1
INVASIVE MICROWAVE MEASUREMENT OF SOIL ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPERTIES AND CORRELATION WITH PHYSICAL QUANTITIES K. Clay, M. Farid, A. N. Alshawabkeh , C. M. Rappaport Contact Info: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] This work was supported in part by CenSSIS, the Center for Subsurface Sensing and Imaging systems, under the Engineering Research Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award Number EEC-9986821) R1 R2 O verview ofthe Strategic Research Plan O verview ofthe Strategic Research Plan Fundam ental Science Fundam ental Science Validating TestBEDs Validating TestBEDs L1 L1 L2 L2 L3 L3 R3 S1 S4 S5 S3 S2 Bio-M ed Enviro-Civil ABSTRACT Modeling detailed spatial distributions and dynamics of the soil properties in the inherently inhomogeneous subsurface requires extensive site characterization. Characterizing this variability with conventional methods is invasive and thus, time consuming, costly, and subject to a large degree of uncertainty due to lack of densely populated sampled insitu measurements thus the need for none or less invasive techniques. It is known that the propagation of electromagnetic waves through a material is dependent on the electrical and magnetic properties of the material. These properties are dielectric permittivity, electrical conductivity and magnetic permeability. There is also need for correlation of measured EM properties to physical and mechanical properties of the soil. Most of these parameters are frequency dependent thus broad band frequency dielectric permittivity and conductivity is vital. INTRODUCTION Microwave measurements refer to electromagnetic measurements conducted at frequencies in the micro wave region. This region lies between 300MHz and 300GHz. In the electromagnetic spectrum for frequency and wavelength, the position of microwaves lies between radio waves and infrared. This region is bounded at the long-wavelength end by the radio wave region, and at the short- wavelength end by the infrared region. The interaction of microwaves with materials and structures is best described in terms of waves. Therefore microwave measurements such as amplitude and phase measurements of transmitted or reflected waves by the specimen, will contain information about internal flaws, material composition, structure, density, porosity, homogeneity, orientation, state of cure, and moisture content, as well as the geometry of the specimen. The fact that microwaves are sensitive to such a large number of material properties leads to a number of possible applications. , , x x E z E _ 2 2 _ 2 j w j w j w jw jw o r 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ) ( jw w j j 2 2 2 w 2 2 w 2 1 2 1 1 2 w 2 1 2 1 1 2 w PLANE WAVE PROPAGATION IN LOSSY MEDIA The propagation properties of an electromagnetic wave such as its phase velocity up and wavelength, are governed by the angular frequency w and the three constitutive parameters of the medium: To examine wave propagation in a conducting medium, we return to the wave equation give by 2 2 w w w f w w w 2 2 f LOW-LOSS DIELECTRIC AND GOOD CONDUCTOR When the medium is called a low-loss dielectric and when the medium is characterized as a good conductor. For a low-loss dielectric, For a good conductor , 1 , 1 SOILBED FACILITY AND LABORATORY MEASUREMENT SYSTEM The SoilBED testing facility has dimensions of 150 cm width by 120 cm depth by 275 cm length (5 ft x 4 x 9 ft). The longitudinal walls of the facility are made of reinforced concrete while the transverse walls and the gate to the small injection trench are made of 3.8 cm (1.5 in) thick acrylic sheets. The facility is filled with sand as the homogeneous and isotropic soil media. The laboratory measurement system is an Agilent 8714ES RF Network Analyzer (NA) and a computer for data acquisition using a Microsoft Excel based system. A NA is an instrument which measures the complex transmission and reflection characteristics of two-port devices in the frequency domain for the frquecy range 300kHz-3GHz. Its connected to connected to a 12 channel Agilent 87050ES multiport test set on which 12 co-axial cables are connected. LABORATORY SETUP Antenna set up 1: Antennas on top of each other (Vertical Plane) Antenna set up 2: Antennas in the same horizontal plane FREQUENCY DEPENDENCE OF EM PROPERTIES The relative permittivity of the sand does not show significant frequency dependence whatever the water content is. There is significant frequency and water content dependence of the electrical conductivity THEORETICAL BACKGROUND OF MEASUREMENTS AND DATA PROCESSING In this analysis, the problem is modeled as a plane wave boundary value problem which leads to a number of algebraic equations that can be solved for the relative permittivity and conductivity. We have restricted our study to the complex permittivity because most materials of geophysical interest are nonmagnetic, while conductivity is incorporated in the complex permittivity. We can deduce that the differential phase is equal to: j(ωt-βz)= j(β(z+dz) -βz) z t j z y z jwt y y e e E e E E 0 0 n m z dz) (z n n m m j j j j j j e e e e n m n m mn sin cos sin cos ) ( n n m m e j j j sin cos sin cos log * c e dz f pi dz * * * * 2 DETERMINATION OF THE CONDUCTIVITY 2 1 10 2 2 2 1 10 2 1 10 log 20 log 10 log 10 ) ( V V R V R V P P dB A e z j K E E dB R x 10 1 10 log ) ( 20 log 20 1 1 ) ( 6 . 173 ) ( * 68 . 8 * 20 z j K z j K 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 Variation ofunwrapped differentialphase with frequency dP inradians 2 4 6 8 10 12 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 A plotofthe unwrapped phases for6",12" and differential dP in radians 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 A plotofthe Conductivity profile forthe sand Frequency (GHz) 6 12 dP 6 12 EFFECT OF EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES ON RESULTS To investigate the impacts of saturating and draining on the relative permittivity, phase measurements for saturating cycles were done. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 21.8 21.85 21.9 21.95 22 22.05 22.1 22.15 S aturating cycles V ariation ofR elative permittivity with saturating cycles A verage 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 19.7 19.8 19.9 20 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.5 20.6 20.7 Saturating cycles V ariation ofRelative permittivity w ith saturating cycles A verage Cycle Distance from Transmitter 8" 12" 16" Average 1 23.367 21.465 20.742 21.858 2 23.071 21.556 20.846 21.824 3 23.577 21.617 20.838 22.01 4 23.664 21.611 20.858 22.044 5 23.706 21.675 20.83 22.07 6 23.664 21.635 20.813 22.037 7 23.738 21.645 20.835 22.073 INTRUSIVE MICROWAVE MEASUREMENTS FOR DENSITY INFERENCE The relative permittivity of saturated sand and dry density were determined at different levels of compaction. The relative permittivity was then plotted against the dry density, porosity and void ratio. Average dry density (g/cm 3 ) Relative Permittivity Porosity Void ratio 1.397333333 23.6108 0.473 1.118 1.682514286 19.5622 0.365 1.7465 1.723433333 18.3699 0.3495 1.8835 1.748466276 16.9231 0.34 1.9395 1.755708403 16.5917 0.3375 1.981 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Frequency (G Hz) RelativePermittivity Frequecy dependence ofthe R elative Perm ittivity for the differentD ry D ensities D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1.35 1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 1.6 1.65 1.7 1.75 1.8 A plotofD ry density againstRelative Perm ittivity Relative Perm ittivity Density (g/cc) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 0.32 0.34 0.36 0.38 0.4 0.42 0.44 0.46 0.48 A plotofP orosity againstRelative P erm ittivity Relative Perm ittivity Porosity 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 A plotofV oid ratio againstRelative P erm ittivity Relative Permittivity Voidratio ONGOING WORK Design of a reliable 2D setup Collection of phase and transmission data from the 2D setup Validation of the 2D FDFD model using using 2D setup data. REFERENCES •Blitz, Jack. Electrical and magnetic methods of nondestructive testing” Bristol ; Philadelphia : A. Hilger, 1991. •Ida, Nathan. Microwave NDTDordrecht ; Boston : Kluwer Academic, c1992. •Ida, Nathan. ” Engineering electromagnetics” New York : Springer, c2000.

ABSTRACT Modeling detailed spatial distributions and dynamics of the soil properties in

  • Upload
    nara

  • View
    29

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

- PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: ABSTRACT Modeling detailed spatial distributions and dynamics of the soil properties in

INVASIVE MICROWAVE MEASUREMENT OF SOIL ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPERTIES AND CORRELATION WITH PHYSICAL QUANTITIES

K. Clay, M. Farid, A. N. Alshawabkeh , C. M. RappaportContact Info: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

This work was supported in part by CenSSIS, the Center for Subsurface Sensing and Imaging systems, under the Engineering Research Centers Program of the National Science Foundation (Award Number EEC-9986821)

R1

R2

Overview of the Strategic Research PlanOverview of the Strategic Research Plan

FundamentalScienceFundamentalScience

ValidatingTestBEDsValidatingTestBEDs

L1L1

L2L2

L3L3

R3

S1 S4 S5S3S2

Bio-Med Enviro-Civil

ABSTRACTModeling detailed spatial distributions and dynamics of the soil properties in

the inherently inhomogeneous subsurface requires extensive site

characterization.

Characterizing this variability with conventional methods is invasive and thus,

time consuming, costly, and subject to a large degree of uncertainty due to

lack of densely populated sampled insitu measurements thus the need for

none or less invasive techniques.

It is known that the propagation of electromagnetic waves through a material

is dependent on the electrical and magnetic properties of the material. These

properties are dielectric permittivity, electrical conductivity and magnetic

permeability. There is also need for correlation of measured EM properties to

physical and mechanical properties of the soil.

Most of these parameters are frequency dependent thus broad band

frequency dielectric permittivity and conductivity is vital.

INTRODUCTIONMicrowave measurements refer to electromagnetic measurements conducted

at frequencies in the micro wave region. This region lies between 300MHz

and 300GHz.

In the electromagnetic spectrum for frequency and wavelength, the position of

microwaves lies between radio waves and infrared. This region is bounded at

the long-wavelength end by the radio wave region, and at the short-

wavelength end by the infrared region.

The interaction of microwaves with materials and structures is best described

in terms of waves. Therefore microwave measurements such as amplitude

and phase measurements of transmitted or reflected waves by the specimen,

will contain information about internal flaws, material composition, structure,

density, porosity, homogeneity, orientation, state of cure, and moisture

content, as well as the geometry of the specimen. The fact that microwaves

are sensitive to such a large number of material properties leads to a number

of possible applications.

,,

xx E

z

E _2

2

_2

jwj

wjwjwjw or

22

222222 2)( jwwjj

222 w

22 w

21

2

112

w

21

2

112

w

PLANE WAVE PROPAGATION IN LOSSY MEDIA

The propagation properties of an electromagnetic wave such as its phase velocity up and wavelength, are governed by the angular frequency w and the three constitutive parameters of the medium:To examine wave propagation in a conducting medium, we return to the wave equation give by

22

w ww

fw

ww

22 f

LOW-LOSS DIELECTRIC AND GOOD CONDUCTOR

When the medium is called a low-loss dielectric and when

the medium is characterized as a good conductor.

For a low-loss dielectric,

For a good conductor

,1

,1

SOILBED FACILITY AND LABORATORY MEASUREMENT SYSTEM

The SoilBED testing facility has dimensions of 150 cm width by 120 cm depth by 275 cm length (5 ft x 4 x 9 ft).

The longitudinal walls of the facility are made of reinforced concrete while the transverse walls and the gate to the small injection trench are made of 3.8 cm (1.5 in) thick acrylic sheets.

The facility is filled with sand as the homogeneous and isotropic soil media.

The laboratory measurement system is an Agilent 8714ES RF Network Analyzer (NA) and a computer for data acquisition using a Microsoft Excel based system.

A NA is an instrument which measures the complex transmission and reflection characteristics of two-port devices in the frequency domain for the frquecy range 300kHz-3GHz.

Its connected to connected to a 12 channel Agilent 87050ES multiport test set on which 12 co-axial cables are connected.

LABORATORY SETUPAntenna set up 1: Antennas on top of each other (Vertical Plane)

Antenna set up 2: Antennas in the same horizontal plane

FREQUENCY DEPENDENCE OF EM PROPERTIES

The relative permittivity of the sand does not show significant frequency dependencewhatever the water content is. There is significant frequency and water content dependence of the electrical conductivity

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND OF MEASUREMENTS AND DATA PROCESSING

In this analysis, the problem is modeled as a plane wave boundary value problem which leads to a number of algebraic equations that can be solved for the relative permittivity and conductivity. We have restricted our study to the complex permittivity because most materials of geophysical interest are nonmagnetic, while conductivity is incorporated in the complex permittivity.

We can deduce that the differential phase is equal to: j(ωt-βz)= j(β(z+dz) -βz)

ztjzy

zjwtyy eeEeEE 00

n

m

z

dz)(z

nn

mmj

jjj

j

j

e

eee

n

m

nmmn

sincos

sincos)(

nn

mme j

jj

sincos

sincoslog*

c

edzfpidz

****2

DETERMINATION OF THE CONDUCTIVITY

2

1102

2

21

102

110 log20log10log10)(

V

V

RVR

V

P

PdBA

ezjKE

EdB

R

x10110 log)(20log20

11 )(6.173)(*68.8*20 zjKzjK

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5Variation of unwrapped differential phase with frequency

dP in

radia

ns

24681012

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20A plot of the unwrapped phases for 6", 12" and differential

dP in

radi

ans

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.60

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

A plot of the Conductivity profile for the sand

Frequency (GHz)

612dP

612

EFFECT OF EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES ON RESULTS

To investigate the impacts of saturating and draining on the relative permittivity, phase measurements for saturating cycles were done.

1 2 3 4 5 6 721.8

21.85

21.9

21.95

22

22.05

22.1

22.15

Saturating cycles

Variation of Relative permittivity with saturating cycles

Average

1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 419.7

19.8

19.9

20

20.1

20.2

20.3

20.4

20.5

20.6

20.7

Saturating cycles

Variation of Relative permittivity with saturating cycles

Average

Cycle

Distance from Transmitter

8" 12" 16" Average

1 23.367 21.465 20.742 21.858

2 23.071 21.556 20.846 21.824

3 23.577 21.617 20.838 22.01

4 23.664 21.611 20.858 22.044

5 23.706 21.675 20.83 22.07

6 23.664 21.635 20.813 22.037

7 23.738 21.645 20.835 22.073

INTRUSIVE MICROWAVE MEASUREMENTS FOR DENSITY INFERENCEThe relative permittivity of saturated sand and dry density were determined at differentlevels of compaction. The relative permittivity was then plotted against the dry density, porosity and void ratio.

Average dry density (g/cm3)

Relative Permittivity

Porosity Void ratio

1.397333333 23.61080.473 1.118

1.682514286 19.56220.365 1.7465

1.723433333 18.36990.3495 1.8835

1.748466276 16.92310.34 1.9395

1.755708403 16.59170.3375 1.981

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.216

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Frequency (GHz)

Rela

tive

Perm

ittiv

ity

Frequecy dependence of the Relative Permittivity for the different Dry Densities

D1D2D3D4D5

D1D2D3D4D5

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 241.35

1.4

1.45

1.5

1.55

1.6

1.65

1.7

1.75

1.8A plot of Dry density against Relative Permittivity

Relative Permittivity

Den

sity

(g/c

c)

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 240.32

0.34

0.36

0.38

0.4

0.42

0.44

0.46

0.48A plot of Porosity against Relative Permittivity

Relative Permittivity

Poro

sity

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 216

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24A plot of Void ratio against Relative Permittivity

Relative Permittivity

Void

ratio

ONGOING WORK•Design of a reliable 2D setup•Collection of phase and transmission data from the 2D setup•Validation of the 2D FDFD model using using 2D setup data.

REFERENCES•Blitz, Jack. “Electrical and magnetic methods of nondestructive testing” Bristol ; Philadelphia : A. Hilger, 1991.•Ida, Nathan. “Microwave NDT” Dordrecht ; Boston : Kluwer Academic, c1992.•Ida, Nathan.” Engineering electromagnetics” New York : Springer, c2000.