UAS

Initiative

Aerospace Leadership and the Potential

of UAVs

13 March 2014

Briefing to the Ohio Board of Regents

Richard Honneywell Executive Director OH/IN UAS Center and Test Complex richard.honneywell@dot.state.oh.us 937-497-6720 (O) 937-716-0944 (C)

UAS

Initiative

“The reasonable man adapts himself to

the world; the unreasonable one persists

in trying to adapt the world to himself.

Therefore all progress depends on the

unreasonable man”

George Bernard Shaw

UAS

Initiative

Planned Capabilities

• Catalysis for commercialization opportunities

• Resource for COA preparation and related Airworthiness and FAA

Reporting processes

• Integrated Safety Management System

• Access to multiple test ranges offering special use and Class D airspace

• Collaboration focal point for RDT&E

• Modeling, simulation and data management

• High bandwidth connectivity across ranges

• Privacy research and policy development

• Business friendly test range services

Mission • Catalyst for UAS Commercialization and Economic Development

• UAS Test Center resource supporting State & Federal Partners

• UAS Test Center supporting Federal Research

OH/IN UAS Center & Test Complex

UAS

Initiative

“What new technology does is

create new opportunities to do a

job that customers want done”

Tim O’Reilly

UAS

Initiative

UAS Economic Opportunity

• Teal Group analysis: UAS industry expected to grow

from $6B/year to $11B/year ($94B over 10 years)

• AUVSI analysis: 100,000 jobs and $82B in total

economic impact over 10 years

• Early Market Sectors:

• Precision Agriculture (>50% market)

• First Responders/EMA

• Fire

• Police

• Resource Survey

• Geospatial Mapping/Survey

• Media

• Infrastructure Inspection

• Logistics

• Micro-delivery

UAS

Initiative

Precision Agriculture Opportunity

Early Capabilities • Crop Assessment • Blight detection • Track invasive insect species • Precision Insecticide control • Precision fertilization • Moisture detection • Harvest-ready detection • Yield Estimates • Insurance Evidence

Technology Needs • Small Fixed wing, and hover vehicles • Visual, Thermal & Multi-spectral sensors • Three dimensional sensing • Endurance • Systems of systems architecture • Data analysis • Knowledge Delivery

UAS

Initiative

Police/Fire Opportunity

Early Capabilities • Track active shooter • Document Accident • Monitor traffic flow/alternative routes • Document Crime Scene • Deterrent Patrols • Detect and locate CBRN hazards • Locate & monitor Illegal drug production • Restore Communications • Public address • Event Situational Awareness

Technology Needs • Small Fixed wing, and hover vehicles • Visual, Thermal & Multi-spectral sensors • Durability & Cost • Operations Development • Rapid Data analysis/evidence • Training

UAS

Initiative

Resource Survey Opportunity

Early Capabilities • Inspect infrastructure • Monitor tree harvest/poaching • Survey construction projects • Monitor drilling sites compliance • Excavation monitoring • Project monitoring & assessment • Assess water quality & effluence • Track invasive species • Inspect amusement park rides • Property Survey and monitoring

Technology Needs • Fixed wing, and hover vehicles • Visual, Thermal & Multi-spectral sensors • Sense and Avoid capabilities • ADS-B capabilities • Secure C2 capabilities • Rapid Data analysis/knowledge transmit

UAS

Initiative

“Whatever it is that the government

does, sensible Americans would

prefer that the government does it

to somebody else”

P.J. O’Rourke

UAS

Initiative

FAA UAS Policy Today

• Current Authority – Certificates of Authorizations (COAs) are required for any UAS flights in USA

outside of DOD Restricted Use Airspace

– COAs are specific to platform and configuration and location(s)

– Only public entity recognized by FAA may apply for COA

– COAs provide authority for flights for up to 2 years

– FAA requires collection and reporting of data associated with flying on

monthly basis

• Typical Operations Authorized

– Small UAS, under 60 lbs

– Flights below 400 feet and away from any airports

– Flights outside of areas with any significant population density

– Flights must occur within Visual Line of Sight

UAS

Initiative

FAA UAS Policy Next Steps

• FAA’s next steps … establish routine operations for – Public sUAS Visual Line of Sight (VLOS) Operations – 2015

– Civil sUAS VLOS – 2015

– Public UAS Ops – 2015

– Civil UAS Ops – 2020

• Concurrent Enabling Policy and Research Efforts – Pilot Certification, Medical and Training Standards

– Air Worthiness Certification Standards

– Airborne Sense and Avoid

– UAS Autonomy

– Ground-Based Sense and Avoid

UAS

Initiative

“Creativity is not the finding of

a thing, but the making

something out of it after it is

found”

James Russell Lowell

UAS

Initiative

State of Ohio’s Strategy

UASC&TC

Economic

Development

Agencies

State & Fed

Agencies

Universities

Colleges

Industry

• R&D

• Training

• Commercial

Collaboration

• Grants

• Operations

• R&D

• Capability

Development

• Grants

• Business Attraction

• Commercialization

Centers

• Investment Capital

• Catalyze

opportunities

• Support

development of use

cases

• Acquire FAA

authority

Supporting development of UAS based business capabilities

UAS

Initiative

“Any sufficiently advanced

technology is indistinguishable from

magic”

Arthur C. Clarke

UAS

Initiative

Key Technologies Knowledge Delivery

Layered Data Processing Heuristics

Domain Dashboard, Metrics & Standards

Platform

Miniaturized sensors and avionics

High energy density (Li Air, Fuel Cell)

Composite Materials

Additive manufacturing

Aero designs optimized for Lower Re

Integration into National Airspace System

Sense and Avoid

ADS-B

Secure Command & Control

Autonomy

Human Factors

Enables FAA Policy to Evolve

Money maker!!

Next Generation Manufacturing

UAS

Initiative

STEM Opportunities

• UAS offers significant motivator for STEM activities • Air Vehicle design and flight • Command and Control • Sensors and data management • Operational research • …

• K-12

• Experiential flight opportunities • Science Fairs

• University/Community Colleges

• Demonstration of theory • Applied research • Thesis support • Workforce development

UAS

Initiative

UAS Air Operations Challenge • Multi-year Challenge Event sponsored by NASA and AF

• Phase 1 Competition April 28 – May 9, 2014 $500K Prize – Fly 4-Dimensional Trajectories (4DT)

– Employ NEXTGEN Technology

– Detect & Avoid cooperative air traffic

– Operate safely in a number of contingency situations.

– Communicating verbally with Air Traffic Control when deviating from flight plan

– Option to Detect & Avoid uncooperative air traffic

– Option to Demonstrate navigation w/degraded or loss of GPS

• Future – Phase 2 Competition – Sense and Avoid $1M Prize

– Phase 3 Competition – Complex Ground Operations (TBD)

UAS

Initiative

Summary

• Ohio bringing together needed collaboration across

broad range of partners

• Working to establish Memorandum of Agreements

that align Ohio UAS activities

– State Agencies

– Universities

– Federal Agencies

• Moving forward with a broad range of activities that

enable:

– Economic Development

– Support of State and University partners

– Federal research

GETTING TO 30

Establishing Ohio’s One-Year Option Credit Articulation System

Ohio Board of Regents Meeting

Miami University Thursday, March 13, 2014

LEGISLATION

2

Not later than June 30, 2014, the Chancellor of the Board

of Regents shall establish a One-Year Option credit

articulation system in which graduates of Ohio Technical

Centers who complete a 900-hour program of study and

obtain an industry-recognized credential approved by the

Chancellor shall receive 30 college technical credit hours

toward a technical degree upon enrollment in an

institution of higher education.

CHANCELLOR’S GOAL

3

Not later than June 30, 2014, the Chancellor of the Board

of Regents shall establish a One-Year Option credit

articulation system in which graduates of Ohio Technical

Centers who complete a 900-hour program of study and

obtain an industry-recognized credential approved by the

Chancellor shall receive 30 college technical credit hours

toward a technical degree upon enrollment in an

institution of higher education.

PLANNING PROCESS

• Focus Groups

• OBR Internal Steering Team

• One-Year Option Stakeholders Team

4

GUIDING PRINCIPLES

• Solutions Driven

• Build Off Existing System

• STUDENT FOCUSED

5

STUDENTS

1. Must Complete a 900 Hour Program of Study.

2. Then Obtain an Industry Recognized Credential,

approved by the Chancellor.

3. They Shall Receive 30 College Technical Credit

Hours Toward a Technical Degree.

4. Will Receive These 30 Credits Upon Enrollment

into an Institution of Higher Learning.

6

FIRST MEETING’S GOAL

Develop and Agree on Framework(s)

that Award 30 College Credits from a

900+ Clock Hour Program with an

Industry Recognized Credential

7

OHIO’S CREDIT TRANSFER SYSTEM

Credit Transfer System’s Components:

• Ohio Transfer Model (OTM)

• Transfer Assurance Guides (TAGs)

• Career-Technical Credit Transfer Guides

(CTAGs)

• Advanced Placement (AP)

• Military Credit Transfer

• Prior Learning Assessment (PLA)

• Apprenticeship Articulation

8

ATS FRAMEWORK

Agreed on exploring the Associate

of Technical Study (ATS) degree

• This degree applies a set of outside hours or

experiences from an OTC or other entities in

the form of a block of credits– “Block

Credit”– in order to meet one-half of an

institution’s degree requirements.

9

WHAT IS AN ATS DEGREE?

Ohio’s Approved Associate Degrees:

• Associate of Arts

• Associate of Science

• Associate of Applied Business

• Associate of Applied Science

• Associate of Technical Study

• Associate of Individualized Study

10

CLOSER TO 30

• Agreed to use the ATS degree

structure

• Chancellor approved industry-

recognized credential

• Created a framework for affirming

the 30 technical college credits

11

PROPOSAL TO THE CHANCELLOR

• Use a “standardized” ATS degree

structure

• Credit Affirmation Teams

• Costs and Timeline for

Implementation

12

ISSUES AND CONCERNS

13

• Higher Learning Commission

– Student Transcripts

– Peer Review

• Timeline

• Communication Strategy

• College Residency Requirements

• Proportional Credit

QUESTIONS ?

MIAMI UNIVERSITY Co1 n<.L 01 Eot:< .\liON,

HF.Ail H & So< II TV

Board of Regents March 13, 2014

Who are our students? Early Middle

Childhood Childhood AYA 668 254 431

36% 14% 23% 0

• 3.32 Average GPA

• 25 Average ACT

• 87.5% (6 year) Graduation rate

• 600 Hours student teaching

• 125-364 minimum hours in f ield

Special Education

373

20%

Art 50

3%

Music 103

5%

• 1,828 of teaching candidates engage in experiential learning

• 93% employed in a f ield related to their program

A Y A Language Arts Candidate

Credits to complete program

80 cred its content preparation

English • literature Global Perspectives • Science

35 credits Professional Education

Ad olescent language Arts Assessment & Evaluation in Educat ion

Classroom Mangement • Read ing methods

15 credi ts Student Teaching

Required GPA for admission: 2.75

Program Average GPA: 3.32

Field hours

125 Field Hours Observation and participation Developmentally sequenced

sp read over 3 semesters• embedd ed in coursework

600 Student Teaching Hours

Emily Pruckno

ECE Candidate

Credits to complete program

46·50 credits Miami Plan Requirements

English · literature · Math Global Perspectives • Science

8 credits Math

9 credits Science

45 credits 3 Method Blocks

include methods for teaching math, science. reading and instruction in dyslexia

Required GPA for admission: 2.75

Program Average GPA: 3.32

Field Hours

125 Field Hours Observation and participation Developmentally sequenced

spread over 3 semesters .. embedded in coursework

600 Student Teaching Hours

All AVA Science AVA Language Arts AVA Math Eerly Childhood

lduc:etlon . 1.1$ Ml:&ml J11An GI•A

8tnchm~tk 1 • l•n» l'raxb I (17) In rc;Adlng, 172 In tnlilh. I 12 In writing) or At.'T of21/s.A'I' of 980 • AdmbsJon to 1(:Kht'r Edun\tlonJCohorl

. C"A!Iculu.s ~oqutnc:t,

33 hours or S<lcn<e 21 hu oflrangu.ng<' M'I'11 22Z. M'l'l•l 408. • • 5 hoo" of:lOO·•OO

• 2.S cumui:Ul\'e, • €1)'1'190 lmroduc· arts contenl courses M'I'J 1/STA COUI'.ki conh!lll , 0111d tlon to the '!Caching • £0'1'190 lntro(hK·

E01'190 lntroduc· Benchmark 2 edunuion GPKs l,rofesliiOn tion to th<-•teaching • lO crt'dit hours

• I-:OP20 I P.duCo\t iona I • El)l.2().4 CultumJ J)mfC$51nn tkln to the T~chlng

Psythology Studies In F,dtKatlon f.01.20·1 Cuhuml Profession

• P.DI.204 Culturol 6-4 toud crcdll ho~•rs SCudk.'$1n P.d~rion • . Swdle-§ in Educ:uioo

1- • 64 total credit hours_

• Succ~ful completicm o( all Block vi COUI'$C$ . .,t leas1 2 Miami Pian science courses

2.S cumulo..th·~. conttnt Su«eufuJ completion Success(ul completion Succcs~ful completion • M'l'li liS and 116

Btn(hMirk 3 arta(s). and cducatk'lfi of EDT 01 (1st of EDT aJ\d all othe-r • Min. 64 total cttdit CPA's methods courst) block da.ssts ofF.IYr43J hours

• F.CE IScnchrnark •4 • moving into aJ<>ck rl3

• Successful completion of Ulod:s I & Z

. Succe$$fuJ compleiioo aU Methods c.ourses and blocks,. l.S c:u·

Benchmark 4 mulativ~. contt·nt. &

TAKE OAE Content A$$C$$mtnts prior to student teaching education GPA's • Compltte 96 hour& • 'fAKE OAE content

assessments

Stnchm•rk S J•as.s OAE. PIX Exam; StKccssfuUy complete stud~tt teaching and all otht.'f degree program requirements . . Must pass cdl'J•A to pass student teaching. Total (Minimum) of 128 credit hours . Grad $llrvtf Benc-hmark 6 • Alumni sur"ey

Faculty ~lemher Irene Kleiman Literacy courses for the early and middle school programs Foundations of Literacy • Phonics • Reading Methods • Language and Literacy

3/4 teaching load (3 courses in one semester, 4 the next)

Key assessments: • Submits assessment data •Submits d isposi tional data • implements and superv ises field experiences for 2 programs

• Setting up requires 60 hours in the f irst 2 weeks

• 8 hours meeting with her class in the schools • 10 hours superv ising each week in the

schools includ ing travel • Lias on projects for schools

• created l iteracy enrichment materials for each school (30 hours)

• c reated year-long calendar (30 hours) • d etailed descriptions of each of our tutoring

programs (30 hours) • Advising - provide counseling and assistance with course and program planning for 45 students • 32 Summer Or ientation sessions

Time spent on 3 courses: • g hours instruction •approx. 18 hours preparation (planning and preparing instruction. class activi ties. grading, staying up-to-date in field)

Service: •university committees such as the Assessment Advisory Committee (generally 3-4 meetings annually) •Tutoring Partnership Committee ( 20 hours/ semester) • Talawanda/Miami Partnerships • Book projects, Goals for Li fe •Mentoring new faculty •Test preparation for students

Scholarship: • 3-4 presentations at national conferences per year

Teaching of Reading

5 Essential Components of Reading Instruction

• Phonemic awareness • Phonics • Fluency • Vocabulary • Comprehension

Both Undergraduate (ECE and MCE) and Graduate students recerve:

• dedicated and intense training in al l f ive of these areas

• intense practice, including tutoring struggling readers (UG) and working in a reading clinic (G)

Serving Communities

• First grad certificate on forming Family-School­

Community partnerships

• Community-based Leadership minor

• Residential Urban Teaching Cohort

Econo1nic impact on the state of Ohio

• 150 Partnerships between Miami School of Education and regional

school d istricts

• 340 EHS students engage in tutoring each year

• 46,851 EHS Alumni

• 23,476 Alumni in Ohio

• 343,835 (on average) hours spent annually by the unit in classrooms

• 4 40 candidates; each spend 600 hours per year per student

• 93% of graduates are employed in a f ield related to their programs

Economic impact on the state of Ohio: $10 Million Approx. per year

What do I need to pay on top of tuition?

• Core academic ski lls (Previously Praxis I) $85 each (reading,

writing, math) or $135 for al l 3 combined (Preparation materials

17.50 for an interact ive pract ice)

• OAE Content Area tests $105

• OAE Professional Knowledge tests $105

• edTPA $300

• Fingerprint ing and FBI Background check - val id for one year- two

are necessary for one for f ield and one for student teaching

because they occur in three different years ($60 each= $180)

• TB test $46

• Licensure application $160

• Graduation application $35 = $1,066

Barriers • Clinical Placements

Incentive for cooperating teachers (part of evaluation plan, stipend)

• Unfair expense of student teaching

Allow for pay for student teaching similar to other internships & co-ops in other disciplines

• Not all providers have same accountability in Ohio

• Space, time & resources to support innovation

Initiatives • Direct admits to EHS for

high performers

• Partnership schools for c linical experience

• Scholarships for direct admits and UASP

• Use of simulation techniques: Teachlive

• Alternative careers to education

• Campus Mentors

• UTC

CAMPUS MENTORS

CAMPUS MENTORS

~11pt/ / www. youtube.<:om/ wotc hWv=p oO BXgtpRNM

Four model components:

• Located on college

campus

• Academic tutors

• One-on-one mentors

• At-risk population

STUDENT I.EARNING lmp...,....;i erod•t .,tt&ni'MIIt GP-' 50·100 h~ld lllolelti'Mf\U

w1th oott partnenh p

PoJIU"" IOclllon •

C!Mee<:>nt..:t • v. 1thiM Ei

30 7'~'~ ·12'~'~ grade

students SCI'Iool Dlstflt:t

50-100 Preservlce Teachers University/

College

• LOW·COil, lo...· ma.nteMn~•

Gr'Hl~r ton ltd Oli*r 8J&perlenctK

Me•ts kCtl!d l .. t_ u.rgau

BENEFITS OF ('.l.~IPIJS ~IE~ TORS FINANCING • Funded with student FTEs • Teacher is an already-eMjsting

dtsl:rict employee • Transportation is the only

outstanding cost of this partnership

MIAMI UNIVERSITY

St:k'!Ot*. ot [ot:.:Lult• .... HI 41 rH A "w 1rT-o

Mentors' description of their experience

Mottl education prof supervlslng his students

Model Flexibility

Grade level served

E-learning options

level of experience (early field, methods, service learning)

Type of support (tutoring, mentoring, teaching)

Type of instruction (teaching Common Gore, career prep, social skills, e-learning)

Student researcher presentlng her findings

Recognition

..... CAEP invited presentations

...... Presidential Service Award

:1 N amed a up rom ising prod ice" by AACTE

_ Middletown campus expansion

_ Requests. for site visits from KY, Ml, lA

o MHJ Fdn. g rant for r·eplication i 14-'15

o Potential replication at higher profile

institutions ' 15-' 16