18
ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA, ARM

ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING

Implementation, Indications and Implications

CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012

Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA, ARM

Page 2: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Antitrust Notice• The Casualty Actuarial Society is committed to adhering strictly

to the letter and spirit of the antitrust laws. Seminars conducted under the auspices of the CAS are designed solely to provide a forum for the expression of various points of view on topics described in the programs or agendas for such meetings.

• Under no circumstances shall CAS seminars be used as a means for competing companies or firms to reach any understanding – expressed or implied – that restricts competition or in any way impairs the ability of members to exercise independent business judgment regarding matters affecting competition.

• It is the responsibility of all seminar participants to be aware of antitrust regulations, to prevent any written or verbal discussions that appear to violate these laws, and to adhere in every respect to the CAS antitrust compliance policy.

Page 3: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this presentation are those of the speaker at this point in time. These views are not necessarily identical to those of the CAS or the speakers’ employers.

3

Page 4: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Credits

Many thanks to Morgan Bugbee of Farmers,

Jeremy Jump of Hanover, &

Susan Bermender of USAA

Their hard work and input made the original presentation a success. Many of their slides and insights are used in this presentation.

Any errors that you find are mine.

Page 5: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Agenda5

• What is Rate Capping?

• Benefits & Costs of Rate Capping

• Regulatory Perspective

• Rate Capping Design

• Rate Indications Under Capping

• CY Financial Projections

• Post-Implementation

Page 6: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

What Is Rate Capping?6

Under rate capping, a customer’s renewal rate change may be capped at a maximum percent increase (or decrease) at each renewal until the approved rate level is reached.

Example:

•Premium at first renewal: $1,200Min($1400, $1000 x 1.20)

•Premium at second renewal: $1,400Min ($1400, $1200 x 1.20)

Current Prem: $1000

Renewal Prem: $1400

Rate Cap: 20%

Page 7: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Rate Capping

• A rating plan gives a premium for insured i at time t of Pi,t

• With rate capping, Pi,t depends on Pi,t-k or on the % change from the prior premium.

• 2 identical insureds would be charged different premiums depending on their prior premium.

• Rate change effective at time t is spread to times t, t+1, . . . , t+n.

• Alternatively, a rating variable could be capped based on the prior value of the variable

Page 8: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Benefits of Rate Capping8

• Customer preference for stable rate changes

• Improved retention

• Lower complaint levels

• Gradual introduction of significant rating plan changes

• Appropriate new business rates

Page 9: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Costs of Rate Capping

• Unfair Discrimination, Disparate treatment of new & existing customers

• Less than optimal rating plan is being used

• Increased use of IT resources

• Increased use of Actuarial resources

• Increased complexity

• Possible Anti-selection

Page 10: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Regulatory Perspective10

• Some states support capping– Fewer large increases = more happy consumers

• Some states limit capping– Capping increases okay, but not decreases; and/or

– Must roll off within defined timeframe (2 yrs)

• Some states will not approve capping (e.g. CA)– Disparate treatment of new and existing customers

Page 11: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Rate Capping Design11

Customer Initiated

Company Initiated

• Coverage changes

• Adding/removing vehicles/drivers

• Driving activity• Moving• Discount

changes

• Subsequent rate changes

• Tiering• Company

placement• Discovery period

changes

• Customer aging• Model year

aging• Other

distributional shifts

Exposure Shift

Capping StructureCap at a coverage level? Vehicle level? Policy level?

Situations to Address

Page 12: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Rate Indications Under Capping12

Should indication be based on capped or uncapped premium?

Indications should be based on uncapped premium,but more analysis is needed…

UncappedCappedHow much more/less premium you need than you are currently bringing in.

Benefit: Tells you if you’re currently bringing in enough money to cover costs

Drawback: What do you apply the indicated rate change to?

How much more/less premium you need than your filed rates.

Benefit: Applies directly to filed rates.

Drawback: Doesn’t answer if current income is adequate to cover costs.

Page 13: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

CY Financial Projections13

Financial projections ensure company is bringing in enough premium to cover costs in near term•Must reflect capped premium•Requires estimating cap “unwind”, premium trend impact•Mismatch with Actuarial projections used in rates requires understanding and explanation

Page 14: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Financial Concerns

• Actual premium collected is primary.– “When we originally launched our product back in

August 2007, we implemented a symmetrical cap of +4/-4%. This symmetrical cap caused us to loose about 1% of our expected premium. With this launch we made the business decision to choose caps that would be more rate neutral.”

– From an Ohio private passenger auto filing

Page 15: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Post-Implementation

• Actuarial / Product– Calculating uncapped premium

– Calculating on-leveled uncapped premium, both segmented and in the aggregate

– Calculating on-leveled capped premium

• IT– Maintaining Capped and uncapped premium in systems

– Validating and correcting data errors

• Customer– Communicating to customers why they continue to see increases

Page 16: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Questions From a Regulator• Why?

– Acquired Book of Business– New/Revised Rating Plan

• Trade offs

• How?– Can the regulator understand the capping rule?– Can your IT staff understand & program the rule?– Do you know what your IT staff has programmed?– Can consumers understand it? Do they need to understand it? – What changes get capped?

• How long till capping disappears?– Over priced risks?– Under priced risks?– Number of insureds & dollars of premium at each renewal– We like everyone to be at the “right rate” by the 3rd renewal.

Page 17: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Questions If Capping in Place

• How is premium treated in the Indication?– See the speaker for another PowerPoint that

we don’t go over for today for one potential problem.

• Is the capping scheme being changed?• What change will the Insured see?

– From this selected change– From prior capping of rates– From trigger points

Page 18: ACTUARIAL CONSIDERATIONS AROUND RATE CAPPING Implementation, Indications and Implications CANW Fall Meeting September 28, 2012 Thomas G. Hess FCAS, MAAA,

Questions?18