Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
National Position Navigation and Timing Architecture
APEC GNSS Innovation Summit
Karen Van Dyke, DOT/RITA/Volpe Center
May 26-28, 2008
2
Overview
• PNT Architecture Background• Architecture Development• Vision, Strategy, and Vectors• Way Forward
27-May-08 3
PNT Architecture Background
• Study requested by– Assistant Secretary of Defense for Networks and Information
Integration– Under Secretary of Transportation for Policy– National Space-based PNT Executive Committee
• Justification - PNT Strategic Landscape is Changing– Gaps in current capabilities– Insufficient unity of effort towards future PNT capabilities
• Products– 20 year strategic outlook to guide near and mid-term decisions on
PNT capabilities
4
NationalPNT Strategy
Needed
NationalNationalPNT StrategyPNT Strategy
NeededNeeded
Origins
NSS Program Assessment
Mar-2005
NSS Program NSS Program AssessmentAssessment
MarMar--20052005
DoD PNT S&T RoadmapApr-2006
DoD PNT S&T DoD PNT S&T RoadmapRoadmapAprApr--20062006
““Develop a Develop a Comprehensive PNT Comprehensive PNT
ArchitectureArchitecture””
““Develop a Develop a DoD Timing DoD Timing
ArchitectureArchitecture””
JROCM 187-06Sep-2006
JROCM 187JROCM 187--0606SepSep--20062006
““JROC Approves JROC Approves the PNT JCD & the PNT JCD &
Validates the Five Validates the Five Gaps IdentifiedGaps Identified””
DSB Task Force on GPS
Oct-2005
DSB Task DSB Task Force on GPSForce on GPS
OctOct--20052005
““Develop a Develop a Comprehensive Comprehensive
National PNT National PNT ArchitectureArchitecture””
““Periodically Evaluate Periodically Evaluate RadionavigationRadionavigation
System Contributions System Contributions to the Overall Mixto the Overall Mix””
““Conduct a Conduct a Comprehensive Analysis Comprehensive Analysis
of GPS Backup of GPS Backup Navigation & Precision Navigation & Precision
Timing OptionsTiming Options””
““Determine the Determine the optimal integrated optimal integrated system for meeting system for meeting
requirements of requirements of Federal usersFederal users””
““Validate GPS Validate GPS Requirements vs. Requirements vs.
PNT RequirementsPNT Requirements””
Radionav Sys. Task Force Jan-2004
RadionavRadionav Sys. Sys. Task Force Task Force JanJan--20042004
Volpe GPS Vulnerability
Sep-2001
Volpe GPS Volpe GPS VulnerabilityVulnerability
SepSep--20012001
Nat’l Approach to Aug. GPS
Dec-1994
NatNat’’l Approach l Approach to Aug. GPSto Aug. GPS
DecDec--19941994
Civil AoABriefing
May-2005
Civil Civil AoAAoABriefingBriefing
MayMay--20052005
5
Foundations
““NSSO develop a NSSO develop a National PNT National PNT ArchitectureArchitecture””
““NPCO will NPCO will initiate an effort initiate an effort
with NSSOwith NSSO””
““RITA will lead RITA will lead effort on behalf of effort on behalf of DOT for the civil DOT for the civil
communitycommunity””
ASD/NII Memo23-Jan-2006
ASD/NII MemoASD/NII Memo2323--JanJan--20062006
NPEC Action Items26-Jan-2006
NPEC NPEC Action ItemsAction Items2626--JanJan--20062006
DOT/RITA Memo
14-Mar-2006
DOT/RITA DOT/RITA MemoMemo
1414--MarMar--20062006
PNT Architecture TOR
11-Jul-2006
PNT Architecture PNT Architecture TORTOR
1111--JulJul--20062006
More Effective & Efficient PNT and an Evolutionary Path for Government Provided Systems & ServicesMore Effective & Efficient PNT and an Evolutionary More Effective & Efficient PNT and an Evolutionary Path for Government Provided Systems & ServicesPath for Government Provided Systems & Services
RITA
FAA
FHWA
FRA
DOC
NIST
DHS
USCG
DOI
State
NCO
NASA
NII
USAF
AFSPC
SMC
USA
USMC
USN
USNO
NGA
NSA
STRAT
JS
S&T
PBFA
SAF/USA
NSSO
SMDC
NRL
JPDO
6
National PNT Architecture Scope
Military
HomelandSecurity
Civil
Commercial
Individual
Space
Air
Surface
Sub-Surface
Location Based ServicesTrackingSurvey
ScientificRecreation
TransportationMachine Control
AgricultureWeapons
OrientationCommunications
and Timing
GNSS
GNSS Augmentation
TerrestrialNAVAIDS
Onboard / User Equip
Networks
Military
Civil
Commercial
International
USERS DOMAIN MISSIONS PROVIDERSSOURCES
Broad Scope Requires Innovative Approaches and Focused Analysis Efforts
7
“As-Is” PNT Architecture Graphic (2008)
EMI EMI
GPS
Tracking
Celestial
Star Trackers
Commercial Augmentations
Beacons
ENABLERS & INFRASTRUCTUREUSNO NIST
Star CatalogsCryptography
Modeling
Standards Science & Technology
PoliciesMapping/Charting/GeodesyElectro Optical Info.
Reference Frames NGA NGSNSA
TestingIndustrial Base
Laser Ranging NetworkLaunch
Version 21 Aug 2007
User Interface Orgs
Inertial
Clocks N
SEW
WAASGALILEO
(GIOVE-A/B)
Cell Phone Networks
TASS
GLONASS
EGNOSCommercial
Augmentations
Time Transfer
WAGEZAOD
Compass
MTSAT
Doppler Tercom
ASI
GDGPS
NDGPSMDGPS
IGS
VOR/DME, TACANILS, NDB
GBAS Cat-I
Time Transfer
Compass
Pedometers
CORS
NAVCEN
GPSOC NOCC
Time Transfer
LORAN-C
AAI
EnvironmentWeather
Geo-politicalFiscal
SpectrumNavwar
Interference
8
Primary PNT Gaps
• Gaps primarily drawn from military’s PNT Joint Capabilities Document, with additions and modifications from parallel civil community documents and discussions– Physically Impeded Environments – Electromagnetically Impeded Environments – Higher accuracy with integrity– Hazardously Misleading Info (Integrity) – High Altitude/Space Position and Orientation– Geospatial information - access to improved GIS data
(regarding intended path of travel)– Insufficient modeling capability
9
Primary Objective of the Architecture
Near & Mid-Term Decisions Guided
by Architecture
Near & MidNear & Mid--Term Term Decisions Guided Decisions Guided
by Architectureby Architecture
Based on Long-Term
Vision
Based on Based on LongLong--Term Term
VisionVision
Without Enterprise
Architecture Strategy
Without Without Enterprise Enterprise
Architecture Architecture StrategyStrategy
Cap
abili
tyC
apab
ility
ShouldShould--Be Be ArchitectureArchitecture
Evolved Evolved Baseline Baseline
(EBL)(EBL)
AsAs--Is Is ArchitectureArchitecture System EmphasisSystem Emphasis
ArchitectureArchitectureEmphasisEmphasis
NowNow 5 Years5 Years 10 Years10 Years 15 Years15 Years 20 Years20 Years
“…provide more effective and efficient PNT capabilities focused onthe 2025 timeframe and an evolutionary path for governmentprovided systems and services.” -- Terms of Reference
“…“…provide more effective and efficient PNT capabilities focused onprovide more effective and efficient PNT capabilities focused onthe 2025 timeframe and an evolutionary path for governmentthe 2025 timeframe and an evolutionary path for governmentprovided systems and services.provided systems and services.”” ---- Terms of ReferenceTerms of Reference
10
PNT User Perspectives (2025)
Framework to describe user needs & environments, and which users are affected by each capability gapVersion 18 Jul 2007
11
Cumulative Process
Data GatheringData GatheringConcept DevelopmentConcept Development
Analysis & AssessmentAnalysis & Assessment
Needs & Gaps
Environment, Technology& Evolved Baseline
Community InvolvementCommunity InvolvementArchitecture Development Team,
Subject Matter Experts,Small Working Groups
& Industry
Trade Space, Features & Architectures
Analytical Framework
12
Related Efforts & National Decisions
• Recent & Upcoming Decisions – Future of eLORAN– Future of NDGPS and High Accuracy NDGPS– Backup SATNAV Tasking – Backup PNT Needs (ADS-B, NGATS, Timing Infrastructure)– GPS III and OCX Acquisition Strategies
National PNT ArchitectureDOT and FAA
• Aviation Navigation Evolution Roadmap• GPS Evolutionary Architecture Study
DOT and FAA• Aviation Navigation Evolution Roadmap
• GPS Evolutionary Architecture Study
National Space-Based PNT Coordination Office
• 5-Year Plan & Assessment
National Space-Based PNT Coordination Office
• 5-Year Plan & Assessment
USSTRATCOM• PNT Joint Capabilities Document
• PNT Functional Solutions Analysis
USSTRATCOM• PNT Joint Capabilities Document
• PNT Functional Solutions Analysis
NSSO• NSS Program Assessment
• NSS Plan
NSSO• NSS Program Assessment
• NSS Plan
RAND• Ensuring Effective PNT
RAND• Ensuring Effective PNT
Joint Planning & Development Office• Next Generation Air Transportation System
SatNav Backup Study
Joint Planning & Development Office• Next Generation Air Transportation System
SatNav Backup Study
MAINTAIN SHARED SITUATIONAL AWARENESS
DHS/USCG• Timing Criticality Study
DHS/USCG• Timing Criticality Study DOD
• DOD PNT S&T Roadmap update
DOD• DOD PNT S&T
Roadmap update
13
Guiding Principles
SUPPORTING VECTORCooperative Organizational Structures
SUPPORTING VECTORSynergy of PNT with Communications
VISIONUS Leadership in Global PNT
VISIONUS Leadership in Global PNT
STRATEGYGreater Common Denominator
STRATEGYGreater Common Denominator
PRIMARY VECTORMultiple Phenomenologies
PRIMARY VECTORMultiple Phenomenologies
PRIMARY VECTORInterchangeable Solutions
PRIMARY VECTORInterchangeable Solutions
14
US Leadership in Global PNTUS Leadership in Global PNTUS Leadership in Global PNT
National PNT Architecture Vision
• National PNT Architecture based on policy foundation set by 2004Presidential Policy Directive on Space-Based PNT
• Efficiently (cost, schedule, acceptable risks, user impact) develop and field the best technologies and systems
• Promulgate stable policies (commitment to funding, commitment toperformance, advanced notice of change, etc)
• Foster innovation through competition within the commercial sector• Ensure robust and enduring inter-agency coordination and cooperation• Maximize the practical use of military, civil, commercial and foreign
systems and technologies• Judiciously develop and apply standards and best practices
15
National PNT Architecture Strategy
• Satisfy common needs with common solutions• Promulgate a predominantly “dependent” architecture where users rely
upon external sources • Leverage ongoing US GNSS modernization to assure global service and
support national interests• Promote adoption of low-burden “autonomous” features for robustness• Specialized needs still require specialized solutions • Balance provided or enabled capabilities with the need for a military PNT
advantage
The US can Best Achieve Efficiency and Effectiveness through a Greater Common Denominator Approach
The US can Best Achieve Efficiency and Effectiveness The US can Best Achieve Efficiency and Effectiveness through a Greater Common Denominator Approachthrough a Greater Common Denominator Approach
16
“Should-Be” PNT Architecture Graphic (2025)
EMI EMI
GPS
Tracking
Celestial
Star Trackers
Commercial Augmentations
Beacons
ENABLERS & INFRASTRUCTUREUSNO NIST
Star CatalogsCryptography
Modeling
Standards Science & Technology
PoliciesMapping/Charting/GeodesyElectro Optical Info.
Reference Frames NGA NGSNSA
TestingIndustrial Base
Laser Ranging NetworkLaunch
Version 22 Oct 2007
Networks
User Interface Orgs
Pseudolites & Beacons
Geospatial Data
PNT UserEquipment
Autonomous
Inertial
Sensors & Sensor Aiding
Clocks
N
SEW
Wireless Networks
Space Comm & Nav Arch
Pseudolites
SATCOMAiding Data &
Ranging Signals
Synergy of PNT and Communications Multiple
PhenomenologiesGround Based Radio Freq
Foreign GNSS
Cell Phone Networks
Pseudolites & Beacons
PNT signal monitoring
EvolvedGNSS Augmentation
Foreign Regional Nav
Interchangeable Solutions
Cooperative Organizational Structures
EnvironmentWeather
Geo-politicalFiscal
SpectrumNavwar
Interference TechnologicalDemographics
Cleared for public release, distribution unlimited; SAF/PA case 2007-0613, 20 Sep 07
17
Next Steps
• NSSO, RITA & NII oversee development of detailed transition and implementation planning
• Hold Workshop to Obtain Industry Feedback on Recommendations When Publicly Released
• Architecture Implementation Memorandum – Approved event-based implementation timeline
• Influence update to PNT planning documents– Federal Radionavigation Plan– Five-Year National Space-Based PNT Plan
18
BACKUPS
19
Purpose of NSSO ArchitecturesPurpose of NSSO Architectures
• Enterprise Level Guidance– High Level Capabilities– Fundamental Processes– Organizations– Infrastructure
• Similar to City Planning– Considerations for how people, buildings,
transportation, utilities work together– Effect of External Factors (e.g., weather,
state jurisdiction, etc.)– Objective is not to design all the buildings– May conduct detailed design of some
elements, primarily to gain understanding of higher level issues
20
Functional Reference Model
Disseminate PTO (to User)Disseminate Disseminate
PTO (to User)PTO (to User)Receive PTO Information
Receive PTO Receive PTO InformationInformation
Generate PTO
Information
Generate Generate PTO PTO
InformationInformation
Determine PTO State
Determine Determine PTO StatePTO State
Receive PTO Information
Receive PTO Receive PTO InformationInformation
Disseminate PTO
Information
Disseminate Disseminate PTO PTO
InformationInformationDetermine
PTODetermine Determine
PTOPTO
AugmenterAugmenter
ProviderProvider
UserUserDisseminate PTO
Information
Disseminate Disseminate PTO PTO
InformationInformation
Receive PTO Information
Receive PTO Receive PTO InformationInformation
Determine PTO State
Determine Determine PTO StatePTO State
Generate PTO
Information
Generate Generate PTO PTO
InformationInformation
Reference Frames
Reference Reference FramesFrames
Geospatial InformationGeospatial Geospatial InformationInformation
ModelsModelsModelsStandardsStandardsStandardsCommand, Control, &
Status
Command, Command, Control, & Control, &
StatusStatus
PTO: Position, Time and/or OrientationPTO: Position, Time and/or Orientation(including the time derivatives)(including the time derivatives)
NavigateNavigate
21
Concept Development
PNT Architecture Trade Space
• Source Location (of the service provider)– Terrestrial: concept provides service from,
near, or beneath the surface of the earth– Space: concept provides service from space
• Service Volume (of the service provided)– Local: concept provides a meaningful
service only at a fixed point– Interplanetary: concept provides a
meaningful service throughout the solar system
• Autonomy (of the user)– Dependent: concept requires frequent
refresh of information from external sources to provide a meaningful service
– Autonomous: concept, once initialized, is self-contained and requires no refresh of information from external sources to provide a meaningful service
LocalInterplanetary
Dependent
Autonomous
Terrestrial
Space
22
PNT Representative Architectures (RA)
RA0 = EBL (Point of Departure)RA0 = EBL (Point of Departure)
Service VolumeService Volume Source LocationSource LocationAutonomyAutonomy
0: Evolved Baseline1: Dependent Terrestrial2A: Combined GNSS
Constellations4: Network Aiding of GNSS5: Aided Autonomous
Sensors and Aiding Sources6: Highly Autonomous
14
65
2A
LocalInterplanetary
Dependent
Autonomous
Terrestrial
Space
RAs ARE NOT FINAL SOLUTIONS – THEY ARE USED TO GAIN INSIGHTS TOWARDS FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS
23
From Representative Architectures … to Recommendations
Representative Architectures
Hybrid Architectures
Should Be Architecture- Recommendations- Guidance- Decision Criteria
Preliminary Analysis(Feb - Mar 07)
Cost and Performance Analysis
(Apr - Jul 07)
24
Three Themes (Hybrid Architectures)
Hybrid A• Common solutions
for many users• Horizontal integration• Greatest common
denominator• Emphasis on global
and long range broadcasts direct to users
Hybrid B• Common solutions
for many users• Horizontal integration• Greatest common
denominator• Emphasis on
networks
Hybrid C• Specialized solutions
for each user group• Vertical integration • Least common
denominator• Emphasis on
autonomous solutions
25
These features should be hybrid cornerstones:
These features/systems can contribute to covering primary PNT gaps; those which help the most, or which help to cover multiple gaps, should be included in hybrids:
INS Clock
“Here”Beacons
MultiLatBeacons
Stars
EBL Enablers
GIS Data
Integrity Augment
US GNSS
AccuracyAugment
Ground Based PNT
Multi Sensor
Integration
More Satellites INS
Clock
Network Aiding
Higher Freq
Cell Network
LF/ELF PNT
Signalsof
Opportunity
More Power
Signal Diversity
TopoSensors
Reduced Age of Data
Redun-dancy
Frequent CalibrationComm Stars
Version 18 Jul 07
Color Legend:Enablers
Space
Ground
Network
Autonomous
Implementation Undefined
Job Aid -- Draft PNT Architecture Features
Network s
26
Comm
EBL Enablers
EBL Enablers
Signal Diversity
Reduced Age of Data
Signal Diversity
Reduced Age of Data
Signal Diversity
Signal Diversity
Redun-dancy
Redun-dancy
More Satellites
More Satellites
Comm
More Satellites
MorePower
MorePower
MorePower
EBL Enablers
GIS Data
EBL Enablers
EBL Enablers
EBL Enablers
EBL Enablers
GIS Data
HigherFreq
LF/ELF PNT
NetworkAiding
NetworkAiding
LF/ELF PNT
NetworkAiding
LF/ELF PNT
NetworkAiding
CellNetwork
CellNetwork
Cornerstone Features: EBL Enablers
GIS Data
US GNSS
Ground Based PNT
INS Clock Stars AccuracyAugment
Integrity Augment
Access to Geospatial Data
Hi-Altitude Pos. & Orientation
Hazardously Misleading Info
Higher Accuracy with Integrity
EM Impeded–Intentional
EM Impeded–Unintentional
Phys. Impeded–Underwater
Phys. Impeded–Underground
Phys. Impeded–Indoors
Phys. Impeded–Canopy
Phys. Impeded–Urban Canyon
Selected features that can contribute to covering gapsPrimary Gaps
NetworkAiding
CellNetwork
ClockMulti
Sensor Integration
INS Clock
INS ClockMulti
Sensor Integration
INS ClockMulti
Sensor Integration
INS ClockMulti
Sensor Integration
LF/ELF PNT
INS ClockMulti
Sensor Integration
INS ClockMulti
Sensor Integration
LF/ELF PNT
NetworkAiding
CellNetwork
INS ClockMulti
Sensor Integration
SignalsOf
Opportunity
LF/ELF PNT
NetworkAiding
INS ClockMulti
Sensor Integration
LF/ELF PNT
NetworkAiding
CellNetwork
INS ClockMulti
Sensor Integration
SignalsOf
Opportunity
“Here”Beacons
MultiLatBeacons
TopoSensors
Version 18 Jul 07
MultiLatBeacons
MultiLatBeacons
MultiLatBeacons
Stars
Frequent Calibration
Frequent Calibration
TopoSensors
TopoSensors
TopoSensors
Stars
Stars
“Here”Beacons
MultiLatBeacons
“Here”Beacons
MultiLatBeacons
Job Aid – PNT Architecture Features vs. Gaps
Networks
“Here”Beacons
MultiLatBeacons
“Here”Beacons
MultiLatBeacons
“Here”Beacons
MultiLatBeacons