198
7.. JJ 4k/’m FINAL REPORT’ on CAUSIX OF’’ CLEAVA(YF FRACTURE INSHIPPLATd FLATPLATE T&STS ANi) ADDITIONAL TdSTS ONlJRGd TUEMS by HARl!ER E.DAVIS, G.E>TROXW,QAjH, R.PARKER, A.BOODH3G ANI) M.P.O113RIEN UNJ31ERS1TY OF’ CALIFORNIA Under Ilavy Contract NObs-31222 ,. COIWCTTEE ONSHIPCONSTJUCTIGN DIVISION OFENGIINEWHJW &INDUSTRIAL R3SEARCH ,%, NATIONAL MSEARCH COUNCIL . ,> >. Advisory t/O sH~ps, NAVY D~~&T~T]@J’r BUREAU OF ikder Contract ~lObs-3&231 Serial No. WC+ M CopyNo. , .’ Jamar.y 17, ‘19+7 ,’., “.. ,. .

Document8

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ship society paper - 8

Citation preview

  • 7..

    JJ4k/mFINALREPORT

    on

    CAUSIXOFCLEAVA(YFFRACTUREINSHIPPLATdFLATPLATET&STSANi)ADDITIONALTdSTSONlJRGdTUEMS

    by

    HARl!ERE.DAVIS,G.E>TROXW,QAjH,R.PARKER,A.BOODH3GANI)M.P.O113RIENUNJ31ERS1TYOFCALIFORNIA

    UnderIlavyContractNObs-31222

    ,. COIWCTTEEONSHIPCONSTJUCTIGNDIVISIONOFENGIINEWHJW& INDUSTRIALR3SEARCH

    ,%, NATIONALMSEARCHCOUNCIL.

    ,>

    >. Advisoryt/OsH~ps, NAVY D~~&T~T]@JrBUREAUOF

    ikderContract~lObs-3&231

    SerialNo.WC+MCopyNo. , .

    Jamar.y17, 19+7

    ,. ,..

    ,.

    .

  • ADDRESSPJAVYDEPARTMENT,BUREAIJOFSHIPS,REFERTOFILENo.

    NObs-31222(334) NAVYDEPARTMENTBUREAUOFSHIPS

    .

    WASHINGTON,D.C.

    JAN31 KM7

    Mr.h.M.MacCutcheonMerchantMarineTechnicalOivisionU.S.CoastGuard1300EStreet,N.ii.Washington252D.C.

    DearSir:SUBJECT:FinalReportonfi~ausesofCleavageFracture.in

    Shipplate:FlatplateTestsandAdditionalT$XtSonmge mbesu,,(ssc-8),Contractliobs-31222?

    Thereisenclosedforyourin.formation.andfileonecopyofthesubjectreportasfollovm~

    ReportserialNo.SW-%

    Qe& Q!2Q?QJanuary17, 1947 18

    L.H,TravisBYdirectionofChiefof13ureau

  • NATIONALRESEARCHCOUNCIL2101ConstitutionAvenueWashington,D.C*

    January17,1947

    Chief,BureauofShipsNavyDepartmentWshington25, DeC.

    DearSir:AttachedisReportberialNo.SSC-8,entitled

    tfcausesofCleavageFractureinShipPlate:FlatPlateTestsandAdditionalTestsonLargeTubes!!.ThisreporthasbeensubmittedbythecontractorasthefinalreportononephaseoftheworkdoneonResearchProjectSR-92underContractldObs-31222betweentheBureauof~hips,NavyDepartmentandtheUniversityofCalifornia.

    Thereporthasbeenreviewedandacceptancerecommendedbyre~resentativesoftheCommitteeonShipConstruction,Divj.sionoftingineeringandIndustrialhesearch,NRC,inaccordancewithtinetermsofthecon-tractbetweentheBureauofbhipsjNavyDepartmentandtheNationalAcademyofSciences.

    Verytrulyyours,

    FrederickM.Feiker,dhairmanUivisionofEngineeringand

    IndustrialResearchtinclosure

    . . .-.-. - ...

    _....

  • thiswithworlc

    PREFACE,..,,,

    .....

    ~he.,NavyDepartllentthroughtheJureauofShipsisdistributing,,,reporttothoseagenciesandindividualsthat.wereactivelyassociatedthisresearchprogram.TnisreportrepresentsapartoftheresearchcontractedforunderthesectionoftheNavylsdirectiveWo investigate

    thedesignandconstructionofweldedsteelmerchantvesselsl!.The

    copyNo.1.-CopyNo.2-

    .,

    ,-+OpyNo.3 -copyso.4-copyxo.5-cOpy :?0. 6-CopyNo.7-copyNo.8-copyAJo.9-GopyNo.10-CopyNo.13.-CopyNo.12-CopyNo.13-GopyNo.14-copyNo.15-copy .io. 16 w

    COPYNO.16 -:OpyANO.7 -COpyiiO.8-copyNo.10-copyNo.U -copyNo.?13 -CopylJo.14 -copylJo.15 -Jopyi~o.17 -CopyNo.18-CopyNo.19-copyNo,20-CopyNo.21-copyNo.22-copyNo. 23 -copj7 No. 24 -

    .,

    distributionofthisreportisasfollows:.

    ChiefjBure+uofShips,NavyDepartmentDr.D.~~.Bronk,Chairmqn,.NationalResea~ch.Council

    -,

    CommitteeonShipConstructionV.H.Schnee,ChairmanJ.L.,Bates ..H.C.BoardmanPaulFfieldM.A.GrossmanC,H.Herty,Jr.A.B.i

  • copYivo.25 -CopyNo.26-CO+jROO 27 -CopyNo.28-

    copy1;0.29-copyNo.30-CopjjNo.20-CcpyNO*31-Copy:iO. 18-COpYNO. 32 -Copyiio,22-copyNo.33-COPYIio.24-copy ,~00 16 -copyiJoe34 -

    CopyNo.35-~Opyi!O. 36 -copyl~o.37 -~Opy~iO, 38-JopyNo.39-copylie.40-CopyNo.41-COpYNo.23-COPYNo. 42 -

    ShipStructureCommitteeRearAdmiralEllisReed-Hill,USCG,ChairmanRearAdmiralCharlesD.llheelock.USN.BureauoftihipsCaptainl,L.DavidArnott,

    ShipCaptain~.V.CaptainR.A.

    Schumacher,USN,k&iti&eCommission-AmericanBweauofShippingStructureSub-Ccxnmittee.Honsinger,USN,BureauofShipsjChairmanHinners.USN.DavidTaylorLodelBasin

    Comdr.R.1).$chmidtmin,U~CG -D.P.Brown,American~ureauofQhippingJ.Ii.LacCutcheon,Jr.,USCGd.M.Robertson,OfficeofResearchandInventions,USNJohnVasta,U.S.karitimeCommissionX.J.~ianless,U.S.MaritimeCommission .J.L.dilson,AmericanBureauofShipping ,FinnJonassen,LiaisonRepresentative,NRC;ln.Spraragen,LiaisonRepresentative,WRC

    NavyDepartment

    Comdr.Ii.H.Lambert,USN,BweauofShipsJomdr.R.S...andelkorn,USN2tiureauofbhipsA.G.Bissell,BureauofShipsJ./J,Jenkins,BureauofbhipsNoahKahn,NewYorkJavalShipyard ..,,,.4.R.Osgood,DavidTaylorLodelBasinI . N.ESPromisel,Bureauofj~eronauticsR.A.:~iley,BureauofShipsL,D.l[illi~s,3ureau.ofbhipsQopyNo.43-~]~v~lAcademy,postGraduate~chool

    GopyNo.44 -ZopyNo.45 -COPYJO. 46 -Copies47 andCopies49and

    copyNoe51 -Copy;?0. 52-

    CopyIJo.53-

    copyNo.54-

    :JavalResear&~~boratoryPhiladelphia.~avalShipyardU.S.UavalengineeringExperimentStation48-PublicationsBoard,NavyDepartmentviaBureauof .,

    Ships,Code330c . . .50- TechnicalLibrary,dureauofShips,Code337-L

    ,..

    U.S.CoastGuard .,..

    CaptainR.B.Lank,Jr.,USCG ...-. .JaptainG.A.Tyler,USCG,.

    U.S.MaritimeCommission.d.M.Martinsky

    ,.

    iiepresentativesof

  • CopyNo.55 - L.C.Bibber,Carnegie-IllinoisSteelCorporationcopyNo
  • FinalReportNavyBuShipsContractNObs-31222

    ProjectbR-92

    CAUSESOF CIJ3AVAGEFRACTUREIN SHIPPLATE .

    ...

    FLATPLATETLSTSAIUlADDITIONALT&STSON LAi?.GETUBES

    August1946

    From:UniversityofCaliforniajBerkeley,CaliforniaIi.P.QIBrien,TechnicalRepresentative

    Reportpreparedby:HarmerE,Davis )G.d.Troxell ) ~ngineeringLaterialsLaboratorydarlR.Parker ) UniversityofCaliforniaA.Boodberg )

  • Page

    .

    Abstract....................................~ListofTables...............................ListofFigures..............................~ntroduction.*.~............,.....0.........4ixperimentalliork.......0......0...,.......~~TestResults*6l*l l,l.l.l l*l l.l,...0.0 l **O* 900DiscussionofResults*O**l l l l.........l l*l aoaConcluslonse............*...2......00..,OOOOO.

    Organization00**.e.0.l.....0.l l.l .*.l..r,eoBibliography.................................

    AppendixA-ResidualStrainsinFractured...Plates

    Appe,tilxB- SummationofResultsofTests...ofLargeTubularSpecimens

    AppendixC-StandardTensionTestsatLow.,.Temperatures

    AppendixD-StudiesonGeometricallySimilar.bpecimens

    iiivv

    1

    356

    u

    1718

    19

    20

    27

    29

  • ii.,.,: ABSTRACT

    ....

    .. .. .,.~.

    Tiisreportsumarizesthe ;.. .

    ofterminationofU,S.HavyBtihipkThematerialsusedinthis

    .,

    killedhull.qualitysteels,one10bof&ckelalloy,onelotoffully-killed,

    testresultsonwideflatplatestodatecontractNObs-31222,August31,1946.

    ..

    investigationwerethreelotsofsemi-

    ,, .,,, .,.,.

    andonelotoffully-killedquenchedfiddrawnsteel.ThespecimensusedintheprincipalprogramWere3/4~nchthick

    ,,,,

    platescontaininga narrowtransverseslotkavingalengthequaltoonefourthofthespecimenwidth.Theseweretestedintensioninwidthsrangingfrom

    ,,,.

    ,..,

    i2inchesto108inches.Testswere&deateachofafiumberoft~peratures,,,, .:

    inordertodetermine-theternperatureatwhichthemodeoffailurechanged..!,

    fromsheartocleavagetype..... ,,.

    Inthetests,observationsweremadeofthefollowing:themaximumload,loadatdevelopmentofcracks,fractureload,energyabsorbedtomaximumIoadjmodeoffracture, !.straindistributionoverthefacesofplatesand

    ,.,. ,.thicknessreductionsnearthelinesoffracture.Resultsfromtestsofwideflatnotci,ed

    . .itiontemperaturesofsemi-killedsteelsmayvary

    ,,.

    platesindicatedfromfreezingto

    thattrans-wellabove

    ..

    . . :.:.roomtemperature.Testsoftwolotsofsteelofessentiallythesamechemicalcomposition,exceptfornitrogencontent,revealedthatthesteelwithtb~

    ,,

    highernitrogencontenthada considerablyhighertransitiontemperature.The..

    microstructureofthesteelwiththehighertransitiontemperaturewasalsoconsiderablycoarser.NoappreciabledifferenceintransitiontemperatureswasfoundwhenonelotofsteelwastestedintheIas-rolledrtandinthenormalizedconditions.

    ...,.

    . .

    .

    .

  • iiiImprovedmetallurgicalstructureofanotherlotofsteel,

    accomplishedbyrequenchingandredrawingatalowertemperature,resulted;,>,,. ;,

    inloweringofthetransition;temperatureandanincreaseintheabilityto!, .,.,

    . .

    absorbenergy.The3+percentnickelsteelwasfoundtobefarsuperiortothe

    ,,,..,

    mildsteel,havingamuchlowertransitiontemperatureanda higherenergy,.

    absorption.,, ,..,

    ItwasfoundthattheCharpy~:e.i~ie-notchimpacttests,tension.,

    testsof3 inchwida:edge-notchedspecimensandtensiontestsofcentr~&-,...

    notched12--inchand72-inchwideflatplatesareall.usefulforratingthestee~sinorderoftheirrelativebrittleness.Howeverjthetransitiontemperatureforanyparticularsteel,asdeterminedbythevarioustests,differconsiderably,withthelargertestspecimensgivingnigheranibetter

    ,.,,,,definedtransitiontemperatures.

    ,.,.,,.

    Thenominalstrengthofplateswasfoundtodecreaseslightlyas,.,

    ,,-,;thewidthofthetestspecimenwasincreased,thistendencybeingmorepro-

    ,...,,

    nouncedforspecir,ensfailinginshear.Transitiontemperatureswerefoundtodecreaseasthespecinen

    thicknesswasdecreased,~~effectintroducedbygeometryandtheadditional!,-..rolling.

    ,,

    Antiberofsupplementalstudiesweremadetoprovideadditional.+ ,,...,, ;:informationoncertainquestionsraisedbytheprincipaltests.Resultsof

    1~2whilea studysomeofthesestudieswerereportedinpreviousreports,,..,.,

    ofgeometricallysimilarspecimenstocheckthevalidityofmodellaws,,,

    .. .

    andresultsoftestsoftensionbarsatlowtemperaturearegiveninappencjicesofthisreport.

    1,2 SeeBibliography

  • IV

    ListofTables

    TableNo. PageNo,1

    2

    3456

    78

    9

    10B-1

    D-1

    DescriptionoftheSteelsUsedandtheProgramofTestsPropertiesofSteelsUsedintheInvestigationChemical.AnalysesofIndividualPlatesResultsofStandardTenfiionandHardnessTestsSumnaryofResultsforHidePiateTestsSummaryofThicknessReductionsAlongFractureLinesSumnaryofResultsfor3-in.HidePlateTestsComparisonofTransitionTemperatureRangesasDeterminedbyVariousTypesofSpecimensReductioninThicknessof?l.ate- %mplesof

    31

    323334-3637-3839-V!J

    42-4445

    46FracturedPlatesfromShipst},atFailedinServiceLoadatDevelopmentofCracks 47SummaryofTestResultsfor20--In.Diameter 48TubesSummaryofResultsofTestsonGeometrically49SimilarSpecifnens

  • LISTOFFIGURES,,

    Fig.No..

    Title- 12.

    3L

    56

    7

    8

    9

    10

    111213L!+

    16

    1718a18b18c

    Viewof108inchspecimenread;fortestingat32FResultsofCharpyImpactT~sts-SteelAResultsofCharpyImpactTests-SteelB,as-rolledResultsofGharpy.lnBactTests.-SteelB,normalized.,

    ResultsofCharpyImpactTests+SteelCResultsofCharpyImpactTests- SteelIiComparisonofresultsofCharpyImpact-TestsforSteelsA,B>C,H$NandQ ,.

    ,.

    Variationwithtemperatureofenergytomaximtuploadfor72-inchspecimens ..

    Variationwitkitemperatureofei~ergytomaximumloadfor12-inchspecimens,spmi-.,killeds%K!.s

    ,.

    Variationwithtemperatureofenergytomaximumload12-inchspecimens,specialsteels ,

    ..

    Transitiontemperatures,72-inchspecimmsTransitiontemperatures?12-inchspeciri%s

    v

    Page

    50.

    ..,~

    for

    Transitiontemperatures~3-inchedgenotchedspecimensTransitiontemperatures,,3-inchedgenotchedspecimensofC steel,cutfromplatesofvarioustkiiCk~SSeSTransitiontemperatures,3-inchedgenotchedspecimensofCsteel~machiried.to-variousthicknessesfroi11/8

    ..inchthickplate ,..,

    Transitiontemperatures,,proportionaledgenotched

    5152535.45556

    57

    58

    59

    60616263

    64

    65specimensofC steel,cutfromplatesofvariousthicknessesTransitiontemperatures~yariclustypesof3..hdl S.pectiens66V&iationinnominalstresswithwidthof.plate;tests ;7atroomtemperature, ,Variationinnominalstresswithwidthofplate;,,tests67at50~Variationinnominalstresswithwidthofplate;tests 67at320F

  • vi-

    . .. ... .

    Fig.No,19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    21i

    25A25B25C25D25E25F26272829

    A-68to

    A-153B-1B-2B-3B-4B-5

    B-6

    LISTOFFIGURES- ConttdTitle

    Variationinmaximumnominalstresswithwidthof 6$plate;testsresultingincleavageandsheartypefractluresVariationinnominal.stresswithtemperatureforflat 69platespecimens;testsof12-inchand72-inchspecimensElongationatmaximumload,illustratinginfluenceof 70platewidthonductilityatmaximumloadResidualelongationafterrupture,illustratinginfluence71ofplatewidthonductilityatfailure3-inchwidespecimensshowingthefourtypesoftension72barsusedintheinvestigation .,

    ,.

    Locationsintheplatespecimensofportionsoffractures73.

    showninFig.25- SpecimenH-$D,viewoffractureatnotch(5x)SpecimenH--1OD,viewoffractureatnotch(5x)SpecimenH-82XD,viewoffractureatnotch(5x]. .SpecimenH-8D,cutacrossthicknessofspecimen(50x)SpecimenH-1OD,cutacrosstkicknessofspecimen(50x)SpecimenH-82XD,cutacrossthicknessofspecimen(50x)

    ,.:,,PhotomicrographsofspecimensfromsteelQ

    ,.

    Photomicrographsofthevarioussteels

    Percentelongationsongridsoffracturedspecimens

    ViewoftubeIO!!after.fractureViewoftubeIILIIafterfracture

    1.Straindistributionhtube11011after

    ,,

    Straindistributionintube~!L1lafterEffective-stressvs.at-40% ,Effective-stressvs.atTOT

    effective-strain

    effective-strain

    ,,

    ,,

    rupture

    rupture

    fortubestested

    fortubestested

    .-

    7475&767778?98081to

    16616716E?169170171

    172

  • viiLISTOFFIGURES-Cont?d

    Fig.No.R-7B-8B-.9

    B-loB-nc-lC-.2c-3C-L+

    D-1D-2

    D-3

    D-4

    D-5

    Title.

    PageNo.

    &tensionoftubellOltatvariousloads 173IbctensionoftubeILI1atvariousloads 174Effective-stressvs.effective-strainforsmalltubes 175testedonNDRCProjectNRC-77Truestressvs.naturalstrainforcouponscutfromtubelIJI1176Photographofdefectinplatenearoriginofbreakintubel!LltdffectoftemperatureontensilepropertiesofsteelAEffectoftemperatureontensilepropertiesofsteelBEffectoftemperatureontensilepropertiesofsteelCEffectofcoldworkingatvarioustemperaturesoncleavagefracturestrengthat-3000F

    Dimensionsofgeometricallysimilarsizeeffectspecimens~~o~alstress-straincurvesforlongitudinalelementsatbaseofnotchfor3,6,and12-inchspecimensVariationoflongitudinalstrainwithverseaxikof3-5nchspe+.menVariationoflongitudinalstrainwithfromnotchfora3-inchspecimenApparatusformeasuringphotogridson

    distancefromtrans-

    transversedistance

    sizeeffectspecimen

    177178179180181

    182182

    183

    183

    184

    -

  • ,

    .., FINALREPORTNa~BuShipsContractNObs-31222

    Project~SR-92CLEAVAGEFRACTUREOFSHIPPLATdASINFLUENCED

    ,,

    i.NDMETALLURGICALFACTORSFlatPlateandTube:

    .,...,.,

    August,1946Tests

    .BYDESIGN

    .

    R.%ril: UniversityofCalifornia,BerkeleyJM.P.0113rien,Technicalrepresentative

    ,...,.

    ,California

    ReportPreparedby:..,....} ,.. ,

    Haimer;:d.Davis ) , ,.G..d.Troxell ) EngineeringM&terialsLaboratoryEarlR-parker ) UniversityofCaliforniaAlexanderBoodberg) .,:

    ,.,..,

    .,

    .

    Theoriginatedby

    ..,..,,!thecausesof

    INTRODUCTIONworkcoveredbythisreportispartoftheresearchprQgramtheOfficeofScientificResearchandDevelopment,tadeterminecleavagetypefailureofshipplate.Theworkconductedby

    theUniversityofCaliforniawas,dividedintotwoparts:Part1 consistedoftestsconductedprincipallyon.!

    inPart2tgstswereconductedoncoiner-structure.ThisreportisnotchedflatplatestoAugust31,

    .!

    centrallynotchedlargeflatplates,and.

    builtupsectionssimulatingahatchconcernedprimarilywiththeworkon1946,t,hedateoftheterminationofthe

    ..

    contract.Alsoreportedhereinaretheresultsoftestsontwolargetubularspecimensfabricatedfromshipplate,whichtestsweremadetosupplementtheinformationobtainedinapreviousinvestigation,NRC-75.

    TheworkonProjectNRC-.92startedinNovember,,19~,andwasconductedundertheauspicesoftheOfficeofScientificResearchand

  • 2DevelopmentuntilAugust31,1945,dndwasstipervisedbytheVarNietallurgyComittee.Afterthatdatetheprogram-;~ascontinuedunderUnitedStatesXavyContractNobs-31222eThechiefphaseoftheinvestigationwasthe

    ,:

    determinationofthetemperatureatwhichoccurredthetransitionfromductilejsheartypefailurestobrittle,cleavagetypefailuresforseveraltiypesofsteelandforvariouswidthsofplates.Theworkwasconfinedprimarilyto3/4-inchthickplatesthathadtransversenotchesatthemid-secticns.Sixdifferentlotsofsteelwereinvestigatedinthismanner,thespecimdnwidthsrangingfrom3 inchesto108inches.Aprogramofsupplementarytestswasalsoundertallenthatincludedthefollowing:standardtensiontestsonfullthicknesscoupons,Charpyimpacttests,hardnessanalyses,metallographi.cexaminations,andhardnesssurveysofplates.

    tests,tensiontests,chemicalthefractured

    Twopreviousreports1~2coveredtheprogressoftheinvestigationindetailtoApril30,1946.Thecontinuationoftheworkto~ugustj1946,andthefinalresultsaredescribedinthisreport.

    TestresultsandtheworkdoneinconnectionwithtwolargetubesaregiveninAppendixB. ThesetestscompletetheworkstartedonNDRCProject

    showingtested.

    NW-753,.

    AppendixA ofthisandtheproiiousreportlcontaindrawings,.

    thepercentelongationsandpathsoffractureforalltheplatesAppendixCgivestheresultso.Pstandardtensionteststhatwere

    ., ...,,,.

    conductedatlowtemperatures,andAppendixDgivestheresultsofstudiesongeometricallysimilar,specimens,

    ,,,,,

    .

    1,2,3 SeeBibliography

  • EXPERIMENTALdORK

    .

    .

    .,

    !,,

    . . .

    TestProgram,.-. .

    The~,incipalphaseoftheprograminvolvedtensiontestsofwide,,.,..... ..+.. .,

    3/4-inchthickflatplatespecimensofthevarioussteels,atseveraltemper-. ,}, .:..

    .,

    atwesinordertodetermimethetemperaturerangeatwhichthemodeof,..

    failurechangedfromsheartocleavagetype.Theplateswerenotchedatthemid-secti~]withatransverseslothavingalengthequaitoonequarterofthewidthoftheplate.Formostofthesteels,plates12-,24-,48-,and72-inches.inM@dthweretested.Two108-inchwidespecimenswerealsotested,

    ,..,.

    onemadeo,fsteelBintheas-rolledconditionandonemadeofsteelC. The,,

    ....,..,

    m~imumloadttheloadatdevelopmentofcracks,theloadatfailure,the>

    modeoffracture,theamountofenergyabsorbedtothemaximumload,there-,. ,,.:,,...,

    ducti.oninthicknessnearthebreak>andthestratidistributiononthefaceoftheplateweredeterminedforeachofthespecimenstested.

    Asanauxiliaryprogram,tensiontestsundercontrolledconditions:,w{ereconductedon~-inchwidespecimenstodeterminethetransitionranges

    ,,,, !,,,forthevarious,steels.Three3-inchspecimenswereeasilyandcheaplypre-pared;the,f,ourtypesusedintheinvestigationareshowninFig.23.

    Thedescriptionofthesteelsusedandtheprogramoftestsare,..

    givenin,Table1. Thesummaryofphysicalpropertiesandchemicalanalyses,,., ,.

    ofthesteelsare,giveninTable2.,, ,, ,.

    TestProcedure,...,Adetaileddescriptionofthetestingandgagingmethodsisgiven,. .,

    .

    inthepreviousreport.1Fig.1 sliowsatestset-upinthe3-millionpoundtestingmachinefora108-inchwidespecimen;theplywoodboxservedasa

    .,, .

    temperaturecontrolchamber.NumerousSR-4electricstraingagesand,,.

    resistance-wireextensometerswereusedonthefacesofeachspecimen,..

    1 SeeBibliography

  • measuretheelasticandplasticstrains.Residualstrainsweremeasured.,..

    mcansofd specialmechanical;gageusedona systemofgridsthatweremarkedononefaceofeachspecimentested.TheresultsofthesegridmeasurementsaregiveninAppendixA. .,,

    Q1

    weretakencmreadingsweresistance-wir~

    specimenswereloadeduntilfractureoccurredandreadingsstraingagesatinteAalssot}iatatotaiofatleast10strainbbt+aineduptoam&chumload.Fromthereadingsofallre-6xtensometershavingalengthequeltothree-fourthsofthe

    specimenwidth,anaverageelongationforthespecimenwascomputedandplotted;andbyfitegratiohoftheresultingload-straindatatheenergy

    .

    absorbeduptoa...

    max&umloadwasdetermined.,. ,.

    : Specimensweremaintainedatthedesiredtemperaturethroughoutthetestbycirculatingheatedorcooledairthioughaplywoodboxthaten-closedthespecimen.Awindowwasprovidedintliisboxinorderthattheforhtionoftiracksandthepropagationofthefractur~couldbeobserved..,,,... Sincetheearlierresultsofwideplatetestsindicatedthattherewasatendency:forthenominalstrengtfioftheplatetodecreaseasthewidthoftheplateincreased,iti~as-decidedtotestafew10&inchwide

    ,..

    platestoverifythis. , .:..Asno10&inchwidepiateswerebediatelyavailable,two7Zby120-inchplateswereweldedtogetheralongthelongedgeandthen.

    ..

    trimmedtothe108-inchwidthsothattheweldedjointwasalongthelongi-tudinalaxhofthespectien. ,,-.Inordtirtotikesurethattheseamhadnoeffectonthestraindistribution,severaitestswereconductedon23-,48-,

    ,,

    and72-inchwideplatesthat~~eremadeupoftwonarrowerplateswitha,.-.

    longitudinalunionmeltsea&.Thesewereequippedwithnumerousstraingagestocheck-thestraindistri%utioniNoappreciabledifferencewasfound

    .. . ,

    -

  • .betweenmadeup

    5thestraindistributionj.ns~~cimensmadeofwholeplateandthosewitha centerseam. .,.,. ,,,

    .. ....

    ,.,,

    ,.,.,.. .

    TestResults..: ,...

    Theresultsof.,chemi,calanalysesofsamplesfromindividualplates.. .

    ..

    ofthevarioussteelsaregivenin,Table3,andtheres~tsofthestandardtensionandhardnesstestsaretabulatedinTable40

    Table.5givesthes~aryofresultsforthenotchedwide-plate.:

    tests,andTable6summarizesthethicknessreductionsalongfracturelinesforthesameplates.

    .,.,

    Tinecompleteresultsofthe3-inchwideplatetests.,

    aresummarizedinTable7. ResidualstrainsaregivenintheAppendixA ofthisandthepreviousreport.~

    Resultsoft~leCharpykeyhole-notchimpacttestsfor.thevarious..

    steelsaregiveninFigs.2to7inclusive.Hotchesweremachinedperpen-diculartotheplaneoftheplateforallCharpyspecimens.

    Table8givesa comparisonofthetransitiontemperaturesforthevarioustypesofspecimenstested.

    Table9 summarizesthereduct~ohsinthicknessofplateobtainedfromsamplesoffracturedplattisofshipsthatfaiiedinservice.

    ,.

    Dataonthenominalstress,,

    crackstar{edaregiveninTab~e10.Transitiontemperattiesas

    ..-.

    inth$largeflatspecimensatwhich.,,

    definedbyttx.energyabsorbedto,,

    maximumloadarerepresentedinFigs.8;~,and10forthe72-and12:-inch,,

    widespecimensofthevarioussteels. ..,,

    Figs.11~i2and13presentthetransitionranges,asdefinedbythepercentoffractureintheshearmode,for72-,12+;and3-inchwidespecimensforthest;elsusedintheinvestigation> ,.

    ~e Bibliography

  • 6Figs.14, 15, 16and..l7showtemperatwe.transitionrangesfor

    thevarioustypesof3-inchwidespecimens.Figs.18and19showthevariationofnominalstressofa specimen

    withwidth,whileFig.20showsthevariationofthenominalskresswith,. ,:

    t~}]eratureforthe12-and72-inchwidespecimens.1,

    Figs;21and22shhtheinfluenceofspecimenwidthonductilityatmaximumloadandatfailure.

    ,,

    Fig.23showsthefourtypesof3-inchwidespecimensused.fintheinvestigation.

    .,

    Figs.varioussteels.

    ,.,

    27to29inclusiveshowtypicalphotom.ocl~gre,~>ljsforMe

    DiscussionofResults. .....-

    :.,

    Theflatpla-betests.provodco~clusivelythati?,waspossiiletoproduceinthelaboratorybrittlec].cava.gofrac-kUuresidentic.a.;.wit$~ttilosefoundonsectionsoffracturedsteel~liips.Theth~cknas.s:cedu~tici?~fortheflatplatesarelistediJITable6; thesemay-becomparedwithsimilarmeasurementslistedinTao].e:9,,@-jich~~ei+emadeonportionsoffracturedplateScutfrom.ships.Twotypesoffracturesoccurredintl-le.laboratorytests,(l),thenormalductileshea??-typefractureand(2)thecleavage-typefracture,whichmayoccurwithoutappreciabledvc~ility.butwhichmayalso.beprecededbyagreatdealofplasticflow~:,Athightemperatures,shear,fracturesin-variablyocc.~red.andatsufficientlylowtemperaturesthesteelsfailedbycleavage.Atanintermediatetemperature,whichiscalledthetransitiontemperature,thefractureoccurred-eitherbyshearorcleavageorbyamixtqreofboth.Steelsmayberated.inarelativeorderbycomparingthetransitiontemperaturesofthematenials

    . ....

    ofbrittlenessandbycomparing

  • 7theenergiesabsorbedbythematerialsatbothhighandlowtemperatures.!,Intheflatplateinvestigation,transitiontemperaturesweredeterminedby,,

    meansofCharpykeyhole-notchimpacttestsandbytensiontestson3-,12-,24-,48-,and72-inchwidecentrally-notchedspecimens.

    Oneofthemostsignificantresults,oftheinvestigationisthatallofthetestsusedfordeterminingtherelativebrittlenessof.steels

    ,,

    ratethesteelsinapproximatelythesameorder.Formoststeels,thelargespecimensgavedefinitetransitiontemperatures,This,however,wasnot

    .,.

    foundtobe,truefortheCharpy,,

    ,,.

    rangeoftemperatureoverwhich,,:,

    Figs.2 to7clearlyillustratefortheCharpytests,listedin

    spectiensjwhichinmanycasesshowedawidethetransitionfromshearto,,cleavageoccurred.thiseffect.The

  • 8. .

    . spreadbetweentransition.

    widespecimenseemstobetie steel

    thewider

    temperaturesofthedifferentsteels,the12-inch,;i,;.,

    moreSuits-blcthanthewiderspecimensforratinginorderoftheirrelativebrittleness;Fromtheoreticalconsiderations,itisreasonabletoexpectthatnotchedplateswouldhavehighertransitiontemperaturesthantli.~

    narrowerones.Itissomewhatsurprising,howeicr,thatinseveralcasestherewaslittleeffectofplatewidthonthbtransitiontemperaturewhilewithothersteelslarge differencesintransitiontemperaturewerefound,Thereseemstobenosimpleexplanationforth{~scresults,Thetransition. .temperatureverylikelyisafunctionoftheamountofplasticflowwhich

    .,.

    has.occurredpriortotheonsetoffracture.It:ispossitilethatamore,.

    detailedstudyoftheconditionsoflocalplasticflowaroundthvnotchesoftheindividualplateswoulddisclosethereasonsforthedifferencesinbehaviorofthevarioussteels.

    FromthetheoreticalconsiderationsdevelopedinthesectionfStudiesofFormationandGrowthofCracksinNotchedPlatesr~ofNDRCReport,

    ....,

    OSRD6452);2itfollows,thatforanotchofagiv&shaipness,t~letrans-itiontemperatureshouldincreasewithincreasingplatethic.~essuptoacertainthicknessafterwhichincreasingtheplatethicknessstillfurthershouldcausenochangeintransitiontemperature.Apparentlythisistrue

    .,becausethetransversestressdevelopedbyrestraintissmallinthinplatesbut,wi,thincreasingthickness,itgraduallyincreasestoamaximumvalue

    ,

    whichwouldprobatdlyre.nainconstantwithfurtherincreaseinplatethick-ness.Toobtainanestimateoftheeffectofplatethickness,somespecialtestswereconducted.TheresultsofthesetestsareshowninFigs.14and15. Platethicknessesrangingfrom$-to1l/8-inchweretestedintheform

    ..

    of3-inchwideedge-notchesb~.~~todeterminethetransitiontemp&atures.2,

    ~eeBibliography.-

  • 9,. ,,

    ofeachthici:nessofplate.TWOseries were tested:(1)platesfromthe,.

    sameheatrolledtoeachofthevariousthicknessesand(2)platesfromthethickestrolledplatemachinedtoeachofthevarious:thicknesses.Thefirstseries(resultsshowninFig.14)involveddifferen~esin~etallurgical.structurebroughtaboutb~thedifferencesinro3&&proce$hresaswellasdifferencesinspecimenthickness.Thesecondseries:(resultsshownin

    ,.

    Fig.15)involvedonlydifferencesinspecimen,thicknessbecauseallspecimensweremachinedfromthesameplate.Theeffectofplatethicknessuponthetransitiontemperatureisver~~evidentinFig,L4;Theresultsindicatethatwhentheplatethicknessexceedsoneinch,thetransitiontemperatureisapparentlyindependentofplatethickness.Thisconclug,ionisnotdefinitejhowever,andadditionaltestsonthickerplatesandon.othersteelsshould

    ,,

    bemade.Itispossiblethatthethicknesseffectdiffersforvarioussteels.Theeffectofadditionalrolling;assl!ownbycomparingFig.15

    andId+,istoraisethetransitiontemperatureofthesteel.,Tiliseffectisinagreementwiththeknowneffectsofrolling-upontheothermechanicalpropertiesofsteei. ..

    ,,.,

    ComparisonofFig.14and16indicatethatthewidth.anddepthofnotchandminorvariationsinwidttiofthespecimenhavelittleeffecton

    ,,.-

    thetransitiontemperaturerangesofedgenotchednarrowspecimen::,FromexaminationofresultsforsteelCin,Fig.17,whichgivesa

    comparisonofthetransitionrangesforvarious.typ@of3-inchwide ,.

    specimens,itappearsthatshe~rededgesofthe.platasasreceivedfromthemillhadundergonestrainagingandcontainedsmall,cr.ackswhichactedasmoresevere

    ,.,

    edgesorinstressraisersthannotchesthecenterofthespecimen.

    madewithhaoksawseith~;ratthe,,,,

    ,,....

    ..:,.. .,.

    -

  • -LO

    Thetestresultsforthe3-inchwideplatesindicatesthatthe...$1

    steelscanbearrangedinapproximately,thesaneorderbymeansofthese,. .,

    testsasbytensiontestofwidenotchedplates,althoughtheactualtransitiontemperaturesmay

    Testsof108-inchdifferforthetwotypes-oftests.widespecimensfailedtoindicatethatthere

    isadefinitedropinnominalstre,ngthast:h,etestspeci,menwidthisin-creasedbeyond72inches.fixaminationofFigs.18and19showthatthere

    ,,,-

    isaconsiderabledropinnominals,trength,ofnotchedtestspecimens,asthewidthisincreasedto24inches.Furtherincreasesinspecimenwidth

    ,. ,.,

    havelittleeffectonthestrength. ,..,

    Thereductioninnominalstrengthissomewhatmorepronouncedforspeciinen$failinginshearthanforthosethatbreakbycleavage.

    Variationofnominalstresswithtemperattieisnotveryevidentfortspeciaillsteelsusedinthisinvestigationalcanbeseenfromex-aminati.onofFig.20.ThestrengthofsteelsN,Q,ahdQSisnotaffectedbytemperature,whilethatofthesemi-killedsteelgkoup(steelsA,B,and

    ,,,.!C)tendstobelowerattemperaturesbelowthetransitiontemperaturefortheparticularsteel.Theiully--kili.ed,fiteelH doesnotexhibitanyappreciabledecreaseinstrengthwithlowertemperaturesforth~12-inchspecimens~butbehavesinthetestsof72-inchspecimens.

    ,,

    samemannerasthesemi-killedsteelgroupin.,,

    ,),,.

    :..

    Comparisonsoftheelon~ationatmaximumloadandatfractureofplatesthatbehavedinaductileandarelativelybrittlemanneraregiveninFigs.21and22.Theelongationsaresl-,owninpercentyandtocompareplatesofdifferentsizes,thelocationsofthegagepointsonwhichthe

    ,.. ,!measurementsweretakenareplottedasfractionsofthespecimenwidth.Amarkeddifferc--eW be-..Jbetweenspecimensthatfailedinshear

  • uandt~ose-thatfailedplatesexhibitedmuchspecimensthatfailed

    bycleavage,Fbr s~ecimensfailingby,~heti,narrower,,greaterducti~itiy;this,however,wasnottruefor

    bycleavage.,~~Dtiingthecourseofthetests,certainspecimensexhibited~~

    anomalousbehaviors.Inparticular,spdcimehsIW,H1O,andH82Xwhichwerecutfromthes~elargeplate&diestedatthesametemperaturebehavedentirelydifferently.SpecimenHIOabsorbedmorethantwicethetiountofenergyth~nwasabsorbedbyitssupposedduplicate,spectienH62X;specimenH8absorbedmorethanttiee~imesasmuchenergyasspeci.menH82X,Thesespecimenswerestudiedindetailtodeterminethecauseforthedis-crepancy.A studyofthesurfaceofthefracturenear.thebaseofthenotchrevealedthatthespecbefiswhichhadabsorbedtheabnormallyhighainountofenergyhadmanyopefi~sinthemetalrunningperpendiculartothesurfacedfthefractureandperpendiculartotheapexofthenotch.ThiseffectisshowninFigq25awhichshowsthesurfaceofthefractureadjacenttothebaseofoftheportiontheportionof

    thenotch.Fig.2&skio~istheofthefractureshowninFig.thefracturenearthebaseof

    locationintheplatespecimen25:SihUarphotographsofthenotchforspecimenH1O

    andH82XareshowninFigs.25band25crespectiiv~lyeTheopeningsinthemetalperpendiculartothefracturesurfacewereprogressivelyfewerinnumberandsmallerinsizefortheSpeeim&swhichfracturedwithlowenergy.TF~issuperficialexami.nationirididatedthatthemetalwasopeningalongseamsofnonmetallicinclusions.ThecausefortheopeningwasthePoi&son~sratiocontractioninthethicknessdirectionbroughtaboutbythelongi-tudinalextensionofthemetslbytheload.Sectionswerethentakerithroughthethicknessandperpendiculartothefracturesurfaceformicroscopic

  • iiexamiiiation.The;re&ltsaresho~vninFig&~2jd,25e,and2$f.These:photomicrographtiAh,iithesmalltransversefratituresprogressingalonglines

    ,.

    ofnonmetallicinclusions.SpecimenH1O~acP.manymore~inerofnonriiqtdlicinclusions,alongwhichthetransversefracturesc~uldoccureasilcy,t:1=.r~didspecimenH82X.SpecimenH8hadstillmoreI:inesO:nohmetallicsth:~~didspecimenHIO,Theextensiveseparationofthemetalinsped-menH8

    .,,,.

    alonglinesofinclusionspreventedthetran&versestressfrombuilding,,

    uptoitsnormal(probablyhigh)value,andthus:b~fectivelyincreasedtheshearstressandproniot$dplasticflow;thusa~argetiountofenergywasabsorbedalthoughthespecimeneventuallyfailed$bycleavage.Thespecimenactedessentiallyas:thoughitwerecanposeclofanumberofthiririerplatesplacedfacetofacetoforma ccvnpositethickplkte.SpecimenH82Xwascutfromadifferentpartoftheorigitiallargeplatewklichhappenedto

    .,

    containfewernonmetallicandconsequentlybehavedinamorenormalmannerthandidspecimensH8andHIO(seeFig.10whichgivestheenergyvs.temperaturecurveforthissteel).Theconclusionrsachedasaresultofthisstudyisratherunusual.Nonmetallicinclusions;ordinarilyconsidered

    ,.

    undesirable,actedinthiscasetomakethesteellessnotct~-sensitive,andhencetiproveditsperformance. .

    AnotherunusualresultwasobtainedwiththeQ steelwhichhad.,ibeenquenchedtiddrawn.Intheoriginalheattreatedcondition;thissteel

    wasnotparticularlyoutstanding.Howeverjwhenrequenchedfrom1600Fandredrawnat1245%for2hours,itsperformancewasmarkedlyimproved.ItS

    ,.:.transitiontemperaturewasloweredslightlyjbutmoreimportantwastheb-.provementobtainedintheamountofenergyrequiredtorupturethematerial.Themicrdstructures6fthissteelareshotiinFig@26,Themicrostructure

  • oftheQSspecimens

    steelwasverymuchlikethatofsteelQ,.,

    ofsteelQthereappearedtobesomefree

    13butinsomeof-theferrite.Theworst

    exampleofthiswasfoundinspectienQ-lwhichfracturedwith~ofienergy,,,

    atatemperatureconsiderablyaboiethenormaltransitiontemperattieforthissteel.Whenthisspecimenwasexaminedmicroscopically,itwasfoundtohavean&usualmi.crostructtie.(iceFig.26c)Muchwas@eSentinthiss:pecimenth&intheottidrsoftheQpresenceoffreeferriteinquenchedanddrawnsteelsofbeenfoundinotherteststobeassociatedwith&bnormal

    morefreeferriteseries,Thethistypeilasalsobrittleness.The

    brittlebehaviorofspecimenQ-1thusseemstobeinlinewiththeknown,,,.,behaviorsofthesteelshavingsmilarmicrostructure.Thefreeferrite

    couldbetheresultof(1)inadequatequenchor(2)reheatingslightly,.

    abovethelo~iertransformationduringthetemperingtreatment.Thereis-sti~iadeplorablelackof-fundtilentaliiiformationabout,.

    thebehaviorofsteelinthevicinityofanotch.Thewideflatplate.:,

    testshaveclearlydemonstratedthateachsteelbehavesdifferentlyandtfiat&erit~&ielativebehavibisaredifferentfordifferentplatesizes,,

    Theneedforafundamentalstudyofthebehaviorofsteelsinthenotchedconditioniscleaplyindicatedbytheresultsofthetestsperformedonwideflatnotchedplates. .,

    ,,.,,.

    ~,,,t,, ., , .,. :

    ,..

    ./

    l.

  • u.!

    Conclusions,;The

    ..,.,.,

    ,>

    followingconclusionsseemjustifiedonthebasisofthe>..

    .,.

    resultsoftheentireinvestigationincluding.,

    1and2 (seeBibliography)aswelJ~asthenew;!

    timeinthisreport...

    theworkdoneunderReferences,,

    workpresentedforthefirst

    1. Fractureswereobtainedinthelaboratorywhich.:.

    appearanceandreductioninthicknesswiththosefoundin,, ,

    fracturedships.

    wereidenticalsectionsof

    in

    2. Allsteelstestedwerearrangedapproximatelyinthesameorder,,

    ofrelativebrittlenessbyCharpykeyhole-notchtestsad bytestsof,notchedplatesofdifferentCharpytestsarelowerthan

    3. Platesfailingby

    widths.Transitiontemperatui-esdeterminedbythosedeterminedbynotchedflatplatetests.cleavagefailwithslightlylowernominal

    ,

    stressvaluesthandosimilarplateswhichfailentirelybyshear,.,, ..

    4. Thechemicalcompositionhasa,parkedinfluenceuponthetrans-itiontemperatureofsteel.Thisiswelldemonstratedbytheresultsoftestsonthe3&percentnickelsteelwhichwasfarsuperiortothemild

    .,

    steelsbothofchemicalonsteelsAsitionwith

    .,,..

    intransitiontemperatureandinenergyabsorption.TheeffectcompositionwasfurtherdemonstratedbytheresultsoftestsandC. Thesesteelshadessentiallythesamechemicalcompo-theexceptionofthenitrogencontent.SteelA contained0.004

    percentnitrogenwhilesteelCcontained0.009percent.Thedifferenceinthebehaviorsofthesetwosteelsmaybemainlyduetothedifferencethenitrogencontent.However,themicrostructureofthesesteelsalsodifferedslightlyandpartofthedifferenceinpropertieswasprobablyduetothedifferenceinmetallurgicalstructure.Apparentlya higherrollingtemperaturehadbeenusedforsteelCthanforsteelA. The

    in

  • transitionte;aperatureahdenergyabsorption:areapparentlyaffected15..as

    muchbythemetallurgicalStfuct&eofthesteelastheyareby.thechemicalcomposition.SteelQ,whichwatiquenchedandwasgreatlyimprovedbyheat-treating,@hiSt&atmentferritefromthemicrostructure,

    drawnoriginally,eliminatedfree

    .,,.

    5* Forhull-qualitysteelsofthesemi-killedtype,producedunderordinaryconditionsofpresefitcommercialpractice,.thetemperaturesatwhichshearabove60

    themodeoffai~ureofsharplynotchedplateschangesfroma,ductiletoabrittlecleavagetypemayvaryfrombelowfreezingtowellroomtemperature.

    Intheset+st~itwasfoundthatonthebasisofthetransitiontemperatures,thesteelscouldbemoredefinitely.ratedbytests.of12-inchspecimensthantiytestsofwiderspecfiens.;7. k~it~thes~eshd~p~essofnotchandafixedratiooflengthofnotchtofiidthofplate,thenominalstrengthofplatesofthe.same

    .. thicknessdecreasedwithincreasingwidth.Thedecreaseinstrength.is,..

    considerableastheplatewidthisincreasedfromafewinchestooneortwofeet,butthedecreaseinstrengthisrelativelysmallastheplate

    ,,

    wid~h5areincreasedbeyondtwofeet:The~ndninaLstrengthofsteelBis:onIjabout1000psilessfi168-inchwideplaie~thanitisin72-inchwide

    :,,,. ,,,.

    plates. ,, ,:., .. .8. :?ithagivennotchgeometryanda-fixedplatewidth,thetrans-itiontemperaturewasfoundtoincreaseasthespecimenthickness.wasin-creased.Inspecimenscutfromplatesrolledtodifferentthicknessesfromthesameheatofsteel,twofactorsinfluencedthetransitiontemper-atures;thesewere(1)specimenthickness,and(2)metallurgicalconditionsintroducedbytheadditional.rollinggiventothethinnerplates.Thin

    .

  • 16specimensmac,hinedthahdidapec.tiens

    fromthickerplateshadhighertransitiontemperaturesofthesamethicknessinadefrom~s-rol.ledplates.

    ,; :9* SteelsC- be~rr~llged:i,n.~ed~eOrderofnotchsensitivitybytestsofedge-notched3-inchwidespecim@ks~S.bytestsofcentrally-notchedwiderplates,althoughtheactualtranshti.ontemperatureinaydifferforthetwotypesoftests. .,,,,::

    ~10. Fora seriesoftestsconductedongeometricallysimilarcentrally-notchedspecimens3,6,andlawsapparentlydonotholdu. Fortensiontests

    12-inchQswideittiasdemonstratedthatthemodelforfracture.madeoncylindricalun-notchedspecimensat

    varioustemperaturesdowntoliquid-airtemperature,bothyieldandfracturestrengthwerefoundtoincreaseasthetemperaturewaslowered.Asthetemperatureapproachedliquid-airtemperature,themodeof;fracturechangedfromthesheartothecleavagetype,anddecreased.Thecleavagestrengthatlowuponthestrainhistoryofthemateriel.

    thefracturefstressandductilitytem~ratureswasfoundtodependBarsstrainedatroomtemperature

    werefoundtohavehighercleavagestrengthwhensubse~uentlybrokenatliquid-airtemperature.3.2researchwithlowandthat

    .,we,l,d.

    ,,, ~,

    .,.

    ..,,: ,.

    Testsoftwoadditionaltubularspecimens,madetocompletetheprogramd.ginatedasNDRCProjectNRC-75,showedthatweldinghydrogencontentelectrodesapparentlydoesnotinprovetheductilitypostheatingto1100%affterweldingimprovestheductilit~ofthe

    .. ,,.-,

    ,,..,,

  • 17

    Organization~~. .:

    ,,..,;

    The.investigationsw&eCondu&edbytheUnivers,ityof:Califorrlia,inthehgineeringl(iaterialsLaboratory,liyP.O~Brien,DeanofWe College

    ..;.,. , ,, ~,.~.ofEngineering;wasth~Tech~ic&.Representat~veforlth~~oject.Thework

    .,,.

    wasunderthegel.eraldirectionofP.aymondi.Davis.,Directorofthe,.

    EngineeringMaterialsLaboratory.G.d.Tioxell.,ProfessorofQivilingi-,,

    neering,HarmerJ.Davis,AssociateProfessorofCivilEngineering,dariIi.,.

    Parker,AssociateProfessorofPhysicalMetallurgy,andA,Bo~dberg,kesearch,...flngmeerjwereinchargeofthetechnicalpliaiesoftheinvestigation.

    ,.

    SpecialstudieswereconductedbyCharlesH.Avery,JosephJ.l)eVito,R.Payne,andT.Robinson.Theskio~ work,weldingandriggingwasunderthesuper-visionoftilvinL.Whittier.OthermembersoftheprojectstaffwhohaveservedeitherD.~3ehM,~LarJ/i?. Brezee,E.

    fullorpart-tfieincluded:d.Bennett,N.Berliner,,D.~~.cleave,llinifredDunlop,

    J, Hancock~EloiseHornstein,R.Johnsen,

    P. R. Angell,G.Barringer,Berner,E,Betts,R.Bousquet,

    C.Glassgow,Davidd.Giobs,InezLeklak,Ruth,,imball,R,

    blorge,S.Lever,J.Logan,N.k,cLaaghlinjJ.Lednick,,/.liillins,JeanNeilson,F.OrmsbyjD.Peterson,li.T.Rains,VeraRideout,A.D.Ringjfi~F.Schord,Le.Seaborn,D.Unger,HarryE.Kennedy,ResearchAssociateasconsultantonspecialproblems.

    T.

    inYsmamoto,andPhebeZimmerman.theGollegeoftingineering,served

  • 18E31BLWWAEHY

    10 ProgressReport,BureauofShips,U.S.Navy,NObs-31222,SerialNo.SSC-2,CausesofCleavageFractureinShipPla:te)FlatPlateTestst,August1946.

    .,..,,.. ..... ,.

    2. FinalReport,OSRDNo.6452,SerialNo.M-608,Jan.1946,tCleavageFractureofShipPlateasInfluencedbyDesignandMetallurgicalFactors(NS-336):Part11-FlatPlateTests.!

    .. ...

    3. FinalReport,OSRDNo.6365,SerialNo,M-542}Dee,19i+5- tBenaviorofSteelUnderConditionofMultiaxiaJStresses afidEffectcfNeldlngandTemperatureoi]ThisBehavior(NS-306):TestsofLargeTub@LarSpebimens(hhipPlateberies)tifl~~ ~ ..

    4. FhalReportjOSRUNo.6593,SerialNo.M-6Q.,FebruaryJ-946jTBe~la~iorofSteelUnderConditionsofMultiaxialStressandtheEffectonThisBehaviorofMetdlographi.cStructureandChemical.Composition[HG-307);TestsofSmallTubular~pecimens.t

    5* AdvisoryReportjOSRI)NO.4060.,Ser:al1$0.li-345~Aug~.~.st~-94~+Js~ggestedSpecificaticnforFcrritj.cArnlor-,le]-dj.ng.JlectrodeTypellHC-2A~

    60 Office of Productio~.ResearchandDevelapme%,jhr%@.iictimBoardjReportNo.W=200. StudyoftineFmnningFYcpertiesofA1.umifiumA120ySheet-PlasticFlowin.biebals,lMay19i;5. .;.

    .7..Progress.ReportonuWhaviorofSteel.umderConi~tLo~,[email protected]~i:trSpecimmsji;OSFOReport45535SerialIJo.E-405,Ja.nu3~y1945.

    ?. ., .

    . . . .,.-.

    :... . .

    ,.

  • . .4...,,!.: . ...+,. ... -.,.,.,.. ,,, ;,,

    ... ,.,- .,

    .APPENDIXA:,.,

    ,

    ResidualStrainDistributioninI~otchedxFlatflate&terFracture

    A systemofrectangulargridsdescribedinaprevious.reportl,.

    wasappliedtoonefaceofal..thefiidenotchedflatplatesthatwere,.

    tested.Readingsreproducibleto~0.002werebkenbymeansofa specialmechanicalstraingagepriortothetest-andafterfracture.PercentelongationswereCalculatedforthedifferentgagelengthsandtheresultsarepresentedinFigs.A-68toA-153ofthisreport.Residualstraindis-tributionsforplatesbrokenintheearlierpartofthepresentedinFigs.A-1toA-67inclusiveoftheearliertobenotedthatthevaluesgiven& thefiguresdonot

    programwere

    report;lItisincludeelastic

    elongat~onsnorthethefractureline.onlyononefaceofduringfracturemay

    amountofseparationofthepartsoftheplatealongAlsojsincetheresidualelongationsweremeasuredtheplate,theeffectofpermanentbendingofaplatebeincludedinthevaluesshowninthefigures.In

    mostcases,however,verylittlebendinganddistortionoccurredduringfracture.

    Linesoffractureareshownonthedrawingsgridsystemisplotted.Thetemperatureoftest,thethemodeoffailureareindicatedcmthefigures;

    . . .

    . .

    1 beeBibliography,! ..

    .....

    forwhichtheoverallnominalstressand

    .

  • 20

    To

    APPENDIXB

    AdditionalTestsofLargeTubularSpecimensofUildSteelsupplyadditionalinformation,asaresultofquestionsraised

    bya studyofthedataobtainedfromthetestsonlargetubularspecimefisincludedintheprogramofworkofNDRCProjectNRC-75,3testsweremadeontwo additionaltubularspecimensat-/+OOFwitha stressratioof1:1.

    Thespecimenswerehollowcylinders20-inchesinoutsidediameter,18~-inchesininsidediameterand10-feetlong.Thetubesweremadebyformingtwo3/4-inchthickplatesintohalfcylindersandweldingthemtogetheralongtwo longitudinalseams180?apart.Thesamesteelwasusedasforthetubespreviouslytested(steelA).TheplatesusedinbothspecimensTL1landOwereheattreatedat11OOOFforalyut 8 hours afterfortingoperationswerecompleted.Fordetaileddescriptionoftheapparatususedandthetestpro-

    ,.

    cedurereferenceismadetotheoriginalreport.3 Specimen!1011waswelded

    withNRC-2Aelectrodesandwasnotstressrelievedafterwelding.Insofaras thefabricationprocedurewasconcerned$specimenLwasaduplicateofspecimenll!!andwasweldedwithE-6020electrodesandwasgivena so-calledofthe

    stress-reliefheattr(?atflLent at1100%for6 hoursafterthecompletionwelding. ,,

    Figs.B-1andB-2showthenatureofthefracturesinthetwotubes.Figs, B-3andB-4 showthe strain distribution fideterminedfromgridmeasurements.Figs,B-5andstress:effecti_ve-strain6curvesplottedforall

    3,5SeeBibliography6 SeeBibliography.

    asfollows:Effective-strain=

    thefracturedtubesasB-6showtheeffective-ofthetubularspecimens

    Effective-strainandeffective-stressaredefined

    =:

    (G -E )2+(%&-- E~)2+ (e~-e)z

  • 21

    forwhi~hload-strainreadingswereavailable.Figs.B-7andB-8showplots.,

    oftheStraindistributionsinthetubesforvariousstresslevels.Someoftheresultsobtainedonsmalltubesofthesamesteel,testedatIllinoisInstituteofTechnologyonNDRCProjectNRC-77,4areplottedinFig.B-9forcomparisonwithFigs.B-5.andB-6.Curvesforresultsobtainedfromstandard.505-inchdiametertensionspecimenscutfromtheweldandtheplatematerialneartheendsofthelargetubeandtestedattheUniversityofCaliforniaareshowninFig.B-10.

    Specimen1101,weldedwithNRC-2Aelectrodes,didnotshowanyappreciablein.provementovertubelfF}t,weldedwithE-6020electrodes;bothtubesweretestedundersimilarconditions.Thetwotubeswerealsosimilarinmethodoffabricationwiththeexceptionoftheelectrodesthatwereusedinwelding.Thesameheattreatmentpriortoweldingwasusedoneachtube-plates beingfirstformed,thenstressrelieved.Neitherofthecylinderswaspreheatedpriortoweldingandneitherwasstressrelievedafterwelding.Theweldingofcylinder!O~wasdonewithl/4-inchdiameterNRC-2Atypeelectrodespreheatedto600Fpriortciuseandusedwhiletheywerestillhot.Thelongitudinalweldrequiredquiteanunberofrepairsnearoneof

    .

    ~ ;3:t~dbliography ,,

    el=measuredaxialstrainand

    where~= average

    a>=averageaxialtruestress,psicircumferentialtruestress,psiradialtruestress~psicr~=average

    Inthesetests,effective-strainswerecomputedfromtheaveragestrainreadingsofthe2-in.clipgageslocatednearthemid-sectionofthespecimenawayfromthewelds,

  • 22

    whichareas

    pairs

    thefractureorigihted.Nopreheatwasusedinreweldingthethatwererepaired.weremadeshowedno

    break.Cleavagefracture110!1about22-inchesbel~~

    X-raypicturesoftheweldtakenafterthere-vindicationofanydefectneartheoriginoftheoriginatedatthelongitudinalweldofspecimenmid-sectionandproceededinbothdirections

    paralleltotheweldalongtheheataffectedzoneforabout12-irlchesandthenpropagatedaroundthespecfieninseveraldirections.

    SpecimenI!L1lfailedtoshowasgoodresultsfrompostheatingtollOOFasdiditscounterpartspectien111,itwasmoreductilethanspecimen!F1l,whichwasnotstressrelievedaft&welding,butciidnotex-hibitasmuchofareductioninthickness,asgreatanelon~=tion,oraslargeatruestressatfractureasdidspecimentIfr.

    ThefractureinspecimenllLoriginatedinthepl~atematerialwellawayfromtheweld,neartheupperapparentlystartednearadefectinthewerenotforthisdefectitispossible

    endofthetube.ThefractureplateshowninFig.B-11,Ifitthatsomewhathigherstrengthmay

    havebeenattainedaswellasgreaterelongationandreductioninthick-nessandthustheresultsfromtubet!Lllwouldcomparemorefavorablywiththosefromtubell!!.LaminationofFig:B-5showsthatthestress-straincurves

    strainonthe

    forbothtubes!IL!landtit!donotdiffergreatlyuptoaneffective-of0.09atwhichpointtubeIIL!:fractured.Thefractureoccurredsectionperpendiculartotheaxisatatruestressof62,ooopsi,

    whichisbelowthetruestressatfractureina simpletensiontest.Itm.aybenotedinpassingthatintheeffective-stress:effect

    straincurvestherearediscrepancieslargeenoughtoindicatethatexistingtheoriesofplasticflowareeitherincompleteorinexact.

  • 23Conclusions

    tubularandthescribed

    The ,,I%il.owingconclusionsmaybedrawnfromtheresultsoflargespecimentestsdescribedinthefinaltieport01NDRCProjectJEW-753,,

    resultsootained:fromthetestsofthetwoadditicna~specimensde-inthisreport.Someoftlieconclusionsarebas~dcnresultsfrom

    testsofpilotBeriesonsmalltubularspecimens.71. Widdd20-inchdiametertubesofhull-qualitiysteeltestedundervariouscombin~tion~ofinternalpressureandaxialloadexhibi~$dstrengthsandductilitiesconsiderablylessthantheutensil.estrengthsandduc-tiiitiesofktandardcouponstideoftheplatematerial.Thistendencywasalsoexhibitedina nuinberofthesmaller,morehotiogeneous,tubesofthepilotseriesoftests.2. :~Thestrengthsofthetubesascalculatedonthe~!conventionalu

    basisdidnotvaryaswidelywithdifferenttesting condikionsastheso-calledtrue!!stressesatfailure,,Also;forthipurposesofinterpretationofthephenomenaobsefvedintheSktests,thetruestressesatfailureappeartobe-amoresignificantindexofstrength,eventhoughtheyarecomputedas~averag&stressesacrossanentitiese~tioniathe.rthanstressesatapoiht. ,, >,. . .,,

    3. Unde&certairico~lbiriationsoft~m~~raturejratioofappliedstresses,andconditionsoftubeasregardsheat-treatment;itwaspossiole

    --tbattainfailureswithveiylowducti~ties,approachingthoseobservedin.fractwedships,&enthoughtherewasnomechanicalnotchinthetubularSpecimens.Thestrengthsattainedundersuchconditionswerecorrespond-inglylowascomparedwiththestrdngthjofth&mostductilespecimens.,,,- : .,.,.: .. .,

    3,7 SeeBibliography. , ; ~ ,

  • 24

    40whichthecausedby

    :...

  • 25

    9. Intubesinwhichfracture@itiated,intheregionofaweld,,.,..,,:.Ii. ,.,,;...:..,.

    acrackappearedtohavestartedintheweldorweldzorie~andthenfrac!turepropagatedinto,theplate. ,

    ,,,,,

    10. Smalldiscontinuities,.suchasdefects,gougesornicksmaybecrack-starters,@particularlyatlowtemperatures(TubeGahdTubeL).U. Inallthetestsmadeinthisirlvesti,gationj

    .; .},.~~startedintheweldzone,failureoccurredby,cleavage

    ,.,

    wasbrittle.

    whereverfraciureandthespecimen

    12* Thebeneficia~,re:ultsofheat-treatmentoftubesafterweld-...:ingisattributedprimarilytoalterationofthemetallurgicalstructureoftheweldzoneratherthantoreliefofresidualstress.(Seees-peciallyTube1).Theso-calledstressrelieving!heat-treatmentmarkedlyimprovedthestrengthandductilityatlowtemperatures.Thisheat-treat-mentreducestheresidualstressesanditaltersthemetallurgicalstructureoftheweldzone$maki~~thematerialinthisregionmoreductile.Theresidualstressisalsoreducedbycausinga smallamountofplasticflowtooccurparalleltotheweld.Thiseffectoccursatatmospherictem-peratures;consequently,themetallurgicalstructureremainsthesame.Theplasticflo~wissufficientinallofthetubestestedintheIIas-welded!lconditiontoproducestress-reliefbystretching,ThetubeIIstress-relievedbyheat-treatmenthadmuchgreaterductilityth~nanyoftheas-welded

    vtubes.Sincestress-reliefoccurredinalltubes,eitherbyheat-treatmentorbystretching,itappearsthatthemainbenefitderivedfromtheheat-treatmentisthebeneficialalterationofthemetallurgicalstructure.Itisindicatedthatappropriateheat-treatmentsorpertinentchangesin

  • 26weIdingtechniqueprematurebrittle3-3e Bending

    aremeansofreducingoreliminatingtendenciestowardcleavagefractures.stresses(suchasthosewhichcanoccurattheend

    ofa closedtubeduetoradialrestraintoftheheads)orabruptchangesinwallthicknessareli.kelycausesofprematurefailureatbothroomandlowtemperatures.Itwasfoundnecessarytotakespecialcaretoprovideaverygradualtransitionattheendsofthetubesin;ordertoobtainfailuresnearthemid-section.14, A specimenweldedwithlowhydrogenccntent,NRC-2Aelectr~des,

    ,, .,

    wasapparentlynomoreductilethansimilarspecimensweldedwithE-6020electrodes.

    ,

    ,.

    .,

    ,. c

    .,

    ,.,

    ., .

    ,.

  • 27.APPE~DIXC f,. ,i ;.> .,~. ...

    ,, .,.:.,. ResultsofTestsonS-impleTensio~bpe~imens

    TestedatVariousTemperatures

    Tensiontestsweremadeonunnotchedcylindrical

    4

    .,. ,,..

    specimensofsteelsA,Bn, andCatvarioustemperaturesrangingfrom450Ftoliquid-airtemperature.Yieldstrength,fracturestressandreductionofareaweredeterminedateachtemperature.Inaddition,theeffectofpre-.

    straining.atvarioustemperaturesonthecleavagefracturestressatliquid-.,

    airtemperaturewasdeterminedforsteelA. Thesetestswereconductedwiththeobjectofobtainingbasicdataonyieldstren@handfracturestre.~th,andtodeterminetheter.peratureoftransitionfromsheartocieavagefractureforthecaseofsimpletensionloading.

    ,.

    TheandC-3.Theis lowered

    resultsofthetestshavebeenplottedinFigs.C-1,C-2yieldstrength.increasesrapidlyasthetesting,temprature.,

    untilitisessentiallyequaltothefracturestressatliquid-airtemperature.Thefracturestress(breakingloaddividedbyfinalarea)risesmoreslowlybutcontinuestoincreaseasthetestingtemperatureislowereduntilthecleavage-typefracturebeginstooccur.Atthistemperature,thetransitiontemperatureinsimpletension,thefracturestressreachesamaximumandatlowertemperaturesdropstocon-siderablylowervalues.Thetransitiontemperatureswerefoundtobeabout-Z50Fforallth!reesteels.Thusitwasindicatedthatthesimpletensiontestapparentlyisnotassuitableforratingsteelsintheirrelativeorderofbrittlenessasarenotched-bartests.

  • 28

    Thereareseveralresultsworthyoffurtherdiscussion.SteelsBnandCtestedat-3C)0Ffracturedat,,stresseslowerthantheyieldstress.

    ...... ,:,,,.......,......$. ........

    Jhenthespecimensyielded,theloaddrop~doffasitnormallydoesat:..-

    roomtemperatureformildsteel,andfractureoccurredbeforetheloadin-ThisunuSualeffectwascheckedbytestsonanumberofcreasedagain.

    additioaalspecimens,A seriesofspecimensmachinedfromsteelAY;erestrainedtoa

    20,20,30,:40,50and60percentreductionofareaat212,70,and-105%?,andthenthetemperaturewasloweredimmediatelyto-300%andtheApeci.me.ns,

    ,,

    brokenwitilnoadditionalplasticflowoccurring.Thecleavagefract~e.. .

    stressat-,300%7wasfotidtoincreaseastheamountofpriorstrainwasincreased;Theseresult+,showninFig,C-4,indic~teforthesesteelshowthefracturestressatalowtemperaturedepe~ldsuponthestrainhistoryofthemateriAl,seemstohave

    .,

    Thetemperaturelittlehfiuence

    ,,,

    .,... .

    . . .

    atwhichuponthe

    ,,

    .

    . .. . .theprestrainingfracturestress.

    . . .

    wasdone,however,.,

    .,,.

  • 29APPE@IXD

    desultsofTestsonGeometricallySimilar .

    ., &entral.lyNotchedFlatPlateSpectiensTestsweremadeat

    similarspecimens.Thetypethreesizesofspecimensaredataforeachtest,andFigs.

    severaltemperaturesona seri&sofgeometricallyofthespecimenandthedimensionsofthegiveninFig.D-1,TableJ-1givestheprincipalD-3andD-4showthevariationoflongitudinal

    strainwithdistancefromthenotchofa3-inchwidesize-effectspecimen.Fig.D-2givesnominalstress-straincurvesforlongitudinal

    elementsatthebaseofthenotchobtainedongagelengthsofO.O1}0.02,and0.04inchesforthethreesizesofspecimens.Thespecimensdonotbehavesimilarlyuptostrainsatwhichthefirstcrackformsintherootofthenotch,Consequently,itisquestionableastotheextenttowhichmodellawsarevalidintheplasticrange.titercracksform,similarityinbehaviornolongeroccursbecausethespecimensaretherafternolongerGeometricallySimdla.rvTheresultsoftilesetestscontradictapreviouslyreported2conclusionthatsti,larlynotchedsamplesseemto@ergosimilarstrainswithintheplasticrange.

    Thefactthatthemodellawsdonotholdwithintheplasticrangeissurprising,becausetheoreticalconsiderationsleadonetoexpectsimi-larityinbehavior.Apossiblecontributiontotheobserveddifferencesinbehavioristhesurfaceconditionofthespecimens.Afterannealing,allspecimenswereffistcarefullymachinedina shaper,withthefinalcutsbeingverylight.Allspecir.enswerefinishedinasurfacegrinder,withthefinalcutsagainbeinglight.Evenwithlightcutsthesurfacelayersoftheplate.worked2 SeeBibliography

    specimensarecoldworkedandareconsequentlystrongerthanthebaseThepercentageofthetotalcross-sectiontakenupbythecold-surfacelayersislargerforthesmallerspecimensandconsequently

  • 30mightconceivablyexplainthere.suXts.A.roughestimateoftheamountofstrengtheningwhichcouldresultfromsuchsuyfacehardeningindicates.,

    .

    . .. i .,.,. ..thatthedifferencescannotbeexplainedbythisfactoralone...-. Additional

    ,,.,, ..

    testsshouldbemadeonspecimensfromwhichthecold-workedsurfacelayershavebeenremovedcompletely.

    ,,

    .,

    .,,,

    .. .. .

    ,

    ,...

    ,.

    ,.,,

    ,,

    -,.,

    ,, ,.

    ,:

    .,.

    ;.,

    .

    .

    .

  • . . .. .. .. . ,. ,....., ,-31

    TABLE1.--DTSC21~TIOlJ07S$EEJ-SUSEDINFLATPLATETISTSAllsteelsweretostodattenper~turesselectedsoastodefineth~tell,-pefaturetransitionrangewithinreasonablelimits.

    Steelsusedintestsof12-in.specimens(orwider)vrerefurnishedinplates3/4by72by120in.

    -- .. . ,-.--..- . ..

    ~Approximate~ .:: ,...-CodeLetterfor Chenica1 Typeof

    ~

    Steeland Anal~sis~Steeland I UseinTestProcramNailufacturer .-....

    7ZC ?nir ; condition /:- ----------...-.. ___,./Largecylinders;! I 72:43,24,12

    A !Semi-kil16d,1and~-,innotched~>la-tes.iO*250,47,asrol~efi./lc1,arp3ri;nD;ct~9s,5i;~a;t$to~Carnegie-Illinoisl .,. ,-! Iperatiureier.silebars~ l-----+ ~ }----------

    ~o~l~0.721Semi-?;illed,72,48,24,12acdS-;n..notchedBethl~;em, iasrolled,plates;,Ckarpy:Jxnacttests:5- .~ --+ .-.--..,..-,-----..,.----I72,48,24,12and~..in,notchedBnI 1.Bethlehem ~.180.72lseni-~zilled[ latec;Charpy~mpo.ct-tests;:~normalizedIpt

    ~lowtemperaturetons.i]ebars..-. .- y.-____ ~. ~.-..!

    - .................._.,____.-______

    ~~2~4~jZq.cI.2~.nc~s-in,notchedc i

    ~0.250.49 Semi-killedIpiates;~;kzwp~iimpacttests;Carnegie-Illinois/ asrolledll~vJt~fi~erz:tu:-ctensilebars.;[ I{ -1

    size=ffects-bwiias. ---.* .....,--i_-_-,...---.------_-__,-_-

    D I0,190s52~lullj-!:illed[lOne72-inspl~teac.d~-in.I.ukens ,normalizedl;notchod~lates#I-.--. --.-:. -~

    - ---i------+ ..-,.....-.-.,.-,--_____.-----_,E

    Lukens

    1 . --.+--

    t

    - --?------- -- ------- . . ... . . -... -.-----

    i? i0.160.85Fully-killed72,1.2and3-in.notched5ekhlehem tis rolled~P]ates;Charpyirmmcttests,-.___-..

    ~----------+-------l----- ---.-.-,..-_],? !0.13, 3

  • -.

    Steel CodeLetterand

    Manufacturer,ChemicalCompositionI c

    ]+~

    TypeandHeatTreatment

    ?hysicalProperties;YieldPoint,psiUlt.jtrencth,psi1210ng.,~;in2in.Hon~9,Zin8 in.

    Deoxidation?ractiee

    Notes:a --Analys~

    SteelACarnegie-Illinoisa b

    0.23 0.260.47 0.500.02 0.030.0110.0120.0420.0s9

    . 0.2 .0.-)12 0.03

    0.03 0.006

    0.0030e004

    SteelB I SteelCBethlehem Carnegie-

    i IllinoisI

    a bfa b0016 0.18 0.24 0.243*74 O*73 0,49 0.482.03 : 0.07 0.043 0.053.011 0.009 0.0150.0123.030 0.030 0,033 0.026

    0

  • 33

    ~. IPlatelJo~,C=d~~ionardType!--+ c

    emlcalAnalysls ~(co c @ ~,..

    ; A-l t Asrolled,semi-killed ~0.27 0.47A-2 ,1 II !1 oo~5 0.47 I1A-3 11 ,, 11 , 0.22 0.47

    ! 0.25 1A-.4 II !?.i1-5 II !! ~ 0.24 ::::1 . J

    I1B-1 , Asrolled,semi-killed I 0.17 0.711

    B-3 t! It

    [1

    ~ttj S.18 0,70

    B-6 11 0.17 0.7!?~ . 11 ~B-7 1! : I 0.17 0.685-9 1! !1 .. i0.17 0671...,.4

    ; B*2 Normalized,semi-killed !0.18 $3.75! B-4 f : 1! ~0.18 ().73/ %: ,, II ~0.18 9.71.II, \0.16 ().71i B-1o [ II 11 ~ i3.17 0071~ ; ~5 ,olled,;mj~kill;;--

    ._-. _.-. -.- .- ........ . ,.- ..~ 0025

    \ & II 11 I 0.26 ~ ;;;~ C-3 !1 !! 1 0223 0 ~(>1 ~,-4 !! . !1 I 0,25 ~,gg I~ C-5 I

    ,,: 1! ; 0,)26 ij,~~; C-6 lt 11 ~ 0.25 G,48

    .y---.. .. ..- ..i D-1 ~ NTormali.zed,full~-killed j0..19 o,5cJI .- . .-...-.___ -.. .-.

    1

    k-i--::s~~-.~~ q#j N-1 As rolle443GZki~N: 0.18 0.48I ~1-z j 11 303470N: I

    0.17 0.481?-3 I : t ; 3.37/:N: :8 }O*15 ., 0.50 tI:7-4 i 11 3.38;;N; 0.17 -- 0.50

    i 1Q-1 ~Quenchedand~rawn,fully-killed022 1.11i !I~ Q-2 j !1 ,. .I1 021 1,13~ 3-3 i

    111 - . 11

    , 0.22 1.12f

    -.

    .

    . . . . . . . .

  • 34

    . ..

    1-------+- --

    i

    A

    ,

    !Al

    .. ..

    A2

    ..----

    A3

    ___

    i A4If.......

    : A5

    +-. ..--

    I ~~

    ~._...

    ! 133~

    IAs ~---

    L.._.

    LolledFIG

    B7

    ------ ...

    ,... , ..-.---

    T]-peI,:fai %%,,-1.------,505 T,505 Ls~J.are LFlat L. . . . . - .+. _-...-_-.

    .505 I T

    .305 LSquare LFlat

    !

    L- ...-,-----..-..- -

    .505 T

    .505 , LSquare LFlat L ------------......-..

    .505 1,505 L

    .505 I i

    ..-.1----------square LFlat L.505

    L

    T.505 LSquaro Li~lat L..... .-.,,----

    .505 T

    ..505 LSquare LFlat L...-..-..-.-.,-...-

    . ,. . ,. .. . . .

    .-...-

    YieldPoint,psi.

    .... --...

    34,57535,55035,070~~.,510

    -...,--

    35,39036,200~JJ~ao32 950

    ._-A....36,50035,50036,62035,3~c

    .. ..

    3s,18036,G8035,2003!,800

    ...-,.---.

    35,1005,00035,10032,800

    -.. .

    ~fl.,6o032,2003~,460.32,210

    -.......

    :~,~~o

    ~~,oso

    32,70031 ;fjrJ

    .--.....>-..

    35,500yJ;$$()32,41031,960

    3s,50033,05033,00032,300

    .- ~.. m...)nslle.-r,.._. .

    Tensile;trength,

    nsi.57,87558,30058,46058,320.---------

    55,70057,6S056,19057,~$o

    ..-

    58,50C,5::,40053,63053,620

    132,47562,~7060,?0060,900

    ...-.-- ,...

    57,10057,40057,80057 500-_2-..56,95057,05057,68056,460... -----

    55,64.055,85056,35057,680

    ,,.56,95056,630S7,20056,860--.---..,.

    56;50057,15057,00057,000

    _..._

    .- .=... ..-. . . .. -,.

    ertles

    Elong.r-ch....

    42.042.850.534.0

    4.3.34.,:.753.232.4

    --.... .

    C2.O~~o

    51.036,6.........

    38.042.247.5~~.~

    4.3.24,3.050.052.4.

    ......

    4,4.344.848.835.0

    ..-.-,...

    44.342.8~~.a

    32.8.,.------.

    42.045.3~Q:.533.9

    ~~.g45.753.5:3.4

    -----..

    .- -. ,-. ,

    Hardness,~p.~~;re11 :B ]?umbers~-. ...... .;

    61

    --.--.-.

    60

    -----------

    60-62

    .........

    61 ~,

    a - .5o5 E A.s.r.u. std. roim.cl 0.505-im. dia. bar; square = fu~l thie~messof square cross section; fl~.t= A.S.T.~.std. full thickness flat bar.

    b - L=~XisOr bar parallel ~~ith-direc:ion :,frOl~ing.~=ttlln perpendicular tO

    c- Elongations measured.on 2-iri.original ~age length except on std.flat bars for uhich gage length was 8 in.

  • TABLE 4.-- R.ES.ULTSOF STA171ARDTENSION

    AIJEHARDNESS TESTS

    (Sheet2 ofS)-..7-.-.=-.. .

    I Plate I Ype ~ Orien- ~1~Type \~ of

    Steel ~ 0

    +

    B~ra

    ~

    tationb Point,.....7 ,...-

    T

    psi_..,. _ ___ ,_< . .

    B:.505 T 34,600.505 L

    :1:*1 ; ~~ ~,

    B9.. 32,400!{s Square L 30,600FJak L 30 800

    --..-+--- . $ ..505

    : f~ ~

    T 36,370.,

    ~.,?2 .506 L 57,100Square L 34,l~o

    l- Flat

    .505 -+4-:-

    1 B4 .505 L

    4

    M:41O

    , l._Square L 51/0s0Flat T, 30 900

    .. -.-..-...- _.~__ ...

    .505 T 37,150

    , B5,505 L

    ,1

    35,650i? Square .L 32,300Nom ~

    .~la~+~--

    33,970- ....

    .1~,5G5 T I .33,600T.~::_ _~~e ,;:1

    38, s0031,900~-~?g::

    - . . ...T __ ,.__. .ro~ m.V 31,?,00

    .] ~lo .>5d5 L :3,:9!)01 square L .J~,q~CJ

    r+ ~~ ~~ ,

    Flat L . ..._._ .-

    J31~s~m_

    .505 , T 35,500

    , cl .5d5 L 35,330

    I j

    Sqtiam L 3s,330Flat L 35,300

    I

    ~ .L

    --------- ___ .__,:_____ ,...___

    .505 ? 36,,000

    i 1C2.505 L 37,130Square L 36,200

    Ij ~~w~ L 35 ,G50.--- ----- ._.-J----.505 T 35,650

    t

    c I 3 $; : $:~+ -- --- ~6E

    .505 T 35,500

    C4.505 L 57,650Sqv.are L ---

    -i

    Flat

    Im

    L ---

    .505 ,.1 36,000

    C5 .505 I L 34,700Square

    ~ Flat -;_,. !gx

    32.!>..)

    Pensile PrWiliY6--.Strength.

    psi...-.

    67,~oo58,60057,00056,900

    .-._______

    5s,32057,93057,44056,88o

    --....__,..

    56,71057,26o55,470~~,l~o

    .-.

    58,,53052,?00[>6,67056,94C

    57,.50056,![;ti36,7CX356,200

    .-..-.,.._.

    56,0J055,s00:.5,35055,300

    _________

    61,50061,G1O63,00064 600

    --J. .,...6B,13068,50066,54.0

    .-,66,170

    6;,s.506.3,65065,50064,500

    .

    M, 20063,750--

    --

    .

    64,00064,20066,00065,700

    .

    .=.

    cmrtle-. .

    Elongzc

    -.

    43.54,3-554;,0~2.5

    -.

    ?;.8~~.s

    Sq:o35 0

    -..:.. .

    4.1.845,5.54,Gf5.i

    ......_

    452?:4.s:~~(),?4.P

  • 36

    ~. . . . . . . . . ..

    ,-...--. -

    i ~1

    .

    H L ..-,.

    I

    __p._.

    I ~~

    II I&3

    . ....

    AND W,RIMS S TESTS

    (Sheet 3 of 3). ... .. .. .

    Typeof

    3ara

    .505

    .505Sc.uare.rlat- _..

    .505.505SgiuareFlat

    .505

    .505SquareFlat,.-_.-,-

    .505

    .505SqmxFlat-.--

    .505

    .505Square~lak...-. -.

    -------

    Ori.en-t.ationb

    . . . . ..-

    TLLL

    - -.

    TLL~

    -.. -

    Tl.,LL

    ........ .

    TLLL

    .-

    Ti,LL

    ---- ----

    TLLL

    TT.,

    LL

    ...

    TT_LL

    -.-,-

    TI : .505Q.3 LSquare~ L

    Flat L--.-. ,- -----.-.--..---

    -- ..

    -. . ..

    YieIdFoir.t,psi.

    -----.

    33,90037,000W, 500300043,50048;4004:3,600...45>20044,80053,00050,700-.. -... . .

    ------- . . .,-. . .. --- . . . ------

    ensile Pr---------.-.

    TensileStrength,

    ,psi.-----

    63,20063,70052,60062 100

    -._~.__

    63,0006.5,90062,300

    --!-:JQo_o-.-76,8507?,10075,600

    _-7-4L70-9-,_77:60076,10077,5!)077 100

    --.?.S3,300S2,000S2,70082 300

    --..

  • ..r,J(

  • I wal

  • 39

  • THICKNESS RELWCTION ALONG FRACTURE LINES~

    TABLE- 6 OF NOTCHED FLAT PLATES *5HLTT 2. Of. 3

    . .. . . .,..? . .. . . . . . ,AWM,=.

    RIGHT SIDE OF PLATE 1,- ,TU.-..m 7.rc,1 I.r I I ,,,. ,.-. L./.

  • THICKNESS REDUCTION ALONG FRACTURE LINESTABLE- 6 *EET 3 F 3OF NOTCHED FLAT PLATES *

    TEL FiA?F S=ftz4E,v 7Es rING 01S7ANCE FROM NOTCH, !,4CUL7SWiom, .ulA@5R TEMP

    IN -F LEFT YDE OF PLATE RIGHT S,0.S OF PLATE

    26 16 8 4 2 i ~ % ~ / 0 0 ~6 ~ ~ $ [ .? 4 8 16 26

    N-3A. @ 2(0 s !9.0 S 150 s !2. 5 s !0.5 S 95 s ao s 8.5 5 9.0 s 8.5 _S ! 3.0 5 3.0 5 12.0 s 13.5 s 17~5 Is:o_ s] Pm s 19.5 s 21.0 s 260 s]72+ &2A /.?574325 3.5 c 5.0 G 9.0 c /3.0 S ,3.5 s /50 s 16.5 S ,0.5 S ,4.0 s 55 s 20 s 6,5 S 6.0 S 10.0 s 9.5 S,.?o s ,40 * ,Z.5 c 6.5 c: 35 c 4.0 c

    *IA 655%51.) E.5 c 5.5 c 6.0 c 6.5 C 8.5 C 15.0 C 2U5 s !85 s !6.0 s /6, 5 S 45 s 60 s ?05 8.0 S 85 s 11.0 s 135 c Z5 c 4.5 c 4.0 C25 c .?0 cN3D 7?- 73- 2?20 5 8.5 s 9,0 S 8.0 S 65 S 6.0 S 6.0 s 25 5 /.5 Si 55 s 6.5 S .?5 s 85 Sllo,o s 13.0 s ,4.5 .5

    N-16XD w-w 6.0 s {.35 S:!!.5 s 35 s 9.0 S : 8.0 S 65 S 35 s ;0 s 555 8.5 S 80 S SW Sill.o s, 12.5 s /2.5 S,W21X0 -r

    ,

    6.0 5 /4.5 s !Z5 s !1.5 SIQO s: 75 s 65 s 30 S @s 55 5 775 s 95 Slc?o s~12.5 s {3.5 s 165 s !

    *2XD (&%9(-z29 ! PI.5 ST/3.5 Syz.,o s 105 S:90 s 85 s Z5 s 20 s 35 s 50 s a5 s s?0 S~ 9.0 Sj 9.5 S 10.0 s 13.0 s

    w,.+!0 (-XZJL2W7 : 100 c 14.0 s 12.5 S [1.0 s: 95 s ,?0 s

    .,.

    I - - ~.2.5 s 2.0 s s 55 s 90 s 9.5 S!ll. o s 14.0 S ~

    ,V-4D #34?+5+.7 /2.5 s 100 s 9.5 s 65 s 80 s 70 s 55 s 20 s P.5 s , 6.5 s ?75 s 80 s a5 s 90. s4~_5 .s 5.5 s,.,. -. . . ... .. . ..

    12. N14XD {m> 2.5 c 3.5 c 60 C 10.5 C 155 s !50 S!15.O s 30 s 1.5 s; Z5 s, 9.0 s !35S,95C 55 C61.) -1 - 1; . . ...! ~{__ ,..:-

    +-1 - I ~~~~~~~ I

    1 .. . . . . . -- - ;50 CJ 65 c 14.0 c 140 s 14D s 11.0 5 10.5 S, 90 S ?70 s //5 S 14.5 S /5.0 5,/7.5 S /45 C 60 C 3.5 c

    O-5*D &[@K-In 30 c 30 c 35 c 6.0 C ,95C )2.5 C(120 c; 4.0 c 2.5 C {2.5 C 12.0 G,IO.O C, 6.5 C; 50 G 2.0. C 20 c

    0-45D @@=7 2.0 G .70 c 3.5 c 65 C 8.5 G K20 C~10.0 Ci100 C Z5 c 11.0 C 1!.5 C 35 C 6.0 C 35 C 2.5 C 1.5 c

    * VALUE5 1?/ TA8LE /NL21CATE PERCENT REDuC T{ON. LETTER FOL L OWING V. L UE INDICATES TYPE OF FRACTURE: S - SHEAR, C = CLEAVAGE.

  • 9A A. ?OIlmormMgI*-llliri

    A u rolledm.lmgl*llllnO

    0 As ,01194:Ur.wb-lllti!

    0 u mummms$..nlimi

    o A9 relhdCwnc&io-Illlmo

    0 u ,Oll!akneme-xlli?w

    a u ?O1lM!--!I*111I-

    O.a

    0.8

    0,1

    0,1

    O.z

    0.2

    U.z

    0.8

    O.a

    TABLE 7 -Y OF z Iion Klm ?LLm Bzawln Pl%e 1 .? .9

    *

    ,da*

    3

    s

    .7

    a

    3

    s

    I-L[l

    a

    s

    a

    &

    -

    &

    5/4

    S/h

    s/4

    s/4

    3/4

    S/b

    S/b

    a

    @

    a/4

    1/6

    1/4

    1/4

    1/4

    1/4

    1/4

    rimh

    0.04,?

    O.ou

    0.C42

    O.obl

    0.OM

    O.W,?

    6727

    .;-6s

    :

    287

    958080717062

    47so

    -E

    2seS6.?4,20

    :

    -19-86

    608816

    5

    2-21-d?

    106

    :

    ST

    4:

    asslssma

    U9110100

    99

    :

    ?467

    :

    74

    E26w

    1

    110108

    9889

    E39

    &Us107101

    E87

    z

    n

    :

    %

    =-l=:Ld@

    .

    U.mo

    lS,$OI

    u,sm

    L5.180

    ~.8.3u

    16,790

    a,?,r3@l

    a0,s3016,580

    11,85018,800

    Ed %,803!4mO?da a5,8ml

    S6,960S#&

    60,190 41:780

    lot 24,020MmNM S%no

    %,630sa,490S3,670SB,S1Og=

    +0

    So,sw

    IO* 46,100ko.r6d 4T;M0

    46,sw48,mm47;30049.60.348,50060,100

    121003 $3,S10,10,100 4.?,600

    9,990 U;7S041,&2-3u., 100

    lo,aaa 44,2s044, am

    1lot +100R+etiti $l,lmaa,wo S0,80D

    40,Wla,7.50 40,010

    40,?Lw16,0S0 40,6.24

    40,TW9,710 U,tta

    41,660U,*O 41;SM10,060 U,sw

    *,6Pa4s.900

  • 43

    l===

    c ti ,Ollad-=.f@e-ullno

    0 A, rolleiC-nwm-lllllw

    O A, rollado&mgie-llllm

    c A. ,OlledCu.negbdlllzn

    o & ,Olhdc8megle-nib!

    o A. mlla-si*Illho!

    D A. mllad:*negle-Illimi

    : A* roua:Unwiodlllnoi

    ! i. rolled:arnwle-llllnOi

    T**0.85 0.4!0.)

    0.1

    0.2

    M

    1.2

    ).8

    1,2

    ,.2!

    .a

    .24

    0.49

    0.49

    0.49

    0.49

    0.49

    I

    0.49

    0.49

    0.49

    0.49

    0.49

    l.t.shedu-l ,bahineikm 1.1Ito&

    lot.tmdam. ,Wlli.d*- 1-1,ltoak

    otuheiw%mohintil-m 1-1,tmk

    otahetma

    .tahmis-

    ,tahedkm

    GLi@-IA

    1

    11

    a,

    1 1,

    1,

    5,

    3/

    >

    1

    5/

    1

    G

    31/4

    1/4

    118

    1/2

    1/4

    1/4

    1/4

    1/4

    $/$2

    1/s2

    -iuA

    9.C4J

    O.au

    O.Ma

    0.W2

    O. M?,

    O.ow,

    0.C42

    D.C-4Z

    ).WI

    ).m

    ).06E

    m

    M6

    UT1s5u

    100

    z

    161

    #

    %110lUw

    UI8$w

    60

    139100m

    7460

    llo9s7s

    120110Ul105

    E

    Ul140U2l,m181la

    918s

    160au

    m10s

    6s

    ESa2610

    l!M9380

    :

    170

    :2

    w

    120

    Rx%=

    lotRwrad

    16,1c1718.400

    3,810

    1I,MO

    a0,61?4

    12,mnll,nmll,c.cm12.976

    18,86019,320

    21,6C421,810

    9,0009,0c08,2ca

    10,90011,50011,160lz.z,zo10,66011.770

    1: z13,660

    14,62o11,10017,S5011,64016,180

    14,c$lo14, E4015,24014,acu

    4.47010,W3O6,0156,430

    4,7726,9c4

    7,5208,6405,s007,3608,970

    16.3901L?,9m

    2?,2:J~~

    13:SC.I

    XmllllMr.,,[=. )

    _

    %n61,80o60,40062.,C4062,03067,80049,9606+500

    62,6MLw,lw67,2005s,200E4,1OQm ,Sc-a69 ,46D66,800

    b2,490m,oto70,490@6,0LM

    61,5W63,00064,69064,50366,0z0

    s7.8a069,36089,520

    69,200S8.03066,10060, OCO68,71058,700

    58,60059, mo59,S1058,63057,00059,SU359,90050 ,4M

    58,.37057,6C4*.65379,903

    17,900U,TooW,4W;8100018,00019,100

    14.om,6,9g0%,7s0,7,420il, uo

    ,7.980,0,180B.no,1,080a.olo,L,acni7.060

    a6,cea39,5C-33+ 60260,4C062,cao61,60057,80049,9M63,.5-M

    4s,8.m

    %ESa, 9CQs4,60369,W59,46056,800

    lB,UO16,9s70,49085,090

    24,2G-324,70061,4c463,80066,LU0

    19,68015,20059 ,azo

    K,s.m16,U5&o,?on60,00057,424Ea,sca

    ?8,.90317,010eo,uo

    !0.=?9021,2C468, lso09 ,ss0E8,1C4

    k ,460>6,ECdk9,aoo%,902

    10,6c4

    IO*OW!s;000K;oc.a19,1N

    U+40!3,080!4.7s017,420;1.223

    B.4m+190 .Pa,zdo,7,4C4,0,%0A,lloim,mo

    100m

    92w

    9su110

    %a

    e

    100100

    14

    :

    lW1001

    9s,?2ls2

    J95#:1518t

  • 44 TABLE 7 WWJkRY OF .5mOH WIDE PUTE &E-SJIIS Paw30f3

    Stad. lettm, tn.d im!mf..tlu.r

    A. r.nea,rnesl$-lllIr.01.

    I M rolled,,thloham

    3 4s ,01103Mtbleh=

    m m rolledU-*U14W1 Allq

    *

    .25

    .19

    1.23

    ),=

    ,.le

    0.11

    0.1:

    0.2

    M

    52

    3s

    3:

    81

    ,8

    .4

    .!

    w

    a*L

    .lJ2

    3

    3

    3

    3

    3

    3

    3

    w

    b...L

    .1/6

    s/4

    a/4

    3/4

    d,

    31

    S/

    v

    .313.?

    1/4

    mm,

    1/4

    *

    1A

    1/4

    th&!----

    0.068

    0.c42

    O.obz

    m

    0.042

    none

    0,C4

    O.w

    ---

    ,f !.,tOF.

    151L393s1125119109

    66

    :

    S6a15

    -2:

    160151141132128L2811090

    2

    B.?66

    47m

    56

    23s32258015

    - 1:- 19- 53-50552823

    -:

    - Zo20

    .%2416

    -:

    - 19- 20- 39-39-63

    5750&240S431L30.4918

    - 2=- M-37

    7-wAbmmhdto&i..

    ----

    21,+5036,47026,35024,79024,54028,410

    15,770

    21,75017,16419,800

    7,600

    10.WO9,52012,160

    18,96019.6-W15,63012,85018,C.3018,87020,91020,.?10.20,20018,64015,220

    19,500

    22,20016,41019,690

    17.500

    18,12018,620

    22,4.7015,92519,785.20,680

    13,090

    15,560

    mcturecimensSteel Code /Letter

    i .-;:% F&;;:i;q=iLOW.. !. Trans. 1.No I&in! 24-in,; W-in J..72-in 108-inI

    -+

    : 45~ 25 j=++-- =--

    i= i: .:15 Pfb- :::~ about !80 to I

    .-c ;2/20above

    /90! 120 90 ,+. 88 I 100 , 90 32.b +--+--

    aboutH .-io,~-lo 20

    -d~

  • 1+6

    . . .

    TAFILE9. -- RZDtjCTICIYS1?1TKICi~lWS O.FFIATE OBTAIN.EZJFROI1SAYPLES

    . . -...... - .. -- ----- .. -- -.. ...-...-.. ------ -

    DistanceIn fron Mac- Percent R&ltictioniti.,~hiclaxxsl!easuredShip tured Sur- at Se.reralLocations Alon~ Fi-acture

    face, inchm ..1 2 3 4 5 67- -----... . ,. ---------.-.-. ----- ---...--..

    -3:16 2.93 3.09 2.61 ---- ---- -----1;16 2.45 2.37 2.29 1.82 ---- ---- ----

    S.S.Sea Bass148 1.11 1.11 1.27 0.79 ---- ---- -----

    0.32 0:55 0:40 0.47 ---- ---- ----:9: O.OB 0.08 0.24 0.00 ---- ---- ----3/4 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00.. ---,- ---- ----

    . . .. - -..--_. -.-

    0, 0.29 1.45 3.46 3.19 2.03 1.16 2;03

    .1/16.,. 0.29 0.58 2.612.32 2.03 0.87 1,,,74

    ,.S.S.Russell H..1/6 0.00 0.29. 1;45. 1.45 2.03 0.87 1.16

    ~~~Chit%anden 1/4 0.00 0.00 1,16 1.16 1.74 0.5B 0.871/2 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.87 1.16 0,58 0958374 ---- ---- 0.29 ---- ---- ---- 0.29

    ,. --!---------.-, --. ------ .--.2.33 2.04 0.58

    1)16 1.&3 0.58 0.00S.S. James Gunn 1/8 ~~~ 0.29 -0.290.00

    1/4 0.230.000.00,,

    1/2 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,,.. .3[4 0.00 0.00 0.00

    .. .-.------ --.,--.m. -------.

    ,,,

    All &bove w.l~ek ?krti,,obtainedat or nenr Ikacturec of cleavage type.

  • 47

    ~BLE 10 - WORD OF LOAD$ AT WHICH CRACKS ST~~n

    DURING TESTS ,OFMUM FLAT PLAT$S

    SpecimenNumber

    43AA4AA5AAIBA3BA3CA3DA5D

    B-108B7AB8AB6BB5DB6DB7DB9DB1OD

    C-108C4AC5Aw)C3DC5DC51XDC52~

    HIAH2AH4A

    NIAN2AN3AN-iDN2DN3DN41XD

    Q2DC!12XD

    _ Development of CrackTemp, Load, NominalF. Kiixi Stress

    4910456848-650.-8

    329

    164550

    -;:-712

    3281

    1523210114312190

    6825-18

    -53-322

    -29-60

    -E

    U:

    13201300S.+oo910950505250220

    175012501150900240325270240265

    190013201350257270275290270

    164015001450

    165022502000385435360430

    390385

    32.632.134.633.735.237.438.032.6

    28.830s828.433.335.648.140.035.639.3

    ;;:

    33:338.140.040.843.040.0

    40.537.035.8

    40.755.549.455.664.453.363.7

    57.857,0

    Max. NominalStressksi

    40.335,840.040.741.138.148.139.9

    36.734.6330342,645.949.340.041.848.7

    38.435.743.040.0,51.154.748.746.6

    44.745.639.0

    64.260.9~;.;

    75:966.469.9

    61.060.7

    Break%

    Shear

    100

    9;1001000

    1000

    10000

    1001001(2Oo

    ;

    o

    9;

    5:9110010

    82880

    41373%:

    10081

    100100

  • w 10. vk-=r2-

  • Size

    Inches..

    3-in. wide9ti. long

    0.18011thick

    _

    &in. wide18in. long

    0.36011tti.ck

    .

    12-inwide36-in.10ng

    O.720tfthick

    TABLJZB-1

    SUMWRY OF RESULTS OF TESTS ON G30HETRICALTUf-SIl.ItL4R SPECIMENS..

    Note: KLl specimms made fmm a single annealed plate cm+?ifing 25% carbOn

    Temp. cTestF.

    .

    757532 *o +$

    20-30-40

    90 *706850 *3.2.:

    &pe of

    Fracture _

    10C@ ShearK@ Shear10@ Shear100% Shear

    94%Shear1% Shear@ Shear

    lOQ%-She ar lC@ Shear10@ Shem

    Shear and Cleavage@ Shear

    6$ ShearCJ%Shear@ Shear@ Shear@ Shear

    .. .

    ._

    Stress atfcmmationof firstcrack

    _ Ksi

    40.342.5x~

    x

    x

    x

    -

    3?.537.5x

    x

    32.3x

    xx

    27.5~

    NominalStress at]@X. LCRd

    Ksi

    45.7L5.7h5.247.945.2117.250.3

    44.444.51+2.8/+/+.2L5.5

    34.439.135.239.940.9

    Redw tion in Thickness%

    29.8 19.828& 20.026.7 15.630>0 18.925.1 17.321.0 026.2 1.2

    25 & 17.725.7 15.120.5 6.923.1 7.822.3 9.0

    19.5 2.919,7 1.714.8 0.917.9 1.416.2 1.4

    * Test results reported in previous report (Bibliography 2)x Observations not possible in these tests because of type of temperature control housing used.z Not cbserved

  • 50

    FIG / VIEW OF /08-/IVCH SPECIMENREADY FOR TESTING AT 32 F

  • 6LONW TiJL6fNdL J9Af?S I I

    TEMPERATE, 7

    TRANSVERSE BARS

    -

    . .

    TEMP6XATURE, F

    FIG. .? RESULTS OF CiiARPY lh4PAC T TESTS STEEL A

    Dwc? 44 E44.=16. #

    51

  • 5:

    LONGITUDINAL BA8S

    mj: 40

    L-$$

    PLATE 872$ .?0 ,$ PL ATE B6 -,Y

    /

    0-80 -40 0 40 60

    TEMPERATURE , F

    60TRANSVERSE EARS

    ~

    ,

    k 40

    kPLATE 01

    PLATE 87 $

    t

    s

    $ 20 -~

    PLA7E 86

    .

    PLATE 03

    TEMPERATURE , F

    FIG. 3- RESULTS OF CHARPY IMPACT TESTS - STEEL B IN THEAS-ROLLED CONDITION.

    DWG. 44s39FM, 3

  • 60

    L ONGITUOINAL 8A RS

    a! ..:

    2/=&!TE B 10 +

    kPLATE 85

    ~- 40~

    ~ RAT E 88

    :

    2 PL A 7E 82g PO

    0-80 -40 0 40 80

    rEMPERA ru8E, .F

    TRANS VERSE BARS

    El4I

    ~ 40

    ;

    $

    PL ATE B.?$ ~.~

    $

    0-80 -40 0 40 80

    TEMPERA TURE, T

    FIG. 4- UESUL TS OF CHARPY IMPACT TESTS - STEEL B IN THENORM\ALIZED CONDITION.

    OwG. +#E33 FM+

  • mLONGI TuDINAL BARS I

    t----- . .

    0-w

    rfHn4ruRE, 1?

    TEMPERATURE,.?

    F/G 5 RESULTS OF CHARPY IMPACT TESTS - STEEL C

  • I 1,+X f I I 11111

    0

    TEMPERATURE, lE

    TI?A~vERsE BAVS

    a~

    k40

    h-

    1a

    PLATE NI

    1 -

    m

    KA7E W

    Q-

    -w -.?60 -180 -100 -m 60TEMPERAW#E, %?

    FIG 6- RESULTS OF GfiARPY IA4PAGT TESTS - STEEL N

  • 60

    L ONGI TUDI NA L BAR s

    50

    40s

    N-, ?TE.ZL _k AS RCILED

    g 30

    $/

    . .

    t~ 20

    ..-

    $.

    , .

    /e/

    TEMERA TURF, *F

    60

    T RAN S VERSE EARS

    50

    40t

    /

    ~

    k

    ~ 30~

    i

    $ ~.. . ~

    % $; s7E~m_$.

    /0A----- --

    I

    mm

    TEMPERA TuRE, ,.?

    FIG, 7- COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF CHARPY IMPACT TESTS FcW STEELS A, S@lN AND ODIAGRAMS SELECTED TO RE~SENT ~C4L RESULTS F@? EACH STEEL

  • IvALw NEAR rnlNTs IAWXTE PERSENT skfAR

    --u----------o- .4- STEEL AS ROLLED

    S@Q,ooo _---b8mS~ AS SVLLEDmBm. STEEL ,WRMALIZWv+ G - STEEL AS ROLLEDw-- -+ N - STEEL AS SDLLED---+ H - STEEL AS ROLLED

    L-,500,06u

    ,6, ..\~100

    I 100L7xWWo !00iq

    II

    ~

    t

    Ls EL &s Tat

    L-!

    ~ @W~ I

    l

    ! II4%3 =L

    i

    AsIi- Z

    k/ 100

    tl@z7@D

    .7 /, ) I

    +

    I7-: f ~ ~- + y -~

    I ! 1 1 .i r r 1 1 I I 1 1

    1/1

    I

    -%.+ -X+-+--+so I

    .80 -60 -40 -.& 0 SD 40 &O 80 /00 /20 140 160

    TEMWRA77J6E , -f

    mEa VARIATION WITH TEMPERATURE OF ENERGY TO MAXIMUM LOADFOR ~- INCH WIDE SPECIMENS

  • TEIIPERATU.W, .F

    FIGURE 9 k%RAQ7701VWVW TEMP15RATU?E CF EWRGY TO MAXiMLW LOAD F~

    I 12- INCH WIDE SPECIMENSSEA.?I-KILLED STEELs

    M *G

  • ~, - I IVALUE5 NEAR PLXN7S WOICATE FfEC5MT SHEAI?

    &-------& A-STEEL AS ROLLED .~-~+--- l&STEEL 4S ROLLED

    *W@ -...< N-STEEL .4s ~LLEO+ ... -+ O-STEEL MO. R O ,/.8&- --~- *+.-. ..+ Q#TE~E-~:;~::EA=o !9

    .~

    I#o,m

    ./ 66m3 . +-- --z

    - 81A18(

    12q m 35 T. ..d-------

    ---

    8 +> .

    . IGO -- ~ -.----- +... ..4 C..._...

    84 - z-~

    m,m,

    171I 8

    z~ p s- -*- ~: ~8;

    ~m

    i/ I

    ~.,,-g.

    $ Ld $ I ~

    $6WC7L9 / F

    iI

    /

    ,,

    (to I

    ,L~ L

    40,mv /+

    I

    .Q-@ ~------ -... _.-A ;,

    I* b a0 i

    XpxlCJ--- - - ~-o:

    0-m -60 -40 .20 0 .?0 40 m 60 !00 1.?0 no 160

    TEMPERAT(A?E, F

    FIGURE 10. VARIATION WITH TEMPERATURE OF ENERGY TO MAXIMUM LOAD

    FOR /2- INCH WIDE SPECIMEW,

    SPECIAL STEELS

  • TEUPERR7URE, ?

    F/G. II - TRANSL70N TEMPERATURE RANGE, 72 INCH WIDE SPECIMENS

    %+s 44E6 6

  • I 1 1

    0

    ITEtdtTRATURE,F

    FIG 12- TRANSITION TEMPERATURE RANGE 12- INCH WILE SPECIMENS$~

    * .Mmms sm. stew w rcmhw &no. 0G2mw AT w msf w PLATSl4E.9

  • FIG. 14 - TRANSITION TEMPERA TURE RANGE, 3- INCH WIDE EDGE NOTCHED SPECIMENS , G STEEL , CUT

    FROM PLATES OF VARIOUS THICKNESSES.

  • ./=/6/5

  • 65

  • 66

    m,g

  • I I I I -+------C-. , ,- ~ ~,.. 1

    -I=F=%Pmm I 1 I I I I I

    o ,osu Jc. ..m%,m%, /..

    FIG.18-A- VA.@lATION IN NOMI,V4L S TRESS WITH W,OTH OFPL4TE TESTS AT ROOM TEMPERATURE.

    . ...(..,

    ----------- +- . -

    - f._&-- __&_ ~-sm!l As ml.w

    4-s7Ea . +..-. . . .

    mxxe , +----t m . . ..+.. ---0-. c-m .* . ,

    $ \.0.

    m, v.mm...-mmm~a7aw ,. mlwE3 SEmmTm&.

    ~

    .5WW?

    .%c-

    OMco.,j $o. ma?Furf A, ,..

    FIG. 18-B - VA,WAnON IN NOMIN4L STRESS WITH WIDTH OFHATE - TESTS AT 50 vye .4.,,,

    FIG 18-C - wRIATk,w IN ,W-MUIWU ST8ESS WITH WIDTH OF PLATE- TESTS AT .%?E

  • A/sd ,Ssaus wsiNO#

    tSd SS3SLS lVMNO#

  • 80,000I I

    &~ N-STEEL

    A .STEE.L~ 6& STEEL Bn STEEL--*-----*-C S77XL

    70,000 ~ N STEEL-~-----m- H STEEL+---+-0s STEEL

    ---- ------

    ~0 STEELO-STEEL -

    604w0 Th (

    ~. ~

    r - H -STEEL

    n 4 r. . . . . .

    w ---,P

    / #Pm- --*---- .----. wSopoo ,- A P.. ..

    d If,, . . .,

    k?nS?K& -*

    %-STEEL-. . 4

    TEEL40,CO0 ------- -

    4,- A-STEEL

    -60 -40 0 40 60 1.?0 160TEMPERATURE, F

    12-INCH WIDE SPECIMENS

    oo~

    _ A STEEL_~ & STEEL~ Bn STEEL

    60,000 -O----- *-C STEEL~N STEEL --w---- +-H STEEL

    So,mo

    - H-S7EEL-- f - C-STEEL

    .,

    quuu [ I 1 I I I I

    t--80 -40 0

    I40 ,80 1.?0 160

    TEMPERAWRE, *F

    7.?- INGH WIOE SPECIMENS

    69

    FIG20- VARIATIO/V IN NOMINAL STRESS WITH TEMPERATURE FORFOR FLAT-PLATE 5PECIMENS,

  • I OICTILE SPECIMEN------ 8RITTLE SPESAMW I I

    ,P5W .2SW .JwMSTAME FRcW C, FRA5T~ OF PLATE Wk3TH.

    FIG21-ELONGATICW AT MAXIMUM LOAD, ILLUSTRATING INFLuENCE OFPLATE WIDTH ON DUCTILITY AT MAXIMUM LOAD

    ELONGAWW MEASWED BY RESISTANCE Wb?E EXTENSLXfETEm

    SPECIMENS S1-108 ANO CI-IOS AM 109- MHES WIDESRV#W?NS 8- SA AND C- .?A AflE 7.?- INSM?S WE=CMENS B-6B M C-2 B ARE 4S- IMHES WIDESPEOIM?NS B-4S ANO C- ~C ~ t+ W(WES WIDEsF!muENs S-4D AND c- I?o AnE As- msmrs m

    GA6E L.SN6THm # W RATE IWOTH

  • /8

    /6

    /4

    /2

    /0

    :

    $8

    t

    ~-

    ~

    3~

    6G

    4

    2

    0

    FIG,22-RESIDUAL ELOIVGATION AFTER RUPTURE ILLUSTRATINGJNFLUENGE OF PLATE WIDTH ON DUCTILITY AT FAILURE.

    ELONGA 71WS MEASURED ON ONE FACE ONLYGAGE LENGTH - % PLATE WIDTH

    sPECl#ENS BI-108 AND G!-(O8 ARE @S- lNCtES WIOESPECIMENS B-5A AND C-2 A ARE 72- NWHE.. WIDESPECIMENS B-6B AND G-.? B ARE 46- INCHES WOESPSCIMENS 8- 4C ANO C-Z C ARE .?4- hYOHES WIOESPSCIA4ENS B-40 AAD G-2 O ARE 12- INCHES WIO=

    ow 44E267 FIG 22

    . . . . ,w c, w E ..<

    MS TANCE FRoM e , FRACTION OF PLATE WIDTH.

    71

  • IWTCHW EDGESSHEXRED EDGE

    MA6WINE0 EDGES CENTER NOTCHED

    FIG 23- FOUR DIFFERENT TYPES OF 3 INCH WIDE SPECIMENS USED IN THElNVEST/GAT/OIV

  • 72

    lL /)-- 111I EI D H (100x)

  • Steel N( 100X )

    Steel Q( 250X )

    Steel QS( 250X )

    FIGURE 29 PHOTOMICROGRAPRS OF STEELS Ii, Q, AND QS

  • RiGH T .51LKLEFT S&7E

    FIG A -68 pERCEiVT EmN6A?70N RATE 61108 (I-INCH GRID)%%7EEL, 108-INGH WIDE HATE NOMINAL SThFNGTH 367 KSI

    T&4/RSRAW7E 31-F l&J .% SM5AR*>

    1 *

  • 83

    . u

    T

    .

    ,0-:0

    . .s

    .

    (1

    -.1. -- -

  • 84

    .0 .0.0.0 ., .0.0.1.0.. ru. o.,w. fo. O./v-o.

    . ...0.0 .0 .,...0 .0. kofvotoo)vv

    .O. o.)n. o .0 .0.0. l/O 0 O.,n. ,.o. ,e.

  • 85

    7r-

    . ,, . ,, . ,, .

    J._. _ ____

  • 86I

    -J O*OO /0 . 0 .A.m*avOolo

    FM. A-

  • . ,0 . .0. y..

    . ,.0.. ,.0. co

    .,0. ,0. ,.,

    .

  • . 00 . 00 . 00 . ,~.

    Qo

    Q+:6

    o /0. . 00 . 00 0 ,0.

    Q 10 . /0 . Zo. . . . .Cu?

    ;;;

    . /0- . O* . ,0 . . ,.O

    . Zo. Q ,0 . 20. . ,0.

    . .

    V*

    ?:

    . .

    . .

    00 . ,0 . ,~ . ,.O .

    /0- . 20 0 ,0 0 ~~ .

    10 . 70 . ,0 . ~.. .

    ,(6, A-75

  • 89

    -. -. . - w-

    ,(6. -?6

  • . /.0 .000.0 11 000

    :T

  • .

    ,,.. 47.

  • :l Gz l es . 66 0 99 0
  • 3

  • 9+

  • . - -(1

    II

    .70 .0,0. ,0.

  • ,.:, ,:.., ../9 . ,0 .?O-..0-: co.: j .0 & : ,0 .. . . . .

    .,

    $ :;:$Y:a

    .,.. ,0..

    ,O:,L; ,.O. ,O. ,0.7 ?.,0. i,o:,... o,.o,.. ;Oil l:,..; ,O.:,.O. :,,. .,..:II

  • 5%3.-

  • . ,s . In . /6- .

    .y

    rz .. 79 k-.9

    >

    *I .. . . *S

    . 6E ./c

    .

    c+

    e/

    00,

    /0. /0.

    t 0 Jo

    N~

    Ho- . . .

    e *

    7s

    / s 09 ,* . ,* .

    ,,6 A-87

  • ,,-

    101

    .,9.

    .

    ?

    . . . .

    I I ~____.

  • /02

    . F.? .

    9 / 0600zs o 0

    w.

    To

    /o

    o

    0

    a ,* &

    o ,0 :0/

    *O

    /7

    so

    a Q Q

    0000 000000 0 0 0 10 0 0

    .

    a q

    000000 o 0 0 /0 o /o o 10 0

    c+ Q a

    o

    0

    0100

    0 i

    00 ,.0 0 /0 :4 ,0,0 0 .,.02. m? :

    0

    /0

    o

    0

    O* #/ o 50 0 /,J o

    z c .0 09 6.J 9/

    ca0 c .

  • i 03

    ,. .T.._

    .9, .

    N

    . .LL

    60. /, .

    .0 .,,.

  • ;05

    ,

    00

    .

    .

    ..> . >, . -. ,, .

    H-R! !1

  • . -0.3.000. .a). o. -0/00000 0000000 000

    .: a o

    0 QO Q o Qo a 0 Q. 0

    . .a4 . -0.3 . 0 . 0 aoPo -0./.3000. 0.0000 -/.7 0 0 *

    * m.

    ~

    -& Q 00 Q Q Qo Q a o.

    ~

    . -/.1 . -07 0 -03 0 0 OO.s. -01.0.0 C-alo-o.loo 00.0.

    :m 0 Q< QQ 0 Q QQ Q Q s

    a

    -0/ .

    . .

    e