n

-

*.

DUKE POWER GOMPANYP.O. BOX 33189

CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28242HAL H. TUCKER TELEPHONE

vna ensaroswr (704) 373-4531~"~~

June 1, 1983

Mr. Harold R. Denton, DirectorOffice of Nuclear. Reactor Regulation

U.'S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, D. C. 20555

Attention: Ms. E. G. Adensam, ChiefLicensing Branch No. 4

Re: Catawba Nuclear StationDocket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414

Dear Mr. Denton:

Section 9.5.4.2 of the Catawba Safety Evaluation Report discusses LicenseCondition 18, Internal Corrosion Protection for the Fuel Oil Storage Tanks.It was'the Staff's conclusion that internal corrosion protection for the Catawbafuel oil storage tanks is not being provided. Therefore, the Staff has proposedto condition the license to require that internal corrosion protection beapplied to the fuel oil storage tanks by or during the first refueling period.

This license condition would require that the eight fuel oil storage tanks bedrained, cleaned and coated. It is Duke Power Company's position that thisrequirement would not enhance safety and could'be detrimental to plant safety.The Staff has based this License Condition on Section 7.5 of ANSI N195 whichstates, " Protection against internal and external corrosion shall be provided."On March 24, 1982, Washington Public Power Supply requested an interpretationof this phrase by F. A. Dougherty, Chairman ANS 59.51. By a unanimous voteof the committee, an internal corrosion allowance was deemed to meet the require-

ments of Section 7.5. Copies of this correspondence are attached.

The Catawba fuel oil storage tanks are fabricated from 3/8 inch nominal thicknesscarbon steel which includes a 1/32 inch corrosioy allowance. These tanks were

initially filled with fuel during March 1980. Internal corrosion of the fueloil storage tanks will be minimized by, 1) maintaining the tanks essentiallyfull in accordance with the Technical Specifications, 2) removing accumulatedwater through a flush mounted connection on the bottom of each unit, and 3)draining, cleaning and inspecting the tanks at 10 year intervals. Any accumulatedsediment in the tank is prevented from entering the supply lines to the day-tank

.by the outlet connection which is raised 6 inches above the bottom of the tank.

ItisthereforeconcludedjhattheinternalcorrosionprotectionforCatawba'sfuel oil storage tanks is in conformance with ANSI N195'and that an internalcoating applied to th'e fuel oil storage tank nou that'they have been filled withfuel oil for over three years (is not necessary', would be of questionable reliability,

8306070314 830601'

PDR ADOCK 05000413 |E PDR

||1. .. .. .

- -

-

..,

Mr.. Harold R. Denton, DirectorJune l',1983

-Page 2

and would pose a greater threat to the supply of fuel oil to the diesels sincethere is no assurance that an internal coating would not peel off in sufficiently-large pieces that could block the outlet connection.

It is therefore requested that License Condition 18 be deleted.

Very truly yours,

; .

' d k 4fckHal B. Tucker

ROS/phpAttachment

cc: ~Mr.-James P. O'Reilly, Regional AdministratorU. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionRegion II101-Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Mr. P. K. Van DoornNRC Resident InspectorCatawba Nuclear Station

Mr. Robert Guild, Esq.' Attorney-at-Law

P.O. Box 12097Charleston, South Carolina 29412

Palmetto Alliance2135 Devine StreetColumbia, South Carolina 292G5

M . Jesse L.- Rileyr

| Carolina Environmental Study Group854 Henley Place

|Charlotte,' North Carolina 28207

|

Mr. Henry A. Presler, ChairmanCharlotte-Mecklenburg Environmental Coalition943 Henley PlaceCharlotte, North Carolina 28207

,

l.

.

!

L.

r_ __ _. x

, -, .

I O # .

D"F(;211Pt?A'.***'/ AMERICAN NUCI. EAR SOCIETY ~ ' "

. 'STANDARDS COMMITTEE

ft:AR 251982 !. .

WR. PMD imaw-==135 Nere W A.umme *

t.c., e-t. m ans usaT W 312/333 4 33Taismyy 323/333 4 50Tem 2Me5

:

March 22, 1982 [.

/

. *

Mr. Frank A. Doughertyf~h= 4 rman, - ANS-59. 51EDS Nuclear Inc.. !,

220 Montgomery Street ',..(San Pravinco, Palifornia 94104 '

i.

.

'Dear Mr. Dougherty:i

Conf 4r=4n- your recent telephone conversation sIth Marilyn Weber I anenclosing copy of page 8 from the American Nuclear Society ScandardsConmittee Procedures Manual. This procedure is to be followed when

~ preparing the interpretation request of Terry Mead from WashingtonPublic Power on ANS-59.51.

If you have any questions or require any additional assistance, pleasedo not besitate to contact us.

.

Sincerely,.

. ..

Mrs. thy PichaSecretary, ANS Standards

d

o

enc 1. /s

.

.

.

e

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. -_ . . -_

.

, .- . a m _=-

~\

V. . .- :. .

, :. *

,

4.2 1

development of a proposed standard would benefit from wider input by trialOn occasion, the stata'of the technology may be such that final1

use of its criteria. ,

in draft form for Trial Use and Comment,It is then appropriate to issue the proposed standard!

This procedure requires the approval of the responsible subcomitteefor a period not to exceed 12 months. -4.3A proposed standard prepared for declaration as an ANS Standard !.

. proceeds through the following approval steps after completion of the stepsgiven in Section 2:

Ctiairman of the ANS Standards Comittee with a statement giving the backgThe consensus body chairman submits the proposed standard to thes. ,

-of the standard. roundb.The Steering Committee votes by letter ballot or by vote at a

regularly constituted meeting on the adequacy of the development of technicalapproval based on the background statement.of the Steering Committee membership shall be necessary for approval.A two-thirds affirmative vote

.

h Chairman of the Standards Comittee reports the approval ofc.

the standard to the ANS President and recomends that be declare the standa dan ANS Standard. rd.

7he standard is then published as an ANS Standard.. -

N."fPreWEEtion'ofTs'

IhthN2aYi MoY1ESE N s3' ' int'efpretations of'an*ANS standard shall beTonductedkfollowing procedura: ecording to the

The request is forwarded to the Chairman of the Standards Cc=1ttee,a.

who refers it through the consensus body chairman to the appropriate subcommitteefor interpretation. 'b. '

If so, the subcommittee chairnan formulates a reply containing the appropriateThe subcoem:ittee determines whether the existing standard is applicable.

interpretation and submits it for ballot and comment of the subcomitteeattempting to reconcile comments and negative ballots, the subcomittee chairmanAfter.

submits a recommendation to the Chairman of the Standards Comittee through the*

consensus body chairman.

of the Standards Committee and is published in #xclecr Ne:The interpretation is transmitted to the requester by the Chairmanc.

Ja..

.

ANS as Secretariat of American National Standards C w itrees.

-

Chairmen of American National Standards Comittees for which ANS is theSecretariat are ANS membere and are appointed to their respective positionsfor three years by the President upon recommendation of the Chaituan of theStandards Committee.

The chairmen of these American National Standards Con-tittees adMMster the committees.in accordance with the procedures of ANSand the American National Standards Institute.

,

- .

M S Representation on other Standards Co ittees.

. The need for ANS representation on standards cor ittees of other organi-.

zations is determined by the Steering Comittee.the chairman of the Standards Comittee, with appropriate consultaticqIf such a need is identified,a representative. , appoints

.

4 .

6

- , - -

,,~~

.

_ ._ . -_-

= -- =,_

s****b483EM54 M h g g. y ,g . ,27M

-

. . ~ ta=2 .<m =po pO

,IN N21 son 906D-

wress comassromosner ua. - - - - 2 2 '8..

CM Prmars 927M',

WHP-2 Files 9177 .

'"

''

JLM/ File /lb -

",,

*-

.-...._

, , . i

e- . March 24,1982 :- ::OTT Responds to: N/A - -

'

R G02-82-340 7 ': , c' -e+ '

. --

Responte required by: N/A, -;

*. * ~ .

~ . . .:<... . ..*

. ).Mr. F. A.sDougherty ''-

3-

EDS Nuclear Inc.*

/ -

220 Montgomery Street-

*

.- -

San Francisco, CA 94104 'j.

.. .

?. ~_ .-

Subject: ANSI-N195-1976/ANS 59.51 'c.

,|^~~~

-

.... <- -

!' |

u-_ , ,

NRC Regulatory Guide 1.137 recognizes ANSI-H195-as providing, .s

a method acceptable to the NRC staff for compl * th rtinent re-quirements of General Design Criterion 17 Ap ix y:o Part 50.. i .'- This letter requests the interpretatio fap a 1 ection 7.5 of ANSI-

.

'N195-1976. This phrase states: " prot c ion gainst external and internalcorrosion shall be provided". The* port estion is internal w. usion. protection.

, . .-qq . ; , .'

-

#-.

. . . -

An NRC reviewer has ' .

ted this phrase as an internal tank coating.The Supply System an o.:

sion allowan utilities interpret this as an internal corro-'

The re eme or i ernal tank coating on a fuel oil tank is unprece-d ur-

'. -

..

i us a letter stating the intent of the comittee who prepareddar with respect to this phrase in ANSI-N195-1976/ANS 59.51..~

P send this correspondence to:..

! Terry 1.. Meade '

WASHINGTON.PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM3000 George Washington WayP. D. Box 968, MD 927MRichland, WA 99352 /

'

;.

Thank you for your cooperation.-

.e ''

.

vg''t- -

T. L'. Meade.,

Electrical Engineer

pb - .

.

mirwon: TL Meade 4/. w c4_ FOR SIGNATURE OF: IL Meade T f. % .J, -

sucnowPOR APPROVAL OF

APPROVED . _l _. __ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ - -

'-

._ . .-m_ . ~ _ . . m --

_. j.

, ,

i-

el2:5$ nuclear -

.

..

..

.-

_

- ' . ' . EDS Nucieer Mc. . -

220 More0amery Street .c

. San Frerdeco.CeBlome 94104..

- -

:-.

. (415)544 8000 -

2.. . - :.s9 Jf,,} * . : .5% : .. -*

..=v . : .. ., . -

. . . . .*r.*. 7~. , ; . . . .;:V * ' *** -g; y*,".. 1 p; * *.*.

.. . .

...

.

-....rs. e -.. . .

2- :..= y_ -.

. . . ..

_. ,. . . . w. .&-

.

- -.. ,.

_2.;.- :,. .a . . . . -

- :April 7. 1982

'

-

EDS/WP- 82-006,

w. . . . . .

u- .. .- .

k .:., . .

[-[,2 ' ,1 waahi yton Public Power Supply System,

,

-Post Offica Box 968 ---- -- -

7" ~~

" 3000 George Washington Way-

,

It141==d, Washington 99352

ATIElhION: Mr. Tirry L. Maade '

~ '

Mail Drop 927M_. 2

, SUBJECT: American Nuclear Society (ANS-59.51) -

f. .-''

* 'ANSI N195 - 1976. . . .

L. */- i Yual Oil Systems -... ..;. r . .. -

.- .

. .,. .

Dear Terry:

Enclosed is a copy of the proposed respense to your March 24, 1982letter which I am submitting to the working group for acceptance.

as a formal response. I will keep you informed of the results.

V truly yours.

. *

.

F. A. Dougberty-

ChairmanANS 59.51

.

-.

.

.

.

.

?- --

, . . ,

.

TAD /rabEnclosures'

.

'.

u.. -

.

>"- ,.

$f -;San Pancisco. New mk+ Amerse. Paris

-

____: -

, . ~ . . . _

. ,, .,

-,, .. . . .. s . .

.

J.

-,

-.,

.,

1.- . . ,- ggqnggy yng m ..

. '

. . -, ..

-

',,- :. ..

, _ . ,. .

. n. . . . :. , ,. i._

. .

:.. . . - - .

-. .. -

:_;,... .. .,,~

ii0 EKING GROUP,: . . [ _.. . ANS 59.51. -

,,.

$g ,w'' . , + .: N .. w . 1- --

E '. STAMD&BD h?2/e.2 @ $c. :r36y cN ' AES'R195'1976/ANS 59.52. .- ' ' " '

,-- -

._; . 7. '-

:._ - , , ; . ... n ..y.qip ; ;_,' ,

* , IETnFRETATIckt REQUESTf See attached letter, dated 3/24/82g._ ,..y k :.: u .:. :. -- . u.9 c .., ,7. . . = .~: dG02- 82-340) !~ . .

~ ~. ,-..: ,3.., ., ,*n

/-_ c.c .n. :- 1

Discussion of Request,

\ -.

[T " ~ Section 7.5 of the Se==dard states: " Protection against internal'= and external corrosion shall be provided." The basic question,b is whether the working group intended .that a jinda be required for' ~ . the' tanks An'the . system. To respond to this cuestion, we must - ~ ~

...

look at our intent in establishing the requirement. The purpose ofthe Standerd is defined in Section 2 and is to assure that an adequatefuel oil supply to the, diesel is maintained and that sufficient fuelexists urider all conditions. This has two componen,ts:,

The fuel reserve must be large enough and"sufficiently reliable ~ 'e

'to meet the fuel requirements during an emergency. '.j'

' .- .: '- .-'

- E-i. . . 5:. 0 2 W ? :'~ ^ - ' ' ' . -. . : -% * :.

i *

.-~-

k,. ,[]1' el 'The ' supply System anst be designed so that fuel can be delivered,] " T.*" .

to the engine from the stored fuel."'.

.

The protection against internal and external corrosion is based onthe above concerns. External corrosion to a buried tank could affectthe integrity of the tank and thus place the fuel oil supply in*

, jeopardy. Thus, the working group required protection againstexternal corrosion.

The basis for requiring protection against the effects of . internal|, . corrosion is two fold. Firstly, there must be assurance of adequate.-

F system integrity for the same reasons as for protection against| external corrosion.- Secondly, the corrosion products must not affect

engine performance. This requirement is stated in Section 7.2 of the, Standard. That is, the mterie.ls must be ' compatible. to the extent,that! - engine operation is not impaired by the materials used.-

I-, -. . .. . . . . ._. . .Question ~'~--

./

_'

Is the use of a corrosion allowance an adequate means of meeting the'

, requirements of Section 7.5 of ANSI N195 - 1976/ANS 59.51 regardinginternal corrosion protection?

-.

Response *s

'

Yes, provided that the allowance is large enough to assure integrity'of the component and conformance with applicable design criteria

. at the end of the plant's design life and provided that corrosionL, products do not impair diesel engine operation.

.

L ,

.- . ._. - _ - _. _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ . _ _ - - . - . . .

r--- - -

efi$s@ nuclear"

.. . . .

. *

.. .

e ..

.N. .

F-

zao wangsarn.,ysw.mEDS NucieerInc.

'g- -

.. -

p ,;... SanT.- Candome94104 "...

I M 5) N .*

. ., - ,;- .

-

k. 2'- ' ''." ' . , '~|~,,7 Y;f5'-5.,,,, ,''' ~ ..$YS' ~ , ' ~ * *: Y?.'''L .. p&E.k,**.: :..~$i.: r '. '~

;-

sf:. . '.'%. . :a. :.,:::.e - 0. y3%. - :-y: , ~. '. . ' . ~*

'. .. -

c.= ; . .-

, ' . . . . :.

.

. .e.':.:T- .-;.Ci .

."- . , , ' . .-.

. ,-' .:.; g.: ..

,-.

..

. ,.-|. g :,E -V[ ' .'. o y. ,

'

. . i..h.s.J Y. : '. ''. ' ' . , . ' .- *

. ...

..

g., . :i- . . . . .. .r. , ,May 4,. 1982 -

- .

% . ~^ Washington Public Power Supply SystemL.~ -- . P.O. Box 968, MD 927M -

~

'

. 3000 George Wa=h 4 =rton ' Way' ' ' '

4-- A- - miehlana,' Washington 99352 -- --

.

I ATTENTICH: Mr. T. L. Meade*

. . Electrical Engineer.L,'.

. mRMr"*?': ANSI-N195-1976/ANS 59.51a.- . , . . . ... . a.

3r '. * - ...' Dea . .

- Y ~. . . . ,' ,. .: r Mr. Meade:-

*'

. - . - . . . . . . . .- ::.' --

.: --,-. . .

e :-- Per today's conversation, I an enclosing five (5) ballots in ;<..

"

response to your need for interpretation of ANSI-N195-1976. Onefinal ballot should be arriving in a few days. Upon receiptof this ballot, I will contact you with additional information.

very truly yours,,

R)SAAMyRLF. A. Dougherty

, -- Chairman* ANS 59.51

, -

1.|

|.

.

.

.

.

f

-. .

,. FAD /rab-

Enclosures-

s

.

. -

%

, . - -

.-

c San Francaco. New Wrk Attorsa. Pars|

l

(

. . . , ~ . -_ . _ _ = . g_. . . - .

-II|quf.ST 70R 214TERParnatIm '- -

. ' . * April 7, 1982 ; -

<.

:. 'Pase T= FEG9VED~'

,

1.-'

'. -

APR 231982

,

-

[. -

. ,. . . 3Attor ..

-

. . .. ..

- - -- . I . . . ..k.-a.t..

M..pp;<9 . Wi.-P. :gy : p''g7n.#r z- , - J9 di.. -. -

W 'i. F U D --e. , .;. . -

.

w. . 2. ;. ;: , c . - w.: -: r.

~O- 4 - --

-n. - .--.. . Response approv- - . y :g.; -. ._ . .

. . -, :ed. .

-

... .. _ .:. .,:- - .; . .. .: .&; . . .

. . . .

O _ ...S.&% c=--.

.

6 _ . . k- .:- |*

'H- . .; .'4% y . .

.;_ r _-,

+ <

~'

~ Response approved with comme:its:- -

C-es ..

-~ .. . .. . . .

+.. . - .

C.. ~-. - -

t;. |',.- .. . .

.

.

~. . .x.

s. .

.

.

..

'.

. -

-,

-

..

,..

,. .

. O Response not approved for the following ressons: -

_...

.

-.

-..

.

.

.

C

.

i*

',

| Mail ballots to: Mr. F. A.'Dougherty -

i EDS Nuclear Inc.i

220 Montgoteery StreetSan Franci' co, California 94104s

i ~.Telephone: (415) 544-8018

.

_

Ballots due: April 20, 1982

s

a.

.. .

N %.

14| 4 Le PZ

Q m% _ ___ _

-- . .- _ n._ ,_ . : .. -.

.-. .BIgEST M M M M ATION R E Cj,W, E DAgiril 7' 1982*

- - -

- Pas * 2* APR 191982*.c, e

c. .. .. .

'- BAUDr WR.F5|iD.

..

.. ,.

. . >.~ . . .

tw ,.c : . = . . . =.- -- + . g w . ;:= . . . ; . ce-.

%!. . . - . nM9mi . .-

-- -

.. .. .

9 Response app m ed. 7.

, ,. 7,, .: ..

<-;

t. ?~. - k

: .' '

.

C Response approved with comments:

Comments ,

, . - . .

w.._

.

*

' -r .- .

%. ~ -- - .. . . . .

l .

.

/.

-.

:..

|.

. . - .., .

. ...

C Response not apprmfed for the following reasons: -.,

-:

.

.

..

.

.

.

. . .

.

.

i

Mail ballots to: Mr. F. A. DoughertyEDS Nuclear Inc.|

|-

220 Montgomery StreetSan Francisco, California 94104

,Telephone: (515) 544-8018

.,.

.' Balle s due: April 20, 1982.~.

.

#

.

D

.. : .

I"

. .

-

- . . - . - -- - - .-

Ruassr raa .. *meros ''-- -

' .

Ar.-4 7, 1982 EEC3!W._O I.. ;.

r se T.o . i I-

_. 1 - APR 101982- -' - '.

.

:;~ .....s,,.c.. . . BAT.10T

.

WB iiMD- : -

%,..- . . . _. . .

. . .{ .. . .

*J' .sv* i'. .

. , . . . . - - ~ .. .. . ,. a. ., . . . . .

Q _ _ , .,9,[4. g. --.y : ;-: .+ v e.5>&, .( ,_'.G.h . -&- : e%.., - ~

-. . . .

.x<.

. --_

.-- ,

. _ . ~ . . , ' ~ ~'

..

;;ri-y' e. . ~~ Response ap. proved. ' 0. ?- Jr--

.% . r.. : : . ra. ..

. - .b. >y,2+-.. .. . ..:.... - *

*.b.

. '.. .x.. . we ._ -

. . . . s

. m-... - ~.g . =. = .- 5..ri.2. . '. -

.+ .:-

.f . ...e-.

. , , , ...

, . . . . . ..

,

'. . 4 ~ Response approved with comments:-- '

Conssents .

_ . . . . . . . .

y> ,..; , ;.. .

. .i *. .. - . . . .. ,*

. . .g .

,.

..

. . ,

.-

/,

.

- i.4.

.

Q Response not approved for the following reasonsi -

.. ..

. .

-.

.

.

.

.

.

. s

| Mail ballots to:' Mr. F. A. Dougherty .

. EDS Nuclear Inc.I 220 Montgomery Street

San Francihco, California 94104

i ~.Telepho'ne: (415) 544-8018

.

_

e

. . Ballots due: April 20, 1982*

l'

.W. ~

* * *.

e

.ee

'd

e.. -, . -n.- _ . . ,e ,. - -, , . , _ _ _ _ , . - - - - _ . - - - ,w

. . - . . . _ ,....- _. _ .. _ _ _ _ _ _ . .

*

~Aprip7,1982 -

Pass Tuo-

.-

.- .

iurinT-

y ,- ." ,- -.

f *;_< ~

m- ., _ _.

. ..

&'T3? . '.lch. :n r.:. .-.<..

. Q.. Response approved._

-

. . -.

. - . g. .

%~- . . ;- ..

.2. . 7. ... . .

. ..' - - 5. n .; .. _ _ .

--

.

. . . .

+ . -. Response' approved with co m es:

Comments b i ds/Mw adwM[_ _ _ . . . . . Y Y Y. ,L :.f L h. _ /2/A_. ;

o -.

R~ M & d t.c & & &y_4 w 'A? W L .s $ a/,

h .6 & A ~ A . Rr a '.,AL9 M A a a 4 ~b 2z-

-..

. .";s,....+( w A. L- |p / L p = ,v ~ = - = -

M % ,/ M .'JL4, 4 %& i s.v _ _'

'

. ACOso.4 W Apm w A--

- @ & 7: + . u +- 2 M d t ~ .s''d'

/~ ~"h*4- nn. H._

O **=Pa=== === =PProved for the following reasonsi'

-

,

.. .

.

.--

.

.

,

| *:1

-.

Mail ballots to: Mr. F. A. DoughertyEDS Nuclear Inc.220 Montgo:nery Street

- San Francisco, California 94104|

Telephone: (415) 544-8018.

*

Ballots due: April 20, 1982{ .

~

.

.

3

(*.9

.

_ , .r. . - .- -

.. _ _ . . --

, , _,

'naqimsT rom 2xTzarmEfAn05_

* '~

brif 7.1982 ! p39;,n5D-

Pase m ...

AP.R 231982. -

.- .-

. . - y .- .-

,

.i - ~ 7c.. . , WR. FMD-

. . .-- . .m.n:.r .. .. ..

f?. s -?.t***" ' - : .' ?. Q' M.f'W'.'.'.# '. .~ ~ * -!&. .j''_*. ~h? * = *__

n. . . . .- -

.- .ar. .

f?),

0 ' ', S?._ap' 5.-. . .

p -

.

,., - . , . .

. --?:- ; . a . . : _ . - . - :kf $..N? ..) -| - n J. :.

., . . . - . . :. . n,. . . . . . ., . .

I - - g Response approved with c ts:

Coxmments k m e: M & nJf mw o , n_- ~* - -- A shaw bAAw &_dAh'

.

b . m:Lds. 7.rL R M Aa.,e i tA , i'

LOmu T*LAA ~GSn Ltk-

L m a A cho, A L n a-. On WD. wEj$wAA E& Ab2 t!p ct

- ""4'M &aLtM \*

o p ~

Q|'

|

O Response not approved for the following reasons: 2 '

.,

.

.

.

.

.

1

:.

.

Jf

'

m il ballots to: Mr. F. A. Dougherty| EDS Nuclear Inc.

220 Montgo sery StreetSan Francisco, California 94104

./Telephone: (415) 544-8018,

.-

Ballots due: April 20. 1982.

%

e

1 ..

. .,

e

.

_.,,.,--.,w wg , - -~ r ~v -,--.r *------v----- v' = - - - - - - - - -- - ' ~ ' ^ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ ' ~_,

f,.- _. _

_.. ... _ - m w m .--

~~-^

..._._ ~.

.

WASHINGTON FUBLIC POWER SUFFLY SYSTDE

.j . RECORD OFTELEPHONE CONVERSATION .

~

h DATE . -- .. -

_ _. .__

pr ts.:< 4 as... e.c. - .THet. .- To at CosersRMso11:oo -

- O'= O-~~- =acc. t. %A. ,,ua wt:c -wo-t_3 80AME" COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT

L_ V.AhA. A E d <s LA, av. - falt{ev4 s."#-4 MAMEX

SuaJECTEB) Dlacus4EO COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT

Qn..ue<A- b - ide v.ev e_4sh! ow c4.su\d s swl.'

a -

(i~ N be8 afe o t_ %\ T cA B o vs SEL .. ,

nemanns:#- bhSf b EDe_b

~

ti.S LCw t tc.$4.%f t. M r. ug e %4,*

n.b usa \ meek- .wT.L. h new un an t w ou.s _ 'swkt,,- al m e e<lew .w es.. ,

.ae .~a M c ; nu.u. .s & um md/ms e.gi .s%

Yu.4uv e_ . TLe.h! an h I e.tk 4.v- taid\ he_ tot-Od e.w bw T. A .A~

%ni nM e.v- h k o Ed SwwIb . b Ev-twsw kM S ; L3 tM\e-

.A a c_.~ .

b,\ul em s\\ ent re.soonclaw ces and vcMhenend Atad Bmfs e.td hwd etsec60s. W e tt y e e . NWPPSc.O . Q ue\cw

% e e.v W E h hw A.se1<. bd, _ e t ds 0 4-\ e w bdbA nw,

tk. . LL n be 74.v e $ M c.L a s h . h \' A e ,- rs; d ,. A wOn th a'w vw n w . Wkew O e. w 'd . 'd unh b< 'w o n -eve.

g i n

b\t-A e.A iw L Ae.av Wa awd he_ce m e b c.k.'W e.h's

(_ A*21% G., twQ %4 *n w N tbh k 40 E_ /__TLS Ea

'e Is k Yd_auesh '.d t W r-(ktLk 6 In w, e- ei r.di Ov- t 'z(, , ,.

<kske.vwew4 * -t 1, e_ <kwwdav-A.*

' rl % bet e.ab Adi c.u.k' m = abh \sw

s o, o, cNn k ri.e.ht e h n > n e_ ta4.hn w$ sv 1 .\ 1~ '

- a

~

b. Deu.nh a_v ku tamendeb 4 tL %e I 'S,

ay > \r ._,_..

towamsk.t o w rec.ov-1 tMth the N E.(L ..

- M r. 5. A .- b e d e d u . T'h <, h \e_av "I w e.\

120 Monh emeei4 M.a I% Eran. (Al . 9 N10N /-4 fC-6W- 3 O/7

-

.

=aq po_ ____ _ a___L- - -- - ~ - - - --- --