17
H. Lundbeck A/S 16 May 2022 1 Creating ADaM Friendly Analysis Data from SDTM Using Meta-data by Erik Brun & Rico Schiller (CD10 - 2011)

Agenda

  • Upload
    lolita

  • View
    56

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Creating ADaM Friendly Analysis Data from SDTM Using Meta-data by Erik Brun & Rico Schiller (CD10 - 2011). Agenda. The challenges. The solution. Conclusion. Abreviations used:. SADs 4 – HLu Statistical Analysis DataSets v.4. DCD – HLu Meta Data Dictionary. CDR – Clinical Data Repository. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 1

Creating ADaM Friendly Analysis Data from SDTM Using Meta-data

by Erik Brun & Rico Schiller(CD10 - 2011)

Page 2: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 2

Agenda

The challengesThe solutionConclusion

Abreviations used:SADs 4 – HLu Statistical Analysis DataSets v.4DCD – HLu Meta Data DictionaryCDR – Clinical Data Repository

Page 3: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 3

The Challenges

The funnel and the trumpetSDTM data: Take data from a variety of sources and funnel it into astandard formatAnalysis data: Take data from a standard format and expand it into a variety of formats depeding on study design (and the statisticians)

Data Flow

Page 4: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 4

The Challenges

Lundbeck challenges with SADs v.3

Insufficent for new study designs

Time resolution was date not date-timeData model embedded in the codePeculiar error and warning messages - Including reports on data issues

Very steep learning curve for new programmersPerson dependent

Only one central lab was assumed used per study

Page 5: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 5

The Solution – SADs 4Requirements

Create the basis upon which the automated and validated production of consistent and standardised statistical analysis reports and listings for safety and efficacy data is possible.

The system should allow for clear documentation of the configuration settings applied in a single study.

The system should be as CDISC-compliant as possible. Lundbeck pursues a strategy of applying CDISC standards, terminology, and concepts in all scientific data models.

Provide together with CDR a validated and controlled environment for the collection and integration of clinical data across studies within a drug project.

The system should be easy to understand and operate and yet flexible to handle a wide range of study designs.

Page 6: Agenda

Study specific macros and programs

SADs Data Model

SADs

job specification

Control Tables

SADs

Macro Library

Data Capture Dictionaries:

Global SAS formats

CDISC and LU specific controlled terminolgy

Lab-ranges

Page 7: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 7

SADs 4 – The master process

Page 8: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 8

SADs 4 – Findings process

Page 9: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 9

SADs 4 - Data Model

One sheet per data set

Generic solution for all scales data sets (SDTM.QS)You can add study specific variables…Examinations (LB, PE, EG, VS) data sets are normalised

but you cannot remove variables

ADaM friendly:

STDM names are kept for unchanged values

SDTM naming fragments are used [SDTMig v3.1.2 appendix D]AVALAVISIT/AVISITN

PARAM/PARAMCD

Page 10: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 10

SADs 4 – Control Tables

Assign group centre

Add treatment code

Add population flags

Rules for date imputations

Derivations:Type castingScale totalsetc. Etc.

Windowing of Visits

Baseline definitions

Period definitionsSort order of output datasets

Study specific additions to the data model

… and much more

Page 11: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 11

SADs 4 - Control Tables

Date and Date-Time Original SDTM value --DTCNumerical SADs value --DTN (date-time)Imputation rule applied --DT_CD

Page 12: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 12

SADs 4 – Control Tables

Input (SDTM) Settings OutputAESTDTC = ”2011-08-07” Rule=”EARLY”

Expected=”DAY”AESTDTN =

07AUG2011:00:00:00AESTDT_CD=“Expected

accuracy”

AESTDTC=”2011-08” Rule=”EARLY”Expected=”DAY”

AESTDTN = 01AUG2011:00:00:00

AESTDT_CD=“Early; Day unknown”

AEENDTC=”2011-08” Rule=”LATE” Expected=”DAY” AESTDTN=31AUG2011:00:00:00

AESTDT_CD=“Late; Day unknown”

AEENDTC=”2011-08-31” Rule=”LATE”Expected=”MINUTE”

AESTDTN=31AUG2011:23:59:00

AESTDT_CD=“Late; Hour unknown”

AESTDTC=”2011-08” Rule=”EARLY” Expected=”DAY”

Limit=DOSE_STDTN(DOSE_STDTN=07AUG2011)

AESTDTN=07AUG2011:00:00:00

AESTDT_CD=“Early; Day unknown”

Page 13: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 13

SADs 4 – Control Tables

*Columns omitted for simplicity and readability

*

Timing

Page 14: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 14

Conclusions

We have a validated system that works!It is flexible

Easy to use

Integration of studies made much easier

It has been used with success on a wide range of indications and study designs

”Real” ADaM data sets can easily be created from SADs 4The SADs data sets work for our standard reporting system

SDTM 3.1.x can be used as source

A junior programmer can make a good draft set-up of a study in 1½ day

Renaming and type casting is all what is needed

Page 15: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 15

Conclusions

SAS-DI can not be recommended as a tool for developing systems like this

The future:

A system generating SDTM has since been made applying the same methodologies, both in development and use

It requires not only dedicated and skilled resources to develop such a system. They must also be assigned wholehearted by their managers to the project

Move away from Excel as control tablesCDISC PRM (Protocol Representation Model) , it could reduce and/or simplify the control tables, and the stat.prog. will not have to re-enter a lot of information

Page 16: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 16

SADs 4

? ? ?

Page 17: Agenda

H. Lundbeck A/S 22 Apr 2023 17

Contact

Erik Brun, System & Process SpecialistH. Lundbeck A/SOttiliavej 92500 [email protected]

Rico Schiller, Head of SectionH. Lundbeck A/SOttiliavej 92500 [email protected]