Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
INSTITUTE for RESEARCH on HIGHER EDUCATION
V VANDERBILT PEABODY COLLEGE
-'-· HIGHER EDUCATION ~ POLICY INSTITUTE
DECLINING COMMUNITY COLLEGE AFFORDABILITY
A FAILING SAFETY NET:
Ben Williams, Joni E. Finney, Sarah Torres
December 2016
Suggested Citation:
Williams, B., Finney, J. E., & Torres, S. (2016). A failing safety net: Declining community college affordability. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Research on Higher Education, Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania.
Image by twenty20.com/@michellehaha
FOREWORD For the first time in a generation, issues of college affordability permeated the presidential election. Candidates from both major political parties acknowledged the pressure that students and families face in paying for college.
The nation’s community colleges serve as the educational safety net for millions of students. While the safety net is showing signs of wear, it can be restored within current state and federal policies guiding higher education. Bipartisan support can and should be developed for this agenda because it cuts across the desire within both major political parties to create opportunities for those left behind.
As policymakers consider how to make a community college education affordable to people across all walks of life, I encourage them to consider the policy questions that appear later in this report.
The analyses that follow are drawn from College Affordability Diagnosis: A National Report and the state-by-state data released in the spring of 2016. College Affordability Diagnosis is a project of the Institute for Research on Higher Education at the Graduate School of Education at the University of Pennsylvania, the Peabody College of Education at Vanderbilt University, and the Higher Education Policy Institute in San
The authors extend their thanks to Patrick Callan of the Higher Education Policy Institute and William Doyle from the Peabody College of Education at Vanderbilt University for their constructive comments on the analysis and findings.
The Institute for Research on Higher Education welcomes the reactions of readers to this publication.
Joni E. Finney Practice Professor and Director, Institute for Research on Higher Education Graduate School of Education University of Pennsylvania
Jose, California.
INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON HIGHER EDUCATION at PENN GSE 1
EIGHT IMPORTANT FINDINGS States lean heavily on community colleges to provide essential postsecondary education and workforce training for their residents— especially those from low-income families. But today, even this lower cost college pathway is a significant financial burden for many families. At a time when family incomes for low- and middle-class families have been stagnant or in decline, total educational costs (tuition + mandatory fees + room and board + books minus all financial aid from institutions, states, and the federal government) at community colleges have gone up.
Consider the following:
� Community colleges provide education and workforce training for over one third of students in 28 states.
� Community college affordability decreased in over two thirds of states between 2008 and 2013.
� In most states (37), many full-time students would be required to work more than 20 hours a week to pay for tuition, fees, room/board, and books—even after accounting for all federal, state, and institutional financial aid.
� Four of ten of the poorest states— based on the proportion of families earning $30,000 or less—rank poorly on community college affordability.
� Of the ten states projected to have the most high school graduates by 2028, five rank in the bottom half of all states on community college affordability.
� Of the ten states projected to have the most nonwhite graduates by 2028, four rank in the bottom half of all states on community college affordability.
� Six of the ten states with the greatest projected demand for workers with some education and training beyond high school rank poorly on community college affordability.
� The notion that community colleges serve as a more affordable postsecondary education option in states with expensive 4-year colleges is no longer true. Many states have both expensive community colleges and expensive public 4-year colleges.
These findings make it clear that community colleges are no longer the educational safety net they once were. Far too many American families must contribute a significant portion of their income to keep up with rising costs. This is particularly troubling considering that to meet workforce demands and to achieve educational equity, we need to lower barriers to education and training beyond high school.
2
a failing safety net: declining community college affordability
64
% o
f stu
dent
s in
each
stat
e w
ho a
re e
nrol
led
in c
omm
unity
col
lege
Cal
iforn
ia
28 States Enroll at Least One Third of Their Students in Community College The proportion of students in each state enrolled in community college in 2013
60
57 57
53 52
49 48 48 47 45 45 45 44 43
40 39 38 38 37 36 36 35 35 35 34 33 32 32 32 30 29 29 29 28 28 28 27 26
24 24 23
20 19 19 18 17 16 14
Wyo
min
g A
rizon
a N
ew M
exic
o Te
xas
Nev
ada
Miss
issip
pi
Illin
ois
Ore
gon
Nor
th C
arol
ina
Haw
aii
Mar
ylan
d N
ew Je
rsey
So
uth
Car
olin
a M
inne
sota
W
ashi
ngto
n Io
wa
Ark
ansa
s Ka
nsas
Vi
rgin
ia
Kent
ucky
M
aine
A
laba
ma
Mic
higa
n O
klah
oma
New
Yor
k C
onne
ctic
ut
Col
orad
o Lo
uisia
na
Miss
ouri
Wisc
onsin
D
elaw
are
Indi
ana
Ohi
o Fl
orid
a N
ebra
ska
Tenn
esse
e M
assa
chus
etts
Wes
t Virg
inia
Id
aho
Rhod
e Is
land
Pe
nnsy
lvan
ia
Sout
h D
akot
a N
ew H
amps
hire
N
orth
Dak
ota
Uta
h Ve
rmon
t M
onta
na
Geo
rgia
Note: Alaska is excluded from the data due to the small number of community colleges and missing data elements.
3
Most States Require a Greater Portion of Family Income to Attend a Community College The % of family income required to pay the total educational costs of attending community college full-time has increased (between 2008 and 2013)
Cha
nge
in %
of f
amily
inco
me
requ
ired
to p
ay fo
r com
mun
ity c
olle
ge 8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
4
Wyo
min
g
3
Wisc
onsin
1
Wes
t Virg
inia
-1
Was
hing
ton
3
Virg
inia
4
Verm
ont
-4
Uta
h
2
Texa
s
-1
Tenn
esse
e
1
Sout
h D
akot
a
1
Sout
h C
arol
ina
5
Rhod
e Is
land
1
Penn
sylv
ania
5
Ore
gon
-1
Okl
ahom
a
1
Ohi
o
-2
Nor
th D
akot
a
4
Nor
th C
arol
ina
1
New
Yor
k
-4
New
Mex
ico
2
New
Jers
ey
-6
New
Ham
pshi
re
2
Nev
ada
1
Neb
rask
a
1
Mon
tana
3
Miss
ouri
0
Miss
issip
pi
1
Min
neso
ta
0
Mic
higa
n
1
Mas
sach
uset
ts
1
Mar
ylan
d
3
Mai
ne
4
Loui
siana
2 Ke
ntuc
ky
1
Kans
as
2
Iow
a
-7
Indi
ana
3
Illin
ois
2
Idah
o
4
Haw
aii
1
Geo
rgia
3
Flor
ida
-2
Del
awar
e
1
Con
nect
icut
-1
Col
orad
o
-6
Cal
iforn
ia
-2
Ark
ansa
s
0
Ariz
ona
3
Ala
bam
a
Increase in % of family income required to pay for community college
Decrease in % of family income required to pay for community college
Note: The “total educational costs” of college, referred to throughout this report, includes tuition, mandatory fees, room/board and books minus all financial aid (federal, state, and institutional). Alaska is excluded from the data due to the small number of community colleges and missing data elements.
4
a failing safety net: declining community college affordability
■ ■ ■ ■ ■
In 37 States, Full-Time Students Would Have to Work More Than 20 Hours a Week to Cover the Cost of Attending Community College The number of states by the number of hours per week that students would need to work at the federal minimum wage in order to meet the total educational costs of studying full-time at community college in 2013
Number of hours per week
41+
31 to 40
26 to 30
21 to 25
0 to 20
Number of states
Note: Alaska is excluded from the data due to the small number of community colleges and missing data elements.
5
■
■
South C
arolina
Wes
t Virg
inia
Miss
issippi
New M
exico
Arkansa
s
Alabama
entuc
ky
Louis
iana
enne
ssee
Florid
a
K T
Many of the Nation’s Poorest States Rank Poorly on Community College Affordability* The % of family income needed to pay the total educational costs of attending community college full-time (2013) in the ten states with the highest % of families in the lowest income quintile ($0–$30,000)
33% 30% 29% 28% 28% 28% 28% 28% 27% 26%
13% 15% 16% 16% 17% 17% 18% 18% 18%
21%
% families in lowest income bracket
% of family income required to attend community college full-time
Note: The “total educational costs” of college, referred to throughout this report, includes tuition, mandatory fees, room/board and books minus all financial aid (federal, state, and institutional). Alaska is excluded from the data due to the small number of community colleges and missing data elements.
* See page 10 for “State Rankings: Percent of Income Needed to Pay for Community College (2013).”
6
a failing safety net: declining community college affordability
■
■
Florid
a
Penn
sylva
nia
Illino
is
Ohio
North C
arolina
Georgia
New Je
rsey
Californi
a ork
exas
New Y
T
Families in Big States Face a Community College Affordability Crunch* The % of family income required to pay the total educational costs of attending community college full-time (2013) in the ten states with the greatest projected number of public high school graduates in 2027/28
348,375 330,181
185,629
150,301 124,188 116,309 104,422 91,787 90,584 84,083
15% 16% 16% 16% 17% 18% 18% 19% 18% 19%
Number of projected HS graduates in 2027/28
% of family income required to attend community college full-time
Note: The “total educational costs” of college, referred to throughout this report, includes tuition, mandatory fees, room/board and books minus all financial aid (federal, state, and institutional). High School projections from Knocking at the College Door (Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 2012). Alaska is excluded from the data due to the small number of community colleges and missing data elements.
* See page 10 for “State Rankings: Percent of Income Needed to Pay for Community College (2013).”
7
■
■
North C
arolina
New Je
rsey
Illino
is
Californi
a ork
Maryl
and
Georgia
ginia
Florid
a
exas
New Y
VirT
Shifting Demographics Signal Affordability Challenges for Nonwhite Students* The % of family income required to pay the total educational costs of attending community college full-time (2013) in the ten states with the greatest projected number of nonwhite high school graduates by 2028
250,833 242,359
Projected 89,719 number of
76,405 nonwhite HS 54,725 51,150 47,931 47,017 39,361 38,489 graduates in 2027/28
% of family income required to attend 15% 16% 16% 16% 17% 17% 18% community 18% 18% 19% college full-time
Note: The “total educational costs” of college, referred to throughout this report, includes tuition, mandatory fees, room/board and books minus all financial aid (federal, state, and institutional). High School projections from Knocking at the College Door (Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 2012). Alaska is excluded from the data due to the small number of community colleges and missing data elements.
* See page 10 for “State Rankings: Percent of Income Needed to Pay for Community College (2013).”
8
a failing safety net: declining community college affordability
■
■
ts
North D
akota
ode Isla
nd
ashing
ton
Massa
chuse
t
Minn
esota
Colorado
Nebraska
egon
ansas
Illino
is
OrKWRh
States Facing High Workforce Needs Must Address Affordability Challenges* The % of family income required to pay the total educational costs of attending community college full-time (2013) in the ten states with the highest % of jobs that will require education and training beyond high school by 2020
74% 74% 72% 72% 71% 71% 71% 70% 70% 70%
28% 23%
18% 18% 15%
18% 16% 22%
16% 17%
% of jobs in the state that will require a postsecondary education
% of family income required to attend community college full-time
Note: The “total educational costs” of college, referred to throughout this report, includes tuition, mandatory fees, room/board and books minus all financial aid (federal, state, and institutional). Alaska is excluded from the data due to the small number of community colleges and missing data elements.
* See page 10 for “State Rankings: Percent of Income Needed to Pay for Community College (2013).”
9
■
■
e
New Je
rsey
South C
arolina
Ohio
Miss
issippi
Illino
is
New H
ampshir
Alabama
Penn
sylva
nia
egon
Maine
Or
In Many States Where Public 4-Year College Is Most Expensive, Community College Is Also Expensive The % of family income required to pay the total educational costs of attending community college full-time (2013) in the ten states that require the highest percentage of family income to pay for college in the public four-year sector
41% 40% 36% 36% 35% 35% 34% 34% 34% 32%
Weighted average % of family income required to pay for public 4-year education
13% % of family 16% 16% income required 17% 18% 18% 19% to attend com-22% 23% munity college
full-time
37%
Note: Graphic shows weighted average percent of family income required to pay for public 4-year nondoctoral and public research universities in each state. The percent of income is weighted by the percent of enrollment in either type of institution. The “total educational costs” of college, referred to throughout this report, includes tuition, mandatory fees, room/board and books minus all finan-cial aid (federal, state, and institutional). Alaska is excluded from the data due to the small number of community colleges and missing data elements.
a failing safety net: declining community college affordability
10
- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
STATE RANKINGS: Percent of Income Needed to Pay for Community College (2013)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hawaii Mississippi Michigan Georgia
New Mexico Connecticut
Rhode Island Nebraska Kentucky
Wyoming Texas
Illinois California Alabama
New Jersey West Virginia
Idaho Virginia
Tennessee Delaware
Washington Oklahoma
Missouri Arizona
North Dakota
13% 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
N/A
South Carolina 13% Arkansas 14% Ohio 15% New York 15% Florida 15% Kansas 15% Massachusetts 16% Maryland 16% Indiana 16% Nevada 16% Pennsylvania 16% North Carolina 16% Utah 16% Montana 17% Louisiana 17% Wisconsin 17% Oregon 17% Iowa 17% Colorado 17% South Dakota 17% Maine 17% Minnesota 17% Vermont 18% New Hampshire 18% Alaska
States ranking in top half of all states # # States ranking in bottom half of all states
18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 19% 19% 19% 19% 20% 21% 21% 22% 22% 23% 23% 23% 28% 29% 37%
Note: The “total educational costs” of college, referred to throughout this report, includes tuition, mandatory fees, room/board and books minus all financial aid (federal, state, and institutional). Alaska is excluded from the ranking due to the small number of community colleges and missing data elements.
INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON HIGHER EDUCATION at PENN GSE 11
POLICY QUESTIONS for State and National Leaders
As states consider how to restore the educational safety net to provide millions of Americans— across all walks of life—with affordable community college education, they should consider the following policy questions:
� What is the family income of students attending community colleges in the state? What are the implications for community college affordability?
� To what extent are state financial aid programs targeted for community college students and those most economically vulnerable?
� What steps can be taken to maintain the purchasing power of financial aid programs for these students?
� What is the state role in establishing community college tuition and fees? Are tuition and fees linked to the income of families served by community colleges?
� In what ways does the state influence local decisions about tuition and fees? How can the state ensure that community college is affordable across local jurisdictions of the state?
� In what ways do tuition and fee policies encourage access to and completion of workforce certificates and degrees? Do these policies address both young and working-age adults?
� To what extent can the state alleviate the need for full-time students to work more than half time to complete their certificate and degree programs?
� To what extent can the state alleviate borrowing for low-income students enrolled in community colleges?
� To what extent is the state fully utilizing its community college capacity in order to reduce the costs of completing a degree? Should that capacity be increased?
� To what extent can 4-year institutions provide the final 2 years of baccalaureate degree instruction on community college campuses to reduce the costs?
a failing safety net: declining community college affordability
12
NOTES � The “total educational costs” of college,
referred to throughout this report, includes tuition, mandatory fees, room/board and books minus all financial aid (federal, state, and institutional).
� The rankings are based on the price of community colleges as a percent of family income for all states—the states where community colleges would take the smallest percent of family income are ranked the highest.
� Alaska is excluded from the data in this report due to the small number of community colleges and missing data elements.
� With the exception of projections for high school graduates, all data in this report are from the 2016 College Affordability Diagnosis published by the Institute for Research on Higher Education at the University of Pennsylvania, Peabody College at Vanderbilt University, and the Higher Education Policy Institute in San Jose, California.
INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON HIGHER EDUCATION at PENN GSE 13
REFERENCES Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College affordability diagnosis: National report. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Research on Higher Education, Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania. http://www2.gse.upenn.edu/irhe/affordability-diagnosis.
Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE). (2012). Knocking at the college door: Projections of high school Graduates. Boulder, CO: WICHE.