Upload
eugenia-parsons
View
63
Download
6
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A Chilled Water System Analysis Tool for Industrial Assessments. Chiller System Optimization & Energy Efficiency Workshop September 2003 Presented by Michael Socks UMass Industrial Assessment Center. The Industrial Assessment Center at UMass-Amherst. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
A Chilled Water System Analysis Tool for Industrial Assessments
Chiller System Optimization & Energy Efficiency Workshop
September 2003
Presented by Michael Socks
UMass Industrial Assessment Center
The Industrial Assessment Center at UMass-Amherst
• The IAC performs no-cost, on-site energy efficiency, waste reduction, and productivity improvement assessments for small and mid-size manufacturers
• Client Characteristics:1) SIC Code 2000-39992) Annual energy bills of $100,000 to $2,000,0003) Gross annual sales less than $100 million 4) Fewer than 500 employees at the plant site5) No in-house staff to complete a similar assessment
Summary of Operating Cost Reduction Measures
Equipment-based Opportunities• Replace the chiller• Install NG or absorption chillers (Hybrid)• Install HX to recover condenser heat• Store thermal energy for peak use
Summary of Operating Cost Reduction Measures
Control-based Opportunities• Optimize chiller sequence• Raise chilled water temperature setting• Lower condenser cooling water temperature• Use variable speed capacity control• Use 2-speed or VSD control of tower fans• Use VSD control of pump flow• Use free cooling
Summary of Operating Cost Reduction Measures
Load-based Opportunities• Use chilled water efficiently• Distribute chilled water efficiently• Use optimal coil or heat exchanger size/design
Purpose: Reduce the energy consumption of installed chilled water systems
Goal: Create a simple but useful software tool for analyzing potential energy savings in chilled water systems
Program Introduction
Chilled Water System (Water-Cooled)
Condens er
1
Evaporator
Com pres s or
32
4
Expans ionValve
Cooling T ow er
Cooling Load
CHILLER LO O P
HEAT REJ ECT IO N LO O P
HEAT G AIN LO O P
Cooling T ow erP um p
S upplyP um p
Cooling T ow erF an
Chilled Water System (Air-Cooled)
Air-CooledCondens er
1
Evaporator
Com pres s or
32
4
Expans ionValve
Cooling Load
CHILLER LO O P
HEAT G AIN LO O PS upplyP um p
F an
Program Description
Visual Basic Executable Program• User is prompted for system information • Program analyzes the existing system• User is prompted for changes to system• Program analyzes the proposed system• Program presents savings results
Program Overview: Input
Basic System Data:
• Number of chillers (up to 5)• Chilled water supply temperature• Geographic location• Condenser cooling method (water or air)
Program Overview: Input
If chiller condensers are water-cooled:
• Condenser cooling water supply temperature (if constant)
• WB to cooling water temperature differential (if variable)
• Cooling Tower Data (# towers, # cells/tower, motor hp, # motor speeds)
Program Overview: Input
If chiller condensers are air-cooled:
• Cooling air design temperature• Average annual ambient air temperature
(if indoor air is used for cooling)• DB to condenser temperature differential
(if outdoor air is used for cooling)
Program Overview: Input
Pump Data:
• Fixed or variable flow pumping• Flow rate [gpm/ton]• Nominal pump efficiency [%]• Nominal motor efficiency [%]
Program Overview: Input
Chiller Data:
• Chiller compressor type • Chiller capacity • Chiller full load efficiency (if known)• Chiller age
Program Overview: Input
Energy Cost Data:• Average electricity cost [$/kWh]• Average NG cost [$/MMBtu]
System Control Data:• System operating schedule• System loading schedule
Program Overview: Cost ReductionCost Reduction Measures to Consider:
• Increase chilled water supply temperature• Decrease chiller condenser temperature• Upgrade to 2-speed or variable speed tower fan motors • Upgrade to variable speed pump motor control• Replace chillers (use more efficient or NG units)• Replace refrigerant• Install VSD on chiller compressor motor (centrifugal only)• Use free cooling• Sequence chillers
Program Overview: Output
Output Information:
• Annual chiller energy consumption (kWh and/or MMBtu) and cost
• Annual cooling tower energy consumption (kWh) and cost
• Annual pump energy consumption (kWh) and cost
• Total annual energy consumption and cost
Program Overview: Output
Chiller energy may be viewed by:
• Chiller
• Load
Cooling tower energy may be viewed by:
• Wet-bulb temperature group
Pump energy may be viewed by:
• Chiller
ExampleLet’s run an example . . .
• (3) 200 ton water-cooled chillers (centrifugal)• 44 ºF chilled water temperature• Located in Boston, Massachusetts• Condenser cooling water is held constant at 85 ºF• (1) 2-cell tower with 15 hp 2-speed motors• Chilled water flow is constant [2.4 gpm/ton]• Condenser water flow is constant [3.0 gpm/ton]• Electricity is $0.06 per kWh• Operates 24/7 and serves an air-conditioning load• Install VSDs on each chiller compressor motor
Example: Input Screen
Example: Output Screen
Output Summary:
• Chillers: 2,187,676 kWh (92%)
• Tower: 4,768 kWh (< 1%)
• Pumps: 193,934 kWh (8%)
• Total Energy: 2,386,378 kWh Total Cost: $143,183
Example: Operating Cost Reduction Opportunities Screen
Operating Cost Reduction Measure:
• Install a VSD on each Centrifugal Compressor Motor
Example: Savings Screen
Savings Summary:
• 598,797 kWh/yr
• $35,928/yr
Case Study: Application
Manufacturer of laminated circuit boards uses chilled water for process cooling and space conditioning
Process Cooling• Laminating oven cool-down cycle• Plating fluid temperature controlSpace Conditioning• ~ 50,000 ft2 clean rooms• Office and manufacturing floor air conditioning
Case Study: System Specs
Chilled Water System Summary• (2) 250-ton helical rotary chillers (1997)• (2) 350-ton helical rotary chillers (2001)• 45ºF chilled water; 2.4 gpm/ton• 75ºF condenser water; 3.0 gpm/ton• (4) cooling towers; (3) 15-hp fans each (2-speed)• Operates 24/7 year-round• Free cooling is used when possible
Case Study: System Loading
Typical Loading Schedule
• 20% load for 25% of year• 30% load for 25% of year• 40% load for 25% of year• 50% load for 25% of year
Note: These are average system loads.
Individual chiller loading will differ.
Case Study: Results
Case Study: Prediction vs. Actual
Without Using Free Cooling • 3,478,905 kWh actual• 3,436,931 kWh predicted• Difference: 41,974 kWh (-1.2%)
With Free Cooling• 489,054 kWh and $41,570 actual savings• 608,720 kWh and $51,744 predicted savings• Difference: 119,666 kWh and $10,174 (+24%)
Case Study: Other Observations
• Chiller and pumping energy decrease by approximately 22%
• Tower energy increases by approximately 63%
Closing Comments
• The Program IS NOT intended to determine system energy use down to the kWh or MMBtu
• Program IS intended to direct analysis effort toward the most promising cost reduction opportunities
• I need your help to make this program better: 1) Download the program from www.ceere.org 2) E-mail questions, suggestions, errors, etc. to me at
[email protected]• Any questions?