Agreement No. CE 45/2008 (CE) Liantang / Heung Yuen Wai

Agreement No. CE 45/2008 (CE) Liantang / Heung Yuen Wai Boundary
Control Point and Associated Works
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
Volume 1 - Main Text
P:\Hong Kong\BRI\255228 Liantang_HeungYuenWai BCP\Environmental\Deliverables\EIA Report\4th\Vol 1 of 5_cover.doc
20 August 2010
Agreement No. CE 45/2008 (CE) Liantang / Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and Associated Works
Environmental Impact Assessment Report
Volume 1 - Main Text
Civil Engineering and Development Department
Mott MacDonald, 20/F Two Landmark East, 100 How Ming Street, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong T +852 2828 5757 F +852
2827 1823 W www.mottmac.com
Civil Engineering Office Boundary Control Point Division 3/F, Civil Engineering and Development Building 101 Princess Margaret Road Homantin Kowloon
255228/ENL/ENL/61/D December 2010 P:\Hong Kong\BRI\255228 Liantang_HeungYuenWai BCP\Environmental\Deliverables\EIA Report\4th\Vol 1 of 5_cover.doc
Agreement No. CE 45/2008 (CE) Liantang / Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and Associated Works Environmental Impact Assessment Report
Chapter Title Page
4. Noise Impact Assessment 4-1 4.1 Introduction _______________________________________________________________________4-1 4.2 Environmental Legislation, Standards and Guidelines ______________________________________4-1 4.3 Assessment Area, Noise Sensitive Receivers and Background Noise Climate ___________________4-5 4.4 Construction Phase Impact___________________________________________________________4-8 4.5 Operation Phase Impact ____________________________________________________________4-22 4.6 Environmental Monitoring and Audit ___________________________________________________4-35 4.7 Conclusion ______________________________________________________________________4-35
5. Water Quality Impact 5-1 5.1 Introduction _______________________________________________________________________5-1 5.2 Environmental Legislation, Standards and Guidelines ______________________________________5-1 5.3 Assessment Area, Water Sensitive Receivers and Description of the Environment ________________5-4 5.4 Assessment Methodology____________________________________________________________5-9
Content
5.5 Identification, Prediction and Evaluation of Environmental Impact ____________________________5-10 5.6 Mitigation of Adverse Environmental Impact_____________________________________________5-14 5.7 Evaluation of Residual Impact________________________________________________________5-19 5.8 Environmental Monitoring and Audit ___________________________________________________5-19 5.9 Conclusion ______________________________________________________________________5-19
6. Sewerage and Sewage Treatment Impact 6-1 6.1 Introduction _______________________________________________________________________6-1 6.2 Assessment Approach and Methodology ________________________________________________6-1 6.3 Design Assumptions, Parameters and Criteria ____________________________________________6-2 6.4 Existing Sewerage Conditions ________________________________________________________6-5 6.5 Estimated Pollutant Loads due to the Project _____________________________________________6-7 6.6 Proposed Mitigation Measures ________________________________________________________6-9 6.7 Short Term Measures during Construction Phase ________________________________________6-13 6.8 Environmental Monitoring and Audit ___________________________________________________6-13 6.9 Conclusion ______________________________________________________________________6-13
7. Waste Management Implications 7-1 7.1 Introduction _______________________________________________________________________7-1 7.2 Environmental Legislation, Standards and Guidelines ______________________________________7-1 7.3 Assessment Methodology____________________________________________________________7-2 7.4 Identification, Prediction and Evaluation of Environmental Impact _____________________________7-4 7.5 Opportunities for Reducing Waste Generation and Maximise Re-Use __________________________7-7 7.6 Mitigation of Adverse Environmental Impacts _____________________________________________7-9 7.7 Impacts Caused by Handling, Collection and Disposal of C&D Materials_______________________7-11 7.8 Waste Handling Procedures and Routes _______________________________________________7-11 7.9 Evaluation of Residual Impacts_______________________________________________________7-14 7.10 Environmental Monitoring and Audit ___________________________________________________7-14 7.11 Conclusion ______________________________________________________________________7-14
8. Land Contamination 8-1 8.1 Introduction _______________________________________________________________________8-1 8.2 Environmental Legislation, Standards and Guidelines ______________________________________8-1 8.3 Description of the Environment/ Baseline Conditions _______________________________________8-1 8.4 Assessment Methodology____________________________________________________________8-4 8.5 Identification of Environmental Impact __________________________________________________8-4 8.6 Prediction and Evaluation of Environmental Impact ________________________________________8-6 8.7 Mitigation of Adverse Environmental Impact______________________________________________8-8 8.8 Evaluation of Residual Impact_________________________________________________________8-9 8.9 Environmental Monitoring and Audit ____________________________________________________8-9 8.10 Conclusion _______________________________________________________________________8-9
9. Ecological Impact 9.1 9.1 Introduction _______________________________________________________________________9-1
9.2 Background_______________________________________________________________________9-1 9.3 Environmental Legislation, Standards and Guidelines ______________________________________9-7 9.4 Assessment Area and Ecological Survey Methodology _____________________________________9-8 9.5 Ecological Baseline Condition________________________________________________________9-12
9.6 Habitat and Species Evaluation _____________________________________________________9-104 9.7 Identification / Evaluation of Environmental Impact and Recommendation of Mitigation Measures __9-134 9.8 Mitigation Measures ______________________________________________________________9-172 9.9 Evaluation of Cumulative Impact_____________________________________________________9-181 9.10 Evaluation of Residual Impact_______________________________________________________9-186 9.11 Environmental Monitoring and Audit __________________________________________________9-186 9.12 Conclusion _____________________________________________________________________9-187 9.13 Reference ______________________________________________________________________9-189
13.3 Noise Impact_____________________________________________________________________13-1 13.4 Water Quality Impact ______________________________________________________________13-1 13.5 Sewerage and Sewage Treatment Implications __________________________________________13-2 13.6 Waste Management Implications _____________________________________________________13-2 13.7 Land Contamination _______________________________________________________________13-2 13.8 Ecological Impact _________________________________________________________________13-2 13.9 Fisheries Impact __________________________________________________________________13-3 13.10 Landscape, Visual and Glare Impact __________________________________________________13-3 13.11 Impact on Cultural Heritage _________________________________________________________13-4
15. Implementation Schedule of Mitigation Measures 15-1 15.1 General _________________________________________________________________________15-1
Tables
Table 2.1: Summary of Environmental Benefits and Dis-Benefits of the BCP Location Options _______________2-8 Table 2.2: Final Screened Options ____________________________________________________________2-15
Table 2.3: Summary of Environmental Benefits and Dis-Benefits of the Alignment Options _________________2-17 Table 2.4: Summary of Potential Concurrent Projects ______________________________________________2-38
Table 3.1: Hong Kong Air Quality Objectives______________________________________________________3-1 Table 3.2: Tunnel Air Quality Guidelines _________________________________________________________3-2 Table 3.3: Representative ASRs Identified for the Assessment________________________________________3-4 Table 3.4: Assumptions for Calculation of Dust Emission Factors______________________________________3-6 Table 3.5: Vehicle Classification in the EMFAC-HK Model __________________________________________3-10 Table 3.6: Worst Case Emission Factors as Predicted by EMFAC-HK Model____________________________3-13 Table 3.7: Forecast of Idling Vehicles in Kiosks, L&UL and PTI in Peak Hour____________________________3-16 Table 3.8: Idling Emissions from Kiosks, L&UL areas and PTI _______________________________________3-17 Table 3.9: Predicted Cumulative Hourly Average TSP Concentration in near the BCP, Lin Ma Hang to Frontier
Closed Area and Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan (Tier 1 – Unmitigated) ________________________3-20 Table 3.10: Predicted Cumulative Hourly Average TSP Concentration in Sha Tau Kok (Tier 1– Unmitigated) ____3-21 Table 3.11: Predicted Cumulative Hourly Average TSP Concentration in Po Kak Tsai (Tier 1– Unmitigated)_____3-21 Table 3.12: Predicted Cumulative Hourly Average TSP Concentration in Fanling (Tier 1 – Unmitigated) ________3-21 Table 3.13: Predicted Cumulative Hourly Average TSP Concentration in near the BCP, Lin Ma Hang to Frontier
Closed Area and Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan (Tier 1 – Mitigated) __________________________3-22 Table 3.14: Predicted Cumulative Hourly Average TSP Concentration in Sha Tau Kok (Tier 1– Mitigated) ______3-22 Table 3.15: Predicted Cumulative Hourly Average TSP Concentration in Po Kak Tsai (Tier 1– Mitigated) _______3-23 Table 3.16: Predicted Cumulative Hourly Average TSP Concentration in Fanling (Tier 1 – Mitigated) __________3-23 Table 3.17: Predicted Cumulative Hourly Average TSP Concentration at Selected ASRs (Tier 2 – Mitigated) ____3-23 Table 3.18: Predicted Cumulative Daily Average TSP Concentration in near the BCP, Lin Ma Hang to Frontier Closed
Area and Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan (Tier 1 – Unmitigated) ______________________________3-24 Table 3.19: Predicted Cumulative Daily Average TSP Concentration in Sha Tau Kok (Tier 1 – Unmitigated)_____3-25 Table 3.20: Predicted Cumulative Daily Average TSP Concentration in Po Kak Tsai (Tier 1 – Unmitigated) _____3-25 Table 3.21: Predicted Cumulative Daily Average TSP Concentration in Fanling (Tier 1 – Unmitigated) _________3-25
Table 3.22: Predicted Cumulative Daily Average TSP Concentration in near the BCP, Lin Ma Hang to Frontier Closed
Area and Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan (Tier 1 – Mitigated) ________________________________3-25 Table 3.23: Predicted Cumulative Daily Average TSP Concentration in Sha Tau Kok (Tier 1 – Mitigated) _______3-26 Table 3.24: Predicted Cumulative Daily Average TSP Concentration in Po Kak Tsai (Tier 1 – Mitigated) _______3-26 Table 3.25: Predicted Cumulative Daily Average TSP Concentration in Fanling (Tier 1 – Mitigated) ___________3-26 Table 3.26: Predicted Cumulative Daily Average TSP Concentration at Selected ASRs (Tier 2 – Mitigated) _____3-27 Table 3.27: Predicted Cumulative Annual Average TSP Concentration in near the BCP, Lin Ma Hang to Frontier
Closed Area and Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan (Unmitigated) ______________________________3-27 Table 3.28: Predicted Cumulative Annual Average TSP Concentration in Sha Tau Kok (Unmitigated) _________3-28 Table 3.29: Predicted Cumulative Annual Average TSP Concentration in Po Kak Tsai (Unmitigated) __________3-28 Table 3.30: Predicted Cumulative Annual Average TSP Concentration in Fanling (Unmitigated) ______________3-28 Table 3.31: Predicted Cumulative Annual Average TSP Concentration in near the BCP, Lin Ma Hang to Frontier
Closed Area and Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan (Mitigated)_________________________________3-29 Table 3.32: Predicted Cumulative Annual Average TSP Concentration in Sha Tau Kok (Mitigated)____________3-29 Table 3.33: Predicted Cumulative Annual Average TSP Concentration in Po Kak Tsai (Mitigated) ____________3-30 Table 3.34: Predicted Cumulative Annual Average TSP Concentration in Fanling (Mitigated) ________________3-30 Table 3.35: Predicted Cumulative Hourly and Daily NO2 and Daily RSP concentrations for Stability Class D ____3-30 Table 3.36: Predicted Cumulative Hourly and Daily NO2 and Daily RSP concentrations for Stability Class F_____3-32 Table 3.37: Predicted Cumulative Annual NO2 and RSP concentrations_________________________________3-34
Table 4.1: Noise Standards for Daytime Construction Activities _______________________________________4-2 Table 4.2: Ground-borne Noise Criteria (Leq 30min, dB(A))_____________________________________________4-3 Table 4.3: Relevant Noise Standards for Planning Purposes _________________________________________4-4 Table 4.4: Acceptable Noise Level for Fixed Plant Noise ____________________________________________4-4 Table 4.5: Area Sensitivity Rating ______________________________________________________________4-5 Table 4.6: Representative Noise Sensitive Receivers _______________________________________________4-7 Table 4.7 Measured Noise Levels _____________________________________________________________4-8 Table 4.8: Unmitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact near BCP, Leq (30mins) dB(A) ____________________4-9 Table 4.9 Unmitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact from Lin Ma Hang to Wo Keng Shan, Leq (30mins) dB(A)
_______________________________________________________________________________4-10 Table 4.10 Unmitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact at Wo Keng Shan, Leq (30mins) dB(A)_____________4-10 Table 4.11 Unmitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact near Sha Tau Kok Road, Leq (30mins) dB(A) ________4-11 Table 4.12 Unmitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact near Po Kak Tsai, Leq (30mins) dB(A) _____________4-11 Table 4.13 Unmitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact near Fanling, Leq (30mins) dB(A) _________________4-11 Table 4.14 Quieter PME Recommended for Adoption during Construction Phase_________________________4-12 Table 4.15 Noise Mitigation Measures for Certain PME during Construction Phase _______________________4-13 Table 4.16: Mitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact near BCP, Leq (30mins) dB(A)______________________4-14 Table 4.17 Mitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact from Lin Ma Hang to Wo Keng Shan, Leq (30mins) dB(A)_4-14 Table 4.18 Mitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact at Wo Keng Shan, Leq (30mins) dB(A) _______________4-15 Table 4.19 Mitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact near Sha Tau Kok Road, Leq (30mins) dB(A) __________4-15 Table 4.20 Mitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact near Po Kak Tsai, Leq (30mins) dB(A)________________4-16 Table 4.21 Mitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact near Fanling, Leq (30mins) dB(A) ___________________4-16 Table 4.22: Cumulative Mitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact near BCP, Leq (30mins) dB(A) ____________4-17 Table 4.23 Cumulative Mitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact at Lin Ma Hang to Frontier Closed Area
Boundary, Leq (30mins) dB(A) __________________________________________________________4-17 Table 4.24: Reference Vibration Level based on Measurements ______________________________________4-19 Table 4.25: Source Vibration Velocity of Octave Band Frequency for Hydraulic Breaker ____________________4-19 Table 4.26: Wave Propagation Properties of Soil __________________________________________________4-19 Table 4.27: Adjustment Factor for Building Coupling Loss (BCF) ______________________________________4-20 Table 4.28: Adjustment Factor for Building Structure Attenuation (BSA)_________________________________4-20
Table 4.29: Building Structure Attenuation (BSA) __________________________________________________4-20 Table 4.30: Building Structure Resonance (BSR) __________________________________________________4-21 Table 4.31: Room Correction Factors ___________________________________________________________4-21 Table 4.32 Unmitigated Construction Ground-borne Noise __________________________________________4-22
Table 4.33 Comparison between With and Without Project in Year 2018 from Lin Ma Hang to North Tunnel (Existing
Receivers)_______________________________________________________________________4-23
Table 4.34 Comparison between With and Without Project in Year 2018 from Lin Ma Hang to North Tunnel (Planned
Receivers)_______________________________________________________________________4-24
Table 4.35 Comparison between With and Without Project in Year 2018 near Sha Tau Kok Road Section (Existing
Receivers)_______________________________________________________________________4-25
Table 4.36 Comparison between With and Without Project in Year 2018 near Fanling Highway (Existing Receivers)
_______________________________________________________________________________4-25
Table 4.37 Unmitigated Road Traffic Noise Impact in Year 2033 near Lin Ma Hang to Wo Keng Shan (Existing Uses)
_______________________________________________________________________________4-26
Table 4.38 Unmitigated Road Traffic Noise Impact in Year 2033 near Lin Ma Hang to Wo Keng Shan (Planned Uses)
_______________________________________________________________________________4-27
Table 4.39 Unmitigated Road Traffic Noise Impact in Year 2033 near Sha Tau Kok Road Section (Existing Uses)4-27
Table 4.40 Unmitigated Road Traffic Noise Impact in Year 2033 near Fanling Highway (Existing Uses)________4-27
Table 4.41 Summary of Exceedance of Road Traffic Noise Criteria____________________________________4-28
Table 4.42 Proposed Location of Noise Barrier for Existing Uses _____________________________________4-29
Table 4.43: Mitigated Road Traffic Noise Levels of Existing Uses______________________________________4-30
Table 4.44 Noise Criteria of Fixed Plant Noise ____________________________________________________4-31
Table 4.45: Summary of Fixed Plant Noise Sources ________________________________________________4-33
Table 4.46: Maximum SWLs of the Fixed Plant____________________________________________________4-33
Table 5.1 Water Quality Objective for the Deep Bay WCZ ___________________________________________5-1 Table 5.2 Marine Water Quality in Deep Bay Water Control Zone in 2008_______________________________5-5 Table 5.3: Summary of River Water Quality Monitoring Data at Several Sections of Shenzhen River (2006-2007) 5-6 Table 5.4: Summary of River Water Quality Monitoring Data at River Ganges and River Indus (2008) _________5-7 Table 5.5: Summary of Results of Water Quality Sampling at River Indus, River Ganges and Kong Yiu Channel _5-9
Table 6.1: Population of the proposed LT/HYW BCP on Hong Kong Side _______________________________6-2 Table 6.2: Population of the Proposed Resite of Chuk Yuen Village ____________________________________6-2 Table 6.3: Staffing of proposed Administration Building______________________________________________6-3 Table 6.4: Design Unit Load Factors ____________________________________________________________6-4 Table 6.5: Peaking Factor for Sewers ___________________________________________________________6-5 Table 6.6: Population and Estimated Sewage Flow from Existing Chuk Yuen Village_______________________6-5 Table 6.7: Pollutant Loading of Existing Chuk Yuen Villages _________________________________________6-6 Table 6.8: Performance of Septic Tank __________________________________________________________6-6 Table 6.9: Pollutant Loading Performance of Septic Tank____________________________________________6-6 Table 6.10: Estimated Sewage Flow from Proposed Chuk Yuen Village Resite ____________________________6-7 Table 6.11: Estimated Sewage Flow from the proposed LT/HYW BCP on Hong Kong Side___________________6-7 Table 6.12: Estimated Sewage Flow from the proposed LT/HYW BCP on Hong Kong Side (with 15% of passengers
using toilet) _______________________________________________________________________6-8 Table 6.13: Pollutant Loads arising from the Raw Sewage of the Proposed Development ____________________6-8 Table 6.14: Comparison of MBR Treatment Performance with Discharge Standards _______________________6-10 Table 6.15: Pollutant Loadings in Treated Effluent (with 10% of passengers using toilets) ___________________6-11 Table 6.16: Pollutant Loadings in Treated Effluent (with 15% of passengers using toilet)____________________6-11 Table 6.17: Comparison of Pollutant Loadings ____________________________________________________6-11 Table 6.18: Comparison of Sewage Flow and Pollutant Loadings to be Discharged after Effluent Reuse (with 10% of
Passengers Using Toilets) __________________________________________________________6-12
Table 6.19: Standards for Reuse of MBR Treated Effluent ___________________________________________6-12 Table 7.1: Summary of Waste Handling Procedures and Routes during Construction Phase________________7-12
Table 8.1 Historical land use in the area of Chuk Yuen Village _______________________________________8-2 Table 8.2 Historical land use along connecting road between Lin Ma Hang and Frontier Closed Area and between
Ping Yeung and Wo Keng Shan _______________________________________________________8-2 Table 8.3 Historical land use along connecting road in Sha Tau Kok Road Section________________________8-3 Table 8.4 Historical land use of the location of proposed ventilation building at Po Kai Tsai _________________8-3 Table 8.5 Historical land use along the proposed BCP connecting road in Fanling ________________________8-4 Table 8.6 Potential Contamination for each section of Study Area_____________________________________8-6
Table 9.1: Schedule of Fauna Surveys _________________________________________________________9-11 Table 9.2: Habitats Present in Assessment Area__________________________________________________9-15 Table 9.3: Habitats Present in Works Area ______________________________________________________9-15 Table 9.4: Mammal Species recorded from BCP Area _____________________________________________9-24 Table 9.5: Mammal Species recorded from Lin Ma Hang Road to Frontier Closed Area Boundary ___________9-25 Table 9.6: Mammal Species recorded from Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan______________________________9-27 Table 9.7: Mammal Species recorded from the North Tunnel Aboveground Area_________________________9-28 Table 9.8: Mammal Species recorded from Sha Tau Kok Road (Shan Tong, Man Uk Pin and Loi Tung Areas)__9-28 Table 9.9: Mammal Species recorded in Pat Sin Leng Country Park from AFCD Survey
(1, 2, 3, 4) _____________9-29
Table 9.10: Mammal Species recorded from Fanling (Wo Hop Shek and Yuen Leng Areas) _________________9-31 Table 9.11: Bird Species recorded from BCP Area _________________________________________________9-36 Table 9.12: Bird Species recorded from Lin Ma Hang Road to Frontier Closed Area Boundary _______________9-38 Table 9.13: Bird Species recorded from Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan _________________________________9-42 Table 9.14: Bird Species recorded from the North Tunnel Aboveground Area ____________________________9-46 Table 9.15: Bird Species recorded from Sha Tau Kok Road (Shan Tong, Man Uk Pin and Loi Tung Areas) _____9-47 Table 9.16: Bird Species recorded from Tan Chuk Hang and Lau Shui Heung Area _______________________9-50 Table 9.17: Bird Species Recorded from Fanling (Wo Hop Shek and Yuen Leng Areas) ____________________9-53 Table 9.18: Amphibian and Reptile Species recorded from BCP Area __________________________________9-57 Table 9.19: Amphibian and Reptile Species recorded from Lin Ma Hang to Frontier Closed Area Boundary _____9-58 Table 9.20: Amphibian and Reptile Species recorded from Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan___________________9-59 Table 9.21: Amphibian and Reptile Species recorded from Sha Tau Kok Raod (Shan Tong, Man Uk Pin and Loi Tung
Areas) __________________________________________________________________________9-61 Table 9.22: Amphibian and Reptile Species recorded from Tan Chuk Hang and Lau Shui Heung Area_________9-62 Table 9.23: Amphibian and Reptile Species Recorded from Fanling (Wo Hop Shek and Yuen Leng Areas) _____9-64 Table 9.24: Butterfly Species recorded from BCP Area______________________________________________9-67 Table 9.25: Butterfly Species recorded from Lin Ma Hang to Frontier Closed Area Boundary ________________9-68 Table 9.26: Butterfly Species recorded from Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan ______________________________9-71 Table 9.27: Butterfly Species recorded from the North Tunnel Aboveground Area _________________________9-75 Table 9.28: Butterfly Species recorded from Sha Tau Kok Road (Shan Tong, Man Uk Pin and Loi Tung Areas) __9-76 Table 9.29: Butterfly Species recorded from Tan Chuk Hang and Lau Shui Heung Areas ___________________9-79 Table 9.30: Butterfly Species recorded from Fanling (Wo Hop Shek and Yuen Leng Areas) _________________9-82 Table 9.31: Dragonfly Species recorded from BCP Area_____________________________________________9-85 Table 9.32: Dragonfly Species recorded from Lin Ma Hang Road to Frontier Closed Area Boundary___________9-85 Table 9.33: Dragonfly Species recorded from Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan _____________________________9-87 Table 9.34: Dragonfly Species recorded from the North Tunnel Aboveground Area ________________________9-89 Table 9.35: Dragonfly Species recorded from Sha Tau Kok Road (Shan Tong, Man Uk Pin and Loi Tung Areas)_9-89 Table 9.36: Dragonfly Species recorded from Tan Shan River and Lau Shui Heung Reservoir Area ___________9-92 Table 9.37: Dragonfly Species recorded from Fanling (Wo Hop Shek and Yuen Leng Areas) ________________9-94 Table 9.38: Freshwater Fish and Crustacean Species recorded from BCP Area __________________________9-97 Table 9.39: Freshwater Fish and Crustacean Species recorded from the channels at Frontier Closed Area _____9-98
Table 9.40: Freshwater Fish and Crustacean Species recorded from branches of River Ganges at Wo Keng Shan
Area ___________________________________________________________________________9-99 Table 9.41: Freshwater Fish and Crustacean Species recorded from streams and channels at Man Uk Pin and Loi
Tung Area ______________________________________________________________________9-100 Table 9.42: Freshwater Fish and Crustacean Species recorded from Tan Shan River, Kwan Tei River and Lau Shui
Heung Reservoir_________________________________________________________________9-101 Table 9.43: Freshwater Fish and Crustacean Species recorded from Fanling Area _______________________9-103 Table 9.44: Ecological Evaluation of Woodland (1) – Fung Shui Wood ________________________________9-105 Table 9.45: Ecological Evaluation of Woodland (2) – Secondary Woodland _____________________________9-106 Table 9.46: Ecological Evaluation of Woodland (3) – Secondary Woodland _____________________________9-107 Table 9.47: Ecological Evaluation of Woodland (4) – Secondary Woodland _____________________________9-108 Table 9.48: Ecological Evaluation of Shrubland___________________________________________________9-109 Table 9.49: Ecological Evaluation of Plantation___________________________________________________9-110 Table 9.50: Ecological Evaluation of Freshwater Wetland___________________________________________9-111 Table 9.51: Ecological Evaluation of Active Agricultural Land ________________________________________9-112 Table 9.52: Ecological Evaluation of Abandoned Agricultural Land____________________________________9-113 Table 9.53: Ecological Evaluation of Hillside Grassland ____________________________________________9-114 Table 9.54: Ecological Evaluation of Pond_______________________________________________________9-114 Table 9.55: Ecological Evaluation of Drainage Channel (1)__________________________________________9-115 Table 9.56: Ecological Evaluation of Drainage Channel (2)__________________________________________9-116 Table 9.57: Ecological Evaluation of Watercourse_________________________________________________9-117 Table 9.58: Ecological Evaluation of Open Field __________________________________________________9-118 Table 9.59: Ecological Evaluation of Developed Area ______________________________________________9-118 Table 9.60: Ecological Evaluation of Floral Species of Conservation Interest within Assessment Area ________9-119 Table 9.61: Mammal Species of Conservation Interest identified within Assessment Area __________________9-120 Table 9.62: Bird Species of Conservation Interest identified within Assessment Area _____________________9-122 Table 9.63: Amphibian and Reptile Species of Conservation Interest identified within Assessment Area_______9-126 Table 9.64: Butterfly Species of Conservation Interest identified within Assessment Area __________________9-128 Table 9.65: Dragonfly Species of Conservation Interest identified within Assessment Area _________________9-129 Table 9.66: Freshwater Fauna Species of Conservation Interest identified within Assessment Area ________9-132 Table 9.67: Habitat Loss in Works Area_________________________________________________________9-135 Table 9.68: Potential Ecological Impact of Habitat Loss at Works Area in Section 1 – BCP (1) ______________9-140 Table 9.69: Potential Ecological Impact of Habitat Loss at Works Area in Section 1 – BCP (2) ______________9-140 Table 9.70: Potential Ecological Impact of Habitat Loss at Works Area in Sections 2 & 3 – Lin Ma Hang Road to
Frontier Closed Area Boundary and Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan (1) _______________________9-141 Table 9.71: Potential Ecological Impact of Habitat Loss at Works Area in Sections 2 & 3 – Lin Ma Hang Road to
Frontier Closed Area Boundary and Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan (2) _______________________9-142 Table 9.72: Potential Ecological Impact of Habitat Loss at Works Area in Sections 2 & 3 – Lin Ma Hang Road to
Frontier Closed Area Boundary and Ping Yeung to Wo Keng Shan (3) _______________________9-142 Table 9.73: Potential Ecological Impact of Habitat Loss at Works Area in Section 5 – Sha Tau Kok Road (between
North and South Tunnel) (1) ________________________________________________________9-143 Table 9.74: Potential Ecological Impact of Habitat Loss at Works Area in Section 5 – Sha Tau Kok Road (between
North and South Tunnel) (2) ________________________________________________________9-144 Table 9.75: Potential Ecological Impact of Habitat Loss at Works Area in Section 6_______________________9-145 Table 9.76: Potential Ecological Impact of Habitat Loss at Works Area in Section 7- Fanling (1) _____________9-146 Table 9.77: Ecological Evaluation of Works Area in Section 7- Fanling (2) ______________________________9-147 Table 9.78: Potential Ecological Impact on Floral Species of Conservation interest _______________________9-148 Table 9.79: Potential Ecological Impact on Fauna Species of Conservation interest ______________________9-158 Table 9.80: Potential Ecological Impact of Habitat Fragmentation_____________________________________9-161
Table 9.81: Potential Ecological Impact of Loss of Ecologically Sensitive Wetland________________________9-164 Table 9.82: Disturbance to Sites of Conservation Interest___________________________________________9-167 Table 9.83: Potential Ecological Impact of Indirect Disturbance (Noise and Visual) _______________________9-171 Table 9.84: Potential Ecological Impact of Hydrological Disruption ____________________________________9-171 Table 9.85: Potential Ecological Impact of Vibration _______________________________________________9-172 Table 9.86: Summary of Potential Ecological Impacts before and after adoption of Mitigation Measures _______9-180
Table 11.1: Attributes of the BCP and the Associated Road Work _____________________________________11-3 Table 11.2: Impact Significance of Landscape or Visual Impact _______________________________________11-7 Table 11.3: OZP No: S/NE-TKL/14-Ping Che/Ta Kwu Ling __________________________________________11-10 Table 11.4: OZP No: S/NE-WKS/10-Wo Keng Shan _______________________________________________11-11 Table 11.5: OZP No: S/NE-MUP/11-Man Uk Pin__________________________________________________11-11 Table 11.6: OZP No: S/NE-HT/5-Hok Tau_______________________________________________________11-12 Table 11.7: OZP No: S/NE-LYT/14-Lung Yeuk Tau and Kwan Tei South _______________________________11-12 Table 11.8: OZP No: S/NE-KLH/11-Kau Lung Hang _______________________________________________11-13 Table 11.9: Draft DPA/NE-TKLN/1 ____________________________________________________________11-14 Table 11.10: Factors Affecting Sensitivity of VSRs and Overall Sensitivity Rating. _________________________11-50 Table 11.11: Impact on Landscape Resources and Landscape Character Areas affected by the Project in the Section
A, Zone 1 ______________________________________________________________________11-55 Table 11.12: Impact on Landscape Resources and Landscape Character Areas affected by the Project in the Section
B _____________________________________________________________________________11-72 Table 11.15: Impact on Landscape Resources and Landscape Character Areas affected by the Project in the Section
Proposed Treatment ______________________________________________________________11-79 Table 11.16: Proposed Construction and Operation Phase Mitigation Measures (CM & OM) for Landscape and Visual
Impacts ________________________________________________________________________11-84 Table 11.17: Significance of Landscape Impacts in Construction and Operation Phases in Section A, Zone 1 (All
impacts are adverse unless stated otherwise) __________________________________________11-96 Table 11.20: Significance of Landscape Impacts in Construction and Operation Phases in Section B (All impacts are
adverse unless stated otherwise) ____________________________________________________11-98 Table 11.21: Significance of Landscape Impacts in Construction and Operation Phases in Section C (All impacts are
adverse unless stated otherwise) ___________________________________________________11-101 Table 11.22: Factors Affecting and Overall Magnitude of Change Experienced by Each VSR During Construction and
Operation Phases _______________________________________________________________11-129 Table 11.23: Significance of Visual Impacts in Construction and Operation Phases, both before and after Mitigation (All
impacts are adverse unless stated otherwise) _________________________________________11-134 Table 11.24: A subjective interpretation of the CIE’s Glare rating system. ______________________________11-163 Table 11.25: Limiting GR value for lighting installations_____________________________________________11-163 Table 11.26: Sensitivity of VSRs for Glare Assessment ____________________________________________11-165 Table 11.27: Assumptions used in Glare Rating Prediction__________________________________________11-166 Table 11.28: Predicted Glare Rating for VSRs near the BCP and Associated Above Ground Structure________11-167
Table 12.1: Definition of grading of historic buildings________________________________________________12-2 Table 12.2: Brief Descriptions of the Proposed Works_______________________________________________12-3 Table 12.3: Site Code Adopted for the Built Heritage Features ________________________________________12-5 Table 12.4: Geology of the CHIA Study Area _____________________________________________________12-8 Table 12.5: Summary of the Test Pits and Auger Holes Distribution ____________________________________12-9 Table 12.6: Test Pits and Auger Holes Completed for the Archaeological Survey ________________________12-10 Table 12.7: Grading System for Levels of Archaeological Potential ___________________________________12-10 Table 12.8: Summary of Findings for TP0202 ____________________________________________________12-11 Table 12.9: Summary of Findings for TP0201 ____________________________________________________12-12 Table 12.10: Summary of Findings for AH0101, AH0201 and AH0208 __________________________________12-12 Table 12.11: Summary of General Findings for the Layer / Stratum with Grayish Colour in TP0303, AH0305, AH0307,
AH0308, AH0309, AH0313, AH0314, AH0315 and AH0316 _______________________________12-14 Table 12.12: Summary of stratification of TP0505__________________________________________________12-15 Table 12.13: List of Finds Unearthed in TP0505 ___________________________________________________12-16 Table 12.14: Built Heritage Identified within the BCP Section _________________________________________12-20 Table 12.15: Built Heritage Identified within the Section between Lin Ma Hang and Frontier Closed Area Boundary
______________________________________________________________________________12-22 Table 12.16: Built Heritage Identified within the Section between Ping Yeung and Wo Keng Shan ____________12-24 Table 12.17: Built Heritage Identified within the Cheung Shan Tunnel Section (North Tunnel) ________________12-27 Table 12.18: Built Heritage Identified within the Sha Tau Kok Road Section______________________________12-27 Table 12.19: Built Heritage Identified within the Lau Shui Heung Tunnel Section (South Tunnel)______________12-29 Table 12.20: Built Heritage Identified within the Fanling Section _______________________________________12-31 Table 12.21: Impact Assessment within the BCP Section ____________________________________________12-34 Table 12.22: Impact Assessment within the Section between Lin Ma Hang and Frontier Closed Area Boundary__12-35 Table 12.23: Impact Assessment within the Section between Ping Yeung and Wo Keng Shan _______________12-37 Table 12.24: Impact Assessment within the Cheung Shan Tunnel Section (North Tunnel)___________________12-39 Table 12.25: Impact Assessment within the Sha Tau Kok Road Section (Between North and South Tunnel) ____12-39 Table 12.26: Impact Assessment within the Lau Shui Heung Tunnel Section (South Tunnel)_________________12-40 Table 12.27: Impact Assessment within the Fanling Section__________________________________________12-42
Table 12.29: Areas Required Further Archaeological Survey _________________________________________12-45
Figures
Figure 1.1a Project Layout Plan (Sheet 1 of 11)
Figure 1.1b Project Layout Plan (Sheet 2 of 11)
Figure 1.1c Project Layout Plan (Sheet 3 of 11)
Figure 1.1d Project Layout Plan (Sheet 4 of 11)
Figure 1.1e Project Layout Plan (Sheet 5 of 11)
Figure 1.1f Project Layout Plan (Sheet 6 of 11)
Figure 1.1g Project Layout Plan (Sheet 7 of 11)
Figure 1.1h Project Layout Plan (Sheet 8 of 11)
Figure 1.1i Project Layout Plan (Sheet 9 of 11)
Figure 1.1j Project Layout Plan (Sheet 10 of 11)
Figure 1.1k Project Layout Plan (Sheet 11 of 11)
Figure 2.1 Project Layout (Main Sections)
Figure 2.1a Project Area – Description of Works (Sheet 1 of 11)
Figure 2.1b Project Area – Description of Works (Sheet 2 of 11)
Figure 2.1c Project Area – Description of Works (Sheet 3 of 11)
Figure 2.1d Project Area – Description of Works (Sheet 4 of 11)
Figure 2.1e Project Area – Description of Works (Sheet 5 of 11)
Figure 2.1f Project Area – Description of Works (Sheet 6 of 11)
Figure 2.1g Project Area – Description of Works (Sheet 7 of 11)
Figure 2.1h Project Area – Description of Works (Sheet 8 of 11)
Figure 2.1i Project Area – Description of Works (Sheet 9 of 11)
Figure 2.1j Project Area – Description of Works (Sheet 10 of 11)
Figure 2.1k Project Area – Description of Works (Sheet 11 of 11)
Figure 2.2 Finalised BCP Layout
Figure 2.3 Refined Alignment Options
Figure 2.4 Indicative Locations of Potential Concurrent Projects
Figure 3.1.1 Location of Air Sensitive Receivers (Sheet 1 of 11)
Figure 3.2.1 Location of Potential Dust Emission Source (Sheet 1 of 11)
Figure 3.3.1 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For TYHP & TYH (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 3.3.2 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For TYHP & TYH (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 3.3.3 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For KL1, TKL1 & TKL2 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 3.3.4 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For KL1, TKL1 & TKL2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 3.3.5 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For KTW4 & KTW2 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 3.3.6 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For KTW4 & KTW2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 3.3.7 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For V1 and V2 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 3.3.8 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For V1 and V2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 3.3.9 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For WKS7
Figure 3.3.10 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For TTW1 & TTW3 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 3.3.11 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For TTW1 & TTW3 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 3.3.12 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For TH1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 3.3.13 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For TH1 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 3.3.14 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For NWP1, NWP2 & NWP3 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 3.3.15 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For NWP1, NWP2 & NWP3 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 3.3.16 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For KT1, KT2, KT3 & KLH1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 3.3.17 Location of 30% Active Areas of Dust Sources Assumed for Tier 2 Assessment – For KT1, KT2, KT3 & KLH1 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 3.4.1a Cumulative Result – Contour of Tier 1 Hourly TSP Concentration (µg/m 3 ) at 1.5m Above Ground
during Construction Phase (Unmitigated) for Northern Section (Sheet 1 of 4)
Figure 3.4.1b Cumulative Result – Contour of Tier 1 Hourly TSP Concentration (µg/m 3 ) at 1.5m Above Ground
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for Northern Section (Sheet 1 of 4)
during Construction Phase (Unmitigated) for Loi Tung (Sheet 1 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for Loi Tung (Sheet 1 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Unmitigated) for Po Kak Tsai (Sheet 1 of 1)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for Po Kak Tsai (Sheet 1 of 1)
during Construction Phase (Unmitigated) for Fanling (Sheet 1 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for Fanling (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 3.5.1 Cumulative Result – Contour of Tier 2 Hourly TSP Concentration (µg/m 3 ) at 1.5m Above Ground
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for TYHP & TYH (Sheet 1 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for TYHP & TYH (Sheet 2 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for KL1, TKL1 & TKL2 (Sheet 1 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for KL1, TKL1 & TKL2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for KTW2 & KTW4 (Sheet 1 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for KTW2 & KTW4 (Sheet 2 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for V1 and V2 (Sheet 1 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for V1 and V2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for WKS7 (Sheet 1 of 1)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for TTW1 & TTW3 (Sheet 1 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for TTW1 & TTW3 (Sheet 2 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for TH1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for NWP1, NWP2 & NWP3 (Sheet 1 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for NWP1, NWP2, NWP3 & KT2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for KT1, KT2, KT3 & KLH1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for KT1, KT2, KT3 & KLH1 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 3.6.1a Cumulative Result – Contour of Tier 1 Daily TSP Concentration (µg/m 3 ) at 1.5m Above Ground
Figure 3.6.1b Cumulative Result – Contour of Tier 1 Daily TSP Concentration (µg/m 3 ) at 1.5m Above Ground
during Construction Phase (Unmitigated) for Po Kak Tsai (Sheet 1 of 1)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for Po Kak Tsai (Sheet 1 of 1)
Figure 3.7.1 Cumulative Result – Contour of Tier 2 Daily TSP Concentration (µg/m 3 ) at 1.5m Above Ground
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for V1 & V2 (Sheet 1 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for V1 & V2 (Sheet 2 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for KLH1 (Sheet 1 of 2)
during Construction Phase (Mitigated) for KLH 1 (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 3.8.1a Cumulative Result – Contour of Annual TSP Concentration (µg/m 3 ) at 1.5m Above Ground during
Construction Phase (Unmitigated) for Northern Section (Sheet 1 of 4)
Figure 3.8.1b Cumulative Result – Contour of Annual TSP Concentration (µg/m 3 ) at 1.5m Above Ground during
Construction Phase (Mitigated) for Northern Section (Sheet 1 of 4)
Construction Phase (Unmitigated) for Loi Tung (Sheet 1 of 2)
Construction Phase (Mitigated) for Loi Tung (Sheet 1 of 2)
Construction Phase (Unmitigated) for Loi Tung (Sheet 2 of 2)
Construction Phase (Mitigated) for Loi Tung (Sheet 2 of 2)
Construction Phase (Unmitigated) for Po Kak Tsai (Sheet 1 of 1)
Construction Phase (Mitigated) for Po Kak Tsai (Sheet 1 of 1)
Construction Phase (Unmitigated) for Fanling (Sheet 1 of 2)
Construction Phase (Mitigated) for Fanling (Sheet 1 of 2)
Construction Phase (Unmitigated) for Fanling (Sheet 2 of 2)
Construction Phase (Mitigated) for Fanling (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 3.9.1a Classification of Road Types (BCP Lower Level) (Sheet 1 of 12)
Figure 3.9.1b Classification of Road Types (BCP Upper Deck Level) (Sheet 2 of 12)
Figure 3.9.2 Classification of Road Types (Sheet 3 of 12)
Figure 3.10.1 Cumulative Result – Contour of Hourly NO2 Concentration (µg/m 3 ) at 1.5m Above Ground during
Operational Phase for Northern Section (Stability Class D) (Sheet 1 of 4)
Operational Phase for Loi Tung (Stability Class D) (Sheet 1 of 2)
Operational Phase for Po Kak Tsai (Stability Class D) (Sheet 1 of 1)
Operational Phase for Fanling (Stability Class D) (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 3.11.1 Cumulative Result – Contour of Daily NO2 Concentration (µg/m 3 ) at 1.5m Above Ground during
Figure 3.12.1 Cumulative Result – Contour of Daily RSP Concentration (µg/m 3 ) at 1.5m Above Ground during
Operational Phase for Northern Section (Stability Class F) (Sheet 1 of 4)
Operational Phase for Loi Tung (Stability Class F) (Sheet 1 of 2)
Operational Phase for Po Kak Tsai (Stability Class F) (Sheet 1 of 1)
Operational Phase for Fanling (Stability Class F) (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 3.16.1 Cumulative Result – Contour of Annual NO2 Concentration (µg/m 3 ) at 1.5m Above Ground during
Operational Phase for Northern Section (Sheet 1 of 4)
Operational Phase for Loi Tung (Sheet 1 of 2)
Operational Phase for Po Kak Tsai (Sheet 1 of 1)
Operational Phase for Fanling (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 3.17.1 Cumulative Result – Contour of Annual RSP Concentration (µg/m 3 ) at 1.5m Above Ground during
Operational Phase for Po Kak Tsai (Sheet 1 of 1)
Figure 4.1.1 Assessment Area and Outline Zoning Plan
Figure 4.1.2 Recommended Development Plan (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 4.1.3 Recommended Development Plan (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 4.2 Representative Noise Sensitive Receivers (Sheet 1 of 11)
Figure 4.13 Photos of Noise Sensitive Receivers (Sheet 1 of 5)
Figure 4.18 Schematic Diagram of Movable Noise Barrier
Figure 4.19 Schematic Diagram of Full Noise Enclosure for PME
Figure 4.20.1 Proposed Location of Noise Barriers
Figure 4.20.5 Cross-section Plans of Proposed Barriers
Figure 4.21.1 Fixed Plant of Boundary Control Point
Figure 4.21.2 Fixed Plant of North Tunnel North Portal
Figure 4.21.3 Fixed Plant of North Tunnel South Portal
Figure 4.21.4 Fixed Plant of Administration Building
Figure 4.21.5 Fixed Plant of South Tunnel North Portal
Figure 4.21.6 Fixed Plant of Mid-Ventilation Building
Figure 4.21.7 Fixed Plant of South Tunnel South Portal
Figure 5.1 Location of Water Control Zone
Figure 5.2 Locations of Key Water Sensitive Receivers
Figure 5.3 Location Plan of the Interception between Proposed Connecting Road Alignment and Existing
Stream
Figure 6.1 General Layout Plan for BCP
Figure 6.2 General Layout for Demonstration Scheme of the Proposed Sewage Treatment Process
Figure 6.3 Proposed Landscape Plan at Lower Deck Level
Figure 6.4 Proposed Landscape Plan at Upper Deck Level
Figure 7.1 Potential Locations of Piers
Figure 7.2 Locations of Possible Temporary Stockpiling Areas
Figure 9.1a Ecological Assessment Area
Figure 9.1b Sections of Works Area
Figure 9.2a Habitat Map (Key Plan)
Figure 9.2b Record Locations of Mammal Species Yellow-bellied Weasel and Crab-eating Mongoose around Assessment Area
Figure 9.3 Habitat Map (Sheet 1 of 12)
Figure 9.15 Estimated Extent of Habitat to be Affected (Sheet 1 of 11)
Figure 9.26 Potential Woodland Compensation Area
Figure 9.27 Indicative Boundary of the Potential Wetland Compensation Area
Figure 9.28 Conceptual Plan and Typical Cross-section Views of the Proposed Wetland Compensation Area
Figure 11.1.0 Project Profile – Key Plan
Figure 11.1.1 Project Profile – Section A, Zone 1
Figure 11.1.2 Project Profile – Section A, Zones 1 & 2
Figure 11.1.5 Project Profile – Section B
Figure 11.1.6 Project Profile – Section C
Figure 11.2 Not Used
Figure 11.3.1 Proposed Landscape at Lower Deck Level Plan for BCP
Figure 11.3.2 Proposed Layout Plan at Upper Deck Level for BCP
Figure 11.3.3 BCP - Elevation
Figure 11.3.4 Ventilation Building Type A – G/F to 3/F Layout Plans
Figure 11.3.5 Ventilation Building Type A – 4/F Layout Plans & Section
Figure 11.3.6 Ventilation Building Type B – G/F to 3/F Layout Plans
Figure 11.3.7 Ventilation Building Type B – Section
Figure 11.3.8 Ventilation Building Type C – G/F to 3/F Layout Plans
Figure 11.3.9 Ventilation Building Type C – Section
Figure 11.3.10 Administration Building – Ground Floor Layout Plan
Figure 11.3.11 Administration Building – Section A-A, B-B
Figure 11.3.12 Viaduct – Typical Section
Figure 11.4.0 Existing Zonings within 500m Study Area – Key Plan
Figure 11.4.1 Existing Zonings within 500m Study Area Section A, Zones 1 & 2
Figure 11.4.5 Existing Zonings within 500m Study Area Section B
Figure 11.4.6 Existing Zonings within 500m Study Area Section C
Figure 11.5.1 Landscape Resources – Key Plan
Figure 11.5.2 Landscape Resources Section A, Zones 1 & 2
Figure 11.5.6 Landscape Resources Section B
Figure 11.5.7 Landscape Resources Section C
Figure 11.5.8 Landscape Character Areas – Key Plan
Figure 11.5.9 Landscape Character Areas Section A, Zones 1 & 2
Figure 11.5.13 Landscape Character Areas Section B
Figure 11.5.14 Landscape Character Areas Section C
Figure 11.5.15 Photorecord of Existing Landscape Resources / Section A, Zone 1
Figure 11.5.18 Photorecord of Existing Landscape Resources / Section B
Figure 11.5.19 Photorecord of Existing Landscape Resources / Section C
Figure 11.5.20 Visual Envelope
Figure 11.5.21 Location Plan of Visual Sensitive Receivers - Key Plan
Figure 11.5.22 Location Plan of Visual Sensitive Receivers (Sheet 1 of 4)
Figure 11.5.26 Photorecord of Visual Sensitive Receivers (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 11.5.27 Photorecord of Visual Sensitive Receivers (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 11.6.0 Impact on Landscape Resources – Key Plan
Figure 11.6.1 Impact on Landscape Resources Section A, Zones 1
Figure 11.6.2 Impact on Landscape Resources Section A, Zones 1 & 2
Figure 11.6.3 Impact on Landscape Resources Section A, Zone 2
Figure 11.6.4 Impact on Landscape Resources Section A, Zone 3
Figure 11.6.5 Impact on Landscape Resources Section B
Figure 11.6.6 Impact on Landscape Resources Section C
255228/ENL/ENL/61/D December 2010 P:\Hong Ko

Documents

Agreement No. CE 45/2008 (CE) Liantang / Heung Yuen Wai