Upload
xuxa
View
47
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
THE IMPORTANCE OF CAPITAL MARKETS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL SECTOR (CASES OF TURKEY&SERBIA). ALI IHSAN DILER ISTANBUL STOCK EXCHANGE. VI. International Belgrade Stock Exchange Conference 15-16 November - Belgrade. IMPORTANCE OF CAPITAL MARKETS. Capital Markets provide - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
THE IMPORTANCE OF CAPITAL MARKETS IN THE
DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL SECTOR
(CASES OF TURKEY&SERBIA)
ALI IHSAN DILERISTANBUL STOCK EXCHANGE
VI. International Belgrade Stock Exchange Conference
15-16 November - Belgrade
IMPORTANCE OF CAPITAL MARKETS
• Capital Markets provide– Long term capital for investments– Liquidity for the security holders– Elimination of term mismatch– Reputation for companies
• Availability of information for all market participants – Disclosure Policies – Corporate Governance
• Liquidity– Price Contiunity
• Price contiunity requires depth
• Minimal Transaction Costs
CHARACTERISTICS OF A GOOD MARKET
TURKISH EXPERIENCE
29,55%
0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00%
20,00%
25,00%
30,00%
35,00% Agriculture
Industry
Construction
Trade
Transport &Communication
Sectorial Breakdown of Turkey’s GDP (% of GDP)
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Total IPO Amount Share of Industry
IPO Amounts ($ billion)
Holdings9%
Other11% Industry
15%
Financial Sector33%Communication
23%
REITs9%
Sectorial breakdown of IPO Amounts (1998-2007)
17,54
229,38
928,01
138,61
1.632,49
1.329,88
9,71
176,24
88,83
825,69
1.110,34
854,43
705,88
238,05
1.775,35
123,21
0,00
200,00
400,00
600,00
800,00
1.000,00
1.200,00
1.400,00
1.600,00
1.800,00
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Total Secondary PO Amount Share of Industry
Secondary PO Amounts ($ million)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
1999 2001 2003 2005 2007/9
MANUFACTURINGINDUSTRY
FINANCIALINSTITUTIONS
Others
Sectorial breakdown of Capital Increases (Rights Issues) in ISE (% of Total)
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
140.00
160.00
1999 2001 2003 2005 2007/9
MANUFACTURINGINDUSTRY
FINANCIALINSTITUTIONS
Others
Sectorial breakdown of Market Value in ISE($ billion)
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
1999 2001 2003 2005 2007/9
MANUFACTURINGINDUSTRY
FINANCIALINSTITUTIONS
Others
Sectorial breakdown of Trading Volume (# of Shares) in ISE (% of Total)
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
140.00
160.00
1999 2001 2003 2005 2007/9
MANUFACTURINGINDUSTRY
FINANCIALINSTITUTIONS
Others
Sectorial breakdown of Traded Value in ISE($ billion)
• Every year Istanbul Chamber of Industry makes a research for the first 500 Industrial Companies of Turkey.
• 105 of the first 500 industry companies are traded in ISE.
• 34 of these companies are in the first 100.
First 500 Industrial Companies of Turkey
41,91%38,06% 37,41%
0,00%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
40,00%
50,00%
60,00%
70,00%
Net Sales Net Assets ShareHolders' Equity
ISE Companies Others
Share of ISE Companies in the first 500 Industrial Companies of Turkey
• ISE was established in 1986
• No institutional investor at the beginning
• Few brokerage houses
• OTC was a big rival
Beginning Phase of the ISE
• Removing the restrictions from international capital movements (1989)
• For ISE Members, it is compulsory to make their transactions at ISE markets. (from 1986 onwards)
• Mutual Funds and Investment Trusts were began to be established and their revenues are exempted from taxes
• Listed companies have tax exemptions from their profit (till 1999)
Evolution of the ISE
• Also the capital gains obtained from the transactions on ISE were exempted from taxes till 1999.– Between 1999 and 2006, if the shares obtained from
ISE are held for 3 months or more the capital gains from the sale of these shares were exempted from tax.
– Since 2006 holding period was extended to 1 year.– Still only for individual foreign investors’ capital gains,
from trading equity shares on ISE, are exempted from tax.
Evolution of the ISE
• Privatizations are made through ISE Whole Sales Market.
• Privatizations increased the liquidity of the ISE markets.
• Privatization Administration – played a market maker role in early 1990s.– Still using ISE Whole Sales Market for public offerings– Also can sell small amounts of securities in available
market conditions
Evolution of the ISE
Block Sale65%
$ 14.64 billion
Capital Markets15%
$ 3.41 billion
Other20%
$ 4.57 billion
Privatization Sale Methods (2001-2007)
• Financial Sector takes the biggest stake from the Capital Markets, but they give them as credits.
• Banking sector’s standards was raised to International Standards after the 2001 crisis.
• This improvement has increased the credit volume by the help of the economic conjoncture.
Evolution of the ISE
• Alternative finance resources– Although the domestic saving rates are at low
levels, by the help of the banking reform in 2001, the banks and private sector could obtain loans from foreign banks.(Appreciation of Lira is the main driver)
• Informal Economy
Why is the stake of Industry not satisfactory in ISE?
• Strong real growth rates in last years
• Declining Inflation to single digits
• Appreciation of local currency RDS
4.80%
4.20%
2.50%
8.40%
6.20%
5.70%
7.80%
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007Q2
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
8.00%
9.00%
GDP (in USD million) GDP Growth
SERBIA
Source:National Bank of Serbia
Technology2%
Financial67%
Holding15%
Industry16%
Source: http://www.belex.co.yu/index-e.php
Sectorial breakdown of BELEX15
FEDERATION OF EURO-ASIAN STOCK EXCHANGES (FEAS) REGION
Not Replied 44%, (14) Replied
56%, (18)
Source: FEAS Research&Development Task Force Report “FEAS Region IPOs” (September 2007)
Number of Respondents
Incentive 41%
No Incentive 59%
Source: FEAS Research&Development Task Force Report “FEAS Region IPOs” (September 2007)
Incentives for Publicly Held Companies
Privatization without IPO
44%Privatization by
IPO56%
Source: FEAS Research&Development Task Force Report “FEAS Region IPOs” (September 2007)
IPO & Privatization
Positive Effect62%
No effect38%
Source: FEAS Research&Development Task Force Report “FEAS Region IPOs” (September 2007)
Effect of Privatization to Capital Markets
5 5
3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Very Important Important Not Important
Source: FEAS Research&Development Task Force Report “FEAS Region IPOs” (September 2007)
Macro Economic Conditions
1
8
4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Very Important Important Not Important
Source: FEAS Research&Development Task Force Report “FEAS Region IPOs” (September 2007)
Level of Domestic Deposits
2
1
8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Very Important Important Not Important
Source: FEAS Research&Development Task Force Report “FEAS Region IPOs” (September 2007)
Crowding Out Effect
13
21
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Very Important Important Not Important
Source: FEAS Research&Development Task Force Report “FEAS Region IPOs” (September 2007)
Equity Culture
6
4
2
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Very Important Important Not Important
Source: FEAS Research&Development Task Force Report “FEAS Region IPOs” (September 2007)
Fear of Losing Company’s Control
1
2
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Very Important Important Not Important
Source: FEAS Research&Development Task Force Report “FEAS Region IPOs” (September 2007)
Taxes
3
4
6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Very Important Important Not Important
Source: FEAS Research&Development Task Force Report “FEAS Region IPOs” (September 2007)
Informal Economy
Very Important Important Not Important
Macro Economic Conditions
5 5 3
Level of domestic deposits
1 8 4
Crowding out effect
2 1 8
Equity Culture 13 2 1
Fear of losing company’s control
6 4 2
Taxes 1 2 9
Informal economy 3 4 6
SUMMARY TABLE