A Descriptive and Analytic Study of Compensatory

ED 093 898

DOCUMENT RESUME

95 TM 003 680

AUTHOR Rubin, Donald; And OthersTITLE A Descriptive and Analytic Study of Compensatory

Reading Programs. Phase I Report.INSTITUTION Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J.SPONS AGENCY Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, D.C. Office

of Planning,' Budgeting, and Evaluation.REPORT NO PR-73-28PUB DATE Aug 73CONTRACT OEC-71-3715NOTE 662p.; For related documents, see ED 064 294-300

EDRS PRICEDESCRIPTORS

ABSTRACT

MF-$1.05 HC-$31.80 PLUS POSTAGEComparative Analysis; *Compensatory EducationPrograms; Data Analysis; Elementary Schools; PublicSchools; Questionnaires; *Reading Programs; *RemedialReading Programs; *Research Design; SchoolDemography; Student Characteristics; *Surveys;Teacher Characteristics; Test Construction

A survey of compensatory and noncompensatory readingprograms in grades 2, 4, and 6 of the U. S. public schools wascarried out in spring 1972. phase I, the subject of this report,involved two tasks: (1) describing what was meant by "compensatoryreading", and (2) identifying the characteristics of schools in whichcompensatory reading programs are offered. Data descriptive ofschools, teachers, students, and instructional practices wereobtained via mail questionnaires. This report describes samplingprocedures, questionnaire development, field procedures, reliabilityand validity checks, index development, a study of nonrespondents,and the results of data analysis. Included in the five appendixesare: Appendix A: sample design and nonresponse weIght.adjustments;Appendix B: copies of the questionnaires used in the study to elicitinformation from the principals and teachers about the students andreading program characteristics; Appendix C; nonrespondent telephone'interview form; Appendix D: item response data for each of thequestionnaires used in the study; Appendix E: the methodology forformalizing subjective notions about the effect of nonresponse insample surveys. (Author/MLP)

U.S- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.EDUCATION //WELFARENATIONAL INSTITUTE or

EDUCATIONOHS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY M RECEIVED FROMTHE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINAT ING IT. POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONSSTATED DO NOT NECESSARILY ReproSENT OFFiCIALNATIDNAL INSTITUTE OFEDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY

PR- 73 28

PHASE I REPORT

Contract No. OEC- 71-3715

A DESCRIPTIVE AND ANALYTIC STUDY OF

COMPENSATORY READING PROGRAMS

Donald Rubin

Donald A. Trismen

Oita Wilder

Allen Yates

BEST copy AVAILABLE

August 1973

EDUCATIONAL TEETSNI3 SERVICEPRINCETON, NEW JERSEY

PHASE I REPORT

Contract No. OEC-0-71-3715

A DESCRIPTIVE AND ANALYTIC STUDY

OF COMPENSATORY READING PROGRAMS

Educational Testing Service

Princeton, N. J.

August 1973

The research reported herein was performed pursuant to a contract with theOffice of Education, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.Contractors undertaking such projects under Government sponsorship areencouraged to express freely their professional judgment in the conductof the project. Points of view or opinions stated do not, therefore,necessarily represent official Office of Education position or policy.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

Office of EducationOffice of Planning, Budgeting, and Evaluation

TABLE OF CONTENTS

?Alit

Introduction 1

Sample Selection and Instrument Development 3

Sample Selection 3

Advisory Board 4

Instrument Development 5

Data Collection 7

Non-respondent Study I 7

Non-respondent Study II 11

Study of error attributable to non-response 17

Questionnaire response rates 30

Quality control 32

Data consistency 32

Data stability 33

Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire 33

School Principal Questionnaire 34

Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaire 34

Data Analysis

Compensatory reading program clustering analysis

Analysis of program variation among and within schools

Clustering of reading programs

Results

Differences and similarities among schools which doand do not offer compensatory reading

Differences among teachers of compensatory readingprograms funded by various sources and teachers ofnon-compensatory reading programs

37

37

44

46

4S

49

55

TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd.)

Relationships between selected variables

The distribution and density ofprograms

Description of schools in termsreading program indices

Among and within cluster analysis

Description of school clusters in terms ofreading program index scores

Item analysis of questionnaire data

Appendix A Sample design and nonresponseweight adjustments

Appendix B Questionnaires

Appendix C Non-respondent study telephoneinterview form

Appendix D Questionnaire item response data

compensatory reading

of compensatory

Appendix E A method for formalizing subjectivenotions about the effect of non-responsein sample surveys

?al

59

62

67

69

70

71

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 Respondent vs. Non-Respondent Groups in Termsof Stratification Variables

bat

9

Table 2 Incidence of Compensatory Reading Programsfor Respondents and Non-Respondents in Title Iand Non-Title I Schools 10

Table 3 Comparisons Between Original Respondent andTelephone Follow-up Groups 13

Table 4 Variables Included in Reading Program IndexAnalysis 18

Table 5 School and Program Background Variables 24

Table 6 Analysis of the Statistical DifferencesBetween Respondents and Non-Respondents

Table 7 Teacher Response Rates By School FundingCategories 30

Table 8 Teacher Response Rates By School IncomeCategories 31

Table 9 Reading Program Factor Loadings 38

Table 10 Eigenvalues of the Among/Within Schools Matrix 45

Table 11 Correlations Between Program Indices and SchoolClusters 47

Table 12 Comparisons Among Schools Categorized ByType of Funding

Table 13 Comparisons Among Teachers in Schools CategorizedBy Type of Funding

Table 14 Contingency Coefficients for Variables From thePrincipal Questionnaire (Weighted Data)

25

Table 15 Contingency Coefficients for Variables From theTeacher Characteristics Questionnaire (WeightedData)

Table 16 Incidence of Schools By Compensatory ReadingProgram Funding Category and GeographicRegion .

50

56

60

61.

62

LIST OF TABLES (conttd.)

Table 17 Incidence of Schools By Compensatory ReadingProgram Funding Category and Urbanizationof Attendance Area

Page

63

Table 18 Incidence of Schools By Compensatory ReadingProgram Funding Category and Total. School.Enrollment 64

Table 19 Proportions of Schools Offering Various Numbersof Compensatory Reading Programs 65

Table 20 Incidence of Schools By Compensatory ReadingProgram Funding Category and Proportion ofNon-White Students 66

Table 21 Means and Standard Deviations of ProgramIndex Scores By School Funding Category 67

Table 22 Means and Standard Deviations of ProgramIndex Scores By School Cluster 69

Various sections of this report were written by the followingindividuals:

Donald RubinDonald TrismenGita WilderAllen Yates

Many other ETS staff contributed to the study. Deserving of specialmention are:

Eugene AlwoodJules GoodisonFrieda HardyStanley Mac DonaldHervey Scudder

SUMMARY

A survey of compensatory and non-compensatory reading programsin grades two, four, and six of the U.S. public schools was carriedout in Spring 1972. Data descriptive of schools, teachers, students,and instructional practices were obtained via mail questionnaires.This report describes sampling procedures, questionnaire development,field procedures, reliability and validity checks, index development,a study of non-respondents, and the results of data analysis.

INTRODUCTION

General Background of Study

In July 1971, Educational Testing Service was requested by theU. S. Office of Education to develop design and analysis plans fora study of compensatory reading programs in U. S. public schools.This planning activity took place during the period July-December1971, and is described in the ETS Final Report for Contract No. OEC-0-71-3715 (A. Descriptive and Analytic Study of Compensatory ReadingPrograms, January 1972). The research reported in the present Phase Ireport represents the implementation of the first segment of theseplans. Additional segments of the overall research plan are beingor will be carried out during the period July 1972-June 1974 and willbe described in a later report.

One of the first problems to be solved in Phase I was that ofdefining the domain of interest. This involved two tasks--describingwhat was meant by "compensatory reading," and identifying the char-acteristics of schools in which compensatory reading programs areoffered. The definition of "compensatory reading" required attentionto a number of semantic and pragmatic issues. It soon became clearthat there was no commonly accepted meaning of the term, even (orperhaps especially) among those considered knowledgeable in the fieldof reading. "Compensation for what?" seemed to be the central question,and the possible answers lay in the areas of both educational under-achievement and economic deprivation. Of the two areas, educationalunderachievement seemed the more basic in the sense that it was botha necessary and sufficient condition for a compensatory reading program.Economic deprivation, while often a concomitant condition, does notnecessarily imply the presence of poor reading achievement. In ad-dition, if economic deprivation were a required element of the definitionof a compensatory reading program, then programs for underachievingreaders of non-poverty families would be excluded from the study.

A second issue bearing on the problem of defining "compensatoryreading program" was that of operational practicality. A large-scalefield study was to be conducted, involving the collection of question-naire data from many and diverse school personnel. Ultimately, in astudy of this scope, the identification of compensatory reading programshad to be made at the school level by local personnel, with the aid ofguidelines provided by the study. Two alternative strategies in thedevelopment of these guidelines were considered: (a) to provide ascomplete instructions as possible, attempting to cover every situationwhich could conceivably occur in practice, or (b) to provide a rela-tively straightforward definition, leaving it to the local schoolstaff to apply it intelligently and ask for help from the administrativestaff of the study where necessary.

-2-

It was decided to adopt a very basic and uncomplicated defini-

tion of "compensatory reading" while at the same time obtaining

information via questionnaire which would enable the definition

to be further constrained and the sample of programs narrowed at

any time.

Thus, the principal of each participating school was

instructed that "by compensatory reading instruction is meant any

reading instruction provided to students because they are reading

below their grade level."

If, for example, it were later desired

to obtain a subsample of programs offered only to students of

economically deprived families, this could be accomplished via

questionnaire items relating to family income.

The first phase of the Compensatory Reading Study, the subject

of this report,

was a Spring 1972 questionnaire survey of com-

pensatory reading programs offered in grades 2, 4, and 6 of the U.

S. public schools.

This survey had two major purposes:

(1) to

obtain for a representative national sample data descriptive of

the instructional characteristics of such programs, the schools

in which they were offered, and the instructional personnel who

staffed them, and (2) to obtain a sample which could serve as a

population list from which to draw a subsample of programs to be

studied more intensively during a succeeding phase of the study,

conducted during the 1972-1973 school year.

(This later phase

will be described in a future project report.)

-3 -

SANPLE SELECTION AND INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT

Sample SeJoction

The primary purpose of the Spring 1972 Survey

was to obtain

data descriptive of the characteristics of

compensatory reading

programs in grades 2, 4, and 6 of the U. S. public schools, the

teachers of these programs, and the schools in which theyare

offered.

Since no population list of compensatory readingprograms

exist, it was necessary to select

a sample of schools using the

1970-1971 School Universe Tape (or in

a few states, the 1969-1970

School Universe Tape) as the basic list.

Socioeconomic status of the community and racialethnic group

membership have been shown to be highly correlated with student test

performance.

Therefore, average income and percent minority were

used as the major stratifying variables in selecting this sample.

In addition, it was felt that degree of urbanization, geographic

region, and size of school might be important variables with respect

to describing compensatory reading programs on a nationally pro-

jectable basis.

Although they were not used as stratifying variables,

they were taken into account in the sample selection process (see

Appendix A, p. 12).

This procedure involved putting the schools

within each major stratum (as defined by income classes and percent

minority) in order by Census region.

The schools were then divided

into a number of approximately equal sized blocks, based upon the-

measure of size.

From each of these blocks, called "final strata,"

two schools were selected to form the initial sample.

Substitute

schools were drawn at the same time by defining four substitute

selection numbers at equidistant intervals before and after the

selection numbers.

The development of the sample design and the actual sample

selection were performed by The Research Divison of Westat, Inc.

Their comprehensive technical report of the sample selection process

is included as Appendix A of this report.

Their method of develop-

ing weight adjustments for nonresponse and sampling error is also

presented in Appendix A.

It should be noted, however, that the

sample was essentially self-weighting.

The end product of Westat's work was a listing of the sample

schools, which were then contacted by ETS during the Spring of 1972.

Associated with each sample school in this listing were five sub-

stitute schools, to be contacted sequentially in the event that

the previously listed school or schools refused to participate.

Prior to contacting any of the sample schools, letters describing

the study were sent to each chief state school ufficer and to each

superintendent in whose district a sample school was located.

After

the superintendent's consent was obtained, the principal of the

-4-

selected school was sent detailed information about the study andthe conditions of participation. Presumably, the final decisionregarding participation was made by the principal, in consulta-tion with his staff and the district superintendent.

Advisory Board

From the very beginning, the Compensatory Reading Projectobtained the counsel of an Advisory Board, composed of six in-dividuals who represent a range of interests in the educationalcommunity.

The following individuals agreed to serve:

Ruth W. HayreAssociate Superintendent of SchoolsSchool District of Philadelphia

D. Dwaine HearnExecutive SecretaryAmerican Association of Elementary,

Kindergarten, and Nursery Educators

Hernan La FontainePrincipalBilingual School, New York City

Alden LilywhiteFederal Liaison AssistantCouncil of Chief State School Officers

Francis PinkowskiAssistant Director for Planning and EvaluationNew Jersey Department of Education

David SeldenPresidentAmerican Federation of Teachers

The Board met twice during the course of the planning phase ofthe study, and once in Spring 1972. At the first meeting, the Boardreacted to the design of the study and provided valuable suggestionsfor maximizing cooperation among sample schools. In fact, the pro-cedures for contacting school districts adopted by the project staffwere developed by the Advisory Board (the procedures were, in themain, quite successful in obtaining district and school cooperation).At subsequent meetings, the Board gave counsel on a variety ofpolicy issues, among them payments to participants, score reporting,and public relations. The Board is expected to continue to functionin its advisory role through the remainder of the study.

-5-

Instrument Development

The main objective of data collection in Phase I was to describereading programs, compensatory and non-compensatory, in as much de-tail as possible in the sample schools. It was decided that question-naires to the individuals most directly concerned with such readingprograms would be the most efficient technique for data collectionin a sample of more than 700 schools. In the initial stages of ques-tionnaire development, ETS project staff consulted a series of expertsin the field of reading first on 'the general question of what constitutesa reading program and how reading programs might be described; secondon what (if anything) differentiates compensatory reading programs fromreading programs in general. (A list of the consultants to questionnairedevelopment appears in Appendix B.)

There was some degree of consensus among the project consultantsthat the variety and types of characteristics found to exist among read-ing programs in general would also be found to exist among reading pro-grams labeled compensatory, and that the goal of questionnaire developmentshould be to describe all reading programs. The consultants deliberatedat length about what constitutes a reading program and, as a result of theseries of meetings with consultants in the Fall of 1971, a comprehensivelist of questionnaire variables or topics was adopted. The variablesfell roughly into four general categories: institutional (or school)variables, instructional (or class) variables, teacher characteristics,and student (demographic and background) characteristics. It was soondecided that questionnaires to students would be unmanageable at thisstage, and that the student background variables would be tapped bymeans of group estimates made by school principals and Leachers. It

was also decided that certain of the variables were most logically theprovince of school administrators and others most logically belongedto teachers. As a result, three sets of questionnaires were developed:a School Principal Questionnaire, two different Class and Program ques-tionnaires (one for compensatory and one for non-compensatory programs),and a Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire. The first, the SchoolPrincipal Questionnaire, was designed to provide data concerning schoolsand school districts, and about administrative policies affecting com-pensatory reading programs. Included in the School Principal Questionnaireare items about the size of the school in which a given reading programexists, the staff, the reading levels of students, the eligibility ofthe district and the school for federal funds, and some demographiccharacteristics of the student population. For schools in which thereare compensatory reading programs, the School Principal Questionnaireasks about the sources and levels of funding, the degree of and basisfor student participation in the programs, as well as descriptions ofthe programs.

-6-

The Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire was intended to elicitinformation about those characteristics of individual teachers thatmight have some influence on their students. Included in this ques-tionnaire were items asking about the teacher's sex, ethnic matchwith students, certification, years and nature of teaching experi-ence, and training specific to the teaching of reading. Some itemsmeasuring teacher attitudes were also included: attitudes about theschool, the administration, and the students, as well as feelingsabout the program and the materials used in the teaching of reading.

The Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaires were designedto be the most comprehensive of the instruments. These two question-naires were the main vehicle for the collection of data about classroominstruction during the first phase of the study. The two sets ofquestionnaires were identical, with certain minor exceptions, exceptthat one was to be completed by teachers of compensatory reading andthe other by teachers of non-compensatory reading. In cases where ateacher taught both compensatory and non-compensatory reading, she wasto complete both questionnaires. In this way, it was hoped that suchdifferences as did exist between compensatory and non-compensatoryprograms could be documented quite simply. Examples of the sort ofvariables included in the Class and Program Characteristics Ques-tionnaires are the size, composition, and flexibility of instructionalgroupings, the methods and materials used, the time allotted to read-ing instruction during the school week and the time allotted to variousinstructional activities during the reading period(s), the availabilityand use of auxiliary personnel and services, and some demographiccharacteristics of students in the classes.

The questionnaires attained their final form by means of a seriesof clinical pretrials in schools near Princeton and in Trenton andPhiladelphia. The schools were chosen to represent a variety ofreading programs (the majority of them compensatory) in grades 2,4, and 6. Questionnaires were completed by principals and teachersin the chosen schools, following which ETS project personnel visitedthe schools to observe reading instruction and to discuss the ques-tionnaires with the principals and teachers involved. The classroom.visits served to validate the information provided in the questionnaires,and the interviews served to review the questionnaire format and thefeasibility of data collection by this method. Valuable insights wereprovided by the principals and teachers who participated in the pre-trials; the questionnaires were revised a number of times in theprocess. When a semi-final form was arrived at, a series of mailtrials was conducted in order to test the whole mail-out and returnreceipt procedure.

-7-

DATA COLLECTION

Every effort was made to ensure the highest possible responserate for the Spring 1972 survey. Letters explaining the purposeof the project were sent to each chief state school officer in whosestate a sample school appeared. Similar letters were sent to super-intendents and principals of selected schools. Teachers were paid anhonorarium to complete and return questionnaires. All questionnairerespondents were guaranteed that their responses would remain anony-mous, and were given individual return envelopes in order that nolocal school staff would have access to the data. For each sampleschool, there were two classes of respondents (principals and teachers),who were requested to complete and return three different instruments(school questionnaires to be completed by the principal; program char-acteristics questionnaires, to be completed by teachers of compensatoryand non-compensatory reading classes; and teacher characteristicsquestionnaires, also to be completed by teachers). Thus, there wereseveral possible ways of defining "respondent" and "non-respondent,"depending upon the criterion of data completeness one wishes to adopt.Eighty percent (585) of the 731 sample schools contacted returned atleast one or more questionnaires of any type and seventy-four percent(543) returned at least a principal's questionnaire.

Non-respondent Study

In addition to variables appearing in the Spring 1972 Surveyquestionnaires, there existed other sources of data on the basis ofwhich the respondent and non-respondent groups might be compared.These data sources were the ones used to supply stratification in-formation prior to sample selection. The following descriptive datawere available for respondents and non-respondents:

1. whether a school participated in one or more ESEA TitleI programs (not necessarily compensatory reading programs,nor even reading programs of any sort) during the 1970-1971 school year

2. percent minority enrollment of schools in districts of3,000 or more enrollment; for schools in smaller dis-tricts, percent nonwhite reported in the county by the1970 Census

3. 1966 average gross income per taxpayer reported by theInternal Revenue Service for the ZIP Code area in whichthe school was located

-8-

4. 1960 Census median family income for the county orindependent city in which the school was located

S. school enrollment

6. urbanization of school attendance area

7. geographic region of school attendance area

Table 1 shows, for respondents and non-respondents, comparisonsin terms of the above listed seven variables. Inspection of the tableshows a small but consistent tendency of the non-respondent group tobe less advantaged than the respondent group. This tendency is some-what consistent with the results of Non-respondent Study II, to bedescribed in the following section.

-9-

Table 1. Respondent vs. Non-Respondent Groupsin Terms of Stratification Variables

Variable Respondents Non-Respondents

Participation in Title I (program(s)

Ethnicity

60% 67%

Less than 5% minority 47 35

5-9% minority 14 14

10-19% minority 13 19

20-39% minority 12 13

40-59% minority 4 5

60-79% minority 4 4

80% or more minority 6 10Mean % minority 16.8 21.7

1966 average gross income per taxpayer

1960 median family income

School enrollment

Urbanization

$6226

$5499

517

$5919

$5248

512

Large city, over 500K 7.3% 8.7%Large city, 200K-500K 4.5% 3.3%Suburb of a large city 9.9% 10.4%Rural area near a large city 11.3% 9.8%Middle-size city, 50K-200K 4.7% 2.7%Suburb of a middle-size city 32.1% 31.1%Rural area near a middle-size city 2.3% 2.2%Small city or town, less than 50K. 4.7% 3.8%Rural area, not near a large or

middle-size city 13.1% 19.7%

Geographic region*Northeast 21.2% 15.8%North Central 32.1% 25.7%

South 29.3% 39.3%

West 17.4% 19.1%

*Geographic regions are defined as follows, based on the 1970 Census ofPopulation, General Population Characteristics, United States Summary, pub-lished by the Bureau of the Census:

Northeast--Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut,Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey

North Central--North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Minnesota,Iowa, Wisconsin, Missouri, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio

South--Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Tennessee, Mississippi,Alabama, Kentucky, West Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, Virginia,North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida

West--Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Utah,Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, Alaska, Hawaii

-10-

It should be noted that the above comparisons are in terms ofdata available prior to sample selection, even though more recentdata on some of these variables are available from the questionnaireresponses of the respondent group. The more recent data were notused to compare respondent and non-respondent groups, since theydiffered from the prior data in three important respects:

1. Title I/non-Title I was defined in the questionnairesrelative to compensatory reading programs, but for thestratification variables relative to _mat Title I fundedprogram (mathematics or health programs, for example).

2. The questionnaire information applied to the 1971-72school year, while the stratification data originatedfrom several sources and were appropriate for timeperiods anywhere from 1960-1971.

3. The questionnaire information applied to the sendingarea of the school, whereas the stratification informa-tion applied to a variety of larger geographic areasin which the schools were embedded.

It is possible, however, to compare the incidence of compensatoryreading programs for respondents and non-respondents in Title I andnon-Title I schools (not necessarily Title I reading schools), interms of questionnaire and telephone responses. (These telephone responsesare described in the following section.) Table 2 shows this comparison.

Table 2. Incidence of Compensatory Reading Programs forRespondents and Non-Respondents in Title I and

Non-Title I Schools

Respondents Non-Respondents

Title I SchoolsNon-Title I Schools

91%88%

87%85%

Non-respondent Study II

A Study of the differences between responding and non-responding schools was undertaken in order to assess the degreeto which the respondent group (and therefore the non-respondentgroup) was typical of the total sample. The procedure followedwas to select a small subset of the questionnaire variables whichwere descriptive of important school characteristics, and to in-corporate them into a short questionnaire which was then administeredby telephone during the winter of 1973. Since the selected vari-ables originally appeared on the principal questionnaire, theabsence of a returned principal questionnaire was taken as thedefinition of a non-respondent for the purposes of this study.Information on the following variables was obtained by phone:

1. presence or absence of a compensatory reading programduring the 1971-1972 school year

2. Title I funding of one or more of the compensatoryreading programs

3. school enrollment during 1971-1972

4. occupational categories of school families

5. estimated percentage of students at each of grades 2,4, and 6 who are reading one or more years belowgrade level

6. estimated percentage of pupils whose head of householdattained various levels of education

7. estimated percentage of pupils whose familiesreceive public assistance

8. estimated percentage of students of various racialor national origins

9. estimated percentage of school families havingvarious annual incomes

10. number of classrooms during 1971-1972

-12-

Information on the above variables was obtained from 188

non-respondents.

Two differences between the modes of obtaining

information in the original survey and in the follow-up study

should be mentioned, since they have contributed to differences

between the two sets of responses.

The first and most obvious

difference was that the phone respondents were asked to supply

information orally, without having the time allowed questionnaire

respondents to weigh their answers or search for supporting data.

In addition, it should be kept in mind that these were respondents

which, for unknown reasons, had refused the first request for

information.

A second difference lay in the fact that certain

questions which had been couched in categorical form in the ques-

tionnaire were asked in open-ended form in the phone interview.

The obtained free responses were then coded into the original

questionnaire categories by the interviewer

Tests of significance of the difference between the means

and standard deviations of the questionnaire respondent group

(Group I) and the telephone follow-up group (Group II) were

performed.

The pattern of these results suggests that there

may have been some differences, but that the question of whether

they are true differences or are in part due to response mode

biases cannot be definitely determined from this study.

Table 3

shows the obtained comparisons between groups, based upon un-

weighted data.

Variable'

-13-

Table 3. Comparisons Between Original Respondentand Telephone Follow-up Groups

Means 2

RespondentGrou

Compensatory reading (CR)during 1971-1972

CR funded by Title 1 during1971-1972

School enrollment during1971-1972

Occupation: % professional

Occupation: 2 business owner

Occupation: % white collar

Occupation: skilled worker

Occupation: % unskilled worker

Occupation: % unemployed

reading below grade level, gr. 2

% reading below grade level, gr. 4

% reading below grade level, gr. 6

Education: % attended college

Education: % h.s. graduate

Education: % attended h.s.

Education: % finished gr. 8

Education: 2. did not finish gr. 8

1.10 528

1.48 537

3.58 537

1:16 534

1.27 534

1.72 534

1.81 534

1.67 534

1.19 534

2.96 485

3.19 481

3.28 423

1.55 534

2.34 533

1.62 533

1.32 533

1.15 533

T-Testfor

Equalityof Means3

F-Testfor

Equalityof S.D.

Follow-upGroup

1.13 188 1.16 1.28*

1.36 175 _2.89* 0.93*

3.66 188 0.75 1.05

1.26 182 2.55* 1.40*

1.17 170 -2.91* 0.64

1.69 178 -0.56 0.88

1.79 174 -0.30 1.01

1.79 176 1.93 0.91

1.19 181 0.11 0.92

3.07 159 1.02 1.52*

3.16 155 -0.26 1.65*

3.23 145 -0.51 1.23*

1.57 179 0.32 0.87

2.21 174 -2.29* 0.87

1.74 174 -2.21* 0.72

1.25 172 -1.65 0.49

1.09 177 -2.04* 0.46

* Significant at .05 level

1See Appendix C for the complete telephone interview form

2Means are expressed in the coded metric (e.g., Yes = 1, No = 2)

3Comparisons for which the followup group mean is smaller are indicatedby a minus sign

Variable1

-14-

Table 3. Comparisons Between Original Respondentand Telephone Follow-up Groups (continued)

Means2

T -Test F-Testfor for

Respondent Follow-up Equality3 EqualityN of Means of S.D.Group Grou

% families receiving publicassistance 1.81 534 2.02 184 2.13* 1.37*

% White 3.32 536 3,31 188 -0.10 1.37*

% Black 1.43 535 1.59 181 2.14* 1.29*

% Spanish surnamed 1.13 535 1.21 182 1.96* 1.76*

% Oriental 1.00 535 1.01 178 0.30 1.51*

% American Indian 1.02 535 1.02 180 0.56 1.84

% Other 1.02 535 1.00 119 -0.75 1.30*

Income: % $12,000 and over 1.47 535 1.51 171 0.74 1.07

Income: % $9,000-11,999 1.68 534 1.57 169 -2.04* 0.83

Income: % $6,000-8,999 1.92 534 1.88 170 -0.70 0.81

Income: % $3,000-5,999 1.63 534 1.58 170 -0.83 0.80

Income: % Under $3,000 1.23 534 1.29 171 1.37 1.06

Number of classrooms 19.99 536 20.13 188 0.17 1.29*

* Significant at .05 level

1See Appendix C for the complete telephone interview form

2Means are expressed in the coded metric (e.g., Yes = 1, No = 2)

3Comparisons for which the follow-up group mean is smaller are indicatedby a minus sign

-15-

Inspection of Table 3 reveals that a significantly higher

proportion of the non-respondent schools reported that they had

a 1971-1972 compensatory reading program supported either totally

or in part under ESEA Title I.

Of all the questions asked in the

telephone follow-up of non-respondents, this one seems to be as

factual and insensitive to the vagaries of oral

response as any.

It would seem easy to remember, minimally dependent upon judgment,

and not apt to be falsified by the respondent.

Therefore, it may

be useful to regard this question as

a benchmark against which to

evaluate the possible effects of response bias in other items less

resistant to response bias.

Another item which shows a similar,

although less, pronounced, effect is that concerning the percentage

of pupils whose families receive public assistance, the differences

between groups being in the direction of making the non-respondents

appear somewhat more deprived-,

However, it should be remembered

that the item is considerably more judgmental than is the previous

one concerned with Title I funding.

The cluster of items concerned with percentage of school

families in various occupational categories shows a somewhat

mixed result.

The non-respondents have a significantly lower

percentage of business owners, and seem to have a higher percentage

of unskilled workers, although the latter difference does not quite

reach significance.

Contrary to expectation, one finds the non-

respondents to have a significantly higher percentage of profes-

sionals, which contradicts the implications of the Title I funding

and percent public assistance variables previously discussed.

The

results for this cluter are difficult to interpret, since they do

not exhibit the compensating pattern one would expect of such a

cluster.

That is, one would expect differences in the "higher"

occupations to be opposite in direction from those in the "lower"

occupations (the more doctors, the fewer unskilled or unemployed).

One possible response mode bias which may be operating in the

cluster of occupational items results from the fact that questionnaire

respondents were able to look at the entire item cluster before re-

sponding to any, while the non-respondents were asked the items

serially and thus were unable to relate their responses to each

other, and adjust them so as to add approximately to 100 percent

across categories.

This might in fact account for the largest dif-

ference being in the second occupational category presented, as

respondents suddenly attempted to compensate for a too-large first

response.

-16-

A similar situation prevails in the set of items relating toestimated annual income of selool families and, to a lesser extent,items about level of education attained by the head of household.Again, one would expect a situation in which positive differencesat one end of the income (or education) scale would be accompaniedby negative differences at the other. This was not the case, how-ever, and one must conclude that the data are more affected byresponse mode biases than they are by true differences between

v.' the respondent and non-respondent groups.

The items concerned with percentage of students of variousracial or national origins are consistent with the results forthe Title I funding item. The two racial categories for whichdifferences are significant, Black and Spanish surnamed, bothshow higher percentages for the non-respondent group.

The final cluster of items, those relating to the percentageof students at each of grades 2, 4, and 6 reading one or more yearsbelow grade level, show no significant differences between the twogroups. If one accepts the trends in the data discussed previously,to the effect that non-respondent schools may serve more deprivedpopulations, then this result suggests the operation of some sortof response mode bias. These items are perhaps the most threateningand at the same time the most judgmental of those asked of non-respondents during the telephone interview. One hypothesis is thatschool personnel are reluctant to provide information unfavorableto their school to telephone interviewers--more reluctant than theyare to provide the same information in a questionnaire survey.

In summary, the results of the follow-up study were notconclusive. There seems to be some reason to believe that non-respondent schools might serve more economically deprived populationsand be more likely to offer Title I funded reading programs. On

the other hand, it seems clear that a substantial portion of theobtained differences is a result of unknown biases due to the un-avoidable differences in response mode between the respondent andnon-respondent groups. Finally, it should be remembered that respondentsand non-respondents tend to respond differently, regardless of the trueconditions they are describing, and that some portion of the intergroupdifferences might be attributable to this influence.

-17-

Study of Error Attributable to Non-Response

It is possible to estimate the amount of error attributable tonon-response by making judgments, on the basis of known qualitiesof the non-respondents, about what their responses might have been.Basically the method formalizes subjective notions of how similarrespondents and non-respondents are to each other, and then calcu-lates a confidence interval for what the average response wouldhave been had all the non-respondents responded. Subjective notionsregarding the degree of similarity between respondents and non-respondents make it possible to estimate how much the average re-sponse would have changed had the non-respondents in fact responded.A technical description of the method employed here and the deriva-tion of the result can be found in Appendix E.

In this study, 731 schools were contacted initially. Of

these, 188 failed to return a School Principal Questionnaire,and are considered for purposes of this exercise the non-respondents.Of the remaining 543, there were 537 for whom usable School PrincipalQuestionnaire data were available, and 504 from whom Class andProgram Characteristics Questionnaire data (from the blue CompensatoryReading version)* had been received. This study of error attributableto non-response is based on the 188 non-respondent schools, plus 488schools from whom School Principal and Class and Program CharacteristicsQuestionnaires could be matched. For the latter 488 schools therewere 80 variables derived from the Class and Program CharacteristicsQuestionnaires (see Table 4) and 30 variables derived from the SchoolPrincipal Questionnaires (Table 5). For all schools there were 37background variables that had been obtained either from the samplingtape or the questionnaires or, in the case of the 188 non-respondents,by telephone follow-up.

*Appendix B contains copies of the questionnaires used in thisstudy. The following color coding scheme was used

Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaire, CompensatoryReading Version-Blue

Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaire, Non-CompensatoryReading Version-Yellow

School Principal Questionnaire-White

Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire-Tan

-18-

Table 4. Variables Included in ReadingProgram index Analysis

Class and Program Characteristics(Blue) Questionnaire Item Number Variable

17a

17b

17c

17d

18 (one or more of a, b, d)

18c

18e

18 (one or more of f, g, h, i)

19

20

2 0a

20b

20 (highest of a, b)

CR carried out during regular schoolhours in time scheduled for regularreading instruction

CR during regular school hours intime released from other classwork

CR before or after school or onweekends

CR during the summer

CR during time released from socialstudies, science and/or foreignlanguage

CR during time released frommathematics

CR during time released fromlanguage arcs

CR during time released fromphysical education, art, music,and/or seat work

CR instruction time per studentper week

CR instruction at same time eachday

Time of instructional period, ifsame time

Usual time of instructional period,if different

Frequency of availability of(a) remedial reading teacher, or(b) other professionals to CRP

more teaching

-19-

Table 4. Variables Included in ReadingProgram Index Analysis (continued)


21c

21 (highest of d, e, h)

21 (highest of f, g)

23a

2 3b

23c

23d

2 3e

24

25

27

29a

29b

Frequency of availability ofparaprofessionals or teacheraides to CRP teaching

Frequency of availability of(d) parent or other volunteer,(e) student teacher or(h) older student in school toCRP teaching

Frequency of availability of(f) media specialist, or(g) resource teacher to CRPteaching

Frequency of organizing CR classinto groups by reading gradelevel

Frequency of organizing CR classinto groups by specific skilldeficiencies

Frequency of organizing CR classinto groups by shared interests

Frequency of organizing CR classinto groups by specific projects

Frequency of organizing CR classinto groups by other (than a-dabove) criteria

Adult/child instructional ratio

Frequency of change of CR groupcomposition

Major approach to teaching of CR

Extent to which basal readers usedin CR teaching

Extent to which programmedinstruction used in CR teaching

-20--


Class and Program Characteristics(Blue) uestionnaire Item Number Variable

29c Extent to which total phonicsprogram used in CR teaching

29d

29e

29f

29g

29h

29i

29 j

29k

32 a

32b

32 c

32d

Extent to which supplementaryphonics program used in CRteaching

Extent to which a languageexperience approach used inCR teaching

Extent to which a linguisticprogram used in CR teaching

Extent to which non-standardorthography used in CR teaching

Extent to which Words In Colorused in CR teaching

Extent to which individualizedprograms used in CR teaching

Extent to which technologicaldevices used in CR teaching

Extent to which other (than a-jabove) approaches used in CRteaching

Frequency with which textbooksother than basal readers usedin CR teaching

Frequency with which books andprinted materials other thantextbooks used in CR teaching

Frequency with which newspapers,magazines, and other periodicalsused in CR teaching

Frequency with which teacher-preparedmaterials used in CR teaching

-21-



32e

32f

32g

32h

32i

32j

33a

3 3b

33c

33d

33e

33f

3 3g

33h

Frequency with which motion picturesand/or filmstrips used in CRteaching

Frequency with which slides andtransparencies used in CR teaching

Frequency with which tape recordingsand records used in CR teaching

Frequency with which video ortelevision tapes used in CRteaching

Frequency with which games, puzzles,and toys used in CR teaching

Frequency with which other (than a-iabove) materials used in CRteaching

Time spent in CR class improvingmotor abilities related toreading

Time spent in CR class increasingattention span

Time spent in CR class developingvisual discrimination

Time spent in CR class matchingletters or words

Time spent in CR class learningletter forms

Time spent in CR class developing asight vocabulary

Time spent in CR class learningword meanings

Time spent in CR class on phonicand/or structural analysis

-22-


Class and Program Characteristics(BlueUmestionnaire Item Number Variable

331

33j

331

3 3e

33m

33n

34

39 a

39b

39 c

39 d

39e

39 f

39 g

Time spent in CR class being readto

Time spent in CR class reading

aloud

Time spent in CR class readingsilently

Time spent in CR class in creativewriting

Time spent in CR class reading forenjoyment

Time spent in CR class enrichingcultural background

Special training for teacher inteaching of reading fordisadvantaged pupils

Amount of CR pupil in-school timedevoted to instructional program

Amount of CR pupil inschool timedevoted to compensatory reading

Amount of CR pupil in-school timedevoted to instructional program(if CR differs from basic program)

Amount of CR pupil in-school timedevoted to reading in content

areas

Amount of CR pupil in-school timedevoted to independent ,reading

Amount of CR pupil in-school timedevoted to library activities

Amount of CR pupil in-school timedevoted to enrichment activities

-23-


Class and Program Characteristics(Blue) Questionnaire item Number Variable

39h

40a -n

41

43

44

Amount of CR pupil in-school timedevoted to other (than a-g above)activities

Use of specified publishers'materials

Teacher creation of CR materials

Frequency with which each child inCR class reads aloud to class

Frequency with which each child inCR class reads aloud to teacher

-24-

Table 5. School and ProgramBackground Variables

Source Variable

School Universe Tape

Class and Program Character-istics Questionnaire

Title I funding (aay program)Percent minority enrollmentUrbanization of school attendance area

Average gross income per taxpayer for ZIPCode area in which school was located

Median family income for county orindependent city in which school was located

Existence of compensatory reading program

Title I funding of compensatory readingprogram

School enrollment

Parental occupation (6 variables)

Percent students reading below grade level(3 variables)

Parental education (5 variables)

Other non-local funding

Parental ethnic backgrOund (5 variables)

Parental income (5 variables)

Number of rooms in school

-25-

as 0, co 0a en or 43 .. A u% cm MN 4 el ce so N 0 0 03 sr c ee 4 P. C) CO CO CO .4 ap an ro oc sr sr te c) e4 en ce P. W* N sr m ce e IP 40 .0 sr C. cp r- em ve 0 0' Cn r- (NJ CC :n C Cm M N 0 MD 44 Cm sr M CO 0 V% 0 eM 00 MD el r- op 41

J 41 co J:: 7.: ..N sr c C ry .n 1, p. ,N 7. sr .e v) JO .? de: :7. JP co c: s- cc NI h. .4 Cs: cr sr MN 0 40 CS: 0 :.MN e- r* 0 C' 4C^ -C -4.1 4 C' .4 JJ Ph r i3 7%. C 0 UN P. Ca Ca C. ON t sr 0 0 41 4N .0 r. CO P. P. Ca C. .0-ENO OM ,r r4 0 CCs N NJ -d de, 4) CD 0 C) 4) C) CD CD CD .. 0 44 C CD CD CD 0 0 .4 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CC Cm 0 0 .4 c) 0 c) 0 c; 000 cp c 0 0 4) c) CD :3 C) CD :CDC 0 CD (.1 4) C C CD C CD CD 0 43 CD 0 0 CD CD CD

CCC00000CCOCC.00CCC000000CC0CC0000000CCCOOCCOCOCCO0

CP .4 4 ir .4 M .4 C. P. 0 PP CP 10 .0 C. CD .4 40 h. P4 4, N00 C. cm 0 es em .. .3 .7 em .. 0 P.4 gs P. sr r.0 CO 03.+ CP. PM .4 PM C Ur C CV sr cr c CD C- 01 r. 1;. 0M37 .0 le 0- en P- Cm MD 4C . 0) N u% .4 m 0 ye, cc cO 0 OC CC 0PU N 4 v CC .0 es r - co M CC a , c r- r- 4 rc r- JaC .4 CF. GO` . UN.. C. VM 4. cs r, .4 MN tD h- h, CP C0 xN sr e. cc srC" 0 00 Cr en r- DO es 00 M CV P. ON m 0 P. .0 aN .4' .O4 3, sr 40, O. 4) 4 CC CD rr m 0 es. i- fr. ,se ill M 4 U1 U1 4. C" P- sr soee r, es 04 No N 0 CD C> 0 Pm P. .4 .4 0 0 CD CD CD C; CD CC 0 0 Ca Ca C: 0 CD CD C C 0 0 0 0 CZ C> CD C C CD CD CDN 0 CD 0 C> 0 0 CZ 0 0 C> 0 CD CD CD C> CD CD C) CD z) 0 CD co co to C> C0 0 CD CD 0 CD CD C> C) CZ 0 0 C> C0 0 C> 0

X 0000C,00000000000000000CaCC00000000C0000000000C0C00

DJC)

C: pry UN PM Q0 us J r. Cr sr r% 0 r- r- cm on or r- 4 OD 0 Pa 0 sr us c4 tc 0a cc 40 m C4 P. .4 4$ 0 .4 CP 4, 40 P. 0 C> CO eVC L h a 4 4 0 h i 40 4 , OC 44 .4 h- 4 0 NN C , s r eN N. c aD ,r c) po hi CD C. 4 Cc. ce. P. 40 CAF C. M r- PC 1. X c* :O c CC 0 CD V* CC

r- P. OD A ca cc a: cr en es cm a C. 0, Ch gC CC CD M O' C" W c0 a, C. Cr 40 C. 0C W. = cr. CD W GC CP W e) Oe ,P x X P G^ cc m- 7 0 m c c .0 cr s o s r ,t un 4 s r s r s r sr s rJ J S J J U r sr sr .4. sr sr sr sr st sr sr 4. sr sr sr sr sr sr sr sr sr 4. sr 4. sr sr

44 cc zc OC 10 COT lc co oc co 00 x Oj lc rp A a> al ao a: m a; OD OD X SCp 70 1C fib» W ,0 0D c0 DD DC 00T 0 2D OC at 1DLc ed N r4 N N N N N N NN Nti N N N N N N N N in. N cm n: N N rs rs N cu N N N N A4 "I ro N CM N N N cs eo N N N NN0 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000?

o.-

O. 0M 0 01 P- 4 PI en .0 .1 4) N ce 0' N sr co eo V% CO 01 J P. en CD el en ao us UN PN CP h- .7 rm oD N em en 3" sr r. 1A r4 cr cr1.0 en 00 e. .. CV UM .7 *Z" CD CP On es on P.w a C. O1 pp P14 C. p. C. .4 p. 4. 0 r4 x eq M.. m c, 4 em .0 CP 41 p. 0 el es em .4 e.:3 .7 00 C) mN .0 h. CM UN UN V' sr J.I. ^4 0 .0 V) NN CP A m h 0 p. M sr cc 00 .0 <0 ell 0 ao 0 N.0 A en CP a% re OD sr ^>J

e edd0 e s 0 M U% un CD C W 4 MC Nee' G0 p. Pn pm 0 ,0 4. p, P. .0 4. m. .0 e0 CD 0 em us .. es c, e. c

'.0 0 eerqescco,oc-da000.-.00000.000000...00000000000000000000000000. 0 0000000000000000000c0c0c00000000000000000000000000

il)NH c.X 0.0000000000.000.c00.00000.000.00.00000000000000.A c c 1 1 I I

I I I 1 1 I I I I

E1z

W W CUNcC J1. c0 CD CV P. NM Cep 0C 0 op op es .. ce us en ea cp .4 a. CP CC A Pa CP M en P. ,r u% cp P. 0 0 c w.0 paCC eC CP P. e- so 4 W 4 sr eq r- C. Ua UN C. P. 1,4 sr r4 rs ee es cr C4 4.4 UN PN C, C, UN PM 40 .4 20 eV . os cr sto sr oM0srr4elPO..

NO NN sr so sr P- .4 sr sc U100 -00 uses 4% .. eo go so ,c rNM a co 0 0o r. .0 ... en c: cr a c0 Ce 0 P. CC I.. .7so n co0c00cuo.r0000000000N00000000000000oa00ccocco0000000C.) Z 00000000-.00000 0000000000000000000u0c00000000000000z rw H 00300000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000geU.1

LL

44

040 0 0 4) h" Ca a) C't J J P% m J M 0 cm en . .4 CP c" op G cm a a en ^' a a CD CP us sr NON sr sr 44 co en cm

44 01 Cm C W 4. 47 Cr h. .. CC UN r. 40 ti.. UN 1.4 CM C. en m M CP P+ 1 UN .. Cr 0 cm M C) p. m un .41 0 cm NCO gc p. el). e s cm e s : P , .40 cc en 0 cp em CD "4 .. r- .. P. .. CC. .6 6 .0 0 Cm CV h" ..J 04 sc C4 MM Ws Cs: .4 CP V' P. UN UN

44 0 . MS, '-00'- . a- mops r0 r- mD P. pn .0 a rr 10 0? el P. ct C .. U' C CD .. cD rA W .>7M 4r* On rs. 4) cm .r rsr. It CP CM Cr en a M r- C. h4 C: MCC CP so so 4 cs 0 co cD eu rm 0 em u% .. ^4 sr sr rs 4 .1- v tr cc -. n- sr e. un r. co .. l+P

O < 010 cp es 0 .4 ml 0 ey 4 4 4 01 J.. es cs c, 4. cs 45 N m cp is. se es es Op a e. is. us co ,0 N rp Q .7 en rm aw r'.r- P: 000 CD CD 0 0 0 el cm 0 0 CD 44 *4 r4 est pv e4 0p 4,, 0, N 0, 0, e, 0, N 0, 0, 0, e, .4 pm N .4 v. .4 pmAT

CD_eo-3- Lu.tlw >,).<1.Jc.)UUult1:0 ..%XX WWMcce-.34WWw000 M...4:1. DC J 0 u c6 :) :.: O.

fill 0. c r- o i 1, w t0 I 1 I r< V .44.1.0>c<uw.611<cumwacLuL:o1;c:pucowwom-nactucwwcox..dimuclwwoz-Nr-r.r-0=a00-0%;...me+re,e40--ccc-comccrccNimNeaesie4NrNmesperNrAmelesrmm..,.....-, ..... Ntsr,NraNNNNNNmN,N:NJevrstN/NN:NmNesr0.-mmmrlmeNelmme.smmelmm

OE

ST C

OPY

AV

AIL

AB

LE

Table 6 (continued)

04,

ANALYSIS

OF THE STAIIS;ICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RESPONDENTS ANu NONRESPONDENTS

MEAN Y

STNU ERR

H 0

HI

H 2

H 3

33J

1.604374

0.000900

0.007174

0.744902

0.0014548

0.006010

33K

1.442017

0.000823

-0.000585

0.284901

(1.004654

0.001951

331

2.065410

C.001046

-0.006689

0.284892

0.008063

0.007722

33M

1.619594

0.000061

-0.000042

0.284894

0.004306

0.007421

33N

1.983331

0.000934

-0.0021'57

0.204005

0.004414

0.006639

34 -TRAIN

1.491887

0.000745

0.004795

0.284899

0.006267

0.000955

39A

2.969736

0.001796

0.004801

0.204080

0.005970

0.006112

390

3.024388

0.000800

0.002332

0.764860

0.003160

0.003677

39C

2.485181

0.001677

-0.000614

0.284922

0.005499

0.009418

390

2.664131

0.001384

-0.003095

0.284493

0.005266

0.007344

19E

2.55/231

0.000931

-0.003579

0.284871

0.004662

0.00:140

39F

2.186287

0.000881

- 0.000059

0.784076

0.003333

0.005744

39G

1.850157

0.000949

0.003673

0.284491

0.00554:6

0.007183

40-SCOTT

3.200337

0.001583

0.000436

0.204891

0.004159

0.007129

40-HRPR

3.702407

0.001085

-0.003249

0.764863

0.004041

0..:04140

40-MACML

3.728068

0.000936

0.001219

0.284859

0.002388

0.003539

40-6m CO

3.794397

0.000844

-0.001241

0.204957

0.002213

0.00115P

40-GINN

3.593367

0.001035

0.007308

0.284063

0.001429

0.0041)4

40-H MFF

3.737021

0.001018

0.001798

0.204860

0.002040

0.003789

40-L1PPN

3.884631

0.000585

0.000569

0.284852

0.001376

0.002159

40-ALEBA

3.885063

0.000710

-0.000449

0.204954

0.001567

0.002587

40-K.REW

3.889557

0.000552

-0.000726

0.284852

0.001385

0.007043

1

40-SRA

3.485577

0.001152

-0.c00340

0.284867

0.002755

0.004717

rs,

cN

40-HARC

3.871876

0.000047

-0.002559

0.204957

0.003131

0.003108

1

40-0PENC

3.521002

0.000667

-0.000248

0.764853

0.001475

0.0O24I4

40-ITA

3.973388

0.000325

-0.000419

0.784850

0.000781

0.601136

40-PERR

3.842535

0.000892

-0.000045

0.204858

0.001929

0.003324

4I-CREAT

1.075331

0.000401

0.004126

0.284870

0.005078

0.005103

43-ALOUD

2.23C337

0.001877

0.007015

0.784969

0.009904

0.012051

44-ALONE

2.765053

0.002045

0.003023

0.284940

0.006793

0.01048.5

-27-

Table 6 presents the values of 7R' h0, h1' h2, h3 for each

of the 80 variables plus the standard error of YR ignoring the non-

respondents. As noted in Appendix E, Viz is a variable recorded

for all respondents but not for non-respondents, X is a background

variable recorded for respondents and non-respondents, 6, is

the subjective coefficient of variation for the non-respondents'

mean if their X distribution were the same as the X distribution

for respondents, 82 is a subjective coefficient of variation for

the non-respondents' regression coefficients, h0 is the relative

bias due to different sample X means for respondents and non-2

1respondents03 21h21 is relative variance due to uncertainty about

the equality of expectations of Y for respondents and non-,2 .

respondents due to sources other than X,622a is relative vari-

ance due to uncertainty about the equality of Y on X regressions

for respondents and non-respondents, and h2

3is relative variance

due to adding pN independent new units to the sample with mean.

25.NR.

First let e1

- 62= 0 so as to assume that aside from the

observed X difference the respondents and non-respondents are

just alike; i.e., only random sampling has generated the observed

X difference. The 95 percent confidence interval given by (1.1)

is then smallest and is

Viz (1 + h0 2h3)

Note that on the basis of h0

and h3

there are basically two types

of variables: the first group has larger than typical values of

h0and/or h

3and consists of variables 17B, 17C, 17D 18ABD, 18C,

18E, 18FGHI, 21C, 21DEH, And 21FG; the second group consists of

the other variables whose values of h0

and h3are typically small

(i.e.< 1.5%). For the first group, the 61 - 02 = 0 95% confidence

interval can be nontrivial; e.g., for 18C: 0.09(1 + .06 + .15),

plus 21%, minus 9%! For the second group, the typical confidence

interval is smaller than (+ .01 + .02).

-28-

It is important to examine what the variables in the first

group are. From Table 4, it can be seen that variables 17B, 17C,

and 17D concern when compensatory instruction is given; the values

of h0

suggest that the non-respondents tend to use "special"

class time less than the respondents, and rely more on regular

class time. This suggests that compensatory reading programs

may be more standard for non-respondents. Also from Table 4,

it can be seen that variables I8ABD, 18C, and 18FGHI concern

what subjects are displaced by compensatory reading instruction;

it looks as if non-respondents tend to take time away from mathe-

matics more than respondents, a procedure perhaps indicating

more serious reading problems. Again from Table 4, it can be

seen that variables 21C, 21DEH, and 21FG concern the availability

and use of additional personnel for compensatory reading instruc-

tion; the directions obtained for h0 are weak, suggesting that

the non-respondents have more paraprofessionals available, but

for all items the uncertainty from h3 is large. So far, the

indications seem to be that the non-respondents have more severe

reading problems than the respondents.

Now consider a non-zero 01

indicating that respondents and

non-respondents may have different Y expectations due to sources

other than the X variables. All values of h1

are essentially 29%.

Since the range of the 9596 confidence interval is at least

+ 201h1= + 588

1 '

% if 01

is substantial (e.g., 35%), the 95% con,

fidence interval will be at least + 20% for all variables. Of

course, if we believe that the X variables we have recorded are

the important sources of bias between respondents and non-respondents

(not a bad assumption in this case, since they include socioeconomic

status and approximations of student achievement variables), the

contribution of e1b1

to the confidence interval will be small for

all variables (e.g., if e1

. 10%, then 281 h1

.--, 6%).

-29-

Now consider a non-zero 02 indicating that the regression of

Y on X may be different for respondents and non-respondents. The

variables divide fairly well into the same two groups as before.

The second group has values of h2 below .02 and typically below

.01, while the first group has values of h2 above .02 except for

MEG and 21FG which have values about .013 (these two had small

h0 as well). Hence for the second group, even if 0 is quite

large, the contribution of 0 2h2 to the 95% confidence interval

will be typically small (e.g., if 02 = 100%, 262h2 typically

is less than 2%). However, for the first group of variables

such a large 02 can be quite important; e.g., for 17C if 02 = 100%,

202h2= 13%.

In summary, the results of this non-response study seem to

tell us that for variables 17B, 17C, 17D, 18ABD, 18C, 18E,

18FGHI, 21C, 21DEH, and 21FG, the inclusion of non-respondents

could have substantially (e.g., by about 30%) changed the average

response, probably in the direction indicating that the average

school has more serious reading problems than the responding schools,

while for the other variables the effect of the non-respondents

was probably not very important (e.g., <10%).

-30-

Questionnaire Response Rates

School response rates and the special study of non-respondentsare described in earlier sections of this report. For that pur-pose, a school was designated as responding if it returned thePrincipal Questionnaire. In addition, however, teachers in eachschool were requested to complete Program Characteristics Question-naires and Teacher Characteristics Questionnaires. Thus, it ispossible to define and determine questionnaire response rates--the proportion of questionnaires distributed in respondentschools which were returned as requested. These data are byno means error free, since the identification of teachers ineach school who were to have received questionnaires was carriedout by the school principal according to procedures specified byETS. Therefore, the number of teachers who should have returnedquestionnaires can be obtained only from data reported by the prin-cipal, and these data are, of course, characterized by their ownerror and incompleteness. Thus, if a principal did not supplyinformation specifying which teachers received questionnaires,there was no way of including that school in the response ratecalculation. If not all teachers listed by a principal did infact receive questionnaires, then the reported response rates wouldbe correspondingly low. Table 7 shows questionnaire response ratesfor several categories of schools.

Table 7.

School Category

Teacher Response Rates bySchool Funding Categories

N N

Expected ReceivedTeacher

Response Rate

All compensatory readingprograms partially ortotally supported byTitle I 441 298 68%

One or more (but not all)compensatory readingprograms partially ortotally supported byTitle I 715 496 69%

No compensatory programspartially or totallysupported by Title I 666 469 70%

No compensatory readingprograms offered 159 133 84%

Uncategorizable schools* 798 520 657

*The assignment of schools to funding categories was dependentupon responses to certain items in the Principal Questionnaire.These items themselves had a non-response rate, thus resulting insome uncategorizable schools.

-31-

Table 8 shows teacher response rates for schools categorizedby income level of student's head of household.

Table 8.

School Category

Teacher Response Rates BySchool Income Categories

N N

Expected ReceivedTeacher

Response Rate

$12,000 and over 232 144 62%

$ 9,000 - 11,999 527 371 72

$ 6,000 - 8,999 595 384 65

$ 3,000 - 5,999 755 504 67

under $3,000 560 398 72

-32-

Quality Control

A.

Data Consistency

A limited check on the consistency of the data was conducted

using a randomly selected 20 of the Phase I schools.

It was

decided that to verify any of the teacher data would cause more

ill will than a study of this nature could afford.

It was also

decided that to verify the student data through individual student

or parent interviews would be prohibitive in cost.

The check was,

therefore, limited to the school data

that had been collected via

Principal Questionnaire.

For each of the 20 schools, the appropri-

ate superintendent was contacted by phone and asked to respond to

twelve of the same questions as had been answered by the principal.

The questions were about the mobility of the school population, the

existence and extent of bussing to and from the school attendance

area, occupations represented by school families, existence and

cost of compensatory reading programs, and per pupil expenditures

for the district and the school.

The estimates of agreement are extremely conservative ones

because they are expressed in terms of percentages of cases in

which the principal and the superintendent agreed perfectly in

their responses.

For purposes of this study, if a principal re-

ports that migrant workers make up 0-10% of his school population,

and the superintendent estimates 11-25%, the item is treated as if

there were no agreement at all.

The percentage of agreement between the principal's original

responses and the responses given by the superintendent ranged from

25 (concerning per pupil expenditure in the district) to 95 (con-

cerning the proportion of migrant workers in the school population).

The average level of agreement over all questions was 58%.

This

is not so surprising considering that the two individuals responding

have distinctly different perspectives, and perhaps different sources

of information.

The highest levels of agreement were found to exist

for the following questions:

mobility of the school population out

of the school attendance area, percent of school families unemployed,

bussing in and out of the school attendance area, and the existence

in the school of one or more compensatory reading programs.

Overall,

where the percentage of agreement was low, the information sought

was more likely to be the province of one or the other class of re-

spondents.

Allowing, therefore, for the time lapse between the two

episodes of data collection, and for the differences in perspective

between the two sets of informants, as well as for the conservative

nature of the scoring, the information gathered was reasonably con-

sistent.

-33-

B. Data Stability

In an effort to assess one facet of the stability of thePhase I data, a random sample was chosen representing approximatelyten percent of the 535 schools from which questionnaires were re-ceived in the Spring of 1972. A total of 75 schools were contactedin an effort to obtain a final school sample of 50 and a finalteacher sample of 150. A second set of questionnaires, identicalto the first set, was then sent to each school six weeks after thefirst set had been sent. The six-week interval was judged to belong enough to minimize the effect of respondents' memory of theirresponses to the first administration, but short enough to minimizethe possibility of real change occurring. There was also thenecessity of obtaining responses before the close of the secondsemester. The principals of the schools, one teacher of compensatoryreading in each of grades 2, 4, and 6, and the teachers of thegrades 2, 4, and 6 with the lowest reading achievement were askedto complete questionnaires. A total of 60 schools responded, yield-ing 56 School Principal Questionnaires, 117 Teacher CharacteristicsQuestionnaires, 62 Class and Program Characteristics Questionnairesfor compensatory programs, and 68 Class and Program CharacteristicsQuestionnaires for non-compensatory programs taught to the studentswith the lowest reading achievement in their respective grades.Correlation coefficients between first and 'second responses werethen computed for each item of each questionnaire. The results,indicating an encouraging level of stability, are given belowby questionnaire. As was the case with the data consistency es-timates, the results that are reported, however high they appearto be, are extremely conservative representations. Once againonly perfect agreement between first and second response affectedthe correlation coefficients positively; in items in which degreesof agreement could have been obtained, any failure to agree perfectlywas treated as failure to agree at all.

Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire. The Teacher CharacteristicsQuestionnaire asked for two kinds of information: background char-acteristics of teachers and their attitudes toward their school andstudents. It would seem logical to assume that the responses toquestions concerning background would remain more stable over timethan would attitudes, and indeed the results bear out the assumption.Correlation coefficients for the background items ranged from .78(regarding special training in the treatment or diagnosis of readingproblems to 1.00 (sex of respondent and highest earned college degree),and averaged greater than .90. For the attitude items, correlationcoefficients ranged from .16 to .86, with the mean around .60. Gen-erally, the coefficients were higher for items concerned with teachers'attitudes toward their schools and administrations than for items

-34-

concerned with their attitudes toward disadvantaged children.This seems a reasonable finding, too, since children are morelikely to change over a shore time span than schools or administra-tions. Of the four types of questionnaires, the Teacher CharacteristicsQuestionnaires yielded the greatest stability over time.

School Principal Questionnaire. The stability of the datagathered by means of the School Principal Questionnaire varied withthe type of information requested. In the main, items that askedfor countable or immediately observable phenomena (school enroll-ment, number of classrooms, racial composition of student population,for example) were extremely stable (r .99, .97, .92, respectively).Items that required the school administrator to make judgments(estimated levels of education of school families and estimatedincomes of school families, for example) were less stable. In thecase of the educational levels, the correlation coefficients rangedfrom .58 to .81 for the five levels of education. Lowest of allwas the stability of responses to items that asked for attitudesand opinions. Correlation coefficients between first and second-time responses to judgments about the condition of the physicalplant, the adequacy of the instructional personnel, and the suita-bility of instructional equipment were .82, .79, and .50 respectively.

Some of the correlations represent items measuring phenomenathat could be expected to change over the short term. For example,the expectation of a summer reading program yielded a correlationcoefficient of .69 between first and second response. The experienceof the project staff with respect to obtaining a sample of summerprograms for study has borne out the variability of that item: in

many school systems, the final decision about a summer program isnot made until late Hay. Likewise, in schools where there is aspring testing program, the number of children in need of remedialreading instruction (r's ranging from .59 to .97) can reasonablybe expected to change within the time frame of the data stabilitycheck. By and large, considering the many opportunites for changein the real situations as well as in individuals' perceptions ofthem (and also in view of the conservative criterion of stabilityemployed), the stability over the six-week period in the School Prin-cipal Questionnaire was quite remarkable.

Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaires. The twoClass and Program Characteristics Questionnaires (blue, for com-pensatory reading programs and yellow, for non-compensatory programs)are essentially parallel, with identical questions in most cases butwith some additional items in the blue version that are particularly

-35-

applicable to compensatory instruction.

For both blue and yellow

forms, the overall stability of the responses over the six-week

period (although generally quite high) was :lower than for either

the Teacher Characteristics or School Principal Questionnaires.

In both blue and yellow versions, a small number of correlation

coefficients failed to approach statistical significance; all

were generally lower than the correlation coefficients for the

other two sets of questionnaires.

In both blue and yellow versions,

there was tremendous variation in the magnitude of the coefficients.

For the most part, the relative magnitude of the correlations

was similar for the two questionnaires (that is, types of questions

that seemed highly stable in the blue form also tended to be highly

stable in the yellow form); there were, however,

some interesting

differences.

The most stable item in both questionnaires was the one asking

for the age range (in years and months) of children in the classroom

(r blue = .92 for lower age limit and .97 for upper age limit;

r yellow = .97 for lower age limit and .96 for upper age limit).

Since assignment to class by age is usually a school decision, and

one that can be expected to remain constant, the high correlations

between first

and second response might be interpreted as evidence

of fairly reliable reporting.

The items asking for demographic data

cpncerning students exhibited less stability.

In the blue question-

naires, the correlation coefficients for demographic items range

from .28 (estimated mobility of students' families into the school

attendance area) to .89 (percentage of Black students in the class).

In the yellow questionnaires the range was from .42 (percentage of

students from foreign language speaking homes) to .94 (percentage

of Black students again).

It seems reasonable to assume, however,

that at least some of the difference between the first and second

estimates is attributable to actual changes in the composition

of the class.

The two attitude items in the Class and Program Char-

acteristics Questionnaires, which might be expected to exhibit low

stability relative to the more factual items, yielded correlation

coefficients of .70 and .84 for the blue version and .74 and .79

for the yellow.

All were statistically significant beyond the .01

level.The main body of the Class and Program Characteristics Ques-

tionnaire deals with characteristics of reading instruction.

The

questions are identical in the blue and yellow forms of the ques-

tionnaire and treat such variables as time and length of reading

period, type and use of auxiliary instructional personnel, nature

and frequency of instructional groupings, nature of materials used

and the frequency of their use, and goals of instruction.

As a

whole, the variability among responses to the program items was

-36-

great, and the coefficients of correlation for first and second

reponses ranged from -.05 to 1.0.

The greatest number of co-

efficients fell into the range from .65 to .75, and were signifi-

cant at or beyond the .01 level.

Interestingly, the yellow ques-

tionnaire responses seemed more stable over time than the blue.

That is, for any given program question, the coefficient of correla-

tion for the yellow questionnaire was likely to be higher than that

for the blue.

For example, one question asks teachers to choose

from among five terms the one that comes closest to describing

their major classroom approach to the teaching of reading.

The

correlation between first and second response to this item among

teachers of compensatory reading was .73; among non-compensatory

reading teachers, the correlation was .92.

With few exceptions,

the other program characteristics items behaved similarly, with the

yellow questionnaires showing greater stability than the blue.

In general, the lower correlations appeared among the items that

could most reasonably be expected to change:

extent of use of news-

papers in the classroom, frequency of classroom grouping by specific

project, and amount of time spent by students in independent reading,

for example.

High correlations existed among such items as those

reporting the availability of a special remedial reading teacher,

extra training gained by the respondent in the teaching of reading,

and who selected the reading materials used by the class.

Why the non-compensatory teachers' responses appeared to be

more stable over time than those of the compensatory reading teachers

can only be the subject of speculation.

Perhaps compensatory reading

programs are more apt to change over the short haul than are non-

compensatory programs.

Perhaps the teachers themselves are more

likely to re-think their responses, goals, and strategies.

Certainly,

the groups were somewhat different to begin with, since the teachers

of non-compensatory reading were all classroom teachers and some of

the compensatory reading teachers were not (they were, in some instances,

specialist teachers rather than classroom teachers).

In any event,

there was less of a tendency for the non-compensatory group to shift

responses over time than there was among the compensatory group.

Overall, the results of this limited study of data stability

were heartening, especially considering the conservative nature of

the estimation process.

For all subjects, the responses were reason-

ably stable over time.

Some (teacher characteristics, for instance)

were exceptionally stable.

Others were less so but usually in pre-

dictable and easily explained ways.

In all, there can be a com-

fortable degree of confidence in the reliability of the reporting

in the questionnaires.

-37-

Compensatory Reading Program Clustering Analysis

The Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaire wascompleted by all teachers of second, fourth, and sixth gradecompensatory reading programs in the Spring 1972 sample schools.The questionnaire was divided into two major sections, "ClassCharacteristics," and "Program Characteristics." The lattersection included 85 variables descriptive of a broad array ofinstructional practices. (The Class and Program CharacteristicsQuestionnaire appears in Appendix B of this report.) Clearly,it was necessary to devise some means of grouping compensatoryreading programs into stable, meaningful types for purposes ofclarity and economy of reporting.

The 85 program descriptive variables were factor analyzed,and 28 principal components with roots greater than one wereextracted. These 28 factors were then rotated using the Varimaxcriterion. Examination of the 28 rotated factors and the propor-tions of the total variance explained by each led to the decisionto perform similar analyses limited to three through ten factors,respectively. Each of these eight solutions was in turn examined,and the five factor solution was finally selected as the mostmeaningful. Table 9 shows the five factors and the variableswhich load highest on each.

Factor

-38-

Table 9. Reading Program Factor Loadings

Variables

Emphasis onbasic readingactivities

Use of audio-visual equip-ment andmaterial

Emphasis onsupplementaryreading ac-tivities

Instructionalflexibility- -tendency not toselect question-naire optionsgiven

Class time spent matching letters or wordsClass time spent learning letter formsClass time spent developing visual discriminationClass time spent developing a sight vocabularyClass time spent on phonic and/or structural

analysisClass time spent improving motor abilities

related to readingClass time spent increasing attention spanUse of a total phonics program

Use of motion pictures and/or filmstripsUse of slides and transparenciesUse of tape recordings and recordsUse of "other" materialsUse of video or television tapesUse of newspapers, magazines, and other

periodicals

Time spent in creative writingTime spent in "other" reading activitiesTime spent in independent readingTime spent in library activitiesTime spent in reading for enjoymentTime spent in enrichment activitiesTime spent reading in content areasOrganizing of reading groups by specific projects

Use of "other" approaches to teachingcompensatory reading

Frequency of organizing reading groups by "other"criteria

Teacher has special training in teaching readingfor disadvantaged pupils

Tendency to divide instruction equally betweenmornings and afternoons

Time devoted to "other" relevant readingactivities

Use of-basal readers

Loadin

.69

.66

.64

.52

.51

.49

.43

-.45

.64

.61

.59

.54

.49

.49

.51

.51

.49

.49

.47

.43

.43

.40

.72

.64

.47

.45

.43-.58

-39-

Table 9. Reading Program Factor Loadings (continued)

Factor

Compensatoryreading programoffered duringtime releasedfrom otherschool subjects

Variables

Instruction carried out during regular schoolhours in time released from other classwork

Instruction carried out in time released fromphysical education, art, music, and/or seatwork

Instruction carried out in time released fromsocial studies, science, and/or foreignlanguage

Instruction carried out in time released fromlanguage arts

Loading

.79.

.70

.61

.52

-40-

The first factor has been labeled "emphasis on basic readingactivities," and examination of Table 9 shows that it is definedchiefly by the amount of class time spent on activities closelyrelated to the mechanics of reading. It is interesting to notethat, although "time spent on phonic and/or structural analysis"loads positively on this factor, "use of a total phonics program"is the only variable with a substantial negative loading. Thiswould seem to indicate that, while phonics activities are an im-portant component of programs of this type, exclusive concentrationon phonics is avoided.

The second factor is clearly related to the use of audio-visual materials. The high loading of "use of 'other' materials"can be more readily understood by examining the actual questionnaireitem (Appendix B, Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaire,item 32). The "other" option appears at the end of the item, im-

mediately following several audio-visual options. It is quite likelythat many respondents interpreted the item to mean "other audio-visual." The high loading of the "use of newspapers, magazines,and other periodicals" is not inconsistent, since it would seemcharacteristic of teachers who are willing to make use of materialsother than books.

The third factor shown in Table 9, "emphasis on supplementaryreading activities," is the logical complement of the first factor("emphasis on basic reading activities"). It is perhaps the clearestfactor of the group to interpret, defined by such variables as at-tention to creative writing, independent reading, and library acti-vities. It is interesting to note that the spirit of the factorextends even to the organizing of reading groups by specific projects,an obvious implication of the emphasis on things related but peri-pheral to reading.

The fourth factor is the most ambiguous of the five, and hasbeen labeled "instructional flexibility--the tendency not to selectquestionnaire options given." It seems composed equally of actualactivities (e.g., the division of instruction between morning andafternoon sessions) and the tendency to select the "other" optionof questionnaire items. This tendency can be viewed either as aresponse set or as reflecting the reality that the respondent'sinstruction is so unique as to be outside the coverage of thequestionnaire.

-41-

The fifth factor is clearly concerned with the offering ofcompensatory reading during time released from other school sub-jects. Its four defining variables are, in order of factorloading size, instruction carried out in time released from(a) other classwork, (b) physical education, art, music and/orseat work, (c) social studies, science, and/or foreign language,and (d) language arts. One of the most interesting aspects ofthis constellation of variables is that the size of the respectivefactor loadings corresponds exactly to one's expectations of thesubject areas from which time is released for compensatory reading.For example, one would expect that compensatory reading would becarried on more frequently during time released from physical educa-tion than from language arts, and the sizes of the respectivefactor loadings reflect this. Mathematics, the subject area listedin the questionnaire least likely to be preempted for compensatoryreading, also had the lowest loading (.44) on this factor. At

first glance, it might seem that this factor does not reflect anaspect of instruction as directly as do the other four. However,it should be remembered that the special treatment of being re-leased from other subjects to participate in compensatory readingclass s..Its these children apart from their peers, and may have aprofound effect upon their attitudes and motivations.

These five factors together account for 19% of the totalvariance. While this is not a large proportion, two considerationsshould be noted. The first 28 principal components account for 59%of the total variance. Thus it can be seen that the addition ofany one factor beyond five does not add appreciably to the propor-tion of variance accounted for. A second purpose of this analysiswas to reduce the number of program variables in order to presentas parsimonious and clear a description of programs as possible.If later analyses performed on the program outcome data collectedduring the 1972-1973 school year should indicate a need for amore complex descriptive framework, it will always be possible toadopt a more comprehensive factor structure.

In addition to the principal components analysis describedabove, a hierarchical group centroid analysis was performed on thesame data.

The cluster analysis procedure used is simply a hierarchicalapplication of Thurstone's (1947)* group centroid factor analysismethod. The hierarchical grouping method is similar to the proceduresused by Johnson (1967)** except that associations among clusters of

*Thurstone, L. L. (1947) Multiple-factor Analysis.The University of Chicago Press, p. 148.

**Johnson, S. C. Hierarchical Clustering Schemes.1967, 32, 241-254.

Chicago:

Psychometrika,

-42-

variables are computed as correlations between 2-score sums overthe respective variables within each cluster. At the first levelof clustering the most highly correlated pair of variables is

joined to form a new variable equivalent to the sum of 2 scoresfor the two variables chosen. In a similar way, hierarchicalclustering is advanced through successive levels by joining which-ever pair of remaining members (individual variables or previouslydefined clusters) has the largest association coefficient (highestcorrelation in absolute value). Preparation for further clusteringis accomplished at each level by computing new correlationsbetween the cluster just formed and all remaining individualvariables or previously formed clusters.

The outcome of hierarchical group centroid cluster analysisis a hierarchical tree pattern or dendrogram which graphicallyrepresents the associations among observed variables and/or theirlinear combinations. The results of this analysis tended to con-firm those of the factor analysis. That is, each of the fiveprogram indices (factors) resulting from the factor analysis hasan identifiable counterpart in the hierarchical cluster analysis.The cluster analysis typically identifies a pair or triad ofvariables as the start of a cluster, and then adds variables tothat basic cluster as the various intercorrelations dictate. Thus,

it is appropriate to examine the clusters to determine the extentto which they contain variables in common with their correspondingfactor.

The first (in order of magnitude of the correlation betweenvariables) cluster to appear is Initially defined by (a) the tendencyof teachers to report that they organize the compensatory readingclass into groups by criteria other than those listed in the Classand Program Characteristic Questionnaire, and (b) the tendency ofteachers to report that they use an approach to teaching compensatoryreading other than those listed in the questionnaire. These twovariables appear first with a correlation of .68. At the .42correlational level, the cluster is augmented by (a) the tendency tohave special training in the teaching of reading or in instructionaltechniques for disadvantaged pupils, and (b) the reported amount ofin-school time devoted to relevant reading activities other than thoselisted in the questionnaire. This cluster can be seen to correspondto the fourth program factor (instructional flexibility--tendencynot to select questionnaire options given) listed in Table 9.

The second cluster to emerge from the analysis is defined by thefollowing variables, the first two correlated .67 and the entire

cluster at .36:

-43-

Time spent by a typical pupil:

(a) matching letters or words

(b) learning letters or words

(c) improving motor abilities related to reading

(d) increasing attention span

(e) developing visual discrimination

(f) developing a sight vocabulary

This cluster corresponds to the first factor in Table 9(emphasis on basic reading activities).

The third cluster to emerge from the analysis is defined by thefollowing variables, the first two correlated .64 and the first threeat .48:

(a) the tendency to carry out compensatory reading instructionduring regular school hours in time released from otherclass work

(b) the tendency to carry out compensatory reading instructionin time released from physical education, art, music, seatwork, or study time

(c) the tendency to carry out compensatory reading instructionin time released from social studies, science, or foreignlanguage

This cluster corresponds to the fifth factor in Table 9(compensatory reading program offered during time released from otherschool subjects).

Cluster 4-7 did not correspond to any of the factors listed inTable 9. The eighth cluster to emerge from the analysis is defined bythe following variables, the first two correlated .48 and the entirecluster at .43:

(a) the tendency to use motion pictures and/or filmstrips incompensatory reading instruction

(b) the tendency to use slides and transparencies in compensatoryreading instruction

(c) the tendency to use tape recordings and records in compensatoryreading instruction

-44-

This cluster corresponds to the second factor in Table 9 (use ofaudio-visual equipment and materials).

The remaining factor listed in Table 9 (emphasis on supplementaryreading activities) appears initially as a pair of variables, at the.37 correlational level:

(a) amount of in-school time devoted to independent (self-selected reading

(b) amount of in-school time devoted to library activities

These two variables are then joined by the following triad ofvariables, forming the cluster at the .32 level:

Amount of time spent by a typical pupil in compensatory readingclass on

(a) creative writing

(b) reading for enjoyment

(c) enriching cultural background

The multi-method convergence on a single outcome, described in theforegoing section, lent credence to the obtained factor structure.

Anal sis of Pro ram Variation Amon and Within Schools

Data were obtained descriptive of compensatory reading programsin grades 2, 4, and 6 of each school in the sample, and many schoolsreported multiple programs at one or more grade levels. A programdescriptive questionnaire was completed by each teacher of each program,except in the case of team teaching, where a single questionnaire wascompleted by the team as a group. The next step in the data analysiswas to perform an analysis of variance on the program indices (factors)in order to assess the variation of programs among schools relative tothat within schools. There was some reason to hypothesize that programcharacteristics as described by individual teachers might vary con-siderably across grade levels, and therefore that this variation mightadd considerably to program variation within school. In order to assessthis possibility, the among/within schools analysis was carried outseparately by grades 2, 4, and 6 and for all three grades combined.Table 10 shows the results of this analysis.

-45-

Table 10 Eigenvalues of the Among/WithinSchools Matrix*

AllGrades

Grade2

Grade4

Grade6

No. of Schools 504 293 306 245

No. of Questionnaires 1958 606 565 431

Linear Combinations

1 2.94 2.39 2.06 2.50

2 2.45 1.66 1.89 2.40

3 1.72 1.55 1.70 1.64

4 1.57 1.17 1.38 1.59

5 1.30 0.94 1.01 0.83

* Eigenvalues of AW-1

, where

A = among mean cross-products matrixW = within mean cross-products matrix

Thus, when the number of variables equals one, the above eigenvaluesare identical to values of F.

The analyses shown in Table 10 were performed on the fiveprogram indices previously described. The eigenvalues shown areto be interpreted similarly to F values for each of the fivelinear combinations of the five indices. The first linear com-bination is that which maximizes the value of F, the second isthat which maximizes the remaining unaccounted for variance, andso on to the fifth linear combination which minimizes the valueof F. Referring to Table 10, it can be seen that for grades 2,4, and 6 combined, there is more variability among schools thanamong teachers within schools. For each of grades 2, 4, and 6separately, the results are similar but the among schools effectsare less marked. This result is intuitively credible, especiallyin view of the fact that the analyses were performed on theprogram indices, which reflect general, stable characteristics acrossgrades of compensatory reading programs. While the specific characteris-tics of programs might be expected to vary somewhat more across gradeswithin school, the generalized indices are more representative of

-46-

overarching educational approaches, and therefore are relatively

constant within schools regardless of grade level.

Also, spillover

effects caused by communication among students and teachers

undoubtedly contribute to these similarities.

As a result of these

analyses, it was decided to cluster average program per school.

Clustering of Reading Programs

The major objective of the data analysis is to define a limited

number of program types.

Therefore a cluster analysis was under-

taken, using the indices developed by the factor analysis previously

described.

Obverse factor analysis was the methodological technique

employed to carry out this clustering.

There were several reasons why it was desirable to define pro-

gram clusters, rather than working with a very large number of

program types.

One of the ultimate objectives of the study is to be

able to identify types of programs which are associated with relatively

large gains on the criterion variables.

In order that such information

be useful, it is necessary that the criterion estimates be stable

and that the program types be replicable.

Clusters based on relatively

large numbers of programs are more apt to possess the requisite

stability and replicability.

Since the among/within analysis

previously described showed relatively minor program index variation

across grades within schools, the obverse factor analysis was

performed for grades combined.

Thus, a given school was assigned

to only one cluster, applicable to each of grades 2, 4, and 6.

Examination of the eigenvalues suggested that the first 5 factors

be used as the basis for clustering schools.

A varimax rotation was

performed, and each school was assigned to one of the 10 clusters

(factors), defined by the poles of the 5 factors, on the basis of

its highest (absolute value) factor loading.

A matrix of the

correlations between the five program indices and the 5 bipolar

factors was generated as a means of describing the clusters.

Table 11 shows these correlations.

-47-

Table 11. Correlations Between ProgramIndices and School Clusters*

School Clusters

Reading Program Indices

r

I 2 3 4 5

I. Emphasis on basic reading activities .09 -.62 .75 -.09 -.01

II. Use of audio-visual equipmentand materials .44 -.54 -.62 -.20 .19

III. Emphasis on supplementaryreading activities .23 -.02 .13 .86 .33

IV. Instructional flexibility--tendencynot to select questionnaire optionsgiven

-.58 -.56 -.27 .25 -.43

V. Compensatory reading program offeredduring time released from otherschool subjects .59 .08 -.09 .16 -.70

* Correlations were computed over all schools, between the schools'factor scores on reading program indices and their obverse factorscores on school clusters.

The first school cluster is characterized by high positivecorrelations with indices II and V, and a moderately high negativecorrelation with index IV. These are schools which utilize releasedtime for compensatory reading instruction, with considerable emphasison the use of audio-visual equipment and materials. They tend eitherto use unique instructional approaches or to believe and report thatthey use such approaches.

The second cluster in Table ll has no high positive correlationswith any of the five program indices. It is characterized mainly bysubstantial negative correlations with indices I, II, and IV, a pat-tern which sheds considerable light on what these schools do notemphasize, but not a great deal on their actual practices. It is hopedthat the classroom observations planned for the 19/3-1974 school year mayprovide more information regarding instructional techniques in theseschools.

The third cluster is characterized by substantial correlationswith only two program indices -- positive with I and negative with II.These schools clearly concentrate their efforts on the basic techniques

-48-

of reading instruction, (see Factor 1 in Table 9) to the exclusion ofless traditional aids such as audio-visual materials.

The fourth cluster has only one substantial correlation, and isdefined rather purely by an emphasis on supplementary reading activities.

The fifth cluster is also primarily a one-index cluster, and ischaracterized by the avoidance of compensatory reading programs offeredduring time released from other subjects. These schools also show atendency to report their programs in terms of the options provided by thequestionnaire.

Examination of the school factor loadings on each cluster revealedthat certain schools did not have a substantially higher loading onany one cluster. It was therefore decided to remove these schoolsfrom their originally assigned clusters and form from them an eleventhcluster. This cluster is characterized by schools having small andonly slightly differing loadings on all five bipolar clusters.

_49_

RESULTS

Differences and Similarities Among Schools

Which Do and Do Not Offer Compensatory Reading

The preceding sections have treated aspects of sampling, instru-

ment development, data collection, and data analysis.

The analyses

described in the previous section had as their prime

purpose the

condensation of many variables into a smaller number of constructs

descriptive of schools and their compensatory reading

programs.

The

analyses to follow present the findings of the study, often in terms

of these constructs.

One item in the School Principal Questionnaire requested re-

spondents to indicate, for each compensatory reading program, whether

it was funded totally, partially, or not at all under Title I.

On

the basis of responses to this item, schools were classified as

(a) Total Title I (all compensatory reading programs totally or

partially funded by Title I),

(b) Partial Title I (at least one, but

not all, compensatory reading programs partially or totally funded

by Title I), or (c) Non-Title I (no compensatory reading programs

partially or totally funded by Title I).

It should be noted that

this categorization does not reflect the amount of funding, but only

its presence or absence, regardless of amount.

A fourth category,

that of schools which offer no compensatory reading programs, was

defined by responses to another questionnaire item.

The following

table compares a variety of school characteristics among these

four categories of schools, based on unweighted data.

-50-

Table 12. Comparisons Among Schools CategorizedBy Type of Funding

Means

Variable

TotalTitle I(N =76) **

PartialTitle I(N=152)

NonTitle I

111=123)

NoCRP(N -53)

Enrollment 500-699 300-499 300-499 300-499

Number of classrooms 21.6 19.3 19.0 19.3

Instructional organizationGrade 2, graded 73% 77% 71% 71%Grade 4, graded 78% 79% 71% 73%Grade 6, graded 70% 62% 66% 64%

Adequacy of instructional facilities(scale 1-4)

Size of physical piailt 1.9 2.2 2.1 1.8Condition of physical plant 1.7 2.1 2.0 1.8Suitability of physical plant 2.0 2.3 2.1 2.1Number of instructional personnel 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.1Number of teacher aides 3.0 2.6 2.5 3.0Number of other non-professionals 2.5 2.4 2.0 2.6Quantity of printed materials 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.9Quality of printed materials 1.7 1.9 2.1 1.9Quantity of audio-visual materials 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1Quality of audio-visual materials 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.0Quantity of instructional equipment 2.0 2.1 1.9 2.1Quality of instructional equipment 1.8 3.2 3.1 1.9Number of other professional personnel 2.2 2.3 2.7 2.4

Students moved from school attendance area 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%

Stuaents mov:d into school attendance area 0-10% - 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%

Students from migrant worker families 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%

Students whose families receive publicassistance 0-10% 11-25% 11-25% 11-25%

Students whose head of householdattained following levels of education:

Attended college 11-50% 0-10% 0-10% 11-50%Graduated from high school 61-90% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%Attended high school 0-10% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%

Finished eighth grade 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%Did not finish eighth grade 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%

**N's for individual variables may be less due to differential response to itemswithin questionnaires.

-51-

Table 12. Comparisons Among Schools CategorizedBy Type of Funding (continued)

Means

Variable

TotalTitle 1(N=76)**


NonTitle I(M=123)

NoCRP(N=53)

School Families in followingoccupations:

Professionals 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%Business owners or managers 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%White collar workers 11-50% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%Skilled workers 11-50% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%Unskilled workers 0-10% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%Unemployed 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%

School families having following annualincomes:

$12,000 and over 11-50% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%9,000-11,999 11-50% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%6,000- 8,999 11-50% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%3,000- 5,999 0-10% 11-50% 11-50% 11-50%

under 3,000 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%

Students of following racial origin:Caucasian or White 91-100% 51-90% 51-90% 51-90%Negro or Black 0-10% 11-50% 11-50% 0-10%Spanish surnamed 0-10% 0-10% 0-102 0-10%

Oriental 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%American Indian 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%Other 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10%

Schools in which children are bussed in 29% 29% 30% 17%

Students bussed in 11-25% 11-25% 11-25% 11-25%

Schools in which children are bussed out 20% 23% 29% 19%

Students reading one or more yearsbelow grade level:

Grade 2 11-25% 11-25% 11-25% 11-25%Grade 4 11-25% 26-50% 11-25% 11-25%Grade 6 11-25% 26-50% 11-25% 11-25%

* *N's for individual variables may be less due to differential response to itemswithin questionnaires.

Variable

-52-


Means

TotalTitle(N=76)**

PartialTitle(N=152)

NonTitle(N=123)

NoCRP(N-53)

Total school per pupil expenditure

Total district per pupil expenditure

Total funds for compensatory reading

Costs per pupil of compensatory reading

Number of students in CRPSchool totalGrade 2Grade 4Grade 6

Students participating in CRP(s)Grade 2Grade 4Grade 6

Basis for determining pupilparticipation in CRP

All students participateMembership in specific groupsDepressed reading levelsTeacher recommendationParent requestVolunteerOther

Number personnel participating in in-service training to prepare for CRP:

Regular classroom teachersSchool-located reading specialistsSchool district reading specialistsOther school personnel

Teacher resistance to implementation of CRP

NoneSome

$ 651

840

6,302

183

178

35

36

39

0-1%1-25%1-25%

24%

11%

88%84%

46%8%

4%

6.6.9

.7

1.2

80%20%

$ 585

795

22,230

308

165

35

34

38

1-25%1-25%1-25%

13%

60%93%87%32%9%4%

7.4

1.31.4

4.2

70%307.

$ 620

720

22,002

183

18434

35

31

1-25%

1-25%1-25%

21%

37%

85%85%

38%7%

2%

8.21.3

1.41.5

71%

29%

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*These items were in that section of the questionnaire not answered by those

respondents who did not have a compensatory reading program.

**N's for individual variables may be less due to differential response toitems within questionnaires.

-53-


Means

Variable

TotalTitle I(N =76) **


NonTitle I(N=123)

NoCRP(N-53)

Community resistance to CRPNone 87% 80% 86% *

Some 13% 20% 13% *

Use of volunteers in CRP classroom 45% 48% 54% *

Use of pupils as tutors 53% 32% 40% *

Expectation of Summer 1973 program 29% 40% 38% *

Grades included in Summer program:Grade 2 38% 40% 41% *

Grade 4 37% 41% 49% *

Grade 6 29% 30% 34% *

Basis of selection of summer programstudents

Previous summer program participation 13% 30% 23% *

Previous non-participation 5% 8% 6% *

Depressed reading level 43% 52% 54% *Membership in target group 12% 32% 28% *

Teacher recommendation 45% 53% 57% *

Parent request 38% 37% 40% *

Volunteer 1270 7% 11% *

Other 4% 2% 1% *

*These items were in that section of the questionnaire not answered by thoserespondents who did not have a compensatory reading program.

**N's for individual variables may be less due to differential response toitems within questionnaires.

-54-

Examination of Table 12 reveals that there are neither many

nor large differences among the four categories of schools--perhaps

not as many as might be expected. There seems to be a trend in the

data indicating that the "Partial Title I" schools are more dis-

advantaged economically and educationally than are the "Total Title I"

schools. In support of this hypothesis, the "Partial Title I" schools

show:

1. a less adequate number of teacher aides

2. a higher proportion of unskilled workers among parents

of pupils

3, a lower proportion of families making $12,000 and over,

and a higher proportion making between $3,000 and $5,999

4. a lower proportion of White students and a higher

proportion of Black students

5, a lower school and district per pupil expenditure

6. a higher proportion expecting to offer a Summer 1973 program

One possible explanation of this trend might be that the "PartialTitle I" schools have, because of their greater need, devoted a vari-ety of resources in addition to Title I to the solution of theirproblems, while the "Total Title I" schools have felt the necessityto provide compensatory reading programs only to the extent thatthey are supported by federal funds. A second possible contributingfactor is the presence of differential funding opportunities in cer-tain areas of the country. For example, the availability of Miller-Unruh funds in California provides disadvantaged schools an additionalsource of funds and many such schools might thus fall into the "PartialTitle I" category. It is also interesting to note that "membership ina target group" is a much more common basis of selecting summer programstudents in the "Partial Title I" schools, a finding which suggeststhe greater incidence of such groups (or the importance attached tothem as a problem) in these schools.

Table 12 shows that total school per pupil expenditures are lessthan total district per pupil expenditures for all three school fund-ing categories, and that the difference is greater for Total Titleand Partial Title I schools than for Non-Title I schools. This seemsto indicate that schools in the first two categories have fewer re-sources, relative to their own districts, than do the Non-Title Ischools. Since schools in all three categories have compensatoryreading programs, it is not surprising that they. all, on the average,seem to have less to spend than do the other schools in their district.It should be noted, however, that these data were supplied by schoolprincipals, who might be expected to make more accurate estimates ofexpenditures in their own school than in the district,

-55-

Perhaps the most striking differences among school fundingcategories are with respect to the "total funds for compensatoryreading" variable. Since these data refer to total funds, ratherthan funding per program or per pupil, it may be that differencesin school size, program size, and/or number of programs per schoolare at least partially responsible for the smaller total expendi-ture in Total Title I schools.

Differences Among Teachers of Compensatory Reading Programs

Funded by Various Sources and Teachers of Non-Compensatory

Each teacher who received a Class and a Program CharacteristicsQuestionnaire was also requested to respond to a questionnaireconcerning certain personal and professional characteristics. Thusit is possible to contrast teachers in each of several school cate-gories in terms of these characteristics. Table 13 shows theresults of these comparisons.

-56-

Table 13. Comparisons Among Teachers in SchoolsCategorized By Type of Funding

Variable*Total Partial Non- No

itle I Title I CR

Females

Years teaching experience

Years taught in present school

Type of teaching certificationNoneTemporaryRegular

85%

6-10

3-6

0%

11%89%

88%

6-10

3-6

2%

16%83%

91%

6-10

3-6

1%

11%

88%

84%

6-10

3-6

0%17%

83%

Highest earned degree:None 0% 4% 1% 5%

Diploma (less than 4 years work) 0% 2% 1% 8%

Bachelor's 71% 72% 75% 76%

Master's 29% 22% 23% 112

Doctor's 0% 0% 0% 0%

Special training in diagnosisand treatment of reading problemsacademic level of special training: 55% 65% 61% 46%

Undergraduate 18% 27% 29% 46%

Graduate 70% 48% 532 46%

Inservice 12% 20% 14% 8%

On the job 0% 3% 3% 0%

Other 1% 1% 2% 02

Chose school in which teaching 47% 44% 45% 54%

Chose class teaching this year 372 38% 41% 35%

Satisfaction with school conditions(scale from 1 = highly satisfied to4 = highly dissatisfied)

Physical facilities 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.0

Faculty 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6

Ability of student body 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.1

Attitudes of student body 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.1

Administration 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.9

Overall philosophy of education 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.9

*See the Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire in Appendix B for thecomplete items.

-57-

Table 13. Comparisons Among Teachers in Schools CategorizedBy Type of Funding (continued)

Variable*

Relief in giving compensatory programsto disadvantaged students at extracost (scale from 1 = definitely yes..3 Undecided, to 5 = definitely no)

Belief that compensatory programs areworthwhile (scale 1 = definitely yes..3 = undecided, to S = definitely no)

Beliefs about academic capabilitiesof disadvantaged pupils (scale from1 = strongly disagree...3 - uncertain,to 5 = strongly agree)

Can learn as well with properinstruction

Will always score lowerDo not wort to learnDo not have right backgroundHas been proven will never do

as well

Materials more important thanmethods in reading instruction

Methods more important thanmaterials

Teacher's ability more importantthan methods or materials

Have more trouble learning to read

Have shorter attention span

Have different linguisticexperiences

Do not have foundation of concepts

Total Partial Non- No

Title I Title I Title I CRP

1.8 1.7 1.7 2.0

1.6 1.5 1.5 1.7

3.5 3.4 3.5 3.2

2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5

1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9

3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7

2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3

2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1

3.6 3.6 3.7 3.5

3.9 4.0 4.0 3.5

3.8 3.8 3.9 3.6

3.4 3.3 3.6 3.4

4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

3.8 3.7 3.9 3.6

*See the Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire in Appendix B for the

complete items.

-58--

Table 13. Comparisons Among Teachers in Schools CategorizedBy Type of Funding (continued)

Variable*Total Partial Non- No

Title I Title I Title I CRP

Learning to verbalize completethoughts important for disadvantagedchildren 3.9 4.0 4.0 3.9

Improving student self-imageimportant 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.2

Ability to ask questions importantin teaching reading 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.7

Wrong response as useful as correctresponse in teaching reading 3.9 3.8 3.9 3.9

nave lower aspirations 3.6 3.4 3.6 3.6

*See the Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire in Appendix B for thecomplete items.

-59-

Examination of Table 13 reveals that there are very few

outstanding differences among teachers in the various school

categories.

In particular, there is almost unanimous agreement with

respect to teachers' satisfaction with school conditions, beliefs

about the value of compensatory reading programs, and beliefs about

the academic capabilities of disadvantaged pupils.

Regarding the

latter, it is interesting to note that teachers, regardless of school

type, tend to believe that disadvantaged students can learn as well

as advantaged students, with proper instruction.

They reject the

notion that disadvantaged students do not want to learn.

Neverthe-

less, they agree that the disadvantaged student has more troubl_

learning to read, and agree that there are a number of problems

for these students to overcome, suchas not having the right back-

ground, having different linguistic experiences, and not having a

proper foundation of the necessary concepts.

It is also interesting to note that the tendency mentioned in

another section of this report for "Partial Title I" schools to

appear more economically and educationally disadvantaged than "Total

Title I" schools is to some extent borne out by the data on teacher

certification and education.

Examination of Table 13 shows that

"Partial Title I" schools have somewhat more teachers with no teaching

certificate or temporary teaching certificates, and no degrees or

degrees based on less than four years' work.

Likewise, they have

considerably fewer teachers with special training at the graduate

level in the diagnosis and treatment of reading problems.

Relationships Between Selected Variables

It was of interest to determine the degree of relationship for

selected pairs of variables in the Principal, Class and Program

Characteristics, and Teacher Characteristics Questionnaires.

Cross

tabulations of responses were obtained and examined.

Where expected

cell frequencies were too small to permit obtaining a meaningful

chi square, adjacent categories were collapsed as necessary.

For

each collapsed cross tabulation, values of chi square and contigency

coefficients* were computed.

Tables 14 and 15 give the contingency

coefficient values obtained.

* The contingency coefficient is defined as:

C'X

N+

2

-60-

Table 14. Contingency Coefficients For VariablesFrom the Principal Questionnaire

(Weighted Data)

VariablesContingencyCoefficient

Enrollment vs. % school heads of households who attended college .25

Enrollment vs. Z school heads of households who graduated high school .20

Enrollment vs. % school heads of households who attended high school ,16Enrollment vs. % school heads of households who finished 8th grade .22

Enrollment vs. % school heads of households who did not finish 8th grade .21

Enrollment vs. % family income 12K and over .23

Enrollment vs. % family income 9 - 12K .24



Enrollment vs. % family income under 3K .18

Enrollment vs. % Caucasian .31

Enrollment vs. % Black .26

Enrollment vs. % Spanish surnamed .22

Enrollment vs. bussing into school (yes or no) .14

Enrollment vs. % bussed in .40

Enrollment vs. % bussed from attendance area .07

Enrollment vs. existence of compensatoryreading program (CRP) .16

Enrollment vs. number of compensatoryreading programs (for schools which have one or more) .35

Enrollment vs. supplementary funding CRP .22

Examination of Table 14 shows that total enrollment of school hasa moderate relationship to a number of indicators of school socio-economicstatus. Interestingly, school size is much more highly related to thenumber of compensatory reading programs (in schools which have one ormore) than it is to the presence or absence of compensatory readingprograms in all schools.

-61-

Table 15. Contingency Coefficients For VariablesFrom the Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire

(Weighted Data)

VariablesContingencyCoefficient

Years of teaching experience vs. certification .35Years of teaching experience vs. degree held .28

Years of teaching experience vs. special training in reading .25

Years of teaching experience vs. ethnicity match to students .06

Years of teaching experience vs. free choice of school .06

Years of teaching experience vs. free choice of class .13

Years of teaching experience vs. responsiveness ofadministration to requests for materials, remedial helpfor students, changes in curriculum .12

Years taught in present school vs. free choice of school .08

Years taught in present school vs. free choice of class .14

Degree held vs. special training in treatment of readingproblems .16

Special training in treatment of reading problems vs. beliefin offering CRP's at extra per pupil cost .14

Special training vs. worthwhileness of CRP's .11

Teacher/student ethnicity match vs. responsiveness ofadministration requests for:materials .04

remedial help for students .05

changes in curriculum .02

Teacher/student ethnicity match vs. belief in offeringsCRP's at extra per pupil cost .04

Teacher/student ethnicity match vs. belief in worthwhilenessof CRP's 4 .05

Table 15 shows that, in general, the professional characteristics ofteachers bear slight relationship either to their freedom to choose schoolsand/or classes, their perceptions of administrators' responsiveness totheir requests, or their beliefs concerning the value of compensatoryreading programs. The student/teacher ethnicity match variable has notbeen shown to be related to any other teacher characteristic tapped bythis questionnaire.

-62-

The Distribution and Density of CompensatoryReading Programs

It is possible, based on a combination of data from thequestionnaires and the sampling population tapes, to summarize theoccurrence of compensatory reading programs with respect to geographiclocation, urbanization of school attendance area, and school fundingcategory. Table 16 shows, for the various program funding cate-gories, the incidence of schools in each of four geographic regions.

Table 16. Incidence of Schools ByCompensatory Reading Program FundingCategory and Geographic Region*

Geographic Region

Sch001 runaing categoryTotal

Title I(N=76)


NonTitle I(N=123)

No Comp.Reading(N=53)

North East 28% 236 19Z 17%

North Central 32% 29% 38% 26%

South 20% 32% 34% 36%

West 21% 16% 9% 21%

*See footnote in Table 1 for listing of states in each region.

Table 17 shows, for the same funding categories, the distributionof sample schools by the degree of urbanization of the school sendingarea.

-63-

Table 17. Incidence of Schools By CompensatoryReading Program Funding Category and

Urbanization of Attendance Area

School Funding Category

Urbanization *

'Large city, over 500K population

:Large city, 200K-500K

,Suburb of a large city(over 500K population)

Rural area near a large city(over 500K population)

Middle-size city, 50K-200K

Suburb of a middle-size city(50K-200K)

Rural area near a middle-size city(50K-200K)

Small city or town, less than 50K

Rural area, not near a large ormiddle-size city

Total Partiali

Title I Title I(N=76) (N=152) :

I

3% 1 5% 1

7% 1%

17% 8%

!

14% 13%

8% 3%

32% 346

3% 3%

1% 5%

5% 15%

NonTitle I

No Comp.I

Reading(N=123) (N=53)

7% 13%

7% 4%

10% 8%

11% 6%

2% 82

30% 25%

0% 6%

3% 6%

20% 21%

1

* Categories defined as on 1970-1971 School Universe Tape

Reference to Tables 13 and 14 shows that the "Total Title I"Schools are most frequently found in the North East and in the suburbsof middle-size (50K-200K population) cities. The South is most fre-quently the location of "Partial Title I," "Non-Title I," and "NoCompensatory Reading" schools, and suburbs of middle-size cities arein each case the most frequent urbanization category. "Rural area,not near a large or middle-size city" is the urbanization categoryshowing the greatest frequency variation across funding categories,ranging from only 5% of all "Total Title I" schools to 21% of all"No Compensatory Reading" schools.

-64-

Table 18 shows the incidence of compensatory reading programsamong schools of various sizes, categorized by type of funding.

Table 18. Incidence of Schools by CompensatoryReading Program Funding Category and

Total School Enrollment


1 TotalTitle I

' PartialTitle I

Non No Comp., Title I . Reading

Total School Enrollment (N=76) (N=153) '(N= 123) 1 04=53)i

Less than 100 0% 1% 2% 11%

100-299 11% 21% 24% 1 17%

300-499 25% 34% 24% 13%

500-699 42% 26Z 32% 38%

1700-899 12% 14% 8% 13%

:900 or more 11% 3% 10% 8%

c

There seems to be some tendency for the larger school tomake up a greater proportion of the "Total Title I" category thanthey do of either the "Partial Title I" or "Won-Title 1" categories.

-65-

A second question of interest concerns the proportion of schoolsoffering various numbers of compensatory reading programs. Table 19shows these proportions for groups of schools defined by fundingsource and regional location.

Table 19. Proportions of Schools OfferingVarious Numbers of Compensatory

Reading Programs

Number of CRP's Offered

School Category 1

More than2 3 4 4

Total Title I (N=76)

North East ' 28Z

North Central 42%South j 22%West I 8%

°artial Title T (N=152) !

North East 1 16%North Central 130%South 37%West 17%

38% 20% 0%19% 30% 0%

10% 30% 0%

33% 20% 100%

28% 40% 20%30% 25% 20%33% 15% 30%9% 20% 30%

!Non -Title I (N=123)North East 14% 19% 24% 21%North Central 43% 35% 29% 36%South 32% 32% 41% 36%West 11% 13% 6% 7%

17%17%33%

33%

33%33%

33%0%

0%

50%

50%

0%

Examination of Table 19 reveals some regional differences, butno clear patterns of response. It should be remembered, however,that each school principal determined the division of his schools'compensatory reading offerings into programs, guided by criteriafurnished him by ETS. It is probable that the application of thesecriteria was not completely uniform across schools.

-66-

The final relationship to be examined is that between schoolfunding category and proportion of non-White students. Table 20shows this relationship.

Table 20. Incidence of Schools by CompensatoryReading Program Funding Category andProportion of Noh-White Students


Non-White Students

TotalTitle T(N=76)

PartialTitle(N=152)

NonTitle(N=123)

No Comp.Reading(N=53)

N %N % N

0-10% 57 75% 66 43% i 67 54% 33 62%

11-50% : 16 21% 43 28% 36 29% 15 28%

51-90% 1 1% 23 15% 13 10% 2 4%

91-1007. 2 3% 20 13% 7 6% 3 6%

A tendency for "Partial Title 1" schools to appear moredisadvantaged than "Total Title I" schools was noted in an earliersection of this report. The data of Table 20, which showrelatively high proportions of non -White students in "PartialTitle I" schools, are consistent with this tendency.

-67-

Description of Schools in Terms ofCompensatory Reading Program Indices

In a previous section of this report, the development of compensatoryreading program indices was described. Five indices were identified bymeans of factor analysis (see Table 9). It was then possible to comparevarious categories of schools in terms of their mean factor scores oneach index. Such a procedure gives a summary view of school categories.Although it compacts a large amount of descriptive information aboutreading programs into a relatively small number of variables, it has theadvantage of reducing the available information into a more comprehensibleform. Table 21 shows, for each of several school funding categories, themean index score and its associated standard deviation.

Table 21. Means and Standard Deviationsof Program Index Scores EySchool Funding Category

Funding CategoryTotalTitle I(N=76)

PartialTitle I

(N=152)

NonTitle I(N=123)

No. Comp.Reading(N=53)

Factor Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean LS.D.

1 - Emphasis on basicreading activities .27 1.55 -.35 1.48 -.06 i.42 .49 1.43

II - Use of audio-visualequipment and materials .23 1.43 -.15 1.26 -.28 1.09 .05 1.18

III Emphasis on supplementaryreading activities .07 1.00 -.38 1.00 -.18 .88 .38 1.07

IV - Instructional flexibilitytendency not to selectquestionnaire optionsgiven -.08 1.50 .64 1.55 .14 1.36 -.18 1.06

V' - Compensatory reading pro-gram offered duringreleased time .30 1.33 -.12 1.18 -.10 1.09 .21 1.43

-68-

Although it is impossible to assign absolute meaning to the

magnitude of the indices reported in Table 21, it is possible to

make comparisons across categories.

Perhaps the most striking

aspect of the Table 21 data is the pattern of positive and

negative index means.

It can be seen that, for each of the five

indices, the "Total Title I" and "No Compensatory Reading"

categories have mean indices of the same sign, while the "Partial

Title I" and "Non-Title I" categories have mean indices of the

opposite sign.

Moreover, the only index for which the "Partial

Title I" and "Non-Title I" schools had a positive mean index

score was "instructional flexibility--the tendency not to select

the questionnaire options given."

It is difficult to know

what these results imply, but it is possible to speculate about

their meaning.

One interpretation might be that the "Total

Title I" and "No Compensatory Reading" schools are attempting

to cope with moderate academic problems using relatively

traditional instructional approaches (indices 1, 2, 3, and 5).

On the other hand, the "Partial Title I" and "Non-Title I"

schools either are trying, or report they are trying, less

traditional means of approaching their reading problems, and

seem to be doing so via programs which do not take time away

from the regular curriculum.

The meaning of these data will be

further explored in succeeding phases of the study.

-69-

Description of School Clusters in Termsof Reading Program Index Scores

In an earlier section of this report (Clustering of Reading Programs),the development of school clusters was described. Table 11 and thediscussion following it showed how these clusters might be defined interms of their correlations with reading program index scores. Table 22shows index score means and standard deviations for each of the elevenschool clusters.

Table 22. Means and Standard Deviationsof Program Index Scores By

School Cluster

Reading Program Index *

No. of SchoolSchools Cluster

I II III IV V

Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D.

59 lA 1.32 1.37 1.85 1.44 1.78 1.66 -1.67 .73 2.11 1.13

46 1B -1.69 1.97 -1.82 1.61 -1.92 1.70 2.77 1.85 -2.86 1.84

73 2A -2.08 1.36 -1.96 1.41 -.68 1.33 -1.16 .90 -.93 1.38

41 28 1.93 1.75 2.85 1.62 .03 1.39 2.48 2.19 .55 1.54

70 3A 2.06 1.39 -1.12 1.05 .30 1.25 -1.05 1.23 .41 1.07

44 38 -2.13 1.38 1.39 2.00 -.93 1.62 1.43 1.75 .09 1.65

41 4A .34 1.65 .12 1.32 2.45 1.26 .05 1.15 1.17 1.50

37 4B .22 2.16 .07 1.23 -2.71 1.30 -.54 1.15 -.65 1.38

it 5A -.49 .1.71 .25 1.78 1.39 1.30 -1.38 1.31 -1.93 1.47

19 513 .70 1.83 .76 1.12 .04 .85 1.38 1.70 2.35 1.20

53 6 -.04 .79 -.17 .77 .40 .88 -.28 .95 -.15 .76

*Index 1Index IIIndex IIIIndex IV

Index V

Emphasis on basic reading activitiesUse of audio-visual equipment, and materialEmphasis on supplementary reading activitesInstructional flexibilitytendency not to select questionnaireoptions given

Compensatory reading programs offered during time releasedfrom other school subjects

See Table 11 for the correlations between these indices and the variousschool clusters.

-70-

Each of the reading program indices shown in Table 22 correspondsto the same-numbered index described in Table 9 of this report. Thefirst ten school clusters shown in Table 22 (1A, B through 5A, B)correspond to the same numbered clusters shown in Table 11, exceptthat the A and B designations refer to the poles of these five bipolarclusters. Cluster 6 is a conglomerate cluster, composed of schoolswhich were not clearly of any of the first ten clusters. Inspectionof Table 22 shows that, in general, the reading program index meansare consistent with the program index/school cluster correlationsshown in Table 11. That is, large correlations in Table 11 correspondto large values of the index means (both positive and negative) inTable 22. The relationship between the signs of the correlationsand the signs of the means are also consistent. Positive correlationscorrespond to a positive mean for the "A" cluster and a negative meanfor the "B" cluster, while negative correlations correspond to anegative mean for the "A" cluster and a positive mean for the "B"cluster. Exceptions to this pattern occur only where both thecorrelation and the values of the means are negligible, as, forexample, in the relationship between School Cluster 3 and ProgramIndex V. In general, the entries in Table 22 show that schoolclusters do in fact differ from each other in terms of one or moreprogram indices, in approximately the ways one would expect fromthe cluster/index correlations. For example, Table 11 shows thatProgram Index III correlates much more highly with School Cluster 5than with any of the other clusters, while Table 22 shows that thelargest pair of index means (both positive and negative) forProgram Index III are those associated with School Clusters 4Aand 4B.

Among and Within Cluster Analysis

Further confirmation of the finding that school clusters do indeeddiffer with respect to reading program variables of interest wasprovided by an analysis of variance performed on the school clusters.Eigenvalues of 123, 71, 61, 37, and 32 were obtained for the firstthrough fifth (respectively) linear combinations of the five readingprogram indices. These eigenvalues are to be interpreted similarly toF values. The first linear combination is that which maximizes thevalue or F, the second is that which maximizes the remaining unaccountedfor variance, and so on to the fifth linear combination which minimizesthe value of F. Since all the obtained eigenvalues are highlysignificant, it can be seen that the obtained school clusters aresignificantly different from each other, as measured by all fivereading program indices.

-71-

Item Analysis of Questionnaire Data

Appendix D contains the basic item response data for the

questionnaires (School Principal, Class and Program Characteris-

tics, Teacher Characteristics) administered in the Spring 1972

Survey.

Although the among/within schools analysis (described

in an earlier section of this report) showed that

grades within

schools were a relatively unimportant source of

program variation,

it was felt that the basic item data still should bedisplayed

separately by grade.

This was primarily because the among/within

analysis was performed on the

program indices, and therefore

left open the possibility that considerableamong grades vari-

ation might still exist at the individual item level.

Appendix A contains a discussion of the weighting procedures

used to adjust the questionnaire data fornon-response.

In general,

the weighted and unweighted item data

appear to be very similar,

but for certain items the differences can be appreciable.

Both

weighted and unweighted data are presented in Appendix D, in order

that the reader can make his own assessment of the importance of

whatever differences exist.

It should be noted that, for the

weighted data, the application of the weights renders meaningless

(without the appropriate transformation) the frequencies andmany

of the summary statistics reported.

As an obvious example, the

"cases processed" are not integers.

In comparing the weighted and

unweighted results, only the "percent" and the "percent below" of

the various item options are comparable.

Any attempt to summarize such a comprehensive body of data

would be both futile and misleading.

The interested reader will

find a wealth of information concerning the characteristics of

compensatory reading programs, their students, teachers, and

schools.

PHASE I REPORT


OF

COMPENSATORY READING PROGRAMS

APPENDICES A, B, C, E

APPENDIX A

is

Sample Design for

"A Large Scale Evaluation of Compensatory

Reading and Reading Related Efforts

in the Elementary Grades"

Prepared for

Educational Testing Service

as a subcontract under

Contract OE C- 0-71-3715

by

The Research Division of

Westat, Inc.11600 Nebel Street

Rockville, Maryland 20852

December 31, 1971

Revised May 15, 1973

1. Introduction

This report sets forth the sample design for Phase I of ContractOEC-0-71-3715. That contract resulted from a response to RFP 71-25,Task B-10. The RFP suggested drawing a sample of schools from thosein the Elementary School Survey (ESS), sometimes referred to as the

"Belmont Survey." The ESS had been going on for several years, but

not during 1971-72. At the date of preparation of this report its

future was uncertain.

After some study of the sampling problem, it was decided to draw

a sample independent of the Belmont sample. The primary reason

was that it seem ad desirable to avoid overlap of the compensatory

reading sample (this study) with the Anchor Test Study, which was

being done during 1971-72. Also, a sample drawn from the Belmontsample would not have had enough opportunities for rational substitution.

Furthermore, the Belmont sample used size of LEA as a major stratify-ing variable, but previous studies have shown that size of LEA is poorlycorrelated with pupil performance as compared to community variableswhich reflect socio-economic status (SES). When the above factors wereconsidered, along with the need to coordinate with the ESS in the event ofits continuation, it was decided to draw an independent sample.

The sample design outlined below includes two stages of sampling.First is a sample of about 750 schools drawn for purposes of describingcompensatory reading programs. The second-stage sample is a subsampleof 200 schools for purposes of performance testing of pupils.

2. Stratification of the Universe and Sample Selection

2.1 Construction of Stage. I Sampling Frame

The 1970-71 School Universe Tape was used as the basic list ofschools from which to draw the sample. However, at the time the workhad to begin on the sampling frame, the 1970-71 lists were not availablefor New Jersey, Maine, Arizona, California, Minnesota, Connecticut,and South Dakota. The 1969-70 School Universe Tape was used forthese states. These two tapes were merged and selected data for thoseschools having enrollments in grades 2, 4 or 6 were extracted.

2. 2 Sources of Data Used for Stratification

Mayeske, et al.. in A Study of Our Nation's Schools (1969), showed thatsocio-economic status of the community and racial-ethnic group member-ship were highly correlated with test performance. Other variables,such as degree of urbanization, size of school, geographic location, etc.,were relatively unimportant community variables in the prediction ofperformance. For this reason, average income and percent minority arebeing used as the major stratifying variables in this study.

Unfortunately, income measures that can be identified with schoolattendance areas on a nationwide basis (for stratification purposes) areeither not available or prohibitively expensive to produce. An example ofavailable but expensive statistics is the Westat income estimator appliedto ED's and Block Groups in the 1970 Census Summary Tapes. Census

estimates of income were not available at the time of sample drawing andwill never be reported for areas below the Tract and MCD level.

One source of income data which was considered is the 1966 averagegross income per taxpayer reported by IRS by five-digit ZIP Codes. Sincethe 'LIP Codes of schools in the School Universe Tapes are known, it ispossible to match files to associate income data with schools. The IRS

2

data ZIP revenue tapes report number of taxpayers and aggregate grossincome for taxpayers with less than $3, 000 of income, $3, 000 and un,ler

$10, 000 of income, and $10, 000 and over. When the average gross incomeper taxpayer in the $10, 000 and over class exceeded $15, 000, the averagewas replaced by $15, 000 to avoid undue influence of a few large incomes.

Even then, average income for small ZIP Code areas is considered tobe a measure subject to wide variation and not necessarily indicative ofthe SES of the school attendance areas within the ZIP Code area.

Another source of income data is the 1960 Census. (Income data from

the 1970 Census were not available in time for this project.) Census medianfamily income data are reported by tract or minor civil division (MCD).However, identification of schools with tracts or MCD's would have beenprohibitively expensive in view of the budget available. Therefore, thesmallest geographic unit for which Census median family income wasassociated with schools was the county or independent city containing the

school.

Percent minority enrollment of schools in districts of 3, 000 or moreenrollment was obtained from a computer tape made available by the Officeof Civil Rights (OCR). For schools without this information, the percentnonwhite reported in the county by the 1970 Census was used.

The records in the School Universe Tape (combined 1969-70 and 1970-71, as described above) were augmented by adding income from the ZIP reve-nue tape, minority enrollment from the OCR tape, 1960 Census median familyincome, and percent nonwhite for the county from a Westat tape of countyCensus characteristics. Some analysis was done on the resulting tape todetermine whether to use Census county income or MS ZIP Code area in-

come. Cross-tabulations having percent minority on one dimension andeither Census income or IRS income on the other were prepared. Thesetabulations were run for various sizes of counties in terms of population

.. -

3

and for various size classes of numbers of taxpayers in five-digit ZIP Codes.On the basis of the observed relationship between minority enrollment andincome, a (largely subjective) decision was reached to use IRS five-digitZIP Code income data for schools in counties of 50,000 population or moreand to use county median family income as reported by the 1960 Census for

schools in counties with less than 50,000 population. The 1960 Censusincomes had to be appropriately transformed to be comparable to the 1966

ZIP Code incomes. This transformation is discussed tater.

One final source of data was used. The Program Reference File forthe 1970-71 school year contains a data item showing whether the schoolparticipated in ESEA Title I programs. If the record showed such parti-cipation for grades 1-6 for either academic or nonacademic programs,the school was labeled a Title I school. The Program Reference File isnot as complete as the School Universe Tape. Schools in the latter filethat are not in the Program Reference File, or in that file but without anindicator of Title I participation, were labeled as Title I schools if theirrecord in the School Universe File indicated federal funded compensatoryprograms. In this manner, it was possible to attach a Title I indicator toevery school in the file.

The format of the merged computer file is shown in Supplement A.

Since income statistics came from two sources at two different pointsin time, it was known that they would not be comparable without adjustment.All schools in counties of 50,000 or more population were given an incomemeasure from the IRS tape, so an equating adjustment was needed only for

1960 Census income for schools in counties of less than 50,000 population.

Examination of preliminary tabulations showed that there was a differentrelationship between IRS income and Census income for the counties contain-ing schools with less than 40 percent minority than for counties containing

4

schools with 40 percent or more minority. Table 1 shows the approximaterelationships found. Comparisons were made from the cumulative income

distributions, and the following rules were adopted:a. If percent minority is less than 40, add $1, 100 to Census income.

b. Otherwise, add $1, 500.

This translation makes it possible to record all income in IRS-equivalent units.

5

Table 1 Correspondence between Census median income (1960) and1966 average gross income reported by IRS for countieswith population under 50, 0000

IRS Income

Census

Income

Less than 40%

minorityL

40% or more

minority

$2, 000 $3,200 $3, 700

3, 000 4,400 4, 700

4, 000 4,800 5, 400

5, 000 5,600 5, 900

6, 000 7, 600 7, 800

Average differ-$1, 100 $1, 500

ence from Census

2.3 Assignment of Measures of Size and the Formation of Major Strata

For purposes of stratification, the following classes of income andpercent minority enrollment were used:

1.

Percent minority

1.

Income ($)

Less than 5 Less than 2, 0002 . 5 9.9 2. 2, 000 - 2, 9993. 10 - 19.9 3. 3, 000 3, 999

4. 20 - 39.9 4. 4, 000 - 4, 9995. 40- 59.9 5. 5, 000 - 5, 999

6. 60 - 79.9 6. 6, 000 - 6, 999

7. 80 and over 7. 7, 000 - 7, 999

8. 8, 000 - 8, 999

9. 9, 000 - 9, 999

10. 10, 000 and over6

Tabulations of number of schools, total enrollment, and "measure of

size" by Title I participation and the above classes of income and minority

are shown in Supplement A. The measure of size was assigned to schools in

such a manner as to optimize approximately the allocation of the sample tothe various size classes of schools in view of the anticipated variability Mthe universe and the cost of data collection. The measures of size assignedto schools are given in Table 2. The methodological basis for assignmentof the measures of size is given in Supplement B.

Table 2. Assigned measures of size.

Enrollment inGrades 2, 4 and 6

Assigned Measure

of size

Less than 50 4

50- 99 9

100 - t99 14

200 - 499 22

500 or more 35

Major stratum boundaries for both Title and nonTitle I schools areshown in Tables 3 and 4. In constructing the major strata, primaryemphasis was placed on income as a stratifying variable and secondary

emphasis on percent minority. This decision was based upon a prelimi-

nary analysis performed by Westat which showed that the relationship

between Title I status and percent minority is less pronounced than

the relationship between Title I status and income.

The number of schools, enrollments and aggregate measures of sizeof the major strata are shown in Tables 5 and 6.

Table 3 Identification of major strata - Title I schools

Percentminority

< 5

5 - 9. 910 - 19. 9

20 - 39. 9

40 - 59. 9

60 - 79.9

80'+

Income classes (thousands of dollars)

2 -2, 9

4- 5- 6- 7 - 1 8 -- I 9_r

4, 9 5 :9 6. 9 17.9. 8.9 9.9 104- NA

Note: Numbers in the clusters identify major strata

Table 4 Identification of major strata - nonTitle I schools

PercentI

minority I

<4 4 - 4. 9 5 - 5. 9.6 - 6. 9 7 - 7. 9 8 - 8. 9 9 - 9. 9

< 55 - 9. 9

10 - 19.920 - 39. 9

40 - 59. 9

60 - 79. 9

80 +

Income classes (thousands of dollars)an,

mole: Manbers in the clusters identify major strata

8

Table 5 Number of schools, enrollment, and measures of sizefor major strata, Title I schools

Major stratum Nu mbe rof schools i

Enrollment

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

1, 449

1, 536

1, 286

947

2, 623

1, 922

1, 892

5, 603

1, 940

1, 474

1, 103

4, 563

1, 878

1, 777

1, 689

1, 610

1, 702

258, 332

181, 808

226, 175

265, 273

280, 696

302, 414

358, 208

677, 113

317, 303

297, 657

275, 846

679, 477

334, 893

382, 908

324, 930

329, 500

371, 199

I

..111. ....

9

Measureof size

21, 647

17, 718

19, 568

18, 649

28, 415

27, 049

36, 564

66, 429

27, 888

24, 435

20, 336

62, 516

29, 120

30, 715

27, 768

27, 364

30, 669

)

Table 6 Number of schools, enrollment, and measures of sizefor major strata, nonTitle I schools

Major stratum Number Enrollment Measureof schools of size

1 1, 710 216, 234 19, 376

2 2, 603 233, 897 24, 331

3 3, 676 357, 555 36, 869

4 1, 681 277, 552 23, 868

5 1, 060 209, 266 17, 161

6 602 158, 173 11, 474

7 4, 569 659,326 60, 450

8 1, 571 282, 564 24, 373

9 908 189, 194 15, 336

10 1, 502 329, 090 32,542

11 2, 603 525, 535 43, 417

12 816 167, 587 13, 757

13 1, 175 259, 326 20, 850

14 1, 613 363, 429 29, 360

15 1, 146 257, 419 20, 793

16 1, 107 262, 840 20, 747

10

2.4 Formulation of Final Strata

As discussed earlier, community variables which measure socio-economic status have been shown to be highly associated with test perfor-mance and this association provided the basis for the decision to use in-come and percent minority as the principal stratifying criteria. If only

pretesting and posttesting were involved no other controls would need tobe placed on the design. However, an important part of the study is todescribe compensatory programs on a nationally projectable basis. Forthis part of the job, degree of urbanization, geographic region, and sizeof school may be important.

If these factors had been brought in as major stratifying factors,

however, the number of substrata would have been too many for the sample

to be allocated. Another way to take them into account was developed.

The plan uses the following steps:

1. Put the schools in each major stratum, as defined by Tables 3and 4, in order by Census region, as follows:

N ortheast

North CentralSouth

West

2. Within the Northeast Region put the schools in order by degree ofurbanization from most urban to least urban, based upon reports in theProgram Reference File, as follows:

Large city, over 500, 000 populationLarge city, 200, 000 to 500, 000 population

Suburb of a large cityMiddle-size city, 50, 000 to 200, 000 population

Suburb of a middle-size citySmall city or town, less than 50, 000 populationRural area near a large city

11

Rural area near a middle-size cityRural area not near a large or middle-size cityUnknown

The classes were chosen by school principals and have obvious weaknesses,both because of the definitional problem and the arbitrary choices as towhich is "more urban" between selected pairs. They should serve somepurpose with respect to spreading the sample over various degrees ofurbanization, however, in spite of these weaknesses. Also, there will not

be any bias introduced into degree of urbanization because of the weaknessOf this classification.

3. The order of urbanization was reversed in the North Central Regionand Western Region so that the schools on the boundary of the listings be-tween two adjacent regions would have similar urbanization characteristics.

4. The schools, having been put in the above order in each majorstratum, were divided into a number of approximately equal sized blocks,based upon the measure of size and these blocks of schools are called"final strata." A detailed description of the formation of final strata isgiven later in this subsection.

5. The schools in each final stratum were assigned random numbersand sorted in the order of the random numbers.

6. Two schools were selected from each final stratum by a procedurediscussed in section 2.5 to form the initial sample.

7. Substitutes were selected by a procedure also described insection 2.5.

The aggregate measure of size of all schools is as follows (thesum of the figures in the last columns of Tables 5 and 6):

Title I schools 516, 850

NonTitle I schools

TOTAL

414, 704

931, 554

12

The UT upon which the contract was based specified that the sample ofschools shall be distributed as follows:

Title I participating schools 60%

Title I eligible but not participating schools 30%

Non Title I eligible schools 10%

It was subsequently found that there is no uniformly applied criterion of Titleeligibility and that eligibility, as determined by LEA's, is not reported onany of the available data bases. Therefore, we interpreted the re-quirement to call for 60 percent of the sample to be allocated to Title Ischools and 40 percent to schools not participating in Title I funds. Thereare, of course, some differences between participation, as indicated

on the data base, and actual participation. Actual status was determined

iron: the sampled schools.

The target number of schools to be selected for the first phase of thesurvey was 750, of which 720 were to come from the school universe listand 30 were to come from the sample of school districts drawn to fill ingaps in the school universe listings (see Section 4, below). Only 11 were

drawn from the district sample, so that the total sample size was 731.With two drawn per final stratum, we needed to identify 360 final stratato achieve a sample of 720 from school universe listings. After elimi-

nating all schools which participated in the Anchor study, only 11

eligible schools remained. These were drEmn from the district sample,

so that the total sample size was 731. With two drawn per final stratum,

we needed CO identify 360 final strata to achieve a sample of 720 from

school universe listings. Of these, 60 percent (216 final strata) were

allocated to Title I schools. The remaining 144 final strata were

allocated to nonTitle I schools. Table 7 gives the average of the ag-

gregate measures of size of the final strata for Title I schools and

for nonTitle I schools.

Table 7. Average measures of size of final strata

Total measureof size

Number of Average measurefinal strata of size

Title I schools 516, 850 216 2,393

Non Title I schools 414, 704 144 2, 88013

Once the schools were ordered within each major stratum asdescribed previously and the average final stratum sizes (given in Table7) were obtained, the definition of final strata within major strata pro-ceded as follows:

thLet A(gfi) represent the measure of size of the i school in the gth major

stratum, where f=1 for the Title I schools and f=2 for the NonTitle I schools.

Then, the aggregate measure of size, A (fp, for the tth major stratum was com-

puted as follows:

A(f)g

= Z A (1).

1 gi (1)

Then, the number of final strata, N (f), defined in major stratum g was

g

obtained from the following expression:

N(g)A(g)= A(f) / A (f), rounded to the nearest integer, (2).

where A (f) equals the average final stratum size indicated in Table 7. (That

(f) (f)is, A = 2393 if f= 1 and A = 2880 if f=2. )1The average measure of size, A()

g, for a final stratum defined in the

gth major stratum was then computed as follows:

A(1) = A (f) / N(f)g g g (3)

For a given major stratum, the value of A()g

will differ somewhat from the

overall average, A if ), depending upon how the number of final strata, N(g1),

computed in equation (2) was rounded for the major stratum.

Based on the ordering of schools by region and degree of urbanizationwithin each major stratum, cumulative measures of size, Cum A (f) weregi

computed for each school as follows:

14

(fh iCum (A (f )= E A .gi j=3. gi (4)

Final stratum boundaries (f)daries were determined from the Cum A . so as approxi-

mately to equalize the measures of size of the final strata. The procedureused is as follows:

1. The schools in the first final stratum within the g th major stratumffor each value of f are the schools for which Cum A (f

.) < A()

g . The nextgi

school (i. + 1) was added if Cum A(f.) - A (f) < A(f)gi + I g gi + 112. This final

stratum was identified as h=1.

2. The schools in the second final stratum within the same majorstratum were all of the schools following those in the first final stratum

-(f) )-fwith Cum A gi(f) (1

g< 2 A , including the next one if Cum A gi + 1 - 2A(

ge

A(f 112. The other final strata in major stratum g are defined in a

similar way.

f3. The result is N (g ) final strata of approximately equal size, defined

within the gth major stratum. Final strata are defined in the same way foreach major stratum.

2. 5 Drawing the Sample of Schools, Stage I

The schools were actually drawn into the sample by the following proce-dures:

1. The schools within each final stratum were sorted on the five-digitrandom number.

2. New Cum Al for the schools (now in random order within final

stratum within the gth major stratum) were obtained by cumulating across allfinal strata within a major stratum g.

))f f3. Compute A (g = A (g /4.

/

15

4. The selection numbers within the g th major stratum are

R(f) = A=(f)g I I g

R(f) A-- (f)g12 g

R(f) (f)= 5 Ag21 g

(f) (f)= 7 A

g22 g

R (f)(1) = A(f) - A=U.)

gNg

2 g g

5. The schools selected for the initial sample are those for which Cum(f) . (f)A nu:hides the selection numbers. The Cum A covers a selection

number if it corresponds to the first school on the major stratum list whosef)Cum A ( is greater than or equal to the selection number.

6. Substitute schools were drawn at the same time as the initial sample.

Four substitute selection numbers were defined at equidistant intervals off0.4 A (g ) before and after the selection numbers. The full set of selection

numbers in the gth major stratum were structured as follows:(f)

R g11(3) = 0.=(f)

2Ag

R = 0. 6A(f) -=(f)g11(1) g

R(f) =(f)gll = A

g

(f) fg11(2) = 1.4A(g)

(f))(--=fg12(4) = I. 13A. g

R(f) (f)gI2 (3) 2

== . 2A

g

16

H(f) --a(f)= 2. 6Ag12(1) g

1/(f) = x (f)g12 g

R(1) =a)=

812(2) ' 3. 4Ag

R(f) (f)= 3. 8Ag12(4) g

and so on, where the subscript in parentheses indicates an order of priorityof substitution (see below).

7. In addition to listing the initial sample and the substitute schools,all schools within the same school districts as the initial sample schoolswere listed for use in the sample supplementation procedure described inSection 2. 6 and Supplement C.

8. The priority order for substitution was:Substitute the school, if any, in the same school districtand with the same 2-4-6 grade structure that is closestin size (enrollment in grades 2, 4, and 6), provided it isin the same major stratum and has the same or adjoiningmeasure of size, No other school in the same districtshould be substituted.

Substitute schools in other school districts, up to a maxi-mum of four eligible substitutes for each primary sampleschool. The numbers in parentheses listed earlier indicatethe order of priority of these schools in obtaining substitutes.

A particular substitute school may, in some instances, bea possible substitute for more than one initial sample school,

9. Substitutes were to be used if the initially selected schoolrefused to cooperate, was previously selected for the AnchorTest study, or was a school participating in a Follow Throughprogram.

17

The procedures given above produced the sample of schools to besurveyed in Phase I (description of compensatory reading programs)except for those selected from the supplemental sample discussed below.

2.6. Supplemental Sample - Phase I

It is known that the sampling frame of schools (the School Universe Tape)is neither complete nor up to date. Part of that file was as old as Fall, 1969,at the time of sample drawing and there have been changes both in grade

composition and numbers of schools since the School Universe Tape wasprepared.

The following steps were taken to obtain a supplemental list ofschools.

a. Draw a sample of school districts with known probability of

selection.b. For each of them, obtain a complete listing of schools with enroll-

ments in grades 2, 4 and 6.c. Check this list against the listing of the School Universe Tape for

those districts.d. Any schools on the current list but not on the School Universe

Tape constitute a special sampling frame.

e. Stratify this special sampling frame and draw two schools

from each stratum. Subsample so as to achieve overall probabilities

of selection that approximate as nearly as possible the probabilities

that the schools included on the School Universe Tape had of inclusion

in the initial sample.

Since it was necessary to conduct the Phase I survey prior to the endof the 1971-72 school year, the plan to obtain lists of schools from sampleddistricts and then to match against the School Universe Tape became in-feasible. The fact that a similar augmentation sample had been drawn for

18

the Restandardization Survey (the so-called Anchor Testing) made itpossible to draw the sample in another way so that the survey deadlinescould be met.

The sample was drawn from the schools having grades 4, 5 and 6 thathad been identified in the Anchor Survey as not being on the School UniverseTape. A listing of schools with grades 2, 4 and 6 was desired, to matchthe Compensatory Reading study, but the differences in listings were not

judged to be great enough to invalidate the procedure.

The schools that had been included in the Anchor Survey supplement

were not permitted to come into the Compensatory Reading sample. Since

selection for the Anchor Study had been with probability approximately

proportional to a measure of size, probabilities of schools remainingfor the Compensatory Reading sample had to be adjusted upward to accountfor differences in average measures of size abetween schools alreadydrawn and those available for drawing in the Compensatory Reading sample.The methodology used in selecting the supplemental sample is describedin Appendix C.

2.7. Sampling of Teachers within Schools Phase I

A principal's questionnaire was sent to each school in the sample.In addition, a questionnaire was sent to every teacher of compensatoryreading in any of the grades 2, 4 or 6 of the sampled schools. Therewas no subsampling.

2.8. Sampling of Schools - Phase II

Phase 1 sample schools were surveyed in the Spring of 1972. The

Phase II sample was drawn on the basis of those returns. This samplingwas done by the prime contractor, Educational Testing Service, and isnot described here.

19

3. Estimation Procedures

3.1 Estimation - Phase I

hLet x(fg)

i ithrepresent the value of some characteristic for the school

f)in the hth final stratum in the gth major stratum. The variable x ( might

be dichotomous, equalling 1 if a school had a given characteristic and zerootherwise. It could also be a sum of student scores, or the number ofstudents tested, or the number of students in compensatory reading, etc.

f)Let w ( represent the sampling weight associated with the ghith

school selected into the sample. The value of w (g0 is given by the follow-

ing equation:

w(f) (f) /2A(f)ghi ghi . (5)

The expression given in equation (5) is the inverse of the selection proba-bility. In the cases in which a substitute school was used, the weight forthe substitute was computed from equation (5) as if the substitute had been

the primary selection.

ithThe sampling weight, w( for the participating school contained

in major stratum g and final stratum h was adjusted for nonresponse to obtain)Ithe final weight, w

(f Separate adjustments were made within each of

10 weighting classes, defined by grouping the major strata. The non-response adjustment, Ice, applied to all participating schools in weighting

class c was computed as follows:

kc = tE w(f) /E' w(f) ]ghi ghi ghi ghi c' (6)

where I' denotes the summation over the schools in class c that cooperated.That is, kc is simply the sum of the sampling weights of all schools in class

c selected into the sample divided by the sum of the sampling weights of thofeschools in class c that reported for the survey.

20

The final weight, wa)1., for school ghi contained in weighting class cghi

was computed as follows:

w(f)' w(f) .k . (7)ghi ghi cThe grouping of the strata into the 10 weighting biasses and the correspondingnonresponse adjustment factor (ke) for each class are given in Table 10 in

Section 3. 4. Also, some further discussion of nonresponse adjustments isgiven in section 3.4.

Then, an estimate of the total of the characteristic for the entire TitleI (or nonTitle I) universe is

X.(f)' =' (f)' (f)

Z w x , (8)ghi ghi ghi

where i indicates summation over the schools that reported.

Adding over Title I and nonTitle I schools, an estimate of the total ofthe X- characteristic for the entire universe is as follows:

s2 o

7- = Z x(

(9)f

An estimate of the ratio of the characteristic X to the characteristic Y isfound by

R'(f) = x(f)s / y(f)t , (10)

where y(f.)' is found from the formula for x(f)t, above, by substituting yfor x.

ft should be noted that substitution for schools that do not cooperatebiases the results unavoidable. However, the rules chosen for substitutionand for estimation are designed to reduce the impact of such biases.

21

Note also that if X is the characteristic "receives Title I funds,"separate estimates are made for f = 1 and for f = 2 and then they areadded together. Weights are assigned in accordance with the assignmentof schools for stratification purposes, and not in accordance with theirobserved status as Title I or nonTitle I schools.

3. 2 Estimation of Variances - Phase I

Let v2'

denote the estimated relvariance of the estimator x'. Then,x

2 / 2 2vx,gh

E (r) icl ghl xigh2) r / x;

where the subscript r denotes those final strata in which two schoolsreport, and xg' = xghi wg' for the first participating school in the final

stratum, and similarly for the second school. The summation is onlyover those final strata in which two schools reported. (For simplicity,the superscript (f) has been dropped.) The estimated relvariance of theratio x' /y' is

where

v2(xl/y1 = v2 + v2 - 2v11x' Y1

(12)

vxty, . ar)(xghi- r , andxgh2) ('''g'111 Ygh2)1 \ v

v2 .

371

= v,Y1Y1

22

x' y'r r

At the time the sample was designed it was presumed that nonre-

sponse would be low because of the multilevel substitution rules. However,

for a variety of reasons, 174 schools out of 731 did not respond and nosubstitutes responded for them. Therefore, many of the pairs of schools,upon which the above formulas are based, contained only one member ofthe pair or no members.

Two recognized procedures are available for estimating variancesin such cases. One is to regroup the unpaired respondents into "pseudo-pairs" and compute variances as in equations (9) and (10). The result isan overestimate of the variance, but all of the data are used. The secondmethod is to discard (only for variance-computation purposes) the unpairedschools and to estimate variances only from the complete pairs. The resultsare unbiased, if response is unrelated to variability, but not all of the datais used. The second method was recommended for this study.

3. 3 Illustration of Variance Computation

The computations are illustrated for major stratum 1. Final

results will, of course, be added over all strata. The basic computations

are shown in Table 9. The relvariance computations follow:

2 55,659,000vx 0.14298(19, 730)2

v2,

37,869 - 0.0474937

9(893)

1, 059 000x'y' 19, 730(893) - 0.06011

= 0.14298 + 0.04749 - 0.12022 = 0.07025

23

Table 9. Illustration of variance computations - (hypothetical data)

Majorstratumstratum

(g)

Finalstratum

(h)(i)

Finalweight*

g(wt hi )

x

g 1

Weightedx

(xghi

wghi

Y

ghi

Weightedy

(yghi

wghit )

Squared xdiff (000)

(1)

Squared ydiff.(2)

xy cross -

product (000)(3)

1 1 1 199 40 7,960 1 1992 129 10 1,290 1 129

6,670 70 44,489 4,900 467

2

2 ) noncooperating

3 1 129 20 2,580 1 1292 82 0 0 0 0

2,580 129 6,656 16,641 333

4 1 82 0 0 0 0

2 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 1 82 10 820 1 822 82 0 0 0 0

820 82 672 6,724 67

u12) noncooperating

7 1 199 I 60 11,940 1 1992 noncooperating

8 1 I 129 I 0 0 0 02 noncooperating

9 1 64 15 960 ** 1 64\ **la 64 25 1,600/ 1 64/2 226 20 4,520 1 ** 1 226)2a 64 0 0/ 0 0

- 1,960 - 98 3,842 9,604 192

Total for pairs x' = 19,730 y' = 893 55,659 37,869 1,059

Totals for all observations x' = 31,670 y' = 1,092

* Rounded for simplicity in the presentation.** The two schools are added before taking differences.

The estimated standard errors are:

= /01,670)2 (0.14298) 12,000

= 1(1, 092)2 (0.04749) = 238

a(x,,ly..) = J(31,670 11,092)2 (0.07025) = 7.69

Note the introduction of the second prime on x and y in the standard

errors. This is necessary because the pairs of schools for which data areavailable do not add to the totals for the population. Note also that one

should add over all strata to obtain results for the whole sample.

The example uses hypothetical data, but is representative of thecase in which y might equal 1 if the school has a compensatory reading

program and zero otherwise. The variable x might be the number of

fourth grade pupils who participate. Then xu/y" is an estimate of thenumber who participate per school (a ratio estimate).

3.4 Nonresponse Adjustments

It had been planned that if a sampled school refused to participatethe first substitute school would be included and if that school refused thesecond substitute school would be included, and so on, so that a high

participation rate would be achieved. However, the shortness of theavailable survey period and the fact that many schools did not "refuse"in the formal sense but simply did not act plus a variety of other circum-stances associated with school closings and consolidations producedrelatively high nonresponse to the survey. For example, out of 720schools drawn in the initial sample, 168 did not respond and no substitutes

25

were obtained for them. Another 22 schools were closed and, by the rulesestablished, no substitutes were drawn for them.

It was decided to take a sample of school districts and to surveythem to obtain a sample of schools that were not in the sample frame(primarily, new schools).

When the 22 closed schools were extrapolated by using basic samplingweights they were estimated to account for 6.5 percent of total schools.On the other hand, extrapolation of the (mostly new) schools from thespecial district sample amounted to 2.3 percent of the schools in theinitial sampling frame. Thus, by this approximate reckoning, the netdecrease in number of schools was 4.2 percent. The 1971 StatisticalAbstract (p. 100) shows an averag' annual decline in number of publicelementary schools of about 2.8 percent per year between 1964 and 1966.The decline between 1966 and 1968 cannot be computed because of inclusion

of some combined elementary-secondary schools, but the figures arenot inconcsistent with the 2.8 percent per year observed earlier. Consider-ing the amount of sampling error in the district sample and the fact thatnew districts were not given a chance to enter the sample, the reconcilia-tion of aggregate ,numbers of schools appears quite reasonable, i. e. , the

2.8 percent compared to the 4.2 percent computed above.

The result of the above analysis was the decision to consider closedschools as respondent schools with zero characteristics. i. e. , not to

include them in the nonresponse adjustments.

Table 10 shows the nonresponse weight adjustments (IQ. The lastcolumn shows the factor to be multiplied by the basic sampling weight to pro-duce the nonresponse-adjusted weights for each responding school in the

26

sample. These adjustment factors were computed as specified inequation (6) in section 3.1.

27

Table 1G. Nonresponse weight adjustments

Nonresponse MajorAdjustment Strata

Group Included(1) (2)

NumberSchoolsSampled

(3)

NumberSchoolsClosed(4)

NumberSchools

Nonresponse(5)

Basic WeightsNon-

responseAdjustment

(8)

Responding andClosed Schools

(6)

TotalSchools

(7)

1 1, 2, 3 48 0 16 2,775.0 4,146.8 1.494

2 4, 5, 6 62 1 20 3,916.1 5,457.0 1.393

3 7, 8, 9 110 2 30 7,298.8 10,098.7 1.384

4 10, 11, 12, 13 114 5 20 7,108.6 8,568.9 1.205

5 14, 15, 16, 17 98 0 19 5,366.2 6,500.2 1.211

6 18, 19, 20 58 10 14 6,751.3 8,632.4 1.279

7 21, 22, 23 36 1 10 2,647.7 3,396.2 1.283

8 24, 25, 26 70 3 8 6,336.2 7,190.8 1.135

9 27, 28, 29, 30 76 0 21 5,231.7 6,926.6 1.324

10 31, 32, 33 48 0 10 2,997.0 3,745.1 1.250--- ___

Subtotals 720 22 168 50,428.6 64,662.7

District Sample 11 0 6 764.8 1,459.0 1.908

Grand Total 731 22 174 51,193.4 66,121.7

.SUPPLEMENT A

SAMPLING UNIVERSE FILE STRUCTURE

1. Track: 7-track2. Density: 556 BPI3. Parity: Even4. Label: Unlabelled5. Record Size: 340 characters6. Blacking factor: 10 records /block7. Mode: Binary coded decimal (BCD)8. Contents of records:

COLUMN DESCRIPTION CODE

1 - 2 State code

3 - 7 School code

8 -12 School district code13 -15 County code

16 Title I1 if Title I on Program Reference Fileor, if not in that file, federally fundedcompensatory program indicates onSchool Universe File; 0 otherwise

17 Filler18 -19 Minority class code

18 Data from OCR tape 1

Data from county tape 2

19 Less than 5% 1

5- 9 210- 19 320 - 39 4

40 - 59 5

60- 79 6

80 or more 7

N.A. 8

A-1


20 Degree of urbanization code

Large city, over 500K population 1

Large city, 200K-500K population 2

Suburb of a large city 3

Rural area near a large city 4Middle-size city, 50K-200K population 5

Suburb of a middle-size city 6

Rural area near a middle-size city 7

Small city or town, less than 50Kpopulation 8

Rural area, not near a large or middle-size city 9

No answer 0

21 Geographic division code

North East 1

North Central 2

South 3

West 4

22 - 26 Adjusted average income from IRS 1966ZIP Code file (Zi)

27 - 29 Percent minority30 Grade combinations

2, 4, 6 only 1

2 only 2

4 only 3

6 only 42, 4 only 5

4, 6 only 6

31 - 34 Pupils in grade 2

35 - 38 Pupils in grade 439 - 42 Pupils in grade 643 - 46 Pupils in grades 2, 4 and 647 - 50 Pupils in all grades51 - 55 Median income from county data file (Xi)

A-2


56 Zi classesLess than $1, 000 0$ 1, 000 - $1, 999 1

$ 2, 000 - $2, 999 2

$ 3, 000 - $3, 999 3

$ 4, 000 - $4, 999 4$ 5, 000 - $5, 999 5

$ 6, 000 - $6, 999 6

$ 7,000 - $7,999 7$ 8, 000 - $8, 999 8$ 9, 000 - $9,999 9

$10, 000 or more +N. A.

57 Xi . classes

Less than $1, 000 0$ 1, 000 - $1, 999 1

$ 2, 000 - $2,999 2

$ 3, 000 - $3,999 3$ 4, 000 - $4, 999 4$ 5, 000 - $5, 999 5$ 6, 000 $6, 999 6$ 7, 000 - $7, 999 7$ 8, 000 - $8, 999 8

$ 9, 000 - $9, 999 9$10, 000 or more +N. A.

58 - 59 Probability of selection (Ai)60 - 61 Lowest grade in school62 - 63 Highest grade in school

64 - 65 F.I. P. S. * state code

66 68 F. I. P. S. * county code

69 - 70 State abbreviation71 - 75 ZIP Code

'Federal Information Processing Standards

A-3


76 - 77 Population size code of county

Public schools in counties of:Less than 5, 000 population 61

5, 000 9, 999 population 6210, 000 - 24, 999 population 6325, 000 49, 999 population 6450, 000 99, 999 population 65

100, 000 - 199, 999 population 66200, 000 or more population 67N.A. 68

78 Tax return code<500 1

500 - 1, 999 2

2,000 - 3,999 3

4, 000 or more 4N.A. 5

79 Data source

From 1969-70 school universeFrom 1970-71 ELSEGIS III- C

90

80 File typePrimary sample 1

Substitute sample 3

81 - 110 School district name111 - 140 School name

141 - 153 City

154 - 175 Street address176 - 201 County name

202 - 210 Number of class sections202 - 203 Grade 2204 - 205 Grade 4206 - 207 Grade 6208 209 Ungraded

210 W A.

A-4

Mesta Research, inc. MULTIPLE LAYOUT CARD FORM.

CUSTOMER NAME ETS Compensatory Reading CONTROL NO. 0243

' -' - 1 - 4 1 - - I - 1 - 1 - 4 - 4 - 1

USOE CODE11

w-1t%.

A

ill1- 8t in 02 5-r ,..)

t7 el II.

i b'¢2cO 4.1

1V,Lb t- ulct ,),2I Z1

luz:

liqfp-0 .-

ei!c A 1s1V 2 1g `-/ct 44a 0

22 /3 24 ZS Z6

1riiziVt

27 ?I 23

1 I f . 1 1 f 111IT PUPILS I

74),---

iii(171U .../z5? 53 54 SS

its1.0

0.,,tsJi.iS6

u 0'72

1 traw

tiRIZ' roS7 S9 51

1_ I

SPANSPAR

I 1

SIPS 2or)

, 17:

1v43j,

163 '3

!ill

0- 1-u- aN 0c3

71 7? 73 74 75

d.

1213

r 8

2 iu11

0v 0Z6 7?

8'7''1-km*

lo

.

4ti8

1 7

1

48 u.,t A

Is-A33 4 S 6 P

3 1 1 1

1-c.)

W0sn 0a

1 I 10 11 17i1 1 1 4

z.140

-3 °.9-ii .a.

1.1'44-#4

1 1 1

30.0

lc/ ggi C6

030 31 3? 33 34

ii1 1-.0

35 36 37 30

hi0cf-sotf,,...

39 40 41 42

.4 .3co -1-4 1.''"c gg

43 44 4S 46

it<ER,n1-

i= ztCI AI 43 51101

0-I

10 tt

li,-'.I

62 $3

wI--

04 6.5

2js,02

66 br CI

SCHOOL. DISTRICT

- 30 A/N

t 7 3 4 S 6 7 6 3 00 11 17 13 14 15 16 14 II II

- 1 4 1 - 1 4 - r 1 1

1,1AME:

70 ZI 22 Z3 74 25 Z6 Z7 ?I 74

I 4 - 4 I f -I

SCHOOL.

30 31 3? 33 34 3S 36 37 33

I l f 111 4111114-f t

NAMEao At/14

31 40 41 4? 43 41 45 46 47 46 43 50 51 5? 53 S4 SS S6 S7 56 51 60

C114-t

I3 Piirq

61 67 63 64 65 6$ 67 68 13 70 71 7? 73114

sl-RESTa.a. Pi AI

7S 76 17 71 73 80

1-4 1-1-1-1--1-1-1-1-1-4-1-1--1-4-4--1-1-1

STREE rC..01-1r.

1 7 3 4 5 1 It I I 10 11 I? 13 14 IS1

1 t 1 1 I f 1 t 1 -4--4-1- -t-t 4 --1-4-1--1-1-1--t-1Nits.robeR ay.CLASS SEcTIOta

4 f I f I s f{ t I-1 1-1-1-1-1 1-1-1-1-1-1--t- t t t t 1

e 0 u_t..t -r-f NAME

alo A/N

16 17 Il II 20 ZI 22 /3 /4 ZS 26 Z7 ZO 79 30 31 3? 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41

is04tC6

/4? 43

LUastl-%41 4S

LA)

ACtsSe

346 41

-1-

46 6P

. I.w'

AI 43

-92...

2%

SO 51 5? 53 54 SS 56 S7 SO S9 60 61 6? 63 64 65 66 67 63 69 10 77 7? /3 114 7S 76 77 78 71 L)

1 1 t -4--4 -1 4 4 4 9 4 4144

t? 3 436 719 10 11 1/13 14 1S

I-4 -1-1-4-f f-1--1.-1-1-4- 44- I I 1 1 f 1-1-1-1-1

16 17 16 19 20 21 22 21 Z4 2$ 26 27 20 2310 31 1? 33 34 3336 37 38 39 40 41

'-1

4? 43 44 4S

-4-7

48 49 SO

-1-4 -1--1-t-4-4 -4-4-1-4-1-1-1--t-4-1-1--1-1-4-1-4-1--1---1-1 4-1

SI 5? S3 S4 SS% S2 SS St 60 61 063 64 65 66 6/ 63 69 70 11 7? 73 74 7S 76 7770 74 80

- 1 - 1 - 4 1 - 1 4 1 - 1 4 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 - 4 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1-1-4 I 1 1 4 1 1 1-1-1-1-1-1-I-1-1-1-1-1-4 1 I-1 1 1 1 4 1 4 1 1-1 1 1 1 4 1-1 1 1 1 -1.- 1 1 4 1 1 1--1-

I 7 3 4 5 6 7 1 I to it 17 13 14 iS is 17 II It ZO Z1 22 23 74 2S 26 /7 211 Zt 30 31 3? 33 34 3S 36 VI 38 31 40 49 I? 43 41 45 46 47 AI 44 50 St 5? 53 54 55 56 57 511 51 60 61 6? II LI CS CS 6? CI 6910 It itnu 15 76 7? Z3 Zt 133

-4 11411 1 11-f- 1114111111111 " :_l__I_I_I_1_1 _1_1_ 1_1 _1_ _I__A 1_1_1 _1_ i_i A__i_ A 11-f-11 1-1411111-4--1-1-1-4 :

)in

I 7 3 4 5 6 1 t I 16 et t? 13 e4 15 16 17 18 19 ?I Z1 22 /3 24 7S 26 Z7 ?I Z9 30 31 32 31 34 3S 36 3/ 3$ 13 40 AI 4? 43 41 45 46 47 AI 41 SO 51 52 33 54 SS Ss 57 58 St 63 61 6? 63 64 6$ 65 67 65 St 70 71 7? Z3 74 75 76 77 71 ?I ta--1- I 1-4 1 1 4 1 I 1--+ -1--1 -1- 1-1- 1-1-1 1 4- 4-4--1-4-1 1 4 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 111711111111141.1111

NUHArm nr crwrilLS WITH fi41rS P. 4 go 6. WHICH TTTI.F 1

r49,1 1 rDLINNI 14 4y c400 t c0L111.4 co,

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

AVERAGE ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME (in $1.000)

cgon 1 cnOmq 19

r400 1 r01.11Mh SATOTAL Go446

-1.9 7 -2.9 1-3.9 4.4.9 -5.9 4-6.9 7 -7.9 0 -8.9 q- 9_9(1 -41 n 10+ NA it-xi Pg't Tn/41

J <33 9 197 J441 7471 5401 4561 1449 769 261 16774 1? 546 17177 171+74.77 7409 14.71 10.09 c7.04 99.57 91.70 59.64 64.94 49.70 37.50 42.65 49.07 4007

', 5-911 7 10 ana Sln 1o17 1014 475 167 In 19I1 6 78 3995 15966.60 4.07 6.77 7.44 0.61 17.39 14.40 17.41 17.24 10.17 18.75 5.68 10.14 10.14

an y 791 774 001 460 4311 166 41 1409 3 77 1405 144914647 701 4.44 10.4n 4.10 10.46 1101 1104 10.17 10.00 9.34 5.60 9.81 0.41

4_2.0=39% 17 1 197 041 1474 704 145 114 76 4149 10 64 4221 t 771I1.37 .41 11.79 14.55 19.69 9.64 11.67 10.64 6.47 12.19 31.25 4.66 11.92 11.92

5 40-S9% 7 4 117 cAA 644 149 tsq 76 7175 1 15 7161t.44 1.41 11.70 4.10 6.06 4.73 4.7n 206 4.74 1.13 2.55 4.10 6.10

4 60-79% 10 14 704 16q 110 7I6 60 6 P 1010 19 17 29 Y77917.02 6.69 4.9n 5.46 7.06 7.63 1.47 .47 .49 3.54 1.38 3.47 1.47

7 80% + 41 pn 964 947 744 164 105 17 1 2_f150 70 707930.44 4.11 14.54 14.04 1.74 4.77 1.14 1.14 .74 6.40 5.00 3426 s.P6

A NA 445 445 44527

crt

0

32.39 1.26 1.26

TrITALt1 -0) lni 246 7,14c 6741 1076A 0716 1200 1266 405 14011 12 1174 35419 15419Innon lon.nO 101.00 100.00 10n.On 100.00 100.00 lon.no 140.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

Y

X

T0741.11 -x1 114 744 7049 6741 1n744 4714 3200 1765 405 14011 32 1174 35430 35419100.90 100.00 100.n0 100.00 100.04 1e0.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 10000 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

*CMCTS

l94"ti) TOTAL 106 744 7049 6741 107AA 01918 3 200 1265 406 34013 32 1374 35439 34191110.00 100.00 100.A0 iqn.nn 100.00 Inn.nn 100.0n 3(10.04 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

4F4N 5.04 1.01 3.50 3.14 ?.S0 0.72 P.?, 1.00 1.64 2.60 2.44 4.05 2.66 7.66

ST on, 1.00 1.94 P.11 ?.pn 1.01 1.74 1.40 1.32 1.0 1.99 1.37 3.14 2.06 2.66

X

LLI y = QV c c Lt.

61'Z 617 60'E SE1 EI.2 i yet b5*1 be1I cl"e bed ht. ibi AO is470'1.

00'001OSetE6S

/07E t6'E 6E'e WeE U9wi VV't 9Z 7U 't bb't 'WV bb'd 110.+7

00'001 00'001 00'001OS29E6S OoLSEe 6190L

00'001 00'001 00'001 00.001 00'001 00'001 00 001 00'001 04.001 00'001e0471.695 Wdeb LO6iLd OV..bV bLeLbCioVUUovibuiebUtii9Lb7 bSkod Uere KW/ ONvb.

SLJ.,1st

00'001 00'001 00'001 00'001 00'001 00'001 00'001 Wool OCOuI 00'001 Ou4u1 110001 00'001 00'0010SetLoS OSe9E6S OWLSEL JULt GO,LobS yedb LObILe 0199SV 4LeLoLlb47u0byl$01coutitV4:2,) t'sibe 0c9b IX-iillioi

A

00'001 00'001 00'001 00'0o1 00'001 00'001 00'061 Ou'oui 00001.0u'ou1 ou'Out ou'out UeuulOSetE65 Obe9C6S OWLSEe W9OL eu7E695 'deer) LObiL UL'otb", taeLbLlobutioyibuicoultv btoc 0Lirb (6-1)14101

Z1 Z2.1 OLOE915e4 WiSeL 9ISZL

UeGEbUbbZL

bet£

OEZt 60'S90o6ei Ubbil

66'E S1.1LUULLd

Zb9

LOOLEZ 6IL4

269 $6Z 112lowp0

E0'471

lOVUI, U9b9 0,1

E07171 476'47 00.Z£

YN

el OS' ble'e Lev LecL ccvc oc'vt tv'uc106LIL LLS L69Z WobT oLOVb obvLbe L4d9c ibvcci Ibt17 lbtl t08 L

Loy' WY' CeE te, L.PV 47,0.0 012'9I0e744 9L7 ti101 aoll ester c/itv 77111 co,d 409 t6L-09 9

beL4ighLub

tE01 tS'S

ov'l Met c.c't C'et, oLel tr,t S-rtoulpr evSub 0vicct cyrosJi vIVI 1,10.

itb el Witcoct

6110IZE LbL;4V

>_ Iso1i440Vb WLL0Vb ChbLI YGUI

CDQsti V3'047V7uJ L7tY47C

69'01 06'9 Oo'6Lbs979 9LeY1 UUL

ist.6 5'471

19Ll ceLl tci Lc-

116S-01,

`fa 0 ZZ 0071 %6£ -OZ

SOll E1'01 beet et'vt eL'11 et'o tr.'01 17'0 let bebk.liblo5dV OLLb OLLLL Levco 7ULL91 LLUVVI 010411 co'oci hvO bc5U------%6T-0T

oyo'b t9'el 90'471 Seel s6u sb'9 Oc'S 0$.01uvosys Ltbsi tivyt. 0,146 bbl141 tael,t ip;str. ,rsoKre ISvE tvo %6 -S

LOt CE'Zt I1.1'047 969 59'09 St'6, t907 Oesc evbe Lb/9 79.17

L'wocbc butiob Moe- tIW9LGL4 SLt1Vy 11007,1 Ut.O.GL LL/OL 4-it4LV Yo,./Ued ovbel 7 8S>

bt N'tirlUJ I OtV:1.40 1X-11 414 U tolo 8 °b 6 L-L 6 9v 6*2b b 6F 6 1.-L b C-e a L-t A7 pouuw t

Onvo9 11i01 1vilai/b hb110j, l Uovj

(000't9 UT) SWOON' SS090 OUSilfGV 299113A1( 9b 1whitrj 1 trov Ad pi WOW I Oci,j

i 1111 .,AVui 1141,1h.h1vUm.lb 'e Nl Slicho 40 tc0.61h

7t*2 t£ SE*1

00'001 00'001 00.00105(2915 66L0. 905

LI).2 £0'1 Id2'1 65'1 2119 92'e SE2 72'2 eb'l Azto IS

7E1 'Z 09 1 9ti T e bE e Lb 'e 59E e6eL 6d aCT7 tkocah

ottuoi tiuot 00001 00001 0060t 0001 utpwoot 0u-001 01.0001 ouw001Lw2b67 kebL ',bed CLIbb tbiddi 741671 beeVb 471507 LLLC 116 ivIca

00'0011.056915

00'001 00.001 00'0010511915 66L02 ribb

5.1.0z$ Je

00'001 0000, 00'001 00w0u4 00001 00001 00w06$ 00'001 WOul 00'001L57567 LesL 7752e ettbb ibLedi /LLoVi b76 71/47 LLLd L16 1X-111V101

A

00'001iG50915

00'001 00'001 00'001 6e001 004'00( 00'001 0u'00100'00I 00'001 40'001 00w601 40-001

to

051291g 661.02 065 L57b07 LC5L 775ee eCibt= i t. i f11671 bc76 ILLe 116 (6-1-)1V101

602$

92'1 92'1 LCIE <be69 5e9 5259 YN b

1W01 fic01 e(P's 69UI Vv. 421.1 I64'6 yb 76wo 6L'61 ,V'te L6'11 61'5e299e5 c99E5 54701 Lri li, 1:$ Lee/I eti.L LltiT--nv,vist 6096 cLt (,t. + 1108 L

WE ire 22'1 Ct EcS' it, 08'1 96'2 09'1 50r9 bbwi e9 di.'13

love61 tOLZI Cbe W2bi 742 06 7Ub 17d9U--77.T5 0o9 t./dt. cET- 9L %6L-09 v

9 I£'9 Su'e 421.4'e bb "1 00w1 ec47 Ihw ea'9 v7wo uv'el bbwe LtoLEt/vt. won 165 lit 9LU7t v67 41,19C I299 vucvl ',Lob ,115 too tse %65-01,

LE'CI LEI 911'7 ta'21: EI v6 (W01 LOCI 96'01 9L vi 1742.Y1 Sl'cI et.. GI.S14616v t/c!6,0 ItY1 Ybt t.tbL VW- OLed witol 6t ETF..rtr22Fa II w.b, b ott- %6E-0t 7

741.41 42901 55'9 tieb 28'01 12001 5w11 eL'11 11'11 474'6 00'11 twk. ve'e 1.9't1

b 1055 U1Ub5 29£L Erb 00biS 651. -5-5tot f795L 791I 02171" 0,21.01 797L 9L LVL 116T-0T- -1T

10'01 10'01 56'5 6£'91 L1'01 912'4.1 10et 21'421 L12e1 ve'6 220'e ue'% lit*, uL01s,cts S'itS Ltel bb utqUg----VTEt $162- LULL 9CS1 L7L1.1 twv,/ %8 -5

vet, OU'L, 111'27 uotiE oleo, rib*S9 weip, LLwOh 01.15 L7.77 tyruL by*de Lb.1.1/

010c/Z4 utrtinZ---rtlu eLe 7-arrrz---776,--V7stt 0.1M-915e9 to0177--STritic bYbt 47 --TS>

61 Nrot1U-0 1 Utir;v11.11 rJa 171.11-----VN +tit to to -T Pb b b b U - li to L- L b -97--9--bCg - 'TM t - 1. b z C-6-1-=1-1%-rao i 1

(4.400 Ivioi 1Vit1.

9!) WOW.) I OtIV4

(OWES' bl.) 1114)13NI gg021!) UUJailecIV UVV21:AV

Ad03 ISA1 J1111 JAVu 0101,X) JU J/15 30 !,t116V-Ph JVdwod

14W11 1013 1. 1.1V t AIi t.1 ijat I I0J I t cV J

41144r0 OF sr,onts 4174 nonnrc 7. 4 04 A. 144R-14 nn MnT HAVF TTTLF I

CA°1 1 CArumm 19 py c4pn 1 COLOom 96 AVERAGE ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME- (in $1,000/

PAGE

ce'll 1 COLUMN SA TOTAL TOTAL GRAMO

% Minority 1-1_9 7-2_9 1 -1 4 L.4 O 46 q A4 0 77 4 ile.4 4 49_9111:11 0 104-----NA 111t1 RP I YWCA.

420 1 Moira s] 14 a7 rri

1 <58 77 1C 671 1417 1474 4c44 7401 1411 717 1 c14C R0 SAO 10404 i'4444

14.74 '4.04 45.67 51.97 54,14 04.21 41.48 44.4. 73.77 44.14 70,1R 42.46 59.59 95,98 V7 CD

7 5-9% 17 7 On 117 O17 1077 414 4Q 114 1477 4 00 '747 n7A7 .1, -4

6.16 1.77 7.71 10.12 17,17 13.24 14.92 17.94 11.64 13.41 5.26 7.66 13.14 11.14 .. Au.

1 10-19% 71 2 101 lAi 44k OSA inA 194 14 PA 74 14110 'Lan g, .1170 11.1) 1.77 4.47 11.40 17.40 11.77 14.44 11.01 7.45 12.36 22.41 5.94 12.09 12.69 IS

rn 20-39% 9n 147 2110 791 719 440 746 SA 2012 7 L7 7041 776i

74.44 1.77 19.41 9.41 11.44 4.5A 9.73 8.84 9.84 10.27 1.75 3.63 9,94 9.94

40-59% 71 106 1AI 771 776 117 11 6 444 _24 QAA QA4 11.11 1.77 10.1' 5.11 4.01 ?.0? ?.41 1.20 .60 3.41 1.46 3.39 1.35

60-79$ 71 1.411 0 A4:1 LKO 11.11 14.47 4.14. 2,44 l 1.46 .41 .1.6 .10 1.44 .70 1.60 I40

7 80% 17 7n 196 174 77 14 7 747 cS AA7 P07 19.504 A.74 A.41 1.14 1.41 1.49 .51 .70 2.71 4.25 2.79 7.74

NA 414 414 33.57 1.51

_414 1.51

4

TrITAI I1 -Q1 140 91 ipla 1011 A749 7717 407, 7769 491 27169 114 1201 7477A 79774 woo w, nn 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

TATAI [1.41 104 cl 1014 1011 476c 7717 4027 27944 991 27169 114 1291 79776 ,4776 110.0n 10009 100.0n 10000 100,00 100,00 100,00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

4F 1FC7S

SPAY) TOTAL 1149 61 1014 1011 A7A5 7717 4422 2769 991 27149 114 1241 20776 */74 100.410 100.00 100.00 100.00 140,00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Woo 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

Mr4I4 4.2, 2,32 P.77 7.14 7.17 1,99 1.90 1.80 1.51 7.07 1 46 4.0? 7.16 2.16

ST rick, 1.99 2.45 1.97 1.44 1.41 1.42 1.14 1.15 1.02 1.63 .40 3.16 1.64 1.64

oL"I

bt

bO'L

Se

99'1

C1'1

1,S1

Let

ul'e

7ee

Ll'e

7461

/111 IS

07Z

07'Z

'et

OS°1

Et'a

L7'1

(DC!

74).e

Ve

sL

b, 'Li

Up L

4,1"7

Wray.'

00'001

00'001

00'001 00'00I

OU.00I

UO'UOI 00'001 U0'001 00'001 O0001 00'001 0UOU1 W001 OU'vG1

ilLebIer7

04cd10,

SoLSEC bk9L2

SsEoSss9

eteste cs960e9 679S1104114oLut.197L9co 4c4uCt. r9v0U4 9u19

c147

-1V1v1 UNVG%,

u0'001

1:1L2ult7

S1 JetJC

00'00t

00'00I 00'001

00'001

00'001 00'0uI OU'uut. U0'001 uu'uOi

Ou'Out ou'vOl uu'IJO1

5445E6 tic94e

bsbSsb,

cICsid wittue9 b7,,s0,411Lt14009791.t. L[ duct. e.mout

tb,

(A-1)1VAvA

A

uJ

00'00i

00'00t

00'001 0000I

OU'001

00'001 00'u01 0000t uu'u01 ,40601/1 00'001 WIJIJI Ouuul vO'uUI

",fir" l

bLe619,

SoLSt4 0C944

$bli$S$7

1C.SEC utbOcv c7,Su,114b40tt9719to G4C0. ,703L /iLy

41;7

1b-trIViul

.<.

..-1

CC

...I

40

t

'-''

97*1

97'I

te6e

4Q 0._

L6 UL

IbZOL

16ZOL

YN

0C.l'" Se,

co

SZ't

t,

WI,

4L

40

99'1

eee

Lo'y

bvLt ,71

ua

vt.01.,e

Ot

7ds

ObVe

00-11

eb9101

t1b1

ltic

IC491

tbSSL t9 LLe7m

tztuLT-

41'41000

't

WO

+ %Pe

L

66'1

68'1

Ob'

90'1

90'

LC'

Sb'

,Ce

..,b6e

LS'i

LI.9

Go(rL

V,,.4

9 d_b

97COS

liblit

liSt.60

tilt'

Lae

0Ssb

079uL

c449c

U4411

4.4;49

,,/tc

'.t%6L-09

9

LU",

LO.,

We

4k

71'1

vc

'C',

vs's

lo'b

1c's1

90'7

teb1

290941

Z'aVol

S-su-s

LtsbOol

LL9

crols

olL yv7s5

'',ut

L.LL,

1214..1

[IL

td6'11

bIt

Sbl,

10'1

L-1/et

9t's

9c'b

VL'01

01'cl

Ib'91

19'91

/4'ud

ou'L,4

-nTOMiTS

u0SL4s

OUto

bLe

41-cvo

ibUdt

CddiS

l'et,Vt ;t1OCVST-70-11

c4Lwl.

t.t C

c411

ccT1

t5E-OZ

97'91

99'71

16'9

6c'Oi

Lb'vt

94'9

7/L1

1O'bt

47'91

ta"4I

Ou'it

(c'el

uc°91

-701T969

00iYb9

b9£91

Lu9S-

776fics,

7uo5i

LVru

UtuUsi 7491-61,1 orvif/t Wmuz

le/Li

z./

$L4

$6T -OT

6e1.1

6L'CI

ZeL

Z169

1''11

ts'Ll

L9'91

eeLt

47'61

L6't

17",1

SSY7YY

bbYhYV

VSVOt

16Y1

.711.7y

youve

1 711bU 1

Lks191

tLtvt

vv1T7-577--

c5S

$6-S

60'47

60'd7

CL'07

ws'cL

LI'bt

7c'SL

7s'oS

4e'2

us

Lu,e

ci'le

-TrETtLC

7144iLe

VitL01 etlue

,/7901e

,ove/Li ue*,Lvt. SLSSCS veLoz,/-4:717-67(7SW--ST.7 t<

oLUc

Its>

Ol

;,....0-I4J

IGCVO

iJZLi

i is

ix-1)

VN----+OT

0tir=rre--8-Sww--6L-L

6 9.-/

6 5-,

6"."1/4-7

b t-t.

13

C 4.

b T-r

A1TIO146 1

uhlto9

1V1.01

'W1U1

9S Nh1

101.1

1(J ct%)

(00011.1 uT) 4WO3NI SS0115 aaxsnrav snimanv

iJUd

t41.1410J

IA.

+.1

11111)...

I J1111 atyll

I.

"/ C 1,..10W-: N1 :1101u JV 0.1e0q111

SL71 Tr( Lb. 19.1 009 9E9 as't Yet We sue 111 Del AA, AS

ZE4 ZEc Lb 'E Si eve e bh bL CU '1 EL e SS 'e Su E $h E Oe et

00'001 00.001 00.001 00.001 OU'UO1 uts'001 00'001 00001 WIWI 00'1)01 UO001 ut'ubi OU'uOi70Lhi7 hOLhih 19,U2 sSie buOebE cbSisi islUS VOieb U6VCIL chvyti ccbit, UL401. ctib UhVdt,

00'001 00'001 00'001 00'001 00*001 titi'001 00.00; 0000l Oteu01 wu01 00001 001AI Ov1 00'001huLV17 hOLVil 197U2 sste UtWebt. ebsbt EbIUS /olcb obveit OriVcr tacSlt. 0470i dei iota

SIJJI At

A

00.001 WOO 00.001 OruOi 013.001 00.001 00*Uttt 00.9V1 0U*001 ubOul UU'UU1 OU'UOI uu'401

0

tOL7E7 701.717 19 V2 SSUZ VWUceol. etistit LSIO *puled 06ticll c777u pcbiL 04YUI cab 101.6 10-1)10101

ESibZ1.9 bZEY esZth

ESi Eb'OE

SS'EbeLV

ssq. s'47

b -I

1LbeLig 0Lb bbLLI

0L'i betbih4 bihL

e4*1:07[

9L'E 901buys[ bu9SU Cu,

YVO-L7

WU*UteL hi

V, 091 Eie hi..b hb.ti Wil behiDU cal 9Uhe uSb, S'LL '-/cL t..1

9E' Ou 90.4 09'd Let VY*S 4U*UL eLN,001 )S9 heLc hbic it.01 90-/ 1:141 WI

trv't uc* set Lbt D'E: u0', cV.4 ho'Li hc'S

VN b

+ $08 A

%6L -09 9

17.11 07E

Ob7L! Ob'Eiut.cts In4LS b7LL t;17

65.9 se'lz

04.£1 WEI 61:0Lefo'S

S7Os7udoud

Utivoti

7191 'Oil

SVOS 99'El 90.217Uet:41e k.Lou LSSI

LVdi SS S49 Vlld t.9I vie, euhe cb71 it 0Q1

WTI eE'b SS'01 IE'il be',! 75*71 e7.01 LV't, tbyeWW$7 viul 7417 I77, iL441 57041 if,s7---Z7T77--TS-----r7c

hl'hitehSs

sO'c WL1 S11'71 trCi 7e7i Lett W.7.4 S7*1l

116S

116E-0Z

llLl LL49 00lci 4LLAI 74U-I 4ctb dUct 77 Sci %6I-01

C8.11 ItLl 9L'91 89.1.1 0h.el uh'01 411.0 Ll.bbotibb Vild 41211W LbLLI cOVUI bOLL 1170 bC %6-S

b9.058[Lbei

1111U1

6771_ 95.11 be2S 5b.CS 99%7 LeSL Lebc Ibac47 71.*cl1501.1 07Lbe 417L7 117tr/ u9t7t built L6ut. vbc 111

10 0-6 b b d b L.- L 6 9-v b b-14 6.11-7 rt- 6 Z-c 6 I-

yS Nr.o I IUJ I WI, J

is>01 NNeilt,:i 1 OchS

AlIJOUN %

(00e it tt) apionNI SSolID wasnrav smnnAV K;mio) I (kiv:) Aip A.4 14JCIVJ l Uctv:.$

1 JuVci 378V71VAV Adal iPza11111 JAVh ii114 Utz Wilph ',It,OhJ:p AU J41'., JO tJoht.V-lh JU L.J1VJW.AA,

SUPPLEMENT B

ASSIGNMENT OF MEASURES OF SIZE

Measures of size have been assigned so as approximately to optimizethe design, that is, to maximize the amount of information for a fixed cost.The optimization, process involves using an estimated cost function whichcontains a cost of including a school in the sample and a cost per pupil ofconducting the study. It also involves some estimates of the expectedsampling variations.

Measures of size were studied in detail by Westat in the design of theAnchor test under another subcontract to ETS. That work has been reviewedcarefully for its applicability to the compensatory reading study. After

thorough investigation we have decided to use those results and have included

as part of this appendix a memorandum prepared for the Anchor test studywhich spells out the theory involved.

The Anchor study concerns pupils in grades 4, 5 and 6 while thecompensatory reading study concerns grades 2, 4 and 6. There appears tobe no reason why this difference should have any effect on the conclusions.

Also, the compensatory reading study calls for a survey of schools inPhase I which is to be followed in Phase II by a testing program. This callsinto question the use of the Anchor Test optimization which is based only ona testing program. That is, in Phase I of the compensatory reading studythere is no per pupil cost of the survey. However, the most expensive partof the compensatory reading study is the testing portion, so it makes senseto optimize the measures of size for that portion of the study. Furthermore,even in the Phase I survey the cost will vary with the number of teachersinvolved in compensatory reading and that number will be correlated with

number of pupils.

B -1

For these reasons, the theoretical results derived for the Anchortest have been determined to be applicable here. The measures of size,based upon the enclosure are as follows:

Enrollment in grades2, 4 and 6

Measureof size

Under 50 4

50 - 99 9

100 - 199 14

200 - 499 22

500+ 35

B-2

nestat Research, Inc.

TO

Memorandum W-4*

John Bianchini, ETS

FROM: Westat, Inc.(MHH)

Attachment

DATE:

SUBJECT:

August 6, 1971

Allocation of the standardizationtest to size uf school strata

This memorandum examines for the standardization study theimplications of the distribution of schools by numbers of students inthe eligible grades (4-6) on the allocation of the sample. We hope youwill look critically at the assumptions for computations of variancesand costs, and the results obtained, and give us any comments as earlyas feasible.

The tentative data used in this memorandum on the size distributionof schools were derived from the 1968-69 school universe tape. Similar

and additional results will be available later from the 1970-71 schooluniverse tape for use in actual sample selection. The results presentedin this memorandum may be altered substantially in the details, but notin their general character, as a result of the revisions that will be madewith improved data

This memorandum deals only with the implications of the size distri-bution of schools, and ignores other questions such as the succession ofgrades in the same school or different schools, the implications of whichwill be considered in a subsequent memorandum,

Since all students in the specified grades within the selected schoolswill be administered the anchor test, both the contribution to variance ofan average test score or percentile, and the cost of including a school inthe sample will be substantially influenced by the size of the eligible enroll-ment in a school. In this situation, strata based on size of schools may bedesirable, along with the use of other stratification criteria to be considered

217_11

* Revised 12/30171 all

Attachment

-2-

in a later memorandum. The size of a school is the number of studentsin it in grades 4, 5, and 6, and it should be feasible to approximate thisbased on the information on the 1970-71 school universe tape. Therewill be no bias, but a larger variance, if the approximation to the numberof pupils eligible to take the test in April 1972 is not a reasonably goodone for some of the schools.

*The theory. The percentile to be estimated is T. the test score

such that the desired proportion P of pupils has a test score less thanTP' with

P A

where

A is the total number of pupils in the specified grade in the universeof schools that have expected scores less than Tp, and

X is the total number of pupils in the specified grade.

We can estimate Tp from the sample by finding tp, the score such that1 t

P = A /X is the desired proportion observed in the sample,where

I

X is the sample estimate of the total eligible pupils in the specifiedgrade, and

I

A is the sample estimate of the number of these pupils with scoresless than tp.

For a stratified sample with the schools within a stratum selected withequal probability, and with the test given to all eligible students in each selected

I I

school, the sample estimates, A and X , are here assumed to be of the form

* See Hansen, Hurwitz and Madow, Sample Survey Methods and Theory, Vol. I,pp. 179-237 and 448-449,

where

Attachment

, L Nh nh

A = r xi-- Z: a , andh h i

nhL NX = 7:

hnh ii-- xhi,

Nh

nh

ahi

xhiL

-3- 1

is the total number of schools in stratum h,is the number of schools in the sample from stratum h,

this the number of eligible students in the i sampled school

in stratum h with scores less than tp,is the number of eligible students in school hi , andis the number of strata.

In practice, the population frequency distribution of scores is

estimated from the sample by estimating frequencies for scores orintervals of scores, using the same type of formula as that above for A .Then, percentiles are easily estimated from the estimated cumulativefrequency distribution by interpolation.

Confidence limits can be computed for Tp, based on the standard

deviation op of the sample estimate, p, of the proportion of students -who score less than T. This proportion p is a ratio-type estimate with variance

2 ba zp

L Nh2N - n S

I Z h h Ph ,2

3c- h N2 Nh nh

* See Ibid., p. 190, equation (4. 5), and the remark on p. 193.

Attachment

where

-4-

2Nh

2SPh = E (Zhi - Z

h) / (Nh

- 1),i

Zhi = Ahi - PXhi,

NZ h Z /Nh'. ih1

Ahi = the number of eligible students in school iof stratum h with a test grade below the percentileTP (the population parameter), and

Xhi the total number of eligible students in school i of stratum !-

The upper and lower.confidence bounds, t P and t P , for a68 percent confidence interval for the percentile U TP will approximatelythe sample estimates of the P

Uth and PLth percentiles, where*

pu = p + crp

, and

PL =P- a .p

An approximate cost function for a stratified sample of the type pro-posed for the standardization study, with all eligible students in a sampledschool taking the test, is

where

LC = C

0+ ZZhnh ,

h

C0 represents coste. that do not vary with the number or sizes of the

schools in the sample, andis the average cost associated with each school included in thesample in size class h.

* See Ibid., pp. 448-449.

Attachment-5-

The maximum precision of results will be achieved for a givennumber of schools in the sample of schools if the sample is allocated to the

i *size strata such that the sample from the hth size class s

Nh S Ph /1 Chn

h L= n .

r NhSPh /LChh

Here we make the assumption that, for any percentile Tp,

S = k SPh p h 'where expressions for kp and Sh will be derived later. Under this assumption,the expression for the optimum n.h becomes

Nh S WEh h v hnh = n L3: Nh Sh /rChh

The approximation Sph = kp'Sh implies that the Sph vary in the samerelative manner between the size strata, for any percentile. When thisholds, the optimum allocation of the sample will be the same for theestimation of each percentile. The basis for this assumption will be

indicated later.

In practice we do no know the Sh in advance of obtaining the samplesurvey results, but can often develop reasonably good approximations to

them, as demonstrated later. Also we can, at best, only approximate thecost function. Nevertheless, even very rough approximations can be highlyuseful in arriving at an approximately optimum allocation of the sample which

is good enough for the purpose.

* See Ibid. , p. 221.

Attachment

-6-

There is no bias in the sample if the approximations are inerror, although the variance is somewhat larger than it would be withthe values known. However, unless the estimated gains from optimumallocation to strata are substantial and the approximations used are inthe right direction, it may be desirable to use uniform fractions, sincethe effort to accomplish an optimum allocation could achieve a loss overproportionate sampling, instead of a gain.

It should be noted that optimum allocation can be achieved byvarying the sampling fractions between strata, or, alternatively, byvarying the numbers of additional strata to be introduced within size stratato achieve the same effect when two units are to be included in thesample from each stratum. We propose to do the latter by using additionalstratification, on other variables, within the size strata. Under some

circumstances the gains from an approximate optimum allocation can besubstantial over selecting a proportionate sample.

We shall now obtain approximate values for Sh and eh. Actually,as can be seen from the formula for the optimum nh, it isn't necessaryto obtain the absolute values, but only numbers proportionate to them,in order to allocate the sample in an optimum manner.

Appro-r.;:mate values for the cost function.

In the standardization study a tentative approximate value for Ch

is given by Ch = 100 + .85 Eh dollars,

where

Eh is the average number of tests to be administered to eligible pupilsper school in size class h.

* It was finally decided not to use size as a stratification variable, but toachieve approximate optimum allocation to size classes by sampling withprobability proportional to a measure of size. This allowed furtherstratification by other important variables, such as income and percentminority. The measures of size used were based on the optimum allocationindicated in Table 2 below.

Attachment

-7-

(Note that Eh is the average per school of all eligible pupils in grades4, 5, and 6 combined, and is different from ,Rh, which is the

average number per school of pupils in a specified grade for which a

percentile is to be estimated. The Xh appears in the variance approximationsand the Eh in the cost function.)

The values assumed in this cost function are the ones we discussed hereon a very tentative basis, and should be reviewed critically. The $100 isthe fixed cost for each school in the sample, independent of the number oftests administered. It is based on a fixed fee of $40 to be paid to acoordinator in each sampler] gchnoL plus other costs speculated to beof the order of $60, including the costs of obtaining cooperation of a schoolin the survey, the costs of providing instructions and controls, and other coststhat vary directly with the number of schools included in th.. sample. fhe

.85 Eh in the cost function is the allowance for the number of tests to beadministered in the school. The . 85 is the unit cost estimate that you pro-vided us and we understand is also included in the contract as representingthe variable costs that depend on the number of pupils tested. The differencesin the sample 'design will not be seriously affected if this fixed cost perschool included in the sample is off by as much as, say, 25 percent. Wehope that you will re-examine it and suggest an alternative level if you feelit is appropriate.

Approximate values for the variances, Si,. 2. We understand from... n

the analyses of data assembled in the Coleman report and from othersources that the proportion of students with scores less than Tp does notvary widely between size classes of schools. If we make this assumption, then

* A Study of Our Nation's Schools by George Mayeske et al (a U. S. Officeof Education working paper analyzing the data collected for theColeman report).

Attachment

Nh

Ph = AhiNh

7 Xhi

P

for each of the size classes. Under this assumption,therefore the SPh

2 (defined earlier) becomes

2SPh = ZZhi2 / (Nh - 1)

where

where

= r (Ahi - PXhi ')2/

(Nh - 1)

= r Xhi2

(Phi - P) 2/ (Nh 1),

Phi = A /Xhi hi

±,h

= 0, and

Moreover, for schools of size Xhi' Phithe expected value of (Phi P) 2 is

E(Phi - P) 2 . PQ 11 + .ophi (Xh. - 1)-',

Xhi 1

E(YPhij P"Phij P)Phi

.2E(YPhi - P)

Ylphij = 1 if the j.th pupil in the specified grade of school i, size-class h,has a score below.TP'

= 0 otherwise

YPhijiis the corresponding value for any other pupil in the same

grade of the same school, and

Ph = r r Y . / r X .hi = EA .ht / rXn t

. is the average value of Yhii,i.1

i.e., the proportion of students in this stratum withscores less than Tp .

Attachment-9-

in the above equation, Phi is intraclass correlation of the Yphi,among pupils within schools, for schools of size X.

Another way of stating pphi in terms of the total variance betweenpupils and the variance between school means is

2 - 2,ab

a/X Xhi hi

phi 2CT X Ihi

where

s

is the size of the grad: in the hith school,Xhi

a 2 is the total variance between pupils, and

ab2 is the variance between school means.

The subtractive term in the numerator will be negligible when Xhi isreasonably large.

We will now assume that the intraclass correlation, pphi, takeson approximately the same value, pp, for each size of school. Actually,

experience shows us for many different variables that on the averagethe intraclass correlation for clusters of different sizes ordinarily decreasesslowly as size of cluster increases. We may later modify the assumptionmade above of essentially equal intraclass correlation for each size ofcluster, but the discussion is simplified by making the assumption here,and possibly modifying it somewhat later.

with the above assumption, and substituting Xhi for Xhi - 1, theexpression for E (Phi - P) 2 is theri approximately

2 . PQ (I + p Xhi) .h

E(Phi - P) = P hiXi

Attachment

-10-

If the above expression is substituted for (phi p) .2 and if Nh is substituted.i.for Nh - 1, the equation for S

P h2 becomei

2

SPh PQ I Xhi (1 + PP Xhi) I Nh

where

=p (

h2Xh + pp X (1 + V

h2)

2V

h= the relvariance among schools within size stratum h

of enrollment in the particular grade for which a

percentile is computed.

If we now make, at least for the present, the further assumptionthat pp is the same for all percentiles (i.e. , pp = p ), we have

1-S Ph2 = PQ IX

h pX+h

2 2(1 + V

h)i._'

There is a limited amount of data available in an unpublished memorandum

in the Office of E..iu-:aLion files to support the above assumption.J.T.

We now have the evidence for the assumption made earlier whin-

we assumed that we could approximate Sph by kpSh. In the result

we have just obtained the value of kp is ART and

ii

Sh = 1Ith + p rCh2 (1 + Vh2).

Computations. We shall now apply these results to approximate data

obtained in the tabulation of the 1968-69 school universe tape referred toearlier.,....* For SAT scores for sixth graders in a recent study in Palo Alto, Calif the 011ie

of Education examined the variance between students of the Y.. variable(defined above on page 8) for the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles. For eachof these percentiles, the variance between schools was about 1/3 of the totalvariance between students. Hence, the intraclass correlation p

Pwas

approximately equal to 1/3 for each of these percentiles.

Attachment

Table 1 shows, by size class of combined enrollment in grades4, 5, and 6, estimates of the number of schools, total combined enroll-ment in grades 4, 5, and 6, average enrollment in the combined classes,and a rough estimate of the enrollment per grade. It also shows an

approximate value for 1 + Vh2. The Vh

2 values were not computed from

the data but were roughly approximated from the .width of the classintervals and the means for the size distributions of enrollment givenin Table 1. Nevertheless, they are likely to be reasonably good approxi-mations.

Table 2 shows the optimum allocation of the sample and comparesit with proportionate allocation for a sample of 1, 200 schools. We havecarried this computation through for two values of p: p = .15 and . . 20.

The use of values of .15 and . 20 for p are based on information you sentme in your memorandum of August 4, for STEP Series II Reading. Those

results are also consistent with results given by Angoff in which he

reported a variaiice between school mean enrollments equal to approximately25 percent of the variance between pupils. The ratio of between-school

variance to total variance of 25 percent would yield an intraclass correlationof .25.

The results summarized in A Study of Our Nation's Schools, cited

earlier, show approximately 35 percent of the total variance accounted forby schools. This variance is presented as an upper-limit estimate, and, again,is for an achievement measure and not just reading. They report essentiallythe same proportion of variance accounted for by schools for each of thegrades studied.

For these computations we have assumed that stratification ofschools would have the effect of reducing the proportion of total variance

* Educational Measurement (2nd Edition), edited by Robert L. Thorndike.American Council on Education, 1971. Chapter 15.

Attachment

-12-

accounted for by between-school variance to the alternate assumed

levels of . 20 and . 15. From the evidence in A Study of Our Nation'sSchools it seems clear that reductions of this order of magnitude and,in fact, considerably greater could be achieved if we had adequatevariables for use in stratification or estimation which are related toaverage economic and social characteristics of the families served bythe schools. Also, information on an individual school basis concerning

average characteristics of teachers and schools would be helpful forstratification. Discussion of the stratification or estimation potentialswill be the subject of another memorandum. Here we simply assumethat we can have some substantial gains from stratification, includingwhat can be accomplished prior to selecting the sample or introducedsubsequently in the estimation process. Consequently, we have chosen

the indicated assumed values for the intraclass correlation.

Results

From Table 2 it is seen that if p = .20, the variance (x k)for a sample of 1, 200 schools is reduced from . 930 for proportionate

allocation of the sample to .731 for optimum allocation, but at an increasein variable costs of from $297, 000 to $360,000. The gain is relativelymore than the increase in cost, but not strikingly so. Thus, if the pro-portionate sample were increased in size from 1,200 schools to 1,450,the cost of the proportionate sample would be the same as a sample of 1, 200 schoolwith optimum allocation. The variance (x k) for a proportionate sample ofthis size would be . 766. Thus we see that for a given size of sample thereis a substantial reduction in variance, but for equal costs the gain is amoderate one of approximately 5 percent.

A consequence of using optimum allocation instead of proportionate

allocation is a substantial decrease in the number of smaller schools inthe sample, and a corresponding increase in the larger schools. The result

Attachment

-13-

is an increase from an average of 67 persons per school to be tested**

to 91 students per school to be tested. This, of course, is the causeof the increase in cost for the optimum allocation of the sample.

In practice we will not know the standard deviation exactly, andthe gain from optimum allocation will be somewhat less than we haveestimated. However, in the nature of this problem, there are reasonsto assume that we should be able to approximate the optimum reasonably well.

As seen in Table 2, the results for o = .15 are essentially similarto those for p = . 20, but with considerably smaller variances as a resultof the reduced correlation.

We need to arrive at an early decision on the basis of these resultsand other considerations, or possibly on the basis of revisions of theseresults if you have suggestions on the cost function or other assumptionswe have made.

* This figure was not developed from our tabulations, but was obtainedfrom another source.

** From the data used in this analysis. the estimated average size ofschool for proportionate sampling was 57.7, and for optimumallocation with o = . 20 was 78. 3. The estimate of 91 was obtainedby computing 67 x 78.3/57.7.

Attachment ,.14-

Table 1. Preliminary size distribution of public schools based on enrollmentin grades 4, 5, and 6.

School SchoolsAverage

1 + Vh 2

wheresize class(combined Total enrollment Average V

h2 -

enrollmentin grades

Percentof

enrollmentin grades

per school,grades

enrollmentper grade relvariance

of4, 5 and 6) Number total 4, 5 and 6 4, 5 and 6 (rough) enrollmentNh Eh Eh Rh

Less than 11, 537 18 247 21 7 1.3650

50-99 10, 584 16 798 75 25 1.03100-199 18, 667 29 2, 782 149 50 1.03200-499 22,347 35. 6, 505 291 97 1.06500-999 1, 293 2 775 617 206 1. 10

1 , 000 + 29 .04 41

Totals 64, 457 100 11,1471

* These results were obtained by using 1968-69 schoo' tapes, for schoolscontaining grades 4, 5 or 6, and imputing grade enrollments by assumingthat the enrollment in grades 4, 5, and 6 contained in a school is g e,

twhereg is the number of grades 4, 5, and 6 in the school,t is the number of grades 1-12 in the school, ande is the enrollment in these grades.

The Rh was approximated simply as Eh / 3.

-15-Attachment

Table 2. Comparison of allocations of the sample, variances and costs

Schoolsize

class

Numberof

schoolsNh

Number of schools in sample, nh,for alternative allocations

Optimum allocation

Less than 5050-99

100-199

200-499

500 +

Totals

11, 537

10, 584

18, 667

22, 347

1, 322

64,457

Variance (x k)of estimated

normfor sample

of 1, 200**schools

Variable cost($1, 000)

1

Average numberof pupils insample per

grade per vhoolin sample

.I.

p = .20

49

114

348

630

60

1, 200

.731

398

Proportionateo = .15 allocation

55

119

345

622

60

1, 200

. 564

395

215

197

348

416

25

1, 200,--__.-- -'.0. . 20 p = .13

.930 . 715 .

%

i

325

* Only the ratios of these numbers were obtained from this study. They areadjusted to an assumed aveiag-e of 67 for all schools.

** The values in the table are computed as\

1N

h2 Nh - nh S,

n1..- .

N2 Nh nhTherefore, since Sph = PQS.

n2' the variance, a 2, for a particular

percentile TP , can be obtained approximately by P multiplying the tabled value by

PQ

X

SUPPLEMENT C

SUPPLEMENTARY SAMPLE OF SCHOOLS

The supplementary sample of schools is intended to provide a knownchance for schools not on the master sampling file (see Supplement A) to be

drawn-into the sample. In order to meet the survey deadlines, it was necessary

to use the same sample of districts that had been used to supplement theRestandardization sample in the Anchor Test Study, another project concurrentlyunderway by Educational Testing Service.

The following text describes that initial sample supplementation forthe Anchor Test Study and then describes the way in which the supplementationsample for the Compensatory Reading project was drawn from it.

C. 1 Summary of the Sample-Supplementation Procedure

After the primary Restandardization and Equating samples wereselected for the Anchor Test Study, a procedure was carried out to supple-ment the primary Restandardization sample with a sample of the relativelysmall number of public schools omitted from the sampling frame for onereason or another.

The supplementary Restandardization sample was selected in two

stages. A sample of 178 school districts was selected as the first-stagesample. Each district selected was asked by telephone to check the listextracted from the School Universe Tape of all schools in the districtcontaining grades 4, 5, and 6,44 and identify any eligible schools omitted

The Compensatory Reading Study covered schools with grades 2, 4, and 6,so the match is inexact.

C1

from this list. The second stage of selection consisted of subsarnpling thelists of missed (i.e., omitted) schools. This supplementary procedure.provided a sample of 20 missed schools for the Restandardization study.

C. 2 The Selection of a Sample of 178 Public School Districts forSample Supplementation for the Restandardization Study

For the selection of the supplementary sample of missed schools,the Office of Education specified that a sample of between 150 and 200 public-school district be surveyed for missed schools. It was decided to select this

sample from the set of the 703 districts represented in the primary Restan-dardization sample. In terms of sampling error, perhaps a somewhat moreefficient district sample could have been obtained by selecting the sampleof districts from all districts in the frame rather than from only thoserepresented in the primary sample. However, there was not enough timeavailable to contact districts for the first time to seek their participation inthe study. The use of a sample of districts already contacted was moreexpedient, and district cooperation for this supplementary procedure wasprobably better than it would have been otherwise. The steps that were usedto select this sample of districts are described below.

First, after the selection of the Restandardization sample, a listwas made of the 703 public school districts that contained at least one schoolselected for the primary Restandardization sample. Then, for each of thesedistricts, the probability that at least one of its schools would be selectedinto the sample was estimated. This probability, which is denoted by Pd, isreferred to as the initial district-selection probability. It was computed as

one minus the probability that the district would not be represented in thesample.

C-2

Before selection of the sample, the districts were grouped intostrata, based on geographic region and size as indicated by the initialdistrict-selection probability, Pd. Then, two districts (or more in fourstrata)* were selected at random from each of the strata. Since only those

districts represented in the primary sample had a chance to be selected forsample supplementation, missed schools in new districts not represented inthe school universe file had no chance of selection in the supplementarysample.

The districts were stratified by geographic region and the Pd valuesin conjunction with the sampling fractions given below in Table C. 1. (The

derivation or these sampling fractions is discussed later in this subsection.)This was done by first ordering the districts in each of the four regions bythe Pd values. Then, strata were defined by grouping the appropriatenumber of districts together within each region, districts with values of Pdbetween .9 and 1 were grouped into strata containing six districts so that,with two districts selected per stratum, the sampling rate would be one inthree. Of course, the number of districts in this P

d-interval was not always

six or a multiple of six in each region. Therefore, some of the districts inthis interval had to be grouped together with districts in the Pd-interval of.8 to .899. In general, districts in adjacent Pd-intervals were sometimesincluded in the same stratum. However, only in a few instances were stratadefined that contained districts from more than one region. This was doneonly to avoid grouping districts with Pd values of 1 with other districts, andto avoid placing districts that had substantially different sizes in the samestratum.

*The reason there were more than two districts selected from four stratawas that the smallest districts had to be subsampled at a 100 percent rate,as indicated later in this subsection.

C -3

Table C-1. District subsampling fractions and selection probabilities

initial

DistrictSelection

Probability

(Pd)

____

CorrespondingEstimatedAverage

District

Enrollment(thousands)

1

SubsamplingFraction

(f 2h)

District-Selection

Probabilitiesfor

Supplementation

(Pd'

)

1 50 1/2 .5

.9 - .999 35 1/3 .300 - .333

.8 - .899 25 1/4 .200 - .225

.7 - .799 18 1/6 .117 - .133

.6 .699 13 1/7 .0833 - .1000

.5 - .599 9.5 1/7 .0714 - .0833

.4 .499 7 1/7 .0571 - .0714

.3 - .399 5 1/7 .0429 - .0571

.25 - .299 3.9 1/6 .0417 - .0500

.20 - .249 3.2 1/6 .0333 - .0417

.15 - .199 2.5 1/6 .0250 - .0333

.10 - .149 1.6 1/6 .0167 - .0250

.075 - .0999 1.2 1/5 .0150 - .0200

.05 - .0749 .9 1/4 .0125 - .0188

.04 - .0499 .7 1/4 .0100 - .0125

.03 - .0399 .6 1/3 .0100 - .0133

.02 - .0299 .5 1/3 .0067 - .0100

.01 - .0199 .4 1/2 .0050 - .0100

Less than .01 .2 1 Less than .01

C - 4

The above process led to the definition of 82 strata of districts.As indicated previously, two districts were chosen at random from each ofthese 82 strata, except in four of the strata that had subsampling ratesof 1. As a result, 178 districts were selected from the 82 strata, 22coming from the four strata that had the 100-percent subsampling rate.

The district subsampling rates given in Table C. 1, which playedan important role in the definition of district strata described above, werebased on two considerations. One was the specification that between 150and 200 districts be selected. The other was an attempt to use approxi-mately an optimum allocation of the district sample to the 19 size-classintervals listed in Table C. 1. That is, since in many cases the standarddeviation on survey items among sampling units is roughly proportionalto the size of the sampling units, it was decided to select districts withoverall probabilities of selection for supplementation approximately propor-tional to their total enrollments in grades 4, 5, and 6. Also, since experiencefrom other studies indicates that standard deviations would tend to begreater than proportional to size for the smaller districts, and to someextent for the larger districts. the subsampling rates were set to produceoverall district-selection probabilities somewhat higher than proportionalto size for the larger and smaller districts.

The procedure used to determine the district subsampling ratesto conform to the considerations mentioned above was rather complex andincluded some personal judgment. First, the overall. probability thatschool district d would be selected for the supplementation procedure, Pd, isequal to the product of the initial district-selection probability for the pri-mary Restandardization sample, Pd, and the subsampling rate for the Pdinterval containing district d, f2h. That is,

Pd P f .d d 2h

C-5

(1)

Since the Pd values were known approximately, the P' values were determinedbythe choices of the interval subsampling rates, 12h values. In order tochoose the f2h values to make the P values approximately proportional todistrict enrollments, the relationship between district enrollments and thePd values was estimated. This was done by plotting a large number ofpoints relating district enrollment to Pd for a sample of districts repre-sented in the primary sample. The approximate relationship observed ledto the correspondence between Pd-intervals and district enrollments givenabove in Table C.1. For example, the average district enrollment ingrades 4, 5, and 6 of districts with initial selection probabilities between. 8 and . 9 was estimated to be 25, 000.

Once this approximate relationship between the Pa-intervals anddistrict enrollments was established, the f2h values given in Table C.1were determined (on a somewhat trial-and-error basis), which provided asample of 178 districts and produced overall district-selection probabilitiesapproximately proportional to district enrollment. Also, as indicated earlier,the subsampling rates for smaller and larger districts were set to provideoverall district probabilities somewhat higher than proportional to their en-rollments.

C. 3 The Selection of the Sample of Missed Schools from the DistrictsSelected for Supplementation of the Restandardization Sample

Each of the 178 school districts selected for the sample supple-ment was surveyed to determine if it contained any eligible schools omitted

from the School Universe Tape. To do this. lists were prepared of allschools contained in each of the 178 selected districts as indicated on theSchool Universe Tape. Each district was contacted by telephone and re-quested to verify the list of schools for that district. Except for very large

C -6

districts, an attempt was made to obtain the names, addresses, and enroll-ments in grades 4, 5, and 6 of missed schools over the telephone. Thevery large districts were asked to send a list of missed schools by mail.Even those districts that refused to allow their schools to participate inthe study were encouraged to help survey their districts for missed schools.As a result of their effort, all districts selected for sample supplementa-tion did participate in the district surveying process. This procedureyielded a total of 138 missed schools identified by the districts.

An attempt was made to give each missed school listed an overallselection probability approximately equal to what it would have been ifthe school had been included in the original sampling frame. This wasdone as follows. First, the measure of size, Ai, for each missed schoolwas determined from the enrollment in the same way that it was done for

*4:the other schools. (The school enrollments were often not provided andthe measures of size had to be approximated, based on the recorded en-rollments of the other schools in the same district. ) In order to provide aneasy way to produce the appropriate overall school-selection probabilities,an adjusted measure of size, Ai, was then computed from the originalmeasure of size, A., as follows:

I

A!1

= Ai /P'd (2)

Due to some reorganization of school districts, some consolidation of schools,and other factors, it was sometimes difficult to determine whether a parti-cular school was actually a missed school. For example, a missed schoolfor a particular district may have been included on the School Universe Tapeas belonging to another school district. Since it was not feasible to searchthe entire tape for a particular school, some judgments had to be made inidentifying missed schools.This procedure approximately matches the procedure used in the CompensatoryReading Study.

C-7

All missed schools with adjusted measures of size greater than1100 were included in the supplementary sample with certainty. All other

missed schools were listed district by district. Next, cumulative adjustedmeasures of size, cum (A!), were computed for each school on this list.

tA systematic sample of these missed schools was then selected by firstpicking the initial selection number as a random number, R, between 1 and1100. The selection numbers for the sample supplement were then computedas follows:

R, R + 1100, R + 2200, R + 3300,

These selection numbers identified the schools selected for the samplesupplement in the same way that the primary sample was selected. That

is, the school determined by a particular selection number was the firstmissed schoot on the list that had a cumulative adjusted measure of size,cum (A!1 ), equal. to or greater than the selection number. This procedure ledto the selection of 20 schools for the supplementary sample for the Re-standardization Study, including six sub-sampled with certainty.

The selection probability, Pi, ror a missed school contained indistrict d, except for missed schools selected with certainty, is given ap-proximately by the following equation:

P! = P(district d is selected)1 (3)

x P(school i is selected given that district d is selected)! (A) A.1 Pi 1 d tpi

A

d1100 d 1100 1100

Since the selection intervals used in the selection of the primary Restandardi-zation sample averaged about 1100 or so, the selection probability for amissed school given above was approximately equal to what it would havebeen if the school had not been omitted from the School Universe Tape.

C-8

Schools subsampled with certainty have selection probabilitiesequal to the district-selection probability. That is, for a missed schoolcontained in district d and selected from the lists of missed schools withcertainty, its selection probability is simply given as follows:

PT = pii. d

(4)

C. 4 Selection of the Supplementary Sample of Schools for the Compen-satory Reading Study

It was impossible to classify missed schools as having or nothaving Tile I programs. It was therefore decided to use a skip intervalwhich was a weighted average of the two used for the primary sample inState I. The data upon which the weighted average was based are:

Average SizeTotal Measure Measure

Title I 516, 850 2, 393

Non Title I 414, 704 2, 880

Weighted Average = 2520

The weighted average was rounded to 2500 and a skip intervalof 1250 was used.

Since the anchor sample supplement had been selected first, itwas necessary to adjust the selection procedures so that the selection pro-babilities would equal A.11250. The following adjusted measure of size was

I.

used:Ali' = [11001(1100-Apj (Ai/P4). (4)

where A! is the adjusted measure of size used for the Anchor supplementa-t

Ron and 1100 is the selection interval used in the selection of the supple-mentary sample for the Restandardization Study.

C-9

SYSTEM CHART

(Westat'scounty

data fil(randomaccess)

SUPPLEMENT D

1969-70school

universefile

1970-71school

universefile

PUB-69 'UB -70

1. Match2. Merge3. Reformat

Officefor CivilRights

surveyextract

Summaryby

states

OCR -SPublicschoolswith

grades2, 4, 6

sp -246

Publicschoolswith nogrades

-Other

Obtain;1. Average AGI (Zi)2. Median income

(Xi)3. Percent minority4. Total tax returns

Assign measure ofsize (Ai) and reformat

Programreference

filePRG-REF U-246A

Obtain;1. Degree of

urbanization2. Title I

information

(IRS zip codedata file(randomaccess)

SU-246W

Tabulation

SU-246B

Schools withand withoutTitle I progseparately

...--*-------'

D-1.

i. Define maj andSU-24GBmin strata

withSort by

2. Assign random 1. Final stratummaj, minnumber numberand final3. Sort 2. Pandora nu4oper--t. Define final stratanumbersstrata MSU-U

1

MSU-Usorted

SU-SA

Selectprimary andsubstitutesamples

MSU-SAwith file

typecode

MSU-SB

Sort by1. Major stratum2. State code3. District code4. Grade combo5. Grade 2, 4, 6

enroll

MSU-SBsorted

Selectadditionalsample fromsame schooldistrict

Substitutesample

Additionalsubstitute

sample

SUB -Si SUB -S2

Merge and sort by1. State code2. School district3. School code4. File type

Mastersamplefile

MSMP

CreateMSMP work file

anddistrict file

MSMPwithshorterrecordlength

MSMPworkfile

MSMPdistrictfile

MSMP-R MSMP- DIST -MSMP

PRM-S

Reportgenerator 1

Reportgenerator

Reportgenerator

Reportgenerator 4

Numericindex ofstates

Master Numericcross index ofreference schools

Numericindex ofdistricts

Alphalisting ofdistricts

0-2

Sort by1. State code2. District code3. School code

RM -SS

Createdistrict

file

Sort by1. State code2. District code

IST-PRM

Select schoolsin MSU-SE

with matchingdistrict codefrom D1ST-PRE

Schoolsin districts

whereprimary

sample wasdown

Sort by1. Final stratum2. State code3. District

codes......M5-DST

--1Generate distrecords fromeach finalstratum

DSF

Select schoolsin subsampledschools and

list

I

=12onschool

districts

D-1

MSU-SE

Sort by1. State code2. School code

DIST -hd

Compute P'dsort and

list

1

I

Listing ofdistricts with

t., Pic____>

Subsampleschool

districts

1

iSubsampledschool

districts

3C

APPENDIX B

Appendix B

Consultants to ETS in the questionnaire development process included:

Dr. Thomas EdwardsState University of New York at Buffalo

Dr. Roger FarrIndiana University

Dr. Jane RootSyracuse University

Dr. S. Jay SamuelsUniversity of Minnesota

Dr. Jaap TuinmanIndiana University

APPENDIX C

TELEPHONE INTERVIEW

FORM

1. Did your school conduct at least one compensatory reading programduring the 1971-1972 school year? (By compensatory reading instruc-tion is meant any reading instruction provided to students becausethey are reading below their grade level.)

1. ri Yes

2. No

(If no, skip to item 3)

2. Was one or more of your 1971-1972 compensatory reading programsfederally funded either totally or in part under Title 1 of theElementary and Secondary Education Act?

Yes

No

3. What was your school enrollment during the 1971-1972 school year?

El Less than 100

0 100-299

300-499

LI 500-699

El 700-899

900 or more

4. Please estimate the percentage of school families in each of thefollowing occupational categories for the 1971 -1972 school year.

0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%

(a) Professionals (Doctors 11:3Lawyers, etc.)

(b) Business ownersor managers 0

(c) White collar workers(clerks, salespeople,etc.) E

(d) Skilled workers; farmowners Fl E

(e) Unskilled, farm, orservice workers

(f) Unemployed 0

5. Please estimate the percentage of students in your school duringthe 1971-1972 school year at each of the following grade levels

who are reading one or more years below grade level according tocurrent test data. The estimate should be based upon the conceptof national norms for the grade for which you are reporting.

(a) Grade 2

O None

O 1-10%

O 11-25%

O 26-50%

El 51-75%

O 76-90%

O 91-100%

(b) Grade 4

O None

,_..j 1-10%

1 11-25%

17 26-50%

51-75%

i 1 76-90%

"j 91-100%

(c) Grade 6

;_i None

; ; 1-10%

i_ 11-25%.

"j 26-50

0 51 -75%

O 76-90%

£ 91-100%

6. Please estimate, for the 1971-1972 school year, the percentageof pupils whose head of household attained the following levelsof education.

0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%

(a) Attended college 0 CD 0 '0CO Graduated from high

school but did notattend college 0 0 0

(c) Attended but did notgraduate from highschool Li 0 0 0

(d) Finished 8th grade butdid not attend highschool 0 M 0

(e) Did not finish 8th grade 0 0 0 07. Please estimate, for the 1971-1972 school year, the percentage of

pupils whose families receive public assistance.

1. 0 0-10% 3. L_J 26-50% 5. 0 76-90%

2. El 11 -25% 4. 0 51-75% 6. p 91-100%

8. Please estimate, for the 1971-1972 school year, the percentage ofstudents of the following racial or national origins.

(a) Caucasian or White

(b) Negro or Black

(c) Spanish surnamed

(d) Oriental

(e) American Indian

(f) Other (Specify )

0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%

0

DI

O 0 00 0 0O 0 LiO 0 0O 0 0O E 0

9. Please estimate, for the 1971-1972 school year, the percentageof school families that have each of the following annual incomes.

(a) $12,000 and over

(b) Between $9,000 and$11,999

(c) Between $6,000 and$8,999

(d) Between $3,000 and$5,999

(e) Under $3,000

0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%

0 0 0

O

El

10. What was the number of classrooms in your school during the 1971-1972school year (Do not include offices, auditorium, or gymnasium)?

School Name

FOR ETSUSE ONLY

SURVEY OF COMPENSATORY READING PROGRAMS

SCHOOL PRINCIPAL QUESTIONNAIRE

School District

Principal's Name

DIRECTIONS: This questionnaire is in two parts. The first part is intended toelicit information about your school and the students in it. PLEASE FEEL FREE TOCONSULT OTHERS IN YOUR SCHOOL OR SCHOOL DISTRICT IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATIONREQUESTED. The second part of the questionnaire has to do with compensatory readingprograms. By compensatory reading instruction is meant any reading instructionprovided to students because they are reading below their grade level,

PART I

PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR SCHOOL. Answer all questionswith reference to the current school year unless otherwise indicated.

1. School enrollment this year (number of pupils).

0 Less than 100

0 100-299

300-499

J 500-699

0 700-899

E] 900 or more

2. Number of classrooms. (Do not include offices, auditorium, or gymnasium.)

OMB No. 51-572020Expires 9/72

(1-5)

(6)

(7-9)

Page 2

3. If you have a combination of graded and ungraded classes, indicate below theinstructional organization for each grade or, if ungraded, the equivalent gradesin your school. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)

Instructional Organization

Grade or Equivalent

Check each grade NOTincluded in your school Graded Ungraded Graded & Ungraded

(a) Kindergarten 0(b) Grade 1

(c) Grade 2 0(d) Grade 3 El(e) Grade 4 El 0(f) Grade 5

(g) Grade 6 El(h) Grade 7 0(1) Grade 8

(10-18)

4. Number of classes at each grade level: (19-28)

K 3

1

2

4 7

5 8

Special orungraded

5. Percent of total student body that moved from school attendance area last year. (29)

76-90%

91-100%

6. Percent of total student body that moved into school attendance area last year. (30)

76-90%

91-100%

1E1 0-109 3 26-50% 520 11-25% 4 51-75% 60

10 0-10% 30 26-50% 5020 11-25% 4 51-75% 60

Page 3

7. Estimated percentage (this year) of pupils from families of migrant workers. (31)

1 0-10% 26-50% 76-90%30 5020 11-25% 51-75% 60 91-100%40

7a. Do you feel this is an accurate estimate? (32)

1 Yes

20 No

8. Estimated percentage of pupil..4 whose families receive public assistance. (33)

10 0-10%

20 11-252

3 26-50%

4 0 51-75%

5[:] 76-90%

60 91-1002

8a. Do you feel this is an accurate estimate?

10 Yes

20 No

9. Estimated percentage of pupils whose head of household attained the followinglevels of education. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)

0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%

(a) Attended nollege

(b) Graduated from high school but didnot attend college

(c) Attended but did not graduate fromhigh school

(d) Finished 8th grade but did notattend high school

(e) Did not finish 8th grade

9a. Do you feel these are accurate estimates?

10 Yes

20 No

(34)

(35-39)

(40)

Page 4

10. Estimated percentage of school families that have each of the following annualincomes. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)

0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%

(a) $12,000 and over

(b) Between $9,000 and 41,999

(c) Between $6,000 and $8,999

(d) Between $3,000 and $5,999

(e) Under $3,000


1 Yes

2 0 No

0 0 01=1

0D OD

11. Estimated percentage of school families in each of the following occupationalcategories. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)

(a) Professionals (Doctors,lawyers, etc.)

(b) Business owners or managers

(c) White collar workers (clerks,salespeople, etc.)

(d) Skilled workers; farm owners

(e) Unskilled, farm, or serviceworkers

(E) Unemployed

lla. Do you feel these are accurate estimates?

1 Yes

2 No

0-10% 11-50% 51 -90% 91-1007

O 0 D

0O 0 0

O ED 0

O D D

(41-45)

(46)

(47-52)

(53)

Page 5

12. Estimated percentage of students of the following racial or national origins.(Check only one box in each lettered row.)

0-107 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%

(a) Caucasian or White 0(b) Negro or Black 7 0(c) Spanish surnamed

1__] El C.] CD

(d) Oriental F-1

(e) American Indian 0 0(f) Other (Specify ) 1-__]

(54-59)

12a. Do you feel these are accurate estimates? (60)

1 ED Yes

2 No

13. Are children bussed to your school from other neighborhoods not in your school's (61)regular attendance area?

1 Yes

2 El No

14. If children are bussed in, about what percentage of the total student body isbussed in ?

1 0-10%

2 11-25%

26-50%

AO More than half

15. Are children bussed from your school's attendance area to schools in otherneighborhoods?

1 E Yes

2 No

(62)

(63)

Page 6

16. Using your best professional judgment, rate each of the followingcharacteristics for your school.

Highly Highly

Adequate Adenuate Inadequate Inadequate

Size of physical plant for pupil f-1 0 0 (64)

Condition of physical plant 0Suitability of physical plant for

flprogram overation

Number of instructional personnel 0Number of other professional personnel C.-..]

Number of teacher aides 0Number of other non-professionals F-1

r--tL_J

Quantity of books, periodicals, and 0 (71)other printed materials

Suitability (quality) of books,periodicals, and other printed 0materials for instruction

Quantity of audio-visual materials LI El

Suitability (quality) of audio-..1 El

visual materials for instruction

Quantity of instructional equipment LI- 0 0 El

Suitability (quality) of instructional 0 E] (76)equipment for instruction

Page 7

17. Estimate the percentage of students in your school at each of the following (77-79)grade levels who are reading one or more years below grade level accordingto current test data, The estimate should be based upon the concept of nationalnorms for the grade for which you are reporting.

(a) Grade 2

n None

n 1 -10%

I} 11-25%

7 26-50%

Ei 51-75%

77 76-90%-7 91-100%

(b) Grade 4

7 None

I_' 1-10%

E 11-25%

7 26-50%iE. 51-75%

E 76-90%

E 91-100%

(c) Grade 6

n None

7 1-107

7 11-25%

7 26-50%

51-75%

E 76-90%

9]-100:''.

Page 8

18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need ofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?

1 u Yes

2 0 No

If no, go on to question 19.

a. If Yes, how many students?

b. If Yes, how many students are there in need of remedial readinginstruction in each of the following grades?

1 4 7

2 5 8

3 6 Ungraded

PART II

(80)

(81-83)

(84-101)

DIRECTIONS: This part of the questionnaire is intended to elicit information aboutthe compensatory reading program(s) in your school. By compensatory reading instructionis meant any reading instruction provided to students because they are reading belowtheir grade level.

If you have more than one compensatory reading program in operation in your school duringthis academic year, space is provided in some instances for you to answer questions abouteach program individually. Some guidelines for determining what constitutes "a program"for purposes of this survey are presented below.

1. If instructional groups (for example, grades) are exposed to essentially the samekinds of materials, personnel, and services, the total over all grades should beconsidered a program.

2. If a separate classroom or space is set aside for reading instruction, staffed byspecial personnel and supplied with special equipment or materials, such an entityshould be considered a program.

3. If teachers receive special training for compensatory reading instruction duringsummers or relaxed time, and that training is funded by supplementary sources, suchtraining, in and of itself, should be considered a program.

Page

19. Does your school conduct at least one compensatory reading program as defined?

1 Yes If so, please go on to question 21 and complete the remainderof this questionnaire. At the same time, please distributequestionnaires in the manner prescribed below.

2 0 No If not, DO NOT COMPLETE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE. HOWEVER, PLEASEARRANGE FOR TEACHER QUESTIONNAIRES TO BE COMPLETED BY ONETEACHER OF EACH OF GRADES 2, 4, AND 6 (3 teachers in all) HAVINGTHE CLASS WITH THE LOWEST AVERAGE READING ACHIEVEMENT. These

teachers should receive Teacher Characteristics Questionnaires(tan) and Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaires(yellow).

DISTRIBUTION OF QUESTIONNAIRES IN SCHOOLS HAVING ONE OR MORE COMPENSATORY READINGPROGRAMS AS DEFINED:

1, Questionnaires should be distributed to all teachers of compensatory reading ingrades 2, 4, and 6, AND to the ONE teacher in EACH of grades 2, 4, and 6 havingthe class with the lowest average reading achievement. All teachers to whomquestionnaires are to be distributed should receive at least two questionnaires,one Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire (tan) and one Class and ProgramCharacteristics Questionnaire (blue or yellow).

2. Teachers of compensatory reading should be given blue Class and Program Character-istics Questionnaires: the teachers of grades 2, 4, and 6 whose classes have thelowest average reading achievement should be given yellow Class and ProgramCharacteristics Questionnaires.

(102)

3. If teachers are involved in more than one Compensatory Reading Program (seedefinitions above), they should be given separate blue Class and Program Character-istics Questionnaires For each program in which they teach 2nd, 4th, and 6th graders.

4. If compensatory reading teachers teach pupils at more than one grade level, theyshould be given separate blue Class and Program Characteristics Questionnaires foreach grade level (2, 4, and/or 6) at which they teach.

5. Teachers of multi-age or ungraded classes should be instructed to respond to theirquestionnaires with reference only to the pupils at grade levels appropriate to thestudy (2, 6, and 6), using years in school as the indicator. Thus, a teacher of aclass containing 3rd, 4th, and 5th graders should answer with respect to her 4thyear students only.

6. It is possible that, following directions 1 through 6 above, you will discover thatyou need additional questionnaires. If that is the case, please return the enclosedcard to Educational Testing Service, indicating the number of additional question-naires you will need.

7. Teachers who work as a team in instructing any of the appropriate groups of studentsshould be given one Class and Program Characteristics Ouestionnaire per group ofstudents and instructed to complete the Ouestionnaire together. The teachers shouldbe given separate Teacher Characteristics Questionnaires, however; one per teacher.

Page 10

20. How many separate and distinct compensatory reading programs are currentlyoperating in your school? (Include teacher training programs conducted duringthe summer preceding the current school year.)

One

Two

1:1 Three

Four

More than four

(103)

20a. If there is more than one compensatory reading program in your school, please listeach program below. Use a brief, descriptive title to identify each program, oneon each line. Thereafter, when asked to answer questions separately for eachprogram, report on the separate programs in the order you list them here.

Program 1

Program 2

Program 3

Program 4

21. Are any of the compensatory reading programs in your school funded totally orin part by funds (federal, state, local, or other) supplementary to the regularongoing school budget?

Yes

0 No) If No or Don't know, skip to question 22.

Don't know

(104)

21a. When was the first compensatory reading program funded by supplementary sources (105)made available in your school?

F-1 One year ago

More than 1 but less than 2 school years ago

More than 2 but less than 3 school years ago

Three or more school years ago

Don't know

Page 11

22. How long has (have) the present compensatory reading program(s) been available (106-109)in your school? (Answer separately for each program.)

Program Program Program Program2 3 4

One school year or less

More than 1 but less than 2 school years7-

More than 2 but less than 3 school years

Three or more school years

23. What was your school per pupil expenditure last year?

O Check here if you don't know

24. What was your district per pupil expenditure last year?

Check here if you don't know

25. What are the total funds allocated for compensatory reading in your school? (120-125)

O Check here if you don't know

26. What are the costs per pupil of compensatory reading in your school?

(126)

(127-130)

0 Check here if you don't know (131)

27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.

Program Program Program Program1 2 3 4

Total cost of program

Cost of personnel:ProfessionalOther

Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check)

(132-155)

(156-179)

(180-203)

(204-207)

Page 12

28. How many pupils participate in (each ofyour school? (If there is more than oneindividual children participate in more

Program 1

Program 2

Program 3

Program 4

Number of

the) compensatory reading program(s) inprogram answer separately for each. Ifthan one program,count them in each total.)

Pupils

29. Approximately what percent of the pupilsparticipate in the compensatory readingeach program.) If classes are ungraded,school instead of grade level and check

Grade

PROGRAM I00 0

in Lel 4-1cI I I

I vo 4-I0 ,I C.1 Iri

K DD001 00002 E'0003 '00004 0 OD El5 0 E_I-

6 07 Darn8 EEI00

PROGRAM 2

trlCs1

i0 r-1

at each grade level in your schoolprogram(s)? (Answer separately foranswer using number of years in

this box O.

EO 000OO 000O 0000000O 000O 000D ODO

PROGRAM 30c, o

in *n ,-.1cv I I

I k0 s-I0 4-1 C1 In

O 0000O 000O 000O 000O 000O 000O 000E 000

PROGRAM 400 0

LA lel 1-1Cs1 1 II k.0 f-I0 t-1 c",1 in

00000O 000O 00010000O 000O 000O 0000

30. About what percentage of the students participating in each of the compensatoryreading programs in your school are from culturally, linguistically, and/oreconomically deprived backgrounds? (Mark one box in each lettered row.)

(a) Program 1

(b) Program 2

(c) Program 3

(d) Program 4

51-90% 91-100% Don't know

0 0

OO 0 0

(208-223)

(224)

(225)

(229)

(233)

(237)

(241)

(245)

(249)

(253)

(257)

(261-264)

Page 13

31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box .

Number of class sections

Number of students

Total for School Total for Grades

2 4 6

(265)

(266)

(274)

32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)

FEDERAL

ESEA Title I

Other(specifv)

PROGRAM I PROGRAM 2.-1 1m o

--1 ri 1-1 viO u W 0 4.3 W4..) W C .6.4 W CO 0 0 0 0 0E4 114 % EW 114 %

O 0 0O0 D

STATE (specify)

E1J

0D Li D

LOCAL (specify)

D

OTHER

D 00 0D 0 0

D 0O 0CD

00 0

0 D

DE 1-1D

PROGRAM 3

-4 4-11-1

C0 0

E-1 a Z

O DO ElEJ 0 0ID 0

0O 0 0O 0

0D-

E 0 0

O 0CLJ

O 0 D

PROGRAM 4r1

r-ICO 4A

4 00.>.1-s 1

0 03 0F4 124 Z

O 0 0El

0 0 0O 0

O 00O 0 0

O 0 0O 0 0

DCheck hero if you cannot provide information requested in question 32.

(287)

(303)

(315)

(327)

(339)

Page 14

33. Was any teacher resistance encountered in the implementation of the compensatory(340)

reading program(s) in your school?

None at all

0 Some

0 A great deal

34. Was any community resistance encountered in the implementation of thecompensatory reading program(s) in your school?

E3 None at all

0 Some

El A great deal

(341)

35. What is the basis for determining pupil participation in the compensatory (342-348)reading program? (Mark all that apply.)

All students in the school participate

Membership in one or more specific target groups (i.e., economicallydisadvantaged, migrants, non-English-speaking)

0 Depressed reading levels (as indicated by test results)

Teacher (or other staff) recommendation

Parent request

Volunteer

El Other (specify)

36. Since June 1971, how many and what types of personnel in your school haveparticipated in inservice training activities to prepare them for teachingin a compensatory reading program for elementary students?

Number ofindividuals

Regular classroom teachers

School-located reading specialists

School district reading specialists

School personnel other than above (specify)

(349)

Page 15

37. Does the compensatory reading program use parents or other volunteers (paid (357)or unpaid) to help in the classroom?

1 Yes 2 No

38. Does the compensatory reading program use pupils as tutors? (358)

lED Yes 20 No

39. Do you expect to have a compensatory reading program in the SUMMER of1973 (the summer after next)?

1 Yes 20 No Don't know

(359)

40. If you do expect to have a summer program, for which of the following grades (360-369)

will the program be conducted? (Circle all that apply.)

K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ungraded

Oa. On what basis do you expect to select students for the summer program? (370-377)(Check all that apply.)

O Previous participation in a compensatory reading program

O Previous non-participation in a compensatory reading program

O Depressed reading level

Membership in one or another specific target groups (economically deprived, etc.)

Teacher or other staff recommendation

LI Parent request

O Volunteer

O Other (specify)

PLEASE CHECK TO MAKE SURE ALL QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED. THEN, RETURN

YOUR QUESTIONNAIRE TO ETS IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED.

1. What is your sex?

BEST COPY AIA11111E


TEACHER CHARACTERISTICS QUESTIONNAIRE

Male Female

FOR ETS. , ii "USE ONLY

1-771-7-i1-5)

2. How many years of teaching experience (public and nonpublic), including thisschool year, have you had?

0 One year or less

More than 1 year but less than 3 years

At least 3 years but less than 6 years



Twenty years or more

3. How many years, including this school year, have you taught in this school?

One year or less

0 More than 1 year but 1.,:ss than 3 years

At least 3 years i..ut less than 6 years



0 Twenty years or more

(8)

4. What type of teaching certification do you have? (9)

0 No certificate

Temporary, provisional, or emergency certification

Regular certification

5. What is the highest earned college degree you hold? (Do not report honorary degrees.)

(10)

No degree

A degree or diploma based on less than 4 years of work

A bachelor's degree

A master's degree

A doctor's degree (EdD, PhD, etc.)

OMB No. 51-S72020Expires 9/72

6. Have you had any special training in the diagnosis and treatment ofreading problems?

Yes No

a. If Yes, at what academic level was the training?

1::] Undergraduate

Graduate

Inservice

U On the job

Other (specify)

(12)

7. Are most of your students of the same racial or national origin as you? (13)

Yes No

8. Were you assigned to or did you choose the school in which you are teaching? (14)

Was assigned to school Chose school

9. Were you assigned to or did you choose to teach the class you are teaching (15)

this year?

0 Was assigned to class Chose class

The questions that follow are all designed to elicit your opinions about your school,the pupils you teach, and any compensatory reading program you might be involved in.Please answer the questions as candidly as you are able. There are no "right" answersto these questions; we are interested in obtaining some information about how teachersfeel about compensatory reading programs and about the pupils in them.

10. Compared with other elementary schools in your district or community, how (16-21)

satisfied are you with respect to the following things about your school?

Highly Moderately Moderately HighlySatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied

Physical facilities(buildings, etc.)

Faculty (teachers)

Ability of student body

Attitudes of student body

Administration

Overall philosophy ofeducation

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

00

U

11. How responsive is the administration of your school to any requests you (22)

might make for additional teaching materials or equipment?

Highly responsive

Moderately responsive

Not at all responsive

12. For remedial or other help for one of your students? (23)

Highly responsive



13. For changes in your curriculum? (24)

Highly responsive



14. Do you believe there is a sound basis in educational policy for givingcompensatory programs to disadvantaged students at extra per pupil cost?

Definitely yes

Probably yes

I am undecided

Probably no

Definitely no

(25)

15. Do you believe that compensatory programs are generally worthwhile? (26)

E:3 Definitely yes

ED Probably yes

I am undecided

0 Probably no

Definitely no

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

16. The following statements are =all related to the academic capabilities ofdisadvantaged pupils. For each'statemerit, indicate the degree to whichyou agree or disagree with tli idea expressed.

a. With proper instruction they can learn about aswell as any other pupils.

b. No matter how good the instruction these pupilsreceive they will always score lower thanmiddle class children.

c. These children do not want to learn.

d. The pupils want to learnthe right background for

e. It has been sufficientlywill never do as well as

f . ,

g.

h.

but they do not haveschool work.

proven that such pupilsother students.

Materials are more important than methods inthe teaching of reading.

Methods are more important than materials in theteaching of reading.

The teacher's ability is more important thaneither method or materials in the teachingof reading.

i. Disadvantaged children have more trouble learningto read than advantaged children.

j. Disadvantaged children have a shorter attentionspan than advantaged children.

k. Disadvantaged children have different linguisticexperiences than advantaged children.

1. Disadvantaged children are disadvantaged mainly inthat they do not have the foundation of conceptsthat advantaged children have.

m. Learning to verbalize complete thoughts isparticularly important for disadvantaged children.

n. Improving the student's self-image as a learner is nparticularly important for disadvantaged children. I-1

o. The ability to ask questions which require acomplete answer is extremely important inteaching reading to disadvantaged children.

p. In teaching reading, a wrong response can beas useful as a correct response.

q. Disadvantaged children often have loweraspirations than advantaged children.

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

0Cu

wU

El

0

4-1

bo0

VQs

o

4J ao

0 0 7 )

0(30 )

0

(35 )

0

El

(40)

D

El

(43)

FOR ETSUSE ONLY

1 1 1 1 1 1 (1-5)


CLASS AND PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS QUESTIONNAIRE

This questionnaire is designed to elicit information about your reading instructionand the group(s) to which you provide such instruction. Because reading instructionand instructional groups are so variable, some definitions are given below. Pleasekeep the definitiont in mind as you answer the questions, and refer to them as oftenas you need to.

The main purpose of the questionnaire is to provide descriptive information aboutcompensatory reading programs in grades 2, 4, and 6. By compensatory reading instructionis meant any reading instruction provided to students because they are reading belowthdix grade level.

In many instances, the questionnaire asks for information about classes. For purposesof this study, a class is any instructional group that is exposed to a common set ofmaterials, personnel and/or services, however large and extensive that set might beand that can sensibly be treated as a group in terms of its general characteristics.IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF A TEAM THAT TOGETHER INSTRUCTS SUCH A GROUP, PLEASE COMPLETETHIS QUESTIONNAIRE TOGETHER WITH THE OTHER MEMBER(S) OF THE TEAM.

If your class includes children from several grade levels, please answer the question-naire with respect to the grade level(s) that are appropriate to this study (2, 4,and/or 6).

I. CLASS CHARACTERISTICS

If you are a classroom teacher, answer questions 1 and 2. If you are NOT a classroomteacher, skip to question 3.

1. What grade do you teach? (6)

0 Two

Four

0 Six

0 Ungraded

la. How many pupils are in your class? (Give actual number) (7-9)

How many are boys? (10-11)

How many are girls? (12-13)


BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Page 2

2. How many of the pupils in your class receive compensatory reading instructionas defined above?

All of the pupils in my class receive compensatory reading (14)

instruction

from me(15)

some from me and some from another teacher

Selected pupils in my class receive compensatory reading (16)instruction

from me (17)


3. The following questions refer ONLY to those pupils who receive their compensatoryreading instruction from you. If you are a classroom teacher, and if all of thepupils in your class receive compensatory reading instruction, answer the questionsin terms of the total class. IF ONLY SOME OF THE PUPILS RECEIVE COMPENSATORY READINGINSTRUCTION FROM YOU, ANSWER IN TERMS OF THOSE PUPILS ONLY. If you provide compen-satory reading instruction to more than one class (as class is described above),answer the questions with respect to one class per program. Answer the questionswith reference to the class in any given program that meets earliest each week. Be

sure to include all meetings of that class. If you do teach compensatory readingto more than one class, indicate in the box how many classes you teach.

r--]

(18-19)

How many pupils receive compensatory reading instruction from you? (Include anypupils who may be sent to your classroom especially for compensatory readinginstruction.)

Total number of pupils (20-22)

a. How Llany are boys? (23-24)

b. How many are girls? (25-26)

4. What is the age range cf the childten in your compensatory reading class?

Age of oldest Age of youngest child: (27-34)

Years Monels Years Months

5. What percentage of the puhils in your compensatory reading class have received (35)

compensatory reading instruction prior to this year?

DI gone

1-25%

71 26-50%

:j 51-75%

7-1 76 100%

Don't knowBEST COPY AVAILABLE

Page 3

6. About what percentage of the children in your compensatory reading classattended some form of Preschool? (Include Headstart, day care, or nurseryselool: DO NOT INCLUDE PUBLIC SCHOOL KINDERGARTEN.)

None

LI 1-25%

(36)

26-50%

51-75%

76-100%

Don't know

7. About what percent of the pupils in your compensatory reading class are members (37-42)

of the fcllowing racial or national origin groups? (dark one box in eachlettered row.)

(a Caucasian or White

(b) Negro or Black


(d) Oriental

(e) American Indian

(f) Other (Specify)

None 1-25% 26-50% 51-7f% 76-100%

0 0

CD 0rl 1

8. Estimate the percent of the pupils in your compensatory reading class who are (43)

from homes in which the dominant language is not English.

one

L: 1-25%

26-50%

[:: 51-75%

1 ! 76-1007

ri Don't know

BEST COPY AVAILAbLE

Page 4

8a. Among the homes where the dominant language is not English, what language(s)is (are) spoken? (Mark all that apply.)

American Indian

Chinese

Japanese

(44-49)

Spanish-Portuguese

El French

Other (Specify)

9. Estimate the percentage of pupils in your compensatory reading class who have (50-57)

persistent problems in each of the following areas. (Mark one box in eachlettered row.)

(a) Speech

(b) Vision

(c) Hearing

(d) Frequent illness

(e) Mental retardation

(f) Emotional problems

(g) Family instability

(h) Other (Specify)

None 1-10% 11-50% 51-100% Don't know

E.J

00

F-1

771

O 0 010. Estimate the percentage of pupils in your compensatory reading class whose (58-64)

family incomes are derived from each of the following occupational categories.(Mark one box in each lettered row.)

(a) Unskilled or service workers

(b) Skilled workers or farm owners


(cl) Business owners or managers

(e) Professionals (doctors,lawyers, etc.)

(f) Unemployed

(g) Don't know

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

None 1-10% 11-50% 51-90Z 91-100%

17 ! 1

Li 0n

,1

L.1 0

Page 5

11. What is the average absentee rate in your compensatory reading class? (About (65)

what percentage of the class is absent on any given day?)

0-10%

11-20%

21-30%

31-40%

41-50%

More than 50%

12. Which of the following would you judge to be the major causes of absenteeism (66-71)

among your pupils? (Mark yes or no for each cause.)1 2

Yes No

0 Illness of pupil

Illness of other family member(s)

Lack of parental concern

c:3 Need for pupil to perform other duties at home

L_J Suspension or expulsion

Other (Specify)

13. Estimate the percentage of your pupils whose families have moved into this (72)

school attendance area during the school year.

None

1-25%

0 26-50X

51-75%

76-100%

Can't estimate

BEST COPY AVA1LAL3LE

Page 6

14. Estimate the percentage of your pupils who have moved out of the schoolattendance area this year.

0 None

U 1-25%

10 26-50%

E] 51-75%

76-100%

0 Can't estimate

Questions 15 and 16 ask for your opinions about the pupils you teach. Please answerthe questions as candidly as you are able; there are no "right" answers.

15. How far do you expect the average pupil in your compensatory reading classwould be able to go in school if he were given the opportunity?

Eighth grade, or lower

0 Ninth, tenth, or eleventh grade

High school graduate

Junior college, business school, or some other post-secondary course,but not a four year college

F-1 Four year college or beyond

u Other (Specify)

16. How far do you expect the average pupil in your compensatory reading classwill actually go school?


Ninth, tenth, or eleventh grade


Junior college, business school. or some other post-secondary course,' but not a four year college

Four year college or beyond

0 Other (Specify)

) -JCopIf AVAILABLE

1.

(73)

(74)

(75)

Page 7

II. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

The following questions refer to your compensatory reading instruction (see definitionon page 1). If you are a classroom teacher, and all of the pupils in your class receivecompensatory reading instruction, answer the questions in terms of the total class. If

only some of the pupils receive compensatory reading instruction, answer the questionsin terms of those pupils only, and in terms of that part of the instructional programthat is directed to them.

If you are a reading teacher or specialist teacher, answer the questions with referenceto the class to which your instruction applies. If you teach more than one class (asclass is defined on page 1), answer the questions with reference to the one class perprogram that meets earliest in the week. Be sure to include all meetings of that class.If you teach in MORE THAN ONE PROGRAM, fill out separate questionnaires for one class ineach program.

If you do teach more than one class, check this box. D (76)

If you teach in more than one program, check this box. ED (77)

17. When is compensatory reading instruction carried out? (Check all that apply.) (78-82)

0 During regular school hours in time scheduled for regular readinginstruction

0 During regular school hours in time released from other class work

Before or after school or on weekends

0 During the summer

0 Other (Specify)

18. If compensatory reading instruction is carried on in time released from other (83-92)

class work, which of the following subject matter areas receive correspondinglyreduced time? (Mark all that apply.)

0 Social Studies

0 Science

0 Mathematics

0 Foreign Language

0 Language Arts

0 Physical Education

ED Art

F-1 music

0 Seat work, study time, etc. BEST COPY f -LABLE

0 Other (Specify)

Page 8

19. What is the average amount of formal instruction time per student in (93)

compensatory reading?

a. Minutes per instructional period:

[=3 1-15

U 16-30

0 31-40

c 41-50

L_J 51-60

0 61-75

0 76-90

fl 91 or more

b. Number of instruction periods per week: (94)

0 One

n Two or three

El Four or five

U More than five

20. Do most pupils receive compensatory reading instruction at the same time of (95)

day every instructional day?

1 E Yes

2j] No

a. If yes, when is the instructional period? (96)

IT Before school

i 1 Morning (Before lunch)

0 Afternoon (After lunch)

After school

b. if no, when does instruction usually take niace?

1-7 Mostly in the morning

1-1 Mostly in the afternoon

LI About equally divided between mornings and afternoons

OOP

(9 7)

Page 9

21. What additional personnel are available to you in your teaching of (98-106)

compensatory reading?Frequently Occasionally Rarely Not Available

ERemedial reading teacher orsupervisor

Other professionals (counselors,psychologists, etc.)

Paraprofessionals or teacheraide

E

Parent or other volunteer

Student teacher 0Media specialist CD 0Resource teacher (music,art,etc.)

Older student in school

Other (Specify) rE] El-

22. During the school year, how many teachers other than yourself have held your (107)

particular teaching assignment with your compensatory reading class for atleast two consecutive weeks? COUNT SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS AND REPLACEMENT TEACHERS;DO NOT COUNT STUDENT TEACHERS OR CLASSROOM AIDES.

None

One

f-1 Two

Three

More than three

23. If your compensatory reading class is organized into groups, indicate the (108-112)

frequency with which you organize these groups by each of the following criteria.Frequently Occasionally Rarely Never

Reading grade level

Specific skill. deficiencies

Shared interests

Specific projccts

Other (Specify)

0 0El 0 nO 0

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

rage 10

24. How often do the following instructional groups operate (occur) in thecourse of your teaching of compensatory reading?

All of Rarely orthe time Frequently Occasionally Never

Adult and child in one-to-onerelationship

Adult and children in groupsof between 2 and 10


Adult and children in groupsor more than 20 (includeswhole class instruction)

Individual pupils workingindependently

Pupil teams workingindependently

Other (Specify)

(113-119)

25. If your compensatory reading class is organized into groups, about howfrequently does the composition of the group change?

F-1 Daily

0 Weekly

Bi- weekly

C:1 Monthly

Rarely, if ever

I Other (Specify)

26. In a sentence or two, describe the outstanding features of your compensatoryreading program.

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

(120)

Page 11

27. Which one of the following terms comes closest to describing your major (121)

classroom approach to the teaching of compensatory reading?

Linguistic - phonetic

1-1 Language experience

Modified alphabet

Eclectic

Other (Specify)

28. How long have you used this method? (122)

This is the first year

For one or two years

0 For three, four, or five years

ED For six years or more

29. To what extent do you use each of the following approaches to teaching (123-132compensatory reading in your classroom?

I

, Not att All Minimally Somewhat Extensively

Basal readers 0Programmed instruction C:] 0A total phonics program C71 0A supplementary phonics program El

Language experience U

A linguistic program U U El 0Non-standard orthography

ED 0(ex., i.t.a.)

Words in color r-1 0Individualized programs ED 0 El

Technological devices such asthe 'talking typewriter" or

--,, i

L....ali

1 i

teaching machines

Other (Specify and describe)

.7

BEST COPY

Page 12

30. Who selected the materials that you are currently using in your teaching of (134)

compensatory reading?

0 You, and you alone

0 You, as a member of a team or committee

r-iAn individual who asked for your views; or a team or committee ofwhich you were not a member but on which your views were represented

ED An individual, team, or committee, operating without any input fromyou

0 Other (Specify)

31. How satisfied are you with the materials you are currently using in yourteaching of compensatory reading?

(135)

0 Totally satisfied

ED Satisfied in major aspects; dissatisfied in some minor ones

0 Lukewarm; neither devoted nor opposed to the materials

0 Dissatisfied in major asnects; satisfied only in some minor ones

U Totally dissatisfied

32. How frequently do you use the following materials in the course of your (136-145)compensatory reading instruction?

Not Rarely or

Available Often Sometimes Never Use

Textbooks other than basalri 0readers

Books and printed materials 0other than textbooks

Newspapers, magazines, and 0 0 0other periodicals

Teache r- prepared materials 0 0 F-1(dittos, etc.)

Motion pictures and/orfilmstrips 0Slides and transparencies F-1

Tape recordings and records 0 0Video or television tapes r-i F-1

Games, puzzles, and toys 0Other (Specify) 0 C:3

BEST cOeY AVAILABLE

Page 13

33. How much time does a typical pupil in your compensatory reading class spend (146-160)

in each of the following types of activity?

A great deal Some Little or none

Improving motor abilities related to reading IT 0Increasing attention span C:1

Developing visual discrimination 0 ED 0Matching letters or words

Learning letter forms F-1 0Developing a sight vocabulary

F-1 ci r-1(Whole word recognition)

Learning word meanings (Vocabulary)

Phonic and/or structural analysis CD (:]

Being read to

Reading aloud 0 0Reading silently (independent silent reading)

Creative writingr-1

Reading for enjoyment UEnriching cultural background

Other (Specify) n34. Have you had any special training in the teaching of reading or in instructional (161)

techniques for disadvantaged pupils in connection with your current teachingassignment?

1 Yes

2 No

If no, skip to question 39.

If yes, Please answer questions 35-38.

135 COPYAVN14_ACI:i.

Page 34

35. What form did the special training take? (Check all that apply.)

O Summer workshop or institute

O College course (whether or not for degree credit)

0 After school or weekend workshop(s)

O Released-time workshop(s)

Individual instruction with supervised practice teaching

1_1 other (SpecOy)

36. Which of the following areas were explored in the course of the specialtraining you received? (Check all that apply.)

1 i New instructional techniques in reading

ri Diagnosis of reading problems

El Open classroom methods

El Individualized instruction

O Use of equipment and materials

7 Techniques for cultural enrichment

1 1 Other (Specify)

37. Over what time period did the special training extend?

O One summer

111 One academic semester

One academic year

1 1 One calendar year

1 One summer and one academic year

LI Other (Specify)

BEST COPY. AVAILABLE

(162-167)

(168-174)

(175)

Page 15

38. How long ago did you receive your special training?

Less than one year ago

E] More than one but less than two years ago

1:1 More than two but less than three years ago

Three or more years ago

39. For a typical pupil in your compensatory reading program, about howmuch in-school time is devoted to each of the following reading orreading-related activities?

Basic reading instructionalprogram

Compensatory reading

Instructional program (onlyif compensatory reading pro-gram is different from basicinstructional program)

Reading in content areas(Science, Social Studies,etc.)

Independent (self-selected)reading

Library activities

Enrichment activities (in-clude trips, specialassemblies, etc.)

Other relevant activities(Specify)

Less than Between More than 11 hour 1 and 4 hour a day(5+

None per week hours/week hours/weekO 000O 00DO 0D0O 000O E0010000O ODDO 00E1

(176)

(177-184)

Page 36

40. Please indicate below what materials you use in your compensatory readinginstruction, and to what extent you use them.

Use as majorresource inteaching

Series Titles(Specify) readingScott Foresman

Harper Row

Macmillan

American Book Co.

Ginn & Co.

Houghton-Mifflin.

Lippincott

Allyn & Bacon

Holt, Rinehart &Winston

SRA

Harcourt Brace &World

Open Court

ITA

Merrill Linguistics

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Use as supple-mental or op-tional coursein class

Occasionallyrefer to my-self but don'tuse in class

Don'tuseatall

0(185)

00El0000(195)

0

0(205)

0

(215)

(218)

Page 17

Use as major Use as supple- OccassionallyList all additional resource in mental or op- refer to my-materials used, including teaching tional course self but don'thardware reading in class use in class

o 0 0o 0 0o 0 0a a EI

o a 0o 0 0o 0 0a o 0a a oo o 0a a a

41. to you create any of the materials you use in teaching compensatoryreading?

1 r:] Yes

2 D No

a. If Yes, which of the following types of materials do you create?(Check all that apply)

El Worksheets

I=-1 Printed stories, poems, or essays

1:1 Transparencies for overhead projector

E] Filmstrips

El Slides

CI Motion Pictures

0 Charts

CI Tapes

CI Other (Specify)

(219-229)

(230)

(231-239)

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Page 18

42. How would you rate each of the following activities in terms of importanceto you as goals in your current teaching of compensatory reading?

Improving motor abilities relat2dto reading

Increasing attention span

Developing auditorydiscrimination

Matching letters or words

Learning letter forms

Developing a sight vocabulary(Whole word recognition)

Learning word meanings(Vocabulary)

Phonic and/or structuralanalysis

Developing skill in using contextclues

Practicing syllabification skills

Practicing punctuation andparagraph skills

Developing comprehensionskills

Improving comprehension rate

Developing limtening skills

Reading aloud

Reading silently (independentsilent reading)

Developing study skills

Developing library skills

Improving verbal communication

Creative writing

Reading for enjoyment

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Major Secondary Of little or no

Goal Goal Importance as a goal

0

0

0

(240)

(250)

(260)

Page 19

Major Secondary Of little or noCoal Goal importance as a goal

Enriching cultural background

Improving self-image E.]

Improving attitudes toward reading

Other (Specify) 0

(261-264)

43. About how often does each child in your compensatory reading class have theopportunity to read aloud to the class?

At least once a day

Several times a week, but not daily

About once a week

Less than once a week, but regularly

0 Seldom or never on a regular basis

44. About how often does each child in your compensatory reading class have theopportunity to read aloud to you alone (or to another adult)?

At least once a day


About once a week


Seldom or never on a regular basis

(265)

(266)

45. How successful would you consider your compensatory reading teaching to bewith respect to each of the following criteria? (267-271)

Highly Moderately Moderately TotallySuccessful. Successful Unsuccessful Unsuccessful

Enhancing pre-readingskills

Enhancing measuredreading achievement

Improving attitudestoward reading

Improving students' selfimages

Remediating culturaldeprivation

01:1

0

0BEST COPY AVAILABLE

FOR ETSUSE ONLYNE

CLASS AND PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS QUESTIONNAIRE

( 1-5)

This questionnaire is designed to elicit information about your reading instructionand the group(s) to which you provide such instruction. Because reading instruction andinstructional groups are so variable, some definitions are given below. Please keep thedefinitions in mind as you answer the questions, and refer to them as often as you need to.

In many instances, the questionnaire asks for information about classes. For pur-poses of this study, a class in any instructional group that is exposed to a common set ofmaterials, personnel, and/or services, however large and extensive that set might be, andthat can sensibly be treated as a group in terms of its general characteristics. IF YOUARE A MEMBER OF A TEAM THAT TOGETHER INSTRUCTS SUCH A GROUP, PLEASE COMPLETE THIS QUESTION-NAIRE TOGETHER WITH THE OTHER MEMBER(S) OF THE TEAM .

I. CLASS CHARACTERISTICS

1. How many pupils are in your reading class? (Give actual number.) (6-8)

a. How many, are boys? (9-10)

b. How many are girls? (11-12)

2. How do the pupils in your class receive their reading instruction?

ElAll of the pupils in my class receive reading instruction (13)

Elfrom me(14)

El some from me and some from another teacher

ri Selected pupils in my class receive reading instruction (15)

El from me(16)

r-i some from me and some from another teacher

The following questions refer ONLY to those pupils who receive their reading instructionfrom you. If all of the pupils in your class receive reading instruction from you, answerthe questions in terms of the total class. If only some of the pupils receive readinginstruction from you, answer the questions in terms of those pupils only.

3. How many pupils receive reading instruction from you? (Give actual number.)

a. How many are boys?

b. How many are girls?


(17-19)

(2o-gi)

(22-23)

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

ti

Page 2

4. What is the age range of the children in your reading class?

Age of the oldest child: / Age of youngest child:(24-3$

Years Months Years Months

5. What percentage of the pupils in your reading class have received compensatory anreading instruction prior to this year?

None

1-25%

26-50%

El 51-75%

U 76-100%

ri Don't know

6. About what percentage of the children in your class attended some form of pre- (33)

school? (Include Headstart, day care, or nursery school. DO NOT INCLUDE PUBLICSCHOOL KINDERGARTEN.)

El None

ri 1-25%

D 26-50%

I--] 51-75%

I--1 76-100%

Don't know

7. About what percent of the pupils in your class are members of the following racialor national origin group? (Mark one box on each lettered row.) (34-39)

(a) Caucasian or white

(b) Negro or Black El 0 0 0(c) Spanish surnamed 0 r=1 0 El(d) Oriental 0 El El EJ(a) American Indian El 0 0 El(f) Other (Specify) 0 El [::] D

% 1H0% 5n0% 916-0%

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Page 3

8. Estimate the percentage of the pupils in your class who are from homes in which thedominant language is not English. (40)

None

1-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-100%

j[ Don't know

a. Among the homes where the dominant language is not English, what language(s) (41 -46)is (are) spoken? (Mark all that apply.)

E=I American Indian

r--1 Chinese

El Japanese

Spanish-Portugueie

French

El Other (Specify)

9. Estimate the percentage of pupils in your class who have persistent problemsin each of the following areas. (Mark one box in each lettered row.)

(47-54)

None 1-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100% Don't know

(a) Speech 0 Q = 0 = 0(b) Vision ED 0 0 0 = 0(c) Nearing -1:1 0 0 0 0 0(d) Frequent illness El = 0 0 E:=1 C:]

(e) Mental retardation 0 = 0 0 0 I=(f) Emotional problems 0 = = ED ED(g) Family instability El El 0 0 0 I=(h) Other (specify) 0 El = 0 0 El

1 2 3 4 5 6

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Page 4

10. Estimate the percentage of pupils in your class whose family incomes arederived from each of the following occupational categories. (Mark one boxin each lettered row.)




(d) Business owners or managers

(e) Professionals (doctors,lawyers, etc.)

(f) Unemployed

(g) Don't know

None .1-11% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%O 00O 0E100000O 0000O E10 El

11. What is the average absentee rate in your class? (About what percentage ofthe class is absent on any given day?)

0-10%

0 11-20%

21-30%

31-40%

1.-50%

More than 50%

12. Which of the following would you judge to be the major causes of absenteeism (63)

among your pupils? (Mark yes or no for each cause.)

1 2

Yes No

(55-60)

(61)

(62)

0 0 Illness of pupil

Illness of other family member(s)


Need for pupil to perform other duties at home

Suspension or expulsion

Other (Specify)

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Page 5

13. Estimate the percentage of your pupils whose families have moved'into thisschool, attendance area before the end of the school year.

(69)

None

1-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-100%

Can't estimate

14. Estimate the percentage of your pupils who have moved out of the school (70)

attendance area this year.

C:] None

C:3 1-25%

26 -50X

51-75%

76-100%

Can't estimate

Questions 15 and 16 ask your opinions about the pupils you teach. Please answerthe questions as candidly as you are able; there are no "right" answers to thesequestions.

15. How far do you expect the average pupil in your reading class would be able (71)

to go in school if he were given the opportunity?




Juniorcollege, business school, or some other post-secondary course,

but not a four year college


Other (Specify)

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Page 6

116. How far do you expect the average pupil in your reading class will actually (72)

go in school?




ri Junior college, business school or some other post-secondary course,1---1 but not a four year college


Other (Specify)

II. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

The following questions refer to your reading instruction. If you are a classroomteacher, and all of the pupils in your class receive reading instruction from you,answer the questions in terms of the total class. If only some of the pupils receivereading instruction from you, answer the questions in terms of those pupils only, andin terms of that part of the instructional program that is directed to them.

17. What is the average amount of formal instructional time per student in reading?

a. Minutes per instructional period: 1 0 1-15 5 0 51-60 (73)

2 C:3 16-30 6 61-75

3[:] 31-40 7 76-90

40 41-50 8 91 or more

b. Number of instruction periods per week:

10 One 3 [:: Four or five (74)

2 Two or 4 More than fivethree

18. Do most pupils receive reading instruction at the same time of day every (75)

instructional day?

1 Yes

2 No

OarCOPY

41/411481C

Page 7

If yes, when is the instructional period? (76)

Before school

Morning (before lunch)

Afternoon (after lunch)

After school

If no, when does instruction usually take place? (77)

Mostly in the morning

Mostly in the afternoon

About equally divided between mornings and afternoons

19. What additional personnel are available to you in your teaching of reading? (78-86)

Frequently Occasionally Rarely Not Available

Remedial reading teacher orsupervisor

Other professionals (counselors,psychologists, etc.)

Paraprofessionals or teacher aide

Parent or other volunteer

Student teacher

Media specialist

Resource teacher (music,art,etc.)

Older student in school

Other (Specify)

1-1

000 0

00

20. During the school year, how many teachers other than yourself have held your (87)

particular teaching assignment with your reading class for at least two consecutiveweeks? COUNT SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS AND REPLACEMENT TEACHERS: DO NOT COUNT STUDENTTEACHERS OR CLASSROOM AIDES.

None

L_J

2

3

0 More than 3

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Page 8

21. If your reading class is organized into groups, indicate the frequency with (88-92)

which you organize these groups by each of the following criteria.

Frequently Occasionally Rarely Never

Reading grade level

Specific skill deficiencies

Shared interests

Specific projects

Other (Specify)

D DO

0 022. How often do the following instructional groups operate (occur) in the course (93-99)

of your teaching of reading?All of Fre- Occasion- Rarely orthe time quently ally Never

Adult and child in one-to-onerelationship



Adult and children in groupsof more than 20 (includeswhole class instruction)

Individual pupils workingindependently

Pupil teams workingindependently

Other (Specify) F-1

D

0

0

D

23. If your reading class is organized into groups, about how frequently does thecomposition of the group change?

O Daily

0 Weekly

Hi-weekly

Lir Monthly

0 Rarely, if ever

L...j Other (Specify)

BEST COPY AVAIIML

(100)

Page 9

24. In a sentence or two, describe the outstanding features of your readingprogram.

25. Which one of the following terms comes closest to describing your major (101)

classroom approach to the teaching of reading?

Linguistic-phonetic

Language experience

Modified alphabet

0.Eclectic

Other (Specify)

G Don't know

26. How long have you used this method? (102)


U For one or two years

For three, four, or five years

For six years or more

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Page 10

27. To what extent do you use each of the following approaches to teaching (103-112)reading in your classroom?

Not at Exten-All Minimally Somewhat sively

Basal readers

Programmed instruction

A total phonics program

A supplementary phonicsprogram

Language experience

A linguistic program.

Non-standard orthography(ex., i.t.a.)

Words in color

Individualized programs

Technological devices such asthe "talking typewriter" orteaching machines

o

ori o

U

o0


28. Who selected the materials that you are currently using in your teaching ofreading?

You, and you alone

You, as a member of a team or committee

E:3An individual who asked for your views; or a team or committee of whichyou were not a member buton which your views were represented

An individual, team, or committee, operating without any input from you

0 Other (Specify)

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

(113)

Page 11

29. How satisfied are you with the materials you are currently using in yourteaching of reading?

Totally satisfied

Satisfied in major aspects; dissatisfied in some minor ones

Lukewarm; neither devoted nor opposed to the materials

Dissatisfied in major aspects; satisfied only in some minor ones

Totally dissatisfied

30. How frequently do you use the following materials in the course of yourreading instruction?

Textbooks other than basalreaders

Books and printed materialsother than textbooks

Newspapers, magazines, andother periodicals

Teacher-prepared materials(dittos, etc.)

Motion pictures and/orfilmstrips

Slides and transparencies

Tape recordings and records

Video or television tapes

Games, puzzles, and toys

Other (Specify)

Not Rarely orAvailable Often Sometimes Never Use

0 0

D

000 0El

D-

tiD 0

(Ilk)

(115-120

BEST COPYP0,110311.

Page 12

31. Now much time does a typical pupil in your reading class spend in each (125-139)

of the following types of activities?

Improving motor abilities relatedto reading


Developing visual discrimination



Developing a sight vocabulary(whole word recognition)

Learning word meanings(vocabulary)

Phonic and/or structural analysis

Being read to

Reading aloud


Creative writing



Other (Specify)

A great deal Some Little or.none

O 0

0 D 0O

O

32. Have you had any special training in the teaching of reading or in instructional (14techniques for disadvantaged pupils in connection with your current teachingassignment?

1 Yes

2 No

If no, skip to question 37.If yes, please answer questions 33-36.

;BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Page 13

33. What form did the special training take? (Check all that apply)

Summer workshop or institute

College course (whether or not for degree credit)

After school or weekend workshop

Released-time workshop

Individual instruction with supervised practice teaching

Other (Specify)

34. Which of the following areas were explored in the course of the specialtraining you received? (Check all that apply)

(":3 New instructional techniques in reading

Diagnosis of reading problems

0 Open classroom methods

Individualized instruction

Use of equipment and materials

O Techniques for cultural enrichment

Other(s) (Specify)

35. Over what period of time did the special training extend?

One summer

O One academic semester

One academic year

One calendar year

One summer and one academic year

Other (Specify)


Less than one year ago

More than one but less than two years ago

More than two but less than three years ago

E Three or more years ago

(141-146)

(147-153)

(154)

(155)

BEST COY AVAILAtu

Page 14

37. How would you rate each of the following activities in terms of importanceto you as goals in your current teaching of reading?

Improving motor abilities related toreading


Developing auditory discrimination

Developing visual discrimination



Developing a sight vocabulary (wholeword recognition)

Learning word meanings (vocabulary)

Phonic and/or structural analysis

Developing skill in using context clues


Practicing punctuation and paragraph skills

Developing comprehension skills

improving comprehension rate

Developing listening skills

Reading aloud

Reading silently (independent silentreading)




Creative writing



Improving self-image


Other (Specify)

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Of little orMajor Secondary no importancegoal goal as a goal

00

U (156)

(166)

(176)

(181)

Page 15

38. For a typical pupil in your reading class, about how much in-school time (182-189)

is devoted to each of the following reading or reading-related activities?

Less than Between More than 11 hour 1 and 4 hour a day

None per week hrsiwk (5+ hrsiwk)

Basic reading instructional oprogram

Compensatory reading 0 0 0 0Instructional program (only ifcompensatory reading program is Ddifferent from basic instructionalprogram)

Reading in content areas (science,social studies, etc.)

Independent (self-selected)reading

Library activities

Enrichment activities (includetrips, special assemblies, etc.)


BESTCOPY

AVAILAubi:

Page 16

39. Please indicate below what materials you use in your reading instruction, and to

what extent you use them. Use as major Use as supple- Occasionally Don't

resource in mental or op- refer to my- use

teaching tional course self but don't at

Series Titles (Specify) reading in class use in class all

Scott Forsmann 1.0CI

Harper Row 0 0 0ii

0Macmillan U

0American Book Co.

0 Dor0

Ginn & Co. 0 00

Houghton-Mifflin

0D 0

Lippincott

0210

Allyn & Bacon 0

Holt, Rinehart Et 0Wins ton

0 0 0 CISRA

Harcourt Brace &1:.1_)

D20World 0 0

Open Court

0 INt° ITA LI 0 0 LlMerrill. Linguistics El 0 u24

;List all additonal important materials;used, including hardware

Page 17

Use as majorresource inteachingreading

0

Da0

Use as supple-mental or op-tional coursein class

0

a00

Occassionallyrefer to my-self but don't (225-234use in class

oE.)

0

40. Do you create any of the materials you use in teaching reading?

1 0 Yes

2 0 No

a. If yes, which of the following types of materials do you create?(Check all that apply. )

Worksheets

0 Printed stories, poems, or essays

Transparencies for overhead projector

ID Filmstrips

E) Slides

Motion pictures

Charts

0, Tapes

0 Other (Specify)

,

BEST COPY AVAILAtO

(235)

(236-244)

Page 18

41. About how often does each child in your reading class have the opportunity (245)

to read aloud to the class?

0 At least once a day


About once a week


Seldom, or never on a regular basis

42. About how often does each child in your reading class have the opportunityto read aloud to you (or to another adult)?

(246)

At least once a day


O About once a week

ri Less than once a week, but regularly

Seldom, or never on a regular basis

43. How successful would you consider your teaching of reading to be with respect (247-251)

to each of the following criteria?

Highly Moderately Moderately TotallySuccessful Successful Unsuccessful Unsuccessful

Enhancing pre-reading skills 0 l.....1

r-1ED

Enhancing maasuzod reading 0 Elachievement

Improving attitudes toward reading(-_-_] 0

Improving students' self images D 0 7-1

Remediating cultural deprivation 0

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

APPENDIX E

APPENDIX E

A method for formalizing on investigator's uncertainties about

the effect of non - response in sample surveys

1. Description of the method

In most surveys there are at least some non-respondents. In

special cases one may be able to estimate the effect of non-response

under some fairly general models.1 More often, the investigator

is left with having to make subjective judgements about the possible

effect of the non-respondents. Given this situation, it seems

reasonable to try to formalize these subjective notions so that

they can be easily stated, communicated and compared across re-

searchers. An easy way to do this is by using Bayesian methods

which are in fact based on the notion of subjective probability.

It should be emphasized that there is no "magic" in this

approach--one cannot know how non-respondents would respond

without data; however, one can formalize subjective notions on

how similar they probably are to respondents and thus formalize

notions on what effect they would have had on the results had

they responded. One might also want to think of the method as

summarizing the results of simulations, where one uses the

respondents to generate "reasonable" hypothetical responses for

the non-respondents.

The method proposed here is for the case of a simple random

sample of N units, a proportion p of which are non-respondents.

1. Cochran, W. G. Sampling Techniques. (2nd ed.) New York:John Wiley Z, Sons, 1963. P. 363.

-2-

The objective is to estimate the average value of a variable Y

which is recorded for all respondents but not for non-respondents.

However, both respondents and non-respondents do have

"background variables" X (xl,...,xq

) recorded (e.g. measures

of socioeconomic status, race, sex, etc.).

There are two subjective parameters (prior parameters),

01 and 02, that summarize subjective notions about the similarity

of respondents and non-respondents. These plus the observed (X,Y)

data for respondents and the observed X data for non-respondents

rleld a "subjective confidence interval" (posterior distribution)

for what the average Y in this sample would have been had all

the non-respondents responded (not the average Y in the population).

02 is a subjective coefficient of variation2 for the non-

respondent's regression coefficients. That is, letting 0 (i)

R

be the regression coefficients of Y on X (i) for respondents,

the investigator is 95% sure that the regression coefficients

of Y on X") for non-respondents will fall in the interval

6(R i) (1 ± 282

)

For conceptual simplicity we assume 02 is the same for all X

variables. We use coefficients of variation because they seem

2. Snedecor, George W., & Cochran, William G. StatisticalMethods. (6th ed.) Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State UniversityPress, 1967.

well suited to summarize subjective notions of large and small

(e.g., 8 1% seems small, while 6 = 100% seems large). This

formulation is most appropriate for Y positive but can be used

for a y that takes on negative values.

Even if the regressions of Y on X were identical for

respondents and non-respondents, the two groups might 'Rave

different Y means. However, as more X variables are added the

investigator should be more confident that if the Y means for

respondents differ, the difference should be reflected in the X

variables. Hence we define 81

to be the subjective coefficient

of variation for the non - respondents' mean if their X distribution

were the same as the X distribution for respondents. That is,

letting ail, + 8Rii be the expected Y for a group of respondents

whose average X is XR, the investigation is 95Z sure that the

expected Y for a group of non-respondents whose average X ':.s YR

lies in the interval

R(a

R+ 8 -R)7 i)(1 + 28

1)

-

Intuitively, as the number of X variables increases 81

should decrease since 81reflects uncertainty about differences

between respondents and non-respondents due.to sources other

than the X variables, but the inclusion of more X variables

should not necessarily increase or decrease 02.

The subjective 95% confidence interval for the average Y

if all units had responded is Chgn

(1.1) TFR

where yR is

functions of

'(1.2) ho2 plit(XNa XR)/YR, RR the least squares regression

coefficient for Y on X for the respondents, 7CNR and 3R

-4--

1 + hip + 2 a2h21 1

e2h2 h22 2 3

the

the

average

data:

Y for respondents and the hi are simple

the average X for non-respondents and respondents

respectively.

"2oR

1 2(1.3) h = 2 [1. + , o8 the least squares residual

YRJJ

variance in the regression of Y on X for the respondents;

2

(XNRh2

= 7 + ;2 -.2 2

( NR R)( R

Sx1 )0714R R x R R )

R

where Sxx

is the centered cross products matrix of X

for the respondents:

"2o

(1.5) h3_2 R 1 + a - S

-11

3 v2 Np(1-P) NR g xxa -NR R )

Y R

The term h0is relative bias due to different sample X means for

respondents and non-respondents assuming that aside from the

observed X difference non-respondents are just like the

2 2 .

respondents; the term 01h1

is relative variance due to uncertainty

about the equality of expectations of Y for respondents and

non-- respondents due to sources other than X;the term 62h2 is

relative variance due to uncertainty about the equality of Y

-5-

on X regressions for respondents and non-respondents; and the

term h3

is relative variance due to adding pN independent new

units to the sample with mean XNR assuming that aside from the

X difference they are just like the respondents.

If either h0

or h3is large (e.g. close to 1) it is clear

that the average Y for the whole sample might be quite different

from T?R

even if non-respondents are assumed just like respondents.

The effect of the investigator's confidence that non-respondents

are similar to respondents is determined by 111 and h2. If all hi

are small (near zero, e.g. .01), unless the investigator has

a tremendous fear that non-respondents and respondents differ,

the effect of non-response in the survey on the average Y will

be small. The example in section 3 will demonstrate the use ..

the hi

in detail.

-6-

2. Derivation of the result

This result is derived as follows from a Bayesian point of view.

(1) The Model for the density of Y (the X data

are considered to be constants) is in both

groups a linear regression with constant residual

variancew:thallY.conditionally independent.

(2.1) 2 , , 2 ,For Respondents (YilaR,I1R,o R)-N(aR 1RAi,u RJ

(2.2) For Non-respondents (Y la2 Nr/ 2 NI

i NR0 'NR' NR'f

-'aNR NR/

(2) The Model for the prior distribution of the parameters:

2(a

R' IR' R) flat

2 all

NR NR. R' IR' 011)-N(aR Al;, yart + 13,R1;)2) inde-pendent

+ 6 '1 apendent

(2.6)

(0 la 0 0-)-N(e 02

RR'BR

)-NR R'R' R R 2 --

22

(0 la B ,cA)" 0L XcNR R'- R R

f

The average Y if all units had responded is

ytot

= (1-p)yR pyNR

where yNR is the unknown mean for the non-respondents.

find the expected value of ytot

given the data (the posterior

We first

mean of Ytot). This is done in three steps:

(1) Find the conditional expectation given the data and all

parameters (take expectations over the distribution of

yNR given the data and all parameters as specified by

(2.2)).

(2) Find the conditional expectation given the data and

respondents' parameters (the expectations over the prior

distribution of non-respondents' parameters given the

-7-

data and respondents' parameters as specified

by (2.3), (2.4), (2.5).

(3) Find the conditional expectation given the data (take

expectations over the posterior uistribution of res-

pondents' parameters) found from (2.1) and (2.3).

The result of step (1) is

(1-P)R + P(4NR + -12111R 2-CNR)

The result of step (2) is

(1-P)R + p(aR 4- 13107;R)

And the result of step (3) is

(l-p) TFB. + p(c^tit + SBX;B)

where the hats refer to the usual least squares estimates of

the regression parameters for the respondents. Since

yR A aR + 8RX this can also be written-1'

+P

$. a - /7 )1R -1 NR R

Now find the variance of y given the data (equivalently, p 2

tot

i:imes the variance of 37NR). The same three steps are used

except now variances are calculated rather than means, where we

use the well-known relation

V(A) = E8 V(AIB) + VB E(AIB).

All expectations are conditionally given the data.

Letting 4, represent the full set of parameters, the result of

the first step is thus

E V(7NR 14) +

-8-

0E(3

NR I+) =

a2NR _E () +V (a +B X )pN NR -NR-NR

Now condition on the respondents' parameters and take expectationS

over the prior distribution of $NR

given OR (Step 2):

2

E

0R 2 -

+ EOR

[ (a + $ X ) + 0 (X -X ) B B (pN -R -R-R 2 -NR -R-

+ V (a + B X )

R-R RNR

As a final step, evaluate the expectations over the posterior

distribution of +R

oR / 2

+01(

2

0- 2(a + B X )pN + 1 i' R -R-R- N(1-0L

r-1

2

L Ro t" NR 7 ) (RiR fR aR 4x)(ECNR XR)

2+ 0R (KNRR) S;x (NR 712). N(1-1:01

^2 2(-teeny at this step we are assuming of aR )

Hence the posterior variance of -itnt given the observed

data is e2h2 + e2h2 + h23where the h2 are defined in equations

1 1 2 2

3. Pratt, J. W.; Raiffa, H.; & Schleifer, R. Introduction toStatistical Decision Theou. Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard Business School, 1965.

-9-

(1.3), (1.4) and (1.5). Since the posterior bias is given by

h0

in (1.2), the posterior confidence interval for ytOt

given

the data in equation (1.1) follows.

Computationally, for q > 1 Y's and r X's,

(1) Compute the means of the X's and Y's for respondents iR , IR

and their centered cross products SXX

(2) Compute the means of the X's for non-respondents XR

(3) Sweep the X's from Sxx to obtain the q x r matrix of

regression coefficients OR , the q vector of residual

"2

'variances o

Rand the r x r matrix S

-1-xx

(4) Calculate the scalar a1

= (IC - )1NR R

)s-xx1(1 - i

NR R)'

. ...

(5) Calculate the 1 x q vector a2 = (XNR 4)4'

(6) Square each element of a2 to obtain the 1 x q vector a3.

Then letting the superscript (i) indicate the ith element of a vector

h") = p 41)/ii(zi)0

c,.(1)2

(1.1h' -1 P

-R

(i)-

IR

h(il P- a") + ;(i)2

a2 -3 -R 1

-(i)

.(i) 1(0 -.4t 1

h3

pN

- + a..

Y(i) -0.1)IR

PHASE I REPORT


OF

COMPENSATORY READING PRO(aAMS

APPENDIX D

..-

PART I

SCHOOL PRINCIPAL QUESTIONNAIRE

ITEM ANALYSIS

1. School enrollment this year {number -of pupils).

1

3

5 0G

Less than 100

100-299

300-499

500-699

700-899

900 or more

SCORE INTERVALS

1.000

F

5.4

PCT CF Palli.61

0.8 41.7 100.02.000 14.0 21.3 56.3 91e13.000 17 .ii 27.4 3905 64.04.000 3s= 2 .4 224 345.000 5.6 9.1 646 14404.000 3.0 4.9 3.0 4.9

CASES PROCESSED a 614130MINIMUM VALUE a 1.0404MAXIWN VALUE a 6.0040SW CF scuaes a 191.4290SUN SUID. SCGnES 494.2044MEAN 3.1051STND. DEW. IN/ a 1.2009SM. OEV. tte.11 1.2914MEDIAN m 3,0047

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

F

LI

Pia

44a

CF

547_190.097 Lila 50 91.4

141 Z7. 421 79.7140 31.1 &SO 52.171 11aZe- -.ELF 30.441 7.4 41 7.6

53:7-1.100404.4000

/471.40U03.20/0

-1701ri.1s41443404d5

Li:3T COri rts;,,:iLABLE

2. Number of classrooms. (Do not include offices, auditorium, or gymnasium.)

SCORE EiWiC$ F PCT LF P*84.0

0.0 - 1.99 017 ill .61.5 100.02400 5.99 4.4 7.1 6046 98.86000 .- 9.99 10.6 17.2 56.4 91.710.00 13.99 9.6 16.0 45.9 74.514.00 - 17.99 9.1 14.7 36.0 58.618.00 - 21.99 10.3 16.8 27.0 43.922.00 - 25.99 7.4 12.0 16.7 27.126400 * 29.99 4.0 6.3 9.3 15.130.00 ... 33.99 1.6 2.8 603 6.634.00 37.19 1.2 2.0 3.5 5.838.00 41.99 1.0 1.7 2.3 3.442.00 45.99 0.9 1.4 1.3 2.146A 0 -. 49.99 0.1 0.1 6.4 0.750.00 53.99 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.654.00 57.99 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.658.00 61.99 440 0.0 0.1 00162.00 - 0 499 0.1 0.1 C.1 0.166.00 - 69.99 0.0 0.0 -.Oa -0.070.00 - 73.99 0.0 0.0 -6.0 -0.074.00 71.99 0.0 0.0 .1400 .a0e076.00 81 e 19 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.062.00 85.99 GI._ _AO -0.0 0.066.00 89.91 0.0 0.0 *0.0 *0.090.00 93.99 0.0 0.0 0.0 *44094.00 - 57.99 G.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.098.00 - 100.00

CASES PROCESSEDNG. ULANK O1AMINIMUM VALUE s04111MUM VALUE aSUN 0 SCORES di

SIUN SOD. SCORESMANSW. GEV. (Ni aSTNU. OEV. (W41 aMEDIAN

11

0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.061.51591.00001.0410062.0000

1031.640922826.0117

140714.3_ _ _9.477194555116.3335

' P6T CPCT

1 0.2 536 100.012 2.2 535 99.854 10.1 543 97.6TO 14.1 469 87.579 14.7 499 74.4

117 21.8 320 59.783 15.5 403 37.950 9.3 120 22.423 4.3 70 13.116 3.0 47 8.814 2.6 31 5.812 Z.t L1 3.21 0.2 , 0.90 0.0 4 0.73 0.6 4 0.7C 0.0 1 0.2

J.2 1 0.20 4.0 0 0.00 0.0 0 0.00 4.0 0 0.00 a.0 0 0.00 u.0 a 0.00 0.0 0 0.00 0.0 0 0.00 1.1.0 U 0.00 u.0 0 0.0.

5361

1. 400062.4000

10714.0000404830.4044

19.911649.43149.439119.777.

3. If you have a combination of graded and ungraded classes, indicate below theinstructional organization for each grade or, if ungraded, the equivalent grades

in your school. (Check only one box in each lettered 'row.)

Instructional Organization

Grade or Equivalent

Check each grade-NOTincluded in your school

1.

(a) Kindergarten

SCURF INTERVALS F

Graded2.

Ungraded Graded & Ungraded:5 4-

CF P-.BLW

1.000 20.1 34.2 5(1.4 100.0

2.000 32.83.000 3.64.000

55.9 38,4 45.84.6 Soli 9.8

1.9 laT

CASES PROLESsEU * 50.6181NU. &ANA OATA 28.0900OININUN VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0080SUN OF SCORES si 104.4419SUM S00. SCORES 216.4913MEAN 1.7847STNOc OEV. (NI .2 0.7029STAID. UV. (141/ * 0.7010NEO1AM a 1.1411

(b) Grade 1

aCUKE INTERVALS

i.00G4.0003.0004.000

CAES Pit4CLSEUNO. rLANK Ak) AMINIMUM VALUEMAAI MUM VALUc4UM UFSkirl 540. $caKesAtAN41P4U. UEv. 1t

STMj. utv. (* -L)MLOIAN

*

a

a

F PL, LF C-PCT

142 48.6 497 100.0

300 444 356 71.435 7.0 66 11.120 4s 0 40 4.0

497401.00004.0000

927.0000&971;4000

1.46540.706.1

1.4550

F PCT C.F P-8LW F PLT C-PCT

5,2 8.4 56.8 100.0 43 0.4 100.043.4 14.4 934'7 91.2 377 74.6 4o9 91.66.1 8.6 9.9 16.1 45 8.4 94 18.041. 4422 4.8 S.2 47 V.2 47 9.2

58.81.01 51224.giCCO 25

CO 00 1.4004i.0000 4.0000

104109 Al2 0.g000302.6464 4106.000U2./622 2./8750.6.6.61 0.10990.0947 0.710b2.0540 2.1,4650

(c) Grade 2 D 0 0SCORE INTERVALS F OCT CF P81. 8

1.000 4 e$ 8.2 51.6 100.12.000 42.1 7.7.4 53.8 91.83.000 5.6 9.6 10.4 Lea4.000 14 0.9 .0.2 8.9

CASES FROCESSEO sAO. BLANK GA TA 0

58e6C76254090

14141148.41 VALUE 0 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE m 4.04000SUM OP SCORES 12844576SUM S20. SCORES 0 310.5720MEAN a 2.1915SYNU. OEV. (hi * 047047SIND. OEV. IN -11 04108MEDIAN a 2.0700

(d) Grade 3

SCORE INTERVALS

OF FCT

F GF C-PC

40 7.8 511 100.0369 72.2 471 92.251 10.0 102 20.051 10.0 51 10.0

0CF P1161 F

Ic404 51,6 100o0 442.000 41.4 /4.0 51.5 91.3 3113.000 5.3 9.0 10.1 170 484.000 4.9 4.9 8.3 49

CASES PROCESSED 4 18.6138O. BLANK OA TA 25.0000MINIMUM VALUE 0 1.10000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES * 127.0933SUM WO. SCORES * 303.6899MEAN a 2.1443STNO. UEV. INI 0.6925STAID. OEV. (N-i ) * 0.6905MEDIAN 2.0517

(e) Grade 4

SCORE INT EK V ALS

1.000

F

.4__ 11.2 sea .09.0 452.000 43.7 74.5 52.1 88.8 3813.000 3.7 642 8.4 14.3 364.000_ 4.7 8.1 49

CASES PROCESSEDNU. 0A TAPI MI MUM VALUE *MAX 1 MUM VALUE *SUM- OF ,SORES

SQO. SCORES '3

NE AN 4

SING. OEV. IN, mg

ST NO* 0E%14. (011 aMED IAN

511261.acioa4.0004

1135. 40004791.0000

2.44110.12690.22762.0840

014.7 CF CPCT

8.672.59.49.6

512 100.0460 91.497 18.949 9.6

51225

1.00004.4044

1136. 00004744.000j

2.19340.72310.14302.0714

PST c,F C -PCT

deb 211 100.074.6 466 91.27.0 85 16.646 49 9.6

54.6631 51126,Z4.0000

1.000U 1.00004.0000 4.0000

143.5419290,1973

2.1124

1.11/.00004077.J000

2.1r4a066160 08(1390.7020 0.71012 .0211 2.41)25

.3. (f) Grade 5

SCORE INTERVALS

2.0003.0004.000

F PCT CF F CF C -PCT

_3_143 100.0 65 1"941.3 70.7 49.1 83.9 362 71.73.3 5.7 let 13.2 32 6.34.4 1.5 444 715 46 9.1

CASES PROCESSED a 56.5143h041 BLANX DATA a 26.0000MINIMUM VALUE aMAXIMUM VALUE aAys.AF SCORESSUM $40. SCORES a

MEANSIND. DWG (NI a

STNO. DEW. (N.11 aMEDIAN

(g) Grade 6

SCORE INT ERVAL:4

1.0002.0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSES; a6LANX DATA

MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE 0

St.M OF SCORES A

SUM SQU. SCORES a

MEANSIND. UEV. IN)

MEDIAN

(h) Grade 7

a

CURE INTERVAL4

2.0003.000

. 4_01.00

CASES PROCESSEDhC. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES aSUM SQO. SCORESREAM

OEV. pa_ 4STNO. UEV. (1.4.1) aMEOIAN a

1 .00004.0000

119.6885275.0473

2.04560.71110.72431.9792

1:1

PCI CF P-8324

Sub 100.044U 87.178 15.44b 9.1

505321.40004.0000

A069.40004537.0000

2.11680.7470.73752.4180

0F OCT ..F C.PCT

14.4 25.1 Sc.1 loo.g 10436.6 65.3 44.3 14.9 3442.0 3.3 5.7 9.6 193.7 6.3 6.3 38

59.055821.00001.00004.0000

246.21331.94170.72400.73221.8818

j03 100.0399 79.357 11.318 7.6

S0334L.40,20

4.00009,7.0000

4451.40041.06210.13920.71991.0313

0F fCT

47.1. 78412.1 20.20.4 0.6Gia OA,

CF P.BL0 F

51.9 100.13 344 74.1.

12.7 21.3 84 13.30.7 1.1 4 U.9

44 goti 3 0.7

19.8414_14.1.00i0

1.00004,10000

,J3.5654103.42351.22480.46t50,47041.1352

C--PCT

435 100.001 20.9

1.63 0.7

435102

1.00004.0000

536.0000764.0000

1.41220.48790.46651.1323

(1) Grade 8

SCORE INTERVAL F PCT CF P-04. it F Pid CF C-PCT

11000

1

49 a9.50.40.3

s 3 015.90.6A*5

59.9 100.0 35960

33

84.54.4.10.7U.7

44566

03

100.013.31.40.7

2.0003.0004.000

10.20.7043

17.01.10.5

CA SE 5 PAW. ESS EliKC. BLANK DATA

a*

55.067415.00 CO

425112

01141 PUN VALUE 1.0000 1.0000SAM SUN VALUE A 4.0300 . 4.U000SUM OF SCORES 71.0199 500.0000SUM S00. SCORES u 95.7071 04.0000PE AN . 14 043 1.1765s7 NU. 0E11. 110 u 0.4350 0.4494St k0 . DEV 1N -11 0.4421 0.44943ME 01/04 a 1.1026 1.0919

4. Number of classes at each grade level:

K (A) 3 0)1 (5) 4

2 (C.) 5

Special orungraded (.3)

QUESTION 4 PART A

PUT Gf Co-PCTSCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P.s81.4 F

es_G 20.0 33.3 _59.11_80.G 52 12.4 418 100.01.800 11.2 18.11 39.4 68.5 78 18.7 366 87.62.000 16.1 27.0 28.4 47.7 141 33.7 Zol 68.93.000 8s5 12.3 10.7 57 13.6 147. 35.24.000 5.4 9.0 7.3 12.2 66 15.8 90 21.55.000 0.7 1.2 1.9 3.2 7 1.7 24 5.74.000 1.0 1.6 1.2 2.0 13 17 4.17.000 0.1 04 0 a 04 2 0.5 4 1.08.000 0.1 0.1 062 1 0.2 2 0.59.000 0.1 0.1 0.1 1

CASES PROCESS ED aNO. BLANK CA IA m

RI NI NUN VALUE a

MAXIMUM VALUE 0SUM Of SCORESSUM SVO. SCORES .

ME AN

SIND. OEV. 4641SIND. 1A-1) aOECIAN

59.547816.00000.0900800

91.0484212.9051

1.52431.49851.5112103787

418_./19

04440400

9a% ilake4104iki

2.4464Isoa371

2.460$QUESTION 4 PART

F GP CPCTSCORE 1NTERVALS PCT CF t4 F PCT

G. 0 5.6 9.7 563 100.0 8 1.? 4/6 100.01.000 144 24.5 53.7 90.3 i6 **Jae 468 --8T1,.32.000 13.7 2363 38.4 65.8 115 24.2 W2 74.53.000 Alt/ 244 42.3 133 27.9 287 60.34.000 7.0 12.1 13.2 22.5 84 16.1 154 32.45.000 4.0 b.8 4.1 1 O. 42 8.8 DS 14.36.000 1.1? 2.2 3o? 12 4.5 26 5.57.000 0.5 0.9 1.2 2.0 4 0.8 ---147 2.98.000 0.4 0.? 0.6 1.1 6 1.3 10 2.19.000 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 4 468 4 0.8

CASES PROCESSEDh0. isLAMx OA TA

mm

:8.342426.00000.0

40661

PIA/MUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE * 9.0000 9.0000iiM _OF goRgsu ri s4b. SCUKES

_I39.2920411.4348

.4433.0000i-41115:4UX'

NE a 2.3015 3e0LOSUEV_IN) * A.65C2 1.26114

K0.1 OEV. 4KAi 146845 1;i741MLUIAN a 201727 2.4644


K (P 3

-MI- 4

2 (c) 5

ALEST1UN 4

CO 7 -0)8 (j)

Special orungraded 13)Pala C

SCUKE INTEkVALS F PCT

1.0002.0003.000

14.914.012.2

25.924.221.2

53.134.224 a

92.166.242.0

4.000 0.4 11. 0 120 20.85.00 3.3 5.8 5.6 9.46. 000 1.0 1.8 2.4 4.07.000 0.9 1.5 1.3 2.28.000 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.79.000 041 0.2 0.1 0.2

44 SE 5 PROCkS5E0 *NI). ASK DATA aPIM MUM VALUERAX HU 84 VALUE aSW Of SCORES aSUM SOD. SCORESPE AN a

SIND. Tik V. 1N1SI PIZ OEV. 4 ti../1MEDIAN

F -LF

6 1.3 4/9 /00.072 15.0 473 98.7

121 23.3 401 83.7139 _49,9 280 58.5

73 15.2 /41 29.440 8.4 64 14.213 4.T

9 149 15 3.14 0.8 6 16 32 0.4 4 0.4

57670325.0000

47958

0.09.0000 9.0000

1.37.3026 1414. 0000473.6563

2.3753 2.95201.5959 1.534)1.6.099 1.33b12.1691 26 7914

CiCeST14.)14 4

1NT ERVA

1.0002.0003.0004.000600056 UNJ6.0GO7.0008.0009.000--

CASES PROCES;ACISO. di, ARK OAMINI VALUEMAXIMUM VALUES1d4 lIF SCUREI _-LM Su0. SCUA ES

MEANST OEV ti)S11716. amkolgut 2

PART 0

_

LF P.BL la

100k0

F.

PL,T

415

CO C -PC T

473 100.013.7 23.9 51.8

...

90.3 66 L4.0 4b6 98.515.0 26.2 38.1 60.3 124 20.2 400 84.6A4.4 43.0 40.1 149 41.3 276 58.4

Del 1 0.0 10.7 18 .6 76 "'I iZif -21.1263 4.0 4.6 8.1 24 2.1 52 11.0

1.4 4.1 16 3.4 id 5.90.3 0.5 Ida 169 12- 2.5U.2 0.4 0 al 1.4 4 0.8 8 1.70.6 1. 0 0.6 49 4 u.8 4 0.8

143C528.0000J.0

47364

06J9.0000 9.0000

133.0769 1374.000059.0493 )062.0000

2.3112 2.90491.6158 1.304*1.0341 1.506/2.1233 2. 1669


K 3 (1:1)

1 Le) 4 co2 cc) 5 (F)

Special orungraded (.3)

QUESTION 4 PANT E

SCORE INTERVALS

0.0

F

6.31.000 15.82.000 13.53.000 12.74.000 5.55.000 1.96.000 1.7U000 0.38.000 0.39.000 0.3

GASES PROCES SECNO. BLANK DA TA *1111 SI SUS VALUE O

MAXIMUM VALUE 4.

SUM OF SCORES 0sum £00. SCORES *LEANSTNO. DEW. IN) =

STNO. DEW. (tell s

.11

MEDIAN

QUESTION 4

6 CO7 (a8 0)

PCT CF P411.1*

10.8 58.4 100.027.1 net 89.223.1 36.2 62.021 .,7 22.7 39.09.4 10.1 17.33.3 4.6 7.92.9 2.7 4.60.6 1.0 1.70.6 0.7 1.10.6 0.1 041

51441124.00000.0900400

130.3972444.3562

2.23331.619514436a .0216

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.0002.0003.0004 40005.000

PAST P

GF

_068

PLT

L./

C.PCT

/011.080 16.8 468 98.3

119 25.0 3.11 81.53.41 30.9_ - 109- *6,570 14.7 122 25.623 4.0 52 10.919 4.0 49 64.4 4.46 la 2.12 464 6 1434 aos___ .4 0.8

414,b10.619.0000

/34800000

F PCT CF P....ft* F'

9.9 16.11, 59.1 100.0 913.7 23.2 494 83.2 6714.2 33.9 35.5 6060 13210.1 17.8 21.3 38.1 1255.5 9.3 10.8 18.3 45-2.0 3.3 5.4 9.1 24

6.000_ 1.6 2.7 3.4 5.7 1647.000 0.9 1.5 1.8 '.1 ti

8.000 0.5 04 0.9 1.1 59.000 __CO__ G.! 0 .1__. 0 AL. 3

CASES PROCESSED m

hG. BLANK 0A TA =

0/14/AUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE 0tiUM OF SCORESStiM S40. SCORES aAEAh

4906.40002.63191 oa L22

-1;i1.482. 7/09

'P a T

IIii14.8

4$2 100.0

29.2 376 83.227.7 244 54.014.4 119 26.35.3 54 11.93.5 30 6.6I 14 3.11.1 0 L.S0.7 3 0.7

59.1379 45224.00G0 850.0 -0.09.0000 9.0000

128.8226 1291.0000468.8562 -41779.3". 412ao-

2.1 1413 2.4562STNO 0kV. INS = 1.7441ST NO. DEV 1.7994MED IAN 1.9483

1.5640---.1a687.

2.6440

4, Number of classes at each grade level:

QUESTICE4 4

K Àl 3 (D) 6 t6)(5) 4 (E) 7 04)

2 (c) 5 (F) 8 0)Special orungraded

PART13)

SCORE INTERVALS. F PCT CF

C. 0 14.41.000 13.62.004 11.43.000 9.24.000 4:85.000 1.76.000 147.044 1.14.000 0.79.000 0.4

24.3 59.223.0 44.41

11.3 31.215.6 /9.68.2 10.62.9 5.83.0 4.01.9 341.1 1.2CO 0.4

PCT cf CPCTF

100.0 20 4.7 422 100.07161' 65 L5.4 402 95.3U.S AO 25.4 331 79.9MI 112 26.5 230 5e517.9 58 13.7 116 24.69.7 22 9.2 60 14.26.8 14 4.3 30 9.034 11 1o6 24 5.1La 1 -1.9 13 3.10.1_ il 4.2_ s. £4

CASES PROCESSED 59.2040 422NO. BLANK DATA mB 41.0000NINCHON VALUEMAXIMO* VALUESUN OF SCORES

si

SUN SOO. SCUMMEANSINU. DEV. OaSTBDe OM, IN*1)MEDIAN 0

0.0 0.09.0000 9.4000

120.0731 1227.4000400:7625 4939;4042.0283 2.0161.9155 1.60211.9319 --------GiRPAI1.6434 2.6696

CMS I 10111 4 PART H

1P-8L1iSCUM INT EAV A iS F PCT CF

0.0 47.2 79.7 54.2 100.01.040 4.5 7.6 13.0 2042.000 2.5 44 7.5 12.63.000 24 3.4 5.0 8.44.000 048 1.3 3.0 5.05.000 0.3 0.6 2.2 3.76.000 1 .0 1 l 1.9 3.27.000 . 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.18.000 0.6 1.0 0.8 1.39.000 4.1 463 0.1 0.2

CASES PRUCESSED 0

NO. BLANK DATA 059.246020.0000

PININUM VALUE ft

MAXIMUM VALUE 0SUN OF SCORES 0

0.09.0000334744

SUM SGD. SCORES 144.3446MEAN a 0.5640MD. DEV. (NI 0 1.4567SIND. NV. IN -41 1.4414MEDIAN 44100

F

77

1WCT

46.4

CO C.PCT

1.66 100.022 1343 69 53.621 12.7 67 40.420 1.2.0 46 27.7i -5.47 lb IVO3 4.6 17 10.27 4.2 (.4 8.46 Y . 7 0 ir -4.25 3.0 7 4.22 1.2 2 1.2

166371---0.4

9.0000275.4000

1.73-9:404.4

1.05662.4744Eraki0.7727


K 3 (0)1 to) 4

2 _ALL.,,

6 (6)7 04)

5 (F) 8 COSpecial orungraded (..3)

QtesTium 4 PART I

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P -BL

060 49.1 92.9 59.21.000 4.4 7.5 10.12.000 Zet 3.3 5.73.000 1.2 2.0 3.64.000 0.4 0.7 2.45.000 0.3 0.5 2.06.000 0.6 1.1 1.71.000 04 0.3 1.08.000 0.6 1.0 0.89.000 0.2 C.4 0.2

CASES PROCESStOW. BLANK DATA mMINIMUM VALUE aMAXIMUM VALUE ASUM OF SCORES aSUM $00. SCORESMEAN a

STNO. 0EV. (N)STAG. OE V. IN -13MEDIAN a

QUESTION 4 PART J

S 1-11-1 KVALS

0.01.0002.0003.0004.0005.00G6.0001.0008.000

_90000

CASE S PROCESSED s

NU. BLANK OA TA aMINI MUM VALUE 0MAXIMUM VALUE aSUM Of STORESSUM S40. SLUNESMEAN4INO. 0EV IN)

S1 M13. DEW. IN-1)MfiCiAN

59.162221.000009.000027.5135

121.87730.44511.39411.40660.1029

100.011.19.66.14.13.32.61.71.40.4

P Fta CF C..Pt T

7$ 54.9 142 100.017 12.0 64 45.117 12.0 47 33.111 1.7 30 211

4 t.8 19 13.43 2.1 15 10.64 1.0 12 8.5t 0.7 8 5.64 2.8 7 4.93 2.1 3 2.1

142395

Oea9.0000

405.0000s.d0001.44312..0432.4582Os 4 LAS

PO' CF P..8L W PVT F C =PC T

.8 ii.110.7 42.34.0 16.0 II .8 34.9 41 17.7 92 39.72.2 8.6 4.8 18.9 24 i03 51 22.0

2,3 100.0 432 100.019.5 17.2 4846 -Tar

_

1.2 4.8 2, 6 10 ,3

0.1 2.1 1.4 5.50 2_ 0.6 0.7 2.6

. 0.1 1 .1 0.6 2.20.3 14 0.3 1.10.0 0.0 ..0.40 -0.0

L4 6.0 7. ----/-1--.-6

6 406 11 5.62 0.9 1 3.03 --i-.-S --5----2-:22 0.9 2 0.90 0.0 0 -0.0

25.2044299.0000

232305

0.00.0000 44400038.6692 379.0000119.041d

1.5291 1.63361.5414 1.57001.5810 1-7.31'W1.1431 1.2133

5. Percent of total student body that moved from school attendance area last year.

10 0-10%

2 11-25%.

30 26-50%

40 51-75%

50 76-90%

60 91-100%

SCORE INTERIMS F PCT CF P-11L0 F P67 CF C-PCT

1.000 44.4 72.5 61.3 100.0 351 b74,11 540 100.02.000 13.0 22.2 16.9 27.5 134 25.3 175 33.03.000 3.1 5.0 3.8 6.3 33 6.2 41 7.74.000 0.4 446 0.7 1.2 5 0.9 4 1.55.000 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 1 0.2 3 0.66.000 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.5 2 0.4 2 0.4

CASES PROCESSED 0NO. BLANK DATA a

61.24417.0000

5307

MINIMUM VALUE a b44 10_ 1.0080MAXIMUM VALUE a 6.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES a 43.3415 759.4000SUM SOU. SCORES a 1420464 436.50900MEAN at 1.3608 1.4321STNO. DEV. IN1 0.6518 0.7244MO. DIV. INs11 0.6975 00.1250MEDIAN a 1.1817 1.4465

6. Percent of total student body that moved into school attendance area last year.

0-10% 3 26-50% 50 76-90%

20 11-25% 40 51-75% 60 91-100%

SCORE INTERVALS F C-PCT f P C w

1.000 340 *4.4 $40 100.0 42.4 69.2_ 613 10002.000 144 47.4 190 35.8 14.8 24.1 18.9 30.83.000 38 7.2 46 8.7 3.5 5.7 4.1 0.84.000 7 14.4 is 1.5 0.5 0.9.___ Gob_ _1.05.000 1 0.2 1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.16.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0

LASES PROCESSED a 530___

61.2641NU. BLANK DATA * 7 1.0C40MINIMUM VALUE a 1.0000 1.0000_MAXIMUM VALUE a 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES a /75.4000 85.0123SON SAO. SCORES a 4395.0000 _.43,7424._MEAN a 1.'644 1.31764I NO. DEV. IN) 00024 0.4491SIMI). DEV. IMili a 0.7034 0.4545MtOlAk a 1.4794 1.2229

. _.

7. Estimated percentage (this year) of pupils from families of migrant workers.

0-10% 3E1 26-50% 50 76-90%

2E1 11-25% 4Ej 51-75% 60 91-100%

P4,1* 1:F-C--PCT

96.4 53a 100.04.3 10 3.61.3 7 1.30.0_ _.0 0.00.0 0 0.004 0 0.0

s coRe INTERVALS KT CF P.-ii..11 F

14200_0_ 59 .4 97.0 61.3 MG. 0 5142.000 14 2.0 108 3.0 123.000 0.6 1.0 0.o 144 74.000 0.4 0.0 .4.0 .0 0_5.A00 0.0 0.0 000 -0.0 06.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 ..0.4 0

CASES PROCESSED * 6162653 533NU. KAU OATA a 4.0000 4*INDIUM VALUE a 1.0000 1.0000MAXI MUM VALUE * 3.0000 3.0000SUM CF SCORES 0 63.1052 559.4000SUN S40. SCORES 69.0043 625.4000MEAN 1.0398 1.4466SIND. OEV. (ND 0.2413 0.4696StNO. OEV. IN-11 062423 062696MEDIAN a 1.0153 1.4145


10 Yes

20 No

CUdSTI ON 7A

SCOKE INTERVALS

1._0_00

aitib

CASES PROC65 S60thDo 8LANA DATAMINIMUM VALUEPi. X1041114 VALUESUM Of SCORESSUP 500. SCORES

PCT CP P..11 LW F PST at4CT60.41.1

94.2 61.5 100.0 524.1 1.1 1 a11 9

61.!1!9sx 4.0000c 1.0000

2.0000a 62.6/119

64181111

98.3 533 106.01.7 9 1.7

5334L.,00042. ki 000

ipvtiwaa56001000

PEA, i f 0 10 0 119 10 0169STNO e DEV i /I/ c 0.2321 -0;17 air: i t N U OtV. 41 N-11 .1 0.1332 061494010;104 a t.00C1. : 1.0060

8. Estimated percentage of pupils whose families receive public assistance.

10 0-10% 30 26-50% 50 76-90%

20 11-25% 40 51-75%

6yESTION 6

SCOitE 1 KM RV ALS

60 91-100%

F PCT CF F-5414 F CF C-PCT

_1.000 _310 31.1_ 61:1_10.2AL243 1004. 514 1.0.44.0

2.000 1742 21.1. Me 44.5 134 29.2 269 50.43.000 9.0 14.1 12.3 20.3 7 14.6 113 21.24.000 2.2 3,5 3.5 3.6 21._, 409 35 6.65.000 1.2 1.9 1.3 2.1 13 2.4 1.4 2.66.000 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 U.2 1 0.2

CAI06 PROCESSE0 41.5320 534NO. SLAM DATA = 3.0400 3MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 4.0040MAXIMUM VAL.Ut 6.0000 6.4000SUM OF SCORES a 108.6456 966.4040SUN SOO. SCUKES * 2"ita_41_41. 4244.4004MEAN . 1.7443 114020SIND. 04V. (NI 0.1123 :..4061

MO. Ott. IN -11 0.9403 1.0070MEDIAN A 1.4703 1.21a4


10 Yes

20 No

IA

SCORE 1i47ERVALS F PCT CF F-114 F CF CPCT

1. 000 59.5 97.4 (1.1 100.0 51.7 97.5 5.30 100.02.000 1.6 2.6 1.6 2.6 13 -2.5 13 2.5

_cks4s_PRAcg4tPNO. BLANK DATAAlkIMUM VALULKAA1 MUM VALUbSUM CF SCORESSUM SQ0* SCOkESMEANSYNC. bEii. -04-1ST hit DE V. 1N-11PLE DI AN

_61.09_______±01 5307.0000 . 7

1.0000 1.4400

..._tAqc9 2.000062.6744 543.400065.8156 569.0000_A.0258._ 1.4.1245

0.1562 0.15470.1515 0.15461.0132 1.0124

9. rstimoted percentage of pupils whose head of household attained the followinp,Levels of education. (Check only one box in each lett.:.red row.)

O-107, 11.-5fr. 51-90% 91-1007.

(a) Attended college

QUESTION 9

SCORE ENTER VALS

PART A

0000CF 14.13LW F PVT

1.000 35.0 56.9 41.6 100.0 283 51_01_,2.000 22.9 37.1 2605 43.1 205 36063.000 3.3 5.4 34 6.0 39 7.14.000 0.4 0.6 40.4 0.6 4 .4.)04

CASES PA0CESSE0 a 6/4549NO. CLANK CAIA a 3.0000MINIMUM VALUE a 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE a 4.0000SLM OF SCORES a 92.1130SQM Me SCORES a 162.3439PE AN a 1.4975STK). DEW. (N)STAID. 06Vs (W.II a 0.6337MEDIAN a 1.3789

(b) Graduated from high school but didnot attend college

CeJEST10,4 9 PART I

SCORE 114TERitirS

LOC.°2.0003.0004.000

LASES PRWASSEC 0

DA TA a-iiNliUM VALUE °MAXIMUM VALUE aSAM OF SCORES *SUN SOO. SCORES aMEAN a.11'1/44 AEI/. IN)STOW. &EV. (W.1)MEDIAN

.

x9.624.0_1.4

5316

C -PCT

*ALIO°. 0246 44.743 1.14 , 0.6

4.0000626.0000

1516.40001.Ooad.40Oec.6321.43620090

PCT

99_9

CF P -BLW F

4448.2

_4t11.4....110AS91.4 90 .1 271

39.0 25 A 41.9 1972.±9_. _AO _ 2.9 17

61.44E6ite00C 0

1.00004.0000

366.96342.340.69500.70072.3322

CF C -PC?

43 549 100.051.2 465-01 737.2 214 40 5

-3.2 I T 3.2

529

1.400o----460000

4245.0400

2.45350..776

-0:6761--2.0137

9. rstimared percentage of pupils whose head of household 3ttnined the followinglevels of educptton. (Check only one box in e.nch letti.xyd row.)

0-107. 11-502 51-90% 01-100%

(c) Attended but did not graduate fromhigh school 0 0 0

414STION 9 PART C

SCOAt INTERVALS

1.000

F

28.1

PCT

46.92.000 2040 45453.000 440 6454.000 00 1.1

CASTS PROCISSEG1104 WAR OATA aATUIROM ilium14A1111416 VALUESUM OP scams aSUM SOO. SCORES a

PIEAM a

ST ND. Of V. INJSUMO. OM. 1* 11MUM

(d) Finished 8th grade but did notattend high school

C-PCT

100.0

CF P.41.6

t1.4 1410.0

F

249

PO'

47.1

CF

_549

a a.6 5141 235 46.4 460 52.94.7 746 39 744 45 1.50.7 1.1 a Lel 4 i 1

6144446 529440000e0.40 '14woo*AGO° '.40.6000

9945416 ambooso1070240 4.636.4000

1.6171 1.0257046545 060700.6419 046711145677 14126b0

0 0 0QUEST ION 9 PART 0

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P.116

1.000 46 75.8 61.42.000 104 17.5 14.93.00i1 2.4 4.6 4414.000 1.3 _2.1 143

CASES PNOCESSEO 61.4446AO. ALMA OATH A 440000

F- PLT CF C.qqa

100.0 394 75.b 541 1U0.02443 92 1.7.E 147 24.46.7 24 4.6 39 6.78.1 11 2.1 11 2.1

521

Pi NINIAN WALK 103000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OP SCOREIL_ 11.1233SUN 4404 SCORES 135.7402ME AM * 1.33C0STAR. Otli iNi 0.6630ST 3. OEV. 4N-4) = 046665Rt41AN a 1,1514

.0040444000

694.00004i5441000

1.434110.063S

-0.0644leibil

9. retimaed percentage of topils whose head of household :it tzithed the followinglevels or edou.ition. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)

0-102 3.1.-507, 51-90% 91-1002

(e) Did not finish 8th grade 0 0 0 0

T

QUESTION 9 PART 6

INTEAVALS F PCT CF et.

1.0QC 54.2 88 e 4 61.4 100.0 448 07.0 515 100. 0

2.004 5.9 9.6 1.1 11.6 57 1101 61 13.03.000 0.9 IA 1.3 2.0 1.6 10 1.94.000 0.3 0.5 043 0.5 2 0.4 2 0.4

CASES PROCESS ED 61.44E6 515NO. ALARM DATA * 4.0000OWL PUN VALUE 100000

.4.1___

1.41000

ItAX 1 NUN VA WE 4.0000 4.4000SUNAW__IICORE S 70.1703 594. 4000SUN SOD. SCORES a 91.4348 780. 4000MAN 1.1424 1.A534ST NO DEV 0.4249 0.'492STNO DIV tNI 1 0.4324 0.4296MEDIAN 1.0657 1.4748


10 Yes

2E] No

fieLEST 1ON 9A.

SCORE F POF:C 1 CF P-.8L 6 F

AtkA 61.4 100.0 481 904 $34 100.02.000 5.7

la9.2 5.7 9,2 51 1.6

CASES PROCESSED a 01t4.4640_5. OCCO

332P40. 8k ANK DATA aMl NI MUM VALUE 1.0000 1.4000SA XI NUM VALUE a 2 .0000 2.4000SUM OF SCORES di 61.0869 583.0008SUN SQO. SCOIAES 74.4406 685.0000MEAN 1.0959__a

DEV tN ) a_691454.2895 0.4444

STK). 0E v. iN-11 a 0.2119 0.4947NED 1.0909 1"449

10. Est boatedincomes.

percentage of school families that have each of the following annual(Check only one box in each lettered row.)

0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%

(a) $12,000 and over CQUESTION 10 PART A

SC041 1NTERVALS 1 KT CF F81N F Pot CF C40*

1.000 42.2 68.6 61.5 100.0 330 63.2 544, 100.02.000 14.7 23 19.3 31.4 143 21.4 192 36.83.000 4.0 406 7.5 40 7.7 49 9.44000 0.6 1.0 0.6 160 9 4«.7 .9 X.7

CASES PROCESS 4kNO. BLANK_ OATA011411114 VALUEPARMA! VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO SCORESNE ANsrhu. OEV D4)

a

a

ST ND DEli WI bRED IAN

4164649 5222.0000 151.0000 1.066004.00000 4.0000

8660372 T726 0000147.0113 1406. 0000

1.3117 1.4.789x«6517 04_144_0.6631 O. /12Z1.2186 1.4909

(b) Between $9,000

f41, EST ION 10

and $11,999

PART 11

o I:1

SCORE INT 1R V AL F KT CF P- T

1.000 27 44 41.4 100.0 204 39.1 522 100.02.004 28.9 47.0 33.0 Ma 214 -54' -446 93.000 5.0 881 5.0 8.2 44 4.4 44 8.44 .000 Owe 0.0 .0.0 0 0s0 0 0.0

CASES PROCESSED143« BLANK OA TA

61.40233.0000

52215

0141841.1 VALUE a 1.0000 Ls 0000MAXIMUM VA Luc a 3.0000 3.41000SUM Of SCORES a 100.2_5 884* 0000SlM SWO. SCORES a 187.9603 ab96;+.40JJ*AN L 6327STM. Ukkle tN) a U. 12s6_ 0.*174

OEV, ihrli m 0 .6340 00164MkO IAN 4 1.6087 1/.084i

10. Estimated percentage of school families that have each of the following annualincomes. (Cheek only one box in each lettered row.)

0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%

(c) Between $6,000 and $8,999

itESTION 10 PART C

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P"BLW F Pia GP C=PCi

17.7 26.d 61.4 100.0 132 25.4 5Z0 100.069.01_2.000 32.4 53.4 43.7 /1.2 291 54.03.000 10.5 17.1 104.9 1704 93 17440104 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.7 4 0.1

CASES PAOCESSIO a 41.4023 520WAAilAALAMOUL a ta0H---- 17AMMAN VALUE a uomm 1.0000MAXIMUM VAWE a 4.0000 41.00001

__ANO OF SCORES * - 116.4040 AmamiSUM SOO. 5404ES 41 250.1044 4193.0000MEAN a 1.8544 1.9404iTNO. OEV. (NI " 0.6901 04.07 @3

STNU. 01V. (Ni) " 0.4588 040/1111

NED1AN 140965 1.9399

318 74.691 18.74 0.8

(d) Between $3,000 and $5,999

Gl1E5I'IOti 10- PAP"(

0 0

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF PLIT

1.00C 27.8 45.3 41.4 100.0 248 47.62.000 24.7 40.1 31.4 54.1 214 41.13.000 7.8 12.7 8.9 140 53 10.64.000 1.1 1.9 Lel leo 4 0.8

4F-C.=-100

521 100.0273 5i;76-

59 11.34 Os 4

LASES PROCLSS EV a 61.4023 521NO. SLAW CA IA = iA0440 __.... !6AIM RUM VALUE 0

___ ____ -1.0000 -17.0-04---

MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES " 105.0548 457.9040SUN SO U. SCORES a 214 7929 166 3.000--ME AN a 10109 4.0449STNO. DEW. (N) 0 9.0356 0.6976----________...lailli Ot V. (N.41 0 0.7614 -- --3:bRED 1 AN 0 1.616$ 1. )314

JO. Estimated percentage or school families that have each of the following annualincomes. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)

0-107 11-50% 51-902 91-100%

(e) Under $3,000 0 0 0 0QUEST ION 10 PART E

C40CTSCORE INTERVALS PCT CF F CF

50.4 81.1 61.4 100.0 416 81.6 510 100.02.000 7.9 1204 10.6 17.3 64 13.3 94 18.43.000 2.6 44 2.7 4.$ 23 4.5 25 4.94.000 02 0. a__AIAL 2 0.4 2 0.4

CASES PAuCESSEGNG. BLANK DA TA *

61.40233.0000

51027

MINIM* V*Ui 1.0000 l.Y000NAN1NUN VALUE 4.0000 4.0000SW OF SCORES 74.9231 631.0000Sum SOO. SCORES 101. C 020 93 1.40Q0*AN 1.2202 1.4313ST Kis, UV 4. (NI 0.5209 0.429StNO. BEV. 114-11 0.5252 0.3434MEDIAN 1.1045 1. 1,130

30a. Do you feel these

1 Yes

20 No

tii0 los 10A

SCORE INTERVALS

0.3

are accurate estimates?

F C7 CF P-41111 F -PUT

1.000 50.1 85.7 56.5 100.0 4432.000 8.3 14.3 8 3 14.3 10

CASES PROCESSED 50.4720NO. BLANK DATA 24.0000MININUN VALUE 1.0000

_ARAX1 MUM VALUE .ogooSW4 OF SCORES aSUN S00. SCORES *NEM51NO. Obi. tN1 *SIN°. UE11. (01-.1

MEDIAN

66.614283.492318.14270.34960.35261.0032

4.; F Corgi

86.4 511 100.013.6 70 13.-6

513

1.00002.4WD1.4.4-Wila

723.00001.13650.64.130.443*1.0790


0-10% 1 l-50Z 51-902 91-100%

(a) Professionals (Doctors,lawyers, etc.) 0 Q 0 0

WASTION 11 PART A

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF 100.61.6 F FT CF CPCI

1.000 53.8 67.1 61.4 140.0 449 64.9 529 100.02.000 7.4 U.S 7.6 1243 ; la /3A $0 25.13.000 0.5 0.1 0.5 04. 7 101 7 1e34.000 0.0 OA .00.4 000 0 0.0 0 0.0

CASE 5 PROCESSED a 61.4114AU. OLANK OATA = 3.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000P4A01141.1 VALUE 3.04100SUN OP SCORES = 1103o$L440_SUN 500. SCORIA 46.7469NE AN 1.1318SIND. OEV. (N) 0.3615SIND. 1411. itfr.1) 0.3635ME 0 1 AN a 1.0103

(b) Business owners or managers

GOESTION 11 PAR? 0

0 0

T PICT CF P.415F

6.000 .J.0 ,J /42.4 i 1.4 100.02.000 14.2 23.1 14.7 23.93.000 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.64.000

-- i1.10._ 0141. .70,0_2.9 .0

CASES PUOCESSECNO. BLANK DATA418IMUN VALUE At

MAXiNUM VALUE s

$4M PF_SPIRe.S _5601 SOO. SCORESOtAN 11.

SIND. DEW. IN/_ _____ .

SINN. DEW. (N-.13REDIAN *

52902.00003.11060

441169006804.0000

1.16450.6046eatialki160691

F Pi.I Cr CPCI

390 73.6 530 100.0134 25.1 140 26.4

6 1.1 6 1.10 U.0 0 0.0

41.4114 5303.0000 710000 -130006"3.0000 300004

70.6149 676.0000108.0048 980.4000'1.2414 1.4755U.4445 0.47140.4536 (447191.1372 1.1795


0-30% 13-50% 51-90Z 91-100%


QUEST ION II MIT C

C4CTSCOPE INTEkVALS F PCT CF 1013L11 F P6,

1.400 25 .l 41.4 61:4_10160_ 191 36.0 530 100.02.000 31.7 514 59.1 564: MK 554 339. 44.03.000 4.0 605 44 6.3' 4S 44 45 6.54.000 0.0 0.0 -0.8 -0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

CASES PROCESS ECNO. BLANK OATS a

41.41143.0040

3307

AI N1 PUN VALUE 1.0000 164000NAZI NUR VALUE a 3.0000 4,00000SUN CIF SCORES 101.1266 0t410000SLN SWO. 5Cuict5 166.5220 A112.4040MEAN A 1.4446 1.1245STAID. OEV. 4N1 a 065%66 0.6076MAO. 0E V. INI) a 0.4035 0.6004ME0 IAN 1.4516 1.017

(d) Skilled workers; farm owners

QUESTION 11

i NT 6Fi ALS

1. QOP

2.0003.000`.000

PART 0

F

IB .0

PCT

49.3

F

174al-732

PUT

Jd**53e013"

CF- PCT

530 100.0

CF P-ALM

61.4 100.030.412.30441

41.820.1U.9

43.4I2.9

_ _

70.72140

A51:

0.4

CASES FPUCESSELNO. BLANK CATA Mk

41.41143.0000

530

4.4000063.4000

NINIPUP VALUtMAA/MUN VALUEMM OF SCURE

1.0000

1184706254.9233

1.92970. 1137

SUS Su C. SCOREa a

WithST140. 0kV. INI

L907.40001.4d400.6491

STNO. DEV. IN.13 aNEOIAN a

0.72971 e9141 1.43244

13. Estimated pefeencage of school families in each of thv rol3owing occupntionalcategories. (Check only one box in each lettered row.)

0-102. 11-502 51-902 91-1002

(e) Unskilled, farm, or serviceworkers

MAISTIOU 11 PRAT E

SCORE INTERVALS F PCI CF P-.81.tt F NA CF t-OCT

27.7 45.0 41.4 100.11L 230 4544 US 10044_1.0002.000 27.1 44.2 334 55.0 216 41.1 247 14.73.000 602 104 6.16 10.4 61 12o* 69 13.14.000 0.4 0.t _OA _OAL 4 0iali 6 0.4

CASES PROCESSED *AO. &LAM DATA 0

41.41143.0000

52512

*d1 AUD VAWE 14400 1.0000MUM. VAWE 0 4.0900 4:0000SUN OF SCORES 0 102473I 011904113t

SUN $00. SCORES 0 119.0419 159.0000MEAN 111 1.4452 1.1,097

SENO, GEV* (NI * 0.6040 0.1133STAO. OEV. IN-4) 40 0 .6196 061140MEDIAN 1.6124 144144

(f) Unemployed

0UESTION 11 PART F

SCURE INTERVALS

0 0 0

F PCT CO F CF C4CI

_1.000 51.7 44.1 41.4 100.0 4,tt2.004 6.4 14.0 9.4 15.9 /7 12.11

3.000 1.2 1.9 24 1.9 11 244.000 0.0 '13410_ 60 4)-0

CASES PROCESSED a 451.411481.ANK DATA 3.0000

N1 AI VALUE 0 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 0 3.0000SUOLIEEgAii_ * 7Z63644SUM SUO. SCOkES 56.5512KLAN 0 1.1744STHO. OEV4b (Ni it 04245STK). 01V. (14-43 = 0.4330HEOIAN 1.0944

545 100.0ia 17.111 2.10 0.0

52512-1.40403.400(1

626.000041044000

1.4,9240.4442

--Ar.44461.4034

lla. Do you feel these are accurate estimates?

1 Yes

2 0 No

QUESTION 11A

SCORE INTERVALS F

1.000 34

PCT CF P'41. F

90.4 60.1 100.0 464

P43 CF

119.0 549 100.02.000

&kilt tiOCESSIO

Ssi

a

9.b S.11 9.6 Si

60.66117

14.0 51 11.0

NO. kW DATA a 11.0400 12PI NI MN VALUE * 1.06C0 L. 0000O1aM04 VALUE s logiMai 2400UOStill OF ICONS * 6640414 Si 34.01011

SUM 190. SCORES 0 MAW 6913.00.0MEAN 4 1.0930 I. ALAS

STNO DIV ( h h a 0.2143 0.3135STNO. Of V. Hell a 0.2461 0.313114E01 AN * 1*0330 1.4621


0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%

(a) Caucasian or White

ta

Ctilicf INTERVALS F PCT CF P-41. W L7r C.41CT

.t_1_110(

4

Ask_Iti_ 41. 7 100.0 39 705 ..S4 100.0aaaa3.0004.000

S0 600 Se .116.2 26.2 S3.137.0 39.9 37.0

94.2 46 11.6 49691.71164.1 151 2644 449 64.1$9.9 29 5" 29# 55.8

CASE 3 PROCESSED 41.610 534NO. (iLANK CA T A a 1.0060 3AI NIRLIR VALVE a 1.0000 -Thiii1-14300MAXIMUM VALUE a 4.0000 414000SIM OF SCORES a 209.8502 ITT 6.0000SUM 30U. SCORES 160.3432 6350.0000PEAR * 3.4025 3.3256STN.)* UE V (NJ 0.4661) 09111STNO !UV. IN -1 i a 046739 .9120NEIMAN sr 3.6657 3.6040


0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%

(b) Negro or Black

QUESTION 12 FART 4

SCORE INTERVALS F PC1 CF P610 F C.4C1

_/.000 46.1 14.8 4144 /.00.0 350 64.3 505 100.02.004 10,5 1701 14.5 2402 193 20.* ASS 30.73.000 2.9 4.4 54 4.1 20 14 52 10.34.000 2.0 3.3 a.o 3.3 24 44.4' 24 4.8

CASES PROCESSIOWS_ BLANK CA1A =

61.62332.000

50532

11111111014 VALUE 1.0000 10)000MAXIMUM VALUE * 4.0000 4.JONSUM OF SCO1l Q1_41391- $34.41000SUM SOO. SCORES 0 141.2194 1304.0000MEAN 1.3454 1.4574

D. t N a 0,7244 0.6026STMO. DeVe (1411 0 0.7303 0.054MEDIAN 1.1442 1.4414


QUE541ON 12 PAO C

11-CT C4C TCF 1)+91.6 F PL.T CF

1.000 56.5 91.6 61.6 10000 430 44.* 464 100.02.000 -4.0 6.5 5.2 8.4 42 4.1 11.23.000 140 1.6 1.2 1.9 10 4.1 42 2.5.4.400 012 0s3 0.2 0.3 2 0.4 .2 0.4

CASES osocesseo = 41.6234 484W. BLANK DATA 2.0000 53014IMOM VALUE 1.0000 L. 0004r-MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.4000SUM OF SCORES 64./276 552.0000SUM SOO. SCORES = 94.1720 72000000MEAN 0 1e/C:5 1./405STND. OEV. (Pd 0 _Q=3141 _

0.34220.4421

SM. OM Vw 1N1 ---G4TUT44101AN . 1.0457 1.U6Z6


(d) Oriental

OLESTION 12 PART 0

0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%

0 0

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF

1.000 61.5 91.1 61.6 300.0 474 5104 476 100.024000 0.1. 04 0.1 0.2 2 0.4 2 0.43.000 0.0 000 ...OA .41p0 0 0.0 0 0.04.000 0.11 0.0 ...0.0 ...OA 0 04 0 0.0

CASES PROCESSEDMO. BLANK DATA

61.623124000

476

MIRIMUN VALUE a 1.0000 160000MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 240000SUM OF SCORES_ 61.1414 47040000SO SOD. SCORES 61.1765 412.0040REAM a 1.1119 1.0042STMU. UEVe 1M1 0.0417 0.064?STRO. 01V. 4A*11 000411 0.06*4MEDIAN 1.0400 1.0021

(e) American Indian

0LiSiiON PART E

0 O

Saila It ERVALS

1.000

PCT

9104

CF P-111.11

61.6 k.0.0

F

454 98.7 460

C -PCT

100.0

2.000 0.6 0.9 0,4 0.1 5 Aal b 1.3

3.000 0.0 0.0 -o.o -Oda 0 0.0 1 0.24.000 0.0 6.0 -o.o -o.o 1 0-2 1 0.2

GASES PROCESSED 41.6239 460NO. SLAM DATA 0 2.0000. 77RIN1MUS1 VALUE 1.0000 1.0400MAXIMUM VALUE 0 2.0000 44.0000

SUN OF SCORES 6/.1917____ 446.0060SUM SOD. SCORES 0 63.3443 490.0000ME AM 1.0013 1.0174STMU. DEV0 ted 4 0.0156 0.1736STtQ. GEV. 4N-.11 0 04164 041.18MEDIAN 1.0047 14006


0-10X 11-50% 51-90% 91-1002

(f) Other (Specify

04441141* 12 FART P

SCORE INTERVALS

Loco

F

61.4

ECT

94.9

CF POL b

41.6 100.0

F

1001

.2

PCT

I.

40044

CF Ce.PCT

Las L40. 0"5 6400

2. 1.9.s_.J9a.0003.0004.000

0.30.0 0.0

4.5

0.1'403Oa

1.1 I!

0

CASE So PROCESS1DNO. *LOA DATA111111110 waneMAY Mill VALUEUM OF SCORES

100. SCORESME All

a

STNO. 0Ev. tft) -MO. o4v. 4N-11.1501114

61.62312.0000I .120431

LO5faa

tsaaaa44000

444 P154.000

114.400067.4444 1444410001.031 1.015/04432? 0E014490.220 0.1814/014025 1.0250

12a. Do you feel these

1 Yes

2 0 No

are accurate estimates?

EILESTION 124

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF PPEL F PGA a-C.41C?

1.000 6007 gii4 1409 528 944.9 544 100.02.000 0.9 1.4 0.9 1.4 6 A 6 1.1

GASES PROCESSED a 61 S21124L. &AUK DATA a 3.0000MINI MUM VALUE 1.0.000 L.0000MA Xi MUM VALUE a 2.0000 2.4)000SUR OF SCORES a 62.3421 54 0. 0000SUR .S00. SCORES 64.0628 .332.:4000NEAN 14139

0.1165 itg0OEV. IN -1I 0.1115 0.102 6

1.0010 1.1)057

13. Are children bussed to yourregular attendance area?

1 Ei Yes

2 fl No

QUESTION 13

school from other neighborhoods not in your school's

scoae INTERVALS F PCT CF P...aL1( F FLY

1.040 15.9 15.7 41.7 100.0 147 27.4 536 100.02.004

CASES PROC9SS00 a

45.9 74.3 45.8 74.3 319

41.6797

22.6 349 72.6

53640. 6L ANS OAT* a 1.0000I%1141 MUM VALUE A 1*(440 1.4000M&1 PUN VALUE a 2.0000 2.4000SUM OP SCORE S a 107.4991 92544000NM 5410. SCORES a 199.0090 L703.0000MEAN 0 1.7424 1._1157S7NO. CEW* (NJ 4.4311 0.4461ST NO. OE V. 04.4 0.4446 0.1410)Otti LAN a 1.8246 1.111.1.1

14. If children are bussedbussed in ?

4iiESTION 14

in, about what percentage of the total student body is

1[:3 0-10% 30 26-50%

20 11-25% 40 More than half

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0G_O_

2.4043.000

_4.400

LASES PAWCESSECNC* 81ANA DATARINI RUM VALUEPAXIMUN VALUESLN OF SCORESSUM 920* SCOREKANSTNU. U4" V. IN1STNO. DEW. IN-41 A(*DIAN

Aa

a

A

F F Ply LF C--PCTPCT CF

1..8 42.1 32.8140.0 135 44.9 201 100.0

346 11.1 194 51,9 34 114.11 453 53.1

6.1 18.7 454 46.8 Si iia 449 41.3

/A? Ziet 26.1 69 23.6 68 23.6

32.164G24510000

1.000044.000

76.3167230.9314

2.3219AALLIA41.294724111

488249

4.400062140000

41$14,00000Z1.1104144484

-Ik-aZ5CWLe 7647

15. Are children bussed from your school's attendance area to schools in otherneighborhoods?

1 0 Yes

2 No

QUESTION 15

SCORE INTERVALS F

L._0_00 _12.9

PCT CF P114IA F

21.2 61.0 100.0 121

CF

24*6 SIO 100.02.440 48.1 78.4 44.1 784$ 4129 11.1 VW 7762

CASES MOUSED a 44.944i S3040. SLAM QATA 7.0000 7A/NINUM VALUE a 1.0000 1.04900RAAIRUN VALUE 2.0000 2.0990SUft OF SCORES a 109401 E5 11111.0000

U11 S00. SCORES 20662448 1737.0409NEAN 1.7065 ain11TNO. 0EV. IN/ a 0.4062 0.40/STIgis DE V. IN.11 0.4116 Owt201PEOLAN a 1.6456 1.02/


Size of physical plant for pupil

PART A

Highly HighlyAdequate Adequate Inadequate Inadequate

F PT GP C-qPCTSCORE INTERVALS F PCT CV 14.11L ti

1.000 1564 2'100 610 190.0 134 40.0 536 100.02.000 32.1 52.1 44.2 I'm 274 skol 442-74.03.000 12.2 19.8 14.1 22.41 100 4044 146 23.94.000 1.9 3.0 1.9 3.0 20 3.1 40 3.7

CASES FROCESSE0Kt. BLANK DATA *

61.61111.4000

5361

NININUX VALUE fil 1.0000NAAINUM VALUE di 4.0000 4.4000SUNOF SCARES * 123.6944 1086.00001086.0000

5146. SCORES a 284.4234 4522.0044otAN 2.4017 2.0261sup. O. it./ s 00950 0.11

01.41 * 9.7412 OaTVC-eN601AN a 149789 1.9891


(1) Condition of physical plant

LC)Suitability of physical plant forprogram operation

HighlyAdequate Adequate Inadequate

0HighlyInadequate

QUESTION /6 OAST

SCORE INTERVALS F OCT CP P...111.4 F OCT CF 0-PCT

1.000 16 27.2_ 61.7 100.0 137 29.3 36 /00.02.040 35.1 546, 44.9 `12 : 294 554 Sig 70.T3.000 T.3 1/40 1 11.9 65 12 .1 SS 15454.000 2.5 4.1 24 4.1 IS 444

.

- Le 3.4

CASES PROCESSEDStO. ALARA OA TA

aa

61.611?1.0004

5361

IMAM VALVE 14000 14:0000NAY MAN VALUE 4.0000 4.4000SUM ar SCOROS a 118.9466 10/6e0000SUN SOO. SCORES at 263.2431 1214. 0000ME AN 1.9285 1.4955ATIMIDa_OiVa (NJ 00445 0.1312STRO. O$V. 46141MEOIAN *

0.74461.9011

0.1111.-L44154)

QUEST ION 16 FAST C

r -PTA- c-PCTSCARS INTERVALS PCI CF P.1.81.01

1,111_0112.000

&.." 16.9 4192 100.0 96242

18.1-53.1

5314315

100.081.932.2 32.6 $0 413411

3..400 1690 264 18 e6 30.4 132 24.2 153 28.84.000 2.6 4.3 246 4:3 21 4.0 Al 4.0

CASES PROCESSE0 a 4/.1951 S31hO. BLANK CA TA = 6.4000 6

0141*30 VALUE a 1.0000 L-.424420

MANIPUR VALUE a 44400 4.%1001)

SUM o SCORES * 13342644 A140. `10011

SUM Slin. SCORES 325.1235 ttWilia00KAM 2.1114 2.1469STNL. OEV. (NI a 9A1,11 0.1524STNO °EV. I N -I1 0.1413 04530ME 0 IAN 2.1241 2. L011


(D) Humber of instructional personnel

Highly RighlYAdequate Adeauate Inadequate Inadequate

(5) Number of other professional personnel

st It3M a

_12.02.0003.000

....

LASES PROCESS EC =

1'3. OL,AA .PA TAPIMPUM VALUE s=

MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SC0J4A =SuM Sfay. SCuRtiMEANSINN. 0Ev. 4.19 =

STKO. 06r. IN-11 =ME6IAm

00e.TION lc

SCOK* 1NTEK8AL.";

1.0002.0003.0004.000

F PCT CP P..81 a

dots 14.0 0_1c5"1.SLOILO41.2 66,9 52.9 86.01i.5 18.7 11.8 19.10.3 0.4 0%3_ Q.4

61.4it54qQOP31.00004.0000

126.4409.480.90062.05610.58340.58822.0386

PAST t

PCT

3.2 b.*34.2 5b.7J;/.1 31.71.6 3.0

LF

60.455.120.4I,d

CASES PRUCt:JE0 = 60.360NC. BLANK CATA = 7.0CCOPIAIOuN vALUii 1.0000MAXIMUM LUt = 4.0000Sum Of SUAES 4 13a.106*Sur W46. SCUksS 342.86o0KaAN 2.2641

iNi J.6616utv. 414-11 = 4.6611

mtolAN 2.2290

F Pia C-PCT

78 L4.*0 .$4, 100.0353 0421. 456 85.4101 1d.9 143 19.3

2 0.4 2 0.4

53431.00004.0000

.1.095.00002431.0000

0.'0960.340i2.4354

-UL. F pt,T .F C-PCT

le0.L 48 4.i 3.10 100.09L.4 301 5o.b 482 90.9

34.6 167 Ji.5 Ica 34.23.0 14 telt) 14 2.6

5307

1.00004.u0u4

i207.0000&i79.u0u4

2.47/40.65i10.059/2.4209


HighlyAdequate Adequate

QE) Number of teacher ides

(G) Number of other non-professionals

Inadequate

CJ

HighlyInadequate

0

011127101. 14 PAOT P

SCORE /NT IRVALS F PCT CF F PC. 7 CF CPCT

448 _A144 LOOaD 23 4.4 1Z7 100.02.000 1h7 29.5 2 1 et 99.2 161 30o6 504 92o62.1100 U.4 47.3 30.4 418.1 251. 47.4 2143 6$1.44.000 1160 14.4 11.0 1984 92 17 ..5 22 1 31.5

CASE1 PROCISSIONO. °LARK SAT*

10.041010.0000

527l0

MUMS VS WE 1.4000 1.4000NMI NU1L 11111/4 06600 4.4000SUM OF 1COOIS 107.4449 /466. I/004SN 500. SCORES 545.46$7 43916404j0RE AN 2.1122 2. laid

STUB). OEWo IA) 0.1123 0.1791ST60. 090. 1611 0.190 0.7799MEC iAM 2.1310 2.6167

QUEST ION 16 FART

SCORE INTERVALS

_L. T3002.0003.0004.000

F PCT

_at/4.4 $7.3lea 30094.4 1.0

CF 1011Lit

51.1 100057 el 9,40.323.3 36.9

CASES PROCESSED 59.9217NO. SLAM DATA 11.0060MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUS VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 145.7436SUN SRO. SCORES 0 383.2E15KEAN a 2.4320ST60. OEV. 1141 - 0.6930STOW 0211. 044 0.6449MEDIAN 2.3067

F PUT CF C-1PCT

19 4.6 546 100.02-8 -r 94.9 rOT 96.4117 314 2111 41.441 7.8 41 7.0

52611

/292.00004424.4000

2.45630.690/

2.4444


49 of books, periodicals,other printed materials

0) Suitability (quality) of books,periodicals, and other printedmaterials for instruction

and

HighlyAdequate

0Highly

Adequate Inadequate Inadequate

CUEST1OM 16 PART

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CP PalLW F PGT C.FG-PCT

1.000 12.5 20.4 61.4 100.0 319 223 934 1001_024400 39.0 6444 4$.9 79.6 312 42.2 41, 77.73.000 9.3 13.2 141.0 16.2 77 16.4 itS 13344000 0.6 1.0 0.6 1.0 6 /t1 __bilk .1

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATA

0 61.44313.0000

5343

MINIMUM VALUE e 14000 14004MAXIMUM vaima 4.0000 440000SUM OF SCORES 120.9547 1030. VsfAOSUM SQ0. SCORES a 262.3403 A236.0000NE M, 1.1643 1.943057140. UV. (141 0.6241

.

0.4394ST MO. 0E V. 116.44 0.6333 046400ME0166 1.9672 149456

OUESTICk 146 PUT 1

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0013

F

124_

PCT

19.4

CF P..01.11

41.3 1014_02.0003.000

.409.0 ________ __

43.65.3__I:= Z.

71.10.9G.4

49.35.7

80.49.3oAA

CASES PR:II:ESSE°HG. BLANK OAT*

0

61.31464.0000L 40130MINIMUM VAIUt

MAA2M11M VALUE * 4.0000SON_ OP SCORES 116.541745U4 S. SCORES 239.147MEAN L 9003STMO. MU. (Mk = 0.3341ST AO. 011 V. 1#4.4) a 0 0423AEOIAN 4 1.9273

ir -cf-tzm

120 2L*5 SAA 100.030-4)4W 4T3 Tf.-543 8.1 46 th

°lie 3 0.4

5334T4T4004---44000

995.4000a21;44504

0.)57i1.6992


Highly HtghlyAdequate Adequate Ihadequate Inadequate

Quantity of audio-visual materials

Suitability (quality) of audio-visual materials for instruction

QUE5711.1.4 16 PAST .1

SCORE INTERVALS F OCT CP 1"111.6 F 106T COCPCT

1 004 LO a 144.7 6163 100.0 97 18 al 544 100.0a.000 04 37.1 53.1 03.3 302 so. a 635 81.83.000 1160 2464 IS a SSA 3.27 21.9 133 25.0CAN 0.1 12I 0.7 L.2 6 16 6 1.1

CASES PROCESSED' 6101E0RD. ,IN DATA SADAOMINI NUS VALUE a 1 40000RA 41 NM VALUE 4.0000SW4 OF scans 1284E04SUS 500. SCORES 21 e. conRE AN a 2.1411SIM). 0111. 11141 a 0.1614STRO DIV. Mal iKa ii AN

04/ 4124011E

41iESTION 16 PAST IL

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CP P.I1L11

02le4.6000

1106.411011454.1/014

264141901t4/112_000.00U41596

F Po..7 C. Csalo CT

1.000 12.0 19.7 60.1 104.0 106 0.0 530 100.02.000 40.6 64.7 411.9 00.3 353 ilea, 424 40.03.000 Sol 13.3 43 13.7 70 1342 I L 1.3.44.000. 0.2 0.3 0.42 063 k._. 0.2

CASES PROCESSEDNO. :AMR DATASIMKO VALUEMAAIRUO VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESREARSUM. DEV. 4N1STOW. DEN. 10141MOLAR '

a 10.1441a 7.0040

1.04004.0000

a 11402415a 250.4812a 1.9434a 0.5132

0.51101.1549

5307

-7474416480026.11000s164. 0000

1.93560.5792

16. Using your best professional judgment, rate echaracteristics for your school.

HighlyAdequate

(_L) Quantity of instructional equipment 0LkAl Suitability (quality) of instructional1-1/ equipment for instruction

04iEST ION 14 PANT L

S CURE INTERVALS

ach of the following

HighlyAdequate Inadequate Inadequate

0 U.

F PCT CF PSLW F PCT CF CPC T

1.000 814 14.3 6104 100.0 $3 1545 544 100.02.000 WA 62.0 51.7 55.7 1S2 4242 451 $4.53.000 1344 225 14.1 21.9 116 211 110 22.34.900 ____ . 0.3 0._4 0.2 0.4 3 Orb 3 0.6

CASES PROCESSEDh4.1. ULANR OA TAAIM NUM VALUE a

MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SOMESUM SQ0. SCuRES m

WE AN a

Aj&G. tokti. iNt 4STMO. 01W.mEDIAN

ouestlOg 16

SCORE 1NTElVA1,S

1.0002.0003.0004.000.

61.43543.0(10140004.0000

12804481291.62702.0900.611100.61762.049

53431.0000400000

1/07. ONOs503.U000

2.47300.62430.0249

. 240542

ACT'-- 0-$1.w ----r P" CF C-PCT

LOA 17.0 _III:A_ADgA.9 97 14" 532 100.044.9 734 50.9 83.0 3837-7 2 A 413-41.46.0 9.8 6.0 9.8 50 9.4 )0 9.40.G C,C. ..0,(_m0,0 0 0.0 0 0.0

CASES PROCESS IC m 41.271SNO. BLANK DATA

.

MIMI MUP VALUE 1 .0000MAXIMUM VALUE m .0000

.0F SCORES 114.4,02Sum SO G. SCOmES 243. 7806MEAN 1.9279ST NO. qhvf 4111 0.5116STM0 U V. tg-1.1 4 0.516-1MEDIAN a 1.9507

53251440003.140150

1017. 0000-aria J00J

1.91110.2142

1.9390

17. Estimate the percentage of students in your school at each of the followinggrade levels who are reading one or more years below grade level accordingto current test data. The estimate should be based upon the concept of nationalnorms for the grade for which you are reporting.

(a) Grade 2

None

1-10%

11-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-90%

91-100%

OUEST1(N 17

SCURF INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.0005.0006.0007.000

PAR'S A

F----

cF 6.461.F OCT CF

3.4 6.1 55.0 100.0 Lk 4.416.9 30.2 524 93.9 150 30.9

__A4,11.9004701 96.9

21.2 39.2 3166 63.1 196 4464 120 66.011.1 19.1 13.7 24" 93

146 2.6 2.7 4.8 17.J40,44.5

__Al§27

_0165.6

1.1 1.4 1.1 1.4 10 2.1 10 2.14.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0 9.9 ...(k___ 0.0

CASES PROCESSEDNO. MANS OATH

55.924752.0000

48552

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000PA )(1 MUM VALUE 21 6.0000 6. 0000SUM OF SCORES a L436.0000SUM SOO. SCORES

.10120004523.0513 4716.0000

MEAN 24043 2.9.08ST1409_ DGV. 1M) a 1.0046 0.0704SIND. tiEV. / a 1.0160 0.4794ME u I AM 2.0903 2. 6954


(b) Grade 4

None

011-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-90%

91-100%

4UE S T I ON 17 PART

14k:r CFCfiC ISCURF INTERVALS F PCT CF POLN F.-

L.000 0.5 O.8 54.4 100.0 3 0.6 4di 100.02.000 11.1i 21.9 $3.9 99.2 116 241 4741 99.43.000 23.5 43.2 40.0 77.3 194 40.3 362 15.340000 14.2 284 11.6 34.1 130 z70 LW 34.95.000 3.1 6.9 4.3 1.9 31 604 36 T.94.000 0.6 1.1 0.6 1.1. 7 1.5 7 1.57.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0 4.0 0 0.0

CASES PROC OSSEO a 54.437 401NO. BLANK OA TA a 5504210 56

-r. votioP INI MUM VALUt a 100000SA* INUM VALUE * 6.0000 604000SUM OF SCORES * L73. d492 4 53 44 U000SUM SOO. SCORES * 601.5119 i-32117/01Z-IIE AN m 3.1495 3.1892STNU. IN) * 0.9199 0049443iSTRO. UV. 04-4.1 * 0.9265 ----GiAA4MEOIAN m 3.1317 3.1264


(c) Grade 6

[:3 None

D11-25%

0 26-50%

D 51-75%

0 76-90%

0 91-100%

CUESTIGN 17 PART C

Cl a-sc. F tart

1.000 0.6 1.4_ 4 /.4 100.0 6 1.4 4413 1 (to. 02.000 10.2 21.5 46.8 91.1 93 24.0 411 98.63.440 17.4 36.7 36 06 774 153 36.2 ea,4 76.64.000 31.6 11a 40.5 12? 30.0 In 40.45.000

.149.35 7.5 462 9.0 36 605 44 10.4

6.000 0.7 1.5 CO 1.5 7 107 d 1 9

.____i_a_N__ _ 404 .,4 00; / 02_ 0.2

CAse 5 PROCESSED a

__AO .:T9

47.3640

..____k__

423NO. KAHN DATA a 112.0000_ ).14MI MAW VALUE a 14,0000 1.4004MAXI MUM VALUE a 6. MO 7. 4000SUN OF SCGIMS aSUN SQO. SCONE a

.154.6361551.0415

_#.386.400Uqt91111,0000

MEAN mg 3 4700 3.44113STNO OEV I NI a 049704 164124STNO. iJEV (N*11 111 069608 1.013iiItE0146N 41 1.2410 3.44353

4.


10 Yes

2 0 No

WEST* ON 1

SCORE INTE RV ALS

1.000

F PCT CF 16.1114t F

420 69.3 61.6 100.0 371

F4,7 Cif CPCT

69.3 SAS 100.02.000

CASES PACC IS I 0

16.9 30.7 1469 30.1 M4

61.6031

30.1 166 30.7

535NO. OLANA DATA14114INUN VALUERAX1NUN VALUE

2.00001.00002.0060

1.00002. 4000

SIA Of SCORESSWI EGO. SCORESPEAR

aa

110.11,4.31466

le 10 ?I

6.116.0000t02 la 0000

la 1065----Getorr-STAO. OEV. 4N1

SIND. OEVe14E01A11

0 646130.46501.2216

0.4eLs1...210


Yes

20 No




1 4 7

C..PCT

100.0

2 5 8

3 6 UngradedWESTION 184

SCORE INTERVALS

.0.0 - 9.99

F

4.0

PCT

11.0

0 61ALM

17.4100.0

F

20. 6.3

CF

31510.00 ." 2449 14.2 340 32.9 694' 94 40.5-. 495 93.730.04 ... 41.99 64 14.4 14.7 56.4 41 4L03 199 63.250.00 - 41699 liaot_l _L30 32.6. 33 10.4 LJa 41.97040 - 19.99 2.5 6.8 9.0 24.5 24 1.4 99 31.410.00 - 149.99 &A 4.4 665 11.7 21 1.0 75 23.8110.00 ... 129.99 0.9 2.5 4.1 21.2 7 4.2 'ea 154.130.00 -. 149.99 O. LA 3.2 .. 4.7' 6 1.9 41 13.0150.00 ..- L69.99 00 1.4 407 70 6 1:9 45 11.1110.04 -. 144.99 0.4 lel 2.1 5_ell 6 1e9 49 9.2190.00 "- 209.09 0.4 1.0 1.7 4.7 5 1. 4.3 7.3214.00 . 229.99 0.1 0.2 1.4 3.8 L 0.3 1.8 5.7230.00 "- 249.99 0.2 0.5 1.3 3.5 3 1.4 Al 5.4250.00 -. 269.99 0.2 0** 1.1 3.0 3 1.0 14 4.4210.00 - 489.99 0.1 0.4 49 2.4 1 0.3 11 345290.00 -. 309.19 0.3 0.8 CA aL 4 1.3 Ill 3.2310.00 ". 329.99 0.1 G.2 0.5 1.2 T 0.3 6 1.93341100 ". 349699 0.1 C. 404 1.0 1 u.3 5 1.6350.00 - 369.99 0.0 4.0 0.3 0.8 0 0.0 4 1.3370.00 -. 389.99 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.8 3. Oa 4 1.3390.00 "1 409.99 0.0 0.0 .2 0.6 0 0.0 3 1.0419.00 "1 429.99 AJAL 0.0 0.1_ 0.6 0 0.0 3 1.0430.00 - 449.99 Q.1 0.2 0.2 0.6 1 0.3 4 1.0450.00 - 469.19 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0 4.0 2 0.6470.00 - 489.99 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 1 0.3 4 0.6490.00 - S09.99 0.1 0.2 ILI 0.2 1 4.3 1 0.3510.00 -. 5Z0.00 0.0 0.0 .4.0 -.0.0 0 0.0 Q 0.0

-313----CASES MAIDC6:SSE0._.... .______

36 .9543...

140 ALMA DATA a 2140000 2221111W4 VAAjztE 1.0000 1.4000

VALUE 11 504.0404SUM OF SCOMOS a 640207111 2447414oasoSUM S. $CQMLS 185025.1415 4446471.0000MEAN ' 56.3435 70.*095SING. OEV. INT m 67.4605 77.4269Mao 4110. (0111 0 14.494/ 77.45141 ECIMM :a 346449 4 44040

1R. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need lofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?

DYes2 D No




QUESTION 1O!

4 7

2 5 8

3 6 Ungraded

PART A

SCOal INT iERV AL S

0.0 -. 1.99

F

3.6

PCT

12.3LAO '''4.00

11441

5099999

13.99

1044.04.3

354.713.414.6

14.00 17.99 1.8 6.011.00 21.19 22 -Gs22AO 15699 MA 2.40ICAO 29.9! 0.2 0.730000 33 94) OA 1.4134.00 37.99 0.4 1.238400 - 41.94 0.2 0.642.00 - 45.99 0.0 0.0464,00 -- 49.99 Os C GO 05W 53490 Cia- 0.354.00 5749 0 40 0.0MAO 61.99 0 A 0.162.00 - 614419 044 0.066.00 - 69.99 0.0 0.070.00 - ... 73.99

7 4 990.1 0.3

74 00 - 04 GA71.00 . 81.19 0.0 0.082.00 =- 45429 0.0 0.086.00 - 119.9V 0.1 044390.00 - 93649 0.0 -0.044 .00 ,:-. 97.99 0.0 0.098.00 100.00 0 00 0a

CF 1211.14

29.525.911.311.47.153lel263Sal1.3.1.00.80404t.30.50.30.30.3us4.10.10.1

-0.0...OA..12.0

F Pe,T GF C-1PCT

10060 27733340

1063a.,4001O.3

&ea 100..0:1 #311;

./Ait aLop a49,2

87.7510038.1134.0 2G 7.6 Ili 30.9.

11.1 22 0.4 61 23.310.4 9 3.4 39 14.97.7 2 0401 30 11.57401 :400 3.8 ' 28 10.74.5 4 1.5 18 6.93.3 3 1.1 L4 5.32.b 0 0.0 1 i 4.22.6 0 Owti 11 4.22.6 3 /al £1 4.21.9 0 0.0 8 3.11.9 4 14.5 8 3.11.1 o 0.0 4-1. 51.1 0 0.0 4 1.51.1 1 0.4 4 1.5

0.9 a 0.1/0.3 0 .040 1 0.40.3 0 04.0 1-I 0.40.3 044 0.4

-0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0dO .0 0

-0-13,700.0 0 0.0

4-0.0-04GASES popcEsuoR0. ALAM DOKINImum vi.LuE

=29.1003 262

271.00000.0

WV0. to

MAAIMUM_YALyk a 116.0000 86.00SUM OF SCOWES 303.63C9 A ti

still SQ0 SCONESMEAN

aa

1517.144IO2925

9441414104)64LIN atl.

ff-tiii.; V. Ihi a 12.21147 1361198"STND. uEv. 1 t*.41 12.4984 14421MEDIAN

. .

0.5970 9.157o

18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment am in need ofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?

10 Yes

20 No


a. If 'Yes, how many students?


3. 4

2 OSIL 5 8

3 6 Ungraded

7

QUEST ION 188 PART 5

SCOPE INTERVALS

0.0 .- 1.995099.99

11.99

2.00 -6440 ..;

10.00 .14.00 -. 17.9918.00 21.9922.00 - 45.9926.00 - 29.1930 AO - 33.99:14.00 37.9931.00 - 41.9942.00 - 45.9946.04 - 49.9950.00 . 53.9954 440 -.. 57.9954.00 61.9962.00 -, 65.9966.00 - 09.9970.00 - 73.9914.00 - 71.9974.00 - 41.9942410 - 85,9986.00 - 89.9990.00 - 93.9994.00 -.. 41c 9998.00 . 100.40

CASES nix assotoiCh 81.46IK OA TAMN' MUM VALUiPAM RUM VALVESUN OP SCORESSUN S00. SCORESSUSSING. C. (N)SINU. OEV IN -1)MEDIAN

CF

40ata1121.45

100.001.664694469

F PCT

3.3 Met4.4 110a .

4.1 14.35.0 15.4

CF F

32:11 140.0 24Oa. 111.4 j 79114 54.51 314.105 40.3 i ft

Pia

A.4OA/0401.1.6

2.0 6.0 84 24.9 19 867 92 32.31.3 1.9 1.2 18.9 17 0.0 73 25.61.5 4.4 4.9 14.9 16 5.6 56 19.60.6 1.414 34

3.4la 10.5,,,

4;11V

4.1169

4034

14.011.9

0.2 067 147 5s2 2 . 4.1 43 8.14*1 0.4 1.5 4:5 2 Oa 20 7.00.3 0.9 1.3 4.0 4 1.4 14 6.3.0.2 11.11__0.3 0.10.0 00

3.2 3 i1 14 4.9_1.0044 eit

244.1.6

40

1.40.0

117

3.92.5

O. 1..±_1_ 04 1 .6 ' 3 lel 1 2.50.4 1.2 0 0.0 4 1.40.0 0.9

3.0 0.0 0.4 1.2 0 i.0 4 1.40.1 03 0.4 1.2 1 0.4 4 1.4

003 0.9 0 G.0 217i10.0 0.00.1 44 0.3 0.9 1 0.4 3 1.10311-_, 4L0 1.02-4.19.4-9

0.2 0.6 04J-0 2 0.7

.

-i-Mi-- 2 0.74).0 060.1 0.3 4.2 0.6 1 0.4 2 0.7

U ..9_ 0.1 0.4 01

a.00;4--

1 0.4-1----.4__AgtILL

0.1 0.4 Del 0.4

0

-iiiig 265

248. MCC°0.0

99.0000

4520.4

99.0000363.9 387

9034.703111.1009

4816044"1151444.0000

t3 ;PAL41

_ _.

_.:._

14.832614.858710.1087

*10 .

13.449513.61097.2070 . _ ._.....


0 Yes

2E1 No




QUESTION 188 PART C

4 7

5 8

6 Ungraded

SCORE INTERVALS F FC7 CP P'8141 F . Pa- 1:F C=PCT

3Co 837.1

0.0 - 1.19 a 12.13.80 'w 5+91

___.3

9+6 31036400 . 9.99 4 o 2 13.5

1040 ...8 13.99 5o6 186214.00 17.99 105 4.91840 - 21499 1.9 60022.00 - 25.99 14 3.328.00 d 29+91 0.8 2.630.00 ... 33.11 0.8 2.63440 - 37699 0.1 2.438.00 -. 41.99 0.0 0.142.00 .- 45.99 0.0 0.046.00 - 49.99 0.1 0.45© .00 - 53.19 0.4 1454.00 - 57.19 0+0 0+058.00 - 41.99 0.2 0.762.00 - 65.99 0.0 0.066.00 - 69.99 0.0 0.0li.e.00 --' 73499 0 60 OA

4,-GW17- 7799 0.1 0.378.00 -. 814,99 0.1 0.382.00 *Soft 000 0.0_.86.00 -. 89.99 0.0 t;.09000 93.919 0.1 0.39440 -- 117 99 060 0.0

0.0i:04- - -1-0-G41T) 0.0

1741347076024.334, 3aa1.71.04.90.9OA0.5Oa0.20.20.2Oa0.20.10.1

C01-*0.0...CNA)

CASES PRAXES $ EC) a 30.1132NO. U. ANK DA TA 0

AI NI NUN VALUE. =AAA! NUM V ALUt az.

257.00000.0

90.0CCOSUN OF SLUM S a

_340.0311

SUN SOO. SCORES a 8174.0814MEAN 18 11.0416SING._ DEV INI = 12.5102ST NU. DEO'. 1N-4 i a 1201114MOAN_ . 709116

100.0 23 444 21 100.08749 IrF 440" az 9 L.6Se.6 39 14.2 17.9 65143.1 14" 1441 50.924.9

.3021 7.6 90 32.7

20.0 19 6.9 69 25.114.0 12 4.4 50 18.2NO b 4.2 36 13.8sa 10 3" 32 11.69.6 9 3.3 22 8+03.2 1 4.4 -T3--4a3.1 0 ticali i. 4.43.1 1 sJ.4 12 4.420 5- 4.1 -11 48013 0 04 6 2.2LA 3 144 6 2.204 0.--4-Car- 3 r.10.8 0 0.0 3 1.1.0.8 0 0.0 3 LaO.. 1 47474- 3' LI003 1 004 Z 0.70.3 0 460 1 0.40.3 0 ii-.0- 1 0.40.3 1 4.4 1 0.4

-0.0 0 woe 0 0.0-0+0 0 ii.0 0 4.). 0

275X62

Oo ta)

90.4.0000

363 z.-asoo111U652.00Ott

134)407413.441113.664310.Z04.10


1 D Yea

20 No




1 4 ija 7

2 5 8

3 6 Ungraded

GAMSTION 188 PART 0

SCORE INTERVALS PC1 CF P..81W P PLT GP C -PCT

4.0 1.99 2.6 8.0 32.42.00 4* 5.94 111.3 34.1 21.66.00 1.99 4.4 ME 18.3

10.00 13.19 4 47 14.4 14.114.00 17.99 2.0 6I 1.418030 - 21.99 2.2 6.6 7.422.00 25.99 1.8 5.5 3k32640 6 20.99 0.6 1.8 3.330440 - 33.99 0.8 2.3 /lei34.00_ - 37.19 0.5 1.4 la311.00 41.19 0.4 1.3 1.742.00 45.11 0.1 0.3 1.346.00 - 49.90 04 0.4 1.230.00 33099 0.3 Oa 1.134.00 . S7.99 0.0 0.0 Gel

00 - 61.19 0.1 0.4 0.162.00 - 65.49 0.0 0.0 0.666.00 69 99 0.0 0.0 0.67040 - 73.99 0.2 0.5 0.674.00 - 17.99 0.3 ha C*511140 81.99 0.0 Oat tel&GOO - #5449 OA_ CA 4..186.00 89.99 0.1 0.3 0.190.00 93.99 0.0 0.0 -0.Q94.00 97.99 0.0 0.0 -G.0OM. - 1.00.00 0.0 0.0 -GO

100.0 16 5.5 290 x.00.092 .o 76 26.9 M4 94.531.1 40 13.8 216 67.643.5 47 164 II* 53. 820.1 23 1.9 109 37.622.9 27 So 3 86 29.716.3 16 5.5 59 20.314.8 6 2.1 43 14.8.2.1 9 3.1 27 12.8'Oa -6 2.l 28 9.75.3 6 2.A 22 7.64.0 I ..4 Lb 5.53.7 1 0.4 15 5.23 a 4 '1.4 14 4.83o4 0 0.0 10 3.422,4 2 0.7 le 3.42.0 0 #.1..0 8 2.8aot) 0 0.0 II 2.82.0 21.5 40.4 L0.3 00.3 1

0.0 00.0 0-0.0 0

0.7 8 2.81 :4 6 2714.1 . 2 0.7000 1 0.303--- -I--0.0 0 0.00.0 0 0.04.0 0 0.0

CASES PROCESSED 0 _12.4432 290i47-7----

0.4NO. SLANK DATAM IN I MU M VALUE "

242.00000.0

MAXIMUM VALUE 0 87.04C0 87.0000SUN OP SCORES 391.0112 ,4254.0000SUN 300. SWROS st 11004.6453 13417141.00110MEAN . '2.0314 144***05160. DIV. IN) 0 13.9274 19.A522IMO. °EV. (Nli 14.1413 13.A192MEDIAN 0 8.0822 10.9362

18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need }ofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?

1 fl Yes

2 0 No


a. If ".es, how many students?


2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Ungraded

f

M4E/ION /04 PAST E

SCORE INTERVALS F OCT CP PfILN PuT CF C..PCT

0.0 1..119 1.4 4.7 30.6 1040 7 44p. 410 100.02.00 5.99 11.4 3.7.3 294 9,1.3 42 30V4 :AS 'LA4.00 - 1.10 44 13.1 1707 440 40 144 Aiii 674

10.00 -.. 13.99 54,1 180 13.1 44.1 42 AMA :t4$ $4.a14.00 .- 17 .99 2.2 1.2 8.4 27.5 -25- 9.3 9 36010.00 21.19 1.9 6.1 6.2 19.3 24 6.9 74 27.422.00 - 25.99 1 1 3.7 4.3 14.2 14 5.4 50 18.5164040 -.- 29.99 0.5 /se 34 ILLS 1214ria30.00 33.99 0. 1.9 2.7 ea 7 2.6 13 12.234.00 - 37.940 046 2.4 1a 6.9 7 2.0 26 9.636.00 - 41.99 0.4 1.3 1.5 4.9 4- 1.5 19 7.042.00 - 45.99 0.3 1.0 1.1 3.b 4 1.5 15 5.646.00 - 49.99 0.1 0.3 0.8 2.6 1 0.4 IL 4.15000.. 53.99 -Oa Oa 4.7 8.3 4 1:5----LIF-- 3.794.00 - 57.99 6.0 GO 6.4 2.4 0 tiolik 6 2.255.00 6149 0.1 0.5 1441 1.4 1 0.4 6 2.242.00 - 65.99 0.0 GA 0.4 1.2 0.---;:e0-. .

,V- 4.986.00 -. 69699 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.2 0 0.0 5 1.970.00 ... 13.99 0.1 0.3 G.4 1.2 1. 4,14 5 1.974.00 - 77.99 0.1 0.3 0.1 4.9 it 0.4 4 ---2.5MAO - 81.19 0.0 0.0 6.2 0.7 0 0.0 3 1.182.00 '.. 85.99 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.7 2 0.7 I La84.60 - 89.99 0.0 04,1 0.0 04 1 0.4 1 0.490.00 - 93.99 0.0 0.0 -(0 -.040 0 4.0 0 0.094.00 - 97.99 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.Q 0 000 0 0.098.00 -. 160.00 0 .0 0.0 .0.0 .---1 a WO. O 0.0

CASES PROCESSED a 34 6C40 210a'. -Iiiiii. -64iA a 2 6i-acdo 267AI NI MUM VALUE ils ',OGG° 1.6104J!eA.AI MUM VALUE * 89.0000 44,4000SUN OF SCORES 'ST eT140 :431;4016-SUN SAO. SCORES 0 9211.4727 114444000NUN so 11,69#}1 Lita2430SIND. DEVe (NI a 12.8969 1445440SING. DE V. ite4 i m 13.1129 14.6151PIED 1 AN A.30:2 10,.714


1 0 Yes

2 0 No




1

2

3

4 7

5 8

6 Ungraded

11131171 ON 166 PART P

sofa INTERVALS

0.0 1.99

F

2.0

PCT

1.230.I615.613.4

, CF Fat/MU

27.9 100.021.1 st A .

114.3 63,113.0 461.3

P

12653639

P6T

4.725.714.213.4

CF C.-PCT

03 100.0griti, .0363at 69.6140 55.3

2.006.00

10600

..

...3.9910I9

13./9

11.54 44.3

14.00 1799 WI 6.5 ea 3161 20 1.9 101 39.916 .00 21.99 2.2 LS 4.9 14.6 26 10.3 41 32.022.00 .' 25699 1.1 6.1 4.7 16.6 17 6.7 35 21 &T26.04 351.09 0.4 1.4 1.11 lea 3 2.0 36 MO30.00 ". 33449 0.1 0.1 &, 9.4 3 11 33 13.034.041 - 37699 044 jd 3.4 Sal_ 4 Los AO 11.9SO AO 91.19 0.9 3.1 1.0 72 10 4.0 26 10.342.00 . 5.49 0.0 G.0 1.2 4.2 0 0.0 16 6.346.00 49.99 G.1 0.3 14 4 02 1 004 16 6.350600 .. 33.19 0.4 163 1st 3.9 6 2.4 15 5.954.00 57.00 0a 0.3 4..7 2 «4 1 0.4 9 3.6341.0_0_ 61.99 0.4 1.4 4.6 1.1 5 2.1.0 a 3.2*2.00 65.99 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 1 U.4 3 fa66.00 69.19 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.870.00 73499 0.4 LA 0.1 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.814.00 77.94 0.0 41.0 OA 0.4 4- 0.0 a Oa76.60 01*99 0.0 0.0 6.1 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.8$1.00 OS. 09 0 A 0.0 0.1 OA 0 0.0 2 0.046.00 -. 111.91 OA 0.0 0.1 0.4 4- 0.0 2 0.890.00 - 13.119 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.844.00.. 97.99 0.0 0.0 Ost 0.4 0 4.0 Z 0.8911.00 . 100.00 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.4 2 U.6 2 0.6

CASES FROCOSSIO 27.4500 253D. BLANK DATA 279.0000

MINIMUM YAtUE ° 0.0 aMAXIMUM VALUE 99.0000 99.4000SON OP SCOR6S 352.0440 4211

SUM $00. 3COM a 1151412 12139 T.0000KAN 11,4A42 5.4636SIND. 0111. IN/ a 13.79113INOe OEV (46-1 1460497 15. 6447HENAN 9 ,1A14 11.3846

18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need f

remedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction?

10 Yes

2 a No




1 4 7 10,_

2 5 8

3 6 Ungraded

PART GWASTION 1E8

SCORE INTERwALS F PCT

0.0 - 1.99 2.8 11.62.006.041 -

10.00

5.199649

13.19

3.11.21.1

30.111.310.7

14.00 -19.00 .22.00 -

17 .9921 9925.99

0.60.3GA

5.53.33.9

li GOO - 294 ils 0.1 0.730.00 - 33.49 0.2 1.834.00 37.99 Oe C Q. 0

CP P...11LW F PT CF C-PCT

Ica took) la 22.77.3 73.4 17 -a.74.4 43.3 9 12.03.2 31.0 9 14140

2.3 20.3 9 "lr1.5 14.7 4 ).31.2 11.5 5 407OA 1.6 .1 1..:4---0.7 6.9 3 4.00.5 S. 0 0.0

4 3.6 0 0.0 4 5.346.00 - 49.99 0.0 0.0 0.4 3.11 0 0.0 4 5.3SO AO - 53.99 0.1 OA OA 3.6 1 ---1-.1-- --4 5.3mscso - 5199 OeG 0.0 03 249 0 0.0 3 4.05600 . 61.99 0.1 1e3 0.3 2.9 1 1.3 3 4.062.00 .. 65 .99 0.0 G.0 0,2 1,6 V -040 --------3-4.4766.00 -. 69.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 i6 0 0.0 2 2.770.00 73.99 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.6 1 4.3 2 2.774 .00 77.99 0.0 0.0 471 0.$ 0 0.0 11:-.3711.00 ... 61.99 0.1 0.8 04 Q.d 1 1.3 1 1.362.00 .. 95099 0.0 0.0 ..0.0 ....0 40 o 0.0 0 0.01/6 00 - 69 .99 0.0 4.0 -0.0 ....0 ,0 0 --Goa-- 11- 0.0-90.00 - 93.99 0.0 0.0 -*C. C -0.0 0 0.0 0 0:094.00 .. 97.99 0.0 0.0 `0.0 -0.0 0 0.0 0 0.096.00 100.00 Oa 0.0 ...Co .000 0 0-.0- 0 0.0

GASES PROCESSED e 10.3323 TSNO. 81. Aftilit EAT A e 454.00000161 WOO VALUE e 0.0 0.4OAX1 MUM VALUE 0 4000000 80.4000SUM OF SCORES 3° 95.4211 $2-4-4;iiiiilliStitil SQ0. SCORES e 2640.9053 .30146.40130MEAN a 9.2443 12.3200SIND* Ca; -INT a 1:377755 lie ditt.6SI t*D OEV IN-4. / e 14.4955 15.4231tifiD1 AN 4.9141 7.,530

. _ _.._ . ..____

i5 100.0511 77.341 54.7&I 42.723 30.716 24.014---0.18.7

010.7

5 6.7

i5 100.0511 77.341 54.7&I 42.723 30.716 24.014 18.7---0. 0

10.75 6.7

18. Are there students in your school who in your judgment are in need ofremedial reading instruction but who are not receiving such instruction? 1

1 Yes

2 No




1 4 7

2 5 8443 6 Ungraded

PANT NuesilifsTaa

SCORE INTERVALS

0.0 -, 1.94

F

4.0

PCT

46.7

CF P8101

1.6 100.0

F

20

PO

A.).1

CF

57

CPC I

494, 0446.914.93444

2.00 .6.00 -

10A40 L -

5o994. 9913.99

104OAOa

12.9i41.67.0

4.63.2244

S3.331.4'26.8 1

87S

14O030303m.1

ST-2032

14.00 - 17.99 0.5 6.1 1.7 19.8 6 10.5 17 29.818.00 - 21.99 Oa SoS Loa 13.6 . 4 To0 . /L 19.322.00 - 25.99 0.3 3.3 0.7 8.2 3 S.3 7 12.32x.00 29.91 0.0 0.0 0.4 409 0 4.0 4 13SO .40 -. 31.49 0.1 Oe 7 OA 409 I 1.8 4 7.034.00 -. 37 .111 444 Co 0 0.4 4 .2 0 0.0 3 5.3

5.1.-38.00 - 41.99 0.1 1.6 0.' 4.j 1 1.8 4

42.00 - 45.99 0.1 1,6 0.2 2.6 I A00 2 3.546.60 - 49.99 0.0 0.0 0.1_ 1.0 0 0.0 1 1.8

50.00 53.99 0.4 0.0 0.1 1.0 0 0.0 1 1.854.00 ii. 57.419 0.0 0.0 LA IWO 0 440 1 1.85440 - 61.99 0.1 A.0 0.1 1.4 1 1.4 1 1.862.00 - 65 .99 0.0 G.0 -0.0 4.0.0 0 U. 0 0.066.00 69.99 0.0 0.0 '"4.0 -.0.0 0 doa 0 0.070.04 73.99 0.0 0.0 ...4.0 -0.0 0 0.0 0 0.014.00 - 77.19 0.4 0.0 *010 ...0A 0 000 0 0.078.00 - 411.99 0o0 0.0 ..0.0 00 A . 0 000 0 0.082.00 .. 85.99 000 Co 0 A.® a 0 .0 0 0.0 0 0.016.00 - 89.99 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0 440 0 0.090.00 - 93.99 0.0 0.0 'CaO *0.0 0 0.0 0 0.094.00 - 97.99 0.0 0.0 .°4 .0 .00.0 0 000 0 0.088 .00 .0 100.00 000 0.0 0.4 -0.0 0 0.0 4 000

CASES PROCESSED a 4.1641 57has .LANK OA TAPI RI NUO VALUE *MAXI NUM VALUE

472.04000.0

ligAggs&L

48--C

0.060.0000

SUN Of SC0,01! S 034110 2.0044SUN 340. SCORES 1446.1414 14020.0040MEAN 7.4141_____ 9.6696SING. OE V. 1 $ I 0 10.8685 12.4436SIND . NV. IN...li 11.5627 12.31411MEDIAN 2.8337 ____ ___40.41444.


1 fl Yes

2 fl No




1 4 7

2 5 8

3 6 Ungraded (8)

QUESTION 18d PARI 1

IL PC7 F c-pcT

0.0 to 99 1.4 .P0.9 _1.010010 it 34.3 44 100.02.00 5.59 0.3 7.2 e.4 65.1 2 **1 42 66.76.00 9.99 0.5 12.7 2.3 57.9 2 6.1 20 60.6

/0.600 _13.99 9..3 41; '1A4._,A54___ 4 12.1 16 54.5lit .00 17.99 0.3 7.5 1.5 37.0 3 9.1 14 44.418.00 21.99 0.6 14.4 1.2 29.5 4 14.1 11 33.322.00 25.9c 0.3 6.5 0.6 15..1 3 9.1 7 21.226.00- 29.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 606 0 0.0 4 12.110.00 33.99 0.0 0.6 0.3 6.6 1 3.0 4 12.13...qti -38.00

37 ..99_

41.99,Q. C0.0

Oo0.0

4.20.2

.8_. 00

0.0060

33

9.19o1

42.00 - 45.94 0.0 0.0 0.2 5.6 0 0.0 3 9.1_46.00 49.99

53.990.00.0

0000.0

. 0f*2b.a

5.8-3.4

00

0604.0

33

9.19.1

54.00 S7.99 0.0 0.0 002 5.6 0 0.0 3 9.156.00 b :.:99 G. C 0.0 0.2 5.8. 0 0.0 3 9.1

65.99 0.1 2.2 -ora- 'soli 1 3 9.162.0066.00 - 69.99 0.0 0.0 Co1 3.6 0 4.0 2 6.1

- 0.0 ci Co 1 3.6 0 0.0 2 6.1_700.0074.00 71 99 0.1 1 06 3.6 3.0 2' 6.176.00 81 59 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.0 0 0.0 1 3.0

. _AZ 85.99 0.4 4*c _ 0 0.0 1 3.0464,00 - 89.99 0.0 C.0 0.1 z.o 0 0.0 L 3.09U.00 - 0 .0 0.0 Co 1 2.0 0 J.0 1 3.0

57.99_ 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.0 0 0.0 1 3.098.00 100.00 6.1 2.0 4c1 2.0 1 4.0 1 3.0

CASES ER0CESSE0 * 4.0184 33W. ELANK CATA * 45660400 504MININA VALUE * 0o0 0.0I.AXIMUR VAL0t a 99.0000 99.0000SUM OF SCORtS * -s27iie8 53-57.40011

St04 SOO. SCORES * 2153.2178 2)315.0000MEAN 4 13.114 16.4121Sliev. 0EV. (NI * 19.0749 22.4564l'tu.A. OEV. IN-/) = 22.CC50 22.6044

rcUIAN : 8.102; 11..01700

19. Does your school conduct at least one compensatory reading program as defined?

1 Yes

2 No

F Pier CF C4C1

475 90.0 528 LOO. 0-53 ii1o0 53 10 .0-

5289

SCORE 1 iffERVA LS- F PCT CF P".111.11

_Aid 11/91 60_0 130_90_iigka_2.000

CA$E $ 0110CSee ii

7.4 12.9 7.8 x29

_44,1911NO fiLAAR OAT A a

-9.0000

14 IN 1 SUM VA IA& 1.0000 1.0000AAA Mg VALUE 2.0000 2 .000OSU( OF SCARES 68.5016 5111G-u000

SUN SOO. SCORES . 1441a6 487. 00210PEAR * le 1.2117 1. 004

... _. --___ _ _.

SING. 1.4iii. thi a 0.3347_ ...

0.4005SIND. DEV 1*.)) a 0.3314 0.40022titE0 IAN 160734 1,550

20. How many separate and distinct compensatory reading programs are currentlyoperating in your school? (Include teacher training programs conducted during

the summer preceding the current school year.)

One

Two

Three

41;t4iSTI UN 20

SCORE 1 tatilVALS

1090..2.0003.0004400.5000

DIFour

More than four

F P-411:01- F (:F C-PCT

23.q !,4.8 40511._AlA.0 I4 7 4"I 444 1,0.013.4 27.2 26.2 53,2 Lit* 29.7 257 57.96.5 13.3 12.8 26.0 61 13.7 125 28.2

_Ale. 7.7 CO_ 12411... 3$ 7.9 44 14.42.7 5.4 2.7 5.4 14 ia.; 5 29 6.5

CAE.S.PNCE4SfitJ 41

rtO a Al% DATA49.187030.0000

44431

XIMMUM IOWA 1.0000 1.4000VAAtRUMIYALUE 5.009 5.0000_a___

SUM OF SCORES 9/.0417 iliir.W.10-

SUM $410. SCORES 259.4958 2549.40001411__..... L.9737 2u690ftma. GEV. (N1 1.1748 laciliistmo. OEV. (N-11 0 1.1149 1.2084

0q.?_10.," - ._____... . 4 0111 ..._______ .._ 1.7652

21. Are any of the compensatory reading programs in your school funded totally or

in part by funds (federal, state, local, or other) supplementary to the regularongoing, school budget?

Qi/ESTIDN 21

Yes

C2I No

Don't know

SCORE INTERVALS PCT Ci F Pt.t LF

_1*_110._Q 36_ 10:3 330 74.2 4.79 1 .93.02.000 14.8 26.8 1506 21.1 129 21.4 140 29.83.000 1.5 9 1.3 2.9 11 2.3 2.3

CASi:S PROCESSED60. s3L ANA DATARINI ILIUM VALUEPAX'. PUN VALUE

ss

a

SUM OF SCORES4(.p1. S00._ SCORESSE Ai4

S7 NU. OEV. IN) xST_ND Ofr V N-11MDIANSAMPLE FUR STATS

21a. When was the first compensatorymade available in your school?

14ESIIiA4 214

52.52475.0C COIROOCO3.0000

65-.0612

to2/5/60.44640045121.1903

50.99820NOTEIVALUES IN LAST INTERVAL tAGLOW

47051. ii4300,3.0000

58 8.(100004.6 0000

0.4490.0,500-144-5-5

PROM CALCULATIONS.

reading program funded by supplementary sources

One year ago

More than 1 but less

More than 2 but less

Three or more school

Don't know

than 2 school

than 3 school

years ago

years

years

ago

ago

S&.L4 EhVALs FCT CF P-8LW F pc..r L.F C--PCT

1.000 400 _14m0 41..9 1.00_t_O 60 16.1 472 100.02.000 4.4 106 35.3 84.2 33 8.4 312 83.93.000 4e2 10o0 30.8 73.6 33 d.9 219 7504.000 2317 584 26.1 43.6 217 56.3 146 66,15.000 3.0 7.1 3.0 7., 29 1.0 24 7.8

CASAS PRUC4SS4eLAtot OAT A

KIN MUM VALUEPAX' MUM V ALL:=ousi OF SCORES

SfVD SCORtot N

Sin). DEV. 161St60. UEV. (N-1)RE 01 ANSAMPLE FOP S-1 A1

a

a

.11

se

03A6ioz.6600

1.04005. °PAO

122.7014440.685

3.1.15511.17351.18693.6103

28.8i0ONOIEIVALOE LS' I

472643

I .U0005. u0 Uti

t093.JOLW496I.u0O0

3.A. don1..L806

3.1097iliTCF.VAL t AL LUCII:v

Fii0i- C'ALCULAiIO

22, How long has (have) the present compensatory reading program(s) been availablein your school? (Answer separately for each program.)

Prgtgiam Prg9ant Pr(o9am ProVam2 3 4


More than I but less than 2 school yearsI

I

I More than 2 but less than 3 school years/


QM 22 PART A

PCi LF C4CTSCORE INTERVALS

1.000 6.7 54.6 12.2 100.0 59 51.8 1/4 100.02.000 4.2 34.6 5.6 45.4 39 34.Z 55 441,62

3.000 1.2 10.2 1.3 1048 15 £3.& 16 14.04.000, 0.1 0.6 0,1 11_6 1 0.9 / 0.9

LASES PROCESSEil 12 4420 114N. BLANK DATA 356.00143 361PI N1 NUN VALUE 1.0800 160000PA II AUK VALUE 40100 4.4000SUP CF SCORES 19.1112 1156.00044

SUP SQO SCORES a 36.4040 344.4000SEMI 1.5673 1**116

,51NUo OEVo 04) a 0.741163760. OE W. 04..1 J, 0.7264 0.743914E01 AN 1.4151 1.4661

CUE .11061-22 PART

1NtEN.VALS

J.00,o_a .0003.000.4.000 .

8

F

2.60.1

.pc3.

OCT

15.031,310.3

CF P -8LM P

OA 2 _WA_ 423.7 45.0 19101 13.8 9G.3. As 3

PLT

57.5

12.34.4.

CF C.:Pct.

74 looao-41.5

4.2 1.40.43 4.1

CASES PRCES SEUNO BLANK DATA a

X A Al NUM VALUEGf SGORkS

SUP SW. SCORESPEAR aST40. GEV. (1/1_ .

ay. IN-1/ a14E01 AN

8.1787391.14000

2..00004e 0000

.13.272326.84 Si

1.62i8Od(159-0.16021.4096

730032

lo 40a044)410430

119.0000441; aido

1.0301066542Gisat1.4494

22. How long has (have) the present compensatory reading program(s) been availablein your school? (Answer separately for each program.)

GL1E

( 1Prog am Prog am1 2

lProgr;)am Prog am

3 4





PMT C

SCORE INTERVALS I PCT CF F

__Is000_ _14 614_2.000 1.7 23.9 LA 30.33.000 0.5 6.4 1.0 14.44.000 0.6 64 0.6 030

4C.70:14110. _

LASES PROCESSED aNO. EL ANK DA TA ....aMINIMUM VALUE * 1.0000ilik X 1 MU14 VALUE a 4.0000SUM OF SCORES a 110 k417 _SUM Si D. SCORES 24.66.35REAM 11 1.6077STP46. UEV.INk a 0.9212

. . _

ST NU* pew. IN -L1 a 0.929"'EDI AN a 1.3103

CeUE1TION 22 PART 0

SCORE INTEKVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

Lase 5 PRLICESSfiC,G. BLANK DATA

MINIMA VALUE14AX NUN VALUESUN OF SCOAEisCk SwO. SCORESPt ANST:W.44V. ill)STND. DEV.ME0 IAN

F PCT

20.43.20.eOs.

LF C-PC

37 54.4 o8 100.21 30.9 31 45.

5 7.4 AO 14.5 7.4 7.

68407.

1e 00004.4000

./14.4004244.40t$0

1.4)76)CLeshjit0.4i11.4189

GF ' -8LW F Pt.T C-PCT

2408 100.0, 175 64."!) 417 100.04.4 170 30 13.1 411 19.41.2 4.9 7 3.2 12 5.50.4 1.7 5 2.3 5 2.3

24.012700.4.9001.00004 400030.0450.0.0toi.243100'6144.40391.1077

217258

1.400Q4.0000

06.4.400U434.40124

1.47190.0:3300.614Z14.44J4

23. What was your school per pupil expenditure last year?

Check here if you don't know

PGA cf F PT i:F C-PCTSCOAF 11+63E-CA1'4.5

0.0 2.4 1 10. 11.4 Loo.0 27 L4.9 161 100.0- 40.00 18.0 as.s 3- 119.99 0.3 1.4 1.7 154 85.1

120.00 199099 0.2 1.2 17.8 87.1 2 1.1 151 83.420040 279.99 0.2 LAO 11A 8640 2 1.1 149 82.3280.00 359.99 0044 108 17.3. 85.0 4 44.4 147 61.2360.00 439.99 0.4 2.0 1.7.0 43.2 3 1.7 143 79.044040 - 519.99 1.7 6.4 16.6_ 0/.2_ 17 9.4 140 77.3520000 599099 3.1 15.0 14.8 72.8 16 8.8 123 68.0600.00 619.99 2.7 13.0 11.8 57.8 28 15.2 107 59.1680.00 159099 3.2 15.5 9.1 44.8 23 12.7 79 43.6760.00 839.99 1.6 13.4 6.0 29.2 22 12.2 ib 30.9840.00 . 919.99 u .so 4.6 3.3 16.4 10 2.5 44 18.8/0.00 159.99 Q.1._ 3.2 1.4 11_.6 8 8 4.4 44 13.3

1000.00 - 1019099 0.1 0.6 lei 8.4 2 1.1 16 8.81080.00 1159.99 0.4 2.1 1.6 7.7 4 2.2 14 7.7

1160.00 - 1239099 Q.3 1.4 11_ 1.4_._ 3 1.7 10 5.51240.00 1319.99 0.2 1.0 C.1

_

4.2 3 1.7 7 3.9

1320.00 1399.99 0.0 0.7 3.2 0 4" 4 2.2/400.00 1479.59 9.4 ;.0. Got _La_ 0 4" 4 4.21400000 - 1559.99 0.0 0.0 0.7 302 0 4.0 4 2.2

1560.00 - 1639.99 0.5 2.7 0.7 isi 2 1.1 4 2.21_71999_. Q.4 0.1. .__41.§.P,_ _ I 0.6 2 1.1

1120.00 - 1199..4v 0.0 0.2 C. C 0.2 1 0.6 1 0.61800.00 - 1879. iv 0.0 0.0 -.0.14 -J.4 0 4.0 U 0.0180t.i_.00 j 559.9_9 0.0 0ev -0.i 70.o 0 v.0 0 0.01960.00 - 2-000.00 0.0 td.o 0.13 -0.0 0 4.0 0 0.0

CASES PROSU SEC)hu. °LANA DATA141 A4 i KIM VALUEn441 VALUE 41

Si M OF SCURESSUS 5.i0. SCORES *

a

a

$.7 hi". 'Av. 1h) 33

ST SO uEv. a

Ati; LANGutS11 ON 21A

SCukE ihrcnVALs

_20490290.0000

0,01125.0900

12710.21090.1034320E 06

626.2466339.1(43347.8201647,7432

F PC r CF P-81.01

0.O 21.1 4C.0 52.9 /00.01.000 31.8 60.0 31.8 600

i.A SE S__PlOCkS SED a141 hi PUP VALUEMAXIMA', VALUE a4U$ OF 'SCOKES a

sum 5Q0. Ss.OitESPE AN sSTNU. 9t.y.(611,,_.,Sitiao UEV. N-1PitUIA14

S2.8(1.J.01.0000

31.755831.75580.6004044180.49450.6372

181494

4725.0004J10987'5. u000

0.09)6093 08007.6.1442355.4999456.484760.1420

F Pc.1 CF C--PC T

190 40.0 415 100.0285 Oi3e0 285 60.0

4750.vz.vooua 504000

285.010Li0..30 +00.4,4 90.49040.4a667

24. What was your district per pupil expenditure last year?

LES TION 24

IAA El Check here if you don't know

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT -PCTcf. F FLT CF C

0.0 - 199.99 1.2 4.7 26.5 100.0 524 14411_30.0200.00 5996'99 500 14.0 25.3 91.3

_13, 44 /403 226 94.6

600600 999.99 16.3 414.3 284 79.3 :149 0108 104 14. 31044h - 1349.19 ol,o4_,_ JAIL 3.7 14.i 27 114 3 1441400.00 - 1799.99 0.9 3.2 1.2 4.5 7 2.9 8 3.316G0.00 2199.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.3 0 0.0 1 0.442200.00 2599409 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.3 0 0.0 1 0.42600000 2999.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.3 0 0.0 L 0.43000.00 3344.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.3 : 0 0.0 1 0.434004003800.00

3199.99-4/99 99

_GS_0.0

0440 0.3 $.3 0 0.0 1 0.40.40.0 C.3 1.3 0 v.0 1

42 C0. 0C 4519.99 Q .0 0.0 C.3 1.3 0 14.0 1 0.44600.00 4999.99 .0 0.3 1.3 0 0.11 1 9.45000.00 5341.99

.____0.00.0 0.0 0.3 1.3 0 04 L 0.4

5400.00 5799.19 0..0 0.0 0.3 1.3 0 0.0 L 0.45800.00 6199_ 99 0.0 0.0 0.3 tc3j 0 0.0 1 .0.4t 2 CO. 00 - b599.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 163 0 0.0 1 0.44600.00 . 6999.99 0.0 0.0 C.3 1.3 0 0.0 1 0.47000.00 7399.99 0.0 U 4.0 0.3 1.3 0 4140 1 0.47400.00 7 7 4i « 99 GO; 0.0 0.3 1441 0 41;e1 1 0.47800.00 - 8000.00 0.3 1.3 0.3 163 1 04.4 1 0.4

BASES Pk0CESSEL aKG. BLANK DATA a

OISIOUN VALUE ANAIINUN VALUE *

SUN OF SCORES *SUN 5000._540RES AMEAN a

STS10. DEV. (NIAPO. 00(.....01!41 aNEDIAN

IAEST ION 44A

26";5i26230.0000

3.0000000.0000

22001.00/40.371251311

2963e68194069

769 62002

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT

..... apt234

3.000004111440400

1115141.418000.215771W 09

-7-8797550.497552./055

G7 P -6LW F PL.7 GF C-PCT

.... _. _ --00.. -01.000

27.7 52.3 52.9 100.0 . 250225

51.647.4

475425

100.047.425.2 47.7 25.2 47.71

cifkgteltAkssEP 52.6877 47 5MINIMUM VALUE a 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE a 14.0000 1 0000SUM OF SCORES a 25.2176 225.000SUS 503,. SCORES * 254 1 is 223.0000REAN .4788 0.4737

0.4.9 95 0.4991SIND. DEv. 14-11 A 0.5043 0.4954SEC IAN a 0.4556 0.450o

25. What are the total funds allocated for compensatory reading in your school?

GUE II ON 25

SCORE INTERVALS

0.0 _ 2199.992200.00 6599.9966 C0.04 10999.9911000.00 - 15399.9915400.00 19799. 9919800 .00 24199.9924200.00 26 599 .99266 00.00 32999.9933000.00 . 37399.9931400.00 41799. 9941800 .00 46159.9446200 .00 50599.9950600.00 54999.9955000.00 59399 .9959400.00 63799.9943800.00 66199. 9466200 72559. 94/2600600 76999.9477000.00 81399.9411400.00 65799 .94158 C0.00 90199.9490200 .00 94599.9444600 .00 S6999.9499000 .00 - 103399.941 C3400 .00 -10779i±54i17400.00 -110000.00

GASES PROCESSEDNO. 6LANK OA tAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUP Sloth SCORESMEAII

SIND. DEV. 4N/S IA V. (1*-11MEDIAN

i6SII0N 2511

VAD Check here if you don't know

iCT CF P.4)L6 F ii.T 6F C.PCT

_3.0 13.9 100.0 24, 10.0.1 1.11. 100.0

1.2 10.8 78.1 13 9.9 107 81.7

3.0 9.6 69.4 25 /9A 94 71.8

1417 666, 4704 18 14.7 69 52.7

1.3 4.8 34.9 12 i;i: Cf. iii. 9

0.5 3.6 25.9 5 3.6 39 29.81.0 3.1 22.6 9 09 1.4. 2640.6 2.2 1507 7 /..1. 25 14.10.5 1.6 11.5 5 3.8 16 13.7

0e4 Lai 7.9 2 1.5 13 9.90.3 0.9 6.4 3 Z-i 11 8.40.1 0.6 4.3 1 i.i a IS 8 6.1084. 04_ 3.4 4 0.8 7 5.30.1 0.4 2.9 1 0.8 6 4.60.0 Co3 2.4 1 0.8 5 3.80.0 0.3 2.1_ 0 0.0 4 3.1

0.0 0.3 2.1 0 060 4 3.1

0.1 13.3 2.1 1 0.8 9 3.1

0.2 0.2_, 1.0 a 1.5 3 2.30.0 0.1 0.5 0 4.0 1 0.80.0 0.1 0.5 0 0.0 1 0.8_o.0 C.1. 0.5 0 00 1 0.8

0.0 0.1 0,5 0 4.4) 1 0

U.0 0.1 0.5 U ki 0 1 0.8

_.Q_s1 0.1 .4 1 0.8 1 0.8

0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

8.622.Q12.19.03.3bog4.23.61.12.10.90.5C.60.20.00.00.51.1_C.00 00

0.00.00.00.5C.0

a 1/4E0933i0 .0000

0.0JC.000.0000i0S128.6815

0.6802891E 1015109 .12t016160 .335916796.671'41 C484. 6066

F FLT

/31344

CitI0 431. y 090_

i236171.00000.79998096 Ll

17047.144511690.472711959./52311855.3547

. .

CF PtiL T

0.0 14 .7 27 *8 52.9 100.0 145-1.000

CASES PROCESSED aMINIMUM VALUEMAXI MUM VALUE aSUM OF SCURESSUM Ms SCORES aMEANSTNO. 0E9. 1M/SIND. CE V. 4611)Mk01AN

/0-

38.2 72.2 38.2 72.2 330

52.88170.01.0660

38.141638 .16560.7216o.4#0120.45250.8011

i.F CPCT

30.5 475 400.069.5 330 69.5

4756;u1.00uv

330.0000

000940.4605

0.7803

26. What are the costs per pupil of compensatory reading in your school?

CU;cS11ON 26

SCORE /NTERVALS

ttO

200.00 599.99600000 999.99

1000.00 13996991400.00 1 7S90 991800.00 - 2199,99

2iatt D Check here if you don't know

F ief CF 01LW F Pc.7 itf C-.PCT

7.I.j_ 511.4. I1 a8_100 .4.) 68 59.64.5 35.4 5.3 41.6 38 33.30.3 3.5 C.8 6.2 5 4.40.0 0.0 _..0.1...._ 2.7_ si.... 0.00.1 1.1 0.3 2.7 1 0.90Q 0.0 0.2 1.6 0 0.0

C42 Lets 0 0.00.2 /.6 1 0.9Col 0.7 0 0.0

AA__ Oft 7 0 0000.1 0.7 0 iile00.1 0.7 0 0.0

22 00 .00 2599.99 O. C 0.02600600 2998.49 0 al 0s93000.00 3594499 0.0 0.03400 aCk0 31189.99 _ _

3800.00 4149.99 0.0 0.04200.00 - 4599.99 0.0 0.04600.00 4999.995000.00 5399.995400.00 5799.995800000 6199.996200.00 6599.996600800 - 6999.997000.00 7399.997400.00 7799.997800.04 8199.998200.00 85 59.998600.00 8999.999000 .00 9399.999400.00 - 9799.991800.00 100004.00

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA is

MINIMUM VALUE °MA X1 MUM VALUESUN OF SCARES aSAJA SQ0. SCORES aREAM_ _ _ .

SMOG OEV IN1 A

SIND. OEV. (1011MOVJAh

cuesti

scutke INTEkVALS

1.000

CASES PROCESSED aMI hi MUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE z

&Le spkEsSUN SOD. SCORES a

AN a

itNO. (AV. 03 aSTNU. UEV tt-1 3 aMEO1AN

OeC 0.0 0.1 0.7 0 41.00.0 0.0 Col 0.7 0 O.0.4 0e0 Col 0.7 0 . 0.00.0 9 .0______ 0 0.0

114 100.046

8______4

40.47.0.2.6

3 2.62 Le$a 1e82 1.8L 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.41 0.91 0.9..__o.i. ___._

0. 0.0 0.1 0.7 0--i.0-------"-----C----"6; 90.0 0.0 0.1 Del 0 0.0 1 0.9

._0.0. G.0 0.1 0.7 0 {40 1 0.90e0 CO Co1 Oa 4-----O-ai--- -1---13-6-904 0.0 Os& 0.7

_ o9Q. _

0.1 0.7 0.1 0 e70.0 0.0 1'0.0 -0.0o.c _._.04t0._170 .30.0 0.0 e 0 .1.0.0

355800000.0

90.0G00 _ _ .

3737.884813670694000

292.8455-605.0 986838.62431AZ..21111

0 0.00 ilo01 i1.90 41.000 ia.0-

L 0.91 0.9

.0.943 0.00 0.00 O.0

114

0.09000.0000

1-613-4.6!Oiri0.99841441 48

301.419281144;4349888.4602135.4939

F PCT CF 1313Liti F Pia 4F CPCT

14.4 4;4 5x.9 100 124 Lb.L 475 100.07i *4 14.8 39.6 74.6 351 73*9 351 73.9

52s$ I 17_.0.0000

39.562039.56300.74800.434104.4383U.6315

4750.101

14.10i;i045 16 VOUO451.4000

0.73890.43920.43910. 0244

\27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, please

provide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.


Total cost of programIF



06631ION 21 Pan a

SCORE INTERVALS F PU CF P0$.8 F Cf Cog.PCT

0.0 9999.99

3041.: 512::

.41 100.0 32 delie 7.1.100.01400060030000.00

. 291911.9449919.89

3t$10

0.4104.0

5.134447

44.411044.

0 43:34- 5.6

39 54.911.3

_50004.01 70000.00 0.4 4.4 4 doe 4 5.47400400 - 6999904 0.0 0.0 0.2 2 a 0 4.0 4 2.840000.06 -.109999.94 0.0 0.0 002 2.2 0 1.0 2 2.81104V0.00 -129999.94 0.1 1.3 0.2 2.2 1. 1.4 2 2.8130000.00 ..1499916i4 0.0 0.0 04 044 0 040 1 1.4150000.00 °149999.14 0.0 04 0.1 0.8 0 0.0 A 1.4110000.00 169949.94 Oot 434 0.1 OA 0 OA 1 1.4190000.00 209999.94 0.0 C.0 0.1 0.8 0 0.0 1 1.4210040.00 -229999.94 0.G 0.0 C.1 0.8 0 0.0 1 1.4230040.0C ...449999.94 04 000 ;AA 0.8 0 0.0 1 1.42500041.00 . 269999.44 0.0 0.0 O. O. 0 040 1 1.4220000.06 - 290000.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.8 0 0.0 1 1.4290000006 - 310000 ,0Q 0.0 040 Qol 0.8 0. JO

0 4 .4.1

1.41.- -f.4110000.06 -330000.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.43

130000.06 ..150000.00 0.0 0.0 C.1 0.6 0 Jo0 1 i.4350000.06 -470004.00 0.0 OA 0.1 0.4 0 __9.QL

0-1 1.41 /.4370000.04 .'390000.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 0441

390400.06 '410044.00 004 0.0 O. 0.8 0 0.0 1.4410000.06 ..420000.00 0.1 0.8 0.1 0_2 1

. . _ 1 1.4

LASES PROCESSEDNU. dLANK DATA 0

Iff

7.8453 71494

11.4MIMIPUM VALUE.4.004:10

0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 420000.0000 420000..004u

OF SCOTS- u 13109101210 031580.4000_SlipSUM 5,50. SCOkES

_

0.144652E 11MEAN 17842.3945 4A57/.06DisTAy. Af .._011124i41_ 950.7109SIND. DEVe I11 -41 0 44087.7144MEDIAN a 9484.11247 144154.0626

27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, please


Program Program Program Program3 4

Total cost of program (lb)Cost of personnel:ProfessionalOther


.

F

8 ta1d4

CFCZFCT

41 100.0

ONEST ION 27

SeCaliE 1NTEKVALS

0.0 . 799:99

F

0.9

FCT

24.0

CF P4316

3.9 100.0800.00 2399.14 0.2 4.4 300 16.0 I -Tar- 33111.4

2440.00 3919.59 0.2 4.2 24 714 3 7.0 32 74.4400040 5599.99 0.4 GO 2.6 67.1 0 460 29 67.45600.00 7199.99 0.3 4.1 2.4 47.1 3 lra isi-40;ii7200.00 .. 8799.94 0.4 10.0 2.3 59.0 4 9.3 24 60.54440600 - 10399.99 0.3 7.9 1.9 49.0 4 9.3 22 51.210400.00 - 11,59.94 0.2 8.6 106 41.1 2 -4-..-.7- i8 41a12000.00 .. 13599.19 0.4 14,7 1.4 35.6 5 11.4 16 37.213600.00 . 13199.99 0.1 64 466 20.9 3 7.0 11 25.615200.00 ' . 16199.99 0.1 3.5 0.6 16.4 .2 7..-7 6 18.616450.00 18399.99 0.1 2.0 604 10.9 1 4.3 6 14.016400.00 - 19999.94 0.1 1.6 4.3 4.9 I 4.4 i 11.624000.00 ... 21599.99 0.0 0.9 0.3 7.3 i Zip 4 11:3

21604400 -.. 23199.99 0.0 0.0 443 6,4 0 000 3 7.023240.40 24799.99 0.4 4.0 G.3 6.4 0 0.0 3 7.024400.00 - 26399.99 i, .0 0.0 0.3 6.4 0 3.-0 3 7-.0

26404.00 . 27999,99 0.1 lee 0.3 604 1 2.1 3 7.0

24040.00 29599.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.6 0 0.0 2 4.1

29600.00 ... 11199.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.6 0 3-ai 2 4.1

31200400 - 327499.99 0..0 0.0 0.2 446 0 0.0 Z 4.1

32440.00 -. 34311909 0.0 0.0 C.2 606 0 0.0 2 4.1

34400.40 35999.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.6 0 4.0 2 4.1

36040.00 .. 37599.99 0.0 0.0 G.2 4.6 U 0.0 2 4.137600.01 - 39200.00 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.6 0 0.0 2 4.1

39200.01 40000.00 0.2 4ei 0.2 4.6 2 4o-7 2 4.1

CASES PkOCESS60 " .3.9250_ 43NO. BLANK CATA 0 425.0000 -4nMINIMUM VALUE " 0.0 0.44

PAXIMUM VALUE " 39852.0000 39852.0000SUM OP SCUMS a 4iii1WIRW- 42'14424;4044

SUM SAO. SCORES a 0.67756244 09 0.79,0463e 10MEAN a 9465.4443 9984.4014SIND. OlVe (N1 " 5112.3164 922163398:)TNO. OEVe IN-11 = 10535.6415 1337.3547MEDIAN xi 8640.9140 9000.4000



Total cost of program 4)Cost of personnel:ProfessionalOther


4

.

QUESTION 37 PART C

SCOAE INTEgVALS

090 - 3 99* 99

410.40 = 1119.19 0.l 5.r1200.00 ". 1999049 Ool 9s42000600 2799 99 0.1 7.42800.00 3599.99 0.0 0.036 00.0 0 - 4399.99 0.0 0.04413000 - S119. 99 0.0 0.052 00 AO 5149.94 0.0 0.0*GOO &DO - 6 714* 99 0.3 1944680000 7399 999 09 2_ ILA_1600400 - 8399.99 0.0 0.08400.00 9199.99 (.O 04092004.00 - 9999.99 0.1 54

10000 .00 IC 71119 SS 01.0 0.018800.00 115!9«49 04.11 0.01140000 ' 12399 99 COLL 4 6124 00.00 - 13199 .9913200600 13999140 00 90 0 - 14719. 9914800 - 1551439 991560040 3`319.9916400*00 J7199.99172 00.0 0 11 999.9918000*()C 18719. 9918800 .00 - 1 9511. 9919400 .00 - 20000« CO

F KZ

0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0Oa 0.0C. 0.0

_SUS C.00.1 3.80 .0 0.0

.g_tg0.1 5.0

CF 1.81.6

1.4 _/00_441 2Sol 7544 2IA *Job 00.9 60.2

00.8 52.8a.. $2.0 0o.. 52.8 I

0.8 Oa °-OA 53 00.5 33 .40.3 31.1C.3 11.1 00.3 21.1.

04 IS .3 0aa isa 0Oa _Li .3 aO. 1097 0Qe2 10.1 00.2 100 004 10.1 00.2 10.7 0

_QA2 10.7 0C.2 10.7 -0C1 5.0 0

ALI__ SAO 00.1 5.0 1

CASES. PROCESSEQ 1.4412NO. 8L AM DATA 451.0800NI NI KIM VALUE 0.0PA X 1 MU 01 VALUE = 20000.0400SUN OF SCORES 410304746Skis SO Os SCORES * 0 e 12971146 011

8411AN__ 541,35743SING. O. 5795.5791SING. 0E11. (61-'1 104/4.3514NEIMAN

GF C-.PCT

2560 8 100.0254 0 6 75.00.0 4 50.0

A405 4 50.01.0 3 -Era4.0 3 37.5

12.5 3 17.5

0.0 2 25.00.0' 2 25.0

1F-13.15-Osti 2 25.0

5 2 25.0

0.0 1 12.50.0 & L2.5490 -1-12750.14 I 12.50.0 1 12.5

.50.0 1 12.50.0 L 12.5

1.2.54.1.0 1 U.S

12.-5

81.67

42000...1004474514000

0.41931/9a 49994.41254

o716.36Z44500.4000

27. If there are separatc compensatory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.



Cost of personnel:Professional

11111111Other


QUESTION

SCORE

0.0500.001500.002500.00

27 PAR1 0

INTERVALS

- 499.99

P

0.1

PCT

17.4

Cf 111.44.M

C.8 100.0

F

4

PGT

46.5

GF C -PCT

a 100.0- /4494.49- 24,9.1,

3499.19

0.8Qa04.2

18.50.0

24.4

447-0.544

84.403.9-43.9

121

5a9&lig'5.9

LA.1641

1,0

74:570.6$8:8

3500.00 - 4499.99 o.o 0.0 0.3 39.5 0 0.0 9 52.94500.0,0 + 5499.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 31:5 0 44 9 52.95500.00 + 6499.99 0.1 14.4 AO jea 0 '4,W 9 52.96500.00 - 7419.99 0.0 0.0 .0.4 MO 0 a" 9 52.97500.00 ... 8499.19 0.0 0e0 Oil 25.0 2 AL.* 9 52.98500.00 - 9499.99 0:0 0,0 0.2 25.0 3 1104 7 41.29500.00 - 10499.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 25.0 0 4.0 4 23.5

10500.00 - 11499.99 0.0 4.0 0.2 25.0 0 0.0 4 23.511500.00 - 12499.19 0.1 7.9 0.2 25.0_ 1 5.9 4 23.-5_12500.00 - 13499.99 0.0 0.0 Oct 17.1 0 000 3 17.613500000 - 14499.49 0.0 0.0 0.1 17.1 0 0.0 3 17.614500.00 - 15499.99 cle.C___ 00_ 0.1 11.1 1 ao9 3 1.1015500.00 - 16499.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 17.1 0 J.0 2 U.S16500.00 - 17496.99 0.0 0.0 C.IL 17.1 0 0.0 2 11.811500.00 - 18499.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 17.1 0 " 2 11.814500.00 - 19499.19 0.0 0.0 La 17.1 0 °.0 2 /1.8-19500.Q0 - 20459.99 0..0 04.0 0.1 17.1 0 000 2 11.820500.00 + 21499.99 040 0.0 Owl 17.1 0 4e0 2 11.821500.00 + 22499.99 0.0 12.-1- 1 5.9 A 11.8GO 00122500.00 -. 23499.99 0.0 0.0 Col 17.1 0 0.0 1 5.9.23500.104 - 24499.99 0.0 0.0 _0.1 _174,1_ 0 0.0 i 5.924500.00 - 25000.00 0.1 17.1 0.1 17.1 IL 9e9 1 5.9

cAsks,iTucsEo 4 0.83781400 8LANK CATA 458MINIMUM VALUL a 0.0 0.0WI.MUM VALUE __25_040400. 20000.0400

5849.6914 140334.0.40410

SUM SQ0, SCURES 04059048E 49 0.120334LL 10MEAN

(11)

AA

7006.1A11_8793.3594

2?02000Ou599

ME 0I AN i0429.03E8 bat:646090200.0000




Cost of personnel:Professional 0Other


QUESTION 27 PART E

F

6.

15

.142313_0

PUT CF CPCT

5 48 103 _1.00.0/00i-- -9-7141.4 $4.463.k. .....A_22.3 29244 36

.,3,4._. ... _25_44.9 15

/.9k9_.. 8

"-"0 5

A " .j

i .0 4

a.0 3

. IA 3

0.0 2

kleiti 21.0 213.0 1

000 1

Usk° _ ;job

___

1

0.0 L

4o0 1

LOD372

94.283.5?Q.'?57.335410

42.-314.6

7.85.84.94.93.92.92.91.91.91.91.01.0

1.01.01.01.0

SCORE INTERVALS

0.0 1249.1V

t PCT CF P°'8LW

OA,Ji 4 . 4 11.1 100.01250.00 3749.993150.04 6249.996250.00 - 8149.99

1.1 15.5 10061.6 14.1 ke01.4 11.8 1.3

95.600.063_. 9

4750.00 - 11249. S911250.00 13141.4913150.00 - 16249.49

2.3 20.5 5.9Lo4 12.6 3.60.4 7.6 $a

33.132.620.0

16250001 . 187$0.0018190.01 21230.0021230.01 - 23150.00

0.6 5.0 1.40.2 1.50.2 1.6

.$4.6

12.4445.9

-5

2

- ..2

23750.01 - 26250.0C26250.01 - 2019044028750.01 -. 31250 .00

0.0 0.3 040.0 0.0 0.4C 0 0.3 0.4

4.23.93.9

10

_ 1.

31250.02 33750 .0033150.02 36250.4036250.02 - 38750.00

0.1 CA 0.40.0 0.0 0.30.1 0.6 0.3

3.62.62.6

1

0_2

38750 .02 - 412:0..0141250.02 431506.0143750.02 46250.01

0.0 0.0 0.20.0 0.0 0.2G.1 1.1 0.2

2.02.02.0

0

0I

46250.02 - 487504144750.0a - 51250.0111210.03 5315 0.-0.

0.0 0.0 010.0 0.0 0.1co ,0 0.O 0.10.0 0.0 0.10.0 0.0 0.10.1 0.9 0.1

0.90.90.9.

00

00

0

1

53750 003 56250. C256250.03 50150.0254150.03 60000600

0.90.90.9

CASES PROCESSED m

igicALANA,ORTR11.0306

30A.g_SitMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES

30.000060000.0000110430.9375

30.U00004400.4000

11.0.0).0.4400a fir77-Cli.W709.60414480V141

9565.4148

_Is_SUR SOO. SCORES m

MEAN a001925152E 10

9993.14368625.6819_sTNo.._DP19..ft.4.1

SM. OEV. (141iMEOIAM

9044.6 2509120.9117




Cost of personnel:Profeasional iOther

Cannot break down cost (s)for program (Check)

.

.

PARTUESTION 27

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF 11. lit. id

0.0 1199.99 .41 18 6.0 100.02000000 4911. 19 0.9 15.s 4.9 81450.00 7991.49 1.4 23.6 4.0 65.1$000 AO 1. 10999.99 0.9 14.8 2.1 42.1

11000.00 . 13999.99 - 1.2 20.5 1.6 27.214040o 01 17000.00 0.0 0.7 Co4 6.?11400.01 20000030 0.1 1.7 4.4 5*9ao00o.01 23041400 0.2 3.0 063 4.223000,01 4. 26000.40 0.0 0.Q 0.1 1.226000 .01 29000.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.221000.02 32000.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.$32080.02 4. 35000:00 0.0 0.0 8.1 1.235000.02 311000.01 Q.0 0.0 001 1.238000 .02 4. 41 Gies 01 0.0 0 ea 0.1 1.241000 Al 44000.01 0.0 0.0 04 10344000.02 47000.01 44.6 OA eel 1.247000.02 4. S0000 .01 0 .0 0.0 0.1 1.250000.00 - 529994 94I 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.213000.00 595919.98 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.256000 .00 . 58199.96 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.259000.00 61919.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.242000.00 .4 64919 .99 0.0 40

4.0O. I /.2

65000.00 67 999 .94 0440 0.1 1.264000.00 - 70000.00 0 *I 1.2 G.1 1.2

F PLY

12 18.59 13.4

15 Lial10 1204

1 is2 Ast

0 0.0o 0.0

0.11

0 000

C;ITC T

6$ 100.0

44 47.729 44.6

-VI.6 9.25 7.7

4.61 1.51 1.51 1.5

1.5Q J.0 1. 1.50----460--- 1--0 00 10 0.0 1Cr -Ta 10 00 1

0 4.0 10 -via- 1Q 0.0 1

0 044 10- -1.1":0"-- 11 L.5 1

0A0

°A

0

0

'6":1)111-404.000060.0000

0

41040.0000

4914114T0-00-047849.4040

L448048d 11

CASES PROCiiSE0Me BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXI MUM VALUESUM CF SCURESSUM 5514,. SORESREAMMO. DEV. ( ft 1HMOs °EV. ( 1 )

65366.06004c674.3612

.62623104 C9E288.71096283.29319071.2070_

41.A4C4

9131.44229202.4004640'0.44004

1.51.51.5-1.5 .

1.51.51.51.51.51.51.5




Cost of personnel:Professional t4)Other


G

P1.T CF C-PCTFSCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF PailLU

0.0 499.19 0.1 5.9 104 100.0 1 *4,7 _4.5 100.0500.00 - 1499.99 001 7.2 14 94 4. I 6.7 /4 93.31900.00 2499.99 002 17.5 1.2 116.8 2 133 13 86.72900.00 - 3499.99 0.0 0.0 1.0 69.3 0 0410 73o33500.00 - 44S9.99 0.3 1961 1.0 69.3 3 20.0

.4411 73.3

4500.00 5499.19 Lioe 0.0 0.7 50.2 0 0.0 8 53.35500600 - 6499.99 C.2 12...E 5_1_12, 2 8 53. 36500.00 7419 *99 Gel 7.9 445 Mel 1

_10.364 6 40.0

7900600 " 0419.99 0.0 0.0 C.4 30.2 0 060 5 33.36500.00 . 9499.19 0 o4 50 C.4 30.2 / 5 33.39500.00 10499.951 Gel 7.9 0.3 24.3 2

_b.//3.3 4 26.7

10500.00 1/ 419.19 0.Co 0.0 0.2 16.4 0 0.0 2 13.311500.00 - 12499 .99 084 C.0 0s2 16.4 0 0=0.. 2 13.312500.00 - 13499 99 0.1 6.3 0o2 16,4 1 0.7 2 13.313500.00 14499.99 0.0 0.0 Col 10.1 0 41.0 1 4.7'.

10j10.00 154 996 99 0_00 4.4_ 1901 0 "9 L 6.715500 .00 - 16494.99 0.0

_0.00.0

.

0.1_

10.1 0.

+.1.0 1 6.7.16500.00 - 17499.99 G.0 0.0 0.1 10.1 0 0.0 1 6.717500.00 18499499 Co C Co0 0.1 0 0.0 1 6.711500.00 19499.99 0 .0 0.0 Col 10.1 0 jot) 1 6.719S100A0 20499099 0.0 0.0 C.1 10.1 0 0.0 1 6.7105004100 21499.99 0.0_000 Oil 0 u.p 1 6.721500 .00 22419.59 0.0 0.0 0.1

_10410.1 0 0.0 1 6.7

22500 .00 - 23499 .99 0.0 0.0 0.1 10.1 0 0.0 1 6.743900.00 _2L*499 .99 1001 .._....4.1..1.0.$11. A Da? 1 6.7245004,00 25000600

.0.1fl .0 0.0 '.0.0 -9.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

GA5E5 PROCISSEC a 1.4042. . . . . . _ .-453.0000400.0000

24500.0000

154611

400.4004

10470004.0000

104704.00000.1.441173t 10

444_6.929729S2a-6176140.9941750.0000

NO. BLANK DATA =AINImum VALUEMAXIMUM 114.WL aSUM OF SCORES s

SU* SQD0 SCORtS a9147.1324

0.1345017E 4170441510_

STNO. (Av. th$STRO. DIV. IN.-11 aM601AN

6776.246112566.0/17


provide the following breakdown(s) of 'costs by program and by componint parts.





401710N 27 PARS'

PCT F -4 LW- f fa "LF-C4faSCORE 1 NT E RV ALS F

0.0 499059 ()e1 9.3 0.9 10060 1 14.3 7 100.0500.00 - 1499019 0.0 0.0 008 901.7 6-577

1500.00 - 2499.99 0.0 0.1 90.7 0 0.0 6 85s72500.Q0 3419.99 0 43 22.7 0.1 94.7 1 1443 6 85.Tjb00.00 4419.99 0.2 23.0 0.6 68.1 2 ii:4 5 71.44500.00 -sy 5459.49 G.0 0.0 0.4 45.1 0 1.1.0 3 42. 9

5500.00 6499.99 0.1 13.4 0.4 45 .1 1 14.4 42.965 60.00 7499.99 0.0 0.0 4.3 31.7 0.0 2 a.67560.00 8499.99 0.0 0.0 4.3 31.7 0 0.0 2 28.6E130.0 -74-560ZU

..11"12t99i0499. S9

0.0-0.G

0.0 4.3 31..7 0'0

4.0 22 28.6TG60.0 0.3 31.7

icisoo .0o - 11499.19 0.0 0.0 0.3 31.7 0 0.0 2 28.61159A.00_7_12500.00

244t9.« IP 9_

13499.99. _

0.0 C*00.3 31.7 0

00.04;0

22

28.62466C.3 31.7

13500.00 14499.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 31.7 0 0.0 2 28.614500.00 - 15499.99 0.0 0.0 4.3 31.1 0 0.0 211.6

15500.u0 16499« 49 0.0 0.0 0.3 31.7 -0- 0` :00 2 28.616500.00 17499.19 On 0.0 0.3 31.7 0 0.0 Z 28.617500.00 19499.99 04C 0.0 04 51.7 0

-IF1.00:0

22

28.628.611500.00 /9499.99 0.0 0.0 003 31.7

19300.00 20499.99 0 «I 1141 C.3 31.7 1 14.3 2 28.420500.00 2/499.99 0.1 15.9 0.1 1589 1 143 L 14.321500800 - 22449.49 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0. 0

WOO .00 - 23499.95 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.023500.00 24499.99 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

-diar0 JLi 0 0.0

24500.00 .. 25000.00_0.0 0.0 C.0 0 o.o 0 0.0

CASES PROCESSE0 *

=

0.9022461.0000

0.0

7468

0.JNU. 6LANK4ATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM * 20135000.000 ZiJ 65 0 000_yASUN OF SCORES 8006.5977 56200.4000SUP $140. SCONES * 0.1303848E G9 0.94)15976 09MEAN .

STNO is [h1 **8874.4110 6314.4152

7939.66806109.3516AiOIAN 42864158 6575.6203

425 O. 0 OLIO


Program Program Program Program2 3

'Total cost of program

Cost of personnel. .,..

Professional

NOther


I A_

.

iiil-rQUESTION 27

SGRE INTERVALS

0.0 6415.99

P

la 1

OCT

41.5700.00 2099.99 1.7 13.1

21011.00 34941.19 0.7 Ilia35_40.1410 4E99.99 0.9 11.64900.00 6299699 0.4 4.6300.00 769199 0 .1 0.97700.00 9049.99 Q.0 0.09100.00 10499.111 0.2 2.6

1090040 . 111111.419 0.0 0.01151g1.00 13299 .99 0.4 0.013300.00 1.4699.99 0.1 1.614144600 14099.99 0.0 0.014100.00 17449. 49 0,0 0.017E00 400 1$$99.99 0.0 4.016900.00 - 202SS 99 0.1 1.120300.00 21649. 99 Q.L. 0.021100.04 - Z3099.99 0 C 4.023100. 00 24499.99 0.I 1.424500 00 W 25899. 99 AAQA025900.00 27219. $9 O. 0.027300.00 2E699099 Goa 0.01E700600 30099.99 0.4 0.030100.00 31499.99 0.0 42031500, 01 - 32900.04 0.0 0.032900.01 34300.00 Q.O 0.034300 .01 350t0.40 0.1 1.4

CF POLM F PT GF C-PCT

1e5 100.0 21., 30*3 66 100.04.4 18.9 16 24.2 44 66.73.7 35.3 7 10.6 L8 42.41.9 AIS .5 6 1414 21 314.81.G 13.7 4 6.1 1.3 19.7

0. 7 da 9 1 1.5 9 13.64.6 10..1 a lie0 8 1210.6 64 3 4.5 8 12.10.4 5.5 0 0.0 5 7.60.4L 5 a 0 0.0 5 7.60.4 5 a5 1 15 $ 7.6C.3 3.b 0 0.0 4 6.10.3 3.0 0 __0.4_0.3 3.8 0 0..0

0.3 3.8 1 1.504 _LLB 9 0.004 2.8 1 L.

c.a 2.8 1 L.50 a___1.4 0 _ 04.0

0.1 1.4 0 13--:6

0.1 1.4 0 0.004 1.4 0 9.00.1 1.4 0 0.00.1 1.4 0 0.00.1_ 14,4__ 0 0.0 .

0.1 1.4 1 15

4443

CASES PRA C_ 66444NO. BLANK GAYA * 4C4.0CCO

PlNINUA VALUE s 0.0 0.0RAXIMUN VALUE * :25000.0000 4600.0090SUR CF MORES s 23093.1406 464i713-0004

SUN SOO. SCORES C 29411260E 09 0.44v84199t 10

MM!_ 1.0_614.17.45455.23C5

4640./416a171:3343SUM. O. IN/

SM. OEV. iN11 * 5858.3184 6220.6477REIMAN a 1211.2.114 662.6000

6.16.16.14.54.53.01.51.51.51.51.51.51.51.5

27. If there are separate compens4ory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following hreakdown(s) of costs by program and by component parts.


'. Total cost of program


.

OtherJ)

L]I


PART

F

1.1

SCORE INTERVALS

0.0 -" 399.99

PCT

29.1

CFP.41.0

1.4 104.4400.00 1 1 1190 19 162 113.1 1.6 70.91200.00 ' I 9S44 911 0.4 10.5 1.4 37.42000.00 ' 2749.99 4.1_0 1.0 27832800.00 3599.99 0.0 C.9 0.7 20.23600.00 4319.99 0.1 3.1 4.7 19.34400. Q0 - 5119,19 0 .0 0.0 146 16.25200*00 5949.99 0.2 5.7 0.6 1646000.00 6799.99 0.0 0.0 0.4 10.56800.04 7509099 0.1 3.0 04.2_4 )0637600.00 . 4399.99 0.1 1.8 0.2 6.81400.00 9199.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 5.09200.00 9999.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 5.010000 .00 10 7 40. g9 OA 0.0 5.O10400.00 ' 115$9.99 044 0.0 0.2 5.0104004.00 12399.99 0*C 0.0 0.2 5.012400.00 13199 .99 0.0 0.0 0.2 5.013200.00 139996 00 0.0 0.0 C.2 5.014000.00 14199.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 5.014400 a00 15599.99 0.0 000 .0.2 5.015600.00 14394.19 0.1 1.9 G.2 5.016400.00 ' 17199.19 0.1 3.1 .0.1

.C.45lel

172 00.00 . 17999.99 0.0 0.0 -4/.014000.00 18799.99 0.0 0.0 -A.0 -0.018600.00 19591.99 0.0 0.0 -0.019600.00 20000.00 0.0 0.0 .0CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK OATA aP1M1MUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALVE a50.1 Of SCORES 0

SUM SRO. SCORES 4NEAh C. _-ST Ku. Oklis (N-/1 =

3.64/$427.0000

0.0t707,1040081/9.2070

Oe 1/074341 462390.2311

4525.1/44Oilt M67,

F

131243210202100

--Z-V-C.PCT

41.0 42 100.041.6 at eto9.57.14;82.4V. 0

40.04,4 S 11.9

0.0 2 4.80.0 4 4.8

3.7 40.514 31.0

21.d 19.07 16.7

5 11.9

0 "3" 4.a000000

0

00

0.0 24.0 213 AU.0v.0

2

22

Uo

42433

0.jiI072.0000

103951.00000,86*9975c 09

4475.0237Jd10.4.242-i854542JLU3

GA a.

4.84.8.84.84.84.84.82.40.00.00.00.0




'Total cost of program



..

4USTLON 2i-- FART It

Oa C-F- C -PCSCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF PBLN

0.0 - 249.99 0.2 27.1 0.6 100.0 2 2504 __ 8 3,000150.00 749099 0.1 1506 .4 72.9 A 1205 6 75.tie AO 1249.99 0.0 4.4 003 574 1 12.5 5 62.

125040 1749.99 O.9 0.0 0e3 51.3 0 0:0 * 50.1750.00 2249.99 0.1 C.3 51.3 1 1243 4 50.2250.0C -- 2749.99 O.0 t2 0.2 32.5 1* 12.5 3 1702150.0C 3249.99 000 0.0 IC 26.3 0 ...9.0 ____Z .003250.00 8149.99 0.0 060 0.1 26.3 0 U*0 2 25.3750600 4249.99 0.0 .0.0 0.1 2603 0 000 2 25.4250:40 4149.99 0.1 0.1 26.4 0 _0.0 2 25.4750.00 5249.99 0.0 0.0 6.1 26.3 0 0.0 2 25.5250000 5749 99 0 0.0 Col 26.3 0 0.0 2 25.5150.00 6249.99 0.0 000 C. 1 26.3 0 0.0_ 2 25.6250000 749.49 0.0 0.0 0.1 28.3 0 0.0 2 25.6750400 7249.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 26.3 0 0:0 Z 25.7250.00 749.99 g. i 11.6 0.1 26.3 1

o0

11.11ii.4--0.0

211.

a.1i.12.

7750.000250.00

8249.998749.99

0.430 Al

C.00.0

0.1001

14.714.7

4750.0 C 9249.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 14.7 0 O0 1 12.9250 AO 9749.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 14:1 0 4.0 1 12.975040 10249099 0.0 0.0 0.1 14.7 0 0.0 L 12.

/0250:00 10749.99 O. C G.0 0.1. 14.7 0 40 1 12.1C750.00 11249.99 0.0 0.0 (1.1. 14.7 0 61.0 1 12.11250000 11 749099 0.0 OA 0.1 1,4.7 0 0. 43 1 12.11750.00 - 12 000:00 0.1 14.7 0.1 14.7 1 /4... 1 12.

CASES PROCESSEDNO. IL *AIWA

NI NUM VAL U t114111 NUN VALUESUN of SCORE SSUN 500. 4COM5 aNtAkSINO. OEV. 46)MEW AN

0.56%_1.6.0.0400

0.012000.04C0

1094.29220.1649578E 04

3125 .6141114230.14.711115.0)27

8441

00a12000.4004Z511.4000

0.21180211" 093188.47i040270,46174305..1203A75060004

\27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following breakdown(s) of 'costs by program and by component parts.





LOJEST ON 27 PART L

F OCT CF CPCTaURE INT ERV ALS F PC, CF PASLW

0.0 - 199 e99 0.1 13.2 0.6 100 .0 4614 5 100.0-8(40200.00 599.99 0.3 53.1 0.6 136.8 2 406 4

6 00.00 999.99 0.0 o.o 0.2 33.1 0 000 2 40.01000.00 1399.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 33.1 0 044 A

--------240.0

--4-U0140Q.00 1159.99 0.0 0.0 13.2 33.1 0 0.0IA 00400 2199 99 0.6 C.0 0.2 33.1 0 000 2 40.02200.00 -.- 2599.99 G. G

U.00.0CA

0.2 33.1 00

OAOa

2 40.040.026 00.00 2999.99 41.2 33.1

.3000600 - 3399.99 0 .0 0.0 0.2 33.1 0 " ° & 40.03400.00 3115.99 0.0 04

0.00.2 33.1 0 6L10

0.022

_40.040.03800 .00 - 4199.99 0.0 0.2 33.1 0

4200.00 4599.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 33.1 0 10 2 40.046 00.9 4999 .99 0.1 22.1 0.2 33.1 1

.040.0 2 40.0

a;ki 1 Z0.05000e00 5399.99 0.0 040 0.1 10.45400.00 5799.99 0 .0 0.0 0.1 10.4 0 04 1 20.05600.00 6199.99 0.0

15 .00.0U.0

0.1 10.4 0 0.04.0

1 20.020-00200.00 - 65 99. 99 0.1 10.4 0

66 00.00 - 6999.99 C. 0.0 0.1 10.4 0 00 20.07000.00 7 399.99 0 eC

0.10.0 0.1 10.4 0 U.

443-a0'

11

20.020.07400.00 7799 .99 10.4 0.1 10.4 1

140000 130(10.40 0.0 060 00 000 0 4" 0 0.0

0.6339463.0000

5470

0.07113;11-000

14090.00000.60400506 06

--1-76P/e59-904032.76964490.164)

500;4040

CASES PROCESSEDNO. 6LANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE

aaa

MAXIMUM VALUESUN OF SCOPESSUP SW. SCORES wo

7463.40001316.7019

7226041.000MEANSM. 000. (N!MEDIAN

2080 .25442659.2 5394 74.1/38



Total cost of program1 --1


r

Other

Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check) .4)

9.

DC6511061 27 PART N

F

24.028.9

215260

CF C.-PCT

4S.b 475 100.0

SCORE INTERVALS

Q.0

PCT CF

4504 52.9

81. w

100.01.000 54.6 28.9 54.6 54.7 260 54.7

CASES PROCESSED 52.6817 47AXI NI MUM VALUE 0.0 o.aPA XI NUN VALUE a 1.0000 10000SUS OF SCOPES a 18..116 160. 0000SUN SOO. SCONES 26 .49 16 260.4000SEAN 0.5463 0.1474MO. DEW. I 60 0.4979 0.4476SIND. 06V. 04'4 I 0.5426 0. 4964

M:01 AN a 0.5646 0 24$0

4 6.16 STI ON 27 PART IA

SCGI4k INT E ALS F PCT CF P -8LW F PT F CPCI

36.5 69.1 52.9 100.0 317 on.7 475 100.01 .000 16.4 34.9 16.4 30.9 1.56 .3 156- 43.3

CASES : 52.8177 405.

SI NI Ali VALUE a 0.0 0. 0

MAXIMUM VA LUk s 1.0000 L.0000SUN OF SCOKES a 16.3532 156.4000SiiiSQ00 SCORES aSEAN

16.36324.3012 1522

SIND 0 DEV. INS a 0..41240 .4666

0.'7120.4417NO. toOl (N-1.1 .

SE0 LAN = 0.2238 0.4.492

27. If there are separate compensatory reading programs in your school, pleaseprovide the following breakdown(s) of costs by program and by component pafts.


Total cost of program1 ]


Cannot break down cost(s)for program (Check) (9) (e)

GUESTION PART 0

F Pi.i GF C.PCTSCOR E INTERVALS F PCT GP 101k

0.0 4401 a3.4 52.9 100.0 392 61.5 475 100.01.000 6 I 16.6 8.8 14.6 43 11.3 i3 17.5

CASES PROCESSED a 52.84170.;-aMINIMUM VALUE O. 0

MAXIMUM VALUE a 1.0000 1.0000SUN UF SCOAES 83.0000SUM SOO. SCORES

_..274750.7475 104)000

MEAN 0 oli Ss 6.174/STNO. 01V. 041 0.3119 ..411.40/97S Th0. OE V. / a 0.3154 0.4801ME 0I AN 4 0944 0.1059

P ART P

SCURF INTERVALS F PC I CF p.431.10 F. kJ F*C...FCT

o.0 46.4 92.2 52.9 100.0 432 90.9 475 100.01.000 4 .1 1.3 4.1 T .8 43 901 43 if. 1

CASES PPM& SEG . SjLoll

MINI MUM VALUE 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 4 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 49124,5U4 SOO. Scames 4.1265ME AN 0.0140

54m0._Piv. oik___Ti__ ____ 04602 ___

S1,w. ULVo ite.// a 0.270BMLOIAN a 0.0423

4700.01.0000

43.U000

O. U9050.469

0.449b

28. How many pupils participate la (each of the) compensatory reading program(0 inyour school? (If there is more than one program answer separately for each. Ifindividual children participate In more than one program, count them in each total)

Member of Pupils

Program 1

'Program 2

Program 3

Program 4

?4ES71DN 3d PART A

CF C4CTSCORE INTERVALS F FCT CF ft-8L 10

O.0 24.99 11 .9 28.0 41.5 1 00. 0 94 4t1 444 100.025.00 ... 74.90 19.4 30.2 35.6 72.0 177 3149 340 78.875.00 '.. 1a4.,9 6.0 1369 16.2 SSA 75 169 173 39.0

125.00 -. 1744_99 105 100 IA 1960 17 3.6 96 22.4175.00 .' 224.99 2.1 4.2 ta 15.9 20 45 ili 18.2225.00 ..- 274.99 2.0 4.0 9.4 11.4 17 3.9 61 137275.00 324. 99 1.0 2.0 US 701 _14_..-___407 44 9.932540 .. 314.80 00 14 1.9 Sae 8 isi/ 341- 7.2375640 -. 424649 0.6 1.1 401 44: 6 &.4 24 5.4425.00 + 474.99 0.3 005 106 102 3 9.7 16 4.1475.00 524.99 0.5 1.0 1.3 2.6 5 iol 15 3.4525.00 - 574.09 0.2 0.4 068 1.7 3 0.7 10 2.3515.00 - 624.19 0.1 0.2 C.6 2 I. 0.2 7 1.6625600 .. 614.99 0.1 0.1 0.5 101 / 002 b 1.4675.00 - 724.90 0.4 0.9 U.S 0.9 i 4 044 5 1.1725.00 - 774.99 0.4 060 0.1 Q el_ 0 0.0 0.2775.00 - 124.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.2825.00 -. 874 a 99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.2915.00 - 924.99 0 .0 0.0 0.1 (1_ 0 u410 1 0.2'925.00 474040 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 0040075.00 -. 1024.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 as() 1 0.2

1025.00 1074.99 94 0.0 0.1 0 IL-1

0.21C75.00 1124.94 U el Col G.1

_AWL_0.1 1 62 0.2

1125.00 1174.99 0.O 0.0 ..C C -0.0 0 oti 0 0.01115600 .- 1200300 0.0 0.0 010 -G.0 0 uO 0 0.0

CASES PROCESSEDNU fas AN It DATA a

1 &1

49.414331.0000

444314; uoao

4.4.00.40046046.0000

$111.61 NUN VALUE w

1,AX! MUM VALUESUN t SCURF S i

4.000O1100. CC CO4E110 . 5130

SUI4 $0D. SCORES aMEAN17ND. ULY. CIO_ AL

3950.000004.5664

12441_55126.1161

53.0516

Od108.211713564245/-3-57;76i61.4.58[

sup. ay. IN*11 aFEW AN a

'

28. How many pupils participate in (each of the) compensatory reading program(s) inyour school? (If there is more than one program answer separately for each. Ifindividual childrenIparticipate in more than one program, count them in each total)

Number of Pupils

odistiom

Program 1

'Program 2

Program 3

Program 4

PART 111

F

1010.0 -

INTERVALS

29444

F

110

PGT

44.6

CF P-111.41

Z6.2 100.0

PEI trrPC1i9i.8 254 100.0

10.04 ss/GAO

110601 Is

69494.109 AO1044.04

0.83.0la

33.811.3

4.11

16.8goo4.1

554421.610.2

iFFTCW--Til 64:233 1300 4 25.214 s.5 11 12.2

-Kr-150.00190.00x34.00 -

149699229.99269:49

0.30.20.4

1.30.61.6

1.51.21.0

5.134.34.0

4 1.6 1.72 0.8 13 5.14 1.6-i- -.4- -rli 4.3

2:81 4.4 6 2.40 4 *0 5 2.0

-1** 4.1:4-- "3 -2.01 0.4 4 1.61 0.4 3 1.21 Ao 4 OA0 0.0 1 0.40 0.0 1 0.40_.- 'O;o ................1 ).4 1 0.4

270.00310.00330.00

AI .99349.9938194 49

0 .10.10.a

Oa0.30.0

Coe4460.5

2 012.11.8

390.00430.00 .470.00 -

429. 99469.44509.99

Gel0.00.1

0.50.2C.3

0.50.30.3

1.8la1.1

5104 00 s'550,00510.00 -

549 .99549.94629.99

0.10.00.0

040.0000

La4.10.1

0 a0.20.2

630.00 -670.00 -

469.99700.00

0.00.1

0.00.2

0.10.1

---0:2O.

'254CASES FRUCESS EC 26./619NO. SLANK DATA 214. GGRG 221RINI NUN VALUE 0.0 OokiMAXIMUM VALUE 646.0000 Wr6;31100SUM OF SCORES a 1514.4744 /6130.0080SUM SOO. SCORES a 214749. 4374 ta24396. +1000NE AO = 58.0461 -61;51119-STNO. 001. IN) a 14.5310 64.2/71MO. 04V. ii0.1) 81.4021 84.4411MbOIAN a 26 .3448 41:11154

28. Now many pupils participate in (each of the) compensatory readig program(s) inyour school? (If there is more than one program answer separately for each. Ifindividual children participate in more than one program, count them in each total.)

Number of Pupils

Program I

=Program 2

Program 3

Program 4

PART

F

5.7

SCORE INTERVALS

0.0 - 29.19

PCT

504

CF I"'

11.3 100.030.00 69.99 Z.7 23 ig6 .49.570 600 109.99 1..2 11.0 2.11 237

110.00 10.99 SILL la 14.6150.00 189 .99 001

_221GT 1.3 11.6

190.00 229.99 060 0.0 1.2 11.0230.00 269. 99 0.4270.00 - 3101.19 0.1

_1.10.6 0.9 /a?

310.00 349.91 0.3 2.4 CA 7.1350.0 0 389.99 A.1 C. / 0.5 4.7390.00 429.99 0.1 0.6 0.4 34430.00 - 469.99 0 el 0.6 4.4 3.3410.04 - 509.99 0.1 0.7 G.3 Tel510.00 549.94 0.0 124 0.2 1.11350.00 519.99 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.9510.00 629.99 eel 4.7_ 0.2 1.9630.00 69.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.2670.00 - 100.00 0 .1 1.2 C.1 1.2

F

49311441

03I2

r1

1

01

0L

PA.T

44.1

1.F

6231LT

C-PC

1100055.927.915.3

2Te912.63.b0.9 13 II./0.0 La 10.84.7 12 10.80.9 9 6.11.8 8 7.20.9 b 5.40.9 5 440.9 4 3.6u.9 3 2.7

0.0 2 1.80.9 2 1.80.0 "

0.9 L 0.9

CASES P4OCESSEDNU. BLANK DATA

a 11.317035144000

411364

MINIMUM VALUE a 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 0 682.0CCO 682.0003SU6 3 SCORES 878.7747 13 6 0000

..s0_4410,.Acuokk4 !" 240004.6113 4434328.00007/4409'MAN

STNO. DEW. (Ni 113 .1903 123.0154

IJN40.PEVA a 1.29.0109 123.0335MECLAN 19.5700

28. How many pupils participate in (each of the) compensatory reading program(s) inYour school? (If there is more than one program answer separately for each. Ifindividual children participate in more than one program, count them in each total.)

Number of Pupils

Program 1

Program 2

Program 3

Program 4

CF PabLN F. -"kJ- '0 C-KT

4LIESTI ON 28 PART

FSCORE INTERVALS PCT

0.0 - 19.99 1.4 164,5 5.3 100a 16 49.6-33.

54 100.020.00 59.99 1.9 36.5 3.9 73.5 111 3 38 7T)7. 4

40.00 . 99.99 0.8 14.1 2.0 37.0 7 13:0 20 37.0100.00 .. 139.99 0.1 2.8 1.2 220 2 34 13 2401140.00 ... 179.99 0.4 7.3 1.1 2Q ..0, 4 . 744 AL 20.4180.00 119.99 0.1 1.6 0.7 1Z.4 1 1.9220.00 ..- 259.94 0.1 1.6 0.6

0.5i.4s.t..i).6

1.9aatxl 1113..01

260.00 299.94 0.0 0.0340400 ... 339.99 0.2 3.0 005 9. 2 34 5 9.334044 - 379,.99 0.0 0.0 4.4 646 OA 3 546-56-73-C-6).-0 411.99 0.0 0.0 0.4 6.6 0 4.0 3420.00 - 459.99 4.1 1.5 0.4 6.6 1 1 9 3 5.6460.00 .- 499.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.1 0 O.0 2 3.7500.00 - 539.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.1540.00 579.99 0.0 4.0 0.2 Ca 0 aa 3.7580.00 - 6t9.99 0.1 1.6 0.2 4.1 1 149 2 3.7

0.0 0.0 440-620.00 -. 655.99660.00 - 699.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.42 0 Veit 1 1.9700.00 - 739.99 0.!..G. 0,0.. 001 1.6 a a

'a-.1 1.9

740.00 - 779:09 0 .0 040 Col 244T"- 0- 0 1 16-9780.00 - 819.99 0.0 0.0 C.1 2.6 0 44.0 1 1.9820.00 0.0 0.0 2.6_ ,..0 0.0

---d1 1. 9.r...

860.00 -.659.99899499 O. G 0.0

.4.1O.1 2.6 0- 1

900.00 - 939499 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.6 0 u.0 1 1.9940.00 L-980.00

979.9910066

011oso

4.6oike

0.1a0.0 0.G

10-

l.94.010

1.90.0

CASES PROLES SELA

f.3 5i 54421RLAMX -DATA 415 4000

MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUt 147.0000 9474u000SUM OP SCORES a 550.8130 379. 0000SUM SOO. SCORESMEAN

IA

a223365.4115

10344236L964597.0000

99.6111176 .7595 163.-avasSIND. 0EV. itNii

S] D. DEW. I N-1 196 .1290 /65.Z20dE I AN 45.7463 44..0.44

29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box 0.

UUETION 29

SCORE INTERVALS F

0.0 4561.000 19

CASES PROCESSED 0

CF CPC7 F

90041 475 100s 0 51.1

FC7 CF-P6Lw

96.7 5_39 100.04.0 19 460 L*11

475

3.3 14 3.3

52.11017MINIMUM VALUE a (44) 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.4000 1.00004404 OF SCORES = 19.4000 1.7321,4410 SOO. SCORES = 19.0000 1.7521WAN 0 0.0400 0.0331amO. DEV. IN1 la 0.1940 001790STNO. DEV. IN-Il a 0.064 0.LSC7MkOIAM a 0.4406 0.0171


PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4..a o 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

in In 1-1 in in 1-1 in in r-i in in r-IN 1 1 N 1 1 N I 1 N I I

I kr) ri I VD r-I I D -.1 I D 1-10 r- es.' in 0 1-1 t-st in 0 r-I N trt 0 r-I N toGrade

(14 ED EI 0,1E1 El (0001:14100041ASTICh 29 PART A

CF 04LN F Poi CF C--PCT

1.000 22.7 70..2 29.1 100.10 195 74..1 43 100.02.000 4.3 14.5 7.1 23.9 38 14.4 68 25.93.000 0.9 3.0 2.b 9.3 10 4.8 30 11.44. 000_..._.....___ "9 e.3 LP. _60 20 7.6 7.6

CASES PROCES S EL/ 4NO.. IL MK OA T A 0

29.82932060000

63212

--I.;1000.4.0000

481.000075 -7 ...at li

1.4491O. 68..00.4447-1.1744

PI NI MUM 118Ltik *Pi1X1 NUN 9 ALUi *SUM CF SCO8E S 0

_ .

1.04C04.0000

41.608278.2660

1.39490.8235._. -_______0.8316

.

11365

Sul 540. wAes .MEAN aSING. DE 9 IN) 'aiiiii;-Ri;64.4i0E01 At. sz

29. Approximately what percent: of the pupils at each grade level in yourk school

participate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box 0.

PROGRAM 1

8r-I

1-10 r-IV)

tr)Grade

PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 30o o

tr)eV 1 1

I %ID0 CsI letr-I 0

PROGRAM 4lc, 00 0 8 2tr) tn 1 -i in

CV I I CI I I

I VD I %ID 6-I1-1 C.4 U1 0 r-{ C.4 U1

K Vi) El El E.] Or] El t40 CI CD GI OD CI 1:1QLES71ON 29 PART 8

SCURE INTERVALS F PCT CF P..81.111 -F --04a CF C....PCT

1.000 ioa 83t1_ 42.1 100.0 19.A _OA_ A44 100.02.000 4.5 12.6 2.0 16.3 46 43.0 20 14.33.000 0.1 4.2 4.5 3.8 1 0.8 4 3.34.000 0.3 1.4 0a4.6 A__ ___ 4,4 ______ I .214

6A4ES PROCESSEDND. BLANK DATA =PIN1PUM VALUE aMAXIMUM VALUE *

__OF SCORES aSUM Si. 0 SCORESMEAN aSTD. DEV 1111 aSIN° DEV. 11.11 a14ED IAN a

DES1104 Vi PART C

12.1318346.0C40

1.00004.0000

14.89,1422.5824

162211045S5704,62111

1.01176

123.452

1000044.4000

440.00011224. J000

1.44195

osiiozwatil

SCORE IN7E4vALS-. F PCT F LF CPCT

2.000_./9D

0.5 8.95..C.L00.0_1.2 21.0

436

70.8/41.7

5613

100.023.2

3.000 0.3 4.5 0.7 12.1 3 5.4 7 42.54.000 0 1.6 0.4 10 4 7.4 4 7.1

CASES PROCESSEDm:,...__BLANK_Olk01141041114 VALUE.

a

a0

5.6(41tiOSG9100000

56419

1.4000MAXIMUM VALUE a 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SLURES 0 7.0_11115. 80a0000104 Wb:--cdf.):Es a 15.4889 158.44,A)MEAN a 1.4064 1.t2064/1111. LIEV a 0.8445 0.ddi,

LTEAT. 1.'4;1* '041:191MEDIAN a 1.1328 1.1512

29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box E.

Grade

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2

0 Oif,cst I I

C rl C9 In

00In InCNI I I

C) 4-1 CsC1

i in

PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4

2CNI I 1

0-1ul

00 0In InCSI I I

O r4 CS' in

K DODD DODO El CI EIWEJ El10:00 ODD ED a o o

QUEST 10N 29 PART

'ha 4F C -PCTSCUitE ANTERVALS F PC' CF 111.4LN F

1.000 2.6 714 3.6 100.0 0 74.6 44 190.02.000 0.7 184 1.0 214 7 2408 AO 29.43.000 0.2 6.1 4.3 8.7 2 8.9. .3 8.84 4000 Oki_ 2.3 0.1 2.3 1 4.9 1 2.9

CASES PROCESSIC aKO. &LAM BATA

3.1415434.0000

34441

MINIMAR VALUE I4040 4 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 0 4 AGOG 4.0000SUN OF SCORES 4.9823 40.4000SOS SOO. SCORES 0 8.6319 86.4000MEAN a 1.3717 141.14

OEV. (NJ 0.7C10 O. 73443STNO. 08V. (N*11 0.4338 0.7434MEDIAN gs 1.1849 1.4084

GAAS T tON 29 PARTE

F OCT F.- -PL.7 4F C..PC1CF P*4116

1.000_ t.s.#__41.0 41.8 130.0 78 21.01 1.69 100.(1.000 24.9 59.6 33.0 79.0 21.2 87418 493 18.43.000 3.4 8.3 8.1 19.4 33 8.9 79 21.44.000 4.0 11.1 ______4.6,_111., 48 _14.8._ 46 12.t

CASES OROCESSIOfrt;. BLANK DATA

41.1114104.0000

3169

1.0000_106

1.4000MAA1NU M VALUE * 4.0000 4.40000SUR OF SCORES 87.5748 789.0000SUN We:. I40gES Iii;31W- i.454:40-40MeAN a 200,1 2.4..414STNO. OEv. (NJ 0 0.bd50STNO. DEV. (14...11 0.8836 044662MEDIAN 0 /4664 24,v024

29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box D.

PROGRAM 1

ul

O4Grade

0 0in (-I

I I%CoN ul

PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3

ul

0

00 0ul 1-4 In

I I0 "-I Iey In 0 '-

PROGRAM 40 0

0 0in g2er !r -4

I I N I I0 -1 I 0 -1cs1 in 0 1-4 N in

K DODO DE-tiOD opoEl DODD1 DopEietiziooptotOoo Doon

01115/1011 29 FART F

F PU F C-PCT

1.§L0.(1...0

SCOMI INTERVAL

1.000

F

6.0

PCI

31.9

CIF

167'Luis

100,02.000 10.0 . 33.3 11.7 66.1 92 119 66.93.000 166 9.4 1.0 1444 18 10.1 27 13.24.000 1.0 S.3 1.0 5.3 9 5./ 9 5.1

CASES PROCESSED110. KAIAK RATAIMIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE m

SUM UP SCORES m

18.66,1291.0000

1.00004440)

35.1331SUM SOO. scages . 77.5699MEAN A 10 OWIND. OEV. INI m 0.7130ST100. OEV. IN-41 m 008449MEDIAN so 1.1391

176297

. . . . _ .

lati,000

4.00g133.0000133.40041.00404424

141261

PART G

F F I)" CF CPCTSCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P81.61

1.000 2.6 .40.0 .5 100.0 26 44o1 aA 104.02.000 4.6 S3.7 boa 7000 40 55 67.93.000 063 Bel 1.4 16.3 4 4.9 LS 18.54_00,0______ 1.1 12_,6 1.1 12.6 11 14.6 11 13.6

CASES PROCESSED * 6.9224 81C. BLANK DATA al 3$9.0040 394MINIMUM VALUE so 1.00410

MAXIMUM VALUE m 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES:WI $00. SCORLS a

_. _ . ... 16.932X /62.U000311500-'

..-____-__40.8626

-ME AN or 1.98152 2.U004SUM. 0EV. IN) ......,

Imo; Tit-v- iii-1,.0.V5j60.4616

...(4.AI1 :

Mkt) IAN a 1.6728 1.6625

29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box La

Grade

PROGRAM 1

0 00ell ell rlÌ %0 4-I0

PROGRAM 2

ellC1 1 1

10 t's14-4%Co

PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 400 0

CNI I IP-I0 14 N ell

orCV

a 6-1K o El O DODOD 1:3401::2 moDOD 0000

QUESTION 29 AR H

S6JRE INT ERV ALS

.taiNg2.0003 .0004.409 _

CAVE.) ORGC,ESEDI A ko kPArA

MINIMUM VALUEPAX! NUM VALUESUM q SCCESSUP. S40. SCORLISPEA t%

SINOP LEV 1k1 *STNL. DEV. IAT-11Mt CI AN

a

Ca

aaa

PLtSTILIN

SCORE. INTERVALS

1..0002.0003.0004 .000

UMSES PROCLSSECJ.O. ALAtt!1/4 DATA zMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE

_SUM OF SCORESSUM 5467. SCORESMEANST O. LiEV thi

N1ME 0 I AN

4

1.51.90.20.3

*PART I

PCT CF

4935.37.5

F PST CF. C''PCT

_ALILLIAVAP2.4 61.1 200.5 12.8 2G.3 7.5 3

3.96024.244000_

1.00004. 00007413 1

15.83441.8 1400,843,40.97321.1296

F OCT-

2 .1 4.731.0 70.06.0 13.55.2 .41.

.4003_42.211.2

44.263177.0900

1.00004.0000

102.8336_263.1112

2.32320.1.4.Ct

o79I2.1467

4,4554.05.0165

_40 100.045 62.5

5 12.57.5

40415_

4.000073.0900

1.61.4.1004I. 02500.0333

1.1500

F t CO t4 CT

100.0 24 0.1 395 100.09.3 266 6103 93.925.3 54 13.1 105 26.6AAA 51 52.9 51 12.9

39 580

1. w006.4.0000

922. 00004390, 4i0U0

2.34420.1760o-xtra-2.1824

29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) if classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box C.

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 40 o 0 00 0 0 0 t0 0a

tr, Lrl rI lf1 tn rt U1 Irl g-4 tri tri r-304 I I cs1 I i cI I I CNI I I

I '0 ,-I I V:r 1-1 i V, r-1 I M) r-ICr 'l CV sr, 0 1-1 cI IA 0 ri cs1 tri 0 ri C1 tri

Grade

1( C3 Ei D 0000000 Cl El EI1 0 DOD O EJ01112 ODDEIUD EIDNOODEI DD

QUESTION 29 PART .1

SCORI INTERVALS F PCT CF F PUT a--C-OCT

1.0002.00(3.4004.000

3.1 15.5 19.1 100.0 _39 X5. 100.012.6 64.2 1444 4405 131 45.4 MO 44.9

216 13.5 4.0 20.3 25 Line MI 19.1LA4____41) .

6.9 13 _6.5 6.5

Ass PRoCESSE0 19.61E1Ilk. BLANK DATA 172.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MARIMUN VALUE 4.0000SW Of SCORES * 411,4111.2

SUR SOD. SCORES 48.9164PE AN 2.1148STMe. .:)Ev TN) As 1$010 OEV 411 0.7614MEOIMM 2.0375

QUS71ON 24_ PASTA

SCORE PCT CP p. bus

1.000 2.I eg 7 100.02.000

_LWboo 51.7 6.6 75.E

3.000 0.1 IA 19 .14 .000 _44..s._

-1065

CASES PROCESSEDU. KAM DATA

MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUN OF SCORES14A SQ0. SCORES$tEAN

Sihu. 44v. (N1 aMO. DIV. 0041MEDIAN

6.7303396.0000

1.00004.0000

11.840142.8646

2.04350.65030.91211.9464

199Z76

1.00004.0400

419.0000967.000-

2.4.055

00.12752.4305

F PLT CF C-PCT

21 25.3 93 100. 045 54.2 b2 74.7

8 96 Al 20.59, ...4p.a 9 113.8

63492.4.00004.0000

171.40004.17.0000

2.0.020.6629

1.1,556

29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately for

each program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years in

school instead of grade level and check this box O.

0Grade

PROGRAM 3.00 0

CI I

1-1 ctO I n 0

PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 300 0

in -1c+i

00 0in tri i-I

1 I I I

ino 4-1 I t((v e-tct inI 0 1-1 c

K DODD Fa ED Ei El DODDODD DODD DOD

2 DODD DODD DOD3 (IDE:JOE) DODD DOD

Q4ESIICII 29 'PART L

PROGRAM 400 0

inn/ I

In 0-I

4-I tO0 (-4 cI

O CIDEDDDODD

NDDODD

SCORE INTERVALS . F

1.000 1.02.000 2.73.000 0.34.000

CASES PROCESSEG a40. BLANK OAT aMINIMUM VALUE aMAY VALUESUM OF SCORESSkil SOC. SCORES aMEANSTMO. OEV. 4N1STNO. OEV.MEDIAN

PAif- M

F

112732

PCi

lA.44147.04.7

'CO C*PC T

43 100.032 Via 43 11.42 4 a7

ACT

24443.04.97o1

CP

4.2.3.20.S0.2

P.151.$0

100.073.112.09.4

SCORE INTER PALS F

1.066 3 .0

2.000 30.13.000 5.04.000 4.6

GASES PROLESSECRG. bLANA04f4MINI 44 V4tUt aMAXIMUM VALUE aSW OF SCORESSi* SOO. SCORES *

REAMOEV. iNi ss

HMO. OE V. 101.-11

MEOIAM

a

a

4.2644446.0000

43432

1.00004.0000 4.0000164450 82o V4100

17.1165 176. 000010210 1.90700.1143 0.709204229 0.11.74.

1.6977 i4.444119

ACT F e i.. 'CP C -PCTCF P1. b

6.9 43.5 160.0 as 4 183 100.071.0 40.5 93.1 265 69.2 X56 93.311.5 9.6 22.2 48 12.5 93 24.3I G. 7 Ad. 0 -0 _ 45 4.7 45 14,1

43.4443ae.00coi.00004.0000

914.t41#9245055i1

2.25500..1400.74552.1017

48392

4.4000*mow2.495Q0.7514

2.1243

29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box p.

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 40 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0

in t" 1M til til 1-4 IA trt rl kr) 2 ,tc-3 1 I es1 I I ("I I I es1 I II 0 r-I I W v-I I tD mi I %O *-)0 I-I CV ir1 0 ri CV Irl 0 ri CV IA 0 rl C4 WI

Grade

3 noonmoonciotlocio(opoCioQ&;EST ION 29 PANT N

SCORE INTERVALS F st, F PirT LF C -PCT

1.000 as0 15.3 1563_100._0_ 2i L544 144 100.02.000 13.6 70.6 16.4 84.1 131. Ikea LIA 04.03.000 1.4 7.2 2.7 14.2 13 Zol AS 13.64.000 _ _1.3 7.0 J.3 7.0 12 CDS IA 6.5

IIASE 5 FROCESSIGNO. (RANK OA TA aURIMI VALUE 4SAX IMUN VALUE go

5W OF 304101E4SUM SOD. SCORESME Ak a

ahu. UEV. iN) 4OEVe 4,4041 0

NE0 IAN

QUESTION 29 PART 0

19.3316 10428 5.0000 29

1.0000 UAW*4.0000 400080

390996 37 /4.410(1091.6056 861. 40002.05.8 2.04090.7012 O. 693410 a 2E2 0.69571.9921 8.0082

3-6RE INTERVALS

__X*.acC2.0403.000

____ 4.000__ ____..._...

F

AO6.30.3II;

FCT

15.369.03.3

144

ai;21L*S.47.81.4114

-F1358.4

I2

14.96iga--4.b

13.0

CF C.-PCT

0 T 100.0ri 65.116 48.412 13.8_ -....

_100.0840157J124

CASE $ FROCESbEt 22 9.1119 87hL. BLANK_ _44 TA x. 344 POSAV

1.0000388

I NI SO I VA LUtMAXIMUM VALUE a 4.0000 40000SUN OF SCORES a 49 4318 189.0000504 i10. .ColiLS 4/.7264 4/3.304i)94E. AN 2.1290 2. A. 144tsilo). ay. h/ 0.010 O. 43410SYI40 0.11455 0.04513MEDIAN 2.0032 2.4259

I.

29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box D.

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4o 0 00 O 0 O 0 0In in r.1 trlN t I N I I N S I

r11-1

1--I-I I

1-;q:)0 N 0 ; N 0 (.4

Grade

0t 8r. I-I

(.14-10 I-I

M:1N

3 ODEJD OCIOD DOCICIMODO4 16A 0 0 DODO DODO

QUESTION 29 FART

FCTSCONE INTERVALS CF 14.61.14 F PO

1.000 0.9 22.1 3.9 100.0 9 40 199e 92.000 3.0 77.7 27 67.5 31 77.52.7 66.53.000 0.1 3.8 0.4 9.2 2 5.0 4' 10.04.191 0.2 5.5 4 .54.. 4.L._ $.0

LASES PROCESSED

QUESTION 29

NO._ILANK DA1A aNINIMUN VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUN OF SCORESsum vac. scmEsmuot

a

SINO. DEVa_ANIDEV. 1.4.41

MEDIAN

PMU

344241

1.00004.0000.3A44 4816.3144loi24300100.71711.9049

40435

1.000044.0000

1700000167.40001.4000.6640469361.9074

f FCT F 'our -C-F. C-PCTSCORE INTERVAL CF p-81, h

1.000 3.2_ 7.7 41.3 1Q0.0 28 1. 366 100.0

2.000 28.7 69.4 314 92.3 249 4-- 340 92.43.0004.000,

4.6 11.640_143_

9.544_11.3

23.0 4744_

/2.8120_.

tl44_

24012.0

CASES PROCESSID a

Rai, BLANK DATA a

MINIMUM VALUE aMAXIMUM VALUE a

SUM Of sums .SUM 500. SCORESKEAN a

SM. 06V. IN/sum. 01V. W1IMEDIAN

41.11211105.0000

1.00004.000013.5/64

215.62172.2451005120.76152.1100

368LO7-17.7J-407-44M140

643.0004i-5-1):110

2.49080. /7340.17,442.1265


Grade

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 20

vi in 1

t-I

(.4va04 in

0 0en en 4-4

I1-40 4

I-I tDNI Vin

PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4o oo oin 2 ,-I 0 2 t-4

C4 I I CV I 8

I VI) I V) f-40 r-1 c4 In 0 1-4 c4 It._--3 DOD DOCI DODO DO

4 DODOWD El D WO El El DODDS T 1004 29 PART P

F

23

SCORE I NTERVALS P

2.2

PCT CF P°'81.W

12 .0 18.1 100.0

PO Cpf_ C -PC T

12.5 114 100.02.0003.000

0009

13.3I ?1.4

71.1 16.4 88.04.3 3.2 14.91.6 A«± C_ ?.6

1301714

704 1419.2 34

87.516.8:7 .6

CASES PittICESSEL 18.6512

_.7-4).__, .14

184M. al-Mot DATA 1.35.0000 491MINIMUM VALUE 0 1.0000 WOOMAXIMUM vALUE 4.0000 4440000SW OF SCuRES * 046559 490. 11000SUR SQD. SCORES * 3. 6421 920.40410PEAN 2.1242 2.1196STN. 0Ev. (h)tlfto. ay. 4/4.41'*

0.7 08 70.7284

0.71240.1143

MECUM 2.0350 2.0308

.44 PART S

tATERvALS F PCT CF 0-8LN F C4CT

1.000 1.3 14.2 1.1104.!9 13 14" 87 100.0at 000 6.1 66.4 7.0 05.8 57 414.5 74 85.13.000 0 .6 6.3 1.8 19.3 6 0.9 17 19.54.000 1.2 13.1 4.4 tAkA LI 14.4 11 12.6

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA

*a

.1247440109

87388

MINIMUM VALUE . 1.0000 1.11000

PAM NUR VALUE a 4. 0 CC 4.Q000SUM OF SCORES

-19.90434.4 ie I4

189.4400.471:40-a4SW' SOD. SCTJRES

MEAN 2.11416 2. i 7Z4

sTND. Dtv. 0.8334 0,4034S ThOdo DE V. EN-1l s 0.843aME 01 AN 2.0313 2.J35i


Grade

3 DODD 0000 DDDD DDD4 DDDD DODO EDIDIDWIDEIDD5 tUPOOD DODO DDDD EMOD.

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 40 0 01" In r-i

0 Ci Giir.1

0 0 0 0kr1 In In In rt til In r-1

CV 1 I 44 I 1 CV I I N I II m, r-1 0 I 11, r-1 1 v, 1-10 r-I N srs Q rl C4 Ill 0 r-I N in 0 ri N tti

CUE STI ON 29 PART T

_ . _

F Pi.t t.F- C-PC TSCORE INTERVALS PCT a P.8 Li*

0., 01_446 4.3 tctO*0 8 _ _1 1 . 1 -- . . . 4 5 -

1 0 0 . 0

2.000 2.1 CO441 3.7 83,4 26 62.2 37 82.21.000 0.5 14.2 1.0 22.5 5 11 .1 9 20440

_ Q 0 0.5 1 C.5 12142 4 81.9 4 8.9

CASES PR ULE3 E0 is

NO. CLANK DATA a4.4524

424.004045

430MINIMUM VALUE a 1.0000 1.4000PAM NUM VALUE 4.4400 4.0000SUM OF, SCOPES 9.7119 952.44.119--SUP Si4/0 St 0 iit S 4 24.4223 229.4000SEAN a 2.1815 2.1111

!,41J N/ a 0.6522 Os /950_SIM/144S7.4 DEV . 114.11 a 0.9678 -0;iiiiiii5

t4E01 AN a 2.04112 2.0119

4titiSTICiii 29 PART U

SCORE INTE RVAL PCT C -I- -ti C C T

1.000 3.1 10.8 36443 100.0 37 11 .2 329 100.0-18.82.000 254 61.4 32.4 4982 221- 29-1

3.000 3.1 844 7.3 24.2 31 9.4 11 21.6_.dtt0P0 4.2 11.6 6,2 14,6 40 12.2 40 12.2

CASES PR tiCES S EL, aNO. &Atli( DATA a

364686141440440

329146----I:4/6a-*PINTO/UN VALUE a 1440000

PARANA VALUE a 4.0400 4444200SUM CP SCORES a 80411927 132.4400SUP SOD SC 0 OiE S 414 199.5844 1 8100MEAN a 2.2141 2.4249SIND. DEV 4.0.1.. a, 0.7836 0. 1011

-S Th0. OE Y. 1 W./ i 067147 0.6027NEOIAN 2.0616 2.4769

29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this boxO.

Grade

3

4

5

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 40 0 0 0°s

o 0 °nin in i-i in ors ,-4 u, Ill 1-1 v, in -ies4 1 $ hl I i h/ i i hi 1 1I V:r

in I V:r 1-1 I ND r-I I ND *-10 P-1 hi in 0 ...I hl VS Co 1-1 hi IA 0 t-I hi In

111000 DEJO D 000 CI 0 (1] 0 0 0 E3 CI CD MOODC3 0 0 ID OD Cl WO E3 DODO

CUEStit44W- PART V

SCORE INTE RV ALS F PC?'1.0002.00034,0004.000

CASES PROCES SEuNO 81. AN K DATA .RINI NUN VALUE aMAX110.1.1 VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCONESWEANSTNO. UE v. iNISTNO. DE v. N-111E 01 AN

PVT GF C -PCT

34_ . .4144. _ 17.1 100.0 31 Id.? A66 100.011.3 45.9 14.1 62.4 111 66.9 US 81.31.k 9.5 2.8 14.5 13 7.6 24 14.5kva . .

7.1. . 1.2_111._ .1.1..... ciA,.. ____ -11

- _404

CUE S T I CM 29 PART ai

$CiiftE 1NTE RV ALS

1.0002.0003. 0004.0190_

LASES PROCESI.EbIX ANS DATA

MINIMUM VALUE6A XI NUN VALUE 0

SUR SOU. SCORESMEAN

N1_STNO. DEV. IN-41Pala AN a

17.1115 164303.10009_ 309

1. 0000 1.4.404-04.4CC0 4.4,0003564479 336. 000062.0094 766. UAW2.0519 2w42410.7413 0.72770.7640 0:11901.9919 1o5!66

F PCT

1.4 11.64.6 62.70.4 5..11.1 14.6

CF P -flLd F Poi .F C-PCT

a .100,0, 13 L6.7 76 100.04.3 64.4 50 6444 66 83.31.5 19.7 5 4.4 IS 19.2

._14440 10 12.6 LO 12.8

7.7077 78351.00.00 497_

1.0600 1.00004.0000 4.00001414915 166.00404 iollil 418.:0002.1654 2.15440864 O. 648)

. -

0.9460 0045442.014C 20,400

29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this boxO.

Grade

PROGRAM I PROGRAM 2a0

O

In in eiC4

1 Or-I Cs) irt

3 004 DOOD5 00D6(1)DDD

00in it) r-

0I

C4

C4Co

O 000O 000E1000O 000-

Gustt ON a 9 PART A

SCORE 1 NTEIV ALS

1.0002 «0003 .0004 OGG

CASES PROCESSEDNU. &LANK DATA 41

141 Mt NUN VALUENAZI MUM VALUESW/ OFSUM SOO. SCORES aMtSIND. GEV. t NI

74 aMEDIAN ss

GUEST' ON 29

scum 1 itsTE OV ALS

1.0002 .0003.0004.000

PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 400 0tiltl I rl0 v

I-1 C.4

0a 0trs ars

Ir-O

0 1

I-4 tNI

0 0 0 a D-00100 CI 0 00 0 000 ID 0 0

D C3 C3 0 Eli 0 0

f PCT CF

CAS_ - 4.1 100 .02.2 54.8 302 79.20e4 1.5 1.0 24;4

. _ 4 1504.

PART' Y

4 .09894a 7. 0000

10414004.06105.5607

23.1376t / 461Q.9304L.01012. 0334

F PGI C-PCT

9 24.0 41 10.0.023 564 32 7410 0

4 is& 9 21.05 122 $ 12.2........._ ... ... ___. __._-_ ......

41434

1.406004.0000

07.00217.4000

2. &220O. siedoOs d99*244000

f PCT CP P11.ti

4.9 13_.6_ 35.2 100.0.....

22.4- 64.4 30.3 86 .23.8 10.8 1.7 214,83.9 ......A1.0,_ .3.2 11. C

CASES PROCESSEDNO. S. AN It DATA *

35 .17/7A§1.-O_O_CO_

MI MINIM VALUE *. _ ...

/ 4. Ct.00MAXIMUM VALUE * 44,41640SUM OF_ SCOSE1 I° 77.05_45SUP SOD. SCORES 23 191.5 413MEAN * 2 .1899STNU Delia 1 Al al 0.2060STNO* OE V. 14.../8 s .0. 4177PE DI AN a 2.0418

LP C -PCT

4.6_14 .3 U2 /40.197 85.740 12.4 19 24.539 12.1 19 12.1

322LS3

4w00716.0000

1011.40a02.22360._6376"0:43492.0030


PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2a 0 00 0 0 0 0U tn r.4 in v-$ .-I in in rcq I I c-.4 I I CV I i

I c el0 9-I4 N in 0 4-I 04 in 0 r-I csi ul

PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4

Grade

6 Ot_z)OOOMDCE:1 DODO7 D DODO E18 ODD DODO DOD DODO

GUL 571 ON 29 PARE

0 0in in rits1 I I

1 .o 4-10 r1 CV in

4 hi' ALS F PCT CF p..64.1d F YC3 LF C.-PCT

.2..9Z000 10.0

1.64.000 .0

CA Sty PA 1:CES Et.;Nth BLANK OA IA_MI NI MUM VALUEPA 3t1 MUM VALUESUM Cf SC-LJAESLO SQL) S(.OKE 5MEANS1N0. UEV N1$ MD. LE V. N-1 )FE D 1 AN

CLc 5 'LON 29

INI RV

I.tiCJ2.000

.0004. CCO

CA 'tS PALLE,NU. bL 'AK Um TAMINIMUM VALUEPik XI MUM 11A LUt

SCURE.,SUM Swu. SCOkLSricai9r40. LEV . 4 Hi

zr(.44;. 0E V. U -11hE 01 AN

i.e.a..9 15 ..5._ 10 0.0 29 19.0. 1.03 op. a64.5 12.5 6/.1 99 64 a 4.24 d 1.010.1 2.6 16.5 15 9o8 14 16.34.1! A.0 0.4_ 10 bob 4.0 6.5

a 15.4496 53.317.0000 422

a 1.000 18.4000a C CG 4.u000

7.

_3.147 2 sts 3412.040203.1.4870.7638Lei B14

312. u0y072 0. 4000

2.u3iOA 73990.74,24/.1 79d

a

a

PAW! AA

F

4.e0.31.2

PLT

65.64.1

IS .d

CF

7.46.aA.41.2

t90.0_445 4.I:::

F

115049

PL

14.907.62.4

14..4

1..F

74661J

9

C-PC

100.085.1/7.612.2

7.2962i4.00cv1.00004.0 CCO14.127641.28842.21040.07i20.94652.c4CZ

74401

1.00004.vOUU

159. uthill

391.41)442. 14000.81060.62232.4140

29, Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program,) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box 0,

Grade

PROGRAM I PROGRAM 20 00 0

in in0 0in in 1-1 r-IN I I N I I

0 .I-i (N

NDI In I .00 f--I N In

PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 40 00 0 oin in 1-i in 0

in (-Icsi I I N I I

I ND 4-1 4-10 I-4 N In 0 rI-I (N

NDI in

6 DODO DODD ODD Ei 1:3

7 ChdP 00D DODD DODD DODD8 0000 0000 0000 0000

VLESTION 24 i" A +;: r A6

1Port:i4VAL

_A0002.0043.0004.000

PRC/C6S:',60hO. BLANK DATA =

141Ni MUM VALUE aPAAIMUM VALUE m

SUM CF StARESSUM SO. SCORESKEANSTNU. DEV. t IiSIND. DEVo 1N-11 20RODIAN

4Lb4TILIN 29

a

IP.TEPVAL'J

2.0003.0004.000

LASS PROCESSEDNU. iiL AN& DATA

VALUEPA A1114UM VALUtSUM SF.5LP 5i4). SCURES aMEAN

F PCT

.9,3 41.62.0 40.10, 7.71..AP 0.6

PART AC

5Ttista...pty,. th ) aST-Pili IJEV 1N -1 )ME 01 AN a

CF P-aL4

3.31.31.0

161

I30004.0000

.9.7Q7627 «9.145

.4172J$

1.21602.1426

100.062 .433.5I5.0

F pt.j

Z 1.)20 40.8

3 7.310

C-PL T

.l 100.033 80.513 31.710 Z."...4

41434

1.40v34.u000

97.1000275.40.)4

2.-bb$V1.4,3b1.46672. 251

193.70.8k. J..

POT

5.0. 7,

27625.9

CF

0.0_19g08.6 41.31.9 14.11.1 8.1

F

614.,328

910

PuT

51.3l).56.29.1

LIU474.9i 0

C-PCT

100.042.717.39.1

13.4904 110'59.0000 365

1.0000 1.4L1JJ4.00(0 4.4.1013O

186. t.o00047 .4817 416. %/Ova1.6363 1.6909091/t) 0.960,0.9537 0.90491.3:20 1.373J


PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2

0 00u)csi I I

%CIi ri0 '-I CV IAGrade

0 00ul

0CV I

I to4-1 Cs1 ul

PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4a o0 0 0 o

IA Ul r-I Ul Ul 1-1cs1 I I Cs1 I 1

I NO 4-1 I 10 *-1or10 I-I (4 In 0 f-I C4

o DD DDD DOD DEI7 CI D 0 D 1:11 CNC D El

8 DO DD EI 00 DDD*ist

/.002.0003.000

CASES POtUCESSEUCLANK DATA s

NAN/SUM VALUEMAXIMUM vALueSUM CF SCOM $ 1.1

Su* SGO. SCOkt SMEANSIN D. A

SOW, OEVe IN-1ME CI AN

4E S T1 ON 29

ORk 1017 ERVA1.4

1.0002 .0003.0004. 000

CASES Pii4CES5 ECNO . BLANK DATA a.NINIOWN VALUL aMAAI CUM VALUESAM S _

540. SCORES sMEANSINO. OEV. 1 hi =STIO TAY. IN-11PEJI AN

a

_-PCT CF P-61.14

.. g.5 .511.a_i_ _ 1..0 100.01.6 31.9 2.1 41.30.1 2.5 0.5 9.49.3 49 4.3 6.4

5.0049421.0000

1.00004.0.0007!.$ 1415.97151.5759p.8412_0.94041.311.

PART At

._F PCT CP P-tiLw

1.4 750 10 00.00.5 25.0 0.5 25.00.0 G.0 -..4.0 -0.00.0 0.0 -4.0 -ore

1.8177449.0440

1.00001.0444

_1.34113.28481.2498U.43290.63321.1065

F PLI .F C-PCT

31 600 47 100.012 4545 16 34.0

1 4.01 4 8.53 e.4 3 6.4

47428

1.00044.4000

70.4000/36. 4000

/.94940.82140.83011.4581

F PCT C-PCT

15 78.9 19 10:404 11.1 4 21.10 0.0 0 0.00 0.0 0 0.0

19956

1.40002.4004

23.000031.44441.41050.90770.44641.1333


Grade

6 DODO 000 E3 DODO D,07 D OD QOOD 10008 LKAO DOD O 0000 0000

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 40 0 0 a0 0̂.

a 0°n o CI

In In .1 In In r..1 In In r1 u1 0 HCs 4 I 1 Cì I 1 C1 i i N I II NO 4-1 1 v::0 4-1 I VC0 4-1 1 u:4 rl0 H N In Q I-1 N 1r1 Q H N 1r1 0 '- N In

WJES 41 CN Z9 PARI AF

SCCKE INTERVALS

1 cO. .P.C4

2.0001.000A.0000

F PC4 Ka CF C....PCYCF PVILW F

O. 5Lte6 100.0 6 60410 &O 100.00.4 36.8 0.5 40194 3 30.0 4 40.00.0 0.0 4.1 12.6 0 0.0 L 10.00.1 12.4 ___e_e_l_ 12.6 1_4/.1.0 1 10.0

CASES PFtUCES s 1.0834NU BLANK DA TA 4D4.4000111611M0.4 VALUE * 1.0000PAM SUM VALUE 4.00CO

:4101, OF * 1'a9.48-SUM SUO. SCORES * 1,..1115MEAN 1.7451

_4.1.1w4 .01Y 1 .

STNO. OE V (144.11 a 3. 54 C4Mt. 1 AN = 1.4819

GUEST' ON 24 PART AG

SCORE iteTEAV-ALS F

..e._

FCT

64,_4_

CF P -BLw

L.4. to_ ty

F

642.000 A.4 27.0 4.5 3566 233.000 0.3 2.4 1.L 603 44.0OO 066 t.4 GO 6.4, 6

10400

1.1.4004/

4.0000106630434. 0000

14.643U00.91.650446641.4344

P4,T GF C.*PCT

06.0 97 100.02447 43 34.04.1 Li) 10.36.4 0 6.2

1*.itt PROLESSEO a 12 .4314 97rtuf _iikAtO, DATA s 474._0_0410 07eMINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.UU40MAXI MUM VALUE s 4.0CCO 4.u000SYM Cf.. SccM4 s .mi 14....1_402_ ii.o. uo0JSLR SQU. SLO14i.S s 36.8914 48 8.610QJMEAN s 1.5111 1..205257NU . u4V. 41'0 i! 08171 O. d3titsSIND. DE V. IN-11 14 0.9626 0.0i32MEDIAN 1.2142 1.478


Grade

Caif' a%

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 40 0 0 00Q 0 0 0 0 01trt trt 4-.1 u't r$ r-I gil r$ 1-1 ut u't 1-1

C4 1 I CN1 I 1 C9 1 I C4 I II ..0 el I I M7) rl I V) rl0 ri (NI V 0 rl CNI VI 0 rt (NI 111 0 r-I Csi Irt

6 00 000 00 0007 0 0 0 0 po 0 0 0 0 0 0 08 0 0 ID Ok410 0 0 (tat 0 0 0 0 0 0

NiLiiv A

2.0003.0004.006

PART AN

F PCT CF (3448LW F

2.4; AG2 4.7 100.0, 31lei 22.5 1.7 37.1 8Q.3 7.2 0.7 14.6 20.3 7.4 6.3_ 7.4 3

CASES FAUCESSEU 4 .D6 S2NU et. ANK.....w:A_..,__.......__ 444 909GO.141111/0401 VALUE 1.0000MAXI MUM VALVE a 4.0060SUM CF SCOKBS._ .14 4242SUP S00. SCORES 15.6803MEAN 11 1.5905S 1140 ...40..._ .i N ) - -1* ..-Q.3103

. ._____

-.STI40. DEv. tx-11 = 1.0269t4E01 Ail a 1.2947

CAA 511.0s 29 Pair Al**

la" CF CPCT

'70.5 44 100.018.2 13 29.54.5 5 11.4#.4 3 b.8

SCURE 1NT E1OVALS F PCI C F F

1...,001) 1.5 77.4 1.9 162.000 0.4 22.6

_100.0G.4 22.6 2

3.000 u.0 CC -000 -00 o4.090 0.0 0.0 -6.6 -0.0 0

CASES PROCESSED 1,13165NJ. BLANK : 400.p.ocg_ta,".T.A

SI Naiiiii VA OEKAM KtoM VALUE

44 1.00602.0660

SUM Cr SCOOS 2125 $1SUP i.4.6 . ;C5RE,aii:Ali

.*

3.14t01.2255

.5 Tilu., .441; .ftP.0 * _0.0,01SIND. D. (04-1) me 0.6115ME.01AN 2 1.14e6

44431

1.00004.0000

65AGO12 9. J000

1.4774O. 1670.87571.4097

PCT

641.911.10.0U.()

CF C-PCT

id 100.0i 11.10 0.0U 0.0

18457

1.00002.0000

20.000024.a0401.L1110.4114.5

0.32441.a62

29. Approximately what percent of the pupils at each grade level in your schoolparticipate in the compensatory reading program(s)? (Answer separately foreach program.) If classes are ungraded, answer using number of years inschool instead of grade level and check this box j.

Grade

6

7

8

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4

.?4 In U

0 c:0 0 0 0 oin R $LA

0en r4 in in r4

Csi I I N I I N I I N I II V) e...1 I D ri I %0 0-4 I %/) H0 r'l N in 0 14 N in o -1 N In 0 1. N In

DODD DODO DODD01:1 DODD D DODDDODD DODD DEIOCI(WIDEDO

__. - ".1181.WF P41 F PO' C.FCT

104.0 8 do .9 9 100.02.000 0.0

..

0.0.PL9

0.1 0 U.0 L 31.13.000 .0 O.0 0.1 14.5 0 0.0 A 11.14_1104 A _11.44 1 11.1

CASiS PROCESSEDtQaOLANK DAIAKINIMOM VALUERAXIMUM VALUESUM a SCORESSUN .:44). bLOKSMEAN

V.TMO tiEW IN):TM O.MLOI AN

_

a

aa

0.94i2459.0000

L00004.004.*#4,5

2.98231.41;17xo.b49.1601145

9466

1.1)0044cJ000

12.J00024.401.00643430.304Z81.6444LotObl

30. About what percentage of the students participating in each of the compensatoryreading programs in your school are from culturally, linguistically, and/oreconomically deprived backgrounds? (Mark one box in each lettered row.)

(a) Program 1

(b) Program 2

0-10% 11-50% 51-90% 91-100%

0 0(c) Program 3 1:1

(d) Program 4.,

Don't know

--_____ __-_-

tESTli3N._

ART A_

17,61509.68 t0Oa

PCT

34.030.414.574.70.5

F

/TO

PCI

16.4 10)2 100.0

SCORE INTERVALS

1.000.2.0003.0004.000

CF P -b Lb

51.7 100.034.2144E.,.-0.3

66.035.7

1318373_15.43

2464618.4 Lot

To3

oia34.816.50.65.000

-A7.$0,5 U.6

CASES PROCESSED aNO. SLAM DATA 4

111 Pa NUN VALUESARI NUR VALUE 0SUM OF SCORES 0SUM O. SCORES aMEAN aSIND. DEW. 041 aSTNO. DE10. 11+41 aPtEOTANSAMPLE F OR ST AT S a

51.737412.00001.00005.00g9_

112.1940304.53712.17941.07,51.0,412.0116

51.46990NOTE:VALUES

462--Iir-----

1.000%NOG_

at2T.Q0002.4,32914.40351.00471.9542

1W LAST-A SI- fNlik VAL

FROM CALCULATIONS.

E

GLES 7 ION 30 P ART

$ PCT F PIA cfSCORE INTERVALS

2 102 014 401 zooMOO b.3 23.0 17.7 64.4 -62 23.2 165 61.83.000 6.9 25.2 11.4 41.3 59 24.1 :03 34.6

. a . 43 16..1 ,4! 0455.00E 0 C1 0.0 0.1 1 0.4 1 0.4

CASES PROCESSED 447_NO. BLANK DATA a 205.0000 204MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000PARIMUN_VALUE talc% 5.0000SUM OF SLURES 60.9133 5T 5-SuP SW. SCORES 164.2442 L56 9.40UU0kAiN 4._*1.114 2. L.617STOW. DEW. INI 1.0922 /./.01.1STNO. DEV. ifioqi 1.1177 1. L 09tMECJAN = 2. u000SAMPLE FOR STATS 27.511CCWO1E:446AS U LAST 1NTEkVAL f:XCLIJOLL.

FKOM CAL CULA .

30. About what percentage of the students participating in each of thelcompensatoryreading programs in your school are from culturally, linguisticallyt, and/oreconomically deprived backgrounds? (Mark one box in each lettered row.)

0-102 11-50% 51-9074 91 -100% Don' t know

(a) Program 1. 0

(b) Program 2 0 0(c) Program 3 0 ID 0(d) Program 4

CUEST1DN 30 PART

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.0005.000

CASES PROCESS E0NO. BLANK DATAAl NI NUN VALUE aMAXI MUN VALUE aSUM OF SC GRESSUM SQL). SC CAE S aMEAN-ffr iii. D1c1f. TST NO. OE V IN -11PIE I ANSAN, LE F Ok STA-TS a

F PCT Cf p-a tad F "Cr *CiPCT*

406 3106 12.7 10000 51 40.6 125 100.0 i

3.2 2504 1.9 6204 30- 21-44 14.. 3-9-.12 06 21.9 O./ 311.0 22 la" 44 35.21.7 13.7 1.9 15a2 20 1O*0 22 1.7.60.2 1.4 0.2 1.4 I 1.6 2 -176

ELESTION PART G

1213S1345.0000

100E009.0000

264490670.7241201 .01.1119

i1.9

12 o55470NOTE !MIMESFAON

125

tadoouS. otiou

689.00;:0260694

1./1631.35AO

IN LAST INTEK VAL EAGLIitil)CALCULATIONS.

F FCT FSCONE INTERVALS

1.000 tat 1041.0 262.000 e5 24.7 34 61.2 1330000 0*$ 6.3 2e2 36.6 6

2.4fa 165.000

.

u.0 C.0-1.01-2-e_a_-0.0 0

CASES PROCESSIDNO BLANK OAT* aMINIMUM VALUE atiA X IMO aSLN CF SCORESSUN $00. SCORES aPEANST ND. ()EV. 1N1 aSTNO. OE V N- ImtomSAMPLE FOR STATS a

44.0324011.0000

180000

13.12(740.344042445_1.2311I.3547

6. C7320NU 1E3 VALUES, IN

44.421.3

9:112612

FROM CAL

4.F C-PCT

01 100.035 57.422 36,116 26.2

0.0

6/714

1000004.0000

366.40044

1.23901.2494

6462LAST I titT RV AL E XC L upEu

CULAT 104 ".

31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box 0.

31

SCORE IhTERVALS f PCT CF MILW P P" C PCT

0.0 10.2 44.9 524 103.0 447 9..L 475 100.01.000 20 Sol *.7 5.1 28 5e9 old $.9

CASES #ROCESSEV a S2o$817 4111

MIAIRUO VAWE 0.0 Oeti

KAXINUM VAWE 1.0000 1.0000WM OF SCOAES 2.715S Z0. 0000SUN EQ0o SCORES 2.71S% 2EoOOOONEAR 004513 4164$19

SlUNOs 00V. 011 a 0.2207 0.4.355

STNO. OEVo (tli 0.2228ALOIAN 0.0271 (64313

31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) Xi classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box 0.


Number of students

QUESTION 31 1481 A


2 4 6

SCORE INTERVALS F FCT

00 _ ). 94 ...__4_ _Jai2.00 - 5.19 12.3 10026.00 .. 94,11 12.1 2448

10.00 -. 13.99 3.A.:0 Al._4_14.00 .... 17.94 Z. 1e016.00 - 21.99 Zo8 1.022440 ... _./..5_0.1 _IA__ AIL&2 4,000 . 29494 005 lel30.00 -. 31499 0.3 0.734.00 - 17.99 0.1 G.218.00 .... 41.99 04442 C.542.00 - 45099 0.1 0.246.00 - 49.99 0.0 0.050400 ... 53.19 0.0 04054400 .... 57.19 Oa 0.058000 .... _61.99_ p.s".__0.062.00 - 65.99 0.1 0.166.00 - 69.99 0.0 0.010.00 __73499 G.0 0.074.00 ... 1,019 0.1 0.210000 - 81019 0.1 0.2

__ANLOIA,._ Aift19 .04....._Git46.00 - 89.99 0.0 0.010.00 ..- 93.99 0.0 0.0

.114.00 - 97.99_. _PAL __019_

98400 - 00.00 0.0 OA

GASES FR000569NO. BLANK OA TA

MINI Millm VALUEPAAIMUN VALUE 0

Skim ii7lcoaesSUM SOO. SCORES116A0-- A5mG. U. 4N1SING. GEV. 4N-.4.41

a

0_40 I AN a

11111,

CF 1104. i F

44641 10460 13L3444 94.2 9226.1 63.9 10813.9 34.2 .124 .

469 zi.o 326.0 14.8 323A27410 23

0.5 3 LC. 1.1 2

0.3 0.7 1

0.2 0.5 00.2 0 00.2 0.5 0

0.2 o.sCei 0.3 00.1. 0.3cla, 003 10.1 042 L

-03.0 -000 0

-C.0 -0.0 00

-0.0 0

40.7068IL GIL CCCO

1.0000430.0000385.1052

4442 .05116_4.441(629436.31151.0.722

PCT

4.544.829.114 .b

8.0el.

1111.1M

CF G -PCT

.111.190.0358 96.52,641 71.7*AC 42.6104 280012 19.4t14-...1901? 4.611 3.0

7 1.96 1.64 1.13 0.83 0.83 Cie

3 0.8.

Oe 8 .

2 0.5

1.6le/0.10.50.3

0.00.0u.00.0J.0 2 0.5403- '2 0.50.3 1 0.30.0 0 0.0

0.0 0 0.00.0 0 OAire-0 --.45 0.0

171104

1.000080.0000

4488.0000T1154. 3004)

1/.0189-3640119.a1568..3815

1.101..

31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box .


Number of students

441E5110N 31 PAM 8

SCORE INTERVALS F


2 4 6

.101111.111 ,11,

Pei CP P8 LW F PSI GO C-40

0.0 ... 1.99 11.9 3G.7 38.800 .0 . $1- 24.9 353 100.01600 5 .19 ie24.1 62.3 24.9 b4.3 24 i 4874 ay rr. 16484 9.99 1.7 464 ao 7.0 17 4.$ AL 8.8

10.00 - 1.3.9_9 0.4 0.9 1.0 2.4_. 5 1.4 14 4.014.00 11.99 0.2 0.4 Oa 1.7 1 004 9 -2;318.00 21.99 0.3 0.7 0.5 1.3 3 048 7 2.0412.00 25.99 0.,C C.0 4:2 0.5 . .! 41.0 4 1.124.00 29 099 0.0 4.0 Oa 06 v 4;0- - 4-13130.00 33.99 0.0 0.0 ea 0.4 1 U.3 4 Lol34.00 37.99 0.0 4.0 0.2 0.8 0 °4438.00 41.99 0.2 0.4

3 0.80 .2 0 ,6 ----.2.---C MI- b t

42.00 - 45.99 0.0 0.0 41.0 0.1 0 u.0 L

417.;46.00 49.9v 0.0 c.o 0.0 44 _ 0 u.050.04 51.99 4.0 G.1 0.0 061 r--- ii33 1 6.354.04 57.99 4.0 0.0 460 -0.0 . 0 0.0 0 0.050.00 61.99 0.0 0.0 -.0.0 ailo . 0_ u0 .

0 0.042 800 65.91 0.0 0.0 -04 ..0 .0 0 -4.41---- --0--- -140b6.00 - 49.09 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0 004 0 0.070.00 73.99 0.0 0.0 0.0 ...OA 0 _4 0 0.000

4 0.074.00 77 .99 0.0 0.0 440 411360 4078.00 . 81. 99 0.0 0.0 0.0 ...ILO 0 " 0 0.0abec.l is.99 _ _ ._. . 9.4.___ 0.0 _ -4_._0_ -00 _ 0 0.0 0 0.086.00 - 89.99 u .43 0.0 ..4.) 03 -0.0 4 4.4 ---a--- -o-aSO .00 93.99 Oe 4 0.0 0.0 --0.0 0 Us° 0 0.094.00 - 37.99 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0 u.0

0 o4- 'I) :::98600 - 100.00 0.0 04 ...CA ...MO

CASES PROCESSES s 380799 353no. 8LARK DATA a 12040000 1217MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 060PAX IMUM VALUE a 52.0000 52.u000SUS OF SCORES 0 11069308 1201;11400

SUM S. SCORES ° 688.5144 14245.0000PE AN 0 2.8805 3.4023'SWtiii. 0-Eit . i 14) S 3.8381 44076--SIND. OEV. t N11 & 3.8886 4.41446E3;1404 s 3.2375 3.24$51

31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box O.


Number of students

Total for School

PART CQUESTION 31

SCORE iNteovAL

0.0 -' 1.99

F

14.4

PCT

37.8

CF 10411,W

31.2 100.0MI *SA1e2 SO47 1.11

1.00CAS *

10.00

S.999e/19

13.99

41.11.40.1

5 to 03.70.8

14.00 -.16000 -22.00 -.

17.9921.9435.99

0.10.20.6

0.20.7C.0

0.40.40.1

1020.90.3

26.00 -'. 29.99 0 .0 0.0 04 04330.00 33.99 0 4 0 4 Sol 0.334.00 -.. 37.114 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.136.00 .. 41.69 0.0 0.0 0.0 Os/4 2 .00 . . 45.19 041) O.0 44 0.146.00 49.99 O. O. Q. 0.0 0.150000 - 53 699 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.154.00 57.99 000 0.0 4°160 ...se

61.99 0.0 0.0 *0.0 41.0./#ao62.00 .. 65.19 0.0 0.0 u0 00 .'0 .066 .00 69. Si

73.99Q.006

0.00.0

'0.00.0-0.0-0.0_10.007_

74.00 77.99 0.0 0.0 -0.41 -0.0MOO 81.99 0.0 0.0 ',OA -*Oda/14,00..7!_____ 009. 0 .,0 0.0 -O.0 -0.0

o.0 0.0 -0.0 -0406.00 - Ec.99va .00 9:3 19 0.4 0.0 04.0 4.094.00 - 97.99 0.0

0 AC.0 -0.0 -0.0

98.00 - t00 .00 0.0 .04.0 1'0.0

Total for Grades

2 4 6

ira

F

101223

234

Pid

1o,9640t

4631 el

_

GF C--PCT

_0_ 1°04 00249 71.126 7.41_ 3.1

7 2.06 1.74 0.6Z 0.62 0.6

14.0 .01

0.3144

_ 0.013.0443

_ALAI() i 9.30 0.00 0.0

. 9 . _0*0..1 030 0.0

___ 13_56°0 ;Ia.-0 4.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 44440 4.00 4.00 0004 th;i:1-

1111000-0U

000.5

004

0.30.30.30.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Geo

casts PROCESS E0 "' .

c.

14SAMI123 60000

3301W a BLANK DATA 1MINIMUM VALUE al 0.0 0.4RAM MUM VALUE a 53. WO 53.4000SUM OP SCORES 13 9o.49111 1044;440o5U SAO. SCORES 0 390.0913 41634.4000

1 ka k I a.

_- -. . .1 ._ 3.3 3 _10133 33_i

ST ha i:g V (d u 3.01059at

STN0 OE V ( N I i = 3.05C1 3. V 727

_14 tCB AN.. ° . WM? 3..2274

sr.

31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the comp4nsatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box D.


Number of students


2 4 6

OUESTION 31

SCORe INTERVALS

0.0 .

HAT C

1.99

F

12.8

ICT

31.9.00 5.49 16.9 51.3

6.00 - 9.99 2.3 Tau10.00- 13.19 0.4 1.314.00 17.99 0.2 0.113.00 21. 99 0.2 0.?12 .00 25.99 0.0 0.0

29.99 0.0 0.030.00 33.49 O. C 0.034.00 - 37,99_ 0.4 C.038.00 - 41.99 0.0 C.042.00 45.99 0.0 0.046.00 .' 49.99 0.0 0.050 600 . 33.99 0.0 OA54.00 4' 57.99 0..0 0.051600 -. 61.99 O. GO62.00 - 65.99 OA 0.066.00 -'. 69.99 0.0 0.170.00 T3.99 0.0 0.014.00 11.419

.. ...... __0.0

..

0.070.00 41.49 0.0 0.0

.40 - 95.99. 044.4266.00 -L". 4.Q 0.1.90.00 93.99 0.0 0.0944.0C - 9709 13.0 0.098.00 100.00 0.0 0.0

...,..

..a.

Cr P84W

3209 100.020.1 01.134 9.80.9 2.8C.5 1.50.3 Os90.0 0.10.0 0.10.0 0.4Ps 0 040.0 OA0.0 0.10.0 0.10 A 0.1000 0.10.0

F P41" CF C -PCT

95 300181- 59.a

2042.3CI

00

0

109 100.0214-679-.73

6=5 314.3 114.1.4 T4.0 50 2

.2-0.0 /0.0 1

j0.0 1J.0 1

10.03462;11.60.60:60.30.30;30.30.3

0 0.0- -IT .0.1O 0.0 1 0.3O 0.0 1 0.3

0.0 (ilia 0 111° 1 0.3A. 0.3O 0.00 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0:0O 0.0O 0.0O 0o0

C.0 0./ 1-.0.0 -0.0 0_.0 .0 .0 .

0"a.° 41,0 0'4.0 ...0.0 00.0 ...0 .0 °...C0 ....0.0 0-f29011_ 0

0 .0 ...0.o 0

CASES PREXESSEL),CATA *

32.930.163.0000

409166

1.1 NI MOM VALUE a 0.0 0.0PAAI_PUN VALUE 60.0000 60.4r000

S0174 a sttitE. 87 4424 043:4000$W4 Me SCORES 649.7444 V949su000!TAN 3u503iN U. 0E9 IM) a 3.5656 4.7796

SW). LJEV. ii 3.1210 4./d73tiM)I 24,8443 3.400,

31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box D.


Number of students


2 4 6

41CUESTIIII

F

PART e

SCORE INTERVALS I PC/ CF Pwi CF C.-PCT

000 99.19 24.2 61.2 39.9 100.0 195 54.0 A0_100.0100.40 219.99 9.3 3309 1163 34.6 96 27.1 166 46.0364.40 s 491.19 2.7 6.7 5.9 14.6 30 403 ea /6.8

411.19 a__ ALOI 302 ihi 1* 102 _40. 5

700.00 - 899.99 0.6 1.5 1.1 2.7 7 1.9 12 3.3100.00 10119.14 0.1 0.3 0.3 14 2 kle 1.41100 000 - 1299.99 0.0 0.0 0.4 _0_1_9_ °_ " 0 0.81300.00 1499.99 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.9 0 U . 0 3 0.8110.00 1699.99 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.9 1 "3 3 0.84700004 - IAVial 0.0 kag (to cat 0 0.0 2 0.62900.00 - 2099899 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.8 0 4.0 0.62100.00 2299.99 Oo 0 0.0 0.3 008 0 U . 0 2 0.62300.40 2499.99 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.6 0 "0 2 0.62100.40 - 2699.99 0 4 0.0 Oa Q. 4- 0.0" 2 0.62700.00 2419.99 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.6 0 0.0 2 0.62900.00 3099.99 0.6 0.0 4e3 0.6 0 000 2 0.63100.00 - 3299. SS 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0 "0 2 0.63300.00 - 3499.99 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.0 1 0.3 2 0.63500.00 3699.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 0 J.0 1 0.33700.00 3699.V0 0.0 Oa 0.2 0.5 6 0.0 0.33,00.44 4 099.99 0.0 0.0 C.2 0.5 0 41.0 0.34100.00 1. 4299409 0.0 OA 002 0.5 0

10.04.4 1

0.30.34300.00 -* 4499.99 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5

4500.00 - 4699.99 04. 0 0.0 -0.0 ...O.() 0 0.0 0 0.04700000 4499099 0.0 04.0 -0.0 ....0.0 0 0e0 0 0.04104.00 5000.00 060 0.0 4'0.0 -0.0 0 00- 4- 0.0

CASES PROCESSED 3903 18 361ITC-NO. BLANK DATA 111.0000MINIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4,0000

VALVE a 4460.04C0 446 0.0000_PAIIINUMSUM OF SCORES a 69610313 11/.64-T4.7046

SUN SUO. SCORES a 7413735.0060 0.5161102i 08MEAN ft 176.1464 191.41275TNO. DEV. TN * 395.7138SIM). DEV. t141-1/ . 400.0203 A 8 00 11MECIAN a 63.3031 05./202

-

31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the comp'ensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box


Number of students


2 4 6

QUESTION 31

SCONE

u.00.00 -

30.00 -50.070.00 -90.00 -

110._ 00 -

PART

I NTE RV ALS

929.9949.9969.11984.99

109 99129.99

t

F

15"

CF

4 ki7 10010 9613246"Y"2377

PuT

46.7364412.810.06.41.91.9

CF C-PCT

359 100.0263 73.3IA 36.5*5 23.7*9 13.64e 7.2L9 5.3

PC7

37x712.9 31.74.9 11.134.6_,_ _9 A_

1.7M 4.30.6 1.40.6 1.4

25.4 62 ..3

12.4 30.51.5 111.4_3.9 9.52.1 5.21.b 3.11._

130.00 --. 149 .99 0 .4 1.0 1.0 2.4 . 6 1.4 12 3.3150.00 -. 4.69.99 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.4 1 0.3 6 1.7

04.01)...1% j 8S 8 9._ 0,._.1 0.5 1.2 1 003 5 1.4190.00 - 209. S9 0.0

___Osa_i.o 0.3 0.6 0 0.4 4 1.1

410.00 - 24:3 59 4I 0.3 0.3 o.a 2 0.6 4 1.100.00 - 249.99 0.0 0.2 0__.5 0 0.0 2 3.6iiboo - 264.49 0.0

_c.90.0 014

_ _0.5 0 0.0 2 0.6

270.00 289.99 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 1 J.3 2 0.6optoo - 309.99 0.0 0,0 CA 0.2 0 0.0 -1 0.3114) .00 124.99 0.0 .0.0 0.1 0.3 4.0 1 0.3330.00 -- 345.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0 0.0 1 0 o 3

350.00 -.- 309.99 p.c C. 0 0..1 ..__0.3 0 0.0 1 0.370.00 - 3d9.99 0.0 CA 0.1 0.3 0 '00 1 0.3

350.00 409.99 0.0 o.o C1 0.3 0 0.0 1 0.3Jiotoc - 429.99 0.1 0 3 41,1 0..L 1 ki.3 l 0.3430.00 - iv 4S. ii 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0 4.0 0 0.04 50.00 . 469.99 0.0 G.0 -0.0 .-13 .4 0 0.0 0 0.0470.00 - 469 .99 0. 4 4._0 -'0. 0 -43.0 0 0.0 0 0.0440.O-4 506.46

_0.0 .4 0.0

_-0.0 ____...0 .0 0 4:4 0 0.0

LASES FROCESSEC a 359U6NU. BLANK OATA

MINI NUN VALUE * 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE__ 430.0400 43 0.0000

SUN OP sctiiii_a

1244.4714 34755.0000SUM S00. SCORES M10414150 /11471 0000MEAN a 19.141, 35.AZ37SItUj. OEV. I ttil 40.0819 42. i3J.

ST140. DEV ( N-11 40.5833 42.v9t,NELII44 17.74.33 22.e513

31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box a


Number of students


2 4 6

QUESTION 31 PART 6

F PCT -V. PT

102 28 .7133 37.537 10.4

CF -CZ131C7'

355 300.0253 11.3120 33.8

SCORE INTERVALS

0.0_ 9_,991040 . 29:9930.00 49.99

CF P-65

39.16 1_00,013.8 34.93.9 9.8

2408 62.711.0 2768

_50400 .99 .1?-4 5 ft.) 1.1 1T e9. 27_ ... 111.6 A4 23.470.00 89.99 2.3 5.9 4,6 1106 27 /et, $6 15.890.00 - 109.99 1.0 2.4 2.3 5.7 13 4.7 29 8.2

..110.9..0 7 129499 0 ..6 .._1_0_ 1.3_ /94 8 4 ea 16 4.5230.00 - 149.99 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.8 1 0.4 8 2.3150.00 16999 0.1 0.2 006 1.6 1 U.3 7 2.0170.00 - 189.99 94 9A6 _0.5 10 2 0.6 6 la190.00 409.99 0.1 C.2 0.3 o .a 1 4.3 4 1.1210.00 229.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 C*6 0 4.0 3 0.8230.00.2 449.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 Oet 0 4.0 3 U.825 0.00 i69. 49

_Us C 0.0 Oa 0.6 0 0.0 3 0.8

270.00 289.99 0.1 0.4 0.2 046 2 0.6 3 0.8290.00, 99 00... 9,4 441_0 Q. 0 4.o. L 0.3316440 . 329.99 0.0 0.0 O.1 11.3 0 4.0 1 0.3330.00 - 349.94, 0.0 0.0 Col 0.3 0 0.0 1 0.3.350.0C -. 0.0 .9 .0.1_____p.3 0 0.0 L 0.3370.00 - 389.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0 0.0 1 0.3

390400 - 409.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0 000 I. 0.341044 429 099 04 _(..,9

.04 0 .3 0 4.0 1 0.3

430.00 iv49 .99 0.1 C.3 O.:. 0.3 1 0.3 1 0.3450.00 469.99 0.0 0.0 »C.0 -0.0 ° 00 0 0.0_470.00 .7 4.8909_ 0.0. 0.0 ..0.0_....0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0490.00 500. GO 0.0 0.0 ..0,0 c1,42 0 4.0 J 0.0

ASES PRUDESSgC, _39,4414 355NL. EI. ANY. DATA 118QC GO 120OI0.1)4U14 VALUE a 0.0 0.P..AIMUM VALUE .04:1QP.QQ.. 450.000JSLIM CF Sc.ORk S 1102.8208UN SOO: SCORES so IC3419.1250 LA*3284.1400MEAN is 29.8674 35.17716

STAID. LEV. 61 11' 41.4653 44.61$61

STNU. CoEV. (N-11 az 41.9550 44.751OLLIAN 17 .2 5Gti 21..)514#

31. Indicate below the actual numbers of classes and pupils in the compensatoryreading program(s) at each of the specified grade levels in your school.(Answer for all programs combined.) If classes are ungraded, answer usingnumber of years in school instead of grade level and check this box


Number of students


2 4 6

LT 17_ skTE

fiaiEST ION 31

SCURF 1 t4T

060_10.0030.00 -50.00

S

29.Vg49.9989.9489.99

109.99

149.99169.99189e99109.94229.99249.94.269.99289.99309_699329 .99349.93644993494 .94400.00

PAR i

F

14.69413.94.71.31.2

at0.00.1083(i20.1

. I0.10..0

0.00 .10.0

.0GoQ0.0

KT

42.3244311447.033.73.4416.2

0.00.4Go96,66

0.2.2

0.40.0

P42620.00.00600.0

Z4 ---ii:iii,

346119.9LOGO

4.22.9

1401600.90,66

0.3C.30.20610.1G.1

-0.00.0

-0.0

10060

F

11094322816178

1

5

11

1

0

01

000

0

04;1"--

44.1290""

doll5.0"5.4ie.ob

063

ia0.4J.30.30.0J.0.30.0JU4640.0

.F-C-ilicT

317 10060---ZoTIi5. 3113 35.681 25.63 16.7

37 11.740 6.312" 3.812 3.811 3.5

1.94 1.3a 0.9

0661 0.31 0.3

0.30 0.00 J. Li

0 0.0J 0.0

57.731.420.112.38,65

2.92.92.51.61.00.8

70400 -50.00

)10.00.2.130.00150.00170 .00__:_

190.40210600230 .00 .7

270.00 -290400 -

0.60.20 .2

310.G0330.00350600370.00 -490.00

062

_70.0*0 .0

-0.0

CASES OROCESS EU.M. 81100. 8A1A

VALUE

34651i5155.0000

a 060

-317158

06.1

PIAXISUM VALUE 318.0000 310.4000

5UM OF SCORES 109968815 14841.0000

SUM. ACM. SCURES 99647e6875 11302AL.000031.8423 37.4534

SIND. UEV. (N) 43.2605 46.787ST AU UEV. t N*1 / 4369010 46.4410kc4.)1Ati 156E4732 20.4),IL

32. Indicate the approximate 3evel of funding for the compensatory reading progrom(s)in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROCRAM 4

FEDERAL

ESEA Title I

...404.J

0H

..-1

UW004

000:4

to-IrU0H

N-IwW004

000Z

I-404.404JWOJJWC0

1-s

vi

04L4

0=

ri0A.,0H

nt

0P.

0

0Z

(8) o o pop oci pop DapMAMMA 32 PAW, A

SCORE INTERVALS F !CT CF P-6L 1 PIA

LQ 13.1 1492.000 L1.6 32.63.000 10.4 30.6

33.121.41044

lama43.130.6

124 47.4-11/- 419.4LOT 34.6

-F C.-PC T

348 100.0l04 62.2LOT 32.6

CASES PROCESSED *M. !WANK CATA4161RUM VALUERAA1PUM VALUESUM OP SCORES140 920. SCORESMEANST I). DEW. Stftl

41146_015_16_ 011REOIAN

a

a

39.4464146.00CO1000403.0.000

14.7607

1.93700.41670.43041.9031

328L47

1._00043.d000

439.4004475. 0004_

1.44820.44760.4369L.91.24

GUEST1001 32

SLORE-INTERVALS

FART

F PCT CF PriLts F 144.T.

4.90_2.0003.000

6.2 17,0 35.7 109.04.3 12.0 29.4 U.S 45

45.929.4

25.2 74.5 25.2 70.5 53 44.4

1513 100.0'94 -64.154 34.6

CASES PROCESSEDMO. SLAM CATA

35.6924140.(1CC4

__MINIMUM VA1 MI___21 1.0900RAX1MUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 90.3194SUM SOO. SCORES 249.91141MEAN a 2.530$5TNO. OLV. (1443 0.77385TMOe (N-As a 0.7441AU-am a 2.7911

L53322

1,6%0004

304.0000712.U000

0.040/

L.0711

32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for

in your school by each source indicated below

FEDERAL

ESEA Title I

PROGRAM 1

4.) wc4+

Nm Z0

PROGRAM

the compensatory reading program(s)

: (Answer separately for each program.)

2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4r4

0 0r4 -1 4-I

1.0 0 0Li 8-4 a0 to 0 0 0

134 Z E-0 N

0el ..-1140 0004.88-404iPa

0 0 0 Z0Z E 114

WO 0(14 n

QUESTION 32 PA C

_ .

F-- PCT CF F *Pa- F d-PC T

I.OLG2.0003.000

2.5 7.3 344_100.0 191.6 4.6 3/e6 9207, 16

30.2 66.1 30.2 66.1' 26

49.121.743.1'

05 100.04. 70.828 43.1

NC. 8L ANY. CATAPINIPUM VALUEPAZIPUN VALUESuM OF SCORESSUN S410. SCORESMEAN 4SIND. DEv. IN1 *

ahac 4/EV.. ktv!I)PEOIAN it

34.3259159.0CCO

1.0G003.0000

96.3655241.9629

2.80600.5488

2.9224

4101.0000

-;464013944000343.000020/1004,4390

QIXSIION 32

SCURF INTEkVALS

PART

F FLT F G,f .

/. 0002.0003.000

1.5 4.60.9 2.d30.9 92.7

310 ko,c 12 36.431.6 95.4 11 34430.9 92.7 10 40.3

6.3 100.0-11 63.610 30.3

A SE PROCESSEDbt. INK CA TA

lt I PaMUM VALUENA ill ilU* VALUE

SUM OF SCORES *SUM SAO. SCORESAN

SIND. ay. (N)th-qk

mifo I At; a

It

33.3223 33163.0000 442

1.0000_ 1.00003.060096.0054

263013232.881r3.44(7

64.0000146.0000

9.k015 _0.0269

2.9605 1*'

32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)

in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)


ri fel vi r.1 vi .-1 41is

S4.1 0 0 4.1 0 4.1

.1.i N 14 0 .i.i k 1.4.1 14 0

0 C1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01.0 CI4 a I-, cii Z 10 CI4 Z H Pa Z

FEDERAL

ESEA Title I

Other(specify)

ODD DOD ODD000) DOD ODDcuesiign 32 PAR E

SCORE 1 til EAV ALS F PC7 CF Petei.to F P 6T Ce-P d4C I

1.000 0.1 AA 33.8 100.0 1 5.3 19 100.02.000 0.7 2.0 3307 .99.7 6 31.6 18 94.73.000 33.0 97.7 33.0 17.1 12 40.2 12 b3.2

CASES PROCESSEDNU. el ASK DATA

33.8013161.4040

I4456

141818UM VALUE _Ls_CACO 1.4000MAXI NUR V ALU k MOO 3.4000SAM OF SCORE S a 1004134 49.0004SUN WO. SCORES a 100.1230 1336+3000MEAN I 2 1148 2.37414SiNee Div. ( NJ * 0.1714 0. SokidSTNO. eft. (14-1/ = 0.1740 0. (WeNEDI *Pi a 2+1114 2.70003

PART4UESTION 32

-iccoir .I. iitiiii ALS F Oa C.'t CPCTF PCT CP P8LiA

1.000_ 0.2 C. I 33.3 100.0 3 1$.0 14 100.0C.6 33.1 11.3 2 is.? 'r73.02.000 0.2

3.000 32 oti 98.1 32.9 VW 7 51.4 7 Se 3

CASESE...i. -PROCEcseu - 33.3221 / Z--- -....___ ____ .. ..... _____ _

NO. BLANK DA TA a 164.0000 463MINIMUM VALUE a 1. 0000 144004MAXI MUM min a 3.00GOSUN Cr SCORES = 91.21.1 20.0000WO S9.. ,SCCiNEL,_ ..4 a 297_10 al 7460000ME AN w 2.9799 2: --3-333-

I IND DEV Ift1 a 0.1842 0K49d$.314041,.001A(470.".. 063170 0.4876%EDI AN ill 201734 2e-6429-

32. Indicate the approximate leve); of funding for the compensatory reacting program(s)

in your school by each sourcedicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)

PROGRAM

Lb at\14

0114 z

FEDERAL

ESEA Title I

Other(specify)

rIrd

(-4

PROGRAM 2

U

0

4-4

0z

3 PROGRAM 44-4 4-1O Z

r4 .1-1 r.i 4.1

10 4-i W 10 4.t1-1 1-4 0 4.1 $.1

0 10 0 0 0I (14 Z F-'

C

El 0 ODD ODD ODDD OG D D(9r 0 DM El

UEStIct4 32 PART 6

_

SC ORE INTERVALS

1 .00g2.0003.000

CASES PRLC ESED

PC7 CP .41,14 F i1c.per0.1 CIL 33.3 [00.0 1 25.0 4 100.00.1 0.3 Via 99.7 1 45.0 3 75.0

33.1 99.4 33.1 911.4 2 U.O.5 2 50.0

33 3211O. EL* kli OA TA .3 /4144.0000

MINIMUM VA LUk a 1.0000mmxIMUM vitt.UkSUO4 OF SCORES 99.6439

291141t4

473.1.0000

hEmm a 2 .99. 15SIND. °EY. Ili) 0.2U3STRO. _UV. ($- 1 ) a: AgalttMEOIAN a 24,9s72

3400009.41000

23.44)002.45000462t20..9514Z.A100

UãS1LQN 32 PART

SOME INTER ALS F PCI Cil p-aLit FP..i C-PGT

i000 o.i oj 3.3.3 10040 1 344 3 100.024000 0.1 0.3 334 99 a 1 33" -2 46,73.000 33.1 99.4 33.1 914 1 3383 1 333

LA SE S PKESS ED a81.ANK DATA

/4 IN I 141.01 VALUéP.AX1 kum vAt.utSUM OF SCOmiS

SQ0._iftAh

IND. UEV, (Ai asit40. cEv. (N-le

"MIN

33.11211b4.0000

1400003.0000

99.6E3900. 44,64

2.99150,11930.12112.991/

3472

1. ki0007

6.400014.4000

0.61051. u0U0

44)U)



FEDERAL

ESEA Title i

Other(specify)

PROGRAM 1r-i0ri ..-40 4.1 0

4., 14 C0 0 0(-0 04 Z

PROGRAM 2..-40

0-1 +4t " 04J W C0 t 0El 14 Z

PROGRAM 3P-I0rI '4

0 " . 04.41-1CJJWC0 0 0EI Al Z

PROGRAM 4.-IcorI -1

0 43 00 ' 0

El CLI Z

DOD DOD DOD E1nOD.DIDD DOD DODWO CIAO OD ODD DOD

32

SCORE INTERVii5

1.0002.0003.000

FART I

PCT CF 1"8LW F CF C -PCT

0.2 0.5 34.1 100.0 Z__,k4.3102 3.4 34.0 99.5 9 64661

__A4-1.0014°141 850

32.8 96.1 3248 96.1 3 21.4 3 21.4

CASES PROCESSED 14.1316NO. BLANK DATA 44 158.4080MINIMUM VAL.U1 1:0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES * 100.034SidtikODA_KOJA4 3006_1423PEAK x 2.9585STNO. OEV. 4hI 4 0.2254STNO itr!-11 * 0.2240MEC1AN a 2.8797

CIESTIZI6 32

Icon

PART 4/

INTERVALS F e44 GP A -d1K F

1.0002.0003.000

G.5 .._O.32.3

2.39662

33.6 100.0 572

336132.3

91.496.2

4-.ASES FRuCESSEDNO. 8LANA DATAMINIMUM VALUE_

*VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEAN

a

aat

as

Sb,O. CEV. (MI51140 O V. Pr ;1ME Ci ts

14 .

461

0016000U3.00

29.000065.00002.47140.931C4.0.572.456i

3.7 14 100.04.6 -14;3

14.3 2 14.3

33.6108162.0000 461A.AcoP 1.00043.0000 564000

99.0280 25.0000294.5142 51.4000

641463 MITT-0.2856 O. 0;3902900. 0.o993269101


PROGRAM 1. PROGRAM 2, PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4

a cd 0:!4

FEDERAL

ESEA Title I

Other(specify)

4-4 ...404..$

44p

Va0 i 0

f4 P4 Z

rj ri 4-4 mrt eiZ k W 0 UM 04.1 0

k 0 .kkO4Jk0O 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

t-t P4 z -' AI Z El At =

17300 DOD ODD ODDD OD DOD COO DOGO DD DD0IVIDDODOO

SCORE J NTE RV ALS

tp_op2.0003.000

NO a 81-AkX DATA Ja

MINIMA VA LUkMAXIMUM wALuEUM OP SCORES Is

SUR SW. SCORESMEAN aSTNO. DEV. (NITNG. 01v. 1N-1_1 m

ME DI AN

a

PART X

QUESTION 32

INTEIN ALS

F i0C1 0 Out614'' F Pt.' C. C....PCT

0.4 Li. 33.50.1 0.3 33.133.0 96.7 33.Q

v0134- 4 44.4 9 100.090 419 : 2 44.2 S 55.6SU/. 3 3304 3 33.3

PART L

33.4572162.0000

1.00003.0600-

99.56L8a97446C82.97630.21020.21342.9933

F PCT- -al.000 0.4.04 __CM2.000 0.2 C.73.000 33.1 96.8

CASES PficCtiEti.NO. 61.Alvm DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAX! MUM VALUE 0

SuA OF SCORES s5um 500 5C0146$__ s.PLANSINU. DIV. iml m

SINR..U4v (N-liMEGIAN a

J3053343 99.433.1 96.6

t: I .0000_1.0003.0000

99.4031290.#

2.98240.16180.11042.9938

9444

1.00#103.0110®L7.0003940000

I. 68890.6749O. /2813_1.7300

F

2

6F C.'PCT

7 100.03 41.9 5 71.42 28.6 2 28.b

468kith/0

ie %IWO14.U04J32.00002.u0J00.15590.6102400JJ

32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)In your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)

FEDERAL

ESEA Title I

Other (specify )

PROGRAM 1

04-4

0 4..) 04,1 14 00 0 0H $2.4 Z

PROGRAM 2

00 U 04../ 1-i 00 0 0

E4 CLI Z

PROGRAM 3

04-I -rt0 4..) 044k041$400 0 0

1.4 CI4 Z

PROGRAM 4

4-I 140

0 4..i 0

0 0 0F4 CL4 Z

I:3 0D OD 00D OD 00(4)0 0 0(00 0 0

QUESTION 32 PART N

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

CASES PROCESSEDNJ. OLANK DATA aMINLOVII VALUE aAAALNUO VALUE41.1* OF SCORES aSUN SAO. SCORES *MOAN aLINO. DEV. IN) uST N0. DEV. IN-1) aMiD1AN

4UETION 32 PART N

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

CASES PROCESSED a

NU. BLANK QA TA aKNIMUM VALUE144XLNUN VALUE ski$4 OF SCORES a

4414 SOD. SCORES aKm ANSIND. DEV. IN)IND. DEV. IN-41 a

ftDIAN a

F Pi,T

0 0.03 1..0I ,4.0

GF C -PCT

4 100.04 100.0A 25.0,

4

4712.40003.40009.4000

21.40002..45000.43300.'0002.twa

F PcT

2 44.03 60.00 0.4

GF C-PCT

4701.40002.04048.400014.00001.60400.484V0.'4771.6667

100.04100

O 0.0

O 0 0O 0 0

0 0

PCT CF P-841

0,0 0.0 _33.4 100.00.1

33630.4

99.633.433.3

100.099.6

33.4055163.00002.00043.4000

100.049099.9427a .9 9

0.06030.06122.9980

F PC1 CF P-Ella

0,3 C.9 33.1 100.00.3 0.9 13.4 09.133.1 90.2 33.1 98.2

33.1455162.0000

1.00003.0000

100.310499.2202

2.91260.21260.21602.9904



O 0H H H H 4-4

FEDERAL

ESEA Title I

. Other(specify)

01.10H

4.;

$4

CL4

0

O 0 44 0 4a v P 0 44O 0 0 0Z E-. CL4

0 Z 14

E3120O DDD ODODD

QUESTION 32 PART U

SCORE INTERVALS

Lo0002.0003.000

CASES PROCESSED aW. BLANK DATA nMINIMUM VALUE *MAX[40k VALUE a.mIM OF SCORES aSUM SQO. SCORES is

MEANSING. DEV. iNI,IND. DEV. IN..11 aMtO/AN

QUESTION SZ PART P

SCORE INTERVALS

1.4442.0003.000

CASES PROCESSED aN0. BLANK DATA aMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE a4014 OF SCORES40M SOD. SCORES aMEANBIND. DEV. (N$ =4fM0* DEV. IN-11 aMEDIAN

F PUT

1 34.4I 34.31 33.3

H0uW0CI4

000Z

HIIIsh

t0o

e.1

0H11kCL4

0

())C0Z

O DD 000 ODDD OC] DODD OD DOD ODD

O (AD D 41-3 D

t,F C...PC T V7Wci

3 1.04.4 G*I 0.32 66.7 0.0 0.01 33.3 33.2 .91007

3472

.?

3.04006.0000

14.00441;404o4.41651.0000,2.4400

F

I

I 14.00 0.0

CF 11-81A

33.3 100.033.Z 29.733.1 9907

33.3464164.4444

1.0000360000

99.13$,296.4114

2.9944044.40.11412.9441

GF Cw40CT- F Cl CF P-t3Lso

2 100.0 G.I C.3 33.2 110*01 10.4 4.0 C.0 334 99.70 0.0 33.1 99.1 33.1 99.7

2

4711.u004.i2.u0003.u0005.u040

0./0711.24)44

33.23010'0004

1.00G03.0400

99.1143294.341520,400.10860.11Q22.2945

32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatoryin your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separate

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3-I . ..4 .-1

co co

H H H 8,4

0 00 W 0 0 kco o o co o

ro

0 014

0 0I. at e-o P. Z E-1 PI ZSTATE (specify)

reading program(s)

ly for each program.)PROGRAM 4

00 al ZP.

L) %WI DOODO ODDEIF] DOD ODD DODDOD DOD DOD DODWitSTION 32 PART Q

SCORE INTERVALS F P..T

1.000 22 /.62.000 123 511.73.000 80 45.6

6F C -PCT F PCT

225 100.0A03 90.240 35.6

CASES PROCESSEDNU. SANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESon OF SCORES

=

0=

225250

1.40403.4000

508.0000i0M SOD. SCORES = .&434.4044McAN 2.2576SIND. DEV. (N) A 0.6220sIND. DEV. (N-11 0.6234MtOIAN 2.4354

4UEsIION 32 PART R

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

F Ptor

9 /o*70 57.443 49.1

CF P-8L6

,5 6.6 38.4 100.012.6 32.7 35.9 93.423.3 60.7 MS 60.7

38.39.7120.0000

4.00003.044097.555

262.411172.54080.61670.62492.6760

(oF C--PC T PCT CP P-Ikw

L22 100.0 0.7 1.1 34.2 100.0113 92.6 6.7 ls.6 33.5 97.9

43 35.2 26.4 74.4 24.4 78.4

LASES PROCESSEDN0. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUEion OF SCORES

u

a

0a

122353L40003.4040

178.40004UN SQ0. SCORES = 676.0004Mc AN a 2.4101iTNO. OEV. = 0.3904SIND. DEV. (N-11 = 0394dMtOIAN a 2.4429

34.2111154.0000

1.03003.431100

94.5361268.0040'446320.47070.47772.8619

32. Indicate the approximate level of funding forin your school by each source indicated below:

STATE (specify)

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2

CO 40r-i ri t-i vi0 6-1 0 0 4-044 S-I C 4.1 640 0 o

Ho

t-4 Do Z 13+

the compensatory reading program(s)(Answer separately for each program.)

PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4

o o- t-C P-i .1.4

W 0 U 0 0 WO 41 $1 C 14 14 Co o o o o o ZoZ 1i 144 Z C-0 04

0 0 El 0(5)0 0 0WD 0 D00 DOD 00 ODD00 DOD 00T I ON 32 PART S

SCORE INTERVALS

.0002.0003.000

C.ASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA.144 MOW VAPJ aiMAMMON VALUE aSION OF SCORES 42

500N_SOD. SCORES aMEAN a.14410. DEN. (NI a41140. DEV. (A141AiDIAN

likea T1 ON 32 PART T

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

CASES PROCESSEDBLANK DATA

NI NINUM VALUEK NUN VALUE

SON OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMt ANSIND. DEW. 1 NJ 21

bINO. DEV. N-1)Mt DIAN

a

a

IF- P kol CF CliCi. F PCT CF P41Lw

3 5.4 So 100.0 0.3 C.9 31.9 100 .S____33 111.9 53 94.6 3.3 9.1 334 99 oi20 13.1 40 35.7 30.1 119.3 104,1 09.3

56419

1.04403.0400

129.0040315.401A

2.30360..)644Cizt02.25 To

F

2 9.150.0

9 44.9

.F CPCT fi

33.0394L 5800000

togoo3000;

etoohisAdatss2 .01470.34560.35112.9406

Pt/ CF P .41T

22 10640 00_2 0.5 33.4 1002Q 90.9 1.0 2.9 33.3 99.5

9 40.9 32.3 96.6 32.3 96.6

22453

1. 00003.'4000

5 14 4100012 T.14000

2.31620.03150.04632..a182

32.406162 .0U00

_ 1.40003.0000

99.0149294.1M3

2.96050.21990.22332.9422



STATE (specify)

QUETION 3Z PART U

.-1 .m

4-1 s4 4-1 4-I ,.I vi0 I., 0 0 i. 0 0 41 4)4-I $ 0 1.1 k 0 4., k 0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0H 61.1 Z H 111 Z t4 114 Z

100-I rt0 1-) 04.1 k 00 m oH Pa Z

DE)O DOD DOD DODtur:10D0)000 COO DODDOD ODD ODD ODD

SCORE INTERVALS F pa CF CFC.PCT P PCT

1.000 1 /2.5 6 100.0 4.1 0.3 33.5 100.02.000 5 6z.5 7 47.5 0.6 1.9 33.4 99.73.000 2 2540 2 23.0 32.1 340 97.4

GASES PROCESSEDN44, SLAM( DATA a

8467

33.4646i63.0000

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000 3.0000WM OF SCORESSuM SQD. SCORESMEAN

mAs

a

17.000039.0000

54.59t029744210

2.4.250 2.9760STNO. DIV. IN/ a 0.5990 0.16794T140. DEV. (N.-1/ 0.0409 0.170MEDIAN a 4,4000 2.9189

QuEsTTON 32 PART V

SCORE INTERVALS F Pa 6F C-PCT f PCT CF

1.000 2 26.6 7 100.0 0.2 0.6 33.5 IN.°2.000 5 71..4 5 71.4 0.5 1.5 33.5 99.43.000 0 0,0 0 0.0 32.8 97.9 32.8 97.5

CAiES PROCESSED00. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE4001 OF SCORES4UM SO. SCORESNtANaNO. DEV. 041Si NO. DEV. 0..4/MEDIAN

s

4681.0004e0004)

12.000422.40001. T1410.45140.4440104000

33.4643163.0040

1.00003.6660

49.51147297.1820

2.97360.19100049352.9893

32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading prograra(s)


PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4..4 r-I

CO tO td CS

r.i 01 p-I get . 1.4 .ri 1.4 .r.1O 4-I

0t.1.3 0 CO -LI di cd aj 41

4.1 ia g 4.1 w 0 owc.ww0o 4 0 0 ad 0 0 0J 0 0 all 0

STATE (specify) t-4 ck Z H P-1 Z H 154 Z E-t M. Z

DQD ODD ODD DOD0 D DOD 490DOD DOD DOD DODAii-E.Stiiiki .32 PART M

F Pia C.F C-PCT f PCT CF P-411.14

10000 2 4.0 *0 5 100.0 g...._. ... -___ .A 4000 1 20;0 3 5000'34100 2 40.0 A 44.0

0.2 046 3_3'3 100.0O*1

134l0.3

4962316133.1

94.4itg a.

a iwi i #110C ES S E D .3" 5 334321Nil. IL MK DATA 0 470 164 .0000I/ NI not VALUE a 1.w000 L.9400taliiai4 0ALie s 3o0000 3 *COWStilt 0/P SCORES = lououa Of. lit.4404 *PI ..APORES * . 00009 19400149OliAN 211 2.4000 1.9465STNO. REV. (Ni is O. 11964 00159341.440..0EV. IN-11 ° 1. 4104,110 0 .1511ME 0 1AM = 2.0009 2.5459

44UtatION 32 PART X

SCORE INTERVALS F 1/42 GO C.PC r

1.000 1 3.4.3 3 100.02.000 1 13.3 2 46.T3.000 1 33.3 1 33.3

CASES PRUCES SEP = 3nJ. BLANK DATA ° 411NININUN VALUE 1.44000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.00004.iN OF SCORES mg 41.40041

aUM SRO. SCORES mg 14.0000MEAN = 2:40o4$INO. 0EV. NiI 0 0.0105Fis604b REV. IN-11 = 1.0000

04ILDIAN 2.0000

F PCT CF P-bLo

0.1 C.3 33.3 100.00.1 0.1 33.2 0.9a

33.1 99.4 3 3.1 99.4

33.32421&44.04360

1.00001.4000

19.6439190.62.99150.1193

2.9912


PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4.-4

..-1 ...1 ..-1o o o o

.--i ..-1 4-1 .ri ri ..-1 .-I rtO Si 41 u 4-0 a} 0 1J 0 03 14 4$W g w W C w W 0 w W 0O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0H C4.4 :4 1-4 Cid Z H 1:74. Z H P. ZSTATE (specify)

QUESTION 32 PART Y

01;JEJ ODD OCIEJ DODDOD COO DOD ODEty)000(4000 ODD DOD

SCORE INTERVALS F

1.000 0 0.02.000 0 tis03.000 1 100.0

CF C-PCT F FCT CF P.41L01

L9.003. 9.0 i1.3 1000_0i 10006 0.0 0.0 3)41 100.01 100.0 33.3 14040 13.3 100.0

CASES PROCESSED a 1 33.2694NJ. ALANX DATA a 41'4 145.0064MINIMUM VALUE a 3404000 3.0000MAX/RUM VALUE a 3.4000 360040SJM OF SCORES a

34.410000 910,414,SUN SOD. SCORES a 9.4000 2494361MEAN sr 3.4000 :i.0041SING. DEV. INI a 0.JMEDIAN = 3.4000

klutsrion 32 PART 2

SCORE INTERVALS F PuT 4.,F C-..PCT F 'PCT CF P.,ALW

1.000 2 60.7 $ 00.0 0.2 0.6 33.4 100.02.000 t 13.3 1. 33.3 0.1 11.4 3114 99.43.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 33.1 91.0 33.1 99.0

CASES PROCESSEDNJ. BLANK OATA

ais

3472

33.3606164.0000

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.4000 1.0040MAXIMUM VALUE * 2.Q0041 1.6640SJM OF SCORES a 4.4000 49.4341SJA SW. SCORES = 6.0000MEAN = 1e434

_ft6d1410___2.9646

STNO. DEV. (NI 41 0.4714 04606SEND. DEV. IN-11 8 0.)774 04630MEDIAN a 144540 24011910



PROGRAM I PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4

toco.-1

to to

,-I .41-1 v-I . v4 ri ,-1 rt 4-1 ...I

013 4.1 al o 4.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 04.i 0 0 as 0 0 al 1.4 C. as It 0O 0 o o cd 0 0 0 0 0 ( 0E+ CLI z E-1 C14 X E-I C14 = I.4 C14 XSTATE (specify)

iiitieT1QM 32 PART AA

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

CASES PROCESSEDMae BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUN OF SCORESSUM SW. SCORESMeANSIND. UV. iNiMiDIAN

*

a

a

a

QftbTIOM 32 PART AO

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

D E,ID ODD ODD DO DD DOD ODD DODD E(AC D

F PI.T

1 400.0.0 0.0Q 0.0

GF C -PCT

1 /00.00 0.00 0.0

1474

1.40001.40001.00001.00001.40000.41.0000

F Net CF

I IOU.°0 0.00 0.0

10

0

LASES PROCESSED a

J. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUEsUlt OF SCORES

4741.00001.00UuLWOW

SUM SOD. SCORES 1.0000MiAN 1.4004SIND. DEV. (14/ 0.4AtOIAN 1.4040

F PCT

O_ 0.30.0 0.4334, 94.1

CF P-410

33.2 100.&3114 99.7

99.7

33.2304145.0000

L24000MAO.

99.014i29463421

2.9,400.101160.11422.9949

100.00.00.0

F

0.1

PC/

463

CF P41LW

33.2 190.00.033.1

04000

33.133.1

99.799.7

33.2304165.0000

1.0000

31110090. 410,290444111

2.90400.10$40.11022.9005



LOCAL (specify)

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2

m m..-1 ....1 r1 ..40 V 0

14 0 44 1444 44

440 0 Z0 0 0

(-4 04 l'4 At

or

0z

PROGRAM 3

00 44 W44 140 c 0Et A. Z

PROGRAM 4

ro0-1M44 14 C

W

0004 z(-4

kficIEIDEMODO DOD DODDOD ODD DOD DOEDOD DOD DOD DODQUESTION 12 PART AC

SCORE ifireRvaCt

4.0002.0003.000

F

0!1St30

CF 10-61.6

100.11

PO! CF C-PCT

zbirl 4$2 100.0

F PC7

2,6 7.3 144S9.9 Lit MO1.5.1 48 0.1

34 Ilia am 92.728.2 424. -SW 024

GASES PROCESSED 252 144167N. BLANK DATA * 221 1484000PN Nl NUM VALUE a 4.4qao 1,00000MAXI PUN VALUE 1.0000 3.4400SIM OF SCORES 479.0000 91641141SU L _SOD. CORE S 1009.00# 2714412MEAN 1.9008 247518STNO« DE V. IN) a 0.6253 0.579

1/41.11 0.0205 0403MEDIAN L.V172 244,20

0UE4T1AN 32 PART AC

SCORE INTERVALS F INA GF PCT CF 16-81.N

1.000 44 30.3 14S 100.0 4., 13.1 37.0 100.0z.000 78 93.8 1.01. 49.7 7.4 204 32.1 84.93.000 23 AS4 23 15.9 24.7 44.1 24.7 66.8

LASES PROCESSEDKANN OA TA

143330

364117134.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0040 100000Oda NUN VALUE 3.0000 3404030/6 OF SCORE S 269.0000 93347JO SOO. SCORES 561.0000 2344567

MEANST NO. OE V 04/ a

11.4.455Z0.6641

143100.7142

STNO DEV. IN-1/ 0.666) 0.7241MEDIAN 1.4444 2.7512


PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4r-1 . .-+ ,-1vs vs 4 taH .0 4-1 .g4 4-4 vi H -ri

0 0 0 W 4-, 0 0 4.4 0 0 0 00 14 0 0 14 0 u 14 0 u f4 c.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0H 114 Z H 114 Z I PO4 Z

LOCAL (specify)

El opowooferciocoo DO DOD DIOD ODD DOD ODDQUESTION 32 PART AE

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

-F -P44

21. 345.36 50.09 12.1

IX-C4C I

/a 100.04$ 62.59 U.S

f PCT CF POL0

7.1 is.0 44.4 100.016.1 44.5 3167 Si .0

54.4 40.5 1464 40.5

CASES PROCESSEDM. BLANK DATA a

72403

41.6140106.0000

mpomym VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =

1.0000 1.00003.4040 3 .0.6ao

SUM OF SCORES a 126.0000 12.3.449sup 590. SCORES " 232.4990 22(6 01441,MEAN 61500 2.2141STNO. OEM. IN) a 0.6614 0a4041sno. oay. (W.11 ooli.0#4 0.74,'1MEDIAN 67500 24449.

QUESTION 32 PART AF

SCORE INTERVALS F 101.4 C-..00CY

1.0002.000

1116

34.450.0

J2ai

100.065.6

3.000 5 15.6 5 15=4

F PCT Cf P...1111.w

1.1 3.3 3444 100.01.52111

4.352.4

33.031.9

96.792.4

GASES PROCESSED * 32 34.0760NU. BLANK DATA 443 155.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0040 60000MAXIOW VALUE 3.0000 3.0400SLIM OF SCORES a so.v000 56.5474SUM SOD. SCORES a 10.6houg_ 290.3131MEAN 1:diz5 2.8900SIND. DEV. IN! 0.66/6 0.4035SIND. DEW. IN-1/ 0 0.0U7 0.4496MEDIAN 1.4/25 . WM*

i


PROGRAM l PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4

0 0 to 0.-1 .44 r4 vi .1 4-1 1'.4 r1M 1-0 n) co 44 4 4 a .4) M a W4..) 1.1 0 ,1-1 14 0 4-1 1.1 0 1.1 1.1 0'0 M 0 0 M 0 0 M 0 0 M 014 Ad Z H N Z H N Z H N ZLOCAL (specify)

00D 0E30(W00 100 000 0E30DOD 0 00 0

QUESTION 32 Pint-AG

SCORE INTERVALS

:10002.0003.000

CASES PROCESSED a

NU. *LANK CA TA144 Mi mum VALUEMAXIMUM voiLUt aSUN OF SCORESit* SQ04 SCORESNtANUNa. oev. (N)ST NO. oev. (14-41MEDIAN

QOESTON 32 PART AM

SCORE INTERVALS

F

5

130

F

PCT CF P11-M

1.2 33.6 A00.0

CF C..PCT

2164 18 1004

F

0.472.2 13 7Z2u.o 0 0.0

0.532.7

1.4 31.2 28 .8

17.3 32.7 27.3

18451

414000

33.64001624000

100002,0000

310000057.0000

IMMO2464413SOI61912

1.12220.44790.,609

2404070.24980.2934

1.4017 2.2841

F C.q0CT F PCT t.F P-.81.4

1.000 3 34.3 9 100.0 0.4 1.2 33.8 100.02.000 5 35.6 6 66.7 1.3 3.9 33.4 98.83.000 1 11.1 1 11.1 32.1 94e$ 32.1 94.6

LASES PROCESSEDalie BLANK DATA a

9466

33.8121159 .04130

MINIMUM VALUE 164000 L0000NA4144N-VALUE 3. M000 3.0000S4M OF SCORES a 16.0000 29.2726S404 SOD. SCORES 32.0000 2244,11145seAN, s' 1;1116 2.9360SIND. DIV. (NI a 0.0285 0.2903STUD. (AV. (**1) 0.0407 0.2947MEOIAN t.aloao 2.9727




cs to to m-4 ..-1 r-1 ..e4 1-.4 ....1 r1 .r.40 f4 0 0 4.3 0 000 M4, 04.J W 0 4.> W 0 4.31.40 w 1.4 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0H Ai Z H A4 Z F4 A4 Z (-4 A. Z

LOCAL (specify)

DOD DOD DOD DDDDDD OD ow otpap DDDOD DDD DOD ODD

WESTION 32 PM? AI

SCORE INTERVALS F OCT' CF C.,,PCT t pc/ CF P-8LN

1.000 2 44.0 5 100.0 0.2 0.6 33.4 100.4_2.000 2 40.0 3 40.0 0.2 Oa 144 99.43.000 1 20.0 1 2000 3303 940 33.4 111.1

CASES PROCESSED m 5 33.4222NJ. BLANK DATA = 470 143.0000MINIMUM VALUE a 1.4000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 0 3.0000 34411140i4N OF SCORES a 9.0000 0110164444UN SOD. SCORES a 19.0000 294101.11MEAN :a 1.6000 269414SIND. DEV. (NI a 0.14B3 0,1731sINO. OEV. (N..1.1 a 0.6367 0.1757NcOlAN 0 1.7500 209936

QUESTION 32 PART AJ

SCORE INTERVALS F PST CF C-PCT pc/ CF P-BLW

4 100.0 C.2 C.6 33.4 100.01.000 2 60.02.000 2 54.03.000 0 0.0

OASES PROCESSED a

NJ. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE$414 OF SCORES nAIM SOO. SCORES is

folcAN

SOW. DEV. (NI aSINO, DIV. (W.1/Mc D1AN 0

2 50.0 0,2 0.7 33.2 99.40 0.0 33.0 98.7 33.0 98.7

4471

1.40402.4.1000

6.000010,400410b0040.60000.57141.$000

33.4222163,0000

1.00003.0000

S14.64410290.31312.94150.417110.17572.9936

32. Indicate the approximate level of funding forin your school by each source indicated below

LOCAL (specify)

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM.-1

. r0

J 14 WW m0 4

14a,

0w Z E-t 1:1.

0 td14 134

the compensatory reading program(s)(Answer sepirately for each program.)

2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4

0100Z

.- -.4 rlr-1

..40 .t.J 01 Ww 0 14 00 4 0 0 4 0E-1 04 Z E-t N

DOD ODD ODD ODDODD DOD ODE: DOD

titc)DODWIDD ODD ODDQUESTION 32 PART AK

SCORE'INTERVALS

100102.0003.000

CASES PROCESSED =ND. BLANK DATA a

SINIAUN VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE5401 OF SCORES =SUN ,400. SCORES 0AEANSENO. DEV. (N).1ND. DEW. (N-I)MEDIAN

4UtST1ON 32 PART AL

SCORE INTERVALS

F

1_ 44,32 66.70 4.0

4.4 t-PCT.

3 1043.0Z0 IL 0

3472

1.40002.44405.40004.40401.66070.t7140.27741.1500

F PCT CF P-B LW

Gel 0.3 33.2 100.0944 0.1 $ 1.1 99.732:1 9444 32.9 99.1

33.2367165.0000.

100000344460994M429740Alt

2.91170.1.3380.13592.9952

F PO CPCT F PCT CF P-BLit

1.000 2 54.0 42.000 2 50.0 23.000 0 0.0 4

LASES PROCESSED =NJ. BLANK DATA 2'

MINIMUM VALUE aMAXIMUM VALUESUN OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORES 0

Me AN a

SINO. OEV. (NIsTNO. ()EV. (N-I) =Mc WAN a

4*71

1.44JJ2.40046.1400

10.40041.20440.20400.'7741.2044

100.0 o.a_ 0.4 33.5 100.650.0060

0.333.0

0.1S4.6

33.333.0

49.448.6

33.4406163.0000

1.00003.400099.1444

294.33472.97940.17774.18042.9127

32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for

in your school by each source indicated below

LOCAL (specify)

PROGRAM I.-4

m.-.4 ,-1O ub 4)4-) 1-i 0O 0fl 04

(0 Z

PROGRAM.-1

to

mw4.

4.JN0E-1 cs4



CO

1-1 1-1m

...4 4-4 .-I 4-1W 0 &I W 0 us 0

O 004

tO 0 0 coz I" Z E4 P.. Z

0

p Li o DOD ODD EDEDOD ODD 'ODD DEC]DOD DIMAKUDDWDO

:14,Ei I I 001 3i PART AN

SCORE INTERVALS

-.0002.0403.000

LASES PROCESSEDNJ BLANK DA TAMI N I MUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORES14c A N

SING. OEV. (NI a'4141}. OEV. I W.1 /MEDIAN a

aaaaaaa

a

00t4TION 32 PART AN

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

LASES PROCESSEDretail BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXI MUM VALUESON OF SCORESSON SQO. SCORES11/4 AN

S T NO. 0EV. (NI4/ NO. OEV. ( I+4. I

1E01 AN

aes

aaaaaaaa

F Pul

3 75.01 25.00 0.0

I;F C -PCT F PCT

4 100.0 0.3 C.91 25.0 0.1 4.40 0.0 3360 91.1

4471

14, 0041U

2.00005.00007.0000idf4a100.43300.20001.4647

F NA

2 66.71, 31..i0 4.0

CF P114

31.4 100.0IS. 09.131.0 41.7

C.F CPCT

3472

1.40402.44044.40446.40441.63330.4.7140..2771/

L 43011

.3 100.01 33.30 0.0

33 .4212163 .00001.09003.0000

99.364'3297 I1)47

2.978/0.19460.14752.9935

....... _______..... _._ . ________P C T L. F P-0Lva

0 a 4..... _C.6 33.3_100.Q0.1 0.4 33.1 99.4

33.0 91.0 33.0 99.0_-.. .43 . 3384

164 400001.00003. OCGO

99.41/0529118592.98400.16620.16872.9949


PROGRAM Irico

OS 4.1 at4.1 W g0 I oH cu Z

PROGRAM 21-.1

co

to ,.., e4.) 14 0o ft oH Gt4 Z

PROGRAM 3r-1co

to u a1.) 84 00 RI 0E4 cti =

PROGRAM 4r-ico

ft 43 QJ 14 00 ea 04 94 Z

33.59601b2.0000

I. O 0003.0000

99.9643298 .13 445

2.97550.20430.20742.9921

OTHER

(AD DJ cIttit Do Doo DooOD ODD CI El D

DOD DOE OD ElwULS T ION 32 PART AO

4Uts T I ON 32 P ART AP

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

F RuT

2 Ai. 63 17.6

12 70.4

GASES PROCESSED 17Ni. KAM( DATA 458MINIMUM VALUE = 1.40u0MAXIMUM VALUE 3.1,m)00,

)UM OF SCORES 44.4DUUSUN SOD. SCORES 21 122.4000MEAN = 2.662STAID. DEV. IN) 0.6910SIND. 0EV. IN-I) = 0,1143MEDiAN 2.1917

CF C*PC T F PCT

17.612 70.4

CF Lki

33.59601b2.0000

I. O 0003.0000

99.9643298 .13 445

2.97550.20430.20742.9921

17 100.0 0.3 C.9 33.6 100.015 88.2 Goa Goi 33.3 99.112 70.6 33.1 98.4 33.1 90.4

17 100.0 0.3 C.9 33.6 100.015 88.2 Goa Goi 33.3 99.112 70.6 33.1 98.4 33.1 90.4

CF C*PC T F PCT

GASES PROCESSED 17Ni. KAM( DATA 458MINIMUM VALUE = 1.40u0MAXIMUM VALUE 3.1,m)00,

)UM OF SCORES 44.4DUUSUN SOD. SCORES 21 122.4000MEAN = 2.662STAID. DEV. IN) 0.6910SIND. 0EV. IN-I) = 0,1143MEDiAN 2.1917

CF LkiCF Lki

33.59601b2.0000

I. O 0003.0000

99.9643298 .13 445

2.97550.20430.20742.9921

i


PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4m

-1 ...1g 44 CU4.4 WI g0 t 0H NI z

OTHER

...4as

.,-Ig 1-1 (1,1

-1-) WI C0 0 0H N Z

(a to- -.4 .1-1 r4 44g a 0 0 i..) di

4-I WI ' 4J W 00 0 0 0 ' 0H Cm Z H N Z

E D E l teLP 11 ED

D D D ODD ED

ODD ODD DOD OEDQUEOION 32 PART AQ

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002,0003,000

F

I

3

1

P6T 1.F C- PC T

9.1 IA 100.027.3 10 90,963.6 7 63.6

i ----PC i ----Eii --P-41 .4

414 33.5 100_.0___.c.1

0.333.1

C.9 33.4lea 33.1

99.798.d

4.ASES PROCESSED a 11 33.4658kJ. BLANK DATA a 464 163,0000MINIMUM VALUE a 1.u000 1.0000

3.0000MAXIMUM VALUE a 3.u000sUM OF SCORES 28.4,1000 99.9114iiipt S120. SCORES 0 76.0000 298.963

2.9835MEAN 2.6456SIND. DEV. IN) a 0.056 0.1418SING. OEV. (N-I) a 0.6610 0.1440HENAN 2.1143 2.9941

WOWLON 32 PART AR

SCORE INTERVALS F 1461 6F C-PCT

1,000 2 8 100.0 G 2 qd 33.3 It"2.000 0 0.0 6 1$.0 Q.( 0.0 33.1 99.33.000 6 15.0 6 15.0 33.1 95.3 33.1 99.3

LASES PROCESSED a 8 :. 3 .3121

NU BLANK DATA aMINIMUM VALUE a

461i.I.WiiJ

164.00001.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE a 3.O0Ou 3.0000suM OF SCORES a 20.0000 99.4833SuM SQU. SCORES a 56.u000 291.9619MEAN a 2.5000 2.9815sTNO. °EV. IN) * 0.6660 0.1693s(NO. DEV. (N-I) aHcOLAN *

0.)02542.6333

0.11192.9963

\32. Indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)

in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4

as m sv m4-4 v4 ..-1 4-1 e-1 .-1

ca c..) a) al u cu as u cou 14 g r! V, 2 4., I.. 0 I-) 1-I 00 (a o 0 0 0 0 a) 0 0 0 0(-4 P. Z E-c P. Z Ei P. Z (.4 P. Z

OTHER

DIDO DOD DOE DODWEIOIDDO MOD DODDOD ODD ODD E]Dkidlit I ION 32 PART AS

SCORE INTERVALS F Pc T .F C-PCT F PCT CF P.-13Lv.

1.000 0 0.0 3 100.0 4.4 4.0 31.3 100.02.000 2 66.7 3 100.0 044 0.5 33.3 100.03.000 1 33.3 1 33.3 33.2 Sea5 334 47905

CASES PROCESSED 11

NCI. BLANK DATA "Mt NIKON VALUE aMAXI MUM VALUE itSUM OF SCORES -QUA SOD. SCORES me

Kt AN zs

SINO. DE V . IN) a4i N0. OE V. (N-41 aNEW AN a

wut4 I ION 32 PART AT

SCORE INTERVALS

1.3002.0003.000

LASES PliOCESSE0NU BLANK DATAMI NI MUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESus OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORESMc AN41ND. UEV. I NIMt 0 IAN

aaaaaaaaa

3 33.3412472 144.0000

440000 2.000030:A0U0 3.00007.,40000 99.11437

17.410011 299.22.3333 24,99 Li'0.4714 0.06650.2774 0.0676_2.45030 247916

F Pia

1 L00. u0 U..O0 tj.0

L.F C-PCT

I474

14, .10:101.0001014,030001.000111.4000110.t)1.110011

1 100.00 0.00 0.0

F 1;Ci

G.1 CS0.c C0

33.1 99.7

CF 13-0 IA

33 t2 100.433.1 99.733.1 99.7

33.2314165.0000

1 00003. MO

99.5143298. 34*5

2.99400.10860.11022.991115

32. Indicate the approximate level of funding forin your school by each source indicated below

LOCAL (specify)

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM

(tt sts.14

4.1 06

014 3-c 44

O m o oH 44 z E-1

Cd



td 0

0O 2 11 I 0 .C.0 0

4.1 14 0O 0 0 0 0

Cc+

0 Z0Z H Ai Z H

0 0 E3 E3 0 E3 0 0 0 0 EJ E3goo 000lignoottc.JoEl ED E3 El E3 E3 E3 0 E3

illUET 10N 32 PART AV

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

CASES PROCESSEDNJ. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESall OF SCORESsus SOD. SCORESMEANSIND. DEV. 3 N)ML DIAN

laiES T 10.4 32 PART AU

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

GASES PROCESSEDNt1 BLANK OA TAMd NI MN VALUEMAXI MUM VALUESaM OF SCORESsuM SQD. SCORESMt ANSr NO. OEV.MiD1AM

a

a

a

F

1 100.0O a.00 u.0

LF PCT

J. 100.0 G.1 C.3o -0.0 0.0 0.0

43 000 33.1 90.1

CF 13413.

33.3 100.03141 99.73344 99.7

1 33623114474 /65.0000

1.4000 1..0001.0000 3.0000.1.4000 99.31431.0000 298.34131.4000 2.99400.4 0.10E61.4044 0.1102

2.9983

F

1 A40e0O 0450

O 444a

i;F C -PCT k PCT a P-81.11

1

00

10000.00.0

0.1_ Ca_ 3102 'octal_

0.033.1

cal19.1

33.133.1

99.7C9.7

1 33 23i4414 165.0000

1.4040 11_0,0001.0000 3.00001.0000 Et 431.4000 i941.34951.4040 2.99400.0 0.10861.u000 0.1102

26990

32. indicate the approximate level of funding for the compensatory reading program(s)in your school by each source indicated below: (Answer separately for each program.)

PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4.-c .

CO tOCO

r-iCO

r-io-t 4.1

el 4 ,--i rt rl ri0 A.) 0., el 4-f oi s0 4r 0 n:1 4./ al4.1 li a u N C 4.,-0 0 0 °w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/4 04 Z E-1 Cki Z 1-$ Gil Z 14 Cki Z

OTHER

ODD ODD ODD D0ODE' 01.110 000 0E10tiliPEIDOVEDO DOD DE1E1

Quebitos 32 PART Am

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

F

012

KT

OA33.366.7

CF C -PCT

3 *90., 03 100.02 66.7

F

O. C_

PCT

Co ca

CF P..8 Lei

3.3 100 U0.1

33.3Eta

99033.3 100.033.3 99.7

CASES PROCESSED et 3 33.3408NO. BLANK DATA at 472 A64.0000MINI NUN VALUE .

4.4094 2.0000!TAXI MN VALUE ItSum OF SCORES a

3000008.0000

3.4. 00009940343

SUN SQL). SCORES a 22.0000 299.4214$kAN iiSIND. DEV. (NI at

2. 4,667 2.99140.4,714 0.0479SIND. DEV. I N-1i 0.2774 0.0488

MEDIAN 2.7500 2.906

%WEST I ON 32 PART AX

SCORE INTERVALS F P I GP C -PCT F PCT GE P-BLvi

1.000 1 240 2 100.0 6,1 0.3 33.3 100.1)2.000 0 43.0 1 5060 04 C.03.000 1 50.0

33.2 2 9999.7.71 50.0 31102 99.7

CASES PROCESSED a 2 33.309NU BLANK DATA : 473 164 .0000NI N INUI4 VALUE a 14000 14,0000MAXIMUM VALUE a 3.00oo 300001,11P0 OF SCORES 4.41000 49.1295SUN SOD. SCORES 11' i O. u0U0PAEAN a 24,0000

496.9 SU2.9940

BIND. DEV. (NI as 1 eU OW 0.1084SIND. DEV. IN-11 a 1.4142 0.1101MEDIAN 11 2eS000 2.9949


PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4rI 4-1 r-1 r-I01 fd RI COr-1 4-I r-i ri

VIarl rl

CV LA 411 03 4.) VI AA 414 0:4 4-4 m

0 0 0 0 m i 0 AI 0 0 40 04.4 14 g 4.4 14 u 14 g u 1-4 gI-4 1:44 Z El C44 Z 1-4 1I4 Z El 1:14 Z

OTHER

ODD ODD ODD ODD1=1 ID El EGO DOE lc E3

Dar: CD D Ckttip EV49

QUESTION 32 PART AY

SCORE INTERVALS F Our t:F C-*PCT F PCT CF P-4iLW

1.000 1 st1.0 2 100.0 0.1 0.3 33.3 100.02.000 1 50.0 1 50.0 0.1 04 33.2 99.73.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 33.1 994 33.1 99.5

CASES PROCESSED = 2 33.3098NJ. BLANK DATA = 473 16460000MINIMUM VALUE 44 1.u004 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0040 3,4404SUR OF SCORES = 3.4040 99.4,81SOK SOD. SCORES 41 5.JOOO 2411643119MEAN 1.004 2.9914SiND. DEV. (N) = 0.1178LINO. DEV. (*1) 0.1071 061196MEDIAN VA 1.)040 2.9914

QUESTION 32 PART AZ

SCORE INTERVALS F 4F C -PCT

1.000 1 104.0 1 100.0 0.1 C.3 33.2 100.02.000 0 u.0 0 0.0 04,C 0.0 33.1 99.73.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 33.1 990/ 33.1 99.7

CASES PROCESSEDNU. BLANK CATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE

OF SCORESLO4 SOD. SCORES

McANsINO. DEV. (N)AdDIAN

a

a

aaa

1

4741.u0UU1.u0001.U0001UOUO1. J0UU0.01.400U

33.2384105.0000

1.000)3.0000

99. S1 A3

29044532 .99400.10060.11022.9910

33. Was any teacher resistance encountered in the implementation of the compensatoryreading program(s) in your school?

None at all

Some

A great deal

LILESTION 33

SCORE INTERVALS Ft.I t.F P IN F KJ CF C-PCT

1.000 7 5.4 52.7 ACM 349 _7.s.d 473 100.02.000 13.0 24.4 13.0 24.6 123 2600 124 24-.2

-0.03.000 0.0 Q*0 -0.0 1 0.2 1 0.2

'52,6925CASES PROCESSEDM. BL ANK DA TA

Ni NUN VALUE2*OCCOI OCCO

21. w000

PAS1 NUN VALUEWI OF SCORES

111. 2400065.6477 59160000

SUP WO. SCORES 9_40522, 654.0000MEAN 1.2459SIND. DEV. IN) * 0.4345 0.465'7

ST hi?. UEV. LI44. 346 4.4464

MEDIAN a 1.1629

34. Was any community resistance encountered in the implementation of thecompensatory reading program(s) in your school?

None at all

Some

(7_1 A great deal

LESTION 34

SCORE INTERVALS r" yCT CF P-81. F Ps.1 (.F C-PCT

1.0 CO 43.9 63.4 52.1.,40S.0 398 +34.L 474 ;00.02.000 6.2 15.6 $.d 16.6 73 13.4 75 15.93.000 0.5 1.0 0.5 1.0 2 U.4 2 0.4

Cita S PRULE:)Ef, :2.6625 473M. di. ASK CAT A - 2.CCCO 2MLhI MUM VALUE 1.4ouJ011041 SUP VALUE: * .0000 3. SOWS+.+14 UP SCORES * 61.9926 550.40004(M S00. 4WKES T0$ 0000MEAN 1.1.765 L. /624SY NA. DEV. IN) = 0.4 C 71 0.48%14$TISAst ...0k V I . 0.4009MEDIAN s 1.0996

35. What is the basis for determining pupil participation in the compensatoryreading program? (Mark all that apply.)

ti4 0

(10/0Membership in one or more specific target groups (i.e., economicallydisadvantaged, migrants, non-English-speaking)


te)

Depressed reading levels (as indicated by test results)


Parent request

Volunteer

Other (specify)

UES71014 3$ PART A

fail INTERVALS r

43.71.000 9.2

PCT CF

62.617.4 9.2

F -PuT CF C-PCT

1000_385._*1.01 415 100.011.4 90 18.9 90.. 18.9

CASES PROCESSED

=

t4.41330.0iOCCO

475fa.t5*---

1.o040MI NI MUM VALUEMAXI MUM VALUESUM CF SCORES = 9.243b- 90.u000SUM SOO. SCORES 9.2030MEAN a 0.1740SING. OEV. Ift) 0.3191 0.3919STNO. OEV. EN-11 0.3826PEO I AN 0.1 Cf.-3 0.1169

QUEsTICN 35

SCORE INTERVALS

P ART 43

F FL I CF P",bLi4 F PLT C-PCT

0 'A. 35.5 61.1 52.9 100.0 313 65.9 475 100.0A.000 17.4 32.9 17.4 32.4 162 34.1 162 34.1

C14.E.S_ CRAKE S SEPMINIMUM VA LUtMAXIMUM vA LuLSUM_ OF scatig_sVA SOO. SCOMESMEAN

$111P. OAV. INI:trill°. Mi. 1 N-LMEDIAN

a

a

la.#6170.01.0000

A7.44.A017.41650.32930.470QL1.47450.2455

4750.01.U0OU

i62,4004162.o0040.34110.47410.4746O. 45do


t4

[1]

Membership in one or more specific target groups (i.e.,disadvantaged, migrants, non-English-speaking)


Depressed reading levels (as indicated by test results)


Parent request

Volunteer

Other (specify)

economically

SUESTION 35 PART C

F ea-- --CF C-PCTSCONE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-OLW

0.9 5.1 9.1 52.9 100.9 53 11.Z 415 100.03 .000 4708 S0.3 47.8 90.3 422 -68.8 aa2 88.8

CAS'S PRO;LSSE0 52.8817 475P1MINUM VALUE 0.0 0.71

MAXIMUM VALUE a 1.0000 1.0000SUN OF SCORES S 47.7510 422. J000

..-422.uTiOliSUM SOGe SCORES 47.7570AEAh 4 0.9030 0.6884ST60. 001. (NI 0 0.2540 0.4/48S7140. OEV. t N I o.2988mbOIAN a 0.9462 0.9372

4UEST10N 35 PART 0

SCORE 1NTERviLS

6 .6

1,000 46°3

PCT CF i".8LW

titi

F 6F C -Pa

eq_ _14.1 415 100.0408 8Sei 408 6.487.6 46.3 87.6

CASES_PROCEL:)E0 0_, 52.8877 475MillIMUN VALUE a (.1.0 0.0

PANIPUm VALUE 1.u0u0SUN OF SCORU 408.0000.SUP SOO. SCORES a 46.3198 408.0040MEAN 0.4758 0.6589MO. GEV. (NI .0 0.3298 0..1444

SIND. GEV. tbs-ti 4.3330 0.4484AEOIAN a 0. 9251 0.v1/i

11


flUE ST I ON 35

Parent request

Volunteer

Other (specify)

PART

SGURE INTERVALS

1.000

CASES_PROCESSEO

11INIRUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUP OF SCORES

aaa

SLR SQL). SCORES aREARSTRO. OE V. thiSTNO. LAW. (01-11MEDIAN

QUESTION 35

SCOICINT EiiV ALS

__kg Q.1.000

_CASES mtoc EsteDMINI NUR VALUE aPAH NUM VALUE st

SUM O SCORES as

SUS WO. SCORES a!LEAN

1t4_1 aSTNO 08V. T

KOTAN4UtiT14N 35

ENV ATS

1.004.

CA s_..pko_t_415EDI Ali 141.40t VALUEPAA IMUN VALUE

a

LIdM QE_AWMA..._SUP SOO. SCORES 11

MEANSTNO. OEV, 4h1

UEV. 1 ft4-13 sI4ki+I AN

6

F PCT C,F 081.10 F P64- C C PCT

31.3 5'1.2 52.9 100.0 288 60.6 475 100.021.6 4C.8 21.6 4048 187 39.4 Lel 39.4

0.01.00GO

21.568221 .5.82

0.481110.49140.49610.3442

PART F

415

1.4000187.1400LAW-410)

0.449174/444886

-074-17in---0.44447

CF P-BL ii FF MLT

4b %IA _Aka ..A.Q.Q.S 4354.9 .2 4.9 9.Z 40

PuT 4F C

91.6 475 100.08.4 40 8.4

_UR 88.n 47.50.w0.0

1.0640 /..w0OU4.8733 40.110004 68733 40.40000.0921 064442

o. darn0.1920 0.47800.05c7 044"4.)460

PART 6

f PCT tF --P-B Lot PO- -PCTcf

5 so 52.9 IA ±C$ 458 90.4 475 100.02.4 4.4 2.4 4.4 17 3.6 17 3.6

52.8417. .

.0475

140000 L.4001)7. u0U0

x.3517 174440340.0445 0.11356012041 0.L8540.2081 O. .4.46J0.0231 0.vido

11.



f)Regular classroom teachers


CC)

(P) School personnel other than above (specify)


L ES 1 ICIN 36

scdii ALS

0.0 1,992.00 5.99.40 9.99

10.00 y 33.9914.00 17.9918.00 21.992a_.00 25.9926.00 29.9930.00 33.99

38.00 41.9942.00 45.9946.00 49.99

53.195* .00 51019

0_,

PART

6.2

IiGT

23.5

Cf se.

35.1 100.0 66

PL

4449

.

GF C P CT

310 J0.010.61.83._4,,1.91.50440.4044

..0_,44;

0.0Del0_40.1Oet40

30.2ViaAA).

5.54.3

_LaLaCO4._(2_,0.0.).00.20.40.00.0

2601 7646316.2 46.3Act_ 4Zia__.

9666'34

30.420.9io.8

310 79.1154 48.7

___<kft_zi.....540 11.134 10.8

.. 19 6.0

5.0 14.43.1 liiil1.6 4.6

20159 .._,_,Z.0

-5-39.001100

6.44.7

1;ia0.9

. 9 f.9.O.0.00.3-41;:i0404.0

0.8 2.40.5 1.4Q.2.___ ._0..e0 .

(.2 0.60.2 0.6

_____0.2 ____9,6,_0.1 0.4

-0.0 -0.0-0.0 _7:0.0_

10 3.25 Le6

...; _. . 0 62 0.64 0.6Z,, 0.61 -0-.30 0.00 0.0

LASES PROCES SE& s 35.0554*40. BLANK OA fit a 117.0000NikiiiiiiiirAiii 46 0.0MAX 114UPI VALUE a 51.0000SUM 01F SCORES .s.,_ 433.9412.SUN SOC. SCOHES s 3438.8149PAEAN s 6.6146SThO. UEV. EN1 0 7.111551140. UEV I Ofrl i 0 7.4241AEOLAPi 5.5125

316159_

04451.0000

t310.400035430.0004

7.41017.4)604

7. 7265.4334

36. Since June 1971, how many attd what types of personnel in your school have I

Participated in inservice training activities to prepare them for teachingin a compensatory reading program for elementary students?


--Iti----



(c) School district reading specialists

(c)) School personnel other than above (specify)

PART l

22.3

F

40 13.1.40 OF16413 .4

U.41.3

a.*0o0:::0.000U0.04.00.00.40.00.00.00.O0.0

234 100.0

tESTTO61

SCORE INTERVALS

0.0

f

7.l 24.4

0)-aLis

100.01.0002.0003 4000

14.03640.7

ST 6313,93461

0.33.1

1.7

14.74.71.3C.6405

74.718.3

142398

1

30

144$213

424922.2$66

4.4005.0006.000

0 el0.4

2 eJ2.00.3

41

0fs.1

0.47.000Be 000

ALMML_ 40:10.!

Q. Go0!7:0,:0

G.00.00.0

0.00.3

0.10.1:11

0 .30 .3

00

111

0.40.40.4

0.00011.00012.000

0.00.0

-It0.04. i

0600 .0

0.0.0 .0

0600.0

0.10.1C.1

0.34.30.3

00000

1a00a0

1 "0:41 0.41 0.4

-----1---0.-4L 0.41 Oo 4

------Z17- 0.00 0.0-0 0.0-0- 0.a

0 0.0

13.000140000

0

0.1

0.10.3.

0630.30 .3

16.00017.00016.000

C.00 .0

0 .0

0.00.0

-C.Q0

-0.0

..0 .0

.0.0-0.0

19.00020.000

-060-0.0

.040-o .0

214'CA SE S PROCESSED 24.4214h(), BLANK OA TA a 238.AI 41 RUA VALUE x,

111

99 OeuMAX I MX VALUE 00000SUM OF SCORES 2666316SW SU 0 e SCORES * 6229

S7444.41000

gEAN 10945SIN°. Ok:V. IN! 1.1557 1.4330STN0e 12209... 1.4456

0 .9651

36. Since June 1971, how many and what types of personnel in your school fiaveparticipated in inservice training activities to prepare them for teachingin a compensatory reading program for elementary students?





School personnel other than above (specify)

61JESTION 34 PART C

dift Ls F PCT CF F*110 F PLT (.F

.____.060 5.1461____ 140 100.0 41 2).3 162. 100.01.000 10.0 52.9 134 71.1 85 M. Lii 74.72.000 2.0 10.6 3.5 10.11 22 13.6 36 22.234000 6204 ;AI_ JAL_ 003. 4 a., 14 3.64.000 0.7 3.d 1.2 6.2 6 4.7 10 6.25.000 0.2 Q. C.5 Z.4 2 1.2 4 2.56.000 4A.Q. . QA2._ 0.1__ 1.5 0 0.00 .

2 1.27.000 0.0 ,0.0 0.3 1.5 0 0.0 2 1.20.000 0a0 04 0.3 1.5 0 0.0 2 142

____ _ -4.000 ___ __ qks__ _060_ _0.4_ 1.1 .. 010.000 0.4 0.0 0.3 1.5 0

11.000 0.0 0.0 C.3 1.5 012, 000 0.2 1.1 0.3 1.5 1

t3.000 0.0 0.0 041 0.4 014.000 0.0 0.Q 0.1 004 00.2009 .4;1*. 0.4

.0 is 1 064 1

. .

li.000 ono -c.c -c.o -o.c 0

17.000 0.0 O. .q. c J. 0 0

14.000 .9 t0 0 41_ _ ,-0...g___ -..P 0._ 019.060 0.0 0.0 40.0 OA 020.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0

111.0. _A_

0.0 20.0 20.6

_

0.0 1

0i0 LOA 1

0000.0

___-- _

o.o0.0

CI 441

0..0J.

s2

a

_____ _......

10.0506300.0 CCO

. _ otg

162313

0.0

CASES PROCESSEDh(1. 01ANK GADMINI MUM V#I.UkmAximuo VALUE 6 15.0000 15.0000SW: WV SCORES 22.5103 202.1/000SON 000. scum a 85.0620 724.1/000

K. , 0 14,1936 1.44119STMO. 0EV. IN) a 1.1566 1.7071ST MO OE V. 4 N.q i 1,004 1. 7144

MEDIAN ID .934j Os V704)

1021.21.2IA 20.60.60.60.00.00.0G.00.0






School personnel, other than above (specify)

60E5710N 36

F

46

kirla07 1741 100.0

PART O

SCORE INTERVALS

0.0 - O.99

F

6.aPCT

29.4

CF P-aLw

MA /00.01.00 ' 2.99 10.9 5165 14.9 70.6 04 46.8 U6 73.33.00 4.19 2.3 11.1 4.0 19.0 21 11t2 42 24.45.00 - 6.99 Oo 5 2.4 1.9 .7 . 401 21 12.27.00 .' 8.99 0.4 1.7

_ILAL_1a 5.5 3 Z9 L4 8.1

9.00 - 10.99 0.1. C5 0.8 3.8 1 0.6 9 5.2

11.00 -. 119

14.99_Q_*_3___Q.,0___0.1 0.5

0._7 3.3 °1

"0 8 4.713.00 ... 0.7 3.3 4.6 11-4.715.00 - 16.19 a./ 0.3 0.6 ha 1 0.6 1 4.11/.00 -. 18.99 04C 0.0 0.5 a.L 0 0°0 6 3.519.00 20.99 0.1. 0.3 C.5 2.5 T 41" 6 3.521.01; - 22.99 0.2 0.9 C.5 2.2 2 L.2 5 2.9

23.00 7-25.00

0.0 0.0 0.30.3

1.4 01

0000.4

3 1.7---71-- 1.7

_24.9926.49 0.1 OA 1.4

27.00 -. 20419 Cal 0.6 0.2 1.0 1 006 2 1.2

29.00 -. 30.99 GaG 0.0 0.1 0.4 0 000 I. 0.6.-31 04 - 32 .99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0 .4 d 41" 633.00 34.99 0.0 0.0 0. i 0.4 0 40 1 0.635.40 - 36.99 0.0 0.0 G.1 0.4 0

0--0.0000

1 0.6-1- 0.637 .00 3 1 19 0.0 0.0 04 0.4

39.00 -. 40.19 0.0 060 0.1 0.4 0 a.o 0.6..41.08 -

43.00 -42.9944.99

Os C0.1

0.0C.4

0.1 0 .40.4

01

"0"*.i.0

I. 0.6L- 0.6Col

45.00 - 46.99 0.0 0.0 -- Cs 0 -O. 0 0 0.0 0 0.047.00 - 48019 0.0 0.0 "000 ..00 0 0.0 0 0.049.00 .... 5C.00 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -o,c1 0 0:11- 3 0.0

CASLS PRLICES EDMI. 6L aNK OA TAAI NI MOM VAL UCItAXI0914 VALL)tSUM 01 SCORESSUN SEW. SCORENEANii-ND. (AV. i N I4.1 We PEW. (.1/*ED IAN

21.1161 Oa30000000 301

0.0 0.1043o0Q00 4 3 . 0400045.0502 43;4000.541.7056 6005. 00002.1335 2.64534.5937 "s;arss4.7065 5.498Y.1.7117 1.71524

37. Does the compensatory reading program use parents or other volunteers (paidor unpaid) to help in the classroom?

QUESTION 3710 Yes 20 No

S CONE E RV AL S F PCI

1.0002.000

CASES PROCE$SENO BLANK DATA 0

1141 NUN VALUE laMAXI MUN VM.UE

m

LF P-41 LP.

1.1.3 52.3 100a0295 5695 29.5 56.5

SUM OF SCORES *SUN SOO. SCORES aMEAN aSIND DEV N)SINO. DIV. 0NEC

.iL..30265 .00001.00002.0000

61444511.44.1241

la 564$0.49170.4005

F PT taF C-PCT

230 46.9 47U 0240 5-1.1 -2-40 51.1

4195.

1.00002J000,..

1190.410011

43.09990. )0041...22114

38. Does the compensatory reading program use pupils as tutors?

iUESIl ON 38

SCURE I NTE RV AL

1.0002 .000

10 Yes 212 No

S P PC

CASES PROCESSED di

NU. BLANK DATA 0MINIMUM VALUE 0PA I MUM VALUE rSSA OF SCORES 0SUM Sane SCORESNANSIND. °EV. (P9SIND UV. I N-1MEDIAN a

F PLI 4.E C-PT

21.2 4C.8 52.0_100.0 199 44.4 407 100.0

30.6 59.2 30.1 $94 2:48 11.4

11.0 figti 600001 'DODO2,0000

1.4/0002.0000

62.1557 -TAU=144.2,56 1271.0000

1.5920 1.37390 .4914 0.4900.4961 0.49501.6552 1.0287

39. Do you expect to have a compensatory reading program in the SUMMER of

1973 (the summer after next)?

I UE Sll ON 39

RV AL

1.[J Yes

F

20 No 30 Don't know

PCT CF P-81W F PLT 40F C C

1.000. 19.4 364 .5,2.3 100.0 109 J0.0. 1QQ..061.9.000 15.7 30.0 32.4 145 30.9 301 64.0

3.000 16.7 21.9 16.7 3/.9 /36 jJ.2 156 33.2

CASES pRatIllo si,;1151-- 410We BLANK DATA 5.0000 5MINittuh_VALOE_ r 1.0000 14$000PLUM VALUE 0 3.0000 3.0044SUM OP SCORES * 51.3295 459.U000SU SQO. sco4ess.meAN

42.211111.4404

_ 7449.0000letold

SINU. DEV. th) * 0.4903th7A) C!.5034 0.4993

MeLLAN 1.3932 /.4290

40. If you do expect Lp have a swayer program, for which of the following grpieswill the program be conducted? (Circle all that apply.)

-luesta ON 40

T 3

PAR; A

4 5 6 7 8 Ungraded

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF 146i0 Is 404 8411.0 52.9 10003_1400 4.4 12.4 64 Ilea

CAST'S nett ssecNININUR VALUE-MAXI NUM VALUESUM OF SCOkESSUN Say. SCuRESDEAN5110. DEVe IN1 *ST40. BEV. IN-41%nil*

a

a

GUESTLUN 4a PART fi

SCORE At

0.01.000

524111/70.0I *WM6,5513balifi0.1.201

o.3140..0682

F.. --p-.r------ C-PCT

411 412.1 100.011.5 44 1345

F PC.T CF P-44. al F

415

1.4$000buu00064o OW

13.13*7O.A414

-CF -C-PCT

42.7 6 1i9 549 100.0 297 444 4/5 100.020e2 341.1 20.2 31101 1/41 Ala tie 31.5

CASES PROCESSED'2

_411.._

52.0417 _PININUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE4UPLOFAGGREL

___ ________0.0L.0000

AAA1139 ..

SUM S40. SCORES 20.1530MEAN 2 0.31111511402 PO. Ni_ ___.. 0.4156..STNO. OEVe (M.4) 0 04,4903&DIAN * 0.3016

CufiS710m 40

SCORE I.NT EICOA LS

_ .

PART C

PC/

*75u

1.0000178.400u

O*00000.4700.4014,0.40460.997

CF P -8l.Yt ,F UF C-PC/

0(.1 313.1 ;t.9 52.9 100 0 2781;000 22 .8 43.a T2.1 45.1 19/

CASES PR10ES4a1mit,' pito' VALUENA I NUN VALutSum GF .SCORESSuig SQD. SCORES!LEAN

._Si144._StAifeSING. CEV.14Etil Ah

sd.5 473_100.041.5 in 41.5

52 al 6770.01.0060

47.5

-0;4100000

22. 77C2 197. uUUU22.7702004305 0.4/410.9419 Z_ 0.492/0.4959 0.49320.3 710 0.454..

O. If you do expect to have a summer program, for which of the fo11ot4ng grades

will. the program be conducted? (Circle all that apply.)

K 1 2Q.))3

) T. )4 5 6 7 8 Ungraded

CULSTION 40 P410.1

SCURE INTERVALS F PCT CF 1141L44 F CF C-PCT

24.8 _1_4_05 5209 141001L. 264 55.4 475 100.01.000 24.1 45.5 24m1 4545i211 44.4 214 44.4

EASES PROCESSEDFINIFUN VALUE aPARIMUN VALUESUM OF SCORES aSUM SOO. SCORESMEANSTN.

OEV. 114-4)MEDIAN

GUESTION 40

524,0072 4750.0 0.01.0000 100000

2400780 2114*(00001400780 21104000

0041103 0044420.4940 0.49490.5020 0.49740 04171. 0.4990

PART E

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.040

cues PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE *SW' C. SCURE,S1418 SOO. SCARESNAMSIMS. °E V. INSTAID. DEV. IN-11 *NEW 4114 ii

F PCT CF

30.2 57.0 U. 40044 276 S11.l

-14-1-44e9,75 100.0

2201 4300 SW 4360 199 41.9

CUiSTI ON 40- PART F

SCORE itirERv ALS

0.01.000

.45ES 40(0_5E4;M1 M1 NUM VALUESAXII4UM VALUE a5U4 OF SCORE SSUM SOO. SCORESSE Mt

_5710. OE V.STN.). DEW. t14-13MEDIAN

52 ._0107 4750.0 ----07i-i1.0000 1.00100

22 a 72_15 199.00002207215 199.0000

0042416 0.41890.4550 0049340.4998 -----G7-0949-0.37 0.1°05

4)43 CF C -PETF PCT CF F

32.5 61.3 52.9 100.0 294 61.9 47$ 100.020.3 36.5 20.3 3o.s 181 38.1 181 38.1

__32siall__...______._ 47 5 ....0.0 0.4)1.0000 1.0000

20.3449 181.000020.3449 181000000.3447 00441110.4145 0.48560.4912 .04)031,20.3126 0.1076

40. If you do expect to have a summer program, for which of the following grades

will the program be conducted? (Circle all that apply.)

(4) 1K 1 2 (13 4 5 Ungraded

atasTICti 40

SCORE INT-EA V ALS CF P-81.. al Pc. 1"

0.0 35.7 67.5 520 100.4 326 68.6 475 100.01.000 17 el 3205 1702 3205 eTif- 31.A A44 £1.4

CASES ILOCESSED .52.11111 AfaiMINIMUM VALUEPAM NUN VALUE

a*

0.01.4CCO io4000

SUM SCORES la 17.1645 14. 0060SUM SQ00 SC046 S 17 .1665 4414.09010MEAN a 0.3246 Owaltif3100. D. L$ * 0.4662 0.4640$ IND. UV. IN- fl 4 0.4127 0 .4643-MEDI AN 0.2403 Os/1285

PART H

SCORE I NTE RV ALS F PCT CF PdI,eLW F CF CPCT

0.0 411e.,1 9/_17 52.9 100 A 439 9204 475 100.0I*000 3.8 7.3 3.8 7,3 lob lob 46 7.6

CASES PROCESSED a

PART 1

32.8817 475$D4L*IM VALUE aRA X I RUN VALUE aStitIt OF SQURES _a

0.010000 1.0000

$W Set. sContsMEANST Ws DEV. IN) a

Se 83300607290_02593 _0.26180.0391

36au0oo0.e70.46470.6490. u4LJ

STRiD ()EV Ur-l1 aPiE0 IAN

5COR -6--1-i4-7-kit V ALS--

_0.0 41*91.000 3.0

-KT C*- P44. ti

9.401 52 10008596 3.0 5.6

F 134.T CF

449 94.5 475 100.026 .5 26 5.5

CASES PROCESSED U 542,6417 475Rat4UR VALUE a 0.0

PAA1 MUM VALUE 1u00SUM CF SCORE S a

2.964626. UOUj

-2-6;4046SL 14 SQL)* SCORESMEAN 0.0561 0.4547

TM). £i. 0.2300 0o42730.2322 -0.4277

'dual ilk a 0.0211 0.90

40. If you do expect to have a summer program, for which of the following grades

will the program be conducted? (Circle all that apply.)(a)

K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ungraded

CUE 11 ON 40 PART J

SCORE INTERVALS P PCT CF P.BLW F Pa.T C.F C -PCT

060 51.2 96.7 52.9 100.0 460 9644 475 100.01.000 1..7 3.3 1.7 3.3 15 344 L5 3.2

CASES PROCESSEC a 92sa I 11 475RI NI OUR VALUE 0 o0 NUPAX MR VALUE lig 1.0000 1.0000SIM OF SCORES a 17343 *1.0.0.94SW SUO. SCORES Se2343 150400PIE AN 0.0320 0.4316_STNO,_ AtiYA. itil_. _ 0.1111 0 1.749iT Na) OE V ft IN -11 4 04798 Oo A 751

MED /Art 0.0170 0.4103

40a. On what basis do you expect to select students for the summer program?(CNeck all that apply.)

(1) Previous participation in a compensatory reading program

0 Previous non-participation in a compensatory reading program

Depressed reading level


0 Teacher or other staff recommendation

Parent request

0 Volunteer

Other (specify)

QUt Si ION 4(A PAkT A

S CUR I Tit; i&-VALS

c 01.090

41.511.4

FC-1

711.521.5

GF P--BC

sao ice.oF

31010-

71.9A4.J.

CF C PC T

475 10060105 22.111.4. 21.5

CASES PROCESSEU a 52681177 475III WNW, VALUE . tl 0 0.0PAMPUti VALUE 0 1QCCO 1,4000SAM CF

iScokgS11.3820 105. 4000UI sii. scora 11.3820 105. 4000

NEAR * 04152 0.4211Me D. DE Id I NI 044110 0.4150S7$Q. DEV I AI1 ) a 0.4149 -0e4354MEDIAN 0.1371 0.1419

41a. On what basis do you expect to select students for the summer program?(Check all that apply.)

Previous participation in a compensatory reading program

Previous non-participation in a compensatory reading program


Membership in one or another specific target groups (economically

Teacher or other staff recommendation

Parent request

0 Volunteer

0 Other (specify)

deprived, etc.)

QUESTION 40A PAM'

SCORE F PC1 CF 15-b LW F C4C1

0.01.6000

5E3662.3

,o6 joo.p, 45 0;V 243 464 25

9467 *75 100.045 5.3

CASES_ PROCESSED a .148(117 475PIK RUM VALUE 0.0 06aMAX IMUR VALUE 1.0000 LUDO°SUS OF SCURES

is 24321325.094.*

254. 4000SUS $006 SCORESNE AN 060440 Oo if4i5166

_siotolk__Qgv,_ (N)(AV I N4.

0, 4012_0.2012

0.4233.4.-424$

MEDIAN a 060230 06027d

QUEST KIN 40A

SCORE IhTE1 VAL-5

C.01.0cd

COA54414kAtumiN)Aum VALUEPAAIOWM VALUE

CF ScidR.E$SQ-06 SCORE!:

MEANs!Np. tft)UNO. OEV. (W-11MEDIAN

tta

a

PART C

F PCT F Ps..T GP CPCT

41,60 51,61 242 Z4.9 475 10060-4961.25.9 46.9 233 49.1 433

54.410.0L. OCCO

25_05:0

0.480917.4119L. 3 C41064161

4750.41.0004

43364000al;0.490506499906i004064t1/4





(P) Membership in one or another speelic target groups (economically deprived, etc.)

(g) Teacher or other staff recommendation

Parent request

QQ) Volunteer

(9 Other (specify)

CUES71 ON 40A

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

CA tE S PROCESSEDPI NI NUN VALUEMAXIMUM VALUEsurt OF SCOitt$SUM Sa0. SCORESKANSTNO. OEU. (N)STAG. DEv. iN-1IMEDIAN

PART 0

F PCT CF P-SL6

410 16.J 52.4 100.012.2 2.1.4 1&.2 22.E

is 52.1417s 0.0a A (1000

11t2091a L1isZ097a 0.2120s 14:4411a 0.4126a 0.134S

GUEST1ON 4d4 PART i

SCORE IWTERVALS

1.000

CASES PRUC ESIE0NI NI NUM VALUEPAM NUN VALUESUN OF SLORESSUN SQD. SCORESNE ANSTNO. 02V... (AISTNO. DEV. IN -I)NE to I AN

L.

F PCT CE C-PCT

363 76.4 475 100.0112 2466 41.12 23.6

475.Cie 01.0000

132.0000112.0000

0*4350.....0. kattS_

0.42410.1543

F 44f -Coz- F 116T GP C.:OtT

.0.0 47.3. _52.9Z7.0 52.6 27.8

109.10 221 47.4 475 100.0-Tit--14.252,6 240 :42.i

i.Ais_14117_

0.0475

0.4/a I. COCCI 1,0000a 2708433 44 So v044

s 4.4.000427.6413a 0.S 265 0.b241

a 0.4995_0.5041

0.49150.i0J0

a 0.5502 4.,413

40n. On what basis do you expect to select students for the summer program?(Check ail that apply.)





LJ Teacher or other staff recommendation

I: Parent request

(..g Volunteer

Other (specify)

11.-Ii ii10,4 40A FART F

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CP PSLAi F FuJ ---Tir7C-70CT

32+1 52.9 100.0 292_ 6005..1.000 10.4 3444 20.4 38.6# 183 38.3

21 51.8877a 0.0= 1.0000II 20.3941..

20.3981a 0.3497

044.46

LASES PROCESSEDPI AI PLO ti VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESOS OF SCORES___ _ ___ _.

UN SOD. SCORESPLANST1210. 0EV. 14)SIM). 0EV. (N -11 0.4914PIED IAN 0.3139

"41.1EsTION 40A PART ta

SCORE ifiTimVAL F PCT

475 100.0183 385

40.5_0. 46

1.40004.44_40.4001830

04311530.4807..0.4d720.4144

CF PiLke F Pt. T

0.01.000

47.95.0

90.69.4

$ 199_r. *CI

L090_944

42554

d9.5te.6

47550

100.010.5

CASES PROCESSED 52.0877 475MI NI MUM VALUE a 0.0 0:4PAXIMUM VALUE leGOC4 1.000USulu 41; 4.9_81/ 50.4000.GIsi; S SCOPE SMEA.,4

4 .9 Os71 -0.0944

Tir.40000./053

Sink/. DEW. INI 0.2923 0..4069SINO. REV. IN-II 4.2951 0.4074',EDI AN 0.0,21 0.u5dd


(:] Previous participation in a compensatory reading program

c:3 Previous non-participation in a compensatory reading program



[:3 Teacher or other staff recommendation

Parent request

Volunteer

GO Other (specify)

Oti 40 A PART 11

av AL s F

P 51.8.1.400 1.G

GASES P110.ESSED

PCT CF

52.9 _100

F PwT CF C-PCT

465 9,704 47$ 1OU, 010 Z. 1.0

475

_90.02.0 1.0 240

ALMPIM PUlit VALUE, a 0.0 04QMAXMN VALUE as 1.0000 1.u000ALM OF SCURES s 110.440 .

SUN 540. SCORES a_

1.0410 0.4/000PEAS 0.01,8 0. galMO. GEV. IN/ 41 0494. 0.4436ST NU. ay. I N-11 a 0.1406Pie IAN 04101 0J/Ot/

PART II

TEACHER CHARACTERISTICS QUESTIONNAIRE

ITEM ANALYSIS

1. What is your sex? Male

QUESTION 1

SCORE INTERVALS

Female

-GRADE 2

F PCT CF

-GRADE 4 -GRADE. 6 '4-

F PCT CF P -8Lw F PCT CF P -8LW

1,000 0.3 0.5 58.2 100.0 14.6 32.9 5.8 10.6 54.3 100.02.000 57.9 99.5 57.9 99.5 29.7 67.1

_Ai4,3 .1900029.7 67.1 46.6 89.4 46.6 89.4

CASESPROCESSKO_ 58.1673 44.25469 54.3369NO. BLANK DATA 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 2.0000MAXIDPMVAJUE 2.0000 10268950_=SUM OF SCORES = 116.0278 73.9658 200.0166SUN SQD. SCORES 231.7412 133.3787 1.8937.MEAN 1.9947 166713 04000,

DEV« iN) 0.0716 0.4696 0.3109STAID, DEV. (N-1) = 0.0722 0.4750 1.9405MEDIAN 1.9973 1.7550

SCURE INTERVAL.; F PC1 CF P -8LW F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P -8LW

1.000 3 0.5 600 I f t 0 I

2.000 597

_LASES PROCESSED

99.5 597 99.5 503

Edo

89.8 503 89.8 274

560

64.6 274 64.6

424Nu. BLANK DATA 1. 1,0000 1MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 2.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 1063.0000 2.0.000SUM OF SCORES 1197.0000 2069.Q000 698.0.000SUM SQD. SCORES 2391.0000 1.6962 1246.0,00

_MEAN 1.9950 0.13024 1.6462iTND. OE V. (N) 0,0705 0.3026 0.4761

DEV. (N-1) 0.0706 1.9433 0.4767etD1AN 1.9975 1.72L1

How many years of teaching experience (public andschool year, have you had?

QUESTION 2

One year or less

More than 1 year but

At least 3 years but




less than 3 years

less than 6 years

less than 10 years

less than 20 years

nonpublic), including this

Gs*SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CI P -8LW F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-BLit

_1.000 33 8.8 801 100.0 46 8.2 560 100.0 40 43.4 425 100-02.000 56 9.3 548 91.2 60 10:7 514 91.8 61 =14:4' 385 90.63.000 114 19.0 492 81.9 113 2002 454 81:1 79. -18:6' .324 76.2

_4.000 79 13.1 378 62.9 95 17.0 341 60.9 73 17.2 245 57.65.000 170 28.3 299 49.8 142 25.4 246 43.9 98 23.1 172 40.56.000 129 21.5 129 21.5 104 18.6 104 18.6 74 17.4 74 17.4

CASES PROCESSED 601 560. 425MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 6.0000 6.0000 6-0000SUM OF SCORES 2447.0000 2219.0000 1625.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 11461.0000 10117.0000 7277.0000MEAN 4.0715 3.9e25 1..11245STNO. DEV. IN) = 1.5787 144347 1:5021STNO. DEV. 1N-1$ = 1.5800 1.4391 ! 41-,01$40

MEDIAN' 4.4810

2. How many years of teaching experience (public and nonpublic), including thisschool year, ;Ave you had?

QUEST ION 2

One year or less






less than 3 years

less than 6 years

less than 10 years

less than 20 years

SCORE INTERVALS F

1.000 5.02.000 4.93.000 10.94.000 7.4_5.000 17.26.000 12.8

-GRADE 2 -GRADE 4 -GRADE 6

PCT CF P-BL W F PCT CF P81.iI F PCT CF

eol fi.L 100.0 4.5 803 54.3 loo...o... 44.4 9:9 44.3 100.08.5 53.2 91.3 5.5 10.0 - 49.8 91.1 S .3 ; 12.0 . 40.0 90.1

18.7 48.3 82.9 10.5 19.2 44.4 81.6 7.5 : 16.9 34.6 713.112..7 37 .464:281431.5.142131.9;62.44..47444--164/6 _71.1 _6.1.229.6 30.0 51.5 13.7 2502 25.6 47.2 10.8 24.3 19.8 44.621.9 12.8 21.9 12.0 22.0 12.0 22.0 9.0 20.3 9.0 20.3

CASES PROCESSEDNINIPILIN VALUEMAXI WI._VALVE

58.25111.0000

54.33691.00006.0000

239.9444 220.0330SUM OF SCORESSUP SQL:). SCORES 1131.7502 1025.3430PLAN_ 4.0494

1.5689 1..5724STND. DEV. INISTND. DEV. iN-1) 1.5826 1 o5.1170.14EVIAN _4.550 4. 3/51 .

44.3001 4419,1*.6.441111).'

174.8181804,0657


QUESTION 3

D

One year or less




less

less

less

than

than

than

3 years

6 years

10 years



Snide. Greide, 4 ervaacioSCORE 11-11-:R VAL S PCT CF P-BLit F PCT OF P-81.14 F PCT CF P--BLM

1.000 108 18.0 601 100.0 104 18.6_ 56_0 1000_0 103 24:2 . 425 100-02.000 110 18.3 493 82.0 123 22.0 . 456 81.4 87 20.5 32275.83.0004.000

166al

27.6 383217

63.736.1

14794

26.216.8

333186

59.5 109_15.2 __Ika_AAJL___

25.6 235 55.312611-29.6

5.000_11,5_

18.5 136 22.6 12.9 66 15.5111 76 13.6 92 16.4 556.000 25 4.2 25 4.2 16 2.9 16 2.9 11 2.6 11 2.6

CASES PROCESSED = 601MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXINUN,WALUE = 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1855.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 7013.0000MEAN = 3.0865STND. DEV. (N) = 1.4636STMO. DEV. IN-11 = 1.4649MEDIAN 2.9970

V

5601440006.41000

1643.00005899.0000

2.93391:38781.311802:8625

-42514400-itaN8dIL

1185.00804163.4800

2.182236.LA233

_2,./A64


QUESTION 3

One year or less

0 More than 1 year but less than 3 years

0 Az least 3 years but less than 6 years

0 At least 6 years but less than 10 yer.rs

0 At least 10 years but less than 20 years


*GRADE 2 .4140E

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8L W F PCT

1.000 10.2 17.6 58.3 100.0 9.82.000 10.3 17.6 48.0 82.4 11 .33.000 15.7 27.0 37.8 64.8 14.54.000 8.1 14.0 22.1 37.9 9.05.000 11.2 19.3 13.9 23.9 7.96.000 2.7 4.7 2.7 4.6 1.8

18.020.926.716.614.53.4

41.4.1W7*

CF p-st.w F PCT

*4 3 100.8 _10_.5 23.7-

44.6 11100 8.8 , 19033.2 6142 ' 10.8 241867 34.5 7.1 14.0 :

9.7 11.9 5.4 12.31.8 3.4 1.7 3.8

CF P*8L W

4414 109.013.8 ,'illti.3

Z, AiS4514:111 42417.1 16.11.7 3.8

CASES PROCESSED " 58.2511 54.3369* , 44.3406.MI M 1 MUM VALUE 4 1.0000 : 1441000 . . 14016010MAXIMUM VALUE = 6.0000 ti,: 6666 6e0000SUN OF SCORES = 182.7558 162.4122 126. 3269SUM SQ0 SCORES = 700.8149 592. 8425 453.7708MEAN = 3.1374 20090 2i POSTN.). DEV. IN/ = 1.4791 144409.. . 1.4550STND. DEV. I N-1 / = 1.4920 iiiiiract 1'144916

_NED IAN = 3.0501 2Atiiit 2.7665

4. What type of teaching certification do you have?

No certificate

Temporary, provisional, or emergency certification

11:3 Regular certification

QUESTION 4


Grids Grade 4CF P-.SLIT F PCT CF P-BLN F PCT OF P-8L W

1.000 0.1 4.1_ .57.9 100.0 Q,3 0.6 64.2 100.0 0.0 0.0 44.3 100.02.000 9.1 15.7 57.8 99.9 8.3 15.4 53.0 99.4 5.3 12.1 44.3 100.03.000 48.7 84.1 48.7 84.1 45.5 84.0 45.5 84.0 39.0 87.9 39.0 87.9

CASES' PROCESSED = 57.9325 54.1532 44.3406NO. BLANK/ DATA = 4.0000 2.0000 2.0000MINIMUM ALUE =

.. --istACM__ 1.0000 3.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000 3.0000 127.6626SUM OF SCORES = 164.5245 '153.4138 372.3552.$V$ SQ00 SCORES = 435.1729_ .443.0/1.54 2.4796MEAN = 2.8399 2.8341 0.3249SIND. DEVe IN) = 0.3701 0.3875 0.3286

_51ND. 0EY. IN-1) = 093733 0.3911 2.9314MEOIAN = 209056 2.9047

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT . CF PA3LW F PCT CF

1.000 1 0.2 SS" 100-0 4 0.7 Ssa 0 o.a 425 100.02.000 100 16.8 596 99.8 87 15.6 554 99.3 57 13.4 425 100.03.000 496 83.1 496 83.1 467 83.7 467 03.7 368 86.6 368 86.6

CASES PRCCESSE0 = 597 558 425NO. BLANK DATA = 4 2 2.0000IIBILWA_MALUE = 1.0000 1-nrinn 1-non0MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000 3.0000 1218.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1689.0000 15790,0000 3540.0000SUM Sjaa,_5CURES = 41165.:01M0 :4555.2280 2-2659MEAN = 2.8291 2.8297 03408STNO. DEV. (NI = 0.3808 0.3945 0.3412SIND. DEVA_IN-Lii = 0.3811 0.3948 2.4226MEDIAN 2.8982 2.9026


No degree

A degree or diploma based on less than 4 years of work

A bachelor's degree

A master's degree


QUESTION 5

SCORE INTERVALS

GM& Gran 4 OreatbF PC' CF P-BLW F PCT CF F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 8 1.3 601 100.0 6 1.1 559 100.0 4 .0.61 425 1.00,0

2.000 7 1.2 593 98.7 9 1.6 553 98.9 6 iO4 421 99.13.000 480 79.9 586 97.5 430 76.9 544 97.3 305 71.8 415 97.64.000 106 17.6 17.6 113 20.2 114 2=4 110 25;03 Ale _25.9_5.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.2 1 0,2 0 0.0 0 0.0

CASES PROCESS1D 601- 559 .425MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0.000 1 -1640000.MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 1.0400 . - .440460-SUM OF SCORES = 1866.0000 5.11i100 4.411.apaa.SUM AD. SCORES = 6052.0000 1771.0000 4536.0000MEAN 3.1381 5745.0000 3.2259STND. OEV. (NJ = 0.4714 3.1682 0.5055SIND. DEV. IN-II 004416 0.4900 0.5101MEDIAN 3.0948 0.4904 3.1639

3.1151


No degree

O A degree or diploma based on less than 4 years of work

O A bachelor's degree

0 A master's degree


QUESTION 5

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.0005.000

Grode Gnat 4-F PCT CF F PCT CF P81.1d F PCT CF PqiLM

0.7 1.2 58.3. 100+0 Oa ? 1.3 54.3 100.0 0.4 -0_a9 44.3 100.0, 1.4 2.4 57.5 98.6 14.6 .:160 51.6 98.7 0:6 )1.4 44-441194.147.5 81.5 5601 96.4 4149 '7T.2 51,;9 95,7 33+1 74..1 4 344V1:40 To 8

807 14.9 8.7 444.9 10 sie 18.4 10.1 .18.5 '10.2 23.1 Li1a2 "23.10.0 .0.0 .41.0 *: -O:0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 .0.0 -0.0 -0.0

PROCESsE0 =CASES _ 58.251/ 54..2601. 44.3404MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =

1.00004.0000

180.6295

1.0000-1.0000

1.6009:::4.111440-. , - -

SUM Sal). SCORES =MEAN =STNO. plEV. (NI =-iiio. 5i ii. ii.11) =MEDIAN =

572.39063.10090.4592

169.9169545.92073.14I5

464.73543.20040.4664

0.46313.0692

-0.=50*70.;50041:0923

c0Alf10.13./1106.

6. Haveyou had any special training in the diagnosis and treatment ofreading problems?

Dyes

QUESTION 6

ED No

Cl atit t Grade.4 Grata 4SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM 'CP SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTNS. DEW. 4N)STND. DE V. 4 N1 IMEDIAN

F PCT CF P-431.ti

34.3 59.8 57.3 100.0 29.023.0 40.2 23.0 40.2 25.3

57.32357.00001.00002.0000

80.3646126.4394

1040190.49020049451.3359

PCT CF F PCT CF

53.4 54.2 100.0 22.5 51.0 4401 100,.Q46.6 25.3 - 46006 21.6 49.0 21.6 . 49= 0

54«2352 440:068721.0000 2.00001100000 .0000

2.0000 2.0000_79. 65.663.;41919 Q its

0.4987 0.49980.5034 0.50561. 356 1.41102

SCORE 1 NT ERVALS PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF F PCT CF

I i I

2.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATARININUN VALUEMAXI MUM VALUESUM OF .SCORESSUN SOD. SCORES

STND. UEV. (N) =I

STNO. DEV. 4N1/ =

243 40.9 243

59471.00002.0000

837«0000132300900 -

0.49170.4921

40.9 211 49.9

423

211 49.9 269 48.2

21.0000

:484hielig41IMAM°0.10000.5006

S 5821.00002.0.000

.827 .0000..

.410*(1000:.i

0.45570 5 00 I.

6. Have you had any special training in the diagnosis and treatment ofreading problems?

0 Yes No

a. If Yes, at what academic level was the training?

QUESTION 6A

0 Undergraduate

0 Graduate

0 Inservice

U On thejob

0 Other (specify)

fir. gait/A.-6

SCORE INTERVALS F PCI CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

IASISLOL___ 11 264 100.0 74 33.0 224 100.D 57 33.9 168 100.02.000 143

_23-754.2 191 72.3 110 49.1 150. 67.0 83 49.4 111. 66.1

3.000 40 15.2 48 18.2 29 12.9 40 17.09 22 13.1 28 16.74.000 2 0.8 8 3.0 S 4.0 11 4.9 4 2.4 ___6 3.65.000 6 2.3 6 2.3 2 0.9 2 0.9 Z 1.2 2 1.2

usis PROCESSED = 264 224 168NO. BLANK DATA = 337 336 257MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000. 1.0400MALI MUM VALUE = 5 a40V:i5iiiiteD5ALIIi1ii0______SUM OF SCORES = 17.0000 427.0000 315.0000SLR SOO. SCORES = 1187.0000 969.0000 701.0000MEAN = 1.9563 1.903 "VPSUE). OEV. (NI 0.8i31

'*OS , 1:04106STNO. ()EV. IN-I) = 0.6141 440AW: 11.4430,MEDIAN = 1.9126 .1:11454' 1.4251_

7. Are most of your students of the same racial or national origin as you?

Yes

WiSIION 7

CI No

Grade a . 4SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.000

46.911.0

CF P-8LW

81.0 57.9 100.0

F

435PCT CF P-8114

8_0.6 53.9 100.035.7

F

8.2

PCT CE P -8LW

61.4 12A200.10219.0 11.0 19.0 10.5 19.4 10.5 19.4 18.6 8.2 18.6

CASES PROCESSED = 57.8781 53.9138 43.8545NO. BLANK DATA = 4.0000 4.0000 3.0000MINIMUM VALUE = t.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 2.0000 2.0000 2 .0000SUM OF SCORES 66.6856 64.4135 52.0272SUM SOD. SCORES = 90.8933 85.3664 68.3678MEAN_ = 1.1943 A.1/64.1.1902

0.3923 0.3955 0.3893STNO. DEV. (N)STNO. DEV. = 0.3957 0.3952 0.3938IMAWM 1.1145

SCORE INTERVALS F KT CF F-8LW F PCT CF F PCT CF P.BLW

1.000 477 60.0 596 100.0 436 7e.6 555 100.Q.. 448 E0.1 422 100.02.000 119 20.0 119 20.0 119 21.4 119 21.4 84 19.9- 84, 19.9

CASES PROCESSED = 596 SSS 422NO. BLANK DATA = 5 5 3MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.11000MAXIMUM VALUE = _2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES = 715.0000 67440440, 506.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 953.0000 912443000 674.0000-MEAN 1.1997 1.:2tA4 111441SU°. DEW. (NI - 0.3997 0.4104 0.3993STNO. DEV. (N-1) = 0.4001 0.4108 0.3998KELIIAN 1.1247 1.1365 1-1241

8. Were you assigned to or did you choose the school in which you are teaching?

QUESTION 8

SCORE

El Was assigned to school

INTERVALS

_1.0_1102.000

SARA_PRXES.E.D_ =NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUEMAXI MUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCOR ESMEAN

STND. DE V. 11.4e.1 =MEDIAN

PCT

Gragit16

Chose school

Cr P -BLW F PCT CF 13-.3L W F PCT CF P-81-$i

29.5 51.2 57.7 1Q0.0 28.1 53,1 _54.0__100.a2_3.5 5306213.2 48.8 28.2 48.8 25.3 46.9 25.3 46.9 20.4 46.4 20.4 46.4

.57.66785.00001.0000

.29.9310CL85.8319

142.15271.48840.49970.50411.4771

54.01554.00001.00002.0000

79.3322129.9588

1.46870.49890.50361.4409

4355634.00001.00002.0000

64.2248104.9568

1.46440.45860.50441.4334

SCORE INTERVALS F

1.000 301

FCT CF P -BLW

50.5 596 100.0

F PCT CF P-801 F

299 514.8 556 100.0 2A4

PCT CF P-81,A1

55-6 421 1002.000

CASES PROCESSED

295

=

49.5 295 49.5

596

257 46.2 257 46.2 187556

44.4 187 44.4421

NO. BLANK DATA = 3 4.MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0_000 2.0.000 2-0000SUM OF SCORES = 891.0000 41340000 608.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1481.41000 ' 13274000 982.0000MEAN 1.4950 1-42.2 10.4442SIND. DE V. IN) 0.5000 0.4586 0.4969STNO. DE V. IN-1) = 0.5004 0.4990 0.49758EDIAN 1.4_900 1.4258 1.3556

9. Were you assigned to or did you choose to teach the class you are teachingthis year?

Was assigned to class

QUESTION 9

SCORE INNTERVALS

Gi-ark

F PCT

ElChose class

CF P-BLW F

Grade 4PCT C F P- BL W F PCT CF P- BL

__Lek0_10 37.3 85.2 57.2 400.0 34.1 63.1 54.0 100.0 28.7 65.1 44.1 I m0- 0_2.000 19.9 34.8 L9.9 34.8 19.9 36.9 19.9 36.9 15.4 34.9 15.4 34.9

___CASEPROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA

= 57.2289 54.0230 44.12891.000011.0000 4.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 14.0000 1.0000YALALE = 2.0000 2.0000

SUM OF SCORES Ix

. _2.1/000.77.1667 73.9499 59.5289

SUM SOD. SCORES = 117.0348 113.8370 90.3240MUM = 1:3694 1.3490_ _

STND. DE V. (N) =..._1*34134

0.4763 0.4825 0.4765STNO. DEW. (N-1) 0.4805 0.4870 0.4820

1.2672 )0111Z2-2.1 - 1.2679SCORE INTERVALS

1._000

F PCT CF P-EILW F PCT CF P-61.14 F PCT CF P-BLW

381_64.7 _58.-9_10_11:0_35_4_63.3____556__Lika.a_z_a_4_62_,,_0_42_4_2,016_0_208 35.3 206 35.3 202 36.3 202 36.3 140 33.0 140 33.0

589

2.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BL ANK OAT A 12 4 1MINI NUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

__pima MUM VALUE 2.0000 2:0000 2_nnnnSUM OF SCORES 797.0000 758.0000 564.0000SUM SQU. SCORES 1213.0000 1162.0000 844.0000MEAN 1.-1_531 1.3633 131112UM). DEW. (N) 0.4775 0.4810 0.4703STND DE V. (N-11 0.47E4 0.4814 0.4708MEDIAN 1.2730 1.2853 1.24E5

10. Compared with other elementary schools in your district or community, how


0 Physical facilities(buildings, etc.)

QUESTION 10 PART A

Highly Moderately Moderately

Satisfies. Satisfied Dissatisfied

Grade 2.

HighlyDissatisfied

Grack A Gra* 6SCORE INTERVALS PCT GF 15-8LIPI PCT CF P*BLW F PCT CF P-8LW

1.000 19.4 33.4 58.0 100.0 ;8.3 33.9 54.1 100.0 12.5 28.3 44.3 1 00. 02.000 27.7 47.7 38.6 66.6 25.6 47.3 11508 66.1 21 48 41162.>:.-- 3148 1.73.000 8.6 14.8 10.9 18.8 8.1 15.1 10.2 18.8 7.3 .; 1.66- 4 10.0- 22.54.000 2.3 4.1 2.3 4,1_2, 3fte---2.0 112e6 5tt92e6__-591

CASES PROCESSED = SI .9534 54.1194 44.2 145NO. M. ANA DATA = 3.0000 2. 0000 1.0 000MI NI MUM VALUE Al 1.0000 1.0000 ' 1.0000MAXI MUM VALUE At - 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000

QF SCORES 2: 008L 102.1190 88.6563_WASUN SQO. SCORES

.409,244. 7481 226.6783 207.9052

MEAN 1 .8948 1.8869 2.0024STN O. 0EV 0.7956 0.7919 o442.83.

SIND. 0E%. IN-11 0.8026 0.7993 0.8378MEDIAN 1.8471 1.8404 1.4041-1

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P- BLit F PC7 CF P-8LW PCT CF

. _

2. 000195 189 33.5 558 100.0 126 29.7

49.1424298

100.070.3

_ _32.0290 48.6

-402 67.3 263 474 369 66.1 208

3.000 88 14.7 112 18.8 85 15.2 106 19.0 64 15.1 90 21.2.24 4.0 _24 _4_00 3.8 21 3.8 26 6.1 26 6.1

CASES PRIX ESS EC) 54;7 55d 424NO. ESL ANK 0A_TA 4_ 2 1RINI NUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0,000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0 .000 4.0000 4.000SUN OF SCORES 1135.0000 1054.0000 gaa.nanoSUM WO. SCORES 2531. 0000 2342.0000 1950.0000SEAN 1.9012 1.8889 1.9764SINU. OE V 4N = 0.7906 0.7932 0.8324STNO . 0E1/. 4N-11 = 04.7913 0.7940 0.83B4MEDIAN = 1.8569 1.8422 1.9135



Whysical facilities(buildings, etc.)

t8) Faculty (teadhers)

QUESTION IC PART 8

SCORE I NI ERVALS

1«000_ 35.9.2.000 19.93.000 2.1

_ 0.1

CASES PROCESSED.___K_ANK DATA

MINIMUM VALUEMAXI NUM VALUESUM OF SORE SSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTISP. 4.11

STND. DE V. (N -I) =MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATAMINI MUM VALUE =MAXI MUM VALUE =

F

Highly Moderately ModeratelySatisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied

HighlyDisiatisfied

E:]

Grade2. Oftute. . .

PCT CF P814,1 °CT

Grade.

6 1. .9_ 58.0 .10.Q.0 28.7 53.034.3 22.1 384 22.3 41.1

'of, 2.2 3.8 3.0 5.6. 0.2._ ._4,1_,.. 0. 2___0:104. 3

58.0329

1.00004.0000

.82.4554 .

136 .28221.4215

_ _

0.57741.3083

35621525_2

CF P81-W

54.125.43.20.1

100.047.0

5.90.2_

F

22.5

PCT

50.0

CF P-131 W

44.3 100.019.8 44.6 21.8 49.21:5 3.4 2.0 4.60.5 1.2 0.5 Ica

54.09 TO 44.261T3.00001.0000 - 1.00004. 0000 4.0000

82.8584 68.6266147.2823

1.51317123.5537

1.55050.6138 0.62250.6154. 0.62961.4438 I .4-849,

KT

39.5CF P-8LM PCT CF P-BLW F PCT W

598 100. 036.0 242

_29952.7553_11111.0_21125a,542414111.p_40.5 233 41.8 258rii46.3 184-- 43.4 208 49.1

4.2 27 4.5 23 4.1. .. 25_;:1::4.5 18 4.2 24 5.70.3 2 0.3 2 0.4 2 2 e 1.4 6 1.4_

5913 5573

4241

SUM SOD. SCORESMEANSIND. C.:EV et/SIND. DEv. (1.11) =ME0 IAN

1.0.000 impopo4.0000 4.0009:'

869.0_000 ;6162.ii110011...

1473. 0000 1470.0000 1210.00001.4532 1.5117 1.5613

0.59_50 ©.64c4_009290.59.34 0.5 955 0.64581.3399 1.4314 1.4815



Highly Moderately Moderately Highly

Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied

OQI Physical facilities(buildings, etc.)

WFaculty (teachers)

tDAbilitY of student body

QUESTION 10 PART C

SCORE INTERVALS-

. le°99.-2.0003.000

______4.000________..,..

CASES PR OCESSEf4NO. ALARA DATA =MI NI MUM VALUE!TAXI NUM VALUE =SRO 0F SCORE-_S_ _= .

SUM SQD. SCORES =MEANSIND. DEV. CNI =SING. DEV. 1141 =MEDIAN

-- SCORE INT EP VALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. IL ANK DATA

==

-MINI I* VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESWI OF SCORES

===

--- SUM SQD. SCORESMEANSTNO. DEV. (N) =

DEV. 1N-11 =MEDIAN

U aa a 0a

Cseute.4 Gale ip

F PCT CF P.-8LW F PCI CF P-BLW F PCI CF P -BLh

14.6 25.3 100.0 10.8 20.0 54.2 100.Q 8.1 18.2_- 44.3 100. C

34.4 59.6_57.6

43.1 74.7 34.5 63.7 43.3 80.0 26.0 58.8 36.2 81.E7.2 12.5 8.7 15,1 6.7 "12.4 8.8 16.3 9.1 20.6 10.2 23.01.5 2.6 ____1.5 2.b 2e1 3.8 2.1 3.6 1.0 2.4 .1.0

57,6353 54.1722 44.2745Z.9_000 2.0000 1.0000

. .

1.0000 1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000 44800

110.8779 108.4085 -91:7081240.6849 242.8085 211. 0907

1.9238 2.0012 2.07140.6892 0.6910 0.65080.6953 0.6274 0.69181.9143 1.9707 2.0406

F PCT CF F CF P8LW F PCT CF

142 23.c 593 100.0 74 17.5 424 100-0 112 20-3 556 100.0351 59.2 451 76.1 255 60.1 350 .:r:42.5 i 347. 62.4 443 79.783 14.0 100 16.9 as MO 9 -22.4 75 ` 13.5 96.18317 2.9 17 2.9 in .2..4 10 2.4 21 3.8 21 . -3.8

5 53

a424

15564

1.0000 4°9" 1.00004.0000 '440070 4.0000

1161. 0000 Aruammo 1116. 000D2565. 0000 2019.0000 2512.0000

1.9578 2.0731 2.00720A017_ 0.6E12 0.69940.7022 0.6820 0.7.0001.9402 2.0412 1.9755





(p) Attitudes of student body

() Administration

404 Overall philosophy of

V..) education

QUESTION 10 PART 0

SCORE INTERVALS

Grade?) Onute.4.F CF P-11-14 F PCT CF

._19000 _12:4_2/.5_2.000 31.1 53.73.000 11.5 20.0

Grade.F PCT CF P-8L W

. _5100 I09 1145.4 78.5 29.9 55.2 45.1 83.2 22.5 51.0 3709 86.014.4 24.8 12.5 23.1 15.2 28.0 11.9 26.9 15.4 35.0

__2.0.____ 4 0- _. _2R 4.9 2.7 4.9 Z16 4.9 3.5 Ss 0 3s_5 8.0

CASES PROCESSED = 57.8480BLABILOATA.

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000144XIMUM VALUE = 4.0000

SUM_Qf WORE s = _ X29_4; 4459_SUM SQO. SCORE S = 285.6929MEAN 2.0825STNO. DEV... Al N.) =STNO. DIV. IN-4 I = 0.7827OE 01 AN 2.0312

54.21062.00001.00004.0000

117.1340283.9)414

2.16070.75430.76142.11012

44.02353.00001.00004.0000

100:8010259023E3

2.28570.803704;8129202052


I I 9 I f

2.0003.0004 I I I

317126

53.321.2

CASES PROCESS EDNO. ANK CAT A =

595_01..

MI NI MUM VALUt - 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1263.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 3049. 0000MEAN 2.1227ST NO. DEV._IN) .7_8_65SIND. DEW. (N-1; = 0.7871MEDIAN 2.0631

CF P-131 W F PCT C F P-8LW F PCT CF P-81 W

476 80.0 304 54.6159 26.7 126 22.6

464 83.3 215 50.9160 - 28.7 118 28.0

366 86.7151 35.833 7.8

557a1.110004.0000

1218.008102987.0000

2.18130. 7.7750.77822.1102

422

14400044000

97211110120

2506. 00002.3033_0.-/S570.79662.2209




(p)Attitudes of student body

Admimis trati 012

Overall philosophy of

tr i education

QUESTION 10 PART E

Give1 Gilgit4 4 araitioSCORE I NT E RV ALS- F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-EL W

1,000 27.8, 57.7. 100.0 23.0 42.6 53.9 100.0 19.2 43.6 44.1 1a0. 02.000 22.8

_44.339.5 29.8 51.7 25.1 46,6 30.9 57.4 17.6 40.5 24.9 56.4

3.000 5.5 9.5 7.1 12.3 5.4 10.1 5.8 10.8 5.0" 11.4 -7.0 16.04.90_8__ . 1.6 . 2913 lip_k 2a 0,A_ .0.8 0.4 0.8' 2.0 4.5 2.0 4.5.

CASES PROCESSED =DATA

57.6876 53.86766.001/0

44.07602:0000

0 NI MUM VALUE. .6.090111.0000 1.0000 1.0000

MAX1 HUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 40000SUP,. SCORE S. = 96.2067 91.0040 77%9882SUM SQD. SCORE S =- 193.7909 178.5493 167. 8723MEAN 166677 1.6894 1.7684SIND. OEV. N 0_.J40 0.6786 0.8234STMD. DE V. IN-li =

_

0.7670 O. 6850 0:8329MEDIAN 1.5437 1.6581 1.6590 .

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF

I.000 287 48.4 593 10.0 240 43.4 553 100.0, isi 42.8 423 100.02.000 227 3 6.3 306 51.6 249 45.0 313 56.6 176 4106 442 - 57.23.000 59 9.9 79 13.3 58 10.5 64 11.6 49 11.6 -'66 15.64.000 20 3..4._. ______20 3.46 1a() 1.1..7 _40017441_

CASES PROCESSEDKG. BL ANK DA TA

=-

593A.

5537

423

MI NI NUM VALUE go 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000.MAX 1 NUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUN OF SCORES = _498.01000936&011PLL_248A0000SUM SQL. SCORES = 2046.0000 1854.0000 1598.0000NE AN 1.6830 1.6926 1.7683SIM). DE VA__ LW_ -,-- 0.7E60 0.6984 0.8067ST NO. DE V.MEDIAN

_

0.78671.5419

0.69901.64e6

oa0771.6733

10. Compared with other elementary schools in your district or community, howsatisfied are you with respect to the following things about your school?

Highly Moderately Moderately HighlyDissatisfied Dissatisfied

WAttitudes of student body

() Admirals t rat ion

dOvertopnhilosophy of

QUESTION 10 PART F

Satisfied Satisfied

0

Gradzi.. Go& 4 Ciatte coSCORE INTERVALS F PCT Cf PCT Cf P'..8 LW F PCT CF N.8L.

1.000 24.5 42.5_ 57.6 100.0 AI* I I S I I I

2.000 28.1 48.7 33.1 57.5 28.3 52.6 34.0 63.2 22.1 50 29.7 67.43.000 4.5 7.8 561 8.8 4.7 8.8 507 10.6 6.3 14.63 71,6 17.240000 0.6 1.0 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.3 2.9 11.3 2.9

CASES PROCESSED =M,_.LANK . DATA . =

57.6072QOM

53.72326.0000

44. 07842.0000

1.0000 1.0000MINI MUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXI MUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 400000SUPL.DE-SCORES._- j5 . 96 o 3722 94.4321 32 e 6456

191.3098 179.9767SUM SQO. SCORES = 186 .2742MEAN 1.6729 1.7578 1.875011119:__DEILILSHI QM 6 514. 0.6865 0.7534

0.6930 0.7621MD. UV. i'&1 0.6652MEOIAN 1.6543

- .

1.7616 1.8470

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P*81-1

1.J100 _235_11.6_2.000 304 51.3 358 60.4 290 5204 347 62.7 216 51.1 289 68.33.000 45 7.6 54 9.1 46 8.3 57- 10:3 60 14.2 73 17.34.000 9 1.5 9 1.5L ii 2.0 11 ka. O s1 3.I 33 3.1

CASES PROCESSED1+40. FLANK DATA

= 5538

5537

4232

MINI MUM VALUE 1.o000 1410010 1ataqoMAXI MUM VALUE 4.0000 4:4009 440640SUM OF SCORES 1014.0000 11682001_. Iiia:asaaSUM SOD. SCORES 2000.0000 1956.0000 1146. 0000MEAN 1.7059 1.7505 1.8865iThOe DEV. IN) = 0.66-99--- Q66877 00541ST NO. OE V. I = 0.6705. 0.6884 0.7550MEDIAN 1.7023 1.7431 1.85$8

10. Compared with other elementary schools in your district or community, howsatisfied are you with respect to the following things about your school?


IN Physical facilities(buildings, etc.)

Opaculty (teachers) 0 00( c) Ability of student body

( }Attitudes of student body

(g) Administration

seA Overall philosophy of ryvri education E:3

Entin tivador Grade('SCORE INTERVALS F PLi CF P -8Lw F PCT CF FozitLw F PCT CF P-BLWUM, SCWAO

A.SLOiL7.0008.000

___31 5.6 585_10.0.&__a__41.._e__54.5__LOA21.___12__2.9__4.1.6_1.110...0_41 7.0 552 94.4 26 4.8 519 95.2 21 5.0 404 97.162 10.6 511 87.4 61 11.2 493 90.5 38 9.1 383 92.1

9,00Q 6___132.0--_____44-9_16-i2.32__Z9.WA__345_82.4.9-10.00011.00012.00013.00014.00015.00016.00017.00018.000/9.00020.00021.00022.00023.00024.000

o5 11.1 373 63.8 65 11.9 366 67.2 45 10.8 306 73.676 13.0 308 52.6 63 11.6 301 55.2 48 U.S 261 62.789 15.2 232 39.7 71 13.O 238 43.7 6A 16.3 213 51.242 7.2 143 24.4 70 12.8 167 30.6 42 10.1 145 34.937 6.3 101 17.3 37. 6.8 97 17.8 45 10.8 103 24.827 4.6 64 10.9 24 4.4 60 11.0 20 4.8 sa 13.918 3.1 37 6.3 16 2.9 36 6.6 12 2.9 38 9.16 1.0 19 3.2 7 1.3 20 3.7 12 2.9 26 6.38 1.4 13 2,2_ 7 1.3 13 2_4_____b 1 4 14 3..4_2 0.3 5 0.9 4 0.7 6 1.1 4 1.0 8 1 90 0.0 3 0.5 2 0.4 2 0.4 3 .0.7 -4 1.00 0.0 3 0,5 0 0.0 0 Ot 0 i 0.2 I' 0.21 0.2 3 0.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0.2 2 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

0 0 0.0 0 0.0

CASES PROCESSED = 585NO. 8LANK DATA = 16MINIMUM VALUE = 6.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 24.0000SO6,(9602QAglixi14CFSCU"-RE0

545 416

SUM SOO. SCORES = 73503.0000MEAN 10.8188STND. 0EV. tNi = 2.9325STNO. DEV. 4N-1) = 2.9350MEDIM = 10.7039

6.000020.0000

7.0920.000011.04592.84912.851710.9524

6.0,00021.0000

59139.000011.55052.95762.9612





(() Physical facilities(buildings, etc.)

WFaculty (teachers)

( C)Ability of student body

(p)Attitudes of student body

Wpdministration

ir4 Overall philosophy of

m education

V.EIRE` INTERVALSCTIMIL SCARS)

6.00070000

4.00010.00011.00012.00013.00014.00015.00016.00017.00018.00019.00020.00021.00022.00023.00024.000

a 0

tPCT

3'7 G.040

CF P-BLW F 'CT CF P-EILW F PCT

ers& bCF P-SLW

3.2 506 57.0 100.0 2.6 4.8 53.1 100.0 1 0 1 2 0 5 4340L100. 0,4.8 8.4 53.8 94.4 2.7 5.2 50.5 95.2 2.1 4.9, :' . i 42:3 ,...,17.56.8 11.8 49.0 86.0 5.6 1006 4708 90.0 4.5 144 -"Vig76 .9 12.1 42.3 74.1 4A1 11.6 . 42.1 79.4 4.0 92: .:. .: Willa 036.3 11.0 9.735.4 62.0 6.7 12.6 36.0 67.8 4.2 31.7 73.17.7 1305 29.1 51.0 5.6 1.008 29.3 55.2 4.4 10.2 27.5 63.58.0 14.0 21.3 37.4 7.1 13.3 23.5 44.3 8.4 19.3 23.1 53.34.1 7.3 13.3 23.4 7.2 13.5 16.5 31.0 4.7 10e8 14147: . .34.03.6 603 9.2 16.1 3.6 6.8 9.3 17445 4.4 10.2 'Lea =;23.22.5 4o4 5.6 9.8 2.4 4.5 5. 7 10.3 1.7 16 AL__ Sgifil.1-11./.0

1.6 249 3.1 5.5 1.5 2.8 3.3 6.2 1.3 2.9 3.9 9.10.5 009 1.5 206 0.8 1.5 1.8 3.4 1.3 3.0 2.7 6.2Q*7 1.7 0.6 1442 P.O. 1 .1-0....5.L102 11.04 3.10.1

.1.2---D02

_WI_0.3 0.5 0.3 0.6 9.4 0.7 0.3 0.6 414;9.: 2.0

0,0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 .001 0.1 0.1 0.2 046 AU* ? 1.3000 0.Q . 0.2 0.3 0.O .* 000. : .460 ..0.41,_ 0.3 0.8 : 043 0.80.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 . -0.0 0.0 000 .0440 -0.00.0 .0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 4:$.0 . -0.0 000 0.0 . -41.0 t:i. 0

0.1. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 .0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 .40 . -0.0

CASES PROCESSED 57 o 0 346 53.1107 43443625NO. BLANK OATA 14.0000 15.0000 9..00MINI NUM VALUE =I 6.0000 6.0000 6.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 24.0000 20.0000 21.0000SON OF SCORES = 608.0020 586. 0088 5oQit7842SUM SQ13. SCORES = 6949.4688 68045825 616141004ME AN 10.6602 11*0337 1 /44.56i7

ST NO* OEV.*49 2.8646 2.8078 2.9450STNO. DE V* I N-1 ) = 2.8901 2.8346 2.9803

I t 4.74741

11. -How responsive is the administration of your school to any requests youmight make for additional teaching materials or equipment?

D Highly responsive

D Moderately responsive

O Not at all responsive

QUESTION 11

SCORE INTERVALS

14JOOD.2.000

F

27 e t .

29.23.000 1.7

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATAESN. VAIJA. =MAXI MUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =

.

MEANSTND. DEV. (N) =SIND. KV. IN,-1)MEDIAN

St;ORE INTERVALS F

_..1,000 2842.000 2963.000 18

Grade 2, Gnade.4 Gracie 4PCT CF F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF

_4_6.3 58.0 100:S1_2541_47:4 54.2 1000 21.1 47.8 44.1. 100..050.3 30.9 53.3 27.0 49.8 28.5 52.6 20.9 4.7.4 23.1 52.23.0 1.7 3.0 1.5 2.8 . 1.5 2.8 2.1 4.8 2.1 4.8

58.01$i3..000010093.0000

90.6591

1.56260.55260.55741.5652

PCT

54.18472.00001.a0003.00008441944

147.20921055380.54980.55491.5523

CF P-8LW F PCT

41.5 598 100.04S.53.0

31418

52.53.0

27117

CF P-BLW F PCT

44.12872.00001.00003.0000

69.3263123.9951

1.57100.58460.59141.5473

CF P-BLW

48.63.0

28 '41:6*-- 3..0

201 47.5 220 52.019 4.5 19 4.5

CASES Pitt:LESSEE) 598NO. BLANK OATA = 3

UALUF I _noon.MINIMUMMAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 93040000

_SUM SOU.MEAN 1.5552STND. DEV. IN) 0.5542

DEV. (N-11 = 0.5547MEOIAN 1.5507

55821-acinn3.0000

863.0040

4232l_nnnn

.3.0000-66240000'

1.54660.55570.5cf.2

1.5332

1.56500.57930.58001.5423

12. For remedial or other help for one of your students?

Highly responsive



QUESTION 12

same INTERVALS

Grate 2. GPI webF PCT CF F".BLW F PCT CF 13.411LW F PCT CF P -BLW

40440 24.8_ 42.9 57.7 100.0 22.3 41.1 54o2 104o02.000 30.4 52.6 32.9 5701 29.9 55.1:. 31.9 501.93.000 2.5 4.4 2.5 4.4 2.0 3.7 2.0 3.7

CASES OROCESS EU 57.6843NO. BL ANK DATA 2: 60 0000

VALUE --: 1.0000_ _MaLRUMMAXI MUM VALUE = 3.0000SUM (F SCORES = 93.1469

- SUM SCA Qs. SPARE. _.- 169.15901.6148MEAN =

STND. DE V. (N) 0.57010EV_o_011.1_= _ 0.5751_57,40.

MEDIAN.-__

= 1.6339

18=3 41.5 44.1 100.022.9 52.0 25.8 58.52.9 6e5 2.9 6.5

54.1536 44.05602.0000 3.00001.0000 1.000034440 3.0000

88=0597 72.7077159.9421 135.73104

1.6261 1.65030.5554 0.59770.5606 0.60461.6049 1.6639

SCURE INTERVALS F PCI CF F PCT CF P..3LW

1.000 259 43.5 5S5 100=0 237 42o5 558 140o02.000 307 51.6 336 56.5 300 53.8 321 57.53.000 29 4.9 29 4.9 21 3.8 21 3.8

F PCT CF

16S 40.0 422 100.0224 5344 253 60.029 6.9 29 6.9

CASES PRCCESSEDNO. BLANK OATAMINIMUM VALUE

5956

55821.(1000

MAXI MUM VALUE 3.0400 300000SUM OF.SCORES 960.0000 900:0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1748.0000 16;6.4000MEAN 1.6134 1.6129STND. DEW. (N) 0.5785 0.5550

MEDIAN 1.6254 1.6400

.

4223i -42000

3.0000104.00001226.41a00___

1.66820.5993

1.6875

13. For changes in your curriculum?

El Highly responsiveEl Moderately responsive

0 Not at all responsive

QUESTION

SCORE INTERVALS

2.0003.000

21.732.43.8

Grade 2.

PGi

55.96.6

Gk GttlikCF P.-.8LW F PCT

57 :36.2 62.5

3.8 6.6

GASES PROGESSEO = 57.9011NO. 81. /INK DATA = 4. 0 000

= _ 1.0000_VALUEMAXIMS VALUE = 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 97.8916SUM SDD = .05.4603_5.08_ESMEAN 1.6907SIND DEV (NI = 0.5871_S1012.4 OE _...1.5.922MEDIAN 1.7234

SCORE INTERVALS

CF W F PCT CF .-P43LW

22.3 41.5 53.9 100.0 16.5 37.7 43.2_100.028.0

3.552.06.6

31.53.5

58.56.6

23.04.4

52.310.0

27.44.4

62.310.0

53.8904 43.6 8 594.0000 4.00001.000 1.00003.0000 3.0000

88.9880 . - 75.66181ik6.2697 ____ 148.0270

1.6513 1.72410.3988 006 3300.6045 0.64031.6643 1.7361

F PCT CF 1)81-ii F PC11 CF 1;81-y F PCT CF p-8L ;.;

1. ODD 223-316.11 557 100-02.000 337 56.4 37U 62.03.000 33 5.5 33 5.5

232 41.7 _554 100.0 173 41-1 A21 10.0.m.0292 52.5 -324 58.3 216 51.3 248 5805

32 5.8 ,Sa S.11 32 : 1.6 32 1 ivio

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE

===

59741.0000

MAXI MUM VALUE = 3.0000SUM "OF" SCORE S 1000.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1872.0000MEAN 1.6750SIND. DEV t tr3 = 0.5744

_SIND. OE Vs ( N... 1 h = 0:5/49ME GI AN 1.7122

556 42141.0000_

4t-n000

3.0000912.0000 ,m4.000:

1.6403 1.66510.5 877 0.61216575 1.6 736

14. Do you believe there is a sound basis in educational policy for giving

compensatory programs to disadvantaged students at extra per pupil cost?

QUESTION 14

D0EDri

Definitely yes

Probably yes

am undecided

Probably no

Definitely noGt-wies. Gros:lel:1

SCORE INTERVAL'S

IsLOAO__.

F PCT

2704.__ _4_7_318._

CF P-q31. W F

5 707 10i/s_O_ 26.6

PCT

49 .1_

CF

54.2W

100.0_

F

19.7

PCT

44.6

CF P-31. W

44.3 L100.0_

30.1 52.2 17.5 32.4 27.6 50.9. 16.2 36.7 24.4' 55.42.000 20.2 35.0.3.000 7.3 12.6 9.9 17.2 8.1 15.0 10.0. 18.5 5.0, 1;p3 44.2 18.74.000 2.0 2.6 4.6 1.1 2.0 1.9 3.5 2.4 5.3 3.3 '.7.45.000

.3.50.6 1.1 0.6 1.1 0.8 1.5 0.8 1.5 0.9 2.1 0.9 2.1

CASES PROCESSED = 54.1666 44.0521M. SLAM DATA =

_57.7334_6.0000 2.0000 2.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 - 1.4181)0MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.O1SUM CIF SCORES 101.0642 94.4965 80.8622SUM SOD. SCORES 221.8489 207.6847 189.4330MEAN 1.7505 1.7446 1.8356STAID. DEV. IN) = 04,882/ 0:8892 4u9444STUD. DEV. = 0.8899 0.8975 0i91#9.MEDIAN _4.5625 1.5281

SCORE INTERVALS

1.000

F

284

PCT

4 7.7

CF 14.13LW

59.5 1_0=0

F

266_

PCT

47.7

CF P-BLit

558 100.0

F PCT

191 46.600 3545, na

A

CF

423226

7628

174.13Lbi

53.418.0

2.0003.0004.000

20280

33.913.4_10

311 52.3109 18.329____41

8 1.3

1858514

33.215.2

2.5292UM-22.

52.3.3.94-:.4s:469

5.000 S 1.3 8 1.4 8 1.4 9 2.1 9 2.1

.

CASES PROCES S 595 558 423NO. 8L ANK DATA 6 2 2MINI MUM VAL UE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

- MX1 MUM VALUE 5.0000 _SOMOOD 5.0.000.SUN OF SCORES 1052.0000 987.0000 762.0000Sul SQL). SCURES 2348.0000 2195.0000 1758.0000-MEAN 1.7681 1. 8014ST140. DE V. l NI = 0.9056 0.8972 0. 9544STNO. 0E9. (N1 I = 0.9064 0.8980. 0.9554

---

I_RAAA

15. Do you believe that compensatory

QUESTION 15

0 Definitely yes0 Probably yes

I am undecided

Probably no

Definitely no

-.SCORE INTERVALS

programs are generally worthwhile?

F PCT CF P-.81W F PC7 CF F PCT CF P -1/LW

42.8_ 56.8 57.7. 100.0 32.3 59.8 54.L 100.0 24.6 55.4 44.3 100.02.000 19.7 34.1 24.9 - 43.2 17.0 31.3 21.8 40.2 15.3 34.4 19.8 44.63.000 4.5 7.8 5.3 9.1 4.2 7.8 4.8 8.9 3.6 8.1 4.5 10.2

0 6 0.8 1.4 0.6 1.1. 0.6 Lel 0.8 1.9 0.9 2.15.000 0.1

__1.10.3 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.1 0.2 .0.1 0.2

CASE S_ERL1LESS.ED.NO. 01 ANK DATA =NI NI NUN VALUE =

-SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCONES =

_MEAN =STNO. DEV. (N) =-

5TNO. DEV. 1.61-4.1 =NED/ AN

SCORE INTERVALS

57=.487.6.00001.0000

. 0110.0_

88 .9 065165.7 782

1=5395.0.7 0750.71371.3802

F PCT CF

54.08983.00001.00004.0000

81.2576147. 6093

1.50230.68110.69361.i3264

44.340614)00005.0000

69.6598133.5412

1.37100.73730:74581.4029

F FCT CF 1).8LW F PCT CF P-8 LW

1.000 lon.0 224 52- 7_ 425100.11-2.000

.___.116564.15951110.10327201 33.8 261 43.9 183 32.9 232 ..i 10=7 ? 154 .36=2 201 47.3

3.000 50 8.4 60 , 1001 42 : 7.5 - 49 --A1=11, .47 8.7 47 11=14.00_0 8 Laa2.11132.4.._-5.000

__.1..3___ILD1sk72 0.3 2 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.2 1 0.2

CASES PROC 595 475ND. BLANK DATA 6 3 1. 0000RINI NUN VALUE

=1.0040s-ancio

'44000';'.4.A1160

5.00006134.nano

SUN OF SCORES 528. 0000 845.0000 1342.0000SUM SOO. SCORES 1766.0000 1547.0000 1.6094

___ &A N! /.3592 1.5171 0.7523STND. DEV. IN/ = 0.7318 0:6899 0.7542S7NO. DEV. IN-1/ = 0.7324 046905 1.4487

1.3907 1.3569

16. The following statements are all related to the academic capabilities ofdisadvantaged pupils. For each statement, indicate the degree to whichyou agree or disagree with the idea expressed.

QUESTION 16

SCOREINTEiVALS-

j60011.2.0003.0004.0005.000

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK OATA =MINIMUM VALUE =Aulgimum_yakug =SUM OF SCORES =

SUM SQ0. SCORES =MEANSTMD. OE V. IN) =STNS. DEV. INli =MEDIAN

a. With proper instruction they can learn about aswell as any other pupils.

PART A

6rade-2, Groff 4F PCT CF PBLN F PCT

1.2 57,9 100.0 0.7 1.313.0 22.5 56.7 97.9 1.6 214710.8 18.7 43.7 75.4 9.9 18;427.5 47.6 32.9 56.8 2641%48.65.3 9.2 5.3 9.2 5.4 10.0 5.4 10.0 3.9 8.9

0w10 0 HON0014 P WO W es P oo ss e) ctniie. pst

la 0 01.1 .1-I 1 1gcn 00 0 0 0 D

tvrtute 6CF F PCT CF P.15LR

53.8 100.0 0.8 1.7 44.2 100.053.0. 98.7 9.7 22.0 43.4 98.341:4 77.0 8.3 '1808 33.7 764,2'31.3 58.6 21:4 ,48.6 25.4 57.4

3.9 8.9

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.0005.000

57.67455.00001.0000.5.0000

196.3702723.9675_309A90.99831.00701.c6422 _

53.75677.0000.1.00005.6000

185.1002688.90943.44330.97930:91853,4770

2.00001 :0000 .

5.000015045245555.4824

3.40600.94080.99213.6525

F PCT CF P8LW F PCT

14 2.3 596 100.0 7 1.3

132 22.1 582 97.7 115 20.8115 19.3 450 75.5 96 1 17.4

46.5 335 56.2 274 49.558 5.7 58 9.7 61 11.0

CASES PROCESSED = 596NO. 8L.ANK DATA = 5

-MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 50_000SUM CF SCORES = 2021.0000SUM SOU. SCORES = 7459.0000MEAN = 3.3909STNO. 0EV. INI = 1.0083STNO. [AV. ti*.1) = 1.0091MECIAN

. . = 3.6336

CF PEILW F PCT CF 11-.81W

553 100.0 8 1.9546 98.7 98 23.2431' 77.9 71 14.8335 60.6 200 47.361 11.0 46 1.0.9

55371.00005.0000

1926.00007240.0000

3.48280.98090.98183.7135

473 100.0415 98.1317 7449246 58.246 10.9

42321.00005.00O0

1447.00005389.0000

3.42081.01681.02013.6/25_

b. No matter how good the instruction these pupilsreceive they will always score lower thanmiddle class children.

QUESTION 16 PART B

Great .GAILILL4 Gee {0

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8L W F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF 13-81-W

1.000 ....a..L....1.1..5_ 58.0 100,0____itai-12- 54.0 100.0 4.9 11,0 44.1 '100.02.000 50.2 86.5 25.7 47.7 47.9 88.8 24.0 54.3 39.3 89.027.0 46.53.000 14.0 24.1 23.2 40.0 1146 21.4 22.2 % 4141 7. ; 17.9 15.3 34.7

15.5 10.8 ' 19.7 7.1' 16.1 7.4' 16.85.000

_ _9_0._0.2 0.4

__3A2_11_,AL--102--InD30.2 0.4 0.8 1.4 0.8 1.4 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.7

.Cm&S_ES _PROCESUU4.0600 2.0000NO. BLANK DATA = 3.0000

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.00011 1.0000VALUf = ___50_0110 5.6000 -salaam__JWAMUM

SUN OF SCORES = 135.4496140.5237 106.5041SUM SOD. SCORES = 390.7698 389.9429 293.5613

. KAN 2.5102 2.41100.9620STND. DEV. IN/ = 0.9194 0.9102

STNO DEV. (N-1I = 0.9274 0.0111 0.9207MEDIAN . 2..1110 . _2.2111A-

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P- 61W F PCIT CF P81-141 F PCT CF P -MA

1.000 79 13.2 597.10 006 72 1:i.9 5.5.6 100.0 ;5 12 7 4231=1.62.000 280 46.9 518 8 6.8 268 48.2 484 87.1212 50.1 365 86.33.000 140 238 3969.118 :214 216 38.8 80 18.9. 153 36.24.000 95 15.9 96 1 6.4 91 16.4 . 98 17.6 69 16.4 71 17...1

5.000 3 0.5 3 0.5 7 1.3 7 1.3 4 0.9 4 0.9

CASES PROCESS Sql 556 473_En

NO. BLANK DATA = 4 4 2MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1ouoqo . 161841180 -

MAXI /WM VALUE = 5.0000SUN OF SCORES - 1454.0000 1361. 0000 1018.0000SUN SOU. SCORES = 4054.0.000 3837.0000 2830.0000MEAN 2.4355 2.4478 2e_40_66_STND. OEV. IN/ = 0.9265 0.9535 0.9479SIND. UEV. = 0.9275. 0.9544 0.9490MEDIAN 839 2.2687 2.2241

c. These children do not want to learn.

QUESTION 16

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.0005.000

cAses PROCESSEDMD. M. MK DATA =IQ 111 MUM VALUE =

__INUILLWRAAVUESUN OF SCORES =-

SUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSTMO. OE V. INS =STMO. OE V. =MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

5.000

0 0 0 0 0

PART COral' 7., Gra& 4 Cytaae_b

F

19.6

PC7 CF LW F

33.8 58.0 100.0 18.8

PCT CF P13L W

34.6 54.2 100.0

F PCT CF P-OLW

16.5 37.3 44.2 100.031.64.41.6

54.5 38.4 66.2 28.97.6 6.8 11.7 4.92.7 2.4 4.1 0.8

5304. 35.4 '65.494.0 6.5 12.01.5 1.6 3.0

23.0 52.1 27.7 62.72.5 5,1 4.7 10.61.8 40 .2.24.9

0.8 1.4 0.8 1.4 0.8 1.5 0.8 1.5 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.9

58.0298 54.1785 44.20143. 0000 2 .0000 11. QOM1.0000 1.6000' 1.00005.0000 5.0000 _5.0000

106.4335 98.5941 79.1868231.1 897 212.0573 169.4961

1.8341 1.11198 1.79150.7874 047161. 0.79070.7943 0.7834 0479881.7973 An7180

F PCT CF P.BLI.1 F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF -Bud

197 32.9 558 100.0 188 33.7 558 100_40 158 37.3 424 100.033 5 56.0 401 67.1 300 53.8 370 66.3 216 50.9 266 62.743 7.2 66 11.0 51 9.1 70. 12.5 28 ,64.6 . 50 11.816 2.7 23__ 3.8 9 1.t6 19 3.4 17 4.0 22 5.2

7 1.2 7 1.2 10 1.8 10 1.8 5 1.2 5 1.2CASES PROCESSED = 598 558We BLANK DATA = 3 2.MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.4000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0_000 560.000SUM C.IF SCORES = 1095.0000 1027.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 2355.0.000 2241.0000MEAN 1.8111 1:8405STNO. OEV. 1N/ = 0.7650 0.7929SOW DEV. I 1+-1 I = 0.7656 0.7936MEDIAN 1.8045 1.8033

.

424/1.00005A110.00

767. 00001671.0000

1.anso0.111770.a1871.7500

d. The pupils want to learn but they not havethe right background for scho-A work.

QUESTION 16

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000 .

5.000

PART DCraig. t

PCT CF P-8LW

L7 O 1:1 CI CI

1.2 2.1 57.8.101.-0 0.85.9 10.3 56.6 97.9 6.48.2 14.1 50.6 87.6 9.4

37.3 64.5 ....42. 5 73.5 22.4_5.2 9.0 5.2 9.0 7.3

Globe.

PCT

1..5

CF

51-4

P8LW

100-0

F

)*A3499-_-040210e-0PCT CF

11.9 53.1 98.5 4.4 9.9 43.4 98.117.5 46.6 86.6 5.6 12.6 39.0 88.255.4 37.2 69-0 29.1 6506 33.4 75.613.6 7.3 13.6 4.3 9.8 4.3 9.8

CASES PNCf5SED__= 57._8 197 53.8738NOD BLANK DATA = 5.0000 5.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000

= 5.0000_-_MARIMUM_VALUESUN OF SCORES = 212 .7 347

_5.0400198.1463

SUM SQO. SCORES = 825.0674 772.7810.3.6759_ . 3.6780

STND. DE V. IN) = 0.8546 0.9038STIO. DEV = 0.8621 0.9123

F

..111EDIAM

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P8LW F

1.000 13 2.2 596 100.0 82.000 63 1,0.6. 583 97.8 633.000 71 11.9 520 87.2 1004.000 392 65-8 Isleg 75-3 3035.000 57 9.6 57 9.6 81

CASES pRnr.Fs_ckEn = 596NO. BLANK DATA = 5MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 2205.0000SIAM S00. SCORES = 8601.0000MEAN 3.6957STOW. DEV. 4N1 0,8624STNO. D. = 0.8631MEDIAN_....- = 5..8652-

44.20831.00001.0000-5.0000

164.3207642.14673.71700S84240485213.88117 ---...__.

PCT

1.4

CF 128LW

555 100.0

PCT Cf 128LW

11.4 547 98.6 44 10.4 415 97.9.28.064.:6

484886

87.2.64.2

54266

12.762.7

371317

87.5

14.6 81 14.6 51 12.0 51 12.0

42451.00005.0000

I1.0000s.adon

2051.0000 1578.00008033.0000 6202.0000

3.69550.9040 0. 88110.9048 0.88213.8315 3.8947

e. It has been sufficiently Proven that such pupils 0.will never do as well as other students.

QUESTION 16

scoRe INTERVALS

.____ it220 _______2.0003.000

_ _____AseQk 0.. ._____

5.000

PART E

F

_._ _--bat_. 27.8

16.2. _ 4:0

0.3

Grode.2.

PCT CF

58.0 100.0

F

9.527.214.32.7

_14.0_6___47.9 48.4 83.428.0 20.6 35.4.

4.3 7.5__TAIL0.5 0.3' 0.5 0.5

CASES PRQC ES S ED = 58. 01 e6NO. 8LANK OAT A = 3.9000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000liALC1 KUM VALUE = 5.0000SUM CF SCORES .= 131. 5907SUM SOO. SCORES = 338.9058MEAN = 2.2681_..... __SIND. DE V. 4 NI

__*

_ ____

0.8350STNO. OE V. 1.1-11 = 0.8422MEDIAN = 2.1964

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F

_1_01 598 100.0 1052.000 284 47.5 497 8341 27193.000 169 28.3 213 35.6 1404..000 40 6.7 44 7.4 *295.000 4 0.7 4 0.7 6

CASES PROCESSED 598NO. 81. ANK DATA 3KIM NUN VALUE = 1.01000MAXI MUM VALUE a, 5.0000SUM OF SCCRES 1356.0000SUM SOO SCORES = 3498.0000MEAN -= 2.21176SING. OEV. (N1 = 0.8412STI'40. OEV. (N-11 *.= 0.8419MEDIAN = --- --.2. 19.7_2_

PCT

6014114CF P'-81W

17.550.226.35.00.9

5_4.3 10,0.044.7 8205174.5 32.2. 2 .90.5 0.9

Grath. 6F PCT CF P-8Lw

4_4.3__ 100 .0s.2 CI 49.6 36.3 .81.9

25.1 13 32.32.6 -::44.9 6.60.4 0.8 0.4 0.a

54.225.13_7_40640 OW8siposti

98-.2019248.7549

2.21670.8330.84392.1436

x.oposz.,1.4otta':.

120.1-951302.7979

2.21540.82050442812.3:465

PCT

3s.a49.925.0

5,21.1

CF P-BL W F PC7

55.2 1.00.0 32 19_.34,4, 81.2.203 47.8423 .31.3 111 264 .45" 25 W

6 1.1 4 .0.9

559114000sit0180

1229.0000

CF P-BLW

425 100.0- 343

. -140: /.929 ---

4 0.9

3095.0000___2.19116___0.83840.8392.2..1254

tkeao2393.0000

2.21410.853_40.85442.1429

f., Materials are more important than methods in

the teaching of reading.

QUESTION 16 PART F

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003,4000

5.000

Cloget.

DDDD0 isk.14.

PCT CF 1..B LW F PCT CF E"81.6

13.8 23.8 58.0 100.0_ 9.6 17-R 54.1 100.035.5 61.2 44.1 76.2 34.0 62.9 44.5 82.25.2 9.0. 8.6 14.9 6.3 '11.6 : 1.0.4 19.33.2____Iak _1%4 5.9 3.Z_ 6.9 .4.2 7.70.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.8

LASES-MIX es SEDNO IL MK DATANI NI NUN VALUE

==

31. 9525 54.49143.00001.0000

3.00001.0000

_SAX/111M-VALUE - 5.01U ND

114.3570 113.10415SUM CF SCORESSUN SQO. SCORES =- 259.2.813 27300076MEAN /..1009STNO. OEV. IN)

-109733_0.74417 0.7958

DE V* = 0.7683 0.8033biEOIAN 109272 -2.11121

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW F

1.00Q 140 23.4 598 1000 992.000 372 62.2 458 76.6 2463.000 49 8.2 86 14.4 464.000 245.000 3 0.5 3 0.5 9

CASES_PROCESSfa = 558NO* BLANK DATA = 3NI NI NUN VALUE 1.0000

SUM OF SCORES = 1182.0000SUN SQO. SCORES = 2688.0000MEAN_ 1..9112b

'STNO. DEV. till = 047669STNO. OEV. = 0.7675imprahm

F PCT CF P-SLW

10.6 23.9 44.5 100.026.4 59.7 33,7 .76.14.6 3O.5 7.3 16.42.11 .6.5- 2.6 1:90.6 1.4 .0.6 1.4

-

44.21011 IMO140000544000-

88.5165205.8664

/699950.80770131:10

_102anPCT CF P-BLW F PCT

23.3 42458.0 3251008 ?9

2.1 9

424

CE P-BLW

/110.0_ ILI 8_ _19.A 557 100.0 --. 76.7 350 62.8 .449 : 80.6

4-466 60.E 10.8 --- - 99 : 17.88_ isill'Ai.:s : _:_a9 .'31) --

261 6 1.1 6 1.1

_557a

, 40000

1150.00002726.0000

2101246_0.1E460.79531.9811

870.00002106.0000

g. Methods are more important than materials in the Do onteaching of reading.

QUESTION- 16 PART GGvoae,A

SCORE INTERVALS

2.0003.0004.0005.000

F

9.16.7

31.210 e 2

PCT CF

_.._1:_3 _ 3212_9_100m15.7 57.111.5 48.053.8 41.4

P-BLW

0 1.2

PCT CF P -BLW

2.2 53.9 100.0-

F

O.

PCT CF P-8 LW

21,1 44.3 100.098.783.071.5

9.37.3

29.4

17.2- 52.7 97.813.5 43.4 80.5

- 36.2 67.1

7.84.1

24.7

17.6 43.4 97.99.2 35.6 80.3

55.6 - 31.5 71.117.7 10.2 17.7 6.7 12.5 6.7 12.5 6.9 15.5 6.9 15.5

CASES PROCESSED = 57.8638 53.9390 44.3406NO. BLANK DATA = 4.0000 4.0000 1.000":WWI NUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.-44942 5.0000 11.1.-7/95SUM OF SCORES = 214.6262 193.D 508 634.9182SUM SW. SCORES - 851.1277 743.2964 3.6472MEAN 3.7092 579 1.0085STNO. DEV. IN) 0.9753 0.9852 1.0200

OEV. I N-1 0.9839 0.9945 3.87929 5

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-44 LW

1.000 9 1.5 557 100:0 a 1-4 . 425 100.0 13 556 100.02.000 101 16:9 588 98.5 78 18.4 417 .: 98.1 . 94

_1.316.9 544.-j'00

3.000 70 11.7 487 81.6 43 10.1 339 - 7148 70 12.6 449 84. 8-4.000 317 53.1 417 69.8 229 53.9 2206 69.12,300 94,;;D 379 141.25.000 100 16.8 100 16.6 67 15.8 67 15.8 79 14.2 79 14.2

CASES PROLE SSED = _597 425NO. BLANK DATA = 4 1.1:4490

MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =

1:110005.0000

5.01100 .

..1.544,koopo 71142114itSUM OF SCORE S = 2189.0 000 6046. 0000 2006.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 8615.00 CO 3.6329 7794.0000I4EAA 3.6667 1.0_137 3. 6079SIND. DEV. = 0.9 930 1.0149 1.11005STNO. DEV. to4.1) = 0.9938 3.8646 1.0014

3.8738 3+8 367

h. The teacher's ability is more important thaneither method or materials in the teaching

of reading.

QUESTION 16 PART h

SCORE fox ERVALS-

. 101100.2:0003.0004.0005.000

Groat

D D D D

grate 4ACT CF P -BLW F ACT CF

0.8 . 1:4. _5:49. 100.0__S4 0.8 54.1 10.0:0_5.0 8.7 57.2 98.6 5.2 9:6 53:7 99.25.7 9.8 52.1 90.0 6.5 12.0 48.5 89.7

28.1 48.6 .._4144 80.1.28.9 iloS 42,0"_71,718.3 31.6 18.3 31.6 13.1 24.2 13.1 24.2

cAMS.PROctS5ED .51A34AD,.111.NO. BLANK DATA 2.0000 3.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0400 1.0000VALUE 5:0000 5.0000.MARIKUM

SUM OF SCORES 231.9797 211.2918SUM SOD. SCORES 979.8521 869.1340MEAN 4.0032 3.9079WIND. DEV. INS a 0.9398 0.85162STND. DEV. (No4b aWO/ AN

0.94804.129"

0:9046

SCORE 1 NTERV ALS F CF ACTACT

1021 i 1.5 599 100.0 5

2.000 55 9.2 590 98.5 62 11.23.000 64 10.7 535 89.3 70 12.64.000 286 47.7 411_ 283 50.95.000 toy

_

185_1166._30.9 136 24.5

F PCT CF P-8LW

_0.4 1:0 44:1 100.04.2 9.6 43.9 99.07.2 163 39.1. 89.520.5 46.2 32.5 73.212.0 27.0 12.0 27.0

44.34061.06005.0000

132.3/19709.4475

3.887411.94220.95304.0621

CASES. PROCESSED 599 5512_

40. SUNK DATANININUN VALUE

a 2

1.00005.0000

41.0000"5.0000__AtainutsmNE

SUN OF SCORES 2380.0000 2151.0000SUN SQD. SCORES --: 10006.0000 8811.0000MEAN 3.9733 3.86E7SIND. 0E14 IN) = 0.9579 0.9382STND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.9587 0.9391

4N_ 3.99E2

CF A-8LW PCT CF

551 9901 38 809 422 99.3489 87.9 70 16.5 384 90.4419 25:4 200 . A2-1 214 73,9136 24.5 114 26.8 114 26.6

424A400905.4040

169S6001106835.0000

3.90350.0191-449to24.0075

i. Disadvantaged children have more trouble learning o 0 0 0to read than advantaged children.

QUESTION 16

SCORE INTERVALS

PART I

GraWL Gault it &luteF PCT CP P-BLW F

6000 Cl 6 X: 0 . 0.32.000 5.1 8.7 57.6 99.0 4.73.000 5.7 9.8 52.5 90.3 8.64.000 382 65_.7._ 46.1_11(6.11 32.95.000 8.6 14.8 8.6 14.8 7.8

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA =MINI MUM VALUE =

. MAXiMU.M_MALUE =SUM OF SC ORES =SUM SQ0. SCORES =MEAN.MO. OE V. IN) =STNO. °EV. *-11 =MEDIAN -

SCORE INTERVAL:i

1.0002.0003.0004.0005.000

50.1.514.1.00001.00005.0.000_

223.5789898.1040

31_84400.81360.82063.9( 36

F PCT

6 1.049 8.260 10.0

3S7 66.268 14.7

PCT CF P-81 W F PCT CF P-BLW

0.5 54.3 100.0 (1.3 9.6 44.3 100 ak8.7 54.0 99.5 -405 10.2 44.0 99.4

15.8 49.3 90.8 ,* o 1 1' 89.260.6 4.0.1 15.0 28.3 311.4 75..414.3 7.8 14.3 5.1 11.5 5.1 115

54.2553 44.26111.0000 : 1.-0000140000 140005.0000 5.04000

205.9795 166.2349817.3716 653.2222

3.7S65 3.75570.0075 0.11079

o.;8150- 0.183123.9129 3.8974

CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-43LW

594 99.0 49 8.8545 90.8 84: 15.0485 80.8 336 60.188 14.1 86 15.4

CASES PROCESSED 600NO. BLANK DATA = 1MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000SUM CF SCORES = 2312.0000SUM SQ0. SCORES = 9294.0000

18rIANK_ 3.8533STNO. DE V. IN/ = 0.a011STNO. DE V. IN-1I 0.8018MEDIAN

86 15.4 53 12.5

559 4241

-19440 1.0080:.'5400aM10 s_Anoo

2128.0000 1621.00008482.000u 6443.0000

3.8068 3.82310.8257 0.7)6130.8265 0.76223.9241 3..9111_

j. Disadvantaged children have a shorter attention 0 0 0 0span than advantaged children.

QUESTION 16 PART J

SCORE INTERVALS F

.22.000 10.93.000 12.24..QQO 29.45.000 4.5

PCT CF P-131.*

58.3 100.0_.18.7 57.0 97.921.0 46.1 79.150.4 130 5 La7.7 4.5 7.7

_4AWE5 PR04ES StO 58.2511.MINIKOM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000SUN. OF .SCORES 199./34651.04 SOD. SCORES 737.3989MEAN 3.4289ST_NO. DEW. IN 09A51STNO. DEV. 4N-1I 0.9580MEDIAN 34,617

SCORE INTERVALS

.

10.512.0

_25.25.1

PCT CF P131.61

. 2.5 5402,_100.0-1945 52.8 97.522.2 42.3 178.0''A6.6_ 30.3 55._9_9.3 5.1 9.3

F PCT CF P-8L44 F

14_.._2 ..3_

54.18482.00001000005,0000

1.8406219681.4885

3.40730.98370099293.6260

Givie,10F PCT CF P-BLW

1..1 2.5 44.3 100.09.2 20.1 .43.2 97.5

11.3 34.1 76.818.9 42. 22.8 1_1033.9 8.7 3.9 8.7

44.24061.00005.0000

538.51643.3438041190.99323.5314

20000 106 1706 587. 97,7 1013.000 124 20.6 481 80.0. 1254000 305 50.7 357.59. 4: .,C,

, 5.000' 52 8.7 52 80 56

CASES PIIIICF SSED$11 N1 NUN VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUN_OE_SCURESSUM SW). SCORES =MEANSIN _ A V . . 1 NiSTNO. 0EV. IN--11 TA

MEDIAN

6011.0.0005.0000

207&. aaon7734.0000

3.45760.95590.95673.6852.

PCT CF F PCT

557

-MA56

CF

77 ; 18v1 413 974'110 -25.9 336 79.1191 44.9 226 53.2

35 8.2 35 8.2

A25_3

Citteatii

1440054401NV

1896. 0000 241.00007008.0000 3.3765

3.4032 P44.500.4424 0446610.9983 3.57073.6111

k. Disadvantaged children have different lisguistic 0 0 0experiences than advantaged children.

V

QUESTION 16 PART Kgirattiei. Ospea..16.

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -BLW PCT CF PBL W F PCT CF PBLW

1.0002.000

0.32oU

0.5 58.23.5 57.9

100.099.5

0.5 0.9 54.2 100.0 0.0 0.0 44.3 100.01.8 3.4 53.7 99.1 1.7 3.9 44.3 100.0

3.000 6.6 11.4 55.8 96.0 4.3 8.0 51.9 95.7 4.2 9.4 42.6 96.14.000 37.8 65.0 49.2 84.6 37.9 69.9 47.5 87.7 31.1_ 38.4 86.75.000 11.4 19.6 11.4 19.6 9,7 1.7.9 9.7 17.6 6.7

_L1s515.1. 6.7 15.1

__PASESPRocgssEo 50.1695. 54../836 44.3406NO. BLANK OATA = 1.0000 2.0000 2.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.D000 5.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000 5.0000 176.421SUM OF SCORES = 232.5221 216.9707 7 19.7 354SUM SW, SCORES = 958.2715 894.4172 3.9789DEAN 3.9573 4.0044 _0.6322STNO. REV. (NI = 0.7037 0.6872 06399STNO. °EV., (N1/ 0.7099 0.6936 4.0123MFDIAN 4..0326 4.0397

SCORE INTERVALS E..' KT CF PBLW PCT C F P-BLW F PCT CF

1.000 3 0.5 I I I F I I I2.000 22 3.7 597 99.5 20 3.6 554 99.3 15 3.5 445 100.03.000 50 8.3 575 95.8 44 7.9 .534 95.7 37 6.7 "'MO . 96.5_4.000 403 67.2 5212. 87.5 384 68 ea 490 87.8 306 72. 0 . 373 87.85.000 122 20.3 122 20.3 1.06 19.0 106 19.0 67 15.8 67 1.5.8

.LAS 'ES PROCESSED = 600 55821.0000

4252.0200 .

5. 0000 .

Me BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE11AXIJI11/L__VALIIE_

= 11.00005.0.000._

SUM OF SCORES 2419.0000 2242.0000 6964.0000SUM SUL). SCE* ES 10039.0000 9274.0000 4.0000BEAN 4.0317 .4,0179 0962,12ST ND. DEV. (NI = 0.6909 0.4902 0.6219STND. DEVo l AF-13MEDIAN

= 0.69154.0583 0.6908

4.04554.0245

-

1. Disadvantaged children are disadvantaged mainly inthat they do not have the foundation of concepts 0 0 I:1 0 Dthat advantaged children have.

QUESTION 16

SCORE INTERVALS

/90002.0003.000400005.000

PART L

#1 PC7 CF P-8134

0.1 0.14.7 8.27.8 13.5

36.7 63.98.2 14.3

571457.3 99.952.6 91.744.9 _1111,a

8.2 14.3

CASES PROCESSED = _STAL.19.35__

NO. BLANK OA TA = 6.0000MINI NUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 54400SUN OF SCORES 220.4313SUM SQO. SCORES = 880.4924MEANSTNO. ()EV. IN) =ST NO. DE V. (N.../ l =MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

3_9_8A. DA

0076900.77583..9411

Coraits-L

0.6

PCT

1.1

CF 14-q1LW

54.2 100.0

F

0.2

FCT

0.5

CF P-8 LW

*4.3_100ALEL5.5 10.1 53.6 98. 4.4 9.9 44.1 99.59o5 11.5 4801 8808: 8.0 18.1 39.70 89.632.3 5907 118.6 71:3 211.2 6347 21::7 71.56.3 11.6 6.3 11.6 3.5 7.8 3.5 7.8

F PCT CF P-BLW

_

2.000 51 8.63.000 73 12.3

324 63.25.000 94 1!.8

595 144.0594 99.8543 91.3470 79.094 15.8

CASES PRIX E S SEEP za

=595

6NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE 100000

_11AXIMUM VALUE 5-0000SUM OF SCORES = 2256.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 9228.0000MEAN 3.85118STNO. DEV. IN)51140. DE Ve 11111 0.1873ago'AN 3. 958

54.1716 44o34_06

2.0000 1..00001.0000 5.0800500000 16343/38

200.7226 628.4189782.1401 3.6841

3,, 7053 0073_47

Oa 8419 0.1836008498 3oMQ-3.8566.

F PCT CF F PCT CF P-81.14

a 3 0.7 425 100.054 9.J

_558_100.0550 98.6 42 909 422 9903

94 16.8 496 88.9 83 1405 380 89041'41 44-7 442 72.4 263 61.9 247 651.Q6S 12.4 69 12.4 34 8.0 34 8.0

558 4252 141419°140000 . SAM

. _5.111101) 45AdAidd2075. 0000 5976.00008123.0000 3.6659

3.71E6 0.711900.8539 0178990.8546 3.82133.8694

la. Learning to verbalize complete thoughts isparticularly impottant for disadvantaged children. 0 El

QUESTION 16 PART II


LAM 0.3 0.62.000 2.4 4.13.000 5.8 10.04.000 40.7 70.15.000 8.8 15.2

CASES PROCESSED =NO. AL M DATA =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANMD. DEL, I N) =STND. OE V l W-1 =MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

VrreAtete

CF

58.057.755.449.58.8

58.04931.00001.00005.0000

229.5365934.4043

0.67920.68514.0039

F PC T CF P-8 LM

GroAte4 Ofettel

100.0 0.5

PCT

0.9

CF P -81.1

54.0 100.0

F

0.1

PCT

0.3

CF P-Blirt

44.0 100.099.4 2.3 4.3 53.6 99,1 2.4 5.4 43.8 99.795.4 5.5 10.1 51.2 94.8 5.5 12.4 41.4 94.385.3 39.2 U23_45:8_ 84.7 30 e4 69.2_ 36.0 81.1115.2 6.6 12.2 6.6 12.2 5.5 12.6 5.5 12.6

1.4a0 2 0-32.000 25 4.23.000 58 9.74:000 421 70.25.000 94 15.7

540_0486 43.96013.0000 4.00001.0000 00005.0000. 5.0000

211.2045 170.7271850.4590 684.22583.9077 3.88360.6820 0.69420.6864 0.7022

9 3.9596F PCi CF

600100.0 4

598 99.7 20573 95.5 595L5 85.8 397

- 94 15.7 77

CASES_PWICESSF0 = 600NO. WANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000PAXIMM VALUE 5.0000SUM OF SCURES = 2380.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 5710.0000MEAN ae_9667SIND. DE V. On =- 0.6700SIND. OE W. IN-1i = 0.67C6MEDI AN 4.41107

0.73.6

10.671.313.8

557

P...8LW F PCT CF PEILW

557 10000 1 0.553 99.3 19 4.5533 95.7 56. 13.3474 85.1 284 67.577 13.8 61 14.5

.

441

421 100.040 99.8Aq1 95.2.:345 81.961 14.5

31.00005.oako

lt:01)60.s.onan

2194.0000 1648.0 0008892.0000 6650.0000

3.9390 1491450. 6698 0.68740.6705 0.68E2

924 .....

n. Improving the student's self-image as a learner is r-1 (:-.1

particularly important for disadvantaged children. L--1

QUESTION 16

SCORE INTERVALS

2.0000..2.0003.0004.0005.000

PART N

Gahe2 C.tnktie

F PCT CF P.41Lid F PCT

_0.2 0.4.0.5 0.80.9 1.5

24.9 42.931.7 54.5

Gro.ste

.10.4:0. 0..158.4 99.6, 0.3 0.657.5 98.9 0.4 0.856.6 .97.3 -Z51.t.7 _. 4i. 331.7 54.5 27.5 50.6

CASES._PROCESSED 5801_655_NO. BLANK DATA 1.0000NI NI KM VALUE 1.0000MA XI If.LIK _V Al U. E 5.0.000,SUN CF SCORESUM Sari, SCORESMEAN

STND. OE V. (N1 =ST ND. OE V. (14-.4b1PIII/111

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000_

261.96291201.2097

0.60760.61294.5822

F PCT CF P-8LW

5 0.86 1.0

2A_CL

3.:7 54.5

600 10111,0598 99.7553 98.8

327 54.3

CF P..11LW F PCT CF P-8Lh

54.3 10,0 0.2 0.5 44.2 10Q.053.9 99.3 0.1 0.3 44.0 99.553.6 98.7 1.0 2.2 43.8 99.253.1 97.9 19.7 44.5 42.8 96.927.5 50.o 23.2 52.4 23.2 52.4

524.2:5531.0000 2.00001.0000 1.00005.0000 5.0000

242.2649 197.98201102.7170 903.5649

4.4656 4.48070.6186 0.61040.6243 0:61744.5Ala 4.5463

PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-BLW

4 559 109.0 _ 7 4,33 0.5 555 99.3 2 O. 420 99.3

.0.9 552 98o7 8 1.9 418 98.8

286 51.7 289 51.7 228 53.9 228 53.9

PRUCESSED = hnn 559NO. aL ANK DATA = 1 1MI NI MUM VALUE 1.0000 1..0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0.000SUM C1 SCORES = 2705.0000 2502.0000SUM SQL). SCORES = 12411.0000 11414.0000tfi AN 4.5 caa A.olt158STND. DE V. IN) - 0.5959 0.6208STND. DE V. = 0.6004 0.6213MEDIAN 4.5329

42321.00005.00116

1899.00008695.0000

4.A ElVt_0.63340.63414.5724

o. The ability to ask questions which require acomplete answer is extremely important inteaching reading to disadvantaged children.

QUESTION -16 PART 0

SCORE INTERVALSy

1.002_

F

0.3_

PGT

_.(642.000 8.9 15.53.000 12.2 21.14.000 29.8 51.65.000 6.5 11.3

11 D D 1:1

Csvmati. tikradul.4

CF P-41:.44 --FPCT

51.4 99.448.5 83.936.3 62.86.5 11.2

CF P -8LW

CVMULL (0

PCT CF P8LW

1.2 51.7 100.0 0.5 1.1 44.0 100.09.0 16.8 53.1 98.8 5.9 13.3 - 43.5 98.912.2 22.7 440 81140 1140 25..0 85.625.6.'47.6 .31.9 59.3 22.0 10O0 26=6 60.66.3 11.7 6.3 11.7 4.7 10.6 4.7 10.6

PROCE$V) 51.7520 53.72886.00001.00005.0000

_LASESNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE

_MA1iINVII_VALU5

4.00001.0000

__AAMO206.4472 189.0324SUM OF SCORES

SUM SOD. SCORES 784.9224 713.0627-3.5183___KAM _-____

STNO. DEV. IN).3.57470.9015 0.9451

STND. 0EV. IM.4) 0.9094 0.9541.. _MEDIAN 1-74AS

. - _3=6939

___________ 43.97075.00001.00005.0000

156.4344591.24E83.55770.88840.89863./121_ --

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF PBLW F PCT CF P-8161 F

1.000 4 0.7 597 100.0 7 1.3 554 100 0 52.000 90 15.1 593 99.3 83 -15.0 .547 :98.7 363.000 134 22.4 503 84.3 134 24.2 464 83.8 1044.000 51.1 3695.000

_V.5.64 10.7 64 10.7 68 12.3 68 12.3. 48

- CASES PROCESSED = 5_97 554MD. BLANK OATA - 4 6MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 tamtio:MAXIMUM UALtif = _5..01100 _500140__SUM OF SCORES = 2126.0000 1963.0000SUM SOW. SCORESMEAN dm.

Mk.

8050.00003.5611

1437.00003.5433

SIND. DEW. IN) 0.8958 0.9322STND. DEW. IN11inEaLmi_

= 0.8965 0.9331_3.7023

PCT

1.2

CF P -8LW

42.0_1110.1--13.3 415 98.824.8 359 85.5

11.4 48 11.4

1497.00005677.0000

3.56430.90140.90253.7174

p. In teaching reading, a wrong response can beas useful as a correct response.

QUESTION 16

SCORE INTERVALS

_4000_2.0003.000

_._......_ 4:00.05.000

_CASES PROCESSED

PART P

F PCT

0.5 0,92.9 5.08.2 14.13704 . 64,18.8 15.2

cottlikt

DODO El

CF P-8LW F PCT

57.3 99.1 3.1 5.854.4 94.1 6.3 11.7

_3_61 _Alas 68.8 15.2 8.6 15.9

57.7560NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE

. AligI14004 YAWL_

5.00001.0000

SUM OF SCORES 224.5453SUM SOD. SCORES 904.6646MEAN_ 3.40USIND. OEV. (NI 0.7473SIND. DEV. IN-1) 0.7538MEDIAN 3.9632

SCORE INTERVALS

Gra& 14

CF P-BLW

,9

f PCT CF P*43LW

44 1 I

54.Z100.05100 94.244.7 82.58.6 15.9

54.16662.00002.00005.0000

212.7110862.4971

3.92700.7084044150

2.5 5.7,7.0'154'-27,2 61.7.6.9 15.6

F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-.BLW F PCT

I.Onft S W% 100 _02.000 33 5.5 590 99.0 273.000 80 13.4 557 9305 684.000 386 &Am& _.471_16.03A55.000 91 15.3 91 15.3 98

_CASES PRCCES &EDNO. CLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE_BAILIMUIL/ALUE=

5

1.00005.0000

SUM Cf SCURES = 2311.0000SIAM SQU. SCORES = 9309.0000_AIAN 1,8775STNO. DEV. IN/ ?= 0.7642STNO, 0E V. IN-1/ = 0.7648_Ple01LAN__ 3.9.637

550

454 98.8404' 93.134;;P1 77036.9 15.6

44.11413.0000'1.005.0000

169.7568680.8640.3.84810011912041:'

34;94

CF P -8LM

100.0 .4D-9 427 laa-n4.8 558 100.0 21 5.0 -41202 531 95.2 55 13.0 -5es...4 - 463 83.0 262_____6:1 1 AWitiiigeb-17.6 98 17.6 80 19.0 80. 19.0

22.40004.00010

2208.00009010.0000

3.9570_0.69940.70004.041

3 !ift

1.4.8

1659.00006775.0000

3.93110.77430.77524.Q000

q. Disadvantaged children oftea have loweraspirations than advantaged children.

QUESTION 16

SCORE INTERVALS

PART 6,1

(61Nbel.

F PCT

0 0 0 0 El

CF P-8LW

Griat4.11,

F PCT CF P-8134 F PCT CF P-8110

1.0110_ 1.4 2.4 58.2_109_.O. 1.7 3.9 44.0 100.0 1.9 3.5 54.0 100.0_2.000 11.0 19.0 56.8 97.6 7.0 15.9 42.3 96.1 9.9 18.2 52.1 96.3.000 10.4 17.9 45.7 78.6 5.6 12.8 35.3 80.2 9.8 18.2 42.3 78.2

29..7 5121 25.2 57.1 294.7 67.4 27.2 50.4 324,4. 60:05.000 5.6 9.6

_"3503-1211.75.6 9.6 4.5 10.3 4.5 10.3 5.2 9.6 5.2 9.6

CASES PROCESSED 58.1.695 44.0203 54.0406I. BLANK DATA 1.0000 3.0000 3.0000MINI MUM VALUE 1.0000 100000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000._ 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 201.6143 155.8893 186.0917SUM SOO. SCORES 754.7637 596.2114 695.7058MEAN 3.4660 3.541___ 3.4436STNO. °EV. IN) 0.9809 1.0016, 1.0078ST NO. OE V. = 0.9895 1.0132 1.0173MEDIAN 3.7095 _3.11051 3.6987

SCORE INTERVALS F PC1 CF P-8LW F PCT CF F PCT CF P-8L14.

1.000 14 __2_.3 600 100.0 22 3.9. 557 1011440 lb 3_8 422100.0

2.000 107 17.8 586 97.7 93' 16.7 535 -.96+1 %70 16.6 406 96.23.000 101 16.8 479 79.8 102 ' 18.3 442- 79.4 .56 13.3 336 70464.000 321 53.5 378 61.0 280 50.3 340 6140 23R 56.4 280. 66:44--5.000 9.5 57 9.5 60 10.8 60 10.6 42 10.0 42 10.057

CASES PROCESSED = 600 557 422NO. BLANK DATA = 1 3 3MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ie--- 5.4100SUM OF SCORES = 2100.0000 1934.0000 1486.0000SUM SQO. SCORES a; 7912.0000 7292.0000 5658.0000MEAN = 3.5000 3.4722____ 3.5213STND. DEV. INI = 0.9678 140176 1.0039STND. DEV. IN-.11 = 0.9686 1.0185 1.0051MEDIAN = 3 0_430 - 3.7196 .3.7859

SC

UR

F IN

TE

R V

AL

SF

PC

6114

8 C

FP

LT4kaie

CF

P-B

LWF

FC

T&

sox

CF

.22

.000

5.73

. -10

0.0

00

41-

.,42

100.

00

0.0

111"

407

1(10

,00 0

0.0

0.0

.at

23.0

0024

.000

0 00.0

0.0

573

100.

057

3 10

0.0

542

542

100.

010

0.0

0 00.

0D

e 0

407

40?

100.

010

0.0

_53

3-C

0.0

542_

100.

0__

CL

0.0

407

100.

0.S

IXF

4-2

5.00

026

.000

.

0.

0.0

-10-

057

3 10

0.0

1.0.

254

210

0.0

10.

24E

710

0.0

27.0

002

0.3

573

100.

00

0.0

541

99.8

10.

240

699

.8.57

199

.7I

1

0.6

540

.99

.60.

040

599

,52

9. 0

002

0.3

568

99.1

30.0

005

0.9

560

98.8

20.

453

799

.13

0.7

405

99.5

31.0

00..

..3-0

.5.-

5121

97_.

95

0.9

535

98.7

;0.

740

298

.855

897

.48

1.5

530

97.8

102.5

399

98.0

32.0

0011

1.9

33.0

0014

2.4

541

95.5

142.

652

296

.314

3.4

389

95.6

34,0

01j

93.0

V5.

050

893

.71/

2_35

375

X22

*135

.000

.19_ 25

4.4

514

89.?

264.8

481

88.7

215.

236

589

.736

.000

356.

148

985

.337

6.8

455

83.9

245.

934

484

.5--

--2

397.

241

877

.128

11.9

320

74341_

8.9

.454

._

400

69.8

459.

037

969

.940

9.8

38.0

0051

292

71.7

39.0

0057

9.9

349

60.9

468.

933

060

0936

8.8

252

6109

iki/0

_0_

579.

9--

4 41.0

00_

.-2

92 234

40.8

519.

422

341

.139

9.6

172

42.3

42.0

0046

8.0

177

30.9

367.

017

231

.743

10.6

133

32.7

39_

131

22.9

448:

113

424

.,728

6.9

44.0

0025

,

4.4

._

9216

.12b

5.2

9016

.621

5.2

6215

.245

.000

244.

267

11.7

203.

762

11.4

122.

941

10.1

4bag

043

Tel

e'.

101.

842

J.7

1k

2.7

9da

l--47

.000

101.

734

5.9

101.

832

5.9

92.

218

4.4

48.0

00.

101.

724

4.2

71:

322

4.1

71.

79

2.2

49.9

510_

-2-:

41+

115

2 ila

10:

2--

50.0

000.

49

1.7

00.

01

0.2

30.

57

1.2

51.0

002

0.3

40.

74

0.7

71.

30

0.0

0.2

----

----

--52

.0-0

-0-

10.

253

.000

10.

21

0.2

10.

21

0.2

00.

00

0.0

54.0

000

0.0

00.

00

0.0

00.

00

0.0

00.

0_5

5_0_

000-

00.

00

Dal

)0-0

.00

0.0

56.0

000

0.0

.0.0

00.

0C

.0.0

00.

00

-0.0

00.

057

.000

C0.

00

0.0

00.

00

0.0

00.

00

0.0

_00.

0

CA

SE

S P

RU

CE

SS

ED

573

542

407

A-

28IR

iii-I

4Q...

--0L

AR

K-D

AT

MI A

n M

UM

VA

LUE

=27

.000

026

.000

026

.000

0P

AA

I MU

M V

ALU

E=

sago

oco

52.0

000

.52

.0.0

00S

UM

OF

SC

UR

E-

2270

3.00

0021

.511

3_,Ia

kO__

____

____

__16

1112

,410

110_

___

SU

M S

00. S

CO

RE

S=

9096

69.0

000

6628

27.0

000

6446

40.0

000

ME

AN

39.6

.213

39.6

734

39.5

970

_S-T

-ND

. °E

V:

--=

-4.

2081

..3.

9514

.4sr

Nic

. ',A

V. I

N-1

1 =

4. 2

118

4.24

C1

3.9S

54

Ott

61 A

N39

,554

.dt8

E4.

39.7

641

271.3tpt $4 2 4AO Z A55 "I M(61 $12 `4co 0 1 E

2270..0 I 1

m FR Z xi i 1 i

,Ic < ec < ,C CD Itn 0 to to LA %A %A s.ln to 144 4% 4% A 4% 4% 4 4% 4% 4?' La %a %a %a $.0 le uo la a 4') NJ NJ NJ N N2 N,..se fe es m) .4 0. LA 44 tot N b5-6 0 op 0) 5-4 iCA VI 4 ko rJ $-* o 10 co;-v ct. Vs:44 L4 r4 0-*0 0 w -4 Ok lul 4,- w Ni pi

......0 mrlom foo:0000. or00000vo 444 4;4444444444444440fornCCkso 10000001000000000 000000:000000000000000107.2 X11r11111.4401 .00000900000000 0000000000000000000;0000

4. rn ,P. 01

X0111 10 00009110 0000000 C000 0000 00000000000404Z000 :

11 11 11 11 'II II 1I 'II fl

c) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 o 0 to to Ig W tfl tp to 4 44 to AJ po h4 CD CD CD CD CD C CD CD CD CD CD,cD cD CD CD P., A.5 Ao N CA m> tA tn 0 to u5 to to to 05 vs cp. tn 0 to 43 tn a. to NJ 0 0 C) 0 4) 1

COomi

;0 0 o :0 0 0 0 001w a.. ro 1-, to, tn 0,4 .0 .0 .0 to CO 04 4% tv to 1- c') 0 o 000.000:0 To

. .0 441444444444444444444444044444 n. L0 4$ w) to NIA., kr i4) CD 4):CD 0 ru 4-# A4 440.6 CA Do CD LA tn 10 CD 4, 40 tn Co C* 4% tn on 4) ca- tn 43 to to to 00 4) 4) 4) -4

4, 4% '0 4% LO ..1 :5-4 to ,Dowro N CA 04 ICA 0 0 10 4440 IA Ao On il* 0 0 0LP CN Id, 8 18u. 2.0, .1

4% 0.1IA to 0

0 11111 0- 1-4 1" IWK1 to to .4. 4.4'. vs us vi us vs tr VI to to V/ to to ,to

CD CD CD CD CD CD 0 CD CD Am to tO 44 -4 CD ua .4 NJ ft4 Uo CD'to CA 0 11. U0 41- 0- 4% tr Lo tn tn!tn LA vital......w........w.4........e..4... ri

0 0 0 0 0 1- rg uo Ix as) 0 k.r. a., i0 N.) .4 On co 43 ry -10 km 0 * ro $-..4% cc 0 it) 4,, 4. 4. 4. 0. 4% .rt

Ii

I I I0-5 b.1 10.b A. Pa ob. T5III

1 t- I- 1U to .1*. P us 0, 4 CO Co .0 4:0 ) 41 AO ,D bb 0 0 to 0 010 ICP 0 CD 0 0 0 CD 0 Cppo to cA .4 Ao co 4% Pw *0 0 .0 co -4 4% co N CA -4 Co 43 .0 .0 0 CD IF 0 CDICD CD***ow w * w000 op]. 1CD CD 0 CD CD 14) to tn 4) P...i CA 44 44 m3 4 -4 ..1 Ao 44 m) .4 CA Qui*. 4) CA A-0 CD Lo ,4 CD CD 0 CD 050 IL

i

16

CD CD 0 0 c) 4) CD CD C0 CD CD Ad A- U4 W 6) 4% kri 44 LP 110 44 Niro A-0 0 10 cd 0 CD Cp Cp C) 0+ s ** wo D 441.4444,41s14 4

0 0 p 0 1--4.) .4. skJ kr, .4 0) i0 NC 0 OD -4 O 1Z .4 0. Co 4, .01.-1 N. s.0 0 0w

co4.444.44

Nto..4 LA %A44(0A-6.. pooN

Ch Nrt) to tA 0 0 0

"II0 N 0 0 0 %A

0Co be) 0 0 0Ok CD C) 0 0

r

b CO

0'

.p...ow0

0 0% Poo

A.4 di ODa

cr

NP N0 o00 ts)

8 8

1

D D DaD D 0k

.00 D . -4 to C

I Io o 10 0 04000 00 0 0 0

141100000oc 00 4-4

000, OD

1.d Po

tr

tol rft1 .4

oo trs N 0

1,4

NNtotocANCAOoppose.*i .0 .4> Co Co 0 lo 444

*tit

4) 4) C0 CD CD CD CD CD cD 0 ,.. 1-, to N4' too w. o444446444rCD 0 C5 CD CD 1.- CD CD Ao -4 OD Ulf-, -4 tn

aloe0

0O 4 000 0

0 0 0 As N w.N Pe CCw ow* opCD 0 N -4 Ad CD LA LW CD to

1 1 1 A00 00000e 0 0100 00 P°

1 1 1 0 00 0 0 0 044 44 0400 00 KI N

1.)

44 0).N

toN4,

%,7i co

.0 El, .4 ;ft LA st. Ai 000 ID 0 0 0 0..... *wow*0 0. )lo to VI ...1 CA /0 PA * to 0 A5

/4, /A'0 CO 0Oo .1%

to CACO OD

44 0

4464 a

co coN co

to to to NN

02 .4 4`N

Co Co

Co

N tOCA 0

ttl

to

N

VI CIO

1101

CA

Vs vI0 0-4 CA

bC5 10Os -4

N co

4!)10 10

U) 04

1+w0004 444.1*. 0 4.1.0

N

4% 4%0 4.0, a-

000

04 0

*

Lo U4

On ft.1 OD Co bC, o) 40 10 4)fu 0 0 * vi ft4 co 10 10o p ** pop- 40 1/441 is.) us C4 to to ts)

0006.1

000 0sal tg

©0040

biz00

11

44.40, 0 Avo p.) N-N 4 n0. t P t II

sod Po I" ID0 0 0 Cp I40 0 0 0 Ct4 rco 0 00 a:

PART III

CLASS AM) PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS QUESTIONNAIRE

ITEM ANALYSIS

1. What grade do you teach?

Two

Four

Six

Ungraded

Gv-...t.ciet cle4=L e_6P-BLW FSCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW PC/ CF P-BLS;

1.000 58.5 IOC.° 58.5 100.0 0.0 0.0 54.7 100.0 C.0 0.0 44.8 100.02.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 000 0 44.8 100.03.0C.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.8 100.0 44.8 100.04. 0CG O.0 0.0 0.) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.

AlmCASES PROCESSEO 58.5473 54.7435 44.8092MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 2.0000 3.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 -2;000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 58.5511 109.4939 134,4351SUM SQL). SCORES 58.5511 218.9877 403.3052MEAN 1.0001 CIO 1 3.0002

SC.:1RE L4TERVALS F PCT C1 P-BLW F PCT F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 606 100.0 606 100.0 0 0.0 565100.0. C 0.0 431 100.02.000 C 0.0 0 0.0 565 100.0 565 100,0 0 0.0 431-i00.03.000 C 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 431 100.0 431 100.04.COC 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 9.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

U.SFS PSJCFSSE0 60u 56S 431MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 .0000 3.0000MAXIMUM VA1U47 1.0000 2.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 606.0000 1130.0000 1293.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 606.0000 2260.0000 3879.0000MEAN 1.0000 2.0000 3.0000STN C. 00/. (N) = 0.0 0.0 0,0STK:. REV. (N-1) 0.0 0.0 0.0.MEDIAN 1.0000 2.0000 3.0000

la.

How many pupils are in your class?

(Give actual number)

SCORE

1171TERVALS

PCT

ORAL*

2:CF

P-BLW

F

GRADE 4

PCT

CP-8LW

F

GRADE

ACT

6

CF

0.0

2.99

0.1

0.2

58.1

100.0

0.3

0.5

54.3 100.0

0.3

0.7

44.2

100.0

3.00 -

8.99

2.8

4.8

57.9

99.8

2.2

4.0

54.0

99.5 -2.4

5.4

43.9

99.3

9.00 -

14.99

3.6

6.2

55.2

95.0

3.0

5.4

51.9

95.5

1.8

4.1

41.5

93.9

15.00 -

20.99

8.0

13.9

51.6

88.8

5.4

9.9

48.9

90.1

4.9

11.0

39.7

89.7

21.00 -

26.99

.2.4

36.6

43.5

74.9

15.1

35.2

43.5

80.1 13.7

31.0

34.8

78.8

27.00

33.00

32.95

-38.99

18.0

1.9

31.0

3.z

21.1

3.1

36.3

5.3

17.7

4.6

-.12.5

8.5

24.4

44.9 14.8

6.8

12.4

3.1

33.4

7.0

21.1

6.4

47.8

14.4

39.00

-44.99

0.3

0.5

1.2

2.0

0.5

1.0

2.1-- *3-.4:- 0.3

0-.6

3.2

7-.;3"

45.00

-50.99

0.4

0.7

0.9

1.5

0.3

0.6

1.6

2.9

0.8

1.9

3.0

6.7

51.00

-5o.99

0.3

0.6

0.5

0.9

0.4

0.8

1.3

2.3

0.3

0.8

2.1

4.9

57.0C

-62.99

O. 0

0.0

0.2

0.3

O. C

0.0

0.8

1.5- 0.3

-C..6

1.8

4.1--

63.00

-68.95

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.3

(.0

C.0

0.8

1.5

0.6

0.0

1.5

3.5

69.00

-74.99

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.8

1.5

0.0

0.0

1.5

3.5

75.00

-80.99

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

-D-.8---1;-5---0.1

-0.'2

1.5

3.5-

81.00

-86.99

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.6

1.0

0.8

1.5

0.6

1.3

1.5

3.3

87.00

-52.99

0.0

U.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

L.2

0.3

0.5

0.1

0.2

0.9

2.0

93.00

-s8.95

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

-0.2---0.3

0.2-0.5

.0.8

1.8-

99.00

105.00

-104.99

-110.99

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0 .0

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.1

0. 2

0.2

0.6

0.5

1.4

1.2

111.00

-116.99

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.1

0.2'

0.2-0-.----C.-0"--Ci.0

0:5

''I--:7T.

117.00

-122.99

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.5

1.0

123.00

129.00

-128.99

-134.99

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.0

-0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1.----0.-r-

0.1

0.1

Q.0.3

0.5

0.4

1.0

0 -:9

135.00

-140.99

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.6

141.00

-146.99

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.4

147.00

-150.00

C.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.0

0.0

'-'.-0:0-----0-.-0----0-.1-----07Z-----

0.1

-0--.7E

CASES PROCESSED

NO. BLANK DATA

58.0561

5.0000

54.3306

44;0000

44.23139

MINIMUM VALUE

1.0000

2.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE

SUM OF SCORES

110.0000

1440.6533

137.0000

146q;04447--

149.0000

----1783:S470

SUM SOO. SCORES

39789.7734

46712.7969

50814.1367

MEAN

--DWD. ()EY. IN)

24.8148

3421

27.0390

11.-3437

29.0263

17.4995

51t40. UE

V. IN

-118.4149

11.4496

17.700?

MEDIAN

24.8719

2.6.1328

26.5660

la.

How many pupils are in your class?

(Give actual number)

SCO

RF

INTER VAL S

PCT

CF

P -8LW

FG

.ro-

aeq

PCT

CF P-8LW

FG-Irs3-

e-PCT

--C

FP-8LW

0.0

-2.99

1600

3.00.0

20.4

561 100.0

2U.S

425 100.0

3.00 -

8.99

14

2.3

599

99.8

16

2.9

559 99.6

1.3

3:1:-

423-99.5

9.00 -

14.99

19

3.2

585

97.5

25

4.5

543

96.8

19

4.5

410

96.5

15.00 -

20.99

'78

13.0

566

94.3

49

8.7

518

92.3

39

9.2

391

92.0

21.00 -

26.99

244

40.7

488

81.3

194

34.6

469

83:6-

276

32.0

----

352

82.8

27.00 -

32.99

209

34.d

244

40.7

205

?6.5

275

49.0

156

.56.7

216

50.8

33.00 -

38.99

LO

3.1

5.8

Si

9.1

70

12.5

*et

8.0

6J

14.1

39.00 --

44.99

50.8

15

2.5

5C.9

19.

-

226-- 6.1

45.00 -

50.94

40.7

10

1.7

4U.7

14

2.5

61.4

24

5.6

51.00 -

56.99

40.7

1.0

40.7

10

1.8

30.7

18

4.2

57.00 -

62.9

00.0

20.3

00.0

6 -1.1-

6.5

15

-3.-5

63.00 -

68.99

10.2

20.3

0C.0

61.1

00.0

13

3.1

69.00 -

74.99

00.0

13.2

CU.0

61.1

0.0

13

3.1

75.00 -

80.99

CJ.0

i0.2

00.0

6--

0.2

81.00 -

86.99

00.0

10.2

30.5

61.1

'

30.7

12

2.8

87.00 -

9::.00

92.49

98.99

0 0

0.0

0.0

1 1

0.2

0.2

1 C0.2

0.0

30.5

'2

6.4

1'

0.2

-----

92.1

99.00 -

104.99

00.0

10.2

00.0

20.4

10.2

71.6

105.00 -

110.99

IO.?

10.2

00.0

20.4

10.2

61.4

111.00 -

116.99

00.0

00.0

10.2

2-0.4

-6-

0.0

117.00 -

122.99

00.0

00.0

00.0

10.2

00.0

51.2

123.00 -

128.99

00.3

00.0

C0.0

10.2

10.2

51.2

129.00 -

134.99

00.0

00.0

00.0

1-4

0.9

135.00 -

140.99

00.0

00.0

10.2

0.2

10.2

30.7

141.00 -

146.95

00.0

00.0

C0.0

0.0

1C.2

0.5

147.00 -

150.00

00.0

00.0

00.0

0.0

10.2

10.2

CASES PROCESSED

Nl. ALANK DATA

= =600

561 4

425 6

MINIMUM VALUE

1.0000

2.0000

2.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE

110.0000

137.0000

149.0000

SUM OF SCORES

13619.0000

15400.0000

12494.0000

SUM SOD. SCORES

=441779.0000

485106.0000

489702.0000

MEAN

26.0317

27.4510

.29.3976

STNP. OEV. (NI

=7.6584

10.5433

SIND. 0E4. IN-11

=7.6648

10.5527

16.9911

ME01.N

25.6229

26.8299

27.1346

--------

On N3 V) Cn 7.( 3

720-4

rn c:C>p.iQ

Cs z Zt A X X pc :e

01

P. CD CD ,11E

pm I-.

ill

1?

Vs C Z a Co Cn

0 "11

0CS

33 b"0

mm

.n

Z 7D

mt mc

CD 0G 0G 7C C)

01 C) 11. 10

C)

CsMr-r-c

mC

D rn C

f.e7D

v,rn

v,m

en

04

01

011

II11

IIN

1II

IIII

H

0..1

WALT.

tn

1.A)

..n N

04 O C.; J`0

so

NJ 0. 04 CO CP 04 C) Cn

-. 4 CP 0. VI CP 4) CD

0 CO

p4 CP ND Co 0.1 CD

GP 04

CI 4% .0 4) CD 4) CD

C)

N43 J

1.4

0. 4% Lc *4

to

4%0n O. 4% a. lA 0 0 Co 4.0

LO

C0 0 ta tA 0 0 C31 03

C0 CO 'NI 0 0 CD 0

0 VI

I-. 0% 4% 0. 0 VI 0 ON

LoNDOCCP00

0a1

-wCo

-d

r-

crC0 4

4'

4'

r. Cc tn -4 1.0 C

0)W

,IN

) cc -4 I-, 4,0.000-.1

VI it, it) -4

cko

CT .t" N

0 C.'

C, 0)

ND 4D ND Co 03 04 .4 -4 CP CP tn L11 SA 4'4' Lo to wn ND 0. .-M

O o 4% C1 O. 1.4 Co 4' e) Cn NJ CO 4% 0 en ND CO 4' 0Ch IN) CC 4% CD C0 Po 0

C) 0 c: Cs C5 0 CD 0

Cs 0 0 0 CD

C) C) 0 0 CD C) CD 0 e) 0 C.,

0 C) 0 CY CD C5 C3 0 0 0 cl 0 Cs 0 CD cs 0 0 CD 0

c cs CD C5 0

I

Inrs0rn-4m

41 45 co no co 04 .4 C0 CP cr Ln kr 4' 4' 4%

LO ND N.. Ns 0.4 0.6

Lo

tm t-d .4 to 41 VI *4 J to

LP 04 04 0 4) Ln . .4 ko qp Ln I

mcA

CD ND 45 ND QD 43 4) 43 43 4D 42 ND 42 NP ND 4)

.0 .0 ND QC ND 4) 0 QD o

r-

0 41 0 40 40 up 45 un ND 4) 41 C 43 ND 4, QD .0 .0 43 QD 45 mD

00 40 42

111

0. Po

C5 CD 0 CD CD C) 0 CD CD CD CD 0 C) 0 CD CI

cs

CD 4% 4) C 43 N 04

COO cD CD CD C GC0

CD CD CD 0' Cs NJ 4. (.) sjr; ww 4%

ta 1-d

11

V. La 04

0000OCCDC.00C 0000000000.--JaDVILTIUD0-

T40.0.800 0$80000SOOSOOSO

C) 0 0 0 CP CD CD CD CD CD P4 cp cp a 0.

4% -4 La %,14 0. NJ

cp up up

-4

72

Crn

1 1111 .111 8

1'0 4% tn tn tn

ND

00000CD.30000000000000.1" LAI-714%04CD

00

cp cp

cp a 0

cp c) r4 p4 p4 P. 0) 1'0 4% CC ND Cc 0" 4% CO tO 04 ND

-n

.

4111111111

p. 4. 04 3 ND CD

8

CD C3 CD C7 CD CD 0 CD CD 0 CD CD 0 C) CD 0 C) 0- 04 LW cD L0.0 CO 4% Co

C:-

0......

t-

0 CS Cs 0 C) CD C. CD CD C

-tu tu Cr aD CP 04 4% 0.1 04 PO 0. CD

le

N.

Cp CD 0 0; 0 0 0' c'D -)0c00'0000000-00:-.1U1No

...............

C Cs C)

C CD C) 0-

0" Ci 0' 0 C C) 0' 0" 1- 0

C) C) 0" *.0 U.

-11

14d

0 C) 0 0 CD CD 0 cp cn c

c, 0

eD ci C1 cD e: 0

NJ- 0" QD VI CD

1D

OSOOS .000 0000O 0000

0 0 0 C) 0 C) 0 0' CI CD NJ 0 CD CD CD CS hJ 1%.1 Us 00

C) 4' LA 14) tn

1110110

1".) 4%

to

0 CD C) C7 CD CD 0 CD CD CD 0 0 cs CD CD CD 0 0. P. po CO Co LA C) k0

0 CD cs GP 0 C) 0 04 0. h4 Ns ND -4 -4

.4 CC tD

0.1 CC Op 04 03 0J CD

1I

11

11

1e- k.t1 cc, 43 40 cs

I

0 0 0 0 CD 0 C) C) CD 0 C5 CD

0-0. 041."

l0 CP tO

4% .0 CD

cc

cs CS

csCD CD 0

to LO 4' 4' 4' 4' Vi Cc CD OD LO LO CO NJ VI CD

ir

I* 0.d

01.000:000i00C.5006.000000;0"ln/-04U1N0

I *co

S..

.0,0 0 0 0

CY

h.

P4 NJ NS 0. 4% 1-0

VI Vito ND C) Co 45 0) CD

11

CD 0 CD CD CD 0 0 C 0

C) CD CD CD 14

C)

04 NJ I.J0 .ftta Cc VI 0

I)

0 0 0O0 0 C i r s NN t n 0 4 % r s 0 I N J %0 hµ 04,up 4% Co 4D 4, LO 0

.4

10

CmCP

C)

I:

ra to 4s.

4%

00

0 0 C) 0 0 C7 CD C5 C5 0 t.d

4 04 ND ND to 43 NJ 04 04 OD 0J

0 CD CD CD C3 CD C) 0. ND IA V14co C to 4' Co" 1* 12"co *4

tn 4% 4 .4

0. 0'

1 1

111111 1.

Ntn co

4000I

C5 CS C CD CD C) C) CD CD 0 04 0A 04 Na LO lo La 4' VI co NJP4 tn 4% 0 CD

Cr

a1-

0 c, C0 CD C) CD 0 ro 4% 0, CD VI 4:0 P. CD NJ 0J Co NO 40. ND Co 04 0 C)

W.

0".4

11)

Cr0w

QUESTI0N

scr,iF

0.0.00

6.00

10.00

14.00

18.00

22.00

26.00

30.0G

34.00

38.00

42.00

46.00

50.00

54.00

58.0C

62.00

66.00

70.00

74.00

/8.00

82.00

86.00

90.00

94.00

99.00

1;3INTiO4VALS,

-1.99

-5.99

-9.49

-13.99

-17.99

-21.99

-25.99

-29.49

-33.99

-37.99

-41.99

-45.99

-49.99

-53.99

-57.99

-61.99

-65.99

-69.99

-73.99

-77.9S

-91.99

-85.99

-89.99

-93.99

-97.99

-100.00

F4

1276

2e4

21747

IL24201001)

1C000'

000000

PCT

0.7

2.0

12.6

57.3

36.1

7.,3

I.a

0.'5

0.1

0.3

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

U.0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Now

many are boys?

rade_ aCF P-dLW

i

601 100.0

3

597

99.3

4.1

585

97.3

4.3

509

S4.7 175

265

47.4 218

68

11.3

13

21

3.5

I0

10

1.7

2

81.3

1

40.7

1

;'

0.3

J?

0.3

01

0.2

01

0.2

31,

0.2

01

0.2

1

b0.0

00

0.0

00

0.0

1

00.0

00

O.0

00

0.0

00

0.0

0

00.0

00

0.0

00

0.0

0

4CF

557

554

533

485

310

92

199765555221110000000

P-BLW

100.0

99.5

95.7

67.1

55.7

16.5

3.4

1.6

1.3

1.1

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.9

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

FC1?37

142

1366011422I21212i110000000

G v-ed e- 6

PCI

CF P-BLW

0.0

423 101).0

4.0

423 100.0

8.7

406

96.0

33.6

369

87.2

32.2

227

53.7

14.2

91

21.5

2.6

31

7.3

0.9

20

4.7

0.5

I

0.5

14

i.. .

0.2

.4

(1.5

112;.1'

0.2

90.5

81.9

0.2

61.4

0.5

5-

1.2

0.2

3

3.-51

0.2

0.

0.2

36

.1:::

0.0

0.00.0

0()

0.(0

0.0

)

0.0

O0.0

0.0

00.0

0.9

00.0

0.0

00.0

Grads

PCT

0.'3

3.8

8.6

.i1.'

39.1

13.1

1.3

0.4

C.2

0.2

C.0

0.0

0.3

0.5

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

CASES PROCESSED

NO. BLANK OATA

MINIMUM VALUE'

MAXIMUM VALUE

SUM OF SCORES

=74

===

60150.0

58.0000

3072.0000

55780.0

70.0000

7870.0000

42382.0000

70.0000.

6426.660b

SUM SOO. SCORES

=122180.0000

130982.0000

127418.0000

MEAN

=13.4309

14.1293

15.1915_

STN0.

0EV. (N)

=4.7858

5.9599

8.3930

STNP.

DEV. (N-1)

=4.7898

5.9652

6.4030

MFOIA-1

=1"3.7232

14.5780

14.4559

CD 0 Ch 01 4 on ch 4,r 4) 01 01 C4 4 o o CD c3 Ch st0CD 0 0 4:1 uN 40 .00 sr on on on (V .4 .4 .4 .4 04 0 0 CDCD CA ,r.4

r- ya ,r 0 ,001 an r- ul V) a.0 U, U1 Ul U51 1 1 , 9

rn 01 CP' 01 CP P. 01 04 .4 .4 1..4 04 0 0 C) p 0000st ,r on ql

;

.4 Ca

so 00 u1 u1rJ4D00Nt0.pOOC).4CD0 1

4' 0 CA CA .4 0 0 10 .4 CD 0QiO00,00N

4 0 C) 41 C) CN 4. ChCO <7 0 ml '''h C" 4t.1 0 0 CP n1 w cu C)P. 0 0 0 0 03 0 UN 40 st-

aD <7 C) .0 ,r sr o' 0+ m0) -4 CM .4 .

4 4)

unirt .r - h. kr 01 r4 un on CD 4) 0 woi c) r4 I10 10 Ft) .4) :14 r4) ..ror:400 oo§o

. i000rc/

0 0 03 Ntot0C on I*. inno cn

coot CD 02 61 u, ul UN u1 .4 r4.4- .

IV .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 014

000t

0 CD 01 1 I

tV

04. 0 43 en r. .4 C4 41 4 on en el en 01 r4 .4 .4 CD CD 0

Nt 01 c) e4 eN 4) C4 .4 0 0 0 CD CD CD CD 0 0 CD 0 0 0uN UN uN 4 eq I li C) 00 C) en P.

N O C) P.- 02 0 I% f.1

LA 0 CD .4 Nt CD 01 .4G CD 00 st 4) CD CO Ch 04

M 03 0 p- .4 01 mN ul UN 01c4 0 p. co tel 44 01 rq rn 0 0 CD CD st 0 0 .4 0 CD 0 40 CD ol .4SOW 1 f0 A. CA

.4 UN IA Nt 0 07 4.-10 c) CD CD CD CD 0 CD 0 0 001

4) ca 40 p. 43 43 0) p4 -4 .4 0 0 0 0 eq C7 CD .4 4D CD IDt

q.) 0 4 0 0 ca 43 ,r e.) 0 CD 0 (5 C7 (JO 0 0 CD CD C) CD44 44

1

1$ c) UN ) 0 00 0 0) 4 4 01 01 en .4 0 CD CD 43 0 CD C)t

CD C3 OD g) en 4) OD -4 C) 17 43 0 0 0 43 0 CD CD CD CD 431 0 G 00 ;111111

0. .4

U. .4 Al p. st P- C) 0 rl r4 esi e4 C) cD 0 0 0U O 09

03 I.. e4 (-4 .4 4 .46 C) 0 0 0 C) C) 43 CD CD CD CD CD

4 1 uN uN 4 ^4 111 111

uN 0+ CD a) m- 4 a) 4 0 r4 4) .4 0 CD CD 17 <7 4) 4)

() 0 0 ,a. .4 p. r. 4, a) 4D 0 0 CD CD 0 0 0 1) 0 0 17 0 1)

0" 40 Ch uN -4 C) -4 .4 .4 0 45 0 <7 0 0 C5$00 Nt 0+ . 4:1 I'M U:4, C5 0 47 CD ID ID 0 CD 0 (7 4)

0 cm Ch Ch cm Ch 0+ Ch +CP0crONCACAcm0crtrcr0

C) C) 4) 4, 0 q, Ntr''41 0 CD U1 01 CD 41' P. 01Nt 0 0 0% OD 01 CI^4 0 00 4 .0 0 Cr% Cntil

04 uN CD c4 on 04 4 404cn U't r.1 144

CAI

11 II 11 11 11 11 11 II II 11

woCP 41% 0 0 CP Cft Cp 0 Cp Ch e5% cm Ch Cm Ch Ch 0 0 0 Ch C) e5 vg ..4

11.1

.4 41 0 nh P.,...4 41 0 on P- .4 IA Ch 11 P. .4 U1 CA ill P. 0 0 F. aitu 0 cc

...3 U A% A% CD 0 . $

0aL> >U ;06 D.

C3 IIII1 1i11111,1111 i 1 1 1 1 !i lc lc 'a' (1 t t)2E

.4 LI) ...1 D Z J. C7 Z1-, CC 0 c) c) 0 0 CD CD 0 0 0 C7 o o o c) CD C) CD CD 0 (.41 c0 DE ): 0 0 Q1/1 0 0 0 CD 0 0 CD CD CD C) C7 C) cD 43 CD CD CD C) 0 C) 0 C7 oj ,. pm Z C5 CltrOUi U $ $ 002 ,C gE lE 41 Jt Z C)

.0 c) IA) 4D 0 ir 03 (NJ 4) CD .4P 0, CY 4) 0 4 02 4N1 40 CD st OD el C, «..-4C :3 ZD uu f.- h- (Ai

C O44 .4 44 c4 r4 co WI 01 s, 4 41 UN 41 .0 4) h, r- r- 1.) Z X X 0 0 *x 0 in r

10...TUN 1C.

How

man

y ar

e gi

rls?

scoRt,

INTEr:VALS

FG

rad

d e

aPCF

CF

/.18LW

FG

rade

IPCT

CF P -BLW

FG

ra. d

eb

PCT

CF

f"-BLW

0.0

1.99

71.2

600

100.0

4U.7

557

100.0

30.7

423

100.0

2.00

5.99

26

4.3

593

98.8

25

4.5

553

99.3

28

6.6

420

99.3

6.00 --

9.)9

34

14.0

567

94.5

77

13.8

528

94.8

56

13.2

392

92.7

10.00

13.99

238

39.7

483

80.5

1'08

-5.5

451

81.0

128

30.4

336

79.4

14.00

17.99

192

12.0

245

40.8

1E2

32.7

253

45.4

140

33.1

208

49.2

16.00 -

21.99

40

6.7

53

8.8

53

9.5

7!

12.?

41

9.7

68

16.1

22.00 --

25.99

71.2

13

2.2

a1.4

i8

3.2

71.7

27

6.4

26.00

29.99

30.5

61.0

5C.9

10

1.8

40.9

20

4.7

30.00

33.99

U-40

30.5

10.2

50.9

20.5

16

3.8

34.00 -

37.99

10.2

30.5

10.2

40.7

20.5

14

3.3

38.00 -

41.99

00.-1

L0.3

00.0

30.5

;3

0.0

12

2.8

42.00

45.99

0Cs.0

20.3

00.0

30.5

30.7

12

2.8

46.00 -

49.99

10.2

20.3

0U.0

:1

0.5

2O.

92.1

50.0C

53.99

10.2

10.2

00.6

30.5

-2

6.5

71.7

54.0C

51.99

00.0

00.0

20.4

30.5

00.0

51.2

58.00

61.99

00.0

00.0

00.0

10.2

00.0

51.2

62.00 .-

65.99

J0.0

00.0

00.0

..

0.2

00.0

51.2

66.00 -

69.99

3J.%;

00.0

10.?

10.2

10.2

51.2

70.00 .-

73.99

Jj.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

40.9

74.00 .-

77.49

00.0

00.0

oo:b

00.0

20.5

40.9

78.0C

80.00

0').0

00.0

00.0

00.0

20.5

20.5

CASES psoct:sseo

=

NO. BLANK DATA

z:

600 6

557 8

423 a

MINIMUM VALUE

=0.0

0.0

0.0

MAXIMUM VALUE

=52.0000

- --

64*-

066-

6--

----

-86

.000

0S

UM

OF 5001(

S=

7604.0000

7387.0000

6056.0000

SUM SO0. SCORES

=109626.0000

116203.0000

123750.0000

MEAN

=12.6733

13.2621

14.3168

SLID.

:,EV. (N)

=4.7007

5.7218

9.3586

'STNO. 0EV. (.41) =

4.7046

5.7270

9.3697

MEDIAN

=1.3.0756

13.4848

13.8906

2. How many of the pupils in your class receive compensatory reading instruction

as defined above?

0 All of the pupils in my class receive compensatory readinginstruction

SCORE IN F6-vacie

PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CFyCF P-8LW F

arwaa 6PCT CF F-BLW

0.0 37.9 64.7 58.5 100.0 35.1 64.0 54.7 100.0 26.1 58.3 44.8 100.01.000 20.7 35.3 20.7 35.3 19.7 36.0 19.7 36.0 18.7 41.7 18.7 41.7

CASES PROCESSED - 58.5473 54.7435 44.8092MINIMUM VALUE - 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES - 20.6851 19.6840 18.7005SUM SQ0. SCORES 20.6851 19.6840 18.7005MEAN 0.3533 0.3596 0.4173STMD. DEV. (N) = 0.4780 0.4799 0.4931STND. OEV. IN-1) = 0.4821 0.4843 0.4987MEDIAN 0.2731 0.2807 0.3581

. -SCURF. INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P -151W CF P-OLW

0.01.000

CASES PROCESSED

396210

=

65.3 606 100.034.7 210 34.7

60o

352 62.3 5,e213 37.7 213

565

100..0251 58.2 4.31_ 130.037.7 160 41.8 180 41.8

.101MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.000SUS OF SCORES - 210.0000 213.0000 180.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 210.0000 213.0000 180.00aMEAN 0.3465 0.3770 0.4176SIND. OEV. (N) = 0.4759 0.41146 0.4932

.0.4937STNO. DEV. (4 -1) = 0.4763 0.4851MEDIAN 0.2652 0.3C)26 0.3586

gUtSTION 28 from me


SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.0002.000

rodeF PC

c.ra.clePCT CF P-BLW CF P-BLW

38.5 65.7 58.5 100.0 34.5 63.1. 54.7 100.012.1 20.7 20.1 34.3 11.8 21.6 20.2 36.97.9 13.6 7.9 13.6 8.4 15.4 8.4 15.3

F

27.310.47.1

Y.:o4.e. 4PCT

. CF Pl3LW

61.0 44.8 100.023.2 17.5-39:015.8 7.1 15.8

CASES PROCESSED = 58.5473 54.7435 44:11092-MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES 26.0111 28.6107 24:3354:-SUM SOU. SCORES 43.8878 45.4175 38.6541MEAN 0.4784 0.5226 0.5476STN!). DEV. IN)STNO. UEV. IN-1)

==

0.72160.7278

0.74600.7529

*075020.7587

MEOIAN 0.2608 0.2925 0.3196

SCORL INTERVAL S F Pef tF P -BLh CF -CO P-BLW

0.0 4(5 66.8 606 100.0 352 62.2 565 100.0 261 6C.6 431 100.01.000 123 20.3 201 33.2 121 21.4 213. 37.7 100 23.2 170 39.42.000 78 12.9 78 12.9 92 16.3 92 16.3 70 16.2 70 16.2

CASES PROCESSED = 606 565 431MINTMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0600 2.0000 2.0000SUM UF SCORES 279.0000 305.0000 240.0000SUM SOU. SCORES = 435.0000 489.0000 380.0000MEIC4 0.4604 0.5398 0.5568STNP. CEV. IN) = 0.7112 0.7577 0.7560SIND. OEV. IN-1) = 0.7118 0.7584 0.7569MEOIAN 0.2481 0.3026 0.3257

QUESTION 2C 0 Selected pupils in my class receive compensatory readinginstruction

SCORE INTERVALS

0.G1.000

F

12.146.5

PCT CF

20.6 58.579.4 46.5

P -8LW

100.079.4

13.841.-0-

31.7 44.8 100.0

F 470G-11244 WCF P-8L---FOertYP=8UW25.1 54.7 100.014.244.-f----71.0--TC;9)0;6--61L5-----30:W--Ea;3

CASES PROCESSED = 56.5473 54.7435 44.8092MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 46.4624 40.9879 30.5982SUM-50D. SCORES 46.4624 40.9879MEAN 0.7936 0.7487 0.6829STND. OEV. (N)STNC. 0EV. iN-11

==

0.40470.4082

0.4337 0.4654--CLW70-6----

MEDIAN 6.8699 0.8321 0.7677

SCORE INTERVALs F ()CT CF P -BLW F Pci CF ip-BLw -0 PCT CF P-ELw

0.0 132 21.8 606 100.0 154 27.3 565 100.0 147 34.1_ 431 100.01.000 474 78.2 474 78.2 411 72.7 411 72.7 284 65.9 284 65.9

CASES PROCESSED = 606 565 431MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0u00SUM CF SCORES = 474.0000 411.0000 284.0.400SUM SOD. SCORES = 474.0000 411.0000 254.0000MEAN 0.7822 0.7274 0.6189SIND. DEV. (N) 0.4128 0.4453STNO. DEV. (N-1) = 0.4131 0.4457

.0.47410.4746

MEDIAN 0.8608 0.8127 0.7412

QUESTION 20

SCORE INTERVALS

from me

CD some from me and some from another teacher

F PCT CF P -BLW PCT

0.0 14.0 24.0 58.5 100.0 15.8 28.8 54.7 10D.0 15.5 34.7 44.8 100.01.0002.000

17.626.9

30.1 . 44.5-76.045.9 26.9 45.9

16.2 29.6 39.0 71.222.8 41.6 22.8 41.6

13.7 30.5 29.3 65.315.6 34.8 15.6 34.8

CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE

===

58.54730.02.0000

54.74350.02.0000

44.80920.02.0000

SUM OF SCORES = 71.4D15 61.7598 44.6T/USUM SOD. SCORES = 125.1761 107.3206 76.0732MEAN 1.2196 1.1282 1.0015STND. DEV. (N) = 0.8067 0e0293STN). DEV. (N-1) = 0.8137 0.8369 0.8429MEDIAN. 1.3644_ 1.2164 1.0023

:1

SCORE INTERVALS F

0.0 158

PCT CF P-8LW F

Z6.1 606 100.0 176

PCT CF P-8LW F

31.2 565 100.0 158

PCT CF P -BLW

36.7 431 1D0.01.0002.000

158290

26.1 448 73.9 15647.9 290 47.9 233

27.6 389 68.8 13741.2 233 41.2.136

31.8 273 63.331.6 136 31.6

CASES PROCESSED = 606 565 431MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES = 738.0000 622.0000 409.0000.SUM SOD. SCORES = 1318.0000 1088.0000 681.6060MEAN = 1.2178 1.1009 0.9490§TAD. DEV. (N) = 0.8318 0.8448 0.8243STNO. DEV. (N-1) = 0.8324 0.8456 0.8253MEDIAN = 1.4177 1.1827 0.9197

How many pupils receive compensatory reading instruction from you? (Include any

pupils who may be sent to your classroom especially for compensatory readinginstruction.)

QUESTION 3

SCURE INTERVALS

0.0 -

3.00 -9.00 -15.00 -21.00 -2_7.00 -33.00 -39.00:5.00 -51.0G57.00 --63.00 -69.00 -75.00 -81.00 -87.00 --93.00 -99.00

105.00 -111.00 -117.00123.00 -'129.00 -135.00141.00

2.998.9914.9920.9926.9932.9938.4944.9950.9956.9962.9968.9974.9980.9986.9952.9998.99104.99110.99116.99122.99128.99134.99140.99144.00

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQU. SCORESMEANSTND. OEV. IN) =STNO. DEV. 04-1)MEOIAN

Total number of pupils

Gra_ct,2 _ YF PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CO F

37 6.4224 38.9122 21.262 10.867 11.650 8.1

1.92 0.3O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0.01 0.2O 0.00 0.0C 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O L..0

o 0.0

576 100.0 1 25 4.8 524 100.0539 93.6 164 31.3 499 95.2315 54.7 103 19.7 335 63.9193 33.5 67 12.8 232 44.3131 22.7 81 15.5 165 31.564 11.1 55 10.5 84 16.014 2.4 19 3.6 29 5.53. 0.5 1 0.2 10 1.91 0.2 1 0.2 9 1.71 0.2 3 0.6 8 1.5

1 0.2 5 1.0O 0.0 4 0.8O 0.0 4 0.8

576300.0

91.00007853.0000 -

16141:660613.63379.69879;7072

10.3279

1 0.21 0.2I 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.2O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0O *0.0O 0.00 0.0O- 0.0O 0.0O 0.0

Gedd, GPCT CF P -8LW

26 6.6109 27.762 15.752 13.267 17.052 13.213 3.3350

20

1 0.22 0.4l' 0.2000

0.00.00.0

O 0.0O 0.00 6.0O 0.0O 0.0O 0.0

4 0.8 03 0.6 01 0.2 0O 0.0 00 0.0 1

O 0.0 0O 0.0 0

O 0.0 0O 0.0 0

0.81.30.00.30.50.00.00.0 20.0 20.0----- 2

0.3 20.0 1

394 100.0368 93.4259 65.7197 50.0145 36.8-'

78 19.826 6.613 3.310 2.55 1.35 1.3.

4 1.02 0.52 0.5

0.50.50.50.50.3

O 0.0 0O 0.0 1

O 0.0 0

0.004.0

0.00.00.30.0

11

1

1

0

0.30.30.30.30.30.0

52441

39437

0.093.0000

8614.0000216436.0000

16.438911.950211.96113.2524

0.0141.0000

6907.0000195227.0000

17.530513.718013.735415.0000

0UFSTION 3How many pupils receive compensatory reading instruction from you? (Include any

pupils who may be sent to your classroom especially for compensatory readinginstruction.)

Total number of pupils

SCORE INTERVALS F PC,i6 rode a

CF 0-81'W

0.0 -- Z.99 4.8 8.5 56.0 100.03.00 - 8.99 22.4 39.9 51;3 91;59.00 - 14.99 11.6 20.7 28.9 51.615.00 - 20.99 5.7 10.1 17.3 30.921.00 -- 6.1 10.8 11:6 20.727.00 - 32.99 4.3 7.7 5.6 9.933.00 - 38.99 0.9 1.7 1.2 2.239.00 - 44.139 6:545.00 50.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.151.00 -57.0C -

56.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1_

63.00 - 68.9S 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.169.G0 74.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.175.00 - 80:94-* 0.-ti 130.- -Oa 0.181.00 - 86.99 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.187.00 - S2.99 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.193.00 - S 8. 97T -0 .0 11. -5- --11:0- -z0 TO99.00 - 104.99 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0

105.00 - 110.99 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0111.00 - 116.99 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -7-0;0 7

117.00 - 122.99 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0123.00 - 128.99 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0

-1-2-4.00 - 134.99 0.0 0.:6 -0.0 -0.UF135.00 - 140.99 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 -0.0141.00 - 144.00 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0

1

I

F PCPranria.itCF P-BLW

! 2.4 4.8 51.1 100.01 1 8 .9 48.7110.0 19.5 31.9 62.4

; 6.2 12.2 21.9 42.9: 8.1 15.9 15.7 30.7

4.9 9.6 7.6 14.8i 1.9 3.6 2.7 5.3

0.1 0.1 0.8 1.60.0 0.0 0.8 1.50.1 0.3 0.8 1.50.10.0G.00.10.30.10.0C.00.00.00.00.00.0

I 0.00.0

0.3 0.6 1.20.0 0.5 0.90.0 0.5 0.90.3 0.5 0.90.5 0.3 0c70.2 0.1 0.20.0 -0.0 -0.00.0 -0.0 -0.00.0 -0.0 -0.00.0 -0.0 .-0.00.0 -0.0 -0.00.0 -0.0 -0.00.0 -0.0 -4,00.0 -0.0 -0.00.0 -0.0 -0.0

CASES PROCESSED = 56.0370 51.0951NO. BLANK OA TA = 29.0000 38.0000RTNIETO VALUE = 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 91.0000 93.0000SUM OF SCORES 724.9241

-1-4504.4961825.5935

IUM-3QD. SCORES = 20783.4688MEAN 12.9365 16.1580SIND. DEV. IN)"SYNb.

= 9.5647 12.0698DEV. (4-1) = 9.6512 12.1897

MEDIAN = 9.4682 12.8047

F

3.1

PCF

7.6

CF

40.1

P -BUJ

100.011.4 85.3 13.3 25.6 63.96.4 16.0 20.3 50.66.7 16.6 13.8 34.54.9 12.2 7.2 17.91.2 2.9 2.3 5.70.2 0.6 1.1 2.80.5 1.3 0.9 2.20.0 0.0 0.4 0.90.0 0.1 0.4' 0.90.2 0.4 0.3 0.80.0 0.0 0.2 0.40.0 0.0 0.2 0.40.0 0.0 0.2 0.40.0 0.0 0.2 0.40.0 0.0 0.2 0.40.1 0.2 0.2 0.40.0 0.0 0.1 0.20.0 0.0 0.1 04.Z.0.0 0.0 0.1 0.20.0 0.0 0.1 0.20.0 0.0 0.1 0.2C4.1 0.2 0.1 0.20.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0

40.084037.00000.0

141.0000683.3975

18532.695317.049113.102413.Lb9015.2112

O

t c1

Mg.

4 I . . . 0,4 .4o coo

4 CO-

r4 04

14. I0ri

t.4'N

02 0

..

4001 «NI

01 AO 1%. N"0 N

0 0 0 CT 61t0 ttO0 01 04 N 14. N0 0

41

4' 01

00

0 0

r40aQ

01 N.

0 0

N00

NNN -4 0 0 0000,0,0,0 0 0 0 0

1 I 1?

r11

00O 0 0

0O 0 -01111

ONO 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 .4

000 0 0 0 0O00000 o 0 0 0

11 111 'MI 0 000 0 0 0 0

1 I

'0 N 0.1 m re 0 00 NO '404000 00 00

m N

bl tr) wt 14. N N1.3 tttt OtOtt

0.1 01 14%4. IA -4000oN r4

U. O'. P. P.

024

0 0 0 4401101111P..N0000

N0

0 .4 00 0 0

O 0 00 0

I

-00 0* 0.000 0 01 1 I I I

o 4. rft o elo Tr-! 4. N0 cri00 r

ill Nn t4,o cock.

..40 r.. P4 .004, r. tA

01 4.

CO°3 wit'. MIA CIN

O3 0 N NM-1 un

,000004. 0 01 *0 **000 -00100 p1.Y UN in4ossopoo00 0 0

00 0 0 0osos0 0 0 0 0

;2 0 *,0 Ch 00 N CO 0 01 .4 4 .4 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0

ci3 OrAi1a;;AlsIZ088188O8O804808-1 0.3. itt N x/ 1 1 1 1 t I I 1 I

eo

et 03 !61 N 14 CO In N wt 0=4 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0o: 0

114 °Cg %0:1'..N0000000001 Crl . I 1

ft

$ 1"i mthiNr400Nopooa0000CI. 4) Pft kr% vo 4, 000 CD C3 0 0 c) Fa cD C2 0 0 Q,O

ol PO r4.1

U. 43 F3 r4 On NL.I 0 b r4 00 0 0 10 C) CD 1CD C2; 0'0 *0 , !rri.041(4114(\100 000 oopoom000cs

Co0 0 0:Co cr cr. !ai cftCO *co tr. 0 :m cn cr lir CP 0 C2CA 0 0 0% 1:14 0 0 X04 0 0 0% crprAo+oocAgNo- ! . ,.

UN co rN,ro r4 0,0 ol Po - al co 0N ro ro C2r4 rus4 01 0ri Qr uN 4D 4) 42 r- Pft 02

1 1 1 1 f 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 .1 1

000010001000000,_0001000000000:00000000 0 0 0 10 0oa- 1 Ict: Ic: I

0 'c%) 4) 0 ,4 03 r4 or c4 oD, 4. rg oD C2 02.4 !^4 Cn in 4- 0 0 0 o2 ro.

o I., IA po, p..0-4 0 it) al 4D (I 4) 0 HDa0000NNr 4Nio0o!! I A r4 C2 oft al 4) 0 al 4701 01 '4

4 L64.

II 11 II

°a4MI LU

VIU.k 0

4>

0. 4.J

N co Zw 0-1

V7 Z4 0 ".Z Z

c0

O

ed

;0"

E

0

oi

Dr 0 45 Om 41' CY 01 N; 4; UN C) C) UN UN pin In 04 01 CD CD CP C3_J 1,0oa 04) U! Oft .3* 0 r4 Pi Pi nlg0 C) C) C) CP CD C) C0 CP1 0 0 MD 4P N

ri

14. CO un 101 sr C3 Oa CD 4) 4e 0 04 N 1-e r4 r4 Pi CD CDU PIN. 1I1 CC) Ito NI rl rM N 1-e

I- 0SJO. m

u- rn

Cft IA N

0 CO01 om

CD .- 0 om opN ON 41 CYP i

3; CD r4 40 pi 0 on u1*pets,OD CD N. uN ri CY 02 CY

cD CN MD 64

u. 0) 01 0 efl M-f 0 4, r4

131 n1 CO .4

-43

kljcr. ul l to 01 00 00 4 11 o

04 ri Nt 0) Nt UlN pi r4

u. U (ft l'C4

4. 0 r-P- re?

0 It% 0i 0 0

141 0 M0 0 0

0 0

N 0 N 0 .4

NO .O0

Pi C)

(4 rt1

N 41I

00io

0

-cN

N000

N N

ONO11040

0 0

00011 110 0 0

0 0 0

N 0 0

0001-1 0 0

N 0 0

000

.4 0 0

in 0 011 o000

e4 0

000000

000

0 0 0o

0 0 0

000

0 o3 4.4 p. r4 uN r4 o4 04 0 CD C3 0 0 0 CD.4a0 0 o1 00 .4 Nt yl 0 CD CD 0 C) CD CD cD 0 0 0 CD 0I CD 01 O1 on r4

U. el 0 01 al 0 0 O1 on 04 .4 cp CD CD 0AU P. 01u1

n...c0 01uN 044 r4

C)

©0

O 000

0 0

a00

CP C)

00

0 000

0 0

O 01100

0 0

O

C) 0 0 ul on u) g)CD C3 0 4) m5 uN 4)CD 0 0 Pi P. Oa 01090 Pa 0 0d

11

In C) OthP. h 47+43 P. .43PM44

In

cD CD CD vO 04CD CD C3 04 u1 pi0 CD 0 Cr. 4- OD in

CD 0 CD 0 CD .4 pi 44io

*) r. 0 cD 0) CN CO.4 st 41 '4 C3U1 N m)

C) CD C3 0 041,010 CD C3 m 6.:C)!C3 0 0 N.0

0'0 0 0 P.- -.4 104o;

,o1 ^1 0,0n r4 M.P. 44 41!Prr4 P. r4 -4.0 .4r on 04 04 0 0 04 CD 0 CD CD CD cD 0 C) CD P- 01 mp ulof0000me oo0O01101100.410 1..0P-P-4)04000000000000000 0PMN,-,

ql ,r .4- 41 oo -4 .4 0.0 r4 CP 0 CD CD:CD CD 0,0 CD.4 .4 141 CP 141 N -

P4

I

U.' c r ' CP C l i C P C T Co 0 1 7 1 C r C P 1 3 + c e, Ch c p CP C l i CP C i C P C P 0 i i it it It It 11

:

It It it ll

j CP 7. cp cp cp 7, cri 0. cr 0. 7, 7, Ct. Cft 0 CN CN O 71,C11 04. .

4;> .4 IA CI% PO t".. ..4 uN th Ph p4 .4 ul CN on p- .4 Ul Ch h) P. C3 .Ca u) .4'

II).4 .4 r4 co N m1 01 0 ,r ,r un wl 42 mD 42 e- P.- a/ 11.1 44 W, ...... 1

SU tn I-- LU SU 0 Ce . 22P. 0 4r M n Ill 0 ' ..0 ...

z LIJ 0... .t..) 414 C) 0. '

I I 1 I I I I I I v II I 11-1 I i I I I (7)>;>.) > >1u4 ix Z , v) ...1.1 U.Ia 0 cD c) 0 0 C) 00 0 00 0 0 C.) C) 0 CD 00 CD cl. <C DCI3E CD: CD CD0 0000000000000,00000000 ..1 II 01 i Ztd ip 1 lo: Ad, a) 3E 27 C VI' 11.4tn CD (11 4D CD 4r CO N 3 0 4p CO N 40 0 .4p ca C4 40 0 4. co to ..y.4 ZE IA CD,r4

.. .4 .4 co cQ r1 0rt 01 4, 0 uN 44 u4 4) 43 e- p- P- (A 2!.)c lr 3 41 Z ;!,0.4 CD 4141 :, :D:Uu 1.- PrAiu.0 z x lc 0 0:x 0 0 lE

i!

QUESTION 3

SC

OR

E

PART

INTERVALS

8

F

b. How many are girls?

Geck-cle

PCT

CF P-8Lw

Gra.cLe

;c-litir----F-E

xcuci4.F

PCT

Pur

P-8144

0.0

-1.99

11.4

20.5

55.6 100.0

6.1

12.0

50.7

100.0

4.6

11.7

39.6

100.0

2.00 -

5.99

23.2

41.7

44.2

79.5

20.4

4U.3

44.6

88.0

14.5

36.6

35.0

88.3

6.00 -

9.99

9.1

16.3

21.0

37.8

9.5

18.7

24.2

47.7

6.8

17.2-

20.5

51.7

10.00 -

13.99

5.9

10.6

11.9

21.4

7.9

15.5

14.7

29.0

7.1

17.8

13.7

34.5

14.00 -

17.99

4.8

8.6

6.0

16.9

4.8

9.4

6.9

-13.5

18.00 -

21.99

1.0

1.9

1.2

2.2

1.1

2.2

2.14.1

1.53.7

2.2

5.7

22.00 -

25.99

0.1

0.20.2

0.4

0.4

0.7

1.0

1.9

0.24.5

0.8

2.0

26.00 -

29.99

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.11

0.61.2

0.4

1.0

0.6

1.5

30.00 -

33.99

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.6

1.2

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.5

34.00-

37.99

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.6

1.2

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.4

38.00

41.99

0:00.4)

0.1-

0:13

0.5

0;0---

0.2

0.4

42.0C -

45.99

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.3

0.7

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.4

46.00 -

49.99

0.1

0.2

-0.1

0.1

---0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

C.0

0.0

0.2

0.4

50.00 -

53.99

0.0

-0.0

0.0

D;-0

0.1

0.2

0.1

O.

D.2

0.4

54.00 -

57.99

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

58.0C -

61.99

0.0

0.0

-0.0

*0.0

0.0

0.0

-0.0

.-0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

-----62.00-

65.99

0.0

0.0-0.0

-43.00.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.4

66.00 -

69.99

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.0

C.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

70.00 -

73.99

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

74.0D- -

77.99

0.0

0.0orb

-0.0

-0.0

D*0

0.0

0.1

0.2

78.00 -

81.99

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

82.00 -

-----86.00-

85.99

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.0

0,0

-0.0

.-0.0

PS.99

0.-o0.0

-0.0-7o7u-

-13 .00. a

0.0-0.0

-0.0

0.0

90.00 -

53.99

0.00.0

-0.0

-0.0

C.0

O.

-0.0-0.0

0.0

0.0-0.0

- -0.094.00

57.99

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

0.0

0.0

-0.0

-0.0

-

106.00-

0.0o

0.0-0.0

-0.0

0.0

0.0

-0.0

CASES PROCESSED

BLANK DATA

=55.5659

S47154IWO

50.7180

39.6080

40.0000

MINIMUM VALUE

=0.0

0.0

6.0

MAXIMUM VALUE

48.0000

56.0000

78.0000

-S-11M-TIF-tCeart-

-3-11g;TS-46-

358.6196

IF27913139-

SUM SAO. SCORES

=3207.3213

4652.9688

4201.9805

MEAN

5.5671

7.0709

7.6477

=-S

al&STAND. DEV. iNi

674-6-10-

6.15494

STNO. °EV. IN-1/

=5.2172

6.5;457

6.9882

MEDIAN

4.8279

5.7728

'

STIf.N

PAxi

4

b. How mazy are girls?

ra 41-

Y&

ro-cia,CF

P-8114

300X'.

FiJeT6

OCT

CF

P-BLW

F17F-414

0.0

-1.99

'.,6

it.3

570

100.0

68

13.1

519

100.0

41

10.5

390

100.0

2.00 -

5.99

249

43.7

474

e3.2

194

37.4

451

86.9

147

37.7

349

89.5

6.00 -

9.99

ed

i5.4

225

39.5

102

19.T

257

49.5

69

17.7

202

51.8

10.00 -

13.99

b9

1.2.1

137

24.0

80

15.4

155

29.9

57

14.6

133

34.1

1'..00 -

17.99

33

9.3

68

11.9

51

9.8

75

14.5

4.9

12.6

76

19.5

18.00 -

21.99

i2

2.1

15

2.6

14

2.7

24

4.6

17

4.4

27

6.9

2:f.CC -

25.99

20.4

30.5

51.0

10

1.9

30.8

10

2.6

26.00 -

29.99

00.0

10.2

0D.0

51.0

41.0

71.8

3000

33.99

00.0

10.2

00.0

51.0

10.3

30.8

34.00 -

37.99

00.0

10.2

10.2

51.0

00.0

20.5

3t1.00 -

41.99

C0.0

10.2

10.2

40.8

00.0

20.5

41.00 -

45.19

00.0

10.2

20.4

30.6

00,0

20.5

46.00 -

49.99

10.?

10.2

00.0

10.2

00.0

20.5

50.00 -

53.99

00.0

00.0

00.0

10*2

10.3

20.5

54.00 -

57.99

0.0

00.0

10.2

10.2

00.0

10.3

58.00.-

61.9S

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

10.3

62.00 -

65.99

00.0

00.0

00.0

66.0

o0.0

10.3

66.00 -

69.55

00.0

02.0

G0.0

00.0

00.0

10.3

70.00 -

73.99

0U.0

00.0

,0

0.0

00.0

00.0

1(1.3

74.00 -

17.99

00.0

00.0

00.0

.0

0.0

00.0

10.3

78.00 -

81.9S

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

10.3

10.3

82.00 -

85.99

00.0

00,0

0'0.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

86.00 -

89.49

.)

0.0

00.0

00

00.0

C0.0

00.0

50.00 -

93.99

0u...

00.0

00.0.

00.0

00.0

00.0

94.00 -

57.99

00.0

00.0

00.3

00.0

00.0

00.0

98.00 -

100.00

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

00.0

CASES PRUCESSED

=570

36

519

390

N1.-61:-ANVOATA =

46

41

MINIMUM VALUE

0.0

0.0

0.0

maxImumymus

48.0000

56.0000

78.0000

SUM OF SCORES

=3383.0005

3749.0000

3085.0000

SUM SQO. SCORES

=36007.0000

48445.0000

45213.0000

ME/IN

5.9351

7.2235

7.9103

ST '0. O'eV.

(N)

=5.2863

6.4159

7.3047

SL. OEV. (N-1)

=5.2909

6.4221

7.3141

MEOltN

5.0361

5.9485

6.4058

4A 4. What is the age range of the children in your compensatory reading class?

Age of oldest child:Years Months

SCORE INTERVAL S F

GRADE

PCT

2.

CF P-SLY

GRADE

PC T-

4 GRADE 6

CV- Pl;;81WF

40.0060.00

--

59.9999.99

0.06.5

0.013.7

47.447.4

100.0100.0

0.1---0-;11-

0.3 42.8 100.0 0.0 0.0--070----cr.

35.135.1

100.0160.00

100.00 - 139.99 40.5 85.5 40.9 86.3 0.2 0.4 42.7 99.7 2.0 5.7 35.1 100.0140.00 - 179.99 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.8 33.0 77.0 42.6 99.3 31.3 89.1 33.1 94.3

-180.0-0 - 219.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 , 9.0 21.0 9.6 22.3 -15.7220.00 - 259.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.6 1.3 ;0.0 0.0 0.4 1.1260.00 299.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.1

340.005g49379.99

0.00.0

0.00.0 0.2 0.4 6:130.0

0.00.0

0.20.2

0.60.6

0.2 0.60.0 0.0

0.40.2

-La-0.5

380.00 419.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 j 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5420.00 - 459.99 C.0- -0.0 0.2 -6;6- 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0460.00 499.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 U.5500.00 539.99 0.0 U.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 U.0 0.2 0.5

-54-0-;00 -579:9-9 0.0 '0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.2 o.580.00 619.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 . 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5620.00 -

-c60r:a0 -7659.99

-6-139719-0.0TE. 0

0.00.0

0.2 0.4-11.4

; 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 : 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.50.-0 0.2 0.6 0.1 o.2 0.2 0.5

700.00 . 739.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 -0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2740.00 779.99 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.6 . 0.0 0.0 -0.0

a --a. 0.1 0.3 ! moo---TGIT U0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 i

CASES PROLE SSEDBL INK UAW -46--

MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =

47.4237

84.0000765.0000

35.0894-42.841-T114.0000

16.0000

88.0000122.0000720.0000

SUM OF SZURE3SUM SQD SC ORE S =MEAN

--5278.9336670621.3750

111.3142

745.T)000--5916.4414

911888.1250

5696.5430982074.3125

162.3438-SIN D *-

STNO. KIEV.MEDIAN

-41.8354-42.2836

116.9790

138.080247.072847.6319

40.401540.9898

159.8871r2-5:750

QUESTION 4a

4. What is the age range of the children in your compensatory reading class?

GRADE 2

Age of oldest child:Years Months

GRADE 4 GRADE 6

SCAKE

40.00 -60.00 -100.00140.00180.002s0.00260.G0 -300.00 -340.00380.00420.00460.00500.00540.00 -580.00 -620.00

. .

660.00700.00740.00780.00

INTEkVALS

59.9999.99139.99179.99

- 219.99259.99299.99319.99379.99419.99459.99

- 499.95539.99579.99619.99659.99

- 699.99739.99

- 779.99- 800.00

065

42020

000

0000oo

ooo

2

0

PCT

0.013.385.90.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0o.o0.00.00.00.00.00.40.0

P-BLW

489_100.045§ 100.0424 86.7

4 0.82 0.42 0.42__ 0.4.2 0.42 0.42 0.44 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.2 0.42 0.4'2 0.42 0.42 0.40 0.0

F

I

01

143933

0

000000000

01

10

PCT

0.20.00.277.421.00.70.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.20.0

CF

443442442441985222

2

2

22

2

222

2

2

1

0

P-8LW

100099.899.899.522.11.10.5_0.50.50.5

F

00

2130612001

0000000

01

1

0

PCT

0.00.06.1

89.53.50.0

.0.00.30.0

.0.00.00.00.00000.00.0

CF P -BLW

342 100,0.342 100.0342 100.0321_93.915 4.43 0.93_ 0.93 0.92 0.62 0.6

0.50.5

2 0.62 0.62 0.6

0.50.50.5

2 0.62 0.62 0.6

0.50.50.5

0.3G.30.0

2 0.61 0.30 0.0

0.20.0

0 0.0

CASES PROCESSED-0. BLANK DA IAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALU-,i-3m OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCNESMEAN§rN0. DEV. (NISIND. DEV. (N-1)_MEDIAN

==

=

===

48911734.0000765.0000

54510.00006958916.0000

111.472442.483142.5266117.0952

44312216.0000

34289

-122.0000jgpl0000

55406.00009622774.0000

162.005843.484143.5479159.6078

745.000060864.0000

9144526.0000137.390542.025242.0727125.714----------

.QUESTION 48


Age of youngest child: /Years Months

SCOREINTERVALS F

GRADE

PCT

2

CF P-BLW F

GRADE 4

PCT a-154tLW

_40.0060.00 -

59.9999.99

O457

0.095.4

479479

100.0100.0

07

0.01.6

441 100.0441 100.0

100.00 - 139.99 20 4.2 22 4.6 425 96.4 434 98.4_140.007_139.99180.00 219.99

00

0.00.0

2 0.40.4

61

1.40.2

9 2.0TG

220.00 259.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5260.00 - 299.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5

O 0.0 i---6;4 0 0.0 I 0.5340.00 - 379.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5380.00 - 419.99 0 0.0 2. 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5420.00 -- -459.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 6:6 20.5460.00 - 499.99 o o.o 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5500.00 - 539.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5540.00 - 579.99 0 0.0 2- -0.4 0 0.0 i-- *0;3

580.00 - 619.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5620.00 - 659.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5

699.99 0 :5.6 2 -0.4- -6 iY.:0--------- -1-1:14,-660.00 -700.00 739.99 0 0.0 2 0.4 0 0.0 2 0.5

- 779.99 2 0.4 2 0.4 2 0.5 2 0.5_740.00780.00 - 800.00 co 0.0 0 0.0 0 OA- -0 0.0

F

(

04

GRADE

PCT'

17).(:221 66.2107 32.0

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o-o0 0.000

_0.0Oo

0 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.60 0.00 0.0

6

TF7413Lw

334 100.0334 Toci:b330 98.8109 32.62--2 0.62 0.62 0-:42 0.62 0.6

2 (T.:2 0.6

--72----o.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.60 0.00 0.0

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE

=======

-===

479 441 33412771.0000

779.0000

12496.0000

756.0000-526960TO52696:0060

7137528.0000119.49214M-6637"43.7133120.0941

97-T3.0000731.0000

SUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORESMEANSTND. DElf:(NI-SIND. 0EV. (N-11MEDIAN

45436:66005254230.0000

94.8559____ _________44.401744.448280.9628

41409.00007460979.0000

141.943146.80184b.8721129.5023

QUESTION 48


Age of youngest child:Years Months

SCORE

40.00

INTERVAL S

59.99

F

0.0

GRADE 2

PC I

0.0 46.5 100.0 0.0

GRADE 4 GRAllE 6CF-p-=81-174--

34.3 100.0

pt-T

0.0 42.5 100.0-1-T2.75-11Y0.0

F PCT0.0 0.0

-0;-4-1:2---30--60.00 - $9.99 44.6. 96.0 -46:5-1-0-6.70---0-. a 1:8100.00 - 139.99 1.7 3.6 1.9 4.0 40.9 96.1 41.8 98.2 23.0 67.1 33.9 98.8140.00 .- 179.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.3 0.9-0.3 2.1 10.7 31.2 10.9 31.7180.00 219.99 C. 0 G.0 0.2 0.4 0:1 0.-2 0.8 0-.0 0.0 0.2 0.5220.00 - 259.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5260.00 - 299.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2

-0.0-0.6'0;6-

0.0 0.0 0.2 0.536(5.00-;- 339.99 0.0 0.0 0.2-- 0: 0.0" 0:2 000 090 0.2 0.5340.00 -- 379099 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 002 0.5380.00 -* 419.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 . 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5420000 - 459.99 0.0 0.6 -6.2- 0.4 '0.6 0.D 0.2- 0.6- o-;.--o--o; 0 002 07:5 4

460.00 499.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0,0 000 0.2 0.5500000 539.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 004 0.0 0.0 0.2

-0".0--

0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5540.00 519.99 0.0 0.0 -0;2 'OA- 0.0- 0.2- 0.6" 0-ay----0.0 -0.2 U.5580.00 619099 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 000 000 Oct 0.5620.00 659.99 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2

-0.-0-

006 0.0 000 0.2 0.566C000 699,99 0.0 0.0 6:T 6.4 D.0 0:2 0.6 CT. 0 0.0 0.2 0.5700000 739099 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5740.00-7alf.do

179.99e00,:00

0.2-D.*0

0.4---6.0-------6--zti.ci

0.2 0.4 .0.2 0.6 0.2 0.6-0.0

0.00.0

De 0

0.o---- -...0.0

-0.0-0.0-070--0.0 0.0 -0.0

CASES PROCE SSE°E-n-ANic OATH

=1--

46.4556 42.5398 34.28289-6.0000--T16.0000MINIMUM VALUE 12 71.0000 96.0000 73.0000MAXIMUM VALUE

aka779.0000 756.0000 131.0000

0.8164 4842.6680SUM SOD. SCORES = 503636.5625 716418.1250 745228.2500MEAN 94.5409 120.1421 141.2565STN-D. ITEV (N) 41:6264 49.0612 e 2406SIND. OEV. (N -11 = 44.1037 49.6483 42.8705MEDIAN 80.8401 120.0586 129.0937

5. What percentage of the pupils in your compensatory reading class have receivedcompensatory reading instruction prior to this year?

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0063.0004.000

F

9.913.65.84..2

PCT

17.0 58.02/.-4. 46:110.0 34.67.3 28.8

27-0- -2-4-.T5

14.9 6.7

100.0

F

3.2

PCT -CF-b

5.8 54.2

Li71

100.0 2.9 6.7 43.4 100.0-113.70

59.649.6

12.15.92.8

22.4 51;u-wzr-lo.o10.9 38.9 71.85.3 33.0 60.9

4.02.516.87.1

23.1 "40.5 93.39.2 30.4 70.25.8 26.4 60.9

38.7 23.9 55.116.4 7.1 16.4

5.-o-in6.00C

15.88.7

-W214.9

20.210.0

37.3 30.218.4 10.0

55.718.4

CASES PROCESSED = 58.-0400 54.1571 43.3712NO. BLANK DATA = 5.0000 5.0000 11.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000TOXINTA VALUE = 670116-0 6.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES 150.6448 157.3131 129.0102SUM SW. SCORES 580.3989 654.5210 539.1101MEAN 3.0328 3.5610 3.5590STND. DEV. (N) = 1.5628 1.4613 1.4853STND. DEV. (N-1) 1.5788 1.4781 1.5062

OTA- 2.7114 3.8256 3.9685SAMPLE FOR STATS = 49.3471 44.1772 36.2495

SCCRE INTERVALS F PC.T CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 90 15.0 601 100.0 33 6.8 560 100.0 21 5.0 4202.000 142 23.6 511 85.0 121 21.6 522 93.2 84 20.0 399

.109,095.0

3.000 58 9.7 369 61.4 59 10.5 401 71.6 44 10.5 315 75.04.000 49 8.2 311 51.7 32 5.7 342 61.1 25_

5.000 172 28.6 262 43.6 204 36.4 310 55.4 170 40.5 246.64.558.6

6.000 90 15.0 90 15.0 106 18.9 106 18.9 76 18.1 76 18.1


==

6015

1.00006.0000

5605

1.0000

420111.0600

.6;bobb-6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1604.0000 1605.0000 1271.0000SUM SQL`. 4264.oppp 6665.0000 5403.0000.scPft.sMEAN 3.1389 3.5352 3.6948SYNC. DEV. IN) = 1.5509 1.4774 1.4336STND.MEDIAN

DEV. (4-.1) = 1.55242.9052

1.4790 1.43563.7813 4:4 To0

SAMPLE FOR STATS = 511 454 344

6. About what percentage of the children in your compensatory reading classattended some form of preschool? (Include Headstart, day care, or nurseryschool; DO NOT INCLUDE PUBLIC SCHOOL KINDERGARTEN.)

"SCORE INTERVALSGRADE 2

F PCT GF P-;13Lti,1-

GRADE 4F PCT

'GRADE 6CF P -BLIi F- PCT CF P -BtW

1.000 15.1 2509 58.1 1000 16.2 29.8 54.2 100.0 14.9 34.7 43.1 100.02.00 1907 33.9 17.3 32.0 3800 70.211.7 27.1 ZUol 65.330000 6.0 10.4 23.3 40.2 6.0 11.1 20.7 38.2 108 4.1 1605 38.240000 306 602 1703 29.8 2.3 4.2 14.7 27.1 1.6 307 14.7 34.15.600 402 102 1307 23.6 2.2 4.0 12.4 22.9 1.7 400 13.1 30.460600 905 1604 9.5 16.4 10.2 18.8 1002 18.811.4 26.4 1104 26.4

CASES PROEMED 54.1571 43.0824NO. BLANK DATA a 5.0000 1300000MINIMUM VALUE = loom) 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM-VALUE 6.0000 600000'-

SUM OF SCORES 107.8864 8868700 5865827SUM SOD. SCORESMEAN ."

310.1931 23066265 146.06901!-.00221 1.84/9

STND0 DEV., (ND 1.2060 1,0764 1.0921STND. DEV. (NID 1.2186 1.0888 1.1098PIED IAN 1006B6 105/113SAMPLE FOR STATS = 48.5966 43.9485 31.7W6

SCORE INTERVALSF PC T CF P-BLW F PC T CF PCT CFP-BLW P-BLW.

1.000 1117 22.8 602 10000 147-17i

26.2_ 560 10000 134 32.1 418 100.02.000 201 33.4 465 7702 3T7.-6 413 73.7 117 28.0 284 67.93.000 60 10.0 264 43.9 65 1106 236 4201 21 5.0 167 40.04.000 44 7.3 204 33.9 23 4.1 171 3005 16 3.8 146 34095.000 45 7.5 160 26.6 23 401 148 26.4 17 4.1 130 31016.000 115 19.1 115 19.1 125 22.3 125 22.3 113 27.0 113 27.0

CASES PROCESSEDNO BLANK DATA

6024

5605

41813

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1,0000MAXIMUM VALUE 6.0000 6.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES 1120.0000 903.0000 580.0000SUM SOO. SCORES 3310.0000 2383.0000 1472.0000MEAN 2.0759 1.9016SUM. DEV. (NI 1.2279 1.0812 1.1000SIND. DEV. (N -11 1.2291 1.0824 1.1018MEDIAN 1.8983 1.6581SAMPLE FOR STATS 487 435 305

7. About what percent of the pupils in your compensatory reading class are membersof the following racial or national origin groups? (Mark one box in eachlettered row.)

(a) Caucasian or WhiteNone 1-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100%

0

SCORE INTERVAL S F&wd 2-e

PC1a

CF P-BLW it-F57-BLW F PCT 8rck" GF P-BLWF PCral)

1.000 5.0 8.7 58.0 100.0 5.4 10.0 54.2 100.0 4.3 9.9 43.1 100.02.000 6.2 10.7 53.0 91.3 -5:1 1 0:----- 748.7' 9.070 7,-.1 15.4 38.8 90.13. CCO 5.3 9.2 46.8 80.6 4.8 8.9 42.9 79.1 3.1 7.3 32.2 74.74.000 5.3 9.1 41.5 71.5 5.5 10.2 38.1 70.3 3.1 7.2 29.1 67.55.00-0 36.2 62.4 36.2 62.4 32.5 60.1 32,5 60.1 25.9 60.2 25.9 60.2

CASES PROCESSED - 58.0200 54.1571 43.0824NO. BLANK DATA = 5.-0000 5.0000 f3.0000-MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE-SW

5.0000 5.0000 5.0000OF SCORES 235.4901 216:1577- 169.1293

SUM SQO. SCORES - 1061.1165 913.9492 757.5793MEAN-STUD; -DEV.

4.0588 3.9949 3.9257(N) 1.3851 1.4-22Y 1.4T42

STNO. ()EV. (N-1) 1.3972 1.4362 1.4916MEOIAN 4.6986 4.6679 4.6698

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1,000 62 10.3 601 100.0 65 11.6 560 100.0 47 11.2 418 100.02.000 68 11.3 539 89.7 70 12.5 495 88.4 64 15.3 ^371 88.83.000 56 9.3 471 78.4 46 8.2 425 75.9 26 6.2 307 73.44. 000 59 9.8 415 69.1 63 11.2 379 67.7 34 8.1 281 67.25,000 356 59.2 356 59.2 316 56.4 316 56.4 247 59.1 247 59.1

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEp!spcitlym VALUE_SUM OF SCORESSUM SQi). SCORESMEANSTUD. 0EV. (N)STND. DEV, IN-1)MEDIAN

==

60)51.00005.0000

2382.000010682.0000

3.96341.43711.43834.6559

560 41851.00005.0000

131.00005.0000

2175.00009667.0000

3.8839

1624.00007256.0000

1.47571.47704.6139

1.50481.50664.6538

OUFSTION 7 (b) Negro or Black

SCORE INTERVALS

1.000

F

35.8

y- ciL

PCI

61.7

e .

CF

58.0

P-8LW-- F

100.0 31.3

P

57.8 54.2 100.0 25.7 59.7 43.1 100.02.000 9.9 17.1 2 .3 16.9 -11.4 4U.33.000 5.1 8.8 12.3 21.2 4.4 8.2 11.8 21.9 4.2 9.7 10.1 23.44.000 2.6 4.5 7.2 12.4 2.6 4.9 7.4 13.6 1.6 3.7 5.9 13.75. got 4.6 8.0 4.6 8.0 4.7 8.8 4.7 8.8' 4.3 100,0 4.3 .10.11

CASES PROCESSED 58.0200 54.1571 43.0824NO. BLANK DATA 5.0000 5.0000 13.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000S UM aV SCORTs----- 50.7552SUM SOD. SCORES = 278.2385 276.4216 225.8712MEAN 1.7991 1.8651 1.8745

1.2749 1.3150STND. DEV. (N-13 = 1.2595 1.2868 1.3305MEDIAN 1.3105 1.3655 1.3373

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000"5:66.6.

F

348115533055

PCI

57.919*18.85.09.2

CF

6012531388555

P-BLW

100.042.123.014.19.2

F

302

PC T

53.9

CF

560

P -8LW

100.0

F

236

PCI

56.5

CF

418

P-BLW

100.01234729

22.08.45.2

25813588

46.124.115.7

813614

19.48.63.3

18210165

43.524.215.6

59 10.5 59 10.5 51 12.2 51 12.2

CASES PROCESSED46.---6LANK OATH

6015

560 4185 13

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5,0000giii14-OF SCORES 1132.0000 1100.0000 817.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 3140.0000 3156.0000 2383.0000MEAN__ 3.8835 1.9643 1.9545

UEV. (NI 1.2950 1.3332 1.3714STNO. OEV, (N-13 1.2960 1.3343 1.3730MEDIAN 1.3635 1.4272 1.3856

QUESTION 7

SCORE INTERVALS

(n) Spanish surnamed

Grade 2-F PCT CF P -BLW

1.000 45.6 78.6 58.02.000 9.5 16.3 12.43.000 0.7 1.3 2.94.000 1.3 2.2 2.25.000 0.9 1.5 0.9

CASES PROCESSED 58.0200NO. BLANK OATH 5.0000-MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000-suN 'OF SCORES 76.4048SUM S00. SCORES 133.0788MEAN 1.3169

DEv. (N) 0.7480SIND. GEV. (N-1) 0.7545MEDIAN 1.1358


1.000 468 77.9 6012.000 98 16.3 1333.000 11 1.8 354.000 14 2.3 245.000 1.7 10


60.1

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE. 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 803.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1433.0000MEAN__ 1.3361STND. DEV. (N) 0.7741STND. DEVe IN-1) 0.7747MEDIAN 1.1421

100.043.221.4 7.35.0 2.43.8 0.8

-G3

E

r ada_11PCJ P-8LW PCT CF P-BCW

79.8 54.2 100.0 33.2 77.1 43.1 100.013.4 ---1100---2D.2 7.1 16.5 9.9 22:g4.4 3.7 6.8 1.5, 3.6 2.8 6.41.4 1.3 2.4 0.7 1.7 1.2 2.9]-:-.U- 0.5 1.O -U.5- ---1:1 cim---r.-r

54.15715.0000-1.00005.0000

119.37181.30420.7040.71601.1268

P-BLW

100.0

F

441

PC T

78.722.1 83 14.85.8 20 3.64.0 10 1.81.7 6 1.1

43.082413.013-001.00005.0000

57.467059.67381.33390.73100.73961.1488

CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

560 100.0 328 78.5 418 100.0119 21.2 61 14.6 90 21.536 6.4 16 3.8 29 6.916 2.9 7 1.7 13 3.16 1.1 6 1.4 6 1.4

56051.00005.0000

737.00001263.0000

1.31610.72340.72411.1349

418131.00005.0000

556.1,000978.0000

1.33010.75530.756Z1.1372

QUFSTION 7

SCORE INTERVALS

(d) Oriental

CY4.8a C F

0

Graele yPCT 'CF

l;-Yo.d.e. 4.P-BLW F FLT CF -BLW

1.000 56.4 97.2 58.0 100.0'52.1 96.2 54.2 100.0 41.6 96.6 43.1 100.02.000 1.6 2.8 1.6 2.8 2.1 3.8 2.1 3.8 1.4 3.2 1.4 3.43.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.14.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.05.000 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0

CASES PROCESSED 58.0200 54.1571 43.0824N0.-6LANK DATA 5.0000 5.0000 13.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 3.0000

StOWES 39.6737 56.232/ 44.572SUM SOO. SCORES 62.9737 60.3773 47.6465MEAN 1.0285 1.0383 1.0346

6:160 0.1917 0.1883STNO. OEV. (14-1) 0.1675 0.1935 0.1905MEDIAN 1.0146 1.0199 1.0174

SCORE INTERVALS F PC.T CF P -BLW F

1.000 583 97.0 6012.000 18 3.0 183.000 0 0.0 04.000 0 0.0 0

0 0.0 0-5.000

PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLW

100.0 540 96.4 560 100.0 401 95.9 418 100.03.0 20 3.6 20 3.6 16 3.8 17 4.10.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.2 1 0.20.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0,0 0 0.00.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

CASE_ S PROCESSEDN0. BLANK DATA

==

601.

5

560 4185 13

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUEsUW o k. RE S

2.0000 2.0000 3.0000619.60'00 580.0000 436.0000

SUM SOD. SCORES = 655.0000 620.0000 474.0000MEAN_ 1.0299 1.0357 1.0431STNO. 0EV. = 0.1764 0.1856 0,2145SIND. REV. IN -1) = 0.1706 0.1857 0.2147MEDIAN 1.0154 1.0185 1.0212

QUESTION 7 (e) American Indian 0 0G A4 :L

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLS! F 17e; F -.BLW

1.000 5(s.4 95.6 52.7 100.0 47.0 93.7 50.1 100.0 35.6 95.0 37.4 100.02.000 2.0 3.8 2.3 4.4 2.9---5.7 3.4 6.3 1.7 4.6 1.9 5.03.000 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.Z. C.2 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.34.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 .10.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.35.000 0.0 0.0 -0.6 -.).0 0.0 0.71 4.1.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0

CASES PRUCESSED 52.7041 50.1070 37.4338NO. BLANK DATA 60.0000 52.0000 63.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM-TP SCORES 55.3498 53.5816 39.5451SUM SQO. SCORES 61.2940 61.3589 44.5209MEAN 1.0502 1.0693 1.0564STNS. OEV. iN) 0.2451 0.2847 0.2708STND. DEV. (NI) 0.2474 0.2876 0.2745MEDIAN 1.0229 1.0334 1.0261

INTONALS F PC(;Y" F PCT lr°." 4CF-F=BEwF

1.000 22.7 92.1 24.6 100.0 21.0 94.7 22.2 100.0 14.5 95.2 15.3 100.0

2.000 -1;6 -6.4.-

1.9 7:4 7U:2 5.3 1.2 5. 0.6 4.0 0.7. 47:8

3.000 0.2 0.7 0.4 1.5 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.8

4.000 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 .-0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0

'5.00C C.2 0.8 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0

CASES PROCESSED = 24.6249 22.1677 15.2532

NO.BLANk DATA - 345.0000 326.0000 275.0000

MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALVE

==

1.00005.0000

1.00002.0000

1.00003.0000

SUM OF SCORES = 27.3274 23.3515 16.1115

SUM SQO. SCORES = 35.4163 25.7180' 18.0739

MEAN-ST NED-E-ir;

1.1097 1.0534 i.05630.2247 0.263i

S7ND. DEV. ( .1) = 0.4642 0.2300 0.2722

MEDIAN 1.0429 1.0282 1.0253

QUESTIIIN 7(f) Other (Specify)


1.000 518 95.2 5442.000 23 4.2 263.000 3 0.6 3

4.000 0 0.0 0

5.000 0 0.0 0

P-BLW

.100.0 4744.8 330.6 20.0 1

0.0 1

PCT

92.8

CF

511

P-BLW

100.0

--F

347

-PCT

94.6

CF

367

P-BLW

100.06.5 37 7.2 18 4.9 20 5.40.4 4 0.8 0 0.0 2 0.50.2 2 0.4 1 0.3 2 0.50.2 1 0.2 1 0.3 1 0.3

CASES PRCICESSE0NO. BLANK DATA

=

=

54462

511 36754 64

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE .= 3.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 573.0000 555.0000 392.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 637.0000 665.0000 460.0000MaAN = 1.0533 1.0861 1.0681

. .

SIND. OEV. (N) = 0.2480 0.3489 0.3354STNO. DEV. (N-1) = 0.2482 0.3493 0.3359MEDIAN 1.0251 1.0390 1.0288

SCORE INTERVAL S

1.0002.0003.0004.000-5.606----

CASES PROCESSED =Na. War*5ii,-tr"--=--

F

23015202

PCT

92.46.00.80.00.8

249357

CF

24919422

P-BLW

100.0

F

210

PCT

93.8

CF

224

P-BLW

100.0

F

139

PCT

93.3

CF

149

P-BLW

100.07.61.60.8.0.8

1400

6.30.00.0

1400

6.30.00.0

91

0

6.00.70.0

101

0

6.70.70.0

0 0.0

224

0 0.0 0 0.0

149

0 0.0

341 282MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM ti---gtoitlr.- -,14.--SUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (N).- =STND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN

1.00005.0000

276-.-06fci-358.0000

1.1084

1.00002.0000

1.0000 ft

3.0000238.0000266.0000

1.0625

160.0000184.0000

1.07380.4573C.45821.0413

0.24210.24261.0333

0.28600.28701.0360

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

OUT OF RANGE

8a. Among the homes where the dominant language is not English, what languaga(s)is (are) spoken? (Mark all that apply.)

0 American Indian

F PC.PYI-dele.F P-8LW F PCP4-FP-8-Eli F PC rode (tr- -p=tt-cw

58.0 99.1 58.50.5 0.8 0.50.1 0.1 0.1

100.00.9(0.1

54.4 99.4 54.7 100.00.6

44.20.6

98.7 44.8 100.01.3------IG-6---r:30.3 0.6 --073

CASES PROCESSED -.58.547354.7435 44.80920.0 U.0

MINIMUM VALUE - 0.0 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE =. 4.0000

-0.77890.3303 0.5725

SUM* OF SCORES - 0.33-03 0.5/25SUM SQD. SCORES = 1.7266 0.0060 0.0128MEAN 0.0133 0.0774 0.1123STND. DEV. IN) - 0.0782 0.1136STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.1727 0.0030 0.0065MEOIAN 0.0047

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

OUT OF RANGE

F PCT

600 99.05 .0.8-1 0.2

CF P -8LW F PCT

60661

CF P-8LW- PCT CF P-BLW

100.0 560 99.1 565 100.0425 98.6 431 100.01.0 5 0.9 5 0.9 6 1.4 6 1.40.2

565 431CASES PROCESSED = 606 0.0 0.0MINIMUM VALUE - 0.0 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 5.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES 9.0000 5'0000 6.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 21.0000 0.0088 0.0139KEAN I 0.0149 0.0937 0.1172STND. DEV. IN) 0.1g5Z Va-137 0.1173STND. DEV. (N-1I 0.1857 0.0045 0.0071MEDIAN 0.0050

OUESTI6N 8

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

OUT OF RANGE

CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE'Sbm OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSING. DEV. (N)STNO. DEV. 4N-1)MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

OUT OF RANGE

CASES PROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUE =ANXIMUMVALUE =SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES =1.1AN.

STND. DEV. (N) =STND. DEV. 01-1) =MEDIAN =

0

(b) Chinese

.p-sco_a 01.1: PC CF P-8LW F

58.1C.40.1

99.20.60.1

58.5 100.00.5.---Da0.1 0.1

58.5473-0.02.00000.53670.69460.00920.10853.10950.0039

CG-ra4e.

PCT CF P-13LW F PGTrab e CF

54.2 99.1 : 54.7 100.0 43.9 97.9 44.80.5 0.9 0.5

F PCT CF P-8LW

60141

99.20.70.2

6060.02!QP9.06.00008.00000.00990.11450.11460.0042

PCI

606_100.0559 98.95 0.8 6 1,11 0.2

54.74350.01.00000.50360.50360.00920.09550.09640,0046

0.9 0.9 2.1 0.9

44.80920.01.00000.92860.92860.02070.14250.14410.0106

P-BLW

100.02.1

CF P-8LW F PCI

565 100.0 422 97.9

5650.01,00006.00006.00000.01060.10250.10260.0054

6 1.1 9 2.1

4310.01,00009.00009.00000.02090.14300.14320.0107

CF P -8LW

431 100.0.9 2.1

QUEST ION 8(C) El Japanese

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUE

F

58.30.2

;t.

PCra.

CF

99.6 58.50.4 0.2

58.54730.0

P-13LW

100.0

rude q v e.-P:71FEW F PC C

100.0 44.3 98.9 44.8

P-BEIT

100.0T.1

54.4

PCT

99.4

CF

54.70.4 0.4 0.6

54.

0.4

7435

0.6 0.5 1.1 0.5

44.80920.0 0.0

MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 0.2319 0.3534 0.4771SUM SOO. SCORES 0.3534 0.4171MEAN 0.0040 0.0065 0.0106$TND. 0EV. (N) 0.0628 0. 0801 0.1026Witt; -ay. 1N-11 0. CT6-54 0.0808 0.103dMEDIAN 0.0020 0.0032 0.0054

SCORE iiitERvALs. F PC CF P-Bill PC T CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-8LW

0.0 603 99. 5 606 100.0 560 99.1 565 100.0 427 99.1 431 100.01.000 3 0;5. 3 0.5 5 0.9 5 0.9 4 0.9 4 0.9

CASES PROCESSED = 606 565 431MINIMUM VALUE UE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 3.0000 5.0000 4. 0000SUM SOD. SCORES 3.0000 5.0000 4.0000MEAN 0.0050 0.0088 0. 0093STNO. DEV. (NI 0.0702 0.0937 0.0959STND. DEV. IN-1 at .6.-0702 0.0937 0.0960MEDIAN 0.0025 0.0045 0.0047

OUFST ION 8

SCORE INTERVALS

(d) Spanish-Portuguese

YakG-racl a 9

F PC CF P-8CW F PCT CF P-BLW FG-ra_de to

PCT CF P-BLw

0.01.000

OUT OF RANGE

48.110.40.1

82.217.70.1

58.5 100.0 45.7 83.5 54.7 100.0 36.4 81.3 44.8 100.010:4'17.80.1 0.1

8.4 18.7 8.4 18.7

CASES PROCESSEC54.7435 44.8092

58.5473 C.0 0.0MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 9.0091 8.3745SUM "OF SCORES 10.1igr8- 9.0091 8.3745SUM SQD. SCORES 11.6868 0.1646 0.1869MEAN 0.1826 0.3708 0.3898STNO. ISEV. tN) 0,4078 0.3742 0.3942SIND. DEV. IN-1/ 0.43.13 0.0985 0.1149MEDIAN 0.1085

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLit PC T CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

0.0 497 82.0 606 100..0 468 82.8 565 100.0 352 81.7 431 100.01.000 108 17.8 109 18.0 97 17.2 97 17.2 79 18.3 79 18.3

OUT OF RANGE 1 0.2 1 0.2


= 6060.04.0000

565 4310.01.0000

97.0000

0.01.0000

79.0000SUM OF SCORES - 112.0000 97.0000 79.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 124.0000 0.1717 0.1833MEAN 0.1848 0.3771 0.3869SIND. DEV. (N) = 0.4129 0.3774 0.3874STN0. DEV. (N-11 = 0.4132 0.1036 0.1122MEOIAN 0.1097

QUESTION 8 (e) c 'French

SCORE INTERVAL S F. _

PC CE P-8LW Y" P- L W F PClarnAALItF

P-0131F PC T F

0.0 57.0 97.4 58.5 100.0 54.0 98.6 54.7 100.0 44.1 98.4 44.8 100.01. COO 1.5 2.5 1;5 2.6. 0.8 1.4 0.7 1.6 0.7 1.6

OUT OF RANGE 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.154.7435 44.8092

CASES PROCESSaft - 58.5473 0.0MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE =- 2.0000 0.7899 0.7379SUM OF SCORES =- 1.6107 D+7899 0.7379SUM SQO. SCORES =.* 2.7687 0.0144 0.0165MEAN 0.0275 0.1193 0.1273

DEV. (N) = V. 1716 0.1204 0.1281STNO. DEV. N-1) = 0.1731 0.0073 0.0084MEDIAN 0.0134

SCORE. INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

0.0 588 97.0 606 100.0 557 98.6 565 100.0 424 98.4 431 100.01.000 17 2.8 18 3.0 8 1.4 8 1.4 7 1.6 7 1.6

OUT OF RANGE 1 0.2 1 0.2


6060.02.0000

565 4310.01.00008.0000

0.01.00007.0000

SUM -OF -SCbRE S. 14;060 8.0000 7.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 21.0000 0.0142 0.0162MEAN 0.0314 0.1181 0.1264STND. 0EV. (N) 0.1835 0.1183 0.1265STND. DEV. ( N-1) 0.1836 0.0072 0.0083MEDIAN 0.0153

QUESTION 8 (F) Other (Specify)

SCORE INTERVAL SGRADE 2

F PCT CF P-BLW

0.0 54.91.000 3.6

OUT OF RANGE 0.1.

CASES PROCE SSE°MINIMUM VALUEMAX IMUM VALUE

93.8 58.56.1 3.70.1 0.1

58.54730.02.0000

SUM OF* SCORE S 3.7356SUM SOD. SCORES 3.8935MEAN 0.0638STND. DEV. 041 0.2419STND. DEV. N-1) 0.2520MEDIAN 0.0333

SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T

YaleF PC CF P-BLprae

W PC-ci

F P-BLW

100.0 52.0 95.0 54.7 100.0 42.2 94.1 44.8 100.06.2 2.7 5.0 2.7 57,1:1- 2.4 5.4 2.i 5.90.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5

54.74350.01.00002.73782.73780.05000.21800.22000.0263

44.809-20.02.00002.88403.33430.06440.265-10.26810.0315

CF P-BLW F 45E1- CF P-BLW F T---- -CO P -BLW

0.0 564 93.1 606 100.0 534 94.5 565 100.0 405 94.0 431 100.01.000 41 6.8 42 6.9 31. 5.5 31 5.5 25 5.8 26 6.0

OUT OF RANGE 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2


6060.02.0000

5650.01.0000

31.0000

4310.02.0000

SLIM OF SCORES 43.0000 31.0000 27.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 45.0000 0.0549 29.0000MEAN 0.0710 0.2277 0.0626SIND. DEV. (N) 0.2631 0.2279 0.2517STNO. DEV. = 0.2633 0.0290 0.2520MEDIAN 0.0372 0.0321

8. Estimate the percent of the pupils in your compensatory reading class who arefrom homes in which the dominant language is not English.

None

1-25%

26-50%

51.-75Z

76-100%

Don't know

SCORE 1N TERVAL SG re...d. a

F PC T CF P-BLWGYe-a. e- 41

F PCT CF P-BLW F6-y-c,c1m.

PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 452 75.5 599 100.0 426 76.3 558 100.0 307 73.4 418 100.02.000 109 18.2 147 24.5 92 16.5 132 23.7 76 18.2 111 26.63.000 17 2.8 38 6.3 14 2.5 40 7.2 16 3.8 35 8.44.000 7 1.2 21 3.5 7 1.3 26 4.7 3 0.7 19 4.55.000 12 2.0 14 2.3 ---14-- -2-.5- 19 3.4 11fl 2,6 166.000 2 0.3 2 0.3 5 0.9 5 0.9 5 1.2 5 1.2

GASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA

==

5997

5587

41813

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000;iAXIMUM VALUE = 6.0000 6.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 809.0000 750.0000 574.000DSUM SOD. SCORES = 1453.0000 1382.0000 1078.0000MEAN = 1.3551 1.3562 1.3898STND. DEV. (NI = 0.7730 0.8122 0.8237STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.7736 0.8130 0.8247ME-DIAN = 1.1604 1.1491 1.1726SAMPLE FOR STATS = 597 553 413

8. Estimate'the percent of the pupils in your compensatory reading

from homes in which the dominant language is not English.

None

1-25%

0 26-50%

1:] 51-75%

0 76-100%

Don't know

clas's who are

SCORE INTERVALS PCIGT-"e- -P-BLN$4 Grad a 6

F_6,--Aee

PC T I F P-BLWTci

CF P-BLW

1.000 44.5 76.9 57.9 100.0---13:1--273.1

41.7 77.2 54.0 100.0 32.4 75.4 43.0 100.02.000 10...0 17.3 8.5 15.7 12.3 22.8 7.5 17.5 10.6 24.63.000 1.5 2.6 3.3 5.7 1.4 2.6 3.8 7.1 1.6 3.6 3.0 7.14.000 0.6 1.0 1.8

-12-3.1'2;1

0.5 1.0 2.4 4.5 0.2 0.4 1.5 3.4-5.000' 1.1 1.8 1.4 2.6 1.9 3.5 1.0 2,3 1.3 3.16.000 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.8

CAS5S-PROCES-WrNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEKWICIPAJM-VACUE--SUM OF SCDRhS =SUM SOD. SCORES =

*****

STND. OEV. IN) =STND. DEV. (N-1) =REDTXR----------SAMPLE FOR STATS =

57:8527'7.00001.0000

54.01496.00001.0000

42.955213.00001.0000

-6:0000.76.6608

133.7329

6.000072.1123

132.2901

6.000057.5829103.2383

32-92-

0.74290.7495

-171479-

1.34680.81050.8182

1.35170.77220,78141.157,

42.599157.67301.141953.5452

9. Estimate the percentage of pupils in your compensatory reading class who havepersistent problems in each of the following areas. (Mark one box in eachlettered row.)

SC6RE INTERVALS

None 1-10% 11-50% 51-100% Don't know

(a) Speech

Grade aF -11aGra.cla

6;iyalit 4F PCT CF P-8LW P-8LW F 17cr CF P-8114

1.000 55.2 100.0 13.7 26.52.000 43.4 78:7 .30.6 59.23.000 12.7 22.9 5.8 11.14.000 2.5 4.6 1.3 2.55.0o G.S 1.6 0.9 1.6 0.3 --141.6

11.8 21.330.8 55.710.1 18.31.7 3.0

CASES PROCE55E0NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE -MAXIMUM_ VALUE =S7UM-D-F-t4ORESSUM S00. SCORES =MEANS7No. DEV. (N) =STND. DEV. (N-1)MEDIANSAMPLE FOR sTAIS =

55.214130.00001.00005.0000

110.3612252.65192.03120.7110.73082.000354.3153

51.7 100.0 14.9 35.938.073.5 21 351.3

51.712631.00001.00005.0000

97.5146209.1112

1.89680.68530.69211.8919

51.4/04

7.41.60.3

14.3 4.3 10.33.1 0.7 1.60.6 0.4 0.8

41.5 100.0Z6.6 64.71

5.3 12.81.0 2.50.4 U.8

41.476231.00001.00005.0000(3.002Z

149.37761.77520.69$60.70221.7668

41.1631

SCORE INTERVALS F PC1 CF P -BLW F PCT CF PCT CF

1.000. 118 20.5 576 100.0 160 30.0 533 100.0'129 32.2 400 100.02.000 329 57.1 458 79.5 308 57.8 373 70.0 211 52.7 271 67.73.000 110 19.1 129 22.4 53 9.9 65 12.2 48 12.0 60 15.04.000 16 2.8 19 3.3 8 1.5 12 2.3 9 2.2 12 3.05.000 3 0.5 3 0.5 4 0.8 4 0.8 3 0.7 3 0.7

CASES PROCESSED.ab.-8LANICCiATA

==

57630

533 40032 31

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE_SUM OF SCORES

5.00001170.0000

5.0000 5.0000967.0000 731.0000

SUM S00. SCORES = 2680.0000 1997.0000 1549.0000MEAN = 2.0419 1.8280 1.8413STN6. DEV. (N) 0.7126 0.6584 0.7151STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.7133 0.6591 0.7160MEDIAN 2.0122 1.8393 1.8294S4MPLE FOR STATS -515- 529 397

QUESTION 9 (b) Vision

SCORE INTERVAL S FGo-de-.2

PC T

1.000 21.0 38.1 55.12.000 28.2 51.1 34.13.000 4.4 8.0 5.94.000 0.3 0.5 1.55.000 1.3 2.3 1.3

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =

55.129636. OMIT

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000SUM OF SCORES' 91-.6924

=SUM SAO. SCORE S 177.7439MEAN = 1.7019Mb. DEV. CO 0.6346STNO. DEV. 01-1) = 0.6405MEDIAN 1.7102SAMPLE FOR $ T/iTS. = 55:117-6 9-

P- BLW T----TDCP":8-1F Gracie 4P-BLWP-8LW F PC T rr

100.0 14.3 28.8 49.7 100.0 11.4 27.7 41.4 100.061.9.27:1-5-5.9 35.4 71.2 23.8 57.5 29.9 72.3-10.8 6.4 12.8 7.6 15.4 5.0 12.0 6.2 14.92.8 0.4 0.7 1.3 2.6 0.3 0.7 1.2 2.82.3 1.8 0.9--- 1.8 0.9 2.1 0.9 2.1

49.739748.0000

1.00005.0000

90.4531188.6464

1.85260.65690.66381.8637

48.8245

41.395430.00001.00005.0000

75.1401156.1130

1.85490.64280.65081.8702

40.5090

SCORE INTERVALS F PC T CF P-BLW F PCT CE P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 214 37.5 570 100.0 153 29.7 516 100.0 116 28.9 401 /00.02.000 290 50.9 356 62.5 289 56.0 363 70.3 222 55.4 285 71.13.000 53 9.3 66 11.6 57 11.0 74 14.3 51 12.7 63 15.74. pop 5_ 0.9 13 2.3 5 1.0 17 3.3 3 0.7 12 3.05.000 8 1.4 8 1.4 12 2.3 12 2.3 9 2.2 9 2.2

CASES PROCESSED = 570 516 401NO. BLANK DA TA = 36 49 30MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES =- 973.0000 922.0000 725.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1931.0000 1902.0000 1511.0000MEAN

. 1.7313.. 1.8294 1.8495STAID. DEV. (N) = 0.6622 0.6536 0.6588STN D. DEV. IN -1) = 0.6628 0.6543 0.6596MEDIAN 1.7310 1.8426 1.8604SAMPLE FOR STATS = 562 5C4 392

QUESTION 9 (c) Hearing

SCORE INTERVALS FG Y

PCTcle a

CF

1.000 30.8 57.3 53.72.000 18.6 34.7 22.93.000 1.4 2.6 4.34.000 0.1 0.2 2.95.000 2.8 5.3 2.8

CASES PROCESSEDaa. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OV-ScdiusSUM SOD. SCORESMEAN

iN).STND. DEV. (N-1)MEDIANSAMPLE FOR STATS

SCORE INTERVALS F

1.000 3222.000 1933.000 184.000 25.000 24

0

P -8LWG. Iro.2te

F PCT CF P-bLW F PCIG-Ir-"--6CF7T7-RUW

100.0 27.1 54.9 49.4 100.0 22.0 53.6 41.0 100.042.7-17.8 N6.1 22.3 45.1 16.4 35.9 19.0 46.48.0 2.2 4.5 4.5 9.0 0.9 2.1 2.7 6.55.4 0.0 0.1 2.2 4.5 0.0 0.0 1.8 4.45.3 2.2 4.4 2.2 4.4 1.8 4.4 1.8 4.4

53.7392 49.3769 41.041847.0000 52.0000 35.00001.0000 1.0000 1.00005.0000 5.0000 5.0000

72.-6560 69.6199 51.3639119.4297 119.2007 95.36651.4266 1.4751 1.46180.5572 0.5913 0.54160.5627 0.5977 0.54861.3268 1.3708 1.3918

50.9-152 47.1955 39.2407

PCI

57.634.53.20.44.3

CASES PROCESSEDKid. RANK DATA

55947

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000SUM TI-F-SCEIRES 770.0000SUM SOO. SCORES 1288.0000MEAN 1.4393STND. DEV. (N) - 0.5797STND. DEV. (N-I) = 0.5802MEDIAN 1.3307SAMPLE FOR STATS = 535

CF P -8LW F PC T CF P-8L0 F PCT CF P -8LW

559 100.0 289 56.6 511 100.0 209 52.8 396 100.0237 42.4 186 36.4 222 43.4 159 40.2 187 47.244 7.9 17 3.3 36 7.0 8 2.0 28 7.126 4.7 1 0.2 19 3.7 0 0.0 20 5.124. 4.3 18 3.5 18 3.5 20 5.1 20 5.1

511 39654 35100000 1.00005.0000 5.0000

716.0000 551.00001202.0000 917.0000

1.4523 1.46540.5735 0.53980.5740 0.54051.3529 1.3995

493 376

JUESTION 9 (d) Frequent illness

SCORE INTERVALS F PCe

F P-$Lwy-ct.ae.

P-BiwbradeCF p-BLWP PCT CF

1.000 20.5 37.7 54.4 100.0 19.2 38.4 49.9 100.0 12.6 30.9 40.9 100.02.000 27.1 44.8 33.9 62.3 25.0 50.1 30.8 61.6 21.5 52.5 28.3 69.13.000 5.6 10.2 6.8 12.5 5.0 10.0 5.7 11.5 5.2 12.7 6.8 16.64.000 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.2 0,5 1.0 0.8 1.5 0.9 2.3 1.6 3.95.000 0.9 1.7 09' 1.7 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.7 T.6 0.7 1.6

CASES PROCESSEUNO.-BLANK DATA -

54.417640.0000

49.9493 40.893246.0000 35.0000

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES *

5.0000 5.0000 5.000092.6832- 86.1153 74.8943

SUM SOD. SCORES - 183.9743 171.8633 160.2097MEAN 1.7322 1.7338 1.8614

(V. = -0:6618 0.6739 0.7185STNO. DEV. (N-1) 0.6680 0.6808 0.7276MEDIAN 1.7302 1.7262 1.8488SAMPLE PQR -STATS = 53.5072 49.6680 40.2249

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF PC T CF P -81W

1.000 213 37.7 565 100.0 198 38.4 516 100.0 124 31.3 396 100.02.000 291 51.5 352 62.3 250 48.4 318 61.6 197 49.7 272 68.73.000 53 9.4 61 10.8 57 11.0 68 13.2 57 14.4 75 18.94.000 4 0.7 8 1.4 11 2.1 10 2.5 18 4.55.000 4 0.7 4 0.7 4 0.8 4 0.8 8 2.0 8 2.0

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK OA TA =

565.41

516 39649 35

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 970.0000 897.0000 724.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1918.0000 1823.0000 1585.0000MEAN 1.7291 1.7520 1.8789STNO. DEV. (N) = 0.6552 0.7009 0.7449STvD. DEV. (N-1) 0.6558 0.7015 0.7459MEDIAN 1.7320 1.7320 1.8553SAMPLE FOR STAIS = 561 512 388

QUESTION 9 (e) Mental retardation

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.0005.CO

CASES PROCEsSEO =NO. BLANK 0A TA =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM sOD. SCORESMEANSTND OEV. iN) =STND. 0E14 (N-1) =MEDIANSAMPLE FOR STATS =

SCORE INTERVALS

F

34.014.41.30.23.2

F

PC i CF

64.0 53.227,1 19.22.4 4.70.4 3.46.1 3.2

53.168553.00001.00005.000067.5590106,56431.3528'0:5511'0.55681.2340

49.9399

PCT CF

P-8LW

100.036;08.96.4

F

33.0L32,30.2

PCTro.Ap

65.5 50.426 6 17-4--36:54.5 4.00.3 1.7

CF P-BLW

100.0 25.5

P T

62.9 40.5 100.0

8.03.5

11.61.50.5

Z8ft7 15,0 37.13.6 3.4 8.41.3 1.9 4.8

1.6 3.2

50.4036

1.4 3.5 1.4 T540.5265

46.00,01.00005.0000

40,00001.00005.0000

67.2183109.5098

1.3772

55.167193.27511.4110

0.58910.59521.2397

0.6e830.63651.2664

P-BLW F

48.8079

'PCT CF

3-9.9988

P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 360 65.2 552_109.0.349 67.8 515 100.0 252 64.5 391 100.02.000 144 26,1 192 34.8 124 24.1 166 32.2 98 25.1 139 35.53.000 18 3.3 48 8.7 23 4.5 42 8.2 16 4.1 41 10.54.4)00 4 0.7 30 5.4

-4.72 0.4 19 3.7 5 1,3 25 6.4

5.000 26 4.7 26 17 3.3 17 3.3 20 5.1 20 5.1

CASES PRgCESSEDN. BLANK DATA

==

55254

515 39150 40

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 718.0060 674.0000 516.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1162.0000 1084.0000 868,0000MEAN 1.3650 1.3534 1.3908STMD. DEV. = 0.5881 0.5873 0.6366STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0,5886 0.5879 0.6374MEOIAN 1.2306 1.2135 1.2361SAMPLE FOR STATS =- 498 371

.QUESTION 9 (g) Family instability 0

SCORE INTERVAL S Ff-rct de a..

PC CF P- BLW*Ira ae. 1.

Flyce-

CF P -BLW

1.000 6.3 11.4 55.2 100.0 6.3 12.0 52.5 100.0 4.8 11.3 42.7 100.0

2.000 22.1 40.0 48.8 88.6 -2LV.T 8.3 -4b1-3-08;0 T8.1 42.3 37.9 88.73.000 17.8 32.4 26.8 48.5 16.8 32.0 26.2 49.9 13.3 31.1 19.8 46.34.000 5.8 10.5 8.9 16.2 5.7 10.9 9.4 17.9 4.4 10.2 6.5 15.35.000 3.1 5.6 3.1 5.6 3-:)6 3.6 6.9 4.2 5.1 2.2 5.1

CASES PROCESSED 55.1530 52.5313 42.6989NO ANK DATA 32.0000 22.0000 19.0E100

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000

O F C OR ESUM ES 127.2370 -119.8097 .98.2063SUM SQD. SCORES 348.1614 329.7439 266.2180MEAN 2.4450 2.4506 2.4228

OEV. 4N) 0:8439 0.8598 0-.3353

STN D. °EV. t+-1) 0.8522 0.8687 0.8458MED IANSki4PEE FOR STATS

2.392652.0390

2.4056 2.3535WE. 8905 41:1.534t1

SCORE INTERVAL S F PCT CF P-BLW PC T CF PBLW F PC T CF F-.BLW

1..000 64 11.2 573 100.0 68 12.6 541 100.0_ 39 9.5 412 100.02.000 226 39.4 509 88.8 209 38.6 473 87.4 164 39.8 373 90.53.000 191 33.3 283 49.4 173 32.0 264 48.8 138 33.5 209 50..7

4.000 61 10.6 92 16.1, 59 10.9 91 16.8 46 11.2 71 17.25.000 31 5.4 31 5.4 32 5.9 32 5.9 25 6,1 25 6.1

CASES FRnCE SSEDND. BLANK DA TA

57333

541 41224 19

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 1333;5000 1241.0000 965.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 3663.0000 3405.0000 2673.0000MEAN 2.4594 2.4381 2.4935S trio. O-EV . N = 0.8424 0.8632 0.8302STNO. DEV. (N -11 = 0.8432 0.8641 0.8313MED IAN 2.4159 2.3923 2.4421

OR = 509 387

QUESTION 9 (f) Emotional problems D

SCORE INTERVALS F PC "de if* P.-80-141 ro.Ae 6pcp.ro-rie-CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 7.7 13.9 55.5 100.0 6.4 12.4 51.9 10000 5.6 13.3 42.3 100.02.000 28.5 51.2 47.8 86,1 25.7 49.6 45.5 87.6 20.8 49.2 36.1 86.T3.000 14.1 25.4 19.4 34.9 14.3 27.6 19.7 38.0 11.1 26.3 15.9 37.54.000 3.3 5.9 5.3 9.5 4.0 7.7 5.4 10.5 3.7 8.7 4.7 11.25.000 2.0 306 2.0 3.6 1.4 2.b 1.4 2.8 1.1 2.5 1.0 2.5

CASES PROCESSED 55.5331 51.9184 42.3044NO. BLANK DATA 28.0000 22.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 10000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES

5.0000"120aF074---

5.0000 5.0000116.8653 9503977

SUM SOO. SCORES 300.7246 302.2605 248.0534MEAN

-DEV.2.2418 2.3148 2.3125

STNfle IN). 0.;76-9-4 0.7929 0.8157STNO. DEV. (N-1) = 0.7767 0.8008 0.8257MEDIAN 2.1701 2°2307 2.22095A-14P-CE-FOR STATS 5305'31/6 -5D.4855 41.2531

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CI P-BLW CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -BLh

1.000 85 14.7 578 100.0 71_ 13.3 535 100.0_ 50 12.2 409 100.02.000 292 50.5 493 85.3 253 47.3 464 86.7 195 47.7 359 87.83.000 152 26.3 201 34.8 152 28.4 211 39.4 114 27.9 164 40.14.000 34 5.9 49 8.5 44 8.2 59 11.0 36 8.8 50 12.25.00C 15 2.6 15 2.6 15 2.8 15 2.8 14 3;'14. .4 3.4

CASE pftocEsspNO. BLANK DATA

57826

535 40930 22

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.00.00 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1261.0000 1209.0000 926.0000SUM SOO. SCORES - 3165.0000 3155.0000 2432.0000MEAN 2.2398 2.3250 2.3443STMO. 0EV. (N) = 0.7778 0.8134 0.8131STN?. 0EV. IN-1) 0.7785 0.8142 0.8142MEDIAN 2.1729

*5632.2470 2.2564

SAMPLE FOR STATS = 520 395

QUESTIdN 9

SCURF INTERVALS

(h) Other (Specify) 0

ae. a1 PC I

ro,CF P-BLW

1.0002.0001.0004.0005.000'

15.71.71.71.03.2

67.2 23.37.2 7.67.2 5.94.4 4.313.9 3.2

CASES PRUCESSED - 23.3279NJ. BLANK DATA 346.000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 28.1989SUM SQD. SCORES = 53.9463MEAN 1.4044STND. DEV. fN) = 0.8452STND. OEV. (N-11 0.8671MEDIAN 1.1399SAMPLE FOR STATS = 20.0768


1.000 174 69.9 2492.000 20 8.0 753.000 15 6.0 554.000 7 2.8 405.000 33 13.3 33

CASES PR )CENO. BLANK DATA

=

=249357

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE .50000SUM OF SCORES = 287.0000SUM WO. SCORES = 501.0000MEAN 1.3287STNO. OEV. (N) = 0.7443STND. OEV. (N-11 = 0.74,60MEDIAN 144q7SAMPLE FOR STATS = 216

0 0

Gy-c,-cl e. -GraffPCT CF P-BLW -P-CT&

CF P--781-.10

100.0 14.1 70.732.8-25.5 1.1 5.618.3 0.3 1.613.9 -2 1-13,,;

P-BLW F

100.0 :15.9_30.1 1522.1 1316.1 5

13.3 24

19.9 100.0 12.8 75.9 16.9 100.0-5-a-2T:g- 0.5 2-4-.8 4.1 24.14.2 20.9 0.9 5.4 3.6 21.33.0 15.3, 0.6 3.3 2.7 15.8

------2:7--IN:7-2;1---1-2.-6 -2.1 12.6

19.9066 16.8804339.0000 2740-000

1.0000 1.00005.0000 5.0000

22.0284 r8.734435.8638 31.84021.2825

-ILT663111.26920.7391

0.6860 0.76551.1103 1.0760

17.1767 14.7614

PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

73.6 216 100.0 112 73.7 152 100.06.9 57 26.4 5 3.3 40 26.36.0 42 19.4 12 7.9 35 23.02.3 29 13.4 5 3.3 23 15.1

11.1 24 11.1 18 11.8 18 11.8

216 152349

1.00005.0000

2791.00005.0000

248.0000 178.0000416.0000 320.0000

1.2917 1.32840.7059 0.78960.7077 0.79261.1038 1.0982

192 134

10. Estimate the percentage of pupils in your compensatory reading class whosefamily incomes are derived from each of the following occupational categories.


SCORE IN

1.COG2.G003.0004.0005.00C

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORESMEANSIND. DEV. (N)SINO. DEV. (N-11MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.0005.000

gPract -(EF-FR5L-w--PLI CF P-8LW -15*Cfr-.?1 cr

8.1 14.5 55.7 100.0 7.4 14.4 51.4 100.0 5.4 13.0 41.4 100.013.9 25.0 47.6 85.5 12.8 24.9 44;6"--8576---1-274-30.0 36.0 87.018.2 32.7 33.7 60.5 16.8 32.7 31.2 60.7 14.2 34.3 23.6 57.010.8 19.3 15.5 27.8 10.1 19.6 14.4 28.0 7.6 18.3 9.4 22.74.7 8.5 4.7 8.5 4.3 8.4 4 1.8- 4.4

55.7051 51.3761 41.425127.0000 33.00001.0000 1.0000 1.00005.0000 5.0000 5.0000

157.3246 11-272-8/b- 518.5264 478.5227 349.6907

=

2.82421.1542

2.8263 2.71061:1515-

1.1647 1.1629 1.05832.8225 2.8263 2.7032

F PCF CF. P-6LW PC1 CF P-81.W F PCT CF15ZBLW

80 13.8 578 100.0 76 14.4 527 100.0 58 14.6 398 100.0141 24.4 498 86.2 135 25.6 451 85.6 118 29.6 340 85.4195 33.7 357 61.8 163 30.9 316 60.0 128 32.2 222 55.8116 20.1 162 28.0 110 20.9 153 29.0 75 18.8 94 23.646 8.0 46 8:0 43 8.2 43 8.2 19 4.8 19 4.8

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM.OF SCORES

57826-

--

5.00001641.0000 .-

527 398381.00005.0000

331.00005.0000

11690.0000 1073.0000SUM SQ0. SCORES 5405.0000 4918.0000 3357.0000MEAN 2.8391 2.8273 2.6960-SIND.- DEV. (N) 1.1361 1.1569 1.0800STND. DEV. (N-1) = 1.1371 1.1579 1.0813MEDIAN 2.8487 2.8221

QUESTION 10

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.0005. C00

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =SUM SLID. SCORES =MEANSTND. DEV. (N) =SIND. DEV. (N-1) =MEOIAN


_Gyo.aF PC' CF R-8LW

15.3 27.819.8 36.014.4 26.23.5 6.42.0 3.6

F PC TG-ra.:1.q.

55.0 100.0 13.2 25.839.7 72.2 47.5-343--19.9 36.1 15.1 29.55.5 9.9 4.0 7.72,0 3.6 1;4---2.1

55.001825.00001.00005.0000

121.997932S.36912.21811.03371.04322.1150

51.2 100.0

20.4 39.95.3 10.41.4 --2;7-

51.176437.00001.D000

8.8 21.3 41.4 100.013.8 33.4 32.6 78.714.6 35.3 18.8 45.32.2 5.4 4.1 10.0

'a:9-- 4.6 --------1.T47-4-.7.6

41.435434.00001.0000

5.0000 5.0000116:11770 ---97.6364316.7424 279.28642.2715 2.3858

r=62-sa1.0247 1.03642.2051 2.3586

_ .

SCORE INTERVALS F PC r CF P -8LW F PCT CF .-0;81W F POT CF P-8LW

1.000 171 29.5 580 100.0.

142 27.0 526 100.0.

94 2.3.7 397 100.034.3 303 76.32.000 201 34.7 409 70.5 187 35.6 384 73.0 136

3.000 156 26.9 208 35.9 150 28.5 197 37.5 134 33.8 167 42.14.000 35 6.0 52 9.0 39 7.4 47 8.9 18 4.5 33 8.35.000 17 2.9 17 2.9 8 1.5 8 1.5 15 3,8 15 3.8

CASES PROCESSED = 580 526 397ma. BLANK DATA = 26 39 34MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.00D0 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 12k...4..5666 1162.0000 915.0000SUM S00. SCORES = 3364.0000 3064.0000 2507.0000MEAN 2.1828 2.2091 2.3048STND. 0EV. 041 = 1.0176 0.9720 1.0014STNO. DEV. IN-11 = 1.0185 0.9730 1.0027MEDIAN 2.0920 2.1471 2.2684_ .

QUESTION 10 (c) White collar workers (clerks,salespeople, etc.)

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CFCT-raagq ad

7F ---PCT CF P-BLW F PC

1.000 23.3 41.9 55.6 100.0 17.8 34.3 51.8 100.0 12.8 30.6 41.8 100.0

2.000 19.8 35.5 32.3 58.1 20.0 38.6--- 111:4-743.3 29.0 69.4

3.000 10.6 19.1 12.5 22.5 11.4 22.1 14.0 27.0 8*1 19.3 10.1 24.14.000 1.5 2.7 1.9 3.5 2.3 4.5 2.5 4.9 1.6 3.8 2.0 4.85.000 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.8 0:2 0.i O.2 0.4 c.4 1.r 0.4

CASES PROCESSEDNO* BLANK OATA

55.628331.00056

51.7528 41.7762r.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUESUM'OF SCORES

5.0000102.8450

5.0000 5.0000mr.747-67T-- -78-3.3zu9

SUM SAO. SCORES 232.6968 243.2526 197.3281

MEAN 1.8468 1.9801 1.9945

SIND* 0EV. IN) CAM 0.8833 U.8635STNO. BEV. 1144-.1) 0.8826 0.8919 0.8740MEDIAN 1..7272 1.9053 1.9285

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT GF P -BLW

1.000 219 38.2 574 100.0 173 32.5 532 100.0106 26.6 399 100.02.000 220 38.3 355 61.8 207 38.9 359 67.5185 45.9 293 73.43.000 114 19.9 135 23.5 123 23.1 152 28.6 89 22.3 110 27.64.000 16 2.8 21 3.7 25 4.7 29 5.5 15 3.8 21 5.35.060 5 C. 9 5 0.9 4 0.8 4 0.8 6 1.5 6 1.5

CASES PROCESSEDNO. RLANK OATH'MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SAO. SCORESMEAN - .

S7No. OEV. IN)-

STND. OEV* IN-q)MEOIAN

574321.00005.0000

1090.-0000-2506.0000

1.89_90_

0.87241.8091

532 399331.00005.0000

321.00005.0000

1076.00002608.0000

2.0226

829.00002029.0000

2.07770.90080.90171.9493

0.87660.87772.0109

QUESTION 10

SCORE INTERVALS F

(8) Business owners or managers

Cr ra.. ePCT CF P-BLW

1.0002.0003.0004.0005.000

35.915.03.30.S0.4

64.5 55.627.0 19.76.0 4.71.7 1.40.8 0.4

100.0

8.42.5-a.a

CASES PROCESSED 55.6361NO. BLANK DATA 30.0000*MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 81.6541'.SUM SQD. SCORES = 151.6964MEAN 1.4712-SIND. DEV. (N) -7=7- 0.7497

DEV. (N-1) 0.7565MEDIAN 1.2747

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 380 66.1 575 100.02.000 148 25.7 195 33.93.000 38 6.6 47 8.24.000 8 1.4 9 1.65.000 0.2 1 0.2

6i2(4a.e2L PCF P-aw-LF P-BLW F

_EinIAPCT

28.7 55.9 51.4 100.0 22.6 53.8 41.9 100.036.8 22.7 44.1 15.2 36.2 19.4 46.2

3.1 6.1 3.8 7.4 4.1 9.9 4.2 10.10.4 0.9 0.6 1.3 0.1. 0.2 0.1 0.2G.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0

51.443034.00001.00005.000071:.Wer

144.93181.53180.68620.69301.3950

41.940831.00001,00004.0000

65.6355121.79171.56500.67440.68261.4299

F PC T CF P-BLW F PICT CF P -BLW

300. 531 100.0 211 52.7 400 100.0194 36.5 231 43.5 145 36.2 189 47.231 5.8 37 7.0 43 10.7 44 11.04 0.8 6 1.1 1 0.2 1 0.22 0.4 2 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0


575311.00005.0000

531 400341.00005.0000.

311.00004.0000

SUM OF SCORES 87.0000 807.0000 634.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1467.0000 1469.0000 1194.0000MEAN 1.4383 1.5198 1.5850SiNO. DEV. 0.6948 0.6758 0.6876SIND. DEV. (N-1) 0.6954 0.6765 0.6884MEDIAN 1.2566 1.3850 1.4479

QUESTION 10 (e) Professionals (doctors,

lawyers, etc.).

Ga-a.eSCORE INTERVALS F PCT LO

I.00O 40.9 77.9 52.52.000 9.5 18.1 11.63.000 1.9 3.7 2.14.000 0.1 0.3 0.15.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0

.CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA

-=

52.479964.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 66.2905SUM S00. SCORES = 98.6771MEAN 1.2633STNo. DEV. (NI = 0.5332'STNO. OEY. (N-I1 = 0.5383MEDIAN 1.1417

1:";;BI.W PCFlibriP=111.w F PCf-"rckc' 4F P-8111

100.0 34.3 71.2 48.2 100.0 26.6 71.2 37.4 100.022.1 1-o.0--22.4 13.9 28.8 9.5 25.4 10.8 28.8-4.0 2.8 5.7 3.1 6.3 1. 1 3.0 1.3 3.40.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.4-0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0al 49.3


1.000 414 77.0 5382.000 100 18.6 1243.000 22 4.1 244.000 2 0.4 2

5.000 0 0.0

CASES PROCESSEDND. BLANK DATA

53868

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMI:V ''SLUE 4.0000SLIM of SCORES 688.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 1044.0000MEAN 1.2788gfN0-..0-EV. (NI 0.5524STNO. DEV. (N-1) 0.5529MEDIAN 1.1498

48.199368.00001.00005.0000

65.5744108.4951

1.36050.63250.63921.2020

37.404466.00001.00004.0000

W9.564I76.95371.32510.54910.55661.2019

P-BLW F --CO P-BLW F PCT

100.0 352 71.1 495 100.0 254 69.8 364 100.023.0 115 23.2 143 28.9 95 26.1 110 30.24.5 25 5.1 28 5.7 14 3.8 IS 4.10.4 2 0.4 3 0.6 I 0.3 1 0.30.0 1 0.2 I 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0

495 364701.00005.0000

671.00004.0000

670.0000 490.00001094.0000 776.0000

1.3535 1.34620.6149 0.56550.6155 0.56621.2031 1.2165

QUESTION 10

SCORE INTERVALS FGro-de

PCT CF

(f) Unemployed

P CF P131.144

PCTGliduLe

CFF PCT

1.000 2:i.7 45.6 52.0 100.0 20.0 42.5 47.1 100.0 15.2 41.1 37.02.000 19.9 38.2 28.3 54.4 19.5 41.4 27.1 57.5 16.1 43.8 21.83.000 6.2 12.0 8.4 16.1 6.3 13.5 7.6 16.0 4.5 12.2 5.74.000 2.0 3.9 2.2 4.2 1.0 2.1 1.2 2.6 1.0 2.7 1.25.000 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5 u.2

P--q3LW

100.0saw15.43.20.5-

CASES PRUCESStO 51.9763 47.1470 37.0325NO. BLANK DATA 73.0000 T9.0000 77.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM CF SCORES 90.9697 83.2713 65.9461SUM SUD. SCORES 195.3981 176.9549 141.1337MEAN 1.7502 1.7662 1.7808SIND. 0EV. IN) 0.8343 0.7961 0.8000SIND. DEV. (141) 0.8425 0.8047 0.8110MEDIAN 1.6142 1.6804 1.7049

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-3LW F PCT CF F PCT. CF

1.000 227 43.0 528 100.0 192 39.7 484 100.0 140 39.5 354 100.02.000 210 39.8 301 57.0 209 43.2 292 60.3 159 44.9 214 60.53.000 68 12.9 91 17.2 66 13.6 83 17.1 43 12.1 55 15.54.000 21 4.0 23 4.4 2.5 17 3.5 10 2.8 12 3.45.000 2 0.4 2 0.4 5 1.0 5 1.0 2 0.6 2 0.6

CASES PRCCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA

52878

484 35481 77

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 945.0000 881.0000 637.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 2065.0000 1939.0000 1373.0000MEAN 1.7898 1.8202 1.7994SIND. DEV. (N) 0.8412 0.8324 0.8004SIND. DEV. (N-."1) 0.8420 0.8333 0.8015MEDIAN )..6762 1.7392 1.7327

QUESTION 10 (g) Don't know

SCORE INTERVALS F PCTeCF P -8Lw PCTGcck.'"4. P -BLW F P-C1" F P-BLW

1.0002.0003.CGO4.0005.GOG

15.65.31.4C.11.2

65.822.56.00.55.2

23.68.12.81.41.2

100.034.211.75.75.2

12.6

1.10.51.6.-

60.6

5.12.2

20.8-8.22.51.51.0

100.0 7.4 51.0 14.5

2.21.3

100.049.0715.39.0

37.4-4-.912.1 0.97.0 0.4

-N-01- 6.9

-33;86.23.1

-6-0 0.9 6.0

CASES PRD0ESSEi) 23.6468 20.7698 14.4601NO. BLANK DATA 346.0000 265.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 37.0811 53;9316' -2577234SUM SQO. SCORES 82.2843 77.1105 63.6477MEAN 1.5681 1.6337 1.7927STNO. CEV. (N) 1.0103 I:02167 1.0698STNO. OEV. (N-1) 1.0324 1.0471 1.1296MEDIAN 1.2596 1.3251 1.4811

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCI CF P-BLW F PCI CF P-Blw

1.000 148 59.0 251 100.0123 54.7 225 100.0 83 51.2 162 100.02.000 66 26.3 103 41.0 70 31.1 102 45.3 51 31.5 79 48.83.000 18 7.2 37 14.7 14 6.2 32 14.2 12 7.4 28 17.34.000 3 1.2 19 7.6' 5 2.2 18 8.0 5 3.1 16 9.95.000 16 6.4 16 6.4 13 5.8 13 5.8 11 6.8 11 6.8


251355

162340 269

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM -OF SCORES 426.0000 390.0000 296.000DSUM SQO. SCORES 1022.0000 934.0000 750.0000MEAN 1.6972 1.7333 1.8272STND. 0EV. (N) 1.0914 1.0708 1.1363STND. DEV. (N-1) 1.0936 1.0732 1.1398MEDIAN 1.3480 1.4146 1.4759

11. What is the average absentee rate in yourwhat percentage of the class is absent on

0 0-10%

0 11-20%

21-30%

El 31-40%

0 41-50%

More than 50%

compensatory reading class? (Aboutany given day?)

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P -81WreLci e.

CF P-BLW F PCT4_CFPCT P-BLW

1.000 507 84.6 599 100.0 478 86.3 554 100.0 347 82.6 420 100.02.000 77 12.9 92 15.4 59 13.8 73 17.410.6 76 13.7 583.000 10 1.7 15 2.5 10 1.8 17 3.1 11 2.6 15 3.64.000 4 0.7 5 0.8 5 0.9 7 1.3 4 1.0 4 1.05.000 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 2 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.06.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA -

5997

55411

42011

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000 6.0000SUM (IF SCORES 712.0000 657.0000 512.0000SUM SOD. SCORES"MEAN

994.0000 945.0000 742.00001.1886 1.1859 1.2190

STNO, °EV. (NI 0.4965 0.5471 0.5297STND. DEV. IN-1, 0.4970. 0.5476 0.5303MEDIAN 1.0907 1.0795 1.1052

11. What is the average absentee rate in yourwhat percentage of the class is absent on

0-10%

11-20%

21-30%

31-40%

41-50%

More than 50%

SCORE INTERVALS F

1.000 49.7 85.92.000 7.1 12.23.000 0.7 1.24.000 0.3 0.6

0.46.000 0.0 0.0

,er 0C.2..F

57.88.11.10.4

-0.0

compensatory reading class? (Aboutany given day?)

(;ra.cie Gv-adt. 6P-80/ F PCI CF P-81-W F PCT CF P -81-W

100.0 47.1 87.8 53.7 100.0 36.4 83.9 43.4 100.014.1 5.3 9.8 6.5 12.2 5.6 12.9 7.0 16.11.9 0.8 1.5 1.3 2.3 1.1 2.5 1.4 3.20.7 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.70.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0-0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 L.0 -0.0 -0.0

-15-SES-FROZETS-EDNO. *BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE_

SUM of SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEAN-STND. DEV. IN1STND. DEV. IN-11WEITIAff

===

-57.7901-7.0000I.0000

53.666811.00001.0000

43.374511.00001.0000

5.0000'67.467390.9691

6.000c62.217085.5643

4.000052.043173.3902

-1;16750.45950.4636

1.15930.50030.5051

1.19990.50240.5082

1.0818 1.0694 1.0957

PART A 12. Which of the following would you judge to be the major causes of absenteeismamong your pupils? (Mark yes or no for each cause.)

1 2Yes No

Illness of pupil

SCORE INTERVALSG. e. D-

F PCGrade

P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLWGrade 62

F PCT CF P-BLW

1.0002.000

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOO. SCORESMEANSTNO. DEV. =STNC. DEV. IN-11 =MEDIAN - =

SCORE INTERVALS

53.93.2

F

94.5 57.1 100.05.5

57.074715;0666-L 00002.0000

49.3 93.4 52.8 100.0 39.0 91.4 42.7 100.0

52.7732

8.6 .7 6

42.717620.00001.00002.0000

18.001XF1.00002.0000

60.2444-66.57361.05550.2287-0.23071.0294

PCT CF P-BLW

56.246163.18541.0658

F

46.401253.76391.08620.2805-0.28391.0471

024770.25011.0352

PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW

1.0002.000

CASES P.kOCE SSEDNO. BLANK OA TA

==

559 94.6 591 lop.o_511 93.8 545 100.0 371 89.8 413 100.032 5.4 32 5.4 34

59115

6.2 34

545

6.2 42 10.2 42 10.2

41318

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES 623.0666 579.0000 455.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 687.0000 647.0000 539.0000MEAN 1.0541 1.0624 1.1017STND. DEV. (N) = 0.2263 0.2419 0.3022STND. OEV. ( N-1 ) = 0.2265 0.2421 0.3026MEDIAN 1.0286 1.0333 1.0566

PART 8

SCORE INTERVAL S F

1.000 8.92.000 42.4

CASES PROCESSEO -1104: -BLOW -DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM tW' SCORESSUM sflo. SCORESMEAN3This5:--br .*-1N)STND. DEV. 04-11 =MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

1. 0 002.000

F

100 18.5440 81.5

0 0 illness of other family member(s)

ro..deI CF

17.4 51.3

P-8L14

100.0-8276

de qP-BLW

100.0 10.4

p

11..0

PCT cF

22.7 48.482.6 42.4 37.4 77.3 37.4 77.3 29.1

51.3081 48.411265.000-0* 64.00001.0000 1.00002. 0000 2.0000

93..69-47 85.8310178.4613 160.6648

1.8261 1.7730-11:378-8 0.41880.3826 0.42321.8947 1.8530

pCT CF P -BLW PCT.- F

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA =

54066

41N1muM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2,9090SUM OF SCORES 980.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 1860.000014?.4N. 1.8148STNO. DEV. = 0.3884STND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.3888MEDIAN 1.8864

-irci_deFC CF

26.4 39.6 100.073.6 29.1 73.6

39.570742.0000i.00002.0000

68.7141126.9967

1.73650.44040.44611.8210

PCT CF P-BLW

540 100.0 118 23.7 498 100.0 104 26.8 388 100.0440 81.5 380 76.3 380 76.3 284 73.2 284 73.2

498 38867 431.0000 1.00002.0000 2.0000

878.0000 672.00001638.0000 1240.0000

1.7631 1.73200.4252 0.44290.4256 0.44351.8447 1.8169

PART C

SCORE INTERVALS


6-ro-cia =LF PCT -CF P-BLS! L F PCT CF P-8LW

1.000 23.6 44.7 52.9 100.0 2342 47.0 49.4 100.0 19.1 47.7 40.0 100.02.000 29.3 55.3 29.3 55-.3-26.2 53.0 26.2 53.0 20.9 5=4. 2.0.9 52.3

CASES PROCESSED = 52.9259 49.3862 39.9655NO. BLANK DATA = 50:0000 54.0000 38.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF-SCORES 82.2114 75.5463 60.8657SUM SOD. SCORES 140.7757 127.8606 102.6620MEAN 1.5533 1.5297 1.52308114T:1; DEV.' 041 = 0:4970 0.4990 0.4994STND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.5016 0.5041 0.5057MEDIAN 1.5962 .1.5559 1.5437

SCORE INTERVALSGYa. d e KrIva d 6

F PCT CF P -BLW -T PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P -BLW

1.000 238 42.9 555 100.0 240 47.2 508 100.0188 48.0 392 100.02.000 317 57.1 317' 57.1 268 52.8 268 52.8 204 52.0 204 52.0


= 555.51

508 39257 39

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000

SCORES = 872.0600 776.0000 596.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 1506.0000 1312.0000 1004.0000MEAN 1.5712 1.5276 1.5204STNO. DEV. (N) 0.4949 0.4992 0.4996STN O. DEV. IN-1) = 0.4954 0.4597 0.5002MEDIAN 1.6246 1.5522 1.5392

PART 0

SCORE INTERVALS

0 0 Need for pupil to perform other duties at home

F Pc 'P1.-°-13 '2CF P-BLW F PCT* C LT P -dLh

1.000 9.6 18.7 51.4 100.0 17.7 36.3 48.9 100.0 16.8 42.4 39.b 100.02.000 41.8 81.3 41.8 81.3 3144- 63.7 31.2 63.7 22.9 57:7 22.9 57-.6

CASES PROCESSED 51.4280 48.9021 39.6440116:-ELANK-DAM 64.a0OD 60.0000 410000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SOM-- StORES 93:25-9-4- 80.0766 62.501.9SLIM SQD. SCORES 176.9156 142.4199 108.2134MEAN 1.8134 1.6375 1.57661TNC: DEV. IN) 0.3894 0.006 0.4940STND. DEV. IN-1) 0.3933 0.4856 0.5003MEDIAN 1.8852 1.7155 1.6326

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF 13-8LW PC T CF P-BLW

1.000 103 19.0 541 100.0 176 35.1 502 100.0 157 40.4 389.100.02.000 438 81.0 438 81.0 326 64.9 326 64.9 232 59.6 232 59.6

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE-Slim OF SCORESum SQD. SCORESMEAN

STUD. 06/. (N1STND. DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN

.1.--

541651.00002.0000

979.00001855.0000

1.80960.39260.39301.8824

502 389631.00002.0000

421.00002.0000

828.00001480.0000

1.6494

621.00001085.0000

1.59640.47720.4776

0.49060.49131.6616,

PART E

SCORE INTERVALS

0 0 Suspension or expulsion

F Pc 9."' _e i-F. -P-BILbe F PCTv-o ap y

LF P-EILW evyLAp_i.

F PC CF P-BLw

1.0002.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OA TAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE

=

=

1.2 2.4 51.0 100.0 1.5 3.2 48.0 100.0 2.2 5.5 39.1 100.049.8 .97.6 .49.8-91.6 46.4

51.0488

96.8 46.4 96.8

47.9590

36.9 94.5 36.9 94.5

39.096668.0000

1.00002.0000

69.00001.00002.0000

47.00001.00002.0000

SUM OF SCORES 100.9036 94.3746 76.0300SUM SQD. SCORES 200.6069 187.2003 149 «8928MEAN 1.9766 1.9678 1.9447STND. bEV. IN) = 0.1507 0.1761 0.2284STNO. OEV. IN-1) = 0.1522 0.1780 0.2314MEDIAN = 1.9880 1.9833 1.9707

SCCP INT.:.0/41:1S-GI,-04 e- 1

F . PCT CF P-OLW F PCTGra..,i& 4 a.G-v- ae 4

CF p-eiw F PCT CF P-11LW

1.000 12 2.2 131 100.0 17 3.4 493 100.0 27 7.0 383 100.0

2.000 525 97.8 525 97.8 476 96.6 476 96.6 356 93.0 356 93.0

CASES _PROCESSED_NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE_

==

===

==

537691.00002.0000

493 383721.00002.0000

481.00002.0000.=

SUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORESMEANgiiiirTiiEv: thI---STND. DEV. IN-11MEDIAN

1062.00002112.0000

1.97770.14780.14791.9886

969.00001921.0000

1.9655

739.00001451.0000

1.92950.18250.18271.9821

0.25600.25631.9621

PART

SCORE INIERVALS-

Other (Specify)

F -PtGrade.

F pCTG"-.11. P -8 LWPCT 1E P-BLW F

1.000 4.2 19.4 21.8 100.0 3.5 19.2 18.2 100.0 3.2 24.1 13.1 100.02.000 -17.6 80.6 -11.6 80.614.7 80.8 14.7 80.8-1000 75.9 10.0 75.9

CASES PROCESSEDDATA

21.8301 18.1792 13.1464-371AMOO 358.0000 .93.0000

MINIMUM' VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES 32.8688 23.1245SUM SOD. SCORES 74.4:449 62.2475 43.0808MEAN 1.8065 1.8080 1.75501INFO-DEV. IN) 0-03-95-0 0,3938 0.4277

DEV. (N -li 0.4044 0.4051 0.4449MEDIAN 1.8800 1.8812 1.8412

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-OLW F PCT CF P -0LW

1.000 42 18.8 223 100.0 42 21.8 193 100.0 30 22.7 132 100.02.000 181 81.2 181 81.2 151 78.2 151 78.2 102 7703 102 7703

CASES PROCESSE0NO. BLANK DATA

223383

193 1.32

372 299MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES 00/ 404.0000 344.0000 234.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 766.0000 646.0000 4380000MEAN _ . .

1.8117 1.7824 1.7727STND. DEV. (N) 0.3910 0.4126 0.4191SIND. OEV. IN-1J 0.3919 0.4137 0.4207MEDIAN 1.8840 1.8609 1.8529

13. Estimate the percentage of your pupils whose familiesschool attendance area during the school year.

None

1-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-100%

Can't estimate

have moved into this

SCORE INTERVALS FGv- co.a e 2-

PCT CF P-BLWa_cie 6; leota

F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 160 26.7_ 600 100.0 169 30.3 558 100.0 134 31.9 420 100.02.000 379 63.2 44673.3 334 59.9 389 69.7 .251. 59.8 286 68.13.000 44 7.3 61 10.2 34 6.1 55 9.9 16 3.8 35 8.34.000 5 0.8 17 2.8 10 1.8 21 3.8 4 1.0 19 4.55.000 3 0.5 12 2.0 3 0.5 11 2.0 2 0.5 15 3.66.000 9 1.5 9 1.5 8 1.4 8 1.4 13 3.1 13 3.1

CASES PROCESSED = 60--NO. BLANK DATA = 0MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAZiktimVADJE = e7.06$36-SUM OF SCORES = 1085.0000SUM SAO. SCORES 2227.0000MEAN 1.8359STNO. ()EV. (N) = 0.6307STNO. DEV.. (N-11 0.6312

OTAN f;t375SAMPLE FOR STATS = 591

13. Estimate the percentage of your pupils whose families have moved into thisschool attendance area during the school year.

None

1-25%

O 26 -50X

51-75%

76-100%

O Can't estimate

SCORE INTEkVALS F' 1CF CF P-B1.41F PCra-A4. P-131-14 F PC2sr.LI-cte.

1.000 17.2 29.7-61.0

58.0 100.0 15.8 29.3 53.9 100.0 14.3 32.9 43.4 100.02.000 35.4 WO./ 71).1 33.0 .61.2 38.1 TO./ 25.7 59,3 29.1 67.13.000 3.7 6.4 5.4 9.3 3.2 5.9 5.1 9.5 1.8 4.1 3.4 7.84.000 0.4

---0;20.7 1.6 2.8 0.9 1.6 1.9 3.6 0.3 0.7 1.6 3.6

5.00 0.4 1.2 la- 0.2 0.4 1.0 1.9 0.1 0.2 1.3 2.96.000 1.0 1.7 1.0 1.7 0.8 1.5 0.8 1.5 1.2 2,7 1.2 2.7

CASES PROCESSED 51.9680NO. BLANK DATA = 6.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = ET:DOooSUM OF SCORES = 102.0128SUM SQO. SCORES = 204.8499MEAN 1.SIND. 0EV. (NI = 0.6246STND. ()EV. = 0.6302MEDIAN 1.8182SAMPLE FOR STATS = 56.9857


None

I-25%

26-50%

51-75%

O 76-100%

O Can't estimate

SCORE INTERVALS F

1.000 2192..000 3503.000 274.000_ 15.000 06.000 4

G-v-a-de. a, ,ft-sitl e 'L (;--iy-ozie. 4PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

36.4 60158.2 3824.5 320.2 50.0 40.7 4

==

6015

CAES PROCE SSE0NO . BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE = 1.0330.MAXIMUM VALUE = 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1004.0000SUM WO. SCORES = 1878.0000MEAN = 1.6817.STND. DEV. (N) = 0.5634SIND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.5639MEDIAN = 1.7271SAMPLE FOR STATS = 597

100.0 215 .38.5 559 100.0 155 36.9 420 100.063.6 313 56.0 344 61:5 241 57.4 265 63.1s5.3 22 3.9 31 5.5 11 2.6 24 5.70.8 1 0.2 9 1.6 1 0.2 13 3.10.7 0 0.0 8 1.4 0 0.0 12 2.90.7 8 1.4 8 1.4 12 2.9 12 2.9

-SCORE -INTERVALS


None

1-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-100%

Can't estimate

F -PCT rcce- 2CF P4CW F PC7taxi

P -BLN VraaeC F P-13LW

1.000-2.0003.0004.000

---5:13t0

21.8 37.5n;.-5 -57:72.3 3.90.1 0.1

58.1 100.03-673---62Y42.8 4.70.5 0.8

21.4

2.00.10.00.7

39.6

3.80.20.01.3

54.1

2.80.80.70.7

100.0.

5.21.4131.3

16.G 37.0 43.4 100.025.31.00.10.00.9

58.42.40.20.02.1

27.32.01.00.9-

0.9

63.04.6

2.12:1 3

2.16.0000.0 0.00.4 0.6

0.40.4

0760.6

==z


587:072-4

5.00001.0000

An 6-17-0141 VAL UE = 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 96.0607SUM S00. SCORES = 177.8795MEAN = 1.6649STNO. ()EV. (N) a 0.5578MD. DEV. 1N..-1/ = 0.5626MEDIAN = 1.7101SAMPLE FOR STATS = 57.6979


0 Eighth grade, or lower

El Ninth, tenth, or eleventh grade

[:3 High school graduate

0 Junior college, business school, or some other post-secondary course,but not a four year college

[:] Four year college or beyond

[:3 Other (Specify)

SCORE INTERVALS

1.000_.. _ .2.0003.0004. 000___....5.0006.000

F

2970

323115433

CPCT

5.012.055.419.77.40.5

CF

583554484161463

.4/CF P-BLW

538 100.0

F

14

PCT

3.4

CF P-BLW

406 100.0

P-BLW

100.0

F

20

PCI

3.795.083.027.6

101255110

18.847.420.4

518417162

96.377.530.1

55233

73

13.557.418.0

392337104

96.683.025.6

0.547

58.70.9

525

9.70_ . 0.9..

265

6.41.2

315

7.61.2

CASES PROCESSEDNO . BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE

=

=

58323

1.0000MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORES

SIN Do DEV. (N)SIND. DEV. N-1)ñThiTSAMPLE FOR STATS

6.00001813.00006131.0000

-3.12590.89420.8950

580


0 Eighth grade, or lower


[:] High school graduate

0 Junior college, business school, or some other post-secondary course,but not a four year college

0 Four year college or beyond

0 Other (Specify)

FGra_cle.

Pt7cryeLde

IMW-13SCORE INTERVALS C-F-F=BUW F PCT CF F P011-cie

1.000 2.5 4.5 56.4 100.0 2.4 4.6 52.0 100.0 1.8 4.3 41.9 100.02.01RT 7:-0 12.4 51.9 9-5.5- 9.8 18.8 49.6 95.4 6.0 14.3 40.2 95.73.000 31.3 55.5 46.9 83.1 25.6 49.3 39.8 76.6 23.2 55.2 34.1 81.44.000 11.2 19.9 15.6 27.7 10.1 19.3

-70314.2 27.4 8.0 19.1 11.0 26.2

5.000 4.2 -7.4 ----47;74----7.7.-8-- 3.8 4.2 8.0 2.6 6.1 3.0 7.16.000 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.7 0.4 1.0 0.4 1.0

=CASES PROCESSED 56.43 IRTNO. BLANK DATA = 23.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM WIN 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 176.2206SUM SQD. SCORES = 596.3271MEAN 3.1345STND. DEV. (N) = 0.8843

nEV. (N-li = 0.8923M E D I? tI = 3.0940SAMPLE FOR STATS = 56.2200

16. How far do you expect the average pupil in your compensatory reading classwill actually in in school?



[1] High school graduate

EiJunior college, business school or some other post -13econdary course,


0 Four year college or beyond

0 Other (Specify)

_______ 6-Y4d4L _6-1f:aig 6SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 50 8.5 586 100.0 35 6.4 547 100.0 17 4.1 413 100.02.000 159 27.1 536 91.5 177 32.4 512 93.6 136 32.9 396 95.93.000 311 53.1 377 64.3 267 48.8 335 61.2 224 54.2 260 63.04.000 50 8.5 66 11.3 44 8.0 68 12.4 26 6.3 36 8.75.000 14 2.4 16 2.7 18 3.3 24 4.4 9 2.2 10 2.46.000 2 0.3 2 0.3. 6 1.1 6 1.1 1 0.2 1 0.2


==

58420

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1571.0000SUM SW. SCORES = '4635.0000MEAN = 2.6901STND. OEV4. INI = 0.8368'STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.8375MEDIAN = 2.7669SAMPLE FOR STATS = 584

16. How far do you expect the average pupil in your compensatory reading classwill actually g in school?




Juniorcollege, business school



C:] Other (Specify)

or some other post-secondary course,

E -maw_ s P- ANCTrade a- (25-ro.sle rcA_A e_

CF P=ITOT- F PCT F F PCT F P-BLW

1,0002-ao0

4.6.A.5.1

8.226.7

56.9 100.0 3.8-917816.5-

7.1 53.0 100.0 2.1 4.9 42.3 100.031.1 49.2. 92,9' 13.8 32.1 40.2 95.1

3.000 30.7 54.0 37.0 65.2 26.9, 50.7 32.7 61.8 22.9 54.0 26.4 62,54.000 5.0 8.7 6.3 11.2 3.8 7.2 5.9 11.0 2.7 6.4 3.6 8.43.000 1.3' 2.3 1 74 2.5 1.6 3.0 2.1 3.9 0.8 1.9 0.1 2.16.000 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 '0.5 0.9 0.4 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2

ra-E-S--PAOCE S-EO. -56.8526NO BLANK OATA = 19.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000WiafgUm VALUE = 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 153.4477SUM SAO. SCORES 453.6777

-2:70311WEAlf---SING. OEV. IN) 0.8278STNO. OEV. 1N-1) = 0.8352WEOIAN 2.7794SAMPLE FOR STATS = 56.7683

QUESTION 16.1II. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

The following questions refer to your compensatory reading instruction (see definitionon page 1). If you are a classroom teacher, and all of the pupils in your class receivecompensatory reading instruction, answer the questions in terms of the total class. Ifonly some of the pupils receive compensatory reading instruction, answer the questionsin terms of those pupils only, and in terms of that part of the instructional programthat is directed to them.

If you are a reading teacher or specialist teaCher, answer the questions with referenceto the class to which your instruction applies. If you teach more than one class (asclass is defined on page 1), answer the questions with reference to the one class perprogram that meets earliest in the week. Be sure to include all meetings of that class.If you teach in MORE THAN ONE PROGRAM, fill out separate questionnaires for one Class ineach program.

If you do teach more than one class, check this box.

a 6-v-ei / CA.Acc.SCORE INTERVALS F PCI a P-81-14 F PCT CF- P--61-14 F PC

0.01;000-

CASES PROCESSED =

MINIMUM VALUtMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =SUA 140. SCORES =MEANSTNO. ()EV. (N) __

G. DEV.MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

49.9 85.2 58.5 100.0 43.3 79.1 54.7 100.0 31.48;1 11.7 14-01 11.4 20.9 11.4 20.9 13.4

58.5473-0.0-1.00008.69418.64410.14850.3556U:33670.0872

F PCT CF

511 84.3_1.000 95 15.7 95 15.7 110 19.5

54.74350.01.0000

11:443711.44370.20900.4066

70.229.8

0.41040.1321

P-BLW F PCI CE P-BLW F' PCT

606 100'0'455 8C.5

CASES pROCESSED______MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSING. OEV. IN) =

MEDIAN

6060.01.0000

95.000045:0666-0.15680.3636'0.36390.0930

5650.01.0000

110.0000110.00000.19470.39600.39630.1209

565 100.0 317 73.5110 19.5 114 26.5

CF -111-W

44.8 100.013.4 29.8

44.80920.01.0000

13.375213.31520.29850.45760.46280.2127

4310.01.0000

114.0000114.00000.26450.44110.44160.1798

CF P-BLW

431 100.0114 26.5

QUESTION 16.2 If you teach in more than one program, check this box. 0

SCi3RE INTERVALae &o-e6.

PCT P 8LN F PCfrV-64-de- P -BLW F PCT CF PfiLW

0.0 53.5 91.5 58.5 100.0 50.6 92.4 54.7 100.0 40.2 89.7 44.8 100.05.0 8.5 5.0 -8.5 4.2 7.6 4.2 7.6 4.6 10.3 4.6 10.3

CASES PROCESSED - 58.5473 54.7435 44.8042WINTRUM- %WOW-- 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1. 0000 1. 0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORE S 5.0040 4.1780 4.5582SU OD. RE = 4.1780 4.5982MEAN 0.0855 0.0763 0.1026STNO. UV. (N) = 0.2796 0.2655 0.30351-Tria7TTEV. TN=11 072-870- 0.2680 0.3069MEDIAN 0.0467 0.0413 0.0572

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF F PC P -BLW F PCT CF P -BLW

0.0 554 91.4 606 100.0_ 522 92.4 565 100.0 386 89.6 431 100.01.000 52 8.6 52 8.6 43 7.6 43 7.6 45 10.4 45 10.4

CASES_ PROCESSED __=.MINIMUM VALUE =

clo60.0

565 4310.0 0.0

MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCOR E S = 43.0000 45.0000SUM SW. SCORES = 52:06-66 43.0000 45.0000MEAN 0.0858 0.0761 0.1044syNo._ DEV._ (y) = 0.2801 0.2652 0.3058SIND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.2803 0.2654 0.3061MEDIAN 0.0469 0.0412 0. 0583

17. When is compensatory reading instruction carried out? (Check all that apply.)

SCORE INTERVAL S.

During regular school hours in time scheduled for regular readinginstruction

G a-F PCI

ra-de tr 15=B1. P-B PCT CF P 8 IN

0.0 3.3 5.6 58.5 100.0 4.0 7.3 54.7 100.0 5.7 12.8 44.S 100.01.000) -33.3 537.3- 94;4 50.8 92.7 50.8 92.7 39.1 87.2 39.1 87.2

CASES PROCESSED 58.5473 54.7435 440 8042MINIMUM- VALUE = 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 55.2546 50.7739 39,0E94SUM SQD. SCORES 55.2.546 543.7739 39.0694MEAN 0.9438 0.9275 0.6719STND. DEV. = 0.2304 0.2593 0.3342WNTS-n-ftTil.:-C4=11- 6 0.3380MEDIAN 0.9702 0.9609 0,9265

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

32 5.3 6136 100.0 41. 7.3 565 100.0 41 9.5 431: 100.01.000 574 94.7 5'74 94.7 524 92.7 524 92.7 390 90.5 390 90.5

CASES PROCESSED = 606 _ 565 431MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE

0.01.0000.

0.01.0000

0.01.0000

SUM OF SCORES 574.0000 524.0000 390.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 574.0000 524.0000 390.0000MEAN 0.9472 0.9274 0.9049STND. DEV. (NI

-=

0.2236 0.2594 0.29340.2238 0.2597 0.2937

MEDIAN 0.9721 0,9609 0.9474

t -a LITS-flbii 17During regular school hours in time released from other class work

--WIRE INTER VAC S. F

0.0 39.21.000 19.4

PC -s17-chcl"C.F--P."-IfL14

66.9 58.5 100.0

v.cL" t--F--.1-)C PC4:7"-a-de. ''F P-.BLW

72.1 44.8 100.0

F P-8114 F

38.9 71.1 54.7 100.0 32.333.1 19.4 33.1 5 8.9 12.5 27,9,

CASES PROCESSED = 58.5473-0.-0-

54.7435 44.8092141NIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES-SUM-S00. -SCORE

= 19.3786 15.8158 12.4674S 193786 15.8158 12.4874

MEAN = 0,3310 0.2889 0.2787STND. DEV. IN/ = 0.4706 0.4533 0.4483STND. DEW-W-11 = 0.4146 0.4575 0,4534MEDIAN = 0.2473 0.2031 0.1932

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF 0-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -8LW

0.01.000

CASES PROCESSED

,

Wil._i!,T 606 106.0 409 72.4 565 100.0 322 74.7 431 100.0198 32.7 198 32,7

606._

156 27.6 156 27.6 109

565

25.3 109' 25.3

431MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 0,0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 198.0000 156.0000 109.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 198.0000 156.0000 109.0000MEAN MP 0.3267 0.2761 0.2529STND. EV. IN) 0.4690 0.4471 0.4347STND. DEV. IN-I/ = 0.4694 0.4475 0.4352MEOIAN = 0.2426 0.1907 0.1693

QUESTIUN 17 Before or after school or on weekends

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000


VALUE ..MAXIMUMSUM OF SCORES

--i-SUM SOO. SCORESMEANSIND. DEV. IN)UNI5. -15-0/.-IFI-=11MEOIAN =

SCORE IN- TERVAL S

0.01.000

F

54.64;0

F

56442

PCf"4-de. CF

93.2 58.5-6:8 4.0

58.5473-0.'0'

L.ro-d e q G-Ini_cie. 4

P-8-Lw . F

100.0 52.5

PC LF P-BLW

96.0 54.7 100.0

F

43.4

OCT CF P-8LW

96.8 44.8 1.00.06.8 -2--.-2 4.0 2.2

54.7435

4.0 1.4 3.2 1.4 3.2

44.80520.01.06601.4418

1.00003.96983.96 ,180,06780.25140.25360.0364

OCT CF

93.1 606

0.01.06002.21672.21610.04050.1971

1.44180 .03220.1765

P-BLW F

100.0 544

0.19890.0211

PCT CF

96.3 565

P-BLW

100.0

F

417

0.17850.0166

OCT CF P-BLW

96.8 431.100.06.9 42 6.9 21 3.7 21 3.7 14 3.2 14 3.2

CASES PROCESSED = 606 565 431MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 42.0000 21.0000 14.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 42.0000 21.0000 14.0000MEAN 0.0693 0.0372 0.0325SIND._ oEy. (N). 7.

sf40.15-Eir. -(N-1) -0.2540 0.1892 0.1.773-6;144T-- 0.1.893 0.1775

MEDIAN = 0.0372 0.0193 0.0168

QUESTION 17

SCORE INTERVALS

During the summer

G-v-a.de C-;VO,s4F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT P-BLW F

G-ro-cte 6PCT F F-aLw

0.0 52.3 89.3 58.5 100.0 50.2 91.7 54.7 100.0 40.3 89.9 44.8 100.01.000 6.3 10.7 6-a---10.7 4.6 8.3 4.6 8.3 4.5 10.1 4.5 10.1

CASES PROCESSED"VALUE

58.5473 54.7435 44.8092MINIMUM 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUN OF SCORES-SUM

6.2888 4.5701 4.5438-SW. SCORE S 6.2188 4.5701 4.5438

MEAN 0.1074 0.0835 0.1014STNO. OEV. 0.3096 0.2766 0.3019

MEDIAN 1).06020.27920.0455

0.30`30.0564

SCORE INTERVALS F

0.0 5391.000 67

PCT

88.911.1

CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW F

606 100.0 521 92.2 565 100.0 391

PCT CF P -BLW

90.7 431 I00.067 11.1 44 7.8 44 7.8 40 9.3 40 9.3

CASES PROLE SSED = 606 565 431MINIMUM VALUE =- 0.0 0.0 0.0MA XIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES

=--

1.0000 1.000044.0000

1.000040.0000

sum SOD. SCORES 67.0000 44.0000 40.0000ME AN 0.1106 0.0779 0.0928SIND DFV = 9?!.?(? 0.2680 0.2902STNO. 0EV. N-1 = 0.3138 0.2682 0.2905MEDIAN 0.0622 0.0422 0.0512

QUESTION 17 Other (Specify)

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

CASES PROCESSED =MINIMTJM VALUE -MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =-§014-sTat: stbitES"MEAN =STNO. OEV. DO =STNO. tiEV. 1-61.1 FMEDIAN =

SCORE INTERVALS

.

56.91.6

F

Pc v-cLd e 0

97.2 58.52.8 -.". 1;6

58.54730.01.00001.6412

-1764120.02800.16510.1600.0144

PCT CF

"cle i;- rst...a.to 4,P-FEIT

100.0

F PCT P-BLW

53.5 97.7 54.7 100.0F PCT CI:- P-8LW

43.9 98.0 44.8 100.02.8 1.3 2.3 1.3 2.3

54.7435

0.9 2.0 .0.9 2.0

44.80520.01.00001.2525

0.01.00000.8931

1.25250.02290.1495

0.89310.01990.1398

P-BLW---

0.1509.0.0117

Ptr----- .-.CF P-8LW F PCT

0.14130.0102

CF F-0--eLw

0.0 59297.7. 606 100.0 551 97.5 565 100.0 425 98.6 431 100.01.000 14 2.3 14 2.3 14 2,5 14 2.5 6 1.4 6 1.4

CASES PROCESSED =...._,...MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =-SUr4 SQO. SCORES =MEAN =STND. OEV (N) =

-fFid. EitTciN-11- i---MEDIAN =

606 565 431_._ _____ _0.0... -1.0000

14.0000

0.01.0000

14.0000

0.01.00006.0000

14.00000.02310.1502

14.00000.02480.1555

6.00000.01390.1172

0.15040.0118

0.15560.0127

0.11730.0071

18. If compensatory reading instruction is carried on in time released from otherclass work, which of the fol.:lowing subject matter areas receive correspondinglyreduced time? (Mark all that apply.) .

Social Studies

SCORE thIRVALS

0.01.000

F

47.111.4

PCT

80.5 58.519.5 11.4

Gco-ce.PCT CF P-BLW F PC7G"r"8. GF P-BLW

84.6 54.7 100.0.38.3 8!..4 44.8 100.0

CF P-BLWCF

100.019.5

F

46.3-a.5 15.4 8.5 15.4, 6. 146 6.5 14.6

CASES PROCESSE0 58.5473 54.7435 44.8092VALuE- 0.0 0.0 0.0

MAXIMUA VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 11.4157 8.4510 6.5342SURSOD, SCORES 11";4157 8.4510 6.5342MEAN 0.1950 0.1544 0.1458STND. DEV. IN) 0.3962 0.3613 0.3529SYNC. DEV. (N-11 0.3996 0.3647 0.3569MEDIAN 0.1211 0.0913 0.0854

SCORE IN F PCT CF P-BLW F KT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLW

0.01.000

cog5,PROCOSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUEjitpi_CFswtEsSUM SQD. SCORES rm

MEAN_sINPt_DEY. 4N) -SINO. DEV. IN-11 =MEDIAN

502104 17.2

82.8_ 606 100.0 489104 17.2 76

.606_0.01.0000

104.0000104.00000.17160.37700.37740.1036

86.5 56513.5 76

5650.01.0000

76.0000

100.0373 86.513.5 58 13.5

431

1.000058.0000

431 100.058 13.5

76.00000.13450.34120.34150.0777

58.00000.13460.34130.34170.0777

QU

ES

T IO

N 1

8S

cien

ce

SC

OR

E IN

TE

RV

AL

SG

-fro

-Ae

e,F

-PC

T-

CF

P-I

SLW

FP

CI

CF

P-a

LwF

Per

-C

F

0.0

49.3

84.2

58.5

.100

0047

.887

0354

.710

0.0

39.0

87.1

4408

1.00

09:

215

.89:

215

.87.

012

.77O

D12

.75.

812

.95.

8

CA

SE

S P

RO

CE

SS

ED

-58

.547

354

.743

544

0809

2M

IN IM

UM

VA

LUE

=O

Z.

0.0

0.0

MA

XIM

UM

VA

LUE

=1.

0000

1.00

001:

0000

SU

M O

F S

CO

RE

S-

9.23

0260

9770

5,77

96S

UM

SO

N s

caM

s=

9023

026.

9770

5.77

96M

EA

N0.

1577

0.12

7400

1290

MO

. °E

V. I

N)

SIN

D. t

V. (

N-t

i=

0.36

44G

.:367

6-0.

3335

0,33

520.

3366

0033

90M

ED

IAN

0.09

360:

0730

0.07

40

SC

OR

E IN

TE

RV

ALS

FP

C T

TC

FP

C T

CF

0.0

519

85.6

606

100.

049

988

.356

510

0.0

380

88.2

431

10

1.00

087

14.4

8714

.466

11.7

6611

.751

11.8

51

CA

SE

S P

RO

CE

SS

ED

=60

656

543

1M

INIM

UM

VA

LU

E--

0.0

000

0.0

MA

XIM

UM

VA

LUE

=1.

0000

1.00

001.

.000

0su

m O

F S

CO

RE

S=

87.0

000

66.0

000

51.0

000

SU

M S

QO

. SC

OR

ES

87.0

000

66.0

000

51.0

000

ME

AN

0014

360.

1168

0011

83S

IND

. DE

V0

IN)

=00

3506

0.32

120.

3230

0.35

090,

3215

0.32

34M

E0

IAN

0.08

380.

0661

0.06

71

GULSTICN 18

StOkE INTERVALS F PC

Mathematics

F PC9r°CF P-8LW6

F PCT CF P -8LW

0. 0 55.1 94.1 58.5 100.0 51.8 94.7 54.7 100.0 41.4 92.3 44.8 100.01.000 3.4 5.9 3.4 5.9- 2.9 5.3 2.9 5.3 737e7---7.77------3:4 7.7

CASES PROCESSED 58.5473 54.7435 44.8052M1NTRUM VALUE 0:0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 3.4444 2.9165 3.4355SUM IQD. SCORES 3.4444 2.9165 3.4355MEAN 0.0588 0.0533 0.0167STND. 0EV. (N) 0.2353 0.2246 D.2661SYNU. DEV, (N-4) 0:2371 0.2267 0.2691MEDIAN 0.0313 0.0281 0.0415

SCORE INTERVALS F PC.T CF 13-8LW F --OCT CF P-8LW F PCT C1.'115451

0.0 578 95.4 606 100.0 536 94.9 565 100.0 401 93.0 431 100.01.000 28 4.6 28 4.6 29 5.1 29 5.1 30 7.0 30 7.0

CASES PROCESSED 606. 565 431MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

OF SCORES 28.0000 29.0000 30.0000_SUMSUM sop. SCORES 28.0000 29.0000 30.0000MEAN 0.0462 0.0513 0.0696

OEV. (N) 0.2099 0.2207 0.2545STND. DEV. (N-1) 0.2101 0.2209 0.2548MEDIAN 0.0242 0.027/ 0.0374

QUkSTION 18

SCORE INTERVALS F PC

Foreign Language

0.0 56.8 97.0 58.5 100.053.31.000 1.7 3.0 1 ;7-----37-.0 T.

CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESS UM SOD.; S- 2:-

ME ANSIND. °EV. IN)

MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (N) =SIND. =MEDIAN

58.5473-6;0--1.00001.7464

0.02980.17010.17160.0154

F PCT

14 2.3

CF

PC

97.4 54.72.6 1.4

606 100.0 54814 2.3 17

6060.01.0000

14.000014;0000--D.02310.15020.15040.0118

54.74350.01.00001.42911.4.2910.02610.15940.16090.0134

it

97.03.0

5650.01.0000

17.000017.00000.03010.17080.17100.0155

P3D1Ger, et&.

PCT CF P -BLW

100.043.6 97.3 44.8 100.02. 1.2 2.7

CF 1;i3Li F

565 100.041517 3.6 16

44.80920.01.00001.22581.22580.02740.16310.16500.0141

PC T

96.33.7

4310.01.0000

16.000016.00000.03710.18910.18930.0193

CF P0LW

431 100.016. 3.7

QUEST ION 18 Language Arts

SCORE INTERVAL S,":".e G v-c: a el

i.F-7C4-7.2(*("t' i'F 'P- MI F Pc CF P-TEF F PCT P-3 LW

0.0 52.3 89.4 58.5 100.0 48.1 87.8 54.7 100.0 39.2 67.4 44.8 100.01. COD -----6,-2-- 10.6 6;2 ro-.-6 6.7 1.2.2 6.7 12.2 5.7 12.6 5.7 12.6

CASES PROCESSED = 58.5473 54.7435 44.809231:11TiMUM Writ- -WO- 0.0 0.0I4A X1MUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 6.2139 6.6916 5.6580SUM SQO. SCORES = -6:21.59 6.6916 5.6580MEAN = 0.1061 0.1222 0.1263STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.3080 0.3276 0.3322

-STN 15..0EV., (Ii-Ii = U. 3 107 0.3306 0.3359ME 0 IAN = 0.0594 0.0696 0,0723

SCORE INTERVAL S F PCT CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

0.0 541 89.3 606 100.0 499 88.3 565 100.0 382 88.6 431 100.01.000 65 10.7 65 10.7 66 11.7 66 11.7 49 11.4 49 11.4

CASES PROCESSED 606 565 431.MINIMUM VALUE = 0,0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1 . 0 0 0 0 1.0000 1.0000SUM _p;7 SCORE S = 65,0000 66.0000 49.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 65.0000 66.0000 49.0000MEAN = 0.1073 0.1168 0.1137STNO. DEV. (NI ... 0.3094 0.3212 0.3174STNO. DEV. (N11 = 0.3097 0.3215 0.3178MEOIAN = 0.0601 0.0661 0.0641

GUESI ION la Physical Education

SCORE IN faVAL S

0.0

CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUE-- =MAXIMUM VALUE -SUM OF SC_ ORE S -SUM SQO. sCiiiitt***-=*-MEANSTNO. DEV. NJ =

MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

53.94.6

F

55650

6-y-o_ap 4. 17r-V-ri-ag.P

92.1 58.57+9 4

58.5473

P w

100.0 52.9

PCT F P -BLW F

96.7 54.7 100.0 43.6

PCT CF P-BLis

97.4 4 4.8 100.01.8 3.3 1.8

54.7435

3.3 1.2 2.6 1.2 2.%

44.8092

1.00004.6130

0.01.00001.7966

0.01.0 0001.218t3

4.61300.07880.2694

1.79660.0328D.1782

1.18630.02650.1605

O. 27170.0428 0.0170

0. 16240.0136

PC T CF P-BLW

91.7 606 100.0

F

546

PCT CF

96.6 565

P-BLW F

100.0.421

PC T CF P -BLW

97.7 431 100.08.3 50 8.3 19 3.4 19 3.4 10 2.3 10 2.3

CASES PROCESSED = 606 565 431MINIMUM VALUE =- 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 50.0000 19.0000 10.0000

SCORESr 50.0000 19.0000 10.0000MEAN 0.0825 0.0336 0.0232STUD. op/. IN) 0.2751 0.1803 0.1505STND. DEN/. IN -I3 = 0.2754 0.1804 0.1507MEDIAN 0.0450 0.0174 0.0119

QUESTION 18

SCORE INTERVALS F

Art

-de C. r--rcLA P 4_x.-0PC T- P-BLW -**---T. Ft -.C12--"igt-F"-- B L W F PCT CF P-BLW

0.0 52..0 9C.5 58.5 100.0 5C.4 92.0 54.7 100.0 42.8 55.5 44.8 100.01.000 5.5 9.5 5.5 9.5 4.4 8.0 4.4 8.0 2.0 4,5 2.0 4.5

CASES PROCESSED 543.54E; 54.7435 44.8092MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 5.5474 4.3826 2,0260SUM SOD. SCORES = 5.5478 4.3826 2.0260MEAN = 0.0948 0.0801 0.0452STAID. OEV. (N)'1410-. OE V. 1N-1)

= 0.2929 0.2714 3.20780.2954 0.2739 0.2101

MEDIAN = 0.0523 0.0435 0,0237

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-BLW. F PCT CF P-BLW

0. 0_._ 545 89.9 606 100.0 517 91.5 565 100.0 412 95.6 431 100.0_1.000 61 10.1 61 10.1 48 8.5 48 8.5 19 4.4 19 4.4

PASESPROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUE -MAXIMUM VALUE In

SUM _OF SCORES -Wor SQO. SCORE s =MEAN =.SIND._0E.V.. iN) ?-

STND. 0EV. (N1) =MEDIAN =

606.6-.ti-1.0000

61.0000

565 4310.01.0000

48.0000

0.01.0000

19.000061.00000.10070.3009..._... .._0.30110.0560

48.00000.08500.2788

19.00000.04410.2053

0.27910.0464

0.20550.0231

QUESTION 18 Music

-Sala-- -1-WManii S

0.0

F PC 16- Ica-"cl-ear-

54.6 93.3 58.53. 9 6.7 3e9

42'- PCGT rElk-<:1'*CF P-BLi

94.6 44.8 100.0

P--81W F

100.0 51.2

PCP-v-fl-ciP-BLW F

93.6 54.7 100.0 42.440500 6T7 3.5 6.4 3.5 6.4 2.4 5.4 204 5.4

CASES PROCESSED = 58.5473 54.7435 44.8052MINIMUM VALUE Oe 0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORE S = 3.9491 304953 2.3588SUM S40. SCORES = 3.9491 304953 2.3988MEAN = 0.0675 000638 0.0535STNO. 0011. INS = 0.2508 0.2445 0.2251SIND. DEV. OTFr) = 0.250 0.2467 0.2277MEDIAN = 0.0362 0.0341 0.0283

SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW

0.0-1Toob

CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES

-SUM StiO.---SCO.RES

MEAN =STND. DEV. IN)STNT. DEV. IN-11 =

7____.

MEDIAN =

==..-.-

560 92.4_ _... ..46 7.6

606 100.0 52746 7.6 38

6060.01.0000

46.000046.00000.07590.26490.26510.0411

93.36.7

5650.01.0000

38.000038.00000.06730.25050.25070.0361

565 I00.04C 838 6.7 23

94.75.3

4310.01.0000

23.0000

431.100.023 5.3

23.00000.05340.22480.22500.0282

CLiiST1 LN 18

SCORE 1Wiett VA I -S F

Seat work, study time, etc..

P-C-1.411.-ci e. ir P- aLw F F P LWI 6

F PC CF P-BLW

0 . 0 40.1 68.5 58.5 100.0 40.8 74.6 54.7 100.0 35.3 7.8 44.8 100.0.1 .. 0-00 18.4 31.5 18.4 31.5 13.9 25.4 13.9 25.4 9.5 21.2 9.5 21.2

.CASES PROCESSED =ffIN I MA --VAt VIEMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =-

11.071 S0T).-S-C-0-Ft E S'- --z--MEAN =STND. DE V. IN/ =

-STN-D-.- 'KV -.- ( N..- 1 V. 4-4-

MEDIAN =

58.5473 54.7435 44.80520.01.0000

18.4229

0.01.0000

13.9251

0.01.00009.4 979

18;42790.31470.4644

13.92510.25440.4355

9.45790.21200.4087

074-68-4-

0.22950.43950.1706

0.41330.1345

SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-8LW F PC T CF P-BLW

0.01.000

427179

70.529.5

606179

100.0432 76.5 565 100.0 353 81.9 431 100.029.5133 23.5 133 23.5 78 18.1 78 18.1


==

606 __0. 0

565 4310.0 0.0

MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES as 179.0000 133.0000 78.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 4--

_179.0000 133.0000 78.0000

MEAN = 0.2954 0.2354 0.1810DEV. (N O = 0.4562 0.4242 0.3850_STK!.

SIND. 0E11. IN-13 = 0.4566 0.4246 0.3854MEDIAN = 0.2096 0.1539 0.1105

QUEST 1 U111 10.. 0 Other (Specify)

SCORE IN TEit VAL S,rdF

11r-=13W F4-yr, A

PCT CF p-01-14F PC Fpc42rvo-ciPift

0.0 57.2 97.6 58.5 100.0 52.3--1;4; -2.4

95.5 54.7 100.0 42.2 94.1 44.8 100.01.000 X04 2.4 4.5 2.4 T;5- 2 5.9 2.6 5.9

CASES PROCESSED-VAL

58.5473 5407435 44.8042MIN IMUM UE 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0400 1.0000 1.0000-SUM OF SCORES-SUM"

1.3973 2.4458-704458

2.6443S40; SCORE S 2.64431.3' 13

MEAN 0.0239 0.0447 000590STNO. DE V (N) 0.1526 0.2066 0.2357STFIN-T)E-V. N-1) 0,134'0 -0.2085 0.2383MEDIAN 0.0122 0.0234 0.0314

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F PC*1 CF 1:31-W F PCT CF P-BLW

0.9. 588 9 Z. 0 606 100.0 541 95.8 565 100.0 410 95.1 431 100.01.000 18 3.0 Id 3.0 24 4.2 24 4.2 21 4.9 21 4.9

CASES PROCESSED

21

6060.01.0000

18.000018.00000.02970.1698

0.0153

565 431MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES

0.01.0000

24.0000

0.01.0000

21.0000SUM S40 . SCORE SMEANsTNp. oEy.sTNP:PEv. f N-1)MEDIAN

24.00000.04250.2017

21.00000.04870.2153

0.20190.0222

0.21550.0256

19. What is the average amount of formal instruction time per student incompensatory reading?


aUESTION -19A.

1-15 41-50

16-30 51-60

31-40 61-75

I:3 76-90

0 91 or more---..---__ ----,-

-PCT CF-SCORE' iNTER VACS F PCT CF P-8LM F PLT cF -aLw

1.000 15.2 26.2 58.1 100.015.4 25.0 53.2 100.011.4 26.2 43.5 100.02.000 22.7 39.2 42-.8 T3,814.7 27.7 37.7 71.0 9.1 22.4 32.1 73.83.000 7.8 13.5 20.1 34.6 6.5 12.3 23.0 43.3 6.9 15.9 22.3 51.44.000 4.2 7.2 12.3 21.1 7.4 13.8 16.5 31.0 9.1 20.9 15.4 35.575.CO 3-.3 -5.8 -13.1---m9 6,7 10.7 9.1 17.2 3.8 8.8 6.4 14.66.000 1.1 1.9 4.7 8.1 1.3. 2.5 3.4 6.4 1.5 3.5 2.5 5.97.000 2.4 4.1 3.6 6.2 1.5 2.9 2.1 3,9 0.8 1.9 1.0 2.4870-00- 1.2 2,-1 -1.2 2.1 0.5 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5

CASES PROCESSED = 58.0557 53.1536 43.4628NO. BLANK -DATA = 14.0000 10.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUEsum-u-sc-aR-a---

8.0000-----f50.8977

8.0000 8.0000145.5769 123.4746

SUM SQO. SCORES 563.0110 551.8335 461.2559MEAN 2.5992 2.7388 2,8408STN t5. UEV;-11111 = 1.71b2 1,6973SIND. OEV. IN-1) = 1.7302 1.7135 1.6131MEDIAN 2.1068 2.2580 2.5869

19. What is the average amount of formal instruction time per student incompensatory reading?


ri

QUESTION 19A

1-15 41-50

16-30 51-60

31-40 61-75

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

5.0006.0007.0008.000

0 76-90

0 91 or more

F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF PBLW F PCT CF P -BLW

157 26.1 601 100.0 151 27.4 551 100.0 111 26.4 421-100.0226 37.6 444 73.9150 27.2 400 72.6 83 19.7 310 73.687 14.5 218 36.3 70 12.7 250 45.4 68 16.2 227 53.945__ _7.5 131 21.8 78 14.2 180 32.7 90 21.4 159 37.834 5.7 86 14.3 63 11.4 102 18.5 41 9.7 69 16.412 2.0 52 8.7 16 2.9 39 7.1 16 3.8 28 6.7

_25 _4.2 40 6.7 16 2.9 23 4.2 10 2.4 12 2.915 2.5 15 2.5 7 1.3 7 :1.3 2 0.5 2 0.5

CASES PROCESSED_NO. BLANK OATA =

601 551 4215 14 10

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 8.0000 8.0000 8.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1587.0000 1552.0000 12284,0000SUM S00. SCORES - 6031.0000 6012.0000 4714.0000MEAN = 2.6406 2.8167 2.9169STNO. OEV. (N) = 1.7499 1.7255 1.6398

OEV. (N+1) 1.7514 1.7270 1.6418MEOIAN 241350 2.3300 2.7426

b. Number of instruction periods per week:

O One

O Two or three

0 Four or five

O More than five

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.000

F

0.2

1CT

0.4 57.8 100.0

F---PCT---

0.5 1.0

CF P-BLW

53.5 100.0

F

0.3

PCT

0.8

CF P -8U

43.4 100.05ra-99 6 6.5 12.2 52.9 99.0 7.1 16.5 43.1 99.2

3.000 35.7 61.8 54.4 94.1 40.2 75.3 46.4 86.8 33.7 77.6 35.9 82.84.000 18.7 32.4 18.7 32.3 6.1 11.5 6.1 11.5 2.2 5.1 2.2 5.1

CASES PROCESSED = 57.8204 53.4536 43.4241NO BLANK DATA = 7.000C 11.0000 10.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 188.5746 158.9034 124.7055

633.7622 487.1518 368.1140MEAN 3.2614 2.9727 2.8719STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.5694 0.5258 0.4789STNO. DEV. (N-1) = 0.5744 0.4846MEDIAN 3.2143 2.9885 2.9223

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF -PBLW

1.000 2 0.3 599 100.0 6 1.1 554 100.0 3 0.7 421 100.02.000 33 5.5 591 99.7 65 11.7 548 98.9 1 16.9 418 99.33.000 377 62.9 564 94.2 424 76.5 483 87.2 320 76.0 347 82.44.000 187 31.2 187 31.2 59 10.6 59 10.6 27 6.4 27 6.4


5997

55411

42110

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1947.0000 1644.0000 1213.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 6519.0000 5026.0000 3599.0000MEAN 3.2504 2.9675 2.8812SIND. DEV. (N) = 0.5638 0.5158 0.4972STNO. DEV. (N-1) 0.5643 0.5163 0.4978MEDIAN 3.2016 2.9858 2.9266

20. Do most pupils receive compensatoryday every instructional day?

1 Yes

2 0 No

QUEST ION 20

SCORE INTERVALS

reading instruction at the sane time of

Grade, IF PCT

GrackC-F F

1.000 50.4 86.7 58.1 100.0

CASES PROCESSED131:WIir

= 58.0634OUGO

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 2.0000

65;7-6-71-

Sum SQO. SCORES = 81.1672MEAN 1.1327

DEV. I N) 33-9-0-STND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.3420MEDIAN 1.0764_.QUESTION 20

48.1--13.3 5.5

SCORE INTERVALS F

1.000 5202.000 81

PCT CF P-BLW F

601 100.0 493.8.6.5

13.5 81 13.5 63

CASES PROCESSED = 601NO. BL Am( OA TA = 5MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VAL UE a 2.0000SUM OF SCORES -- 682.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 844.0000MEAN 1.1348STND. DEV. (N) = 0.3415STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.3418MEDIAN 1.0779

PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF

89.8 53.6 100.0 37.0 84.9 43.5 100.010.2 5.5 10.2 6.6 L54 6.6 15.1

53.58759.00001.00002.0000

59.061570.00281.10210.30260.30551.0568

43.54719.00(.01.00002.0.000

50.131963.29971.15120.35810.3E231.0850

PCT

88.711.3

55691.00002.0000

619.0000745.0000

1.11330.31700.31731.0639

CF P-BLW

556 100.063 11;e3

F PCT

352 83.470 16.6

42291.00002.0000

492.0000632.0000

1.16590.37200.37241.0994

CF P-BLW

422 100.070 16.6

a. If yes, when is the instructional period?

Before school

Morning (Before lunch)

Afternoon (After lunch)

O After school

Gradell, Gtotte.4 Gmxteig.-SURI Di-ravArS"- *F PCI CF 1)=78rn CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLIN

1.000 0.1 0.3 48.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 46.6 100.0 0.0--roo.o

0.0 35.5 100.02:boo 42.2 88.0 4708 99.7 39.7- 85.5- 46.6 26.4 74.4 35.5 100.03.000 5.6 11.7 506 11.7 6.5 14.0 6.8 14.7 9.0 25.2 9.1 25.64.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4


47.9811210.0000

46.566386.0000

35.51088.0000

MI NINUM-VATUE 1:U000-- -2:710oo 2.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 101.4556

-II9--;61.5n100.2748 80.2890

SCGRES 222.5607 188.6843MEAN 2.1145 2.1534 2.2-610STND. DEV. IN/ = 0.3269 0.3774 0.44E8STNO. OEV. (NIf = 6:3303 0.3815 0.4552ME0 IAN 2.06.S0 2.0860 2.1725

PCT CF 0BLW- FSCORE INTERVALS F PCI CF PBLW F PCT CF P -BLW

1.000 1 0.2 492 100.0 1 0.2 478 100.0 0 0.0 341 100.02.000 431 87.6 491 99.8 405 84.7 477 99.8 261 76.5 341 100.03.000 60 12.2 60 '12.2 68 14.2 72 15.1 78 22.9 80 23.54.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.8 4 0.8 2 0.6 2 0.6

CASES PROCE SSEDNO. BLANK DA TA

-=

492114

47887

34190

MINIMUM VALUE = 175-60 1.0000 2.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1043.0000 1031.0000 764.0000SUM SOD. SCORES - 2265.0000 293.0000 1778.0000MEAN 2.1199 2.1569 2.2405STND. DEV. IN/ 0.3311 0.3914 0.4409STND. DEV. (N -l1 = 0.3314 0.3918 0.4415MEDIAN 2.0684 2.0877 2.1533

b. If no, when does instruction usually take place?

CD Mostly in the morning

0 mostly in the afternoon

0 About equally divided between mornings and afternoons

QUESTION 208

SCORE INTER-VAL S* T

1.000 4.8 51.32;000- 0.6 6.63. 000 3.9 42.1

PRDCE-S'SED-NO. BLANK OATAMINIMUM VALUE

---WAXIFFUM-VATUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORES =

STND. DEV. (N) =STND. DEV. (ft-1) =

Cft/let Gititio#P-8111-1- PCT CF P-8114 F PCT

9.3-4;:5--487.-7-737.3

100.0 4.3 59.2 7.2 100.0 4.2 56.610.6 3.0 40.8 1.2 16,2

3.9 42.1 2.2 30.2 2.2 30.2 2.0 27.2

-9;2483497.0000

1.000037.013150"

17.745242.4692

SCORE INTERVAL S

0.96191.01821-."4-75-4

F PCT

&Me 6.CF P -8LW

7.4 100.03.2 43.42.0 27.2

7.2434466.0000

1.00003.0000

12.383727.0336

1.70910.89960.96901.3446

CF P-8LW F PC

7.3678347,0000

1.00003.0000

12.616227.07391.70540.8b680.93211.3828

CF P-8L)1 F PCT CF P-81W

1.000 48 50.5 95 100.0 52 63.4 82 100.0 49 62.8 78 100.02.000 5 5.3 47 49.5 8 9.8 30 36..6 8 10.3 29 37.23.000 42 44.2 42 44,2 22 26.8 22 26.8 21 26.9 21. 26.9


= 95511

1.0(100

82483

1.0000

78353

1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 184.0000 134.0000 128.0000SUM WO. SCORES = 446.0000 282.0000 270.0000MEAN 1.9368 1.6341 1.6410STND. DEV. (N) = 0.9713 0.8767 0.8767STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.9764 0.8821 0.8824MEDIAN 1.4896 1.2885 1.2959

21. What additional personnel are available to you in your teaching ofcompensatory reading?

}Remedial reading teacher orsupervisor

Frequently Occasionally Rarely Not Available

QUESTION 21 PART A

Gloat-SCORE TA ItkvAL s F PCT CF P--131.W

1.000 22.6 42.4 53.4 100.0

3.000 4.8 9.0 18.9 35.54.000 14.2 26.5 14.2 26.5

CASES PROCESSED = 53.4027NO. BLANK DATA = 43.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 117.2524SUM SQO. SCORES = 339.4116MEAN = 2.1956STND. DEV. (N) = 1.2391STND. DEV. (1i11-1-= -1.2508MEDIAN = 1.8428

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

F PCT

16.8 33.510.0 20.06.6 13.116.7 33.3

CF r=q1Lw

50.0 100.0.0.6-33.3 66.5 8.6

23.2 46.5 6.016.7 33.344.4

50.030247.0000

_1.00004.0000

123.2159382.795D

2.46281.25921.21202.3232

Griale 14,PCT CF P-BL m

26.8 39.6 100.021.7 29.0 73.215.2 20.4 51.536.3 14.4 36.3

39.600544.00001.110004.0000

103.3346329.0366

2.60S41.22471.24052.5974

F PCT CF P -131W F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-131%

245 43.5 563 100.0 182 35.1 528 100.0 104 26.9 387 100.0133 23.6 318 56.5 112 21.6 336 64.9 101 26.1 283 73.150 8.9 185 32.9 72 13.9 224 43.2 62 16.0 182 47.0135 24.0 135 24.0152 29.3 152 29.3 120 31.0 120 31.0


==

56343

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1201.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 3387.0000MEAN 2.1332STND. DEV. (N) = 1.2105STND. DEV. (N-11 = 1.2116MEOIAN 1.7744

51847

38744

1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000

1230.0000 972.00003710.0000 2986.0000

2.374$ 2.51161.2344 1.18641.2356. 1.18792.1875 2.3861

00ther professionals (counselors, 0'psychologists, etc.)

QUESTION 21 PART B

O D El

Getute,,2,

SCORE INTERVAL S- CF P-BLW F ACT CF P-8LW F ACT CF P -BLW

1.000 5.1 10.3 49.6 100.0 5.6 11.9 47.1 100.0 2.4 6.4 36.8 100.0,2.000 C4:589.7 13.8 29.4 41.5 88.111:3 30=7 34.4 93.63.000 13.5 27.3 25.1 50.5 15.6 3301 27.6 58.712.7 34.5 23.1 62.84.000 11.5 23.3 11.5 23.3 12.1 25.6 12.1 25.610.4 28.3 10.4 28.3

CASES PROCESSED = 49.5775 47.0720 3607804NO. BLANK DATA = 83.0000 73.0000 74.0000

---MIWINUN7VACTIE 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 130.6390 126.2119 104.7202SUM SQO. SCORES = 181:0012 393.9443 328.4707MEAN 2.6350 2.7237 2.8472STNO, DEV. IN/ = 09502 009748 0.9078

0=95179 -6.9853 0.9204MEDIAN 2.5199 2.7622 2.8718

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P--81.W E PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-8LW

1.000 59 11.4 517 100.0 56 11.5 486 100.0 27 7.6 356 100.02.000 194 37.5 458 88.6 152 31.3 430 88.5 110 30.9 329 92.43.000 152 29.4 264 51.1 157 32.3 278 57.2 122 34.3 219 61.540000 112 21.7 112 21.7 121 24.9 121 24.9 97 27.2 97 27.2


==

51789

48679

35675

MINIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1351.0000 1315.0000 1001.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 3995.0000 401300000 3117.0000MEAN 2.6132 2.7058 2.8118STNO. DEV. = 0.9480 0.9675 0.9216S7ND, DEV. IN-1/ = 0.9489 0.9685 0.9229MEDIAN 2,5362 2.7229 2.8361

finParaprofessionals or teacher

="1 aide

QUESTION 21 PART C

Gude 21


Ortuite-

CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -BLW F

AWLPCT CF P-8LW

1.000 18.9 36.0 52.4 100.0 14.8 30.6 48.3 100.0 6.5 22.2 38.3 100.02.000 8.3 15.9 33:5 64.0 7.6 15.7 33.5 69.4 6.1 16.o 29.8 77.83.000 4.5 80.5 25.2 48.1 4.5 9.3 25.9 53.7 4.7 12.3 23.7 61.84.000 20.7 39.5 20.7 39.5 21.5 44.4 21.5 44.418.9 49.5 18.9 49.5

CASES PROCESSED =NO. 8LANK DATA =

520.364961.0000

48.307368.0000

38.270158.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0.000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 131.7396 129.2508 110.6600SUM SQO. SCORES = 423.5935 428.85-A 378.5203MEAN 2.5158 2.6756 2.8916STNO. 0EV. (N) = 1.3267 1.3111 1.2368SIND. OE V. (N--IT 1.3395 1.3249 1.2533MEDIAN 2.3778 2.8986 3.4582

SCORE INTERVALS F FCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -BLW

1.000 199 36.9 540 100.0 137 28.0 490 100.0 81 21.7 373.100.0.2.000 91. 16.9 341 63.1 83 16.9 353 72.0 5g 15.8 292 78.33.000 51 9.4 250 46.3 48 9.8 270 55.1 51 13.7 233 62.54.000 199 36.9 199 36.9 222 45.3 222 45.3 182 48.8 182 48.8_


==

54066

49075

37358.

MINIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1330.0000 1335.0000 1080.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 4206.0000 4453.0000 3688,0000MEAN 2.4630 2.7245 2.8954STND. 0EV. (N) = 1.3125 1.2903 1.2263SIND. °EV. (N-1) ' 1.3137 1.2916 1.2279MEOIAN = 2.2802 3.0208 3.4118

t) Parent or other volunteer

QUESTION 21 PART 0

Nuke it goo& bSCORE INTERVALS

1.000

F

3.4

OCT

7.1

C"15:-Bifi

47.6 100.0

F

2.8

PCT

6.3

CF P-8LW

44.2 100.0

F

1.2

PCT

3.5

CF P -BLW

35.2 100.07.2 15.2 44.2 42.9 5.0 11.4

3.000 8.5 17.8 37.0 77.7 7.0 15.9 36.3 82.2 508 16.6 30.2 85.74.000 28.5 59.9 28.5 59.9 29.3 66.3 29.3 66.3 24.4 69.2 24.4 69.2


47.6378101.0000

1-0:10150-

44.1536109.0000

35.216990.0000MINIMUMt 1.0000 1=0,000

MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 400000SUM OF SCORES 157.4273 151.1195 12307583SUM SOD. SCORES = 565.1128 5 4.8020 45806641MEAN 3.3047 3.4226 3.5142STND. DEV. LN) = 0.9705 0.9226 008213STNO. DIV. (WIVW 07.9113F8 0.9332 008332MEDIAN 3.6647 3.7459 3.7770

SCOREINTERVALS F PCT CF P-4SLW F PCT CF P-4SLW F PCT CF P-.BLW

1.000 37 7.4 500 100.0 31 6.9 449 100.0 15 4.4 339 100.02.000 85 17.0 463 92.6 61 13.6 418 93.1 36 10.6 324 95.63.000 93 18.6 378 75.6 68 15.1 357 79.5 57 16.8 288 85.04.000 285 57.0 285 57.0 289 64.4 289 64.4 231 68.1 231 68.1

CASCS PROCESSED----NO. BLANK DATA

500106

449116

33992

MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE

1.00004.0000

1.00004.0000

1.00004.0000

-SUM OF SCORES 1626.0000 1513.0000 1182.0000SUM SCID. SCORES 5774.0000 5511.0000 4368.0000MEAN 3.2520 3.3697 3.4867

- STND. DEV. IN) 0.9862 0.9586 0.8531STND. DEV. = 0.9871 0.9597 0.8543MEDIAN = 3.6228 3.7232 3.7662

(E.) Student teacher

QUESTION 21 PART E

Coat lel- atilt e. Lo

SCORE 1WTERViiIS F PCT --CF P--611-4 F PCT CF P..8LW F PCT CF

1.000 2.9-6.9

6.1 47.0 100.0 2.5 5.6 45.0 100.0 1.2 3.6 34.1- 100.62:00-0 14.6 44.1 93.9----5.2 11..6-427.5 94.4 3.2 9.5 32.9 96.43.000 4.0 8.4 37.3 79.3 3.6 37.3 82.8 3.1 9.2 29.7 86.94.000 33..3 70.9 33.3 70.9 33.7 74.9 33.7.74.926.5 77.8 26.5 7708

CASES PROCESSED = 47.0181 45.0130 34.1119NO. BLANK DATA = 110.000(1 100.0000 9800060MININVH-VALUE 1:000-0 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0.000SUM OF SCORES = 161.7786 158.4692 123.2039SUM SQD. SCORES- t)95.T.17rY 594.7615 466.8464MEAN 3.4408 3.5205 3.6118STND. DEV. IN) =

=0.9510 0.9050 0.8006

ST TD. DEV. 04-.4)MEDIAN

0.9-6133.7945

0x1w--3.8223

0.81263.8572

SCORE INTERVALS F PCI CF P -8LW F PC T CF P..4$LW F PCT CF P -BLN

1.000 30 6.1 489 100.0 27 5.9 458 100.0 12 3.6 332 100.02.000 79 16.2 459 93.9 59 12,9 431 94.1 38 11.4 320 96.43.000 40 8.2 380 77.7 41 9.0 372 81.2 34 10.2 282 84.94.000 340 69.5 340 69.5 331 72.3 331 72.3 248 74.7 248 74.7


==

489117

458107

33299

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000- SUM OF SCORES = 1668.0000 1592.0000 1182.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 6146.0000 5928.0000 4438.0000MEAN 3.4110 3.4760 3.5602STND. DEV. IN) 0.9661 0.9278 0.8320STNO, DEV. 01-4) = 0.9671 '0.9288 0.8332MEDIAN 3.7809 3.8082 3.8306

e Media specialist

OUESTION 21 PAK i

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.00C4.000

I-

F

3.35.46.4

30.9

OptericvPCT

7.1 45.911.9 42.713.9 37.267.1 30.9

CF P-BLW

100.0

gnat-4 webF PCT

2.8 6.4 43.6

CF P-BLW

100.0

82.570.7

F PCT CF

2.1 o.1 34.23.6 1.0.5 32.15.8 16.8 28.5

22.8 66.6 22.8

P-81..3%

100.042.463.466.6

92.961.167.1

4:Tr-Y1:1 4-0-.7V-0-T;i5-5.1 11.8 36.0

30.9 70.7 30.9

CASES PRUCE SSED = 45.9453 46.6404 34.2221NO. BLANK DATA = 120.0000 135.0000 97.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 -1,-0-0T) 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 156.7336 151.3611 117.7120SUM SOD. SCORES = 576.2017 432.5336562.2483McAN- 3.4113 3.4684STND. CEV. (N) =STND. DEV. IN-12 =MEDIAN

0.95080.96133.7553

0.9242a.gs-403.7929

0.90530.91683.7490

SCOR c INTERVAL S F ?CT CF P-BLW CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 34 7.1_ 478_100.0 27 6.1 442 100.0 20 6.0 332 100.02.000 59 12.3 444 92.9 50 11.3 415 93.9 41 12.3 312 94.03.000 79 16.5 385 80.5 53 12.0 365 82.6 56 16.9 271 81.64.000 306 64.0_ 306 64.0 312 70.6 312 70.6 215 64.8 215 64.8_

CASES PROCESSED =O. BLANK DATA

_

478128_

442123

33299

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1613.0000 1534.0000 1130.0000SUM SOO. SCORES = 5877.0000 5696.0000 4128.0000MP Am 3.3745 3.4706 3.4036

Tg V. (N)_ .= 0.9528 0.9175 0.9215STND. DE V. IN-1) = 0.9538 0.9186 0.9229MEDIAN 3.7190 3.7917 3.7279

0) Resource teacher (musicoart ,etc.)'[:]

QUESTION 21 PART G

0,1431b2Ar GibSCORE INTERVAL S F PCT CFP -81W F PCT P -LIU( F PCT CF P-.8L8

1.000 9.6 20.4 47.0 100.0 8.1 17.9-8.70-17476

45.5 100;0 4.3 12.5 34.6 100.02. 660- 7.9 16.7 37.5 79.6 3743 82.1 5.3 15.5 30.3 87.53.000 6.5 13.8 29.6 62.9 5.7 12.6 29.3 64.5 7.0 20.1 24.9 72.14.000 23.1 49.1 23.1 49.1 23.6 51.9 Z3.6 51.918.0 52.0 18.0 52.0

CASES PROCESSED = 47.0404 45.4802 34.5881NO. BLANK DATA = 111.0000 93.0000 92.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1,60-60 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 137.2088 135.7789 107.7877SUM SQD. -SCORES 469.1-683 469.5044 375.9761MEAN 2.9168 2.9854 3.1163STND. DEV. IN/ = 1.2107 1.1876 1.0764

1.2238 1.2009 1.0923MEDIAN 3.4361 3.5368 3.5381

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P -BLW

1.000 95 19.4 490 100.0 81 17.4 466 100.0 46 13.6 338 100.02.000 93 19.0 395 80.6 81 17.4 385 82.6 52 15.4 292 86.43.000 73 14.9 302 61.6 66 14.2 304 65.2 63 18.6 240 71.04.000 229 46.7 229 46.7 238 51.1 238 51.1 177 52.4 177 52.4


490116

46699

33393

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 -1:6000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1416.0000 1393.0000 1047.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 4788.0000 4807.0000 3653.0000MEAN 2.8898 2.9893 3.0976STND. 0EV. IN) 1.1919 1.1746 1.1011STND. OEV. iN-1) 1.19311 1.1759 1.1027MEDIAN 3.2808 3.5210 3.5452

OA) Older student in school

QUESTION' 21 PART N

ID D 0 0

Q4stie/2d G-eAe_1+

SCORE INTEgVALS

1.000

F

4.7 9.9

-CT-P-11m F

47.5 100.0 3.4

PCT

7.5

Cf 1:18LW F

44.9 100.0 2.0

PCT

5.9

CF P-.9L W

34.4 100.0.2. 000 9.8 30s7 41:8--9-0.1 5.1 12.6 416 92.5 4.3 12.4 32.4 94.13. 000 7.8 16.3 33.0 69.4 7.3 16.3 35.9 79.9 3.5 10.3 28.1 81.74.000 25.2 53.1 25.2 53.128.6 63.5 28.6 63.524.6 71.4 24.6 71.4

CASES PROCESSED = 47.4931 44.9370 34.4072NO. BLANK DATA =

--14INTRUFFVATUE---100.0000

1: uo0O101.0000 95.00001.0000 1.00017

MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 148.5163 150.9857 119.4421

-7VMW UFO , SCORE 549.1169 443.4146MEAN = 3.1271 3.3599 3.4714STND. DEV. IN) = 1.0564 0.9646 0.9234STND. DENa-IN747-= 1:0677 0.9755 0.9372MEDIAN = 3.5585 3.7131 3.7996

SCORE INTERVALS F PICT CF P -BLW F PCT CF F PCT CF P -8LW

1.000 53 10.5 503 100.0 32 7.0 458 100.0 20 6.0 334 100.0_2.000 105 20.9 450 89.5 69 15.1 .426 93.0 39 11.7 314 94.03.000 86 17.1 345 68.6 75 16.4 357. 77.9 43 12.9 275 82.34.000 259 51.5 259 51.5282 61.6 282 61.6 232 69.5 232 69.5

CASES PROCESSED = 503 458 334NO. BLANK OATA = 103 107 97MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1557,0000 1523.0000 1155,0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 5391.0000 5495.0000 4275.0000MEAN 3.0954 3.3253 3.4581STNO. DEV. (NI = 1.0658 0.9695 0.9171STND. DEV. = 1.0669 0.9706 0.9185MEDIAN 3.5290 3.6879 3.7802

() Other (Specify)

QUESTION 21 PART I

Girtute. It- Crab-stoRE P PCT CF PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-8Le

1.000 3.5 31.0 11.2 100.0 1.3 15.2 8.5 100.0 2.0 25.4 8.0 100.02004 T. 0 8.6 7:7-69,0 0.8 9.6 7.Z 84.8 0.4 4.9 5.9 74.63.000 0.5 4.7 6.8 60.4 0.3 3.3 6.4 75.2 0.4 5.4 5.5 69.74.000 6.2 55.7 6.2 55.7 6.1 71.9 6.1 71.9 5.1 64.4 64.4


4=

11.1949479.0000

8.4744458.0000

7.9578353.0000

-WYNIKUM VALUE 1.0000 1.4000MAXIMUM VALUE - 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 31.9287 28.1247 24.5113SUM SOD.1CDRES 111.8861 104.5501 89.3522MEAN 2.8521 3.3188 3.0877STNO. 0EV. (N) - 1.3638 1.1501 1.3036STND. oev. IN-11 1.4291 1.2247 1.3941MEDIAN a 3.6030 3.8048 3.7234

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PL1 CF P -81W F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 31 27.7 112 100.0 14 15..6 90 100.0 17 23.6 72 100.02.000 9 8.0 81 72.3 8 8.9 76 84.4 4 5.6 55 76.43.000 5 4.5 72 64.3 2 2.2 .66 75.6 4 5.6 51 70.84.000 67 59.8 67 59.8 66 73.3 66 73.3 47 65.3 47 65.3


==

112494

90475

72359

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUN OF SCORES = 332.0000 300.0000 225.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 1184.0000 1120.0000 821.0000MEAN 2.9643 3.3333' 3.1250STND. DEV. IN) 1.3358 1.1547 1.2795STND. DEV. IN-1) 1.3418 1.1612 1.2885MEDIAN 3.6642 3.8182 3.7340

22. During the school year, how many teachers other than yourself have held your

particular teaching assignment with your compensatory reading class for at

least two consecutive weeks? COUNT SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS AND REPLACEMENT TEACHERS;

DO NOT COUNT STUDENT TEACHERS OR CLASSROOM AIDES.

0 None 0 Two

One 0 Three

OU EST ION 22 More than threeCoutek. Grodelo

SCORE INTERVALS F -PCT 15.B1if F PCT F PCT CF 12-.3Lk

1.000 48.1 82.9 58.0 100.0 46.8 87.1 53.8 100.0 36.0 83.5 43.1 100.02.000 5.3 '9.1 9.9 17:1 3.6 6.7 .1 16.53.000 2.9 5.1 4.6 8.0 1.6 3.0 3.4 6.3 1.9 4.4 2.6 6.14.000 1.0 1.7 1.7 2.9 0.8 1.5 1.8 3.3 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.75. COO 0.7 1.2 -0.7- la 1.0 1.8 1.0 1.8 0.6 1.3 0.6 1.3

CASES PROCESSED = 57.9834

1.00005.0000

7-47-574-7-128.7100

1.2913-0-.7432**

0.74971.1030

53.7933 43.1050NO . a-4W DI TA- -7=-MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =

"SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =MEAN

0EV. IN-1 ) =MEDIAN

9.00001.00005.0000

14.00001.00005.0000

66.8496112.5411

1.2427

54.143487.7812

1.25E10.74010.74711.0742

0.61130.68531.0988

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF

/400 501 83.4 601 100.0 475 85.4 556 100.0 346 83.0 417 100.02.000 54 9.0 100 16.6 41 7.4 81 14.6 44 10.6 71 17.03.000 29 4.8 46 7.7 17 3.1 40 7.2 16 3.8 27 6.54.000 10 1.7 17 2.8 11 2.0 23 4.1 3 0.7 11 Zob5.000 7 1.2 7 1.2 12 2.2 12 2.2 8 1.9 8 1.9

-

CASES PROCESSED^NO. BLANK DATA


= 601 556 417= 5

1.00005.0000

91.00005.0000

141.00005.0000

SUM OF SCORES = 771.0000 712.0000 534.0000SUM SOO. SCORES = 1313.0000 1268.0000 914.0000MEAN_ _ 1.2829 1.2806 1.2806SIND. DEV. = 0.7341 0.8004 0.7429SIND. °EV. = 0.7347 0.8012 0.7438MEDIAN 1.0998 1.0853 1.1026

23. If your compensatory reading class is organized into groups, indicate thefrequency with which you organize these groups by each of the following criteria.

Frequently Occasionally Rarely Never

Reading grade level

QUESTION 23 PART A.

GmtSCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 414 77.7 533 100.02.000 90 16.9 119 22.33.000 18 3.4 29 5.44.000 11 2.1 11 2.1

GeeF OCT F PCT Cf P-BLW

235 66.2 355 1002.0_356 13.6 484. 100.086 33.8 '95-- 19.6 128 26.425 7.0 34 9.6 19 3.9 33 6.89 2.5 9 2.5 14 2.9 14 2.9


==

53373

35576

484di

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 692.0000 518.0000 659.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 1112.0000 948.0000 1131.0000MEAN 1.2983 1.4592 1.3616STND. DEV. INI = 0.6330 0.7357 0.6949SIND. DEV. (N-11 = 0.6336 0.7368 0.6956MEDIAN 1.2437 1.2553 1.1798

SCORE INTERVALS

1.000 40.2

PCT

77.4 51.9

P-BLW---f

100.035.0

PC1

73.7

CF

47.5

P- 110.

100=0

F

24.,6

Pt-T

66.6

CF P-BLW

37.0 100.02.1)015-

3.0004.000

9.01.81.0

17.33.41.8

'11.72.71.0

22.6 9.45.3 1.81.8 1.3

19.73.72.8

12.53.11.3

26.36.62.8

9.22.40.8

24.86.52.1

12.43.20.8

33.48.62.1


==

51.881372.0000

47.498375.0000

37.027475.0000

MINIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 I I 1 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 67.2948 64.4743 53.3897SUM SQD. SCORES = 107.3804 110.069 55.6341MEAN 1.2971 1.3574 1.4419SIND. DEV. (N) = 0.6223 0.6890 0.70S7SIND. DEV. = 0.6284 0.6964 0.7195MEDIAN 1.1460 1.1785 1.2511

Specific skill deficiencies

QUESTION 23 PART B

SCORE INTERVALS F

1.000 31.82.000 14.33.000 2.24.000 1.0

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA-MI NIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES

SOffi. SCORESMEANSTND. 0EV. (N)

---3TND:-DEV; (N1)MEDIAN

O E3 0 0

Gracia.PCT

Gude lb 4- Gam. bCF P-EILM F PCT

64.5 49.329.0 17.54.4 3.22.0 1.0

49.292987.000010-00.64.0000

70.9138124;1638-.

1.43860.67360:68051.2746

SCORE I-NTER VACS F PCT

100.0 26.235.5-1-6:96.4 2.12.0 1.3

56.336.34.52.9

CF PBLW F PCT

46.520.33.41.3

100.043.77.42.9

18.713.12.41.5

52.336.86.74.2

CF P-11w

35.7 100.017.0 47.73.9 10.91.5 4.2

CF P -BLW F

1.000. 333 64.4 517 100.02672.000 153 29.6 184 35.61713.000 20 3.9 31 6.0 234.000 2.1 11 2.1 15


51789

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 743.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 1301.0000MEAN 1.4371STND. DEV. (N) = 0.6716

0.6723MEDIAN 1.2763

56.1

46.455684.00001.00004.000071.5071

133.76021.53930.71410.72201.3880

35.651781.00001.00004.000058.0436116.59521.62E10.7E730.79851.4558

35.94.83.2

CF PffEW F PCT

4762093815

100.0 18343.9 1278.0 243.2 15

52.436.46.94.3

CF P -BIM

349'100.0166 47.639 11.215 4.3

47689

34982

1.00004.0000

738.00001398.0000

1.55040.73020.73101.3914

1.00004.0000

569.00001147.0000

1.63040.79270.79391.4536

(1;) Shared interests

QUEST ION 23

-SCORE INTERVAL S

PART C

titaatz

0 0

Gra& 4-F PCT CF P-BLit F PCT CF P-BLit F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 11.8 25.1 47.3 100.0 11.6 25.4 45.9 100.0 10.5 30.5 34.6 100.02.000 19.9 42.0 35.4 1-4.9 21.1 45.4) 34.3 14.6 16.1 46.5 24.1 69,53.000 10.3 21.8 15.5 32.9 7.5 16.3 13.2 28.8 4.3 12.5 8.0 23.04.000 5.3 11.1 5.3 11.1 5.7 12.5 5.7 12.5 3.6 10.5 3.6 10.5

CASES PROCESSED 47.2662 45.9401 34.6236NO, BLANK DA TA 107.0000 92.0000 93.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 103.5075 99.1905 70.3066SUM SOD. SCORES 266.1333 255.0628 172.1310MEAN 2.1899 2.1591 2.0306STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.9369 0.9435 0.9211

DEV. (N-1) = 0.9540 0.9346MEDIAN 2.0931 2.0371 1.9200

SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T CF P-BLW PCT CF P BLW PCT CF P -SLW

1.000 118 23.7 497 100.0 109 23.5 464 100.0 97 28.9 336 100.0_2.000 202 40.6 379 76.3 210 45.3 355 76.5 157 46.7 239 71.13.000 115 23.1 177 35.6 85 18.3 145 31.3 49 14.6 82 24.44.000 62 12.5 62 12.5 60 12.9 60 12.9 33 9.8 33 9.8_

CASES PROCESSEDNO BLANK DA TA

3 497109

464101

33695

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1115.0000 1024.0000 690.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 2951.0b00 2674.0000 1694.0000MEAN 2.2435 2.2069 2.0536STND. DEV. IN) 0.9532 0.9447 0.9080STND. DEV. IN-1) 0.9541 0.9458 0.9094MEDIAN 2.1460 2.0857 1.9522

CD) Specific projects

QUEST ION 23

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK OA TA =*MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUN-SOD. SCORESMEANSTND. DE V. (N) =-STNO. OE V. (N-lI =MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000t.P139

0000PART D

F

( NA* 1PCT CF

Cotaut.OrtukbeP-81W F PCT CF FL-8LW F FCT CF P--8Lw

9.4 15.8 47.6 100.0 10.1 22.2 4505 100.0 8.3 24.2 34.3 100.020.'4-42.5 38.2 8Ii.'D 2 20.4 44.7 35.4 77.8 17.0 49.5 26.0 75.811.8 24.7 17.8 37.3 S.7 21.4 15.0 33.1 5.4 15.6 9.0 26.36.0 12.6 6.0 12.6 5.3 11.6 5.3 11.6 3.7 10.7 3.7 10.7

47.6300 45.5031 34.3377104.0000 97.0000 94.0000

1.11000 1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000 4.0000

109.5790 101.2632 73.0977212.1214 264.0752 183.41372.3006 2.2254 2.12es0.9258 0.9225 0.8558w)336 0.9328 0.91322.2038 2.1215 2.0218

F PCT CF P -BLW---

F PCT CF P-45LW F PCT CF PI3LW

95 19.0 500 100.0 92 20.0 460 100.0 86 25.6 336 100.0209 41.8 405 81.0'208T-45.2 368 80.0 160 47.6 250 74.4132 26.4 196 39.2 110 23.9 160 34.8 55 16.4 90 26.864 12.8.. 64 12.8 50 10.9 50 10.9 35 10.4 35 10.4


==

500106

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXI MUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1165.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 3143.0000MEAN 2.3300STND. DE V. (N) = 0.9258STND. DEV. 1*-1) = 0.9267MEDIAN = 2.2416

460105

33695

1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000

1038.0000 711.00002714.0000 1781.0000

2.2565 2.11610.8989 0.90710.8999 0.90852.1635 2.0125

1E) Other (Specify)

QUESTION 23 PART E

0

Cwitig.1

D 0 0

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT F CF

1.000 9 15.0 60 100.0 8 13.3 60 100.0 17_36.2 47 100.02.000 8 13.3 51 85.0 7 11.7 52 86.7 7 14.9 30 63.83.000 5 8.3 43 71.7 5 8.3 45 75.0 1 2.1 23 48.94.000 38 63.3 38 63.3 40 66.7 40 66.7 22 46.8 22 46.8


60546

60505

47384

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000

192.0000 197.0000 122.0000_SUM"SOD.

,SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES 694.0000 721.0000 406.0000MEAN 3.2000 3.2833 2.5957STNO. DEV. 1.1518 1.1119 1.3786.(4)

-'STND. DEV. -1) 1.1615 1;1213 1.3935MEDIAN 3.7105 3.7500 2.4286

SCORE INTERVALS F-- PtY Z F1-131W FL. I --8LW F PCT CF P-BLw.

1.000 0.8 13.6 6.2 100.0 0.8 13.3 5.7 100.0 1.6 34.1 4.8 100.02.000 0.9 14.7 86.4 0.8 14.4 5.0 86.1 0.8 16.9 3.1 65.9'3.000 0.5 8.3 4.4 71.6 0.7 11.8 4.1 72.3 0.0 0.0 2.3 49.14.000 3.9 63.3 3.9 63.3 3.5 60.5 3.5 60.5 2.3 49.1 2.3 49.1

CASES PROCESSED 6.1899 5.7154 4.7685NO. BLANK OATA 530.0000 489.0000 378.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 19.6915 18.2643 12.5915SUM SQD. SCORES 71.8450 65.4627 42.2762MEAN 3.2135 3.J956 2.6405STND. DEV. (N) 1.1314 1.1143 1..3759STND. OEV. (it-.11 1.255-6 1.2268 1.5478MEDIAN 3.7106 3.6739 2.4447

24. How often do the followingcourse of your teaching of

ins tructional groups operate (occur) in thecompensatory reading?

All ofthe time Frequently Occasionally

(N) Adult and child in one-to-onerelationship

QUEST ILA 24 PArtT A

Rarely orNever

to

SCORE INTERVAL r PC T CF. P-61.14 F PCT P-BLV1 F PCT CF

1.000 5.9 10.6 55.4 100.0 2.4 5.6 51.9 100.0 2.3 5.5-41.4

41.5 100.02.000 25.5 46.0 49.5 89.4 -21;0 -473:4 1-7-.7 39.2 94-:5

3.000 20.1 36.3 24.0 43.4 21.5 41.4 28.0 54.0 17.2 41.3 22.0 53.14.000 3.9 7.1 3.9 7.0 6.5 12.'6 6.5 12.6 4-5.9 11.7 4.9 11.7

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE

55.360923.0000

-1.. 0000'

51.97030.0000

41.54412/3.00001.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE - 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES - 132.7698 135.4939 107.7233SUM SQU. SCORES = 351.2476 3134-.7T63 I 303.6 C4MEAN 2.3983 2.6093 k.5930SYNC. DEV. (NI = 0.7701 0.7754 0.76t7SYNC. DEV. IN-f).= '0.7771 D. /82V 0.7751MEDIAN 2.3562 2.5956 2.5742

SCORE INTEVALS F PCT CF PCT CF P-BLW PC T CF P-8LW

1.0002.000

48257 44.2

582534

100.091.8

31216

5.840.6

532501

100.094.2

26167

6.441.3

404378

100.093.6

3.000 234 40.2 277 47.6 212 39.8 285 53.6 161 39.9 211 52.24.000 43 . 7.4 43 7.4 73 13.7 73 13.7 50 12.4 __50

CASES PROCESSED 582 532 404NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE

24 --00

..1.00

33 271.0000 1.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1436.0000 1391.0000 1043.0000SUM SW,. SCORES 3876.0000 3971.0000 2943.0000MEAN 2.4674 2.6147 2.5817STNt. rEV. (N) 0.7494 0.7924 0.7871STMD. °EV. (N-1) 0.7501 0.7931 0.7881MEDIAN 2.4455 2.5896 2.5559

L) Adult and children in groupsof between 2 and 10

QUESTION 24 PART

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -8LW

1.0002.0003.0004.000.

29.9 53.9 55.520.6 37.1 25.6*2.6 4.7 5.02.3 4.2 2.3

CASES PROCESSED 55.5459NO. BLANK OATA = 27.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE - 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 88.45665UM-540. SCORES = 173.5488MEAN 1.5925STNO. DEV. (N) 0.7671

601. (N-I) = 0.7741MEDIAN 1.4274


014.4.4-

100.0 17.7 34.146.1237:17-4-67r----714-8.9 6.5 12.54.2 3.7 7.2

LF

51.8.1

10.23.7

CF P-BLW F

1.000

==

320 55.4 578 10D.0 1722.0003.0004.000


209 36.2 258 44.6 24628 4.8 49 8.5 7621 3.6 21 3.6 42

57828

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 906.0000

SOD. SCORES = 1744.0000MEAN 1.5675STND. DEV. (N) = 0.7485STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.7 92MEDIAN 1.4031

51.772129.00001.00004.000099.8633

231.45181.92890.86600.81451.8445

P-BLW

100.0

F

9.6

PCT

23.4

CF P-BLw

61.1 100.060,4.9 18.4 44.9 31.5 76.619.8 9.0 21.9 13.0 31.77.2 4.0 9.8 4.0 9.8

41.075232.00001.410004.0000

89.6288228.93552.16190.90150.91262.0929


32.1 536 100.0 85 21.4 398 100.045.9 364 67.9184 46.2 313 78.614.2 118 22.0 86 21.6 129 32.47.8 42 7.8 43 10.8 43 10.8

53629

39833

1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000

1060.0000 883.00002512.0000 2283.0000

1.9776 2.21860.8807 0.90220.8815 0.90341.8902 2.1196

Lc)Adult and children in groupsof between 11 and 20

QUESTION 24

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM-S00. SCORESMEANSING. BEV. IN)*STNIX. DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN

PART C

ert42.2>

F PC T CF P-BLW F PC

4.27.57.531.1

8.3 50.3 100.0 6.214.9 46,1* 91.7 9.614.8 38.6 76.7 8.661.9 31.1 61.9 23.1

50.254975.00001;00004.0000

165.9728598.690'6

3.30261.00491.01503.6918

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATAMINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES._SUM SOD. SCORES =ME!!,.N

SIND. OEV. IN) =STNO. DEV. IN-1) =MEDIAN

F PCT

50._ 9.5.79 15.077 14.6

322. 61.0

C.stuitt 10

13.120.218.148.6

CF P-BLW r

47.541.331.723.1

100.086.966.748.6

2S9.48.1

18.2

PCT

7.524.520.94701

CF P'13LW

38.5 100.035.626.2 68.018.2 47.1

47.531467.0000100UU400000

143.66334910/446

3.02251.1001

3.4225

CF P -BLW F PCT

100 .0 61 12.3478 90.5102 20.6399 75.6 95 19.2322 61.0236 47.8

CF P -BLW F PCT

38,545652.00001.0000400000

11805675403.6646

3.07601.00521.0185303414

CF P-BLW

494 100.0 26 6.9 378 100.0 _433 87.7 91 24.1 352 93.1331 67.0 84 22.2 261 69.0236 47.8 177 46.8 177 46.8

52878

49471

37853

1.0000 1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000 4.0000

1727.00D0_ 1494.0000 1168.00006211.0000 5100.0000 3978.0000

3.2708 3.0243 3.08991.0319 1.0851 0.98791.0329 1,0862 0.98933.6801 3.3842 3.3571

WAdultand children in groups

lor more than 20 (includeswhole class instruction)

QUESTION 24 PART

eittutu_4.SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT- CF P-81. F PCT CF

1.000 2.5 5.0 50.5 100.0 3.5 7.4 46.9 100.0 2.9 7.6 37.9 100.02.000 7.9 15.6 48.0 95.0 073 19,8 43.4 92.6 9.0 23.7 35.1 92.43.000 10.1 20.0 40.1 79.4 10.5 22.3 34.1 72.8 6.9 18.3 26.0 68.64.000 30.1 59.5 30.1 59.5 23.6 50.5 23.6 50.419.1 50.4 19.1 50.3


50.524276.0000

46.871366.0000

37.945556.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 168.7542 148.0221 118.1617SUM SQO. SCORES 605;7522 513.1218 407.1111MEAN 3.3401 3.1581 3.1140STND. DEV. IN) = 0.9128 0.9870 1.0158

DEV. IN-11 = 0.9220 0.9977 1.0255MEDIAN 3.6596 3.5089 3.5069

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 28 5.3. 528 100.0 37 7.5 495 100.0 32 8.6 374 100.02.000 80 15.2 +:5co 94.7 106 21.4 458 92.5 90 24.1 342 91.43.000 108 20.5 420 79.5 108 21.8 352 71.1 75 20.1 252 67.44.000 312 59.1 312 59.1 244 49.3 244 49.3 177 47.3 177 47.3

CASES PROCESSED = 528 495 374NO. BLANK DATA 78 70 57MIN VALUE -1:6600 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1760.0000 1549.0000 1145.0000!;w4 s00. SCORES 5337.0000 3899.0000MEAN 3.3333 3.1293 3.0615STNO. 0EV. IN) = 0.91840.9184 0.9947 1.0258STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.9193 0.9957 1.0272MEDIAN 3.6538 3.4676 3.3667

lc\ Individual pupils workingKV, independently

QUESTION 24 PART

G-Tata. be Grulta.1SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

F

9335112412

PCT

16.060.521.42.1

CF

58048713612

P -.8LW

100.084.023.42.1

F

7331612721

PCT

13.6-----

8.823.63.9

CF

537464148_21

100.0 4186,4-15127.6 1003.9 11

PC7

10.2

CF

403

P-8LW

100.089.827.52.7

62.324.82.7

36211111


58026.

53728

40328

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0006 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1215.0000 1170.0000 887.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 2805.0000 2816.0000 2121.0000MEAN 2.0948 2.1788 2.2010STK!. DEV. (N) 0.6693 0.7049 0.6470STND. DEV. IN -1) 0.6698 0.7056 0.6478MEDIAN 2.0613 2.1187 2.1394

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF157.FLW F PET CF P-OLIF1 PC7 CF

1.000 9.1 16.5 55.2 100.0 7.8 15.1 51.7 100.0 4.7 11.4 41.4 100.02.000 33.2 60.2 46.0 8-3.530,2 58.4 43.9 84.9 25.7 62.2 36.7 80.63.000 11.4 20.7 1208 23.2 11.9 23.0 13.7 26.5 9.7 23.5 10.9 26.44.000 1.4 2.5 1.4 2.5 1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 1.2 2.9 1.2 2.s


55.156225.0000

51.651826.0000

41.392427.0000

wir-vmm hest 1111 .0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 115.4010 111.0089 90.2127SUM SQO. SCORES 267.0789 264.252-2 214.52.1?MEAN 2.0923 2.1492 2.1795STNO. DEV. (N) 0.6817 0.7050 0.6379STND. DEV. (N-.1) 0.6879 0.7120 0.6660MEDIAN 2.0555 2.0979 2.1208

ice) Pupil teams workingindependently

QUESTION 24 PART F

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004..000

0

Gtiatld

F PCT CF P-8LW ---F---FCT

3.3 6.2 54.119.4 35.9 50.822.9 42.4 31.38.4 15.6 8.4

()tide 4-CF P-BLW F

Ora&CF P--81.W

1 00.0 2.8 5.5 50.5 100.0 2.7 t.7 40.5 100.093.8 18.3 36.2- 47.7 94.5 14.2 35.1 37.8 93.357.9 19.2 38.1 29.4 58.3 16.6 41.1 23.5 58.215.5 10.2 20.2 10.2 20.2 6.9 17.0 6.9 17.0


54.133435.0000

50.494936.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 144.6942 137.8929SUM SOD. SCORES = 422.1877 412.4773MEAN 2.6729 2.7308STNO. DEV. (N) 0.8090 0.8434STND. DEV. (N-1) 0.8166 0.8518MEDIAN 2.6867 2.7184

SCORE INTERVALS PC I CF P -BLW F OCT CF P-BLW F

1.000 32 5.6 569 100.0 26 5.0 525 100.0 172.000 198 34.8 537 94.4181 34.5 499 95.01393.000 250 43.9 339 59.6204 38.9 318 60.6 1634.000 89 15.6 89 15.6114 21.7 114 21.7 75


=

=56937

52540

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE - 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1534.0000 1456.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 4498.0000 4410.0000MEAN 2.6960 2.7733STND. OEV. (N) 0.7981 0.8418STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.7988 0.8426MEDIAN . = 2.7180 2.7721

40.478635,00001.00004.0000

108.6816319.7429

2.68490.83090.84132.083

PCT

4.3

CF

394

P -8LW

100.035.3 377 95.741.4 238 60.419.0 75 19.0.

394371.00004.0000

1084.00003240,0000

2.75130.80860.80962.7515

CO Other (Specify)

QUEST ION 24

SCORE INTERVALS

PART

PC 1

1.000 0.3 6.62.000 -0:3 .-/.r3.000 0. 0 0. CI4.000 4.1 86.1

CASES PROCESSED =NO BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQD. SCORES =MEANSTNO. DEV. IN)SIND,' DEV. (1111MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

0

Oraiet Gtaek

CF`P.;-Blw pr-f CF P-81.14 E PCT CE P -BLw

4.8 100.0 0.7 12.9 5.1 100.0 0.1 2.6 3.0 100.04._5 9L 17,3- 9.3 4.5 87.1 0,1 2.6 2.9 97.24.1 86.3 0.2 3.7 4.0 77.8 0.3 11.1 2.8 94.64.1 86.3 3.8 74.1 3.8 74.12,5 83.4 2.5 83.A

4.796554 O. 0000

1. 00'00-4.0000

174558467:92133.66G70.87270,48103.9209

F PC T CF

1,000, 3 6.0 502, 000 4 8.0 473.000 0 0.0 434.000 43 86.0 43

5.1109497.0000

3.0051-396.0000

1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000

17.3255 11.274764.8490 43.5 2583.3899 3,75191.0940 0.63831 '7100 0078143.8249 3,9007

P -8LW

100.0 3

PCT

5.9

CF

51

P -8LW

100.0

F

1

PCT

3.4

CF

29

P-81.1,4

100.0-94.086.086.0

42

42

7.83.9

82.4

484442

94.1 1

86.3 382.4_24

3.410.382.8

282724

96.693.182.8_

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DA TA

==

50556

51514

MINIMUM VALUE =MAXI MUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORE S =

1.00004.0000

18360000 --1.00004.0000

185.0000STK§1515;- 707.0000 709.0000MEAN 3.6600 3.6275STND. DE V. (N) = 0.8628 0.1i623

TND. UV. = 008715 0.8709MEDIAN 3.9186 3.8929

29402

1.00004.0000

108.0000416.0000

3.72410.68970.74193.8958


0 Daily

C:3 Weekly

QMonthly

Rarely, if ever

Other (Specify)

QUESTION 25

SCORE INTERVAL S

1.0002.0003.0004.0005.41Ct6.000

5.22:*8

1.47.8

23.89.8

PCT

10.2

2.715.346.8L 9.4

CF

50.8-43:642.841.433:69.8

P-BLW F

100.0 3.1

PCT

6.6

CC P-8LW

46.2 100.0

F

2.1

PCT

5.7

CF

37.1 100.069;8 3.884.2 2.681.5 7.9

8.25.6

17.2

43.139.336.7

93.485.179.5

3.62.57.4

9.66.720.0

3.1-1

31.525.0

v4.384.778.0

66.121.919.4 6.9

47.315.0

28.86.9

62.3A5.0

14.96.6

40.217.8

21.56.6

58.037.8

--CASES 37.1299NO. BLANK DATA = 80.0000 84.0000 73.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 6.0000 6.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES . 165.1298 159.5455 121.0291SOK SOD. SCORES 748.4004

-4-.70E851,15.2554 530.E531

MEAN 4.0627 3.9660STND. DEV. 4N) 1.4245 1.3069 1.2883STNO. DEV. d N-11 1.4422 1.3239 1.3100MEDIAN 4":W181 4.60/5 4.4549SAMPLE FOR STATS = 40.9906 39.2713 30.5165

NOTE:VATUES DI LAST INTERVAL ERCEUUEU-R-(04 CALCULATIONS.


F-1 Daily

E) Weekly

0 B1- weekly

Monthly

0 Rarely, if ever

Ei Other (Specify)

QUESTION 25

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF 0-8LW F PCT CF P-BLW F

1.000 47 9.0 5232.000 27 5.2 4763.000 18 3.4 4494.000 88 16.8 4315.000 242 46.3 3436.000 101 19.3 101

PCT CF P-BLW

100.0 29 6.1 474 100.0 22 6.2 357 100.091.0 41 8.6 445 93.9 32 9.0 335 93.885,9 27 5.7 404 85.2 21 5.9 303 84.982.4 81 17.1 377 79.5 68 19.0 282 79.065.6 221 46.6 296 62.4 150 42.0 214 59.919.3 75 15.8 75 15.8 64 17.9 64 17.9


52383

47491

35774

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1,0000giCIMUM-liALUC 6.-0000 6.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES 41: 1717.0000 1621.0000 1171.0000SUM sqp.scpREs 7775.0000 7257.0000 5177.0000MEAN 4.06W1 4.062/ 3.9966STNO. DEV. IN) = 1.3674 1.2972 1.3024STND. DEV. IN-1) = 1.3690 1.2989 1.3046MEDIAN 4.6281 4.5973 4.5233SAMPLE FOR STATS = 422 399 293

NOTE:VALUES IN LAST INTERVAL EXClUDED FROM CALCULATIONS.

27. Which one of the following terms comes closest to describingclassroom approach to the teaching of compensatory reading?

0 Linguistic-phonetic

Language experience

0 Modified alphabet

your major

0 Eclectic

0 Other (Specify)

SCDFtE INTERVAL S F PCT CF P-BLW --F PCT CF P-BLW f CF P-BLiiPCT

1.000 35.3 66.7 52.9 100.0 27.7 56.7 48.8 100.0 17.8 44.9 39.6 100.02.000 6.5 12.2 17.6 33.3 9:1---I9;-8- 7172 43.3-26.7 21.8 55.13.000 C.2 0.3 11.2 21.1 0.2 0.5 11.5 23.5 0.0 0.0 10.4 26.44.000 9.0 16.9 11.0 20.8 9.4 19.2 11.3 23.1 9.2 23.3 10.4 26.45.GOG 2.0 3.8 2.0 3.8 ---179- 3.9 1.1 37.17- 1.2 3.1 1.2 ..i,1

CASES PROCESSED 52.81353 48.8455 39.5E20ND. BLANK DATA 54.0000 59.0060 47.0.Ci00MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0.000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 94:6694 94.6741 83.4894SUM SQO. SCORES 256.663i) 265.7715 241.2771MEAN

--STM-DEV..(14)1.790k1.2842

1.9382 2.10931.2-979 1.2832

STND. DEV. (N-1) 1.2964 1.3113 1.2997MEDIAN 1.2496 1.3824 1.67E9

SCORE INTERVAL S F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 N)A 549 100.0 281 55.6 505 100.0 165 43.2 382 100.02.000 68 1.2.4 188 34.2 104 20.6 224 44.4 108 28.3 217 56.83.000 2 0.4 120 21.9 2 0.4 120 23.8 0 0.0 109 28.54.000 97 17.7 118 21.5 101 20.0 118 23.4 95 24.9 109 28.55.000 21 3.8 21 3.8 17 3.4 17 3.4 14 3.7 14 3.7

CASES PROCEcSED 549 505 382NO. BLANK DATA = 57 60 49MINIMUM VALUE T.-- 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 996.0000 984.0000 831.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 2728.0000 2756.0000 2467.0000ME AN 1.8142 1.9485 2.1754STNO. DEV. = 1.2953 1.2887 1.3137STNO. REV. IN-1) = 1.2964 1.2900 1.3154MEDIAN 1..2604 1.3986 1.7407

28. How long have you used this method?


For one or two years

For three, four, or five years

ED For six years or more

SCORE INTERVALS F PCI CF P-BLW PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 9.3 16.0 57.8 100.0 12.8 24.1 53.1 100.0 10.0 23.5 42.4 100.02.000 11.4 19.7 48.6 64.0 11.8 2Z.2 -70.3 75.9 10.0 23.6 32.4 76.53.000 17.3 29.9 37.2 64.3 14.7 27.7 28.5 53.7 10.3 24.4 22.4 52.94.000 19.9 34.4 19.9 34.4 13.8 26.0 13.8 26.0 12.1 28.5 12.1 28.5

CASES PROCESSED 57.8327 53.1069 42.4065NO. BLANK DATA 8.0000 16.0000 19.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALVE 4,0000 4.0000 4.41000SUM OF SCORES 163.4692 135.7559 109.3965SUM SQO. SCOPES 528.6868 413.3518 336.6584MEAN 2.8266 2.5563 2.5796STNO. OEV. (NI 1.0733 1.1175 1.1332

DEV. (N..1) 1.1282 1.148MEDIAN 2.9779 2.6331 2.608

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF. F PCT FCF P.431-W PCT CF P -BLW

1.000 104 17.4 598 100.0 96 23.3 412 100.0 141 25.7 549 100.02.600 -128 21.4 494 82.6 107 26.0 316 76,7 118 21.5 408 74.33.000 167 27.9 366 61.2 104 25.2 209 50.7 148 27.0 290 52.84.000 199

. _33.3 199 33.3 105 25.5 105 25.5 142 25.9 142 25.9

CASES PROCESSEONO. BLANK DATA

598a

41219

54916

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1657.0000 1042.0000 1389.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 5303.0000 3140.0000 4217.0000MEAN 2.7709 2.5291 2.5301STND. DEV. (N) 1.0909 1.1067 1.1314SIND. DEV. (N-1) 1.0918 l-Tabl)1 1.1324MEDIAN 2.9012 2.521111 2.6047

29. To what extent do you use each of the following approaches to teachingcompensatory reading in your classroom?

Not atAll Minimally Somewhat Extensively

Basal readers UQUESTION 29 PART A

SCGRE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -ULW F PCT CF 1581.F4- -17 PCT CF P-04,

1.000 2.4 4.1 57.5 100.0 2.5 4.8 53.0 100.0 5.4 12.b-10:8

412.9 100.02.000 3.4 5.9 55.1 95.9 4.7 ---8.-8' 37.5 07.43-0.4- g5;2 .4TM-

3.000 11.3 19.6 51.7 89.9 13.7 25.9 45.7 86.3 12.5 29.3 32.9 76.74.00C 40.5 70.4 40.5 70.4 32.0 60.5 32.0 60.420.3 47.4 20.3 47.4

CASES PROCESSED = 57.5003 5'2.9505 4-.86t9NO. BLANK DATA 10.0000 19.0000 1:1.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1,0000 1:1313-0-0 1.0CCOMAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.00COSUM OF SCORES 204.8098 181.0946 133.5703SUM SOU. SCORES 764.6754 -656:U694-- 461.0593MEAN 3.5619 3.4201 3.11.16STNC. GEV. (N) 0.7821 0.8417 1.034oSTND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.7890 0.8498 1.0468MEDIAN 3.7893 3.6728 3.4122

SCORE INTERVAL F KT CF P -8LW F OCT CF P -8LW PCT CF P -8LW

1.000 25 4.2 595 100.0 52 12.5 415 100_.0 20 511:6_ 100.02.000 35 5.9 570 95.8 44 10.6 363 87.5 51 9.3 518 94.93.000 121 20.3 535 89.9 124 29.9 319 76.9 135 24.7 467 85.54.000 414 69.6 414 69.6 195 47.0_ 195 .47.0_ 332 332 60.8


59511_

41516_

54619

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES

2114.00007878.0000

_.1292.9.9094464.0000

1863.00006759.0000

ME 4N 3.5529 3.1133 3.4121SIND. DEV. IN) = 0.7855 1.0316 0.8584STND. DEV. (N-1) 0.7861 1.0329 0.8591MEDIAN 3.7814 3.3992 3.6777

Programmed ins traction

QUESTION 29 PART 8

SCORE INTERVALS F ?CT CF p-EiLw F OCT tF P-3LW F PCT CTP-13114

1.000 17.7 32.4 54.7 100.0 13.4'8;4

26.7 5000 100.0 907 24.1 41.1 100.02.000 8.9 16.2 37.0 67.6 16./- 36;7 71F0F9.0 21,8 31.2 75.93.000 16.9 30.9 28.1 51.4 19.6 39.2 28.3 5606 1407 35o7 2202 54.14.000 11.2 20.5 1142 20.5 8.7 17.5 807 U.S 7.6 18.4 7.6 18.4

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQL. SCORESMEANSING. 0EV. IN)SING. OEV. (N-1)MEDIAN

SCORE IN

54.'0S342.00001.00004.0000

131.0632384.93552.39581.13871.14932.5451

F PCT CF P-BLW F

50.03884500000

10-04.0000

123.7990)62.92432.47411.0639

-1707472.6689

PC 1 CF P-8LW--

F

41.1444:12000001000004.0000

102.2161299.16502.48431.04E41.06142.6143

4CF P -RLWPCT

1.000 200 35.7 560 10000 150 29.1 516 100.0 103 25.S 398 100.02.000 96 17.1 360 6403 78 .1501 366 70.9 80 20.1 295 74.13.000 152 27.1 264 47.1 201 39.0 288 55.8 142 35.7 215 54.04.000 112 20.0 112 0,0 16.9 87 16.9 73

. _18.3 73 18.3


'56046

51649

39633

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES

1296.0000 1257.0000- . . - _ _ . . --3663.0000

981.00003744.0000 2869.0000

MEAN 2.3143 2.4360 2.4648SIND.DEV. (N) 1.1532 1.0791 1.0645

DEV. (N-1) 1:1542 1.0802 1.0659MEDIAN 2.3333 2.6493 2.6127

A total phonics program

QUESTION 29 PART C

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW 'F'' -PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-6LW

1.000 12.3 22.5 54.5 100.0 13.1 26.5 49.4 100,0 14.1 34.5 41.0 100.02,00') 7.3 13.5 42.2 77.5 11.6-23.6 36.3 (3.5 19.3 32.5 26.8 65.53.000 16.2 29.8 34.9 64.0 16.0 32.5 24.6 49,9 9.9 24.3 13.5 33.04.000 18.6 34.2 18.6 34.2 8. 17.4 8.6 17.4 3.0 E.7 3.6 8.7

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATA ='MINIMUM

54.479141.0000

49.380357.0000

40.952338.0000

VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES =-SUM

150.1818 118.9156 84.8669SQD. SCORES = 495.8406 341.6531 213.9796

MEAN 2.7567 2.4082 2.0723STND. DEV. (N) 1.1483 1.0581 0.9647TND. CEV.AN-1) = 1.1590 1.0690

MEDIAN 2.9697 2.4957 1,9770

SCURF INTERVALS F PCT CF. P-BLW PCT CF PCT CF P -BLW

1.000 130 23.1 563 100t011 392 100.0 146 29.0 504100.0,2.000 68 12.1 433 76.9125 31.9 258 65.8 fli2-2,Or 358 7100--3.000 185 32.9 365 64.8 98 25.0 133 33.9 161 31.9 247 49.0_4.000 _180 32.0 113s! 32.0 35 8.9 35 8.9 86 17.1 86 17.1


==

56343

39239

504

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1541.0000 818.0000 ).195,0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 4947.0000 2076.0000 3415.0000MEAN 2.7371 2.0867 2.3716STND. t)EV. (N) = 1.1380 0.9703 1.0742STND. DEV. IN-1) = 1.1390 0.9715 1.0753MEDIAN 2.9514 L.9960 2.4550

A Supplementary p-ionics program

QUESTION 29 FART 0

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P -8LW CF P -iiLW

1.000 3.7 7.G 33.1 100.0 4.5 8.9 50.3 100.0 4.9 12.0 41.0 100.02.000 7.7 1444 91.1 13.2 32.). 36.1 88.093.0 z--20.3 45.93.000 25.0 47.1 41.8 78.6 25.9 51.5 35.6 70.8 20.7 50.3 22.9 55.94.000 16.7 31.5 16.7 31.5 9.7 19.3 9.7 19.3 2.3 5.6 2.3 5.6

CASES PROCESSED 53.1109 50.3377 41.0256NO. BLANK DATA 49.0000 37.0000 34.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 161.0135 141.5539 102.3549SUM SOD. SCORES 27.2644 --4S4.0796 280.0288MEAN 3.0316 2.8121 2.4949SING. DEV. IN) 0.8583 0.8459 0.7755STNO. OEV. (*-11 0.8665 0.7651MEDIAN 3.1074 2.9036 2.6115

SCORE INTERVALS F PC T CF CF 11BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 42 7.6 556 100.0 52 9.9 525 100.0 50 12.6 396 100.02.000 84 15.1 514 92.4 102 19.4 473 90.1 137 34.6 346 87.43.000 265 47.7 430 77.3 268 51.0 371 70.7 184 46.5 209 52.84. 99. 165 29.7 165 29.7 103 19.6 103 19.6 25 6.3 25 6.3

CASES PROCESSED 556 525 396NO. BLANK DATA 50 40 35410111a VALUE-- 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.D000SUM OF SCORES = 1665.0000 1472.0000 976.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 5403.0000 4520.0000 2654.0000MEAN 2.9946 2.8038 2.4646STNO. DEV. IN) 0.8660 0.8650 0.7922SIND. DEV. (N-1) 0.8668 -0.8658 0.7932MEDIAN 3.0736 2.9049 2.5598

Language experience

QUESTION 29 PART E

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-81w F -PCT -CF FiCT CF P-8Liq

1.000 1.3 2.4 56.3 100.0 2.7 5.-4 51.0 100.0 1.7 4.0 4.1.7 100.G2.000 6.9 12.2 55.0 97.63.00C 31.9 56.8 48.1 85.4 24.6 48.2 40.5 79.4 Z0.5 49.0 31.4 75.24.000 16.1 28.7 16.1 28.7 15.9 31.1 15.9 31.1 10.9 26.i 10.9 26.1


56.284522.0000

51.023534.0000

41.730727.CCC0

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0131TO 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.00coSUM OF SCORES

-SUM'SQ0.175.4576 155.7075 124.0567

SCORES 574.4900 509.5813 395.0300MEAN 3.1173 3.05.17 2.9728STK:. DEV. (N) 0.6994 0.8212 0.7929

OEV. (N-1) 0.7057 ---0.8294 0.8026MEDIAN 3.1240 3.1086 3.0129

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW P PCT CF P-BLW F TV' f-61.ti

1.000 15 2.6 582 10.0.p. 28 5.3 529 19 4.72.000 73 12.5 567 97.4 8 16.4 501

_100.094.7 74 384 95.3

3.000 330 56.7 494 84.9 245 46.3 414 78.3 199 49.4 310 76.9164 28.2 164 28.2 169 169 31.9 111 111 27.5


58224

52936

40328

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SOH OF SCORkS = 1807.0000 1613.0000 1208.0000SUM SOD. SCORES -= 5901.6066 38B2.0000MEAN 3.1048 3.0491 2.9975SING. 0.7066 0.8326 0.8048STNb. DEV. (N-1) = 0.7072 0.8334 0.8058MEDIAN 3.1152 3.1102 3.0452

A linguistic program

QUESTION 29 PART F

SCORE INTERVALS F NCI CF P -BLW PCT CF P-BLW F PCT Cr- P-81:;4

1.000 9.0 16.8 53.4 100.0 7.2 14.6 49.1 100.0 7.4 18.2 40.9 100.02.000 10.1 19.0 44.4 83.2 12.0--24.5 41.9 35.4 9.7 23.7 33.5 81.83.000 24.3 45.6 34.3 64.2 23.2 47.3 29.9 60.8 18.5 45.3 23.8 58.14.000 9.9 18.6 9.9 18.6 6.6 13.5 6.6 13.5 5.2 12.8 5.2 12.8

CASES PROCESSED - 53.3650 49.0694 40.9028NO. BLANK DATA = 45.0000 58.0000 36.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.000 1.0060 1.0.000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 141.9947 127.4544 103.3679SUM SOD. SCORES = 427.5152 370.4846 296.7417MEAN 2.6608 2.5974 2.5272STND. DEV. IN) = 0.9656 0.8964 0.9318STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.9747 0.9057 0.9434MEDIAN 2.8120 2.7292 2.6789

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT---------CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 92 16.5 558 100.0 77 15.2 506 100.0 76 19.2 395 100.02.000 100 17.9 466 83.5119 23.5 429 84.8 105 26.6 319' 80.83.000 266 47.7 366 65.6234 46.2 310 61.3 169 42.8 214 54.24.000 100 17.9 100 17.9 76 15.0 76 15.0 45 11.4 45 11.4


==

558. . .

506. _

5939536

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000_

1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE - 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1490.0000 1321.0000 973.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 4486.0000 3875.0000 2737.0000MEAN 2.6703 2.6107 2.4633STND. DEV. IN) = 0.9535 0.9179 0.9281STND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.9544 0.9188 0.9292MEDIAN 2.8271 2.7436 2.5976

Non - standard orthography

(ex., i.t.a.)

QUESTION 29

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000


==

--MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =-.SUPT SOD. SCORES =MEAN =

STNO. DEV. (N) =--STEM. DEV. (N -I1 =

MEOIAN

a

PART G

F PC7 CF PCT 'CF--PB1WP -BLW F- *WA' CF P-1314

42.5 85.4 49.7 100.0 38.2 82.2 46.4 100.0 32.3 64.0 38.1 100.04.0 8.1 7.2 14.6 4.4 9.6 -8.3 17.8 4.2 11.1 5.9 15.42.5 5.0 3.2 6.5 2.9 6.2 3.8 8.2 1.4 2.6 1.6 4.30.7 1.5 0.7 1.5 0,9 2.0 0.9 2.0 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.6

SCORE INTERVAL S F

1.000 4492.000 343.000 274.000 9...

CASES PROCESSEDND. BLANK DA TA

==

MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQO. SORE S =MEAN =STND, DEV. (N) =STND. DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN

s

2C

49.7171 46.4095 3d.123284.0000 82.0000 57.0000I.00CO 170.01}0 1.00004.0000 4.0000 4.0000

60.9256 59.4172 45.870592.7251 96.8064 6::).62661.2254 1.2803 1.0320.6023 0.6684 0.52320.60891.0852

0.61511.1082

0.53021.0508

PCT

86.56.65.21.7._

CF

519-70369

P-BLW

100.0---_.13.56.91.7

F

312

PCT

83.9

CF

372

P 8-LW

100.0

F

395

PC T

82.8

CF

477

P-BLW

100.044142

11.83.80.5

60162

16.14.30.5

4726

9

9.95.51.9

82359

17.27.31.9_

519_87 __

37259

47788

1.0000 1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000 4.0000

634.0000 450.0000 603.0000972.0000 646.0000 961.0000

1.2216 1.2097 1.26420.6169 0.5227 0.64540.6175 0.5234 0.64611.0780 1.0962 1.1038

Words in color

QUESTION 29

SCORE INTERVAL S

PART H

0

F PC T

0

CF P -BLW F PC T CF P -BLIi F pCT CF P-81-ii

1.0002.0003.0004.G00

CASES PROCESS W) =P.0. 81. ANK DA TAMINIMUM VALUE -MAXIMUM VALUE -

37.57.56.11.5

71.3 52.614.2 15.111.7 7.62.8 1.5

52.615:556.000G1.00004.0000

100.0 35.7 74.5 4709 100.0 :30.525.54:39.5 4.31.4 0.1

71.9 39.211.0 8.710.9 4.30.2 6.1

100.022 0 i11.1

0.2

28.714.52.8

7. 63.90.7

16.0 12.28.1 4.51.4 0.7

47.862562.0000

39.164143.0000

1.000Q400000

1.00004.0000

SUM OF SCORES = 76.8490 65.2543 52.2518SUM S00. SCORES 146.5092 111.7447 87.3612MEAT = 1.4606 1.3634 1.383557ND. DEV. ( N) = 0.8070 0.6899 0.6718ST.140. DEV. I N..1 / = 0.8148 0.6972 0.6805MEDIAN = 1.2016 1.1708 1.1417

SCORE INTERVAL S F PCT CF P-81-hi----__

F_

PC T CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-Blw

1.000 395 72.1 548 pq.p 380 76.2 499 100.0 305 78.8 387 100.02.000 82 15.0 153 27.9 72 14.4 119 23.8 45 11.6 82 21.23.000 56 10.2 71 13.0 40 8.0 47 9.4 36 9.3 37 9.64.000 15 2.7 15 2.7 7 1,4 7 1.4 1 0.3 1 0.3

CASES PROLE SSED = 548 499 387NO . GI- ANK DA TA. 58 66 44MINIMUM VALUE - -row 1..0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORE S = 787.0000 672.0000 50700000SUM-SOD . -SCORES = 1467. 6600 1140.0000 825.0000ME AN 1.4361 1.3467 1.3101STND. DEV. I N /._ =_ 0.7839 0.6863 0.6446StN-0 .-- ISEV . IN--1) 0.7846 0.6870 0.6454MEDIAN =. 1.1937 1.1566 1.1344

Individualized programs

QUESTION 29 PART I

O E


1.000 9.1 16.62.000 12,0 21.93.000 20.0 36.64.000 13.6 24.9

CF P-BLW

54.7 100.0 5.3-83;471,5

33.6 61.5 21.313.6 24.9 15.0


==

54.659034.0000

'MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 147,43333UM SOO. SCORES = 454:5178MEAN 2.6973STND. UEV. (N) 1.0198STN71: 0EV. 4N-11 -1-:0292MEOIAN 2.8130


1.000 102 17.92.000 128 22.53.000 '10 .36.84.000 130 22.8

CASES PROCESSED =No. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =SUM SQO. SCORESMEANSTND. UV. (N)STND. DEV. 4N-11 =MEDIAN m

570361.00004.0000

1508.00004584.0000

2.64561.02121.02212.7619

PG I P -ULW r PCT CF P -BLW

10,5 50.2 100.0 3.6 S.0 41.8 100.017.-0 44.9 6975 6,4 15.0 3001 91.042.5 36.4 72.5 17.5 41.7 31.8 76.030.0 15.0 30.0 14.3 34.3 14.3 34.3

CF P-BLW

5.7o 100.0 37468 82.1 63340 59.6 168130 22.8 139

50,177937.00004000004.0000

146.51964124.16 /Z

2.92000.93990.94$43.0294

41.825624.00001.00004.0000

126.0425415.4363

3,01320.92310.93433.1234

PCI CV15:81*--F PCT CF P-BLW

9.1 4 07_100.0 58 11.0 527 100.015.5 3 70 90.9 85 16.1 469 89,041.3 3 07 75.4222 42.1 384 72.934.2 1 39 34,2162 30.7 162 30.7

40724

52738

1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000

1223.0000 1542.00004025.0000 4988.0000

3.0049 2.92600.9273 0.95050.9285 0,95143.1161 3.0428

Technological devices such asthe "talking typewriter" orteaching machines

o E 1-1 D

QUESTION 29 PAR T

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

J

F

34.37.78.13.0

PCT CF P-BLW

64.7 53.1 100.0 32.314.5 18.8 3'5O 3 -7:115.3 11.1 20.8 8.15.6 3.0 5.6 2.3

F-PC7 CF-1581,W.

64.7 49.8 10000-1-43

F PCT CF 76-4Ciir

26.8 66.7 4002 100.0-11:6--35 v37

16.3 1004 21.04.7 2.3 4.7

507 14,2 13.4502 13.0 106204 6.0 204

33.319.06.0

CASES PROCESSED = 53.0927 49.8361 40.1863NO. BLANK OA TA -MINIMUM VALUE =

48.00001.0000

-... _49.0000 3800000

100000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 400000SUM OF SCORES - 85.8734 80.1779

-171.029363,6043

SUM SOD. SCORES = 185.3956 135.3421MEAN = 1.6174 1.6088 1.5827STNO. OE V. (N) = 0.9359 0.9184 0092E9-VCN.O. DEV. (N1) = 0.9448 0.9278 Oo 9407PIE 0 IAN 1.2730

*PC

1.2723 1.1,2491

SCORE INTERVALS F T CF P -8LW F PCT C1 PBLW PCT CF P -BLW

1.000 357818732

64.114 0515.65.7

557_100.0 335 65.4 512 100.0 265 67.8 391 100.02.0003.0004.000

---

^200 35.9119 21.432 5..7

7177

_29

13.915.05.7

17710629

34.620.75.7

584820

14.812.35.1

1266820

32.217.45.1

CASES PROCESSED =NO . BLANK DA TA =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES

--SUM sciti; SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. 1N) =

-

STND. DE V. 1 N1 / =MEDIAN =

=

=

55749i.00004.0000

908.00001976.0000

1.63020.94350.94431.2801

512531.00004.0000

824.00001776.0000

1.60940.93740.93831.2642

391401.00004.0000

605.00001249.0000

1.54730.89450.89571.2377


QUESTION 29 PART K

SCORE IN F PCT CF P-BLW F P-8Li---F---PCT --CF-P-BLWPCT CF

1.000 4.1 35.2 11.5 100.0 2.1 A,t.c 5.6 100.0 3.7 5G.5 7.4 100.02.000 1,2 10.5 7.5 64.8 8,7 37.7--49«5004 ,9 2.9 52.0 -D.63.000 3.7 31.8 6.3 54.3 1.8 21.1 2.8 49.1 1.6 21.4 3.0 40.84. GCO 2.6 22.5 2.6 22.5 1.0 18.1 1.0 18,1 1.4 19.4 1.4 19.4


==

11.5454482.0000

5.6494367.0000

7.4091469.0000

MINIMUM VALUE = 1,0000 1.41000 1,0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 27.8904 12.3835 15.5463SUM SOD. SCORES = 83.4923 35.4827 43.6336MEAN = 2.4157 2,1920 2,0983SIND. DEV. (N)

--STND. DEV. (N-1)=

=1.18151.2363

1.2149 1.21921.3391 1,3109

MEDIAN = 2.6351 2.1996 1.4910

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT- . .

Cr' P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 43 39.8. 1.08_100.0 44 54.3 81 100.0 27 46.6 58 100.02.000 9 8.3 65 60.2 7 8.6 37 45.7 2 3.4 31 53.43.000 32 29.6 56 51.9 15 18.5 30 37.0 18 31.0 29 50.04.000 24 22.2 24. 22.215_ 18.5 15 18.5 11 19.0 11 19.0

CASES PROCESSEDNO. 8LANKDATA

==

10d498

81484

58373

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1,0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 253.0000 163.0000 129.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 751.0000 447.0000 373.0000MEAN = 2.3426 2.0123 2.2241STNO. DEV. (N) = 1.2108 1.2120 1,2183STND. DELI, (N-1) 1.2164 1.2196 1.2289MEOIAN = 2.5625 1.4205 2.5000

30. Who selected the materials that you are currently using in your teaching ofcompensatory reading?

0 You, and you alone

You, as a member of a team or committee

O An individual who asked for your views; or a team or committee ofwhich you were not a member but on which your views were represented

O An individual, team, or committee, operating without any input fromyou

O Other (Specify)

QUEST ION 30

SCORE 1N TER-VAL s P PCT CFP -BLW F PCT CF r-BLW F PCT CF p-Bul

1.000 7.9 14.3 55.0 100.0 10.7 21.1 51.0 100.0 9.1 22.1 41.1 100.02.000 14.3 26.0- 47..1-65;7 12.5 24.4 40.3 78.9 9.8 23.8 32.0 77.93.000 12.2 22.3 32.8 59.6 9.4 18.5 27.8 54.5 9.4 22.8 22.2 54.04. 000 15.0 27.3 20.5 37.3 12.6 24.8 18.4 36.0 9.2 22.3 12.8 31.2

-15-0-C. 5.5 1D-.1 5.5 ro.1 5.T 11.2 5.7 11.2 3.7 8.9 3.7 8.9

CASES PROCESSED --= 54.9517 51.0142 41.1255ND. BLANK 0A TA = 33.0000 38.0000 30.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.00000 14.0000MAXI MUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000

--S014 OP SCORES - -160a-41. 143.1910 111.8912SUM SQO. SCORES 553.4312 490.9661 371 .2732MEAN .... 2.9270 2.8069 2.7207STN D. DEV. TNT -1:2 2Z-2 1.3212 1.2749STNO. DEV. (N-1) 1.2375 1.3343 1.2907ME0 IAN 2.9314 2.7433 2.6772

30. Who selected the materials that you are currently using in your teaching ofcompensatory reading?

CD You, and you alone

0 You, as a member of a team or committee

0 An individual who asked for your views; or a team or committee ofwhich you were not a member but on which your views were represented

ri An individual, team, or committee, operating without any input fromyou

[:) Other (Specify)

QUESTION 30

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF 13-6-64 F PCT CF

1.000 85 14.8 573 100.0 1.14_2.1.7 525 100.0 93 23.2 401 100.02.000 132 23.0 488 85.2 114 21.7 411 78.3 88 21.9 308 76.83.000 136 23.7 356 62.1 104 19.8 297 56.6 89 22.2 220 54.94.000 164 28.6 220 38.4 135 25.7 193 36.8 91 22.7 131 32.75.000 56 9.8 56 9.8--8 58 11.0' 40 10.0 40 10.0


- 57333

525 40140 30

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES 1693.0000 1484.0000 1100.0000SUM SOO. SCORES = 5861'0000 5116.0000 3702.0000MEAN 2.9546 2.8267 ?.7431STND. OEN/. (N) = 1.2-243 1.3247 1.3066STNO. OEV. 1N-1) = 1.2253 1..3259 1.3082MEDIAN 3.0110 2.8317 2.7191

31. How satisfied are you with the materials you are currently using in yourteaching of compensatory reading?

Totally satisfied

0 Satisfied in major aspects; dissatisfied in some minor ones


0 Dissatisfied in major aspects; satisfied only in some minor ones

0 Totally dissatisfied

QUFST!I)N 31

SCCE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -6L' F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CV0;st_w

1.000 84 14.0 598 100.0 63 11.3 558 100.0 51 12.2 418 100.02.000 393 65.7 514 66.0 345 61.8 495 88.7 236 56.5 367 87.83.000 86 14.4 121 20.2 92 16.5 150 26.9 97 23.2 131 31.34.000 31 5.2 35 5.9 52 9.3 58 10.4 30 7.25.000 4 0.7 4 0.7 6 1.1 6 1.1 4 1.0

.34___8.14 1.0

CASES PROCESSED = 59t) i58 416NJ. BLANK OhTAMINIMUM VALUE

=

1.00007

1.0000131.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 5.09PQ____SUM CIF SCORES 1272.0000 1267.0000 954.0300

SUM SOO. SCORES = 3026.0000 3253.0000 2448.0000ME.IN 2.1271 2.2706 2.2823

OEV. (N) 0.7319 0.8216 0.8047SIND. PO/. = 0.7325 0.8218 0.8057MEDIAN 2.0471 2.1261. 2.1695

31. How satisfied are you with the materials you are currently using in Yourteaching of compensatory reading?

0 Totally satisfied

ED Satisfied in major aspects; dissatisfied in some minor ones


0 Dissatisfied in major aspects; satisfied only in some minor ones

0 Totally dissatisfied

QUESTION 31

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -8LW F FCT CF P -8-LW F FCT CF P-81,

1.000 7.4 12.9 57.4 100.0 6.1 11.3 54.0 100.0 6.2 14.3 43.2 100.02.CCO 39.6 69.0 50.0 67.1 34:0 63.1.; 41.9 tio.r 2.5 5v.0 37.0 85.73.000 7.8 13.6 10.4 18.2 8.6 15.9 13.9 25.7 8.8 20.3 11,5 26.74.000 2.3 4.0 2.6 4.5 4.8 8.8 5.3 9.8 2.6 eG 2.8 6.45.000 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6, 0.5 I.G 0.5 1.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4

CASES PROCESSED = 57.4171 53.9500 43.1871140.-61_14* 'DATA 8.0400 7.0000 13.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000

'120:81745.0000 5.0000

--1-0F.SCOkE-S7_44 111.5879 54.6564SUM SOD. SCORES = 280.8347 309.1858 232.7806MEAN = 2.1042 2.2537 2.1S18-MO. IIEV. IN) = 0-.-6608--

_0.8073 0.7k56

STND. ()EV. (N-11 = 0.6868 0.8149 0.7746MEDIAN = 2.0385 2.1150 2.1046

32. How frequently do you use the following materials in the course of yourcompensatory reading instruction?

NotAvailable Often Sometimes

Textbooks other than basalreaders

QUESTION 32 PART A

0 D 0

Rarely orNever Use

SCORE INTERVALS F PC T CF PCT CF P -BLWCF P-8LW

1.000 1.7 2.9 57.9 100.0 1.8 4.3 42.8 100.0 1.6 2.9 53.6 100.02.000 29.9 51.6 56.2 97.1 17.4 40.7 41.0 95.7 25.4 47.5 52.0 97.13.000 Z2.5 38.9 26.3 45.5 18.1 42.2 23.6 55.0 21.1. 39.4 26.6 49.64.000 3.8 6.6 3.8 6.6 5.5 12.9 505 12.9 5.5 10.2 5.5 10.2

CASES PROCESSED 57.9097 42.8237 53.6138NO BLANK DATA 7.0000 17.0000 12.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1=elati 1.0000 100000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 44,0000SUM OF SCORES 144.3326 112.8679 137.7339SUM SQO. SCORE S 385;1826 322.1777 381.0596MEAN 2.4924 2.6361 2.5690SIND. DE V (N) = 0.6629 0.7578 0.7125STNO. OEV. IN -1) 6:6681 0.7668 0.7193MEDIAN 2.4128 206195 2.4918

SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T CT P BLW F PCT CF F PCT CF

1.000 14 2.3 599 100.0 19 3.4 551 100.0 17 4.1 413 100.02.000 307 51.3 585 97.7 258 46.8 532 96.6 158 38.3 396 95.93.000 236 39.4 278 46.4 216 39.2 274 49.7 177 42.9 238 57.64.000 _ 42 7.0 42 7.0 58 10.5 58 10.5 61 14.8 61 14.8

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA -

5997

55114

41316

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1504. 0000 1415.0000 1108.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 4038.0000 3923.0000 3218.0000MEAN 2.5109 2.5681 2.6828STNO. 0EV. (N) = 0.6610 0.7245 0.7709STNO. DEV. (1+,11) 0.6615 0.7251 0.7718MEDIAN 2.4300 2.4942 2.6780

Books and printed materialsother than textbooks

QUEST ION 32 PART

SCORE INTERVAL S

8

F PC T CF P-BLW -g TT. P=BIT, F PCT CF

1.0(30 0.4 0.6 57.7 100.0 0.4 0.7 53.5 100.0 0.4 0.9 43.1 100.02.000 35.b 61.b 57.4 99.4.33 53.1 99.3 28.9 67.1 42.7 99.13.000 19.1 33.0 21.8 37.8 16.7 31.2 19.3 36.1 12.9 29.9 13.8 32.04.000 2.7 4.7 2.7 4.7 2.7 5.0 2.7 5.0 0.9 2.1 0.9 2.1

CASES PROCESSED = 57.7395 53.4902 43.0533NO. BLANK DATA = 7.0000 12.0000 15.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.'0000 1:0000 1.00G0MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 139.6657 128.6084 100.3941SUM SQO. SCORES = 358.0867 ST8.0957- 246.1890MEAN 2.4189 2.4043 2.3219STND. OEV. IN) = 0.5922 0.5941 0.5298STND. 0EV. (N-1) = 0.5974 0.5997 0.5361MEDIAN 2.3016 2.2804 2.2316

SCORE INTERVAL S PC I CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW

1.pqo 5 _0..8.. 599-_10 0. 0 3 0.5 552 100.0 4 1.0 416 100.02.000 359 59.9 594 99.2354 64.1 549 99.5 277 66.6 412 99.03.000 20B 34.7 235 39.2169 30.6 195 35.3 124 29.8 135 32.54. 000 27. 4.5 27 4.5 24 4.7 26 4.7 11 2.6 11 2 ..6


==

5997

55213

41615

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SON OF SCORES 1455.0000 1322.0000 974.0000_SUM SOD. SCORES 3745.0000 3356.0000 2404.0000MEAN 2.4290 2.3949 2.3413STND. OEV. (N) = 0.5931 0.5865 0.5449STND. OEV. (N-l) = 0.5936 0.5871 0.5456MEDIAN 2.3203 2.2712 2.2365

-

Newspapers, magazines, andother periodicals

QUESTION 32 PART C

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUEMAX/MUM VALUE 'SUM OF SCORES -SUM SQO. SCORES =MEANSTNC. DEV. IN) =SIND. DEV. 4N-11MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK OATA =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE -SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSTNC. DEV. INI =STND. DEV. IN-1) =MEDIAN

E

F PCT CF

1.2 2.115.8 28.324.8 44.314.2 25.3

56.054.839.014.2

55.983718.00001.00004.0000

163.9422514.4353

2.92840.78330.79042.9425

F PCT

13155266154

2.226.445.226.2

D

P-BLW

100.0 6.7

PCT

1.7

CF P-BLW

42.3 100.097.9 15.6 37.5 4105 98.369.6 20.7 48.8 25.7 60.825.3 5.1 11.9 5.1 1109

CF

588575420154

588181.00004.0000

1737.00005491.0000

2.95410.78220.78292.9737

42.282721.00001.04004.0000

114.5909330.8186

2.71010.65230.70062.72C8

F PCT CF P-BLW

1.1 2.1 53.2 100.0142:2267MT.V27.8 52.1 37.9 71.310.2 19.1 10.2 19.1

53.227014.00001.00004.0000

153.43864T0.4585

2.88270.72710.73402.9079

P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW F PCT

100.0 14 2.6 549 100.0 9 2.297.8 145 26.4 535 97.4154 37.771.4 280 51.0 390 71.0195 47.726.2 110 20.0 110 20.0 51 12.5

CF P-BLit

409 100.0400 97.8246 60.151 12.5

54916

40922

1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000

1584.0000 1106.00004874.0000 3196.0000

2.8852 2.70420.7439 0.70830.7445 0.70922.9125 2.7128

Teacher-prepared materials(dittos, etc.)

QUESTION 32

SCORE INTERVAL S

1.0002.0003.0004.000

PAR T Ct

0 0 0

E PCT CF P-BLW PCT

0.1 0.3 57.7 100.0 0.0 0.046.910.4

81.318.0

57.610.7

99.718.5

37'. 5

14.8 27.60.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 1.3 2.3

CF P-8LW

53.6 100.053.6 TOO O16.1 30.01.3 2.3


==

57.71869.0000

53.576410.0000

N )(RUM VALUE 1.0000 2.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 126.1990 124.4750SUM SOD. SCORES = 285.4524 303.4121MEAN 2.1865 2.3233SIND. 0E11. N) = 0.4062 0.5151

DEV. = 0.4098 0.b200MEDIAN 2.1120 2.2140

SCARE- INTERVAL S

1.0002. 0003.0004.000

F PCT CF P-BLW

2 0.3 597 .100.0490 82.1 595 99.7103 17.3 105 17.6

2 0.3 2 0.3

F PCT

r PCT CF

0.1 C.3 42.826.8 62.8 42.613.0 30.4 15.82.8 6.6 2.8

CF P-8LW F PCT

412.77118.00001.00004.0000

104.0132269.3171

431.90.61E70.62602.2516

0

CF P-8

0 0.0 555 10_9,0 1 0.2 413 100379 68.3 555 100.0 250 60.5 412 99162 29.2 176 31.7 140 33.9 162 3914 2.5 14 22_5 22 5.3 22 5

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAKINMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESLIM _AF .,sccT.ESUM SOD. SCORESMEANSIND. DEV. (N)

-s-fiNTEG-MEDIAN

=

=--=

=...

5979

55510

1.00004.0000

U99.00002921.0000

2.17590.39790.39832.1051

2.0DDO4.0000

1300.00003198.0000

2.34230.52500.52542.2322

4131$1000004.0000

1009.00002613.0000

2.44310.59850.59922.3220

Motion pictures and/orfilmstrips

QUESTION 32 PART E

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F---P.CT- CF P-BLW' F FCT CF P-6-LW

1.000 1.0 1.7 56.9 100.0 1.4 2.6 53.2 100.0 2.0 4.7 42.7 100.02.000 20.5 36.1 55.9 98.3 15.0282 --5178-97.4- 11.2 26.3 40.8 95.33.000 26.7 46.9 35.4 62.226.7 50.2 36.8 69.2 20.0 46.8 29.5 69.14.000 8.7 15.3 8.7 15.310.1 19.0 10.1 19.0 9.5 22.3 9.5 22.3

CASES PROCESSED 56.9119NO. BLANK DATA 10.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCOPES = 156.9376SUM SOD. SCORES 462.5747MEAN 2.7576STND. DEV. IN/ = 0.7237STND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.7302MEDIAN 2.7597

SCORE INTERVALS F.__PCT

1.000 11 1.82.000 269 35.13.000 282 47.34.000 94 15.8

CASES PkOCFSSEDNO. BLANK DATA =

59610

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1651.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 4889.0000MEAN 7- 2.7701STNO. DEV. (NI = 0.7276STND. DEV. IN-11 =

_0.7282

MEDIAN = 2.7766

53.194515.0000-17.1K0-0

4.0000151.9607463.6689

2.8567

42.745318.00001.;(1000

4.0000122.5567379.34232.8672

0.7455 0.8E660.75267 0.81E22.8831 2.9015

CF P-814-F iitf- CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

596 100.0 16 2.9 550 100.0 17 4.1 413 100.0585 98.2155 -28.2 534 97.1 96 23.2 396 95.9376 63.1271 49.3 379 68.9 198 47.9 300 72.694 15.8108 19.6 108 19.6 102 24.7 102 24.7

55015

413)8

1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000

1571.0000 1211.00004803.0000 3815.0000

2.8564 2.93220.7576 0.79970.7583 0.80062.8838 2.9722

Slides and transparencies

QUESTION 32 PAK] 1-

SCORE INTERVALS F PC1

1.000 3.2 5.82.000 10.1 18.23.000 23.1 41.54.000 19.2 34.5

D

CF P-BLW F

55.7 100.0 3.052.4 94.2 9.242.3 76.022.019.2 34.5 17.3

PC T

D

CF P-BLW

5.9 51.5 100.0.17-.9----W8757-94.142.6 39.3 76.333.6 17.3 33.6

CASES PROCESSE0NO. BLANK DATA

55.655824.0000

51.481332.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.6600MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 169.5793 156.5333SUM SQO. SCORES 558.7451 514.41.ifMEAN 3,0469 3.0406ST NO. (iEV. IN) 0.8692 0.8643

y0:87ST. 0EV. IN-1NO ) 0.8771 9MEOIAN 3.1258 3.1160

SCOPI- INTERVALS F PCT CFP-BLW-- F

1.000 36 6.2 583 100.02.000 100 17.2 547 93.83.000 229 39.3 447 76.74.000 218 37.4 218 37.4

CASE.; PRUCESSE040. BLANK DATA

MAXIMUM VALUEOF SCORES

SUM SQO. SCORESMEANSTND. 5EV. IN)STND. DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN

583231.00004.0000

_1795,00005985.0000

3.07890.88670.88753.1790

33101212186

2.0

PCT

4.8

CF

4C.8

P -6L0

100.07.2 17.6 38.8 ')5.217.3 42..5 31.6 77.614.3 35.1 14.3 35.1

40.772329.00001.00004.0000

125.5483415.64283,07930.84410.85463.105

P-8LW F PC I CF P-BLWPCT CF

6.2 532 21. 401 00.019.0 499 93.8 60 15.0 380 94.839.8 398 74.8 168 41.9 320 79.835.0 186 35.0 152 152 37._9

53233

40130_____________

1.0000-

1.00004.0000 4.0000

1615.0000 1253.00005321.0000 4205.0000

3.0357 3.12470.8867 0.85010.8876 0.85113.1226 3.2113

Tape recordings and records

QUESTION 32 PART G

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F FLT CF

1.000 1.1 2.1 56.0 100.0 1.7 3.2 52.4 100.0 1.4 3.4 41.7 100.02.000 20.7 37.0 54.9 97.9 16.0 30.4 5 TIT,7 96.6 13.0 31":1 40.3 g6.63.000 26.2 46.7 34.2 61.0 26.5 50.5 34o8 66.3 18.9 45.2 27.4 65.64.000 8.0 14.3 8.0 14.3 8.3 15.8 8.3 15.8 8.5 20.4 8.5 20.4

CASES PROCESSEU = 56.0347 52.4291 41.7127NO. BLANK DATA = 16.0000 23.0000 22.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 /00OO 14,0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 153.1162 146.2522 11708e69SUM SOO. SCORES = 447.6687 436.6248 358.9346MEAN 2.7325 2.7895 2.8281STND. DEV. (N) 0.7228 0.7392 0.7861STND. OEV. (N-1) = 0.7293 0.7464 0o7557MEOIAN 2.7354 2.8234 208444

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F ***Vel CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 14 2.4 590 100.0.19 3.5 541 100.0 15 3.7 408 100.02.000 ?09 35.4 576 97.6169 31.2 522 96.5 125 30.6 393 96.33.000 282 47.8 367 62.2254 47.0 353 65.2 177 43.4 268 65.74.000 85 14.4 85 14.4 99 18.3 99 18.3 91 22.3 91 22.3


--MIWIMU*4-VaUE*--

==

590161.0000

541244.-6600

408)3

1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES

-SUM-1618.0000 1515.0000 1160.0000

SOD. SCORES = 4565.0000 3564.0000MEAN 2.7424 2.8004 2.8431STND. 0EV. (N) = J.7258 0.7720 0.8074STND. DEV. (N-11 = 0.7265 0.7727 0.8084MEDIAN 2.7553 2.8248 2.8616

Video or television tapes

QUESTION 32 PART H

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -BLW F P01 V-OLW r V-81.1v

1.000 16.5 30.3 54.4 100.0 17.3 34.6 49.9 100.0 12.2 30.S 39.5 100.02.000 6.8 12.6 37.9 69.7-4:3- ---8-.5-----32;"6---65;4-' 3.6 27.3 69.13.000 7.8 14.4 31.0 57.1 7.8 15.6 28.3 56.9 6.0 15.2 23.7 60.04.000 23.2 42.7 23.2 42.7 20.6 41.3 20.6 41.3 17.7 44.8 17.7 44.8

CASES PROCESSED = 54.3521 49.8655 39.4857NO. BLANK DATA = 39.0000 45.0000 45.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 400000SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES

14604867485.7283

131.4124 108.1856433:5759-- II63.7878

MEAN 2.6951 2.6453 2.73'46SIND. DEV. IN) 1.2934 1.3225 1.3065SUE). DES/. (N*1) = 1.3055 1.335-9 1.3233MEDIAN 2.9939 2.9396 3.1593

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P*BLW CF P -BLW PC7 Cr-P*81W

1.000 171 30.2 567 j00.0 167 516 100.0 122 31.7 385 100.02.000 68 12.0 396 69.8 48 9.3 349 67.6 21 5.5 263 68.33.000 77 13.6 328 57.8 79 15.3 301 58.3 62 16.1 242 62.94.000 251 443

_ ..... _ 25_1 44.3 .222 222 43.0 180 1_41..-2!-§!,111

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DAIk..,_! . _MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUESUM- OF SCORES =_SUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSTNO. DEV. (N) =

=MEDIAN

56739

-- _ _1.00004.0000

1542.00005152.0000

2.71961.30011.30133.0779

51649

38546

1.00004.0000

1388.0000

1.00004.0000

1070.0000.4622.0000

2.68991.3121

3644.00002.77921.3194

1.31343.0443

1.32113.2984

Games, puzzles, and toys

QUESTION 32 PART I

SCCRE INTERYALS F PCT CF P-8LW PLI CF P-BLW PCT -CP P-804

1.000 0.6 1.0 56.7 100.0 1.8 3.4 52.6 100.0 1.6 3.E 41.7 100.02.000 34.1 60.1 56.1 99.0 19.5 37.0 --50:4--9-6.6 12.8 3 7 40.1 S6.23.000 19.7 34.7 22.0 38.9 26.0 49.5 31.4 59.6 18.8 45.0 27.3 65.54.000 2.4 4.2 2.4 4.2 5.3 10.1 5.3 10.1 d.6 20.5 8.6 20.5

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF W:CIKESSUM SQL.MEANSTND. (N)STNO. 0E-V. (N-1)MEDIAN

56.658613.00001.00004.0000

137.1879351.855v

2.421.-3

0.5ZS<,0.5942.3153

52.649319.0000

---1.0000

41.687928.0000

4.0000140.1860

1.00,004.0G00

117.6754399.2358

2.66260.7024

358.52952.82290.7S48

07-ATT12.6933

0.80452.8451

SCORE INTERVALS

1.000 8 1.3

CF

593 20

F

20

P-BLW

100.0

PC3-

3.7

CF

544

P-BLW

100.0

PC.3

5.0

Cr

402

P -8LW

100.02.000 347 58.5 385 98.7 199 36.6 524 96.3 118 29.4 382 95.03.000 215 36.3 238 40.1 262 48.2 325 59.7 176 43.8 264 65.74.000 23 3.9 23 3.9 63 11.6 63 11.6 88 21.9 88 21.9

CASES PROCESSED 593 544 40?NJ. BLANK DATA 13 21 29MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1439.0000 1456.0000 1136.0000SUM SOD. .JCORES 3699.0000 4182.0000 3484.0000MEAN 2.4266 2.6765 2.8259STND. DEV. (N) = 0.5909 0.7239 0.8253STND. DEV. 0.5914 0.7245 0.8263MEDIAN 2.3314 2.7023 2.8580

Other (Specify)

QUESTION 32 PART J

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW F PC. CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-PLk

1.000 5 7.8 64 100.0 6 9.4 64 100.0 7 30 100.02.000 29 45.3 59 92.2 19 29.7 58 90.6 5 16.7 23 76.73.000 10 15.6 30 46.9 12 18.8 39 60.9 5 16.7 18 60.04.000 20 '41.3 20 31.3 27 42.2 27 42.,2 13 43.3 /3_43.3


=

=64

54264501

30 _MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 173.0000 188.0000 84.0000.SUM SOD. SCORES = 531.0000 622.0000 280.0000MAN 2.7031 2.9375 2.8000STNO. DEV. (N1 = 0.9950 1.0440 1.2220STND. DEV. IN-1) = 1.0028 1.0522 1.2429MEDIAN Z.4310 3.0833 3.1000

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT U- P-BLW F PCT

_ _

CF P -8 LW

1.060 1.2 17.2 6.8 100.0 0.4 6.3 5.9 100.0 1.0 31.7 3.2 100.02.0-00 3.0 44.3 5.6 82 8 1.7 28.9 5.5 93.7 D.5 16.1 2.2 68.33.000 1.0 14.9 2.6 38.5 1.4 23.6 3.8 64.8 0.4 11.5 1.7 52.24.000 1.6 23.6 1.6 23.6 2.4 41.2 2.4 41.2 1.3 40.7 1.3 40.7

CASES PROCESSED = 6.7624 5.8998 3.1820NO. BLANK DATA = 526.0000 487.0000 315.0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES - 16.5623 17.6812 8.3141SUM SW: SCUM = 47.7563 '8.6L04 27.0872MEAN 2.4492 2.9969 2.6128STNO. DEV. (N) = 1.0313 0.9770 1.2484STND. DEV. IN-11 s 1.01Z1 1.5679MEDIAN 2.2406 3.1279 2.6943

33. How much time does a typical pupil in your compensatory reading class spend

in each of the following types of activity?

A great deal Some

Improving motor abilities related to reading

Little or none

QUESTION 33

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM S0D. SCORESMEANSTNO. OEV. (NISTNO. DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN 0

SCLIRE INTERVALS

PAr1T A

F

14.432.79.9

F

PCT CF

25.2 57.057.4 42.617.4 9.9

56.963316.00001.00003.0000

109.441?234.1726

1.92130064780.65361.9313

OCT CF

P-BLW F

100.0 9.2

PCT CF-V701131------f7 C F 1)- b

17.8 52.0 100.0 6.5 15.3 42.5 100.74.827.317.4 15.4

52.6 742;7---82.2--5.78 36.0 d4.29.6 15.4 29.6 13.1 30.9 13.1 30.

25.000U1.0000

42.458121.00001.0000

3.0000110.0672257.0601

3.000091.5255215.65E7

2.118401.67810.6847

2.15570.66120.6651

P-BLW

2.1.124

PCI CF P-BLit F

2.1444

PCT cr7157-7610T

1.000 147 25.0 589_100.0 84 i5.6 54_0 100.0 58 14.1_ 410 100.02.000 329 55.9 442 75.07282- 52.2 456 84.4 205 50.0 352 85.93.000 113 19.2 113 19.2 174 32.2 174 32.2 147 35.9 147 35.9

CASES P.PoCrS.soNO. BLANK DATA 17

54025

41021


1.0000 1.0000 1.0000_ _ _3.00003.0000

SUM OF SCORES 1144.0000 1170.0000 909.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 2480.0000 2778.0000 2201.0000

1.9423 2.1667 2.2171STNO. DcV. IN) = 0.6619 0.6708 0.6730SIND. DEV.(N-1) 0.6624 0.6714 0.6738

- 1.9483 2.2171


QUESTION 33

SCORE IN

PART 6

F PLT CF P --BLS! F PCT CF PC1

1.000 26.4 46.1 57.2 100.0 19.9 37.4 53.1 100.0 1403 34.7 42.o 10J.02.000 28.2 49.2 30.8 53.9 30.9 58.1- 33.2 62.6 23.2 54.5- T7.11.- 65.2.3.000 2.7 4.7 2.7 4.7 2.4 4.5 2.4 4.5 4.6 14.8 4.6 10.

CASES PROCESSEDNU. BLANK DATA

57.198812.0000

53.-Tt515.0000

42.614018.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000---370U6D-

1.0CCOMAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 90.7365 88.7268 75.0654SUM SOD. SCORES 163.1822 164.7257 149.1611MEAN 1.5863 -1.670 1.7t15STMC. OEV. (N) 0.5800 C.5571 0,6305SIND. DEV. (N-11 0.5852 0.5624 0.630MEDIAN 1.5797 f: 166 1.7813

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -ALW F PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P -BLW

1-P00 ?5, 43.6 594 100.0 20.0_ 36.4 550 100.0 125 3C.3 413 100.02.000 298 50.2 335 56.4 321 58.4 350 63.6249 60.3 288 69.73.000 37 6.2 37 6.2 29 5.3 29 5.3 39 9.4 39 9.4


59412 15

41318

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 966.0000 929.0000 740.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1784.0000 1745.0000 1472.0000MEAN 1.6263 1.6891 1.7918STND. OEV. (N1 0.5989 0.5654 0.5948

(N-1) = 0.5994 0.5659 0.5955.STNO..DEV.MEDIAN 1.6275 1.7336 1.8273

Developing .sual discrimination

QUESTION 33 PART C

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0CC2.0003.000

F PCT CF

34.8 451.6 56.519.9 35.2 21.71.8 3.2 1.8

CASES PROCESSED = 56.5214NO. BLANK DATA = 13.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 80.0424SUM SQD. SCORES = 130.6864MEAN i.4161STND. DEV. IN) = 0.5538STND. OEV. (N-1) = 0.5588MEDIAN 1.3118

SCOkE INTERVALS PCT

0 0

P-BLW F PCI

100.0 21.6 40.638.4-24-1.6 46.43.2 6.8 12.9

0

CF-F=8Lw F PCT

53.0 100.0 11.9.11:4 236.8 12.9 5.9

28.058.2

LF P-6L191

42.6 100.030.6 72.05.9 13.6

57:9773 42.55i517.00001.0000-3.000091.1648181.1616

1.72100.67680.68331.6991

19.00001.00003.0000

79.0507163.78441.85780.63070.63831.8/76

CF P-BLW F

1.000 358 60.4, 59? 100.02.00U 212 35.8 235 39.63.000 23 3.9 23 3.9

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATAMINIMUM VALUE

-Wkicikum VACIJE

= 593131.00003.0000

SUM OF SCORES 851.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 413.0000MEAN 1.4351STND. OEV. (N) = 0.5686STNO. ()EV. (N71) = 0.5691mE01AN 1.3282

21426964

PCT CF P-BLW F

35.1 547 100.0 11849.2 333 60.9 23311.7 64 11.7 60

3107-181.00003.0000

944.00001866.0000

1.72580.65800.6587

PCI

28.756.714.6

1.7212

CF P-BLW

411 100.0293 71.360 14.6

411201.00003.0000

764.00001590.0000

1.85890.64280.64361.8755


QUEST /ON 33 PART D

SCORE INTERVAL S F

1.000 22.82.000 29.23.000 5.0

CASES PROCE sseoNO. BLANK DATA -

PCT CF

39.9 57.051.2 34.28.8 5.0

57.001313.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE - 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 96.2696SUM SQO. SCORES = 184.8517MEAN- 1.6889SIND. DEV. IN) 0.6249SIND. DEV. (N-13 = 0.6305MEDIAN 1.6963

SCORE INTERVAL S F PCT

P -8LW F PCT CF E -CF ii;g1;

100.0 11.8 22.4 52.660.1-26;9-3-1-.7-43:138.8 13.9 26.4 13.9

C1 P-BLW

1.000 252 42.5 5932.000 287 48.4 3413.000 54 9.1 54


59313

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORE S - 988.0000SUM SQD. scpREs

..

MEAN1886.0000

1.6661SIND. DEV. IN) 0.6360SIND. ()EV. IN-1 / = 0.6366.MED IAN 1.1;551

100.9 11857.5 2859.1 139

100.0 5.0 11,8 42.2 100.0-77:6 21.1 5U.1 37.2 b13.226.4 16.1 38.1 16.1 38.1

20.00001.0000

42.217621.00001.0000

.0000- zi.00OO107.2902 95.5435244.5235 234.37E5SOT 2.2610.6975 0.65570.7042 0.6636

---2 039-6 2.2626

PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

21.8 542. 100.0 50 12.2_ 409 100.052.6 424 78.2 189 46.2 359 87.825.6 139 25.6 170 41.6 170 41.6

542231. ppuo3.0000

1105.00002.509. ()cop

2.03870.68750.6881_2.0368

409221.0000

938.0000233.6.0000

2.2440.67220.67302.3175


QUESTION 33 PART

SCORE INTERVALS

E

PCT CFF PCT CF P-8LW F V-ILW F PCT

1.000 24.2 42.5 57.1 100.0 7.4 14.1 52.6 100.0 3.3 7.d 42.5 100.02.000 24.6 43.1 32.8 57.5 -23.8 -4.5.2 85:9- 16.1 37.9 39.2 92.23.000 8.2 14.4 8.2 14.4 21.4 40.6 21.4 40.6 23.1 54.3 23.1 54.3

CASES PROCESSED = 57.0644 52.5676 42.5464NO. BLANK DATA 14.0000 /9.0000 19.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0060 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 98.1089 119.0869 104.8591SUM SQO. SCORES 196.6371 294.8503 275.648MEAN 1.7193 2.2654 2.4646STND. DEV. (N) 0.7000 0.6906 0.6362

STND. DEV. (N-1) 0.7062 0.6973 0.6438MEDIAN 2.5,B3-1.6741 2.2V51

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF

1.000 255 43.1 592 100.0 79 14.5 543 100.0 34 8.3 411 100.02.000 254 42.9 337 56.9 240 44.2 464 85.5 143 34.8 377 91.73.000 83 14.0 83 14.0 224 41.3 224 41.3 234 56.9 234 56.9


-i.WX-01-0g- VALUE._-

SUM OF SCORESSUM SQD..., SCORESMEANSIND. DEV. (N)STND. DEV. IN-I)MEDIAN

592141.0000

543221.0000

411201.0000

1012.00002018.0000

3.00001231.00003055.0000

3.00001022.00002712.0000

1.703-0.69750.6981

2.26700.69760.6983

2.48660.64440.6452

1.6614 2.3021 2.6218


QUESTION 33 PART F

SCORE INTERVALS F

1.000 41.52.000 15.13.000 1.2

PCT CF

71.8 57.826.1 16.32.1 1.2

CASES PROCESSED 57.8435NO. BLANK DATA 7.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 75.3840SUM SQD. SCORES 11.2.8852'MEAN 1.3032STND. DEV. (N) 0.5031STNO. OEV. (N-1) = 0.5675MEDIAN 1.1965

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

_ .

F PCT

0

P-BLW F -

E

tr-r=mtv-- 1%. t.r r-DLW

100.0 29.1 54.9 53.0 100.0 2C.7 46.6 42.7 100.028.2-21:*0---39;7----2-3.9 45.1 I8.T A2.T 22.0 51.42.1 2.8 5.4 2.8 5.4 3.7 8.8 3.7 8.8

F

52.-9930516.00001.0000

79.7218138.8697

0.59780.6035

-1:VICOD

PCT OCT

16512

10.5_27.52.0

59917712

100.0 305.

29.5 2132.0 30 5.5

548J00.0.194243 44.318230 5.5 38

44.09.2

CASES PROCESSED =

NO. BLANK DATA = 7

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 788.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 1190.0000MEAN 1.3155S7ND. DEV. (N) = 0.5060STND. DEV. = 0.5064MEDIAN 1.2097

44.705817.00001.00003.000

68.4167127.3203

1.60200.64400.65171.5335

CF P-BLW

414 L00.O220 53.138 9.2

----------54817

41417

1.0000 1.00003.0000 3.0000

821.0000 672.00001427.0000 1264.0000

1.4982 1.62320.5996 0.64680.6001 0.64761.3984 1.5714

Learning word meanings (Vocabulary)

QUESTION 33

SCORE INTERVALS

PART G

F PCT CF P -8LW F F ACT CF F-13Gi

1.0002.000

38.218.7

66.4 57.532.5 19.3

100.033.6

39.313.4

73.4 53.611::

31.4 72.6 43.1 100.024.9 14.3 2111 11.2 26.0 11.7 27.2

3.000 0.6 1.1 O. 1.1 0.9 1.7 0.9 1.7 0.5 1.2 0.5 1.2

CASES PROCESSED = 57.5116 53.6222 43.1123NO. BLANK DATA = 9.0000 10.0000 14.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1,0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0-000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 77.4454 68.8478 55.3717SUM SOO. SCORES = 118.5423 101.1563 80.9456MEAN 1.3466 1.2834 1.2845STNC. (AV. IN) = 0.4978 0.4878 0,4770STNO. °EV. = 0.5022 0.4924 0.4826MEDIAN 1.2527 1.1816 101872

SCOkE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-3CW PC1 CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -.81W

1.000 4pp_ 67.0 597 100.0 408 73.5 555 100.0 307 73.6 417 100.02.000 189 197 33.0 143 25.8 147 26.5 105 25.2 110 26.43.000 8 1.3 8 1.3 4 0.7 4 047 5 1.2 5 1.2

CASES PROCESSED 555 417NO. BLANK DATA = 9 10 14MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 802.0000 706.0000 532.0000SUM S00. SCORES = 1228.0000 1016.0000 772.0000MEAN 1.3434 1.2721 1.2758STNO. DEV. (N, = 0.5023 0.4609 0.4730

0.5027 0.4614 0.4735MEOIAN 1.2462 101801 1.1792

Phonic and/or structural analysis 0 D D

QUESTION 33 PART H

SCORE INTERVALS F

1.000 49.22.000 8.03.0G0 0.4

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOO. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (N)STNL. OEV. (N-1)MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS F

PC1 CF P-BLW

85.5 57.5 100.013.8 8.40.7 0.4

57.52788.00001.00003.0000

66.306184.67501.5260.37870.38211.0-851

PCT CF

F

34.514.5-1-7:70.7 1.0

PCT

64.9 53.233.3 18:71.8 1.0

-53.1888-14.00001.0000

CF

100.0-35.1

1.8

f -00

18.6 43.4 42.8r2-.-1-517.7-2-4.22.1 4.9

100.0

2.156.64.9

42.795517.00001.0000

3.000072.8001113.9255

3.000069.1033125.88/0

1.36810.51820.5231

-1---27013

1.61470.57810.5m1.62/4

P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 516 86.3 598 100.o 362 65.8 550 100.0.194 46.9 414 100..02.000 78 13.0 82 13.7 178 32.4 188 34.2 198 47.8 220 53.13.000 4 0.7 4 0.7 10 1.8 10 1.8 22 5.3 22 5.3


_MINIMUM VALUE

5989

1.0000

550--15

1.000o171.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 684.0000 748.0000 656.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 864.0000 1164.0000 1184.0000MEAN 1.1438

. . . . . .

1.3600 1.5845STND. DEV. (N) 0.3695 0.5165 0.5909STND. PEY(N-0 0.3698 0.5170 0.5916MEDIAN 1.0795 1.2597 1.5657

Being read to

QUESTIUN 33

SCORE INTERVALS

PART I

0

F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P -81p;

1.000 19.0 33.1 57.3 100.0 9.8 18.4 53.3 100.0 5.7 12.4 42.7 100.02.000 35.9 62.6 38.3 66.9 -55.7-67;04375816 29.3 68..5 37.0 86.63.000 2.4 4.2 2.4 4.2 7.8 14.5 7.8 14.5 7.7 18.1 7.7 18.1

CASES PRuC=SScu 57.2865 -53.2980 42.7:. i7

NO. BLANK OATA 12.00J0 14.0000 17.0000MINIMUM vALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.00J0 3.0000SUM OF SCt:"ES 98.0202 104.5313 87.4710SUM SQO. SCORES 184.3227 222.4958 192.3707MEAN 1.7111 -1=9613 2.0467STNO. OEV. IN) 0.5384 0.5727 0.5588STND. °EV. IN-I) 0.5432 0.5782 0.5654MEDIAN 1.7692 ----1.9710 2.030

SCORE INTERVALS- F PCT CF P-BLW F PCI CF P-B6777--F PCT CF P-BLW

1 000- _

2.0003.000

19536930

32.867.15.1

59439930

100.0 102 18.5 550 100.0 53 12.8 414 100.067.2 37Z5.1 76

67.613.8

44876

81.528113.8 80

67.919.3

36180

87.219.3


59412 15

41417

MINIMUM VALUE_ _1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 1023.0000 1074.0000 855.0000SUM S00. SCORES

----MEAN1941.0000

1.72222274.0000 1897.0000

1.9527 2.0652>EV. (N) 0.5492 0.5669 0.5630

SIND. IEV. (N-1) 0.5497 0.5674 0.5637mId1WSJ 1.-7164 1.9651 2.0480

Reading aloud

QUESTION 33

SCORE INTERVALS

PARE J

F PCT

D 0 0

CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-B.LA F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 38.9 67.5 57.7 100.0 I:;.1.) 43.1 100.0 24.1 45.2 53.3 100.02.000 18.5 32.0 18.8 32.5 2'11.2 5 3.9 28.1 65.2 27.5 51.6 29.2 54783.00C 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.5 4.9 11.3 4.9 11.3 1.7 3.2 1.7 3.2


57.72618.00001.0000

43.105614.00001.0000

53.295814.00001.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 76.8277 76.0951 84.2457SUM SOD. SCORES = 115.6412 151.8197 149.5624MEAN 1.3309 1.7653 1.5807STNO. OEV. (N) 0.4816 0.6369 0.5546STNC. DEV. IN-1) 0.4859 i).6445 0.5599MEDIAN 1.2412 1.1b22 1.5939

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW PC T CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 394 65.9 598 10.0.0 228 41.5 550 00.0_143 34.3 417 I00.02.000 202 33.8 204 34.1 304 55.3 322 58.5 226 54.2 274 65.13.000 2 0.3 2 0.3 18 3.3 18 3.3 48 11.5 48 11.5

CASFS PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMINIMUMMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES

59881.00003.0000

804.0000

550151.00003.0000

890.0000

41714

3.0000739.0000

sum sap. SCORES un,qopp 1606.0000 1479.0000MEAN 1.3445 1.6182 1.7722STND. 0EV. (N) 0.4822 0.5491 0.6373STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.4826 0.5496 0.6381MEUTAN = 1.2589 .6546 1.7698--

Reading silently (independent silent reading) 0

QUESTION 33 PART K

SCORE INTERVALS F

1.000 35.92.000 20.53.000 1.2

PCI CF

62.3 57.735.6 21.82.1 1.2

CASES PROCESSED 57.6936NO. BLANK DATA 8.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 80.7041SUM SQO. SCORES 129.1805MEAN 1.3988SIND. DEV. (N) 0.5313SIND. DEV. (N--1) 0.5360MEDIAN 1.3031


0 0

P-BLW PCT

100.0 33.0 61.637.7 -f q:6-736.-52.1 1.1 2.0

CF

1.000 376. 63..0 597-221

100.02.000 204 34.2 37.03.000 17 2.8 17 2.8


5979

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM' VALUE 3.0000SUM. OF SCORES 835.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 1345.0000MEAN 1.3987STND. DEV. IN) 0.5447SIND. DEV. (N-1) 0.5451MEDIAN 1.2939

F

CF P -8LW F PCT Cr P-8LW

53.6 100.0 28.1 65.5 42.9 100.020.6 38.4-13 32.4 14.8 34.51.1 2.0 0.9 2.1 0.9 2.1

53.644910.00001.00003.0000

75.3103120.7424

0.52910.5341

----1.3119

CF F PCT

42,907515.00001.00003.000058.584491.71031.36540.52270.52t91.2629

CF P-8LW

349 62.9 555 100.0 277 66.6 416 100.0197 35.5 206 37.1133 32.0 139 33.4

9 1.6 9 1.6 6 1.4 6 1.4

1041615

1.0000 1.00003,0000 3.0000

770.0000 561.00001218.0000 863.0000

1.31374 1.34860.5194 0.50590.5198 0.50651,2951 1.2509

Creative writing

QUESTION 33 PART L

SCORE INTERVALS E

1.000 13.92.000 34.43.000 8.5


PCT CF

24.4 56.860.6 42.915.0 8.5

56.795410.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 108.2590SUM SQO. SCORES 228.2454MEAN 1.9061STNO. OEV. (N) 0.6208STNO. DEV. (N-.11 0.6264MEDIAN 1.9223

0

100.075.615.0

0

F

11.3

8.8

PCT CF PCT CF 13-8144

21.2 53.2 100.0 11.6 21.0 43.G 100.07 55.1 31.4 73.0

16.6 8.8 16.6 7.7 17.9 7.7 17.9

5i.236-314.0U001.0000-3:omo

104.0034223.1727-179'536

0.61280.61861.96Z6

15.00001.00(.03.0000

82.1477175.7522

1.90690.0634

0.67121.9173

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P -131..101 F PCT CF F Oc-T

1.0002.000

154354

25.859.4

596442

100.0 10874.2 228

26.0 415307

100.011574.0350

204963.5

551436

100.079.1

3.000 88 14.8 88 14.8 79 19. 0 79 19.0 86 15.6 86 15.6

CASES PROCESSED 596 551NO. BLANK DATA I0 16 14MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMA VALUE 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 1126.0000 801.0000 1073.0000SUM SQO. SCORES

-M

2362.00001.8893

1731.00001.9301

2289.00001.9474

STND. 0EV. (NI 0.6275 0.6676 0.6017STND. fiEV. (N'1) 0.6280 0.6684 0.6022MEDIAN 1.9068 1.9364 1.9586


QUESTION 33

SCORE INTERVAL S

PAKi M

0 0

F PC T CF P-BLW PC-1 F PCT CF P-BLw

1.000 27.0 46.6 57.9 100.0 25.6 48.0 53.5 100.0 20.0 1:6.2 43.2 100.02.000 29.1 50.2 31.0 53.4 24.2 43.2 27.8 52.0 21.3 49.3 23.2 53.83.000 1.9 3.2 1.9 3.2 3.7 6.8 3.7 6.8 1.9 4.5 1.9 4.5


57.91206.0000

b3.46'1212.0000

43.208713.0400

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0003 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =

3.000090.7258

3.000084.9368

3.000069.3809

SUM sop. SCORES 160.0542 155.1903 122, 6043MEAN 1.5666 -1.5888 1.5826STND. DEV. (N) 0.5563 0.6154 0.5170STND. OEV. (N-1) 0.5612 0.6212 0.583aMEDIAN 1.5686 1.5449 1.5762

----SCORE INTERVALS. F PC CF P-BLW F CF F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 ?77 46.2 600 100.0 251 45.5 552 100.0 199 47.7 417 100.02.000 302 50.3 323 53.8 263 47.6 301 54.5 198 47.5 218 52.33.000 21 3.5 21 3.5 38 6.9 38 6.9 20 4.8 20 4.8


6006

55213

41714

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000mAxTgaW-V4LuE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 944.0000 891.0000 655.0000SUM SQt. SCORES 1674.0000 1645.0000 1171.0000MEAN 1.5733 1.6141 1.5707STND. DEV. (N) = 0.5609 0.6121 0.5839STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.5614 0.6126 0.5846MEDIAN 1.5762 1.5951 1.5480


QUESTION 33

SCORE INTERVALS

PART N

F PCT

0 0 0

CF P-BLW CFF-81.W F

1.000 13.9 24.7 56.3 100.0 10.0 19.6 52.8 100.0 9.8 23.1 42.5 100.02.000 33.0 58,6 42.4 75.3 '33;7-63.9 63.0 32.' 76.S3.000 9.4 16.7 9.4 16.7 9.0 17.1 9.0 17.1 5.9 13.9 5.9 13.9

CASES PROCESSED 56.3289NO. BLANK DATA 15.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 108,2041SUM SOD. SCORES 230.7918-WEAN 1.9209STNO. DEV. (N) 0.6382STNO. DEV. (N-1) 0.6440WED14N = 1.9324

SCOkE INTERVALS F PCT.

52,795815.000G1.00003.0UU0

104.6293226.3840

-1.9H-18C. 60040.6062Z. 9856

CF P-8LW F PCT

1.000 142 24.0 5912.000 351 59.4 4493.000 98 16.6 98

591.

15CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 1138.0000SUM SQO. SCORES 2428.0000MEAN 1.9255STND. DEV. IN) = 0.6329STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.6334MEDIAN 1.9373

CF P -8LW

42.514619,00001.00003.0OO

61.1945170.34S2

1.90890.60130,6Ef51.9276

F PCT. CF F-8EW

100.0 103 18.9 544 100,0 97 23.6 411 100.976.0 341 62.7 441 81.1 248 60.3 314 76.416.6 100 18.4 100 18.4 66 16.1 66 16.1

54421

41110

1.0000 1.00003.0000 3.0000

1085.0000 791.00002367.0000 1683.0000

1.9945 1.92460.6108 0.62520.6114 0.6260L.9956 1.9375

Other (Specify)

QUESTION 33 PART C)

SCO,.E INTERVALS F

1.000 0.72.000 0.530 000 2.7

CASES PRUCESSEDNU. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE 7.4

SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTNO. OEV. (N)STND. DEV. (N'-1)MEDIAN

PC I

17.213.369.5

3.8618550.0000

1.00003.00009.740926.86362.52240.77070.89532.7801

SCOAE INTERVALS

CF F PC T CF P-BLW F PLT CF F'-.13 LW

3.9 100.0 0.9 2o.1 4.4 100.0 0.6 a,' 2.7 100.03.2 82.8 0.7 3.5-79.9--6.4 14,8 201 7809207 69.5 2.8 64.0 2.8 64.0 107 64.1 1.7 6401

4: i319 2.71'79502.0000 401.0000

1.0000 1.00003.00D0 3.0000

10.8110 60604029.2420 17.8599-7204393 2.42590.8048 0.81660.9145 1.02732.7188 2.7198

CFP.4a---g OCT- v--Lr-P-BLW F PCT CF P.-3LW

1.000 17.5 40 )00.0 7 14.6 48 100.0 4 13.2 22 100.02.000 15.0 33 82.5 7 14.6 41 85.4 4 18.2 1g 81083.000 27 67.5 27 67.534 70.8 34 70.8 14 63.6 14 6306

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK QA TA

=-= 566

48517

22409

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000-= 3.0000 3.X5-0TE 3.0000

SUM OF SCORES = 100.0000 123.0000 5400000SUM SQD. SCORES - 274.0000 341.0000 146.0000

2.5625 2.4545SING. DES/. (N) 0.7746 0.7333 0.7620STNO. DEV. = 0.71345 0.7411 0.8004

2.7593 2.7941 2.7143

34. Have you had any special training in the teaching of reading or in instructional

techniques for disadvantaged pupils in connection with your current teaching

assignment?

1 0 Yes

2 0 No

QUESTION 34


1.0002.000


26.831.2

==

MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =MEAN =STND. OEVe IN) =STND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN =

46.2 58.053.8 31.2

58.00446.00001.00002.0000

89.2028151.59201.53790.49840.50281.5702

SCORE INTERVALS F pEi----- CF

1.0002.000


265335

==

44.2 60055.8 335

6006

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0300MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000SUM OF SCORES 935.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1605.0000MEAN- 1.5583STND. DCV. (N) = 0.4966STND. OEV. (N-1) = 0.4970MEDIAN 1.6045

P-BLW F PC1 CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-aLbo

100.0 19.7 36.5 53.9 100.0 16.E 38.S 43.1 100.053.8 34..2.--b3.5-----34.2 63.5 26.3 61.1 26.3 61.1

53.9472 43.07937.0000 14.00001.0000 1.00002.0000 2.000088.1923 69.4105

156.6760 122.06E31.6348 1.61120.4814 0.48740.4859 0.49211.7122 1.6b18

P-BLW F PCI CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

100.0 193 34.6 551_100..0 165 39.655.8 365 65,4 40.4

417 100.0. _252 60.4

5587

41714

1.0000 1.00002.0000

923.0000 669.0000'-1653.0000 1173.0000

1.6541 1.60430.4757

.

0.48900.4761 0.48961.7356 1.6726

35. What form did the special training take? (Check all that apply.)

0 Summer workshop or institute

GVeSTION 35 PART A

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

F

45.013.5

PCT CF

76.9 58.523.1 13.5

P-BLW

100.0

F PCT CF

45.4 33.7 54.7

P-8LW F

100.0 36.8

PCT CF P

82.2 44.8 100.023.1 8:7157.98.9

0.2 0.4 0.216.3-8,00.4

17.8 e.0 17.8

CASES PROCESSED = 58.5473 4408052MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 54.7433 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 0.0 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 13.5103 3.0000 7.9658SUM SQD0 SCORES = 13.5103 9.2338 7.9658MEAN 0.2308 10.0012 0.1778STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.4213 0.1687 0.3823STENO. DEV. IN-11 = 0.4250 0.3927 0.3867MEDIAN 0.1500 0.3964 0.1081

0.0975SCORE IN7EkVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLW

0.0 474 78.2 606 100.0 482 85.3 565 100.0 367 85.2 431 100.01.000 132 21.8 132 21.8 81 14.3 83 14.7 64 14.8 64 /4.8

2 0.4 2 0.4CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUE =

606GO--

431565 0.0

MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 0.0 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 132.0000 3.0000 64.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 132.0000 86.0000 64.0000MEAN 0.2178 94.0000 0.1485SIND. DEV. IN) = 0.4128 0.1522 0.3556STNO.DEV. IN -11 = 0.4131 0.3784 0.3560MEDIAN '0.1392 0.3788 0.0872

0.0861

College course (whether or not for degree credit)

QUESTION 35 PART

SCORE INTERVALS

13

F PCT CF P-8LW F 0,1 CF P-BLW r -PtT- CF P-8L.

0.0 4.1 30.6 13.5 100.0 1.6 18.7 8.7 100.0 2.9 36.1 8.0 100.01.000 9.4 69.4 9.4 69.4 7.1 81.3 1.1 817.3-5a- .9 5.1 63.9

CASES PROCESSED 13.5102 8.7176 7.9658MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 9.3811 7.0878 5.0866SON-SQD. SCORES 9.3811 1.0818 5.0866MEAN 0.6944 0.8130 0.6386

OEV. (N) 0.4607 0.3899 0.4804DEV. (N-1) = 0.4787 0.4144 0.5137

MEDIAN 0.7799 0.8850 0.7170

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLS! F PCT CF P -8LW

0.0 39.93

29.5 132 Ippo 1770.5 93 10.5 64

132

81_100.02079.0

___---..._64 79.044

31.3 64 100.068.8 44 68.8

64

1.000

CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 93.0000 64.0000 44.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 93.0000 64.0000 44.0000MEAN 0.7045 0.7901 0.6875STNO. DEV. (N) = 0.4562 0.4072STND. DEV. (N-1/ = 0.4580 0.4098

.0.46350.4672

MEDIAN 0.7903 0.8672 0.7727

0 After school or weekend workshop(s)

QUESTION 35

SCORE

PART C

INTERVALS F PCT CF

0.G 9.5 1C.5 13.51.000 4.0- 29.5 400

CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VA-CUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQD. SCORES =MEANSIND. DEV. (N) =SIND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN =

SCU'RE INTERVALS

0.0.1.000

CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUE =MA XI MUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM s1)6:--sCciRtsMEANSIND. OEV. (N) =SIN°. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN

P-BLW F PCT ---CF-1"--8LW F PCT

100.0 5.3 6007 8.7 100.06.7 8A.5 8.0 1000029.5374-39.3 304 39.31.2 15.5 102 15.5

13.5102 8.7176 7.96580.0 0.0 0.01.0000 1.0000 1.00003.9835 3.4259 1.23523.9835 304259 1.23520.2949 003930 0015510.4560 004884 0.36200.4738 005191 0.38710.2091 0.3237 000918

PCT

85_ 64.447 35.6

CF P-BLW

13247

1320.01.0000

47.0000_4.7:66156

0.35610.47880.48070.2765

Oct CF P-BLWF PCT CF P -BLW

10000 47 58.0 81 10000 50 78.1 64 100003506 34 42.0 34 4200 14 21.9 14 21.9

810.01.0000

34.000034000000.41980.49350.49660.3617

640.01.0000

14.000014.00000021880041340.41670.1400

U Released-time workshop(s)

QUESTION 35

-

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

CASES PROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQO. SCORES =MEANSIND. DEV. (N1 =STNO. DEV. 1N-11 =MEDIAN

PART D

SCORE INTERVAL S

O.01.000

CASES PROCESSED _7=

MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSIND. DEV. (N) =SIND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN

F PCT CF P-BLW C_F "P =3LW 1 PrT Cr P -BLI

84.7 13.5 100.0 7.1 81.1 8.7 100.0 o.8 85.6 5.0 100.015.3 2.1 15.3 r:7-18.-9 1.7 1E69 1.1 14.4 1.1 14.4

13.5102 8.7176 7.96580.0 0.0 0.01.0000 1.0000 leOCCO2.0657 1.6519 1.14442.0657 1.6519 1.14440.1529 0.1895 0.14370.3599 0.3919 0.35070.3740 0.416 0.3/510.0902 0.1169 0.0829

i

_107 81.125 18.9

CF P-BLW F PCT

132 18.8.86425 18.917

CF P-BLW F PCT CFP -BLW

81 100.0 51 79.7 64 100.021.0 17 21.0 13 20.3 13 20.3

132 81 640.0 0.0 0.01.0000 1.0000 1.0000

25._pcloo_25.0000

17.0000 13.000017.0000 13.0000

0.1894 0.2099 0.20310.3918 0.4072 0.40230.3933 0.4098 0.40550.1168 0.1328 0.1275

36. Which of the following areas were explored in the course of the specialtraining you received? (Check all that apply.)

Li New instructional techniques in reading

QUESTION 36

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01. COO

CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSTNO. OEV. IN)STND. DEV. 4N-11MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVAL :s

0-01.000

CASES PROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQO. SCORES =MEANSTND. DEV. IN) =STND. DEV. (N-1) =MEOIAN

PART A

Cr rade 2

F PCT 015-411A

2.0 14.911.5 85.1

13.5 100.011.5 85.1

13.51020.01.0000

11.501011.56100.85130.35580.36980.9126

F PC T CF

17 12.9115^ 87.1

Crraee.. A-F PCT CF F PCT CF p-aLw

1.5 17.7 8.7 100.0 1,2 14. S 8.0 100.07.2 82:3------71-1Ennr- b..8 85.1 6.8 85.1

8.7176 7.96580.0 0.01.0000 1.00007.1789 6.78257.1789 6.78250.8235 0.85150.3813 0.35560.4052 0.38030.8928 0.9128

132 100.0115 87.1

132_------0.01.0000

115.0000115000000.87120.33500.33820.9261

PC T CF PEILW PCT

15 18.5 81 100.0 9 14.1 64 100.066 81.5 66 81.5 55 85.9 55 85.9

81 640.0

1.0000 1.000066.0000 55.000066.0000 55.00000.8148 0.85940.3884 0.34760.3909 -0.35040.8864 0.9182

0 Diagnosis of reading problems

QUESTION 36 PART d

Grade, Crtztae,11- G-ratte..c,-SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

F

1.512.0

PCI

11.3 13.586.7 12.0

CF -P-BLW

100.0

FELT1.1 12.8

I,F F-13LW---

8.7,100.0F PC7

0.3 3.8

CF P-BLil-

8.0 100.08e.7 -7:6-87.2 1.b 131.2 7.7 96.2 1.1 96.2

CASES PROCESSED -4-. 13.5102 8.7176 7.9658WINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 11.9840 7.6014 7.6E31

-31.114-SQD. SCORES 11:9840 7.6014 7.66=7MEAN 0.8870 0.8720 0.9621STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.3166 0.3341 0.1910

-STITIY,-; DENG fN-1) = 0.3290 0.9971 0.2043MEDIAN 0.9363 0.9266 0.S6C3

-----SCORE INTERVAL S F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF-T)=FLW PCT CF P-BLW

0.0 18 13.6 132 100.0 12 14.8 81 100.0 4 6.3 64 100.01.000 114 86.4 114 86.4 64 85.2 69 85.2 60 93.8 60 93.8

CASES PROCE SSED = 132 81 64MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 114.0000 69.0000 60.0000SUM SW. SCORES 114.0000 69.0000 60.0000MEAN 0.8636 0.8519 0.9375STNO. DEV. IN) 0.3432

*0.34450.3552 0.2421

STNO. DEV. (N-1) = 0.3575 0.2440MEDIAN . 0.9211 0.9130 0.9667

0 Open classroom methods

QuEST WN 36 PART C

Clrorte2 Grroe_11- C,racia.L,SCURF INTERVAL S F Pc T --C-F- P---81:ii F PC T CF P -8tW p PCT CF p-aLl.

0.0 9.5 70.0 13.5-4.-1

100.0 4.5 51.9-.MX-472-48.1

8.7 100.0 4.2 52.4 8.0 100.01.000 4.1 30.0 4.2 48.1 3.8 47.6 3.8 47.6

CASES PROCESSEDM IN 'NUM VALUE

==

13.5102OA

8.7176 7.9658070 0.0

MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.000oSUM OF SCORESSUM WO. SCORES

4.05074.0507

4.1895 3.79294.1895 3.7929

MEAN - 0.2998 0.4806 0.4761STND. DEV. IN) = 0.4582 0.4996 0.4954STND. DEV. (N-1) --2 ci-:4761 0.5310 0.5341MEDIAN = 0.2141 0.4626 0.4545

SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T CF P-81.14 F PCT CF P-8Lw F PCT CF P-BLW

0.0_ 89 67.4 132 100.0 46 56.8 81 100.0 38 59.4 64 100.01..000 43 32.6 43 32.6 35 43.2 35 43.2 26 40.6 26 40.6

CASES PROCESSED = 1.32 81 64MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES - 43.0000 35.0000 26.0000SUM SOO. SCORES 43.0000 35.0000 26.0000MEAN 0.3258 0.4321 0.4063STND. DEV. (N) = 0.4687 0.4954 0.4911STND. OEV. IN-11 = 0.4704 0.4985 0.4950MEDIAN = 0.2416 0.3804 0.3421

'QUESTION 36 PART D

0 Individualized instruction

LZ rack Gracke-io

-SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T CF P-BLW r PCT LF P-8114 F PCT CF

0.0 2.9 21.4 13.5 100.0 1.4 16.3 8.7 100.01.9 23.4 8.0 100.01. COO 10.6 78.6 10.6 78..6 7.3 83.7 7'73 83.16.1 76.6 6.1 76.6

CASES PROCESSED--MINIMUM VALUE =

13.51020.0

8.7176 7.96580.0

MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0CCOSUM OF SCORES

-SUM-SOO.= 10.6231 7.2943 6.1022

SCORES = 10.6237 6. 42MEAN 0.7863 0.8367 0.7661STNV. DEV. IN)

DEV. (N-1I==-

0.40990.4260

0.3696 0.42330.4527--D*39Z8

MEDIAN 0.8641 0.9024 0.8413

SCORE INTcRVAIS F PC T CF P-8LW PC T CF P -BLW PO' CF-P-8LW

0.0 27__ 20.5 132-105

100.0 16 19.8 81 100.0 10 15.6 64 100.01.000 105 79.5 79.5 65 80.2 65 80.2 54 84.4 54 84.4

CASES PROCESSED T_-

Wait mu/4 VALUE132._

0.081 640.0 0.0

MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF scpEs___=-___________ 105.0000 65.0000 54.0000SUM WY. SCORE S 105.0000 65.0000 54.0000MEAN = 0.7955 0.8025 0,8438STND. DEV. I N I = 0.4034 0.3981 0.3631STN D. DEV. IN-1) = 0.4049 0.4006 0.3660MEDIAN 0.8714 0.8769 0.9074

El Individual instruction with supervised Praccice teaching

QUESTION 35

SCORE INTERVALS

0.0

PART E

F

11.4

PCT CF

84.4 13.5

P-BLW F

100.0 6.8

PCT

77.7

CF

8.7

15-81W

100.0

F

7.5

PCI CF

94.7 8.0 100.01.000 2.1 15.6 2.1 15.6-71:9 o.4 5.3 0.4 5.3

CASES PROCESSED 13.5102 8.7176 7.9658MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 2.1035 1.9399 0.4197SUM SOD. SCORES 2.1035 71.9399 0.4197MEAN 0.1557 0.2225 0.0527STND. DEV. (NI 0.3626 0.4/59 0.2234STND. DEV. (N-1) 0.3768 --7.1.4421 0.236/MEDIAN 0.0922 0.1431 0.0278

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF F PCT CF P-BLW PCT cri-BLW

0.01.000

CASESPROCESSE0MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESsuA'sQp. SCORESMESTENO. DEV. IN/-Mb. D£ V. (N-1)MEDIAN

47.

110Z2

83.316.7

1320.01.0000

22.0000

13222

--

100.0 64 79.0 81 100.0.60 93..86.3

64

644

100.0_16.7 17 21.0

81

17 21.0 4 6.3

0.01.0000

17.0000

0.01.00004.0000

2'.00000.16670.37276;314T.0.1000

17.00000.20990.4072

4.00000.06250.2421

0.40980.1328

0.24400.0333

El Other (Specify)

QUESTION 35 PART F

SCORE IN TER VAL S F

0 . 0 13.11.000 0.4

PC I CF P-BLW

97.0 13.5 100.03.0 0.4 3.0

F.--

8.0

FC T

91.8 8.7

CF P -BUFF- r100.0 7.9

FCT

59.2

CF P8Lit

8.0 100.0077 8.1 0.7 13.2 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.8

CASES PROCESSED a 13.5102 8.7176 7.9658MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE a 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 0.4008 0.7177 0.0637SUM SOU. SC ORE S 0.4008 0.717-7- 0.0637MEAN 0.0297 0.0823 0.0080STNO. °EV. (N) 0.1697 0.2749 0.0891 ..MID. DEV. IN -11 :-- 0.1763 0.2941. 0.0952MEDIAN m.- 0.0153 0.0449 0.000

SCORE INTERVAL S F PC T CF P-81.,1 F PCT CF P -BLW F PC T CF P8LW

U. 0 128 97.0 132 100.0 35. 92.6 81 100.0 63 98.4 ________,64 _100.0_..-- -7.4 6 7.4 11.000 4 3.0 4 3.0 6 1.6 1 1.6

CASES PROCESSED 7:

MINIMUM iiAL UE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOO . SC ORE S =ME ANSTNO. OEV . ( 14)

1320.01.00004.0000.4- odob0.03030.1714

...0:1110.0156

81. 640.01.00006.0000

0.01.00001.0000

6.00000.07410.2619

1.00000.01560.1240

STNO. DE V .---IN.:i i. =MEDIAN =

0.26350.0400

._-- _-- - .._0.12500.0079

QUESTION 36 PART E

Use of equipment and materials

SCORE INTERVALS

1.000

F

3.310.2

Crircul

PCT

24.8 13.5'75.2 10.2

CrtaLde4 erradie_t.CF P-OLW

100.0

F PCT CF P-BLW

2.0 22.7 8.7 100.0

F PLT

0.9 11.4

Cr P -8Lw

8.0 100.075-.2 6.7 77.3 6.7 7.3 7.1 88.6 7.1 88.6

CASES PROCESSED 13.5102 8.7176 7.9658MINIMOMNALUE --= 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 10.1649 6.7422 7.05E3-8UM-S06.-tC0kES = 10.1649 6.7422 7.0563MEAN 0.7524 0.7734 0.8E61STNO. DEV. IN/ 0.4316 0.4186 0.3177

0.4485 0.4449 0.3398MEOIAN 0.8354 0.835 0.9357

SCORE INTERVALS-- F PCT CF P-664 F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

0.0 33 25.0 132_100.0 19 23.5 81 100.0 9 14.1 64 100.01.000 99 75.0 99 75.0 62 76.5 62 76.5 55 85.9 55 85.9

CASES PROCESSED = 132 81 64MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 99.0000 62.0000 5500000SUM SOD. SCORES = .99.0000 62.0000 55.0000MEAN 0.7500 0.7654 0.8594STNO. DEV. (N) = 0.4330 0.4237 0.3476STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.4347 0.4264 0.3504MEDIAN 0.8333 0.8468 0.9182

QUESTION 36 PART R

Techniques for cultural enrichment


Gotten.CF P-BLW

0.0 6.9 51.3 13.5 100.01.000 6.6 48.7 6.6 48.7-

CASES PROCESSED--MINIMUM VALUE

MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES-SUM SQD. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (N)STND. DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN

13.51020.01.00006.58026.5E020.48710.49980,51940,4748

i P -JAW I e-b A

5.2 55.8-3.5-6-0-.2

8.7 100.0 4.5 1-.6.9 8.0 100.i3.5 40.2 3.4 43.1 3.4 43.

1141hKVALS

0.01,000

_cASS PROCSSSED

r rt. a

72 54.5 132.100.060 45.5 60 45.5

132MINIMUM VALUE 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 60.0000SUM SO. SCORES 60.0000MEAN 0.4545STND. DEV. (N)_ = 0.4979STNO. DEV. (N-li = 0.4998MEOIAN 0.4107

8.71760.01.00003.50533.50530.40210.4903075Zr/0.3362

PCT CF P-BLW F PCT

33 40.7 33 40.7 30

810.01.0000

33.000033.00000.40740.49140.49440.3438

46.9

7.96580.01.00003,42123.42120.43070.45520.5255

640.01.0000

30.oppo_30.00000.4688

CF P-BLW

64 100.030 46.9

0.4990_ . _ _ _

0.50300.4412

0 Other (Specify)

QUESTION 36

SCORE INTERVALS

PART G

&a:1e2 CK043e-

F PCT CF *P-81..W rPrr CF

0.6 13.1 96.8 13.5 100.01.060 0.4 3.2 0.4 3.2

CASES PROCESSED = 13.5102MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0_-MAXIMUM VALUE - 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 0.4316

--SUM S00. SCORES = 0.4316MEAN 0.0319STNC. DEV. (N) =

--fi46. DEV. -(N-1)-=0.17590.1828

MEDIAN 0.0165

SCORE INTERVALS

O.01.000

CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUMMEANSTND. DEV. (N)

OEV. IN -11MEDIAN

F PCT

8.3 95.8-Z.4 4.2

CF P-BLW. F PCT

127 96.2 132 _100,05 3.8 5 3.8

=

==

1320.01.00005.00005.0000

= 0.0379= 0.1909- 0.4916

0.0197

8.71760.01.00006.36820.36820.04220.20110.21380.0221

P -SLW F

8.7 100.0 7.30.4 4.2 O.T

PCT CF

91.8 6.08.2 0.7

7,96580.01.00000.65420.65420.06210.27460.29360,0447

P-BLW

100.08.2

77 95.14 4.9

.CF P-BLW F PCT

810.01.00004.00004.00000.04940.21670.21800.0260

81 100.0 62 96.94 4.9 2 3.1

64

CF P-BLW

64 100.02 3.1

0.01.00002.00002.00000.03130.17400.17540.0161

37. Over what time period did the special training extend?

One summer

One academic semester

One academic year

C-i.e calendar year

One summer and one academic year

(:11 Other (Specify)

SCORE INTEKVALS F

(1X044PCT CF

1.000 20 22.2 902.000. 6 6.7 703.000 11 12.2 644.000 2 2.2 535.000 23 25,6 516.000 28 31.1 28

P-BLW F

Grme.CF -01.66W-

Grade.6Z-F P BLW

100.0 19 33.9 56 100.0 17 36.2 47 100.077.8 3 5.4 37 66.1 2 4.3 30 63.871.1 1 1.8 34 60.7 2 4.3 28 59.658.9 1 1.8 33 58.9 0 0.0 26 55.1_56.7 11 19.6 32 57.1 14 29.8 26 55.331.1 21 37.5 21 37.5 12 25.5 12 25.5


==

9042

5625

4717

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 6.0000 6.0000 6.0000SUM OF SCORES = 356.0000 213.0000 169.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1758.0000 1087.0000 825.0000MEAN' 3.9556 3.8036 3.5957SIND. DEV. IN) = 1.9715 2.2234 2.1503STNO. OEV. IN-1)

._MEDIAN= 1.9826

4.76092.2435 2.17364.8636 4.6786

QUESTION 37

SCORE INTERVALS F(.1111.40)

PCT CF P-EILW r(rnalt.

PCTOde.6

CF-P-

1.CCO 2.2 26.3 8.5 100.0 1.7 2d.2 6.2 100.0 2.s; 6 I 100.02.000 0.7 8.6 6.3 73.7 0.3 4.9 -4;4-7178-0.3 4.4 2.2 52.63.000 C.9 10.7 5.5 65.1 0.1 2.1 4.1 67.0 U.1 2.4 2.9 48.24.000 0.2 2.3 4.6 54.4 J.2 3.6 4.0 64.8 0.0 0.0 2.d 45.85.000 1.9 22.4 4.4 52.2 1.4 22.0 Z.d6.CCC 2.5 29.8 2.5 29.8 2.4 38.4 2.4 38.4 1,4 2L1.

CASES PROCESSED = 9.4594 -6.1606NO. BLANK DATA = 42.0000 24.0000 17.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0060MAXIMUM VALUE = 6.0000 6.000u t.CCCCSUM OF SCORES - 31.8E65 24.8468 1.0543SUM SQO. SCORES = 155.0883 128.0183 68.t:523MEAN 3.7518 4.0332 3.1240STNO, DEV, TN) = 2,0422 2.1245 2,1815SIND. DEV. TN-I) = 2.1741 2.3213 2.3658MEnIAN 4.5970 -4.9924- 2.13-8-sT


Less

DMore

than one year ago

than one but labs than

but less than

years ago

D More than two

Three or more

QUESTION 38

SCORc INTERVALS

two years ago

three years alt;

Crin 46 1

PCT CF P-BLW PCT

GrraAeACF P-BLW

CrtukeioPLT CF 13-6Lw

1.000 2.e 18.1 12.4 100.0 1.4 15.6 7.3 100.0 2.4 32.2 7.5 100.02.000 3.5 26.2 10.1 81..9 1.5 20.1' . -1 .4 6-1.d3.000 2.7 21.5 6.6 53.7 1.6 21.8 4.4 60.2 U.6 10.6 2.8 49.64.000 4.0 32.2 4.0 32.2 2.8 38.5 2.8 38.5 3.0 39.2 3.0 35.2

CASES PRUCESSEUNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOLO. SCORESMEANSTNC. ()EV. (N)SIND. DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN

=

=

=

12.374811.00001.00004.0000

33.1509103.9476

2.6789'1.10611.15372.6735

7.319811.0000

4.000020.4288

7.5372

'.9(401.00004.000019.3519

2.56751.[S40

66;7272-2 . 7909

1.1519

2.97031.36952.4E12

scupr 1NTtiRVALS F PC.T CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW".

1.000 26 2:.5 121 100.0 14 20.0 70 100.0 20 33.3 60 100.02.000 30 24.8 95 78.5 15 21.4 -80.0 14 23.3 40 66.73.000 21 17.4 65 53.7 13 18.6 41 58.6 8 13.3 26 43.34.000 44 36.4 44 36.4 78 40.0 28 40.0 18 30.0_ 18 30.0

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OA' TA

12111

7011

604

MINIMUM VALUE 1.006o 1.0660 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCIRES 325.0000 195.0000 144.0000SUM SOC. SCORES 1039.0000 6 39. odix) 436.006UMEAN 2.6860 ?.7F57 2.4000SINK). (N) 1.1715 1-IAA& 1.2275STNC. 7JEV. IN-1, 1.1764 ./182- 1.'2318MEDIAN 2.7143 2.9615 2.2143

39. For a typical pupil in your compensatory reading program, about howmuch in-school time is devoted to each of the following reading orreading-related activities?

Basic reading instructional

QUESTION 39

SCORE 1NTERVAL-S

1.000 0.32..000 0.3.000 7.34.000 5.5

Less than Between More than 11 hour 1 and 4 hour a day(5+

None per week hours/week hours/week

0Gioule2,

PCT CP isz-81W

2.1 13.2 100.01.3 13.0 97;1

54.9 12.8 96.641.8 5.5 41.8

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OA TA

==

13.23363.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VAL UE - 4.0000SUM OF SCORES - 44.5043SUM SOO. SCORES = 154.7277MEAN 3.3630STND. OEV. (N) 0.6184STN0, = 0.6432-MEDIAN 3.3498

SCORE INTERVALS

2:0063.0004.000

F pC1

3 2.3-2

75 58.149 38.0


1293

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE - 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 428.0000SUM SOO. SCORES = 1470.0000MEAN 3.3178STND._OFV._ (N)__.. 0.6224STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.6248MEDIAN 3.2933

CF p-BLw

F

0.4

PC I

5.7

F

0.0

PCT"

0.0

CF-P-EILW

8.0 100.0

-CF

7.8 100.0UB5.51. 8

11.468.322.4

8.0 100.07.3 90.61.8 22.4

0.95.70.7

11.87?..49.2

1.3 94.36.4 82.50.7 9.2

8.0492 7.75413.0000 1.00002.0000 1.00004.0000 4.000025.1960 22.1812131.2872 66.68163.1302 2.66060.5480 0.64550.5856 0.61163.0954 2.9436

F PCT CF F CF P -8L1

129 100.0 1.3 78 100.0 3 4.8 63 100.0126 97.7 8 10.3 77 98.7 8 12.7 60 95.2124 96.1 51 65.4 69 88.5 47 74.6 52 82.549 38.0 18 23.1 18 23.1 5 7.9 5 7.9

78 633 1

_

1.00004.0000

242.0000780.0000

3.10260.61160.61563.0882

1.00004.0000

180.0000538.0000

2.85710.61350.61852.9362

Compensatory reading

QUESTION 39

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.CCC3.0004.CCO

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA -MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSTND. DEV. IN) =SIND. DEV. IN-11 =MEO1AN

SCORE INTEkVALS

PART B

0 0

&DAC,/ C911216APA'

F PCT CF P-BLW -F---PCT CFWIFER--

0.2 0.34.5 8.536.8 68.612.1 22.7

53.6 100.0 0.3 0.553.4 99.7 -5 0 Ta48.9 91.238.5 75.612.1 22.7 7.1 14.0

53.597739.00001.00004.0000

168.0863543.4351

3.13610.55150.55683.1012

F PCT

50.8 100.0 0.450.6 99.5 5.545.6 89.7 30,27.1 14.0 5.0

50.836536.0000

-174:101r0

4.0000154.1399480.4292

3.03210.50700.51203.0244

ci=

C.9 41.2 100.012.4 40.8 99.172.5 35.3 85.612.2 5.0 12.2

CF P-BLW F PC1.------ ---------

CF P-BLW F

41.16GS28.00001.00004.0000

122.33E0373.46582.97150.53640.54502.9865

CF P-BLW

1.000 2 0.4 566 100.0_ 3 0.6 528 100.0 4 1.0 403 1b0.02.000 51 9.0 564 99.6 54 10.2 525 99.4 61 15.1 399 99.03.000 391 69.1 513 90.6 393 74.4 471 89.2 288 71.5 338 83.94.000 122 21.6 122 21.6 78 14.8 78 14.8 50 12.4 50 12.4

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =MIN ?MUM_ VALUE -

566401.0600

52831

40328

1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1765.0000 1602.0000 11'90.0000SOM-SOD. SCORES = 5677.'0000 5004.0000 36.,0.0000MEAN 3.1184 3.0341 2.9529STND. OEV. = 0.5530 0.5211 0.5594SIND. DEV. 1 NL11-= 0.5216 0.5601MEDIAN 3.0882 3.0267 2.9740

Instructional program (onlyif compensatory reading pro-gram is different from basic E:3

instructional program)

QUESTION 39

SCORE INTERVAL S

PART C

F

1.000 7.82.000 4.13.000 12.84.000 2.4

Grtuie."2.,PCT

28.9

CF P-8LW

27.1 100.0

F

7.715.3 19.3 71.1 4.647.1 15.2 55.8 13.88.7 2.4 8.7 2.8

CASES PROCESSES = 27.1490NO. BLANK DATA = 313.0000MINIMUM VAL UE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 63.9842SUM ..SO: SCORE S = 177.4404'MEAN 2.3568STND. DEV. (N) = 0.9906

0E41.' (N -I) = 1.0094MEDIAN 2.6238

Gmdteii- G-ratiePCT

26.715.847.79.8

CF 17-.-BLW F

28.9 100.0 8.421.2 73.3 5.416.7 57.5 10.82.8 9.8 0.9

SCORE INTERVAL S

1.0002.0003.0004.000

F

834513523..

PC T

29.015.747.28.0

_ ...

CF

28620315823

P-.81W

100.0

F

8171.055.28.0

4614532


====

286320

MINIMUM VAL UEMAXIMUM VALUE

1.00004.0000

SUM OF SCORES = 670.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1846.0000MEAN = 2.3427SIND. DEV. (N) = 0.9831SIND. °EY. (N-1 ) = 0.9848MEDIAN = 2.6111

28.9351250.0000

1.00004.000069.6543

195.41592.40730.9855i.ouZV2.6582

PCT CF 11-.11-w

32.7 25.6 100.0214, 17.2 67.342.4 11.8 .46.03.6 41.9 3.6

25.5560/55.00001.00004.0000

55.4429142.4064

2.16930.93060.94942.3129

PC T

26.615.147.710.5

CF P-8LW F

304 100.0 75223 73.4 48177 58.2 9932 10.5 10

304261

1.00004.0000

736.00002082.0000

2.42110.99360.99522.6724

PCT

32.3

CF

232 100.020.7 157 67.742.7 109 47.04.3 10 4.3

232199

1.00004.0000

508.00001318.0000

2.18970.94150.94352.3542

Reading in content areas(Science, Social Studies,etc.)

QUESTION 39

SCORE INTERVALS

PART 0

D

GroffF PCT CF

Ckllakt4F CF

Gee. 6P.3LW F PCT CF Pi3L0

1.000 3.8 6.9 55.4 100.0 3.1 5.9 52.1 100.0 2.7 6.5 41.5 100.02.000 18.5 33.3 51.'6 93: 1 94.1 6.8 i6.4 3b.8 93.53.000 30.5 55.1 33.1 59.8 31.5 60.6 41.3 79.4 22.4 53.9 32.0 77.14.000 2.6 4.6 2.6 4.6 9.8 18.9 9.8 18.9 9.6 23.1 9.6 23.1

CASES PROCESSED 55.4018 52.0538 41.52G1NO. BLANK DATA 26.0000 23.0000 26.000CMINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 142.6578 152.2260 121.9510

-Son SCORES 474.5356 365.2126MEAN 2.5750 2.9244 2.9172STND. DEV. (N) 0.6895 0.7511 0.6068

OEV.x.698 0. (584 0.8167

MEDIAN 2.6770 2.9859

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 44 7.6 580 100.0 34 6.3 541 100.0 :o 7.4 404 100.02.000 201 34.7 536 92.4 88 16.3 507 93.7 70 17.3 374 92.63.000 315 54.3 335 57.8 324 59.9 419 77.4 211 52.2 304 75.24.000 20 3.4 20 3.4 95 17.6 95 17.6 93 23.0 93 23.0


Mit 58026

541.

2440427

M I NI-RUN VTOTE 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1471.0000 1562.0000 1175.0000SiTM rdr5. SCORES 4003.0000 4822.0000 369 .0000MEAN 2.5362 2.8872 2.9084STND. DEV. ( N)

-TTNO.0.6851 0.7596 0.8319

DEV. N11 0.6857 0.7603 0.8330MEDIAN 2.6429 2.9583 2.9834

Independetit (self-selected)reading

QUESTION 39

SCORE INTERVALS

PIR1 E

Groat% Ghtele.4-F PCT CF P-81W F PIT LF 1J7-13LW

ComJle.F PCT CF P-1:13LW

1.000 0.7 1.2 55.8 100.0 0.9 1.7 51.8 100.0 0.3 G.7. 41.8 100.02.000 21.9 39.3 55a--913V.8 20.6 31.1 50.9 95.3 /01 36.2 41.5 99.33.000 30.1 54.0 33.2 59.6 28.1 54.3 30.4 58.6 22.3 26.4 63.14.000 3.1 5.6 3.1 5.6 2.2 4.3 2.2 4.3 4.1 9.7 4.1 9.7

CASES PROCESSED 55.7642 51.8406 41.7871NO. BLANK DATA 22.0000 28.0000 22.00G0MINIMUM VALUE 1.60130 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0(100 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 147.2185 135.4043 113.7169SUM SOD. SCORES 409.02-59 372.2461 326.5854MEAN 2.6400 2.6119 2.7213SIND. DEV. (N) 0.6043 0.5987 0.6401STND. DEV. IN-li 0.6098' 0.6045 0.6479MEDIAN 2.6771 2.6585 2.7451

SCORE INTERVAL F PCT CO-P-BLW F PCT__ 0:41.7 F CF P -BLWPCT

1.000 9 1.5 584 100.0 10 1.9 536 100.0 3 0.7 408 100.02,000 225 38.5 575 98.5 220 41.0 526 98.1 162 39.7 405 99.33.000 326 55.8 350 59.9 286 53.4 306 57.1 212 52.0 243 59.64.000 24 4.1 24 4.1 20 3.7 20 3.7 31 7.6 31 7.6


==

58422

53629

40823

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1533.0000 1388.0000 1087.0000SUM SO. SCORES = 4227,0000 3784.0000 3055.0000MEAN 2.6250 2.5896 2.6642STND. DEV. IN) = 0.5394 0.5949 0.6243tfNO. OEV. (N-1) = 0.5049 0.5955 0.6250MEDIAN 2,6779 2.6329 2.6840

Library activities

QUESTION 39

SCORE INTERVALS

PARI F

0 p 0

(x04WP Grazte.A.F PCT CO P-BLW F PCT CFP-F-W

1.000 1.9 3.42.000 38.8 70.03.000 14.3 25.74.000 0.5 C.9

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =-MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQD. SCORES =MEAN

DEV. (N) =-.SIND. DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

CrtadtF PLY P-a.

55.4 100.0 1.7 3.3 52.0 100.0 2.0 4.8 42.3 100.053.5-96.6 37.4 72.0 50.3 96.1 25.8 61.0 40.3 v5.214.8 26.6 12.3 23.6 12.8 24.7 13.9 32.9 14.5 34.20.5 0.9 0.6 1.1 0.6 1.1 0.5 1.3 0.5 1.3

55.4440 51.9944 42.295326.0000 24.0000 20.00001.0000 1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000 4.0000

124.2526-293.3608-

115.7079 97.558927 6 239.1716

2.2410 2.2254 2.30660.5185

-0.5232-0.5119 0.57820.5169 0.5852

2.1658 2.1487 2.2406

PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF

1.000 18 3.1 580 100.0 19 3.5 541 100.0 222.000 417 71.9 562 96.9 390 72.1 522 96.5 2573.000 141 24.3 145 25.0 127 23.5 132 24.4 1264.000 4 0.7 4 0.7 5 0.9 5 0.9 5

5.462.730.71.2

P-864

410 100.0388 94.6131 32.0

5 1.2


58026

54124

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 1291.0000 1200.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 3019.0000 2802.0000MEAN 2.2259 2.2181SIND. DEV. IN) 0.5007 0.5092SIND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.5011 0.5097MEDIAN 2.1523 2.1449

410211.00004.0000

934.00002264.0000

2.27800.57660.57732.2121

Enrichment activities (in-clude trips, specialassemblies, etc.)

QUESTION 39 PART G

SCORE INTERvAS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM NACREMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES ='SUM SQn. SCORESMEANSTNC. (*V. (N)

0Ev.*-CWq)MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM-VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSIND. 0EV. IN)STNO. :REV. (N-1)MEDIAN

0

Cyrouiel. c r ae_ 4 GrwietoF PCT CF-P-ECK F PCT CF P-BLW F T

11.636.94.80.0

21.8 53.3 100.0 11.2 22.1 50.8 100.0 10.5 25.3 41.7 100.069.2 41.7 78;2-33:7 66..3 39.6 t7.9 26.1 64.1 31.1 74.76.9 4.8 8.9 5.6 11.1 5.9 11.6 3.8 9.2 4.4 10.60.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.6 1.4 0.6 1.4

53.3190 50.7745 41.696336.0000 38.0000 26.000G1.0000 EONNUY--- -raZ003.0000 4.0000 4.0000

99.7779 96.4685 77.8424202.2250 400.b630 161.2635

1.8713 1.8999 1.86660.5393 0.5837 0.61840.5444 0.5895 0.6 2601.9070 1.9209 1.8852

F PCT ii:iitTri PCT CF P-8LW PCT CF P -81W

119 20.9 569_100.0_12fL__23.9 527 100.0 106 26.2 404 100.0397 69.8 450 79.1 341 64.7 401 76.1 261 64.6 298 73.853 9.3 53 9.3 57 10.8 60 11.4 33 8.2 37 9.20 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.6 3 0.6 4 1.0 4 1.0

=

==

56937

52738

40427

1.0000 1.0000 1.00003.0000 4.0000 4.0000

1072.0000 991.0000 743.0000164.0000 2051.0000 1511.0000

1.8840 1.8805 1.8391= D.5374 0.5964, 0.5981= 0.5379 0.5970 0.5989

1.91 i9 1.9032 1.8678


QUESTION 39 PART H

0 Q

Grae.,10SCORE INTERVALS

1.000

F PCT

36.0

CF

9.6

P-BLW

100.0

F

4.3

PCT

52.5

CF

8.1

P-BLW

100.0

F

4.2

PCT

5.5.8

CF

7.6

P-IiiLW

100.02.000 2.3 24.6 6.1 64.0 2.3 28.1 3.9 47.5 2.4 31.2 3.3 44.23.000 3.6 38.1 3.8 39.4 1.5 18.1 1.6 19.4 V.7 8.7 1.0 12.94.000 0. 1 1.3 0.1 1.3 0.1 1.3 0.1 1.3 0.3 4.2 0.3 4.2

CASES PROCESSED 9.5672 8.1237 7.5514NO. BLANK OATAMINIMUM VALUE

498.0000 463.0000 358.00001.606-6 1.0000 1.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 19.5928 13,6661 12.1845SUM SQO. SCORES 41.;7061 28.3336 24.6855MEAN 2.0479 1.6822 1.6134STND. DEV. (N) 0.8902 0.8111 0.8158STNO. OEV. (N-1) 0.9407 0.8661 0.8759MEDIAN 2.0701 1.4522 1,3954

F F PCT e.F F PCTSCORE LNTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 35 37.2 94 100.0 49 57.6 85 100.0 37 56.9 65 100.02.000 26 27.7 59 62.8 20 23.5 36 42.4 18 27.7 28 43.13.000 32 34.0 33 35.1 14 16.5 16 18.8 7 10.8 10 15.44.000 1 1.1 1 1.1 2 2.4 2 2.4 3 4.6 3 4.6


94512

85480

65366

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1,0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 400000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 187.0000 139.0000 106.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 443.0000 .87.0000-MEAN 1.9894 1.6353 1.6308STNO. DEV. (N) 0.8690 0.8380 0.8516STNO. DEV. (N-1) 0.8737 0.8430 0.8582MEDIAN 1.9615 1.3673 1.3784

40. Please Indicate below what materials you use in your compensatory readinginstruction, and to what extant you use them.

Use as major Use as supple- Occasionally Don'tresource in mental or op- refer to my- useteaching tional course self but don't at

Series Titles(Specify) reading in class use in class allScott Foresman

SCORE INTERVALS

1.00C2.0003.000

ZASTI-PRXEsSED =NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE =-104TATA-WituE---=SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES

STND. OEV. (N) =STND. OEV. (N-1) =

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE .MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF .SCORESSUM SAD. SCORES -MEANSTND. OEV. (N) =STND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN

CriadaF -pCT cF Pt&A64LIF-15=4kiw F PCT CF P -BLw

6

18.8 40.4 46.5 100.0 13.5 32.5 41.6 100.0 14.9 55+C 27.2 100.027.0. -1i5...2--. '27.7 59.6 2-8;0- 67..L 28.1 67;751;=275 12.2 45.00.7 1.4 0.7 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 1.2 4.3 4.8 17.6

3.6 13.2 3.6 13.2

137,0000 27.1834. 1.0000 179.0000

46;4927126.00001.00003760-074.8850

133.0039

0.51620.5218

F PCT CF

170..

139 35.010 2.578 -(=k

3972278878

397209

1.00004.0000

790.00002064.0000

1.98997.1132.1.11461.7050

3.00007-69.8869126.7115

1.671190.47460.48041.7608

P-BLW F PCT

10040 137 32.557.2 283 67,122.2 2 0.519.6

42a1431.0000

CF P-BLW

1.00004.0000

47.7977112.95071.75831.03121.05071.4058

PCT

422 100.0 134 53,8285 67.5 70 28.1

2 0.5 10 4.0AS 14.1

CF P -BLW

249 100.01115 46.245 18.135 14.1

3,0000709.00001287.0000

1.68010.47650.47711.7615

249182

1.00004.0000

444.00001064.0000

1.78311.04571.04781.4291

qO!k

Sc.dif Plresh,All

SCORE INTERVALS

&rcule 2

FPCT

CF PBLW

0

C;

PCt

a

va

P -BLW

FPCT

CFPBLW

1.000

12.6

31.7

39.7

100.0

9.Y

27.6

36.0

100.0

4.5

!C.0

9.0

100.0

2.000

26.7

67.2

27.1

68.3

25.6

71.1

26.1

72.4

2.9

32.5

4.5

50.0

3.000

0.4

1.1

0.4

1.1

0.5

1.3

0.5

1.3

0.4

4.1

1.6

17.5

1.2

13.4

1.2

13.

CASES PROCESSED

39.7044

W:9951

NO. BLANK DATA

195.0000

203.0000

9.13149

MINIMUM VALUE

1.0000

1.0000

352.0000

MAXIMUM! VALUE

3;6665

3.0000

1.0000

SUM OF SCORES

67.2565

62.5459

4.00G0

SUM SQO. SCORES

123.2255

116.5986

16.3139

MEAN

.-

f.6939

1.7376

38.9133

STND. DEV. IN/

0.4839

0.4690

1.8CS7

STNO. DEV. 0-1)

WOTAN--

----

0.490/

1.7722

0.4757

1.02C6

1.8154

1.0824

1.50C4

SCORE INTERVALS

FPCT

CFPBLW

-PCT

CF P -BLW

FPCT

CF

P -81W

1.000

64

40.3

159

100.0

94

26.4

356

100.0

32

44.4

72

100.0

2.000

65

40.9

95

59.7

25?

72.2

262

73.624

33.3

40

55.6

3.000

00.0

30

18.9

51.4

51.4

45.6

16

22.2

4.000

30

18.9

30

18.9

12

16.7

12

16.7

CASES PROCESSED

NO. BLANK DATA

159

447

356

209 1.0000

72

359

r WORM VALUE

1.0000

3.0000

1.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE

4.0000

623.0000

4.0000

SUM OF SCORES

314.0000

1167.0000

140.0000

SQL). SCORES

804.0000

1.7500

356.0000

MEAN

1.9748

0.4643

1.9444

STND. DEV. (NI

1.0755

0.4650

1.0787

STND. OEV. (N1)

1.0789

1.8268

1.0863

MEDIAN

1.7385

1.6667

q0(c) Scat+ roviesman

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA -MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORESMEANSTNO. 0EV. (N) =STND. uEV. (N-1)MEOIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

F PCF-1-cude2-CF P-BLW F PCP.-1"c"le-6-1513111 F PC14311-1 P-BLW

12.2 33.1 37.0 100.0 6.0 21.0 28.8 100.0 4.5 31.924.5 66.3 24.7 66.9'27:5--7-8:70- 79,0 4.1 29;20.2 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.3 1.0 0.3 1.0 0.5 la

4.9 35.136.9658

224.00001.00003.0000

61.8968112.17081.67440.48030.48701:7544

F PCT

14.1 100.09.6 68.15.5 38.84.9 35.1

CF F PCT

4b. f !UV

260.00001.0000

51.810498.45051.80050.42410.4317L.8719

CF P-BLW

14.0628253.0CCC

1.00004.000034.0295

--1(74.63212.41981.25891.30622.1113

F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 101 37.3 271 100.0 65. 217 100.0 37 28.2 131 100.02.000 66 24.4 170 62.7 228 76.8 232 78.1 37 28.2 94 71.83.000 9 3.3 104 38.4 4 1.3 4 1.3 6 4.6 57 43.54.000 95 35.1 95 35.1 38.9 51 38.9


==

271335.

29726B

1.0000131300

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 3.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 533.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORES

==

640.00001966.0000

/913.0000 333.00001.7946 1055.0000

MEAN 2.3616 0.4360 2.5420STNO. 0EV. IN) = 1.2951 0.4368 1.2616STK/. DEV. (N-1) = 1.2975 1.8662 1.2665MEDIAN 2.0227 2.2703

'41(d ) Harper Row

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

F

9.S20.30.t.

G.Y.04,de 1PCT CF

32.3 30.865.8 20.91.9 0.6

100.067.71.9

r:..4êt A.- to

6.1ma-TxTr--0.2

F PCT LF

26.1 23.2 100.0

F PCT CF P-BLW

1.5 23.0 6.4 100.017.2

0.8 0.273.90.8

2.7 41.6 5.0 77.00.3 5.0 2.3 35.42.0 30.4 2.0 30.4

CASES PROCESSED = 30.8115 IN:2758NO. BLANK OA TA = 292.0000 310.0000 6.4463MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 367.0000MAXIMUM. VALUE - 3.0600 3.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 52.2660 40,5785 4.0000SUM SQD. SCORESMEW.

96.31621.6960

75.6633 15.65E146.48E21--.7r4/1

STNO. DEV. IN1 = 0.4990 0.4531 2.4267STNO. DEV. IN-11 0,5073 0.4632 1.1459MEDIAN 1.7691 1.8269 1.2467

2.1492

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 61 46.9 130 100.0 64 26.2 244 100.0 10 17.9 56 I00.02.000 30 23.1 69 53.1 178 73.0 180 73.8 24 42.9 46 82.13.000 1 0.8 39 30.0 2 0.8 2 0.8 2 3.6 22 39.34.000 38 29.2 38 29.2 20 35.7 20 35.7

CASES PROCESSED =NO. 3LANK.DATA =

130476

244321

1.000056375

MINIMUM VALUE = I;i5060- 3.0000 170-01:r0--MAXIMUM VALUE - 4.0000 426.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 276.0000 794.0000 144.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 798.0000 1.7459 444.0000MEAN 2.1231 0.4538 2.5714STND. DEV. IN1 = 1.2771 0.4547 1.1473

IN -11 = 1.2820 1.8258 1.1577MEDIAN -- 1.6333 2.2500

1-10(.0 blo.vper Rot*,

SC0RE INTERVALS F PC CF P-BLW^ AA& Ya e

CF P-8140-15Cqlr P-BLW f_ard

PCT

1.000 7.3 29.6 24.6 100.0 4.3 22.3 19.1 100.0 0.3 7.1 3.8 100.02.000 16.3 66.2 17.3 70.4 o 14.3 77.7 1.3 32.7 3.6 92.93.00c 1.0 4.2 1.0 4.2 0.5 2.6 0.5 2.6 0.2 4.2 2.3 60.1

2.1 55.9 2.1 55.4CASES PROCESSED 24.5543 19.0540NU. BLANK DATA 345.0000 354.0000 3.8311MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 385.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 42.8871 34.3537 4.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 81.6301 65.9531 11.8342hitAN 1.7466 1.6030 41.0165SIND. DEV. IN) 0.5233 0.4590 3,0890STNO. DEV. IN-11 C.5342 0.4716 1.0791MEDIAN -.= 1.8085 1.8667 1.2553

3.609

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT C! P-BLW

1.000 36 37.9 95 100.0 43- 21.4 2PILWP!.0. 10.5 38 100.028.9 34 89.52.000 23 24.2 59 62,1 153 76.1 158 78.6 11

3.000 5 5.3 36 37.9 5 2.5 5 2.5 2 5.3 23 60.54.000 31 32.6 31 32.6 21 55.3 21 55.3

CASES PROCESSED 95idi364 38

NO. BLANK DATA 511 1.0000 393MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 3.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 364.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 221.0000 116.0000SUM SAO. SCORES 669.0000

_70.0.9000

1.8109 402.0000MEAN 2.3263 0.4506 3.0526sTNp. DEV. (NJ 1.2769 _qp418 1.1227

1.1377SIND. DEV. 1 N-1) 1.2836 1.8758MEDIAN 2.0000 3.5952

0(c) ecTei Roy,/

SCORE INTERVALSG v-

F PC-1- CF P-8Lw__C4L_ArwAp 4 av&d., 4

F PC7 CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-ELW

1.000 6.3 30.9 20.3 100.0 3.4 23.8 14.2 100.0 .1 34.3 14.9 100.02.000 13.6 67.1 14.0 69.1 NT 7174- 10.8 76.2 4.0 7Z7.0 9.W 65.73.000 C.4 2.0 0.4 2.0 9.7 4.8 0.7 4.8 0.8 5.6 5.8 38.7

4.9 33.2 4.9 33.2GASES PROCESSED = 20.2561NO. BLANK DATA = 351.0000 403.0000 14.8655MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 279.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.0000 3.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 34.6667 25.7188 4.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 64.3122 50.0898 35.3241MEAN 1.71.14 1.8094 107.4830-STNC. °EV. (NJ = 0.4960 0.5000 2.3762STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.5087 0.5186 1,2585

MEDIAN 1.7848 1.8665 1.30312.0885

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-8Lw

1.000 100 36.2 276 100.0 40 26.5-70.9---7--"-

151 100.0 48 33.1 145 100.02.000 68 24.6 176 63.8 107 111 73.5 S9 26.9 97 66.93.000 4 1.4 1.08 39.1 4 2.6 4 2.6 7 4.8 58 40.04.000 104 37.7 104 37.7 51 35.2 51 35.2


=-

2763?0

151414

1.0000145286

MINIMUM VALUE' = 1.0000 3.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 266.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 664.0000 504.0000 351.0000SSW SQ 3. SCORES = 2C72.0000 1.7616 1C83.0000MEAN 2.4058 0.4843 2.4207STND. ,EV. (N1-SYND-.-

= 1.3113 0.4859 1.2686()EV. (N-11 = 1.3136 1.8316 1.2730

MEDIAN 2.0588 2.1282

Macmillan

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.CGC

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSIND. DEV. IN/STNO. DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0006.000

CASES. PROCESSED =NO, BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOO. SCORES =MEANSTNO. DEV. IN/STNO. DEV. IN-1) =MEOIAN

PC7 P-BLW F PC f-T- "P. tiCF

o

Gy.eLelo 6P-8LW F PCT CF P-BLW

4.7 30.2 15.6 100.0 3.2 27.2 11.7 100.0 0.6 13.8 4.0 100.010.6 68.0 10.9 t9.8 t706:17 8.6 72.8rr:7-4:$.3 3.5 86.20.3 1.8 0.3 1.8 0.5 4.4 0.5 4.4 0.1 2.8 1.7 42.9

1.6 40.1 1.6 40.115.6265 11.7468

434.0000 427.0000 4.00171,0000 1.0000 386.00CO3.0000 3.000 1.0000

26.8186 20.8196 4.000049.7742 40.0098 10.77621.7162 1.7724 34.16440.4897 0.5145 "P.69290.5062 0.5380 1.13611.7912 1783735 1.3117

2.3367

F PC1 CF P-BLW F PCT *F PCT CF P-BLW

70 51.5 136 100.0 35 29.2 1 20 100.0 6 16.2 37 100.033 24.3 66 48.5 83 69.2 85 70.8 12 32.4 31 83.81 0.7 33 24.3 2 1.7 2 1.7 2 5.4 19 51.4

32 23.5 32 23.5.

17 45.9 17 45.9

136470

120445

1.000037394

1.0000 3.0000 1.00004.0000 207.0000 4.0000

267.0000 385.0000 /04.0000_723,0000 1.7250 344.0000

1.9632 0.4824 2.81081.2091 0.4844 1.18181.2136 1.8012 1.19811.4714 2.7500

Yo(1,) 1\10_c

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. 8LANK OATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORESMEANSTNC. OEV. (N)STNO. DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

F

4.67.00.3

F

PC 1yagLe

CF

38.8 11.958.9 7.32.3 0.3

11.8564476.0)001.0a03.0000

19.390335.01311.63540.52770.5515*1.6903

PCT CF

P-8114

100.061.22.3

P-BLW

F PCi

2.0 23.4

r-F7ECW

8.7 100.0

F

0.1 4.3 3.0 100.06.4--74:20.2 2.4

6.60.2

76.62.4

1.0 34.7 2.8 9-5.70.0 0.0 1.8 60.91.8 60.9 1.8 60.9

E.6587458.0000

1.00002.9539

396.0000

15.494529.5751

1.00004.00009.3798

F

1. T8950.46200.4912

33.0Z263.17541.04E6

ra-382

PCT CF P-BLW F

1.2E933.6795

PCT CF P -BLW

1.0002.0003.0004.000

35163

35

39.318.03.4

39.3

.89543835

100.060.742.739.3

21682

Z3.174.72.2

91 100.0 2 7.4 27 100.0702

76.92.2

70

18

25.90.0

66.7

251818

92.666.766.7


89517

1.0000

91474

1.000027

4043.0000 1.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 163.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 216.0000 3/1.0000 88.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 684;6060 1.7912 318.0000MEAN 2.4270 0.4573 3.2593STNO. OEV. (N) 1.3482 0.4599 1.0747STNO. DEV. (N-1) 1.3559 1.8603 1.0952MEDIAN 2.0938 3.7500

lip CZ) nick.c Yr% 1 11 o..)-1 0

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW CF 17,-78EWF PCT CF P-BLW F PCT

1.000 2.4 33.2 7.1 100.0 1.8 28.4 612 100.0 3.6 25.7 14.1 100.02.000 4.3 61.2 4.7 66.t-4.4 70.2 4.5 71.6 4.6 32.7 10.5 74.33.000 0.4 5,5 0.4 5.5 0.1 1.3 0.1 1.3 0.7 5.2 5.9 41.6

5.1 36.4 5.1 36.4CASES PROCESSED 7.0825 6.2406NO. BLANK OATA 516.0000 481.0000 14.1016MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 303.0000MAXIMUM- VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 12.2029 10.7912 4.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 23.2278 20.0600 35.5753MEAN 1.'7230 1.7292 110.7783STNC. OEV. (N) 0.5577 0.4736 2.5228STNO. t;EV. (N-1) 0.6018 0.5168 1.2212MEDIAN 1.7737 1.8012 1.2669

2.2426

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CJ P-11LW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -8011

1.000 34 16.7 203 100.0 17 26.2 65 100.0 29 24.0 121 100.02.000 53 26.1 169 83.3 47 72.3 48 73.8 36 29.8 92 76.03.000 6 3.0 114 57.1 1 1.5 1 1.5 6 5.0 56 46.34.000 110 54.2 110 54.2 50 41.3 50 41.3

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOO. SCORESMEANSTNC. DEV. IN1SIND. DEV. (M-11MEDIAN

203.

4031.00004.0000,

598.00002060.0000

2.94581.21241.21543.5773

65500

1.00003.0000

114.0000214.0000

1.75380.46510.46871.8298

121310

1.00004.0000

319.0000-1027.0000

2.63641.23981.24502.3750

American 846k Co.

--tCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

CASES PROCESSED -NU. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUETIAXYWOM VALUE =

SUM OF SCORES =

SUM SOD. SCORES =WEANSTNO. DEV. =

STNC. DEV. (N-11 =MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

F PCT

1.4 25.64.1 72.90.1 1.5

CF P-BLW F PCT

5.7 100.0* 1.1 23.24.2 74.4 3.6 76.80.1 1.5 0.0 0.0

GF P -ELW F PCT

4.7 100.0 0.7 1703.6 76.8 1.8 45.2

-0.0 -0.0 0.2 4.11.3 33.0

CF

4.0 100.03.3 82.31.5 37.11.3 33.0

5.6512535.0000

1.00003:600*9,938118.67811.758-60.46110.50821.8544

4.7262496.0000

1.00002.00008.355715.61481.76800.42210.47541.8489

x.96853d 3.0000

1.00004.000010.015130.281;72.52361.12421.2SS82.2143

F PCT

21 29.214 19.42 2.8

.35 48.6

CF P-BLW PCT

72 100.0 11 21.651 70.8 40 78.437 51.4 0 0.035 48.6

CF P-BLW

51 100.0 640 78.4 160 0.0 2

14

PCT

15.842.15.3

36.8

CF P-BLW

38 100.032 84.216 42.114 36.8

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK OA TA =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORES -MEANSTNO. DEV. (N) =

OEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN

72534

1.00004.0000

195.0000655.00002.70831.32751.33683.0000

51

5141.00002.0000

91.0000171.0000

1.78430.41130.41541.8625

38393

1.00004.0000

100.0000312.00002.63161.13371.14892.3125

(I) /-)rn

cosi

Co-

SCORE

INTERVALS

6447,2eL.,

seep

PCT

CE P-OLW

P-PCT

CF P-BLW

rPVT

CFPtIW

1.000

1.2

31.5

3.8

100.0

0.6

24.5

2.5

100.0

0.!,

15.,

3.1

100.0

2.000

2.5

66.4

2.6

68.5 IT7--ZW.IF

--r7.9

75.5

1J.

37.t

2.6

84.5

3.000

0.1

2.1

0.1

2.1

0.2

8.6

0.2

8.6

0.0

0.0

1.5

47.3

1.5

47.3

1.5

47.3

CASES PROCESSED

3.7658

2.5166

NO. BLANK DATA

552.0000

51a.0000

3.08C1

MINIMUM VALUE

1.0000

1.0000

395.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE

3.0000

3.0040

1.0000

SUM OF SCORES

-6.4232

4.6344

4.0000

SUM SOO. SCORES

11.8960

9.3033

8.5929

MEAN

1.7057

23.3527

SIND. DEV. (N)

0.4996

0.5528

2.7898

SIND. DEV. (N-1)

=0.5830

0.7121

1.1925

MEDIAN

1.7783

178.816

1.4510

2.4264

SCORE INTERVALS

PCT

CF

P -BLW

FPCT

CF

1.000

10

15.9

63

100.0

620.0

30

100.0

414.3

28

100.0

2.000

12

19.0

53

84.1

21

70.0

24

80.0

932.1

24

85.7

3.000

23.2

41

65.1

310.0

310.0

00.0

15

53.6

4.000

39

61.9

39

61.9

15

53.6

15

53.6

CASES PROCESSED

NO. BLANK DATA

= =

63

543

30

535 1.0000

23

403

MINIMUM VALUE

3..0000

3.0000

1.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE

4.0000

57.0000

4.0000

SUM OF SCORES

-196.0000

117.0000

82.0000

SUM SOD. SCORES

=700.0000

1.9000

280.0000

MEAN

3.1111

0.5385

2.9286

STND. DEV. (N)

=1.1967

0.5477

1.1931

SIND. DEV. (N-1)

=1.2063

.1.9286

1.2150

MEDIAN

3.6923

3.5667

140(L) /1)-n r; .a v1 Bovk C

StbkE IN. fERVALS PCT CF P8LN F PC4-cteFT-7-ELw F PCTGckci°*L CF P -8Lk

1.000 10.6 30.9 34.4 100.0 9.7 41.8 23.3 100.0 6.0 33.9 17.7 100.02.000 14.6 42.5 23.8 69.1 6.9 29.6 13,5-1547f 6.4 36.4 11.7 66.13.000 2.3 6.6 9.2 26.7 1.2 5.2 6.6 28.6 1.0 5.9 5.3 29.74.000 6.9 20.0 6.9 20.0 5.4 23.3 5.4 23.3 4.2 23.8 4.2 23.8

CASES PROCESSED = 34.3702 23.2771 17.7192ND. BLANK DATA = 245.0000 306.0000 260.0000MINIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.000oMAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 74.1873 48.9072 38.9328SUM SOD. SCORES = 199.6986 135.1965 ioa.aoo9MEAN 2.1585 2.1011 2.1972STND. DEV. IN) = 1.0729 1.1805 1.1457STND. DEV. IN1)-= 1.0889 1.7067 1.1744MEDIAN 1.9505 1.7766 1.5432

SCORE INTERVALS CF Pq1LN F PCT CE-0;t1A F CF-P -diw

1..000 116 33.0 351 100.0 99 40.2 246100.0 61 34.9 175 100.036.0 1142.000 144 41.0 235 67.0 70 28.5 14'i T9'.8 63 IT&al

3.000 27 7.7 91 25.9 12 4..9 77 31.3 9 5.1 51 29.14.000 64 18.2 64 18.2 65 26.4 65 26.4 42 24.0 42 24.0


==

351255

1.0000

246319

175256-

1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 741.0000 535.0000 382.0000SUM SO. seats '190.00(30 1527.0000 1066.0000MEAN 2.1111 2.1748 2.1829STND. DEV. IN1 = 1.0604 1.2156 1.1518STMT.a-V. = 1.0619 1.2180 1.1551MEDIAN 1.9132 1.8429 1.9206

Ginn & Co.

SCUP INTERVALS

.ra

deF

P-8LW

FPC

'r.c."-

C-rYOB

fo

PCT

CF P --=BL;

1.000

5.5

36.8

14.8

100.0

3.0

42.9

7.0 100.0

1.4

26.5

4.8

100.0

2.000

6.1

40.9

9.4

63.2

4.0--57:I

35.3

3.4

71.5

3.000

0.8

5.4

3.3

22.3

0.1

1.5

2.2

32.1

0.2

4.4

1.7

36.2

4.000

2.5

16.8

2.5

16.8

2.1

30.6

2.1

30.6

1.,

31.8

1.5

31.8

CASES PROCESSED

NO. BLANK DATA

MINIMUM VALUE

MAXIMUM VALUE

SUM OF SCORES

SUM SUL). SCORES

MEAN

STND. 0EV. (N)

STND. 0EV. (N-11

MEDIAN

= = = = = = =

14.8012

434.0000

1.0000

4.0000

29.9384

76.7709

2.0227

1.0467

1.0839

1.8220

6.9745

476.0000

4.8187

315.0000

1.b000

4.0000

15.3336

1.0000

4.0000

11.5417

A75:0783-4

2.1985

1.2769

r:37117---

1.7836

34.6009

2.3952

1.2015

1.3457

2.1096

SCORE INTERVALS

PCT

CF

P-BLW

FPCT

CF P -BLW

FO

tf---

-1.000

60

37.5

160

100.0

32

44.4_

72

100.0

15

31.3

48

100.0

2.000

65

40.6

100

62.5

16

22.2

40

55.6

16

33.3

33

68.8

3.000

85.0

35

21.9

11.4

24-

33.3

24.2

17

35.4

4.000

27

16.9

27

16.923_

.23

_31.9

15

31.3

15

31.3

CASES PROCESSED

NO. BLANK DATA

= -160

446

72

48

383

MINIMUM VALUE

ZT

.1.0000

*

1.00

001.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE

4.0000

4.0000

4.0000

SUM OF SCORES

=322.0000

113.0000

SUM SOC. SCORES

=824.0000

.159,0000

337.0000

MEAN

2.0125

2.2083

2.3542

STN O. GEV. (N)

STND. DEV. (N-1)

= =1.0487

1.0520

1.3010

1.2160

--1.2289

MEDIAN

1.8077

1.75

002.0625

G Pi VI Co 0 El

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF 1"4/LW F PC/ a P-BLW F

1.000 3.4 37.2 9.0 100.0 1.6 36.6 4.4 100.0 0.2 S.2 2.6 100.02.000 2.7 29.8 5.7 62.8 O. 2(7.8 2. 613.13-:9 35.2 2.3 90:13

3.000 0.3 3.0 3.0 33.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 42.5 0.0 0.0 1.4 55.74.000 2.7 30.0 2.7 30.0 1.9 42.5 1.9 42.5 1.4 5.7 1.4 55.7


==

9.0044493.0000

4.4435505.0000

2.5617354.0000.

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1-0-00 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 20.3293 11.0379 7.7416SUM SOD. SCORES = 59.7276 35.563W-- 26.6557MEAN 2.2577 2.46'41 3.0221STND. DEV. IN/ = 1.2393 1.3539 1.12E8.STND. DEV. IN -11 = 1.3145 1.5379 1.4457MEDIAN 1.9290 2.1412 3.6020

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P F

1.000 57. 37.0 100 100.0 142.000 31 31.0 63 63.0 93.00C 2 2.0 32 32.0 04.000 30 30.0 30 30.0 22

PC T CF P -BLW PC T CF -BLW

26.2 42 100.0 3 12.0 25 100.021.4 31 73.8 7 28.0 22 88.00.0 22 52.4 0 0.0 15 60.0

52.4 ?? 52.415 60.0 15 60.0

CASES PROCESSEDND. BLANK OATAMINIMUM VALUE

==

1005061.0000

42523Tailibe.

25

4061.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM nF SCORES = 225.0000 117.0000 77.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 659.0000 399.0060 271.0000MEAN 2.2500 2.7857 3.0800STND. DEV. (NJ = 1.2359 1..3190 1.1634STNO. OEV. 4N-11 = 1.2421 1.3350MEDIAN 1.9194 3.5455 3.6667

if° (0) G-,;11-1 1' Co.

SCORE INTERVALS F PCCT1-414e.a_CF P-BLW

1.000 9.1 35.5 25.6 100.02.000 5.3 20.6 16.5 64.53.000 1.0 4.0 11.2 43.94.000 10.2 39.8 10.2 39.8

CASES PROCESSE0 = 2i.5555NU. BLANK DATA = 345.0000MINIMUM VALUE 0 I.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 63.4861SUM SOD. SCORES 20,4677MEAN 2.4813SIN°. DEV. (N) 1.3253SIND. DEV. IN-1) = 1.3520MEDIAN 2.2017

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 78 31.2 250 100.02.000 46 18.4 172 68.83.000 11 4.4 126 50.44.000 115 46.0 115 46.0

CASES PROCESSEDNi). BLANK DATA

==

250356

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 663.0000SUM SAO. SCORES = 2201.0000MEAN 2,6520SIND. OEV. (N) = 1.3307SIND. OEV. (N-1) = 1.3334MEDIAN 2.5909

0

yo_ e. Ovc,cipF PCT CF F=:11-0,7

7.3 41.3 17.5 100.0 4.3 314.5 13.4 100.02:5--14:0 10.3 -513:I- 2.w iti.s 9.1 O8.i1.5 8.4 7.8 44.7 0.5 3.8 6.3 47.26.4 36.3 6.4 36.3 5.8 43.4 5.6 43.4

17.5496 13.3EE7373.0000 3C6,0000

1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000

42.0502-rnnalanT

144.6443113.0486

2.3961 4.58761.3383 1.32211,3782 1.37452.1188 2.3668

F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -BLW

61 34.3 178 100.0 32 27.1 118 100.024 13.5 117 65.7 26 22.0 86 72.911 6.2 93 52.2 4 3.4 60 50.862_ 46.1. 82 46.1 56 47.5 56 47.5

178387

118313

1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000

470.0000 320.00001568.0000 1068.0000

2.6404 2.71191.3554 1.30261.3592 1.30812.8636 2.7500

'70(0Houghton-Mifflin

SCORE INTERVALS FGN-a..1d. 4

PCT:LCF P-BLW F PC IY4A CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-81.11

1.000 5.0 54.4 9.6 100.0 4.0 56.8 7.0 100.0 1.3 3/.5 4.1 100.02.000 1.5 15.7 4.6 47.6 0.4 6.3 3.0 43.2 1.3 30.1 2.8 68.13.000 G.3 3.1 3.1 31.9 0.4 6.4 2.6 36.9 0.0 G.0 1.5 37.54.000 2.8 28.8 2.8 28.8 2.1 30.5 2.1 30.5 1.5 37.5 1.5 37.5


= 9.6336500.0000

6.9694484.0000

4.055'3b5,otico

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0-00D 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 20.0618 14.6617 9.959SUM SOD. SCORES = 58.1533 45;i6-17 30.8745MEAN 2.0825 2.1066 2.4 3CSIN°. OEV. (N) = 1.3038 1.3570 1.2775SIND. DEV. (N-1i = 1.3772 1.4662 1.4694MEDIAN 1.4541 1.3805 2.0SCa

SCORE INTERVALS F PC I CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BIM F PC T CF P-BLit

1.000 43 46.7 92 100.0 30 48.4 62 100.0 13 34.2 38 100.02.000 15 16.3 49 53,3 6 9.7 32 51.6 9 23.7 25 65.83.000 4 4.3 34 37.0 3 4.8 26 41.9 0 0.0 16 42.14.000 30 32.6 30 32.623 37.1 23 37.1 16 42.1 16 42.1

CASES PROCESSEDND. BLANK OA TA

==

92514

62503

38393

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 205.0000 143.0000KUM SOD. -SCORES = 619.0000 449.0000

.95.0000305.0060

MEAN 2.2283 2.3065 2.5000STND. DEV. (N) = 1.3278 1.3864 1.3328STND.'OEV. (N-1) = 1.3351 1.3978 1.3507MEDIAN 1.7000 1.6667 2.1667

flo 0-011) et_

SCORE INTERVALS F PCcreco_ae

CF P-BLW F- P-BLI0G,ta_271 e

F PCT

1.000 3.3 42.5 7.8 100.0 1. 7 37.8 4.4 100.0 0.3 9.5 3.4 100.02.000 1.3 16.6 4.5 57.5 0. F T.6 2.7 62.2 Z.0 3.0 90.53.000 0.1 1.3 3.2 40.8 0.3 7.1 2.7 60.6 0.0 0.0 2.0 60.74.000 3.1 39.5 3.1 39.5 2.3 53.5 2.3 53.5 2.0 60.7 2.0 60.7

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM S00. SCORESMEANSING. DEV. IN)STNO. DEV. IN-11MEDIAN

22

7.7913518.0000

1.00004.000018.530958.69712.37841.37001.46741.9486

4.3925504.0000

3.356039.0000

1.00004.000012.1377

1.00G04.000010.4676

42.34632.76331.4160

3o.9 1503.11901.1275

.1.611Z3.5648

1.34573.6764

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF F PCT CF

1.000 25 34.Z 73 100.0 14 32.6 43 100.0 2 6.7 30 100.02.000 13 17.8 48 65.8 1 2.3 29 67.4 7 23.3 28 93.33.000 1 1.4 35 47.9 2 4.7 28 65.1 0 0.0 21 70.0

4.000 34 46.6 34 46.6 26 60.5 26 6p.5_21 70.0 21_70.0


73533.

43 30401

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000_522

1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 190.0000 126.0000 100.0000

366.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 630.0000 452:0000MEA 2.6027 2.9302 3.3333STNO. DEV. IN/ 1.3623 1.3876 1.0435SIND. DEV. IN-1/ 1.3717 1.4040 1.0613

MEDIAN 2.3846 3.6131 3.7857

yo(Y) FicAtylion fYi, (Pi 6

SCORE INTERVALS F PC16 y-cm_cie. CF P -I LW F PCfri v";7":6 AiCF .1J-131.64 F ----FEFY-ct4g-6-1-CF11-13 re

1.000 1.7 8.6 19.7 100.0 1.0 9.2 11.3 100.0 0.32.000 5.1 26.0 18.0 91.4 2.3 20.4 10.3 90.8'1.23.000 1.7 8.7 12.9 65.4 0.3 2.8 8.0 70.4 0.44.000 11.2 56.7 11.2 56.7 7.7 67.6 7.7 67.6 6,4

CASES PROCESSED 19.7444 11.3387NO. BLANK OAIA = 393.0000 423.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 61.8862 37.2777SUM SOO. SCORES 216.7468 135.7835MEAN 3.1344 Et.2877

STND. UEV. (N) 1.0739 1.0801STND. DEV. 1.1022 [7,1311MEOIAN 3.6175 3.7605

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF-0:13L-t. F

1.000 19 9.5 201 100.02.000 44 21.9 182 90.53.000 17 8.5 138 68.74.000 121 60.2 121 60.2


201405

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 642.0000SUM SQO. 'SCORES 2284.0000MEAN 3.1940STND. OEV. {N) L.0777STNO. DEV. (N-11 1.0804MEDIAN 3.6694

1g

94

7.915.0-3.1

74.0

127 100.0117. 92.198 77.294 74.0

127438

i.o60o--4.0000

,436.00001626.0060

3.43311.00851.01253.8245

3.3r46-5.6

77.2

8.3 100.08.0 .9471:7

6.8 82.Z6.4 77.2

8.2909345.0000

1.00004.000029.5140111.16473.5598O.65780.91483.850

4 5.19 11.45 6.3

61 77.2

CF P -BLW

79 100.075 94.966 $3.561 77.2

,.

79352

1.00004.0000

281.0000106a.0000

3.55700.88230.88793.8525

Lippincott

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -8LW F CF P -8L T F I-CT CF P-8LW

1.000 0.7 12.8 5.3 100.0 0.6 16.5 3.4 100.0 0.1 2.3 2,7 100.02.000 1.3 23.9 4.6 87,2 0.4 11;Z-- 2.8 83.5 u.6 22.7 2.6 96.73.000 0.2 4.4 3.3 63.3 0.1 3.9 2.4 71.7 0.2 7.5 2.0 74.04.00C 3.1 58.9 3.1 58.9 2.3 67.8 2.3 67.8 1.8 66.5 1.8 66.5

CASES PROCESSEUNO. BLANK DATA

= 5.2942534.0000

3.393o516.0000

2..6670398.0060

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 176000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 16.3770 10.9602 8.9544SUM SOU. SCORES = 57.7163 46.169 32.6913MEAN 3.0934 3.2297 3.3725STND. DEV. IN/ = 1.1544 1.1353

-17:41130.9402

STND. DEV. (N--lb = 1.2818 1.1652MEDIAN 3.6512 3.7628 307481

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CE P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLW F P-BLWPCT CF

1.000 9 15.5 58 100.0 5 13.9_______ 3_6 1_00.0 1 4.0 25 100.02.000 11 19.0 49 84.5 4 11.1 31 86.1 4 16.0 24 96.03.000 3 5.2 38 65.5 1 2.8 27 75.0 2 8.0 20 80.04.000 35 60.3 35 60.3 26 72.2 26 72.2 IS 72.0 18 72.0

CASES PROCESSED = 58 36 25N3. BLANK DATA = 548 529 406MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 180.0000 120.0000 87.0000SUM SOU. SCORES = 640.0000 446.0000 323.0000MEAN 3.1034 3.3333 3.4800STN&. DEV. (N) = 1.1845 1.1304 0.8998STND. CEV. (N-1) = 1.1949 1.1464 0.9183MEDIAN 3.6714 3.8077 3.8056

90(0 ovi coif

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002,0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESWM-S-40-. SCORESMEANSTN D. DEV. IN)

MEOIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA -

MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES'SUM SOD.-SCORESMEANSIND. VEV. (Ni .=5TND. DEV. IN-1) =MEDIAN

0

Fcycta.c.

PC CF P-BLWG-Nr

0:61-7WF.r617NreXao,

PC CF P-BLW PCT CF

0.4 8.2 4.3 100.0 0.3 8.2 3.1 100.0 0.1 2.5 100.00.4 10.3 3.9 91.8 071.4-- 12.1 271r Tra61.7 25.7 2.4 94.i0.0 0.0 3.5 81.5 0. 0 0.0 2.5 79.8 0.1 2.4 1.b 65.23.5 81.5 3.5 81.5 2. 5 79.8 2.5 79.8 1.5 61.8 A.5 61.6

4.2926 3.0791 2.4818544.0000 512.0000 3c9.0CCO

1:0000 1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000 4.000015.2248 10.8181 7.988658.-0691 41.0303 28.31223.5468 3.5134 3.21890.9738 0.9907 1.03511:1118 1.2056 1.33953,8862 3.8731 3.6911

F PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

4 8.5 47 100.0 2 5.7 35 100.0 1 4.2 24 100.03 6.4 43 91.5 4 11.4 33 94.3 6 25.0. 23 95.80 0.0 40 85.1 0 0.0 29 82.9 1 4.2 17 70.8

40 85.1 40 85.1 29 82.9 29 82.9 16 66.7 16 66.7

47559

35530

24407

1.0000 1.0000 1.00004.0000. 4.0000 4.0000

170.0000 126.0000 80.0000656.0000 482.0000 290.00003.6170 3.6000 3.33330.9352 0.9008 0.98600.9453 D.9139 1.00723.9125 3.8966 3.7500

iitqa..) j_i pp ty C ott-

SCORE INTERVALScry- es-de a

F PC CF

0 a D

lea_ cl& e.P-8LW 7-- PCrv-Q-5- Le-gCF P-I3N- F PCT CF IT-BL

1.0002.0003.0004.000

2.14.60.4

12.7

10.5 19.8 100.023.3 17.7 89.52.1 13.1 66.2

64.1 12.7 64.1

CASES PROCESSED = 19.8186NO. BLANK OATA = 395.0000M1NIMUm VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 63.4016SUM SQO. SCORES = 227.6739MEAN = 3.1991STNO. DEV. (N) = 1.1157UN°, DEV. (N-1) ...'Z 1.1490MEDIAN = 3.7205

SCORE INTERvALS F PCT CF P -8LW

1.000 19 9.5 199 100.02.000 46 23.1 180 90.53.000 3 1.5 134 67.34.000 131 65.8 131 65.8

CASES PROCESSEDNO, BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE

====

199407

1.00004.0000

SUM OF SCORES = 644.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 2n6.0000MEAN = 3.2362STND. DEV. IN) = 1.1025STNO. DEV. (N-11 = 1.1053MEOIAN = 3.7405

1.4 12.3-1..3 -63.50.5 4.27.9 69.9

11.39.98.47.9

100.0 0.1874.7 2.474.2 0.369.9 6.6

11.2914419.0000

1.00004.0000

37.4589138.1224

3.31751,10771.16023.7850

F PCT

.14 1.9..6 _____13216 12.14 3.0

98 Till!? _

7.0[..1.8

2.766.o

10.0 100.G9.3 "'3.06.9 69.36.6 66.6

9.9652:;2a.0060

1.00004.0000

32.7759118.76093.28901.04671.10573.7492

CF13-aLw F PCT CF P -8LW

100.0 10 10.5 95 100.0118 89.4 18 18.9 85 89.5102 77.3 3 3.2 67 70.598 74 2 64 67.4 64 67.4

132____433__

1.00004.0000

450.00001682.0000

3.40911.05851.06263.8265

1 .

95336

1.00004.0000

311.00001133.0000

3.27371.09971.10553.7578

(v) Allyn & Bacon

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA-WINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOU. SCORESMEANSTNC. OEVo (NISTNC. DEV.MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002,0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SO. SCORES/.411N

STNO., (N)STND. 0EV. (*-1)MEDIAN

c:c aF PC CF P 13EW

1.61.20.02.8

F

15130

31

0

PC --C1--PRZW F Pt.4;42:16hP-71Wi

23.6 5.6 100.0 0.7 i9.2 3.4 100.0 0.2 7.5 2.3 100.021.6 4.0 71.4 0-.;4 11.7 2.7 8 006 24.0 2020.0 2.8 49.8 0.2 6.3 2.4. 69.0 U. 1.8 1.6 68.5

49.8 2.8 49.8 2.1 62.7 2.1 62.7 1.5 66.7 1.5 66.7

5.5814 3.4049 2.2950532.0000 509.0000 400.0000

1.0000 100000 1.00004.0000 4.0000 4,0(10015.1278 1006417 7.535550.8986 38.3625 27.2972.7104 3.1254 .27781.3316 1.2241 1.06241.4697 1.45-66- 1..41342.4909 3.7031 3.7507

PCT

25.422.00.0

52.5

CF

59443131

100.074.652.552.5

F

65

224

PCT

...16213.5'5e4

64.9

CF

37312624

P -BLW

O p.0 2

PC T

8.7

CF.P-BLW

23 100.0-83o8*

70.364.9

41

16

17.44.3

69.6

211716

91.373.969.6

59547

37528

23408

1.0000 1;0000 i 1.00004,0000 4.0000 4.0000

165.0000 118.0000 77.0000563.0000 428.75066 283.0000

2.7966 3.1892 3.34781.3120 1.04711.3233

_1.18181.0706

3.5484 3.7292 3.7813

171004 Allyn B._ co N, 0


1.000 1.1 2i.9 4.82.000 0.6 12.2 3.83.000 0.2 4.1 3.24,C00 3.0 61.8 3.0

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES

4.8450542.0000

1.0000-4,000014.8159

SUM SOD. SCORES 53.1201MEAN 3.0580SIND. CEV. (N) 1.2699STNO. DEV. (N-1) 1.4255MEDIAN 3.6911

F -81W

100.0

F

0.3

PCT

10.7 2.7 100.0

F fCT

/

iF P-BLw

2.,* 100.t)78.1 0 --33 -106 2.4 89.8 L. 2.3 96.365.9 0.0 0.0 2.1 78.7 0.9 0.0 1.7 73.461.8 2.1 78.7 2.1 78.7 1.1 73.4 1.7 73.4

2.7278 2.3556516.0000 dIC0.00001.0000 1.00004.0000 400009.4554 8.0836

75.7884 29,9180:3.4663 3.43171.0510 C.96161.3206 1.26753.8645 3.8191

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P -8LW PCT CF P-864

1.000 8 16.3 49 100.0 2 6.7 30 100.0 1 4.3 23 100.02.000 6 12.2 41 83.7 3 10.0 28 93.3 4 17.4

T22 95.7

3.000 1. 2.0 35 71.4 0 0.0 25 83.3 0 0.0 18 78.34.000 34 65.4 34 69.4 25 83.3 25 83.3. 18 78.3 18 78.3


49557

30535

23408

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 159.0000 108.0000 81.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 585.0000 .414.0000 305.0000MEAN 3.2449 3.6000 3.5217SIND. DEV. (N) 1.1872 0.9165 0.9264SIND. DEV. (N-1) 1.1995 0.9322 0.9472MEDIAN 3.7794 3.9000 3.8611

lip (

x)19

illi

Yt +

Ba-

c-W

ri

SCORE INTERVALS

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

CASES PROCESSED

NO. BLANK DATA

MINIMUM VALUE

MAXIMUM VALUE

SUM OF SCORES

SUM SOD. SCORES

MEAN

STND. DEV. IN1

-ST46; DEV. (N-1)

MEDIAN

= =

SCORE INTERVALS

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

CASES PROCESSED

NO. BLANK DATA

MINIMUM VALUE

MAXIMUM VALUE

SUM OF SCORES

SUM SOD. SCORES

MEAN

STND. 0EV. 01

STNO. OEV. IN-11

MEOIAN

=

0D

00

F-e

a-ci

e..:4

PCT6

CF 0 -8LW

r---Fu.vA.c

i

---TFC\I-er-C141-4----.TFP-8LW

42

CyF P-OLW

1.0

5.S

17.5 100.0

0.9

6.5

13.4 100.0

1.8

16.7

10.5

100.1)

3.6

20.3

16.5

94.1

3.2

23.9

12.5

93.5

2.6

26.8

8.7

83.3

1.0

5.8

12.9

73.8

1.6

12.1

9.3

69.7

0.1

1 0.8

5.9

56.5

11.9

68.0

11.9

68.0

7.7

57.5

7.7

57.5

5.9

55.8

5.9

55.6

17.5269

13.4085

10.4523

415.0000

404.0000

325.0000

1.0006-

1.0000

1.0000

4.0000

4.0000

4.0000

58.8866

43.0058

31.0231

215.1710

151.7444

10.3640

3.3598

3.2074

2.9365

0.9942

1.0149

1.2210

1.0244)-

1.0550

1.2E37

3.7649

3.6311

3.6037

FPCT

CF

P-BLW

FPCT

CF

P-BLW

TF

PCT

CO-P-BEW

11

6.1:

179

100.0

10

6.8

147

100.0

15

15.2

99

100.0

35

19.6

168

93.9

33

22.4

137

93.2

25

25.3

84

84.8

73.9

133

74.3

96.1

104

70.7

11.0

59

59.6

126

70.4

126

70.4

95

...._

64.6

95

64.6

58

58.6

58

58.6

179

427

147

4113

99

332

1.0000

1.0000

1.0000

4.0000

4.0000

4.0000

606.0000

483.0000

300.0000

2230.0000

1743.0000

1052.0000

3.3855

3.2857

3.0303

0.9983

1.0302

1.2015

1.0011

1.0337

1.2076

3.7897

3.7263

3.6466

day) Holt, Rinehart &Winston

SCORE INTERVALS4; V- 0.4Ad Dr-

F PCT CF P -8LW

a

-Ptir-a4g- 10F P-BLW F PCT CI- P -8 LWe:,:,,-.2..a.8. 6

1.0002.0003.0004.000

0.61.3G.03.6

100424.00.0

65.5

5.54.93.63.6

100.089.665.565.5

C.5E.F--0.02.5

1C.9 4.4 100.0 0.3 10.4 2.7 100.0

0.057.1

3:92.52.5

89.157.157.1

0.80.01.6

25.10.0

60.6

2.41.61.6

89.660.660.6

CASES PROCESSEDNO. !LANK DATA

==

5.5067533.0000

4.3573504.0000

2.65013S7.0CCO

MINIMUM VALUE -7-' 100000 100000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 17.6564 13.2159 8.2351SUM SOD. SCORES = 63.6074 745.8568 29.0330MEAN = 3.2064 3.0330 3.1074STND. 0EV. (NI = 1.1270 1.1510 1.1398STND. DEV. IN-1) = 1.2458 1.44451.3113MEDIAN = 3.7370 3.6241 3.6743

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-8LW F-

PCT--CF

-----._P-8CW

-F

-OCT CF P -BLW

1.000 5 8.6 58 100.0 4 s.A____...._. 4.3 100.0 3 11.5 26 100.02.000 14 24.1 53 91.4 12 27.9 39 90.7 6 23.1 23 88.53.000 0 0.0 39 67.2 0 0.0 27 62.8 0 0.0 17 65.44.000 39 67.2 39 67.2 27 62.8_ 27 62.8 17 65.4 IT 65.4


====

58548

1.00004.0000

43522

26405

1.00004.0000

1.00004.0000

SOM OF scnREsSUM SOO. SCORES =

189.0000685.0000

139,929.9.. 83.0000484.0000 299.0000

ME V4 3.2586 3.1628 3.1923STND. DEV. (N) = 1.0917 1.1192 1.1442STNO. 0EV. IN-1) 1.1012 ra32-4-------- 1.1668MEDIAN 3.7564 3.7037 3.7353

yo(z) holt, loulvsfort

SCORE INTERVALS61-ecuie

CF F-81.W 7r----0Cfrv-6""- P-6Lw PC,4;-(6-111-.7ffLAF PCT

1.000 0.4 S.0 4.7 100.0 0.1 4.2 3.2 100.0 ti.1 B.6 2.3 100.0.1'6.42.000 1.2 24.8 4.3 91.0 0.-2 .3.1 95.8 o. a0 B 2.3

3.000 0.0 0.0 3.1 66.2 0.8 23.5 2.9 90.6 0.0 0.0 1.5 65.64.000 3.1 66.2 3.1 66.2 2.1 67.1 2.1 67.1 1.5 65.6 1.5 65.c

CASES PROCESSED 4.7231 3.1990NO. BLANK DATA 541.0000 517.0000 461,0000MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0CtOMAXIMUM VALUE - 4,0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF ScORES 15.2716 11.3103 7.6618SUM SOD. SCORES 55.1247 41.9155 27.512*MEAN 3.2334 3.5356 3.2761STND. DEV. (N) 1.1030 0-7762 1.0/5ITNO.OEV. (N-11 = 1.2423 0,9362 1.3422MEDIAN 3.7446 3.7548 3.7378

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F __ - - -.PC

T CF P-BLW F PCT CF

1.000 5 10.0 50 100.0 1 3,3 30 100.0 1 4.5 2Z 100.02.000 10 20.0 45 90.0 3 10.0 29 96,.7 5 22.7 21 95.-5

3.000 0 0.0 35 70.0 1 3.3 26 86.7 0 0.0 16 72.74.000 35 70.0 35 70.0 25 83.3 25 83.3 16 72.7 16 72.7

CASES PROCESSED = 50 30 22NO. BLANK DATA = 556 535 409MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 165.0000 110.0000 75.0000SUM SLID. SCORES 605.0000 422:5650 277.0000MEAN 3.3000 3.6667 3.4091STND. DEV.

DEV. IN-11= 1.1000

1.11120.7888 0.9844

..0+315-0.8023MEDIAN 3.7857 3.9000 3.8125

go11

-, R

t;ei-

Nav

ttjt;istov-t

SONE IN 1.00C

2.000

3.00C

4.000

F

6.9

13.6

0.7

7.9

PCs

23.7

46.7

2.5

27.2

v-a..cl

al-

CF P-BLW

29.1. 100.0

22.2

.76

.38.6

29.7

7.9

27.2

7.1

r9.7

0--6

270.5

3.6

_ _vrq_x-_sea

23.5

1.8

12.1

e-

Cl "

lea

4.P-BLd

100.0

17--BLW

F

30.3 100.0

e.8

pC

26.5

25.6

.-273:177-6:5-13.3

4.2

13.8

1.0

3.6

12.1

2.5

59.5

3.9

9.6

3.5

2.5

13.6

9.6

CASES PROCESSED

=29.0983

30.2524

25.5644

NO. BLANK DATA

=310.0000

244.0000

183.0CCC

MINIMUM VALUE

1.0000

1.0000

1.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE

4.0000

4.0000

4.0CCO

SUM OF SCORES

=67.8588

61.2358

50.3357

SUM SQD. SCORES

=194.2866

14'6;1655

114).6430

MEAN

2.33

212.0242

1.9674

STNC. DEV. (NI

=1.1128

0.8569

0.8297

STNU. 0EV. IN-11

=1.1325

C.8114

0.8464

MEDIAN

2.0643

1.9230

1.8924

SCORE INTERVALS

FPCT

CF

P -8LW

FPC

TPC

TCF

P

1.000

58

20.4

285

100.0

69

311

100.0_57,

23.4

244

100.0

2.000

/35

47.4

227

79.6

187

60.1

242

77.8 154

63.1

187

76.6

3.000

93.2

92

32.3

72.3

55

17.7

93..7

33

13.5

4.000

83

29.1

83

29.1

48

48

15.4

24

9.8

.24

9.8

CASES PROCESSED

NO. BLANK DATA

= =285

321

311

254

244

187

MINIMUM VALUE

1.0000

1.0000

1.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE

4.0000

4.0000

4.0000

SUM OF SCORES

687.0000

_ .

__ _656.0000

488.0000

1138.0000

SUM SQD. SCORES

=2007.0000

1648.0000

MEAN

2.4105

2.1093

2.0000

STND. 0EV. IN)

=1.1097

0.9e18

-0.

8148

STND. DEV. IN-11

=1.1117

0.92

330.8165

MEDIAN

2.1259

1.9626

1.9221

110 0_161

SRA

SCORE INTERVALS

1.CCO

2.000

3.000

4.000

CASES PROCESSED

NO. BLANK DATA

MINIMUM VALUE

MAXIMUM VALUE

SUM OF SCORES

SUM.SQC. SCORES

MEAN

STND. DEV. (N)

SIND. DEV. IN-11

MEDIAN

r-G

,ce

FPCT

CF

P-BLW

0

FPCT

CF P-

F

00

rk

PCf

CF P-BLA

2.1

29.4

7.3

100.0

0.7

10.3

6.8

100.0

1.4

2ti.7

6.3

106.0

1.9

25.5

5.2

70.6

574---55:6--

S:6-75672-

8977

4.f

74.3

0.0

0.0

3.3

45.1

0.0

0.0

2.3

33.4

0.0

0.0

1.3

20.7

3.3

45.1

3.3

45.1

2.3

33.4

2.3

33.4

1.3

20.7

1.3

20.7

SCORE INTERVALS

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

CASES PROCESSED

NO. BLANK DATA

MINIMUM VALUE

MAXIMUM VALUE

SUM OF SCORES

SUM SOD. SCORES

MEAN

STND. DEV. IN/

STNO. DEV. IN-1)

MEDIAN

7.2925

517.0u00

6.8384

475.0000

6.3442

361.0CCO

1.0000

1.0000

1.0000

4.0000

4.0000

4.0000

19.0234

17.5443

13.6773

62.2223

*36.2097

2.6086

2.5655

2.154

1.3143

1.0588

1.0295

1.4149

1.1459

1.1216

2.3084

2.2055

1.9526

FPCT

CF

P-BLW

CF

P-BLW

FPC T

CF

18

24.3

74

100.0

79.6

73

100.0

17

26.6

64

100.0

19

25.7

56

75.7

40

54.8

66

90.4

33

51.6

47

73.4

00.0

37

50.0

00.0

26

35.6

00.0

14

21.9

37

5C.0

37

50.0

26

35.6

26

35.6

14

21.9

14

21.9

74

532

73

492

64

367

1.0000'

1.0000

100000

4.0000

4.0000

4.0000

204.0000

191.0000

139.0000

636.0000

3433

:156

611.

----

---373.0000

2.7568

2.6164

2.1719

1.2925

1.0680

1.0541

1.3013

1.0754

1.0624

3.5000

2.2375

1.9545

610

(0-c

)S

R A

SCORE. INTERVALS

1.000

2. C00

3.060

4.000

CASES PROCESSED

NO. BLANK DATA

MINIMUM VALUE

MAXIMUM VALUE

SUM OF SCORES

=

SUM SOD. SCORES

=

MEAN

STND. DEV. (N)

=

SIND. DEV. 1N-1) =

MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

CASES PROCESSED

NO. BLANK DATA

MINIMUM VALUE

MAXIMUM VALUE

SUM OF SCORES

SUM SOD. SCORES

ME 4r

STND. DEV. (N)

STNO. DEV. 1N-1)

MEDIAN

0

FG

ro.a

ea

PCT

CF P-BLW

pgrlecut,.

P-BLW

^'PCT

1.0

21.9

4.5

100.0

0.2

7.2

3.3 100.0

1,e

17.6

3.5 100.0

0.4

8.6

3.5

78.1

0.9

28.4

1 1 .--g2.0"

1.5

42.4

2.9

82.4

0.0

0.0

3.1

69.6

0.0

0.0

2.1

64.4

0..0

0.0

1.4

39.9

3.1

69.6

3.1

69.6

2.1

64.4

2.1

64.4

1.4

39.9

1.4

39.9

4.4517

3.3166

3.5105

545.0000

1.0000

510.0000

389.0000

---Eannw

1.0000

4.0000

4.0000

4.0000

14.1228

52.0445

10.6680

9.2050

-3871-369

.29.0044

3.1725

3.2166

2.6221

1.2753

1.0806

1,076

1.4483

4.3945

3.7812

3.7236

2.2626

FPCT

CF

P-BLW

FPCT

CF

P-BLW

FOCT

CF P-BLW

715.2

46

100.0

38.3

36

100.0

7_2 04

_35

-24

100.0

510.9

39

84.8

925.0

33

91.7

13

37.1

80.0

00.0

34

73.9

00.0

24

66.7

00.0

15

42.9

34

73.9

34

73.9

24

.10.67

2466.7_

15

42.9

.15

42.9

=46

560

36

529

35

396

1.0000

1.0000-

1.0000

4.0000

4.0000

4.0000

153.0000

117.0000

(p.plapo

=571.0000

423.0000

299.0000

3.3261

3.2500

2.6571

= =1.1620

1.1748

1.0897

1.2176

--

1.1052

1.2353

3.8235

3.7500

2.3077

/1( t) S RA

same INTERVALS

LOCO2.0003.CCO4.000

CASES PKUCESSE0NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTN G. DEV. (N)STND. DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN

. - 7 Y* cta e .2,.F PCi LF P-BLW

._______Gy-,La.21F PCT CF P-BLW

G-w-cxele__4F PCT CF P-IlLw

1.9 12.3 15.3 100.0 1.1 11.5 9.4 100.0 1.0 10.7 649 100.61.9 12.4 13.4 87.7 6.8- -1.7 8.3-18.75" 2.1 23.9 8.0 69.3G.7 4.7 11.5 75.3 1.0 10.6 7.5 79.7 ).2 2.3 5.9 65.4

iC.8 70.6 10.8 70.6 6.5 69.1 6.5 69.1 5.6 63.1 5.6 63.1

= 15.3181 9.3885 8.947= 439.0000 439.0000 537.0CCO- 1.0000 1.00607 1.0000= 4.0000 4.0000 4.00GO= 5/.0918 31.6681 2d.4277= 188.9731 117.1379'1 iol.boe= 3.3354 3.3731 3.1776= 1.04:96 1.0495 1.1254= 1.174 1.1:101 1.1942= 3.7914 3.7768 3.7074

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003. DCO4. COO

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESLIM JF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. IN)STND. OEV. IN-11MEDIAN

F PC T CF P-BLW F PC T 7ET-------evii=ecwCF P -BLW

i9 12.3 154 100.0 12 10.9 110 100.0 8 9.2 87 100.018 11.7 1.35 87.7 10 9.1 98 89.1 19 21.8 79 90.89 5.8 117 76.0 8 7.3 88 80.0 3 3.4 60 69.0

108 70.1 108 70.1 80 72.7 80 72.7 57 65.5 57 65.5

= 154 110 87= 452 455 344= 1.0000 1.0000 '1.0000= 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000= 514.0000 376.0000 283.0000= i900.0000 1404.0000 1023.0000= 3.3377 3.4182 3.2529= 1.0944 1.0391 1.0851= 1.0980 1.008 1.0914= 3.7870 3.8125 3.7368

510<

o-e)

Harcourt Brace &

World

SCORE INTERVALS

GY

-o-c

iePCT

I.

111-

8LW

FPC?ra-cLg2-1F

P-BLW

FPCT

CF

1.000

C.6

10.3

5.7

100.0

0.3

7.9

3.7

10D.0

0.1

5.4

2.8

100.0

2.000

0.4

6.2

5.2

89:7

a.4

11.2

3.4

92.10.6

22.

2.6

94.6

3.000

0.1

1.9

4.8

83.5

0.2

5.8

3.0

80.90.1

2.4

2.0

72.3

4.0CC

4.7

81.6

4.7

81.62.7

75.1

2.7

75.1

1.9

70.0

1.9

70.0

CASES PRUCESSE0

NO. BLANK DATA

5.7434

529.0090

3.6507

503.0000

2.7537

393.0000

MINIMUM VALUE

1.0000

1,0000

1.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE

4,0000

4,0000

4.0000

SUM OF SCORES

20.3780

12.7115

9.2768

SUM SQO. SCORES

77.9833

47.1123

34.0149

MEt.N

3.5481

3,4819

'J.366(1

STND. 0EV. (N)

0.9945

0.9723

1.0018

STND. 0EV. (N-1)

1.0943

1.1411

1.2553

MEDIAN

3.8871

3.8344

3.7855

SCORE INTERVALS

FPCT

CF

P-BLW

FPCT

--

CF

P-BLW

PCT

P-BLW

CF

1.000

57.';;

63

100.0

49.1

44

100.0

77.1

28

100.0

2.000

57.9

58

92.1

613.6

40

90.9

517.9

26

92.9

3.000

23.2

53

84.1

24.5

34

77.3

3.3.6

21

75.0

4.000

5181.0

51

81.0

32

?"1_

_20

71.4

20

71.4

CASES PROCESSED

ND. BLANK DATA

63

543

44

521

28

403

MINIMUM VALUE

1.0000

1.0000

1.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE

4.0000

4.0000

4.0000

SUM OF SCORES

225.0000

95.0000

SUM SOD. SCORES

859.0000

558.0000

351.0000

MEAN

3.5714

3.4091

3.3929

STND. DEV. (N)

STND. DEV. (N-1)

0.9380

0.9455

1.0295

1.0120

-1.0414

1.0306

MEDIAN

'3.8E24

3.8125

3.8009

oF

)O

pen

Cou

rt

SCORE INTERVALS

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

CASES PROCESSED

=

NO. BLANK DA'.A

=

MINIMUM VALUE

MAXIMUM VALUE

SUM OF SCORES

=

SUM SOD. SCORES

=

MEAN

STND. DEV. IN)

S7

NU

.DE V.

=

MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

F

0.7

0.8

0.2

12.0 F 3

11 3

116

retA

e.PCI

CF

5.3

13.8

5.5

13.0

1.7

12.3

8/.5

12.0

13.7596

457.0000

1.0000

4.0000

51.0890

198.4162

3.7130

0.7562

0.8269

3.9283

PC

TCF

5.8

138

8.0

130

2.2

119

84.1

116

P-BLIP

100.0

94.7

89.1

87.5

I

0.1

0.2--

0.2

7.5

6=Y:Aula._

-Pt

1.7

2.6

2.7

93.1

CF

8.1 9

7.7

7.5

15-81W

100.0

9-8.1

95.7

93.1

F

0.1

1.7

CF

6.2 100.0

6.1.-..3

5,4

87.3

5.2

84.S

0.1

11.0

0.1

2.4

5.2

84.9

8.0723

453.0000

6.1594

365.0000

ITotmo

4.0000

31.2442

1.0000

4.0000

22.82E6

P -8LW

100.0

94.2

86.2

84.1

123.0880

3.8706

0.5167

1

67.8522

3,7063

0.7256

0.7928

3.5113

PC T

1.7

tV-Tc-sLw

58 100.0

57

98.3

52

89.7

50

86.2

91

0.5520

3.9627

2.1

CF

97

P...13LW

100.0

2.1

2.1

93.8

95

93

91

97.9

95.9

93.8

5 250

8.6

3.4

#§!?

CASES PROCESSED

NO. BLANK DATA

= =138

468

97

463

58

373

MINIMUM VALUE

1.0000

1.0000

1.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE

4.0000

4.0000

4.0000

SUM OF SCORES

=503.0000

376.0000

217.0000

SUM SQO. SCORES

=1935.3003

1484.0000

839.0000

MEAN

3.6449

3.8763

3.7414

STND. DEV. IN)

=0.8580

0.5228

0.6838

SINU. DEV. IN-1)

=0.8612

0.5255

0.6898

MEDIAN

3.9052

3.9670

3.9200

90(9)

SCORE INTERVALS

1.00C

2.000

3.000

4.000

CASES PROCbSSED

NO. BLANK DATA

-

MINIMUM VALUE

MAXIMUM VALUE

-SUM OF SCORES

SUM SOD. SCORES

=

MEAN

STNO. 0EV. IN)

STNC. DEV. (N-II

MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

1.000

2.000

3.000

4.000

ITA

D

e_ a

67-v-44.c1

FPC;

CF P-BLW

FCT----

P-BLW

F

C.6

4.4

0.4

2.6

0.1

0.6

12.6

92.5

13.6 100.0 0.0

13.0

95.6-GT

12.7

93.0 0.0

12.6

92.5 7.6

13.6365

458.0000

I. -ODD

4.0000

51.9722

204.4529

3.8113

0.6836

0.7102

3.9592

FPCT

85.9

32.2

10.7

123

91.1

0.0

0.0

98.9

CF P-BLW

F

135 100.0

0127

94.1

1124

91.9

0123

91.1 91_

CASES PROCESSED

NO. BLANK OATA

MINIMUM VALUE

MAXIMUM VALUE

-=135

4711.0000

4.0000

SUM OF SCORES

=509.0000

SUM son. SCORES

=1997.0000

MEAN

3.7704

STNU. OEV. IN)

0,7595

STNO. 0EV. (N-II

=0.7-624

MEDIAN

3.9512

7.6657

458.0000

2.0000

4.0000

30.4963

1-21.6513

3.9783

0.2072

0:2221

3.9945

PCT92

4732.0000

4.0000

Grad e_

pzTc3

PCT

w

7.7

100.0

0.1

1.5

5.8

100.0

7.-7I000-

0-5

8.8

,,T

7.6

98.9

0.0

0.0

5.2

89-7

7.6

98.9

89.7

5.2

89.7

3.7St6

369-0000

1.0000

4.0000

21.90E1

b5.3248

3.7791

0.6615

0.7276

3.9426

CF

P-BLW

PCT

CF

P-BLW

921000

11.9

54

100.0

92

100.0

35.6

53

98.1

91

98.9

00.0

50

92.6

91

_98.9

50

92.6

50

92.6

54

3771.0000

4.0000

366.0000

207.0000

1460.0000

813.0000

3.9783

0.2074

0.2085

3.9945

3.8333

0.6009

0.6066

3,9600

go (0-9 Merrill Linguistics


1.000 C.5 3.4 14.92.CCO 2.2 14.6 14.43.COC 0.7 4.9 12.24.CCO 11.5 77.1 11.5

CASES PROCESSED = 14.E644NO. BLANK DATA 447.000CMINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 52.8665SUM SOD. SCORES = 199.0924MEAN 3.5566STNO. DEV. (N) = 0.8629TTNIY. OEV. (N-1) = 0.8935MEDIAN 3.6516

SCORE INTERVALS F FCT CF

1.000 6 4.1 1472.000 18 12.2 1413.000 9 6.1 1234.000 114 77.6 114

D

.

P-BLW F PCT F

100.096.682.077.1

P-8LW

100.095.983.777.6

-cr&Irad&Ci CF P-44IW

0.5 4.7 10.1 100.0 0.! E.7 7.6 100.02.11 1 ILT 9.6 43.3 1.0 12.5 7.1 93.30.3 3.1 7.6 75.7 0.9 12.3 6.1 79.37.3 72.6 7.3 72.6 5.1 67.4 5.1 67.4

10.0604433.0000

1.00004.0000

34.5641177:99693.43560.95871.01023.8110

7.60C2356,00(0

1.00004.0000

23.875095.04E73.404,0.95671.02c63.7585

F OCT CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW

6 5.1 - .5 7.5 67 100.020 16.9

.1113_100f.9112 94.9 13.4 62 92.5

4 3.4 92 78.0 4 6.0 53 79.188 88_34.6 49._ 71.1_ 49


147459

118447

67364

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.000D 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES - 525.0000 410.0000 231.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1983.0000 1536.0000- -711T:MEAN 3.5714 3.4746 3.4478STND. DEV. CM) = 0.8571 0.9452 0.9817STNO. UEV. IN-1) = 0.8601 -6:947§.2 0.9891MEDIAN 3.8553 3.8295 3.8163

41. Do you create any of the materials you use in teaching compensatoryreading?

1:1 Yes

20 No

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.000

CASES PROCESSED -NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE -SOP' OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES -MEANSIND. DEV. (N) =

SIND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

F

55.d2.0

E

G v-c....1e

PC7 CF

96.5 57.93.5 2.0

57.89427.00001.00002.000059.942664.03201.03540.18440.186J1.0183

PCT CF

P-8LW

100.049.43.5

P-BLW

ra_as_Ct--F=-31..w

100.0

F PC

91.9

CF P-BLW

53.7 100.04.3 11:r

53.6695

F PCT

37.4 66°3 42.3

42.31E4

4.3 --"80,1

11.00001.00002.0000

16.00001.00002.0000

47.282857.20681.1113

58.024066.68651.0807

F PCT

0.27220.27481.0439

F

0.32160.32551.0664

CF P-BLW PC T CF P-BLW

1.000 579 96.7 599 100.0 502 99.6 554 100.0 366 88.2 415 100.02.000 20 3.3 20 3.3 52 9.4 52 9.4 49 11.8 49 11.6


==

5997

554 415Yr---- 16

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES 619:6006 606.0000 464.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 659.0000 710.0000 562.0000ME-AN 1.0334 1.0939 1.1181SIND. DEV. (N) = 0.1797 0.2916 0.3227SIND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.1798 0.2919 0.3231MEDIAN = 1.0173 1.0518 1.0669

SCORE INTERVALS

a. If Yes, which of the following(Check all that apply)

El Worksheets

G.co.cleF PCT CF P -8LW

types of materials do you create?

F P-BLW F

0.0 3.5 6.0 58.5 100.0 6.6 12.1 54.7 100.0 7.7 17.2 44.6 100.0LOCO 55.0 94.0 55.0 94.0 48.1 87:9 48.1 87.9 31.1 62.a 37.1 82.3

CASES PROCESStO = 58.5473 54.7435 44.8042MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 v.0MAXIMUM VALISE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES - 55.0451 48.0982 37.0835

-SUM 500. SCORES = 55.0451 4T.0982 37.0t35

MEAN 0.9402 0.8786 0.8276STNC. DEV. (N) 0.2371 0.3266 0.3777SING. 0EV. IN-11 0.2392 0.3296 0.2820MEDIAN 0.9681 0.9309 0.6958

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT LF P-8LW F. PhT CF P-BLW

0.01.000

35571

5.894.2

606571

100.094.2

77488

_13.6. . . .

86.4_ _565

488100.0

. _

86.476

35517.682.4

_101 100.082.4

CASES PROCESSED 606 565 431MINIMUM VALUE 0.0 0.0 0.0MAXIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000SUM OF SCORES 571.0000 488.0000 355.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 571.0000 488.0000 355.0000MEAN 0.9422 0.8637 0.8237SING. DEV. (N) 0.2333 0.3431_ 0.3811SING. REV. IN-11 0.2335 0.3434 0.3815MEDIAN 0.9694 0.9211 0.8930

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

CASES PROCESSED

F

18.336.7

MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORES =MEANSTND. DEV. (N) =STND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS F

0.0 1851.000 386

0 Printed stories, poems, or essays

PCTGractev-a_Ap 6

CF P-BLW F PCfv " 62. P-BLW r FCTG

CF P-8L;

33.3 55.0 100.066.7 36.7 66.7

55.04160.01.0000

36.736136.73610.66740.47110.47550.7508

PCT

32.467.6

CF P-BLW

571 100.0386 67.6

17.3 36.0 48.1 100.0 14.7 35.8 37.1 100.030.6 64.0 30.8 64.0 22.3 60.2 22.3 60.2

48.0955 37.08160.0 0.01.0000 1.0000

30.7870 22.338030.7070 "22.33800.6401 0.60240.4800 0.48940.4850 0.45810.7188 0.6859

PCT CF P-BLW r PCT

184 37.7 488 100.0 133 37.5 355 100.0304 62.3 304 62.3 222 62.5 222 62.5

CASES PROCESSED 571 488 355MINIMUM VALUE = 0.0 0.0 0.0

MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

SUM OF SCORES = 386.0000 304.0000 222.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 386.0000 304.0000 222.0000MEAN 0.6760 0.6230 0.6254STND. DEV. = 0.4680 0.4846 0.4840

OEV. (11-1) = 0.4684 0.4851 0.4847MEDIAN 0.7604 0.6974 0.7005

I Ylcd

SCORE INTERVALS

0,01.000

CASES PROCESSEDMINAMUM VALUEMAXIMUM'VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. IN)STND. DEV. IN-11MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.600

CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (N)STNO. DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN

Transparencies for overhead projector

F PCIG-ratle. CF -F---Fcr cF-VzITUT- r F-BLvi

33,8 61.3 55.0 100.0 26.2 54.5 48,1 100.0 22.2 37.1 100.021.3 38.7 21.3 38.7 21.-4-455- 21.9 45.5 14.5 14.-V 40.1

5.04160.01.0000

2,-290521.29050.36680.48700.49150.3154

F PCT CF P-BLW F

48.0955

1.000021.884721.88470.45500.4980

PCT

0.t4d20.4174

353 61,8 571 100.0 280 57.4.218 38.2 218 38.2 208 42.6

CF P -8LW

44.0208 42.6

213142

.PCT

60.040.0

37.081611.0

2.0000Itones14.8/f50.40120.45010.49650.37449

CF P -BLW

355 100.0142 40.0

5710.0

488_ 3550.00.0

1.0000 1.0000 1.0000218,0000 208.0000 142.0000218.0000 2013.0000 142.6000

0.3818 0.4262 0.40000.4858 0.4945 0.48990.4863 G.4950 0.49060.3088 0.3714 0.3333

SCORE INTERVAL S

0.G1.000

CASES PROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =SUM SOL. SCORES =MEANSTNC. DEV. (N) =SIND. DEV. (N-1) =MED IAN

SCORE INTERVALS

0 . 02.000

CASES PROCESSED =MINIM-U VALUE -MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORE S =MEAN--SEND. DEV. =STN). DEV. (N-11 =MEDIAN

F

El Filmstrips

v-a-d e. a.PCT CF F -ELW

Gy-F P-BLW F. PCT P-aLt.4

51.3 93.2 55.0 100.0 43.4 90.2 48.1--9:-a

100.0 3'2.4 87.3 37.1 100.03.7 6.8 3.7 6.8 4.7 4 .7-9:8- 4.7 12.7 4.7 12.7

55.0416 48.0955 37.08160.0 V. V 0.01.0000 1.0000 1.00003.7498 4. 7267 72343.7498 :72-6T- 4.72240.0681 0,0983 U.12740.2520 0.2977 0.33340.2543 0.3008 0.33E00.0365 0.0545 0,0720

F PCT CF P -BLW F PC T CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-BLW

53140

93.0 571.100.97.0 40 7.0

44048

90.2 488 100.0 311 87.6 355_100.09.8 48 9.8 44 12.4 44 12.4

5710.0

480d-

3550.01.0000 1.0000 1.000040.0000 48.0000 44.000040.0000 48.0000 44,00000.0701 0.0984 0.1239

0.2552 0.2978 0.32950.2555 0.2981 0.33000.0377 0.0545 0.0707

OUESTICN 41

SCORE INTERVAL S

0 . 0

1.000

CASES PROCESSED--MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES

--SUM SQ0. SCORESMEANSTNO. i;EV. tN)

-STNO. DEV. tN-11MEDIAN

QUESTION 41

=

=

SCORE INTERVAL S

0.01.000

CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMF. 6N

ST40. DEV. (N)SIND. OEV. (N-1)MEDIAN

PART E

D Slides

G-_-rcticia. a-F PC1 CF P-BLW

5G.2 51.2 55.0 100.04.8 8.8 4.8 8.8

PART E.

53.04160.01.00004.84244.84240.08800.28330.28590.0482

F PCT CF

Y'SLa4c'd1:- --PCT 1..*F -P-BLW

43.?4.4

P-BIN F

Ne OLa .0

CFez,

P -15-C-r p-81w91.0 48.1 100.0 33.9 51.4 37.1 100.09.0 4.4- -5.a s, 4, 2 6.6 3.2 8.6-

PCT

48.0955(7.0

1.00004.3515C-35150.09050.28690.28990.0457

37,0616

- ..CF P-13114 F

0.01.00003.1E153.16150.0E600.28030.e8420,0470

PCT CF P-BLit_

530 92.8 571 100.0 448 91.8 488 100.0 319 89.941 7.2 41 7.2 40 8.2 40 8.2

4f2.: TO.I5710.01.0000

41.000041.00000.07180.25820.25840.0387

4880.01.0000

40.000040.00000.08200.27430.27460.0446

_50.01.0000

36.0000---Y62tiatiO"

0.10149.?019

---0.So-i

0.0564

3. 55_100.0. . _36 10.1

QUESTION 4i

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

CASES PROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQ0. SCORESMEANSTN). DEV. (N) =STNO. OEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN

QUFSTION 41

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

CASES PROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =SUM SQO. SCORES =MEANSTND. DEV. (N) =STND. DEV. IN-11 =MEDIAN

PART

PART F

Motion Pictures

Gv-otsl_e_ aPCT CF F-BLW

Gy-a..cLa 6F PC1 CF

52.9 96.1 55.0 100.0 45.8 95.2 48.1 10(.0 3-4.2 92.1 37./ 100. ti2.1 3,9 2.1 3.9 2.3 4:1- 273 4.0 4-9 1.9 2.9 7.9

55.0416 48.0955 37.06160.0 0.01.0000 1.0000 1.00002.1335 2.3271 2.51E32.1335 2.3271 2.91830.0388 0.0484 0.07870.1930 0.2146 0.2693

0.216a- 0.277100.0202 0.0254 0.0427

F PCT CF P -BLW F PCI CF P-804 F PCT CF P-BLW

548 96.0 571 100.0 463 94.9 488 100.0 326 92.4 355 100.023. 4.0 23 4.0 25 5.1 25 5.1 27 7.6 27 7.6

571 488 3550.0 0.0 0.01.0000 1.0000 1.0000

23.0000 25.0000 27.0000-27.000023.0000 25.0000

0.0403 0.0512 0.07610.1966 0.2205 0.26510.1968 0.2207 0.26550.0210 0.0270 0.0412

`f1(

31

ww7ST10N 41

PART G

SCOKL INTERVALS

F

Cha

rts

-2_

PC1

CF

P-8

LW

0.0

8.3

15.1

55.0 100.0

1.000

46.7

84.9

46.7

FP

CLE

7WF

q-C

fszL

'C

FP-B

I w

13.3

27.7

48.1 100.0 14.0

31.7

37.1 100.0

84.9

34a

--72

-.1-

34:8

72.

3 'M

r" 6

2..3

23.1

WITS

CASES PROCESSED

55.0416

48.0955

MINIMUM VALUE

0.0

0.0

MAXIMUM VALUE

1.0000

1.0000

SUM OF SCORES

46.7419

34.7666

SUN SQL). SCORES

46.7419

34.7666

MEAN

0.8492

0.7229

STND. DEV. (N)

0.3578

0.4476

STNO. OEV. (N-1)

0.3611

0.4523

MEDIAN

=0.9112

0.8082

QUESTION 41

PART G

SCORE INTERVALS

0.0

1.00

0

FPCT

79

13.8

492

86.2

CF P -8LW

E

571 100.0 139

492

86.2 349

PC

T01,;KW"

37.0E16

0.0

i'OCCO

23.0935

23.0S:t5

o.ezke

0,4E47

0.4914

0.6571

488 .100..0 132

37.2

355 100.0

71.5

349

71.5 223

62.8

223

62.8

CASES PROCESSED

571

488

_ .

_.

-MINIMUM VALUE

0.0

0.0

MAXIMUM VALUE

1.0000

1.0000

SUM OF SCORES

492.0000

349.0000

SUM SQO. SCORES

492.0000

349.0000

MEAN

0.8616

0.7152

STND. DEV. (N)

'

0.3453

0.4513.

STNO. DEV. (N-1)

0.3456

b.4518

MEDIAN

0.9197

0.8009

355 0.0

1.0000

223.0000

223.0000

0.6282

0.4833

0.4840

0.7040

QUESTION 41 PARI H

SCORE INTERVALS

0 Tapes

G".1,041e gF PCT cf P-6114

0.01.000

29.9 t...4.4

25.1 45.655.025.1

CASES PROCESSED =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =

.--§Coitio. SCORES =MEAN =SYNO. OEV. (Ni -=

STAID.DEV. (N-1J =MEDIAN =

QUESTION 41

SCORE INTERVALS

PART H

55.04160.01.0000

25.109625.10960.45620.49810.5D270.4194

F PCT

100.045.6

GV- OA P 14

F PCT CF F -BIM6t,et A A,

F PCT CF P:TC-ti

26.6 55.4 48.1 100.0 21.4 57.6 31.1. 100.021.4 44.6 21,4 44.6 1.5.7 42,4 15.f 42.4

48.09550.01.0000

21.448521.44850.44600.4971

---6.5023U.4024

37.08160.01.0C41015.715015.71500.42280,45420.50100.2677

CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

0.01.000

CASES PROCESSED

321250

=

56.2 57143.8 250

571MINIMUM VALUE - 0.0.MAXIMUM VALUE = 1.0000SUM OF SCORES = 250.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 256A0OoMEAN 0.4378STND. DEV. IN) = 0.4961STMD. DEV. IN-13 = 0.4966MEDIAN 0.3894

F PC T CF P-BLW

100.0 274 56.1 488 100.0 202 56.9 355 100.043.8 214 43.9 214 43.9 153 43.1 153 43.1

_

4880.01.0000

214.0000214.00000.43850.49620.49670.3905

3550.01.0000

153.0000 ____153.0000

0.43100.4952_0.49590.3787

- -

QUESTION 41

SCORE INTERVALS

0.01.000

CASES PROCESSED-MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUH SQ0. SCORESMEANSINE. DEV. (N)STNO DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN

QUESTION 41

SCORE INTERVALS

0.0.1.000

CASES PROCESSEDMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES§UM-SQD. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (NISTNO.* DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN

PART I

PART I

Other (Specify)

F

41.213.9

PCF1.6-6 iF P-BLW

74.8 55.0 100.025.2 13.9

4-v a(1.F

38.9

PCT-"--/81.0

CF P-811(

48.1 100.0---79.2--17:0

F

31.8

FLT

85.E

CF

37.1

P-131..p

100.%',

5.3 14.4 5.3 14.2

F PCT

55.0416 48.0955 37.08160.0 0.0 0.01.0600 1.0000 1.0000

13.8908 9.1512 5.288413.8906 1:151-2 5.26640.2524 0.1903 0.14200.4344 0.3925 0.34910.4384 0.39b 0.35390.1888 0.1/75 u,0828

CF p-BLW

423148

74.125.9

571148

100.025.9

390_98

79.9 488 100.0 30550

85.9 355 100.020.1 98 20.1 14.1 50 14.1

573. 488 3550.0 0.0 0.01.0000 1.0000 1.0000148.0000 98.0000 50.0000148.0000 98.0000 50.00000.2592 0.2008 0.14080.4382

_ _ 0.4006_____ 0.34790.4366 0.4010 0.34840.1749 0.1256 0.0820

How would you rate each of the followingto you as goals in your current teaching

Improving motor abilities relatedto reading

activities in terms of importanceof compensatory reading?

Major Secondary Of little or noImportance as a goalGoal Goal

QUESTION 42 PART A

SCORE INTERVALS F PC7 CF P-BLW F FDT CF P -8LW F PCT cfT=IP717,

25.8 49.0 52.7 100.0 21.4 46.5-Y8.4

45.9 100.0,3.4 37.1 36.1 100.02.CCO 23.0 43.7 26.9 51.0 17.6 24.6 53.5'6.2 44.9 22.7 62.93.CCC 3.9 7.3 3.8 7.3 6.9 15.1 6.9 15.1 6.5 18.0 6.5 18.0

CASES PROCESSED 52.6810 45.9398 36.0629NO. I3L4NK DATA 20.0000 24.0000 9.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SLIM OF SCORES 83.3919 77.4329 65.2590SUM SOD. SCORES 152.5097 154.2765 136.6343MEAN -1.58M 1.6855 1.8CS6SIND. DEV. (N) 0.6239 0.7192 0.7171STN&. DEV. (N-I) C.6299 0.7271 0.7272MEDIAN -1:5223 1.5901 1.188o

suIREYRTERVAis F PCT Cr P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 274 49.7 551 100.0 197 42.6 462 100.0 108 31.2 346 100.02.000 232 42.1 277 50.3 195 42.2 265 57.4168 48.6 238 68.83.000 45 8.2 45 8.2 70 15.2 70 15.2 70 20.2 70 20.2

CASES PROCESSEDND. BLANK DATA =

55120

46226

3469

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 873.0000 797.0000 654.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1607.0000 1607.0000 1410.0000

1.5844 1.7251 1.8902STND. DEV. (N/ = 0.6374 0.7088 0.7088SIND. DEV. (N71)_= 0.6379 0.7095 0.7098

1.5065 1.6744 1.8869


WftSlion 4z YAK 1 6

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000


F PCT CF P-BLW

41.7 77.2 54.1 100.012.1 22.4 12.4 22.8-13.30.2 0.4 0.2 0.4

54.069210.0000

F- TZ1----

32.7 69.2 47.2

CI- P-BLW

100.0 23.7

F

rri,9--1.2

PCT CF P -B-L

64.4 36.7 10C.2-8:1--14.5 30.8

1.3 2.7 1.3 2.732.3 13.13.2 1.2

35.3.

47.214310.0000

?.6.74E34.0CLO

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000-MA X I 1.1-UM VA-CUE = 3.0.0-00 3.0000 _3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 66.6620 62.9950 51.009SUM SQO. SCORES = 92.3096 97.0598 81.8937

--KEAN = 1.2'329 1.335Z 1..38E0STND. DEV. IN1 = 0.4327 0.5249 0.5494STNC. DEV. IN-11 = 0.4367 0.5306 0.5571

-----74EDIAN = 1.1481 1.Z221 1.2(0

----

SCORE IN F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P.:BL

1.000 432 ..7.7.0. 561 100.0 320 66.9 478.100.0 215 61.3 351 100.2.000 126 22.5 129 23.0 146 30.5 158 33.1 123 35.0 136 38.3.000 3 0.5 3 0.5 12 2.5 12 2.5 13 3.7 13 3.


MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM 590. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (N1STND. DEV. IN-11

1-IEDIAN

=-

561101.0000

.-478101.0000

35141.0000

==-

3.0000693.0000

3.0000648.0000

3.0000500.0000

963.0000 1012.0000 824.00001.2353 1.3556 1.4245

=0.43660.4370

0.52860.5291

0.56420.5651

1.1493 1.2469 1.3163

Developing auditorydiscrimination

QUESTION 42

SCORE INTERVAL S

PART C

0 0

F PCT CF P-BLW -F -PCT

1.000 46.5 86.7 53.72.000 6.6 12.4 7.23,000 0.5 1.0 0.5

CF P-BLW F FCT CF P-BL 0

100.0 32.3 68.5 47.2 100.0 1-1.2 47.6 36.1 100.013.3 13.3 28.2 14.8 3175 16.7 46.3 16.9 52,41.0 1.5 3.2 1.5 3,2 2,2 6.1 2.2 6.1

CASES PROCESSED' 53-.6572 47.1928 35.1150NO. BLANK DATA 13.0000 9.0000 10.0CCCMINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIAOMVALliE = 3;0000 3,0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES - 61.3343 63.5650 57.2388SUM 9Pf..5c.WS 77.7070 99.3476 103.8820

1.1'431 1.3469 1.5849STND. DEV. IN) = 0.3763 0.5394 0.6037STND. OEV, 4N-11 0.3798 0.5452 0.6123MEDIAN 1.2295 1.5516

SCORE IN tERVAL PCT P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PC7 CF P -BLW

1.000 477 85.5 558 100,0 327 68.3 479 100.0 171 49.6 345 100.02.000 75 13.4 81 14,5 136 28.4 152 31.7 151 43.8 174 50.43.000 6 1.1 6 1.1 16 3.3 16 3.3 23 6.7 23 6,7


55813

4799

34510

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES =- 645.0000 647.0000 542.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 831.0000 1015.0000 982.0000MEAN 1.1559' 1,3507 1.5710STND. DEV. IN) = 0.3913 0.5427 0.6151STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.3916 0.5433 0.6159MEDIAN 1.0849 1.2324 1.5099


QUESTION 42

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEWAIRDA if-AE (1ESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORES

-WEANSTND. °EV. (N)STND. DEV. (N-13

-WED IAN

PART 0

SCORE

1.9002.000.-3.000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSTUD. DEV. IN) =STND. DEV. (N-1) =MEDIAN

F PCT

28.023.03.1

51.842.65.7

CF P-BLW PCT

54.126.13.1

54.10379.00001.00003.0000

83.2452147.6358

1.53860.60120.60681:4653

F PCI

299 53.2227 40.436 6.4

CF P-BLW F LF

100.0 13.0 27.5 47.2 100.0 6.0 16.9 35.6 100.048.2 13;2 29.6 63.13cr2--7z;5-7-,;9--50.25.6 11.0 23.3 11.0 23.311.7 32.9 11.7 32.9

47.176310.00001.0000

35.6C6011.00001.0000

3.0000 3.000092.4177 76.9431

204.9261 183.07331.9590 2.16100.7115 0.66700.7191 0.65.681.9582 2.1602

CF P-BLW

56226336

56291.00003.0000

861.00001531.0000

1.53200.61410.61461.4398

PCT CF F PCT CF

100.0 133 27.9 477 100.0 60 17.4 344 100.)46.8 236 49.5 344 72.1 163 47.4 284 82.66.4 108 22.6 108 22.6121 35.2 121 35.2

47711.

1.0000

344111.0000

3.0000 3.0000929.3000 749.0000

2049.0000 1801.00001.9476 2.17730.7089 0.70340.7096 0.70441.9470 2.1871


QUESTION 42

SCORE INTERVALS

PART E

0 0 0

F PC r

1.0002.0003.000

30.918.3.

4.9

57.133.89.1

CF P-BLW

54.023..24.9

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORES____MEANSTUD. DEV. (N)STND. DEV. (N-1.)MEDIAN

.

====

======

54.035811.00001.00003.0000

82.1244148.1089

1.51980.65660.66271.3755

-----SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

---tWStgi5OCSSED ...

100.042.99.1

F PCT CF P-BLW-- F PCT CF P-Bi.h

11.022.913.1

23.448.827.8

47.036.013.1

100.0 3.476.6137927.813.3

16.545.338.1

35.0 100.029.2 83.513.3 38.1

46.9/5312.00001.00003.0000

96.0187220.2223

2.04400.71410.72192.0450

34.974013.00001.00003.0000

77.5001189.22122.21590.70710.71742.2380

F -PCT CF 0-BLS!

323 57.8188.-33.648 8.6

55912NO. BLANK DATA

MINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SOD. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV. (N)STND. °EV. (N-1)MEDIAN

===

==

===

_

_ .

1.0000________3.0000

843.00001507.0000_ . _ _ . . _

1.50800.64940.64991:3653

PCT CF 15-13Lw PCT CF P-BLW

559 100.0 120 25.3236-42.2219 46.148 8.6136 28.6

475 100.0 56355 74.7 148136 28.6 138

16.443.340.4

342 100.0.286' 83.6.138 40.4

475131.0000___ ____3.0000

966.00002220.0000_ _ _ _

2.03370.73340.73412.0365

342131.00003.0000

766.00001890.0000

2.23980.71400.71502.2770


QUESTION 42

SCORE INTERVALS

PARI

F P&.1 CF P-BLW F PCT

1.000 42.72.000 '11.43.000 0.3

78.5 54.421.0 11.70.6 0.3

--CASES PROCESSEDNO. dLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE

54.35767.00001.0000

XTKUM-VAL IiE 3:0000SUM OF SCORES 66.3735SUM SOD. SCORES 91.0177

- 1,'2211

STN G. DEV. (NI 0.4283SIND, DEV. IN-1I 0.4323

-AEDIAN- 1:1372

SCORE INTERVALS

CF P F PC 1 CF P-8L

100.036.8 77.2 47.7 100.0 23.7 64.5 34.8 100.214.5-977750740.6 1,1 2.4

10.91.1

22.g-11.,12.4 1.9

30.35.2

13.11.9

35.5.

47,69144.00001.00003.0000

59.688885.93551.25160.48530.49041.1475

F PCT CF P-BLW E PCT

36.77534.000U1.00003.0000

51.772785.60391.40770.5620.59641.2(55

CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-B1

1,000 446 79.2 563 100.0 365 75.6 483 100.0 226 64.4 351 100.2.000 114 20.2 117 20,8 106 21.9 118 24.4 101 28,8 125 35.3.000 3 0,5 3 0.5 12 2.5 12 2.5 24 6.e 24 6.

5638


= 4835

3514

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 683.0000 613.0000 500.0000SUM SOD, SCORES 929.0000 897.0000 846.0000MEAN 1.2131 1.2692 1.4245SIND. DEV. (N) 0.4223 0.4964 0.6173SIND. DEV. IN-1) = 0,4227 0.4969 0,6182MEDIAN 1.1312 1.1616 1.2765

Learning word meanings(Vocabulary)

QUESTION 42

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

PART 1..;

0

F PCT

45.48.96.0

CF P.43LW PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF Pte'

83.6 54.3 100.0 42.1 88.0 47.8 100.029.9 81.7 36.6 100.016.4 8.9 16.4 5.7 12.0 5.1 L1.° 6.5 1/./ 6.7 18.30.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.6

CASES PROCESSED 54.3164 47.8223 36.61E0Na. BLANK DATA 7.0)00 3.0000 5.DOCCCMINIMUM VALUE 1.0000

.

1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 .0000SUM OF SCORES 63.2445 53.5527 43.5353SUM SQO. SCORES 81.0939 65.0080 5708107MEAN 1.1644 1.1198 1.1889STND. UEV. IN) 0.3704 0.3246 0.4065STND. DEV. IN -1) 0.3739 0.3280 0.4122MEDIAN 1.0983 1.0680 1.1118

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-8134

1.000 470 83.3 564 100.0 424 87.4 485 100.0 293 83.7 350 100.02.000 94 16.7 94 16.7 61 12.6 61 12,6 56 16.0 57 16.33.000 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.3 1 0.3

CASES PROCESSEDNO0 BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE

=564

71.0000

4853

1.0000

35051.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000 2.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 658.0000 546.0000 408.0000SUM 500. SCORES 846.0000 668.0000 526.0000MEAN 1.1667 1.1258 1.1657STND. DEV. IN) 0.3727 0.3316 0.3794STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.3730 0.3319 0.3800MEDIAN 1.1000 1.0719 1.0973

Phonic and/or structuralanalysis

QUESTION 42 PAK I-I

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002:0003.000

-CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA =

F PCT CF

49.9 92.0 54.24.1 7.6 4.40.3 0.5 0.3

54.24737.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000-MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 58.8637SUM S_OC. SCORES = 68.6824MEAN 1.0855STN&. DEV. IN/ 0.2964STN). DEV. = 0.2992

-leaTAN 1;0438

SCORE INTERVALS PCT

F

100.0 36.38.0 11.-30.5 0.2

FCT

75.9 47.7 100.0273.6-----MT5.--247r--rs.70.4 0.2 0.4

T---TZT

21.7

CF P -81.$

54.7 36.3 100..

1.037.6 14.6 40.2.7 1.0 2.

47.7421 3t. 61324.0000 700CCO1.0000 1.00003.00-00 3.0000

54.4352 51.930683.2230 e5.1(781.2449 1.43010.4397 0.54640.4444 0.5.t4111.1584 1.3318

CF P -BLW F PCT CF PBLYI F

1.0002.0003.000

. . . - . - -516- - - . . . . .

453

91.5- . . . _ _

8.00.5

564_100.048 8.53 0.5

376 77.8 483 100.0 214 61.5 348 100.0103

421.30.8

1074

22.20.8

12311

35.33.2

13411

38.53.2

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OA TAMINIMUM VALUE

===

5647

1.0000

48351.0000

34871. 0000

MAXIMUM VALUE - 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 615.0000 594.0000 493.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 723.0000 824.0000 805.0000MEAN 1.0904 1.2298 1.4167STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.3048 0.4400 0.5534STND. DEV. (N-11 = 0.3050 0.4404 0.5542MEDIAN 37,57W61 1.1423 1.3131

Developing skill in using contextclues

QUESTIUN 42

SCORE INTERVALS

i-ART I

F PCT CF

1.000 44.1 82.42.000 9.3 17.33. OOC 0.2 0.4

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OA TA

=

=MINIMUM VALUE

-MAXIMUM VALUE==

SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQD. SCORES =MEAN =

SYNC. DEV. (N) =STND. DEV. (N-1) =

-MEDIAN =

SCORE INTERVAL S

1.0002.0003.000

53.69.50.2

53.60828.00001.00003.0600

63.266882.96451.18020.39350.39721;1071

F PCT

a

P-BLW F '-to. - - CF

100.017.60.4

39.77.20.4

P-BLW F PCT Ce P-BL*I

83.9 47.3 100.0 23.7 80.2 3700 100.0-1-57.1

0.7 0.46.10.7

.20.1

1 .40.4

7.30.1

19.80.4

47.2696 36.5Sa8.0000 i.00CO1.0000 1.00003.0000 3.0000

55.2220 44.457971.8299 59.64551.1682 1.2Clo0.3935 Oo 41010.3977 0.41561.01967 1.1233

CF P-BLW F PCT

463 82.2 56398 17.4 1002 0.4 2


56381.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE = 3.000SUM OF SCORES 665.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 873.0000MEAN = 1.1812STND. DEV. (N) = 0.3943SING. DEV. (N-1) = 0.3946MEDIAN 1.71U0-

100.039617.8 800.4 4

CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

82.5 480 100.0 290 81.9 354 100.016.7 84 17.0 62 17.5 64 18.10.8 4 0.8 2 0.6 2 0.6

48081.0000

3541

1.00003.0000 3.0000

568.0000 420.0000752.0000 556.0000

1.1833 1.18640.4079 0.40370.4083 0.40431.1061 1.1103


QUESTION 42 PART

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003. 000

16.5243.1

8.7

F PCT CF

31.0-52.716.3

53.336;88.7

100.0 25.0 52.6

16.3 1.8 3.8

F FCI CF

47.622.61.8

100.0..1 41.141.41.9 54.43.8 .7 4.5

p-ah

36.7 100.021.6 58.91.7 4.5


-MANI-KM VALUESUM OF SCURESSUM SOD. SCORES

STND. DEV. (N)SIND. DEV. IN-11MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

5S:338310.00001.00005..0000

98.0457207.2599

1.-8-532

0.67190.6783

-4776374-5.00001.00003.0000

72.0340124.3992

1.51210.56990.5760

F MT' CF P-BLW F

36.67S14.0CCO1.00003.0000

59.9323109.73891.63400,56750.5i541.6633


.I.000.2.0003.000

166295100

29.6_52.617.8

561 100.0 244 50.5395 70.4215 44.5100 17.8 24 5.0

483 100.0 143239 49.5 18824 5.0 19

40.953.75.4

350 100.0207 59.119 5.4

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESBUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSIND. DEV. (N) =

SIND. DEV. IN -1) =MEDIAN

561- 48310 51.0000 1.0000-6:61560 3.0000

1056.0000 746.00002246.0000_ 1320.0000

176824 1.54450.6785 0.58940.6791_ 0.59001.8881 1.4898

35051.00003.0000

576.000D1066.0000

1.64570.56080.58161.6702

Practicing punctuation andparagraph skills

QUESTION 42

SCORE INTERVALS

PART K

0 0

F PCT CF P-8LW F PCT CF P-BLW F FCT

1.000 15.1 27.6 54.5 100.02.000 33.0 60.6 39.4 72.43.000 6.4 11.8 6.4 11.8

16.5 34.7 47.5 100.0 12.0 32.9 36.6 100.627.3 57.4 31.0 65.3-20.9 57.2 24.5 67.13.8 7.9 3.8 7.9 3.6 9.9 3.6 9.9


54.50255.0000

47.54616.0000

36.56275.0060

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 100.3520 82.3414 64.7253SUM SQD. SCORES 204.8626 159.4321 128.2909MEAN 1.8412 1.7318 1..TTO3

STNC. DEV, IN) 0.6071 0.5950 0.6124STNO. DEV. IN-1) 0,6128 0.6013 0.4209MEDIAN 1.8689 1.7662 1.7'9421

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF 13.41CW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 150 ?6.5 565 100.0 158 32.8 481 100.0 118 33.7 350 100.02.000 341 60.4 415 73.5 284 59.0 323 67.2 198 56.6 232 66.33.000 74 13.1 74 13.1 39 8.1 39 8.1 34 9.7 34 9.7

T4Sts PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA

5656

4817

3505

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 1054.0000 843.0000 616.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 2180.0000 1645.0000 1216.0000MEAN 1.8655 1.7526 1.7600BIND. DEV. IN) = 0.6151 0.5902 0.6137STNC. DEV.MEDaN

==

0.61571.8886

0.5908 0.61461.7905 1.7879

Developing comprehens ionskills

QUESTION 42

SCORE INTERVALS

PART L

F PCT CF P-8LW -F-- tF-157=1311,7-

1.00G 52.3 96.6 54.2 100.0 46.2 96.5 47.8 100.0 34.1 93.0 36.7 100.02.000 1.9 3.4 1.9 3.4--1:7 2.6 7.03.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0

CASE; PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA

=

=

54.17937.0000

4.7.713Z.4.3

3.000036.70853.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 2.0000 ---7:0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES = 56.0510 49.4855 39.2817SUM SQD. SCORES = 59.7874 52.8064 44.4242MEAN 1.0345 1.0348 1.0701STNC. DEV. IN) = 0.1823 0.1829 0.2551STND. OEV. = 0.1E140 0.1848 0.25E7MEDIAN 1.0179 1.0180 1.0377

SCORE INTERVALS F

1.000 5442.000 193.000 0

PCT CF 0-41:w

96.6 563 100.03.4 £9 3.40.0 0 0.0

CASES PROCFSSED -= 56SNO. BLANK DATA -MINIMUM VALUE_ 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 2.0000SUM OF SCORES = 582.0000SUM WO. SCORES = 62o.p000MEAN 1.0337STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.1806STN D. DEV. = 0.1807MEDIAN 1.0175

F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF 13-81.W

468 96.5 485 100.0 336 95.5 352 100.017 3.5 17- 3.5 16 4.5 16 4.50 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

4853

3523

1.0000 1.00002.0000 2.0000

502.0000 368.0000536.0000 400.0000

1.0351 1.04550.1839 0.20830.1841 0.20861.0182 1.0238

Improving comprehension rate

QUESTION 42 PART M

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW P -Fro P-BLW F PCT CF P-8Lh

1..00C 38.8 71.8 54.1 100.0 36.2 76.1 47.6 100.028.9 78.7 36.7 100.02.CCC 13.8 25.6 15.2 28.2 10.5 -2-2.1 11.4 23.4-6.9 18.8 7.8 21.33.000 1.4 2.6 1.4 2.6 0.8 1.7 0.8 1.7 0.9 25 0.9 2.5


54.071510.0000

47..57006.0000

36.74373.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.6000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0060 300000SUM OF SCORES 70.7131 59.7549 45.4653SUM SOD. SCORES 106.7808 85.7714 64.7183-MEAN 1.3078 1.2561 1.2374STND. OEV. (N) 0.5143 0.4745 0.4795STND. CEV. IN-11 0.5192 0.4796 0.4E65MEDIAN 1.1:461 1.1568 1.1350

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT- CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 401 71.5 561 100.0 355 73.8 481 100.0 278 79.0 352 100.02.000 145 25.8 160 28.5 116 24.1 126 26.2 64 1802 74 21.03.000 15 2.7 15 2.7 10 2.1 10 2.1 10 2.8 10 2.8


56110

4817

3523

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 736.0000 617.0000 436.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1116.0000 909.0000 624.0000MEAN 1.J119 1.2827 1.2386STNV. DEV. IN) 0.5178 0.4943 0.4884STNO. DEV. IN-1) 0.5183 0.4949 0.4891MEDIAN 1.1995 1.1775 1.1331

Developing listening skills

QUESTION 42

SCORE INTERVALS

CASES PROCESSEDNU. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORESMEAN-STNC. DEV. (N)STNO. OEV. IN-1)MEDIAN

1.000 49.9 91.9 54.3 100.038.9 82.02.000 4.4' 8.1 4.4 '8.1 EL-5 --1-8.0

3.000 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0

SCORE INTERVALS

PART N

F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P' 81W

F .PCT. CF P-BLW F PCT

54.26198.00001.00002:000058.661767.45431.08110.27270.27531;0441

47.3138.00001.00002.0000

55.892572.92521.11980.38390.3680.1.1096

FLT

47.4 100.0e9.88.5 18.0 7.1 19.Z

-0.0 -0.0 0.1 0.3

CF P -8LW F PCT

3b. 99E31.00L01.00003.000044.350159.2ses1.19E70.40720.41291.1213

CF P-8L.

37.0 100.07.2 19.50.1 0.3

CF P-8LW

1.000_

2.0003.000

517 91.846 8.20 0.0

563 100.0 388 80.846 8.2 92 19.20 0.0 0 0.0

480 100.0285 80.592 19.2 66 18.60 0.0 3 0.11

354 100.069 19.53 0.8

MEDIAN

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQD. SCORESMEANSTNO. 0EV. (N) =

STND. DEV. (N-1) =

5638

1.00002.0000

609.0000701.0000

1.08170.27390.27421.0445

4808

1.00002.0000

572.0000756.0000

1.19170.39360.39401.1186

3541

1.00003.0000

426.0000576.0000

1.20340442310.42361.1211

Reading aloud

QUESTION 42 PART

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002-00-0-0

3.000

CASES PAbtESs80-NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE

-MAX-ft-WM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORES =

STNO. DEV. (N)STND. DEV. (N-1)

-14-E-01AN

0

F

27.224.92.3

F

PCT CF

50.1 54.445.8 27.24.1 203

54.42246.00001.00003.0000

83.8683147.2678

1.54110.57540.58081.4990

-Pc f CF

P -BLW

100.015,449-.9'2-7.1-

4.1

VIOLA%

100.0

F PCT CF

32.6 47.3

P-BLW

100.0

F

0,0

PCT CF

21.6 3t.9

4.637;7-----31:99.7 4.6

67.C.3.59.7 5.4

64.4 2U.914.6 5.4

78.414.6

47.26299.00001.0000

36.85C93.00001.0000

3.000083.7187

165.8238

3.000071.1283150.4656

P-BLW

1.77130.60900.6156

1.93020055800.00E31.9451

F

1.8016

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 272 48.1 565 100.0139 29.1 478 100.0 78 22.2 352 1D0.02.000 271 48.0 293 51.9289 60.5 339 70.9218 61.9 274 77.83.000 22 309 22 3.9 50 10.5 50 10.5 56 15.9 56 15.9

_ _. . _ . _ _ _

*.6561.0000

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE -

478101.0000

35231.0000

MAXIMUM VALUE --Taidurs 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 880.0000 867.0000 682.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1554.0000 1745.0000 1454.0000MEAN 1.5375 1.8138 1.9375STNO. DEV, IN) = 0.5697 0.6006 0.6138STND. DEV* (N-1/ = 0.5702 0.6012 0.6147MEDIAN 1.5387 1.8460 1.9495


QUESTION 42

SCORE INTERVALS

PART P

F PCT CF P -B LW

1.000 45.8 84.6 54.2 100.02.000 6.2 15.1 8.3 15.43.000 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3

1:- PC7-- PCT CF P-ct.CF P-81.14 F

36.4 76.9 47.4 100.027.9 75.9 36.7 100.010.8 22.7 11.0 23.1 790.2 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.S 2.6 0.9 2.6

USES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK OATH

==

54:16429.0000

WT.74-1-047.0000

36.68004.0000

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000-1411/AUOt VALUE 3.0000 3.0000---73:0000SUM OF SCORES = 62.6922 58,6110 46.4543SUM SQO. SCORES = 80.0967 81.4516 67,8664MEAN 1.1574 4.2-362 1.26E5STND. OEV. (NJ = 0.3729 0.4355 0.4568STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.3764 0.4402 0.5037MEDIAN = 1.0911 1.1506 1.1565

F PCT CO P -BLW F -OCT CF--0-BLg F PCT CF P -BL

2,0003.000

470902

_83.616.00.4

562922

100.016:40.4 2 0.4

481119

2

100.024.70.4

269766

76.6 351 100.21.7.7

826

23.1..


==

5629

4817

3514

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 656.0000 602.0000 439.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 843.0000 848.0000 627.0000MEAN- 1.1673 1.2516 1.2507STND. DEV. IN) - 0.3826 0.4434 0.4712STND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.3830 0.4438 0.4719MEDIAN 1.0979 1.1644 1.1524


QUESTION 42

SCORE INTERVALS

PART ij

El L7 U

F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT tF F PCT CF P-8Lte

1.000 38.6 71.5 54.0 1000 38.3 80.6 47.6 100.0 30.9 84.0 36.7 A00.0.2.000 14.2 2602 15.4 28.5 901 19.1 902 19.4 5.6 1504 5.9 16.03.000 1.2 2.3 1.2 203 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.6

CASES PROCESSED 54.0148 47.5702 36.-7214NO. BLANK DATA 10.0000 6.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 300000SUM OF SCORES 70.6441 56.9504 4208,016SUM SOD. SCORES 106.3569. 76.0033 5503662MEAN 1.3079 1.1972 101654STND. DEV. (Ni 0.5084 0.4055 0.3666STNO. DEV. (W'1) 0.5132 0.4099 0.3920MEDIAN .40 1049'93 1.1203 1.0514


1..000 400 71.32.000 146 26003.000 15 2.7

CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-.BLW F PCT CF P -BLW

561 100.0 377 78.2 482 10000 289 82.1 352 10000161 28.7 21.4 105 21.8 61 1703 63 17.915 2.7 2 0.4 2 0.4 2 0.6 2 0.6

----EASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATA

56110

4826

3523

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 73700000 589.0000 417.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 1119.0000 807.0000 551.0000MEAN 1.3137 1.2220 1.1847STND. DEV. (N) 0.5184 0.4255 0.4024STNO. DEV. = 0.5189 0.4259 0.4030MEDIAN 1.1393 1.1090


QUESTION 42 PART R

F FCT CF P -8LW iF- PCT CF P-BLit PCT CF P-BL og

1. COG 11.6 21.4 54.3 100.0 15.7 33.2 47.4 100.0 13.9 37.9 36.7 100.02.000 35.8 65.9 42.7 78.6-28.3 59.8 31.7 66.8E20.3 55. 22.B 62.13.000 6.9 12.7 6.9 12.7 3.3 7.0 3.3 7.0 2.5 6.9 2.5 6.S


=

=

54.31928.0000

4/.38798.0000

31).70485.0000

MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0006 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 103.9333 82.3840 62.0590SUM SOO. SCORES = 216.9724 159.0237 117.8552

1.9134- 1.1385 1.6SC8STND. DEV. (N) = 0.5774 0.5774STNC. DEV. (N-1) = 0.5828 0.5836 0.o017MEDIAN 1 9342 1.7131Z 1.(1v8

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF 0--KW CF P-BLW F PCT CF 0.-bLW

1.000 _121 21.5 563 100.0155 32.4 478 100.0126 36.0 350 100.02.000 370 65.7 442 78.5285 59.6 323 67.6200 57.1 224 64.03.000 72 12.8 72 12.8 38 7..9 38 7.9 24 6,9 24 6.9


===

8

1.0000

478101.0000

3505

1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1077.0000 839.0000 598.0000SUM SQD. SCORES = 2249.0000 1637,0000 1142.0000MEAN 1.9130 1.7552 1.7086STMD. DEV. (N) = 0.5790 0.5864 0.5862STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.5795 0.5870 0.5870MEDIAN 1.9338 1.7947 1.7450


QUESTION 42

SCORE INTERVALS

PART S

F PCT CF P -6LW PCI- CF-P=B-CR- r PC I CF P-eLw

1.000 39.6 73.6 53.9 100.0 34.0 71.4 47.7 100.0 26.5 72.2 36,7 100.02.000 13.9 25.8 14.2 26.4-12.7-22,6 13.7 28.6 FUO1 27.5 10.2 27.83.000 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.7 1.0 2.1 1.0 2.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2

CASES PROCESSED 53.8977 47.6600 36.7151NO. BLANK DATA 11.0000 5.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 68.5141 62.2954 47.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 98.4668 93.5167 6707212MEAN 1.2712 1.3071 1.2800STNC. DEV. IN) 0.4593 0.5037 0.4538SIND. DEV. IN-1) 0.4637 0.5091 0046C1MEDIAN -1.1747 1.2008 1019.22

-SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PC T CF P-8LW

1.000 426 76.1 560 10000 338 70.1 482 100.0249 71.1 350 100002.000 129 23.0 134 2309133 27.6 144 29.9100 28.6 101-28093.000 5 0.9 5 0.9 11 2.3 11 2.3 1 0.3 1 0.3

CASES PROCESSEDO. BLANK OATA

56011

4826

3505

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 699.0000 637.0000 452.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 987.0000 969.0000 658.0000MEAN 1.2482 1.3216 1.2914SIND. DEV. (N) = D.4522 0.5136 0.4607STNO. DEV. = 0.4526 0.5142 0.4613MEDIAN 1.1573 1.2130 1.2028

Creative writing El

13.US TION 42

SCORE INTERVAL S

1.0002.0003.000

PART T

F

17.732.74.0

PCT CF P-BLW

32.5 54.4 100.060,1 36,7 67.5

7.4 4.0 7.4

15.327.7

4.8

---CF

32.0 47.7

P-BLW F

100,0 11.8

ECT CF

32.3 36.5 100L5-8.D 32.5 68.0 20.3-53,7 24.1 67.710.0 4.8 10.0 4.4 12.0 4,4 12 .0

-CASES PROCESSED =- 54.3796 547747,7391NO. BLANK OA TA = 6.0000 4.0000 3.00CGMIN IMUM VALUE -=

--MA XI MUM VALUE1.00003.0000

1.0000 1.00003.0000 3.0000

SUM OF SCORE S = 95,1265 84.9861 65.6631SUM SQD. SCORE S = 184.6844 169.0166 132.6611-MEAN 1.7493 1. (U04 1.79E6STND, DEV. IN) = 0.5798 0.6093 0,6 .3;,STND. 0EV. (N-1) =

--ME D IAN0.58521.7912

0.6158 0.64281.8105 1,8172

SCORE INTERVAL S F PCT CF P-6LW F PCT CF LW F -)67 CF

1.000 192 34.0 565. 100.0 152_ 31.5 483 100.0 120 34.3 350 100.02, 000 329 58.2 373 66,0 281 58.2 331 68,5 183 52,3 230 65,73..000 44 7.8 44 7.8 50 10.4 50 10.4 47 13.4 47 13.4


-=

5656

4835 5

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3,0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 982.0000 864.0000 627.0000SUM SQO. SCORES = 1904.0000 1726. 0000 1275.0000MEAN = 1.7381 1.7888 1.7914STND. OEV. (N1 = 0,5908 0.6112 0.6585STND. DEV. IN-11 = 0.5914 0.6119 0.6595MEDIAN = 1:771 1.8185 1.8005


OUESTION 42 PART U

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW CF 13-81-14 F FC7 177771XTIF

1.000 43.6 79.9 54.6 100.0'20.1

36.9 77.4 47.7 100.0 26.8 78.0 37.0 100.02.000 10.7 19.7 1100 10.4 21.8 10.8 22.6 8.1 21.8 8.2 22.03.000 C.3 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.8 001 0.2 0.1 0.2


54.59795.0000

47.66305.0000

36.55E3160060

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 65.8702 58.8215 45.2305SUM SOD. SCORES 88.9455 81.9108 6108480MEAN 1.2065' 1.2341 1.2225STND. DEV. (N) C.4166 0.4422 00420SIND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.4205 0.4469 0.427MEDIAN 1.1261 1.1459 1.1413

SCORE INTERVALS. F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 447 79.0 566 100.0 372 77.0 483 100.0 282 79.7 354 100.0_2.000 115 20.3 119 21.0 107 22.2 111 23.0 71 20.1 72 20.33.000 4 0.7 4 0.7 4 0.8 4 0.8 1 0.3 1 0.3

CASES' PROCESSEDND. BLANK DATA

56-6

5

4835

3541

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE - 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 689.0000 598.0000' 427.0000SUM SQD. SCORES 943.0000 836.0000 575.0000MEAN 1.2173 1.2381 1.2062STNO. DEV. (N) = 0.4292 0.4449 0.4115SIND. DEV. IN-1) = 0.4296 0.4454 0.4121MEDIAN 1.1331 1.1492 1.1277


QUESTION 42

SCORE INTERVALS

PA WI V

Major Secondary Of little or noGoal Goal importance as a goal

0 ID

F PCT CF P-8LW

1.000 21.4 40.2 53.32.000 27.0 50.8 31.83.000 4.8 9.0 4.8

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK OA TA =MINIMUM VALUE =

-MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =

--M1ANSTND. DEV. (NI =

STNO. DEV. (N-1I =MEDIAN

SCORE INTERVALS

1.0002.0003.000

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SOD. SCORES =MEANSTND. DEV. (NI =STND. DEV. (N-11 =MEDIAN

53.276013.00001.0u003.0000

89.9249172.8159

1.68790.62830.63431.6925

F PCT

221 39.6.287 51.450 9.0

558131.00003.0000

945.00001819.0000

1.69350.62590.62651.7021

CF

P-8LW- PCT Cr P=7P-

100.0 18.4 39.0 47.2 100.0 14.7 40.3 36.5 10G.59.8-24:2- 51.3 -213.8 61.0 17.9 49.0 21.8 55.9.0 4.6 9.7 4.6 9.7 3.9 10.7 3.9 10.

47.243/ 36.51779.0000 5.00001.0000 1.00003.0000 3.0000

80.6480 62.2602156.6198 121.54471./071 1.70450.6333 0.64E80.6401 0.65E91.7143 1.654,

P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT

558 100.0 171 35.8 478 100.0 131 37.5 349 100.0337 60.4 257 53.8 307 64.2 178 51.0 218 62.550 9.0 50 10.5 50 10.5 40 11.5 40 11.5

478101.0000

34961.0000

3.0000 3.0000835.0000 607.00001649.0000 1203.0000

1.7469 1.73930.6311 0.64960.6317 0.65051.7646 1.7444

Improving self-image

QUESTION 42

SCORE INTERVALS

PART h

F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW r FCT CF P-BLw

1.0002.0003.000

46.06.90.5

86.112.81.0

53.47.40.5

100.013.91.0

41.06.40.2

86.1 47.6 100,0 31.4 85.9 36.E 100.013.40.4

6.60.2

13.E0.4

4.60.4

13.01.1

5.20.4

14.1.1.1

CASES PROCESSED 53.3940 -47:60$07- 36.5914NO. BLANK DATA 12.0000 5.0000 4.0000MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.000D 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 61.3492 54.4218 42.1450SUM SOD. SCORES 78.3525 68.4531 54.0660MEAN 1.1490 1.1431 1.1519STNO. DEV. (N) 0,3837 0,3621 0.3E82STND. DEV. (N-1) 0.3874 0.3660 0.3937MEDIAN 1,0805 r7.0-air6- 1401319

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW--

1.000 481 86.0 559 100.0_415 85.9 483 100.0 299 85.4 350 100.02.000 72 12.9 78 14.0 65 13.5 68 14.1 46 13.1 51 14.63.000 6 1.1 6 1.1 3 0.6 3 0.6 5 1.4 5 1.4


55912

4835

3505

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1,0000MAXIMUM VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000SUM OF SCORES 643,0000 554.0000 406.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 823,0000 702.0000 528.0000MEAN 1,1503 1.1470 1.1600STND. DEV. IN) 0.3862 0.3712 0.4037STND. DEV. IN-1) 0.3866 0.3716 0.4043MEDIAN 1.0811 1.0819 1.0853

.


QUESTION 42 PART X

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW CF F-tU;--

1.000 50.2 92.2 54.5 100.0 44.6 93.6 47.6 100.0 33.8 92.2 36.7 100.02.000 3.9 7.2 4.2 7.8-279--6-1- 3:1 6.4 1.9 1.8 2.9 7.83.000 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 -0.0 -0.D

-CASES PROCESSED = 54.4739 -47:33'49 36.65E0NO. BLANK DATA = 7.0000 5.0000 ,f.0C(,0MINIMUM VALUE =

VALUe1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

MAXIMUM = 1.0000- 3.0000 2.0000SUM OF SCORES = 59.0477 50.8178 39.5578SUM SOD. SCORES =

-MEAN68,8616 57.4631 45.2735

= 1.0840 1.0610 1.071STNO. DEV. IN) = 0.2986 0.2608 0.2679STND. DEv. IN-1) =KE01AN =

0.3014 0.2635 0.2716I:o42.27--1.0421 1.0.343

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT PCT CF P-BLW

1.000 525 93.1. 564 100.0 449 93.0 483 100.0 328 93.7 350 100.02.000 36 6.4 39 6.9 33 6.9 34 7.0 22 6.3 -22 6.33.000 3 0.5 3 0.5 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0


--=

======

===

5647

1.00003.0000

606.0000696.0000

1.07450.28210.2823

"1..457-1-

4835

1.0000

35051.0000

r---- MAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORESSUM SQO. SCORES

3.0000518.0000590.0000

2.0D00372.0000416.0000

MEANSTNO. 0EV. (N)

___STNO. DCV._ IN-1)MEDIAN

1.07250,26710.2674

1.06290.24270.2431

1.0379 1.0335

Other (Specify)

QUESTION 42

SCORE INTERVAL S

PART Y

F PC T CF W-BLW F PCT CF P-BLW r FCT CF P-BLW

1.000 1.0 56.6 1.8 100.0 0.7"43.4.-0.1

46.1 1.6 100.0 0.6 42.1 1.3 100.02. COO 0.0 0.0 0.8 5.3 0.9 53.9 0.1 5.2 0.8 37.93.000 0.8 43.4 0.8 43.4 0.8 48.5 0.8 48.5 0.7 52,7 0.7 52.7

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUE-MAXIMUM

'=

==

1.811i---536.0000

1.0000

1.5839457.0000

1.0000

1.34503.19.0000

1.0000VALUE 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000

SUM OF SCORES = 3.3817 3.2060 2.8322SUM SOD. SCORES-NEM-

8.0936 7.9880 7.22331.8673 2.0241 2.1058

. STND. DEV. IN) = 0.9911 0.9727 0.9676SIND. 0EV. (N-1) = 1.4811 1.6021 1.9107MEDIAN 1.3828 2.2266 2.5506

SCORE INTERVAL S

1.0002.0003.000

I_CASES "FROG` ME)NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORE S -SUM SOD. SCORES =MERV--

DEV. IN) =SIND. DEV. IN-1) =

F PCT CF P-BLW F PC T CF P -BLW F PC T CF P-BLW

11 55.0 20 100.0 7 41.2 17 100.0 5 55.6 9 100.00 0.0 9 45.0 2 11.8 10 58.8 1 11.1 4 44.49 45.0 9 45.0 8 47.1 8 47.1 3 33.3 3 33.3

20551

1.0000

17471

1.0000

9346

1.00003.0000 3.0000 3.0000

38.0000 35.0000 16.000092.0000 87.0000 36.00001.9000 2.0588 1.77780.9950 0.9375 0.91621.0208 0.9663 0.9718

2.2500 1.4000

- .-

43. About how often does each child in your compensatoryopportunity to read aloud to the class?

At least once a day


About once a week

QUESTION 43

reading class have the


Seldom or never on a regular basis

--SCORE IN-TER-VAL S F PCT CF P*-8LW----F PCT CF P-BLW E PCT CF P-81.11

1.000 30.0 54.9 5447 100.0 12.3 25.9 47.6 100.0 6.4 17.4'45.1

86.8 100.02.000 16.2 29.7 24.7 24.2 50:1 35.3 .744.115.7 42.7 30.4 a2.63. OCC 3.7 6.8 8.5 15.4 5.2 11.0 11.1 23.4 0.8 18.4 14.7 39.94.000 2.0 3.7 4.7 8.6 2.2 4.6 5.9 12.4 3.8 10.2 7.9 21.55.000 2.7 4.9 2.7 4.9-377---7:7377--ar .i.. 1-1-1:3 4.1 11.3

CASES PROCESSEDNO BLANK DATA

54.7317 47.6181 313.80544.0-600 5.0000 4.0000

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE

-SUM5.0000 5.0000 5.0000

OF SCORES 95.51-60 103.642T 93.9754SUM SQD. SCORES 228.4530 283.6631 294.Z 344MEAN

IN)1.7414-.1/6-84--

2.1765 2.55301 1.,[147

STND. DEV. 11+11 1.0783 1.1162 1.2315MEDIAN 1.4111 1.9755 2.2638

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF P-13LW F PCT

297 52.4 567_100.0. 110 22.8 483 100.0 55 15.7 351 100.02.000 178 31.4 270 47.6 254 52.6 373 77.2 158 45.0 296 B4.33.000 39 6.9 92 16.2 56 11.6 119 24.6 64 18.2 13B 39.34.000 22 3.9 5.3 9.3 24 5.0-___ a3..1,_9_ 7.4.. 21,15.00c 31 5.5 31 5.5 39 8.1 39 8.1

_37.

37_10.51b.5 37 16.3

CASES PROCESSED ==

5674

483 351NO. BLANK DATA 5 4MINIMUM VALUE = 1.0000 1.0000 1.00D0MA?(.111PMY4IJE. 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1013.0000 1077.0000 846:0000-SUM SOO. SCORES 2487.0000 2989.0000 2780.0000MEAN 1.7866 2.2298 2.5527STND. DEV. (N) = 1.0928 1.1029 1.1849STND. DEV. IN-l) = 1.0938 1.1040 1.1866MEDIAN 1.4545 2.0177 2.2627

44. About how often does each child in your compensatory reading class have theopportunity to read aloud to you alone (or to another adult)?

El At least once a day

Q Lessthan once a week, but regularly(:ISeveral times a week, but not daily

*QUESTION 44

SCORE INTERVALS

About once a week

F PCT -CF

Seld9m or never on a regular basis

P-BLW F -197f CF P -8LW F PCT CF P-BLw

1.00C 16.5 3(.3 54.5 100.0 7.3 15.4 47.5 100.0 4.2 11.5 36.9 100.02.000 20.9 38.4 38.0 69.7 14.4 53:47 40.2 84.6 8.0 21.8 32.6 88.53.000 5.5 10.1 17.1 31,3 8.5 17.9 25.8 54.2 90:.: 25.4 24.6 66./4.000 3.1 5.8 11.6 21.2 6.7 14.1 17.3 36.4 6.6 18.0 15.2 41.35.000 804 15.4 8.4 15.4 10.6 22.2 10.6 22.2 8.6 23.3 8.6 i3.?

CASES PROCESSED = 54.4902 47.505a 36.85C2BL AN OA TA = 60-0000 300000

MINIMUM VALUE - 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 5.0000 5.0000 500000-am DF SCORES = 124:5331 141.3155 11708666SUM SOO. SCORES = 410.4814 512.9746 44105204MEAN 2.3772 2.9747 3.190

DEV. (N) = 1:31-176 1.3962 103232STNO. DE/. 1*-11 = 1.3846 1.4111 103415MEDIAN .2.0137 2.7372 3.15E5

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BL4--- F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF PeLW

1.000 159 28.1 565 100.0 68 14.1 481 100.0 34 9.7 352 100.02.000 212-5-1-:5 406 71.9 146 30.4 413 85.9 84 23.9 318 90.33.000 62 11.0 194 34.3 90 18.7 267 55.5 84 23.9 234 66.54.000 35 6.2 132 23.4 69 14.3 177 36.8 64 18.2 150 42.65.000 97 17.2 97 17.2 108 22.5 108 22.5 86 24.4 86 24.4

CASES PROCESSED = 565 481 352NO. BLANK DATA = 8 -7 3MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 5.0000 5.0000 5.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1394.0000 1446.0000 1140.0000SUM SOD. SCORES 4550.0000 5266.0000 4300.0000MEAN = 2.4673 3.0062 3.2386STNO. OEV. (N) = 1.4020 1.3822 1.3142SIND. DEV. IN-1) = 1.4033 1.3837 1.3161MEDIAN = 2.0825 2.7944 3.1905

=NIMINI1=1,,45. How successful would you consider your compensatory reading teaching to be

with respect to each of the following criteria?

Highly Moderately ModeratelySuccessful Successful Unsuccessful

Enhancing pre-readingskills

QUESTION 45

410'SCORE INILf4V

1 A

F PCT

TotallyUnsuccessful

CF P-8LW F PC7 F CF P-BLw

I. (..oC 13.7 26.0 52.7 100.0 7.2 16.4 4::.7 100.0 2.4 7.6 31.2 100.02.COO 17.1 70.5 39.0 74.0-712-4;8 75.1 36.5 833.6 2-4.i 1-8.0 21,4.8 92.43.00C 1.! 3.2 1.8 3.5 3.5 0.1 3.7 8.5 3.6 11.5 4.5 14.44.000 0.1 G.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.5 2.9 0.9 2.9


--MINIMUM VALUE

52.659331.00002.0000

43.670846.0000

31.2033:7.0000

1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 93.5963 84.0658

-112.401V465.4432

SUM' S00. SCORES 179.7126 140.5733MEAN 1.7774 1.9250 2.0978STND. DEV. IN) 0.5036 0.5056

-70-;51150.54to

DEV. (N-1/ 0.5084 0.5556MEDIAN 1.0400 1.9472 2.0415

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P -BLW F PCT CF P-BIW PCT CF

1.000 134 24.8 540 100.0 70. 1,77 440 100.0 25 8.4 297 10.02.000 387 71.7 406 75.2 319 72.5 362 82.3 227 76.4 272 91.63.000 17 3.1 19 3.5 39 8.9 43 9.8 33 11.1 45 15.24.000 2 0.4 2 0.4 4 4 .Q.R9 12 4.0 12 4.0


54031

44040. --

29758

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCOPES 967.0000 849.0000 626.0000SUM 500. SCORES 1867.0000 1769.600.6MEAN 1.7907 1.9295 2.1077STND. DEV. 04) 0.5007 0.5876SING. DEV. (N-1) 0.5011 0.5459 0.5886MEDIAN 1.8514 1.9451 2.0441

Enhancing measuredreading achievement

QUESTION 45 PART

PC7 CF PBLW PCT CF P-81-4SCORE IN F. F PCT CF P -8LW

1.000 13.3 24.5 54.4 100.0 7.4 15.8 47.2 100.0 500 1:7.9 35.8 100.t

2.000 7FT:6 69.1 41.175.5 36.2 76.7 39.8 84.2 27.9 7700 30.9 86.13.000 3.4 6.3 3.5 604 3.6 7.6 306 7.6 2.8 7.9 3.0 8.14.000 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 000 000 0.2 0.4 0.2 O.

CASES PROCESSEDNO. 8LANK OATA

==

54.43857.0000

47.22209.0000

35.849013.0000

MINIMUM VALUE = 100000 100000 100000..MAXIMUM VALUE = 400000 3.0000 400000SUM OF SCORES = 99.1357 90.5836 6908768SUM SQO. SCORES = 195.7880 184.4572 144.5261MEAN 1.8211 1.9183 1.9492STNO. OEV. iN1 = 005294 0.4759 0.4818STNO. OEV.-14411 = 0.5343 0.4810 004887MEOIAN 108696 1.9466 1.9645

SCORE INTERVALS F PC T CF P8LW F PCT CF P -8LW F PCT CF P8LW

1.000 138 24.5 563 100.0 82 17.1 479 100.0 50 14.6 342 100.020000 387 68.7 425 75.5 366 76.4 397 8209 265 77o5 f292 0504,3.000 37 6.6 38 6.7 31 6.5 31 605 25 7.3 27 7.94.000 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0.0 0 000 2 0.6 2 006

CASES PROCESSEONO. 8LANK OATA

5638

4799

34213

MINIMUM VALUE 1.0000, 1.0000 100000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 3.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES = 1027.0000 907.0000 66300000SUM SOO. SCORES 2035.0000 182500000 1367.0000MEAN 1.8242 108935 1.9386STNO. OEV. IN) 0.5357 0.4739 0.4888STNO. OEV. iN14 0.5362 004744 0.4895MEDIAN = 1.8708 1.9303 1.9566

Improving attitudestoward reading

QUESTION 45 PAR r C

SCORE INTERVALS PCT CF P-BLW F

1.000 26.6 48.7 54.7 100.0 17.22.CCO 26.2 47.9 28.1 51.3 28:03.GCG 1.8 3.2 1.8 3.4 2.24.000 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES-SUM SQO. SCORESMEANSTND. DEV, (N)STND. DEV. (N-1)MEDIAN

54.78174.00001.00004.0000

84.7434148.7746

1.54830.56650,57171.5273

PCT -PVT- Tr."

36.2 47.4-59;0------30.2

100.0 13.5 36.7 3t.E 100.663.8-2J:5 55.7 23.3 63,3

4.7 2.2 4.7 2.7 7.5 2.8 7.60.0 -0.0 -0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1

47.40647.0600

3.000079.8816

-1493 3T411.68500.55710.56301,7331

36.7941-r.00001.00004.0000

62.9254120.9517

1.71020,60200.61041.7287

SCORE INTERVALS F PCT CF P-BLW F PCT CF

1.000 268 47.3 567 100.0 187 38.9, 38.2 351 100.02.000 280 49.4 299 52.7 270 56.1

_441100.0134294 61.1 189 53.8 217 61.8-

3.000 18 3.2 19 3.4 24 5.0 24 5.0 27 7,7 28 8.04.000 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 Cy:L__ 0_0.0_ 1 0.3 1_0.3

CASES PROCESSEDNO. BLANK DATAMINIMUM VALUEMAXIMUM VALUESUM OF SCORES

_ .

SUM SQD. SC. ORF.SMEANSTND. 0EV. (N)SIND. DEV. IN-1)MEDIAN

zt

=

56741.00004.0000

886.00001566.0000

1.56260.56580.56631.5554

481

71.0656--3.0000

_799,0000

35141.00004.0000

597.00001483,0000

1.6611_0.56910.,5647"

1.6981

1149.00001.70D90.61690.61781.7196

Improving students' selfimages

OC%STION 45

SCORE INTERVALS

1.CCO2.0003.0004.000

CASES PROCESSED =NO. BLANK DATA =MINIMUM VALUE =MAXIMUM VALUE =SUM OF SCORES =SUM SQO. SCORES =MEAN =STND. DEV. IN) =STND, DEV.. (W-1) =MEDIAN =

PAR.'. D

----ZtikEftii-CliiiiiCS"

0 0

F PCT CF

22.331:21.20.0

40.856.92.20.0

54.732.41.2

-0.0

E 0

P -BLW F PCT tP P-BLW F PCT CF P:TIGT

100.0 16.9 35.8 47.3 100.0 12.6 34,3 36.8 100.059.2 20:4--T0-.1 30.3 64.2 21.7 59.1 24.2 65.12.2 1.9 4.0 1.9 4.1 2.3 6.3 2.4 6.6

-0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3

54.7317 47.2519 36.19324.0000 8.0000 -.4,0000

1.0000 1.0000 1.00003.0000 4.0000 4.0000

88.3491 79.5435 63.5334158.0340 148.1218 122.3c46

1.6142 1.6834 1.72660.5308 0.5486 0.5E12O.:5357 0.5545 0.59541.6610 1.7358 1.7657

--ifT-fsiii-----

1.000.4613-

3.0004.1300._ ______

CASES PROCESSEI) =NO. BLANK DATA =

233 41.1 W1.09.0-jii-3(7,;(----334 58,912 2.1 12 2.1

0.0 0 0.0----._ __0____

5674

MINIMUM VALUE - 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE - 3.0000SUM OF SCORES = 913.0000SUM SOD. SCORES = 1629.0000MEAN 1.6102STND. DEV. IN) 0.5293STND. DEV. (N-1) = 0.5298MEDIAN = 1.6568

114_280211

15ff-- CF P-611,1 F PCT CF P-BLW

37.1 480 100.0 126 35.9 351 100.058.3 302 62.9 201 57.3 225 64.14.4 22 4.6 22 6.3 24 6.80.2 1 0.2 2 0.6 2 0.6

480a

3514

1.0000 1.00004.0000 4.0000

805.0000 602.00001503.0000 1160.0000

1.6771 1,71510.5645 0.60270.5651 0.60361.7214 1.7463

Reiaediating culturaldeprivation

QUESTION 45 PART E

SCORE INTERVALS F PC7 P - BLit CF P -8LU F ?GT CF P-81.14

1.000 4. 0 7.7 51.8 100.0 3.4 7.6 44.8 100.0 2.b b.1 34.4 100.02.000 38.8 74.9 47.8 92.3 32.4 72.3 41.4 92.424.1 70.3 31.6 'F1.93.000 8.6 16.6 9.0 1704 707 17.2 9.0 20.1 7.0 20.5 7.4 21.74.000 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.8 1.3 2.9 1.3 2.9 U04 1.2 0.4 1.2


=

=

51.777338.0000

44.773037.6000

34.35172I.00CO

1.0000 1.0000KM IWO VAra 1-.01300-

MAXIMUM VALUE 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES 108.9575 96.4380 73.1865.

D St ORES 242..9278." 222.9809 169.1 769MEAN- 2.1043 2.1539 Z.i4E0STNO. DEV. ( N) = 0.5133

-0:51134'0.5838 0.5578

--STNTW OM 4 N'..1 ) 0.5904 0.5661MEDIAN 2.0644 2.0861 2.0967

SCORE INTERVALS F PC I C F -P-BLit -Off P43Lti --0 PC T CF P8LW

1. 000 44 8.3 533 100.0 35 7.8 450 100.0 30 9.2 326 100.02.000 385 72.2 489 91.7 314 69.8 415 92.2 225 69. 0 296 90.83.000 98 18.4 104 19.5 8H 19.6 101 22.4 66 20.2 71 21.84.000 6 6 1,1 13 2.9 13 2.9 5 1.5 5 1.5


=53338

dodo

45038

32629

1.0000 1.0000MAXIMUM VALUE = 4.0000 4.0000 4.0000SUM OF SCORES

-SCORES-- 1132.0000 979.0000 698.0000

SUH SOD. 2562.0000 2291.0000 1604.0000MEAN 2.1238 2.1756 2.1411STNO. DEV. (N)

'DEV.= 0.5442 0.5984 96

STND. ( ) 0.5447 0.5991 6.5805MEDIAN 2.0779 2.1051 2.0911

Documents

A Descriptive and Analytic Study of Compensatory