A draft introduction to A draft introduction to WP 5WP 5

Dr. Algirdas Dr. Algirdas ŠŠakalysakalys

WP 5 WP 5 “Knowledge “Knowledge

development”development”

WP 5 Strategic focus and WP 5 Strategic focus and resultsresults

Focus:Focus:Develop advanced simulation tools and Develop advanced simulation tools and visualization of results to support the decision visualization of results to support the decision processprocess

Planned results:Planned results:- description of best practice;- description of best practice;- improvement of understanding how multimodal - improvement of understanding how multimodal

transport system works;transport system works;- understanding how the performance of corridor - understanding how the performance of corridor

transport system responds to system changes transport system responds to system changes (e.g. improvements in infrastructure (e.g. improvements in infrastructure information exchanges, synchronized information exchanges, synchronized planning).planning).

WP 5 shall improve academic WP 5 shall improve academic cooperation and the business cooperation and the business development with high quality development with high quality

recommendations for improvement recommendations for improvement of intermodal transport concepts in of intermodal transport concepts in the corridor in line with the overall the corridor in line with the overall

objective of East-West projectobjective of East-West project

WP5 relations with other WP5 relations with other WP’sWP’s

WP

5 –

kno

wle

dge

deve

lopm

ent

WP 4 – business and logistics development

WP1 – Intermodal transport corridor development strategy

Input to sustainable development strategy

Scenario and concepts for simulation

Results fromsimulation andbenchmarking

Telematic application

Requirementson applications

Goals

WP

2–

ITS

Input to WP1

Involved partnersInvolved partners VGTU;VGTU; Klaipeda University;Klaipeda University; Municipality of Karlshamn;Municipality of Karlshamn; Blekinge County Administration;Blekinge County Administration; Swedish Road Administration;Swedish Road Administration; Blekinge Institute of Technology;Blekinge Institute of Technology; Port of Esbjerg;Port of Esbjerg; University of Southern Denmark;University of Southern Denmark; Vinnova;Vinnova; Kaliningrad State University;Kaliningrad State University; Baltic State Fishing Fleet AcademyBaltic State Fishing Fleet Academy

Key tasks of WP5Key tasks of WP5

Task A - Corridor development Task A - Corridor development analysis (Macro level analysis);analysis (Macro level analysis);

Task B - Micro level simulation of Task B - Micro level simulation of transport corridor;transport corridor;

Task A - Corridor development Task A - Corridor development

analysisanalysis Task A 1. Identification of the main hubs, LC’s as well as Task A 1. Identification of the main hubs, LC’s as well as the main actors along East-West corridor:the main actors along East-West corridor:

Task A.1.1.Task A.1.1. Analysis of infrastructure (networks, terminals, Analysis of infrastructure (networks, terminals, transshipment technologies);transshipment technologies);

Task A.1.2.Task A.1.2. Analysis of communication networks; Analysis of communication networks;Task A.1.3.Task A.1.3. Identification of the regulative legal framework Identification of the regulative legal framework

for development of transport sector along E-W corridor;for development of transport sector along E-W corridor;Task A.1.4.Task A.1.4. Review of studies on development of existing Review of studies on development of existing

transport network along the E-W corridor (Others + BTH);transport network along the E-W corridor (Others + BTH);Task A.1.5.Task A.1.5. Analysis and generalization of regional profiles Analysis and generalization of regional profiles

along the corridor;along the corridor;Task A.1.6.Task A.1.6. Identification and assessment of current technical Identification and assessment of current technical

capacity and administrative and legal bottlenecks along E-capacity and administrative and legal bottlenecks along E-W corridor.W corridor.

Task A - Corridor development Task A - Corridor development

analysisanalysis Task A.2. Overview of different transport modelling Task A.2. Overview of different transport modelling

tools:tools:

Task A.2.1.Task A.2.1. Provide overview on status of transport Provide overview on status of transport modelling in southern part of BSR (others+BTH);modelling in southern part of BSR (others+BTH);

Task A.2.2.Task A.2.2. Selection of best practice for different Selection of best practice for different types of transport modelling (others+BTH);types of transport modelling (others+BTH);

Task A.2.3.Task A.2.3. Clarification of the main obstacles in Clarification of the main obstacles in developing and applying transport modelling developing and applying transport modelling along the corridor (others + BTH) ;along the corridor (others + BTH) ;

Task A.2.4.Task A.2.4. Elaboration of the outputs that could be Elaboration of the outputs that could be helpful for transport companies (stakeholders) on helpful for transport companies (stakeholders) on transport modelling (others+BTH);transport modelling (others+BTH);

Task B - Micro level simulation of Task B - Micro level simulation of transport corridortransport corridor

B.1) Identifying the crucial stakeholders and their objectives; and defining B.1) Identifying the crucial stakeholders and their objectives; and defining performance metrics relevant for the corridor. performance metrics relevant for the corridor. Task B.1.1 identification of the crucial stakeholders and their objectives (BTH + others):Task B.1.1 identification of the crucial stakeholders and their objectives (BTH + others):Task B.1.2 defining performance metrics at operational level relevant for the corridor Task B.1.2 defining performance metrics at operational level relevant for the corridor

(BTH+others).(BTH+others).

Task B.2. Development of micro-level corridor simulator model and scenarios;Task B.2. Development of micro-level corridor simulator model and scenarios;

Task B.2.1 Define architecture of simulator model (BTH+others)Task B.2.1 Define architecture of simulator model (BTH+others)Task B.2.2. Define level of detail including characteristics of objects simulated Task B.2.2. Define level of detail including characteristics of objects simulated (BTH+others)(BTH+others)Task B.2.3. Refine simulation scenarios for micro based simulation Task B.2.3. Refine simulation scenarios for micro based simulation (BTH+others)(BTH+others)

Task B.3 Development of micro-level simulator and verification (BTH+others)Task B.3 Development of micro-level simulator and verification (BTH+others)

Task B.4 Simulation experiments and validationTask B.4 Simulation experiments and validationB.4.1 Simulation of scenarios (BTH+others)B.4.1 Simulation of scenarios (BTH+others)B4.2. Result visualisaation (BTH+others)B4.2. Result visualisaation (BTH+others)B4.3 Result and simulation validations (BTH+others)B4.3 Result and simulation validations (BTH+others)

Thank you for the Thank you for the attention!attention!