Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
An Ethnobotanical Study of Medicinal Plants
Used By Palestinians in Gaza Strip
ؾؼث لث اطة ااغرخذح ف اطث١ح دساعح اثاذاخ
افغط١١١ ف لطاع
Samar Yousuf. Alghuff
Supervised by:
Dr. Tarek A. ElBashiti
Associate Prof. of biotechnology
Dr.Mohamad M. Abou Auda
Associate prof. of Botany
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Science in biological science
July /2018
ضجــغ – حــلا١ــــــح الإعـــــــــاؼـاد
اثسث اؼ اذساعاخ اؼ١ا ػادج
اؼــــــــــــــــــــــح ــــــــــــــــــــ١ـو
اؼ اــــس١ــــاذــــ١ــــح ش ـــــــاخغر١
The Islamic University–Gaza
Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies
Faculty of Science
Master of Biological Science
II
إلــــــــــــــشاس
أا الغ أدا مذ اشعاح ار ذس اؼا:
An Ethnobotanical study of Medicinal Plants Used By
Palestinians In Gaza Strip
لث افغط١١١ ف لطاع اغرخذح ف اطة اؾؼث اطث١ح دساعح اثاذاخ
غضج
ألش تأ ا اؽرد ػ١ ز اشعاح إا راج خذ اخاؿ، تاعرثاء ا ذد الإؽاسج إ١ ز١ثا سد،
أ ز اشعاح وى أ أ خضء ا ٠مذ لث الاخش٠ ١ دسخح أ مة ػ أ تسث ذ أ
ؤعغح ذؼ١١ح أ تسث١ح أخش.
Declaration
I understand the nature of plagiarism, and I am aware of the University’s policy on
this.
The work provided in this thesis, unless otherwise referenced, is the researcher's own
work, and has not been submitted by others elsewhere for any other degree or
qualification.
:Student's name اع اطاة:
:Signature ارل١غ:
:Date 1/7/2018 اراس٠خ:
III
IV
Abstract
The study aimed at evaluating the current status of folk medicine treatment in
Gaza strip, identify medicinal plants still in use by therapists, and their importance in
health care. An ethnobotanical survey conducted investigated and recorded plant
species used in folk medicine. Information was collected by interview with 20
informants from different locations. The study documented 72 medical plant species
belonging to 33 families. The most frequently utilized plant parts were leaves 41%
followed by stems 18%, and seeds 14%. The majority of remedies were used to treat
gastrointestinal disorders, 37 species followed by circulatory system problems, 22
species, and Urinary system, 20 species.
The antimicrobial activity of eleven plant extracts and synergistic effect
between some plant extracts was evaluated against Escherichia coli and
Staphylococcus aureus.. The antibacterial activities of the extracts were evaluated
using the disk diffusion method, well diffusion method, minimum inhibitory
concentration (MIC) and minimum bacterial concentration (MBC). The results
showed that the E.coli was more susceptible to the employed plant extracts than
S.aureus. In most plant extracts the aqueous extract has greater effect in the
inhibition from ethanolic extract except Syzygium aromaticum which showed the
large inhibition zone on the bacteria and the convergence between the results of the
ethanol extract and aquatic extract in both disc and well diffusion method. On the
contrary of Syzygium aromaticum the Hibiscus sabdariffa shown the lowest MIC
value in aquatic extact Compared to ethanolic extract against two types of pathogenic
bacteria. The MBC results for the most of the plant species in each ethanolic and
aquatic extract against E.coli and S.aureus was >200. This current study detected the
effectiveness of synergistic effects to some extract with each other toward a
pathogenic bacteria some plant extracts showed weak synergistic effect using disc
and well diffusion method and low value of MIC.
Keywords : Ethnobotany, medicinal plant, antimicrobial, synergism, aquatic extract,
ethanolic extract, MIC, MBC.
V
Arabic abstract
إى رق اىػغ اىحبى ىيؼلاج اىشؼج ف قطبع غضح ، رحذذ اىجبربد اىطجخ اىز لا ذفذ اىذساعخ
أخشذ دساعخ اعزقظبئخ ثئخ ىزغدو الأاع رضاه رغزخذ قجو اىؼبىد ، أزب ف اىشػبخ اىظحخ.
ؼبىح صػ 02اىؼيبد خلاه اخشاء قبثيخ غ خغ حث راىجبرخ اىغزخذخ ف اىطت اىشؼج
صػذ ع جبر 20ػي ابم خزيفخ قطبع غضح. ثيغ ػذد اىجبربد الامثش اعزخذاب ف اىؼلاج اىشؼج
ػبئيخ جبرخ رغزخذ ف ػلاج اىؼذذ الاشاع. ثذ اىذساعخ ا امثش الاخضاء اىغزخذخ 33ػي
%. 41% يب اىجزس ثغجخ 41% احزيذ اىغقب اىشرجخ اىثبخ ثغجخ 14الاساق شنيذ غجخ اىجبد
00ي اىدبص اىذس الاػخ اىذخ ع 32مبذ اغيت اىجبربد رؼبىح اػطشاثبد اىدبص اىؼ
.ع جبر 02 يب اشاع اىدبص اىجىع
اىجبربد اىطجخ , ثبلإػبفخ اى اىزؤثش ع جبرزش لإحذ ػشش مب ر رق اىزؤثش اىؼذ ثن
ر رق اىشبؽ اىؼذ اىزآصس ىجؼغ ب ػذ الإششنخ اىقىخ اىجنزشب اىنسح اىؼقدخ اىزجخ .
حفش. قذسح ثنزش ىيغزخيظبد اىجبرخ, ثبعزخذا ؽشقخ الازشبس ف اىقشص مزىل ؽشقخ الازشبس ف اى
قخ أقو رشمض ثجؾ اىغزخيظبد اىجبرخ حذب ثبعزخذا ؽشقخ اىزخفف اىدضئ . اشبسد اىزبئح ذ
خ اىقىخ امثش فؼبىزب ػي اىجنزشب اىنسح شاىجبربد ػذ الإششاىغزخيظبد فؼبىخ ثؼغ ز
اىؼقدخ خبطخ ف اىغزخيظبد اىبئخ.
ف ؼظ اىغزخيظبد اىجبرخ مب رؤثش اىغزخيض اىبئ امجش رؤثش اىغزخيض الاثبى ف رثجؾ
اىز اظش اىغزخيض الاثبى زبئح افؼو Syzygium aromaticumثبعزثبء اه اى اىجنزش
Hibiscusش جبد اظ Syzygium aromaticumاىبئ ف رثجؾ اى اىجنزش. ػي اىؼنظ
sabdariffa قخ افؼو ف اىغزخيض اىبئ ثبىقبسخ غ اىغزخيض الإثبى ػذ ػ اىجنزشب اىغججخ
مب أظشد ثؼغ اىغزخيظبد اىجبرخ رؤثشا رآصسب ػؼفب ثبعزخذا ثبعزخذا ؽشقخ الازشبس ف ىلأشاع.
شقخ اىزخفف اىدضئ.اىقشص مزىل ؽشقخ الازشبس ف اىحفش ؽ
اىجبربد اىطجخ ، ؼبداد اىنشثبد، اىزآصس، غزخيظبد بئخ ، اىطت اىشؼج، اىنيبد اىفزبحخ3
غزخيض الإثبه، أقو رؤثش ثجؾ أقو رؤثش قبرو.
VI
Dedication
To the Spring that never stops giving, to who weaves my happiness with strings from
her merciful heart … my mother
To the big heart …. my father.
To my brothers and sisters who have been a great source of motivation and
inspiration .
To my daughter, my friend who suffered the difficulties with me Samar Abo Saffia
VII
Acknowledgments
My thanks first and foremost to Allah almighty, for his bounty, which enabled me to
accomplish this work. Praise be to Him first and foremost. who has been the source
of my energy throughout my study; without Allah none of this would be possible
All thanks to my supervisors Dr. Tarek Elbashiti and Dr. Mohamad Abou Auda for
their advice, guidance, and encouragement.
Also, I am very grateful for each of Farida Mousleh and Mahmoud Al Hindi from
Biological Control Unit and Samar Abo Saffia to help in the practical part of
antimicrobial methods of this research.
Finally, thanks are extended to everyone who has a hand in this work.
VIII
Table of content
Declaration ................................................................................................................... II
Abstract ...................................................................................................................... IV
Arabic abstract ............................................................................................................. V
Dedication .................................................................................................................. VI
Acknowledgments .................................................................................................... VII
Table of content ....................................................................................................... VIII
Table of Figures ........................................................................................................ XII
List of Table .......................................................................................................... XVII
List of Abbreviated Terms .......................................................................................XIX
Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................. 1
1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................ 2
1.2 Main objective: ...................................................................................................... 5
1.3 Specific Objectives: ............................................................................................... 5
1.4 Significance : ......................................................................................................... 6
Chapter 2 : Literature Review .................................................................................. 7
2.1 The history of herbal treatment .............................................................................. 8
2.2 Ethnobotany .......................................................................................................... 9
2.2.1 Traditional ethnobotanical markets ............................................................. 9
2.3 Medicinal plants ..................................................................................................... 9
2.3.1 Future of Medicinal Plants .......................................................................... 9
2.4 Plants used in extraction ...................................................................................... 10
2.4.1 Ocimum basilicum (basil) : 11 ........................................................... اش٠سا
2.4.2 Hibiscus sabdariffa L. (Roselle) : 12 ................................................. اىشوذ٠ح
2.4.3 Trigonella foenum- graecum L. (Fenugreek seed) : 13 ........................ اسثح
IX
2.4.4 Coriandrum sativum (Coriander) : 14 ................................................. اىضتشج
2.4.5 Anethum graveolens (Dill) : 15 ....................................................... ػ١ خشادج
2.4.6 Syzygium aromaticum L. (Clove) : 16 ................................................. امشف
2.4.7 Glycyrrhiza glabra L. (Licorice) : 17 ........................................... اؼشق عط
2.4.8 Cuminum cyminum L. (Cumin) :18 ...................................................... اى
2.4.9 Cymbopogo schoenanthus.L (camel grass) :19 .................................. اسفا تش
2.4.10 Boswellia sacra Flueck (Olibanum or frankincense) : 20 .... زص اثا اذوش
2.4.11 Artemisia monosperma Delile (white wormwood) : 21 ....................... اؾ١ر
2.5 Microorganism ..................................................................................................... 22
2.5.1 Escherichia coli ........................................................................................ 22
2.5.2 Staphylococcus aureus ............................................................................. 23
2.6 Previous Studies:.................................................................................................. 24
Chapter 3: Materials and Methods ......................................................................... 27
3.1 Materials .............................................................................................................. 28
3.1.1 Study Area ................................................................................................. 28
3.1.2 Study population ........................................................................................ 29
3.1.3 Medicinal Plants Markets .......................................................................... 31
3.1.4 Plant Sample Collection: ........................................................................... 31
3.1.5 Culture media and chemicals ..................................................................... 33
3.1.6 Microorganisms ......................................................................................... 33
3.2 Methods: ........................................................................................................... 33
3.2.1 Ethnobotanical Methods: ........................................................................... 33
3.2.1.1 Survey and Identification: .................................................................. 33
3.2.2 Extraction methods : .................................................................................. 34
3.2.2.1 Preparation of plant extract: ............................................................... 34
X
3.2.2.2 Evaluation of antibacterial activity of plant extracts by disc diffusion
method: ........................................................................................................... 35
3.2.2.3 Evaluation of antibacterial activity of plant extracts by well diffusion
method: ........................................................................................................... 35
3.2.2.4 Determination of MIC and MBC of plant extracts by Microdilution
Method: ........................................................................................................... 35
3.2.2.5 Synergistic assay: ............................................................................... 36
Chapter (4) :Results .................................................................................................. 37
4.1 Taxonomic diversity of plants under investigation............................................. 38
4.2 Most cited plants and remedies ............................................................................ 40
4.3 Folk medical knowledge sources: ........................................................................ 57
4.4 Used parts ............................................................................................................ 57
4.5 Procurement methods of medicinal plants: .......................................................... 58
4.6 Evaluation of antibacterial activity of plant extracts by disc diffusion method .. 58
4.6.1 Against Escherichia coli ............................................................................ 58
4.6.1.1 The aquatic extracts ............................................................................ 58
4.6.1.2 The ethanolic extracts ......................................................................... 59
4.6.2 Against Staphylococcus aureus ................................................................ 59
4.6.2.1 The aquatic extracts: ........................................................................... 59
4.6.2.2 The ethanolic extracts: ........................................................................ 59
4.7 Evaluation of antibacterial activity of plant extracts by well diffusion method .. 60
4.7.1 Against Escherichia coli: ........................................................................... 60
4.7.1.1 The aquatic extracts: ........................................................................... 60
4.7.1.2 The ethanolic extracts: ........................................................................ 60
4.7.2. Against Staphylococcus aureus: ............................................................... 61
4.7.2.1 The aquatic extracts: ........................................................................... 61
4.7.2.2 The ethanolic extracts: ........................................................................ 61
XI
4.8 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) & minimum bactericidal
concentrations (MBC) of plant extracts ..................................................................... 70
4.8.1 Against Escherichia coli: ........................................................................... 70
4.8.2 Against Staphylococcus aureus: ............................................................... 75
4.9 Evaluation the synergistic effect: ......................................................................... 80
4.9.1 The Synergistic effect between plant extract: ............................................ 80
4.9.1.1 Evaluation the synergistic effect by disc diffusion method: ............... 80
4.9.2 Evaluation the synergistic effect by well diffusion method ...................... 80
4.9.2.1 Against Escherichia coli: .................................................................... 80
4.9.2.2 Against S. aureus: ............................................................................... 80
4.9.3 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of mixed plant extracts
against isolated bacteria: .................................................................................... 82
4.9.3.1 Against Escherichia coli: .................................................................... 82
4.9.3.2 Against S. aureus: ............................................................................... 82
Chapter (5) Discussion and Conclusions ........................................................... 85
5.1 Study population: ................................................................................................. 86
5.2 Medicinal Plants Markets: ................................................................................... 86
5.3 Plants and parts used ............................................................................................ 87
5.4 Antibacterial Activity of the Plant Extracts ......................................................... 88
5.5 Conclusion: .......................................................................................................... 91
5.6 Recommendation: ................................................................................................ 91
References .................................................................................................................. 93
Appendix .................................................................................................................. 100
XII
Table of Figures
Figure (3.1) : Gaza strip map ( source : www.arij.org )............................................ 29
Figure (3.2): Distribution of study population by gender ......................................... 30
Figure (3.3): Distribution of study population by age .............................................. 30
Figure (3.4): Distribution of study population by educational level. ....................... 31
Figure (3.5) : Photograph shows interview with informants .................................... 34
Figure (4.1): Distribution of plant families by number of species ........................... 39
Figure (4.2): Sources of folk medical knowledge .................................................... 57
Figure (4.3): Percentage of used plant parts ............................................................. 57
Figure (4.4) Procurement methods of medicinal plants ............................................ 58
Figure (4.6) : The effect of aquatic extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum, 7-Ocimum
basilicum,8-Artemisia monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum, 10-Cymbopogon
schoenanthus and 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by disc diffusion method to against E. coli
................................................................................................................................... 64
Figure (4.5) : The effect of aquatic extract to 1- Anethum graveolens, 2- Hibiscus
sabdariffa, 3- Boswellia Carterii, 4- Cuminum cyminum, 5- Trigonella foenum
graecum by disc diffusion method to against E. coli ................................................. 64
Figure (4.8) : The effect of ethanolic extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum, 7-Ocimum
basilicum,8-Artemisia monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum, and 10-Cymbopogon
schoenanthus by disc diffusion method to against E. coli ......................................... 64
Figure (4.7) : The effect of ethanolic extract to 1- Anethum graveolens, 2- Hibiscus
sabdariffa, 3- Boswellia Carterii, 4- Cuminum cyminum, 5- Trigonella foenum
graecum by disc diffusion method to against E. coli ................................................. 64
Figure (4.10) : The effect of aquatic extract to 1- Anethum graveolens, 2- Hibiscus
sabdariffa, 3- Boswellia Carterii, 4- Cuminum cyminum, 5- Trigonella foenum
graecum by disc diffusion method to against S. aureus ............................................ 65
Figure (4.9) : The effect of aquatic extract to 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by disc
diffusion method to against E. coli ............................................................................ 65
XIII
Figure (4.12): The effect of aquatic extract to 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by disc
diffusion method to against S. aureus ........................................................................ 65
Figure (4.11) : The effect of aquatic extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum, 7-
Ocimumbasilicum,8-Artemisia monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum, and 10-
Cymbopogon schoenanthus by disc diffusion method to against S.aureus ............... 65
Figure (4.14) : The effect of ethanolic extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum, 7-
Ocimum basilicum,8-Artemisia monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum, and 10-
Cymbopogon schoenanthus by disc diffusion method to against S.aureus. .............. 66
Figure (4.13) : The effect of ethanolic extract to 1- Anethum graveolens, 2-
Hibiscus sabdariffa, 3- Boswellia Carterii, 4- Cuminum cyminum, 5- Trigonella
foenum graecum by disc diffusion method to against S. aureus ............................... 66
Figure (4.16) : The effect of aquatic extract to 1- Anethum graveolens, 2- Hibiscus
sabdariffa, 3- Boswellia Carterii, 4- Cuminum cyminum, 5- Trigonella foenum
graecum by well diffusion method to against E.coli ................................................. 66
Figure (4.15) : The effect of ethanolic extract to 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by disc
diffusion method to against S. aureus ........................................................................ 66
Figure (4.18) : The effect of aquatic extract to 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by well
diffusion method to against E.coli ............................................................................. 67
Figure (4.17) : The effect of aquatic extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum,7-Ocimum
basilicum,8-Artemisia monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum, and 10-Cymbopogon
schoenanthus by well diffusion method to against E.coli. ......................................... 67
Figure (4.20) : The effect of ethanolic extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum, 7-
Ocimum basilicum,8-Artemisia monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum, and 10-
Cymbopogon schoenanthus by well diffusion method to against E.coli. .................. 67
Figure (4.19) : The effect of ethanolic extract to 1- Anethum graveolens, 2-
Hibiscus sabdariffa, 3- Boswellia Carterii, 4- Cuminum cyminum, 5- Trigonella
foenum graecum by well diffusion method to against E.coli .................................... 67
Figure (4.22) : The effect of aquatic extract to 1- Anethum graveolens, 2- Hibiscus
sabdariffa, 3- Boswellia Carterii, 4- Cuminum cyminum, 5- Trigonella foenum
graecum by well diffusion method to against S.aureus ............................................. 68
XIV
Figure (4.21) : The effect of ethanolic extract to 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by well
diffusion method to against E.coli ............................................................................. 68
Figure (4.24) The effect of aquatic extract to 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by well
diffusion method to against S. aureus ........................................................................ 68
Figure (4.23) The effect of aquatic extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum, 7-Ocimum
basilicum,8-Artemisia monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum, and 10-Cymbopogon
schoenanthus by well diffusion method to against S.aureus ..................................... 68
Figure (4.26) The effect of ethanolic extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum,7-Ocimum
basilicum,8-Artemisia monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum, and 10-Cymbopogon
schoenanthus by well diffusion method to against S.aureus ..................................... 69
Figure (4.25) The effect of ethanolic extract to 1- Anethum graveolens, 2- Hibiscus
sabdariffa, 3- Boswellia Carterii, 4- Cuminum cyminum, 5- Trigonella foenum
graecum by well diffusion method to against S.aureus ............................................. 69
Figure (4.27) The effect of ethanolic extract to 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by well
diffusion method to against S. aureus ........................................................................ 69
Figure (4.29): (MIC) of ethanolic extracts of 4-Cuminum cyminum 5-Syzygium
aromaticum 6-Trigonella foenum graecum against E. coli....................................... 72
Figure (4.28): (MIC) of ethanolic extracts of 1- Anethum graveolens 2- Hibiscus
sabdariffa 3- Boswellia Carterii against E. coli. ........................................................ 72
Figure (4.31): (MIC) of ethanolic extracts of 9- Coriandrumand 10-
sativumCymbopogon schoenanthus against E. coli. .................................................. 72
Figure (4.30): (MIC) of ethanolic extracts of 7-Ocimum basilicum 8-Artemisia
monosperma against E. coli. ...................................................................................... 72
Figure (4.32): (MIC) of ethanolic extracts of 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra against E. coli
................................................................................................................................... 73
Figure (4.33): (MIC) of aquatic extracts of 1- Anethum graveolens 2- Hibiscus
sabdariffa 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra against E. coli..................................................... 73
Figure (4.34): (MIC) of aquatic extracts of 3- Boswellia Carterii 4-Cuminum
cyminum against E. coli............................................................................................. 73
XV
Figure (4.35): (MIC) of aquatic extracts of 5-Syzygium aromaticum 6-Trigonella
foenum graecum against E. coli. ................................................................................ 73
Figure (4.36): (MIC) of aquatic extracts of 7-Ocimum basilicum 8-Artemisia
monosperma 9- Coriandrumand 10- sativumCymbopogon schoenanthus against E.
coli. ............................................................................................................................ 74
Figure (4.37): (MIC) of ethanolic extracts of 1- Anethum graveolens 2- Hibiscus
sabdariffa against S.aureus. ....................................................................................... 77
Figure (4.38): (MIC) of ethanolic extracts of 3- Boswellia Carterii 4-Cuminum
cyminum against S.aureus. ........................................................................................ 77
Figure (4.39): (MIC) of ethanolic extracts of 5-Syzygium aromaticum 6-Trigonella
foenum graecum against S.aureus. ............................................................................ 77
Figure (4.40): (MIC) of ethanolic extracts of 7-Ocimum basilicum 8-Artemisia
monosperma against S.aureus.................................................................................... 77
Figure (4.41): (MIC) of ethanolic extracts 9- Coriandrumand 10- sativum
Cymbopogon schoenanthus against S.aureus ............................................................ 78
Figure (4.42): (MIC) of ethanolic extracts of 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra against
S.aureus...................................................................................................................... 78
Figure (4.43): (MIC) of aquatic extracts of 1- Anethum graveolens 2- Hibiscus
sabdariffa and 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra against S.aureus. ......................................... 78
Figure (4.44): (MIC) of aquatic extracts of 3- Boswellia Carterii 4-Cuminum
cyminum against S.aureus. ........................................................................................ 78
Figure (4.45): (MIC) of aquatic extracts of 5-Syzygium aromaticum 6-Trigonella
foenum graecum against S.aureus. ............................................................................ 79
Figure (4.46): (MIC) of aquatic extracts of 7-Ocimum basilicum ......................... 79
8-Artemisia monosperma ........................................................................................... 79
9- Coriandruman sativum .......................................................................................... 79
10-Cymbopogon schoenanthus against S.aureus. ...................................................... 79
XVI
Figure (4.47): the MIC of aquatic extract of 12- Cuminum cyminum with Ocimum
basilicum and 13- Artemisia monosperma with Coriandrum sativum against S.
aureus......................................................................................................................... 83
Figure (4.48): the MIC of ethanolic extract of 12- Cuminum cyminum with
Ocimum basilicum and 13- Artemisia monosperma with Coriandrum sativum
against S. aureus. ....................................................................................................... 83
Figure (4.49): the MIC of aquatic extract of 12- Cuminum cyminum with Ocimum
basilicum and 13- Artemisia monosperma with Coriandrum sativum against E.coli 84
Figure (4.50): the MIC of ethanolic extract of 12- Cuminum cyminum with
Ocimum basilicum and 13- Artemisia monosperma with Coriandrum sativum
against E.coli .............................................................................................................. 84
XVII
List of Table
Table (2.1) : Classification of Ocimum basilicum .................................................... 11
Table (2.2) : Classification of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. ............................................... 12
Table (2.3) : Classification of Trigonella foenum- graecum L. ................................ 13
Table (2.4) : Classification of Coriandrum sativum L. ............................................. 14
Table (2.5) : Classification of Anethum graveolens L. ............................................. 15
Table (2.6) : Classification of Syzygium aromaticum. L ........................................... 16
Table (2.7) : Classification of Glycyrrhiza glabra L ................................................ 17
Table (2.8) : Classification of Cuminum cyminum L. ............................................... 18
Table (2.9) : Classification of Cymbopogo schoenanthus.L ..................................... 19
Table (2.10) : Classification of Boswellia sacra Flueck ........................................... 20
Table (2.11) : Classification of Artemisia monosperma Delile ................................ 21
Table (2.12) : Classification of Escherichia coli ...................................................... 22
Table (2.13) : Classification of Staphylococcus aureus........................................... 23
(Table 3.1) List of medicinal plants used in the antimicrobial & synergistic assay . 32
(Table 3.2) List of chemicals used in the study ........................................................ 33
Table (4.1) : Distribution of plant families by number of species ............................ 38
Table (4.2): Classification of the most used plants in popular treatments in the Gaza
Strip ............................................................................................................................ 41
Table (4.3) : Diversity of medicinal use- categories ................................................ 56
Table (4.4) : Antimicrobial Activity of Plant extracts against E. coli by well
diffusion method and disc diffusion method ............................................................. 62
Table (4.5): Antimicrobial Activity of Plant extracts on Staphylococcus aureus by
well diffusion method and disc diffusion method ..................................................... 63
Table (4.6) : The MICs & MBCs of plant extracts against E. coli .......................... 71
Table (4.7): The MICs & MBCs of extracts against S.aureus .................................. 75
XVIII
Table (4.8): Antimicrobial Activity between Plant extracts on E. coli by well
diffusion method and disc diffusion method ............................................................. 81
Table (4.9): Antimicrobial Activity between Plant extracts on S. aureus by well
diffusion method and disc diffusion method ............................................................. 81
Table (4.10): The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) between plant extracts
against isolated bacteria ............................................................................................. 82
XIX
List of Abbreviated Terms
MIC Minimum Inhibitory Concentration
MBC Minimum Bactericidal Concentration
DMSO Dimethyl Sulfoxide
TTC Triphenyl Tetra zolium Chloride
MHB Muller-Hinton Broth
MHA Muller-Hinton Agar
milligram/milliliter mg/ml
Millimeter mm
CFU Colony Forming Unit
1
Chapter 1
Introduction
2
1.1 Overview
Throughout history, human relied on various natural materials as a treatment
for several diseases. But it has been replaced by the most natural products with
synthetic drugs that are based on modern chemistry and biotechnology over the past
few decades (Jaradat, 2005).
We cannot be denied that the discovery of antibiotics is one of the most
important discoveries that have helped to combat bacterial infections that cause
various diseases but because of the erroneous and random use of antibiotic infectious
bacteria have formed resistance against these drugs, this is in addition to the side
effects that appear due to the use of antibiotics (Jouda et al., 2015) , for these reasons
there has been an increasing interest in the study of medicinal plants and their
traditional use in different parts of the world.
Although modern medicine may be available in many developing countries
but about two thirds of the population relies heavily on traditional practitioners and
medicinal plants to meet primary health care needs. Traditional herbal medicine is
often been used for historical, cultural, and ecological reasons, in particular this is
due to continued availability, better compatibility and high acceptance (Kunwar et
al., 2010).
Reliance on derivative treatments of medicinal plants, especially in
developing countries where the importance of modern drugs often absent or simply
too expensive. Low economic situation of developing countries leads to higher prices
for medicines and this makes medicinal plants and traditional medicine more
desirable by the local population (Randriamiharisoa et al., 2015).
Most of the world’s population still use herbs as a first choice to treat
diseases but besides the medicine field several mass-consumed eatables and
stimulants also have beneficial side-effects (Nemeth, 2012). The knowledge of
medicinal plants has been accumulated in the course of many centuries and the used
of these plant by indigenous cultures are useful not only to maintain their
biodiversity and cultural traditions but also for the health care community and the
development of drugs in the present and the future (Abou Auda, 2011).
3
Large population density in developing countries rely on plant resources for
health care. Allopathic medicine can cure a wide range of diseases, but rising prices
in some cases, side effects cause a lot of people to return to herbal medicines, which
tend to have fewer side effects (Mahmoud and Gairola, 2013)
WHO estimated in 2002 that 80% of the world's population in developing
countries rely mainly on medicinal plants and traditional medicine practitioners to
meet the primary health care needs (Ali-Shtayeh et al., 2011) and previous research
has shown that about 85% of traditional treatment involves in the use of plant
extracts (Quiroga et al., 2012).
However, Western countries have also seen a growing interest in natural
medicine. In the particular, it has spread in the herbal medicine market and become
rich in pharmacies and many stores (Jaradat, 2005).
Medicinal plants can be of great importance in the daily life of the people
who live near the places where they grow, not only for healing traditions, but as a
commodity out to urban areas where they are not found locally to be sold in the
market (Randriamiharisoa et al., 2015).
Several studies indicate that some plants contain compounds such as peptides,
aldehydes, alkaloidal constituents, some essential oils, phenols and water, ethanol,
chloroform, methanol. These plants shown therapeutic application against some
human diseases caused by bacteria, fungi and viruses (El Astal et al., 2005).
These natural products are still a major source of new drug discoveries: for
example, 65% of the drugs that were approved for marketing between the years 1983
and 1994 were based on natural sources (Jaradat, 2005). Several studies have shown
the possibility of using plant extracts in the therapy of some diseases caused by
bacterial infection and confirmed the effect of these extracts on bacterial growth,
these studies proved that some Palestinian plants have a significant impact on these
infectious bacteria (Ali-Shtayeh et al., 2014).
In the late 19th century scientific tests were conducted for the first time on
the properties of some plants in their resistance to certain microbes. The results were
documented today as a reliable source of modern medicine(Abu Shanab et al., 2015).
So medicinal plants have a promising future because there are about half million
4
plants around the world, and most of the medical activities of them have not
investigated yet, which could be decisive in the treatment of present or future studies
(Rasool Hassan, 2012).
In Palestine, like in many developing countries, medicinal plants play an
important role in primary health care and are widely used as complementary and
alternative medicine in the Traditional Arabic Palestinian Herbal Medicine, for the
maintenance of health, and for the treatment of various illnesses including chronic
diseases (Ali-Shtayeh et al., 2013). These herbal medicine considered an integral
part of the Palestinian culture and plays a pivotal and indispensable role in the
current folk healthcare (Jaradat, 2005).
On Palestine culture and economy the impact of local plant varieties is
significant. Many wild plant species are extensively used in Palestine cuisine and
many people, mostly in rural areas, still widely use medicinal plants for the treatment
of burns, disease and other (Hinnawi, 2010).
In Palestine, has a lot of ethnobotanical surveys were conducted to highlight
the importance of herbal medicine in the treatment of illnesses and diseases (Abd
Rabou et al., 2008). but there is a significant lack of information on the number and
type of medicinal plants used in Palestine, especially in Gaza Strip (Abou Auda,
2011).
The local market of medicinal plants in Gaza strip not documented so our
study focused on the Gaza strip and its medicinal plant markets. We focused also on
the varieties of medicinal plants used in medical treatments by traditional healers.
This study was the starting point for identifying the main groups of medicinal plants
used by folk medicine practitioners and the benefits derived from these plants.
Few studies have found combining antimicrobial agent with crude plant
extracts increase the efficiency of them against some kinds of pathogenic organism
(Elbashiti., et al 2011), so we focused also on the effect of extract of some plants on
S.aureus and E.coli bacteria and the synergistic effect of some plants on these
pathogenic bacteria.
5
1.2 Main objective:
The main objective of this study is to identify and classify the most important
medicinal plants that are used by folk therapists in Gaza Strip.
1.3 Specific Objectives:
1- To documenting and preserving traditional knowledge on the use of
medicinal plants among the local population in the Gaza Strip for the
management of various diseases.
2- To study the impact and effectiveness of certain medicinal plants used in the
treatment of some diseases
3- To ascertain the detailed information about the use of plants and healing
practices among citizens and therapists on traditional medicine.
4- To find out the efficiency of the most popular extracts against pathogenic
bacteria.
5- To determine the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum
Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of the plant extracts.
6- To determine the synergistic effect of some plant extracts with each other on
pathogenic bacteria.
6
1.4 Significance :
This study is the current attempt to be the first of its kind in the Gaza Strip. It
will identify and give useful information on the classification and identification of
the most important medicinal plants in Gaza Strip used by locals and therapists on
traditional medicine in the treatment of some diseases. Moreover, the results of this
study should be a top priority for the people in terms of knowledge, management,
use, and research potential in the future.
7
Chapter 2
Literature Review
8
2.1 The history of herbal treatment
The concept of the use of plants by humans has changed since 1880s until the
present day. The method of use of some plants varies according to the culture of man
and his surrounding environment. Man depends on plants as a food, economic,
cultural and therapeutic source(Ari et al., 2015).
Herbal treatment is one of the oldest methods of treatment used by mankind
on the face of the earth, where the profession was passed from generation to
generation orally and without codification, where it became a traditional way among
the peoples and one of the most important habits passed through generations
(Revathi and Parimelazhagan, 2010)
The increasing demand for medicines manufactured from natural herbs led to
the exploitation of these plants in an uncontrolled and uncoordinated and this led to
the threat of natural plants in most countries (Kunwar et al., 2013).
Herbal treatment have not been well studied, tested, or documented in many
developing countries, and most of the information about these plants are still in the
hands of traditional healers and knowledge of healers is either lost or passed to next
generation by the word of mouth (Amiri and Joharchi, 2013). And because the
value of knowledge of treatments is eroding with the older generation, the
government should make efforts to preserve this knowledge, and promote the
traditional treatments and protection of natural resources of medicinal and aromatic
plants, and the initiation of research and development activities in this field. There is
a need to strengthen production and trade to get the commercial benefits of medicinal
and aromatic plants of the country's natural resources( Handa et al., 2006).
Over the long history of traditional use of medicinal plants in Palestine study
the use of ethnobotanical represents a unique opportunity (Ali-Shtayeh et al., 2015).
West Bank and Gaza Strip have lots of herbs and medicinal plants, which are widely
used for the treatment of various diseases and also in high demand (Abou Auda,
2012). But the constant and ongoing conflict with Zionist enemy has led to the
deterioration of health care services, natural resources and plant reduced the ability to
exploit these resources despite the popular awareness of these resources and their
uses in folk medicine (Handa et al., 2006).
9
2.2 Ethnobotany
The definition of ethnobotany can be summed up in four words: people,
plants, interactions, and uses, so its includes all types of relationships between
people and plants (Abbasi et al., 2011) and focuses on how and why local people use
medicinal herbal remedies and works to understand the relationship between humans
and local plants in their land (Hinnawi, 2010).
2.2.1 Traditional ethnobotanical markets
Around the world the traditional ethnobotanical markets has been recognized
as that which sell and trade medicinal herbs and their derivatives as it became a
regional trade between the countries of the world and express the culture of some
peoples and their traditions (Tinitana et al., 2016).
Traditional ethnobotanical markets includes two main branches: the first is
the market of traditional medicinal plants where the plants are sold raw, untreated
and dried. The second branch is the market for medicines manufactured from these
plants where the plants are sold individually or mixed with several other herbs to
treat a specific disease (Randriamiharisoa et al., 2015)
2.3 Medicinal plants
Medical plants are plants that have medicinal properties and are used for
therapeutic purposes because some or all of their parts contain an effective substance
for the treatment of diseases (Nemeth, 2012). It is also known as plants used to
maintain health or treat some diseases. The methods of using these plants vary from
one country to another around the world according to the traditions of this country
(Smith-Hall et al., 2012).
Any plant may be considered a medicinal plant if it contains an effective
substance whether this plant is wild or implanted and whether it is Vegetables , fruits
, or spices. Most of these plants were used mainly to save food or spices or to treat
gastric disorders because of their beneficial effects and taste (Nemeth, 2012).
2.3.1 Future of Medicinal Plants
Medicinal plants have a promising future, where all around the world about
half a million plant , and most of them their medical activities have not investigated
10
yet which could have been decisively in the treatment of many diseases (Rasool
Hassan, 2012). Recently, modern medicine has been adopted on the use of plant
extracts in order to reduce the use of chemical treatments and reduce their side
effects and with great technological advances, researchers can recognize the
importance of these large numbers of plants and use them to treat diseases as an
alternative to these chemical compounds (Yuan et al., 2016).
The effectiveness of some medical extracts has also been proven in the
treatment of certain incurable diseases such as cancer. The most important
characteristic of medicinal plants is therapeutic synergy where more than one plant
extract can be used simultaneously to treat a specific disease (Rasool Hassan, 2012).
Where popular healers famous for the creation of mixtures of a group of herbs
together to treat some diseases on the grounds that the plant cannot cure the disease
alone. Therefore, in this study we tested the synergistic effect of extracts to some of
these plants on some types of human pathogenic bacteria and their effectiveness in
eradicating the disease.
2.4 Plants used in extraction
The following are some of the plant extracts that have been studying its
antimicrobial activity against some pathogenic clinically isolated bacteria
11
2.4.1 Ocimum basilicum (basil) : اش٠سا
Basil or sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L) is a plant that belongs to the
family Lamiaceae and has shown its potential to be therapeutic in averting several
diseases in various countries, some studies have shown that basil leaves contain
antioxidants, anti-bacterial and antiviruses, as well as cancer treatment, also basil oil
used in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease (Sakr and Al-
Amoudi, 2012) (Table 2.1).
Table (2.1) : Classification of Ocimum basilicum
Kingdom Plantae
Ocimum basilicum L
Subkingdom Tracheobionta
Superdivision Spermatophyta
Division Magnoliophyta
Class Magnoliopsida
Subclass Asteridae
Order Lamiales
Family Lamiaceae
Genus Ocimum L.
Species Ocimum basilicum L
12
2.4.2 Hibiscus sabdariffa L. (Roselle) : اىشوذ٠ح
Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) belongs to the family Malvaceae, is an important
annual crop grown successfully in tropical and sub-tropical climates
The whole plant can be used as a drink or dried sepals can be used only by soaking it
in water or boiling it and being taken as a hot drink, around the world roselle plant
have been used for its medicinal importance such as hypertension, pyrexia and liver
damage Recently the sepal extract has been used as an effective treatment against
leukemia (Mohamed et al., 2012 ). (Table 2.2).
Table (2.2) : Classification of Hibiscus sabdariffa L.
Kingdom Plantae
Hibiscus sabdariffa L
Subkingdom Tracheobionta
Superdivision Spermatophyta
Division Magnoliophyta
Class Magnoliopsida
Subclass Dilleniidae
Order Malvales
Family Malvaceae
Genus Hibiscus L.
Species Hibiscus sabdariffa L
13
2.4.3 Trigonella foenum- graecum L. (Fenugreek seed) : اسثح
Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) is a plant that belongs to the
Fabacecae family. Fenugreek seeds have been known and valued as medicinal
material from very early times. The leaves and seeds of the fenugreek are used in
many countries in the treatment of some diseases such as diabetes, high cholesterol
and cancer as contain antibiotics for some types of bacteria and other diseases
(Moradi kor et al., 2013 ). (Table 2.3).
Table (2.3) : Classification of Trigonella foenum- graecum L.
Kingdom Plantae
Trigonella foenum -graecum L.
Subkingdom Tracheobionta
Superdivision Spermatophyta
Division Magnoliophyta
Class Magnoliopsida
Subclass Rosidae
Order Fabales
Family Fabaceae
Genus Trigonella L.
Species Trigonella foenum-graecum
L.
14
2.4.4 Coriandrum sativum (Coriander) : اىضتشج
Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) which belongs to the family Apiaceae is
one of miraculous herb that functions as both, spice as well as herbal medicine, it is
mainly cultivated from its seeds throughout the year.
Coriander is a seasonal herb that spreads throughout the mediterranean and is known
for its great medicinal value. This plant is used in folk medicine treatment because of
its highly aromatic and has multiple uses in food and in other industries (Bhat et al.,
2014). (Table 2.4).
Table (2.4) : Classification of Coriandrum sativum L.
Kingdom Plantae
Coriandrum sativum L.
Subkingdom Tracheobionta
Superdivision Spermatophyta
Division Magnoliophyta
Class Magnoliopsida
Subclass Rosidae
Order Apiales
Family Apiaceae
Genus Coriandrum L
Species Coriandrum sativum L.
15
2.4.5 Anethum graveolens (Dill) : ػ١ خشادج
Anethum graveolens L. commonly known as dill belonging to the family
Apiaceae, originated from mediterranean and West Asia, dill has a long history in
medicinal uses, where the leaves of this plant are used in food because it is rich in
minerals such as phosphorus, potassium and magnesium, as the seeds are used in the
treatment of cystitis, liver disease and insomnia (Chahal et al., 2017). (Table 2.5).
Table (2.5) : Classification of Anethum graveolens L.
Kingdom Plantae
Anethum graveolens L
Subkingdom Tracheobionta
Superdivision Spermatophyta
Division Magnoliophyta
Class Magnoliopsida
Subclass Rosidae
Order Apiales
Family Apiaceae
Genus Anethum L.
Species Anethum graveolens L
16
2.4.6 Syzygium aromaticum L. (Clove) : امشف
Syzygium aromaticum L. commonly known as Clove belonging to the family
from family Myrtaceae. The part used from the plant is the flower buds where they
are collected before flowering it is one of the most valuable spices that has been used
for centuries as food preservative and for many medicinal purpose. Clove is an
important medicinal plant due to the wide range of pharmacological effects
consolidated from traditional use for centuries. Clove oil is effective as a broad
spectrum antibiotic it is effective for the treatment of diarrhea and eradicating the
fungus that caused athlete's foot (Cortés-Rojasf et al., 2014). (Table 2.6).
Table (2.6) : Classification of Syzygium aromaticum. L
Kingdom Plantae
Syzygium aromaticum.L
Subkingdom Tracheobionta
Superdivision Spermatophyta
Division Magnoliophyta
Class Magnoliopsida
Subclass Rosidae
Order Myrtales
Family Myrtaceae
Genus Syzygium P
Species Syzygium aromaticum.L
17
2.4.7 Glycyrrhiza glabra L. (Licorice) : اؼشق عط
Glycyrrhiza glabra L., belonging to the family Fabaceae, is a plant which
grows in Egypt and other countries of the world, and has roots of great nutritional
and medical value (Zadeh et al,. 2013). Licorice is used in folk medicine as a
treatment for stomach and duodenal ulcers and is a good antidote to inflammation
and allergies (Damle, 2014 ). (Table 2.7).
Table (2.7) : Classification of Glycyrrhiza glabra L
Kingdom Plantae
Glycyrrhiza glabra L
Subkingdom Tracheobionta
Superdivision Spermatophyta
Division Magnoliophyta
Class Magnoliopsida
Subclass Rosidae
Order Fabales
Family Fabaceae
Genus Glycyrrhiza L
Species Glycyrrhiza glabra L
18
2.4.8 Cuminum cyminum L. (Cumin) : اى
Cuminum cyminum L., belonging to the family Apiaceae, it is considered as
one of the old medicinal herb in both Asia, Africa and Europe. Cumin was used in
the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases, gynecological diseases and also in the
treatment of dental pain and epilepsy, the seeds were also documented as stimulant,
carminative and astringent (Gohari, A. R., and Saeidnia, S., 2011). (Table 2.8).
Table (2.8) : Classification of Cuminum cyminum L.
Kingdom Plantae
Cuminum cyminum L
Subkingdom Tracheobionta
Superdivision Spermatophyta
Division Magnoliophyta
Class Magnoliopsida
Subclass Rosidae
Order Apiales
Family Apiaceae
Genus Cuminum L.
Species Cuminum cyminum L
19
2.4.9 Cymbopogo schoenanthus.L (camel grass) : اسفا تش
Cymbopogo schoenanthus.L belongs to the family Poaceae, it is characterized
by a distinctive and strong smell and is considered an important medicinal plant. It is
a powerful sedative for the digestive system and antiparasitic, Some studies have
shown the role of the camel grass in the treatment of heart disease and high
cholesterol (Sousa et al,. 2005 ). (Table 2.9).
Table (2.9) : Classification of Cymbopogo schoenanthus.L
ingdom Plantae
Cymbopogo schoenanthus.L
Subkingdom Tracheobionta
Superdivision Spermatophyta
Division Magnoliophyta
Class Liliopsida
Subclass Commelinidae
Order Cyperales
Family Poaceae
Genus Cymbopogon Spreng.
Species Cymbopogo schoenanthus.L
20
2.4.10 Boswellia sacra Flueck (Olibanum or frankincense) اذوش :زص اثا
Boswellia sacra Flueck or olibanum is a plant product. It is an oleo-gum-resin
produced by several species of tree belonging to the family Burseraceae. Since
ancient times, frankincense has been used in many countries, including Middle
Eastern countries, to treat many diseases, especially chronic inflammatory diseases.
Extensive studies on frankincense and its effect showed that this gum resin can
reduce the inflammation and pain in the body and relieve the related symptoms of
many diseases. The anti-inflammatory, anti-arthritic, anti-microbial and analgesic
effect, in addition to his role in the treatment of heart disease, asthma, skin, prostate
cancer and diabetes (Hamidpour et al., 2015). (Table 2.10).
Table (2.10) : Classification of Boswellia sacra Flueck
Kingdom Plantae
Boswellia sacra Flueck
Subkingdom Tracheobionta
Superdivision Spermatophyta
Division Magnoliophyta
Class Magnoliopsida
Subclass Rosidae
Order Sapindales
Family Burseraceae
Genus Boswellia
Species Boswellia sacra Flueck
21
2.4.11 Artemisia monosperma Delile (white wormwood) : اؾ١ر
Artemisia monosperma Delile commonly known as belong to the family
Asteraceae. The main medicinal use of this plant is that it works on the treatment of
diabetes, anti-convulsions, anti-microbial, and anti-malarial treatment, on the other
hand this plant is widely used in folk medicine as a treatment for hypertension
(Moufid, A., and Eddouks, M., 2012). (Table 2.11).
Table (2.11) : Classification of Artemisia monosperma Delile
Kingdom Plantae
Artemisia monosperma Delile
Subkingdom Tracheobionta
Superdivision Spermatophyta
Division Magnoliophyta
Class Magnoliopsida
Subclass Asteridae
Order Asterales
Family Asteraceae
Genus Artemisia L.
Species Artemisia monosperma
Delile
22
2.5 Microorganism
Clinical isolated bacteria used in the study are Escherichia coli and
Staphylococcus aureus.
2.5.1 Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli is a Gram negative rod non-sporing bacilli belongs to the
family Enterobacteriaceae, most E.coli are normal commensals found in the
intestinal tract, Pathogenic E.coli can be classified in to pathotypes by their
virulence factors, together with the type of disease, virulent strains causes
serious infections include meningeal, urinary tract, gastrointestinal (Welch,
2006). (Table 2.12).
Table (2.12) : Classification of Escherichia coli
Domain Bacteria
Escherichia coli
Phylum Proteobacteria
Class Gammaproteobacteria
Order Enterobacteriales
Family Enterobacteriaceae
Genus Escherichia
Species Escherichia coli
23
2.5.2 Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus aureus (S.aureus) bacteria is a Gram-positive belongs to the
family Staphylococcaceae which characterized by individual cocci, which divide in
more than one plane to form grape-like clusters, it is are facultative anaerobic, non-
motile and do not form spores (Harris et al,. 2002).
S.aureus is a major pathogen that infects both hospitalized patients with
decreased immunity, and healthy people in the community (Harris et al,. 2002), this
bacteria cause many type of diseases where their proliferation in the blood leads to
secondary pneumonia, endocarditis, osteoarthritis and arthritis (Jouda, 2013). (Table
2.13).
Table (2.13) : Classification of Staphylococcus aureus
Domain Bacteria
Staphylococcus aureus
Phylum Firmicutes
Class Bacilli
Order Bacillales
Family Staphylococcaceae
Genus Staphylococcus
Species Staphylococcus aureus
24
2.6 Previous Studies:
In 2015 Randriamiharisoa et al identified and generated a list of medicinal
plants sold in the traditional markets of the capital of Madagascar, Antananarivo and
obtain an idea of the amount of medicinal plants sold on the large outdoor markets,
and estimates the economy of the medicinal plant markets.
In 2015 Ali-Shtayeh et al investigated a broad range of Palestine flora using
a methodology that enabled the discovery of plants with potential medicinal
characteristics. Some of the plants identified have a history of human use, while
others have never been used before for medicinal purposes. plant samples were
collected from 76 natural sites distributed in different geographical and climate
zones. Samples were evaluated for thirteen kinds of activity protected from disease
using bioassays field deployment based on the screen to technical nature of the
World Institute for Bio-Exploration. More than 1470 plant samples derived from 588
plant species belonging to 100 families were screened. Approximately 329 species
(56%) belonged to 12 families, notably the Papilionaseae, Asteraceae, Liliaceae,
Lamiaceae, Brassicaceae, and Apiaceae families.
In 2010 Revathi and Parimelazhagan observed that the tribal’s use 70 wild
valuable plant species belonging to 42 families which identified with pertinent
information with regard to their botanical and local name, family, parts used by the
local people for different human ailments. The common diseases treated by folk
therapies were asthma, digestive problems, paralyzes, skin diseases and diabetes. the
study provides an ethnobotanical data of the medicinal plants used by the tribal
people of Irulas to cure several diseases. and promoted a practical use of medical
plant which must be continued focusing on its pharmacological effectivness. Further
detailed exploration and collection of ethnobotanical information, chemical studies
and screening for medicinal properties will provide cost effective and reliable source
of medicine for the welfare of humanity.
In 2012 Abou Auda Performs an extensive survey on medicinal plant
diversity in the flora of Gaza Valley showed that a total of 183 species under 33
families are represented in the flora. The investigation for medicinal plant diversity
25
within these families revealed that out of these 183 species, 52 are medicinal and
many of them are mentioned at different literature.
In 2011 Abou Auda collected knowledge of plant species, which used by
the local inhabitants of villages of the middle area of Gaza Strip, Palestine. A total of
19 plant species belonging to 19 genera and 16 families have been listed which are
being utilized for treating 23 different diseases during 2008-2009. Herbs were found
to be the most consumed plants (10 species), followed by trees (5 species) and
shrubs (4 species)
In 2015 Ari et al indicated that 130 plants taxa belonging to 39 families were
recorded and collected. Hundred and seventy-eight different uses of these plants
were documented and used generally for medicinal (84), food (68), fodder (16),
household goods (3), dyes (3), handicrafts (3) and religious (1).
In 2012 Quiroga et al identified 258 uses traditional medicines, spanning a
total of 13 disease categories, including 91 species of local and foreign plants and
one unknown type of plant specimen. The most often treated digestive disorders
(55%) with medicinal plants, followed by the pain of musculoskeletal system (25%)
and skin disorders (24%). Hospital information indicates that the most common
diseases are acute respiratory infections (47%), diseases of acute diarrhea (37%).
And mostly used herbal remedies in the form of teas and decoctions. Informants are
used mainly native plant species, despite the fact that alien species have been
introduced to drugs.
In 2015 Rakotoarivelo et al identified the six most common diseases,
namely malaria, diarrhea and stomach pains, cough, bilharzia and dysentery. Among
the 209 species of plants that have been identified as the use of drugs, and used 83
species belonging to 49 families and 77 genera for the treatment of these diseases.
In 2014 Husein et al examined the ethanol extracts of six types of medicinal
plants that belong to three families on the basis of their uses in the Palestinian Arab
traditional herbal medicine for the treatment of various ailments as stomach acidity,
atherosclerosis, cancer, diabetes and food toxicity The extracts were tested against:
six bacterial strains including Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus vulgaris,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella
26
pneumoniae; five Candida albicans isolates, and two dermatophytes: Microsporum
canis, and Trichophyton rubrum
In 2015, Abu Shanab et al examined nine medicinal plants grown in
Palestine were examined in vitro for possible antibacterial activity against 6 bacterial
strains through partial dilution and propagation methods. Three plant extracts have
almost antibacterial activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.
There are other three plant extracts were more active against gram-positive than
against gram-negative bacteria and these plant extracts were from the cycoproteum
spinosome, lunonia inermes and pseudium guagava. This study supports the use of
traditional medicine for various plant extracts in the treatment of various infections
caused by pathogenic bacteria in Palestine, either using single or combined extracts.
In 1998 Ali-Shtayeh et al evaluated ethanolic and aqueous extracts of 20
Palestinian plant species used in folk therapy were investigated for their
antimicrobial activities against five bacterial species (Staphylococcus aureus,
Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas aeruginosa)
and one yeast (Candida albicans). This study shown that most of the studied plants
are potentially a good source of antimicrobial agents and demonstrates the
importance of such plants in medicine and in assisting primary health care in this part
of the world.
In 2015 Elkichaoi et al detected the effectiveness of some fruit types extracts
against some types of pathogenic bacteria that known for their resistance to
antibiotics, sensitivity of each fruit extracts were tested by serial micro dilution
method and agar disc diffusion method, the efficacy of these extracts has been
demonstrated against Gram positive bacteria than Gram-negative bacteria due to the
different cell-wall shape of different types of bacteria.
In 2011 Elbashiti et al evaluate the antimicrobial activity of some local plant
extracts alone and synergism with antibiotics against E.coli and S.aurues. The results
showed that the plant extracts alone have rare effect against isolated bacteria, but the
extracts and there synergistic effect with antibiotics appear to be an inhibitor to
S.aurues (Gram positive bacteria) rather than E.coli (Gram-negative bacteria).
27
Chapter 3
Materials and Methods
28
3.1 Materials
3.1.1 Study Area
The Gaza strip
The total area of the historic Palestine is 27.009 km2. The area of west bank
is 5844 km2. The Gaza strip, an area of 365 km2 .The Gaza Strip is a narrow strip of
land on the Mediterranean coast. It borders the occupied lands to the east and north
and Egypt to the south. It is approximately 41 kilometers long, and between 6 and 12
kilometers wide (Environmental Assessment of the Gaza Strip, 2009).
The study area has a typical semi –arid Mediterranean climate, hot in summer
and cold in winter. The average daily mean temperature ranges from 25C˚ in summer
to 13C˚ in winter, with the average daily maximum temperature range from 29C˚ to
17C˚ and the minimum temperature range from 21C˚ to 9C˚ in summer and winter
respectively. The daily relative humidity fluctuates between 65% in daytime and
85% at night in summer and between 60% and 80% in winter (United Nations
Environmental Program – UNEP, 2003).
29
Figure (3.1) : Gaza strip map ( source : www.arij.org )
3.1.2 Study population
The interview was conducted with 20 informants from different areas of Gaza
Strip, including 2 females and 18 males, their ages ranged from 30 to 65 years, as
shown in Figure (3.2), (3.3),respectively.
30
Figure (3.2): Distribution of study population by gender
Figure (3.3): Distribution of study population by age
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
male
female
No. of informant
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30-44 45-65 >65
No. of informant
31
Interviews were conducted with informants of different educational levels. Figure
(3.4) shows the level of education, (Illiterate, primary, secondary, diploma,
university).
Figure (3.4): Distribution of study population by educational level.
3.1.3 Medicinal Plants Markets
Medicinal plants sold in popular markets, which are special shops sell these
medicinal plants, mixtures or oils made from these plants. There are also centers use
these plants in alternative medicine treatment.
During this study, field work and survey to the vast majority of these markets
and centers where the most common plant species used by folk therapists in treating
some diseases. They were distributed throughout the Gaza Strip (7 in Gaza City, 2 in
Jabalya, 3 in Khan Younis, 3 in Nuseirat, 2 in Deir al-Balah, 1 in Rafah, 2 in
Maghazi).
3.1.4 Plant Sample Collection:
The Plants whose extracts were used in this study consisted of Ocimum
basilicum (basil), Hibiscus sabdariffa (Roselle), Trigonella foenum-graecum
(Fenugreek seed), Coriandrum sativum (Coriander), Anethum graveolens (Dill),
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Illiterate primary Middle secondary university
No. of informant
32
Syzygium aromaticum (Clove), Glycyrrhiza glabra (Licorice), Cuminum cyminum
(Cumin), Cymbopogon schoenanthus (Camel grass), Boswellia sacra (Olibanum)
and Artemisia herba-alba (white wormwood) were bought from Al-Zawea popular
market.(Table 3.1).
(Table 3.1) List of medicinal plants used in the antimicrobial & synergistic assay
Tested
part
Family Local Arabic
Name
Scientific Name No.
Seeds Umbelliferae ػ١ ادشادج Anethum graveolens L 1
Sepals Malvaceae اىشوذ٠ Hibiscus sabdariffa L 2
Gum Burseraceae زص اثا
اذوش
Boswellia sacra Flueck 3
Dry
fruits
Apiaceae اى Cuminum cyminum L 4
Seeds Fabaceae اسثح Trigonellafoenum-
graecum L 5
Flower
buds
Myrtaceae امشف Syzygium aromaticum
(L.) Merrill & Perry 6
Leaves Lamiaceae اش٠سا Ocimum basilicum L. 7
Leaves Asteraceae اؾ١ر Artemisia monosperma 8
Seeds Apiaceae اىضتشج Coriandrum sativum L 9
leaves Poaceae اسفا تش Cymbopogon
schoenanthus Spreng 10
roots Fabaceae اؼشق عط Glycyrrhiza glabra L. 11
33
3.1.5 Culture media and chemicals
For carrying out this study we used Mueller Hinton Broth and Mueller-Hinton
agar. Also ethanol and distilled water used for extraction process, Triphenyl Tetra
zolium Chloride (TTC) were used as microbial growth indicator. Dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO) .(Table 3.2).
(Table 3.2) List of chemicals used in the study
3.1.6 Microorganisms
Two bacterial species, gram- positive Staphylococcus aureus and gram- negative
Escherichia coli were obtained from the biology department of the Islamic
University of Gaza (IUG) and the microbiology department of Al-Shifa hospital.
3.2 Methods:
3.2.1 Ethnobotanical Methods:
3.2.1.1 Survey and Identification:
Ethnobotanical information was obtained through interview which was
applied on People who use medicinal plants in folk remedies in popular markets of
Gaza city.
Questions addressed to the therapist were therefore, mainly focused on the
purpose of plant application, parts used, the manner of their preparation and
Chemicals Manufacturer
Mueller Hinton agar Liofilchem
Mueller Hinton Broth Liofilchem
Dimethyl Sulphoxide (DMSO) Applichem
Ethanol, Distilled Water CHEM Limited
Triphenyl Tetra zolium Chloride
(TTC)
Applichem
34
administration, forms of use, purchase method, method of storage and collection,
types of diseases which treated and how to prepare some popular prescriptions
Figure (3.5).
Figure (3.5) : Photograph shows interview with informants
3.2.2 Extraction methods :
3.2.2.1 Preparation of plant extract:
Ten grams of plant material were placed in a flask with 150 ml of solvent
(Ethanol or distilled water) and placed in the microwave extractor for 60s (1min) to
be exposed. After being taken and cooled in room temperature for one min, they
were placed again in the microwave extractor and returned 12 times. The previous
steps were repeated with the plant samples eleven times using 80% ethanol and again
using distilled water (Jin-Yu Hao et al., 2002). The extracts were transported into
glass watch and by oven at 45ºC overnight to remove the solvent.
One gram of each extract was dissolved in 5 ml of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO).
Thus 200 mg/ml of stock was obtained as a standard concentration of extracts
(Jouda, 2013). The dried extracts were stored in sterile glass bottles at -20 ºC until
use.
35
3.2.2.2 Evaluation of antibacterial activity of plant extracts by disc diffusion
method:
Agar disc-diffusion method was followed to determine the antimicrobial activity
of the selected plant extracts against test microorganism, sterile filter paper discs
approximately 6mm in diameter were impregnated with stock extracts and placed on
the surface of a MHA that has been inoculated with test microorganism. After 24
hours, the antimicrobial activity was evaluated by measuring zones of inhibition of
microbial growth surrounding the plant extracts (Sharma, 2011). The assay was
repeated trice.
3.2.2.3 Evaluation of antibacterial activity of plant extracts by well diffusion
method:
Well diffusion method was followed to determine the antimicrobial activity of
the selected plant extracts against test microorganism. After solidification wells
(6mm diameter) were cut into the agar and test plant extracts were introduced into
the wells, 50µl of the plant extracts were tested in a concentration of 100 mg/ml
After 24 hours, the antimicrobial activity was evaluated by measuring the diameter of
the inhibition zone formed around the plant extracts well. (Abu-Shanab et al.,
2004). The assay was repeated trice.
3.2.2.4 Determination of MIC and MBC of plant extracts by Microdilution
Method:
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) which means the lowest
concentration of the plant extract at which the bacteria does not show visible
growth was determined by the micro-dilution method (96- well plates). Plant
extracts were diluted a number of times through a sterile diluent (MHB). A final
concentration from 200 to 0.1953 mg/ml was used for each plant sample Then
added 10 μl of inocula of overnight growth microorganisms to each well except a
positive control. Inoculum with media was used as a negative control and extract
with media was used as a positive control (Cheraif et al, 2007) After incubation
at 37°C for 24 h. 50μl of a 0.01% triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) solution
added to the well as indicator and the plate was incubated for one hour. Since the
colorless tetrazolium salt is reduced to red colored product by biological active
36
bacteria, the inhibition of growth can be detected when the solution in the well
remains clear after incubation with (TTC) (Abu-Shanab et al., 2004).
To determine MBC (lowest concentration of the plant extract at which
inoculated bacteria was totally killed) MHA inoculated with broth which taken
from each well and incubated for 24hr at 37ºC the lowest concentration that
revealed no visible bacterial growth after sub-culturing was taken as MBC 10%
DMSO solution served as negative controls(Kang et al., 2011).
3.2.2.5 Synergistic assay:
A modification of previously described procedures (Elbashiti et al, 2011)
was followed to evaluate of the synergistic effect. The antimicrobial activities of
the selected plant extracts a gainst the tested microorganism were compared with
each other, after mixed 50gm of Coriandrum sativum extract with 50gm of
Artemisia monosperma extract and mixed 50gm of Cuminum cyminum extract
with 50gm of Ocimum basilicum, the antimicrobial activity was evaluated by
well diffusion method, disc diffusion method and MIC.
37
Chapter (4)
Results
38
4.1 Taxonomic diversity of plants under investigation
The study documented 72 medical plant species belonging to 33 families that
were the most used in Traditional Arabic Palestinian Herbal Medicine in Gaza
strip (Table 4.1). The most represented families were: Lamiaceae (8 species),
Apiaceae (8 species) and Asteraceae (7 species) (Table 4.1). Figure (4.1).
Table (4.1) : Distribution of plant families by number of species
No. of Species اؼائح اثاذ١ح Family Name NO.
Lamiaceae 1 اؾف٠ح 9
Apiaceae 2 اخ١١ح 8
Asteraceae 3 اد١ح 7
Fabaceae 4 اثم١ح 5
Brassicaceae 5 اص١ث١ح 4
Lauraceae 6 اغاس٠ح 3
Malvaceae 7 اخثاص٠ح 3
Ranunculacea 8 اؾم١م١ح 2
Zingiberaceae 9 اضدث١١ح 2
Euphorbiaceae 10 اغعث١ح 2
Poaceae 11 اد١١ح 2
Apocynaceae 12 اذف١ح 2
Rosaceae 13 اسد٠ح 2
Myrtaceae 14 ا٢ع١ح 2
Lythraceae 15 اسائ١اخ 1
Hypericaceae 16 اا٠ثشو١ح 1
valerianaceae 17 ااسد١٠ح 1
Arecaceae 18 اخ١١ح 1
Urticaceae 19 امش٠ص١ح 1
Theaceae 20 ػائح اؾا 1
39
No. of Species اؼائح اثاذ١ح Family Name NO.
Equisetaceae 21 اىثاث١ح 1
Polygonaceae 22 اثطثاط١ح 1
Burseraceae 23 اثخس٠اخ 1
Asparagaceae 24 ا١١ح 1
Ginkgoaceae 25 ادى١اخ 1
Caryophyllaceae 26 امشف١ح 1
Sapotaceae 27 اغثذ١ح 1
Cyperaceae 28 اغؼذ٠ح 1
Plantaginaceae 29 اس١ح 1
Papaveraceae 30 اخؾخاؽ١ح 1
Portulacaceae 31 اشخ١ح 1
Rutaceae 32 اغزات١ح 1
Araliaceae 33 الأسا١ح 1
Figure (4.1): Distribution of plant families by number of species
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
No. of Species
40
4.2 Most cited plants and remedies
Based on the study survey, it was found that there were many plants that are
used in folk remedies. The method of preparation of these plants varies according to
the type of disease and the part used. Table (4.2) shows the classification of the most
used plants in popular treatments in the Gaza Strip. Also the plant is classified as
medical plants if mentioned by more than two therapists.
The remedies were administered orally or used externally according to the
disease and preparation method. Where the informants administer their remedies in
various forms including standard decoction prepared by boiling plant parts in hot
water, volatile compound and oils, use as ointment and use as paste. The remedies
were administered orally or used externally according to the disease and preparation
method.
41
Table (4.2): Classification of the most used plants in popular treatments in the Gaza Strip
Mode of
preparation and
use
Medicinal use Part used Arabic
name
Common name Family Scientific name No
Boiled leaves Urinary tract infections and
hormonal regulator
Above-
ground
part
تشدلػ ا
شدلػ
Marjoram Lamiaceae Origanum majorana L. 1
Boiled seeds Diuretic - digestion disorder
- asthma
Leaves and
Seed
اؾش ا
اؾش
Fennel Apiaceae Foeniculum vulgare Mill. 2
Boiled seeds
And oil as an
external treatment
Calming the nerves - colic -
cough and asthma
Seed ا١غ Anise Apiaceae Pimpinella anisum L. 3
Boiled leaves and
flowers
Cough - headache - skin -
colic - wounds
Leaves and
flowers
Golden اثاتح
cotula
Asteraceae Matricaria aurea (Loefl)
Sch.Bip
4
Raw fruit Boiled
peel
Anemia - stomach ulcer -
heart
All part of
fruit
Pomegranate Lythraceae Punica granatum L. 5 اشا
42
Mode of
preparation and
use
Medicinal use Part used Arabic
name
Common name Family Scientific name No
Boiled bark Nausea - Diabetes bark امشفح cinnamon Lauraceae Cinnamomum verum J.Presl. 6
Drenched flowers
Oils as an external
cream
Depression - the effects of
addiction
Above-
ground
part
Saint John's wort Hypericaceae Hypericum perforatum L. 7 لذ٠ظ ٠زا
Boiled flowers or
leaves
Respiratory Allergy - Cough
- Calming the stomach
Above-
ground
part
Little-leaf Linden اض٠ضف
or greenspire
Malvaceae Tilia cordata Mill. 8
Oil Extract
Boiled roots
Indigestion - Epilepsy Root اغث spikenard valerianaceae Nardostachys grandiflora
DC.
9
Boiled dried fruits Prostate - urinary tract
infection
Fruits saw palmetto Arecaceae serenoa repens (w. bartram) ت١ظ ؾاس
small
10
Boiled seeds Increase breast milk -
diabetes
Seed اسثح Fenugreek Fabaceae Trigonella foenum-graecum
L.
11
43
Mode of
preparation and
use
Medicinal use Part used Arabic
name
Common name Family Scientific name No
Boiled leaves or
roots or eaten raw
Hemorrhoids - diabetes -
inflammation of the nerves
Whole
plant
امش٠ـ ا
اسش٠ك
Nettle Urticaceae Urtica urens L. 12
Soaked crushed
seeds
Diabetes - diuretic -
constipation - high
cholesterol
Seed ارشظ اش White Lupine Fabaceae Lupinus albus L. 13
Soaked leaves Hypertension - Indigestion -
Immunodeficiency
Leaves الاخضش Green tea Theaceae camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze 14 اؾا
Soaked leaves Kidney stones - Arthritis -
Pulmonary tuberculosis
Leaves ر٠ اسصا Horsetail field Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense L. 15
Extract Oil
Boiled leaves
Diarrhea - headache -
sunburn - urinary tract
infection
Above-
ground
Part
اش٠سا ا
اسثك
basil Lamiaceae Ocimum basilicum L. 16
44
Mode of
preparation and
use
Medicinal use Part used Arabic
name
Common name Family Scientific name No
Boiled roots Stomach disorder -
constipation - tonic for the
liver
Root اشاذ Rhubarb Polygonaceae Rheum Palmatum L. 17
Extract oil and raw
seeds
Rheumatism - Hypertension
- diabetes - colon
Seed زثح اثشوح ا
اسثح اغداء
Black cumin Ranunculacea Nigella sativa L. 18
Soaked leaves and
branches
Gastrointestinal disorders -
Elimination of intestinal
worms
Leaves اؾ١ر White Wormwood Asteraceae Artemisia monosperma
Delile
19
Boiled Rhizomes Hypertension - stomach pain
- vertigo - memory
activation - high lipids
Rhizome اضدث١ Ginger Zingiberaceae Zingiber officinale Roscoe
20
Extract Oil Gastrointestinal tract - hair
loss - skin
Fruits and
Seed
Castor beans Euphorbiaceae Ricinus communis L. 21 اخشع
45
Mode of
preparation and
use
Medicinal use Part used Arabic
name
Common name Family Scientific name No
Dried fruits or fresh
leaves
Dysentery - vomiting -
indigestion - colon disorder
Leaves and
Fruits
Coriander Apiaceae Coriandrum sativum L. 22 اىضتشج
Boiled roots Diabetes - sexual impotence Roots اضع Zallouh Apiaceae Ferula hermonis Boiss 23
Boiled or Soaked
Flowers
Hypertension - Circulatory
system
flowers اىشوذ٠ Rosella Malvaceae Hibiscus sabdariffa L. 24
Boiled leaves Gastrointestinal pain - tonic
for memory – colds
Above-
ground
Part
Rosemary Lamiaceae Rosmarinus officinalis L. 25 او١ ادث
Soaked gum Colon - intestinal
disinfectant - activates
memory - diabetes
Gum
زص اثا
اذوش
Olibanum or
Frankincense
Burseraceae Boswellia sacra Flueck 26
46
Mode of
preparation and
use
Medicinal use Part used Arabic
name
Common name Family Scientific name No
Boiled leaves and
extract oil from
seeds
Overweight - Asthma - High
cholesterol
Whole
plant
Geranium grass Poaceae Cymbopogon schoenanthus اسفا تش
Spreng
27
Extract gum Gastrointestinal tract -
urinary system -gingivitis-
hair
Barks and
Fruits
الاخ٠د dragon blood tree Asparagaceae Dracaena cinnabari Balf.f. 28
Boiled leaves Asthma - activates memory
– Hypertension- Diabetes
Leaves ادىح ginkgo Ginkgoaceae Ginkgo biloba L. 29
Boiled leaves and
extract oil
Respiratory System -
Digestive System -
Circulatory System
Above-
ground
Part
Wild اضػرش اثش
thyme
Lamiaceae Thymus sepyllum L. 30
Boiled leaves Urinary tract infection -
anemia - rheumatism
Above-
ground
Part
Silvery سخ اساح
Whitlow wart or
silver nailroot
Caryophyllaceae Paronychia argentea Lam. 31
47
Mode of
preparation and
use
Medicinal use Part used Arabic
name
Common name Family Scientific name No
Soaked seeds or
added to milk or
bread
Skin - Diabetes -
Overweight
Seed اؾ١ا shea butter tree Sapotaceae Vitellaria paradoxa
C.F.Gaertn.
32
Boil the leaves and
twigs
Digestive system -
Hypertension
Above-
ground
Part
Sage Lamiaceae Salvia officinalis L. 33 ا١ش١ح
Dry Rhizomes
powder
Antibacterial - gallstones Rhizome اىشو Turmeric Zingiberaceae Curcuma longa L. 34
Boiled powder
leaves
Intestinal disinfectant -
Constipation
Leaves اغا ىح coffee senna Fabaceae Senna occidentalis (L.) Link. 35
Cooked or boiled
leaves
Laxative for the stomach -
Calming cough - Diabetes
Leaves اخث١ضج mallow Malvaceae Malva parviflora L. 36
48
Mode of
preparation and
use
Medicinal use Part used Arabic
name
Common name Family Scientific name No
Boiled seeds or eat
raw leaves
Gastrointestinal tract -
urinary system
Seeds and
leaves
ادشادجػ١ Dill Apiaceae Anethum graveolens L. 37
Soaked leaves Diuretic - laxative - joint
pain
leaves اسشخ Ghalisum Apocynaceae Cynanchum argel Delile 38
Boiled , dipped or
emulsified
Heart tonic - blood vessels Above-
ground
Part
Hawthorn Rosaceae Crataegus aronia L. 39 صػشس ؽائه
Boiled powder
twigs
Gonorrhea - Thyroid -
analgesic
stalk امغظ اذ Costus Asteraceae Saussurea costus (Falc.)
Lipsch
40
Boiled dried leaves Disinfectant of toxins -
reduces cholesterol - skin -
indigestion
leaves اغاس Laurel Lauraceae Laurus nobilis L. 41
49
Mode of
preparation and
use
Medicinal use Part used Arabic
name
Common name Family Scientific name No
Emulsion or
immersed
Vaginitis - diarrhea -
stomach analgesia
Above-
ground
Part
lady's mantle Rosaceae Alchemilla Vulgaris L. 42 سخ الاعذ
raw leaves or
boiled seeds
Prostate enlargement -
diabetes - hepatitis
Seed and
leaves
خشف١ؼ اد
ا ؽن
اداي
milk thistle Asteraceae Silybum marianum (L.)
Gaertn.
43
Boiled leaves Urinary system - menstrual
pain - sores
leaves و١ظ اشاػ shepherd's purse Brassicaceae Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.)
Medik.
44
Boiled leaves or
extract oil
Headache - cough leaves اىافس camphor tree Lauraceae Cinnamomum camphora (L.)
J.Presl.
45
Boiled leaves Respiratory System -
Digestive System - Allergies
leaves اى١١ا Red River
Gum
Myrtaceae Eucalyptus camaldulensis
Dehn.
46
50
Mode of
preparation and
use
Medicinal use Part used Arabic
name
Common name Family Scientific name No
Dry Roots boiled
for 10 minutes
Kidney failure - rheumatism
- hemorrhoids
Roots اؼالي Alhagi Manna Fabaceae Alhagi graecorum Medik. 47
Emulsion of
flowers
De-worming - antifungal -
anti-inflammatory - gout
Flowers الألسا ا
اثغ
Chamomile. Asteraceae Chrysanthemum coronarium
L.
48
Boiled flowers Arteriosclerosis - skin -
psoriasis - urinary system
Flowers تمح اه ا
ؽارشج
fumitory Papaveraceae Fumaria officinalis L. 49
Eat fresh or boiled
seeds and leaves
Urinary system - digestive
system - antibacterial
Above-
ground
Part and
seeds
اشخح ا
اثمح
Verdolaga or
Purslane
Portulacaceae Portulaca oleracea L. 50
Boiled flowers or
boiled herb as a
whole
Cough - nervous tension Flowers
and leaves
ؽمائك اؼا
ا اس
Windflower or
crown anemone
Ranunculaceae Anemone coronaria L. 51
51
Mode of
preparation and
use
Medicinal use Part used Arabic
name
Common name Family Scientific name No
Grind the herb and
mix with honey or
Soaked herb
Menstrual pain - Postpartum
bleeding - Prostate
enlargement
Whole
plant
Chaste tree Lamiaceae Vitex agnus-castus L. 52 وف ش٠
raw or boiled
leaves
diabetes -bacterial infection
and rheumatism
leaves اغش٠ظ Endive or escarole Asteraceae Cichorium endivia L. 53
Boiled seeds or
extract oil from
buds
Analgesic - Fever -
Allergies
Flower
buds and
seeds
Clove Myrtaceae Syzygium aromaticum (L.) امشف
Merrill & Perry
54
Soaked dry roots Anemia - Digestive System
- Headache
Roots زؾ١ؾح الان Dong Quai Apiaceae Angelica sinensis (Oliv.)
Diels
55
Raw leaves or
boiled seeds
Obesity - diabetes - arthritis
- digestive system
Above-
ground
Part and
seeds
celery Apiaceae Apium graveolens L. 56 اىشفظ
52
Mode of
preparation and
use
Medicinal use Part used Arabic
name
Common name Family Scientific name No
Raw or boiled
leaves and extract
oil
Digestive System -
Headaches - Colds
Above-
ground
Part
Spearmint Lamiaceae Mentha spicata L. 57 اؼغ
Soaked roots or as
bandages
Rheumatism - Colds -
urinary system
Roots ا ػالش لشزا
ػد امشذ
Akarkara or
Pellitory
Asteraceae Anacyclus pyrethrum (L.)
Link
58
Soaked Crushed
fruits
Gout - urinary system -
infertility - liver - skin
Fruits زة اؼض٠ض ا
عؼذ از٠ز
Yellow nutsedge or
chufa flatsedge
Cyperaceae Cyperus esculentus L. 59
Soaked or boiled
roots
Gastric ulcers - weakened
immunity
Roots اؼشق عط Liquorice Fabaceae Glycyrrhiza glabra L. 60
Oil extract as
external ointment
Scabies - psoriasis Latex اذفح oleander Apocynaceae Nerium oleander L. 61
53
Mode of
preparation and
use
Medicinal use Part used Arabic
name
Common name Family Scientific name No
Boiled leaves or
seeds , raw seeds or
extract oil
Rheumatism - sciatica -
anemia
Leaves and
Seeds
Gardn Cress Brassicaceae Lepidium sativum L. 62 زة اشؽاد
Soaked of whole
plant
Diabetes - Irritable Bowel -
Hemorrhoids - Laxative of
the intestine
Whole
plant
fleaworts Plantaginaceae Plantago lagopus L. 63 غا اس
Soaked leaves Diabetes - Cancer - skin
diseases
Leaves اسثب annual mercury Euphorbiaceae Mercurialis annua L. 64
Raw leaves or
extract oil
Hair loss - Anemia -
Hypertension - Cholesterol -
Diabetes
Above-
ground
Part
ادشخ١ش ا
اشوا
Garden rocket Brassicaceae Eruca sativa Miller 65
Boiled dry fruits Gastrointestinal tract -
respiratory system - anemia
Dry fruits اى Cumin Apiaceae Cuminum cyminum L. 66
54
Mode of
preparation and
use
Medicinal use Part used Arabic
name
Common name Family Scientific name No
Soaked leaves Digestive System -
Menstrual disorders
circulatory system
Leaves عزاب/ف١د Rue Rutaceae Ruta chalepensis L. 67
Soaked leaves Respiratory system -
Irritable colon - a sedative
of the nerves
Leaves ا١غح Lemon Balm Lamiaceae Mellisa officinalis L. 68
Boiled or soaked
seeds
Urinary system - increases
immunity - circulatory
system - diabetes
Seeds اؾؼ١ش Barley Poaceae Hordeum vulgare L. 69
Soaked roots Impotence - Immune
Deficiency - Memory
Activation
Roots ادغه Ginseng Araliaceae Panax Ginseng Baill. 70
55
Mode of
preparation and
use
Medicinal use Part used Arabic
name
Common name Family Scientific name No
Soaked leaves Stomachache, colic,
Diabetes,
leaves ادؼذج felty germander Lamiaceae Teucrium polium L. 71
Soaked seeds or Oil
extract
Diabetes – Cancer-
Rheumatism- Gout-
Circulatory System
Seeds اخشدي mustard Brassicaceae Brassica alba L. 72
56
Medicinal plants were reported to be used for the treatment of several
ailments as shown in Table (4.3). The largest number of remedies was used to treat
gastrointestinal disorders were represented by 37 plants. The second commonly used
remedies were for the treatment of circulatory system and were represented by 22
plants. As for remedies for the Urinary system were represented by 20 plants.
Table (4.3) : Diversity of medicinal use- categories
Disease No. of Plants
Digestive System 37
Circulatory system 22
Urinary system 20
Diabetes 18
Respiratory system 14
Nervous system 13
Skin, burns, and hair 12
Weight loss 10
Skeletal and muscular system 7
Immunity system 7
Reproductive system 7
Cancer 3
Others 11
57
4.3 Folk medical knowledge sources:
With respect to sources there is no processor qualified academically for this
profession, parents and grandparents seem to be the main source of traditional
knowledge as 75% of the study population reported to gather their knowledge from
this sources. Other information sources were obtained from old medical books and
others. Figure (4.2).
Figure (4.2): Sources of folk medical knowledge
4.4 Used parts
The most repeatedly utilized plant parts were leaves, stems and seeds which were
represented by 40%, 18% and 14%, respectively. Other plant parts were also reported
to be used in folk remedies as shown in Figure (4.3).
Figure (4.3): Percentage of used plant parts
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
parents andgrandparents
old medicalbooks
others
Percentage ofinformants %
Leaves 41%
Stem 18%
Seeds 14%
Flower 8%
Fruits 7%
Roots 7%
Others 5%
58
4.5 Procurement methods of medicinal plants:
The findings of the current study showed that 35% of informants imported
medicinal plants from abroad, 30% purchased plants from local market, 20%
collected plants from nature and 15% obtained the plants by the three previous
methods (Figure 4.4). These plants are often stored in special bags or tightly sealed
plastic containers. However, there are difficulties in obtaining some plant species due
to the scarcity of some of these plants or the high prices.
Figure (4.4) Procurement methods of medicinal plants
4.6 Evaluation of antibacterial activity of plant extracts by disc diffusion
method
The results of antibacterial activity of aquatic and ethanolic extracts of all the
eleven plants tested individually against the two isolated bacterial species, which are
known to cause infection in humans. Each experiment replicated three time at least.
4.6.1 Against E. coli
The disc diameters of zone of inhibition of plants extracts against E.coli are
shown in Table (4.4).
4.6.1.1 The aquatic extracts
The aquatic extracts of all the plants screened showed various inhibitory effects
ranged between (8-17mm) in diameter, highest effect towards E.coli showed by
(Syzygium aromaticum) (with a 17 mm zone of inhibition) followed by (Hibiscus
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Imported Localmarket
Collectfrom
nature
all ofthem
Percentage ofinformants%
59
sabdariffa, Artemisia monosperma and Coriandrum sativum (with a 8 mm zone of
inhibition). The lowest activity was the Anethum graveolens, Boswellia Carterii,
Cuminum cyminum, Trigonella foenum graecum, Ocimum basilicum, (with a 7 mm
zone of inhibition). No effect was shown for either Cymbopogon schoenanthus and
Glycyrrhiza glabra (with a zero mm zone of inhibition). Shown in (Table 4.4) and
(Figure 4.5 and 4.6)
4.6.1.2 The ethanolic extracts
The ethanolic extract of Syzygium aromaticum.L were the most effective
extract against E.coli which it is showing the highest antibacterial activity against
this bacteria with inhibition zone diameter of 17 mm followed strictly were extracts
of Hibiscus sabdariffa with inhibition zone diameter of 8 mm, no effect was shown
for Ocimum basilicum, Boswellia Carterii, Cuminum cyminum, Trigonella foenum
graecum, Anethum graveolens, Artemisia monosperma, Coriandrum sativum,
Glycyrrhiza glabra, and Cymbopogon schoenanthus. Shown in (Table 4.4) and
(Figure 4.7, 4.8 and 4.9)
4.6.2 Against Staphylococcus aureus
The disc diameters of zone of inhibition of plants extracts against S.aureus are
shown in Table (4.5).
4.6.2.1 The aquatic extracts:
The Aquatic extract of Hibiscus sabdariffa were the most effective extract
showing the highest antibacterial activity against S. aureus bacteria with inhibition
zone diameter of 10mm followed by Syzygium aromaticum.L with inhibition zone
diameter of 9mm, but there are no antibacterial activity shown for Ocimum
basilicum, Boswellia Carterii, Cuminum cyminum, Trigonella foenum graecum,
Anethum graveolens, Artemisia monosperma, Coriandrum sativum, Glycyrrhiza
glabra, and Cymbopogon schoenanthus. Shown in (Table 4.5) and (Figure 4.10,
4.11 and 4.12)
4.6.2.2 The ethanolic extracts:
Only Syzygium aromaticum.L with inhibition zone diameter of 12mm and
Hibiscus sabdariffa with inhibition zone diameter of 7mm showing antibacterial
60
activity against S. aureus bacteria, but there are no antibacterial activity shown for
Ocimum basilicum, Boswellia Carterii, Cuminum cyminum, Trigonella foenum
graecum, Anethum graveolens, Artemisia monosperma, Coriandrum sativum,
Glycyrrhiza glabra, and Cymbopogon schoenanthus Shown in (Table 4.5) and
(Figure 4.13, 4.14and 4.15)
4.7 Evaluation of antibacterial activity of plant extracts by well diffusion
method
Antibacterial activity of aquatic and ethanolic extracts of all the eleven plants
where tested against each E.coli and S.aureus by well diffusion method. Each
experiment replicated three time at least.
4.7.1 Against E. coli:
The inhibition zone of plants extracts against E.coli are shown in Table (4.4).
4.7.1.1 The aquatic extracts:
Various inhibitory effects ranged between 11- 25 mm in diameter showed by
aquatic extracts of all the plants against E.coli. The largest zone of inhibition were
observed from the Syzygium aromaticum.L with inhibition zone diameter of 25mm,
followed by Hibiscus sabdariffa, Boswellia Carterii, Anethum graveolens, Cuminum
cyminum, Ocimum basilicum, Trigonella foenum graecum, Glycyrrhiza glabra, with
inhibition zone diameter of 16, 16, 13, 14, 12, 11and 11mm respectively. There are
no antibacterial activity shown for Coriandrum sativum and Cymbopogon
schoenanthus. Shown in (Table 4.4) and (Figure 4.16, 4.17, 4.18).
4.7.1.2 The ethanolic extracts:
The ethanolic extract of Syzygium aromaticum were the most effective extract
against E.coli which is showing the highest antibacterial activity against this bacteria
with inhibition zone diameter of 25 mm followed strictly were extracts of Hibiscus
sabdariffa with inhibition zone diameter of 13 mm. There was no effect shown for
Ocimum basilicum, Boswellia Carterii, Cuminum cyminum, Trigonella foenum
graecum, Anethum graveolens, Artemisia monosperma, Coriandrum sativum,
Glycyrrhiza glabra, and Cymbopogon schoenanthus Shown in (Table 4.4) and
(Figure 4.19, 4.20 and 4.21).
61
4.7.2. Against Staphylococcus aureus:
The inhibition zone of plant extracts against S.aureus are shown in Table(4.5)
4.7.2.1 The aquatic extracts:
The aquatic extracts of the tested plants give various degree of activity (11-
24mm) inhibition zone against S.aureus. The extract of Syzygium aromaticum
presented the highest antibacterial activity with inhibition zone diameter of 24mm
followed by Ocimum basilicum with inhibition zone diameter of 23mm followed by
Hibiscus sabdariffa, Boswellia Carterii, Cuminum cyminum, Trigonella foenum
graecum, which have an intermediate activity against S.aureus with inhibition zone
diameter of 16, 14, 13and 13 mm, respectively. The lowest activity was the Anethum
graveolens, Artemisia monosperma and Coriandrum sativum with inhibition zone
diameter of 11mm. Cymbopogon schoenanthus and Glycyrrhiza glabra have no any
antibacterial activity against S.aureus. Shown in (Table 4.5) and (Figure 4.22, 4.23
and 4.24).
4.7.2.2 The ethanolic extracts:
The ethanolic extract of Syzygium aromaticum were the most effective extract
against S.aureus which is showing the highest antibacterial activity with inhibition
zone diameter of 22 mm, followed by Hibiscus sabdariffa, Anethum graveolens,
Cymbopogon schoenanthus, Coriandrum sativum and Artemisia monosperma which
have an intermediate activity against S.aureus with inhibition zone diameter of 17,
16, 14, 12 and 9 mm respectively. Boswellia Carterii, Glycyrrhiza glabra, Trigonella
foenum graecum, Ocimum basilicum and Cuminum cyminum have no any
antibacterial activity against S.aureus. Shown in (Table 4.5) and (Figure 4.25, 4.26,
4.27)
62
Table (4.4): Antimicrobial Activity of Plant extracts against E. coli by well diffusion
method and disc diffusion method.
Well diffusion method (mm) Disc diffusion method (mm) A*A*A
Average of inhibition zone.(± SD)
Control Water Ethanol Control Water Ethanol Plant extract
- 14 (0) - - 7 (0) - Anethum graveolens
- 16(0.82) 13 (0.82) - 7 (0.47) 8 (0.82) Hibiscus sabdariffa
- 16(0.82) - - 7 (0.47) - Boswellia Carterii
- 13(0.47) - - 7 (0.47) - Cuminum cyminum
- 11(0) - - 7 (0.47) - Trigonella foenum
graecum
- 25(0.47) 25(0.47) - 17 (0.47) 17 (0.82) Syzygium
aromaticum
- 12(0.82) - - 7 (0.47) - Ocimum basilicum
- 13(0) - - 8 (0.47) - Artemisia
monosperma
- - - - 8 (0.47) - Coriandrum sativum
- - - - - - Cymbopogon
schoenanthus
- 11(0) - - - - Glycyrrhiza glabra
* Antimicrobial Activity Assays.
Control= DMSO
(-) No inhibition zone.
Standard deviation = SD
63
Table (4.5): Antimicrobial Activity of Plant extracts on Staphylococcus aureus by
well diffusion method and disc diffusion method
Well diffusion method (mm) Disc diffusion method (mm) A*A*A
Average of inhibition zone.(± SD.)
Control Water Ethanol Control Water Ethanol Plant extract
- 11(0.94) 16(0.47) - - - Anethum graveolens
- 16(0.47) 17(0.47) - 10(0.82) 7 (0) Hibiscus sabdariffa
- 14(0) - - - - Boswellia Carterii
- 13(0.47) - - - - Cuminum cyminum
- 13(0.47) - - - - Trigonella foenum
graecum
- 24 (0) 22 (0.82) - 9 (0.94) 12 (0.47) Syzygium aromaticum
- 23(0.47) - - - - Ocimum basilicum
- 11(0.47) 9(0.47) - - - Artemisia
monosperma
- 11(0.82) 12(0.47) - - - Coriandrum sativum
- - 14(0.82) - - - Cymbopogon
schoenanthus
- - - - - - Glycyrrhiza glabra
* Antimicrobial Activity Assays.
Control= DMSO
(-) No inhibition zone.
Standard deviation = SD
.
64
Figure (4.6) : The effect of aquatic
extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum,
7-Ocimum basilicum,8-Artemisia
monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum,
10-Cymbopogon schoenanthus and
11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by disc
diffusion method to against E. coli
Figure (4.5) : The effect of aquatic
extract to 1- Anethum graveolens,
2- Hibiscus sabdariffa, 3- Boswellia
Carterii, 4- Cuminum cyminum,
5- Trigonella foenum graecum by disc
diffusion method to against E. coli
Figure (4.8) : The effect of ethanolic
extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum,
7-Ocimum basilicum,8-Artemisia
monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum,
and 10-Cymbopogon schoenanthus by
disc diffusion method to against E.
coli
Figure (4.7) : The effect of ethanolic
extract to 1- Anethum graveolens,
2- Hibiscus sabdariffa, 3- Boswellia
Carterii, 4- Cuminum cyminum,
5- Trigonella foenum graecum by disc
diffusion method to against E. coli
65
Figure (4.10) : The effect of aquatic
extract to 1- Anethum graveolens,
2- Hibiscus sabdariffa, 3- Boswellia
Carterii, 4- Cuminum cyminum,
5- Trigonella foenum graecum by disc
diffusion method to against S. aureus
Figure (4.9) : The effect of aquatic
extract to 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by disc
diffusion method to against E. coli
Figure (4.12): The effect of aquatic
extract to 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by disc
diffusion method to against S. aureus
Figure (4.11) : The effect of aquatic
extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum,
7-Ocimumbasilicum,8-Artemisia
monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum,
and 10-Cymbopogon schoenanthus by
disc diffusion method to against
S.aureus
66
Figure (4.14) : The effect of ethanolic
extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum,
7-Ocimum basilicum,8-Artemisia
monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum,
and 10-Cymbopogon schoenanthus by
disc diffusion method to against
S.aureus.
Figure (4.13) : The effect of ethanolic
extract to 1- Anethum graveolens,
2- Hibiscus sabdariffa,
3- Boswellia Carterii, 4- Cuminum
cyminum, 5- Trigonella foenum
graecum by disc diffusion method to
against S. aureus
Figure (4.16) : The effect of aquatic
extract to 1- Anethum graveolens,
2- Hibiscus sabdariffa, 3- Boswellia
Carterii, 4- Cuminum cyminum,
5- Trigonella foenum graecum by well
diffusion method to against E.coli
Figure (4.15) : The effect of ethanolic
extract to 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by
disc diffusion method to against S.
aureus
67
Figure (4.18) : The effect of aquatic
extract to 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by well
diffusion method to against E.coli
Figure (4.17) : The effect of aquatic
extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum,7-
Ocimum basilicum,8-Artemisia
monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum,
and 10-Cymbopogon schoenanthus by
well diffusion method to against E.coli.
Figure (4.20) : The effect of ethanolic
extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum,
7-Ocimum basilicum,8-Artemisia
monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum,
and 10-Cymbopogon schoenanthus by
well diffusion method to against E.coli.
Figure (4.19) : The effect of ethanolic
extract to 1- Anethum graveolens,
2- Hibiscus sabdariffa, 3- Boswellia
Carterii, 4- Cuminum cyminum,
5- Trigonella foenum graecum by well
diffusion method to against E.coli
68
Figure (4.22) : The effect of aquatic
extract to 1- Anethum graveolens,
2- Hibiscus sabdariffa, 3- Boswellia
Carterii, 4- Cuminum cyminum,
5- Trigonella foenum graecum by well
diffusion method to against S.aureus
Figure (4.21) : The effect of ethanolic
extract to 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by
well diffusion method to against E.coli
Figure (4.24) The effect of aquatic
extract to 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by
well diffusion method to against S.
aureus
Figure (4.23) The effect of aquatic
extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum,
7-Ocimum basilicum,8-Artemisia
monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum,
and 10-Cymbopogon schoenanthus by
well diffusion method to against
S.aureus
69
Figure (4.26) The effect of ethanolic
extract to 6-Syzygium aromaticum,7-
Ocimum basilicum,8-Artemisia
monosperma, 9-Coriandrum sativum,
and 10-Cymbopogon schoenanthus by
well diffusion method to against
S.aureus
Figure (4.25) The effect of ethanolic
extract to 1- Anethum graveolens,
2- Hibiscus sabdariffa, 3- Boswellia
Carterii, 4- Cuminum cyminum,
5- Trigonella foenum graecum by well
diffusion method to against S.aureus
Figure (4.27) The effect of ethanolic
extract to 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra by
well diffusion method to against S.
aureus
70
4.8 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) & minimum bactericidal
concentrations (MBC) of plant extracts
Extracts were tested against the bacterial isolates for their inhibitory activity,
using a common broth microdilution method in 96 multiwell microtiter plates in two
fold dilution series of these extracts. It was prepared as 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5. 6.25,
3.125, 1.562, 0.781 & 0.390 mg/ml for the aquatic and ethanolic extracts in
triplicated. The results showed antibacterial activity against E.coli and S.aureus, the
average of the obtained minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) & minimum
bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) is listed in Tables (4.6),(4.7), Respectively.
4.8.1 Against E.coli:
As shown in Table (4.6) the MIC values of all tested plant extracts against
E.coli. The MIC values of the ethanolic extracts of Anethum graveolens and
Cuminum cyminum was 12.5mg/ml, for each of Ocimum basilicum, Artemisia
monosperma, Glycyrrhiza glabra and Cymbopogon schoenanthus was 6.25 mg/ml.
While for Boswellia Carterii and Coriandrum sativum was 1.56mg/ml. The MIC for
Hibiscus sabdariffa, Syzygium aromaticum and Trigonella foenum graecum against
E. coli was the least one 0.78 mg/ml as shown in (Figures 4.28 to Figure 4.32).
The MIC results of the aquatic extracts of Anethum graveolens, Coriandrum
sativum and Cymbopogon schoenanthus was 25mg/ml, and the MIC value of
Artemisia monosperma and Glycyrrhiza glabra was 12.5 mg/ml. The MIC for
Ocimum basilicum, Trigonella foenum graecum, Cuminum cyminum, Syzygium
aromaticum and Boswellia Carterii against E. coli were 6.25, 3.125, 1.56, 1.56 and
0.78 mg/ml, respectively. The least value was 0.39 mg/ml for Hibiscus sabdariffa.
(Figure 4.33 to Figure 4.36).
As shown in table (4.6) the MBC of the ethanolic extracts of Glycyrrhiza
glabra 100mg/ml and Syzygium aromaticum 200mg/ml. The MBC value was
>200mg/ml for Anethum graveolens, Hibiscus sabdariffa, Boswellia Carterii,
Cuminum cyminum, Trigonella foenum graecum, Coriandrum sativum, Cymbopogon
schoenanthus, Artemisia monosperma and Ocimum basilicum. The MBC values of
aquatic extracts for all eleven sample was >200mg/ml.
71
Table (4.6) : The MICs & MBCs of plant extracts against E. coli
MIC conc. MBC conc.
Solvent
Plant extract
Ethanol Water Ethanol Water
Anethum graveolens 12.5 25 >200 >200
Hibiscus sabdariffa 0.78 0.39 >200 >200
Boswellia Carterii 1.56 0.78 >200 >200
Cuminum cyminum 12.5 1.56 >200 >200
Trigonella foenum graecum 0.78 3.125 >200 >200
Syzygium aromaticum 0.78 1.56 200 >200
Ocimum basilicum 6.25 6.25 >200 >200
Artemisia monosperma 6.25 12.5 >200 >200
Coriandrum sativum 1.56 25 >200 >200
Cymbopogon schoenanthus 6.25 25 >200 >200
Glycyrrhiza glabra 6.25 12.5 100 >200
72
Figure (4.29): (MIC) of ethanolic
extracts of 4-Cuminum cyminum
5-Syzygium aromaticum
6-Trigonella foenum graecum
against E. coli.
Figure (4.28): (MIC) of ethanolic
extracts of 1- Anethum graveolens
2- Hibiscus sabdariffa 3- Boswellia
Carterii against E. coli.
Figure (4.31): (MIC) of ethanolic
extracts of 9- Coriandrumand 10-
sativumCymbopogon schoenanthus
against E. coli.
Figure (4.30): (MIC) of ethanolic
extracts of 7-Ocimum basilicum
8-Artemisia monosperma against E.
coli.
73
Figure (4.32): (MIC) of ethanolic
extracts of 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra
against E. coli
Figure (4.33): (MIC) of aquatic
extracts of 1- Anethum graveolens 2-
Hibiscus sabdariffa 11- Glycyrrhiza
glabra against E. coli
Figure (4.34): (MIC) of aquatic
extracts of 3- Boswellia Carterii
4-Cuminum cyminum against E. coli
Figure (4.35): (MIC) of aquatic
extracts of 5-Syzygium aromaticum
6-Trigonella foenum graecum against
E. coli.
74
Figure (4.36): (MIC) of aquatic extracts
of 7-Ocimum basilicum 8-Artemisia
monosperma 9- Coriandrumand 10-
sativumCymbopogon schoenanthus
against E. coli.
75
4.8.2 Against Staphylococcus aureus:
The MIC values of the ethanolic extracts against S. aureus of Glycyrrhiza
glabra was 50mg/ml. The MIC of Boswellia Carterii, Cuminum cyminum and
Trigonella foenum graecum was 25mg/ml and for each of Anethum graveolens,
Hibiscus sabdariffa, Ocimum basilicum, Artemisia monosperma, Coriandrum
sativum, Cymbopogon schoenanthus was 12.5mg/ml. The least value was 0.39
mg/ml for Syzygium aromaticum. (Table 4.7) and (Figure 4.37 to Figure 4.42).
The MIC of the aquatic extracts of Cuminum cyminum was 50mg/ml, for
Anethum graveolens, Boswellia Carterii, Trigonella foenum graecum, Ocimum
basilicum, Cymbopogon schoenanthus, Coriandrum sativum, Artemisia monosperma
was 25mg/ml, and for Glycyrrhiza glabra was 12.5mg/ml. The least value was
6.25mg/ml for Hibiscus sabdariffa and Syzygium aromaticum (Table 4.7) and
(Figure 4.43 to Figure 4.46)
The MBC value was >200mg/ml for aquatic and ethanolic for all eleven plant
extracts.
Table (4.7): The MICs & MBCs of extracts against S.aureus
MIC Conc. MBC Conc.
Solvent
Ethanol
Water
Ethanol
Water Plant extract
Anethum graveolens 12.5 25 >200 >200
Hibiscus sabdariffa 12.5 6.25 >200 >200
Boswellia Carterii 25 25 >200 >200
Cuminum cyminum 25 50 >200 >200
Trigonella foenum graecum 25 25 >200 >200
Syzygium aromaticum 0.39 6.25 >200 >200
76
Ocimum basilicum 12.5 25 >200 >200
Artemisia monosperma 12.5 25 >200 >200
Coriandrum sativum 12.5 25 >200 >200
Cymbopogon schoenanthus 12.5 25 >200 >200
Glycyrrhiza glabra 50 12.5 >200 >200
77
Figure (4.37): (MIC) of ethanolic
extracts of 1- Anethum graveolens 2-
Hibiscus sabdariffa against S.aureus.
Figure (4.38): (MIC) of ethanolic
extracts of 3- Boswellia Carterii 4-
Cuminum cyminum against S.aureus.
Figure (4.39): (MIC) of ethanolic
extracts of 5-Syzygium aromaticum
6-Trigonella foenum graecum against
S.aureus.
Figure (4.40): (MIC) of ethanolic
extracts of 7-Ocimum basilicum 8-
Artemisia monosperma against
S.aureus.
78
Figure (4.41): (MIC) of ethanolic
extracts 9- Coriandrumand 10-
sativum Cymbopogon schoenanthus
against S.aureus
Figure (4.42): (MIC) of ethanolic
extracts of 11- Glycyrrhiza glabra
against S.aureus
Figure (4.43): (MIC) of aquatic
extracts of 1- Anethum graveolens 2-
Hibiscus sabdariffa and 11-
Glycyrrhiza glabra against S.aureus.
Figure (4.44): (MIC) of aquatic
extracts of 3- Boswellia Carterii 4-
Cuminum cyminum against S.aureus.
79
Figure (4.45): (MIC) of aquatic
extracts of 5-Syzygium aromaticum
6-Trigonella foenum graecum against
S.aureus.
Figure (4.46): (MIC) of aquatic
extracts of 7-Ocimum basilicum
8-Artemisia monosperma
9- Coriandruman sativum
10-Cymbopogon schoenanthus
against S.aureus.
80
4.9 Evaluation the synergistic effect:
4.9.1 The Synergistic effect between plant extract:
We estimated in vitro synergism between extracts of Cuminum cyminum with
Ocimum basilicum, and Artemisia monosperma with Coriandrum sativum against S.
aureus and E. coli
4.9.1.1 Evaluation the synergistic effect by disc diffusion method:
4.9.1.1.1 Against E. coli:
The aquatic extract of Cuminum cyminum with Ocimum basilicum shown
inhibition zone diameter of 7mm but there was no effect of ethanolic extract from
them against E. coli. The ethanolic extract of Artemisia monosperma with
Coriandrum sativum shown inhibition zone diameter of 8mm and no effect was
shown for aquatic extract Table (4.8).
4.8.1.1.2 Against S. aureus:
As shown in Table (4.9) there was no inhibition zone for both Cuminum
cyminum with Ocimum basilicum and Artemisia monosperma with Coriandrum
sativum in each of aquatic and ethanolic extract.
4.9.2 Evaluation the synergistic effect by well diffusion method
4.9.2.1 Against E. coli:
As shown in Table (4.8) the aquatic extract of Cuminum cyminum with
Ocimum basilicum shown inhibition zone diameter of 7mm but there was no effect of
ethanolic extract from them against E. coli. The aquatic and ethanolic extract of
Artemisia monosperma with Coriandrum sativum shown inhibition zone diameter
of 8mm.
4.9.2.2 Against S. aureus:
The table (4.9) shown that there was no any effect for both Cuminum
cyminum with Ocimum basilicum and Artemisia monosperma with Coriandrum
sativum in each of aquatic and ethanolic extract against S. aureus
81
Table (4.8): Antimicrobial Activity between Plant extracts on E. coli by well
diffusion method and disc diffusion method
Well diffusion method (mm) Disc diffusion method (mm) A*A*A
Average of inhibition zone. (± SD.)
Control Water Ethanol Control Water Ethanol Plant extract
- 7(0) - - 8(0) - Cuminum cyminum
with Ocimum
basilicum
- 8(0) 8(0) - - 7(0) Artemisia
monosperma with
Coriandrum sativum
* Antimicrobial Activity Assays. Control= DMSO
(-) No inhibition zone. Standard deviation = SD
Table (4.9): Antimicrobial Activity between Plant extracts on S. aureus by well
diffusion method and disc diffusion method
Well diffusion method(mm) Disc diffusion method(mm) A*A*A
Average of inhibition zone. (± SD.)
Control Water Ethanol Control Water Ethanol Plant extract
- - - - - - Cuminum cyminum
with Ocimum
basilicum
- - - - - - Artemisia
monosperma with
Coriandrum sativum
* Antimicrobial Activity Assays. Control= DMSO
(-) No inhibition zone. Standard deviation = SD
82
4.9.3 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of mixed plant extracts
against isolated bacteria:
4.9.3.1 Against E. coli:
As shown in table 4.10 and figure 4.49 and 4.50, the MIC of the aquatic
extract of Cuminum cyminum with Ocimum basilicum was 6.25 mg/ml and the
ethanolic extract was 25 mg/ml. The MIC for Artemisia monosperma with
Coriandrum sativum of aquatic extract was 12.5 mg/ml and the ethanolic extract was
25 mg/ml
4.9.3.2 Against S. aureus:
The MIC results of the aquatic extract of Cuminum cyminum with Ocimum
basilicum was 25mg/ml and in ethanolic extract was 50mg/ml. The MIC for
Artemisia monosperma with Coriandrum sativum of aquatic and ethanolic extract
was 25 mg/ml against S.aureus (Table 4.10) and (figure 4.47 and 4.48).
Table (4.10): The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) between plant extracts
against isolated bacteria
E.coli MIC
Conc.
S. aureus. MIC
Conc.
Solvent
Plant extract
Ethanol Water Ethanol Water
Cuminum cyminum with Ocimum basilicum 25 6.25 50 25
Artemisia monosperma with Coriandrum
sativum
25 12.5 25 25
83
Figure (4.47): the MIC of aquatic
extract of 12- Cuminum cyminum
with Ocimum basilicum and 13-
Artemisia monosperma with
Coriandrum sativum against S.
aureus.
Figure (4.48): the MIC of ethanolic
extract of 12- Cuminum cyminum
with Ocimum basilicum and 13-
Artemisia monosperma with
Coriandrum sativum against S.
aureus.
84
Figure (4.49): the MIC of aquatic
extract of 12- Cuminum cyminum
with Ocimum basilicum and 13-
Artemisia monosperma with
Coriandrum sativum against E.coli
Figure (4.50): the MIC of
ethanolic extract of 12- Cuminum
cyminum with Ocimum basilicum
and 13- Artemisia monosperma with
Coriandrum sativum against E.coli
85
Chapter (5)
Discussion and
Conclusions
86
Plant kingdom is one of the most important sources of the natural product due
to both medicinal and economical values (Kharjul et al., 2012). Many of medicinal
plants are known for decades as essential resources to human health.
The traditional cultural use of plant recipes and their protective and curative
significance is most likely associated with low cost, limited side effects, easy access
and the popular relationship with them.
People continue to use traditional remedy by consuming special medicinal
plant species sold at local markets and due to the limited number of studies in
Palestine in this field (Ali- Shtayeh and Jamous, 2006). The current study aimed to
evaluate the traditional use of medicinal plants by therapists in Gaza strip, as a part
of a series of ethno-botanic studies for estimation of the status of traditional herbal
medicine in the Palestinian communities.
5.1 Study population:
The current study shows that men were predominantly represented in the
samples where the folk therapy with medicinal plants considered more common
among men more than women with age group between 45–65 years, and this is not
consistent with study (Idu et al., 2010) which reported that the majority of medicinal
plant traders in Nigeria were women (64.29 %) between the age group of 40 – 60
years. The main source of traditional knowledge was also mainly rely on the
information and experiences gained from parents and grandparents and although
there is a similarity in some of the therapeutic recipes, each healer has its own
knowledge and tries to keep it secret and not exchange with everyone.
These findings clearly show that herbal medication still holds an important
status in folkloric medicine in Gaza strip, and these agree with Ali-Shtayeh and
Jamous (2006) which note that a people in Gaza strip and West Bank depend on a
monthly average visit to folk therapies at least 2-6 time on month.
5.2 Medicinal Plants Markets:
Most of the plant materials used in folk medicine is sold in herbal shops and
mostly being imported from other countries. Most of the plant materials were in
dried form and sold either singularly or as a mix with other plants for a particular
treatment (Idu et al., 2010). So to collect information about the markets of medicinal
87
plants, a series of semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 informant of
therapist and sellers of medicinal plants in Gaza Strip. Seventy two species of
ethnomedicinal plants belonging to 33 families were considered the most widely
used by therapist in the Gaza Strip. The most important family was Lamiaceae with 9
species, followed by Apiaceae with 8 species, Asteraceae with 7 species and
Fabaceae with 5 species other families with low numbers. (Table 4.1).
5.3 Plants and parts used
In the current study leaves were reported to be the most commonly used plant
parts for treatment (Figure 4.3). This might indicates that leaves are the major site of
active ingredients, and these agree with studies which observed that aerial parts are
the most frequently used parts in medicinal therapies (Amiri and Joharchi, 2013;
Arellanes et al., 2013), but these disagree with previous study which observed that
the underground parts were most used by therapies, while the whole plant and leaves
were second and third respectively (Maneenoon et al., 2015).
Each plant has a different method of use according to the part from the plant
used and the method of preparation of the prescription depending on the type of
disease. Most therapeutic prescriptions were prepared by simply boiling or soaking
the plant and were administered as tea. Table (4.2).
Plant recipes may include one or more plants, and one plant can be used to
treat many diseases. This is why it is difficult to identify certain plants for certain
diseases (Ali-Shtayeh et al., 2000)
These study showed that plants sold at the traditional markets were mostly
used for gastrointestinal disorders and these agree with previous study of (Amiri and
Joharchi, 2013; Maneenoon et al., 2015). However, our results indicate that the
number of plant species that treating the gastrointestinal system was (37) species,
followed by circulatory system (22), urinary system (20), diabetes (18), respiratory
system (14), nervous system (13), skin, burns, and hair (12), weight loss (10),
skeletal and muscular system (7), immunity system (7), reproductive system (7),
cancer (3), and (11) for other diseases.
88
5.4 Antibacterial Activity of the Plant Extracts
Many naturally occurring compounds found in plants have been served as a
source of antimicrobial agents against pathogens. This study evaluates the ability of
the aquatic and ethanolic extract of 11 plants species from the 72 species to inhibit
the growth of two type of pathogenic bacterial isolates E. coli and S. aureus.
Both disc diffusion method and well diffusion method were used to assess the
activity of plant extracts. It is noted that obtained results from well diffusion method
much better than that of disc diffusion method against the two types of bacterial
isolate and this finding in agreement with the previous study of (Al-Talib et al.,
2016). These results may be due to that the plant extracts in well diffused method
diffused in the plate more than that of disc diffusion method. Although, the low
recorded values of some plant extracts can be attributed to the fact that the extracts
are in crude form, containing very small amounts of biologically active compounds
(Karmegam et al., 2008). Probably part of prevention or inhibitor material for the
growth of microorganisms in plant extracts may lose their inhibitory power during
extraction methods (Elkichaoi., et al 2015).
The most results of disc and well diffusion method of the aqueous plant
extracts provided more strong antimicrobial activity compared to ethanolic extracts
against the isolate bacterial. This may be due to the aquatic extract found to be richer
in polar phenol than in ethanolic extracts (Triantaphyllou et al., 2001) which in
consistence with traditional therapies who use primarily water as the solvent. Also it
is found that the ethanolic plant extracts of Syzygium aromaticum.L have large
inhibition zone against E. coli, but gave a close result against S. aureus in both
ethanolic and aquatic extracts in both disc and well diffusion method. This may be
related to different solubility of the active constituents in the different solutions
(Parekh and Chanda., 2007).
It is shown that excellent effect of Syzygium aromaticum.L and Hibiscus
sabdariffa.L against both E.coli and S.aureus that infect the gastrointestinal tract and
these agree with (Tolulope, M., 2007 ; Cortés-Rojasf et al., 2014). Although these
two plant species have not been mentioned by therapists for treatment of
gastrointestinal disorder as shown in Table (4.2).
89
Microdilution method was used to determine the lowest plant extracts
concentration that inhibiting the growth of the bacteria isolates. As shown in
Tables(4.7), (4.8), the MIC value of Syzygium aromaticum.L of ethanolic extract
against S.aureus was found as the lowest 0.39mg/ml. On the other hand, the aquatic
extract of this plant species shown 6.25mg/ml against S.aureus. It also showed least
concentration of ethanolic extracts against E.coli with value 0.78mg/ml. On the
contrary of Syzygium aromaticum.L the Hibiscus sabdariffa.L shown the least MIC
value in aquatic extact. Compared to ethanolic extract against the two pathogenic
bacterial isolates. Where the MIC value of Hibiscus sabdariffa.L in aquatic extract
against S.aureus was 6.25mg/ml but the ethanolic extract value was 12.5mg/ml, and
the MIC value of this plant species in aquatic extract against E.coli was 0.39mg/ml
and the ethanolic extract was 0.78mg/ml.
Some researchers however, have reported that the activity in the disc
diffusion assay does not necessarily correlate to low MIC & MBC values in the
microtitre plate method (Ncube et al., 2008). This finding were agreed with our
results where the result of MBC of the ethanolic extracts of Glycyrrhiza glabra was
100mg/ml against E.coli. In contrast, the MBC results for the rest of the plant species
in both ethanolic and aquatic extract against E.coli was > 200 mg/ml.
The difference in antimicrobial activity of the plant extract can be due to the
freshness of the plant material, the physical factors (temperature, water) or the drying
method used prior to the extraction process and the extraction method (Okigbo and
Mmeka., 2008). As well, the successive isolation of plant compounds from plant
materials depends largely on the type of solvent used in the extraction process. We
have seen this clearly in the results of Syzygium aromaticum.L extracts which gave
high results against E.coli and S.aureus in the ethanolic extracts than in the aquatic
extract.
On the basis of the antibacterial assay of this study E. coli (Gram negative) as
found more susceptible to the employed plant extracts than S. aureus (Gram positive)
and this disagree with the previous study of Elbashiti which show that there was no
antibacterial activity of plant extracts against E.coli (Elbashiti., et al 2011) and this
due to the different cell-wall shape of different types of bacteria (Elkichaoi., et al
2015).
90
This current study detected the effectiveness of the synergistic effects of
some plant extract when mixed with each other toward a pathogenic bacterial
isolates. Plant extracts mixing gave weak results compared to the use of plant
extracts alone, this result disagree with (Karmegam., et al 2012) which showed that
the antimicrobial activity of aqueous and ethanolic leaf extracts of some plants gave
lower inhibition zones when used alone than that of the extract combinations.
One of the prescriptions from a popular therapist was tested and the
synergistic effect was tested of Cuminum cyminum with Ocimum basilicum, and of
Coriandrum sativum with Artemisia monosperma against each of E.coli and
S.aurues.
As shown in Table (4.9) there was antagonistic effect in the disc diffusion
method of ethanolic and aquatic extracts of mixed Cuminum cyminum with Ocimum
basilicum and mixed of Coriandrum sativum with Artemisia monosperma against
S.aurues. On the other hand, these mixed plant extracts showed weak synergistic
effect against E.coli with inhibition zone 7-8mm. (Table 4.8).
As for well diffusion method, the results were different. The Table (4.10)
showed that the effect of the aquatic extract of each plant separately on a bacterium
gave average results between 13-23 mm inhibition zone but when mixed the extracts,
there was no synergistic effect against S.aureus. These extracts showed 7-8 inhibition
zone against E.coli in aquatic extracts which was lower than that of each extract
alone.
Therefore, the results of this prescription were weak compared with the use of
each extract alone, and this is clearly shown in the results of MIC, where all extracts
showed a decrease in MIC to test synergistic effect. This finding was in agreement
with the previous study of Adwan & Mhanna (2008) which explained this as these
crude extracts have many different phytochemicals which might inhibit bacteria and
fungi by different mechanisms.
91
5.5 Conclusion:
The folk treatment and the use of medicinal plants in therapy is still transferred
from grandfathers and parents to younger generation and not depend on academic
study.
This study indicates that a large number of ethnomedicinal plant (72) species are
still the most useful in the folk treatment in Gaza strip. Majority of these plants
imported from other countries and some of them considered as local.
our results indicate that the number of plant species that treating the
gastrointestinal system was (37) species, followed by circulatory system (22), urinary
system (20), diabetes (18), respiratory system (14), nervous system (13), skin, burns,
and hair (12), weight loss (10), skeletal and muscular system (7), immunity system
(7), reproductive system (7), and cancer (3).
The most results of disc and well diffusion method of the aqueous plant extracts
provided more strong antimicrobial activity compared to ethanolic extracts against
the isolate bacterial. The strongest effect against E. coli was recorded in MIC in
aquatic extract of Hibiscus sabdariffa.L with value 0.39mg/ml. But the Syzygium
aromaticum.L observed strong effect in each S. aureus and E. coli in ethanolic
extract by all types of evaluation methods.
5.6 Recommendation:
1- The need to maintain knowledge through documentation and to encourage people
working in the field (therapists) with a control by the Ministry of Health.
2- The need to conduct awareness seminars by the Ministry of Health on the harms
and benefits of plant extracts and how to use them properly.
3-Toxicity studies of active plants should be conducted to determine safety indicators
for extracts.
4- Determine the interaction of these crude extracts with each other to determine the
validity of the recipes based on mixing the medicinal plants together by therapists.
5- It is essential to make the complete inventory of the medicinal component of the
flora of Palestine for conservation and sustainable use.
92
Chapter (6)
References
93
References
Abbasi, A. M., Khan, M. A., Ahmad, M., & Zafar, M. (2011). Medicinal plant
biodiversity of lesser Himalayas-Pakistan. Springer Science & Business
Media.
Abd Rabou, A. N., Yassin, M. M., Al-Agha, M. R., Madi, M. I., Al-Wali, M. M., Ali,
A. S., & Hamad, D. M. (2008). Notes on some common flora and its uses in
Wadi Gaza, Gaza Strip. The Islamic University Journal (Series of Natural
Studies and Engineering), 16(1), 31-63.
Abou Auda, M. (2011). An ethnobotanical uses of plants in the Middle Area, Gaza
Strip, Palestine. Advances in Environmental Biology, 3681-3688.
Abou Auda, M. (2012). Medicinal plant diversity in the flora of Gaza Valley, Gaza
Strip, Palestine.
Abu-Shanab, B., ADWAN, G. M., Abu-Safiya, D., Jarrar, N., & Adwan, K. (2004).
Antibacterial activities of some plant extracts utilized in popular medicine in
Palestine. Turkish journal of biology, 28(2-4), 99-102.
Abu-Shanab, B., Adwan, G. M., Adwan, K. M., & Shanab, F. B. A. (2015). Efficacy
of aqueous and ethanol extracts of some Palestinian medicinal plants for
potential antibacterial activity. IUG Journal of Natural Studies, 16(2).
Adwan, G., & Mhanna, M. (2008). Synergistic effects of plant extracts and
antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from clinical specimens.
Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 3(3), 134-139.
Ali-Shtayeh, M. S., Yaghmour, R. M. R., Faidi, Y. R., Salem, K., & Al-Nuri, M. A.
(1998). Antimicrobial activity of 20 plants used in folkloric medicine in the
Palestinian area. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 60(3), 265-271.
Ali-Shtayeh, M. S., Yaniv, Z., & Mahajna, J. (2000). Ethnobotanical survey in the
Palestinian area: a classification of the healing potential of medicinal plants.
Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 73(1-2), 221-232
Ali-Shtayeh, M. S., & Jamous, R. M. (2006). Ethnobotany of Palestinian herbal
medicine in the northern West Bank and Gaza Strip: review and
comprehensive field study. Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences Studies
Series, 4, 1-122.
94
Ali-Shtayeh, M. S., Jamous, R. M., & Jamous, R. M. (2011). Herbal preparation use
by patients suffering from cancer in Palestine. Complementary therapies in
clinical practice, 17(4), 235-240.
Ali-Shtayeh, M. S., Jamous, R. M., Jamous, R. M., & Salameh, N. M. (2013).
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among hypertensive
patients in Palestine. Complementary therapies in clinical practice, 19(4),
256-263.
Ali-Shtayeh, M. S., Jamous, R. M., & Abu-Zeitoun, S. Y. (2014). BERC 2014"
National list of Medicinal Plants in Palestine-West Bank and Gaza Strip. Til,
Nablus: Biodiversity and Environmental Research Center (BERC).
Ali-Shtayeh, M. S., Jamous, R. M., & Abu Zaitoun, S. Y. (2015). A Comprehensive
Science-Based Field Assessment of Bioactive Properties of the Native Plants
of Palestine. J Biodivers Biopros Dev, 2(151), 2376-0214.
Al-Talib, H., Ali, N. D. M., Suhaimi, M. H., Rosli, S. S. N., Othman, N. H., Mansor,
N. A. S., ... & Al-Khateeb, A. (2016). Antimicrobial effect of Malaysian
vegetables against enteric bacteria. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical
Biomedicine, 6(3), 211-215.
Amiri, M. S., & Joharchi, M. R. (2013). Ethnobotanical investigation of traditional
medicinal plants commercialized in the markets of Mashhad, Iran. Avicenna
journal of phytomedicine, 3(3), 254.
Arellanes, Y., Casas, A., Arellanes, A., Vega, E., Blancas, J., Vallejo, M., ... &
Pérez-Negrón, E. (2013). Influence of traditional markets on plant
management in the Tehuacán Valley. Journal of ethnobiology and
ethnomedicine, 9(1), 38.
Arı, S., Temel, M., Kargıoğlu, M., & Konuk, M. (2015). Ethnobotanical survey of
plants used in Afyonkarahisar-Turkey. Journal of ethnobiology and
ethnomedicine, 11(1), 84.
Bayati Zadeh, J., Moradi Kor, Z., & Karimi Goftar, M. (2013). Licorice (Glycyrrhiza
glabra Linn) as a valuable medicinal plant. International Journal of
Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, 1(10), 1281-1288.
Bhat, S., Kaushal, P., Kaur, M., & Sharma, H. K. (2014). Coriander (Coriandrum
sativum L.): Processing, nutritional and functional aspects. African Journal of
Plant Science, 8(1), 25-33.
95
Chahal, K., Monika, A. K., Bhardwaj, U., & Kaur, R. (2017). Chemistry and
biological activities of Anethum graveolens L.(dill) essential oil: a review. J.
Pharma. Phytochem., 6, 295-306.
Chéraif, I., Jannet, H. B., Hammami, M., Khouja, M. L., & Mighri, Z. (2007).
Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oils of
Cupressus arizonica Greene. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 35(12),
813-820
Cortés-Rojas, D. F., de Souza, C. R. F., & Oliveira, W. P. (2014). Clove (Syzygium
aromaticum): a precious spice. Asian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine,
4(2), 90-96.
Damle, M. (2014). Glycyrrhiza glabra (Liquorice)-a potent medicinal herb.
International Journal of Herbal Medicine, 2(2), 132-136.
Didarshetaban, M. B., Pour, S., & Reza, H. (2013). Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-
graecum L.) as a valuable medicinal plant. International Journal of Advanced
Biological and Biomedical Research, 1(8), 922-931.
El Astal, Z. Y., Ashour, A. E. R. A., & Kerrit, A. A. M. (2005). Antimicrobial
activity of some medicinal plant extracts in Palestine. Pak. J. Med. Sci, 21(2),
187-193.
Elbashiti, T. A., Elmanama, A. A., & Masad, A. A. (2011). The antibacterial and
synergistic effects of some Palestinian plant extracts on Escherichia coli and
Staphylococcus aureus. Funct Plant Sci Biotechnol, 5, 57-62.
Elkichaoi, A., El-Hindi, M., Mosleh, F., & Elbashiti, T. (2015). The Antimicrobial
Effects of the Fruit Extracts of Punica granatum, Actinidia deliciosa and
Citrus maxima on Some Human Pathogenic Microorganisms. American
International Journal of Biology, 3(2), 1-18.
Gohari, A. R., & Saeidnia, S. (2011). A review on phytochemistry of Cuminum
cyminum seeds and its standards from field to market. Pharmacognosy
Journal, 3(25), 1-5.
Hamidpour, R., Hamidpour, S., Hamidpour, M., Shahlari, M., & Hamidpour, R.
(2015). Chemistry, Pharmacology and Medicinal Property of Frankincense
(Boswellia Species): From the Selection of Traditional Applications to the
Novel Phytotherapy for the Prevention and Treatment of Serious
Diseases. Global Journal of Medical Research.
96
Handa, S. S., Rakesh, D. D., & Vasisht, K. (2006). Compendium of medicinal and
aromatic plants ASIA. ICS UNIDO. Asia, 2, 305.
Hao, J. Y., Han, W., Xue, B. Y., & Deng, X. (2002). Microwave-assisted extraction
of artemisinin from Artemisia annua L. Separation and Purification
Technology, 28(3), 191-196.
Harris, L. G., Foster, S. J., & Richards, R. G. (2002). An introduction to
Staphylococcus aureus, and techniques for identifying and quantifying S.
aureus adhesions in relation to adhesion to biomaterials: review. Eur Cell
Mater, 4(3).
Hinnawi, N. S. A. (2010). An ethnobotanical study of wild edible plants in the
Northern West Bank" Palestine (Doctoral dissertation, An-Najah National
University).
Husein, A. I., Ali-Shtayeh, M. S., Jamous, R. M., Zaitoun, S. Y. A., Jondi, W. J., &
Zatar, N. A. A. (2014). Antimicrobial activities of six plants used in
Traditional Arabic Palestinian Herbal Medicine.
Idu, M., Erhabor, J. O., & Efijuemue, H. M. (2010). Documentation on medicinal
plants sold in markets in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Tropical Journal of
Pharmaceutical Research, 9(2).
Jaradat, N. A. (2005). Medical plants utilized in Palestinian folk medicine for
treatment of diabetes mellitus and cardiac diseases. J Al-Aqsa Unv, 9, 1-28.
Jouda, M. M. (2013). The antibacterial effect of some medicinal plant extracts and
their synergistic effect with antibiotic and non-antibiotic drugs. Biological
Sciences Master Program, Faculty of Science, Islamic University-Gaza, P34
Jouda, M. M., Elbashiti, T., Masad, A., & Albayoumi, M. (2015). The antibacterial
effect of some medicinal plant extracts and their synergistic effect with
antibiotics. World J Pharm Sci, 5(2), 23-33.
Kang, C. G., Hah, D. S., Kim, C. H., Kim, Y. H., Kim, E., & Kim, J. S. (2011).
Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of the methanol extracts from 8
traditional medicinal plants. Toxicological research, 27(1), 31.
Karmegam, N., Karuppusamy, S., Prakash, M., Jayakumar, M., & Rajasekar, K.
(2008). Antibacterial potency and synergistic effect of certain plant extracts
against food-borne diarrhea genic bacteria. International journal of
biomedical and pharmaceutical sciences, 2(2), 88-93.
97
Karmegam, N., Jayakumar, M., & Karuppusamy, S. (2012). Synergistic antibacterial
activity of four medicinal plants collected from Dharapuram Taluk of
Tiruppur District, south India. Journal of Plant Sciences, 7(1), 32.
Kharjul, A., Kharjul, M., Vilegave, K., Chandankar, P., & Gadiya, M. (2012).
Pharmacognostic investigation on leaves of Citrus maxima (Burm.)
Merr.(Rutaceae). International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and
Research, 3(12), 4913.
Kunwar, R. M., Mahat, L., Acharya, R. P., & Bussmann, R. W. (2013). Medicinal
plants, traditional medicine, markets and management in far-west Nepal.
Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 9(1), 24.
Mahmoud, T., & Gairola, S. (2013). Traditional knowledge and use of medicinal
plants in the Eastern Desert of Egypt: a case study from Wadi El-Gemal
National Park. Journal of Medicinal Plants, 1(6).
Maneenoon, K., Khuniad, C., Teanuan, Y., Saedan, N., Prom-in, S., Rukleng, N., ...
& Wongwiwat, W. (2015). Ethnomedicinal plants used by traditional healers
in Phatthalung Province, Peninsular Thailand. Journal of ethnobiology and
ethnomedicine, 11(1), 43.
Mohamed, B. B., Sulaiman, A. A., & Dahab, A. A. (2012). Roselle (Hibiscus
sabdariffa L.) in Sudan, cultivation and their uses. Bull. Environ. Pharmacol.
Life Sci, 1(6), 48-54.
Moufid, A., & Eddouks, M. (2012). Artemisial herbal allbal: A Popular Plant with
Potential Medicinal Properties. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences,
15(24), 1152-1159.
Ncube, N. S., Afolayan, A. J., & Okoh, A. I. (2008). Assessment techniques of
antimicrobial properties of natural compounds of plant origin: current
methods and future trends. African journal of biotechnology, 7(12).
Okigbo, R. N., & Mmeka, E. C. (2008). Antimicrobial effects of three tropical plant
extracts on Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Candida
albicans. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative
Medicines, 5(3), 226-229.
Parekh, J., & Chanda, S. (2007). Antibacterial and phytochemical studies on twelve
species of Indian medicinal plants. African Journal of Biomedical
Research, 10(2).
98
Nemeth, I., (2012) : Medicanal Plants and Drugs. Eszterházy Károly College.
Hungary.
Quiroga, R., Meneses, L., & Bussmann, R. W. (2012). Medicinal ethnobotany in
Huacareta (Chuquisaca, Bolivia). Journal of ethnobiology and
ethnomedicine, 8(1), 29.
Rakotoarivelo, N. H., Rakotoarivony, F., Ramarosandratana, A. V., Jeannoda, V. H.,
Kuhlman, A. R., Randrianasolo, A., & Bussmann, R. W. (2015). Medicinal
plants used to treat the most frequent diseases encountered in Ambalabe rural
community, Eastern Madagascar. Journal of ethnobiology and
ethnomedicine, 11(1), 68.
Randriamiharisoa, M. N., Kuhlman, A. R., Jeannoda, V., Rabarison, H.,
Rakotoarivelo, N., Randrianarivony, T., ... & Bussmann, R. W. (2015).
Medicinal plants sold in the markets of Antananarivo, Madagascar. Journal
of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 11(1), 60.
Rasool Hassan, B. A. (2012). Medicinal plants (importance and uses). Pharmaceut
Anal Acta, 3, e139.
Revathi, P., & Parimelazhagan, T. (2010). Traditional knowledge on medicinal
plants used by the Irula tribe of Hasanur Hills, Erode District, Tamil Nadu,
India. Ethnobotanical Leaflets, 2010(2), 4.
Sakr, S. A., & Al-Amoudi, W. M. (2012). Effect of leave extract of Ocimum
basilicum on deltamethrin induced nephrotoxicity and oxidative stress in
albino rats
Sharma, A. (2011). Antibacterial activity of ethanolic extracts of some arid zone
plants. International journal Pharm Tech Res, 3, 283-286.
Smith-Hall, C., Larsen, H. O., & Pouliot, M. (2012). People, plants and health: a
conceptual framework for assessing changes in medicinal plant consumption.
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 8(1), 43.
Sousa, E. M. B. D. D., Câmara, A. P. C., Costa, W. A., Costa, A. C. J., Oliveira, H.
N. M., Galvão, E. L., & Marques, M. M. O. (2005). Evaluation of the
extraction process of the essential oil from Cymbopogon schoenanthus with
pressurized carbon dioxide. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology,
48(SPE), 231-236.
99
Tinitana, F., Rios, M., Romero-Benavides, J. C., de la Cruz Rot, M., & Pardo-de-
Santayana, M. (2016). Medicinal plants sold at traditional markets in southern
Ecuador. Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 12(1), 29.
Triantaphyllou, Georgios Blekas, Dimitrios Boskou, K. (2001). Antioxidative
properties of water extracts obtained from herbs of the species Lamiaceae.
International journal of food sciences and nutrition, 52(4), 313-317.
Tolulope, M. (2007). Cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity of methanolic extract of
Hibiscus sabdariffa. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 1(1), 009-013.
UNEP (2003): Desk Study on the environment in the Occupied Palestinian
Territories. United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya,
188 pp.
UNEP (2009): Environmental Assessment of the Gaza Strip. United Nations
Environment Program (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya, 6pp.
Welch, R. A. (2006). The genus Escherichia. In The prokaryotes (pp. 60-71).
Springer New York.
Yuan, H., Ma, Q., Ye, L., & Piao, G. (2016). The traditional medicine and modern
medicine from natural products. Molecules, 21(5), 559.
100
Appendix
101
Appendix: A
Interview Question
ؼيبد شخظخ3
اىدظ رمش ] [ اث ] [
] [ 44] [ امجش 44 -14 ] [ 14-32] [ 02-41اىؼش
] [ اثزذائ ] [ زعؾ ] [ اىغز اىزؼي ا
ثب ] [ خبؼ ] [
ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
ز ز ربسط ز اىخ؟ .4
ا رحظو ػي اىؼيبد اىزؼيقخ ثبىؼلاج ثبلأػشبة؟ .0
و بسط احذ غشك ف اىؼبئيخ ز اىخ؟ .3
و رق ثزؼي أ احذ ز اىخ حز لا رذثش؟ .1
رؼبىد ف الاعجع؟؟ و ىل صثبئ دائ؟؟م ػذد اىشػ اىز .4
و خذ اشاع حذدح زؼبىح ب اغيت اىبط ثبلأػشبة؟؟ ارمش ثؼغ ز .4
الاشاع؟
ا رحظو ػي الاػشبة؟؟ .2
و راخ طؼثبد ف اىحظه ػي اىجبربد اىطجخ؟ ب ز اىظؼثبد؟؟ .1
طؼت اىحظه ػيب؟؟و خذ جبربد رغزخذب ف اىؼلاج بدسح .2
ارمش اعبء ثؼغ ز اىجبربد؟؟
و اخذ حبلاد رؤثشد ثشنو عيج اىؼلاج ثبلأػشبة؟؟ .42
و رق ثئػذاد اىزشمجبد اىذائخ ثفغل؟؟ ا مبذ الاخبثخ ؼ... ارمش ثؼغ .44
اىطفبد اىزقيذخ اىز رق ثئػذادب ثفغل ا أن ؟
ز رذخو ف اغيت اىؼلاخبد اىز رق ثئػذادب ؟؟ارمش اعبء ثؼغ اىجبربد اى .40
غبىجب أ خضء اىجبد ز اعزخذا ف اػذاد اىطفبد اىطجخ ؟؟ .43
و رؤذ خد شامض اىؼلاج ثبلأػشبة ؼزذح صاسح اىظحخ اىفيغطخ؟؟ .41
ا مبذ اخبثزل لا... ارمش الاعجبة؟؟
بطو ػي شبدح زخظظخ ثزا اىدبه؟؟و رؤذ ا ن اىؼبىح ثبلأػشبة ح .44
و ىذل أ اقزشاحبد ا لاحظبد حه ػع اىذساعخ ) اعزخذا اىجبربد اىطجخ .44
ف اىؼلاج اىشؼج(
102
ثؼذ الاخبثخ ػ الاعئيخ اىغبثقخ و نل رؼجئخ زا اىدذه؟؟ .42
لازظاخ الاػذادطش٠مح ا الاشاض ار ٠ؼادا ادضء اغرخذ اع اثاخ اشل
103
Appendix: B
Photograph of survey
104
105