8/11/2019 4 Spouses Palomo vs CA
2/7
of the %ublic >and >aw ?CA 101@ nor re$istrable under the
>and =e$istration Act ?ActNo' 0* @'
The %alo!os, howe er, continued in possession of the propert ,
paid real estateta/es thereon 7*8 and introduced i!pro e!ents b
plantin$ rice, bananas, pandan andcoconuts' On April 6, 1*
8/11/2019 4 Spouses Palomo vs CA
3/7
1(2 -ec *ring ot Nos# &, 9, (, ', 4, 0, /, =, 3, &7,
&& *nd &9, > *n II%3933 *nd ots
&,9&,6&&8 ( *nd ' o) > *n II%3974 *s p*rt o) the
$i5i Hot pring N*tion* >*r?and =e$istration'"
7;8 As shown b E/pediente No' =O =ecord *6;; which beca!e the
basis for the issuance of alle$edOCT No' 1*55 ?1 *@ and E/pediente
No' 1 +>=O =ecord *6 6' It should be noted howe er thatthe
=e$ister of the Deeds does not ha e an record of an OCT issued
pursuant to +>=O=ecord *6 6'
7)8 As shown b E/pediente No' , +>=O record *6;1 which beca!e
the basis for the issuance of thealle$ed OCT No' =O 1*5 ?1ot Nos'
1, ;, ), 0, 5, , ot No' 0 of %lan II *; 5'
7 8 E/h' ;1'7
