Upload
clarissa-gallagher
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A Non-EST-Based Method for Exon-Skipping Prediction
Rotem Sorek, Ronen Shemesh, Yuval Cohen, Ortal Basechess, Gil Ast and Ron Shamir
Genome Research August 2004
楊佳熒
Homologous human and mouse exon are, on the average, 85% identical intheir sequences, but introns are more pooly conserved. (Waterston et al. Nature,2002)
Segments and blocks >300kbin size with conserved in humanare superimposed on the mousegenome
Reference
• Sorek, R. et al. Intronic Sequences Flanking Alternatively Spliced Exons Are Conserved Between Human and Mouse. Genome Research, 2003.
• Sorek, R. et al. How prevalent is functional alternative splicing in the human genome. TRENDS in Genetics, 2004.
• Sorek, R. et al. A Non-EST-Based Method for Exon-Skipping Prediction. Genome Research, 2004.
What is Exon-Skipping ?
dbESTs
exon1 exon2 exon3 exon4 exon5 exon6gene
est2
est3
est4
est1
Intronic Sequences Flanking Alternatively Spliced Exons Are Conserved Between Human and Mouse
Rotem Sorek and Gil Ast
Genome Research July 2003
Objective and Result
1. Alternatively spliced conserved exons
2. Constitutively spliced conserved exons
exon1 exon2 exon3Human est1
Human est2
Alternatively spliced internal exons
Mouse est1
Mouse est2
Alternatively spliced conserved exons3583
243
Human gene
Human gene
Human est1
exon1 exon2 exon3
Human est2
Human est3
Human est4
Constitutively spliced internal exons7557
Mouse est
Constitutively spliced conserved exons1966
Mouse gene exon1 exon2 exon3
Mouse gene exon1 exon2 exon3
A1 B1
A2 B2
D1C1
C2 D2
223/243=92% 199/243=82% 188/243=77%
886/1966=45% 691/1966=35% 343/1966=17%
Per-position conservation near alternatively and constitutively spliced exons
<Example> Human KCND3 gene (exon 4~8) Refseq:NM_004980
KCDN3 gene exon information
KCDN3 gene exon 6 sequences (bold)(alternatively spliced exon)
Compare to chimpanzee genome (NM_004980)
Compare to chimpanzee genome (NM_172198)
Review : Finding exon-skipping events that are conserved between human and mouse
243 Conserved exon skipping events (25%)737(980-243) Non-Conserved exon skipping events(75%)
How prevalent is functional alternative splicing in the human genome ?
Rotem Sorek, Ron Shamir and Gil Ast
TRENDS in Genetics Vo1.20 February 2004
Motivation
1. How many of there predicted splice variants are functional?
2. How many are the result of aberrant splicing (noise data)?
The influence of alternatively spliced exon on the protein-coding sequence.
are peptide cassettess139
73%191
are peptide cassettess109
21%510
Features differentiating between conserved alternatively spliced exons and non-conserved alternatively spliced exons
Features Conserved alternatively spliced exons
Non-conserved alternatively spliced exons
Average size 87 116
Percentage of exon that a multiple of three
77%(147/191) 40%(206/510)
Percentage of exons that are “peptide cassettes”
73%(139/191) 21%(109/510)
Percentage of exon insertion that result in a longer protein by a nearby stop codon
61%(27/44) 8%(25/304)
Percentage of exon insertions that result in a protein <100 amino acids
9%(4/44) 30%(91/304)
Average supporting expressed sequences
9 2.2
30% 62%
Conclusion
1. We show that conserved (functional) cassette exons possess unique characteristics in size, repeat content and in their influence on the protein.
2. By contrast, most non-conserved cassette exons do not share these characteristics.
3. We conclude that a portion of skipping exon evidence in EST databases is not functional, and might result from aberrant rather than regulated splicing.
Review : Intronic Sequences Flanking Alternatively Spliced Exons Are Conserved Between Human and Mouse
1. Alternatively spliced conserved exons
2. Constitutively spliced conserved exons
exon1 exon2 exon3Human est1
Human est2
Alternatively spliced internal exons
Mouse est1
Mouse est2
Alternatively spliced conserved exons3583
243
Human gene
Human gene
Human est1
exon1 exon2 exon3
Human est2
Human est3
Human est4
Constitutively spliced internal exons7557
Mouse est
Constitutively spliced conserved exons1966
Mouse gene exon1 exon2 exon3
Mouse gene exon1 exon2 exon3
A1 B1
A2 B2
D1C1
C2 D2
223/243=92% 199/243=82% 188/243=77%
886/1966=45% 691/1966=35% 343/1966=17%
Review : Features Differentiating Between Alternatively Spliced and Constitutively Spliced Exons
Alternatively spliced exons
Constitutively spliced exons
Average size 87 128
Percent exons whose length is a multiple of 3
73%(177/243) 37%(642/1753)
Percent exons with upstream intronic elements conserved in mouse
92%(223/243) 45%(788/1753)
Pervent exons with downstream intronic elements conserved in mouse
82%(199/243) 35%(611/1753)
Percent exons with both upstream and downstream intronic elements conserverd in mouse
77%(188/243) 17%(292/1753)
A Non-EST-Based Method for Exon-Skipping Prediction
Rotem Sorek, Ronen Shemesh, Yuval Cohen, Ortal Basechess, Gil Ast and Ron Shamir
Genome Research August 2004
Objective
1. Our goal was to find a combination of features that would detect a substantial fraction of the alternative exons.
2. The features we have chosen are the following : 1) exon length
2) divisible / not divisible by 3
3) percent identity when aligned to the mouse
4) conservation in the upstream and downstream intronic sequences
Result
1. The best rule is : 1) at least 95% identity with mouse exon counterpart
2) exon size is a multiple of three
3) a best local alignment of at least 15 intronic nucleotides upstream of the exon with at least 85% identity
4) a perfect match of at least 12 intronic nucleotides downstream of the exon
2. The combination of features identified 76 exons, 31% of the 243 alternatively spliced exons in the training sets, whether non of 1753 constitutively spliced exons matched these features.
To test this classifier in a genome-wide manner (cont.)
1. For 453(48%) of the 952 candidate alternative exon there was such skipping evidence.2. Only(17%) of the 453 exons that were classified by our rule had their exon-skipping supported by only one EST.3. The rest were supported by two or more.
108,983 human exons for which a mouse counterpartcould be identified
using these rules
108,983
952 candidate exon, ~1%, were found.
To test this classifier in a genome-wide manner (cont.)
1. In comparison, skipping was supported by only a single EST in 46% of the total 7495 exons.2. This suggests that our classification rule enriches for alternatively spliced exons with higher probability of being “real” relative to alternative exons merely supported by EST evidence.
108,983 human exons for which a mouse counterpartcould be identified
search ESTs and cDNA
108,983
7% (7495 exons) out ofour entire set
To test this classifier in a genome-wide manner
1. The remaining 499 candidate alternative exons (952-453) for which no EST/cDNA showing an exon skipping event was found.
2. Using the UCSC genome browser to check, we found that for 190 additional exons there was a human expressed sequence showing patterns of alternative splicing other than exon skipping cases.
1) Alternative donor/acceptor 22%
2) Intron retention17%
3) Mutually exclusive exon 7%
3. Thus, for 643(453+190 ; 68%) of the 952 candidate alternative exons identified by this method, there was independent evidence for alternative splicing in dbEST.
Conclusion
1. We show that a substantial fraction of the splice variants in the human genome could not be identified through current human EST or cDNA data.
2. In the future, we hope it could develop into a more general alternative splicing predictor that would identify other types of alternative splicing.
Classification of alternative splicing
1. Skipped Exons
2. Multiple Skipped Exons
3. Alternative Donor / Acceptors
4. Retained Introns