Acton Campus Building #75A Laundry Hazardous Materials Report · Date Scope/Location Carried out by Result/Comments Entered by 14/05/2017 Hazardous Materials Survey Imam Malik - WSP

Acton Campus

Building #75A Laundry

Hazardous Materials Report

This document is uncontrolled once printed.

You must consult the individual Building

Register prior to work commencing.

Contents Page

1. Revision Table

2. ANU Hazardous Materials Register

3. ANU Hazardous Materials Maintenance Log

4. WSP Hazardous Materials Report Dated 17 May 2017

5. WSP Clearance Certificates

1. Revision Table – Building 75A Laundry

Rev.

Nature of changes

Approval

Date

1 Building 75A Laundry – Hazardous Material Report WSP 14/05/2017

2 Building 75A Laundry – Hazardous Material Report

- Update Hazardous Material Register - Additions of native documentation - Addition of air monitoring results to

Hazardous Materials Maintenance Log

WSP 07/09/2018

2. ANU Hazardous Materials Register

Site Location: Building 75A Laundry, Acton Campus

Assessor: Imam Malik

PB-228052 CHRefer to

WSP

Report

Asbestos Cement

SheetingCeiling to laundry 1 1 2 2 2 8 L ~24m

2

Removed by AGH Demolition and Asbestos

Removal Pty Ltd 30/07/2017. Asbestos

containing material to the Laundry ceiling,

walls and floor was conducted on the

30/07/2017 refer to Hazaroud Materials

Remediation Clearance Certificate - 17 07 30

2270971_ANU Bld75A Gallery Shed/Laundry.


WSP

Report

Asbestos Cement

SheetingTop wall panels to interior of laundry 1 1 2 2 2 8 L ~6m

2









WSP

Report

Asbestos Vinyl Tiles Floor to interior of laundry 1 1 2 2 2 8 L ~24m2








No Sample taken PresumedRefer to

WSP

Report

Electrical backing

boardElectrical fuse box to laundry 1 1 2 2 2 8 L

PB-235001 9.1 % w/wRefer to

WSP

Report

Paint Exterior laundry, door - - - - - - - -

Poor condition external building surfaces were

remediated and repainted during August -

October 2017. The lead base paint was

encapsulated beneath a new non-lead paint.

Maintain in good condition and inspect

regularly.


WSP

Report

Paint Exterior laundry, door and window frames - - - - - - - -






regularly.

PB-235003 12 % w/wRefer to

WSP

Report

Paint Exterior laundry, weatherboard - - - - - - - -






regularly.


WSP

Report

Paint Exterior laundry, window frame - - - - - - - -






regularly.


WSP

Report

Paint Exterior laundry, weatherboard - - - - - - - -

All poor condition external building surfaces

were remediated and repainted during August -




regularly.


WSP

Report

Paint Exterior laundry, piping - - - - - - - -






regularly.


WSP

Report

Paint Exterior laundry, window frame - - - - - - - -






regularly.


WSP

Report

Paint Exterior laundry, gable end - - - - - - - -






regularly.


WSP

Report

Paint Exterior laundry, roof - - - - - - - -

Recommendations to either 1) Encapsulate

and/or monitor the status on the paint, 2)

Remove in accordance with state and national

guidelines.


WSP

Report

Paint Interior laundry, panel above wash sink - - - - - - - -






regularly.


WSP

Report

Paint Interior laundry, walls - - - - - - - -

Removed by AGH Demolition & Asbestos

Removal Pty Ltd 30/07/2017.

Refer to Hazaroud Materials Remediation

Clearance Certificate - 17 07 30 2270971_ANU

Bld75A Gallery Shed.


WSP

Report

Paint Interior laundry, ceiling - - - - - - - -

Removed by AGH Demolition & Asbestos

Removal Pty Ltd 30/07/2017.

Refer to Hazaroud Materials Remediation

Clearance Certificate - 17 07 30 2270971_ANU

Bld75A Gallery Shed.

PB-235018 32 mg/m2Refer to

WSP

Report

Dust Interior laundry, on top of soap dispenser - - - - - - - - No further action required.

PB-235019 18 mg/m2Refer to

WSP

Report

Dust Interior laundry, on top of shelving attached to wall - - - - - - - - No further action required.

Lead Dust

Lead in Soil

PB-235036 410mg/kgRefer to

WSP

Report

Soil Exterior 75A, Northern side of building - - - - - - - -

Remediated.

Refer to validation sample LS1, LS2, S1A & S2A.

Lead Clearance Certificate Surface Soils dated

08/05/2018


WSP

Report

Soil Exterior 75A, Southern side of building - - - - - - - -

Remediated.

Refer to validation sample LV17, LV18, S4A &

S5A. Lead Clearance Certificate Surface Soils

dated 08/05/2018


WSP

Report

Soil Exterior 75A, Western side of building - - - - - - - -

Remediated.

Refer to validation sample LS3, LS4 & S3A.


08/05/2018

LV17 400mg/kgRefer to

WSP

Report

Soil South exterior of laundry shed, west side closest to wall - - - - - - - -

No further action required.

The remaining lead in soil is below HIL of

600mg/kg for buidling classified as Recreational

C.

LS1 510mg/kgRefer to

WSP

Report

Soil North exterior of laundry shed, east side closest to wall - - - - - - - -




C.

LS2 460mg/kgRefer to

WSP

Report

Soil North exterior of laundry shed, west side closest to wall - - - - - - - -




C.

PB-228051 NADRefer to

WSP

Report

Mastic Exterior Window Frame to Laundry - - - - - - - - No further action required.

PB-235008

PB-235012 0.05 % w/wRefer to

WSP

Report

Red paint Exterior laundry, undercoat paint to bird box attached to wall - - - - - - - - No further action required.

PB-235014


ReportSoil Exterior 75A, Eastern side of building - - - - - - - - No Further Action Required

- -Refer to

WSP

Report

- - - - - - - - - - No SMF found at the time of inspection

- -Refer to

WSP

Report

- - - - - - - - - - No ODS found at the time of inspection

- -Refer to

WSP

Report

- - - - - - - - - - No PCB found at the time of inspection

Synthetic Material Fibres (SMF)

Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS)

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB'S)

3. ANU Hazardous Materials Maintenance Log

Hazardous Materials Maintenance Log

Site: Building 75A Laundry

ANU Hazardous Materials Maintenance Log The following log should be maintained by the responsible person. It should contain information relating to the on-going maintenance or control measures associated with ACM including removal, remedial works, repairs, inspection, monitoring and clearance details etc.

Site: Building 75A Laundry

Date Scope/Location Carried out by Result/Comments Entered by

14/05/2017 Hazardous Materials Survey Imam Malik - WSP Undertake a survey of the site

to identify and access hazardous materials.

Joseph McNeill – WSP11/09/2017

05/08/2017 Lead air monitoring reports from sampling undertaken during lead paint remediation works CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 172929

Peter Whatman – WSP WSP Reference: 17 08 05 2270971A-Bldg 75A Gallery Shed-LTR-Rev0 Job No: 2270971A

All lead air monitoring sample results were below the lowest detectable limit of

Sample No: AL593 05/08/2017 Exterior, south side of block 75A, gallery shed -

Sample No: N-5 19/08/2017 Exterior, east side of block 75A, gallery shed -

Exterior, east side of shed on temporary fence -


Anton Delac - WSP WSP Reference: 17 09 09 2270971A-Bldg 75A Gallery Shed-LTR-Rev0 Job No: 2270971A



Lauren Smith - WSP WSP Reference: 17 10 21 2270971A-Bldg 75A Gallery Shed-LTR-Rev0 Job No: 2270971A


Job No: 2270971A

Sample No: CBR09 28/10/2017 Exterior, north side of building on temporary fence -

Sample No: PB-9 01/12/2017 Exterior, south side of building on temporary fence -

corner of temporary fence -

4. WSP Hazardous Material Report

AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

BUILDING 75 LAUNDRY, AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LENNOX CROSSING ACTON ACT HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BUILDING ASSESSMENT

JUNE 2017 CONFIDENTIAL

This document may contain confidential and legally privileged information, neither of which are intended to be waived, and must be used only for its intended purpose. Any unauthorised copying, dissemination or use in any form or by any means other than by the addressee, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this document in error or by any means other than as authorised addressee, please notify us immediately and we will arrange for its return to us.

CONFIDENTIAL OUR REF: 2270971A-ANU REPORT BUILDING 75A LAUNDRY HAZMAT R2.DOCX JUNE 2017

BUILDING 75 LAUNDRY, AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LENNOX CROSSING ACTON ACT HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BUILDING ASSESSMENT AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

WSP LEVEL 1, 121 MARCUS CLARKE STREET CANBERRA ACT 2601 PO BOX 1551 CANBERRA ACT 2600 TEL: +61 2 6201 9600 FAX: +61 2 6201 9666 WSP.COM

REV DATE DETAILS

B 23 June 2017 Original

NAME DATE SIGNATURE

Prepared by: Garry Miller 07 June 2017

Reviewed by: Jason Watson 14 June 2017

Approved by: Warren Lal 14 June 2017

1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 1

1.1 Legislative requirements ................................................................ 1

1.2 Scope of services ................................................................................ 2

1.3 WSP Approach .................................................................................... 2

2 RESURVEY METHODOLOGY ...................................................... 3

2.1 Hazmat register review ................................................................... 3

2.2 Site inspection .................................................................................... 3

2.3 Identification of material ............................................................... 3

2.3.1 Asbestos containing materials (ACM’s) .......................................................... 3 2.3.2 Lead-based paint .......................................................................................................... 3 2.3.3 Synthetic mineral fibres (SMF) materials ...................................................... 4 2.3.4 Polychlorinated biphenyls (pcb’s) ...................................................................... 4 2.3.5 Ozone depleting substances (ODS) .................................................................. 4

3 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................ 5

3.1 Survey Restrictions ........................................................................... 5

4 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RISK ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTORS AND RATINGS ................ 6

4.1 Asbestos ................................................................................................. 6

4.2 Other Hazardous Building Materials ........................................ 8

4.3 Recommended Risk Controls ...................................................... 9

5 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS .................................................. 11

5.1 Scope of Service ................................................................................ 11

5.2 Reliance on Data ............................................................................... 11

5.3 Environmental Conclusions ........................................................ 11

5.4 Report for Benefit of Client .......................................................... 11

5.5 Other limitations .............................................................................. 12

6 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS ................................................. 13

6.1 Site Sspecific Issues ........................................................................ 13

6.2 Additional Precautionary Testing ............................................ 13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

6.3 Planning of Maintenance, Refurbishment or Demolition Works ........................................................................... 13

6.4 Maintenance of the Hazardous Building Materials Register ............................................................................ 14

6.5 Suspect Materials or Further Advice ...................................... 14

6.6 Hazardous Material Management Plan ................................. 14

LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 PCB concentration classification ............................................................. 4

Table 3.1 Building descriptions ...................................................................................... 5

Table 4.1 Friable descriptors .............................................................................................6

Table 4.2 Material assessment descriptors ..............................................................6

Table 4.3 Location assessment descriptors ............................................................. 7

Table 4.4 Asbestos risk score descriptors ................................................................. 7

Table 4.5 Friability descriptors .........................................................................................8

Table 4.6 Material assessment descriptors ..............................................................8

Table 4.7 Location assessment descriptors .............................................................8

Table 4.8 Other hazardous building materials risk score descriptors ..............................................................................................................8

Table 4.9 Recommended risk controls - actions .................................................9

LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A hazardous Materials Register

Appendix B Photographs

Appendix C Plans

Appendix D NATA Laboratory

PROJECT NO BUILDING 75 LAUNDRY, AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LENNOX CROSSING ACTON ACT HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BUILDING ASSESSMENT AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 1

1 INTRODUCTION WSP Australia Pty Ltd was commissioned by Facilities and Services of Australian National University (ANU) to undertake Hazardous Materials Re-surveys of property within the precinct of the University property portfolio. This report outlines the findings of the re-survey of Building 75A Laundry – Lennox Crossing, Acton ACT undertaken by Imam Malik (Occupational Hygiene Consultant LAA 001048) on the 17th May, 2017.

For the purpose of this report the term hazardous materials (HAZMAT) refers to the following:

— Asbestos containing materials (ACM)

— Lead based paints

— Synthetic mineral fibre (SMF) material

— Light fittings and accessible electrics that may contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) capacitors.

— Ozone depleting substances (ODS)

A complete list of the in-situ and suspected HAZMATs identified during the resurvey, including details about the condition and the risk posed by each situation has been provided in the hazardous materials register, photographs, and certificates of analysis and site plan attached as Appendices C.

No one section or part of a section of this report should be taken as giving an overall idea of this report. Each section must be read in conjunction with the whole of this report, including the hazardous materials register and sample results.

1.1 LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS The resurvey works and production of this report have been undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the following documents:

— Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Commonwealth)

— Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (ACT)

— Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 (ACT)

— Safe Work Australia: How to Manage and Control Asbestos in the Workplace: Code of Practice 2016.

— Safe Work Australia: How to Safely Remove Asbestos: Code of Practice 2016.

— Guidance Note on the Membrane Filter Method for Estimating Airborne Asbestos Fibres. 2nd Edition [NOHSC:3003(2005)]

— ANZECC (1997) Identification of PCB-containing Capacitors: An information booklet for Electricians and Electrical Contractors.

— AS 1319, Standards Association of Australia, Rules for the Design and Use of Safety Signs for the Occupational Environment

— AS 1715, Standards Association of Australia, Selection, Use and Maintenance of Respiratory Protective Devices

— AS 1716, Standards Association of Australia, Respiratory Protective Devices

— AS 2601 Demolition of Structures


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 2

— AS 4361.1 Guide to Lead Paint Management, Part 1: Industrial Application 1995

— AS 4361.2 Guide to Lead Paint Management, Part 2: Residential and Commercial Buildings 1998

— National Code of Practice for the Control and Safe Use of Inorganic Lead at Work [NOHSC:2015(1994)].

— AIOH positional paper: Synthetic Mineral Fibres and Occupational Health Issues 2011

— NOHSC (1989b). Guidance Note on the Membrane Filter Method for the Estimation of Airborne Synthetic Mineral Fibres. [NOHSC:3006 (1989)] June 1989

— National Standard for Synthetic Mineral Fibres [NOSHC:1004 (1990)].

— National Code of Practice for the Safe Use of Synthetic Mineral Fibres [NOSHC:2006 (1990)].

— AS 3640 Workplace atmospheres - Methods for sampling and gravimetric determination of inhalable dust 2009

1.2 SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of the hazardous material survey were to:

— Undertake a re-survey of the site to identify and assess hazardous materials

— Assessment of HAZMAT previously identified in the supplied HAZMAT register

— Undertake an initial HAZMAT survey of the site where a previous HAZMAT register is not available

— Visual assessment of suspect HAZMAT including screening of lead based paint using NATA accredited laboratory

— Sampling of representative materials suspected of containing asbestos or lead

— Perform a risk assessment of HAZMAT identified in accordance with the ANU adopted HAZMAT risk assessment descriptors and ratings

— Update the existing or prepare a new HAZMAT Register for the site

— Provide a semi-quantitative risk assessment of the HAZMAT identified

— Provide recommendations for the management of HAZMAT identified.

1.3 WSP APPROACH ANU provided WSP with the current asbestos and hazardous building materials registers for Building 75A Laundry. It should be noted that WSP has inspected the sites using data supplied from the survey carried out by Safe Work & Environments Pty Ltd (SWE) in 2015 and subsequent reinspections. WSP can provide no assurances on the accuracy of previous sampling regimes and analysis results.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 3

2 RESURVEY METHODOLOGY

2.1 HAZMAT REGISTER REVIEW Where available the existing HAZMAT register was supplied for the site. Where a previous HAZMAT survey had not been performed, WSP surveyors developed a register through an initial HAZMAT survey of the site. All amendments to the original register including updated risk assessment, location description and new HAZMAT identified are denoted by red colour text.

2.2 SITE INSPECTION The identification of hazardous materials involves a combination of visual inspection of the accessible areas of the building/structure and the collection of representative samples of the suspect materials for the purpose of analytical confirmation. Where identical suspect materials are detected at different locations, visual confirmation only may have been made rather than additional sample collection.

Access was made only where safe access by solid floors, decking, walkways, protected catwalks or ladders was available. Minimal to no disturbance of any equipment was undertaken as part of the survey as all plant, electrical installations, pipe-work and associated equipment were considered live at the time of the survey.

Access through the buildings and structures on the site was made by systematic walkthrough.

2.3 IDENTIFICATION OF MATERIAL

2.3.1 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS (ACM’S)

Representative samples of materials suspected to contain asbestos were collected and analysed at WSP NATA Accredited Laboratory. The identification of asbestos fibres was based on using Polarised Light Microscopy supplemented with Dispersion Staining techniques. This is detailed in Australian Standard 4964-2004 ‘Method for the qualitative identification of asbestos in bulk samples’. Asbestos samples were only collected for analysis where the safety of personnel would not be compromised. Sampling was conducted in accordance with the WSP in house survey guide, SafeWork Australia’s Code of Practice, ‘How to Manage and Control Asbestos in the Workplace’ and the United Kingdom Health & Safety Executive publication, ‘HSG 264: Asbestos: The survey guide’.

2.3.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT

Painted surfaces were sampled to provide a concentration of the surface paint layer. Where XRF screening indicated a concentration of lead greater than 10,000 parts per million (1.0 % w/w) and flaking was observed, additional sampling of the suspect paint layer was undertaken.

Representative samples of paint were analysed at Envirolab Services NATA Accredited Laboratory. Laboratory analysis of lead based paints is used to achieve a reportable weight by weight percentage of lead throughout the paint layers and is reported against AS 4361.-1998 Guide to lead Paint Management, Part 2: Commercial and Residential Buildings lead containing paint system level of 1.0 per cent (w/w) of the dried film.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 4

Sampling was conducted in accordance with the WSP’s in house survey guide and AS 4361.2-1998 Guide to lead Paint Management, Part 2: Commercial and Residential Buildings.

Sampling methodology will consider the various paint coats and record these layers accordingly, these observations will be referred to alongside the analytical sample results to acknowledge that lead paint layers of varying lead content will affect the analytically observed lead weight concentration recorded from the sample. To this end, where multiple lead paint layers have been visually recorded but analytically determined lead percentage of the collective paint layers is below actionable limits, the paint undercoats may still be determined as hazardous due to its dilution in the sample by the non-lead topcoats. Sampling methodology may also consist of the use of a lead paint chemical colorimetric test reagent that can provide an instantaneous result of lead presence within specific layers. This testing will however be used in conjunction with a physical sample to determine the lead concentration as above.

2.3.3 SYNTHETIC MINERAL FIBRES (SMF) MATERIALS

Our experienced surveyors visually identified and recorded the presence of synthetic mineral fibre products onsite. Where required representative samples of suspect SMF were collected and analysed at WSP NATA Accredited Laboratory.

2.3.4 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCB’S)

Where access was available and power was isolated representative examples of each major type of fluorescent light fittings were examined to determine which lights were fitted with PCB containing ballast capacitors. The details of the brand, model of each capacitor and capacity were recorded and checked against with the ANZECC database of known PCB capacitors and PCB free capacitors. Where safe access was not possible, external components of each fluorescent light fitting were visually assessed by our experience surveyor’s onsite.

The Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council ‘Polychlorinated Biphenyls Management Plan, November 1996’ outlines the National Strategy for the management of PCBs.

The document defines PCB materials and wastes as follows:

Table 2.1 PCB concentration classification

PCB concentration Waste classification

100,000 mg/kg (10%) - Concentrated PCB material.

2.3.5 OZONE DEPLETING SUBSTANCES (ODS)

The identification of potentially ODS-containing items, such as industrial refrigerators and air conditioning units, were not included in the scope of services of this resurvey. Where ODS-containing items have been previously identified at the site they have been included in the updated HAZMAT register.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 5

3 SITE DESCRIPTION The site is located at Building 75A Laundry, Lennox Crossing, Acton in the Australian Capital Territory 2600. The survey was restricted to buildings owned and managed by ANU. Details of the buildings are presented below:

Table 3.1 Building descriptions

Building Building description

Building 75A Laundry

Single storey fibro/wood structure, corrugated steel roof, mix of plaster and fibro cement ceiling ling and internal wall.

3.1 SURVEY RESTRICTIONS The resurvey was limited to the buildings listed above. The resurvey was not fully intrusive and therefore certain areas were not accessible including:

— areas of height deemed not safely accessible via a risk assessment in accordance with the SafeWork ACT Code of Practice: Managing the risk of falls at workplaces, July 2015

— confined spaces as defined within the SafeWork ACT Code of Practice: Confined Spaces, February 2016

— all areas below ground or soil surfaces

— within air conditioning units and ductwork

— internal wall cavities

— internal subfloor cavities

— electrical equipment

— ceiling space – height restricted


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 6

4 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RISK ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTORS AND RATINGS

The descriptors in the following tables were used by SWE and subsequent consultants to assess the risk associated with the identified HAZMAT during the last site inspection.

In order to avoid inconsistencies with any potential overarching Hazardous Building Materials Management Plans that may exist, the same descriptors have been adopted in order to assess the risks for each identified hazardous building material and hence, the recommended risk management controls. For the purpose of this resurvey WSP have adopted the ANU approved descriptors outlined in the following tables.

For full details of the locations, analysis results, condition, accessibility and risks associated with the identified HAZMATs, please refer to the attached Hazardous Buildings Materials Register.

4.1 ASBESTOS Table 4.1 Friable descriptors

Item Score Description

Friable Y Asbestos cement debris, or material which when dry may become crumbled, pulverised or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

N Bonded i.e. non-friable material

Table 4.2 Material assessment descriptors


Asbestos Type 0 No asbestos

1 Chrysotile only

2 Amphibole asbestos (excluding crocidolite)

3 Crocidolite

Product type 0 No asbestos detected

1 Bonded asbestos in good condition

2 Friable asbestos in good condition or cement in poor condition

3 Friable asbestos in poor condition

Extent of Damage 0 No visible damage

1 Minor scratches or mark, broken edges

2 Significant breakage, many small areas of damage to friable material

3 High damage, visible debris


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 7


Surface Treatment 0 Bonded Asbestos including encapsulated asbestos cement

1 Enclosed laggings, sprays and boards or bare cement

2 Bare board or encapsulated lagging/spray or cement debris

3 Unsealed lagging/spray

Table 4.3 Location assessment descriptors


Occupant Activity 0 Rare disturbance, e.g. little used store room

1 Low disturbance, e.g. Office type activity

2 Periodic disturbance, e.g. industrial or vehicular activity which may contact ACMs

3 High levels of disturbance e.g. fire door with AIB sheet in constant use

Likelihood of Disturbance

0 Usually inaccessible or unlikely to be disturbed

1 Minimal likelihood for disturbance

2 Likely disturbance

3 Frequent disturbance

Human Exposure Potential

0 Infrequent

1 Monthly

2 Weekly

3 Daily

Maintenance Activity 0 Minor disturbance (e.g. possibility of contact when gaining access)

1 Low Disturbance (e.g. changing light bulbs in asbestos insulating board (AIB) ceiling).

2 Medium disturbance (e.g. lifting one or two ceiling tiles to access a valve)

3 High level of disturbance (e.g. moving a number of AIB ceiling tiles to replace a valve or for re-cabling)

The asbestos containing material risk score is a quantitative assessment determined by the sum of the scores based on the Materials and Location Assessments; i.e. Risk score = Material Score + Location Score (out of as possible 24).

Should no asbestos be detected then the register will indicate a risk score of 0.

Table 4.4 Asbestos risk score descriptors


Risk 0 – 6 Very Low Risk

7 – 12 Low Risk

13 – 18 Medium Risk

19 – 24 High Risk


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 8

4.2 OTHER HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS

Other hazardous building materials, with the exception of asbestos.

Table 4.5 Friability descriptors


Friable Y Unsealed SMF

N Sealed SMF

NA Applicable to Ozone Depleting Substances, PCB, Lead in paint

Table 4.6 Material assessment descriptors


Extent of Damage G Good condition

Av Average condition

P Poor condition

Surface Treatment Y Sealed

P Part sealed

N Not sealed

Table 4.7 Location assessment descriptors


Occupant Activity H High traffic area

M Medium traffic area

L Low traffic area

The other hazardous building materials risk score is a qualitative assessment determined by the combination of Material and Location Assessments. Depending on the material one or all of these criteria may be used in assessing the recommended Action.

Table 4.8 Other hazardous building materials risk score descriptors


Risk Score L Low exposure risk

M Medium exposure risk

H High exposure risk


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 9

4.3 RECOMMENDED RISK CONTROLS In accordance with the previous hazardous materials building reports WSP has adopted the same recommended risk controls as those documented during the last inspection.

Following the assessment for both asbestos containing and other hazardous building materials an action score is assigned. The action score will be assigned according to the surveyor’s assessment of the situation.

Table 4.9 Recommended risk controls - actions

Descriptor Item Action

A1 Action 1 Restrict access and remove

As a guide, the material conforms to one, or more, of the following:

Friable or poorly bonded to substrate, located in accessible areas;

Severely water damaged, or unstable;

Further damage or deterioration likely;

Friable asbestos material located in air conditioning ducting;

Asbestos debris and stored asbestos in reasonably accessible areas;

Significant peeling and Flaking Lead Paint in areas that pose immediate risk to children/resident. Removal considered lead risk work.

A2 Action 2 Enclose, encapsulate or seal by licensed contractors

Reinspect Periodically


Damaged material;

In reasonably accessible area;

Friable material or poorly bonded to substrate, with bonding achievable;

Possibility of disturbance through contact;

Possibility of deterioration caused by weathering;

Large areas of peeling and flaking lead paint in an area that poses high risk. Removal considered lead risk work.

A3 Action 3 Remove during refurbishment or maintenance

Enclose, encapsulate or seal by general maintenance contractors

Reinspect Periodically


Asbestos debris or stored material in rarely accessed areas;

Further disturbance or damage unlikely other than during maintenance or service;

Readily visible for further assessment;

Asbestos friction materials, gaskets and brake linings;

Small/moderate areas of peeling and flaking lead paint in an area that poses low risk. Remedial works suitable by a general maintenance contractor.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 10

A4 Action 4 No remedial action – Reinspect Periodically


Firmly bonded to substrate and readily visible for inspection;

Inaccessible and fully contained;

Stable and damage unlikely.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 11

5 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS

5.1 SCOPE OF SERVICE This hazardous materials control plan (‘the report’) has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services set out in the contract, or as otherwise agreed, between the Client and WSP (‘scope of services’). In some circumstances the scope of services may have been limited by a range of factors such as time, budget, access and/or site disturbance constraints.

5.2 RELIANCE ON DATA In preparing the report, WSP has relied upon data, surveys, analyses, designs, plans and other information including the HAZMAT register for the site provided by the Client, most of which are referred to in the report (‘the data’). Except as otherwise stated in the report, WSP has not verified the accuracy or completeness of the data. To the extent that the statements, opinions, facts, information, conclusions and/or recommendations in the report (‘conclusions’) are based in whole or part on the data, those conclusions are contingent upon the accuracy and completeness of the data. WSP will not be liable in relation to incorrect conclusions should any data, information or condition be incorrect or have been concealed, withheld, misrepresented or otherwise not fully disclosed to WSP.

5.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CONCLUSIONS The conclusions are based upon the data and visual observations and are therefore merely indicative of the environmental condition of the site at the time of preparing the report, including the presence or otherwise of contaminants or emissions.

Within the limitations imposed by the scope of services, the assessment of the site and preparation of this report have been undertaken and performed in a professional manner, in accordance with generally accepted practices and using a degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised by reputable environmental consultants under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.

5.4 REPORT FOR BENEFIT OF CLIENT The report has been prepared for the benefit of the Client and no other party. WSP assumes no responsibility and will not be liable to any other person or organisation for or in relation to any matter dealt with or conclusions expressed in the report, or for any loss or damage suffered by any other person or organisation arising from matters dealt with or conclusions expressed in the report (including without limitation matters arising from any negligent act or omission of WSP or for any loss or damage suffered by any other party in relying upon the matters dealt with or conclusions expressed in the report). Other parties should not rely upon the report or the accuracy or completeness of any conclusions and should make their own enquiries and obtain independent advice in relation to such matters.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 12

5.5 OTHER LIMITATIONS WSP will not be liable to update or revise the report to take into account any events, emergent circumstances or facts occurring or becoming apparent after the date of the report.

The scope of services did not include any assessment of the title to nor ownership of the properties, buildings and structures referred to in the report, nor the application or interpretation of laws in the jurisdiction in which those properties, buildings and structures are located.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 13

6 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS

6.1 SITE SSPECIFIC ISSUES For information about site specific issues, please refer to the comments section of the HAZMAT register in Appendix A.

6.2 ADDITIONAL PRECAUTIONARY TESTING If suspected hazardous building materials are encountered during, maintenance, refurbishment or demolition (but are not listed in the asset register), it is recommended to undertake additional precautionary testing. In particular, the following testing should be included:

— Any fibrous or otherwise suspect cement building materials observed on the Site, and not identified in the HAZMAT Register, should be treated as asbestos-cement material or sampled and analysed for asbestos fibres;

— Any bituminous water proofing membranes not identified in the asset asbestos register should be treated as asbestos containing materials or sampled and analysed for asbestos fibres;

— Any building containing old vinyl floor tiles or sheeting that is to be demolished or if the vinyl flooring in these assets is to be removed and upgraded, it is recommended that a sample of the vinyl flooring be collected and analysed for asbestos, particularly the vinyl flooring that is not identified in the asset’s asbestos register. This is required to assess disposal options for the vinyl; and

— Any other material suspected of being a hazard to health, or not specifically listed within the Hazardous Building Materials Registers, should be sampled and analysed prior to any refurbishment, demolition, or other activity with potential to disturb the material.

6.3 PLANNING OF MAINTENANCE, REFURBISHMENT OR DEMOLITION WORKS

With respect to any known or potential hazardous building material, the planning of maintenance, refurbishment or demolition works associated with any asset needs to be undertaken carefully. It should include consideration of the following:

— Requirements of the overarching Hazardous Building Materials Management Plan or similar;

— Recognition that any identified hazardous building material is the minimum amount of material present;

— Subsequent recognition that the scope and limitations of prior hazardous building material survey(s) may result in additional unidentified hazardous materials being present. This may require works to;

— Address known information gaps, such as surveying any previously inaccessible rooms and assuming that asbestos may be present in other areas not generally accessed by previous survey(s), such as wall and ceiling cavities;

— Project team undertaking an HAZMAT risk analysis and incorporating suitable provisions into contract/specifications; and


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 14

— Consider directing the Contractor to undertake an independent HAZMAT survey of the work area (may use existing information) that then adds an additional layer of assurance as well as minimising potential Contractor time and cost variations as works progress.

Prior to demolition or refurbishment all hazardous materials likely to be disturbed by those works should be removed.

6.4 MAINTENANCE OF THE HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS REGISTER

Maintenance of the HAZMAT register is required so that it remains current and any contractors can rely upon it as an accurate representation of HAZMATs present at each asset. In order to continually improve the completeness and accuracy of the HAZMAT register, it is recommended that:

— Action and document the HAZMAT management recommendations made within the registers, particularly where an elevated risk is present with a corresponding recommended timeframe of 12 months or less;

— Add entries related to precautionary testing, if conducted;

— Undertake surveys to determine the presence of HAZMAT in spaces or assets that were not accessible or may not be listed on the HAZMAT register;

— Record the removal or demolition of assets containing HAZMAT;

— Undertake an HAZMAT re-survey once every year (or as otherwise required) to maintain the register and review the level of risk assigned to the particular instance of HAZMAT;

— Record removal and maintenance of HAZMAT; and

— Distribute or otherwise make available all HAZMAT surveys, registers or other relevant information to all employees, visitors, contractors and maintenance people or companies with potential to disturb or work with known or potential asbestos materials.

6.5 SUSPECT MATERIALS OR FURTHER ADVICE Should suspect materials be identified that are not identified within the HAZMAT Registers or supporting systems, then the material should be sampled and analysed for the suspected hazard. If applicable, any associated works with potential to disturb the material are to cease and the area made safe. If the suspect material has already been disturbed, then the overarching provisions of the Hazardous Building Materials Management Plan or similar is to be followed, including advice sought from a suitably qualified and experienced professional. If in doubt or unsure of any issue involving known, potential or suspect hazardous materials then works should cease and advice sought.

6.6 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Refer to the Hazardous Materials Management Plan for the ANU Management Practices.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 1

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS REGISTER

Building 75A Laundry - Australian Nation University ACT IHT

Building Name

Property Address17-May-17

Property Description Imam Malik

Event Location Application Material Description Sample Number Analytical Result Photo Extent Estimate FriabilityMaterial

ConditionRisk Status

Control

PriorityControl Recommendations/ Comments

Consultant /

Hygienist nameControl action taken Date actioned Contractor details

1 Electrical fuse box to laundry Resinous electrical backing board Electrical backing board No Sample taken Presumed 4




Control


Consultant /


11 Exterior laundry, front weatherboard wall Yellow paint Paint PB-235003 12 % w/w - - NA Good Low Low

All external building surfaces remediated and

repainted during August - October 2017. The lead

base paint was encapsulated beneath a new non-

lead paint.

Maintain in good condition and inspect regularly.

Imam Malik

Scrapping and encapsulation of lead based

paint was conducted on August - October

2017.

31-10-17

Hertiage Painters & AGH

Demolition & Asbestos

Removal Pty Ltd

12 Exterior laundry, front window frame Green paint Paint PB-235004 22 % w/w - - NA Good Low Low




lead paint.


Imam Malik



2017.

31-10-17



Removal Pty Ltd

13 Exterior laundry, rear weatherboard wall Yellow paint Paint PB-235005 2.1 % w/w - - NA Good Low Low




lead paint.


Imam Malik



2017.

31-10-17



Removal Pty Ltd

14 Exterior laundry, piping Yellow paint Paint PB-235006 15 % w/w - - NA Good Low Low




lead paint.


Imam Malik



2017.

31-10-17



Removal Pty Ltd

15 Exterior laundry, southern window frame Yellow and white paint Paint PB-235007 1.7 % w/w - - NA Good Low Low




lead paint.


Imam Malik



2017.

31-10-17



Removal Pty Ltd

16 Exterior laundry, gable end Yellow paint Paint PB-235009 18 % w/w - - NA Good Low Low




lead paint.


Imam Malik



2017.

31-10-17



Removal Pty Ltd

17 Exterior laundry, roof Green paint Paint PB-235011 5.8 % w/w - - NA Fair Low Med

Recommendations to either 1) Encapsulate and/or

monitor the status on the paint, 2) Remove in

accordance with state and national guidelines.

18 Interior laundry, lower section walls White paint Paint PB-235013 6.2 % w/w - - NA Good Low Low

The lead base paint was encapsulated beneath a

new non-lead paint during lead remediation on

August - October 2017.


Imam Malik



2017.

31-10-17



Removal Pty Ltd

19 Interior laundry, panel above wash sink White paint Paint PB-235017 6.3 % w/w - - NA Good Low Low

The lead base paint was encapsulated beneath a

new non-lead paint during lead remediation on

August - October 2017.


Imam Malik



2017.

31-10-17



Removal Pty Ltd

20 Interior laundry, upper section walls White paint Paint PB-235013 6.2 % w/w - - - - - -

Removed.

Refer to Hazaroud Materials Remediation Clearance

Certificate - 17 07 30 2270971_ANU Bld75A

Gallery Shed.

Imam Malik

Removal of lead containing material to the

Laundry ceiling and internal upper walls

was conducted on the 29-30 July 2017

30-07-17

AGH Demolition &

Asbestos Removal Pty

Ltd

21 Interior laundry, ceiling White paint Paint PB-235016 15 % w/w - - - - - -

Removed.

Refer to Hazaroud Materials Remediation Clearance

Certificate - 17 07 30 2270971_ANU Bld75A

Gallery Shed.

Imam Malik

Removal of lead containing material to the

Laundry ceiling and internal upper walls

was conducted on the 29-30 July 2017

30-07-17

AGH Demolition &


Ltd

22 Exterior laundry, piping Red paint Green paint PB-235008




Control


Consultant /


27 Interior laundry, on top of soap dispenser Lead Dust PB-235018 3.2 mg/m2 - < 1m - - - - No further action required.

28Interior laundry, on top of shelving

attached to wallLead Dust PB-235019 1.8 mg/m2 - < 1m - - - - No further action required.

29 Northern side exterior of building Lead Soil PB-235036 410mg/kg - Throughout - - - -

Remediated.

Refer to validation sample LS1, LS2, S1A & S2A.


08/05/2018

Anton Delac & Imam

Malik

Soil remediation conducted from September

2017 - February 2018. 07-02-18

AGH Demolition &


Ltd

30 Western side exterior of building Lead Soil PB-235039 7200mg/kg - Throughout - - - -

Remediated.

Refer to validation sample LS3, LS4 & S3A.


08/05/2018

Anton Delac & Imam

Malik


2017 - February 2018. 07-02-18

AGH Demolition &


Ltd

31 Southern side exterior of building Lead Soil PB-235038 4200mg/kg - Throughout - - - -

Remediated.

Refer to validation sample LV17, LV18, S4A & S5A.


08/05/2018

Anton Delac & Imam

Malik


2017 - February 2018. 07-02-18

AGH Demolition &


Ltd

32 Eastern side exterior of building Lead Soil PB-235037 250mg/kg - Throughout - - - -

Remediated.

Refer to validation sample S6 & S6A.


08/05/2018

Anton Delac & Imam

Malik


2017 - February 2018. 07-02-18

AGH Demolition &


Ltd

33North exterior of laundry shed, east side

closest to wall (validation sample)Lead Soil LS1 510mg/kg - Throughout - - - -


The remaining lead in soil is below HIL of 600mg/kg

for buidling classified as Recreational C.

34North exterior of laundry shed, west side





35West side of laundry shed, north side



36West side of laundry shed, south side



37South exterior of laundry shed, west side

closest to wall (validation sample)Lead Soil LV17 400mg/kg - Throughout - - - -




38South exterior of laundry shed, east side

closest to wall (validation sample)Lead Soil LV18 80mg/kg - Throughout - - - -


39East side of laundry shed closest to wall

(validation sample)Lead Soil S6 67mg/lg - Throughout - - - -


40North exterior of laundry shed, east side

away from wall (validation sample)Lead Soil S1A 13mg/kg - Throughout - - - -


41North exterior of laundry shed, west side



42West side of laundry shed away from wall

(validation sample)Lead Soil S3A 63mg/kg - Throughout - - - -


43South exterior of laundry shed, east side



44South exterior of laundry shed, west side



45East side of laundry shed away from wall

(validation sample)Lead Soil S6A 16mg/kg - Throughout - - - -


Lead Content in Soil

ACM - Asbestos Containing Material, CH - Chrysotile, A - Amosite, C - Crocidolite, PCB's - Polychlorinated Biphenyls, ODS - Ozone Depleting Substances, NAD - No Asbestos Detected, Pr - Presumed, OF - Organic Fibres Page 3 of 4


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 2

PHOTOGRAPHS


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 3

Photograph 1 – Interior, ceiling to laundry. Chrysotile Asbestos Detected.

Photograph 2 – Interior, top wall panels. Chrysotile Asbestos Detected.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 4

Photograph 3 – Interior, vinyl flooring. Chrysotile Asbestos Detected.

Photograph 4 – Exterior, electrical backing board to fuse box. Presumed asbestos.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 5

Photograph 5 – Exterior, paint to entrance door. 9.1% Lead Detected.

Photograph 6 – Exterior, paint to door and window frames. 1.2% Lead Detected.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 6

Photograph 7 – Exterior, paint to weatherboard. 12% Lead Detected.

Photograph 8 – Exterior, paint to window frame. 2.2% Lead Detected.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 7

Photograph 9 – Exterior, paint to weatherboard. 2.1% Lead Detected.

Photograph 10 – Exterior, paint to piping. 15% Lead Detected.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 8

Photograph 11 – Exterior, paint to window frame. 1.7% Lead Detected.

Photograph 12 – Exterior, paint to gable end. 18% Lead Detected.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 9

Photograph 13 – Exterior, paint to roof. 5.8% Lead Detected.

Photograph 14 – Interior, paint to walls. 6.2% Lead Detected.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 10

Photograph 15 – Interior, paint to ceiling. 15% Lead Detected.

Photograph 16 – Interior, panel above wash sink. 6.3% Lead Detected.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 11

Photograph 17 – Exterior, soil from northern side of the building. 410mg/kg Lead Detected.

Photograph 18 – Exterior, soil from southern side of the building. 4200mg/kg Lead Detected.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 12

Photograph 17 – Exterior, soil from western side of the building. 7200mg/kg Lead Detected.


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 13

PLANS

PB-235001PB-235002

PB- 235004PB-235051

PB-235003

PB-235005

PB-235006

PB-235012

PB-235007

PB-235008PB-235009PB-235010

PB-228052PB-235017PB-235018

PB-235016

PB-228054

PB-228053PB-235013

Electrical fuse box

PB-235011

PB-235014PB-235015

PB-235019

PB-235038

PB-235037

PB-235036

PB-235039


WSP JUNE 2017

PAGE 14

NATA LABORATORY

Lab No Sample ID Location Sample Description Sample Dimensions Identification Type

001 PB-228051 Exterior window to laundry Mastic 4.7 gm NAD Trace

002 PB-228052 Sheeting to laundry ceiling Fibre Cement Sheet 1.7 gm CH

003 PB-228053 Sheeting to laundry wall Fibre Cement Sheet 2.1 gm CH

004 PB-228054 Tile flooring to laundry Vinyl Tiles 17.2 gm CH, CH Trace

005 PB-228055 Exterior wall panel to building 75A Fibre Cement Sheet 1.6 gm CH

TEST METHOD: Qualitative identification of Asbestos fibre in bulk and soil samples at WSP Corporate Laboratories, by polarised light microscopy, including dispersion staining techniques using AS4964 (2004) and supplementary in house laboratory procedure (LP1 - Identification of Asbestos Fibres). This document is issued in accordance with NATA's requirements under NATA accreditation No. 17199, accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC: 17025. The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included in this document are traceable to Australian/national standard.

DATE\S SAMPLED:

DATE RECEIVED:

DATE ANALYSED:

ORDER NUMBER:

SAMPLED BY:

18/05/2017

19/05/2017

n/a

17/05/2017

Lauren SmithCONTACT:

EMAIL:

TELEPHONE: 0448588446

[email protected]

Garry Miller

ANU, Acton ACT 2600CLIENT ADDRESS:

Australian National UniversityCLIENT:

Page 1 of 1

Notes:If no asbestos is detected in vinyl tiles, mastics, sealants, epoxy resins and ore samples then confirmation by another independent analytical technique is advised due to the nature of the samples.The results contained within this report relate only to the sample(s) submitted for testing. WSP accepts no responsibility for the initial collection, packaging or transportation of samples submitted by external persons. This document may not be reproduced except in full.

AUTHORISATION DATE

Approved Identifier

Name: Sapna Dutta

Approved Signatory

Laura Wilson-DennisName:

19/05/2017

NADCHACUMFSMFOF

-------

No Asbestos DetectedChrysotile Asbestos DetectedAmosite Asbestos DetectedCrocidolite Asbestos DetectedUnknown Mineral Fibres DetectedSynthetic Mineral Fibres DetectedOrganic Fibres Detected

LEGEND:

Hand picked refers to small discrete amounts of asbestos distributed unevenly in a large body of non asbestos material.

Certificate of Analysis

Level 1 121 Marcus Clarke StreetPO Box 1551 Canberra ACT 2600Telephone +61 2 6201 9600Facsimile +61 2 6201 9666Email [email protected]

WSP AustraliaPty Limited

ABN 80 078 004 798

NCSI Certified Quality System ISO 9001

CERTIFICATE NO: ACT-2270971A-0001-67668LOCATION: ANU - Lennox Crossing, Building 75A and Laundry

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 167513

Client:

WSP Australia Pty Limited

Level 2,

54 Marcus Clarke St

Canberra

ACT 2600

Attention: Garry Miller, Warran Lal

Sample log in details:

Your Reference: ANU - Lennox Crossing, 75A and Laundry

No. of samples: 32 Paints

Date samples received / completed instructions received 19/05/17 / 19/05/17

Analysis Details:

Please refer to the following pages for results, methodology summary and quality control data.

Samples were analysed as received from the client. Results relate specifically to the samples as received.

Results are reported on a dry weight basis for solids and on an as received basis for other matrices.

Please refer to the last page of this report for any comments relating to the results.

Report Details:

Date results requested by: / Issue Date: 22/05/17 / 22/05/17

Date of Preliminary Report: Not Issued

NATA accreditation number 2901. This document shall not be reproduced except in full.

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 - Testing Tests not covered by NATA are denoted with *.

Results Approved By:

Page 1 of 7Envirolab Reference: 167513

Revision No: R 00

Client Reference: ANU - Lennox Crossing, 75A and Laundry

Lead in Paint

Our Reference: UNITS 167513-1 167513-2 167513-3 167513-4 167513-5

Your Reference ------------

-

PB-235001 PB-235002 PB-235003 PB-235004 PB-235005

Date Sampled ------------ 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017

Type of sample Paint Paint Paint Paint Paint

Date prepared - 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017

Date analysed - 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017

Lead in paint %w/w 9.1 1.2 12 22 21

Lead in Paint



-

PB-235006 PB-235007 PB-235008 PB-235009 PB-235010

Date Sampled ------------ 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017


Date prepared - 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017

Date analysed - 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017

Lead in paint %w/w 15 1.7


Lead in Paint



-

PB-235029 PB-235030 PB-235031 PB-235032 PB-235033

Date Sampled ------------ 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017


Date prepared - 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017

Date analysed - 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017

Lead in paint %w/w 10 7.4 11 0.5 15

Lead in Paint

Our Reference: UNITS 167513-31 167513-32


-

PB-235034 PB-235035

Date Sampled ------------ 17/05/2017 17/05/2017

Type of sample Paint Paint

Date prepared - 19/05/2017 19/05/2017

Date analysed - 19/05/2017 19/05/2017

Lead in paint %w/w 0.67 2.0


Revision No: R 00


Method ID Methodology Summary

Metals-004 Digestion of Paint chips/scrapings/liquids for Metals determination by ICP-AES/MS and or CV/AAS.


Revision No: R 00


QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate

Sm#

Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike %

Recovery

Lead in Paint Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD

Date prepared - 19/05/2

017

167513-5 19/05/2017 || 19/05/2017 LCS-1 19/05/2017

Date analysed - 19/05/2

017

167513-5 19/05/2017 || 19/05/2017 LCS-1 19/05/2017

Lead in paint %w/w 0.05 Metals-004


Report Comments:

Acid Extractable Metals in Paint: Minimal sample was supplied for sample #22 (


Quality Control Definitions

Blank: This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents,

glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as for samples.

Duplicate : This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sample

selected should be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable.

Matrix Spike : A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix

spike is to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferences exist.

LCS (Laboratory Control Sample) : This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blank

sand or water) fortified with analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample.

Surrogate Spike: Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds

which are similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.

Laboratory Acceptance Criteria

Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency

to meet or exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batches of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix

spike recoveries for the batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.

Filters, swabs, wipes, tubes and badges will not have duplicate data as the whole sample is generally extracted

during sample extraction.

Spikes for Physical and Aggregate Tests are not applicable.

For VOCs in water samples, three vials are required for duplicate or spike analysis.

Duplicates: 5xPQL - 0-50% RPD is acceptable.

Matrix Spikes, LCS and Surrogate recoveries: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140%

for organics (+/-50% surrogates) and 10-140% for labile SVOCs (including labile surrogates), ultra trace organics

and speciated phenols is acceptable.

In circumstances where no duplicate and/or sample spike has been reported at 1 in 10 and/or 1 in 20 samples

respectively, the sample volume submitted was insufficient in order to satisfy laboratory QA/QC protocols.

When samples are received where certain analytes are outside of recommended technical holding times (THTs),

the analysis has proceeded. Where analytes are on the verge of breaching THTs, every effort will be made to analyse

within the THT or as soon as practicable.

Where sampling dates are not provided, Envirolab are not in a position to comment on the validity

of the analysis where recommended technical holding times may have been breached.

Measurement Uncertainty estimates are available for most tests upon request.


Revision No: R 00


Client:


Level 2,

54 Marcus Clarke St

Canberra

ACT 2600

Attention: Garry Miller, Warren Lal


Your Reference: ANU - Lennox Crossing

No. of samples: 5 swabs


Analysis Details:





Report Details:







Revision No: R 00

Client Reference: ANU - Lennox Crossing

Lead in swab



-

PB-235018 PB-235019 PB-235027 PB-235044 PB-235051

Date Sampled ------------ 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017

Type of sample Swab Swab Swab Swab Swab

Date prepared - 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017

Date analysed - 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017

Lead in Swabs µg/swab 32 18 400 36 77


Revision No: R 00



Metals-005 Digestion of Dust wipes/swabs and /or miscellaneous samples for Metals determination by ICP-AES/MS

and/or CV-AAS


Revision No: R 00



Sm#


Recovery

Lead in swab Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD


017

[NT] [NT] LCS-1 19/05/2017


017

[NT] [NT] LCS-1 19/05/2017

Lead in Swabs µg/swa

b

1 Metals-005


Report Comments:

Asbestos ID was analysed by Approved Identifier: Not applicable for this job

Asbestos ID was authorised by Approved Signatory: Not applicable for this job

INS: Insufficient sample for this test PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit NT: Not tested

NR: Test not required RPD: Relative Percent Difference NA: Test not required

: Greater than LCS: Laboratory Control Sample


Revision No: R 00











Surrogate Spike: Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds

which are similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.

Laboratory Acceptance Criteria

Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency

to meet or exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batches of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix

spike recoveries for the batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.

Filters, swabs, wipes, tubes and badges will not have duplicate data as the whole sample is generally extracted

during sample extraction.

Spikes for Physical and Aggregate Tests are not applicable.

For VOCs in water samples, three vials are required for duplicate or spike analysis.

Duplicates: 5xPQL - 0-50% RPD is acceptable.

Matrix Spikes, LCS and Surrogate recoveries: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140%

for organics (+/-50% surrogates) and 10-140% for labile SVOCs (including labile surrogates), ultra trace organics

and speciated phenols is acceptable.

In circumstances where no duplicate and/or sample spike has been reported at 1 in 10 and/or 1 in 20 samples

respectively, the sample volume submitted was insufficient in order to satisfy laboratory QA/QC protocols.

When samples are received where certain analytes are outside of recommended technical holding times (THTs),

the analysis has proceeded. Where analytes are on the verge of breaching THTs, every effort will be made to analyse

within the THT or as soon as practicable.

Where sampling dates are not provided, Envirolab are not in a position to comment on the validity

of the analysis where recommended technical holding times may have been breached.

Measurement Uncertainty estimates are available for most tests upon request.


Revision No: R 00


Client:


Level 2,

54 Marcus Clarke St

Canberra

ACT 2600

Attention: Garry Miller, Warran Lal


Your Reference: ANU - Lennox Crossing

No. of samples: 10 soils


Analysis Details:





Report Details:







Revision No: R 00


Acid Extractable metals in soil



-

PB-235036 PB-235037 PB-235038 PB-235039 PB-235040

Date Sampled ------------ 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017

Type of sample Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Date prepared - 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017

Date analysed - 20/05/2017 20/05/2017 20/05/2017 20/05/2017 20/05/2017

Lead mg/kg 410 250 4,200 7,200 310

Acid Extractable metals in soil



-

PB-235041 PB-235042 PB-235043 PB-235050 PB-235045

Date Sampled ------------ 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017


Date prepared - 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017

Date analysed - 20/05/2017 20/05/2017 20/05/2017 20/05/2017 20/05/2017

Lead mg/kg 3,100 39 190 2,300 510


Revision No: R 00


Moisture



-

PB-235036 PB-235037 PB-235038 PB-235039 PB-235040

Date Sampled ------------ 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017


Date prepared - 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017

Date analysed - 22/05/2017 22/05/2017 22/05/2017 22/05/2017 22/05/2017

Moisture % 14 2.9 17 7.7 2.5

Moisture



-

PB-235041 PB-235042 PB-235043 PB-235050 PB-235045

Date Sampled ------------ 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017 17/05/2017


Date prepared - 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017 19/05/2017

Date analysed - 22/05/2017 22/05/2017 22/05/2017 22/05/2017 22/05/2017

Moisture % 12 6.1 0.2 2.1 4.6


Revision No: R 00



Metals-020 Determination of various metals by ICP-AES.

Inorg-008 Moisture content determined by heating at 105+/-5 °C for a minimum of 12 hours.


Revision No: R 00



Sm#


Recovery

Acid Extractable metals

in soil

Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD


017

167517-1 19/05/2017 || 19/05/2017 LCS-15 19/05/2017


017

167517-1 20/05/2017 || 20/05/2017 LCS-15 20/05/2017

Lead mg/kg 1 Metals-020


Report Comments:

Acid Extractable Metals in Soil:

# Percent recovery is not possible to report due to the high concentration

of the element/s in the sample/s. However an acceptable recovery was

obtained for the LCS.

Asbestos ID was analysed by Approved Identifier: Not applicable for this job

Asbestos ID was authorised by Approved Signatory: Not applicable for this job

INS: Insufficient sample for this test PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit NT: Not tested

NR: Test not required RPD: Relative Percent Difference NA: Test not required

: Greater than LCS: Laboratory Control Sample


Revision No: R 00











Surrogate Spike: Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank

Documents

Acton Campus Building #75A Laundry Hazardous Materials Report · Date Scope/Location Carried out by Result/Comments Entered by 14/05/2017 Hazardous Materials Survey Imam Malik - WSP