43
1 Charge density wave Masatsugu Sei Suzuki Department of Physics, SUNY at Binghamton (Date: January 13, 2012) Sir Rudolf Ernst Peierls, CBE (June 5, 1907, Berlin – September 19, 1995, Oxford) was a German-born British physicist. Rudolf Peierls had a major role in Britain's nuclear program, but he also had a role in many modern sciences. His impact on physics can probably be best described by his obituary in Physics Today: "Rudolph Peierls...a major player in the drama of the eruption of nuclear physics into world affairs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Peierls ((John Bardeen (1941))) Many ideas of CDWs were developed in early attemmpts to explain superconductivity. In 1941, John Bardeen suggested that "in the superconducting state there is a small periodic distortion of the lattice" that produces energy gaps, and that these gaps would lead to enhanced diamagnetism. Bardeen abandoned this idea when he realized the difficulty of obtaining an appropriate arrangement of gaps on the three-dimensional Fermi surfaces of common superconductors. ((J. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. 59, 928 (1941))) Proceedings of the American Physical Society, Minutes of Washington DC, Meeting May 1-3, 1941. The energy discontinuities produced by the zone structure yield a decrease in the energy of the electrons at the expense of the increase in energy of the lattice resulting from the distortion. A rough estimate of the interaction between the electrons and the lattice obtained from the electrical conductivity in the normal state indicates that the superconducting state may be stable at low temperatures. The most favorable metals are those which have a high

27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

1

Charge density wave

Masatsugu Sei Suzuki

Department of Physics, SUNY at Binghamton

(Date: January 13, 2012)

Sir Rudolf Ernst Peierls, CBE (June 5, 1907, Berlin – September 19, 1995, Oxford) was a

German-born British physicist. Rudolf Peierls had a major role in Britain's nuclear program,

but he also had a role in many modern sciences. His impact on physics can probably be best

described by his obituary in Physics Today: "Rudolph Peierls...a major player in the drama of

the eruption of nuclear physics into world affairs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Peierls

((John Bardeen (1941)))

Many ideas of CDWs were developed in early attemmpts to explain superconductivity. In

1941, John Bardeen suggested that "in the superconducting state there is a small periodic

distortion of the lattice" that produces energy gaps, and that these gaps would lead to

enhanced diamagnetism. Bardeen abandoned this idea when he realized the difficulty of

obtaining an appropriate arrangement of gaps on the three-dimensional Fermi surfaces of

common superconductors.

((J. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. 59, 928 (1941)))

Proceedings of the American Physical Society, Minutes of Washington DC, Meeting

May 1-3, 1941.

The energy discontinuities produced by the zone structure yield a decrease in the energy

of the electrons at the expense of the increase in energy of the lattice resulting from the

distortion. A rough estimate of the interaction between the electrons and the lattice obtained

from the electrical conductivity in the normal state indicates that the superconducting state

may be stable at low temperatures. The most favorable metals are those which have a high

Page 2: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

2

density of valence electrons in a wide energy band and which have a large interaction

between electrons and lattice (low conductivity).

___________________________________________________________________________

1. One-dimensional energy band

(1) Regular lattice

Suppose that the system consists of N atoms, forming a linear chain along the x direction.

They are periodically arranged such that the distance between the nearest neighbor atoms is a.

The size of the system is L = Na.

Fig. One dimensional chain of atoms where the nearest neighbor distance is a.

The energy gap appears at the Brillouin zone boundary )(a

k

. The energy gap is fixed at

this reciprocal lattice point. In this case there are 2N states for the first Brillouin zone

)(a

k

. The factor 2 comes from the spin of electrons. When each atom has two electrons,

there are 2N electrons in the system. Then the band is filled up to the Brillouin zone

(insulator). When each atom has one electrons, there are N electrons in the system. Then the

band is half-filled in the energy band (metal).

Fig. Energy band for the system where there are two electrons per atom. All states are

occupied up to the zone of the Brillouin zone (insulator)

a

k

EHkL

p

a

-p

aO

Page 3: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

3

Fig. Energy band for the system with one electron per atom. All states are occupied for

|k|<kF (= /a) in the Brillouin zone (metal)

(ii) Effect of lattice distortion

We still assume that there is one electron per atom in the linear chain. Now let us displace

every second atom by a small distance .

Fig. Lattice constant changes from a to 2a due the lattice distortion.

This reduces the symmetry to that of a chain with spacing 2a, and the potential acquires a

Fourier component of wave number /a which in this case is equal to 2kF. This results in an

energy gap at k = kF = /2a, in accordance with the change in the periodicity from a to 2a. In

this case, all states raised by the change are empty, and all states lowered are occupied, so the

system becomes insulator.

k

EHkL

p

a-p

akF=

p

2 a-

p

2 aO

2 a

Page 4: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

4

Fig. Energy band for the system with one electron per atom, after the lattice distortion.

The energy gap appears at k=kF = ±/2a. The system changes from metal to insulator

(Peierls instability).

((Peierls, More surprise in theoretical physics, 1991))

This instability came to me as a complete surprise when I was tidying material for my

book (Peierls 1955), and it took me a considerable time to convince myself that the argument

was sound. It seemed of only academic significance, however, since there are no strictly one-

dimensional systems in nature (and if there were, they would become disordered at any finite

temperature. I therefore did not think it worth publishing the argument, beyond a brief

remark in the book, which did not even mention the logarithmic behavior.

It must also be remembered that the argument relies on the adiabatic approximation, in

which the atomic nuclei are assumed fixed. If their zero-point motion were taken into

account, the answer might change, but this would be a difficult problem to deal with, since it

involves a strongly nonlinear many-body problem.

2. Elastic energy due to the lattice distortion

Then change of the total energy of the system consists of

(i) the change of energy in electrons (Eelectronic<0) which decreases because of the

appearance of energy gap.

(ii) the change of energy associated with the lattice distortion (Eelastic>0)

The total energy E is given by

latticeelectronic EEE .

k

EHkL

kF=pê2a-kF=-pê2a O

Page 5: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

5

If E <0, the lattice distortion occurs. This is predicted by Peierls for an ideal one

dimensional conductor.

The charge density wave has a periodic function of x with the periodicity . We consider

the elastic strain

)2cos()cos( xkQx F ,

where

F

F

k

k

Q 222

Note that kF is a general value and is not always equal to /2a. The spatial-average elastic

energy per unit length is

44

1

)]4

cos(1[4

1

)2(cos2

1

)2(cos2

1

22

0

2

0

22

22

CC

dxxC

dxxkC

xkCE

F

Felastic

where C is the force constant of the linear metal. We next calculate Eelectronic. Suppose that the

ion contribution to the lattice potential seen by a conduction electron is proportional to the

deformation,

iQxiQx

F eVeVxkVxU 000 )2cos(2)(

where AVUQ 0 (see Kittel, ISSP, p.422- 423).

3. Bragg diffraction; Ewald sphere

(a) Typical Bragg reflections:

Page 6: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

6

Fig. Ewald sphere: kkq ' ; k'=k. The Bragg reflection occurs when q = G. q is the

scattering vector and G is the reciprocal lattice vector

(b) The case for the charge density waves;

Fig. Ewald sphere: kkq ' ; k'=k. The Bragg reflection occurs when q = Q. q is the

scattering vector and Q is equal to 2kF.

Experimentally the Bragg reflection appear at

Fklaq 2*

O

G H»G»=2kF L

k H»k»=kFLk' H»k'»=kFL

Origin of RLAB

O

Q

kk'

Origin of RLAB

Page 7: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

7

where a

a2* is the reciprocal lattice and a is the lattice constant in the absence of the

lattice distortion. The Bragg intensity is proportional the square of the order parameter

(energy gap). Note that

FF k

a

kaa 22

12*

.

If this ratio is a rational number (= p/q; p and q are integers).

q

p

a

.

There are q CDW waves in the p lattice distances. This is called the commensurate CDW.

If this ratio is irrational, this is called the incommensurate CDW.

4. Calculation of the change of energy near the regions at k = kF

Page 8: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

8

Now we consider the simplest case: mixing of only the two states: k and Gk (k≈kF),

k - G ≈ - kF, G = 2kF). The wavefunction is approximated by

GkCkC Gkk .

where only the coefficients Ck and Ck-G are dominant. The central equation (eigenvalue

problems) is

Page 9: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

9

0

0*

Gk

k

GkG

Gk

C

C

U

U

.

where

22

2k

mk

ℏ ,

22

)(2

Gkm

Gk

From the condition that the determinant is equal to 0, we have

0))((2 GGkk U ,

or

2

4)(22

)( GGkkGkk

k

U

.

Note that the potential energy U(x) is described by

)cos(2)(00 GxUUeUeUUxU G

iGx

G

iGx

G ,

where we assume that UG is real:

0

*VUUU GGG .

Then we have

2

0

222

2

422

2)(

})({[16

])([4

VGkkm

Gkkm

k ℏℏ

We retain the minus sign to get minimum energy. The reduction of the lower energy is

Page 10: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

10

2

0

222

2

422

2

2

0

222

2

422

22

2

)()1(

})({[16

])([4

})({[16

])([42

)(

VGkkm

Gkkm

VGkkm

Gkkm

km

kE kkelectronic

ℏℏ

ℏℏℏ

To get the reduction of the total energy per unit length, we have to integrate from -kF to kF,

multiplied by (1/2), The main contribution comes from the neighborhood of k = kF. We

assume that V0 is constant. Using the relation

)(4)(2))(()( 22

FFF kkkkkGGkkGkkGkk

we get

2

0

22)( VkE selectronic

where

m

kF

2ℏ

, kkF

We note that

1)(

2

0

22

00

VVV

kE selectronic

As is expected, the value of 0

)(

V

kE selectronic is negative. It increases with increasing

0V

.

Page 11: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

11

The approximations are valid only in the neighborhood of k = kF. So we need to restrict the

integration to a maximum value of k, k0, such that

FkkV

00

Then we have

1

0 0

2

0

222

0

22)1()(

1)(

2

2

dVdkVEFk

k

electronic

where the factor 2 comes from the spin degree of the electron.

01 kkF

5. Calculation of change of energy in the regions near k = -kF.

Here we show that the contribution from the regions near k = -kF is the same as that from

the regions near k = kF as shown in the above. give equal contributions

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0akêV0

-1.0

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

DEelectronicHkLêV0

Page 12: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

12

We consider the case when k ≈-kF (<0), k+G = kF with FkG 2 . Since

2

4)(2

0

2)( VGkkGkk

k

we have

2

0

222

2

422

2

2

0

222

2

422

22

2

)()2(

})({[16

])([4

})({[16

])([42

)(

VGkkm

Gkkm

VGkkm

Gkkm

km

kE kkelectronic

ℏℏ

ℏℏℏ

Noting that

)(4)(2))(()( 22

FFF kkkkkGGkkGkkGkk

we get

Page 13: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

13

2

0

22)2()( VkE selectronic

where

m

kF

2ℏ

, kkF

Then we get

10

0

2

0

222

0

22)2()(

1)(

2

2

dVdkVE

k

k

electronic

F

where the factor 2 comes from the spin degree of the electron.

01 kkF

So it is found that

)1()2(

electronicelectronic EE

6. The change in the total energy due to the lattice distortion

The total energy is given by

Page 14: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

14

]2

ln24

11[

2

)4

2(ln

ln)8

1

2

1(

ln11ln)11(

)ln()(

)(2

22

0

12

1

2

2

0

2

0

2

1

2

2

0

2

0

1

0

2

0

2

1

2

2

0

2

0

1

0

2

02

1

2

2

0

2

02

1

2

2

0

2

1

0

2

1

22

01

2

02

1

22

011

0

2

0

22

)1()1(

1

V

VV

VV

VVVV

VVVVV

V

VVV

dV

EEE electronicelectronicelectronic

or

]2

ln24

11[

2 0

1

2

1

2

2

0

2

0

V

VVEelectronic

The important feature of this result is that it behaves for small V0 as

1

0

2

0

2

0

0

1

2

0

0

1

2

0

ln

2lnln

2ln

VV

V

V

V

V

VE electronic

For small displacement, V0 is proportional to the displacement .

AV 0 ,

where A is constant (see Kittel, ISSP, p.422- 423). The behaviors of the reduction in

electronic energy for small displacement is

Page 15: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

15

AA

E electronic ln22

<0

This is interesting because there may be other effects favoring the regular spacing, = 0,

such as the repulsion between the atomic cores, but these will have an energy varying 2.

Thus the electronic energy must dominate for small displacement. This suggests that the

periodic chain must always be unstable.

The change in the total energy E is given by

42ln

4]

2ln2

4

11[

2

2

1

22

2

1

2

1

2

2222

CAA

CAAA

EEE elasticelectronic

In order to find the minimum value of E, we take a derivative of E with respect to .

0)]2

ln(42[2

1)(

1

22

AACA

d

Ed.

Then we get

)4

exp(21306.1

)4

exp()2

1exp(2

21

21

A

C

A

CA

or

)4

exp(21306.12

2

1

2

mA

Ck

m

kA FF

ℏℏ

This expression is almost the same as that derived by Kittel,

)4

exp(2

2

222

mA

Ck

m

kA FF ℏℏ

(Kittel, ISSP)

Page 16: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

16

7. Electronic density )(x

At finite temperatures, there is a finite probability that a part of electrons is excited from the

lower state ()(

k )to the higher state ()(

k ).

We consider the state given by

QkCkC Qkk

)()()(

or

xQki

Qk

ikx

kk eCeCxx)()()()()(

)(

Page 17: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

17

where

0

0*

Qk

k

QkQ

Qk

C

C

U

U

.

The eigenvalues are )(

k and )(

k , defined by

]2

1[22

2

4)(

2

2

22

)(

Qkk

QQkkQkk

QQkkQkk

k

U

U

and

12

)(2

)(

Qkk CC . (Normalization).

The charge density at x is given by

k

kkkk ffN

x })()({1

)(2

)()(2

)()( ,

where f is the Fermi-Dirac distribution function. When Qkk ,

kQk

Q

k

Qkk

QkQkQkk

k

U

U

2

2

2

)(]

21[

2

)(

2

and

Page 18: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

18

kQk

Q

Qk

Qkk

QkQkQkk

k

U

U

2

2

2

)(]

21[

2

)(

2

When 02

QU ,

)()()(

kk ff , )()(

)(

Qkk ff .

The probability is given by 2

)()(xk

,

iQx

Qkk

iQx

Qkk

iQx

Qkk

iQx

QkkQkk

iQx

Qkk

xQki

Qk

ikx

kk

eCCeCC

eCCeCCCC

eCC

eCeCx

*)()()(*)(

*)()()(*)(2

)(2

)(

2)()(

2)()()(

2)(

1

)(

Then the density is

]}1)[(

]1)[({1

})()({1

)(

*)()()(*)(

*)()()(*)(

2)(

2)(

iQx

Qkk

iQx

QkkQk

k

iQx

Qkk

iQx

Qkkk

k

kQkkk

eCCeCCf

eCCeCCfN

ffN

x

What is the value of *)()(

Qkk CC ? We note that

0

0)(

)(

)(

*)(

Qk

k

kQkQ

Qkk

C

C

U

U

.

or

Page 19: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

19

0)()(*)()(

QkQkkk CUC ,

or

*

)()()( )(

Q

kkkQk

U

CC

.

Then we get

Qkk

kQ

Qkk

Q

Q

k

Q

kkk

Qkk

CU

U

U

C

U

CCC

2)(*

22)(

2)()(

*)()()(

since

kQk

Q

kk

U

2

)(

Similarly,

0

0)(

)(

)(

*)(

Qk

k

kQkQ

Qkk

C

C

U

U

,

or

0)()()()(

QkkQkkQ CCU .

Then we get

Page 20: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

20

kQk

kQ

kQk

Q

Q

k

Q

kQkk

Qkk

CU

U

U

C

U

CCC

2)(

2

*

2)(

*

2)(*)(

*)()()(

since

kQk

Q

Qkk

U

2

)(.

The electron density can be rewritten as

]}(1)[(

](1)[({1

)(

*

2)(

*

2)(

iQx

Q

iQx

Q

kQk

k

Qk

k

iQx

Q

iQx

Q

Qkk

k

k

eUeUC

f

eUeUC

fN

x

Suppose that QU is real. Thus we have

)]}cos(2

1)[(

)]cos(2

1)[({1

)(

2)(

2)(

QxUC

f

QxUC

fN

x

kQk

Qk

Qk

k Qkk

Qk

k

It is appropriate that 2

12)(

2)(

kk CC for 0QU .

Page 21: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

21

k

Q

Qkk

Qkk

k

Qkk

QxUff

N

ffN

x

)cos(])()(

[1

)]()([1

)(

We define (Q, T) as

k Qkk

kQk ff

NTQ

)()(1),( .

Then we have

)cos(),()( 0 QxUTQx Q .

The Fourier component of )(x is given by

QQ UTQ ),( .

We note that the potential energy is given by

iQx

Q

iQx

QQ eUeUQxUxU )cos(2)( .

where

realAVUUU QQQ 0

*.

8. Calculation of )0,( TQ

We now calculate the susceptibility

Page 22: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

22

k

k

k

k

k k Qkk

k

kQk

k

k k kQk

Qk

kQk

k

k kQk

Qkk

kQkQf

Q

m

kQQkQQf

m

ff

ffffTQN

)2

1

2

1)((

2

]2

1

2

1)[(

2

)()(

)()()()(),(

2

222

' ''

'

At T = 0 K, 1)( kf for k<kF and 0 for k>kF.

F

F

F

F

k

k

k kQk

Qkk

kQ

kQ

Q

mL

Qk

Qk

Q

mL

Qk

Qk

dkQ

mL

kQkQdk

Q

mL

ffTQN

F

F

2

2ln

2

2

2ln2

)

2

1

2

1(

2

12

2

2

2

)2

1

2

1(2

2

2

2

)()(),(

22

0

2

0

2

ℏℏ

or

12

12

ln

2

2

2ln2

),(

2

2

F

F

F

F

F

F

k

Q

k

Q

k

Qnk

m

Qk

Qk

QN

mLTQ

where we take into account of the degree of spin (the factor 2). We make a plot of the

function defined by

Page 23: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

23

1

1ln

1),()(

0

x

x

x

TQxf

where x = Q/(2kF), and

20ℏFnk

m

The susceptibility is found to diverge at Q = 2kF.

Fig. Scaling plot of 1

1ln

1)(

x

x

xxf with

Fk

Qx

2 .

9. The density of state at the Fermi energy for the 1D system

Q

cHQ,T=0Lêc0

2kFkFO

Page 24: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

24

Fig. Peierls instability. Electrons with wave number k near k = kF have their energy

lowered by a lattice deformation. When the length of the system is L, the allowed

value of k is k = l (2/L), where l is 0, ±1, ±2,.... In this figure (T = 0 K), the states in

the lower energy band is fully occupied, while the states in the upper energy band are

empty.

The lattice distortion with wavelength gives rise to an energy gap at

k . If Fkk ,

Fk

.

Then the system changes from conductor to insulator. All the states ,k (spin-up state) and

,k (spin-down state) with |k|≤kF are occupied in the lower band. Then we have

FF kL

kL

N2

)2(2

2 ,

k

EHkL

kF-kF O

Page 25: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

25

where the factor 2 comes from the spin degree, and N is the total number of electrons in the

system (L). Note that N is not the number of unit cell in this case. The number density n is

defined by

L

Nn .

Using the above relation, we get

Fk

n2

, or , 2

nkF

.

We note that

nnk

k

F

F

2

2222

.

This means that here are two electrons per wavelength .

The density of states is defined by

dkL

dkL

dD

2

2

22)( ,

where we take into account of (i) the spin factor (2) and (ii) the even function of k for the

energy dispersion. The energy dispersion of the free electron is

22

2k

m

ℏ ,

2

22

dmdk

ℏ .

l

Page 26: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

26

Using the relation

dmLdmL

dkL

dD22

2

2

222)(

ℏℏ ,

we have the density of states as

1

2

22)(

2ℏℏ

LmmLD .

The density of states at the Fermi energy is

FFFFF

F

N

k

mN

k

mLmLmLD

2

222)(

22222

ℏℏℏℏ.

10. The relation 0

1),2(

TkQ F

What is the temperature dependence of the susceptibility?

k kkk

kkk

F

F

Fff

NTkQ

2

2 )()(1),2(

We assume that kkF

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

Fk

kkm

k

km

k

km

km

)2

1()2

1(2

)1(2

)(22

22

2

22

22

22

ℏℏ

Page 27: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

27

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

FF

Fkk

kkm

k

km

k

kkm

kkmF

)2

1()2

1(2

)1(2

)2(2

)2(2

22

2

22

22

22

2

where

)()(22

2

kkm

kkk

kkF

F

F

F

F

F

F ℏ

This leads to

2)(2 FFkkk F.

The numerator:

1

1

1)(exp[

1)(

2

2

e

fFkk

kk

F

F

1

1

1)(exp[

1)(

ef

Fk

k

Then we get

)2

tanh(1

1

1

1

1

1)()( 2

e

e

eeff kkk F

and

2

)2

tanh()()(

2

2

F

F

kkk

kkk ff

Page 28: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

28

Then we have

0

0

0

0

0

0

)2

tanh(

2

)(

2

)2

tanh()(

1

2

)2

tanh(

)(1

2

)2

tanh(1

),2(

dxN

D

dDN

dDNN

TkQ

F

F

F

k

F

or

)13387.1ln(2

)(

1

2

)(),2(

0

0

TkN

D

N

DTkQ

B

F

FF

where

)13387.1ln()

2tanh(

1 0

00

0

Tkdx

B

Note that

dkm

kd F

2ℏ

)( 0

2

0 kkm

kF

F ℏ

k0 is the lower limit of k (which was discussed above). The magnitude of 0 is not essential in

our discussion.

11. The critical temperature Tc

Page 29: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

29

The energy gap is equal to zero at T = Tc. The critical temperature Tc is derived from the

energy gap equation. The derivation of Tc is almost the same as that derived for the BCS

model of the superconductivity. We start with the energy gap equation with zero energy gap,

)2

ln(

])4

[ln()2

tanh()2

ln(

)(cosh

ln)]tanh([ln

)(cosh

ln)]tanh([ln

)tanh()2

tanh(1

0

00

0

2

)2/(

0

)2/(

0

2

)2/(

0

)2/(

000

0

0

0

00

e

Tk

TkTk

d

d

d

Tk

d

cB

cBcB

Tk

Tk

Tk

Tk

cB

cB

cB

cB

cB

,

where = 0.577216 is the Euler's constant. Then we get

81878.0)2

ln(1 0

0

cBTk

since 81878.0])4

[ln(

. This equation can be rewritten as

]1

exp[881939.0

)81878.0exp(]1

exp[2

0

0

0

cBTk

or

)1

exp(13387.10

0 cBTk .

________________________________________________________________

12. The energy difference at finite temperatures

Page 30: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

30

),(

])()([

[

])()(

[

)}()({

)}(][)(]{[

)}()({)}()({

2

2

22

22

)()()()(

TQNU

ffU

fUfU

ff

fU

fU

ffffE

Q

k kQk

Qkk

Q

k kQk

QkQ

kQk

kQ

k

QkQkkk

k

Qk

kQk

Q

Qkk

kQk

Q

k

k

QkQkkk

k

kkkkelectronic

where

kQk

Q

kk

U

2

)(,

kQk

Q

Qkk

U

2

)(

)()()(

kk ff , )()(

)(

Qkk ff

and

k kQk

Qkk

k Qkk

kQk ffff

NTQ

)()()()(1),(

.

Then we have

),(2

TQNUE Qelectronic

The total energy of both electron and lattice is given by

Page 31: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

31

}4

),({

4),(

4),(

2

2

2

2

2

A

CTQNU

UA

CTQN

CTQN

EEE

Q

Q

elasticelectronic

where AVUQ 0 . When Q → 2kF and T →0, ),( TQ shows a logarithmic divergence.

Therefore, below a characteristic temperature Tp, E becomes negative, leading to the Peierls

instability. Using the expression for ),2( TkF ,

)133887.1ln(2

)(),2( 0

TkN

DTkQ

B

FF

we get

)13387.1ln(2

)(

4),2( 0

2 TkN

D

NA

CTkQ

B

FF

or

)1

exp(13387.1])(2

exp[13387.10

020

F

cDA

CT

where 0 is a dimensionless electron-lattice interaction parameter,

C

DA F )(2 2

0

.

13. Kohn anomaly

At temperature which is sufficiently higher than the Peierls transition temperature, the

angular frequency (k = 2 kF) of the phonon dispersion curve drastically decreases, showing

the softening of the phonon mode. This behavior is called the Kohn anomaly. This behavior

can be explained qualitatively as follows. The electrons are influenced through the potential

UQ. due to the lattice distortion. The electronic charge is newly generated in the form of

QQ UTQ ),( .

Page 32: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

32

The force exerted on the phonon is weakened by the electron-phonon interaction. This leads

to the decrease in the restoring force of the lattice distortion. The angular frequency of

phonon at Q becomes softening and is reduced to zero at the critical temperature. In summary,

the lattice wave with Q gives rise to the electric potential with Q, which works for the electric

charge Q, turns back to the lattice wave with Q as a positive feedback. This leads to the

restoring force of the lattice.

We discuss the time dependence of the displacement Q of the phonon mode with Q and

Q . Noting that

QQ UTQ ),( , QQQ vU

we get the equation of motion for Q as

QQQ

QQQQ

QQQQQ

TQv

TQv

vdt

d

)],([

),(

22

22

22

2

2

where vQ is the strength of the electron-phonon interaction, and AUQ in thermal

equilibrium. Then we have the characteristic angular frequency

),(222

TQvQQQ

Q reduces to zero when

2

2

),(Q

Q

vTQ

at Q = 2kF. Using

)13387.1ln(2

)(),2( 0

TkN

DTkQ

B

FF

we have

Page 33: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

33

)13387.1ln(2

)( 0

2

2

TkN

D

v B

F

Q

Q

or

]1

exp[13387.10

0 cT ,

where

2

2

02

)(

Q

FQ

N

Dv

.

This is equal to

20

)(2

CA

D F ,

which is obtained in the previous section.

Fig. Schematic diagram of acoustic phonon dispersion relation of a one dimensional metal

at various temperatures above Tc.

Q

WQ

2kF

T>Tc

T=Tc

Page 34: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

34

14. Order parameter

The Peierls instability occurs in a one-dimensional metal. This instability gives rise to the

combination of the electronic density wave and lattice wave with the same wave number 2kF.

This combined waves are called the charge density wave (CDW). The appearance of the

CDW state can be experimentally found by x-ray and neutron scattering.

In the CDW state, the order parameter is the energy gap. This gap is equal to zero at T =

Tc and increases with decreasing temperature. We consider the temperature dependence of

the energy gap below the critical temperature. We start with

2

2

),(Q

Q

vTQ

We need to calculate the T dependence of ),( TQ .

k kk

kkF

ff

NTkQ

)()(

)()()()(1

),2(

2

4)(22

)( GGkkGkk

k

U

FFF

FFF

FFF

FFk

kk

kkm

k

kkkkm

kkm

)(

)(

))((2

)(2

2

2

222

FFF

FFF

FFF

FFGk

kk

kkm

k

kGkkGkm

kGkm

)(

)(

))((2

])[(2

2

2

222

Page 35: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

35

FGkk 2 , )(2 FGkk kk

Here we assume that

m

kF

2ℏ

. FkG 2 Fkk

)( kkF , QU

Then we get

22)( Fk

1)exp(

)exp(

1)exp(

1)(

22

22

22

)(

kf

1)exp(

1)(

22

)(

kf

)2

tanh(

1)exp(

1)exp()()(

22

22

22)()(

kk ff

kk

FE

E

NNTkQ

)2

tanh(

2

1)

2tanh(

2

1),2(

22

22

where

22 E

)( 00 kkF

dkd

Page 36: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

36

0

0

0

0

22

22

)2

tanh(

2

)(

)2

tanh()(

2

1

)2

tanh(

2

1),(

E

E

dN

D

E

E

dDN

NTQ

F

k

We note that

)14.1ln(1

),2()(

2 0

0 TkTkQ

D

N

B

F

F

Then we have

)14.1ln(

)2

tanh(1 0

00

0

Tkd

B

and

0

00

)2

tanh(1

E

E

d

.

14. Calculation of order parameter

00

0

0022

22

022

22

0

)2

tanh(

}

)2

tanh()2

tanh(

{

)2

tanh(1

Tkd

TkTkd

Tkd

BBB

B

Page 37: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

37

Then we get

0

00

0

0

22

22

0

022

22

0

022

22

0

)]2

tanh(1

)2

tanh(1

[)2

ln(

}

)2

tanh()2

tanh(

{

)2

tanh(

)2

tanh(1

TkTkd

e

Tk

TkTkd

Tkd

Tkd

BBB

BBB

B

Using the expansion formula

0222

)12(4

8)tanh(

n nx

xx

we get

0 0

222222

20

22

2

22

22200

0

0

0

0

])12([4)

2ln(

]

)12(2

4

1

)12(2

4

1[

4)

2ln(

1

n B

B

B

B

B

nBB

nTk

dTk

e

Tk

nTk

nTk

Tk

e

Tk

Here

Page 38: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

38

3233

0

222233

/

0

222233

0

222222

)12(4

11

])12[(

1

])12[(

1

])12([

00

nTk

xn

dx

Tk

xn

dx

TknTk

d

B

B

Tk

BB

B

Then we have

)3(8

7)

2ln(

)12(

1

4

4)

2ln(

1

222

2

0

03222

2

0

0

Tk

e

Tk

nTk

e

Tk

BB

nBB

where

)3(8

7

)12(

1

03

n n,

and (3) = 1.2206. Using the relation

)2

ln(1 0

0

e

Tk cB

,

we have

)3(8

7)

2ln()

2ln(

222

2

00

Tk

e

Tk

e

TkBBcB

,

or

)3(8

7)ln(

222

2

TkT

T

Bc

.

or

Page 39: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

39

)ln()3(7

82

22222

T

T

T

TTk c

c

cB

From this we get the expression for as,

2/1

2/12

2/12

)1(06326.3

)1(])3(7

8[

)ln(])3(7

8[)(

c

cB

c

cB

cc

cB

T

TTk

T

TTk

T

T

T

TTkT

((Mathematical note))

Suppose that

xT

Tt

c

1

where x is close to x ≈ 0 (but x>0)

xxxxx

xx

tt

tt

T

T

T

T c

c

)(03

1

2

3

)1ln()1(

)ln(

)1

ln()ln(

432

2

2

2

2

In the vicinity of T = Tc (but T<Tc), we have a good approximation,

2/1

2

)1()ln( tT

T

T

T c

c

16. Critical behavior of the order parameter (energy gap)

The energy gap is obtained as

Page 40: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

40

2/1

2/1

2/1

2/1

)1(06326.3

)1()3(7

8

)ln()3(7

8)(

c

cB

c

cB

c

c

cB

T

TTk

T

TTk

T

T

T

TTkT

The energy gap at T = 0 K can be evaluated from the energy gap equation at T = 0

K

]2

ln[

]ln[

1

0

0

0

2

0

2

00

02

0

20

0

d

or

)1

exp(20

00 .

Together with the relation

)1

exp(13387.10

0 cBTk ,

we get the universal relation

52774.313387.1

42 0

cBTk.

The energy gap is the order parameter. Since this order parameter continuously changes with

T and reduces to zero. The phase transition is of the second order with the critical exponent

= 1/2.

Page 41: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

41

2/12/1

0

)1(73667.1)1(52774.3

06326.32)(

cccB

cB

T

T

T

T

Tk

TkT

Fig. Plot of the energy gap /0 as a function of a reduced temperature t = T/Tc.

______________________________________________________________________

REFERENCES

R.E. Peierls, Ann. Phys. Leipzig 4, 121 (1930).

R.E. Peierls, Suprises in Theoretical Physics (Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1976)

R.E. Peierls, More Surprises in Theoretical Physics (Princeton University, New Jersey, 1991).

R.E. Peierls, Quantum theory of solids (Oxford, University Press, 1955).

J. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. 59, 928 (1941). H. Frölich, Proc. R. Soc. A 223, 296 (1954).

C. Kittel, Introduction to Soild State Physics, 8-th edition (John Wiley & Sons, 2005).

G. Grűner, Density Waves in Solids (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1994).

G. Grűner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 1129 (1988).

S. Kagoshima, H. Nagasawa, and T. Sambongi, One dimensional Conductors (Springer

Verlag, 1988).

R.E. Thorne, Phys. Today 42, May Issue (1996).

S. Kagoshima, T. Ishiguro, and H. Anzai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn, 41, 2061 (1976).

J.P. Pouget, B. Hennion, C.E.-Fioppini, and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. B 43, 8421 (1991).

M. Sato, H. Fujishita, and S. Hoshino, J. Phys. C 16, L877 (1983).

_______________________________________________________________________

APPENDIX Typical quasi-one dimensional metal

1. TTF-TCNQ

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2t=TêTc

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

DHTLêD0

Page 42: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

42

The tetrathiafulvalene-tetracyanoquinodimethane (TTF-TCNQ) is not a simple metal.

Above 58 K, there is an energy gap at gℏ = 0.14 eV and an extremely narrow conductivity

mode centered at zero frequency. Near 53 K, TTF-TCNQ undergoes a metal-insulator

transition to a high-dielectric constant semiconductor in which the oscillator strength is

shifted from zero frequency and pinned in the far infrared. In an earlier work.

2. Blue bronze K0.3MoO3

The quasi-one-dimensional (1D) conductor K0.3MoO3 undergoes a Peierls transition at T

=183 K. Using cold-neutron scattering, Pouget have succeeded in resolving in frequency and

for wave vectors parallel to the chain direction the pre-transitional dynamics and the

collective excitations of the phase and of the amplitude of the charge-density-wave (CDW)

modulation below T. The pre-transitional dynamics consists of the softening of a Kohn

anomaly at the wave vector 2kF together with the critical growth of a central peak in the

vicinity of T, . In addition we observed just above T, the beginning of a decoupling between

the fluctuations of the phase and of the amplitude of the CDW.

Page 43: 27 Charge density wave - Binghamton University

43

__________________________________________________________________________