1
Pallavi.Chakravorty@timesgroup.com T he 2nd edition of the ET2Good4Good CSR Ratings indeed turned out be an event to remember. With the Jury in full attendance along with most participating companies, it was encouraging to see how we have made a mark in just one year. Plus, a 38 per cent jump in the number of participating companies and a wonderful feedback from both, the jury and the participants, made the second year a really positive one for us. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become one of the standard business practices of our times, particularly with the government getting more and more serious about it. For companies committed to CSR, it means kudos and an enhanced overall reputation — a powerful statement of what they stand for in an often cynical business world. The ET2Good4Good Ratings — the highest recognition by ET in the CSR domain — was precisely drafted by ET and KPMG as the gold standard in CSR to recognise the corporates doing best CSR work. The idea was to create a platform for comparative benchmarking and process improvement, and encourage companies to keep up the good work. What makes the platform even more coveted is the fact that the ratings scheme doesn’t really stop after the conferral ceremony. Each corporate has an individual feedback session with ET and KPMG where they are given detailed inputs and feedback on their performance and the best in class practices. These sessions help the companies ascertain where they stand in terms of CSR and also what more can they do in the field of doing good. In her opening speech, Naina Lal Kidwai, Ex-Country Head, HSBC India and also one of our jury members, brought out the true essence of CSR and the relevance of this ratings scheme for the companies. “It’s always good to see companies which are in the business of making money also learning to give it away,” she said. “In most of the boards that I am involved with today, I can see how CSR is being driven right from the top and indeed becoming a part of the company’s DNA. The most meaningful being those efforts which engage employees and embrace CSR completely,” she said. Regarding the scheme, there was a conscious effort not to portray it as an award as an award doesn’t really leaves much scope for improvement, while a rating has an aspirational value. One of the biggest changes that the jury brought about in this year’s ratings was the ratings itself. Apart from the 2Good and 4Good ratings, we introduced two new ratings of Aspire 2Good and Challenger 2Good. The idea was to acknowledge those who are really trying to make a difference to the society and also to give them an opportunity to try harder to achieve the ET 2Good and ET 4Good ratings. We are still evolving, particularly in terms of process and parameters. The jury meets twice a year — an unlikely ritual for any other event — to brainstorm on the process and again to evaluate the submissions. And we can proudly say that we really have come a long way in terms of experience in the past one year. Braced with very positive feedback from the companies and the overall momentum the ratings has gained, we look forward to an even better year in terms of participation and bettering of processes. For any feedback/information reach us at [email protected] Driving positive change is an integral part of our core purpose whereby we enable communities to rise. Our CSR efforts are focused on supporting girls, youth and farmers in the domains of education, health and environment. SHEETAL MEHTA Senior Vice President - CSR, Mahindra Group The beauty of this ratings scheme is its structure. The feedback sessions with the companies are really helpful particularly in terms of self- assessment DEEPAK ARORA Head - Corporate affairs, Nayara Energy This initiative is a good way to measure your CSR progress and ground impact. The good part is the feedback from ET and KPMG that helps us assess where we stand in terms of CSR and how can we contribute more PRATYUSH PANDA CSR Head, ACC Cement We do CSR using the Toyota Way Plan-Do-Check-Act principle. This ratings helps us reflect on our activities and kaizen them so that we can serve our stake- holders and communities better NAVEEN SONI VP (External Affairs, CSR & PR), Toyota Kirloskar Motor The evaluation process is such that every year it sets a benchmark for the company itself, thus allowing a company to self-evaluate. This rating system is distinctive in the way that it allows a company to grow from within AVANISH KUMAR Professor, Public Policy & Governance, MDI If India has truly to become a country with equality and social justice and we are to achieve the goals of social development and sustainability, it is important that many more companies participate in the process T.C.A. RANGACHARI Distinguished Fellow, Vivekananda International Foundation What struck me this year besides the generosity of the companies involved in CSR activities, was the careful measurement of the impact, some of the innovations, and the attention to so many factors that go into doing quality CSR work ASHOK ALEXANDER Founder, Antara Foundation What makes the platform stand out is the criteria itself, which isn’t just about the spend but also, outcomes, impact, governance, and the way companies actually process and progress on the CSR criteria as have been set out NAINA LAL KIDWAI Ex-Country Head, HSBC India Pallavi.Chakravorty @timesgroup.com C ompassion, as they say, cannot be built or legislated. It comes from within. Perhaps true. In a very thought- provoking session, R.A. Mashelkar, National Research Professor; Vineet Nayar, Founder & Chairman, Sampark Foundation; Akhil Bansal, Deputy CEO, KPMG; and Vikram Kirloskar, Vice Chairman, Toyota Kirloskar Motor and Vice President, CII, discussed the future of CSR and how society can benefit from it. The panel was moderated by T.K. Arun, Editor- Opinion, The Economic Times. The speakers discussed if pooling in of resources by corporates to address a common cause could be the way forward. While Nayar didn’t really see much scope in that, he said an idea through which corporates deploy the best of their people and resources, and help solve some complex issues that the government hasn’t been able to solve, can be the real game- changer. Bansal felt otherwise. “Collaboration on a local level between companies to work towards a common cause can help as it can have a bigger impact.” He also felt that legislation has encouraged companies to invest in CSR and also attracted involvement from the top-most stakeholders. Often credited as being a dangerous optimist, Mashelkar, said, “CSR 2.0 to me is doing well by doing good.” He spoke about how a scholarship of `60 per month that he got from the Tata Trust, helped him study and reach where he is today. Agreeing to that thought, Kirloskar said that it is not so much about the money you put in, but more about what impact is achieved with that. “I belong to a century-old business family, and we have developed a culture of compassion over the years. For us, CSR is a core activity.” The panellists also spoke about how corporates can contribute to CSR just by paying their taxes on time. “If all corporates pay their taxes diligently, the government will have enough money to fund better healthcare, education and a host of other issues facing the nation,” Bansal said. One big learning that emerged from the session was the importance of investing in an innovative idea that is disruptive. “Within two years of the Sampark Foundation being formed, we realised the need to concentrate on just one area — education — as we had a disruptive innovative idea that could help us reach millions of children in less than $1 per child per annum,” Nayar said. “I agree,” said Mashelkar. Citing the example of an innovation by TCS that could have helped check illiteracy, he said, “TCS came up with an idea called computer- based functional literacy that enabled learning via pictures. For example, a person could learn the word Mother by looking at a picture and not by first learning the alphabets as we did. In 46 hours of training, an illiterate could read a newspaper,” he said. The discussion ended on the note that CSR is about impact and not money. And the sooner we realise it, the better it is. The sustainability of any CSR programme depends on the whole- hearted participation of its stakeholders. We work a lot with the government, for example. We have signed an MoU with the Gujarat government for imparting digital education in 1,000 schools BRIG ATUL WAHI, Trustee for Welspun Foundation and Executive CSR Head, Welspun India Ltd. OMC has presence mostly in the backward areas of the state, which have a big tribal population. Their human development index in terms of education, health and social well- being is very poor. Our focus is to address these issues and help them improve their living standards SANTANU RATH, Director (Personnel) and Member of Board, OMC Ours is a very involved and empowered team, and we engage in very deep discussions regarding various aspects of CSR. We follow a very systematic and structured process and do the best we can to sustain the programme. D.K. SEN, Director and CSR committee member, L&T Digital platform and usage of modern technology helps to reach out to the targeted people, with the required need at a much faster pace. That itself is extremely satisfying. HARINDER SIKKA, Group Director-Strategic Business, Piramal Enterprises Winning the ratings second time in a row is very encouraging indeed. As for our CSR process, we are a very involved team and we first try to assess the needs of the people we are targeting to reach and then build a plan around it. We also use lot of technology in our innovations. A.K. TOMAR, Executive Director, Maruti Suzuki This is our second year of association with the ET2Good4Good ratings and our experience has been very encouraging. The best part is after the evaluation, we are given feedback in terms of where all we have improved and where all we are required to step up VIJAY SETHI, Head-CSR, CIO and Head-HR, Hero MotoCorp We are a company from the Bellary district of Karnataka. We recognise the needs of the neighbourhood and work as per what the society needs. We have adopted 16 plants under our CSR programme and this is precisely our success story MEDA VENKATAIAH, Executive Director and Member of Board, MSPL CONSUMER CONNECT INITIATIVE The second edition of the ET2Good4Good CSR Ratings turned out to be a major success with 33 companies walking away with the accolades in the presence of several industry bigwigs CSR 2.0: About Innovation and Compassion (L to R): T.K. Arun, Editor-Opinion, ET (Moderator); R.A. Mashelkar, National Research Professor; Vineet Nayar, Founder & Chairman, Sampark Foundation; Akhil Bansal, Deputy CEO, KPMG; and Vikram Kirloskar, Vice Chairman, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Winners of the ET 4Good ratings pose with their certificates The ET Aspire 2Good rating has set the aspiration levels high for these participants ET 2Good winners pose with their certificates OMC bags the ET Challenger 2Good rating POINT OF VIEW We asked some of our winners to talk about what CSR means for them and how important it is in their scheme of things CSR is not a one-time activity for us; we see this more as an ongoing process. Plus, we involve our employees at various levels — from the top to bottom. The top level is involved in approving budgets and projects, the middle and bottom management are involved in the execution part VINOD SINGH, Director & Board Member — CSR Committee, GKN Driveline It’s interesting to watch how companies looking to work towards humanitarian good, progress over the years, the impact they create, the kind of governance structures they bring in, and the innovations they make to drive social change VINEET NAYAR Founder & Chairman, Sampark Foundation Compassion has to come from within. I have seen many companies, irrespective of them making profits or not, being involved in CSR and doing excellent work. I hope this initiative helps drive more companies towards CSR R.A. MASHELKAR National Research Professor There has been a big improvement in terms of the quality of submissions and the evaluation process. There are so many companies who are doing excellent work and I would encourage such companies to participate in this ratings NISHI VASUDEVA Ex-CMD, Hindustan Petroleum AND THE WINNERS ARE... IT WAS A PROUD MOMENT FOR OUR PARTICIPANTS. HERE ARE SOME CANDID SHOTS THAT CAPTURED THEM ALL ABOUT THE PROCESS... Santhosh Jayaram, Partner and Head- Sustainability and CSR Advisory. KPMG in India, explains the process — in its entirety — about how the submissions are analysed and winners are chosen. Before we started and collaborated on this ratings initiative, we realised that a genuine benchmarking process was missing in this space. With CSR gaining board-level attention in most companies and the government too taking it more seriously than ever, it was a good time to launch a ratings scheme such as the ET 2Good4Good ratings. In the first year, we put the companies in just one category but we realised that it was resulting in an unfair comparison. So, this year we bucketed them into four categories of annual CSR spend of less than `10 crore, `10-30 crore, `30-100 crore and more than `100 crore. These companies are rated across seven pillars of Innovation, Impact, Governance, Stakeholder Engagement, Strategy, Monitoring and Evaluation, and Reporting. Companies can apply as per the parameters relevant to them through an online portal. There are 65 questions across all the seven pillars, each carrying a benchmark. The companies are then evaluated in comparison to these benchmarks and the evaluation is then presented to the jury. After the conferring of the ratings, feedback sessions are conducted for each participating company, so that they know where they lacked and how they can improve their rating. JURY SPEAK WINNERS’ SPEAK CROWNING THE TRUE CSR DRIVERS www.economictimes.com/et2good4good ET 4GOOD Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. GAIL (India) Ltd. Hero MotoCorp Ltd. JSW Steel Ltd. Larsen & Toubro Ltd. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Mytrah Energy (India) Pvt. Ltd. Piramal Enterprises Ltd. Tata Motors Ltd. Tata Projects Ltd. ET 2GOOD ACC Ltd. Ashok Leyland Ltd. Central Coalfields Ltd. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Tech Mahindra Ltd. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd. WNS Global Services Pvt. Ltd. YES Bank Ltd. ET CHALLENGER 2GOOD Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Odisha Mining Corporation Ltd. ET ASPIRE 2GOOD Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Aparajitha Corporate Services Pvt. Ltd. Embassy Group GKN Driveline (India) Ltd. HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd. HPCL ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. MSPL Ltd. Nayara Energy Ltd. Tamilnadu Newsprint & Papers Ltd. Welspun India Ltd. SPECIAL COMMENDATION FOR COMMITMENT TOWARDS CSR Vedanta Ltd.

2GOOD TRUE CSR DRIVERS

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2GOOD TRUE CSR DRIVERS

[email protected]

The 2nd edition of theET2Good4Good CSR Ratings indeedturned out be an event to

remember. With the Jury in fullattendance along with most participatingcompanies, it was encouraging to seehow we have made a mark in just oneyear. Plus, a 38 per cent jump in thenumber of participating companies and awonderful feedback from both, the juryand the participants, made the secondyear a really positive one for us.

Corporate social responsibility (CSR)has become one of the standardbusiness practices of our times,particularly with the government gettingmore and more serious about it. Forcompanies committed to CSR, it meanskudos and an enhanced overallreputation — a powerful statement ofwhat they stand for in an often cynicalbusiness world.

The ET2Good4Good Ratings — thehighest recognition by ET in the CSRdomain — was precisely drafted by ETand KPMG as the gold standard in CSR to

recognise the corporates doing best CSRwork. The idea was to create a platformfor comparative benchmarking andprocess improvement, and encouragecompanies to keep up the good work.What makes the platform even morecoveted is the fact that the ratingsscheme doesn’t really stop after theconferral ceremony. Each corporate hasan individual feedback session with ETand KPMG where they are given detailedinputs and feedback on theirperformance and the best in classpractices. These sessions help the

companies ascertain where they stand interms of CSR and also what more canthey do in the field of doing good.

In her opening speech, Naina LalKidwai, Ex-Country Head, HSBC Indiaand also one of our jury members,brought out the true essence of CSR andthe relevance of this ratings scheme forthe companies. “It’s always good to seecompanies which are in the business ofmaking money also learning to give itaway,” she said. “In most of the boardsthat I am involved with today, I can seehow CSR is being driven right from the

top and indeed becoming a part of thecompany’s DNA. The most meaningfulbeing those efforts which engageemployees and embrace CSRcompletely,” she said.

Regarding the scheme, there was aconscious effort not to portray it as anaward as an award doesn’t really leavesmuch scope for improvement, while arating has an aspirational value. One ofthe biggest changes that the jury broughtabout in this year’s ratings was the ratingsitself. Apart from the 2Good and 4Goodratings, we introduced two new ratings ofAspire 2Good and Challenger 2Good. Theidea was to acknowledge those who arereally trying to make a difference to thesociety and also to give them anopportunity to try harder to achieve the ET2Good and ET 4Good ratings.

We are still evolving, particularly interms of process and parameters. The jurymeets twice a year — an unlikely ritual forany other event — to brainstorm on theprocess and again to evaluate thesubmissions. And we can proudly say thatwe really have come a long way in termsof experience in the past one year. Bracedwith very positive feedback from thecompanies and the overall momentumthe ratings has gained, we look forward toan even better year in terms ofparticipation and bettering of processes.

For any feedback/information reach usat [email protected]

Driving positive change is an integralpart of our core purpose wherebywe enable communities to rise. OurCSR efforts are focused onsupporting girls, youth and farmersin the domains of education, healthand environment.

SHEETAL MEHTA Senior Vice President - CSR,

Mahindra Group

The beauty of this ratingsscheme is its structure.The feedback sessionswith the companies arereally helpful particularlyin terms of self-assessment

DEEPAK ARORA Head - Corporate

affairs, Nayara Energy

This initiative is a good way tomeasure your CSR progressand ground impact. The goodpart is the feedback from ETand KPMG that helps us assesswhere we stand in terms ofCSR and how can wecontribute more

PRATYUSH PANDA CSR Head, ACC Cement

We do CSR using the Toyota WayPlan-Do-Check-Act principle.This ratings helps us reflect onour activities and kaizen them sothat we can serve our stake-holders and communities better

NAVEEN SONI VP (External Affairs,CSR & PR), Toyota

Kirloskar Motor

The evaluation process is such thatevery year it sets a benchmark forthe company itself, thus allowing acompany to self-evaluate. This ratingsystem is distinctive in the way thatit allows a company to grow fromwithin

AVANISH KUMARProfessor, Public Policy & Governance, MDI

If India has truly to become acountry with equality and socialjustice and we are to achieve thegoals of social development andsustainability, it is important thatmany more companies participate inthe process

T.C.A. RANGACHARIDistinguished Fellow,

Vivekananda International Foundation

What struck me this year besides thegenerosity of the companiesinvolved in CSR activities, was thecareful measurement of the impact,some of the innovations, and theattention to so many factors that gointo doing quality CSR work

ASHOK ALEXANDERFounder, Antara Foundation

What makes the platform stand out isthe criteria itself, which isn’t justabout the spend but also, outcomes,impact, governance, and the waycompanies actually process andprogress on the CSR criteria as havebeen set out

NAINA LAL KIDWAIEx-Country Head, HSBC India

[email protected]

Compassion, as they say,cannot be built or legislated.It comes from within.

Perhaps true. In a very thought-provoking session, R.A. Mashelkar,National Research Professor;Vineet Nayar, Founder &Chairman, Sampark Foundation;Akhil Bansal, Deputy CEO, KPMG;and Vikram Kirloskar, ViceChairman, Toyota Kirloskar Motorand Vice President, CII, discussedthe future of CSR and how societycan benefit from it. The panel wasmoderated by T.K. Arun, Editor-Opinion, The Economic Times.

The speakers discussed ifpooling in of resources bycorporates to address a commoncause could be the way forward.While Nayar didn’t really see muchscope in that, he said an ideathrough which corporates deploythe best of their people andresources, and help solve somecomplex issues that thegovernment hasn’t been able tosolve, can be the real game-changer. Bansal felt otherwise.

“Collaboration on a local levelbetween companies to worktowards a common cause canhelp as it can have a biggerimpact.” He also felt thatlegislation has encouragedcompanies to invest in CSR andalso attracted involvement fromthe top-most stakeholders.

Often credited as being adangerous optimist, Mashelkar,said, “CSR 2.0 to me is doing wellby doing good.” He spoke about

how a scholarship of ̀ 60 permonth that he got from the TataTrust, helped him study and reachwhere he is today. Agreeing to thatthought, Kirloskar said that it is notso much about the money you putin, but more about what impact isachieved with that. “I belong to acentury-old business family, andwe have developed a culture ofcompassion over the years. For us,CSR is a core activity.”

The panellists also spoke about

how corporates can contribute toCSR just by paying their taxes ontime. “If all corporates pay theirtaxes diligently, the governmentwill have enough money to fundbetter healthcare, education and ahost of other issues facing thenation,” Bansal said.

One big learning that emergedfrom the session was theimportance of investing in aninnovative idea that is disruptive.“Within two years of the SamparkFoundation being formed, werealised the need to concentrateon just one area — education — aswe had a disruptive innovativeidea that could help us reachmillions of children in less than $1per child per annum,” Nayar said.

“I agree,” said Mashelkar. Citingthe example of an innovation byTCS that could have helped checkilliteracy, he said, “TCS came upwith an idea called computer-based functional literacy thatenabled learning via pictures. Forexample, a person could learn theword Mother by looking at apicture and not by first learningthe alphabets as we did. In 46hours of training, an illiteratecould read a newspaper,” he said.

The discussion ended on thenote that CSR is about impact andnot money. And the sooner werealise it, the better it is.

The sustainability of any CSRprogramme depends on the whole-

hearted participation of itsstakeholders. We work a lot withthe government, for example.We have signed an MoU withthe Gujarat government forimparting digital education

in 1,000 schools

BRIG ATUL WAHI,Trustee for Welspun

Foundation and Executive CSRHead, Welspun India Ltd.

OMC has presence mostly in thebackward areas of the state,

which have a big tribalpopulation. Their human

development index in terms ofeducation, health and social well-

being is very poor. Our focus isto address these issues and

help them improve theirliving standards

SANTANU RATH, Director (Personnel)

and Member of Board,OMC

Ours is a veryinvolved and

empowered team, andwe engage in very deep discussions

regarding various aspects of CSR.We follow a very systematic and

structured process and do the bestwe can to sustain the programme.

D.K. SEN,Director and CSR committee

member, L&T

Digital platform andusage of modern

technology helps to reachout to the targeted people, with the

required need at a much fasterpace. That itself is extremely

satisfying.

HARINDER SIKKA, Group Director-Strategic Business,

Piramal Enterprises

Winning the ratings second time in arow is very encouraging indeed. Asfor our CSR process, we are a veryinvolved team and we first try to

assess the needs of the people weare targeting to reach and then

build a plan around it. We alsouse lot of technology in our

innovations.

A.K. TOMAR, Executive Director, Maruti

Suzuki

This is our second year ofassociation with the

ET2Good4Good ratings and ourexperience has been very

encouraging. The best part is afterthe evaluation, we are given

feedback in terms of where all wehave improved and where all we

are required to step up

VIJAY SETHI, Head-CSR, CIO and Head-HR,

Hero MotoCorp

We are a company from theBellary district of Karnataka. We

recognise the needs of theneighbourhood and work as perwhat the society needs. We haveadopted 16 plants under our CSRprogramme and this is precisely

our success story

MEDA VENKATAIAH, Executive Director and

Member of Board,MSPL

CONSUMER CONNECT INITIATIVE

The second edition of the ET2Good4Good CSR Ratings turned out to be a major success with 33companies walking away with the accolades in the presence of several industry bigwigs

CSR 2.0: About Innovationand Compassion

(L to R): T.K. Arun, Editor-Opinion, ET (Moderator); R.A. Mashelkar,National Research Professor; Vineet Nayar, Founder & Chairman,Sampark Foundation; Akhil Bansal, Deputy CEO, KPMG; andVikram Kirloskar, Vice Chairman, Toyota Kirloskar Motor

Winners of the ET 4Good ratings pose with their certificates

The ET Aspire 2Good rating has set the aspiration levels high for these participants

ET 2Good winners pose with their certificates

OMC bags the ET Challenger 2Good rating

POINT OFVIEW

We asked some of ourwinners to talk about whatCSR means for them and

how important it is in theirscheme of things

CSR is not a one-time activity for us;we see this more as an ongoing

process. Plus, we involve ouremployees at various levels — fromthe top to bottom. The top level isinvolved in approving budgets andprojects, the middle and bottommanagement are involved in the

execution part

VINOD SINGH, Director & Board Member — CSR

Committee, GKN Driveline

It’s interesting to watch howcompanies looking to work towardshumanitarian good, progress overthe years, the impact they create, thekind of governance structures theybring in, and the innovations theymake to drive social change

VINEET NAYAR Founder & Chairman, Sampark Foundation

Compassion has to come fromwithin. I have seen many companies,irrespective of them making profitsor not, being involved in CSR anddoing excellent work. I hope thisinitiative helps drive morecompanies towards CSR

R.A. MASHELKAR National Research Professor

There has been a big improvementin terms of the quality ofsubmissions and the evaluationprocess. There are so manycompanies who are doing excellentwork and I would encourage suchcompanies to participate in thisratings

NISHI VASUDEVAEx-CMD, Hindustan Petroleum

AND THE WINNERS ARE...

IT WAS A PROUD MOMENT FOR OUR PARTICIPANTS. HERE ARE SOME CANDID SHOTS THAT CAPTURED THEM ALL

ABOUT THE PROCESS...Santhosh Jayaram, Partner and Head-Sustainability and CSR Advisory.KPMG in India, explains the process —in its entirety — about how thesubmissions are analysed and winnersare chosen. Before we started and collaborated onthis ratings initiative, we realised that agenuine benchmarking process wasmissing in this space. With CSR gaining

board-level attention in mostcompanies and the government tootaking it more seriously than ever, itwas a good time to launch a ratingsscheme such as the ET 2Good4Goodratings.

In the first year, we put thecompanies in just one category but werealised that it was resulting in anunfair comparison. So, this year webucketed them into four categories of

annual CSR spend of less than ̀ 10crore, ̀ 10-30 crore, ̀ 30-100 crore andmore than ̀ 100 crore.

These companies are rated acrossseven pillars of Innovation, Impact,Governance, Stakeholder Engagement,Strategy, Monitoring and Evaluation,and Reporting.

Companies can apply as per theparameters relevant to them throughan online portal. There are 65

questions across all the seven pillars,each carrying a benchmark. Thecompanies are then evaluated incomparison to these benchmarks andthe evaluation is then presented to thejury.

After the conferring of the ratings,feedback sessions are conducted foreach participating company, so thatthey know where they lacked and howthey can improve their rating.

JURY SPEAK

WINNERS’ SPEAK

CROWNING THE TRUE CSR DRIVERS

www.economictimes.com/et2good4good

ET 4GOOD ■■ Bharat Aluminium Company

Ltd.

■■ GAIL (India) Ltd.

■■ Hero MotoCorp Ltd.

■■ JSW Steel Ltd.

■■ Larsen & Toubro Ltd.

■■ Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.

■■ Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.

■■ Mytrah Energy (India)

Pvt. Ltd.

■■ Piramal Enterprises Ltd.

■■ Tata Motors Ltd.

■■ Tata Projects Ltd.

ET 2GOOD ■■ ACC Ltd.

■■ Ashok Leyland Ltd.

■■ Central Coalfields Ltd.

■■ Power Grid Corporation ofIndia Ltd.

■■ Tech Mahindra Ltd.

■■ Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd.

■■ WNS Global Services Pvt. Ltd.

■■ YES Bank Ltd.

ET CHALLENGER 2GOOD■■ Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

■■ Odisha Mining CorporationLtd.

ET ASPIRE 2GOOD■■ Amway India Enterprises Pvt.

Ltd.

■■ Aparajitha Corporate Services

Pvt. Ltd.

■■ Embassy Group

■■ GKN Driveline (India) Ltd.

■■ HDFC Asset ManagementCompany Ltd.

■■ HPCL

■■ ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd.

■■ MSPL Ltd.

■■ Nayara Energy Ltd.

■■ Tamilnadu Newsprint & PapersLtd.

■■ Welspun India Ltd.

SPECIAL COMMENDATIONFOR COMMITMENT TOWARDS CSR ■■ Vedanta Ltd.