8
Effectiveness of the State Penalties Enforcement Registry ICT reform (Report 10: 2019–20) 44 A. Full responses from agencies As mandated in section 64 of the Auditor-General Act 2009, the Queensland Audit Office gave a copy of this report with a request for comments to Queensland Treasury and the Department of Housing and Public Works. This appendix contains their detailed responses to our audit recommendations. The heads of these agencies are responsible for the accuracy, fairness and balance of their comments.

A. Full responses from agencies · (Quarter and year) Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Additional comments A draft Audit Committee Guidelines —

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A. Full responses from agencies · (Quarter and year) Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Additional comments A draft Audit Committee Guidelines —

Effectiveness of the State Penalties Enforcement Registry ICT reform (Report 10: 2019–20)

44

A. Full responses from agencies As mandated in section 64 of the Auditor-General Act 2009, the Queensland Audit Office gave a copy of this report with a request for comments to Queensland Treasury and the Department of Housing and Public Works.

This appendix contains their detailed responses to our audit recommendations.

The heads of these agencies are responsible for the accuracy, fairness and balance of their comments.

Page 2: A. Full responses from agencies · (Quarter and year) Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Additional comments A draft Audit Committee Guidelines —

Effectiveness of the State Penalties Enforcement Registry ICT reform (Report 10: 2019–20)

45

Comments received from Under Treasurer, Queensland Treasury

Page 3: A. Full responses from agencies · (Quarter and year) Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Additional comments A draft Audit Committee Guidelines —

Effectiveness of the State Penalties Enforcement Registry ICT reform (Report 10: 2019–20)

46

Responses to recommendations

Page 4: A. Full responses from agencies · (Quarter and year) Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Additional comments A draft Audit Committee Guidelines —

Effectiveness of the State Penalties Enforcement Registry ICT reform (Report 10: 2019–20)

47

Comments received from Director-General, Department of Housing and Public Works

Page 5: A. Full responses from agencies · (Quarter and year) Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Additional comments A draft Audit Committee Guidelines —

Effectiveness of the State Penalties Enforcement Registry ICT reform (Report 10: 2019–20)

48

Responses to recommendations

Page 6: A. Full responses from agencies · (Quarter and year) Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Additional comments A draft Audit Committee Guidelines —

Effectiveness of the State Penalties Enforcement Registry ICT reform (Report 10: 2019–20)

49

Page 7: A. Full responses from agencies · (Quarter and year) Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Additional comments A draft Audit Committee Guidelines —

Effectiveness of the State Penalties Enforcement Registry ICT reform (Report 10: 2019–20)

50

Page 8: A. Full responses from agencies · (Quarter and year) Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Third quarter 2019- 20 Additional comments A draft Audit Committee Guidelines —

Effectiveness of the State Penalties Enforcement Registry ICT reform (Report 10: 2019–20)

51