13
AN ISU EVALUATION OF VIRTUAL DESKTOP INFRASTRUCTURE

An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure

  • Upload
    hamlet

  • View
    33

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure. Project Team Members. Dudley Roach. Majeed Abu-Qulbain Alexander Fishel Bryan Gill Ryan Grahs Patrick Healy Krena Hoyt Pete Juvinall Ballard McCleskey Kevin McMahon Dave Rathke Chad Scheiman Paul Unsbee. Project Summary. Goal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure

AN ISU EVALUATION OF VIRTUAL DESKTOP INFRASTRUCTURE

Page 2: An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure

PROJECT TEAM MEMBERSDudley Roach

Majeed Abu-Qulbain

Alexander FishelBryan Gill

Ryan GrahsPatrick HealyKrena Hoyt

Pete JuvinallBallard McCleskey

Kevin McMahonDave Rathke

Chad ScheimanPaul Unsbee

Page 3: An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure

PROJECT SUMMARY•Goal• The goal of this project is to research and evaluate the various

HVD environments and make a recommendation on a scalable implementation plan and the resources it would require.

•Scope• This project was asked to look at campus wide HVD solutions for

both lab/classroom environments and faculty/staff workstations.

Page 4: An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure

Research PhaseResearch VDI Software, Server Hardware, End-Points, and Peer Institution HVD Deployments

Design & Build PhaseDesign and build the HVD environments, evaluation scripts, and monitoring procedures, and determine the

end-user participants

Evaluation PhaseRun through the evaluation scripts, monitor environment performance, receive end-user feedback

Analysis & Recommendation PhaseAnalyze the evaluation results, environment performance, and end-user feedback to create

recommendations for server hardware, HVD software, end-point devices, environment design, and implementation plan

March

April

May

June

July

August

September

October

November

HVD Project Phases

Page 5: An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure

RESEARCH PHASE

• Vendors

• Citrix

• Dell

• Microsoft

• Nutanix

• Unidesk

• Universities

• University of Connecticut

• Heartland Community College

• Indiana University

• Clemson

• Michigan State

Page 6: An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure
Page 7: An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure
Page 8: An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure

WHAT’S IT GOING TO RUN ON?(ENDPOINT TESTING)

Page 9: An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure
Page 10: An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure

Thick Thin Zero• Existing

machines• Minimal

updating

• Connection broker independent

• Increased Graphics

• Long recap cycle

• Connection broker dependent

• Inexpensive• Minimal

management

Page 11: An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure
Page 12: An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure
Page 13: An ISU Evaluation of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure

Questions?