Agcaoili vs Gsis g.r. No. L-30056 Aug 30.1988

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Agcaoili vs Gsis g.r. No. L-30056 Aug 30.1988

    1/2

    Republic of the Philippines

    SUPREME COURT

    Manila

    FIRST DIVISION

    G.R. No. L-30056August30, 1988

    MARCELO AGCAOILI, plaintiff-appelleevs.GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM, defendant-appellant.

    Artemio L. Agcaoili for plaintiff-appellee.

    Office of the Government Corporate Counsel for defendant-appellant.

    NARVASA, J.:

    The appellant Government Service Insurance System, (GSIS, for short) having approved the application of the appellee Agcaoili forthe purchase of a house and lot in the GSIS Housing Project at Nangka Marikina, Rizal, subject to the condition that the lattershould forthwith occupy the house, a condition that Agacoili tried to fulfill but could not for the reason that the house was absolutely

    uninhabitable; Agcaoili, after paying the first installment and other fees, having thereafter refused to make further payment of otherstipulated installments until GSIS had made the house habitable; and appellant having refused to do so, opting instead to cancelthe award and demand the vacation by Agcaoili of the premises; and Agcaoili having sued the GSIS in the Court of First Instance ofManila for specific performance with damages and having obtained a favorable judgment, the case was appealled to this Court bythe GSIS. Its appeal must fail.

    The essential facts are not in dispute. Approval of Agcaoili's aforementioned application for purchase 1 was contained in a letter2

    addressed to Agcaoili and signed by GSIS Manager Archimedes Villanueva in behalf of the Chairman-General Manager, reading asfollows:

    Please be informed that your application to purchase a house and lot in our GSIS Housing Project at Nangka, Marikina,Rizal, has been approved by this Office. Lot No. 26, Block No. (48) 2, together with the housing unit constructed thereon,has been allocated to you.

    You are, therefore, advised to occupy the said house immediately.

    If you fail to occupy the same within three (3) days from receipt of this notice, your application shall be consideredautomatically disapproved and the said house and lot will be awarded to another applicant.

    Agcaoili lost no time in occupying the house. He could not stay in it, however, and had to leave the very next day, because thehouse was nothing more than a shell, in such a state of incompleteness that civilized occupation was not possible: ceiling, stairs,double walling, lighting facilities, water connection, bathroom, toilet kitchen, drainage, were inexistent. Agcaoili did however ask ahomeless friend, a certain Villanueva, to stay in the premises as some sort of watchman, pending completion of the construction ofthe house. Agcaoili thereafter complained to the GSIS, to no avail.

    The GSIS asked Agcaoili to pay the monthly amortizations and other fees. Agcaoili paid the first monthly installment and theincidental fees, 3 but refused to make further payments until and unless the GSIS completed the housing unit. What the GSIS didwas to cancel the award and require Agcaoili to vacate the premises. 4 Agcaoili reacted by instituting suit in the Court of FirstInstance of Manila for specific performance and damages. 5 Pending the action, a written protest was lodged by other awardees ofhousing units in the same subdivision, regarding the failure of the System to complete construction of their own houses. 6 Judgmentwas in due course rendered , 7 on the basis of the evidence adduced by Agcaoili only, the GSIS having opted to dispense withpresentation of its own proofs. The judgment was in Agcaoili's favor and contained the following dispositions, 8 to wit:

    1) Declaring the cancellation of the award (of a house and lot) in favor of plaintiff (Mariano Agcaoili) illegal and void;

    2) Ordering the defendant (GSIS) to respect and enforce the aforesaid award to the plaintiff relative to LotNo. 26, BlockNo. (48) 2 of the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) low cost housing project at Nangka Marikina, Rizal;

    3) Ordering the defendant to complete the house in question so as to make the same habitable and authorizing it(defendant) to collect the monthly amortization thereon only after said house shall have been completed under the termsand conditions mentioned in Exhibit A ;and

    4) Ordering the defendant to pay P100.00 as damages and P300.00 as and for attorney's fees, and costs.

    Appellant GSIS would have this Court reverse this judgment on the argument that

    1) Agcaoili had no right to suspend payment of amortizations on account of the incompleteness of his housing unit, since said unithad been sold "in the condition and state of completion then existing ... (and) he is deemed to have accepted the same in thecondition he found it when he accepted the award;" and assuming indefiniteness of the contract in this regard, such circumstance

    precludes a judgment for specific performance.9

    2) Perfection of the contract of sale between it and Agcaoili being conditioned upon the latter's immediate occupancy of the housesubject thereof, and the latter having failed to comply with the condition, no contract ever came into existence between them ; 10

    3) Agcaoili's act of placing his homeless friend, Villanueva, in possession, "without the prior or subsequent knowledge or consent ofthe defendant (GSIS)" operated as a repudiation by Agcaoili of the award and a deprivation of the GSIS at the same time of thereasonable rental value of the property. 11

  • 7/31/2019 Agcaoili vs Gsis g.r. No. L-30056 Aug 30.1988

    2/2