ratio 7.697 2 .021

Linear-by-Linear Association 4.922 1 .027

N of Valid Cases 25

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .20.

7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

6/16

Pupuk K

dosis pupuk K * keparahan penyakit Crosstabulation

keparahan penyakit

Totalringan sedang berat

dosis pupuk K rendah Count 10 10 1 21

Expected Count 9.5 10.5 1.0 21.0

% within dosis pupuk K 47.6% 47.6% 4.8% 100.0%

% within keparahan penyakit 100.0% 90.9% 100.0% 95.5%

sedang Count 0 1 0 1

Expected Count .5 .5 .0 1.0

% within dosis pupuk K .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within keparahan penyakit .0% 9.1% .0% 4.5%

Total Count 10 11 1 22

Expected Count 10.0 11.0 1.0 22.0

% within dosis pupuk K 45.5% 50.0% 4.5% 100.0%

% within keparahan penyakit 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.048a

2 .592

Likelihood Ratio 1.434 2 .488

Linear-by-Linear Association .503 1 .478

N of Valid Cases 22

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .05.

7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

7/16

Pupuk N

dosis pupuk N * keparahan penyakit Crosstabulation

keparahan penyakit

Totalringan sedang berat

dosis pupuk N rendah Count 9 9 1 19

Expected Count 9.5 8.6 .9 19.0

% within dosis pupuk N 47.4% 47.4% 5.3% 100.0%

% within keparahan penyakit 81.8% 90.0% 100.0% 86.4%

sedang Count 2 1 0 3

Expected Count 1.5 1.4 .1 3.0

% within dosis pupuk N 66.7% 33.3% .0% 100.0%

% within keparahan penyakit 18.2% 10.0% .0% 13.6%

Total Count 11 10 1 22

Expected Count 11.0 10.0 1.0 22.0

% within dosis pupuk N 50.0% 45.5% 4.5% 100.0%

% within keparahan penyakit 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .463a

2 .793

Likelihood Ratio .593 2 .743

Linear-by-Linear Association .440 1 .507

N of Valid Cases 22

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .14.

7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

8/16

Pupuk P

dosis pupuk P * keparahan penyakit Crosstabulation

keparahan penyakit

Totalringan sedang berat

dosis pupuk P rendah Count 10 10 1 21

Expected Count 9.5 10.5 1.0 21.0

% within dosis pupuk P 47.6% 47.6% 4.8% 100.0%

% within keparahan penyakit 100.0% 90.9% 100.0% 95.5%

sedang Count 0 1 0 1

Expected Count .5 .5 .0 1.0

% within dosis pupuk P .0% 100.0% .0% 100.0%

% within keparahan penyakit .0% 9.1% .0% 4.5%

Total Count 10 11 1 22

Expected Count 10.0 11.0 1.0 22.0

% within dosis pupuk P 45.5% 50.0% 4.5% 100.0%

% within keparahan penyakit 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.048a

2 .592

Likelihood Ratio 1.434 2 .488

Linear-by-Linear Association .503 1 .478

N of Valid Cases 22

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .05.

7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

9/16

Pemberian pupuk kandang

pemberian pupuk kandang * keparahan penyakit Crosstabulation

keparahan penyakit

Totalringan sedang berat

pemberian pupuk kandang iya Count 3 3 0 6

Expected Count 2.9 2.9 .2 6.0

% within pemberian pupuk

kandang

50.0% 50.0% .0% 100.0%

% within keparahan penyakit 25.0% 25.0% .0% 24.0%

tidak Count 9 9 1 19

Expected Count 9.1 9.1 .8 19.0

% within pemberian pupuk

kandang

47.4% 47.4% 5.3% 100.0%

% within keparahan penyakit 75.0% 75.0% 100.0% 76.0%

Total Count 12 12 1 25

Expected Count 12.0 12.0 1.0 25.0

% within pemberian pupuk

kandang

48.0% 48.0% 4.0% 100.0%

% within keparahan penyakit 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .329a

2 .848

Likelihood Ratio .562 2 .755

Linear-by-Linear Association .084 1 .772

N of Valid Cases 25

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .24.

7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

10/16

Pemangkasan tanjar

pemangkasan tanjar * intensitas serangan Crosstabulation

intensitas serangan

Totalringan sedang berat

pemangkasan tanjar satu kali pertahun Count 5 7 1 13

Expected Count 5.5 6.8 .7 13.0

% within pemangkasan tanjar 38.5% 53.8% 7.7% 100.0%

% within intensitas serangan 62.5% 70.0% 100.0% 68.4%

% of Total 26.3% 36.8% 5.3% 68.4%

dua kali pertahun Count 3 3 0 6

Expected Count 2.5 3.2 .3 6.0

% within pemangkasan tanjar 50.0% 50.0% .0% 100.0%

% within intensitas serangan 37.5% 30.0% .0% 31.6%

% of Total 15.8% 15.8% .0% 31.6%

Total Count 8 10 1 19

Expected Count 8.0 10.0 1.0 19.0

% within pemangkasan tanjar 42.1% 52.6% 5.3% 100.0%

% within intensitas serangan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 42.1% 52.6% 5.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .603a

2 .740

Likelihood Ratio .897 2 .639

Linear-by-Linear Association .426 1 .514

N of Valid Cases 19

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .32.

7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

11/16

Tumpang sari

tumpang sari * intensitas serangan Crosstabulation

intensitas serangan

Totalringan sedang berat

tumpang sari iya Count 3 2 1 6

Expected Count 2.9 2.9 .2 6.0

% within tumpang sari 50.0% 33.3% 16.7% 100.0%

% within intensitas serangan 25.0% 16.7% 100.0% 24.0%

% of Total 12.0% 8.0% 4.0% 24.0%

tidak Count 9 10 0 19

Expected Count 9.1 9.1 .8 19.0

% within tumpang sari 47.4% 52.6% .0% 100.0%

% within intensitas serangan 75.0% 83.3% .0% 76.0%

% of Total 36.0% 40.0% .0% 76.0%

Total Count 12 12 1 25

Expected Count 12.0 12.0 1.0 25.0

% within tumpang sari 48.0% 48.0% 4.0% 100.0%

% within intensitas serangan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 48.0% 48.0% 4.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.527a

2 .171

Likelihood Ratio 3.244 2 .197

Linear-by-Linear Association .264 1 .607

N of Valid Cases 25

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .24.

7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

12/16

Suhu

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

faktor epidem * keparahan

penyakit

23 100,0% 0 ,0% 23 100,0%

suhu * keparahan penyakit Crosstabulation

keparahan penyakitTotalringan sedang berat

suhu optimal Count 9 9 1 19

Expected Count 9,1 9,1 ,8 19,0

% within faktor epidem 47,4% 47,4% 5,3% 100,0%

% within keparahan

penyakit

81,8% 81,8% 100,0% 82,6%

% of Total 39,1% 39,1% 4,3% 82,6%

jelek Count 2 2 0 4

Expected Count 1,9 1,9 ,2 4,0

% within faktor epidem 50,0% 50,0% ,0% 100,0%

% within keparahan

penyakit

18,2% 18,2% ,0% 17,4%

% of Total 8,7% 8,7% ,0% 17,4%

Total Count 11 11 1 23

Expected Count 11,0 11,0 1,0 23,0

% within faktor epidem 47,8% 47,8% 4,3% 100,0%

% within keparahan

penyakit

100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

% of Total 47,8% 47,8% 4,3% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square ,220a

2 ,896

Likelihood Ratio ,392 2 ,822

7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

13/16

Linear-by-Linear

Association

,059 1 ,808

N of Valid Cases 23

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimumexpected count is .17.

Symmetric Measures

Value

Asymp. Std.

Errora

Approx. Tb

Approx. Sig.

Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,052 ,186 -,238 ,814c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,039 ,198 -,179 ,859c

N of Valid Cases 23

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on normal approximation.

Letak kebun

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

letak kebun * keprahan

penyakit

20 100,0% 0 ,0% 20 100,0%

letak kebun * keprahan penyakit Crosstabulation

keprahan penyakit

Totalringan sedang berat

letak kebun terbuka Count 9 4 0 13

Expected Count 6,5 5,9 ,7 13,0

% within letak kebun 69,2% 30,8% ,0% 100,0%

% within keprahan penyakit 90,0% 44,4% ,0% 65,0%

% of Total 45,0% 20,0% ,0% 65,0%

berbatasan kebun karet Count 1 5 1 7

Expected Count 3,5 3,2 ,4 7,0

% within letak kebun 14,3% 71,4% 14,3% 100,0%

7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

14/16

% within keprahan penyakit 10,0% 55,6% 100,0% 35,0%

% of Total 5,0% 25,0% 5,0% 35,0%

Total Count 10 9 1 20

Expected Count 10,0 9,0 1,0 20,0

% within letak kebun 50,0% 45,0% 5,0% 100,0%

% within keprahan penyakit 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

% of Total 50,0% 45,0% 5,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 6,276a

2 ,043

Likelihood Ratio 7,031 2 ,030

Linear-by-Linear

Association

5,962 1 ,015

N of Valid Cases 20

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .35.

Symmetric Measures

Value

Asymp. Std.

Errora

Approx. Tb

Approx. Sig.

Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,560 ,157 2,869 ,010c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,554 ,170 2,821 ,011c

N of Valid Cases 20

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on normal approximation.

Kultivar

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

15/16

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

kultivar * keparahan

penyakit

16 100,0% 0 ,0% 16 100,0%

kultivar * keparahan penyakit Crosstabulation

keparahan penyakit

Totalringan sedang berat

kultivar bengkayang Count 6 5 1 12

Expected Count 6,0 5,3 ,8 12,0

% within kultivar 50,0% 41,7% 8,3% 100,0%

% within keparahan

penyakit

75,0% 71,4% 100,0% 75,0%

% of Total 37,5% 31,3% 6,3% 75,0%

india Count 1 1 0 2

Expected Count 1,0 ,9 ,1 2,0

% within kultivar 50,0% 50,0% ,0% 100,0%

% within keparahan

penyakit

12,5% 14,3% ,0% 12,5%

% of Total 6,3% 6,3% ,0% 12,5%

unggul Count 1 1 0 2

Expected Count 1,0 ,9 ,1 2,0

% within kultivar 50,0% 50,0% ,0% 100,0%

% within keparahan

penyakit

12,5% 14,3% ,0% 12,5%

% of Total 6,3% 6,3% ,0% 12,5%Total Count 8 7 1 16

Expected Count 8,0 7,0 1,0 16,0

% within kultivar 50,0% 43,8% 6,3% 100,0%

% within keparahan

penyakit

100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

% of Total 50,0% 43,8% 6,3% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

7/29/2019 analisis spss / pasw

16/16

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square ,381a

4 ,984

Likelihood Ratio ,622 4 ,961

Linear-by-Linear

Association

,046 1 ,830

N of Valid Cases 16

a. 7 cells (77.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum

expected count is .13.

Symmetric Measures

Value

Asymp. Std.

Errora

Approx. Tb

Approx. Sig.

Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,055 ,216 -,207 ,839c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,035 ,236 -,130 ,898c

N of Valid Cases 16

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on normal approximation.